Hubbry Logo
Immigration to FranceImmigration to FranceMain
Open search
Immigration to France
Community hub
Immigration to France
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Immigration to France
Immigration to France
Immigration to France
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

A French biometric residence permit issued to non-EU citizens
A French residence permit issued to EU citizens

In 2024, the United Nations estimated 12 million immigrants (foreign-born people) in France, representing 17.2% of the total population, making France the second largest foreign born population in Europe after Germany and tied with the United Kingdom. This is an increase from the United Nations statistics in 2018 in which there were 9 million immigrants (foreign-born people) in France, which at the time represented 14% of the country's total population.[1][2] As of 2024, around 12 million people living in France, or 17.2% of the population, are first-generation immigrants, while the population with a migrant background in the wider sense stood at approximately 19.2 million, accounting for 30.2% of the total population of 69.4 million.[3][4]

The area with the largest proportion of immigrants is the Parisian urban area (Greater Paris), where almost 40% of immigrants lived in 2012.[5] Other regions with important immigrant populations are Rhône-Alpes (Lyon) and Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur (Marseille).

The Paris region is a magnet for immigrants, hosting one of the largest concentrations of immigrants in Europe. As of 2006, about 45% of people (6 million) living in the region were either immigrant (25%) or born to at least one immigrant parent (20%).[6]

Among the 802,000 newborns in metropolitan France in 2010, 27.3% had one or both parents foreign-born, and about one quarter (23.9%) had one parent or both born outside of Europe.[7][8] Including grandparents, about 22% of newborns in France between 2006 and 2008 had at least one foreign-born grandparent (9% born in another European country, 8% born in Maghreb and 2% born in another region of the world).[9]

In 2014, the National Institute of Statistics (INSEE) published a study reporting that the number of Spanish, Portuguese, and Italian immigrants in France between 2009 and 2012 has doubled. This increase resulting from the financial crisis that hit several European countries in that period, has pushed up the number of Europeans settled in France.[10] Statistics on Spanish immigrants in France show a growth of 107 percent between 2009 and 2012, i.e. in this period went from 5,300 to 11,000 people.[10][11]

Of the total of 229,000 new foreigners coming to France in 2012, nearly 8% were Portuguese, British 5%, Spanish 5%, Italians 4%, Germans 4%, Romanians 3%, and Belgians 3%.[10]

By 2022, the total number of new foreigners coming to France rose above 320,000 for the first time, with nearly a majority coming from Francophone Africa (Former French Colonies). A significant increase in students, family reunification and labor migration occurred under the presidency of Emmanuel Macron.[12]

History

[edit]
Evolution of number of immigrants in France since 1921

France's population dynamics began to change in the middle of the 19th century, as France joined the Industrial Revolution. The pace of industrial growth attracted millions of European immigrants over the next century, with especially large numbers arriving from Poland, Belgium, Portugal, Italy, and Spain.[13] In the wake of the First World War, in which France suffered six million casualties, significant numbers of workers from French colonies came. By 1930, the Paris region alone had a North African Muslim population of 70,000.[14]

Large numbers of Belgians immigrated to France in the late 19th century (there were nearly 500,000 Belgians in France in 1886), as well as Italians.[15] The interwar era was marked by the arrival of numerous Poles (500,000 in 1931), Spaniards, Russians and Armenians.[15]

1945–1974

[edit]
Major immigration legislation since 1945
Source: Impact of Extreme Right Parties on Immigration Policy

Right after the Second World War, immigration to France significantly increased. During the period of reconstruction, France lacked labor, and as a result, the French government was eager to recruit immigrants coming from all over Europe, the Americas, Africa and Asia.

Although there was a presence of Vietnamese in France since the late 19th century (mostly students and workers), a wave of Vietnamese migrated to the country after the Battle of Dien Bien Phu and the Geneva Accords, which granted Vietnam its independence from France in 1954. These migrants consisted of those who were loyal to the colonial government and those married to French colonists. Following the partition of Vietnam, students and professionals from South Vietnam continued to arrive in France. Although many initially returned to the country after a few years, as the Vietnam War situation worsened, a majority decided to remain in France and brought their families over as well.[16]

This period also saw a significant wave of immigrants from Algeria. Before 1962, Algerians were not restricted, as a result of the 1945 Code of Nationality, to come to France.[17] As the Algerian War started in 1954, there were already 200,000 Algerian immigrants in France.[18] However, because of the tension between the Algerians and the French, these immigrants were no longer welcome. This conflict between the two sides led to the Paris Massacre of 17 October 1961, when the police used force against an Algerian demonstration on the streets of Paris. After the war, after Algeria gained its independence, the free circulation between France and Algeria was once again allowed, and the number of Algerian immigrants started to increase drastically. From 1962 to 1975, the Algerian immigrant population increased from 350,000 to 700,000.[19] Many of these immigrants were known as the "harkis," and the others were known as the "pieds-noirs." The "harkis" were Algerians who supported the French during the Algerian War; once the war was over, they were deeply resented by other Algerians, and thus had to flee to France. The "pieds-noirs" were European settlers who moved to Algeria, but migrated back to France since 1962 when Algeria declared independence.

Additionally, the number of Pakistani and Japanese immigrants also increased during this period. There was also a great number of students and workers from former French colonies in Africa. In the 1960s, there was a wave of Portuguese, Moroccan and Turk immigrants.[15]

With this massive influx of immigrants, France became an asylum for refugees. According to the convention in Geneva, refugee status was granted to four out of five immigrant applicants. Many of these refugees came from countries in Eastern Europe (i.e. Hungary) and Latin America, because they feared the dictatorship in their home countries.

Although the majority of immigrants at this time came from rural regions, only 6% of them were willing to work in agriculture. About two-thirds of the immigrants worked in mining, steel, construction, and automotive industries. Approximately 12% of male immigrants and the majority of female immigrants worked in domestic services, restoration, and commerce (as for French women, a woman working was subject to her husband's authorisation until 1965.[20]) Minor and aged immigrants usually worked in craftsmanship and small scale trades.[18]

1974–present

[edit]

During the 1970s, France simultaneously faced economic crisis and allowed immigrants (mostly from the Muslim world) to permanently settle in France with their families and to acquire French citizenship. It resulted in hundreds of thousands of Muslims, especially to the larger cities, living in subsidized public housing and suffering from very high unemployment rates.[21] Alongside this, France renounced its policy of assimilation, instead pursuing a policy of integration.[22]

In 1974, France restricted immigration from its former colonies, but immigration from former colonies in the Maghreb and West Africa would end up steadily increasing under the presidencies of Nicolas Sarkozy, François Hollande and Emmanuel Macron.[23] In the late 20th century and in the 21st century, immigration has diversified, with many immigrants originating from Sub-Saharan Africa (922,000 in 2019), Asia (486,000 in 2019) and Latin America.[15] In addition, the enlargement of the European Union has led to more Eastern European immigrants.

According to an Ipsos poll in September 2019, 65% of respondents in France said that accepting migrants did not improve the situation in France and 45% responded that accepting migrants deprived the French of social services.[24]

In 2019, 46.5% of all immigrants were born in Africa, 35.3% were born in Europe, 14.7% in Asia and 5.4% in the Americas and Oceania.[25] In 2020, non-EU citizens had employment rates less than 50% in the southern and southwestern regions of France and in the north and northeastern regions and was above 65% only in the Burgundy region.[26]

The African proportion of both migrants and residents in France is increasing, as by 2022, nearly a majority, 48.2%, of all immigrants living in France come from Africa, 32.3% come from Europe, 13.5% come from Asia and 6% come from the Americas and Oceania.[27] 61.7% of all immigrants living in France come from non-European origins in 2022.[28][27] By 2022, the total number of new foreigners coming to France rose above 320,000 for the first time, with a significant increase in students, family reunification and labor migration from African and Asian countries happening under the presidency of Emmanuel Macron.

A 2023 survey carried out by Jean-Paul Gourévitch for the Contribuables associés association (English: Associated Taxpayers) found that the estimated cost of immigration to France for French taxpayers was of about €53.9 billion per year, four times more than the Justice ministry's yearly budget.[29]

In June 2025, the UDR (right) group in the French Parliament, led by Éric Ciotti, called for the creation of a parliamentary commission to calculate the true cost of immigration. Ciotti is demanding a detailed assessment of French spending on health, housing, education, and emergency aid to migrants, as well as their economic contributions.[30]

Origins of immigrants

[edit]

Europeans

[edit]

In 2014, the National Institute of Statistics (INSEE, for its acronym in French) published a study on Thursday, according to which has doubled the number of Italian, Portuguese and Spanish immigrants in France between 2009 and 2012.[10] According to the French Institute, this increase, resulting from the financial crisis that hit several European countries in that period, has pushed up the number of Europeans installed in France.[10] Statistics on Spanish immigrants in France show a growth of 107 percent between 2009 and 2012, i.e. in this period went from 5300 to 11,000 people.[10][11] Of the total of 229,000 foreigners arriving to France in 2012, nearly 8% were Portuguese, British 5%, Spanish 5%, Italians 4%, Germans 3%, and Belgians 3%.[10]

With the increase of Italian, Portuguese and Spanish immigrants to France, the weight of European immigrants reached 46 percent in 2012, while this percentage for African reached 30%, with a presence in Morocco (7%), Algeria (7%) and Tunisia (3%). Meanwhile, 14 percent of all immigrants who settled in France that year were from Asian countries—3% of China and 2% in Turkey, while in America and Oceania constitute 10% of Americans and Brazilians accounted for higher percentage, 2 percent each.[10]

By 2022, as a result of rapidly increasing African immigration into France, the proportion of European immigrants declined from 46% in 2012 to 32.3%.[27]

Maghrebis

[edit]

French of Maghrebi (Arabs and Berbers) origin in France form the largest ethnic group after French of European origin.

According to Michèle Tribalat, a researcher at INED, there were 3.5 million people of Maghrebi origin (with at least one grandparent from Algeria, Morocco or Tunisia) living in France in 2005 corresponding to 5.8% of the total French metropolitan population (60.7 million in 2005).[31] Maghrebis have settled mainly in the industrial regions in France, especially in the Paris region. Many famous French people like Edith Piaf,[32] Isabelle Adjani, Arnaud Montebourg, Alain Bashung, Dany Boon, Zinedine Zidane, Karim Benzema, and Kylian Mbappé have Maghrebi ancestry.

In 2005, the percentage of young people under 18 of Maghrebi origin (at least one immigrant parent) were about 7% in Metropolitan France, 12% in Greater Paris, 13% in Lyon, 21% in Perpignan, 22% in French département of Seine-Saint-Denis, 37% in 18th arrondissement of Paris and 40% in several arrondissements of Marseille.[33][34]

16% of newborns in France between 2006 and 2008 have at least one Maghrebi grandparent.[9]

Their number increased in the following years. According to other sources between 5 and 6 million people of Maghrebi origin live in France corresponding to about 7-9% of the total French metropolitan population.[35]

As of 2011, there were 4.5 million Algerians in France of which 42% were women.[36]

By 2022, as result of both The African proportion of both migrants and residents in France increasing, nearly a majority, 48.2%, of all immigrants living in France come from Africa. Algeria, Morocco and Tunisia are the main countries of origin for immigrants into France in 2022.[37]

Marginalization of Muslim and Arab immigrants

[edit]

The Constitution of France states it is illegal for the state to gather information on race and ethnicity in the census. In 2020, research was conducted by mapping where there was a high presence of Islamic institutions to prove that income segregation was prominent in Paris amongst Islamic migrants. Banlieues are lower-income suburban areas of France, historically known as "religious ghettos" occupied by African and Islamic immigrants.[38] These areas hold higher numbers of Islamic institutions compared to urban, more wealthier areas, which concludes a high population of Islamic immigrants in the area.

This segregation of cultures and identities can allow for these groups to flourish without intervention from the other groups[39] as seen as well with the creation and destruction of the Calais Jungle. The Calais Jungle was a homeless encampment located by the border of France. During the 2015 European Refugee Crisis there was an influx of asylum seekers moving into the Calais Jungle. Formerly a landfill, migrants and asylum were able to replicate an urban style of living with the establishment of stores, restaurants, schools and places of worship, while they waited for the government to determine their fate. The Calais Jungle received support from NGOs and grassroot organizations even after the French government dismantled the area in 2016. Just like the banlieues in France, the living conditions of the Calais Jungle are hazardous and unkept with high levels of state authority violence. People living in these areas with high migrant populations reported insufficient food, water and healthcare.[40]

The large population of Islamic and African immigrants in banlieus has allowed for different marginalized groups to thrive independently but can institute poverty traps - making it difficult for them to be fully integrated.

