Hubbry Logo
ElectretElectretMain
Open search
Electret
Community hub
Electret
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Electret
Electret
Electret
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Electromagnetism
Solenoid
Electrostatics
Magnetostatics
Electrodynamics
Electrical network
Magnetic circuit
Covariant formulation
Scientists

An electret (formed as a portmanteau of electr- from "electricity" and -et from "magnet") is a dielectric material that has a quasi-permanent electrical polarisation. An electret has internal and external electric fields, and is the electrostatic equivalent of a permanent magnet.

The term electret was coined by Oliver Heaviside[1] for a (typically dielectric) material which has electrical charges of opposite sign at its extremities.[2] Some materials with electret properties were already known to science and had been studied since the early 1700s. One example is the electrophorus, a device consisting of a slab with electret properties and a separate metal plate. The electrophorus was originally invented by Johan Carl Wilcke in Sweden in 1762[3] and improved by Alessandro Volta in Italy in 1775.[4] The first documented case of production was by Mototarô Eguchi in 1925[5] who melted a suitable dielectric material such as a polymer or wax that contained polar molecules, and then allowed it to solidify in a powerful electric field. The polar molecules of the dielectric align themselves to the direction of the electric field, producing a dipole electret with a quasi-permanent polarization. Modern electrets are sometimes made by embedding excess charges into a highly insulating dielectric, e.g. using an electron beam, corona discharge, injection from an electron gun, electric breakdown across a gap, or a dielectric barrier.[6][7]

Electret types

[edit]

There are two types of electrets:

Similarity to magnets

[edit]

Electrets, like magnets, are dipoles. Another similarity is the fields: they produce an electrostatic field (as opposed to a magnetic field) outside the material. When a magnet and an electret are near one another, the Lorentz force acts on them: while stationary, neither has any effect on one another. However, when an electret is moved with respect to a magnetic pole, a force is felt which acts perpendicular to the magnetic field, pushing the electret along a path 90 degrees to the expected direction of "push" as would be felt with another magnet.

Similarity to capacitors

[edit]

There is a similarity between an electret and the dielectric layer used in capacitors; the difference is that dielectrics in capacitors have an induced polarisation that is only transient, dependent on the potential applied on the dielectric, while dielectrics with electret properties exhibit quasi-permanent charge storage or polarisation. Some materials also display ferroelectricity (i.e. they react to the external fields with a hysteresis of the polarisation). Ferroelectrics can retain the polarisation permanently because they are in thermodynamic equilibrium, and thus are used in ferroelectric capacitors. Although electrets are only in a metastable state, those fashioned from very low leakage materials can retain excess charge or polarisation for many years. An electret microphone is a type of condenser microphone that eliminates the need for a polarisation voltage from the power supply by using a permanently charged material.

Materials

[edit]

Electret materials are quite common in nature. Quartz and other forms of silicon dioxide, for example, are naturally occurring electrets. Today, most electrets are made from synthetic polymers, e.g. fluoropolymers, polypropylene, polyethyleneterephthalate (PET), etc. Real-charge electrets contain either positive or negative excess charges or both, while oriented-dipole electrets contain oriented dipoles. The quasi-permanent internal or external electric fields created by electrets can be exploited in various applications.

Manufacture

[edit]

Bulk electrets can be prepared by heating or melting the material, then cooling it in the presence of a strong electric field. The electric field repositions the charge carriers or aligns the dipoles within the material. When the material cools, solidification "freezes" the dipoles in position. Materials used for electrets are usually waxes, polymers or resins. One of the earliest recipes consists of 45% carnauba wax, 45% white rosin, and 10% white beeswax, melted, mixed together, and left to cool in a static electric field of several kilovolts/cm. The thermo-dielectric effect, related to this process, was first described by Brazilian researcher Joaquim Costa Ribeiro.

Electrets can also be manufactured by embedding excess negative charge within a dielectric using a particle accelerator, or by stranding charges on, or near, the surface using high voltage corona discharges, a process called corona charging. Excess charge within an electret decays exponentially. The decay constant is a function of the material's relative dielectric constant and its bulk resistivity. Materials with extremely high resistivity, such as PTFE, may retain excess charge for many hundreds of years.[citation needed] Most commercially produced electrets are based on fluoropolymers (e.g. amorphous Teflon) machined to thin films.

See also

[edit]
Look up electret in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Electret

