Hubbry Logo
JutesJutesMain
Open search
Jutes
Community hub
Jutes
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Jutes
Jutes
Jutes
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The Jutland Peninsula, possible homeland of the Jutes

The Jutes (/dʒuːts/ JOOTS)[a] were one of the Germanic tribes who settled in Great Britain after the departure of the Romans. According to Bede, they were one of the three most powerful Germanic nations, along with the Angles and the Saxons:

Those who came over were of the three most powerful nations of Germany—Saxons, Angles, and Jutes. From the Jutes are descended the people of Kent, and of the Isle of Wight, and those also in the province of the West Saxons who are to this day called Jutes, seated opposite to the Isle of Wight.

— Bede 1910, 1.15

There is no consensus amongst historians on the origins of the Jutes.[1] One hypothesis is that they originated from the Jutland Peninsula but after a Danish invasion of that area, migrated to the Frisian coast. From the Frisian coast they went on to settle southern Britain in the later fifth century during the Migration Period, as part of a larger wave of Germanic migration into Britain.[2] They were possibly or probably related to the North Germanic tribe Geats.

Settlement in southern Britain

[edit]
See also: Anglo-Saxon settlement of Britain
A map of Jutish settlements in Britain circa 575

During the period after the Roman occupation and before the Norman conquest, people of Germanic descent arrived in Britain, ultimately forming England.[3] The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle provides what historians regard as foundation legends for Anglo-Saxon settlement.[4][5]

The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle describes how the brothers Hengist and Horsa in the year 449 were invited to Sub-Roman Britain by Vortigern to help his forces in fighting the Picts. They landed at Wippidsfleet (Ebbsfleet), and went on to defeat the Picts wherever they fought them. Hengist and Horsa sent word home to Germany asking for help. Their request was granted and support came. Afterward, more people came to Britain from "the three powers of Germany; the Old Saxons, the Angles, and the Jutes". The Saxons populated Essex, Sussex and Wessex; the Jutes Kent, the Isle of Wight and Hampshire; and the Angles East Anglia, Mercia and Northumbria (leaving their original homeland, Angeln, deserted).[6]

The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle also lists Wihtgar and Stuf as founders of the Wihtwara (Isle of Wight) and a man named Port and his two sons Bieda and Maeglaof as founders of the Meonwara (southern Hampshire).[7][8] In 686 Bede tells us that Jutish Hampshire extended to the western edge of the New Forest; however, that seems to include another Jutish people, the Ytene,[b][c] and it is not certain that these two territories formed a continuous coastal block.[11] Towards the end of the Roman occupation of England, raids on the east coast became more intense and the expedient adopted by Romano-British leaders was to enlist the help of mercenaries to whom they ceded territory. It is thought that mercenaries may have started arriving in Sussex as early as the 5th century.[12]

Before the 7th century, there is a dearth of contemporary written material about the Anglo-Saxons' arrival.[d] Most material that does exist was written several hundred years after the events. The earlier dates for the beginnings of settlement, provided by the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, have been contested by some findings in archaeology.[13][14] One alternative hypothesis to the foundation legend suggests, because previously inhabited sites on the Frisian and north German coasts had been rendered uninhabitable by flooding[e], that the migration was due to displacement. Under this alternative hypothesis, the British provided land for the refugees to settle on in return for peaceful coexistence and military cooperation.[13]

Ship construction in the 2nd or 3rd century adopted the use of iron fastenings, instead of the old sewn fastenings, to hold together the plank built boats of the Jutland peninsula. This enabled them to build stronger sea going vessels. Vessels going from Jutland to Britain probably would have sailed along the coastal regions of Lower Saxony and the Netherlands before crossing the English Channel. This was because navigation techniques of the time required the ship to be moored up overnight. Marine archaeology has suggested that migrating ships would have sheltered in various river estuaries on the route. Artefacts and parts of ships, of the period, have been found that support this theory.[16]

It is likely that the Jutes initially inhabited Kent and from there they occupied the Isle of Wight, southern Hampshire and also possibly the area around Hastings in East Sussex (Haestingas).[17][18][19] J E A Jolliffe compared agricultural and farming practices across 5th century Sussex to that of 5th century Kent. He suggested that the Kentish system underlaid the 5th century farming practices of Sussex. He hypothesised that Sussex was probably settled by Jutes before the arrival of the Saxons, with Jutish territory stretching from Kent to the New Forest.[20] The north Solent coast had been a trading area since Roman times. The old Roman roads between Sidlesham and Chichester[f] and Chichester to Winchester would have provided access to the Jutish settlements in Hampshire. Therefore, it is possible that the German folk arriving in the 5th century that landed in the Selsey area would have been directed north to Southampton Water. From there into the mouth of the Meon valley and would have been allowed to settle near the existing Romano-British people.[22][23] The Jutish kingdom[g] in Hampshire that Bede describes has various placenames that identify the locations as Jutish. These include Bishopstoke (Ytingstoc) and the Meon Valley (Ytedene).[24]

Mercian and South Saxon takeover

[edit]

In Kent, Hlothhere had been ruler since 673/4. He must have come into conflict with Mercia, because in 676 the Mercian king Æthelred invaded Kent and according to Bede:

In the year of our Lord's incarnation 676, when Ethelred, king of the Mercians, ravaged Kent with a powerful army, and profaned churches and monasteries, without regard to religion, or the fear of God, he among the rest destroyed the city of Rochester

— Bede 1910, 1.15

In 681 Wulfhere of Mercia advanced into southern Hampshire and the Isle of Wight. Shortly after he gave the Isle of Wight and Meonwara to Æthelwealh of Sussex.[25][26]

In Kent, Eadric was for a time co-ruler[h] alongside his uncle Hlothhere with a law code being issued in their names. Ultimately, Eadric revolted against his uncle and with help from a South Saxon army in about 685, was able to kill Hlothhere, and replace him as ruler of Kent.[28]

West Saxon invasion

[edit]

In the 680s, the Kingdom of Wessex was in the ascendant, the alliance between the South Saxons and the Mercians and their control of southern England, put the West Saxons under pressure.[29] Their king Cædwalla, probably concerned about Mercian and South Saxon influence in Southern England, conquered the land of the South Saxons and took over the Jutish areas in Hampshire and the Isle of Wight. Bede describes how Cædwalla brutally suppressed the South Saxons and attempted to slaughter the Jutes of the Isle of Wight and replace them with people from "his own province", but maintained that he was unable to do so, and Jutes remained a majority on the island.[i][31]

After Cædwalla had possessed himself of the kingdom of the Gewissae, he also took the Isle of Wight, which till then was entirely given over to idolatry, and by cruel slaughter endeavoured to destroy all the inhabitants thereof, and to place in their stead people from his own province.

