Recent from talks
Contribute something
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Hardiness zone
View on WikipediaA hardiness zone is a geographic area defined as having a certain average annual minimum temperature, a factor relevant to the survival of many plants. In some systems other statistics are included in the calculations. The original and most widely used system, developed by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) as a rough guide for landscaping and gardening, defines 13 zones by long-term average annual extreme minimum temperatures. It has been adapted by and to other countries (such as Canada) in various forms. A plant may be described as "hardy to zone 10": this means that the plant can withstand a minimum temperature of −1.1 to 4.4 °C (30 to 40 °F).
Unless otherwise specified, in American contexts "hardiness zone" or simply "zone" usually refers to the USDA scale. However, some confusion can exist in discussing buildings and HVAC, where "climate zone" can refer to the International Energy Conservation Code zones, where Zone 1 is warm and Zone 8 is cold.
Other hardiness rating schemes have been developed as well, such as the UK Royal Horticultural Society and US Sunset Western Garden Book systems. A heat zone (see below) is instead defined by annual high temperatures; the American Horticultural Society (AHS) heat zones use the average number of days per year when the temperature exceeds 30 °C (86 °F).
A hardiness or heat zone are both highly specific with respect to altitude, amount of sunlight, rainfall, humidity levels, wind chill, wind speed, amongst other conditions, regardless of latitude and longitude. Trees and greenery foliage may provide dappled or full shade like they can break wind to provide, as do greenhouses without artificial climate control. As a result, microclimates are created where some plants may unexpectedly thrive. Always include caution, knowledge from personal experiences and trial and error when determining whether a plant will grow or not in a particular area.https://evergreenbotany.com/blogs/news/plant-growing-zones
United States hardiness zones (USDA scale)
[edit]

The USDA system was originally developed to aid gardeners and landscapers in the United States.
In the United States, most of the warmer zones (zones 9, 10, and 11) are located in the deep southern half of the country, on the southern coastal margins, and on the Pacific coast. Higher zones can be found in Hawaii (up to 12) and Puerto Rico (up to 13). The southern middle portion of the mainland and central coastal areas are in the middle zones (zones 8, 7, and 6). The far northern portion on the central interior of the mainland have some of the coldest zones (zones 5, 4, and small area of zone 3) and often have much less consistent range of temperatures in winter due to being more continental, especially further west with higher diurnal temperature variations, and thus the zone map has its limitations in these areas. Lower zones can be found in Alaska (down to 1). The low latitude and often stable weather in Florida, the Gulf Coast, and southern Arizona and California, are responsible for the rarity of episodes of severe cold relative to normal in those areas. The warmest zone in the 48 contiguous states is the Florida Keys (11b) and the coldest is in north-central Minnesota (2b). A couple of locations on the northern coast of Puerto Rico have the warmest hardiness zone in the United States at 13b. Conversely, isolated inland areas of Alaska have the coldest hardiness zone in the United States at 1a.
Definitions
[edit]
| Zone | From | To | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | a | < −65 °F (−53.9 °C) | |
| b | −65 °F (−53.9 °C) | −60 °F (−51.1 °C) | |
| 1 | a | −60 °F (−51.1 °C) | −55 °F (−48.3 °C) |
| b | −55 °F (−48.3 °C) | −50 °F (−45.6 °C) | |
| 2 | a | −50 °F (−45.6 °C) | −45 °F (−42.8 °C) |
| b | −45 °F (−42.8 °C) | −40 °F (−40 °C) | |
| 3 | a | −40 °F (−40 °C) | −35 °F (−37.2 °C) |
| b | −35 °F (−37.2 °C) | −30 °F (−34.4 °C) | |
| 4 | a | −30 °F (−34.4 °C) | −25 °F (−31.7 °C) |
| b | −25 °F (−31.7 °C) | −20 °F (−28.9 °C) | |
| 5 | a | −20 °F (−28.9 °C) | −15 °F (−26.1 °C) |
| b | −15 °F (−26.1 °C) | −10 °F (−23.3 °C) | |
| 6 | a | −10 °F (−23.3 °C) | −5 °F (−20.6 °C) |
| b | −5 °F (−20.6 °C) | 0 °F (−17.8 °C) | |
| 7 | a | 0 °F (−17.8 °C) | 5 °F (−15 °C) |
| b | 5 °F (−15 °C) | 10 °F (−12.2 °C) | |
| 8 | a | 10 °F (−12.2 °C) | 15 °F (−9.4 °C) |
| b | 15 °F (−9.4 °C) | 20 °F (−6.7 °C) | |
| 9 | a | 20 °F (−6.7 °C) | 25 °F (−3.9 °C) |
| b | 25 °F (−3.9 °C) | 30 °F (−1.1 °C) | |
| 10 | a | 30 °F (−1.1 °C) | 35 °F (1.7 °C) |
| b | 35 °F (1.7 °C) | 40 °F (4.4 °C) | |
| 11 | a | 40 °F (4.4 °C) | 45 °F (7.2 °C) |
| b | 45 °F (7.2 °C) | 50 °F (10 °C) | |
| 12 | a | 50 °F (10 °C) | 55 °F (12.8 °C) |
| b | 55 °F (12.8 °C) | 60 °F (15.6 °C) | |
| 13 | a | 60 °F (15.6 °C) | 65 °F (18.3 °C) |
| b | > 65 °F (18.3 °C) | ||
History
[edit]The first attempts to create a geographical hardiness zone system were undertaken by two researchers at the Arnold Arboretum in Boston; the first was published in 1927 by Alfred Rehder,[1] and the second by Donald Wyman in 1938.[2] The Arnold map was subsequently updated in 1951, 1967, and finally 1971, but eventually fell out of use completely.
The modern USDA system began at the US National Arboretum in Washington. The first map was issued in 1960, and revised in 1965. It used uniform 10 °F (5.6 °C) ranges, and gradually became widespread among American gardeners.[3][4]
The USDA map was revised and reissued in 1990 with freshly available climate data, this time with five-degree distinctions dividing each zone into new "a" and "b" subdivisions.
In 2003, the American Horticultural Society (AHS) produced a draft revised map, using temperature data collected from July 1986 to March 2002. The 2003 map placed many areas approximately a half-zone higher (warmer) than the USDA's 1990 map. Reviewers noted the map zones appeared to be closer to the original USDA 1960 map in its overall zone delineations. Their map purported to show finer detail, for example, reflecting urban heat islands by showing the downtown areas of several cities (e.g., Baltimore, Maryland; Washington, D.C., and Atlantic City, New Jersey) as a full zone warmer than outlying areas. The map excluded the detailed a/b half-zones introduced in the USDA's 1990 map, an omission widely criticized by horticulturists and gardeners due to the coarseness of the resulting map. The USDA rejected the AHS 2003 draft map and created its own map in an interactive computer format, which the American Horticultural Society now uses.[5]
In 2006, the Arbor Day Foundation released an update of U.S. hardiness zones, using mostly the same data as the AHS. It revised hardiness zones, reflecting generally warmer recent temperatures in many parts of the country, and appeared similar to the AHS 2003 draft. The Foundation also did away with the more detailed a/b half-zone delineations.[6]
In 2012 the USDA updated their plant hardiness map based on 1976–2005 weather data, using a longer period of data to smooth out year-to-year weather fluctuations.[7] Two new zones (12 and 13) were added to better define and improve information sharing on tropical and semitropical plants, they also appear on the maps of Hawaii and Puerto Rico. There is a very small spot east of San Juan, Puerto Rico, that includes the airport in coastal Carolina, where the mean minimum is 67 degrees F (19 C), which is classified as hardiness Zone 13b, the highest category, with temperatures rarely below 65 °F (18 °C). The map has a higher resolution than previous editions, and is able to show local variations due to factors such as elevation or large bodies of water. Many zone boundaries were changed as a result of the more recent data, as well as new mapping methods and additional information gathered. Many areas were a half-zone warmer than the previous 1990 map.[8] The 2012 map was created digitally for the internet, and includes a ZIP Code zone finder and an interactive map.[9][10]
In 2015, the Arbor Day Foundation revised another map, also with no a and b subdivisions, showing many areas having zones even warmer, with the most notable changes in the Mid Atlantic and Northeast, showing cities like Philadelphia, New York City and Washington D.C. in zone 8, due to their urban heat islands.[11]
In November 2023, the USDA released another updated version of their plant hardiness map, based on 1991–2020 weather data across the United States. The updated map shows continued northward movement of hardiness zones, reflecting a continued warming trend in the United States' climate.[12]
Selected U.S. cities
[edit]The USDA plant hardiness zones for selected U.S. cities as based on the 2023 map are the following:
Limitations
[edit]As the USDA system is based entirely on average annual extreme minimum temperature in an area, it is limited in its ability to describe the climatic conditions a gardener may have to account for in a particular area: there are many other factors that determine whether or not a given plant can survive in a given zone.