Sub-Saharan Africans

[edit]

Immigrants from Sub-Saharan Africa come primarily from the countries of Francophone Africa in West Africa and Central Africa, and also Madagascar. The most common countries of birth for these immigrants are Madagascar, Senegal, Ivory Coast, Cameroon, DRC, Mali, Republic of the Congo, Mauritius, Comoros and Guinea.[41] Some of these immigrants have been settling in France for over a century, and were employed in various jobs such as soldiers (Senegalese Tirailleurs) and domestic workers; while others, such as Malians in France, started arriving mainly from the 1960s onward.[42]

North Americans and South Americans

[edit]

An important community of immigrants from North America to France are Haitians in France. Citizens of the United States of America total more than 100,000[43] permanent residents in France, Canadians 11,931,[44] followed by Latin Americans are a growing sub-group the most numerous are the Brazilians 44,622,[45] followed by Venezuelans 30,000,[46] Peruvians 22,002,[47] Chileans (esp. arrived in the 1970s) 15,782,[48] and Argentineans 11,899 (or up to 15,000).[49] Latin Americans are increasingly emigrating to France for economic reasons, study, work, family, and sometimes political asylum.[10]

State provisioning on illegal immigration

[edit]

Illegal immigration to France has developed as the country's immigration policy has become more rigid. There were between 890,000 and 1.2 million illegal immigrants in France, the second highest numbers of illegal immigrants in Europe after Germany.[50]

In 2011, 28,000 of such people were expelled from France. The French government set a goal of 35,000 for the next year.[51] The initialism 'OQTF', from the 2006 law obligation de quitter le territoire français, is sometimes used for a person who is required to leave France.[52]

The French government threatened to withdraw from the Schengen accord in 2009,[53] 2011[54][55] and 2012.[56][57][58]

As of 2016, many undocumented immigrants tried to jump the fences at Calais and board a train or truck heading for the United Kingdom. The Home Office has agents working alongside French police and immigration agents to prevent unauthorized people from entering the British border zone.[59]

Île-de-France

[edit]

In France, the three largest cities (Paris, Lyon and Marseille)[60] also attract the largest share of immigrants to the country. The region with the largest proportion of immigrants is the Île-de-France (Greater Paris), where 40% of immigrants live. Immigrants are more concentrated in urban areas than the native population. 90.1% of the immigrant population is located in urban areas which is significantly more than the proportion for the native population, 81.9% of them living in urban areas. In 2012, 38.2% of the total immigrant population lived in the Parisian urban area compared to 4.1% and 3.1% respectively for Lyon and Marseille.[61] According to INSEE, French National Institute for Statistics and Economic Studies, responsible for the production and analysis of official statistics in France, about 35% of people (4 million) living in Île-de-France, are either immigrant (17%) or born to at least one immigrant parent (18%) in 2006.[62]

In the city of Paris, 20% of people living are immigrants and 41.3% of people under 20 have at least one immigrant parent.[63] Among the young people under 18, 12.1% are of Maghrebi origin, 9.9% of non-French West Indies Subsaharan African origin and 4.0% of South European origin.[64] 436,576 immigrants live in Paris, representing 20% of Parisians and 22.4% of immigrants in Ile-de-France. 162 635 children under 20 with at least one immigrant parent live in Paris, representing 41.3% of the total of children under 20 in Paris and 15.4% of the total of children under 20 with at least one immigrant parent in Ile-de-France

Département Immigrants Children under 20 with at least one immigrant parent
Number % département % Ile-de-France Number % département % Ile-de-France
Paris (75) 436'576 20 22.4 162'635 41.3 15.4
Seine-Saint-Denis (93) 394'831 26.5 20.2 234'837 57.1 22.2
Hauts-de-Seine (92) 250'190 16.3 12.8 124'501 34 11.8
Val-de-Marne (94) 234'633 18.1 12 127'701 40 12.1
Val-d'Oise (95) 185'890 16.1 9.5 124'644 38.5 11.8
Yvelines (78) 161'869 11.6 8.3 98'755 26.4 9.3
Essonne (91) 150'980 12.6 7.7 94'003 29.6 8.9
Seine-et-Marne (77) 135'654 10.7 7 90'319 26 8.5
Île-de-France 1'950'623 16.9 100 1'057'394 37.1 100

Statistics

[edit]
Main article: Immigration statistics in France

By country of origin

[edit]

According to UN estimates from mid-2020, the most common countries of birth of the foreign born population in France were:

• 1 - Algeria (1,637,000)

• 2 - Morocco (1,060,000)

• 3 - Portugal (640,000)

• 4 - Tunisia (445,000)

• 5 - Turkey (340,000)

• 6 - Italy (326,000)

• 7 - Spain (282,000)

• 8 - Germany (203,000)

• 9 - United Kingdom (170,000)

• 10 - Belgium (164,000)[65]

By region of origin

[edit]

Immigration into France was expected to exceed 300,000 in the early 2020s, as shown in table below.[66]

Region 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2018[25]
Europe 80 500 78 660 80 120 79 290 80 330 75 040 88 820 94 580 105 830 93 000
Africa 70 200 66 110 62 340 62 140 63 470 66 480 65 610 66 280 68 640 106 000
Asia 30 960 30 120 30 520 32 070 30 180 32 960 29 810 32 430 32 060 46 900
America and Oceania 19 810 19 990 20 460 18 770 21 440 20 450 26 270 23 360 23 070 27 000
All countries 201 470 194 880 193 440 192 270 195 420 194 930 210 510 216 650 229 600 273 000
Place of Birth Year
2011[67]
Number %
Place of birth in reporting country (France) 57,611,142
Place of birth not in reporting country 7,321,237
Other EU Member State 2,119,454
Outside EU but within Europe 313,555
Outside Europe/ Non-European 5,201,782
Africa 3,596,143
Asia 925,183
North America 77,569
Caribbean, South or Central America 279,529
Oceania 9,803
Total 64,933,400 100%

By country

[edit]
Recent immigrants arriving to France as per 2014 and 2023[68][69]
Country[70] % of all
immigrants in France
2012 		% of all
immigrants in France
2021[69]
Portugal 8%[70] 8%
United Kingdom 5%[70]
Spain 5%[70] 3%
Italy 4%[70] 4%
Germany 4%[70]
Romania 3%[70]
Belgium 3%[70]
Russia 2%[70]
 Switzerland 2%[70]
Poland 2%[70]
Algeria 7%[70] 12%
Morocco 7%[70] 12%
Tunisia 3%[70] 4%
China 3%[70]
Turkey 2%[70] 3%
United States 2%[70]
Brazil 2%[70]

INSEE Data Reporting

[edit]

With the increase of Spanish, Portuguese and Italians in France, the weight of European immigrants arrived in 2012 to 46 percent, while this percentage for African reached 30%, with a presence in Morocco (7%), Algeria (7%) and Tunisia (3%). Meanwhile, 14 percent of all immigrants who settled in France that year were from Asian countries - 3% of China and 2% in Turkey, while in America and Oceania constitute 10% of Americans and Brazilians accounted for higher percentage, 2 percent each.[10]

In 2008, according to The National Institute of Statistics (INSEE), there were 12 million immigrants and their direct descendants (2nd generation) making up about 20% of the population.[71] with an immigrant defined as a foreign born person without French citizenship at birth. Without considering citizenship at birth, people not born in metropolitan France and their direct descendants made up 30% of the population aged 18–50 in metropolitan France in 2008.[72]

In 2008, there were 5.3 million immigrants corresponding to 8.5% of the total population in France (63.9 million in 2008). 42% were from Africa (30% from Maghreb and 12% from Sub-Saharan Africa), 38% from Europe (mainly from Portugal, Italy and Spain), 14% from Asia and 5% from the Americas and Oceania.[7] Of this total, 40% have assumed French citizenship. In addition, 1.8 million people born in foreign countries (including 1 million in Maghreb) with French citizenship at birth were not included in this total.

There were also 6.7 million direct descendants of immigrants (born in France with at least one immigrant parent) living in France in 2008, corresponding to 11% of the total population in France. Immigrants aged 18–50 count for 2.7 million (10% of population aged 18–50) and 5.3 million for all ages (8% of population). 2nd Generation aged 18–50 make up 3.1 million (12% of 18–50) and 6.5 million for all ages (11% of population).[73] The regions with the largest proportion of immigrants and direct descendants of immigrants are the Île-de-France and Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur/Languedoc-Roussillon, where more than one third and one quarter of the inhabitants respectively were either immigrants or direct descendants of immigrants.[71]

The table shows immigrants and 2nd generation immigrants by origin in 2008. It leaves aside 3rd generation immigrants, illegal immigrants, as well as ethnic minorities with long-standing French citizenship like black people from the French overseas territories residing in metropolitan France (800,000), Roms (500,000) or people born in the Maghreb with French citizenship at birth and their descendants (about 4 million Maghrebi Jews, Harkis and Pied-Noirs and their descendants live in France[74]).[75]

Immigrants by origin (2008) in thousands Immigrants 2nd generation Total %
Italy 317 920 1 237 10.4%
Portugal 581 660 1 241 10.4%
Spain 257 620 877 7.3%
Other countries from UE27 653 920 1 573 13.2%
Other European countries 224 210 434 3.6%
Europe Total 2 032 3 330 5 362 44.9%
Algeria 713 1 000 1 713 14.3%
Morocco 654 660 1 314 11.0%
Tunisia 235 290 525 4.4%
Maghreb Total 1 602 1 950 3 552 29.7%
Subsaharan Africa 669 570 1 239 10.4%
Turkey 239 220 459 3.8%
SouthEast Asia 163 160 323 2.7%
Other Asian countries 355 210 565 4.7%
America/Oceania 282 170 452 3.8%
Other Regions Total 1 708 1 330 3 038 25.4%
Total 5 342 6 610 11 952 100.00%

In 2005, 18.1% of young people under 18 were of foreign origin (at least one immigrant parent) in France including 13.5% of non-European origin. Ile-de-France has the highest proportion of total young people with foreign origins, including Europe and non-European, at about 37%.[76][77]

People under 18 of Maghrebi, Sub-saharian and Turkish origin became a majority in several cities of Ile-de-France (Clichy-sous-Bois, Mantes-la-Jolie, Grigny, Saint-Denis, Les Mureaux, Saint-Ouen, Sarcelles, Pierrefitte-sur-Seine, Garges-lès-Gonesse, Montfermeil, La Courneuve, Sevran, Aubervilliers, Argenteuil, Évry, Stains, Gennevilliers et Épinay-sur-Seine). Youth of non-European origin became a majority in a few areas outside the Ile-de-France also, in particular in Vaulx-en-Velin close to Lyon, as well as Vénissieux, Rillieux-la-Pape and Wazemmes in Lille, in Grand Parc in Bordeaux, and in several arrondissements of Marseille. In Grigny, 31% of young people are of Sub-saharian origin.[78]

Between 2006 and 2008 about 22% of newborns in France had at least one foreign-born grandparent (9% born in another European country, 8% born in Maghreb and 3% born in another region of the world).[9]

In 2010, 27.3% of the 802,000 newborns in metropolitan France had at least one foreign-born parent. In 2010, about one quarter (24%) of all the newborns had at least one parent born outside of Europe, with about 17% of newborns in France having at least one parent originate from Africa (11% from Maghreb and 6% from Subsaharan Africa).[7][8]

In May 2025, according to INSEE, the increase in educational attainment was greatest among African immigrants. One in two African immigrants now has a higher education diploma, compares to just under one in three in 2006.[79]

Posted workers of Europe

[edit]

Regarding the country of origin of "posted workers", the same document states the origin of the posted workers: Poles represent the largest contingent of employees posted to France (18% of the total), followed by the Portuguese (15%) and Romania (13%). The majority of these employees, about 60% comes from the historical countries of the European Union, but the share from the new Member States "EU" is growing very rapidly, and the nationals of countries outside "EU "also increases.[80]

Asylum

[edit]

In April 2025, a survey conducted by the CSA Institute revealed that a majority of the French population wanted stricter conditions for access to asylum in France.[81]

Crime rates

[edit]
This section is an excerpt from Immigration and crime § France.[edit]

A 2006 study found "that the share of immigrants in the population has no significant impact on crime rates once immigrants' economic circumstances are controlled for, while finding that unemployed immigrants tend to commit more crimes than unemployed non-immigrants."[82] As shown in the 2006 study with 1999 French census data calculations, an unemployed nonimmigrant outlier raises the number of crimes by 0.297, and another raises it by 0.546.[82]

Aoki and Yasuyuki's research show that data that is frequently shown regarding French immigration and crime is misleading, as it does not take discrimination and economic hardships into account as a motivator for criminal acts. As shown in the 2006 study, after adding the share of unemployed immigrants in the labor force, it is determined that the effect of the share of immigrants now becomes insignificant.[82]

With the exception of 2015 in Macrotrends collection of data, French crime rates overall have been on the steady decline, experiencing a 5.68% decline from 2017 to 2018.[83] However, immigration rates are on the incline, with a 10.74% increase of migrants granted asylum from 2017 to 2018. This data from 1990 to 2022 indicates that crime rates and migration rates do not correlate if one is only looking at the numbers, with no other qualitative factors in place.[83]

A study by sociologist Farhad Khosrokhavar, director of studies at the EHESS, found that "Muslims, mostly from North African origin, are becoming the most numerous group in [French prisons]."[84][85] His work has been criticized for taking into account only 160 prisoners in 4 prisons, all close to northern Paris where most immigrants live.[86]

According to police figures, 77% of perpetrators of solved rapes in Paris during 2023 were of foreign nationality.[87]

Citizenship clauses

[edit]

Children born in France to foreign parents with legal long-term residence in France are automatically granted French citizenship upon reaching the age of 18. People born abroad and living in France can acquire French citizenship if they satisfy certain conditions. In 2009 the number of naturalised persons was 135,000, with the largest contingent from Maghreb (41.2%). People who have worked in the French military can also get French citizenship.[88]

Naturalisations by origin 2000 2005 2009 % Total 2009
Africa 84 182 98 453 85 144 62.7
Maghreb 68 185 75 224 56 024 41.2
Sub-Saharan Africa 10 622 15 624 22 214 16.4
Other Africa 5 375 7 605 6 906 5.1
Asia 27 941 26 286 19 494 14.4
South-East Asia 7 265 4 069 2 475 1.8
East Asia 1 139 1 280 1 622 1.2
South Asia 4 246 4 436 3 660 2.7
Middle East 15 291 16 501 11 737 8.6
Europe (not including CIS ) 22 085 18 072 14 753 10.9
CIS 1 181 2 108 4 704 3.5
CIS (Europe) 1 000 1 535 4 454 3.3
CIS (Asia) 181 573 250 0.2
America 5 668 6 352 6 677 4.9
North America 1 048 854 747 0.5
South and Central America 4 620 5 498 5 930 4.4
Oceania 87 127 108 0.1
Others 8 882 3 245 4 962 3.7
Total 150 026 154 643 135 842 100

Comparison with other European Union countries 2023

[edit]

According to Eurostat 59.9 million people lived in the European Union in 2023 who were born outside their resident country. This corresponds to 13.35% of the total EU population. Of these, 31.4 million (9.44%) were born outside the EU and 17.5 million (3.91%) were born in another EU member state.[89][90]

Country Total population (1000) Total Foreign-born (1000) % Born in other EU state (1000) % Born in a non EU state (1000) %
EU 27 448,754 59,902 13.3 17,538 3.9 31,368 6.3
Germany 84,359 16,476 19.5 6,274 7.4 10,202 12.1
France 68,173 11,985 17.2 2,204 3.4 9,781 16.2
Spain 48,085 8,204 17.1 1,580 3.3 6,624 13.8
Italy 58,997 6,417 10.9 1,563 2.6 4,854 8.2
Netherlands 17,811 2,777 15.6 748 4.2 2,029 11.4
Greece 10,414 1,173 11.3 235 2.2 938 9.0
Sweden 10,522 2,144 20.4 548 5.2 1,596 15.2
Austria 9,105 1,963 21.6 863 9.5 1,100 12.1
Belgium 11,743 2,247 19.1 938 8.0 1,309 11.1
Portugal 10,467 1,684 16.1 378 3.6 1,306 12.5
Denmark 5,933 804 13.6 263 4.4 541 9.1
Finland 5,564 461 8.3 131 2.4 330 5.9
Poland 36,754 933 2.5 231 0.6 702 1.9
Czech Republic 10,828 764 7.1 139 1.3 625 5.8
Hungary 9,600 644 6.7 342 3.6 302 3.1
Romania 19,055 530 2.8 202 1.1 328 1.7
Slovakia 5,429 213 3.9 156 2.9 57 1.0
Bulgaria 6,448 169 2.6 58 0.9 111 1.7
Ireland 5,271 1,150 21.8 348 6.6 802 15.2