— Bede 1910, 4.16

Cædwalla killed Aruald, the king of the Isle of Wight. Aruald's two younger brothers, who were heirs to the throne, escaped from the island but were hunted down and found at Stoneham, Hampshire. They were killed on Cædwalla's orders. The Isle of Wight was then permanently under West Saxon control and the Meonwara was integrated into Wessex.[32][33] Cædwalla also invaded Kent and installed his brother Mul as leader. However, it was not long before Mul and twelve others were burnt to death by the Kentishmen.[28] After Cædwalla was superseded by Ine of Wessex, Kent agreed to pay compensation to Wessex for the death of Mul, but they retained their independence.[33]

Influences and culture

[edit]
See also: History of Kent

When the Jutish kingdom of Kent was founded, around the middle of the 5th century, Roman ways and influences must have still had a strong presence. The Roman settlement of Durovernum Cantiacorum became Canterbury. The people of Kent were described as Cantawara, a Germanised form of the Latin Cantiaci.[34]

Although not all historians accept Bede's scheme for the settlement of Britain into Anglian, Jutish and Saxon areas as perfectly accurate,[35] the archaeological evidence indicates that the peoples of west Kent were culturally distinct from those in the east of Kent, with west Kent sharing the 'Saxon' characteristics of its neighbours in the southeast of England.[36] Brooches and bracteates found in east Kent, the Isle of Wight and southern Hampshire showed a strong Frankish[j] and North Sea influence from the mid-fifth century to the late sixth century compared to north German styles found elsewhere in Anglo-Saxon England.[38][36][39] There is discussion about who crafted the jewellery (found in the archaeological sites of Kent). Suggestions include crafts people who had been trained in the Roman workshops of northern Gaul or the Rhineland. It is also possible that those artisans went on to develop their own individual style.[40] By the late 6th century grave goods indicate that west Kent had adopted the distinctive east Kent material culture.[36]

The Frankish princess Bertha arrived in Kent around 580 to marry the king Æthelberht of Kent. Bertha was already a Christian and had brought a bishop, Liudhard, with her across the Channel. Æthelberht rebuilt an old Romano-British structure and dedicated it to St Martin allowing Bertha to continue practising her Christian faith.[41][42] In 597 Pope Gregory I sent Augustine to Kent, on a mission to convert the Anglo-Saxons,[43][42][44] There are suggestions that Æthelberht had already been baptised when he "courteously received" the pope's mission. Æthelberht was the first of the Anglo-Saxon rulers to be baptised.[45][43]

The simplified Christian burial was introduced at this time. Christian graves were usually aligned East to West, whereas with some exceptions pagan burial sites were not.[46] The lack of archaeological grave evidence in the land of the Haestingas is seen as supporting the hypothesis that the peoples there would have been Christian Jutes who had migrated from Kent.[19] In contrast to Kent, the Isle of Wight was the last area of Anglo-Saxon England to be evangelised in 686, when Cædwalla of Wessex invaded the island, killing the local king Arwald and his brothers.[47][32]

The Jutes used a system of partible inheritance known as gavelkind, which was practised in Kent until the 20th century. The custom of gavelkind was also found in other areas of Jutish settlement.[k][49][18] In England and Wales, gavelkind was abolished by the Administration of Estates Act 1925.[50] Before abolition in 1925, all land in Kent was presumed to be held by gavelkind until the contrary was proved.[50] The popular reason given for the practice remaining so long is due to the "Swanscombe Legend"; according to this, Kent made a deal with William the Conqueror whereby he would allow them to keep local customs in return for peace.[51]

Quoit brooch found in Sarre, Kent. Part of the British Museum collection.
Monument in Swanscombe to Kent's agreement with William the Conqueror.
Augustine's grave at St Augustine's Abbey.

Homeland and historical accounts

[edit]
The early migrations of Germanic peoples from coastal regions of northern Europe to areas of modern-day England. The settlement regions correspond roughly to later dialect divisions of Old English.

Although historians are confident of where the Jutes settled in England, they are divided on where they actually came from.[l][1]

The chroniclers, Procopius, Constantius of Lyon, Gildas, Bede, Nennius, and also the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, Alfred the Great and Asser provide the names of tribes who settled Britain during the mid-fifth century, and in their combined testimony, the four tribes mentioned are the Angli, Saxones, Iutae and Frisii.[m][1]

The Roman historian Tacitus refers to a people called the Eudoses,[52] a tribe who possibly developed into the Jutes.[1]

The Jutes have also been identified with the Eotenas (ēotenas) involved in the Frisian conflict with the Danes as described in the Finnesburg episode in the Old English poem Beowulf.[53] Theudebert, king of the Franks, wrote to the Emperor Justinian and in the letter claimed that he had lordship over a nation called the Saxones Eucii. The Eucii are thought to have been Jutes and may have been the same as a little-documented tribe called the Euthiones.[2] The Euthiones are mentioned in a poem by Venantius Fortunatus (583) as being under the suzerainty of Chilperic I of the Franks. The Euthiones were located somewhere in northern Francia, modern day Flanders, an area of the European mainland opposite to Kent.[2][54]

Bede inferred that the Jutish homeland was on the Jutland peninsula. However, analysis of grave goods of the time have provided a link between East Kent, south Hampshire and the Isle of Wight, but little evidence of any link with Jutland.[55] There is evidence that the Jutes who migrated to England came from northern Francia or from Frisia.[1] Historians have posited that Jutland was the homeland of the Jutes, but when the Danes invaded the Jutland Peninsula in about AD 200, some of the Jutes would have been absorbed by the Danish culture and others may have migrated to northern Francia and Frisia. In Scandinavian sources from the Middle Ages, the Jutes are only sporadically mentioned, now as subgroup of the Danes.[1]

There is a hypothesis, suggested by Pontus Fahlbeck in 1884, that the Geats were Jutes. According to this hypothesis the Geats resided in southern Sweden and also in Jutland (where Beowulf would have lived).[n][58]

The evidence adduced for this hypothesis includes:

