Hubbry Logo
Cruiser Mk IICruiser Mk IIMain
Open search
Cruiser Mk II
Community hub
Cruiser Mk II
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Cruiser Mk II
Cruiser Mk II
Cruiser Mk II
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The Tank, Cruiser, Mk II (A10), was a cruiser tank developed alongside the A9 cruiser tank, and was intended to be a heavier, infantry tank version of that type. In practice, it was not deemed suitable for the infantry tank role and was classified as a "heavy cruiser". It served briefly in World War II.

Key Information

History and specifications

[edit]

The A10 was developed by Sir John Carden of Vickers in 1934 by the adaptation of his A9 design. The A10 specification called for armour of up to 1 inch (25 mm) standard (the A9 was 14 mm (0.55 in)); a speed of 10 mph (16 km/h)) was acceptable.[2] The two sub-turrets present on the A9 were removed, and extra armour bolted onto that already present on the front and sides of the hull, along with all faces of the turret, providing approximately twice the armour in most areas. The A10 was two tonnes heavier than the A9, but used the same 150 bhp (110 kW) engine, and as a consequence the tank's top speed was cut from 25 miles per hour (40 km/h) to 16 miles per hour (26 km/h).

The turret armament consisted of a QF 2-pounder (40-mm) gun and a coaxial .303 Vickers machine gun. For the production version, there was a 7.92 mm BESA machine gun mounted in the hull in a barbette to the right of the driver. This was added to give extra firepower, but at the expense of simplicity - the Vickers and the BESA using different ammunition. The tank had a crew of five (Commander, gunner, loader, driver and hull machine gunner). There was no separation between the driver's compartment and the fighting compartments.

The prototype ("Tank, Experimental A10E1") was completed in 1936, a few months after the A9 prototype.[3] Carden had died in an air crash in 1935 and development was slower than expected. In 1937, the A10 was dropped as an infantry support tank, but in 1938 it was decided to produce an order of 75 as an interim "heavy cruiser".[3]

The A10 was accepted for service - initially as "Tank, Cruiser, Heavy Mk I" and then "Tank, Cruiser A10 Mk I" and finally "Tank, Cruiser Mk II". Production was ordered in July 1938. Total production was 175 vehicles, including the 30 CS versions (see below); 45 were built by Birmingham Railway Carriage & Wagon Company, 45 by Metropolitan-Cammell, 10 by Vickers. In late 1939, another order was placed with Birmingham Railway Carriage & Wagon Company, this time for a larger order of 75 vehicles. Entering service in December 1939 the tank was something of an oddity, it had been intended to sacrifice speed for armour like an Infantry tank but was still relatively poorly armoured and not effective.

Combat history

[edit]
A British Cruiser Mk II disabled by having lost a track (seen lower right) in Greece, 1941.

A number of Mark IIs were part of the British Expeditionary Force (BEF) sent to France in the early stages of the Second World War. The cross country performance was recorded as poor, but they were still used later in North Africa at the defence of Tobruk in 1941, where reliability and suspension performance in the desert conditions was praised. Sixty worn out examples were taken to Greece by the 3rd Royal Tank Regiment and, although they performed well against the German tanks, over 90% were lost due to mechanical breakdowns as opposed to enemy action (mainly lost tracks).[4][5]

Variants

[edit]

In total, 61 with Vickers machine guns and 99 with Besa machine guns were produced.[6]

Tank\Year Pre-War Sep-Dec 1939 1940 1941
Cruiser, Mk. II (A.10 Mk. I) — 1 60 —
Cruiser, Mk. IIA (A.10 Mk. IA) — — 89 10
Tank, Cruiser, Mk II (A10 Mk I)

Classified as a 'heavy cruiser', 31 were sent to France with the 1st Armoured Division, but performed poorly in the Battle of France. The tank also served in the North African Campaign until late 1941.

Tank, Cruiser, Mk IIA (A10 Mk IA)

The coaxial Vickers machine guns were replaced with BESA machine guns. Armoured radio housing added.

Tank, Cruiser, Mk IIA CS (A10 Mk IA CS)
Cruiser MkIIA CS

The CS (Close Support) version of the Mark II had a 3.7 in (94 mm) howitzer in the turret instead of the 2-pdr.[7] The standard ammunition load was 40 rounds smoke, and a few HE shells.

This weapon was derived from a World War I field howitzer, the QF 3.7-inch mountain howitzer. It was not related to the 3-inch (76 mm) howitzer used in later British tanks in the Second World War, which was itself replaced by a 95 mm (3.7 in) howitzer in the later versions of the Churchill infantry tanks and all CS versions of the Centaur and Cromwell cruiser tanks. British doctrine was that the CS tank was to provide smoke cover in advances or retreats and hence many more smoke rounds were carried than HE.[8]

[edit]

The Valentine used the suspension and transmission of the A10 but with a much more heavily armoured hull and turret.