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
An electret is a material that possesses a quasi-permanent internal and external , serving as the electrostatic analog of a permanent . The term "electret" was coined in the late by the physicist to describe a material with electrical charges of opposite sign at its extremities, drawing a parallel to . The concept of electrets traces back further, with early observations of persistent electrification in materials like resins noted as early as 1732 by Stephen Gray, though systematic production began in the early . In 1925, Japanese Mototarô Eguchi created the first documented artificial electret by melting and polarizing a mixture of and resins, demonstrating stable surface charges that could last for years. Eguchi's work, published in the , established electrets as materials capable of retaining macroscopic polarization without continuous external power, distinguishing them from temporary electrets or piezoelectrics. Electrets exhibit two primary types of quasi-permanent charges: true (dipole) charges from aligned molecular s and space charges trapped in bulk or surface regions, often induced by methods such as , electron beam irradiation, or thermal polarization. Key properties include high surface (typically measured in μC/m²), long-term stability (from months to decades depending on and environment), and sensitivity to temperature, humidity, and mechanical stress, which can lead to charge decay via thermally stimulated discharge. Common materials include polymers like polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), (PP), and (PE), as well as inorganics such as silica (SiO₂) or (HA), chosen for their ability to trap charges effectively. Electrets have found widespread applications leveraging their persistent fields, notably in electret microphones, where a thin polarized foil acts as a condenser without needing external bias voltage—a breakthrough invented in by James E. West and Gerhard M. Sessler at Bell Laboratories, used in the vast majority of audio devices as of the early . Other notable uses include air filtration systems, where corona-charged fibers enhance particle capture efficiency; electrostatic transducers and sensors for ; radiation dosimeters; and emerging biomedical applications such as and bone regeneration through endogenous electrical stimulation. Recent advances as of 2025 include meta-structured electrets for resilient sensing in systems.

Fundamentals

Definition and Characteristics

An electret is a material that exhibits quasi-permanent or polarization, serving as the electrostatic analog to a permanent . This polarization arises from either real charges injected into the material or aligned molecular dipoles, generating persistent internal and external . Key characteristics of electrets include surface charge densities typically on the order of 10−510^{-5} to 10−310^{-3} C/m², achieved through processes like corona charging, along with internal alignment that maintains electrostatic potential. These materials demonstrate remarkable stability, retaining their polarization for years to decades under ambient conditions, and exhibit behavior under applied where charges remain largely immobilized due to high trap depths. The basic structure of an electret features either uniform polarization distributed throughout the volume or charges trapped at interfaces, such as surfaces or internal voids. Unlike dielectrics with temporary polarization, which relax quickly upon removal of an external field, electrets sustain their charge state through deep traps—typically with energies exceeding 1.5 eV—that hinder charge mobility and dissipation. Electrets find practical use in devices like condenser microphones, where their stable charge enables efficient transduction of acoustic signals into electrical output.

Historical Development

Observations of persistent in materials like resins date back to 1732, noted by Stephen Gray, though the term "electret," derived from a combination of "electr-" and "" to denote a material with quasi-permanent electric polarization analogous to a permanent , was first proposed theoretically by in 1885. Heaviside envisioned such a substance as one that could retain electric charges indefinitely after being subjected to an , drawing parallels to the cooling of ferromagnetic materials in a to form permanent magnets. The practical realization of electrets came in 1925 through experiments conducted by Japanese physicist Mototaro Eguchi, who successfully produced the first permanent electrets using a composite of , , and . Eguchi's method involved melting the mixture, casting it into disk form between two electrodes under a high DC electric field, and allowing it to solidify, resulting in materials that exhibited opposite charges on their surfaces persisting for extended periods. These early electrets, primarily based on organic waxes and resins, demonstrated the feasibility of stable charge storage but suffered from limitations in uniformity and longevity due to environmental factors. Significant advancements occurred in the 1960s at Bell Laboratories, where Gerhard M. Sessler and James E. West developed thin foil electrets using polymer films, such as fluorinated polymers like Teflon, charged via corona discharge or electron beam methods. Their 1962 patent (issued 1964) marked a pivotal shift toward lightweight, flexible polymer-based electrets, which offered improved charge stability and mechanical robustness compared to earlier wax composites. Building on this in the 1970s, Bell Labs researchers refined polymer electret fabrication, exploring materials like Mylar and incorporating techniques for deeper charge implantation to enhance thermal and temporal stability. By the 1980s, the field evolved further with a predominant focus on synthetic polymers such as (PVDF) and its copolymers, enabling electrets with tailored piezoelectric and pyroelectric responses through advanced poling methods like thermal poling under high fields. This transition from predominantly inorganic or wax-based to electrets facilitated broader scalability and integration into devices. Post-2000 developments have emphasized nanostructured electrets, incorporating nanofibers or nanocomposites to achieve enhanced charge trapping and stability, as seen in electrospun mats that exhibit prolonged charge retention under harsh conditions.