Zone information alone is often not adequate for predicting winter survival, since factors such as frost dates and frequency of snow cover can vary widely between regions. Even the extreme minimum itself may not be useful when comparing regions in widely different climate zones. As an extreme example, due to the Gulf Stream most of the United Kingdom is in zones 8–9, while in the US, zones 8–9 include regions such as the subtropical coastal areas of the southeastern US and Mojave and Chihuahuan inland deserts, thus an American gardener in such an area may only have to plan for several nights of cold temperatures per year, while their British counterpart may have to plan for several months.
In addition, the zones do not incorporate any information about duration of cold temperatures, summer temperatures, or sun intensity insolation; thus sites which may have the same mean winter minima on the few coldest nights and be in the same garden zone, but have markedly different climates. For example, zone 8 covers coastal, high latitude, cool summer locations like Seattle and London, as well as lower latitude, hot-summer climates like Charleston and Madrid. Farmers, gardeners, and landscapers in the former two must plan for entirely different growing conditions from those in the latter, in terms of length of hot weather and sun intensity. Coastal Ireland and central Florida are both Zone 10, but have radically different climates.
The hardiness scales do not take into account the reliability of snow cover in the colder zones. Snow acts as an insulator against extreme cold, protecting the root system of hibernating plants. If the snow cover is reliable, the actual temperature to which the roots are exposed will not be as low as the hardiness zone number would indicate. As an example, Quebec City in Canada is located in zone 4, but can rely on a significant snow cover every year, making it possible to cultivate plants normally rated for zones 5 or 6. But, in Montreal, located to the southwest in zone 5, it is sometimes difficult to cultivate plants adapted to the zone because of the unreliable snow cover.[citation needed]
Many plants may survive in a locality but will not flower if the day length is insufficient or if they require vernalization (a particular duration of low temperature).
There are many other climate parameters that a farmer, gardener, or landscaper may need to take into account as well, such as humidity, precipitation, storms, rainy-dry cycles or monsoons, and site considerations such as soil type, soil drainage and water retention, water table, tilt towards or away from the sun, natural or humanmade protection from excessive sun, snow, frost, and wind, etc. The annual extreme minimum temperature is a useful indicator, but ultimately only one factor among many for plant growth and survival.[9][3][16]
Alternatives
[edit]An alternative means of describing plant hardiness is to use "indicator plants". In this method, common plants with known limits to their range are used.[17]
Sunset publishes a series that breaks up climate zones more finely than the USDA zones, identifying 45 distinct zones in the US, incorporating ranges of temperatures in all seasons, precipitation, wind patterns, elevation, and length and structure of the growing season.[18]
In addition, the Köppen climate classification system can be used as a more general guide to growing conditions when considering large areas of the Earth's surface or attempting to make comparisons between different continents.[19] The Trewartha climate classification is often a good "real world" concept of climates and their relation to plants and their average growing conditions.[citation needed]
Australian hardiness zones
[edit]The Australian National Botanic Gardens have devised another system keeping with Australian conditions. The zones are defined by steps of 5 degrees Celsius, from −15–−10 °C for zone 1 to 15–20 °C for zone 7.[20] They are numerically about 6 lower than the USDA system. For example, Australian zone 3 is roughly equivalent to USDA zone 9. The higher Australian zone numbers had no US equivalents prior to the 2012 addition by USDA of zones 12 and 13.
The spread of weather stations may be insufficient and too many places with different climates are lumped together. Only 738 Australian stations have records of more than ten years (one station per 98,491 hectares or 243,380 acres), though more populated areas have relatively fewer hectares per station. Mount Isa has three climatic stations with more than a ten-year record. One is in zone 4a, one in zone 4b, and the other is in zone 5a. Sydney residents are split between zones 3a and 4b. Different locations in the same city are suitable for different plants.
Canadian hardiness zones
[edit]Climate variables that reflect the capacity and detriments to plant growth are used to develop an index that is mapped to Canada's Plant Hardiness Zones.[21] This index comes from a formula originally developed by Ouellet and Sherk in the mid-1960s.[22][23][24]
The formula used is: Y = -67.62 + 1.734X1 + 0.1868X2 + 69.77X3 + 1.256X4+ 0.006119X5 + 22.37X6 - 0.01832X7
where:
- Y = estimated index of suitability
- X1 = monthly mean of the daily minimum temperatures (°C) of the coldest month
- X2 = mean frost free period above 0 °C in days
- X3 = amount of rainfall (R) from June to November, inclusive, in terms of R/(R+a) where a=25.4 if R is in millimeters and a=1 if R is in inches
- X4 = monthly mean of the daily maximum temperatures (°C) of the warmest month
- X5 = winter factor expressed in terms of (0 °C – X1)Rjan where Rjan represents the rainfall in January expressed in mm
- X6 = mean maximum snow depth in terms of S/(S+a) where a=25.4 if S is in millimeters and a=1 if S is in inches
- X7 = maximum wind gust in (km/h) in 30 years.
| City | Canadian Zone[21] | USDA Zone[21] |
|---|---|---|
| Calgary | 4a | 4a |
| Edmonton | 4a | 3b |
| Halifax | 6b | 6a |
| Montreal | 6a | 4b |
| Ottawa | 5b | 4b |
| Saskatoon | 3b | 3a |
| St. John's | 6a | 7a |
| Toronto | 7a | 5b |
| Vancouver | 8b | 8b |
| Victoria | 9a | 9a |
| Winnipeg | 4a | 3b |
| Yellowknife | 0a | 2a |
For practical purposes, Canada has adopted the American hardiness zone classification system. The 1990 version of the USDA Plant Hardiness Zone Map included Canada and Mexico, but they were removed with the 2012 update to focus on the United States and Puerto Rico.[8] The Canadian government publishes both Canadian and USDA-style zone maps.[21]
European hardiness zones
[edit]Selected European cities
[edit]The table below provides USDA hardiness zone data for selected European cities:
Britain and Ireland
[edit]USDA zones do not work particularly well in Ireland and Great Britain as they are designed for continental climates and subtropical climates.[62] The high latitude, weaker solar intensity, and cooler summers must be considered when comparing to US equivalent. New growth may be insufficient or fail to harden off affecting winter survival in the shorter and much cooler summers of Ireland and Britain.[62]

Owing to the moderating effect of the North Atlantic Current on the Irish and British temperate maritime climate, Britain, and Ireland even more so, have milder winters than their northerly position would otherwise afford. This means that the USDA hardiness zones relevant to Britain and Ireland are quite high, from 7 to 10, as shown below.[63]
- In Scotland the Grampians, Northwest Highlands and locally in the Southern Uplands; in England the Pennines; and in Wales the highest part of Snowdonia.
- Most of England, Wales and Scotland, parts of central Ireland, and Snaefell on the Isle of Man.
- Most of western and southern England and Wales, western Scotland, also a very narrow coastal fringe on the east coast of Scotland and northeast England (within 5 km (3.1 mi) of the North Sea), London, the West Midlands Urban Area, most of Ireland, and most of the Isle of Man.
- Very low-lying coastal areas of the southwest of Ireland and the Isles of Scilly.
In 2012 the United Kingdom's Royal Horticultural Society introduced new hardiness ratings for plants, not places. These run from H7, the hardiest (tolerant of temperatures below −20 °C (−4 °F)) to H1a (needing temperatures above 15 °C (59 °F)).[64] The RHS hardiness ratings are based on absolute minimum winter temperatures (in °C) rather than the long-term average annual extreme minimum temperatures that define USDA zones.[64]
Scandinavia and Baltic Sea Region
[edit]Scandinavia lies at the same latitude as Alaska or Greenland, but the effect of the warm North Atlantic Current is even more pronounced here than it is in Britain and Ireland. Save for a very small spot around Karasjok Municipality, Norway, which is in zone 2, nowhere in the Arctic part of Scandinavia gets below zone 3. The Faroe Islands, at 62–63°N are in zone 8, as are the outer Lofoten Islands at 68°N. Tromsø, a coastal city in Norway at 70°N, is in zone 7, and even Longyearbyen, the northernmost true city in the world at 78°N, is still in zone 4. All these coastal locations have one thing in common, though, which are cool, damp summers, with temperatures rarely exceeding 20 °C (68 °F), or 15 °C (59 °F) in Longyearbyen. This shows the importance of taking heat zones into account for better understanding of what may or may not grow. Milder parts of western Norway are in zone 9, and Sarpsborg south of Oslo at 59°N with more continental summers are in zone 8. Inland it gets colder in winter, Hamar at 61°N is in zone 6 and Røros further north is zone 4.