  • Primary sources referring to the Geats (Geátas) by alternative names such as Iútan, Iótas, and Eotas.[59]
  • Asser in his Life of Alfred (Chapter 2) identifies the Jutes with the Goths[o] (in a passage claiming that Alfred the Great was descended, through his mother, Osburga, from the ruling dynasty of the Jutish kingdom of Wihtwara, on the Isle of Wight).[61]
  • The Gutasaga is a saga that charts the history of Gotland prior to Christianity. It is an appendix to the Guta Lag (Gotland law) written in the thirteenth or fourteenth century. It says that some inhabitants of Gotland left for mainland Europe. Large burial sites attributable to either Goths or Gepids were found in the 19th century near Willenberg, Prussia.[p][62]

However, the tribal names possibly were confused in the above sources in both Beowulf (8th–11th centuries) and Widsith (late 7th – 10th century). The Eoten (in the Finn passage) are clearly distinguished from the Geatas.[10][56]

The Finnish surname Juutilainen, which comes from the word "juutti", is speculated by some to have had a connection to Jutland or the Jutes.[63]

Possible synonymy with the Frisians

[edit]

While there is no definitive proof that the Frisians and Jutes were the same people, there is compelling evidence suggesting that they were either a single group known by different names or closely related tribes with overlapping territories, cultures, and identities. The fluidity of ethnic designations during the Migration Period makes it plausible that the distinction between "Frisians" and "Jutes" was more of a practical simplification by later chroniclers than a strict ethnic separation. In several Old English and early medieval sources, such as the Finnsburg Fragment and the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, the terms "Frisians" and "Jutes" appear to be used interchangeably. This suggests that, at least from the perspective of the authors of these texts, the two groups were not clearly distinguishable culturally or ethnically.[64]

Moreover, archaeological findings point to strong cultural similarities between the two groups, as burial practices, material goods (such as weapons, pottery, and jewelry), and settlement patterns in Jutland and Frisian territories show remarkable parallels.[65]

In the field of linguistics, the linguist Elmar Seebold argued that the relatively sharp linguistic boundary between Frisian and Dutch is attributable to migrants from Jutland, with the Jutes simultaneously leaving behind a sharp linguistic boundary between West Germanic and North Germanic in Denmark.[66]

Evolution of North Sea Germanic according to Seebold:[66]
  •   Position of North Sea Germanic dialects before the migration period (3rd century CE).   Migration of the Saxons from the territory of the Angles (A.).   Migration of Weser Rhine Germanic speakers towards the Roman limes (1.), southward migration of Elbe Germanic speakers (2.).
      Position of North Sea Germanic dialects before the migration period (3rd century CE).
      Migration of the Saxons from the territory of the Angles (A.).
      Migration of Weser Rhine Germanic speakers towards the Roman limes (1.), southward migration of Elbe Germanic speakers (2.).
  •   Position of North Sea Germanic dialects during the 5th and 6th century.   Migration of North Germanic speakers (including the Saxon elite) to England (A.) and Frisia (B.)   Migration of Weser Rhine Germanic speakers (1.), migration of West Slavic speakers (2.), migration of North Germanic speakers (3.).
      Position of North Sea Germanic dialects during the 5th and 6th century.
      Migration of North Germanic speakers (including the Saxon elite) to England (A.) and Frisia (B.)
      Migration of Weser Rhine Germanic speakers (1.), migration of West Slavic speakers (2.), migration of North Germanic speakers (3.).
  •   Position of North Sea Germanic dialects (Old English & Old Frisian) directly following the migration period.   Linguistic expansion of Old Frankish (1.) and Old Low German (2.).   10th/11th century migration of (Ems) Frisian speakers to the North German mainland (A.)
      Position of North Sea Germanic dialects (Old English & Old Frisian) directly following the migration period.
      Linguistic expansion of Old Frankish (1.) and Old Low German (2.).
      10th/11th century migration of (Ems) Frisian speakers to the North German mainland (A.)

Language and writing

[edit]
See also: Anglo-Frisian languages

The runic alphabet is thought to have originated in the Germanic homelands that were in contact with the Roman Empire, and as such was a response to the Latin alphabet. In fact some of the runes emulated their Latin counterpart. The runic alphabet crossed the sea with the Anglo-Saxons and there have been examples, of its use, found in Kent.[67][68] As the Anglo-Saxon kingdoms were evangelised the script of the Latin alphabet was introduced by Irish Christian missionaries. However, they ran into problems when they were unable to find a Latin equivalent to some of the Anglo-Saxon phonetics. They overcame this by modifying the Latin alphabet to include some runic characters. This became the Old English Latin alphabet. The runic characters were eventually replaced by Latin characters by the end of the 14th century.[68][69]

Majuscule forms (also called uppercase or capital letters)
A Æ B C D Ð E F Ᵹ/G H I L M N O P R S T Þ U Ƿ/W X Y
Minuscule forms (also called lowercase or small letters)
a æ b c d ð e f ᵹ/g h i l m n o p r s/ſ t þ u ƿ/w x y

The language that the Anglo-Saxon settlers spoke is known as Old English. There are four main dialectal forms, namely Mercian, Northumbrian, West Saxon and Kentish.[70] Based on Bede's description of where the Jutes settled, Kentish was spoken in what are now the modern-day counties of Kent, Surrey, southern Hampshire and the Isle of Wight.[71] However, historians are divided on what dialect it would have been and where it originated from.[72] The Jutish peninsula has been seen by historians as a pivotal region between the Northern and the Western Germanic dialects. It has not been possible to prove whether Jutish has always been a Scandinavian dialect which later became heavily influenced by West Germanic dialects, or whether Jutland was originally part of the West Germanic dialectal continuum.[73] An analysis of the Kentish dialect by linguists indicates that there was a similarity between Kentish and Frisian. Whether the two can be classed as the same dialect or whether Kentish was a version of Jutish, heavily influenced by Frisian and other dialects, is open to conjecture.[72][74]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Jutes

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Jutes were an ancient tribe traditionally originating from the in present-day and , though their exact continental homeland is subject to scholarly debate; they migrated to Britain in the mid-5th century CE as part of the broader Anglo-Saxon invasions following the Roman withdrawal around 410 CE. Alongside the closely related Angles and , they formed one of the three primary groups that reshaped the island's demographics, culture, and language, establishing early kingdoms and contributing to the foundations of . Their settlements were concentrated in southeastern , particularly and the Isle of Wight, where they exerted significant influence before their distinct identity gradually merged with neighboring Anglo-Saxon populations by the 7th century. The earliest detailed account of the Jutes comes from the Venerable 's Ecclesiastical History of the (completed c. 731 CE), which describes them as one of the "three most powerful Germanic tribes" that responded to invitations from British leaders to defend against northern invaders like the and Scots. recounts that in 449 CE, Jutish brothers led an initial force of warriors to the southeast coast at the request of the British king , but the alliance soon broke down, leading to conflicts that facilitated Jutish conquest and settlement. is credited with founding the Kingdom of , with his descendants ruling there until the late , while Jutish settlers also colonized the Isle of Wight and parts of modern and . Archaeological evidence supports Bede's narrative, with distinctive Jutish-style artifacts—such as brooches, buckles, and pottery—appearing in Kentish graves from the mid-5th century, indicating a cultural continuity from continental North Sea regions rather than direct ties to Scandinavian North Germanic groups. Linguistically, the Jutes likely spoke an Anglo-Frisian dialect akin to those of the Angles and Saxons, influencing the Kentish variant of Old English, though their smaller numbers and early assimilation limited their long-term distinctiveness. By the time of the Viking invasions in the 8th–9th centuries, references to the Jutes as a separate people had faded, absorbed into the emerging English identity.