Physical Properties

Electrical Properties

Electrets store quasi-permanent primarily through two mechanisms: the trapping of or holes in deep energy levels within the material, or the orientation and alignment of molecular dipoles under an applied field. These charges can be distributed as surface charges, located at the interfaces of the material, or as volume charges, embedded throughout the bulk, with the former often resulting from corona or contact charging processes and the latter from deeper penetration methods like electron beam . The stored charges in electrets produce a quasi-permanent external electric field, analogous to the magnetic field of a permanent magnet, with the field strength for a surface charge approximated by the formula E=σϵ0,E = \frac{\sigma}{\epsilon_0}, where σ\sigma is the surface charge density and ϵ0\epsilon_0 is the permittivity of free space; this field persists due to the material's insulation properties and can reach intensities sufficient for applications in sensors and transducers. As dielectrics, electrets typically display a ϵr>2\epsilon_r > 2 (e.g., around 2.1 for ), which supports charge polarization without significant loss, alongside very low electrical conductivity, often below 10−1210^{-12} S/m, to prevent rapid charge dissipation. Certain electrets, particularly those with non-centrosymmetric crystal structures or induced polar domains, also exhibit piezoelectric effects, generating charge under mechanical stress, and pyroelectric effects, producing charge in response to temperature changes. The stability of electret charges is a critical electrical property, with decay rates typically low enough to achieve half-lives exceeding 10 years at room temperature under dry conditions, enabling long-term functionality in devices. However, environmental factors such as elevated temperatures (e.g., above 50°C) and high humidity (e.g., 95% relative humidity) can accelerate charge decay through increased ionic mobility and trap detrapping, potentially reducing surface potential by about 1 dB per year in adverse conditions. Key measurement techniques for electret electrical properties include the Kelvin probe method, which non-destructively maps surface potential and infers charge distribution by vibrating a to nullify the contact potential difference, and thermally stimulated discharge current (TSDC) analysis, which heats the sample to release trapped charges and reveal trap depths and activation energies from the resulting current peaks.

Mechanical and Thermal Properties

Electrets exhibit piezoelectric coupling, where mechanical stress induces surface charge due to the interaction between trapped charges and the material's deformation. In polymer electrets such as (PVDF), the d33d_{33} reaches values greater than 18 pC/N, enabling stress-induced charge generation that couples mechanical input to electrical output. This effect arises from the alignment of dipoles or charges under stress, with higher values observed in foamed structures like cellular , where d33d_{33} can exceed 200 pC/N under optimized conditions. The viscoelastic behavior of electrets is characterized by a combination of elastic recovery and viscous , particularly relevant under vibrational loads. Typical polymer electrets, such as those based on or PVDF, display a in the range of 1-5 GPa, reflecting the stiffness of the base matrix. occurs through dissipation in the polymer chains, with loss moduli increasing under , as seen in cellular ferroelectrets where the out-of-plane is low (~0.1 MPa at low frequencies) but frequency-dependent, enhancing vibration absorption. Thermal stability in electrets is governed by the at which trapped charges begin to depolarize, influenced by the polymer's structure. For (PTFE) electrets, depolarization occurs progressively from up to 320°C, with significant charge retention maintained up to 150°C in porous forms due to deep trap sites. effects further impact charge retention; above the (TgT_g), increased mobility leads to softening and accelerated charge migration, reducing stability in polymers like high-density polyethylene where TgT_g is around -100°C but secondary transitions affect long-term retention. Environmental factors, particularly , degrade electret performance through absorption that promotes ionic conduction and charge neutralization. In high relative (RH) environments, such as 90% RH, electrets can experience up to 50% charge loss over 48 hours due to molecules facilitating ion mobility and surface discharge, with hydrophilic polymers showing greater vulnerability. This ionic conduction pathway increases conductivity, leading to rapid in fibrous or porous electrets exposed to elevated RH levels. Testing mechanical and thermal properties of electrets commonly employs (DMA) to measure modulus and damping as functions of temperature and frequency, revealing viscoelastic transitions with high sensitivity. (DSC) assesses thermal transitions, including glass transitions and depolarization events, by monitoring heat flow during controlled heating, which helps quantify charge stability thresholds. These methods provide complementary insights, with DMA excelling in mechanical response and DSC in energetic changes.

Analogies

Comparison to Permanent Magnets

Electrets are frequently described as the electrostatic equivalents of permanent magnets, maintaining a quasi-permanent electric polarization P\mathbf{P} that parallels the magnetization M\mathbf{M} in ferromagnets. This core analogy arises from the persistent internal charge separation in electrets, which generates a stable electric field akin to the magnetic field produced by aligned atomic moments in magnets. The term "electret" itself was proposed by Oliver Heaviside in 1885 as an electrical counterpart to "magnet," and Mototarô Eguchi first realized such a material in 1925 by electrizing waxes and resins, explicitly invoking the magnet analogy to describe its enduring electrization. The field configurations of electrets and permanent exhibit striking similarities, with electrostatic field lines emerging from the positively charged surfaces of an electret in a manner that mirrors lines exiting the of a and entering the . Both systems behave as , where the μe\mu_e of an electret is given by μe=P⋅V\mu_e = \mathbf{P} \cdot V for uniform polarization over volume VV, analogous to the moment m=M⋅V\mathbf{m} = \mathbf{M} \cdot V. This dipole nature allows electrets to align in external much like align in , enabling and force responses that underpin their functional parallels. Despite these parallels, the mechanisms for achieving persistence differ fundamentally: permanent magnets rely on the cooperative alignment of ferromagnetic domains through exposure to strong , whereas electrets are formed by trapping free charges in deep energy wells or orienting dipolar molecules via techniques like poling under high . In practical applications, such as non-contact sensing devices, both electrets and magnets facilitate detection without physical contact—electrets through electrostatic coupling in and sensors, and magnets via magnetostatic induction—but electrets circumvent demagnetization risks from thermal or opposing fields, instead contending with gradual charge leakage that can diminish polarization over years.