In Sweden and Finland generally, at sea level to 500 metres (1,600 ft), zone 3 is north of the Arctic Circle, including cities like Karesuando and Pajala. Kiruna is the major exception here, which being located on a hill above frost traps, is in zone 5. Zone 4 lies between the Arctic Circle and about 64–66°N, with cities such as Oulu, Rovaniemi and Jokkmokk, zone 5 (south to 61–62°N) contains cities such as Tampere, Umeå, and Östersund. Zone 6 covers the south of mainland Finland, Sweden north of 60°N, and the high plateau of Småland further south. Here one will find cities such as Gävle, Örebro, Sundsvall, and Helsinki. Åland, as well as coastal southern Sweden, and the Stockholm area are in zone 7. The west coast of Sweden (Gothenburg and southwards) enjoys particularly mild winters and lies in zone 7, therefore being friendly to some hardy exotic species (found, for example, in the Gothenburg Botanical Garden), the southeast coast of Sweden has a colder winter due to the absence of the Gulf Stream.
Central Europe
[edit]
Central Europe is a good example of a transition from an oceanic climate to a continental climate, which reflects in the tendency of the hardiness zones to decrease mainly eastwards instead of northwards. Also, the plateaus and low mountain ranges in this region have a significant impact on how cold it might get during winter. Generally speaking, the hardiness zones are high considering the latitude of the region, although not as high as Northern Europe with the Shetland Islands where zone 9 extends to over 60°N.
In Central Europe, the relevant zones decrease from zone 8 on the Belgian, Dutch, and German North Sea coast, with the exception of some of the Frisian Islands (notably Vlieland and Terschelling), the island of Helgoland, and some of the islands in the Rhine-Scheldt estuary, which are in zone 9, to zone 5 around Suwałki, Podlachia on the far eastern border between Poland and Lithuania. Some isolated, high elevation areas of the Alps and Carpathians may even go down to zone 3 or 4.
An extreme example of a cold sink is Funtensee, Bavaria which is at least in zone 3. Another notable example is Waksmund, a small village in the Polish Carpathians, which regularly reaches −35 °C (−31 °F) during winter on calm nights when cold and heavy airmasses from the surrounding Gorce and Tatra Mountains descend down the slopes to this low-lying valley, creating extremes which can be up to 10 °C (18 °F) colder than nearby Nowy Targ or Białka Tatrzańska, which are both higher up in elevation. Waksmund is in zone 3b while nearby Kraków, only 80 km (50 mi) to the north and 300 m (980 ft) lower is in zone 6a. These examples prove that local topography can have a pronounced effect on temperature and thus on what is possible to grow in a specific region.[65]
Southern Europe
[edit]The southern European marker plant for climate as well as cultural indicator is the olive tree, which cannot withstand long periods below freezing so its cultivation area matches the cool winter zone. The Mediterranean Sea acts as a temperature regulator, so this area is generally warmer than other parts of the continent; except in mountainous areas where the sea effect lowers, it belongs in zones 8–10; however, southern Balkans (mountainous Western and Eastern Serbia, continental Croatia, and Bulgaria) are colder in winter and are in zones 6–7. The Balkan area is also more prone to cold snaps and episodes of unseasonable warmth. For instance, despite having similar daily means and temperature amplitudes to Nantucket, Massachusetts, for each month, Sarajevo has recorded below-freezing temperatures in every month of the year. [66][67]
The Croatian (Dalmatian) coast, Albania, and northern Greece are in zones 8–9, as are central-northern Italy (hills and some spots in Po Valley are however colder) and southern France; Central Iberia is 8–9 (some highland areas are slightly colder). The Spanish and Portuguese Atlantic coast, much of Andalusia and Murcia, coastal and slightly inland southern Valencian Community, a part of coastal Catalonia, the Balearic Islands, southwestern Sardinia, most of Sicily, coastal southern Italy, some areas around Albania,[68][69] coastal Cyprus and southwestern Greece are in zone 10.
In Europe, the zone 11a is limited only to a few spots. In the Iberian Peninsula, it can be found on the southern coast, in small Spanish areas inside the provinces of Almería, Cádiz, Granada, Málaga and Murcia.[53] In Portugal, zone 11a can be found in the Southwest on a few unpopulated sites around the municipalities of Lagos and Vila do Bispo.[70] In mainland Greece, zone 11a can be found in Monemvasia and also in areas of Crete, the Dodecanese, Cyclades and some Argo-Saronic Gulf islands.[71][72] The Mediterranean islands of Malta, Lampedusa and Linosa belong to zone 11a as well as a few areas on the southernmost coast of Cyprus.[citation needed]
Macaronesia
[edit]Macaronesia consists of four archipelagos: The Azores, the Canary Islands, Cape Verde and Madeira. At lower altitudes and coastal areas, the Portuguese Azores and Madeira belong to zones 10b/11b and 11a/11b respectively. The Azores range from 9a to 11b and Madeira ranges from 9b to 12a, 9a and 9b found inland on the highest altitudes such as Mount Pico in the Azores or Pico Ruivo in Madeira.[73] The Spanish Canary Islands hardiness zones range from 8a to 12b depending on the location and the altitude. The islands are generally part of zones 11b/12a in lower altitudes and coastal areas, reaching up to 12b in the southernmost coasts or populated coastal parts such as the city of Las Palmas. The lowest hardiness areas are found in Teide National Park being at 8a/8b for its very high altitude. Teide peak is the highest peak of Macaronesia.[53]
The Cape Verde islands, located much further south inside the tropics, have hardiness zones that range from 12 to 13 in the coastal areas, while the lowest hardiness zone is found in the island of Fogo, in the country's highest peak Pico do Fogo.[citation needed]
American Horticultural Society heat zones
[edit]In addition to the USDA Hardiness zones there are American Horticultural Society (AHS) heat zones.
The criterion is the average number of days per year when the temperature exceeds 30 °C (86 °F). The AHS Heat Zone Map for the US is available on the American Horticultural Society website.[74][75]
| Zone | From | To |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | < 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | 7 |
| 3 | 8 | 14 |
| 4 | 15 | 30 |
| 5 | 31 | 45 |
| 6 | 46 | 60 |
| 7 | 61 | 90 |
| 8 | 91 | 120 |
| 9 | 121 | 150 |
| 10 | 151 | 180 |
| 11 | 181 | 210 |
| 12 | >210 | |
South Africa
[edit]South Africa has five horticultural or climatic zones. The zones are defined by minimum temperature.[76]
Effects of climate change
[edit]The USDA map published in 2012 shows that most of the US has become a half zone (2.8 °C or 5 °F) hotter in winter compared to the 1990 release.[8] Again, with the publication of the 2023 map, about half of the US has shifted a half zone warmer.[77] Research in 2016 suggests that USDA plant hardiness zones will shift even further northward under climate change.[78]
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ Fernald, M. L. (1927). Rehder, Alfred (ed.). "Rehder's Manual of Cultivated Trees and Shrubs". Rhodora. 29 (339): 48–51. JSTOR 23298457.
- ^ Wyman, Donald (1938). Hedges, Screens & Windbreaks: Their Uses, Selection and Care. McGraw-Hill. Archived from the original on 2023-01-15. Retrieved 2020-05-21.
- ^ a b "History of Plant Hardiness Zone Maps – The Rest of the Story". Plant Delights Nursery. Archived from the original on 2018-08-04. Retrieved 2018-06-03.
- ^ Del Tredici, Peter (1990). "The New USDA Plant Hardiness Zone Map" (PDF). Arnoldia. 50 (3): 16–20. doi:10.5962/p.250731. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2017-05-05. Retrieved 2018-06-03 – via Harvard University.
- ^ "USDA Hardiness Zone Map". American Horticultural Society. Archived from the original on 8 December 2017. Retrieved 8 December 2017.
- ^ "New arborday.org Hardiness Zone Map reflects warmer climate: Latest hardiness zones, based on most current temperature data available, suggest up-to-date choices for best trees to plant". Archived from the original on 2007-12-28. Retrieved 2007-12-27.
- ^ "USDA Plant Hardiness Zone Map, 2012". Agricultural Research Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Archived from the original on 24 October 2017. Retrieved 7 December 2017.
- ^ a b c "What's New | USDA Plant Hardiness Zone Map". Agricultural Research Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Archived from the original on 19 October 2017. Retrieved 7 December 2017.