See also

[edit]

Cruiser Mk III

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Cruiser Mk II

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Cruiser Tank Mk II (A10), designed by Sir John Carden of , was a British cruiser tank developed in the mid-1930s as a heavier-armoured 'heavy cruiser' version of the A9 Cruiser Tank Mk I for close infantry support. It was armed with a 40 mm QF 2-pounder gun and two 7.92 mm Besa machine guns, had up to 30 mm of armour, and was powered by an AEC Type A179 150 hp engine, with a top road speed of 16 mph (26 km/h) and range of 100 miles (160 km). Weighing 14 long tons (14 t) and crewed by five, around 175 were produced from 1938 to 1940. The tank saw service in (1940), (1941), and until late 1941, but was limited by slow speed and reliability issues. The sole surviving example, a Mk IIA close-support variant, is at , Bovington.

Development

Design origins

The Cruiser Mk II, designated A10, originated from a 1934 British War Office specification for a medium tank intended to serve as a heavier, infantry-support counterpart to the lighter A9 Cruiser Mk I. This design evolved directly from the A9 platform, adapting its chassis to incorporate thicker armor while maintaining cruiser tank mobility for exploitation roles alongside infantry advances. The specification emphasized a balance between protection and speed, with an acceptable top speed of around 10 mph (16 km/h) to prioritize durability over rapid maneuvering. The design was led by Leslie Little at , building on earlier concepts by Sir John Carden. The initial prototype, A10E1 (with War Department number T.1479), was constructed using mild steel and completed in July 1937 for testing at the Fighting Vehicle Proving Establishment. Initially intended as an , it was reclassified as a in 1937 before production. Trials in 1937 demonstrated satisfactory performance, though the design underwent refinements; armor started at a 15 mm baseline but was increased to 30 mm on the front and sides from the A9's 14 mm baseline, enhancing resistance to small-arms and light anti-tank fire without excessively burdening the . Armament decisions retained the A9's heritage, adopting a 2-pounder (40 mm) QFSA gun in a two-man turret for effective anti-tank capability, paired with a coaxial .303-inch for close defense. The twin-gun turret design, derived from the A9, allowed for efficient crew operation but limited auxiliary weaponry compared to multi-turret contemporaries. This configuration prioritized firepower concentration over dispersed machine-gun mounts, aligning with the tank's infantry-support role. The suspension system employed a Christie-inspired setup with triple-wheel bogies and vertical coil springs, derived from the A9, offering 13.5 inches of vertical travel for improved cross-country performance over earlier rigid systems. Weight progressed from approximately 11 tons in the A10E1 prototype to 13.75 tons in the production model, primarily due to the added armor plating and structural reinforcements.

Production history

The production of the (A10) began with an initial order placed in for 120 units from the Birmingham Railway Carriage and Wagon Company (BRC&W), 45 units from Metropolitan-Cammell Carriage and Wagon (MCCW), and 10 units from (Elswick Works). This allocation reflected the British War Office's effort to distribute manufacturing across established railway and engineering firms to accelerate output amid rising tensions in . The design originated as a heavier variant of the prototypes, adapting their chassis for enhanced armor while retaining characteristics. Manufacturing spanned from 1938 to 1940, culminating in a total of 175 tanks delivered, with the first vehicles entering service in December 1939. Production continued until September 1940. Production faced challenges, including retooling to integrate the QF 2-pounder gun and secure sufficient armor plate supplies, which contributed to timelines extending into early 1940. Wartime pressures also prompted adaptations, such as the shift from Vickers .303-inch machine guns to the simpler Besa 7.92 mm machine guns starting with the Mk IIA variant, driven by bottlenecks in Vickers production and the need for more reliable domestic . No major follow-on orders were placed for the Cruiser Mk II, as its design was quickly superseded by the improved A13 Mk II (), which offered better mobility and armor integration for evolving battlefield requirements. This limited run underscored the transitional nature of early British programs, prioritizing rapid deployment over long-term scalability amid the onset of war.

Technical specifications

Armament and ammunition

The Cruiser Mk II was equipped with a primary armament of one (40 mm) gun mounted in a centrally located turret, with a standard ammunition stowage of 100 rounds. This gun fired solid armor-piercing (AP) shot, such as the Mk 1 type weighing approximately 1.02 kg, at a of 792 m/s, achieving effective anti-tank performance up to approximately 1,000 yards. High-explosive (HE) rounds were limited and primarily introduced in upgrades after for select units, while armor-piercing high-explosive (APHE) was not available until later variants. Secondary armament included a coaxial Vickers .303 in (7.7 mm) Mk V in early production models, later replaced by the more reliable Besa .303 , alongside an auxiliary Vickers mounted in the front hull. for the s totaled up to 4,050 rounds, distributed across the coaxial and hull weapons with capacities ranging from 1,000 to 2,625 rounds depending on configuration. The three-man turret housed the , gunner, and loader, with the hull machine gunner separate; it provided 360° manual traverse via handwheel and gun elevation from -10° to +20°, supporting a practical of 10–12 rounds per minute for the main gun. Lacking a , the Cruiser Mk II relied on sights for targeting, which contributed to reduced accuracy beyond 500 yards, particularly in mobile engagements.