Comparison to Capacitors

Electrets and capacitors both rely on charge separation within a dielectric material to store electrostatic energy, analogous to the relation Q=C⋅VQ = C \cdot V, where QQ is the stored charge, CC is the , and VV is the voltage. However, while a traditional requires external electrodes and a continuous applied voltage to maintain separated charges on its plates, an electret achieves quasi-permanent charge storage internally through trapped charges or oriented dipoles without needing ongoing external power. This internal polarization allows electrets to function as self-biased electrostatic devices, contrasting with the temporary nature of capacitor charge storage. The stored in both follows the form 12CV2\frac{1}{2} C V^2, but electrets exhibit persistent energy densities due to their stable internal fields, enabling long-term retention without rapid dissipation. In contrast, capacitors can achieve higher instantaneous densities but lose stored quickly upon disconnection from the power source. Electrets' advantage lies in their deep charge traps, which provide relaxation times τ>106\tau > 10^6 s (often extrapolated to years or centuries via Arrhenius behavior, τ=τ0eEtrap/kT\tau = \tau_0 e^{E_{\text{trap}}/kT}, with trap depths exceeding 1.5 eV), resisting discharge through conduction pathways that plague capacitors. Capacitors, by , discharge rapidly via ohmic conduction, with time constants typically in seconds to minutes depending on leakage resistance. In hybrid applications, electrets enhance capacitive systems by providing a permanent charge; for instance, electret microphones operate as variable capacitors where the electret's fixed polarization acts as a , allowing the diaphragm's motion to modulate and generate an AC signal without an external for biasing. This integration leverages the electret's persistence while utilizing the capacitor's responsiveness to dynamic changes. Nonetheless, electrets inherently possess lower effective , often in the picofarad (pF) range for thin-film configurations, compared to traditional capacitors that readily reach microfarad (μF) values for purposes. This limitation confines electrets to applications prioritizing stability over high-capacity buffering.

Classification

Types of Electrets

Electrets are classified primarily according to the location of trapped charges or s, the underlying polarization mechanisms, and their functional responses, providing a framework for understanding their behavior and applications. This taxonomy distinguishes variants based on whether charges reside on the surface or within the bulk, the nature of polarization (dipole orientation versus space-charge injection), and specialized forms that exhibit unique properties like enhanced or temperature sensitivity. Surface electrets feature quasi-permanent charges trapped on the material's surfaces, generating strong external due to the proximity of charges to the interface. For instance, these can be formed through , resulting in surface charge densities up to several mC/m², but they are particularly susceptible to neutralization by environmental contaminants such as or ions, which can reduce stability over time. In contrast, volume electrets involve space charges distributed uniformly throughout the material's bulk, often achieved via particle or , leading to more stable polarization as the charges are shielded from surface interactions; however, achieving uniform distribution remains challenging and requires precise control to avoid inhomogeneities. Polarization mechanisms further delineate electret types into those relying on oriented molecular dipoles, such as thermoelectrets, where dipoles align during heating in an electric field and freeze upon cooling to maintain quasi-permanent polarization, versus space-charge electrets, which trap injected charge carriers (electrons or ions) within defects or traps throughout the dielectric. Thermoelectrets often demonstrate higher thermal stability for dipole-based effects, while space-charge variants can exhibit greater charge densities but may degrade under high temperatures due to carrier mobility. Special variants include ferroelectrets, which are cellular or porous structures incorporating air gaps that amplify the through macroscopic formation from charge separation across voids, enabling coefficients up to 200 pC/N in materials like foamed . electrets represent an early experimental form, utilizing conductive liquids like oils to transfer and trap charges on or within interfaces, as demonstrated in methods where is transmitted from liquid to solid surfaces for sustained polarization. Overall classification criteria emphasize charge location (surface versus volume), stability against environmental factors (e.g., or ), and specialized responses, such as in pyroelectric electrets, where polarization changes reversibly with variations, generating measurable voltage in response to gradients.

Fabrication-Based Classification

Electrets can be classified based on their fabrication techniques, which determine the distribution and stability of trapped charges, often resulting in surface, bulk, or hybrid charge configurations. This approach emphasizes the primary charging or poling method employed during production, distinct from structural classifications such as surface versus volume types. Common categories include , corona/, particle , and other specialized techniques, with hybrids combining multiple approaches for optimized performance. Thermal methods produce thermoelectrets by heating the dielectric material to its softening point, applying an external to align dipoles or inject charges, and then cooling it to while maintaining the field, akin to a Curie-like poling . This technique, first demonstrated with materials like , relies on thermal activation to enable charge mobility and subsequent immobilization upon cooling. Corona or ion-based methods involve non-contact charging using a high-voltage (typically 5–10 kV) to generate s that are directed onto the surface or into its bulk, often controlled by a grid for uniform charge distribution. These approaches are particularly suited for thin films and fibrous structures, where the ion bombardment creates quasi-permanent space charges without requiring direct contact. Grid-controlled variants enhance uniformity by modulating flux, making them scalable for industrial applications. Particle irradiation techniques embed charges deeply into the material volume using focused beams of electrons or ions, such as electron beam injection or , to create stable bulk electrets. For instance, into (SiO₂) films achieves high charge densities by accelerating ions (e.g., at energies of 10–50 keV) to penetrate and trap charges within the lattice. Electron beam methods similarly inject s for precise control, often in vacuum environments to minimize scattering. These are favored for applications requiring long-term charge retention in inorganic dielectrics. Other techniques include electrospraying, which generates charged nanofibers or microparticles by atomizing solutions under , inherently imparting electret properties through in-situ charge deposition during fiber formation. Plasma treatment activates surfaces via low-pressure or atmospheric plasma to enhance charge trapping sites prior to or during poling, often using barrier discharges to modify polarity and without altering bulk structure. Hybrid classifications involve multi-layer electrets assembled by combining fabrication methods, such as layering corona-charged with thermally poled substrates or incorporating in configurations to achieve charge gradients and stability across interfaces. These designs leverage complementary strengths, like surface uniformity from corona with deep bulk charges from , for tailored electrostatic performance.