Opinion polls on immigration

[edit]

In 1971, an INED poll was asked which gauged as to whether or not the French public thought there were too many foreigners (2.7 million, 5%) in the country.[91] 2% thought there were too few, 39% thought the present number was about right while 40% thought it was too high and 12% much too high.[91] In 1974, another INED poll asked as to whether or not a maximum should be set on the number of foreigners in the country. 70% thought there should be a maximum, 9% thought there should not, and 15% said it depended on the nationality.[91] For the latter part, the majority of those who said it was dependent on the nationality thought there should be a maximum for non-European nationalities (Black Africans, 67%, North Africans, 87%), while less said there should be for European groups (Italians, 28%, Spanish, 33%, Portuguese, 43%, Yugoslavs, 37%).[91] The majority additionally thought that European nationalities would "adapt easier into French life" in comparison to only 19% for North and Black Africans.[91]

In an IFOP commissioned poll in 1973, the majority of the French public (very probable, 23%, fairly probable, 36%, slightly probable, 26%) believed that there would be an increase in the amount of foreigners in the country by the year 2000.[91] The majority also thought that it represented a serious situation (very serious, 17%, fairly serious, 37%) comparatively to 39% (not very serious, 28%, not at all serious, 11%) of the public who did not.[91]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]

Bibliography

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Immigration to France

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Immigration to denotes the sustained influx of foreign-born individuals seeking long-term residence, a process originating in the mid-19th century to offset labor deficits during industrialization and population stagnation. As of 2021, immigrants numbered 7 million, equating to 10.3% of the total of 68 million. Annual entries peaked at 490,000 in 2022 before declining to 347,000 in 2023, with net migration driving nearly 90% of demographic growth in recent years. Historically, early waves drew primarily from neighboring European nations such as , , and to fill industrial and agricultural roles, expanding the immigrant stock from 1.4 million in 1921 to 2.7 million by 1931. Post-World War II reconstruction and spurred migration from former territories, shifting origins toward —, , and —now accounting for over 28% of immigrants, alongside comprising 47.7% of 2023 arrivals. In 2023, 32% of France's immigrants were European-born, with countries supplying three-quarters of that group. French policy formalized a suspension of primary labor immigration in 1974 amid economic downturns, redirecting flows toward and asylum claims, though recent legislation has sought to curb irregular entries and expedite deportations of rejected applicants. These developments have fueled controversies over assimilation efficacy, with empirical indicators revealing persistent socioeconomic disparities, including elevated among non-EU immigrants and concentrated urban enclaves resistant to cultural integration. Net migration rates hovering at 1.1 per 1,000 population underscore France's role as Europe's eldest immigration destination, yet provoke debates on sustainability given strains on public services and social cohesion.

Historical Development

Pre-20th Century Inflows

In the , selective inflows of skilled artisans from German states and supplemented France's workforce in luxury crafts, particularly cabinet-making in , where migrants introduced innovative techniques amid domestic shortages. These movements were limited in scale, driven by opportunities and economic niches rather than broad labor demands, with immigrants integrating through apprenticeships and networks. The onset of industrialization in the mid-19th century accelerated immigration from neighboring countries to address shortages in , , and . settled predominantly in northern regions, while concentrated in southern farms and construction sites. By , numbered around 63,000, rising to 240,000 by as demand for seasonal and permanent labor grew. Census classifications highlighted border proximities, with , , Swiss, and forming the core groups, often temporary migrants returning seasonally. Foreigners exceeded 1 million by the 1881 census, equating to roughly 2.7% of France's of about 38 million, a modest share compared to later eras and concentrated in industrial border zones. This percentage held steady at approximately 2.7% in 1901, reflecting targeted economic pulls rather than policy-driven mass settlement, with most arrivals from filling specific skill or manual roles. Assimilation occurred through workplace necessities, including for and intermarriage with French locals, enabling rapid cultural alignment among these proximate groups.

Colonial Era and Interwar Period

The French conquest of Algeria in 1830 initiated colonial ties that facilitated limited migration to the metropole, primarily involving temporary workers, soldiers, and select elites rather than broad settlement. Inflows from Algeria remained modest before World War I, with approximately 30,000 North Africans employed in France on the eve of the conflict, drawn mainly for seasonal or industrial labor in sectors like construction and mining. Moroccan migration followed the establishment of the French protectorate in 1912, but similarly consisted of short-term labor contracts, with workers returning home after service; permanent communities were negligible until the interwar years. World War I dramatically escalated recruitment from North African colonies to address labor and military shortages, with mobilizing around 500,000 and workers for the European front, including nearly 175,000 Algerian soldiers and 100,000 workers, alongside contributions from and . Of the 140,000 to 195,000 North African laborers deployed in , about two-thirds originated from , performing tasks in munitions factories, farms, and infrastructure amid severe metropolitan manpower deficits. High casualties—exceeding 25,000 deaths among North African combatants—along with post-war policies curtailed long-term settlement, as most survivors were compelled to return to colonies, reinforcing patterns of transient rather than integrative migration. In the , colonial repatriation continued amid ongoing labor demands, with roughly 120,000 North African workers summoned to France between 1920 and 1924 to fill gaps in and reconstruction. By 1931, the foreign-born population peaked at approximately 2.89 million, or about 7% of France's total 41.8 million inhabitants, but North Africans formed a small fraction—predominantly male and transient—while Europeans (Poles, , ) dominated inflows. Colonial structures emphasized extraction and dependency, granting limited rights like partial to Algerian Muslims but prioritizing military utility over , which confined permanent communities to under 50,000 by and sowed seeds for future tensions without fostering assimilation.

Post-WWII Reconstruction Phase (1945-1973)

Following , France faced acute labor shortages amid its reconstruction efforts, prompting the government to establish state-controlled immigration through the 1945 ordinances, which prioritized economic needs by granting work permits and pathways to residency for foreign laborers. Initial recruitment focused on Southern European countries via bilateral agreements, beginning with in the immediate postwar years to fill vacancies in , , and construction sectors depleted by war and demographic losses. Approximately 250,000 Italian workers entered between 1945 and the early 1950s, comprising the largest early inflow and helping to rebuild critical to industrial recovery. Formal agreements expanded in the with in 1961 and in 1963, drawing additional hundreds of thousands of workers as France's economy accelerated during the period of sustained growth. By the 1954 census, Italians numbered 508,463, Spaniards 289,497, and Portuguese 20,759 residents in , with Portuguese inflows surging to around 700,000 by 1970 due to these pacts and economic pull factors. These European guest workers, often skilled or semi-skilled and intended as temporary, contributed to annual GDP growth averaging over 5% from 1945 to 1973 by addressing labor gaps in expanding sectors like manufacturing and urban development. As European sources became saturated by the late , shifted recruitment to to sustain workforce demands, signing agreements with and in 1963 and a limited pact with in 1964 following its . Maghrebi laborers, primarily , , and men, increasingly filled low- roles in and factories, with alone reaching 212,711 by 1954 amid the ongoing war and postwar migration pressures. While debates persist over localized suppression from this influx, indicate a net positive fiscal contribution during the era, as immigrants bolstered production without immediate strain on social systems designed for transient workers. Policies emphasized single male migrants to preserve the temporary nature of programs, curtailing until the 1970s to avoid settlement and integration costs; circulars from supported limited family ties only for stability, but broad restrictions maintained focus on economic utility. This approach facilitated achievements in national infrastructure, such as highway networks and housing projects, yet early signs of spatial segregation emerged, with North African workers often housed in makeshift bidonvilles (shantytowns) on urban peripheries due to inadequate state provisions like SONACOTRAL dormitories established in 1956.

Post-Oil Crisis Shifts (1974-1990s)

In July 1974, amid the economic recession triggered by the oil crisis, the French government under Prime Minister issued a halting the of non-EU migrant workers, marking a formal end to organized labor immigration from outside . This shift reflected concerns over rising and strained public resources, yet it explicitly exempted and asylum entries, which were framed as humanitarian obligations rather than economic necessities. Consequently, while primary labor inflows ceased, secondary migration chains persisted, with family members joining established workers from former colonies, particularly in , leading to sustained despite official rhetoric of control. The 1980s saw repeated regularization amnesties that undermined the 1974 restrictions, effectively legalizing hundreds of thousands of undocumented entrants. In May 1981, shortly after François Mitterrand's election, a circular under the new Socialist government regularized approximately 120,000 to 130,000 undocumented immigrants, primarily from , , and , prioritizing those in long-term . Subsequent amnesties in 1985 and 1990 further extended status to over 100,000 additional individuals, often through administrative circulars that bypassed legislative hurdles, resulting in a cumulative total exceeding 300,000 regularizations by decade's end. These measures, intended to address humanitarian and labor market realities, instead incentivized clandestine entries by signaling pathways to permanence, as empirical patterns in subsequent flows indicated networks adapting to policy loopholes rather than deterring migration. Asylum claims surged during this period, shifting inflows toward and the amid geopolitical instability. Requests rose from around 5,000 annually in the mid-1970s to a peak of 61,372 in 1989, with applicants predominantly from , , , and emerging conflict zones like and . Approval rates remained low—averaging under 20%—yet the volume strained administrative capacity and contributed to irregular settlement, as rejected claimants often overstayed via or underground economies. Net migration turned consistently positive in the , averaging 50,000 to 80,000 annually, driven by these non-labor channels despite repeated governmental pledges to curb entries. This pivot to family reunification and asylum facilitated the formation of concentrated ethnic communities, as causal chains from initial workers amplified through kin sponsorship, with INSEE data showing the foreign-born population rising from approximately 4.5 million (8% of total) in 1975 to over 4.3 million foreigners (6.3% but reflecting broader immigrant stock including naturalized) by 1999, concentrated in urban banlieues. Policy evaluations from the era, including internal reports, highlighted how unrestricted family migration—lacking integration preconditions like language or employment—fostered parallel societies, as evidenced by rising welfare dependency and spatial segregation in regions like , where non-EU origins dominated new inflows. These dynamics exposed early gaps in enforcement, where humanitarian framing overrode economic realism, enabling demographic shifts without corresponding assimilation mechanisms.

21st Century Mass Migration (2000-2025)

The has marked an escalation in to France, characterized by sustained high inflows predominantly from non-EU countries, including low-skilled labor migration, family reunifications, and asylum claims. Following the , annual asylum applications peaked above 100,000, with figures reaching 127,000 in 2017 and remaining elevated through the early 2020s, driven largely by arrivals from , , and the . By 2022, long-term or permanent inflows hit 294,000 new entrants, including status changes and free mobility, reflecting a 10% rise from 2021 amid post-pandemic recovery and ongoing global displacements. In 2024, first-time asylum applications totaled 130,952, a 9.8% decline from prior peaks but still substantial, underscoring persistent pressures from irregular crossings and humanitarian claims. Visa issuances further facilitated these dynamics, with France granting 2.86 million visas in 2024—a 16.8% surge over 2023—predominantly short-stay Schengen types for tourism and business, which have enabled widespread overstays and transitions to irregular residency. While intra-EU free movement accounts for a portion of recorded entries (often skilled or temporary), it has obscured the heavier fiscal and social burdens from extra-EU mass migration, which constitutes the majority of net low-skilled inflows and strains integration resources. Official data indicate the foreign-born population reached approximately 9.3 million by late 2024, equating to about 13.7% of France's total populace, though estimates vary due to undercounting of irregular residents. In response to public discontent and electoral pressures, enacted the January 2024 Law for Controlled Immigration and Successful Integration, which streamlined deportation procedures for public order threats and aimed to cap unregulated entries while prioritizing skilled labor. Deportations of irregular migrants rose nearly 27% in 2024, reaching around 22,000, yet enforcement gaps persist amid diplomatic hurdles. By mid-2025, escalating tensions with —over rejected deportations and consular disputes—prompted to suspend visa exemptions for Algerian diplomatic and service passports, signaling tighter bilateral controls to curb unchecked flows from . These measures reflect a shift toward quota-like restrictions on non-EU origins, though implementation faces resistance from EU mobility rules and source-country non-cooperation.

Sources and Demographics of Immigrants

European Migrants

In 2023, 2.4 million immigrants born in resided in , accounting for 32% of the total immigrant population. Of these, nearly three-quarters originated from countries, benefiting from free movement provisions that facilitate intra-EU labor mobility. remains the leading source, with over 600,000 Portuguese-born individuals in as of recent estimates, followed by (around 400,000) and (approximately 100,000), reflecting historical labor recruitment patterns and recent economic migrations. These groups predominantly enter for employment in sectors such as , , and services, where they fill labor shortages without requiring extensive cultural adaptation due to shared European heritage and, in cases like and Italian migrants, linguistic affinities with French. ![Flag of Portugal](./assets/Flag_of_Portugal_(official\ ) European migrants demonstrate higher assimilation metrics compared to non-European cohorts, including superior acquisition rates—often exceeding 80% proficiency within five years for arrivals—and employment participation levels aligning closely with native French workers in similar demographics. This is evidenced by lower unemployment gaps; for instance, -born workers in maintain activity rates around 65-70%, versus persistent 10-15 deficits for extra- groups, attributable to fewer barriers in credential recognition and cultural alignment. Fiscal impacts are correspondingly muted, with migrants showing reduced reliance on social benefits; official data indicate that intra- movers contribute net positively to public finances through taxes in blue-collar roles, contrasting with higher welfare drawdowns observed elsewhere. Crime involvement among European immigrants remains below native averages when adjusted for socioeconomic factors, with official French justice statistics reporting lower overrepresentation in delinquency records for nationals versus third-country foreigners—foreigners overall comprise 14% of suspects despite being 7.4% of the , but subsets exhibit rates closer to French-born due to stable residency and integration. This pattern holds in empirical analyses controlling for age and poverty, underscoring causal links to opportunity structures rather than origin-based predispositions. In labor-intensive fields like building trades, and Polish workers have sustained France's needs, providing skilled manual labor with minimal social friction and enhancing economic complementarity absent in more divergent migrant streams. Post-Brexit adjustments have yielded negligible shifts in UK-to-France migration, with British residents stabilizing at 260,000-400,000; the loss of automatic EU now mandates visas for stays beyond 90 days, curbing spontaneous moves while preserving a niche of retirees and professionals whose inflows do not materially alter EU-dominant patterns. Overall, European migrants' profile—marked by skills alignment to French demands in vocational trades—yields verifiable advantages in integration velocity and sectoral contributions, informed by proximity in values, education systems, and legal frameworks.