Origins and Homeland

Historical Accounts of Origins

The Venerable , writing in his Ecclesiastical History of the English People in 731 AD, identifies the Jutes as one of three powerful Germanic tribes—the , Angles, and Jutes—that emerged as distinct groups in and played a key role in the settlement of Britain. According to , these tribes were invited by the British king around 449 AD to assist against invasions by the and Scots, marking the Jutes' initial emergence in historical narratives as military allies in post-Roman Britain. He describes their leaders, the brothers , as sons of Wihtgils from the Jutish people, who arrived in three longships and were granted eastern lands, thereby founding the basis for Jutish influence. Later medieval sources build on these foundations, with the —compiled from the 9th century onward—recording the traditional landing of at Ebbsfleet in 449 AD, explicitly as Jutish figures invited by to combat the and Scots. The Chronicle emphasizes their foundational role, noting that from this alliance, the Jutes established early footholds that led to broader Germanic dominance. Similarly, the 10th-century chronicler Æthelweard, in his Chronicle, adapts and affirms this narrative, presenting as Jutish progenitors whose arrival in 449 AD initiated the shift from British to English rule through their victories against northern foes.

Theories on Continental Homeland

The primary theory regarding the continental homeland of the Jutes locates it on the Peninsula in present-day , with the tribal name deriving from the region's Latin designation as Iutum. This identification is supported by toponymic evidence, as the modern name "" (Danish: Jylland) preserves the ancient , suggesting a long-standing association between the tribe and the area. Roman geographer Claudius Ptolemy, in his (c. 150 AD), refers to a tribe called the Eudoses (or Eutii) positioned in the northern part of the peninsula, near the Baltic coast, which scholars widely equate with the Jutes based on phonetic and locational similarities. This placement aligns with broader archaeological patterns of Germanic material culture in southern during the late Roman Iron Age, including distinctive pottery and burial practices that indicate a cohesive tribal identity in the region. Earlier Roman sources provide additional corroboration for a northern Germanic origin. In Germania (98 AD), historian lists the Eudoses among several tribes in the northern reaches of , situated beyond the Anglii and near the River, describing them as protected by natural barriers of rivers and forests. This positioning, in what is now or southern , underscores a homeland along the southeastern Baltic fringe, consistent with linguistic evidence from Proto-Germanic roots linking Eud- to terms for "youth" or "people," potentially reflected in Jutish dialects. Toponymic traces, such as ancient place names in resembling Eud- variants, further bolster this connection, though archaeological evidence remains indirect, relying on shared artifact styles with later Anglo-Saxon finds rather than tribe-specific markers. Alternative theories propose a more southerly or migratory origin, situating the Jutes in southern or , with possible overlaps in identity with earlier tribes like the Cimbri, who were also based in and migrated southward in the . One prominent hypothesis suggests that following Danish expansions into around the 4th-5th centuries AD, elements of the Jutes displaced to the North Frisian coast or adjacent areas in modern-day and , integrating with Frisian groups. This view draws on linguistic affinities between Jutish and , as well as archaeological evidence of hybrid settlements along the littoral, where burials and types blend Scandinavian and coastal Germanic styles. Debates persist over the Jutes' migration routes to Britain, with evidence pointing to either direct sea voyages from —facilitated by advanced in Scandinavian waters—or overland and coastal movements via , potentially as part of broader Germanic folk migrations. Proponents of the Jutland-direct model cite naval prowess implied in Ptolemy's coastal placements and the rapid settlement of , while Frisian-route advocates highlight genetic and artifact continuities in trade networks, though no consensus exists due to sparse pre-migration records.

Migration and Settlement

Accounts of the Migration

The migration of the Jutes to Britain during the 5th century was driven by a combination of push and pull factors, including environmental pressures and demographic strains in their continental homeland, as well as opportunities arising from instability in post-Roman Britain. Scholars have pointed to climate changes in northern Europe during the Migration Period, which may have contributed to population movements among Germanic tribes. Overpopulation in regions like Jutland, coupled with competition for resources amid tribal conflicts, further motivated these groups to seek new territories. These continental pressures were compounded by the Roman Empire's withdrawal from Britain in 410 AD, when Emperor Honorius instructed the province to fend for itself, creating a significant power vacuum that left the island vulnerable to external incursions. The primary historical accounts of the Jutes' arrival emphasize an invitation extended by British leaders amid internal chaos. In his 6th-century work De Excidio et Conquestu Britanniae, the British cleric describes how a "proud tyrant" (later identified as in other sources) summoned warriors—likely including Jutes, as they were closely associated with the Saxons in early narratives—to aid against northern invaders like the and Scots. portrays this as a fateful decision, noting that the newcomers initially repelled the threats but soon demanded excessive tribute and turned against their hosts, igniting widespread conflict: "The barbarians... sent messengers to their country, and in a short time ships full of wolves came sailing to the island, whose fury neither the sea nor the land could withstand." This account underscores the migration's initial nature, with the Jutes and their allies exploiting Britain's disarray following the Roman exit. Key events center on the leadership of the brothers , semi-legendary Jutish figures who spearheaded the landings. The , compiled in the late 9th century but drawing on earlier traditions, records their arrival in 449 AD at the Isle of Thanet in , invited by to combat Pictish raids. The chronicle details initial successes, including a battle at Crayford (Creccanford) in 457 AD where the Jutes defeated British forces, followed by further clashes that solidified their foothold. 's campaigns, marked by battles against the Britons, are depicted as pivotal, with Horsa falling in 455 AD at . These narratives highlight the Jutes' role in the broader Germanic incursions, blending military alliance with opportunistic conquest. The main wave of Jutish migration occurred between 449 and 473 AD, as per the 's annalistic entries, which chronicle annual reinforcements and victories, such as the summoning of additional ships in 465 AD and the conquest of Kentish territories by 473 AD. Smaller groups also ventured to the and parts of around this period, though the chronicle focuses primarily on the Kentish expeditions under Hengist. ' earlier testimony corroborates the timeline's general outline, lamenting the "grievous divorce" between Britons and the incoming "barbarians" as a cascade of invasions lasting decades, ultimately transforming Britain's demographic and political landscape. These sources, while biased toward Christian moralizing and later Anglo-Saxon perspectives, provide the foundational documented record of the Jutes' migratory process.