Materials

Common Materials

Electrets are commonly fabricated from a variety of materials that exhibit high charge storage capabilities due to their ability to trap electric charges persistently. Among polymers, (PTFE), also known as Teflon, is widely used for its exceptional thermal and chemical stability, making it suitable for foil electrets where charges are primarily stored near the surface. (FEP) is another employed in electrets, valued for its melt-processability and enhanced thermal stability when laminated with PTFE, allowing for robust charge retention in composite structures. (PP) is a common for electrets, particularly in cellular forms for piezoelectric applications due to its low density and high charge stability. Polyethylene (PE), especially high-density polyethylene (HDPE), is used for its good charge trapping in corona-charged films. Polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) serves as a key organic material due to its inherent piezoelectric properties, which complement charge trapping for multifunctional electrets. Early electrets frequently utilized , a natural organic resin derived from palm leaves, prized for its low cost and ability to form stable heterocharge distributions, though its charge lifetime is limited at elevated temperatures above 60°C. Inorganic materials play a significant role in advanced electrets, particularly silicon dioxide (SiO₂) thin films, which offer high surface and compatibility with , though they exhibit weaker mechanical properties compared to polymers. Aluminum oxide (Al₂O₃) thin films are similarly utilized in (MEMS) for their insulating qualities and charge stability in layered structures. Hydroxyapatite (HA), a bioactive , is employed in electrets for biomedical applications owing to its and ability to retain polarization for tissue stimulation. Quartz, a crystalline form of SiO₂, functions as a naturally occurring electret base material, leveraging its piezoelectric nature for inherent charge polarization without artificial processing. Polymer-ceramic composites enhance electret performance by combining the flexibility of organics with the charge-trapping efficiency of inorganics; for instance, blended with up to 8 vol% (TiO₂) improves thermal stability above the temperature without substantially increasing DC conductivity. These materials are selected primarily for their high resistivity, typically exceeding 10^{14} Ω·m, which minimizes charge leakage, and deep trap depths greater than 1 eV, ensuring long-term charge stability through effective or hole trapping.

Material Selection Criteria

The selection of materials for electrets prioritizes stability against depolarization, which is crucial for maintaining quasi-permanent electric polarization over extended periods. Materials with deep charge traps, such as trap depths up to 6 eV in (PTFE), enable lifetimes exceeding 100,000 years and thermal stability up to 120°C, while low factors (tan δ < 0.01) minimize energy dissipation and charge leakage. Similarly, (PP) offers trap depths of 4.6–6.3 eV but exhibits reduced stability above 50°C or under UV exposure below 210 nm, leading to a 4% drop in d33 after 3.5 hours. Dielectric constant (εr) and properties further influence stability; low εr (e.g., 2.2–2.6 for PP) and low (27.2–32.6 mN/m for PP) enhance charge retention under humidity (90% RH) and thermal aging (120°C), with PP showing only 55–61% potential loss compared to 83% for higher-εr (PVDF, εr 8.4–8.9). Processability is another key criterion, focusing on the ability to form thin, uniform films suitable for charging. Polymers like PVDF are melt-processable, allowing into flexible films, while PP supports biaxial for cellular structures with thicknesses of 30–120 µm. PTFE, though , requires solvent-based foaming due to its high melt , limiting ease of fabrication compared to more versatile options like porous Teflon AF, which forms films via perfluorocarbon . These attributes ensure compatibility with techniques like corona charging at 50–100 kV/mm. Cost and scalability guide choices between low-cost options like natural waxes (e.g., carnauba or ) and expensive fluoropolymers such as PTFE, which can exceed 12,000 USD per metric ton due to complex synthesis. Waxes enable economical, scalable production for basic electrets but offer inferior long-term stability, whereas fluoropolymers like PP balance affordability with commercial viability through established processes and potential recyclability. Environmental factors, particularly for biomedical uses, emphasize and non-toxicity; inorganic materials like (HA) or TiO₂, and biodegradables like (CS), are preferred for their inertness and degradability, avoiding halogenated polymers (e.g., PVDF, PTFE) due to potential toxicity and environmental persistence. Performance trade-offs often involve balancing high with mechanical flexibility. PTFE achieves surface charge densities up to 2.5 mC/m² but lacks flexibility, whereas cellular PP reaches d33 up to 790 pC/N with low (2.2 MPa), enabling piezoelectric applications despite moderate stability. PVDF provides good flexibility and d33 of 20–40 pC/N but suffers higher and edge , making it suitable for piezoelectrets where mechanical compliance outweighs maximal charge retention.