Maghrebi and North African Origins

Immigration from the region—primarily , , and —constitutes the largest non-European Union source of immigrants to France, accounting for approximately 28.7% of the total immigrant population in recent years, with at 12.2%, at 11.7%, and at 4.8% as of 2023 data from the French National Institute of Statistics and Economic Studies (INSEE). This group represents over 30% of non-EU immigrants, sustained not only by ongoing inflows but also by higher rates among Maghrebi-origin women, whose completed fertility stands at 2.85 children per woman compared to 1.8 for native French women, contributing to demographic expansion across generations. Colonial histories facilitated initial ties: was administered as French departments until independence in 1962, while and were protectorates until , providing linguistic and administrative familiarity that theoretically eased adaptation. Initial waves in the consisted predominantly of male labor migrants recruited via bilateral agreements to fill industrial shortages in sectors like and , with signing a key accord in 1963 and following suit. Following the and France's 1974 halt to primary labor , inflows shifted decisively toward , enabling workers to sponsor spouses, children, and extended —a process that amplified chain migration and transformed temporary labor streams into settled communities. By the , family-based entries dominated, often involving less-skilled dependents whose arrival prioritized over economic selection criteria, fostering patterns of residential concentration in low-wage enclaves and complicating socioeconomic mobility despite prior colonial-era exposure to French institutions. This chain migration dynamic has been causally linked to persistent under-integration challenges, as reunified families frequently lack the qualifications of initial labor migrants, perpetuating reliance on welfare systems and limiting upward mobility even in a context of shared francophone heritage from colonial rule. Remittances further illustrate economic decoupling: outflows from to Maghrebi countries totaled billions annually, with contributing 11.4 billion euros in migrant transfers overall in 2018 (a figure rising over 25% since 2010), much directed to , , and , where inflows exceeded 10 billion dollars combined by the late —diverting income from French circulation and undermining local investment despite intentions to bolster origin-country development. High among these communities exacerbates growth amid integration strains, with second-generation rates converging toward native levels but initial disparities sustaining .

Sub-Saharan African Inflows

Sub-Saharan African immigration to France has accelerated since the , driven primarily by asylum claims and economic opportunities amid demographic pressures in origin countries. In 2011, immigrants from comprised approximately 13% of France's total immigrant population, totaling 733,000 individuals, predominantly from . By 2023, while comprehensive inflow shares remain challenging to disaggregate precisely due to aggregated African statistics, the broader African-born immigrant stock reached 3.5 million, or 48% of all immigrants, with Sub-Saharan origins contributing significantly to recent entries via , student visas, and protection status. Key source countries include , , , and Côte d'Ivoire, with Guinea leading asylum applications in 2024 among non-European nationalities. Asylum and irregular entries form a substantial portion of Sub-Saharan inflows, often routed through the Mediterranean via or , or the Western African route across the Atlantic to the before onward travel to . recorded 130,012 asylum applications in 2024, with Sub-Saharan nationals like Guineans, Malians, and Senegalese prominent, reflecting motives blending conflict, poverty, and perceived economic prospects rather than solely persecution. Irregular migration dynamics shifted in 2024, with issuing orders against 147,156 foreigners for irregular stay—an 18.9% increase from 2023—despite an overall EU-wide drop in border crossings; West African routes saw relative rises, underscoring persistent push factors. These patterns align with broader trends, where at least one million Sub-Saharan Africans migrated to since 2010, bolstered by nearly 970,000 asylum applicants continent-wide. Demographic realities in exacerbate migration pressures, with the region's population projected to reach 2.2 billion by 2050—22% of the global total—fueled by high fertility rates averaging 4.6 children per woman, far exceeding 's 1.5. This youth bulge, coupled with limited intra-regional absorption (only 15% of Sub-Saharan migrants head to ), generates outflows seeking better livelihoods, though French data indicate elevated economic dependency among arrivals: Sub-Saharan immigrants exhibit an 80% activity rate (versus 88% for non-immigrants), with 42% below the poverty line and around 34% reliant on housing assistance. Such patterns stem from skill mismatches and structural barriers, compounded by origin societies' emphasis on extended networks, which contrast with France's universalist civic model and foster reliance on state supports over rapid self-sufficiency.

Asian, American, and Other Sources

In 2023, approximately one million immigrants born in resided in , comprising 14% of the total immigrant population and ranking as the third-largest continental origin after and . This group includes significant flows from , , , and Southeast Asian countries such as and , often driven by economic opportunities, , and student mobility rather than mass unskilled labor migration. Among these, Chinese-origin immigrants number over 100,000 individuals born in , noted for their economic dynamism through in sectors like retail, textiles, and services, particularly concentrated in the region where two-thirds reside. Indian-origin residents total around 119,000 as of 2023, with residence permits issued to Indians rising from 3,180 in 2015 to 6,984 in 2022, reflecting growing skilled inflows in , , and higher education. Turkish immigrants form a substantial subset, with nearly 600,000 residents holding Turkish nationality or born to Turkish parents, establishing communities through labor recruitment since the and recent family-based entries, though post-2020 political tensions in have spurred selective increases in economic and study-related migration. In contrast, American inflows remain modest at around 100,000 residents, with 13,000 first residence permits granted in 2024, primarily to professionals, retirees, and expatriates in or academia, marking a 5% annual increase amid post-pandemic trends. Latin American migration is minimal by comparison, totaling under 300,000 across origins, led by at 181,500 and at 40,000 as of 2019, often involving skilled workers in , arts, or temporary postings rather than large-scale settlement. These streams are characterized by higher selectivity, with issuing 51,335 economic visas in 2024 targeted at employees, scientists, and entrepreneurs, a category disproportionately attracting Asians via , , and pathways that transition to . High-education profiles among Chinese and Indian cohorts—evidenced by elevated rates of tertiary qualifications and —yield positive net fiscal contributions through taxes and , diverging from overall immigration's modest drag of 0.5% of GDP, as skilled migrants exhibit rates and surpassing native averages in urban enclaves. Southeast Asian subgroups, such as Vietnamese, demonstrate model integration with low reliance on social housing (14% versus 3-4 times higher for Maghrebi peers) and strong cultural adaptation via and small-business networks. Crime involvement remains low, with Asian communities more frequently victimized by petty than perpetrators, per police data showing negligible overrepresentation in violent or property offenses relative to population share.

Irregular and Asylum-Based Entries

In 2024, French authorities detected 147,156 foreign nationals in irregular situations, representing an 18.9% increase from 2023, with notable surges among nationals from Georgia, , and . This uptick occurred despite enhanced border controls and a 26.7% rise in enforced removals, totaling 21,601 deportations of irregular migrants, underscoring persistent enforcement shortfalls where detections vastly exceed expulsions. Irregular entries predominantly occur via overland routes from following Central crossings or through the Western Balkans, facilitated by smuggling networks that exploit gaps in EU frontier monitoring. Asylum-based inflows complemented these unauthorized channels, with 157,947 applications registered in 2024, including 130,952 first-time claims, primarily from nationals of , , and Georgia. The first-instance protection rate stood at 38.8%, granting refugee status or subsidiary protection to a minority, though overall recognition drops further amid appeals, where backlogs delay final resolutions and enable prolonged residence. Low grant rates reflect rigorous evidentiary standards under the Geneva Convention, yet systemic delays—averaging over a year for appeals—effectively extend stays for many ineligible claimants, as operatives and certain NGOs provide logistical support that circumvents initial deterrents like readmission agreements with origin countries. In early 2025, Bruno Retailleau issued a circular tightening criteria for exceptional admissions to residence (AES) for long-term undocumented workers, emphasizing case-by-case assessments tied to economic contributions and integration rather than blanket amnesties. While more restrictive than prior frameworks, the policy's provisions for regularization in select cases—such as for those with stable employment—have drawn criticism for diluting deterrence signals, as irregular entrants may anticipate pathways to status despite heightened deportation rhetoric. Empirical patterns indicate that such mechanisms, combined with uneven maritime patrols on Mediterranean and Channel-adjacent routes, sustain inflows by prioritizing humanitarian optics over absolute integrity.

Spatial Distribution

Concentration in Île-de-France

The Île-de-France region, encompassing and its suburbs, hosts approximately 40% of France's total immigrant population despite comprising only about 18% of the national populace, resulting in immigrants representing 20.7% of the region's residents compared to 10.6% nationwide. This disproportionate concentration stems primarily from chain migration networks, where initial waves of labor migrants settled in the Paris area for industrial and service jobs, drawing family members through reunification policies and established communities that provide social and economic support absent in rural France. Within Île-de-France's banlieues, departments like exhibit even higher densities, with immigrants accounting for 31.4% of the population as of 2022, including substantial shares from and . These demographics foster ethnic enclaves, particularly in municipalities where populations of Maghrebi and sub-Saharan origin predominate, with unofficial estimates placing Muslim residents—largely from these groups—at over 30% in several areas, though France's secular policies preclude official religious censuses. Such clustering arises from preferences for co-ethnic neighborhoods offering cultural familiarity, services, and informal employment, compounded by barriers to integration like gaps and that deter dispersal to less diverse rural regions with sparse job opportunities for low-skilled workers. High immigrant density exacerbates strains on local , notably and . Nearly one in four immigrants resides in overcrowded dwellings—defined as lacking sufficient rooms per occupant—compared to just 5.1% of native-born French, a disparity linked to larger family sizes, lower incomes, and reliance on subsidized concentrated in suburban towers. Schools in these banlieues face similar pressures, with over half of pupils in having at least one immigrant parent, leading to elevated dropout rates, resource shortages, and bilingual program demands that stretch budgets and contribute to academic underperformance. This spatial overload has causal ties to social unrest, as evidenced by the 2005 riots, which erupted in banlieues characterized by 30%+ immigrant shares, exceeding 40%, and intergenerational segregation fostering alienation and anti-police sentiment. The violence, sparked by the accidental deaths of two North African-descended youths fleeing police, spread to over 250 municipalities, involving of thousands of vehicles and schools, with analyses attributing its intensity to concentrated and failed assimilation in immigrant-heavy enclaves rather than isolated incidents. Empirical studies confirm that riot epicenters correlated with deindustrialized suburbs housing disproportionate non-European migrant populations, underscoring how density amplifies grievances over exclusion and service inadequacies.

Regional Variations Outside Paris

In regions east of France, such as , and in southern areas like , European immigrants constitute a larger share of the foreign-born population compared to national averages outside major urban hubs, with Southern Europeans from , , and prominent in industrial and agricultural employment. These groups, often arriving via historical labor migrations, exhibit higher integration rates in rural and semi-rural zones, where they fill niches in and farming with employment rates approaching native levels in select sectors. Sub-Saharan African immigrants, however, cluster in secondary cities like and , drawn by established networks and port economies; in 's region, these communities have expanded amid broader African inflows, contributing to localized densities exceeding 10% foreign-born in certain arrondissements as of recent estimates. 's region similarly hosts growing Sub-Saharan populations, often in service and logistics roles, though integration challenges persist due to skill mismatches and urban segregation. Provincial areas outside Paris generally offer improved employment prospects for immigrants in low-skill industries compared to the capital's competitive markets, with regional unemployment gaps narrowing in industrial belts; yet, immigrants nationwide faced over 15% joblessness in 2023, double the native rate, alongside higher welfare dependency—immigrants relying on social assistance at rates exceeding natives by factors of two to three in longitudinal studies. This reliance endures even in provinces, where family reunification and asylum-driven inflows prioritize benefits over labor participation, straining local resources despite policy intents for self-sufficiency. Attempts to enforce dispersed housing for asylum seekers and refugees in rural provinces, mandated since 2018 via geographic allocation by the French Office for Immigration and Integration (OFII), have largely failed, as over 40% of assignees relocate to urban centers within months for ethnic enclaves and informal economies, exacerbating concentrations and undermining rural integration experiments.

Quantitative Data

Annual Flows and Net Migration

In 2022, France recorded 294,000 new long-term or permanent immigrants, including changes of status and free mobility within the , marking a 10% increase from 2021. According to INSEE estimates, the number of immigrants entering for at least one year reached a peak of 490,000 that year, driven by , work, and study permits, before declining by 5% to approximately 465,500 in 2023. These inflows contributed to a positive net migration balance, with annual net figures averaging around 1.1 migrants per 1,000 population in recent years, lower than in peer countries like (3.4 per 1,000 from 2004-2024). Net migration for stood at 179,377, dropping to 91,862 in 2023 and an estimated 90,527 in 2024, reflecting outflows that partially offset gains, including of skilled French nationals amid economic opportunities abroad. This trend, though modest relative to inflows (France's overall rate remains among the OECD's lowest), highlights a brain drain in sectors like and , where domestic tax and regulatory burdens have prompted departures to lower-tax jurisdictions. Immigration flows spiked post-2015 amid the European migrant crisis, with asylum applications rising sharply—France received over 70,000 first-time claims that year, contributing to elevated entries through 2016 before stabilizing. By 2024, total visa issuances reached 2.86 million (a 16.8% increase from 2023), predominantly short-stay Schengen visas, while long-stay visas numbered 288,049, a slight 2.8% decline. Irregular entries saw no broad uptick in 2024, aligning with a 38% EU-wide drop in border crossings, though enforcement intensified with 21,601 deportations of irregular migrants, up 26.7% from 2023. Discrepancies in reported data arise from definitional differences: INSEE tallies current foreigners and long-term entries, yielding lower stock estimates (around 6 million foreigners, or 8.8% of population), while UN figures for foreign-born reach 12 million (17.2%), including naturalized citizens not recaptured in national censuses. Despite such variances, flows data from official sources confirm persistently positive but moderated net migration, sustaining at 0.3% annually without reliance on inflows alone.

Foreign-Born Population Stock

As of 2024, the foreign-born population residing in totaled 7.7 million individuals, constituting 11.3% of the country's overall population of approximately 68.4 million. This figure, derived from the Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques (INSEE), encompasses all persons born outside , including those who have acquired French (2.6 million) and non-citizens (5.1 million). Alternative estimates diverge notably; recorded 9.3 million foreign-born residents as of December 2024, potentially reflecting methodological differences such as inclusion of certain overseas territories or adjustments for underreporting. The stock of foreign-born residents has expanded not solely through migration but also via natural increase, driven by elevated rates among select subgroups relative to the native . Women originating from exhibit total rates often exceeding 3 children per woman, markedly higher than the 1.8 rate observed among native-born French women. This differential contributes to demographic momentum within the foreign-born cohort, with second-generation descendants partially inheriting elevated birth rates before convergence toward national averages. France's native faces pronounced aging, with a median age surpassing 42 years and a projected to rise amid sub-replacement (1.59 live births per woman in for 2024). While foreign-born inflows and their natural increase partially mitigate workforce shrinkage and pension system strains, empirical projections indicate this offset remains inadequate for long-term demographic equilibrium without sustained high levels, as native cohort decline accelerates post-2030. Official data underscore that the foreign-born share, even at higher estimates approaching 17% in some international assessments, has not reversed the underlying structural deficit in replacement-level reproduction.