Armour and protection

The Cruiser Mk II featured armor constructed from riveted plates, with a maximum thickness of 30 mm applied to the turret front and hull , while sides measured 14 mm, and the roof, rear, and bottom were 7 mm thick. This configuration provided basic protection against small arms fire and shell splinters but was inadequate against dedicated anti-tank weapons at typical combat ranges. The armor layout included a modestly sloped plate, which marginally increased the effective thickness on the frontal arc, and a turret ring protected by 20 mm ; the design relied on bolted plates for reinforcement without incorporating armor in its standard production form. Frontally, the 30 mm armor offered resistance to 37 mm anti-tank rounds like the German PaK 36 at ranges beyond 500 yards (approximately 457 m), where such guns achieved penetrations around 36 mm under optimal conditions, though side and rear aspects were highly vulnerable to 50 mm guns or even the British 2-pounder from beyond yards due to the thin 14 mm and 7 mm coverage. The tank accommodated a five-man crew consisting of a , gunner, loader, , and hull machine gunner, with basic ventilation systems for engine fumes but no specialized filtering against chemical agents, as such technology was not standard in pre-war British designs. Escape provisions were limited to a single top hatch for the and a driver's hatch, reflecting the era's emphasis on simplicity over enhanced survivability features. Compared to its predecessor, the A9 , which had a maximum armor thickness of only 14 mm across all facings, the Mk II's heavier protection increased its weight to 14 tons and reduced its top road speed from 25 mph (40 km/h) to 16 mph (26 km/h) using the same AEC A179 engine, effectively repositioning it from a fast role toward closer support of despite its original specifications.

Mobility and engine

The Cruiser Mk II (A10) was powered by an AEC Type A179 inline-six petrol engine, which delivered 150 horsepower at 2,200 rpm from a displacement of 9.6 liters. This engine provided a power-to-weight ratio of approximately 10.4 hp per ton, enabling the tank to achieve a maximum road speed of 26 km/h (16 mph), though cross-country performance was limited to about 13 km/h (8 mph). The vehicle's fuel capacity stood at 441 liters (97 imperial gallons), yielding an operational range of around 100 miles on roads under typical conditions. Power was transmitted through a five-speed sliding gearbox with one reverse gear, coupled to a conventional system that proved adequate for the tank's 14-ton combat weight but contributed to handling challenges in varied terrain. The added armor plating over the lighter A9 design increased mass and slightly reduced overall mobility, though the A10 retained reasonable agility for its class in open environments. The suspension system employed triple-wheel bogies per side, each with coil springs and Newton hydraulic shock absorbers, supporting six road wheels and tracks 267 mm wide for a ground contact of 3.14 m. This setup generated a ground pressure of about 0.94 kg/cm² (13.4 psi), allowing the to navigate soft or uneven terrain effectively without excessive bogging. The vehicle's dimensions measured 5.59 m in , 2.58 m in width, and 2.65 m in height, with a ground clearance of 0.44 m that aided in obstacle negotiation. Despite these features, the Cruiser Mk II experienced notable reliability challenges, particularly in desert environments where heat and dust led to frequent failures, suspension wear, and engine overheating, often necessitating overhauls after 1,000–1,500 miles of operation. These issues were exacerbated by the tank's mechanical inheritance from the A9, resulting in high breakdown rates during early campaigns in and .

Operational service

Campaigns in 1940

The Cruiser Mk II tanks entered combat during the in May 1940, with approximately 31 vehicles assigned to the 1st Armoured Division, including the 5th (which was landed and largely lost at ) and elements of the 3rd and 4th s. These tanks were rushed into service to bolster British defenses amid the rapid German advance, providing mobile fire support to infantry formations facing the Wehrmacht's armored spearheads. Their debut occurred in engagements in northern , such as the defense at and actions near St. Omer, where they supported efforts to disrupt German advances. In key engagements, the Cruiser Mk II's 2-pounder gun demonstrated effectiveness against lighter German and II during close-range actions, knocking out several enemy vehicles. However, the tank struggled against more capable opponents such as the and IV at extended ranges, where German 37mm and 50mm guns easily penetrated its thinly armored sides, often from flanking positions. Operationally, the Cruiser Mk II was employed primarily for support, but its tactical performance was hampered by the absence of radios for effective coordination with and , leading to disjointed assaults and exposure to ambushes. Losses mounted quickly due to combat damage, with mechanical unreliability—stemming from underpowered engines and fragile suspension—compounded by inadequate , fuel shortages, and the chaos of . Most of the tanks were destroyed or abandoned, with a small number evacuated from during the division's withdrawal in mid-June 1940, their experiences highlighting critical deficiencies in armor protection and communications that informed subsequent designs like the and IV.