Production

Manufacturing Techniques

Electret films are commonly prepared using techniques that yield thin layers with thicknesses typically ranging from 10 to 100 μm, suitable for applications requiring flexibility and sensitivity. Melt extrusion involves forcing molten polymers, such as , through fine orifices into a high-velocity air stream to form microfibers or nonwoven mats, which form the basis for fibrous electrets used in filtration media. Spin-coating is a solution-based method where a polymer dispersion, like (PTFE) or silica powders, is applied to a substrate and spun at high speeds to produce uniform thin films, often on wafers for integrated devices. Vapor deposition, particularly thermal , deposits amorphous fluoropolymers such as Teflon AF onto substrates in a , enabling films with exceptional charge stability due to the controlled molecular structure. Emerging additive manufacturing techniques, such as synchronized fused deposition modeling (FDM) 3D printing integrated with corona charging, enable one-step prototyping of polarized electrets. In this method, a high-voltage needle attached to the printer applies -6 to -8 kV during extrusion of (PLA), achieving surface potentials up to -1500 V without post-processing. Observations as of 2025 confirm that electrostatic charging can occur directly during of polymers like PLA and ABS due to triboelectric effects and phase changes, facilitating the production of quasi-electrets for sensors and harvesters. Electrode integration follows film preparation to enable electrical in devices like and sensors. Metalization techniques, such as of aluminum or chromium-gold alloys, deposit thin conductive layers (e.g., 2000 thick) onto the film surfaces to serve as contacts, ensuring low-resistance connections without compromising the properties. Electrode-less designs are employed in certain configurations, such as nonwoven electret filters, where the inherent polarization of the material generates the without added metallic layers, simplifying assembly and reducing costs. Quality control measures are essential to verify film integrity before charging. Uniformity is assessed through spectroscopic methods like Infrared (FTIR) analysis to confirm consistent molecular orientation and absence of defects that could affect polarization. Thickness gauging employs optical or micrometry to ensure precise dimensions, maintaining performance consistency across batches. For industrial-scale production, facilitates continuous of electret foils, particularly for diaphragms, by unwinding films through , drawing, and coating stations before rewinding. This method supports high-throughput output while preserving film uniformity. Manufacturing electrets presents challenges, including the need to avoid contamination from dust or humidity during handling, which can neutralize surface charges; environments are thus standard. Yield rates for polymer-based electrets often exceed 90%, achieved through optimized process controls to minimize defects in film formation and deposition.

Charging and Poling Methods

Electrets are created by inducing and stabilizing electric charges or dipole orientations within materials, primarily through poling processes that align charges or s under an applied . Charging methods deposit free charges (electrons, ions, or holes) into traps, while poling typically orients molecular , though the terms are often used interchangeably for electrets. These techniques produce either surface or volume charge distributions, with surface charging common for corona methods and volume charging for beam-based approaches. Stability is achieved by trapping charges in deep energy wells, often enhanced by post-treatments. Corona poling involves a high-voltage discharge in air to ionize gas molecules, depositing charges onto the electret surface. A needle at 5-20 kV creates a , while a at lower voltage (e.g., ±2 kV) regulates charge deposition for uniform surface potentials. This method yields surface charge densities up to 1 mC/ on polymers like , suitable for creating heterocharge electrets with charges trapped near the surface. Thermal poling heats the material under a strong DC electric field to facilitate dipole alignment or charge injection, followed by rapid cooling () to freeze the configuration. Temperatures range from 100-200°C, depending on the material's (e.g., 95°C for PET), with fields of 1-5 MV/m applied via electrodes. For instance, a 5 kV/mm field at 95°C on 320 μm PET films produces uniform polarization through charge injection at non-blocking electrodes, resulting in stable distributions. below the poling temperature locks the charges, preventing relaxation. Electron beam charging injects high-energy into the material bulk to create volume-distributed charges. Beams of 10-50 keV penetrate to depths up to 10 μm, forming charge layers where are trapped, often accompanied by positive counter-charges from secondary emission. In PTFE, 1-20 keV beams deposit charges in traps up to 1.7 eV deep, with layer thicknesses around 0.1-12 μm depending on and material. This method is ideal for homogeneous volume electrets, as the controls charge position. Ion implantation uses low-energy ions (typically keV range) accelerated into the material for precise charge trapping, particularly in inorganic electrets like SiO₂. Ions are implanted at controlled doses, creating positive space charges through and defect formation. In 500 nm SiO₂ films, this achieves charge densities up to 16 mC/m², with penetration limited to shallow depths for semiconductor-compatible processes. The method offers high precision for applications but requires conditions. Post-treatments like annealing stabilize induced charges by promoting structural changes without altering the primary poling. Annealing at 70-110°C for 12 hours increases surface crystallinity in electrets, minimally affecting initial surface potential while enhancing long-term charge retention through deeper trap formation. However, overheating risks ; for example, PVDF electrets show little decay up to 100°C but lose half their activity at 150°C due to thermal release of trapped charges. These treatments are applied after charging to optimize stability without re-poling.