Breakdown by Origin and Status

In 2023, France hosted approximately 7.3 million foreign-born immigrants, equivalent to 10.7% of the total population. Among these, origins from non-EU countries predominated, with 48% born in —primarily the (, , and , accounting for 60% of African immigrants)—and an additional 14% from , yielding over two-thirds from non-European sources. Europe contributed 32% of the immigrant stock, though this includes both EU and non-EU countries, with the latter featuring smaller shares from places like the and .
Continent of BirthShare of Immigrants (%)Approximate Number (2023)
483.5 million
322.4 million
141.0 million
Americas and 60.4 million
As of , non-citizen residents totaled 6.0 million, or 8.8% of the population, the majority holding legal residence permits rather than citizenship. Among non-citizens, 46% possessed African nationalities, reflecting the non-EU skew in ongoing inflows, while 35% were European (including approximately 26% from other EU states, often as free movers under EU mobility rules). The remaining 19% hailed from , the , or elsewhere. EU-origin non-citizens, comprising about 20-25% of the foreign stock, frequently enter via temporary postings or intra-EU relocation, distinct from the longer-term settlement patterns of non-EU permit holders. Many non-EU residents begin on temporary visas or one-year permits, which enable transitions to multi-year or indefinite status through applications demonstrating employment, family ties, or integration, thereby facilitating permanence without immediate . In 2023, first residence permits issued to non-EU nationals reached 343,000, with subsequent renewals and status upgrades sustaining the legal non-citizen base. This pathway underscores how initial legal entry often evolves into enduring residency, particularly for African and Asian cohorts. In recent years, has granted over 100,000 naturalizations annually, with 97,288 acquisitions recorded in 2023—a decline of 33.8% from 2022 due to stricter administrative scrutiny—and a rebound to approximately 103,661 in 2024. These figures reflect continued demand for amid integration requirements, though processing backlogs and enhanced vetting have moderated growth. The 2016 immigration reforms mandated B1-level French proficiency and civics tests for by decree, aiming to ensure ; however, average pass rates hover at 61%, with trials showing even native French speakers failing oral and written components, indicating formidable hurdles especially for low-skilled applicants lacking formal or exposure. Empirical assessments highlight that these tests disproportionately filter non-European, lower- cohorts, as linguistic and knowledge gaps persist despite preparatory programs. Visa issuance has accelerated for skilled categories, with 51,335 "Talent Passport" and related economic permits granted in 2024 to employees, researchers, and entrepreneurs, prioritizing high-salary thresholds (at least 1.8 times the national average) to attract economic contributors. Overall long-stay and short-stay visas totaled 2.86 million in 2024, a 16.8% increase from 2023, driven by post-pandemic recovery and targeted skilled inflows. Decree No. 2025-539 of June 13, 2025, further eased "Talent" pathways by reducing minimum salary requirements and expediting EU Blue Card processing, facilitating skilled migration while imposing stricter language mandates (A2-B1 levels) for visas to curb chain migration and emphasize self-sufficiency. These adjustments, effective mid-2025, signal a pivot toward merit-based issuance amid persistent integration challenges, as evidenced by elevated rejection rates for low-qualification family applications.

Core Immigration Legislation

The foundational framework for regulating foreign entry and residence in was established by the Ordinance of 2 November 1945 (Ordinance 45-2658), which required visas for entry, work authorizations, and residence permits, while allowing for expulsions in cases of public order threats or irregular status. This ordinance, enacted amid post-World War II reconstruction needs, prioritized controlled labor inflows to support economic recovery but embedded provisions for administrative removal of non-compliant foreigners. Economic pressures from the prompted Prime Minister to announce a halt on organized labor on 3 July 1974, suspending new worker recruitment while exempting seasonal, intra-company, and highly skilled entries; this suspension was extended indefinitely in subsequent years, shifting emphasis from inflows to managing existing stocks amid rising unemployment. Despite the halt, family reunification under bilateral agreements continued unchecked, contributing to sustained from non-EU sources and straining assimilation efforts. The 1993 Pasqua laws, formally Loi no. 93-141 du 4 février 1993 and subsequent measures under Interior Minister , marked a pivotal tightening by easing expulsions of irregular migrants—reducing judicial oversight for those posing security risks—and imposing stricter conditions on , such as proof of adequate housing and income. These provisions aimed to curb illegal entries and chain migration, with penalties for aiding undocumented stays rising to five years' ; however, faced legal challenges and inconsistent , perpetuating cycles of regularization amnesties that signaled lax long-term controls. Underpinning these laws is France's republican assimilation model, which mandates immigrants' adherence to universal civic values, proficiency, and (laïcité), explicitly rejecting multicultural policies that preserve distinct communal identities in favor of individual integration into the national fabric. This principle, rooted in the framework's emphasis on oaths for permanent status, views diversity as compatible only through erasure of parallel societies, with empirical data showing higher integration failures where origin-group enclaves persist absent enforced assimilation.

Citizenship Acquisition Rules

French citizenship is acquired primarily through , requiring applicants to be at least 18 years old, hold a valid , demonstrate five years of continuous legal residence (reduced to two years for those completing higher education in or for certain exceptional contributions), prove integration via B2-level French proficiency, knowledge of French and culture, and adherence to republican principles without criminal convictions that compromise loyalty. The process involves an interview assessing assimilation, with approval by decree from the Ministry of the Interior, emphasizing not just duration of stay but genuine commitment to French society. Birthright citizenship, or , was modified by the 1993 Pasqua-Méhaignerie law, which abolished automatic acquisition for children born in to foreign parents, replacing it with a conditional system to prevent unintended incentives for chain migration and ensure demonstrated ties to . Under current rules, such children may apply at age 18 after residing in since at least age 11, or declare intent at 16 with and government approval, requiring proof of residency and integration rather than granting solely by birthplace. This shift prioritizes sustained connection over territorial birth, reflecting causal concerns that unconditional could foster transient populations with weak national bonds. France permits dual citizenship without requiring renunciation of prior nationalities, a policy that, from a first-principles perspective, risks diluting exclusive allegiance by allowing divided loyalties between states with potentially conflicting interests, as evidenced in debates over hyphenated identities weakening social cohesion and republican unity. Empirical discussions highlight how retaining foreign passports may hinder full assimilation, correlating with persistent ethnic enclaves and reduced incentives for cultural adaptation, though some studies claim minimal self-reported impact on national attachment. Naturalization rates reflect this framework: in 2024, 48,500 foreigners acquired via decree, down from prior peaks amid stricter integration scrutiny. Citizenship deprivation applies to dual nationals convicted of serious terrorism offenses or acts compromising , a safeguard extended under post-2015 laws to deter disloyalty without rendering individuals stateless, though application remains selective and tied to judicial findings of intent to harm the . This mechanism underscores the conditional nature of , revocable when empirical evidence reveals non-allegiance, countering risks from lax prior grants.

Enforcement, Deportations, and Border Controls

France's enforcement of immigration laws has shown modest improvements in deportation numbers, with the Interior Ministry reporting a 27% increase in removals of irregular migrants to 21,601 in 2024, up from prior years. This rise, while notable, represents a fraction of the estimated irregular migrant population, as over 140,000 orders to leave (OQTF) were issued that year, with execution rates hovering around 10-15%, meaning the majority of orders fail to result in actual departure due to logistical, legal, and diplomatic hurdles. Border controls have been bolstered by the temporary reintroduction of systematic checks at internal Schengen borders with neighboring countries, effective from November 1, 2024, to April 2025, in response to security and migration pressures. assistance through provided an average of 230 officers to support French in management tasks, including screenings and returns, though this deployment has been limited in scope compared to overall irregular crossing attempts detected EU-wide. Implementation gaps persist due to resistance from local authorities and non-governmental organizations, which in some urban areas delay or obstruct deportations through administrative non-cooperation or legal challenges, effectively creating pockets of reduced . Such laxity in executing removals empirically correlates with sustained incentives for irregular entries, as low removal probabilities reduce deterrents for potential migrants seeking to exploit asylum or regularization pathways.

Reforms from 2023-2025

In December 2023, the French Parliament adopted the "Law to Control Immigration and Improve Integration," which sought to restrict inflows while enhancing requirements for residency and integration, including curbs on social benefits for non-EU migrants waiting five years for full access and criteria for regularizing undocumented workers in sectors facing labor shortages, such as agriculture and construction. The legislation, influenced by pressure from the far-right National Rally party's electoral advances in prior local and national votes, introduced measures like mandatory French language proficiency for certain residence permits and limits on family reunification by requiring proof of adequate housing and stable income. On January 25, 2024, the Constitutional Council invalidated 35 of the law's 80 articles, primarily on procedural grounds or for violating constitutional principles of equality and proportionality, striking down proposals for annual immigration quotas set by , accelerated naturalization denial for children born in to foreign parents convicted of serious crimes, and differentiated welfare access based on origin. Surviving provisions included expanded for irregular migrants up to 210 days in certain cases and a new "medical permit" for undocumented individuals unable to return home due to health issues, reflecting a partial amid ongoing debates over system overload from rising asylum claims and irregular entries. By October 2024, amid continued far-right momentum from the 's strong showing in elections—securing 31% of the vote and prompting President Macron to dissolve the —the government announced plans for a new bill in 2025 to further tighten controls, including extending maximum detention periods for irregular migrants and stricter scrutiny of asylum and work visa applications. Proposed 2025 reforms emphasize enhanced verification for asylum claims, reduced processing times to 90 days, and targeted restrictions on work visas for nationals from high-risk countries like , while streamlining pathways for skilled labor under the Talent Permit and EU Blue Card to address labor shortages without broadening low-skilled inflows. These efforts respond to empirical pressures, including a 25% rise in Channel crossing attempts from the in 2024 and sustained public concern over integration failures driving far-right support.

Economic Consequences

Contributions to Growth and Labor

Following , France faced acute labor shortages during its economic reconstruction phase, prompting the recruitment of foreign workers to fill gaps in industries such as , , and . Between 1945 and 1974, immigration policies facilitated the influx of workers primarily from , , , and later , contributing to sustained by expanding the labor force without immediate reliance on domestic mobilization. This period saw foreign labor help tune the economy amid cyclical fluctuations, supporting and postwar resurgence in sectors like services and . In recent years, targeted skilled immigration has provided measurable boosts to high-value sectors. The French Tech Visa and Passeport Talent programs, streamlined for tech talent, have attracted professionals in , AI, and biotech, with applications rising notably since to address shortages in innovation-driven fields. In , these visas supported France's economic attractiveness by enabling multi-year residence for qualified employees earning at least €41,933 annually, fostering contributions to tech ecosystems in hubs like and . Empirical analyses indicate such selective inflows positively influence GDP per capita through skill complementarity, particularly when immigrants occupy niches natives underfill. However, aggregate labor market data reveal limited overall contributions from the broader immigrant population. In 2023, the employment rate for working-age immigrants stood at 62.4%, compared to 69.5% for natives, reflecting barriers like skill mismatches and qualification recognition that constrain productivity gains. This gap persists across regions, with studies showing imperfect substitutability between immigrants and natives, leading to modest net additions to the labor supply rather than transformative growth. Remittances further diminish reinvestment in the French economy, with outflows exceeding €13 billion in , equivalent to a leakage of earnings that reduces the multiplier effect of immigrant labor. Long-term dynamics suggest , as increased immigrant shares have been linked to slight depression for certain native groups, such as highly educated workers (around 1% reduction), and potential displacement in low-skill sectors due to flexibility differences. While short-term fills of shortages yield verifiable positives, sustained high-volume inflows risk crowding out native participation without proportional uplift.

Fiscal Burdens and Welfare Dependency

Immigrants in France exhibit higher rates of compared to natives, with non-EU immigrants particularly overrepresented in social assistance programs. According to INSEE data for 2021, social benefits (excluding pensions and ) constitute 11% of the average for immigrants overall, versus 6% for non-immigrants; this disparity is starkest for those born in , at 16% (€3,110 annually), encompassing regions like the and . Such reliance strains minima sociaux like the (), where studies indicate foreigners and recent non-EU arrivals form a disproportionate share of beneficiaries, though official breakdowns by origin remain limited due to data constraints. Net fiscal burdens from immigration are estimated at €41 billion annually as of 2023, after subtracting immigrant contributions in taxes and social security payments from gross expenditures of €75.1 billion. This net figure, derived from public budget analyses, highlights welfare-related costs such as €7.4 billion in solidarity benefits, alongside (€12.1 billion) and aid (€3.2 billion), with non-EU and unemployed immigrants driving the majority. Independent assessments, including those using INSEE data, peg additional surcoûts from immigrant at over €10 billion yearly, reflecting elevated rates (42.4% for immigrants and descendants in consolidated 2019 figures). Family allowances exacerbate long-term fiscal pressures, as non-EU immigrant households, often larger due to higher (2.3 children per foreign-born woman in 2021 versus 1.7 for natives), qualify for amplified payouts under progressive benefit structures. Reforms tying allowances to size, as analyzed in policy evaluations, demonstrate modest fertility boosts among recipients, implying causal reinforcement of dependency cycles in high-benefit groups like Maghrebi and sub-Saharan origins. These dynamics contribute to sustained budgetary strain, with non-EU inflows prioritizing low-skill profiles that yield limited offsets via employment taxes.

Employment Disparities by Origin

In 2024, issued 51,335 economic visas to employees, scientists, and entrepreneurs, signaling targeted efforts to attract skilled labor amid broader labor market challenges. Despite this, immigrants as a group experienced rates roughly double those of natives, with INSEE reporting 11.2% for immigrants in 2023 versus 6.5% for individuals born in without migrant ancestry. Non-EU immigrants, who constitute a significant share of arrivals, faced even steeper hurdles, with rates at 62% compared to 70% for natives. Employment outcomes vary sharply by geographic origin, with European immigrants generally achieving integration into the job market closer to native levels due to shared cultural, linguistic, and educational alignments that facilitate skill transferability. In contrast, immigrants from African nations, particularly , exhibit persistently higher , often exceeding 19.5% for non-European foreigners overall—a rate more than double the 8% national average for citizens. These gaps reflect not only credential non-recognition and deficiencies but also structural mismatches between imported low-skill profiles and France's service- and tech-oriented economy, where vocational training programs have proven insufficient for cohorts resistant to linguistic and cultural adaptation. Youth unemployment amplifies these origin-based disparities in immigrant-heavy suburbs (banlieues), where rates for 15-24-year-olds surpass 40% in locales like Grigny (41%) and approach 54% in others with high concentrations of North African descent. Such figures underscore policy shortcomings in bridging skill gaps for non-European , where networks and parallel economies deter mainstream entry, perpetuating cycles of dependency over assimilation-driven upskilling.