Early Settlements in Britain

The Jutes established their primary early settlements in southeastern Britain during the mid-5th century, focusing on —particularly the Isle of Thanet and eastern parts of the county—as their initial territorial foothold. According to the Venerable Bede's account in his Ecclesiastical History of the , the Jutes arrived under leaders such as and were granted land in Thanet by the British ruler , who sought their aid as against northern invaders like the and Scots. This arrangement allowed small groups of Jutish warriors and their kin to secure a , with Thanet serving as a strategic entry point due to its defensible position and proximity to the continent. Archaeological evidence from sites like the Lyminge cemetery in supports this early presence, revealing late 5th- and early 6th-century burials with distinctive Jutish artifacts, including saucer brooches and wheel-thrown pottery styles reminiscent of continental traditions. Beyond , the Jutes expanded to the and the opposing mainland in , forming what became known as the Meonwara Jutes. explicitly identifies these areas as Jutish settlements, noting that the inhabitants of the (Vectis) and the adjacent Vectoringasora (the area around ) traced their descent from Jutish migrants. Place-name evidence reinforces this, such as Wihtgarasburh—modern on the —named after Wihtgar, a Jutish leader who inherited the island around 534 according to the . Demographically, the Jutish migration involved significant numbers, contributing up to 76% continental northern European ancestry to early medieval populations in southeastern , through waves of settlers including warriors, families, and dependents. Genetic studies indicate significant admixture in these regions, with early medieval populations in and of deriving up to 76% continental northern European ancestry, with regional variation (e.g., around 70% in the Isle of ), consistent with intermarriage patterns that integrated Jutish settlers with indigenous groups. Cemeteries in eastern , such as those at and Sarre, provide further corroboration through like applied disc brooches and coarse , which exhibit Jutish stylistic traits distinct from Saxon or Anglian equivalents, dating to the late 5th and early 6th centuries.

Political Development and Decline

Formation of the Kingdom of Kent

The formation of the Kingdom of Kent is traditionally attributed to the Jutish leader Hengist, who is recorded as arriving in Britain around 449 AD with his brother Horsa as the first commanders of the settlers from the three most powerful Germanic tribes—the , Angles, and Jutes. Hengist is credited with establishing control over following initial alliances with local British rulers, serving as its first ruler from approximately 455 to 488 AD, during which he consolidated Jutish authority in the region. Upon Hengist's death, leadership transitioned to his son Oisc, marking the beginning of the Oiscingas dynasty, which continued through figures like Octa, Oisc's son, who succeeded his father around 512 AD and further stabilized the nascent kingdom. Governance in early Kent relied on a known as the witena gemot, a council of wise men that advised the king on matters of , warfare, and administration, reflecting broader Anglo-Saxon practices of consultative rule. This structure was formalized under King Aethelberht, who ruled from around 589 to 616 AD and issued the earliest surviving written code in any Germanic circa 600 AD, comprising 90 clauses that addressed compensation for offenses, , and church protections, thereby establishing a codified legal framework for the kingdom. Aethelberht's code, influenced by Roman and Christian elements, represented a pivotal development in Kentish , emphasizing fines over physical punishments and integrating ecclesiastical authority into secular . Canterbury, formerly the Roman settlement of Durovernum Cantiacorum, emerged as the political and ecclesiastical capital of by the late , serving as the seat of royal power and later the archbishopric. The kingdom's economic foundation was bolstered by maritime trade with , facilitated through ports such as Sandwich, where archaeological evidence of 7th-century imported goods like glass vessels and quernstones indicates active exchange networks that supported Kentish prosperity and cultural ties across the Channel. Relations with the indigenous Britons involved initial arrangements that evolved into , with Hengist securing payments from British leaders in exchange for against Pictish and Scottish incursions, as per early accounts of the settlement process. By the late , these dynamics shifted with the arrival of Augustine's mission in 597 AD, sent by Pope Gregory the Great, which introduced early Christian influences; King Aethelberht, influenced by his Frankish Christian wife , permitted the mission's landing on the Isle of Thanet and soon converted, leading to the establishment of the first cathedral in and the gradual of the Jutish elite. This event not only reinforced Kent's royal authority but also positioned it as a bridge for Christianity's spread among the Anglo-Saxon kingdoms.

Expansion, Conflicts, and Assimilation

The Jutes expanded their influence beyond in the early Anglo-Saxon period, maintaining control over the Isle of Wight and parts of southern until the late 7th century. This territory, known as Wihtland, was settled by Jutish groups who established a distinct under kings like , preserving pagan traditions amid Christianizing pressures from neighboring kingdoms. Their hold on the island ended in 686 when Caedwalla, king of , launched a brutal , slaughtering much of the Jutish and annexing the region to , thereby ceding Jutish authority there. Through alliances, trade networks, and occasional military interventions, the Jutes influenced adjacent areas such as parts of , though these regions were integrated with neighboring Saxon groups. By the 8th century, the Jutish kingdom of faced increasing external pressures, culminating in Mercian dominance under Offa. Around 775, Offa capitalized on internal instability in to assert overlordship, installing puppet rulers and integrating Kentish administration into Mercian structures, which included the construction of as a broader defensive measure against Welsh incursions. This takeover marked a significant curtailment of Jutish , as 's resources and strategic position were redirected to support Mercian expansion. Further conflicts arose in the with the rise of ; in 825, of decisively defeated at the Battle of Ellandun (near modern Wroughton, ), shattering Mercian hegemony and allowing to reclaim , , and from Mercian control. The decline of distinct Jutish identity accelerated with the onset of Viking raids in the mid-9th century, beginning with attacks on Kentish shores in 835, such as the raid on the Isle of Sheppey that foreshadowed widespread devastation. These incursions weakened Kent's defenses and economy, facilitating Wessex's full absorption of the region by the late 9th century under kings like , who reorganized Anglo-Saxon resistance against the . As a minority tribe within the —the loose confederation of Anglo-Saxon kingdoms—the Jutes underwent gradual assimilation through intermarriage, shared legal customs, and cultural blending with and Angles, leading to the erosion of their separate ethnic and political distinctions by the .