- ^ a b "About | USDA Plant Hardiness Zone Map". planthardiness.ars.usda.gov. Archived from the original on 2022-07-09. Retrieved 2021-12-22.
- ^ "History of USDA Hardiness Zones". alugy.com. 22 December 2021. Archived from the original on 2021-12-22. Retrieved 2021-12-22.
- ^ "Hardiness Zone Map at arborday.org". arborday.org. Archived from the original on 2016-06-23. Retrieved 2021-11-03.
- ^ "USDA Unveils Updated Plant Hardiness Zone Map". U.S. Department of Agriculture. Retrieved 18 November 2023.
- ^ "2023 USDA plant hardiness zone map". U.S. Department of Agriculture. Retrieved 2023-11-18.
- ^ The coldest city over 10,000 people in the United States.
- ^ Small portions of the city of Los Angeles extend into zones 9b and 11a.
- ^ McKenney, Daniel W.; Pedlar, John H.; Lawrence, Kevin; Campbell, Kathy; Hutchinson, Michael F. (2007-12-01). "Beyond Traditional Hardiness Zones: Using Climate Envelopes to Map Plant Range Limits". BioScience. 57 (11): 929–937. doi:10.1641/B571105. hdl:1885/33387. ISSN 1525-3244.
- ^ Cannon, Helen L. (1957). "Description of Indicator Plants and Methods of Botanical Prospecting for Uranium Deposits on the Colorado Plateau" (PDF). Geological Survey Bulletin. United States Geological Survery. Retrieved 18 February 2025.
- ^ Sunset National Garden Book. Sunset Books Inc. Menlo Park, California (1997)
- ^ Köppen, Wladimir. "Die Wärmezonen der Erde, nach der Dauer der heissen, gemässigten und kalten Zeit und nach der Wirkung der Wärme auf die organische Welt betrachtet [The thermal zones of the Earth according to the duration of hot, moderate and cold periods and of the impact of heat on the organic world]" (PDF). World Maps of Köppen-Geiger Climate Classification. Translated by Volken, E.; Brönninmann, S. Meteorologische Zeitschrift, Vol. 20, No. 3, 351-360. Archived (PDF) from the original on 14 February 2019. Retrieved 24 September 2019.
- ^ Dawson, I. (1991). "Plant Hardiness Zones for Australia". Archived from the original on 2010-12-10. Retrieved 2010-11-11.
- ^ a b c d "Natural Resources Canada – Plant Hardiness of Canada". Natural Resources Canada – Plant Hardiness of Canada. Government of Canada. Archived from the original on 29 June 2006. Retrieved 7 April 2018.
- ^ Ouellet, C. E.; Sherk, L. C. (1967). "Woody Ornamental Plant Zonation: I. Indices of Winterhardiness". Canadian Journal of Plant Science. 47 (3): 231–238. doi:10.4141/cjps67-044. ISSN 0008-4220. pdf Archived 2020-08-01 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ Ouellet, C. E.; Sherk, L. C. (1967). "Woody Ornamental Plant Zonation: Ii. Suitability Indices of Localities". Canadian Journal of Plant Science. 47 (4): 339–349. doi:10.4141/cjps67-064. ISSN 0008-4220. pdf Archived 2020-08-01 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ Ouellet, C. E.; Sherk, L. C. (1967). "Woody Ornamental Plant Zonation: III. Suitability Map for the Probable Winter Survival of Ornamental Trees and Shrubs". Canadian Journal of Plant Science. 47 (4): 351–358. doi:10.4141/cjps67-065. ISSN 0008-4220. pdf Archived 2020-08-01 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ "Netherlands Interactive Plant Hardiness Zone Map". plantmaps.com. Archived from the original on 2021-05-28. Retrieved 2021-05-31.
- ^ a b c d "Spain Interactive Plant Hardiness Zone Map". plantmaps.com. Archived from the original on 2021-06-03. Retrieved 2021-05-30.
- ^ "Serbia Interactive Plant Hardiness Zone Map". plantmaps.com. Archived from the original on 2021-06-02. Retrieved 2021-05-30.
- ^ "Slovakia Interactive Plant Hardiness Zone Map". plantmaps.com. Archived from the original on 2021-06-02. Retrieved 2021-05-30.
- ^ "Romania Interactive Plant Hardiness Zone Map". plantmaps.com. Archived from the original on 2021-06-03. Retrieved 2021-05-30.
- ^ a b c d "Italy Interactive Plant Hardiness Zone Map". plantmaps.com. Archived from the original on 2021-06-02. Retrieved 2021-05-30.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k "Plant Cold Hardiness Zone Map of the British Isles". trebrown.com. Archived from the original on 2021-05-20. Retrieved 2021-05-30.
- ^ a b "Finland Interactive Plant Hardiness Zone Map". plantmaps.com. Archived from the original on 2021-06-02. Retrieved 2021-05-30.
- ^ a b c d e f g "Russia Interactive Plant Hardiness Zone Map". plantmaps.com. Archived from the original on 2021-06-02. Retrieved 2021-05-30.
- ^ a b c d e "Poland Interactive Plant Hardiness Zone Map". plantmaps.com. Archived from the original on 2021-06-02. Retrieved 2021-05-30.
- ^ a b c "Portugal Interactive Plant Hardiness Zone Map". plantmaps.com. Archived from the original on 2021-06-02. Retrieved 2021-05-30.
- ^ "Slovenia Interactive Plant Hardiness Zone Map". plantmaps.com. Archived from the original on 2021-06-02. Retrieved 2021-05-30.
- ^ a b c "France Interactive Plant Hardiness Zone Map". plantmaps.com. Archived from the original on 2021-06-02. Retrieved 2021-05-30.
- ^ "Czech Republic Interactive Plant Hardiness Zone Map". plantmaps.com. Archived from the original on 2021-06-02. Retrieved 2021-05-30.
- ^ "Latvia Interactive Plant Hardiness Zone Map". plantmaps.com. Archived from the original on 2021-06-02. Retrieved 2021-05-30.
- ^ "Bosnia and Herzegovina Interactive Plant Hardiness Zone Map". plantmaps.com. Archived from the original on 2021-06-02. Retrieved 2021-05-30.
- ^ a b "Page 3: USDA ARS". ars.usda.gov. Archived from the original on 2021-06-02. Retrieved 2021-05-30.
- ^ a b c "Sweden Interactive Plant Hardiness Zone Map". plantmaps.com. Archived from the original on 2021-06-02. Retrieved 2021-05-30.
- ^ "Estonia Interactive Plant Hardiness Zone Map". plantmaps.com. Archived from the original on 2021-06-02. Retrieved 2021-05-30.
- ^ a b c "Norway Interactive Plant Hardiness Zone Map". plantmaps.com. Archived from the original on 2021-06-03. Retrieved 2021-05-30.
- ^ "Austria Interactive Plant Hardiness Zone Map". plantmaps.com. Archived from the original on 2021-06-02. Retrieved 2021-05-30.
- ^ "Switzerland Interactive Plant Hardiness Zone Map". plantmaps.com. Archived from the original on 2021-06-02. Retrieved 2021-05-30.
- ^ "Belgium Interactive Plant Hardiness Zone Map". plantmaps.com. Archived from the original on 2021-06-03. Retrieved 2021-05-30.
- ^ a b c "Wetter und Klima - Deutscher Wetterdienst - Climate Atlas". dwd.de. Archived from the original on 2021-06-02. Retrieved 2021-05-30.
- ^ "Denmark Interactive Plant Hardiness Zone Map". plantmaps.com. Archived from the original on 2021-06-03. Retrieved 2021-05-30.
- ^ "Germany Interactive Plant Hardiness Zone Map". plantmaps.com. Retrieved 2024-12-28.
- ^ "Bitki Soğuğa ve Sıcağa Dayanıklılık". mgm.gov.tr. Archived from the original on 2021-08-12. Retrieved 2021-05-30.
- ^ Some inland regions of Istanbul are in zone 8a. Meanwhile, a small strip of land in the far-south of the city, as well as the neighboring Princes' Islands, are in zone 9b.
- ^ a b c "LAS PLANTAS ORNAMENTALES Y SUS ZONAS DE RUSTICIDAD EN ESPAÑA" (PDF). José Manuel Sanchez de Lorenzo-Cáceres, Agricultural Engineer. 2004. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2021-01-15. Retrieved 2021-01-13.
- ^ "Belarus Interactive Plant Hardiness Zone Map". plantmaps.com. Archived from the original on 2021-06-02. Retrieved 2021-05-30.