Social and Cultural Ramifications

Integration Metrics and Failures

Integration of immigrants into French society, particularly in education and , has shown persistent gaps that contribute to economic underperformance. Second-generation immigrants, defined as individuals born in to at least one immigrant parent, exhibit lower compared to natives without immigrant backgrounds. For instance, children of immigrants achieve higher qualifications than their parents but remain below the levels of native French children, with disparities evident in completion rates. School dropout rates among second-generation immigrants are notably higher, exacerbating economic stasis. Boys in this group are three times more likely than girls to leave without a , with rates reaching 28% for boys, compared to lower figures among natives. These patterns reflect empirical non-progression, where immigrant-origin face barriers in academic advancement, leading to reduced skill acquisition and limited access to higher-wage . Language proficiency represents another critical lag, with many non-EU immigrants arriving at elementary levels (A1 on the CEFR scale), hindering labor market entry. Official assessments by the Office Français de l'Immigration et de l'Intégration (OFII) indicate that low initial French skills correlate with prolonged and stalled integration, as basic communication barriers impede job training and employment. Studies attribute this to insufficient incentives for rapid acquisition, where welfare provisions sustain households without necessitating immediate linguistic or vocational adaptation. From a causal perspective, France's extensive welfare system, including housing and family allowances, creates disincentives for self-reliant integration by reducing the urgency to overcome educational and deficits. shows that higher welfare expenditures are negatively associated with immigrant rates, as benefits substitute for labor market participation, perpetuating cycles of low skills and economic marginalization. This contrasts with models emphasizing conditional tied to integration milestones, which empirical evidence links to faster progression toward independence.

Cultural Clashes with Secular Republicanism

France's principle of laïcité, enshrined in the 1905 law separating church and state, mandates strict neutrality in public institutions and prohibits religious symbols that overtly challenge secular authority. Immigration from predominantly Muslim countries has introduced practices perceived as incompatible, such as demands for spaces, food in schools, and veiling, which have repeatedly tested this framework. In , legislation banned conspicuous religious signs in public schools, primarily targeting the Islamic headscarf (), following debates over its role in undermining uniform secular education. A 2010 law extended restrictions to full-face coverings like the and niqab in public spaces, citing security and the need to affirm republican values over imported religious norms. These tensions reflect broader Islamist , where parallel normative systems erode state monopoly on . Reports document informal by imams applying sharia-inspired rulings on family matters, divorces, and inheritance within Muslim enclaves, bypassing French civil codes that prioritize equality. In response, the Reinforcing Respect for the Principles of the (Loi confortant le respect des principes de la République) targeted such separatism by regulating religious associations, closing radical mosques, and curbing foreign imams promoting ideologies hostile to laïcité. The law addressed "entryism" by groups like the , which advocate sharia supremacy, as evidenced in affiliated institutions distributing materials deeming Islamic superior to secular . Foreign funding exacerbates these clashes, with states like , , and bankrolling mosques and training that import Wahhabi, Salafi, or Brotherhood doctrines rejecting . Between 2010 and 2018, alone financed multiple French Islamic centers tied to Brotherhood networks, while 's Diyanet influences hundreds of mosques via imams and curricula emphasizing religious over republican loyalty. Such influences correlate with cultural practices like honor-based violence, imported from origin countries and manifesting in through familial punishments for perceived infractions against communal norms, often targeting women. Academic analyses link rising honor killings in , including , to migration flows preserving patriarchal controls incompatible with egalitarian laïcité. Empirical surveys underscore value rejection: A 2016 Ifop poll found 29% of French Muslims opposed secular laws in favor of religious rules, with higher rates among younger cohorts. Studies confirm among Muslim immigrants predicts lower support for and secular authority, fostering parallel moral orders that prioritize divine over civil law. These data challenge narratives of inevitable assimilation, highlighting causal persistence of origin-country norms under lax integration enforcement.

Family Structures and Fertility Differentials

Immigrant women in France exhibit significantly higher total fertility rates (TFR) than native-born women, with the disparity most pronounced among those originating from sub-Saharan Africa and North Africa. In 2017 data, the TFR for immigrant women stood at 2.6 children per woman, compared to 1.8 for native French women, accounting for immigrant mothers comprising 19% of all births despite representing a smaller share of the female population of childbearing age. Women born in sub-Saharan Africa maintain a TFR of approximately 2.9-3.0 children, while those from Turkey average around 3.1, far exceeding the native rate that declined to 1.62 children per woman in 2024. These elevated rates persist into the second generation to a lesser degree but contribute to sustained demographic divergence, as native fertility remains below the 2.1 replacement level. Family reunification policies amplify these differentials by facilitating the arrival of spouses and children from high-fertility origin countries, often leading to a "catch-up" in births post-reunification. Studies indicate that fertility increases following spousal reunification, as separated migrant couples resume childbearing patterns closer to those in origin countries upon settling in . This mechanism, combined with larger household sizes in immigrant communities—frequently exceeding four children in sub-Saharan African families—contrasts with the smaller, nuclear structures prevalent among natives, where and delayed parenthood predominate. French family allowances, available without employment conditions from the second child and scaled by family size, provide incentives that align with cultural norms favoring larger families among immigrants, though recent reforms impose a five-year residency wait for non-working foreigners. Projections underscore the long-term impact: under high-migration scenarios, the Muslim population—largely drawn from high-fertility regions like and —is expected to reach 18% of France's total by 2050, driven primarily by above-replacement rather than alone. This shift sustains overall amid native decline but alters family composition, with immigrant-origin groups projected to account for the of births by , posing causal pressures on intergenerational structures supporting France's welfare system through demographic imbalance.

Security and Crime Dimensions

Overrepresentation in Criminal Statistics

Foreign nationals, who constitute approximately 7-8% of France's population, accounted for 24% of the prison population as of 2023, resulting in an overrepresentation factor of roughly three times. This disparity is even more pronounced for non-EU nationals, who predominate among foreign inmates and exhibit incarceration rates 3-5 times higher than natives when adjusted for demographic shares. Official Ministry of Justice data for 2023 further indicate that foreign nationals represented 17% of suspects in all offenses (excluding dual nationals), more than double their population proportion, with elevated shares in violent and property crimes. In urban centers like , the overrepresentation is stark. Police data reported that foreign nationals committed 48% of all crimes in the city during the first half of 2022, despite comprising under 20% of the local population. For sexual offenses, 77% of solved street rapes in Paris in 2023 involved foreign perpetrators, primarily from non-EU origins such as and . Similar patterns appear in gang-related violence, where internal police analyses have documented foreign nationals' involvement exceeding 50% in organized urban assaults, though comprehensive national breakdowns remain limited due to data collection constraints. These disparities persist even after controlling for socioeconomic variables like and in select econometric studies, suggesting factors beyond economic deprivation—such as differing cultural norms on , roles, and —contribute causally. For instance, analyses of offender profiles indicate that recent non-EU arrivals from high-violence origin countries exhibit rates uncorrelated with assimilation duration or income levels, pointing to imported behavioral patterns rather than solely environmental failures. Mainstream interpretations often attribute overrepresentation primarily to profiling biases or vulnerabilities, yet raw Ministry and prefecture figures, cross-verified across jurisdictions, undermine such explanations as insufficient to account for the scale of the gaps. Recent trends exacerbate these patterns: Interior Ministry reports noted a 2024 uptick in violent urban incidents, with non-EU foreign nationals implicated in over 60% of recorded assaults in hotspots like , amid broader rises in knife crimes and robberies linked to migrant-heavy demographics. Empirical controls for age, gender, and urban density in these datasets confirm the overrepresentation's robustness, highlighting composition—particularly from regions with weak rule-of-law traditions—as a key driver over generic disadvantage. Since 2015, Islamist terrorist attacks in France have resulted in at least 294 deaths across 53 incidents documented up to April 2024, with major events including the November 2015 Paris attacks (133 deaths) and the July 2016 Nice truck ramming (86 deaths). These attacks, predominantly claimed by groups like the Islamic State, highlight a persistent jihadist threat linked to migration patterns from regions with entrenched Islamist extremism. Perpetrators frequently include first-generation immigrants or second-generation descendants from North African countries such as Algeria, Tunisia, and Morocco, where familial and cultural ties facilitate radicalization pathways. For instance, the 2015 Paris attackers comprised French nationals of Iraqi descent alongside others with foreign ties, while the Nice perpetrator was a Tunisian national who resided in France. Unvetted asylum processes have enabled the entry and persistence of radicals, as seen in cases like the 2018 Strasbourg attack, where the perpetrator, an Algerian national, repeatedly applied for asylum despite prior criminal convictions and deportation orders, ultimately killing five before being neutralized. Irregular migrants' involvement in attacks has risen since 2017, with security analyses noting increased participation by those entering via uncontrolled routes from jihadist hotspots in the and . This causal connection stems from inadequate screening amid mass inflows, allowing individuals radicalized abroad to embed in host communities, where second-generation grievances amplify domestic threats. Radicalization incubates in immigrant-dense banlieues, where high concentrations of migrants from Muslim-majority countries create environments conducive to Salafi-jihadist networks, often insulated from integration efforts. These areas, characterized by socioeconomic isolation and parallel Islamist structures, serve as breeding grounds for recruitment, with studies linking family from conflict zones to heightened risks among youth. In , French authorities foiled multiple jihadist plots, including three targeting the Paris Olympics, underscoring ongoing vulnerabilities tied to such demographics, though specific perpetrator migration statuses varied. Empirical data from operations reveal that overrepresentation of immigrant-origin individuals in jihadist convictions persists, driven by imported ideologies rather than solely socioeconomic factors.

Urban Disorder and No-Go Areas

The banlieues, France's public housing suburbs housing large concentrations of immigrants and their descendants primarily from North Africa, have experienced chronic urban disorder characterized by riots, arson, and property destruction, often erupting as responses to police actions but symptomatic of broader failures in maintaining state authority. These areas, designated by the government as sensitive urban zones (zones urbaines sensibles), number over 700 and feature elevated rates of violence where routine policing is contested, with officers frequently operating in reinforced units due to risks of ambush. The June-July 2023 riots, triggered by the fatal police shooting of Nahel Merzouk—a 17-year-old French citizen of Algerian and Moroccan descent—on June 27 in , exemplified this breakdown, with violence spreading to over 500 municipalities and resulting in approximately 3,000 arrests, the burning of more than 1,300 vehicles, and widespread estimated in the hundreds of millions of euros. Rioters, largely young males from immigrant backgrounds, targeted symbols of authority including police stations, schools, and town halls, with Interior Ministry data recording over 1,000 fires in public buildings and alongside of commercial properties. This unrest followed a pattern seen in prior episodes, such as the 2005 riots originating in , where 28,000 vehicles were incinerated over three weeks amid similar youth-led attacks on emergency services and property. Arson attacks, particularly on , spike during these disturbances but reflect underlying endemic issues, with national fire service records showing around 45,000 fires annually, disproportionately concentrated in suburban areas prone to ritualized burnings on occasions like —such as 874 cars torched in 2021-2022. Property crimes, including burglaries and , escalate in tandem; during the 2023 events, reports documented hundreds of break-ins and assaults on businesses, exacerbating local economic decline in already high-unemployment zones. Police tactics have adapted with retreats from high-risk zones to regroup, as evidenced by accounts of feeling "hunted" and avoiding solo patrols, which cedes temporary control and fosters parallel authority structures. Such policing limitations have, in response, spurred among residents, with historical data from the early 1990s indicating two-thirds of troubled neighborhoods lacked permanent police presence, prompting citizen patrols and self-defense groups to fill the void against gang activity and . While sporadic, these initiatives underscore causal links between state withdrawal and community-level enforcement, as seen in isolated mobilizations against perceived threats in unpoliced enclaves.

Debates and Comparative Analysis

Major Controversies and Policy Critiques

The 2024 Immigration Law, enacted on January 27, aimed to tighten controls through measures such as annual migration quotas and extended waiting periods for non-EU migrants to access social benefits, but the Constitutional Council struck down key provisions including quotas, benefit restrictions, and tightened rules on grounds of procedural irregularities and incompatibility with EU law. These rulings highlighted tensions between deterrence-oriented reforms—intended to reduce irregular entries and prioritize skilled inflows—and regularization pathways that critics argue incentivize further arrivals by signaling leniency. Proponents of stricter deterrence, including right-leaning parliamentarians, contended that partial implementation still advanced selective admission for labor needs, while opponents viewed the law's remnants as insufficient to address systemic inflows exceeding 300,000 net migrants annually in recent years. Post-World War II immigration policies successfully addressed acute labor shortages, with France recruiting over one million workers from , , , and between 1946 and 1965 to rebuild industries like , , and , contributing to economic growth rates averaging 5% annually in the 1950s-1960s era. However, policy critiques intensified from the onward, as and asylum provisions shifted inflows toward low-skilled migrants, fostering debates over 's incompatibility with France's assimilationist republican model, which emphasizes secular unity over . Advocates for selective models argue that unrestricted multiculturalism has led to parallel societies, contrasting with evidence from targeted labor programs that integrated earlier cohorts more effectively through economic contributions rather than subsidized settlement. Critics portray France's welfare system as a for non-economic migrants, with empirical studies documenting disproportionate reliance on benefits among immigrants from —such as overrepresentation in aid and programs—exacerbating fiscal strains estimated at €20-30 billion annually in net transfers. While some disputes the magnet hypothesis by noting decisions driven more by than benefits, causal analyses of benefit restrictions in high-welfare states reveal clustering of welfare-dependent immigrants, supporting critiques that generous entitlements undermine deterrence and self-selection for employable entrants. Denmark's empirical experience provides a , where strict policies since the —including temporary protection, benefit pauses for new arrivals, and integration contracts—reduced asylum inflows by over 80% from 2015 peaks and boosted employment rates to 60% within five years, outperforming France's 40% benchmark for similar cohorts through enforced deterrence and skill prioritization. These outcomes underscore arguments for policy pauses or caps to recalibrate inflows, allowing assimilation of existing stocks before resuming selective admissions, a approach France's fragmented reforms have yet to fully emulate amid judicial and EU constraints.