Culture and Society

Social Structure and Daily Life

The social structure of Jutish society in was organized hierarchically, reflecting broader Germanic traditions, with the king at the apex as the ultimate authority and protector, followed by ealdormen who served as regional governors and leaders. Below them were ceorls, the free farmers who formed the bulk of the population and held land rights, while at the base were theows, enslaved individuals often captured in raids or born into servitude. This stratification was codified in the early Kentish legal framework, particularly through the wergild system, which assigned monetary compensation values to individuals based on status to prevent feuds; for instance, a ceorl's wergild was set at 200 shillings, significantly lower than that of nobles or the king. The economy of the Jutes centered on , with arable farming of crops like and extensive rearing providing the foundation for subsistence and surplus production on communal and individual lands. Craftsmanship played a key role, including ironworking for tools and weapons, as well as production using from local herds, which supported both local needs and emerging exchange networks. Trade contributed to economic vitality, particularly through Kent's coastal position facilitating exchanges of sourced from Baltic routes and slaves acquired via raids or internal conflicts, as referenced in contemporary legal provisions regulating unfree labor. Daily life revolved around rural settlements where families inhabited rectangular timber-framed structures with thatched roofs, often including sunken-floor buildings for storage and work. Among the elite, social gatherings centered on feasting in mead halls, where leaders distributed food, ale, and gifts to reinforce loyalty and alliances. Gender roles were divided yet interdependent, with men primarily handling plowing, herding, and warfare, while women managed weaving, dairy processing, and household oversight; notably, women could inherit and control property, including land, underscoring their economic agency in Kentish custom. Family organization emphasized extended kin groups, known as the "kindred," which collectively received wergild payments to maintain group solidarity and resolve disputes without escalating to violence. These kin networks extended beyond the nuclear unit to include bilateral relations, fostering mutual support in labor and protection.

Religion and Customs

The Jutes adhered to a polytheistic pagan typical of early Germanic tribes, venerating deities such as Woden, the chief god associated with wisdom, war, and death, and Thunor, the thunder god embodying strength and protection. Evidence for these beliefs in the Jutish homeland of appears in place names like Woodnesborough (Wōdnesbeorg), meaning "Woden's hill" or , suggesting sites of significance linked to prehistoric monuments. Thunor worship is similarly attested through regional toponyms, reflecting a sacred where natural features and burial mounds served as focal points for devotion. Pagan burial rites among the Jutes emphasized provision for the afterlife, with inhumations in communal cemeteries featuring grave goods to accompany the deceased on their journey. In Kentish sites such as Eastry, elite graves from the fifth to seventh centuries contained items like silver disc brooches, cruciform brooches, spearheads, shield bosses, and iron arrowheads, indicating status and warrior identity while underscoring beliefs in an otherworldly existence. These practices, often in unenclosed fields away from settlements, sometimes reused prehistoric barrows, blending ancestral reverence with contemporary rituals; boat-rivets found in graves along Kent's coast, as at Sarre and Finglesham, point to symbolic inclusions of vessel fragments honoring the Jutes' seafaring heritage. Customs reinforced communal bonds and spiritual obligations, including oath-swearing to affirm truth and loyalty, as codified in King Aethelberht's early seventh-century laws, where incurred severe penalties like wergeld payments or loss of oath-worthiness. These oaths, sworn in assemblies involving kin and lords, reflected social hierarchies in ritual contexts, with higher-status individuals requiring more oath-helpers. Festivals aligned with natural cycles, particularly solstices; the celebration, known as Geola or , marked the year's turning point with feasting and offerings, possibly invoking Thunor for renewal amid the darkest days. The conversion of the Jutes began in 597 AD when dispatched Augustine and about forty monks to , where they landed on the Isle of Thanet and preached to King Aethelberht, who had been exposed to through his Frankish wife . Aethelberht, initially cautious, permitted preaching in and converted after observing miracles and the missionaries' piety, receiving on Whitsunday without compelling his subjects. This royal endorsement facilitated the establishment of episcopal sees at , where Augustine repaired St. Martin's Church for worship, and later at Rochester, marking the institutionalization of Roman in Jutish territories. Post-conversion, Jutish Christianity in blended Roman rites with lingering pagan elements, fostering such as adapting solstice festivals into observances. The Kentish church, rooted in Augustine's mission, influenced broader Anglo-Saxon ecclesiastical politics, including support for Roman practices against Celtic traditions in ; the Kentish church, rooted in Roman traditions, supported the outcome of the (664 AD), where the Roman Easter computation prevailed, aiding unification under Roman authority.

Language and Material Culture

Linguistic Characteristics

The linguistic characteristics of the Jutish , identified as the Kentish variant of , reflect its origins among the Germanic tribes settling in southeastern Britain. This featured distinct phonological innovations, notably in the treatment of ; for instance, the long diphthong *ēo was raised to *īo in Old Kentish, contrasting with the West Saxon retention of *ēo before monophthongization to a . Such differences arose from the Jutes' migration from and possible interactions with neighboring groups, contributing to a sound system that preserved certain front rounded vowels longer than in other Anglo-Saxon dialects. Evidence for early Jutish writing primarily consists of on artifacts dating to the 5th and 6th centuries, utilizing the script adapted into the Anglo-Saxon Futhorc for sounds. Notable examples include short inscriptions on Kentish sword pommels and buckles, indicating personal ownership or memorial purposes. A recent discovery in 2024 of a 6th-century sword from an Anglo-Saxon cemetery near features a on its blade, highlighting continued use of in early Kentish contexts. Following the Christian conversion of in the late 6th century, the Jutes transitioned to the Latin alphabet, as seen in the earliest Kentish charters from the 8th century, which exhibit dialectal spellings like smoothed diphthongs absent in West Saxon texts. The Kentish dialect likely incorporated Frisian substrates, particularly in vocabulary related to maritime activities, owing to the Jutes' coastal origins near Frisian territories; examples include terms like "fry" (free or clear, from Old Frisian *fri), used in nautical contexts for unobstructed seas. This influence is further evidenced in place names preserving Jutish suffixes, such as "-den" denoting a wooded valley (e.g., Blean-den), which differ from Saxon "-ham" or Anglian "-ing" forms and highlight the dialect's role in Kentish toponymy. By the , political shifts—including Mercian overlordship followed by West Saxon dominance under —led to the assimilation of the Kentish dialect into broader varieties, with its unique features like vowel raising (Kentish Raising of /æ/ to /e/ before /r/) gradually supplanted by West Saxon norms in written records. This process marked the effective extinction of distinct Jutish linguistic traits, though traces persisted in local speech until the period.