North Africa and later deployments

In late 1940, approximately 30–40 Cruiser Mk II (A10) tanks were shipped to and assigned to the 7th Armoured Division, with units distributed to regiments such as the , 3rd Hussars, and 8th Hussars by December. Their first significant combat came during (December 1940–February 1941), where they supported the British counter-offensive against Italian positions in and contributed to the capture of key strongholds like and . The A10 performed effectively in the open desert against Italian M13/40 medium tanks, leveraging its 2-pounder to outrange and penetrate the lighter-armored Axis vehicles on flat terrain. However, the tank's thin armor and limited speed proved vulnerable once German forces entered the theater in early 1941; it was readily defeated by the ' 88 mm anti-aircraft guns repurposed for anti-tank roles. Mechanical reliability further hampered operations, with high attrition from sand ingress clogging air filters and engines overheating during prolonged advances in extreme conditions, often reducing operational readiness to below 50% in forward units. In April 1941, approximately 60 surviving A10s were transferred from to with the 3rd to support the Allied campaign against the German invasion, but suffered heavy losses—around 90%—primarily due to mechanical breakdowns rather than combat, with most abandoned during the retreat. The remaining A10s continued limited service in through (June 1941) and (November 1941), but were withdrawn from front-line duties by late 1941 due to mounting losses and obsolescence. From 1942 onward, they were repurposed for training in and , where they familiarized crews with tactics and basic tank handling. Some units were adapted as armored recovery vehicles to tow damaged , extending their utility in rear areas. Full retirement occurred by 1943, supplanted by the faster and better-armed A15 Crusader, which addressed many of the A10's shortcomings. Approximately 100 tanks were lost overall in the North African and Greek theaters through combat, mechanical failure, and abandonment, with remaining examples scrapped or stripped for spare parts to sustain newer models.

Variants and modifications

Primary variants

The primary variants of the Cruiser Mk II (A10) consisted of the initial Mk I model and the upgraded Mk IA, with a limited close support sub-variant for support roles. These factory-produced versions featured minor differences in armament and internal structure to address reliability issues identified during early production and testing. A bridging was developed with a 30 ft scissors bridge capable of supporting 24 tons, but not produced in quantity. The Cruiser Mk II A10 Mk I entered production in 1938 as the base model, armed with a QF 2-pounder gun and a Vickers .303-inch . It incorporated 30 mm frontal armour and the AEC A179 6-cylinder , weighing approximately 13.75 tons. Production focused on simplifying the design from the related A9 by removing auxiliary turrets and adopting a sloped front plate for better protection. The Cruiser Mk II A10 Mk IA, produced primarily in 1940, addressed the unreliability of the water-cooled Vickers machine guns by replacing them with air-cooled Besa .303-inch machine guns in both and hull positions. This variant also included a revised gun mount for the main armament, a wider driver's compartment, and an additional 143-liter fuel tank for extended range. The Mk IA formed the majority of output and served as the basis for further adaptations. The Cruiser Mk II CS was a rare close support sub-variant, primarily based on the Mk IA chassis, equipped with a 3.7-inch (94 mm) derived from a in place of the 2-pounder for firing high-explosive or smoke rounds to support . Some examples incorporated smoke mortars for screening purposes. Limited production emphasized its specialized role, with units seeing service in and . No successful export sales occurred for the Cruiser Mk II, though prototypes were evaluated for potential supply to nations such as before being rejected in favor of local designs. Overall, production across variants totaled 175 units, comprising 145 gun-armed tanks and 30 howitzer-equipped CS versions.

Field modifications

In response to the harsh desert environment encountered in , Cruiser Mk II tanks received improvised modifications to improve engine reliability and protection. A two-stage was fitted to the air intake system starting in 1941, addressing early issues with fine sand ingestion that had caused engine failures in related A9 models; this adaptation significantly enhanced operational endurance in dusty conditions. Radio systems were upgraded to the No. 19 set, enabling more reliable divisional communications over the vast desert expanses. These field modifications were largely ad-hoc, relying on available materials and unit-level ingenuity, which resulted in uneven reliability across the fleet; while they extended service life in theater, inconsistencies in application contributed to ongoing mechanical issues not fully mitigated until the introduction of more robust successor designs.
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.