Public Opinion and Electoral Impacts

Public opinion polls in have long indicated widespread concern over levels, with majorities consistently favoring stricter controls despite occasional media narratives suggesting declining anxiety. A February 2025 survey revealed that 68% of respondents supported holding a national on , reflecting deep public unease with current inflows. Similarly, around 70% of the population expressed a desire to tighten migration laws, underscoring a for reduced legal and illegal entries over expansion. These sentiments persist amid perceptions of inadequate integration and security risks, with 80% criticizing the government's handling of as of early 2025. This public dissatisfaction has profoundly shaped electoral dynamics, propelling the Rassemblement National (RN) to unprecedented gains by centering its platform on immigration restriction. In the 2022 presidential election, RN candidate secured 41.5% in the runoff, a marked increase from prior cycles, driven partly by voter frustration with unchecked migration. The party's momentum accelerated in the June 2024 European Parliament elections, where RN captured 31.37% of the national vote—its strongest showing ever—explicitly tying the result to anti-immigration appeals amid rising asylum claims and border pressures. This outcome prompted President to dissolve the and call snap legislative elections on June 30 and July 7, 2024, in a bid to counter the far-right surge. In the snap elections' first round, RN and allies obtained approximately 33% of votes, positioning them as the leading force and highlighting as a pivotal voter motivator, with analysts noting hostility to migration as a key driver of turnout shifts. Although tactical withdrawals by centrist and left-wing parties in the second round limited RN to 143 seats—short of a —the fragmented outcome left Macron's reliant on ad hoc alliances, effectively forcing concessions toward tougher measures, such as the December 2023 law enhancing powers and restrictions. These electoral pressures, rooted in polling data showing sustained viewing as excessive, have compelled policy pivots away from prior liberalization, even as instability endures into 2025.

Contrasts with Other EU Nations

France's immigration policies exhibit greater leniency compared to several peers, particularly in asylum processing and enforcement, leading to persistently higher inflows amid 2023-2024 data. While recorded the highest immigrant inflows at 1,271,200 in 2023, France followed with 417,600, translating to comparable per capita pressures given differences. However, France issued the most return decisions in the EU (136,000 in 2023) yet demonstrates lower execution rates, exacerbating welfare and burdens relative to Germany's more structured integration efforts. Non-EU immigrants in France, predominantly from (61% of inflows), display elevated , contrasting with Germany's emphasis on labor market integration despite similar overrepresentation in crime statistics—foreigners comprising 41% of suspects in Germany (15% of population) versus proportional disparities in France. Denmark and Sweden provide stark contrasts through recent policy tightenings that have curtailed asylum grants and net migration. 's shift to a "zero " paradigm under Social Democratic leadership reduced asylum applications to historically low levels by mid-2025, ranking it low per capita among states, with further restrictions on and benefits in 2024. , reversing prior openness, implemented all-out tightening measures, achieving negative net migration in 2024 via accelerated deportations (over 12,000) and plummeting asylum permits, a trajectory absent in France's 157,947 asylum registrations that year. France's lag in comparable reforms perpetuates higher asylum persistence into 2025, diverging from these Nordic models' empirical success in flow reduction. Eastern EU nations like Poland and underscore the stabilizing effects of low net non-EU migration, enforced via rigorous border controls and opt-outs from EU redistribution mechanisms. These countries recorded minimal positive or negative net migration in 2023-2024, far below Western averages, correlating with enhanced social cohesion, subdued crime rates, and avoidance of immigration-linked urban unrest prevalent in . data reveal Eastern inflows dominated by intra-EU mobility rather than third-country sources, fostering demographic stability without the welfare strains or security challenges observed in high-migration , where net gains exceed 180,000 annually. This pattern empirically links restrained immigration to reduced societal tensions across the EU divide.