Archaeological Evidence and Artifacts

Archaeological evidence for the Jutes primarily derives from cemeteries and settlements in , , dating to the 5th through 7th centuries CE, where material culture exhibits distinct continental influences suggestive of origins in and northern Germany. Key sites include the Sarre and Finglesham cemeteries, which reveal furnished inhumations reflecting Jutish settlement patterns. At Sarre, excavated in the , burials from the yielded high-status , including the renowned Sarre , a silver quoit-style example with gilded animal ornamentation in two zones separated by a plain band, featuring birds flanking a notch and on the pin-head. Similarly, Finglesham cemetery, used from the 6th to 8th centuries, contains over 50 graves, many oriented west-south-west, with artifacts like square-headed cloisonné brooches and saucer brooches in graves such as D3, indicating elite status through pattern-welded iron tools and imported garnets. Other distinctive artifacts include quoit-brooch style jewelry, characterized by large, openwork designs with interlace and zoomorphic motifs, concentrated in and dated to the early , often interpreted as markers of Jutish or late Romano-British elite identity rather than widespread Germanic mercenary use. Bucket graves, a recurrent feature in Kentish Jutish cemeteries like those at Lyminge and Dover Buckland, involve iron-bound wooden pails placed at the head or foot, sometimes with drop-handles, symbolizing feasting or domestic rituals and linking to continental traditions. Continental imports, such as glass beads from the and bracteates echoing Scandinavian styles, underscore ongoing trade ties to , as seen in Finglesham's from . Kent's archaeological record shows greater continuity with Roman material culture compared to other Anglo-Saxon regions, with villas like Eccles featuring mosaics and hypocausts adapted into post-Roman structures for industrial or domestic use, rather than abrupt abandonment. This persistence, evident in repurposed mosaics at sites like Brading on the Isle of (a Jutish-associated area), contrasts with more transformative Saxon settlements elsewhere, suggesting Jutish integration with local Romano-British elites. Challenges in identifying Jutish-specific evidence stem from the tribe's relatively small , estimated at a few thousand migrants, resulting in sparse and localized finds that blend into broader Anglo-Saxon . Ongoing debates question whether artifacts like quoit brooches or bucket graves uniquely denote "Jutish" ethnicity or represent shared Kentish variants within Anglo-Saxon traditions, complicating ethnic attributions based solely on .

Modern Interpretations and Legacy

Genetic and Scholarly Debates

Recent () analyses from 5th- to 7th-century burials in and the Isle of Wight have provided evidence for genetic affinities between these populations and early medieval groups from in and . A comprehensive study sequencing 278 early medieval English genomes alongside continental samples identified that individuals from exhibited ancestry components aligned with continental sources, including those from in and , consistent with continental northern European (CNE) ancestry supporting historical accounts of Jutish settlement in southeastern . This CNE genetic signal, characterized by average proportions of 76 ± 2% continental northern European input, appears localized and less prevalent in broader early medieval English populations, where overall migrant ancestry ranges from 25% to 47%. In DNA, the Jutish component contributes to the national through broader CNE ancestry, reflecting assimilation and dilution through intermarriage with indigenous British populations and other Germanic groups over centuries; targeted analyses show residual affinities from continental northern European sources, including Jutlandic, at 25–47% in contemporary southeastern English populations, including Kentish residents. Post-2010 archaeological re-evaluations, including of cemeteries like Chessell Down, corroborate this by linking burial goods to Jutlandic styles while highlighting limited site distribution, suggesting the Jutes formed a regionally confined group rather than a widespread . Scholarly debates persist over the Jutes' distinctiveness, with some researchers questioning Bede's 8th-century tripartite model of Angles, , and Jutes as separate tribes, proposing instead that the Jutes may represent an elite warrior group or cultural construct rather than a mass ethnic migration. John Hines' contributions to chronological frameworks and terminological discussions in the 2020s have emphasized reevaluating Bede's framework in light of integrated archaeological, linguistic, and genetic data, arguing for possible overlaps with Frisian coastal cultures in material styles and settlement patterns. Evidence of Frisian-Jutish overlap includes shared quoit brooch types in Kentish and Frisian finds, indicating fluid interactions rather than rigid tribal boundaries. 19th-century scholarship often romanticized the Jutes as a heroic, foundational in English origins, drawing on to construct a of pure Germanic vigor against Celtic decline, but this view has been supplanted by modern minimalist interpretations that view them as a minor, assimilated element within broader Germanic migrations. These contemporary perspectives prioritize from and targeted excavations, revealing gaps in earlier models and underscoring the Jutes' role as a localized with limited long-term demographic impact. Recent 2025 aDNA studies from 7th-century southern English burials further highlight diverse ancestries, including non-European components, in early medieval southeastern , enhancing interpretations of cosmopolitan settlement dynamics.

Influences on English History

The Jutes' establishment of the Kingdom of Kent in the fifth century laid foundational institutional influences on English legal and ecclesiastical structures. Kentish law codes, such as those attributed to Æthelberht (c. 600) and subsequent rulers like Hlothere and Eadric (c. 685), introduced concepts like wergild compensation and inheritance that persisted and shaped later Anglo-Saxon legislation. These provisions, emphasizing fines for offenses and equitable land division, were incorporated into King Alfred the Great's Domboc (c. 890), which drew directly from Kentish precedents to promote a unified legal framework across and beyond. Similarly, the Jutes' control of positioned as the primatial see of the English Church, a role solidified when St. Augustine's mission arrived in 597 at the invitation of King Æthelberht, a Jutish ruler. This event established as the metropolitan see, influencing the organizational hierarchy of the and facilitating the integration of Romano-British and Germanic Christian practices into a national ecclesiastical identity. In cultural terms, Jutish folklore endures through the legends of , the brothers mythologized as the first Jutish leaders who arrived in around 449 to aid against and Scots, only to conquer the region. These tales, rooted in Bede's Ecclesiastical History and the , symbolize the origins of English kingship and appear in as archetypes of migration and betrayal, embedding Jutish motifs in broader English narrative traditions. Complementing this, the Jutes' maritime prowess—evident in their sea-borne settlement of 's coastal areas—fostered enduring seafaring customs in southeast , including trade networks and techniques that supported 's role as a gateway to . The Jutes occupy a marginal position in the overarching "Anglo-Saxon" historical narrative, often subsumed under the tripartite Angles-Saxons-Jutes framework popularized by , yet their distinct identity faded as kingdoms consolidated. This overshadowing intensified in early , but the saw a revival through philological and studies that highlighted Jutish contributions to Germanic of English identity, as seen in works emphasizing tribal migrations. In modern legacy, Jutish influences persist in Kentish place names like those ending in -ing (e.g., Gillingham, deriving from tribal associations) and -ham (e.g., Sandwich, linked to Jutish settlements), reflecting their topographic imprint. Subtle genetic traces of Jutish ancestry also appear in southeast English populations, with studies estimating continental northern European contributions, including from Jutlandic sources, at around 25-40% in Kentish genomes, underscoring a layered ethnic heritage.