- ^ "Cyprus Interactive Plant Hardiness Zone Map". plantmaps.com. Archived from the original on 2021-06-02. Retrieved 2021-05-30.
- ^ "Iceland Interactive Plant Hardiness Zone Map". plantmaps.com. Archived from the original on 2021-05-06. Retrieved 2021-05-30.
- ^ "Bulgaria Interactive Plant Hardiness Zone Map". plantmaps.com. Archived from the original on 2021-06-02. Retrieved 2021-05-30.
- ^ "Greek Plant Hardiness Zones". hardiness.inforest.gr. Archived from the original on 2021-06-02. Retrieved 2021-05-30.
- ^ "Malta Interactive Plant Hardiness Zone Map". plantmaps.com. Archived from the original on 2021-06-02. Retrieved 2021-05-30.
- ^ meteo.lt / Atšiaurumo zonos Lietuvoje Archived 2022-09-04 at the Wayback Machine | Lietuvos hidrometeorologijos tarnyba | 2022-05-09
- ^ "Croatia Interactive Plant Hardiness Zone Map". plantmaps.com. Archived from the original on 2021-06-03. Retrieved 2021-05-30.
- ^ a b Martin Crawford (2010). Creating a forest garden: working with nature to grow edible crops. Green Books. p. 13. ISBN 978-1-900322-62-1. Archived from the original on 2023-01-15. Retrieved 2018-09-09.
- ^ "United Kingdom Plant Hardiness Zone Map". plantmaps.com. Archived from the original on 2021-05-06. Retrieved 2021-01-07.
- ^ a b "RHS hardiness rating". Royal Horticultural Society. Archived from the original on 25 September 2016. Retrieved 24 September 2016.
- ^ "Plant hardiness Zones". HobbySeeds. Archived from the original on 2022-12-05. Retrieved 2022-12-05.
- ^ "MA Nantucket MEM AP". National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Archived from the original on 2020-07-12. Retrieved February 19, 2015.
- ^ "Weather and Climate: The Climate of Sarajevo" (in Russian). Weather and Climate (Погода и климат). Archived from the original on 16 May 2012. Retrieved 25 August 2016.
- ^ Teqja, Zydi (Mar 2017). "Map of Albanian plant hardiness zones based on the WorldClim data for the 1950-2000 period". Archived from the original on 27 October 2022. Retrieved 16 February 2021 – via ResearchGate.
- ^ Teqja, Zydi; Libohova, Zamir; Kopali, Albert; Naçi, Robert (December 2014). "Climatic hardiness and heat zones of Albania and their use in evaluating the potential of introducing new plant species". Archived from the original on Nov 19, 2023. Retrieved 16 February 2021 – via ResearchGate.
- ^ "Hardiness zones of Portugal" (PDF). Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Lisboa. pp. 60–62. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2021-02-02. Retrieved 2020-09-19.
- ^ "Home". hardiness.inforest.gr. Archived from the original on 2021-06-02. Retrieved 2021-05-30.
- ^ "Meteo.gr - Προγνώσεις καιρού για όλη την Ελλάδα" (in Greek).
- ^ "Portugal Interactive Plant Hardiness Zone Map". plantmaps.com. Archived from the original on 2 June 2021. Retrieved 23 June 2021.
- ^ "Heat Zone Map developed". American Horticultural Society. 14 January 2022. Retrieved 2023-08-24.
- ^ "AHS Plant Heat Zone Map". American Horticultural Society. Archived from the original on 2017-05-16. Retrieved 2017-05-26.
- ^ PlantZAfrica 2016, Horticultural Zones
- ^ "USDA Unveils Updated Plant Hardiness Zone Map: USDA ARS". ars.usda.gov. Retrieved 2023-11-29.
- ^ Parker, Lauren E.; Abatzoglou, John T. (2016). "Projected changes in cold hardiness zones and suitable overwinter ranges of perennial crops over the United States". Environmental Research Letters. 11 (3) 034001. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/11/3/034001. ISSN 1748-9326.
Bibliography
[edit]- "PlantZAfrica". SANBI. Archived from the original on 10 December 2016. Retrieved 14 November 2016.
External links
[edit]- 2023 USDA Plant Hardiness Zone Map (with ZIP code lookup, interactive)
- Freeze/Frost data from NOAA
- Data on plant hardiness in Ireland
- Plant Hardiness Data (Canada)
- Plant Hardiness Zones of Canada – Interactive Map Archived 2009-06-14 at the Wayback Machine
Hardiness zone
View on GrokipediaFundamental Concepts
Definition and Purpose
A plant hardiness zone delineates geographic regions according to their average annual extreme minimum winter temperature, serving as a key metric for evaluating the cold tolerance required for plant survival.[2] These zones categorize areas into bands typically spanning 10°F (-12.2°C), with finer subdivisions of 5°F (-8.3°C), derived from long-term meteorological data such as 30-year averages of the coldest recorded winter temperatures.[2] The concept focuses on the physiological limits of perennial plants, trees, and shrubs, where the zone's minimum temperature threshold indicates whether a species can endure without lethal frost damage to roots, stems, or buds.[3] The primary purpose of hardiness zones is to guide horticultural and agricultural decision-making by matching plant selections to local climatic rigors, thereby minimizing cultivation failures and optimizing resource use in gardening, landscaping, and farming.[2] Developed initially for practical application in the United States, the system—most notably the USDA Plant Hardiness Zone Map—enables growers to predict perennial plant viability based on empirical temperature extremes, though it emphasizes that zones represent averages and do not fully capture variables like microclimates, soil drainage, wind exposure, or summer conditions.[3][4] By standardizing cold hardiness assessments, zones facilitate evidence-based planting recommendations, with the USDA's framework updated periodically using expanded weather station data to reflect observed climatic shifts, such as warmer minima in recent decades.[2]Temperature Ranges and Zone Designations
 Plant hardiness zones are delineated based on the average annual extreme minimum winter temperature, serving as a primary indicator of a location's capacity to support perennial plant survival. In the predominant USDA system, zones are designated from 1 to 13, where each full zone encompasses a 10°F range of these minimum temperatures, further subdivided into "a" (colder) and "b" (warmer) subzones differing by 5°F. This designation enables gardeners and horticulturists to select plants suited to local cold tolerance requirements.[5][6] The specific temperature ranges for USDA zones are as follows:| Zone | Temperature Range (°F) |
|---|---|
| 1 | Below −50 |
| 2a | −50 to −45 |
| 2b | −45 to −40 |
| 3a | −40 to −35 |
| 3b | −35 to −30 |
| 4a | −30 to −25 |
| 4b | −25 to −20 |
| 5a | −20 to −15 |
| 5b | −15 to −10 |
| 6a | −10 to −5 |
| 6b | −5 to 0 |
| 7a | 0 to 5 |
| 7b | 5 to 10 |
| 8a | 10 to 15 |
| 8b | 15 to 20 |
| 9a | 20 to 25 |
| 9b | 25 to 30 |
| 10a | 30 to 35 |
| 10b | 35 to 40 |
| 11a | 40 to 45 |
| 11b | 45 to 50 |
| 12a | 50 to 55 |
| 12b | 55 to 60 |
| 13 | Above 60 |
Interrelation with Plant Physiology
Plant cold hardiness, the physiological capacity to endure subzero temperatures without lethal cellular damage, underpins the temperature thresholds defining hardiness zones. This tolerance primarily arises from adaptations preventing intracellular ice formation, such as extracellular freezing where ice nucleates in apoplasts, leading to cellular dehydration and solute concentration that lowers freezing points. Supercooling, wherein protoplasts remain unfrozen below -40°C in some species, further enhances survival by delaying nucleation, though it risks rapid ice propagation if breached. These mechanisms are genetically determined and vary by species, with woody perennials often exhibiting greater hardiness than herbaceous plants due to structural lignification and bark insulation.[11][12] Cold acclimation, induced by prolonged exposure to non-freezing low temperatures (typically 0–10°C) coupled with shortening photoperiods, reprograms metabolism to bolster these defenses. Key physiological shifts include accumulation of compatible solutes like sugars and proline for osmotic adjustment, synthesis of antifreeze and dehydrin proteins that stabilize membranes and prevent protein denaturation, and remodeling of membrane lipids to maintain fluidity. For instance, starch hydrolysis to glucose in woody tissues can depress tissue freezing points by up to 10–15°C, enabling survival in zones with minima of -30°C or lower. Deacclimation reverses these changes upon warming, rendering plants vulnerable if freezes follow mild spells, a risk amplified in marginal zones.[13][14][15] Dormancy stages profoundly modulate hardiness; endodormancy confers maximal tolerance, while ecodormancy allows partial acclimation, linking zone suitability to seasonal timing. Root systems, often less hardy than shoots (tolerating 5–10°C warmer minima), impose additional constraints, as soil insulation varies but generally lags aerial acclimation. Empirical tests, such as artificial freeze assays on acclimated tissues, quantify these limits, informing zone ratings: a plant hardy to zone 5 (minima -29 to -23°C) withstands such stress via integrated physiological responses, whereas non-acclimated tissues fail at higher thresholds. Latitudinal origins correlate with evolved hardiness, with boreal species exhibiting superior solute mobilization and gene regulation, such as CBF transcription factors activating downstream cold-responsive genes.[16][17] Thus, hardiness zones serve as proxies for matching locations to plants' physiological tolerances, though microclimatic factors like snow cover (insulating roots) or wind (enhancing desiccation stress) can modulate outcomes beyond zone predictions. Over-reliance on zones without considering acclimation status or physiological variability risks misattribution of failure to temperature alone, as evidenced by differential survival in controlled vs. field trials.[18][19]Historical Development