References

  1. https://www.histoire-immigration.fr/en/migration/since-when-has-france-been-a-land-of-immigration
  2. https://www.ined.fr/en/everything_about_population/demographic-facts-sheets/faq/how-many-immigrants-france/
  3. https://www.insee.fr/en/statistiques/8575212
  4. https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/news/france-new-and-inspiring-initiatives-immigration-statistics-and-reports-combating-discrimination-2025-10-24_en
  5. https://www.pragueprocess.eu/en/countries/854-france
  6. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/france-immigration-rising-far-right
  7. https://hal.science/hal-01154196/document
  8. https://www.insee.fr/en/statistiques/8245945
  9. https://www.lemonde.fr/en/france/article/2023/12/20/what-s-in-france-s-controversial-immigration-law_6361995_7.html
  10. https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01081685/document
  11. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/266915127_Integration_of_immigrants_in_France_a_historical_perspective
  12. https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/field/net-migration-rate/country-comparison/
  13. https://research.monash.edu/files/658528172/433639132-oa.pdf
  14. https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00167374/document
  15. https://www.histoire-immigration.fr/en/migration-characteristics-by-country-of-origin/the-italians-in-france-milestones-in-a-migration
  16. https://fbaum.unc.edu/teaching/France_Sp08/Statistics.pdf
  17. https://www.histoire-immigration.fr/en/migration-characteristics-by-country-of-origin/algerian-immigration-into-france
  18. https://merip.org/1981/01/origins-of-the-algerian-proletariat/
  19. https://encyclopedia.1914-1918-online.net/article/non-european-soldiers/
  20. https://encyclopedia.1914-1918-online.net/article/african-labour-in-europe-africa/
  21. https://www.nytimes.com/1931/12/28/archives/french-census-shows-increase-of-1091000-total-is-41834923-of-whom.html
  22. https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/mlewis/files/strangeness_foreigners.pdf
  23. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2004/12/migration-for-employment_g1gh467d/9789264108684-en.pdf
  24. https://www.citeco.fr/10000-years-history-economics/contemporary-world/the-post-world-war-ii-30-year-boom-period-the-trente-glorieuses
  25. https://cambridgeforecast.wordpress.com/2006/10/02/the-concept-of-les-trentes-glorieuses-from-1945-1975/
  26. https://www.cepii.fr/PDF_PUB/wp/2018/wp2018-04ang.pdf
  27. https://hal.science/hal-05007826/document
  28. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2545735
  29. https://www.bpb.de/themen/migration-integration/regionalprofile/english-version-country-profiles/133522/historical-development-of-immigration-and-immigration-policy/
  30. https://migration.ucdavis.edu/rs/more.php?id=70
  31. https://www.cepii.fr/PDF_PUB/wp/2023/wp2023-18.pdf
  32. https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2020-09/regine_appendix_a_january_2009_en.pdf
  33. https://www.iom.int/resources/regularization-programmes-effective-instrument-migration-policy
  34. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1048500
  35. https://www.macrotrends.net/global-metrics/countries/fra/france/net-migration
  36. https://www.ined.fr/en/everything_about_population/data/france/immigrants-foreigners/immigrants-foreigners/
  37. https://bpy.bilgi.edu.tr/media/document/2020/06/09/literature-review-on-france_june_2020.pdf
  38. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1057/9780230616660_2
  39. https://www.statista.com/statistics/460355/asylum-applications-france/
  40. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/2024/11/international-migration-outlook-2024_c6f3e803/full-report/france_c739c214.html
  41. https://www.msn.com/en-in/news/world/france-immigration-statistics-surge-in-2024-visas-up-168-amid-political-debate/ar-AA1ysLEG
  42. https://www.fabexpat.com/french-visa/france-issued-2-86-million-visas-in-2024/
  43. https://www.business-standard.com/finance/personal-finance/france-issues-16-8-more-visas-in-2024-indians-among-top-recipients-125020600605_1.html
  44. https://tradingeconomics.com/france/foreign-born-population-eurostat-data.html
  45. https://asylumineurope.org/reports/country/france/overview-main-changes-previous-report-update/
  46. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/frances-government-welcomes-rise-deportations-it-tries-stave-off-far-right-2025-02-04/
  47. https://www.infomigrants.net/en/post/62684/france-rise-in-deportations-and-stricter-migration-controls-by-government
  48. https://www.reuters.com/world/africa/france-tighten-visa-rules-algerian-diplomats-deportation-dispute-escalates-2025-08-06/
  49. https://www.insee.fr/fr/statistiques/8236359
  50. https://www.insee.fr/fr/statistiques/6793224?sommaire=6793391
  51. https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01081685v1/document
  52. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/fr/publications/reports/2023/06/indicators-of-immigrant-integration-2023_70d202c4/d5253a21-fr.pdf
  53. https://www.histoire-immigration.fr/economie-et-immigration/quel-est-le-poids-de-l-immigration-sur-les-prestations-sociales
  54. https://www.lemonde.fr/en/france/article/2023/04/23/no-study-has-found-any-effect-of-immigration-on-criminality_6023985_7.html
  55. https://www.antoniocasella.eu/nume/Aoki_Todo_2006.pdf
  56. https://ftp.iza.org/dp5185.pdf
  57. https://www.insee.fr/en/statistiques/8245925
  58. https://en.bladi.net/study-moroccan-immigrants-largest-foreign-born-groups-france%2C114892.html
  59. https://www.moroccoworldnews.com/2025/02/165020/moroccan-immigration-to-france-tops-600-000-as-north-african-numbers-rise/
  60. https://shs.cairn.info/journal-population-and-societies-2019-7-page-1?lang=en
  61. https://www.cairn-int.info/abstract-E_POPSOC_568_0001--french-fertility-is-the-highest-in.htm
  62. https://www.migrationinstitute.org/files/events/natter-1.pdf
  63. https://www.mei.edu/sites/default/files/publications/Migration%2520Maghreb.pdf
  64. https://wilj.law.wisc.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/1270/2012/02/hajbandeh.pdf
  65. https://scholarworks.seattleu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1388&context=suurj
  66. https://www.mei.edu/publications/patterns-and-trends-migration-maghreb
  67. https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1109&context=urceu
  68. https://www.gpfi.org/sites/gpfi/files/sites/default/files/France%2520National%2520Remittance%2520Plan%25202019.pdf
  69. https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC123516/jrc123516_remittances_in_north_africa_04_02_2021_final.pdf
  70. https://www.demographic-research.org/articles/volume/36/45
  71. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6261851/
  72. https://www.worlddata.info/europe/france/asylum.php
  73. https://www.pewresearch.org/global-migration-and-demography/2018/03/22/at-least-a-million-sub-saharan-africans-moved-to-europe-since-2010/
  74. https://www.ceped.org/fr/publications-ressources/working-papers-du-ceped/wp09
  75. https://cipe.umd.edu/conferences/Maastricht/conf_papers/Papers/Immigrants_Dependency_to_Welfare_State.pdf
  76. https://www.insee.fr/en/statistiques/8245895
  77. https://www.lemonde.fr/en/france/article/2024/08/30/in-france-the-reasons-behind-immigration-are-becoming-more-diverse_6723779_7.html
  78. https://www.ined.fr/en/everything_about_population/demographic-facts-sheets/focus-on/chinese-immigration-in-france/
  79. https://www.ined.fr/en/publications/editions/population-and-societies/Integration-and-insularity-The-diversity-of-Chinese-immigrants-in-France/
  80. https://www.ined.fr/en/everything_about_population/data/france/immigration-flow/residence-permits-by-nationality/
  81. https://www.cats-network.eu/assets/cats/CATS_Network_Paper__Briefs/CATS_NETWORK_PAPER_NO._6_08.05.2024.pdf
  82. https://www.blacktowerfm.com/news/americans-are-moving-to-france/
  83. https://www.jobbatical.com/blog/frances-latest-skilled-immigration-numbers-what-employers-need-to-know
  84. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-37720780
  85. https://www.thelocal.fr/20250206/number-of-foreigners-expelled-from-france-rose-26-in-2024
  86. https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/news/eu-sees-38-drop-irregular-border-crossings-2024-2025-01-24_en
  87. https://asylumineurope.org/reports/country/france/statistics/
  88. https://ecre.org/aida-country-report-on-france-update-on-2024/
  89. https://www.infomigrants.net/en/post/62689/france-new-government-measures-to-regularize-undocumented-migrants
  90. https://multidimensionparis.com/about-the-new-policy-of-regularising-undocumented-migrants-in-france/
  91. https://mixedmigration.org/moving-beyond-deterrence-the-need-for-a-fresh-approach-to-migration-to-europe/
  92. https://www.immigration.interieur.gouv.fr/Info-ressources/Etudes-et-statistiques/Les-chiffres-de-l-immigration-en-France/Population-immigree-par-departement
  93. https://www.insee.fr/fr/statistiques/8242329?sommaire=8242421
  94. https://www.insee.fr/fr/statistiques/2121524
  95. https://www.insee.fr/fr/statistiques/2012727
  96. https://www.immigration.interieur.gouv.fr/Info-ressources/Etudes-et-statistiques/Etudes/Infos-migrations/La-suroccupation-des-logements-en-France-metropolitaine-pres-d-un-immigre-sur-quatre-vit-en-logement-suroccupe
  97. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/unrest-in-france-november-2005-immigration-islam-and-the-challenge-of-integration/
  98. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0167268120300196
  99. https://academic.oup.com/sf/article/98/4/1719/5608518
  100. https://www.ined.fr/fichier/s_rubrique/203/591.population.societies.june.2021.immigration.rural.en.pdf
  101. https://www.statista.com/statistics/761176/jobseekers-immigration-status-france/
  102. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2546762
  103. https://openmigration.org/en/analyses/reception-of-migrants-in-paris-crumbles-at-porte-de-la-chapelle/
  104. https://ip-quarterly.com/en/france-has-problem-racism-not-migration
  105. https://www.pewresearch.org/global-migration-and-demography/2016/08/02/number-of-refugees-to-europe-surges-to-record-1-3-million-in-2015/
  106. https://www.connexionfrance.com/news/small-drop-in-percentage-of-french-visa-applications-being-declined/750299
  107. https://www.frontex.europa.eu/media-centre/news/news-release/irregular-border-crossings-into-eu-drop-sharply-in-2024-oqpweX
  108. https://www.dailysabah.com/world/europe/frances-foreign-population-much-lower-than-widely-believed-study
  109. https://data.worldbank.org/country/france
  110. https://www.insee.fr/fr/statistiques/3633212
  111. https://www.insee.fr/fr/statistiques/8651304
  112. https://shs.cairn.info/journal-population-and-societies-2004-4-page-1?lang=en
  113. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Fertility_statistics
  114. https://www.insee.fr/en/metadonnees/source/serie/s1169
  115. https://www.insee.fr/en/statistiques/8654456
  116. https://www.thelocal.fr/20251008/6-million-foreigners-call-france-home-official-figures-show
  117. https://www.rfi.fr/en/france/20251010-france-share-of-foreigners-lower-than-in-most-eu-countries
  118. https://www.welcometofrance.com/en/fiche/resident-card
  119. https://www.welcometofrance.com/en/fiche/temporary-residence-permits-marked-temporary-worker-and-employee
  120. https://thinkeurope.de/blog/foreigners-granted-french-citizenship-decrease-by-33-8-in-2023
  121. https://citizenx.com/insights/france-citizenship-exception/
  122. https://www.lemonde.fr/en/france/article/2025/05/07/french-interior-minister-promises-to-tighten-criteria-for-naturalizations_6741026_7.html
  123. https://www.remitly.com/gb/en/landing/citizenship-tests
  124. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/feb/14/french-citizens-would-fail-language-tests-for-foreigners-seeking-residency
  125. https://www.business-standard.com/finance/personal-finance/france-immigration-even-citizens-struggle-with-tough-french-language-tests-125021800399_1.html
  126. https://newlandchase.com/recap-of-various-immigration-reforms-implemented-over-the-summer/
  127. https://www.fragomen.com/insights/france-changes-to-talent-permit-scheme-processing-timeframes-and-minimum-salary-levels.html
  128. https://www.centuroglobal.com/article/france-immigration-policy/
  129. https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/llglrd/2019669808/2019669808.pdf
  130. https://ae.ambafrance.org/IMG/immigration_policy.pdf
  131. https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/explained-global/history-france-immigration-8699397/
  132. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/immigration-policy-in-france/
  133. https://www.europeana.eu/en/item/2051943/data_euscreenXL_EUS_30B4DECC9F2041618BA17BFF2424214F
  134. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3685089.pdf
  135. https://www.ifri.org/sites/default/files/atoms/files/bertossi_immigrant_integration_2020.pdf
  136. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110507324-003/html?lang=en
  137. https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01081685/file/BAROU-Integration%2520in%2520France%2520COR-1.pdf
  138. https://total.law/fr/citizenship-france/
  139. https://getgoldenvisa.com/french-citizenship
  140. https://lexial.eu/french-immigration-lawyers/french-citizenship/
  141. https://digitalemigre.com/relocation/french-citizenship/
  142. https://www.histoire-immigration.fr/en/politics-and-immigration/how-does-one-become-french
  143. https://verfassungsblog.de/dismantling-jus-soli/
  144. https://globalcit.eu/ius-soli-a-french-constitutional-principle/
  145. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/research/french-national-identity-and-integration-who-belongs-national-community
  146. https://france-amerique.com/when-dual-citizenship-means-divided-loyalties/
  147. https://www.ined.fr/en/everything_about_population/demographic-facts-sheets/focus-on/double-nationalite-national-identity/
  148. https://www.insee.fr/fr/outil-interactif/5367857/details/20_DEM/25_ETR/25G_Figure7
  149. https://globalcit.eu/citizenship-deprivation-in-a-context-of-terrorist-violence-multiple-membership-and-citizenship-in-france-and-the-maghreb/
  150. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/pubs/FrenchIdentity.pdf
  151. https://www.sudouest.fr/politique/loi-immigration/immigration-les-premiers-titres-de-sejour-et-les-expulsions-en-hausse-en-2024-23121077.php
  152. https://demarchesadministratives.fr/actualites/immigration-140-000-oqtf-delivrees-2024
  153. https://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/dyn/17/documents/cion_lois/l17n813203444_document
  154. https://www.rfi.fr/en/france/20241031-france-reinstates-border-checks-as-immigration-policies-tighten-across-europe
  155. https://www.frontex.europa.eu/media-centre/news/news-release/last-month-in-the-field-july-2024-jp7i4H
  156. https://www.liberties.eu/en/stories/sanctuary-cities/16694
  157. https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/news/france-law-adopted-control-immigration-improve-integration-2023-12-20_en
  158. https://www.fragomen.com/insights/france-new-comprehensive-immigration-law-introduced.html
  159. https://www.politico.eu/article/france-marine-le-pen-scores-big-win-on-toughened-immigration-bill-macron/
  160. https://www.service-public.gouv.fr/particuliers/actualites/A17135?lang=en
  161. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/top-french-court-rules-large-parts-new-immigration-law-go-against-constitution-2024-01-25/
  162. https://www.lemonde.fr/en/france/article/2024/01/26/french-immigration-law-constitutional-council-rejects-measures-largely-on-procedural-grounds_6466765_7.html
  163. https://www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/en/decision/2024/2023863DC.htm
  164. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/france-immigration-law-constitutional-council-scraps-articles/
  165. https://www.lemonde.fr/en/politics/article/2024/10/14/french-government-wants-new-immigration-bill-in-2025-less-than-a-year-after-the-last-one_6729341_5.html
  166. https://www.france24.com/en/france/20240620-how-france-s-far-right-changed-the-debate-on-immigration
  167. https://immigratetofrance.com/f/what-to-expect-for-2025-changes-in-immigration-policy-in-france
  168. https://faccnyc.org/trends-and-challenges-in-professional-immigration-to-france-in-2025/
  169. https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/183/oa_monograph/chapter/2145957/epub
  170. https://publishing.cdlib.org/ucpressebooks/view?docId=ft287004zv&chunk.id=d0e5695&toc.depth=1&toc.id=d0e5695&brand=ucpress
  171. https://www.welcometofrance.com/en/fiche/french-tech-visa-for-founders
  172. https://france-visas.gouv.fr/en/france-visas/international-talents-and-economic-attractiveness
  173. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273453989_Immigration_Policy_and_Macroeconomic_Performance_in_France
  174. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0927537114000566
  175. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w22852/w22852.pdf
  176. https://www.insee.fr/fr/statistiques/7941405?sommaire=7941491
  177. https://www.senat.fr/questions/base/2023/qSEQ231109061.html
  178. https://observatoire-immigration.fr/cout-immigration-economies/
  179. https://www.ifrap.org/budget-et-fiscalite/precarite-pauvrete-et-immigration-un-surcout-plus-de-10-milliards-deuros-par
  180. https://www.immigration.interieur.gouv.fr/Info-ressources/Etudes-et-statistiques/Etudes/Infos-migrations/La-fecondite-des-femmes-primo-arrivantes
  181. https://read.dukeupress.edu/demography/article/60/5/1493/382373/Fertility-and-Labor-Supply-Responses-to-Child
  182. https://www.inegalites.fr/Les-immigres-et-leurs-descendants-marques-par-le-chomage
  183. https://www.immigration.interieur.gouv.fr/Info-ressources/Etudes-et-statistiques/Les-chiffres-de-l-immigration-en-France/Activite-emploi-et-chomage-des-immigres
  184. https://inirnet.org/article-written-for-inir/the_disconcerting_economic_and_fiscal_results_of_frances_immigration_policy
  185. https://www.insee.fr/fr/statistiques/6793268?sommaire=6793391
  186. https://schoolofjournalism.shorthandstories.com/les-banlieues/index.html
  187. https://www.insee.fr/fr/statistiques/6793274?sommaire=6793391
  188. https://www.ined.fr/en/publications/editions/population-and-societies/immigrant-families-rising-educational-levels-across-generations-but-persistent-inequalities/
  189. https://www.metropolitiques.eu/The-Educational-Fortunes-of-Children-of-Immigrants-in-France.html
  190. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/social-issues-migration-health/catching-up-country-studies-on-intergenerational-mobility-and-children-of-immigrants/france-intergenerational-mobility-outcomes-of-natives-with-immigrant-parents_9789264301030-4-en
  191. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/231797/1/WP120178.pdf
  192. https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/110955/2/01979183211032677.pdf
  193. https://berkleycenter.georgetown.edu/posts/the-weaponization-of-laicite
  194. https://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/06/world/old-tradition-of-secularism-clashes-with-frances-new-reality.html
  195. https://www.iar-gwu.org/print-archive/walo9blyi7f2khrooz06ntl01q6sd1
  196. https://www.institutmontaigne.org/en/expressions/french-brief-finding-answers-islamic-separatism
  197. https://www.thefp.com/p/how-the-muslim-brotherhood-is-capturing
  198. https://english.alarabiya.net/features/2019/04/07/French-book-reveals-how-Qatar-funded-Muslim-Brotherhood-mosques-in-Europe-
  199. https://www.state.gov/reports/2022-report-on-international-religious-freedom/france
  200. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283181737_Honour_Killings_in_Europe_as_an_Effect_of_Migration_Process_-_Perspective_for_Poland
  201. https://www.reuters.com/article/world/just-under-30-percent-of-french-muslims-reject-secular-laws-poll-idUSKCN11O0ES/
  202. https://academic.oup.com/sf/advance-article/doi/10.1093/sf/soaf149/8263646
  203. https://www.ined.fr/en/news/press/french-fertility-is-the-highest-in-europe-because-of-its-immigrants/
  204. https://www.insee.fr/en/statistiques/7232020
  205. https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol43/29/43-29.pdf
  206. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/psp.2567
  207. https://www.cleiss.fr/docs/regimes/regime_france/an_4.html
  208. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/french-immigration-bill-tightens-welfare-benefits-foreigners-2023-12-20/
  209. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2017/12/04/europes-muslim-population-will-continue-to-grow-but-how-much-depends-on-migration/
  210. https://www.prisonstudies.org/country/france
  211. https://inirnet.org/article-written-for-inir/the_overrepresentation_of_foreign_nationals_in_delinquency_in_france_an_assessment_for_the_year_2023
  212. https://www.lemonde.fr/en/les-decodeurs/article/2022/11/01/at-least-half-of-paris-crime-is-committed-by-foreigners-where-does-macron-s-claim-come-from_6002508_8.html
  213. https://europeanconservative.com/articles/news/foreigners-responsible-for-77-of-solved-rape-cases-in-paris-in-2023/
  214. https://www.gbnews.com/news/world/france-migration-rape-cases-paris-foreigners
  215. https://www.erudit.org/en/journals/crimino/2022-crimino07323/1092583ar.pdf
  216. https://www.cepii.fr/PDF_PUB/wp/2022/wp2022-10.pdf
  217. https://voxeurop.eu/en/immigration-crime-valette/
  218. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/46528159_Are_immigrants_more_likely_to_commit_crimes_Evidence_from_France
  219. https://www.fondapol.org/en/study/islamist-terrorist-attacks-in-the-world-1979-2024/
  220. https://www.startinsight.eu/en/european-terrorism-in-numbers/
  221. https://www.airuniversity.af.edu/JEMEAA/Display/Article/2213984/radicalization-in-prisons-and-mosques-in-france/
  222. https://www.lemonde.fr/en/france/article/2024/09/11/paris-2024-france-foiled-3-attack-plots-targeting-olympics-prosecutor-says_6725622_7.html
  223. https://szazadveg.hu/en/cikkek/french-urban-policy-and-migration/
  224. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/understanding-urban-riots-in-france/
  225. https://www.democracynow.org/2023/7/5/france_nahel_merzouk_protests
  226. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/06/29/world/europe/france-nahel-m-protests.html
  227. https://www.latimes.com/world-nation/story/2023-07-20/france-riots-race-nahel-merzouk
  228. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/french-banlieues-distrust-police-runs-deep-2023-06-30/
  229. https://english.elpais.com/international/2023-07-10/why-have-frances-suburbs-been-burning-for-over-40-years.html
  230. https://www.pinfa.eu/news/254-000-fires-in-france-in-2021/
  231. https://www.reddit.com/r/europe/comments/rtjiza/france_874_cars_burned_and_441_arrested_counted/
  232. https://www.rfi.fr/en/france/20230720-riots-in-france-s-banlieues-are-over-for-now-but-deep-rooted-anger-remains
  233. https://www.lemonde.fr/en/france/article/2023/10/02/from-hunters-to-hunted-a-growing-sense-of-unease-among-french-police-forces_6142508_7.html
  234. https://www.nytimes.com/1993/05/27/IHT-poor-unpoliced-french-areas-find-vigilantism-on-the-rise-european-topics.html
  235. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jun/22/broken-lives-vigilante-justice-roma
  236. https://www.lemonde.fr/en/france/article/2024/01/25/french-constitutional-council-rejects-large-parts-of-controversial-immigration-law_6465408_7.html
  237. https://dcubrexitinstitute.eu/2024/02/the-new-french-immigration-law-part-1/
  238. https://ecre.org/16309-2/
  239. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2569526
  240. https://temple.manifoldapp.org/read/immigrant-workers-in-industrial-france-the-making-of-a-new-laboring-glass/section/9f4c870d-bbe9-4a8c-b6b4-fa58ab194b33
  241. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/debate-over-multiculturalism-philosophy-politics-and-policy
  242. https://academic.oup.com/oxrep/article/41/1/64/8157933
  243. https://wol.iza.org/articles/welfare-magnet-hypothesis-and-welfare-take-up-of-migrants/long
  244. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/209933
  245. https://academic.oup.com/oxrep/article/38/3/531/6701697
  246. https://ukandeu.ac.uk/denmarks-migration-policy-an-example-to-follow/
  247. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/denmark-migration-profile-pioneer
  248. https://brusselssignal.eu/2025/02/seven-in-10-french-citizens-want-immigration-referendum-poll-finds/
  249. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025/feb/26/western-europeans-say-immigration-is-too-high-and-poorly-managed-survey-finds
  250. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/frances-far-right-rn-makes-immigration-pillar-europe-poll-campaign-2024-03-03/
  251. https://www.lemonde.fr/en/politics/article/2024/06/09/2024-european-elections-far-right-rassemblement-national-achieves-historic-success_6674319_5.html
  252. https://www.lemonde.fr/en/france/article/2024/06/13/european-elections-how-the-migration-issue-influenced-the-french-vote_6674612_7.html
  253. https://www.france24.com/en/europe/20240630-french-far-right-national-rally-makes-big-gains-in-first-round-of-legislative-elections
  254. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/08/world/europe/france-election-key-takeaways.html
  255. https://www.american.edu/sis/centers/transatlantic-policy/articles/20240919-the-national-rallys-electoral-success.cfm
  256. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Migration_to_and_from_the_EU
  257. https://www.politico.eu/article/germany-chancellor-olaf-scholz-migration-policies-deportation-crime-islam-syriia-afghan/
  258. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c1mgkd93r4yo
  259. https://www.lemonde.fr/en/international/article/2025/01/17/sweden-s-all-out-tightening-of-migration-policy_6737114_4.html
  260. https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/aug/19/sweden-negative-net-immigration-figure-record-low-asylum-application-global-displacement
  261. https://wiiw.ac.at/shifting-patterns-of-migration-in-europe-new-source-countries-old-challenges-dlp-6915.pdf
  262. https://www.ined.fr/en/publications/editions/population-and-societies/is-france-still-a-demographic-outlier-in-europe/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.