References

  1. https://www.ruf.rice.edu/~kemmer/Words04/history/index.html
  2. https://ageofarthur.substack.com/p/who-were-the-jutes
  3. https://www.ling.upenn.edu/~kroch/courses/lx310/Assessing_the_Anglo-Saxon_Invasions.html
  4. https://soar.suny.edu/bitstreams/a9a9f4cb-9556-4162-bc64-d85e3c892f2f/download
  5. https://www.academia.edu/128422294/Role_of_the_Jutes_and_Frisians_in_the_5th_Century_Anglo_Saxon_Settlement_of_England_and_Related_Y_Chromosome_Haplogroups
  6. https://www.historyfiles.co.uk/KingListsEurope/ScandinaviaJutes.htm
  7. https://sacred-texts.com/cla/tac/g01040.htm
  8. https://www.historyextra.com/period/roman/fall-roman-britain-empire-what-happened-why/
  9. https://www.tertullian.org/fathers/gildas_02_ruin_of_britain.htm
  10. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/657/657.txt
  11. https://www.kentarchaeology.org.uk/journal/69/jutish-cemetery-lyminge
  12. https://www.historyfiles.co.uk/KingListsBritain/EnglandMeonware.htm
  13. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-05247-2
  14. https://www.bbc.co.uk/legacies/immig_emig/england/kent/article_2.shtml
  15. https://www.ccel.org/ccel/bede/history.v.i.xiv.html
  16. http://media.bloomsbury.com/rep/files/Primary%2520Source%25205.2%2520-%2520Bede.pdf
  17. https://www.historyfiles.co.uk/KingListsBritain/EnglandKent.htm
  18. https://academic.oup.com/book/9840/chapter/157093795
  19. https://www.kentarchaeology.org.uk/records/textus-roffensis/1r-3v
  20. https://avalon.law.yale.edu/medieval/saxlaw.asp
  21. https://blogs.canterbury.ac.uk/kenthistory/saxon-history-linking-canterbury-to-continental-europe/
  22. https://www.persee.fr/doc/mafam_1152-2518_2006_act_15_1_988
  23. https://dcc.dickinson.edu/bede-historia-ecclesiastica/intro/christianity-in-anglo-saxon-england
  24. https://www.brepolsonline.net/doi/pdf/10.1484/M.SEM-EB.5.105558?download=true
  25. https://www.historyfiles.co.uk/KingListsBritain/EnglandWight.htm
  26. https://www.vectisarchaeology.org.uk/pdfs/king_arwald.pdf
  27. http://elibrary.bsu.edu.az/files/books_400/N_244.pdf
  28. https://kentarchaeology.squarespace.com/s/archaeologia-cantiana_104-07_the_period_of_mercian_rule_in_kent_and_a_charter_of_ad_811.pdf
  29. http://www.anglo-saxons.net/hwaet/?do=get&type=chron&id=825b
  30. https://www.kentarchaeology.org.uk/journal/63/vikings-come-thanet
  31. http://www.anglo-saxons.net/hwaet/?do=get&type=chron&id=835
  32. https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2705&context=theses
  33. http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/1034/1/1034_v1.pdf
  34. https://octavia.net/early-english-architecture/
  35. https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1841&context=lawreview
  36. https://www.tha-engliscan-gesithas.org.uk/daily-life-in-anglo-saxon-england/anglo-saxon-families/
  37. https://www.societies.ncl.ac.uk/pgfnewcastle/files/2015/05/Foster-Religion-and-the-Landscape.pdf
  38. https://is.cuni.cz/studium/predmety/index.php?do=download&did=62018&kod=ARL100252
  39. https://www.academia.edu/2306387/With_Dickinson_T_M_and_Richardson_A_Early_Anglo_Saxon_Eastry_Archaeological_Evidence_for_the_Beginnings_of_a_District_Centre_in_the_Kingdom_of_Kent_Anglo_Saxon_Studies_in_Archaeology_and_History_17
  40. https://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/2461/1/DX190240_1.pdf
  41. https://uccshes.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/boat-rivets-in-graves-in-pre-viking-kent-reassessing-anglo-saxon-boat-burial-traditions.pdf
  42. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/13376/13376-h/13376-h.htm
  43. https://www.originalsources.com/Document.aspx?DocID=QRQ7AVQZ3FR7IBI
  44. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24428427
  45. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/longvowel-shifts-in-english-c10501700/development-of-oe-e-and-eo/E4156D7591539014451AD96D963730E3
  46. https://www.ling.upenn.edu/~dringe/CorpStuff/Thesis/Dialects.html
  47. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2024/dec/26/really-incredible-sixth-century-sword-found-in-kent
  48. https://linguistics.byu.edu/classes/Ling450ch/reports/english2.html
  49. https://www.kentarchaeology.org.uk/notes/dialect
  50. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/63263/63263-h/63263-h.htm
  51. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/1198970.pdf
  52. https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/H_1893-0601-219
  53. https://www.academia.edu/127478217/The_Anglo_Saxon_Cemetery_at_Finglesham_Kent_a_Reconsideration
  54. https://kar.kent.ac.uk/71645/1/SwiftQuoitBroochStyleMedArch.pdf
  55. https://archaeologywkas.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/AS-TextRep-2141.pdf
  56. https://archaeology.co.uk/articles/features/axe-the-anglo-saxons.htm
  57. https://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/20505/1/MasterFile.pdf
  58. https://phys.org/news/2025-08-ancient-dna-reveals-west-african.html
  59. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/725457
  60. https://www.churchofengland.org/about/history-church-england
  61. https://blogs.kcl.ac.uk/english/2018/09/05/founders-of-england/
  62. https://www.academia.edu/35675074/Angles_Saxons_Jutes_and_Burgundians_
  63. https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/34281/chapter/290628836
  64. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9534755/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.