Origins in Horticultural Mapping
The systematic mapping of geographic regions for plant hardiness originated from the practical needs of horticulturists in the early 20th century, who sought to predict the survival of cultivated species amid expanding ornamental and arboreal plantings across North America. Prior to formalized zones, gardeners and botanists relied on anecdotal observations and local trials to assess cold tolerance, but the growing scale of nursery operations and landscape design demanded a more empirical framework tied to measurable climatic variables, particularly average annual minimum winter temperatures. This led to the first comprehensive hardiness zone map in 1927, developed by Alfred Rehder, a German-American dendrologist at Harvard University's Arnold Arboretum. Rehder's map, published as an appendix to his Manual of Cultivated Trees and Shrubs Hardy in North America, divided the United States and parts of Canada into eight broad zones based on interpolated weather station data and surveys of woody plant survivability in botanical collections and private gardens.[20][21] Rehder's methodology emphasized first-hand data from over 1,000 cultivated species, correlating observed winterkill patterns with recorded minima to delineate latitudinal bands where plants could reliably persist without protection. Zones were defined in roughly 10°F increments, starting from the warmest (Zone I, minima above 5°F/-15°C) to the coldest (Zone VIII, minima below -35°F/-37°C), though boundaries were approximate due to limited station density and variability in microclimates. This approach marked a shift from qualitative descriptions in earlier horticultural texts to quantitative spatial mapping, enabling nursery catalogs and landscape architects to recommend species by region rather than vague suitability claims. Rehder acknowledged influences from 19th-century biogeographers like Alexander von Humboldt, whose isotherms and altitudinal vegetation profiles had established causal links between temperature gradients and plant distributions, but adapted them for horticultural utility by focusing on cultivated exotics' limits in temperate climates.[20][22] These early maps highlighted the limitations of temperature alone, as Rehder noted factors like soil drainage and wind exposure affected outcomes, yet they laid the groundwork for subsequent refinements by underscoring the value of aggregated empirical data over isolated trials. By standardizing survivability predictions, Rehder's work facilitated interstate plant trade and reduced economic losses from mismatched introductions, influencing arboreta and extension services to adopt zonal thinking in propagation advice. Subsequent iterations at the Arnold Arboretum, including revisions by Donald Wyman in the 1930s, built directly on this foundation, incorporating denser weather networks to refine boundaries while preserving the core principle of minimum temperature as the primary delimiter for cold-hardy horticulture.[21][20]Evolution of the USDA System
The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) first published its Plant Hardiness Zone Map in 1960, establishing a standardized system to classify regions based on average annual extreme minimum winter temperatures recorded at approximately 450 weather stations across the country.[21] This inaugural map divided the contiguous United States into 10 zones, each spanning a 10°F range (e.g., Zone 5: -20°F to -10°F), providing horticulturists with a tool to predict plant survival primarily driven by cold tolerance rather than other factors like soil or summer heat.[23] The methodology relied on historical data without advanced interpolation, resulting in broader, less granular zone boundaries compared to later iterations.[24] The system underwent its first major revision in 1990, led by Henry M. Cathey of the USDA, which incorporated temperature averages from 1974–1986 across thousands of stations to refine zone delineations and address limitations in the original map's data coverage.[24] This update introduced half-zone subdivisions (e.g., 5a and 5b) differentiated by 5°F intervals, enhancing precision for microclimatic variations, particularly in diverse terrains.[25] While the core 10°F zone structure persisted, the revised map reflected slight warming trends in some areas but maintained coarser resolution due to manual averaging techniques.[24] A significant advancement occurred in 2012, when the USDA collaborated with Oregon State University's PRISM Climate Group to produce a higher-resolution map using 30-year averages (1976–2005) from 7,983 stations, including remote automated weather systems like SNOTEL and RAWS.[24] Employing climatologically aided interpolation that accounted for elevation, coastal proximity, and terrain effects, the map achieved an 800-meter grid resolution for the conterminous U.S., revealing finer spatial details such as mountainous microzones previously smoothed over.[24] This iteration documented a general half-zone shift to warmer designations in many regions, attributable to the updated baseline period's higher minimum temperatures.[24] The 2023 update, released by the USDA Agricultural Research Service, built on these foundations by analyzing 1991–2020 data to capture more recent climatic shifts, maintaining the 10°F zones and 5°F half-zones while leveraging vastly expanded station networks for unprecedented detail.[26] The map's interactive, GIS-based format allows zip-code queries and visualizes an average 2.5°F increase in minimum temperatures since the 2012 version, with about half the U.S. shifting to warmer zones—effects most pronounced in the Northeast, Midwest, and West due to reduced cold extremes.[26][27] Methodological refinements emphasized empirical extremes over modeled projections, prioritizing observed data for causal accuracy in plant selection.[26]International Adaptations and Divergences
The Canadian plant hardiness zone system, developed by Agriculture Canada in the early 1960s, adapted the core concept of temperature-based zoning from U.S. horticultural mapping but diverged significantly in methodology by employing a multivariate index. This index integrated seven climatic variables, including extreme minimum temperatures, frost-free period length, and precipitation accumulation during winter and growing seasons, derived from field observations of over 170 woody plant species' survival rates across experimental stations.[28] Unlike the USDA's exclusive reliance on average annual extreme minimum temperatures, the Canadian approach accounted for precipitation's role in modulating cold damage through snow cover insulation and spring thaw risks, reflecting Canada's harsher continental winters and variable moisture regimes.[29] Initial zones ranged from 0 (coldest, below -45.6°C) to 9 (mildest, above -6.7°C), with subdivisions, and the system was first mapped using 1931–1960 data, emphasizing empirical plant performance over pure isotherm mapping.[30] In Europe, adaptations emerged later, with a pivotal 1984 map by botanists Walter Heinze and Dietrich Schreiber providing one of the earliest continent-wide frameworks for woody plant hardiness. This system delineated zones primarily based on long-term mean annual minimum temperatures, akin to the USDA model, but calibrated to European weather station data and adjusted for regional variations in continentality, elevation, and maritime influences.[31] Zones spanned from H1 (below -45°C) to H8 (above -7°C), numerically offset by approximately 6 units lower than equivalent USDA designations due to differing baseline calibrations and inclusion of subzone modifiers for factors like wind exposure and soil drainage.[24] The map, published in the Mitteilungen der Deutschen Dendrologischen Gesellschaft, drew on historical climatological records from over 1,000 stations, prioritizing dendrological evidence from arboreta to validate isotherms against observed plant dieback during events like the 1956 and 1963 cold waves.[32] Australian adaptations, developing in the late 20th century amid expanding commercial horticulture, diverged more pronouncedly from the USDA template to accommodate the continent's arid interiors, monsoonal north, and Mediterranean south, where minimum temperatures alone fail to predict survival amid erratic rainfall and heat stress. Early efforts, such as those by the Australian National Botanic Gardens in the 1980s–1990s, overlaid USDA equivalents onto local climate data but introduced subzones for summer aridity and wet-season flooding, effectively creating hybrid maps with 7–10 zones spanning USDA 7b to 11+.[33] These systems incorporated empirical trials from regional trials, revealing that USDA zones underestimated risks from dry winters desiccating roots or humid summers fostering fungal pathogens, prompting divergences like rainfall-based modifiers absent in the original U.S. framework.[34] Broader international divergences stem from recognition that the USDA's univariate focus on winter minima overlooks causal factors like prolonged frost duration, summer humidity, and microsite variations, leading to over-optimistic predictions in non-temperate zones. For instance, while USDA updates refined resolution with denser station data (e.g., 13,412 sites by 2012), international variants often prioritize integrated indices; Canadian and select European models validate against multi-decadal plant trial outcomes rather than solely meteorological proxies.[35] Such adaptations, grounded in local agronomic data, highlight systemic limitations of exporting a U.S.-centric model without causal adjustments for divergent physiographic drivers of plant stress.[30]USDA Plant Hardiness Zone System