Applications

Audio and Sensing Devices

Electret , also known as electret condenser , utilize a permanently charged electret material to provide the necessary voltage, eliminating the need for an external power source like a battery found in traditional condenser . This design enables compact integration into small devices, making them ideal for consumer audio applications such as smartphones, laptops, and . Their typical sensitivity is around -40 dB, allowing effective capture of sound pressures from everyday environments. In operation, sound waves cause the thin diaphragm—serving as one plate of a —to vibrate relative to a fixed backplate coated with the electret material. This vibration varies the between the plates, modulating the from the electret's permanent charge and generating an output voltage proportional to the diaphragm's displacement. of electret began in the , driven by advancements in foil electret technology, which facilitated their widespread adoption due to low cost and in . They offer a wide , typically spanning 20 Hz to 20 kHz, covering the full range of hearing and enabling high-fidelity audio reproduction in devices like voice recorders and teleconferencing equipment. Beyond audio capture, electrets are employed in various sensing devices that detect mechanical disturbances through similar capacitive principles. In ultrasonic detectors, electret-based sensors respond to high-frequency waves above 20 kHz, such as those used in proximity sensing or applications, where their sensitivity to airborne ensures reliable . For sensing, electret transducers measure acceleration and structure-borne by converting mechanical oscillations into electrical signals, finding use in automotive applications like monitoring engine vibrations for diagnostics. These sensors benefit from the same compactness and cost-effectiveness as their audio counterparts, allowing integration into harsh environments without external biasing. Despite their advantages, electret devices face limitations related to environmental stability. Over time, the electret charge can degrade due to aging, leading to a sensitivity loss of less than 1 dB after 10 years under normal conditions, which gradually reduces output signal strength. High exacerbates this effect by facilitating charge leakage across the electret surface, potentially accelerating and further diminishing performance in moist environments.

Filtration and Biomedical Uses

Electrets play a crucial role in air filtration by leveraging electrostatic charges on fibers to attract and capture airborne particles, significantly improving over mechanical filtration alone. In systems like N95 masks, electret-based filters achieve at least 95% filtration for 0.3 μm particles, the most penetrating size for aerosols, through the combined effects of electrostatic and mechanical capture. This is exemplified in products such as 's N95 respirators, where melt-blown electrets enhance particle removal while maintaining low breathing resistance. For high- particulate air ()-like applications, electret-enhanced filters can reach 99% for 0.3 μm particles, as demonstrated in nonwoven structures produced via blow spinning with additives like MoS₂, which nearly double capture rates compared to uncharged counterparts. These filters are commonly integrated into HVAC systems, such as Filtrete models, to reduce , , and pathogens in indoor environments without excessive . The primary mechanism in electret filtration involves the Coulomb force, F=q⋅EF = q \cdot E, where the electret's persistent EE induces attraction on charged aerosols with charge qq, enabling enhanced collection of neutral or polarizable particles that would otherwise evade mechanical sieving. This electrostatic enhancement allows for thinner media and higher airflow rates, making electrets ideal for and ventilation systems. In biomedical applications, electrets facilitate through dressings that generate endogenous electrical fields to promote tissue regeneration and exhibit antibacterial properties via charged surfaces that disrupt microbial adhesion. For instance, polarized (HA) powder incorporated into / hydrogels accelerates maturation and epithelialization in animal models, reducing inflammation markers like Ki67 while increasing vascularization via expression. Similarly, electret-based piezoelectrets enable controlled in patches; polypropylene (PP) electrets charged to ±2000 V yield piezoelectric coefficients around 1.15 pC/N, enhancing the release flux of drugs like 5-fluorouracil by altering molecular cohesion under applied fields. Emerging post-2020 developments include electret biosensors using (PVDF) for detecting viral biomarkers through charge interactions, offering high sensitivity in wearable formats for point-of-care diagnostics. Additionally, piezoelectrets support implantable devices like hearing aids by harvesting for power, though charge stability remains key. Electrets are also used in radiation dosimeters, such as electret ion chambers, to measure exposure including gamma rays and concentrations in environmental and personnel monitoring. A major challenge in these applications is charge dissipation in humid environments, where moisture facilitates ion migration and reduces electrostatic forces, potentially halving filtration efficiency over time. To address this, research focuses on rechargeability, such as triboelectrification mechanisms in self-charging masks that sustain over 95% efficiency for 0.3 μm particles for up to 60 hours of use.