Methodology and Data Sources
The USDA Plant Hardiness Zone Map delineates zones primarily according to the average annual extreme minimum winter temperature, calculated as the mean of the lowest temperature recorded each year over a 30-year climatological period. For the 2023 edition, this encompasses data from 1991 to 2020, with zones defined in 10°F increments (e.g., Zone 5 spans -20°F to -10°F) and subdivided into 5°F half-zones (e.g., 5a and 5b).[36][26] This metric serves as a proxy for the coldest winter conditions likely to affect plant survival, though it excludes variables such as summer heat, humidity, soil conditions, or microclimates.[36] Data for the map derive from 13,625 weather stations across the United States, including contributions from the National Weather Service and state networks in the eastern U.S., Puerto Rico, and Hawaii; USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, Forest Service, and Department of the Interior stations in the western U.S. and Alaska; Environment Canada; Mexico's National Weather Service; and the Global Historical Climatology Network.[36] Supplementary reanalysis datasets, such as the NCEP North American Regional Reanalysis for Alaska and NCAR/NCEP Reanalysis 1 for the conterminous U.S., fill gaps in observational coverage. All raw data undergo quality control to exclude anomalies before aggregation into annual extremes and subsequent averaging.[36] Spatial interpolation employs the Parameter-elevation Regressions on Independent Slopes Model (PRISM) developed by Oregon State University, which generates gridded estimates at approximately 0.5-mile resolution by incorporating topographic predictors like elevation, proximity to water bodies, coastal influences, temperature inversions, and terrain complexity.[36][37] The resulting GIS-based map was validated by climatologists, agricultural meteorologists, and horticultural experts to ensure fidelity to observed patterns, representing an advancement over the 2012 version through doubled station density (from about 7,983) and refined resolution, particularly in Alaska.[26][36]The 2023 Update and Recent Refinements
The United States Department of Agriculture released the updated Plant Hardiness Zone Map on November 15, 2023, marking the first revision since 2012.[26] This iteration, developed in collaboration with the PRISM Climate Group at Oregon State University, incorporates 30-year averages (1991–2020) of the annual extreme minimum winter temperatures, shifting the baseline from the 1976–2005 period used previously.[26] [36] Key methodological refinements include data from 13,412 weather stations—more than double the 7,983 stations in the 2012 map—enhancing spatial resolution to approximately 0.5-mile grid cells via PRISM's interpolation algorithms.[26] [36] These algorithms account for topographic factors such as elevation, coastal proximity, and landform variations (e.g., ridges, slopes, valleys), supplemented by high-elevation reanalysis data from sources like the National Centers for Environmental Prediction.[36] The resulting interactive GIS-based map offers finer detail, particularly in regions like Alaska's uplands, where resolution improved from 6.25 square miles to 0.25 square miles.[26] Zone designations reflect these updates, with approximately half of the contiguous United States reclassified into warmer half-zones, corresponding to an average 2.5°F increase in extreme minimum temperatures compared to the prior map.[26] Two new zones were introduced—Zone 12 (above 50°F) and Zone 13 (above 60°F)—primarily applicable to southern areas like Hawaii and Puerto Rico.[36] While the core focus remains on winter minima, the enhanced dataset improves predictive accuracy for perennial plant survival without altering the fundamental 10°F zone and 5°F half-zone structure.[36] The USDA website now includes a "Tips for Growers" section to aid practical application.[26]Zone Descriptions and Selected Examples
The USDA Plant Hardiness Zones classify geographic areas according to their average annual extreme minimum winter temperatures, measured over a 30-year period from 1991 to 2020 in the 2023 update. Each principal zone covers a 10°F range, further divided into 'a' and 'b' subzones of 5°F each, enabling finer distinctions in plant suitability. These designations primarily inform the selection of perennial plants capable of withstanding the local winter lows without significant damage, though factors like soil drainage, wind exposure, and summer conditions also influence survival.[1][26] The following table summarizes the temperature ranges for the zones:| Zone | Temperature Range (°F) |
|---|---|
| 1a | -60 to -55 |
| 1b | -55 to -50 |
| 2a | -50 to -45 |
| 2b | -45 to -40 |
| 3a | -40 to -35 |
| 3b | -35 to -30 |
| 4a | -30 to -25 |
| 4b | -25 to -20 |
| 5a | -20 to -15 |
| 5b | -15 to -10 |
| 6a | -10 to -5 |
| 6b | -5 to 0 |
| 7a | 0 to 5 |
| 7b | 5 to 10 |
| 8a | 10 to 15 |
| 8b | 15 to 20 |
| 9a | 20 to 25 |
| 9b | 25 to 30 |
| 10a | 30 to 35 |
| 10b | 35 to 40 |
| 11a | 40 to 45 |
| 11b | 45 to 50 |
| 12a | 50 to 55 |
| 12b | 55 to 60 |
| 13a | 60 to 65 |
| 13b | 65 and above |
Practical Applications and Tools
The USDA Plant Hardiness Zone system aids gardeners, landscapers, and agricultural professionals in selecting perennial plants, trees, shrubs, and certain crops capable of surviving local average annual extreme minimum winter temperatures.[1] Users match plant hardiness ratings—typically provided by nurseries or seed catalogs—to their designated zone, often opting for plants rated one zone hardier to buffer against atypical cold snaps or microclimate variations.[40] In practical horticulture, this guides landscape design, orchard establishment, and perennial border planning, reducing replacement costs from winter kill; for instance, zone 6 gardeners avoid tender zone 8 perennials like certain citrus varieties unless protected.[35] Farmers apply zones to assess viability of fruit trees and woody ornamentals, integrating them with site-specific factors like elevation and soil drainage for decisions on varieties such as apples (e.g., selecting cold-hardy 'Honeycrisp' for zones 3-8).[10] The system's emphasis on 30-year climatic averages supports long-term planning, though users must cross-reference with local frost dates and first/last freeze calculators from cooperative extension services to refine planting timelines.[41] Key tools include the USDA's interactive online map, launched with the 2023 update, where users input a ZIP code or geolocation to instantly retrieve zone data, enabling rapid plant compatibility checks.[5] Downloadable high-resolution maps and GIS layers from the same platform allow offline use or integration into farm management software for broader applications like regional crop zoning.[42] Complementary resources, such as university extension zone finders, provide embedded advice on adjustments for urban heat islands or sheltered gardens, enhancing accuracy beyond broad zonal averages.[43]International Hardiness Zone Systems
Canadian Hardiness Zones
The Canadian plant hardiness zone system, developed by Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada in the early 1960s, classifies regions based on climatic suitability for plant survival, extending from zone 0 in the Arctic to zone 9 in coastal British Columbia.[44] Unlike systems focused solely on winter extremes, it employs a multivariate hardiness index incorporating seven key factors: the mean temperature of the coldest month, mean annual extreme minimum temperature, frost-free period, January mean temperature, July mean temperature, annual precipitation, and growing season precipitation.[29] Each zone spans 10 index units, subdivided into 'a' (lower half) and 'b' (upper half) subzones, with zone 0 reserved for the harshest northern conditions where mean annual temperatures fall below -12.2°C.[45] This approach addresses limitations of temperature-only models by accounting for summer conditions and moisture, which influence plant vigor and disease resistance in Canada's variable climate.[30] For instance, the index weights extreme minimum temperatures heavily but adjusts for shorter growing seasons in the Prairies, where adequate precipitation is critical for perennials.[46] Maps derived from this system, first published in 1967 and refined in subsequent editions, delineate zones using interpolated climate station data, revealing that over 55% of Canada falls into zone 2 or lower, reflecting widespread cold snaps below -40°C.[47] A 2025 update to the zones, utilizing 1991–2020 climate normals from Environment and Climate Change Canada, incorporated higher-resolution data to refine boundaries and assess warming trends.[48] This revision shows modest northward shifts, such as portions of southern Ontario advancing from 5b to 6a, but persistent zone 3–4 dominance in the interior due to unmitigated winter lows and increased precipitation variability.[30] The updated methodology also generates USDA-equivalent maps for cross-referencing, highlighting that Canadian zones typically rate one unit milder than USDA counterparts for equivalent locations, as the latter ignores non-temperature stressors like late frosts.[49] In practice, the system guides nursery labeling and selection, with tools on the official Natural Resources Canada portal allowing users to query zones by postal code or latitude/longitude.[50] Limitations persist, including underrepresentation of microclimates and wind chill, prompting supplemental use of site-specific observations for urban or coastal areas where effective zones may vary by 1–2 units.[51] Empirical validation through field trials confirms higher predictive accuracy for Canadian-native species compared to imported USDA ratings.[52]Australian Hardiness Zones