References

  1. https://www.afssociety.org/what-is-electret/
  2. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/electret
  3. https://pubs.aip.org/asa/jasa/article/149/4/R7/1068000/Nearly-40-years-of-domination-by-electret
  4. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10299394/
  5. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14786442508634594
  6. https://www.fuw.edu.pl/~op2ds/wyklad/Eguchi1925.pdf
  7. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/app.50406
  8. https://www.aps.org/apsnews/2023/04/electret-microphone
  9. https://www.cell.com/matter/fulltext/S2590-2385(25)00406-0
  10. https://is.mpg.de/rm/talks/electrets-dielectrics-with-quasi-permanent-charges-or-dipoles-a-long-history-and-a-bright-future-d83c3e95-c3dc-424e-bff7-85d03a2eebe8
  11. https://www.eeer.org/journal/view.php?number=1372
  12. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357806426_Effect_of_surface_charge_density_on_electret_filters_charge_degradation_by_organic_solvent_exposure
  13. https://publishup.uni-potsdam.de/opus4-ubp/files/498/mellinger.pdf
  14. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9661856/
  15. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jap/article/136/12/124101/3314188/Charge-stabilization-in-corona-electrets-made-of
  16. https://www.digikey.com/en/articles/the-complete-guide-to-electret-condenser-microphones
  17. https://ptacts.uspto.gov/ptacts/public-informations/petitions/1486854/download-documents?artifactId=g_25tKBrZ00yREGEU0ZnVrmRcBJyvN9T2IM1biqERyXB9pNrGu-EyvI
  18. https://ptacts.uspto.gov/ptacts/public-informations/petitions/1486854/download-documents?artifactId=xcT3T0AGZWfo15mleRGZggbdYcDLbkNFwZK2gaBbdYh2FwX9PFNiI
  19. https://patents.google.com/patent/US3118022A/en
  20. https://acousticstoday.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/A-HISTORY-OF-CONSUMER-MICROPHONES-THE-ELECTRET-CONDENSER-MICROPHONE-MEETS-MICRO-ELECTRO-MECHANICAL-SYSTEMS-Gary-W.-Elko.pdf
  21. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1070/RC1983v052n08ABEH002884
  22. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-07747-y
  23. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/physics-and-astronomy/electret
  24. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0025540813004856
  25. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/materials-science/electret
  26. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264127524007743
  27. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jap/article/98/6/064105/292126/Verification-of-a-model-for-the-piezoelectric-d33
  28. https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/young-modulus-d_417.html
  29. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jap/article/119/12/125101/390516/Viscoelastic-properties-of-cellular-polypropylene
  30. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S030438860200205X
  31. https://www.nature.com/articles/pj197122.pdf
  32. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7183080/
  33. https://patents.google.com/patent/US8153702B2/en
  34. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8035431/
  35. https://www.tainstruments.com/wp-content/uploads/DSC-Theory-Applications_PHL.pdf
  36. https://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/II_11.html
  37. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211285524009182
  38. https://patents.justia.com/patent/10672564
  39. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9232101/
  40. https://www.analog.com/en/resources/analog-dialogue/articles/toward-more-compact-digital-microphones.html
  41. https://www.ifmpan.poznan.pl/pcmr/Pdf/Sessler1.pdf
  42. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19760007179/downloads/19760007179.pdf
  43. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/pat.3908
  44. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6680180/
  45. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/3339427_Pyroelectric_polymer_electrets
  46. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780123965615500153
  47. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jap/article/44/8/3459/6578/Volume-charge-distribution-in-carnauba-wax
  48. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9781785482151500020
  49. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128137314000047
  50. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-63484-9
  51. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1361-665X/aaca55
  52. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/231007477_Properties_of_SiO2_electret_films_charged_by_ion_implantation_for_MEMS-based_energy_harvesting_systems
  53. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128224250000166
  54. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/admi.202202173
  55. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.50406
  56. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article/23/12/2381/205240/Experiments-on-the-Carnauba-Wax-Electret
  57. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6474306
  58. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb14060320
  59. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12030721
  60. https://www.imarcgroup.com/fluoropolymer-pricing-report
  61. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/394468240_Bio-Based_Piezoelectrets_from_Polylactic_Acid_and_Natural_Waxes_A_Sustainable_Approach_for_Energy_Harvesting
  62. https://patents.google.com/patent/US4215682A/en
  63. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10221819/
  64. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0304388613000375
  65. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ecj.12372
  66. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323422432_Electret_films_with_extremely_high_charge_stability_prepared_by_thermal_evaporation_of_Teflon_AF
  67. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10255866/
  68. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12365285/
  69. https://patents.google.com/patent/US6806593B2/en
  70. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0032386121002391
  71. https://patents.google.com/patent/US4623438A/en
  72. https://patents.google.com/patent/US3924324A/en
  73. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2103.17227
  74. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jap/article/128/2/024902/157355/Multiple-coupled-charge-layers-in-electron-beam
  75. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0960-1317/19/9/094003
  76. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305370560_Effect_of_annealing_on_charging_properties_of_electret_fibers
  77. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00150198408017509
  78. https://www.stetron.com/key-parameters-electret-condenser-microphone-ecm/
  79. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/515252
  80. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11548498/
  81. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecj.12418
  82. https://past.isma-isaac.be/downloads/isma2010/papers/isma2010_0659.pdf
  83. https://service.shure.com/s/article/permanently-biased-condenser-life-span?language=en_US
  84. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9915213/
  85. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsapm.0c01294
  86. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11679853/
  87. https://www.filtrete.com/3M/en_US/p/pc/air-filtration/
  88. https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/210480
  89. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.32547
  90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.03.018
  91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2020.112133
  92. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0168900298009115
  93. https://inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:21076354
  94. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-35521-w
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.