Australia lacks a nationally standardized plant hardiness zone system comparable to the USDA's, with horticulturists instead adapting international models or employing descriptive climate classifications tailored to local conditions. The continent spans USDA zones 7b to 11, corresponding to average annual extreme minimum temperatures from approximately -15°C to above 4.4°C, but these mappings overlook Australia's predominant challenges of summer heat, low humidity, and irregular rainfall, which often determine plant viability more than winter lows.[53][54] The Australian National Botanic Gardens developed a practical seven-zone framework in response to the coarseness of USDA coverage, utilizing data from 738 Bureau of Meteorology weather stations to calculate the average of each location's annual minimum temperatures over multi-decade periods.[53] Zone 1 applies to alpine highlands in southeastern Australia, where minima frequently drop below -10°C; Zone 2 covers tablelands in Queensland, New South Wales, Victoria, and Tasmania; Zones 3 and 4 encompass much of the southern interior and coastal fringes from Sydney northward; Zones 5 and 6 extend to northern Queensland, Western Australia above Shark Bay, and the Northern Territory coast; and Zone 7 includes remote northern islands with rare or absent frosts.[53] This metric-based approach, employing 5°C increments in Celsius, refines the USDA's four-zone span for Australia by accounting for elevation, latitude, and coastal moderation, though data sparsity (one station per roughly 100,000 hectares) limits precision in remote areas.[53] In practice, Australian gardeners integrate hardiness assessments with five broad climate zones defined by organizations like seed suppliers and nurseries: cool temperate (southern highlands with regular frosts below -5°C), temperate (southeast coasts with occasional light frosts), subtropical (eastern seaboard with mild minima around 0°C to 5°C), arid (inland deserts with variable but generally above-freezing lows), and tropical (northern regions with minima seldom below 5°C).[55] These align approximately with USDA zones—cool temperate to 4-8, subtropical to 9-10, and tropical to 10-11—but diverge in emphasizing heat duration over 30°C (up to 210+ days in northern zones) and drought tolerance, as evidenced by higher plant failure rates from aridity than cold exposure.[33][54] Local microclimates, such as urban heat islands or sheltered valleys, further necessitate site-specific adjustments beyond zonal guidelines.[53]European Hardiness Zones
![USDA hardiness zones of Europe][float-right] The European hardiness zone system primarily delineates regions based on the average annual extreme minimum winter temperatures, analogous to the USDA framework but tailored to continental European climates. This approach divides Europe into approximately 11 zones, each spanning a 5-6°C range, from colder northern and mountainous areas to milder Mediterranean regions. For instance, much of central Europe falls within zones 7 to 8, where minimum temperatures range from -17.8°C to -6.7°C, while southern coastal areas align with zones 9 to 10, tolerating minima down to -1.1°C.[56] These zones serve as a guideline for selecting woody plants, perennials, and trees likely to survive local winters, though they exclude factors like summer heat, humidity, or soil conditions.[56] Recent analyses have refined these maps by incorporating mesoclimatic effects and updated climate data. A 2024 study by Wulff and Bouillon, utilizing 1991-2020 meteorological records, revealed a northward shift of zones by about half a zone compared to the 1951-1980 baseline, attributing this to rising temperatures from climatic changes. This adjustment enhances predictive accuracy for plant hardiness, particularly in varied topographies. Similarly, Wageningen University researchers developed high-resolution (100m) winter hardiness zone maps integrating urban heat island influences via local climate zones and E-OBS gridded data, demonstrating warmer urban minima that expand viable planting options in cities.[57][58]| Zone | Minimum Temperature Range (°C) |
|---|---|
| 2 | -45 to -40 |
| 3 | -40 to -34 |
| 4 | -34 to -28 |
| 5 | -28 to -23 |
| 6 | -23 to -17 |
| 7 | -17 to -12 |
| 8 | -12 to -6 |
| 9 | -6 to -1 |
| 10 | -1 to +4 |
| 11 | +4 to +10 |
Systems in Other Regions
In regions beyond North America, Europe, Australia, and Canada, dedicated plant hardiness classification systems are rare, with practitioners frequently adapting the USDA framework by overlaying it onto local meteorological data focused on average annual minimum winter temperatures. This approach facilitates cross-regional plant recommendations but often requires adjustments for factors like elevation, humidity, and seasonal extremes not captured in the base model. For instance, global datasets enable zone mappings for continents such as Asia and Africa, where zones typically span from 1 to 13 based on minima from below -45.6°C in high-altitude or northern areas to above 15.6°C in equatorial lowlands.[60][61] South Africa employs a distinct system from the South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI), which divides the country into nine horticultural zones emphasizing rainfall seasonality—summer-dominant, winter-dominant, aseasonal, or tropical—alongside frost severity rather than isolated temperature minima. This classification better suits the region's topographic diversity and precipitation-driven ecosystems; for example, Zone 1 covers summer-rainfall highveld with severe frost (minima below -5°C and up to 50+ frost days annually), supporting hardy grasses and bulbs, while Zone 9 designates frost-free tropical lowveld (minima above 5°C) ideal for subtropical fruits. Unlike USDA zones, SANBI's integrates causal elements like dry-season duration, reflecting empirical observations of plant stress from water scarcity over cold alone.[62] New Zealand lacks a formal national hardiness system equivalent to the USDA or Australian standards, instead using approximate USDA mappings (ranging from 5a in southern inland areas to 12a in northern subtropical zones) tempered by local caveats. Minimum temperatures guide initial assessments, but discrepancies arise from milder summers and higher humidity; a locale with USDA zone 9 minima (-6.7°C to -1.1°C) may fail to ripen heat-dependent crops like certain stone fruits due to insufficient degree-days above 10°C, prompting nurseries to recommend trial planting or hybrid vigor over strict zonal adherence.[63][64][65] In Asia, official systems are similarly absent, with China approximating USDA zones from 1a (-51.1°C minima in northern provinces) to 13b (above 18.3°C in southern Hainan), derived from national weather station records since the 1960s. Southeast Asia and India follow suit via interpolated maps, though empirical critiques highlight underemphasis on monsoon variability and soil drainage. South America and much of Africa rely on analogous overlays, such as zones 8-13 across Andean highlands to Amazon basins or Saharan edges to Cape floristic regions, without standardized local refinements; these serve agricultural extension but show predictive gaps in microclimatic events like El Niño-induced frosts.[66][67][68]Complementary and Alternative Zoning Approaches
Heat and Summer Stress Zones
Heat and summer stress zones address the limitations of traditional cold hardiness systems by quantifying exposure to prolonged high temperatures, which can induce physiological stress in plants through mechanisms such as reduced photosynthesis, leaf scorching, and disrupted reproductive cycles.[6] Unlike minimum winter temperatures, summer heat affects plant performance by accelerating evapotranspiration and limiting root uptake, particularly in regions with extended warm periods where cold-hardy species may fail despite surviving winters.[69] Empirical observations indicate that heat stress thresholds around 86°F (30°C) correlate with decreased vigor in temperate perennials, necessitating separate zoning to predict summer survivability.[70] The American Horticultural Society (AHS) established a standardized Plant Heat Zone Map in 1997, dividing North America into 12 zones based on the average annual number of "heat days"—defined as days reaching 86°F (30°C) or higher—derived from 30-year climate normals.[6][71] Zone assignment reflects cumulative heat exposure, with lower numbers indicating minimal stress suitable for cool-climate natives and higher numbers for heat-adapted species.[72] This system complements USDA cold hardiness zones by enabling gardeners to select cultivars tolerant to both extremes; for instance, a plant rated USDA Zone 5 (cold hardy to -20°F) but AHS Heat Zone 1 may thrive in northern gardens but succumb in southern ones due to summer desiccation.[73]| AHS Heat Zone | Average Heat Days per Year (>=86°F/30°C) |
|---|---|
| 1 | Fewer than 1 |
| 2 | 1–7 |
| 3 | 8–14 |
| 4 | 15–30 |
| 5 | 31–45 |
| 6 | 46–60 |
| 7 | 61–90 |
| 8 | 91–120 |
| 9 | 121–150 |
| 10 | 151–180 |
| 11 | 181–210 |
| 12 | More than 210 |
