Hubbry Logo
Middle PaleolithicMiddle PaleolithicMain
Open search
Middle Paleolithic
Community hub
Middle Paleolithic
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Middle Paleolithic
Middle Paleolithic
Middle Paleolithic
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Middle Paleolithic
PeriodStone Age
Dates300,000 to 50,000 BP
Preceded byLower Paleolithic
Followed byUpper Paleolithic
The Paleolithic
↑ Pliocene (before Homo)
Lower Paleolithic
 (c. 3.3 Ma – 300 ka)
Middle Paleolithic
 (c. 300–50 ka)
Upper Paleolithic
 (c. 50–12 ka)

Fertile Crescent:

Europe:

Africa:

Siberia:

↓ Mesolithic
Map
Selected Middle Paleolithic sites from the ROAD database (CC BY-SA 4.0 ROCEEH)

The Middle Paleolithic (or Middle Palaeolithic) is the second subdivision of the Paleolithic or Old Stone Age as it is understood in Europe, Africa and Asia. The term Middle Stone Age is used as an equivalent or a synonym for the Middle Paleolithic in African archeology.[1] The Middle Paleolithic broadly spanned from 300,000 to 50,000 years ago. There are considerable dating differences between regions. The Middle Paleolithic was succeeded by the Upper Paleolithic subdivision which first began between 50,000 and 40,000 years ago.[1] Pettit and White date the Early Middle Paleolithic in Great Britain to about 325,000 to 180,000 years ago (late Marine Isotope Stage 9 to late Marine Isotope Stage 7), and the Late Middle Paleolithic as about 60,000 to 35,000 years ago.[2] The Middle Paleolithic was in the geological Chibanian (Middle Pleistocene) and Late Pleistocene ages.

According to the theory of the recent African origin of modern humans, anatomically modern humans began migrating out of Africa during the Middle Stone Age/Middle Paleolithic around 125,000 years ago and began to replace other Homo species such as the Neanderthals and Homo erectus.

Origin of behavioral modernity

[edit]
−10 —
–
−9 —
–
−8 —
–
−7 —
–
−6 —
–
−5 —
–
−4 —
–
−3 —
–
−2 —
–
−1 —
–
0 —
Miocene
 
←
←
←
←
←
←
←
←
←
←
←
←
←

The earliest evidence of behavioral modernity first appears during the Middle Paleolithic; undisputed evidence of behavioral modernity, however, only becomes common during the following Upper Paleolithic period.[1]

Middle Paleolithic burials at sites such as Krapina in Croatia (dated to c. 130,000 BP) and the Qafzeh and Es Skhul caves in Israel (c. 100,000 BP) have led some anthropologists and archeologists (such as Philip Lieberman) to believe that Middle Paleolithic cultures may have possessed a developing religious ideology which included concepts such as an afterlife; other scholars suggest the bodies were buried for secular reasons.[3][4]

According to recent[when?] archeological findings from Homo heidelbergensis sites in the Atapuerca Mountains, the practice of intentional burial may have begun much earlier during the late Lower Paleolithic, but this theory is widely questioned in the scientific community. Cut-marks on Neandertal bones from various sites – such as Combe Grenal and the Moula rock shelter in France – may imply that Neanderthals, like some contemporary human cultures, may have practiced excarnation for presumably religious reasons (see Neanderthal behavior § Cannibalism or ritual defleshing?).

The earliest undisputed evidence of artistic expression during the Paleolithic period comes from Middle Paleolithic/Middle Stone Age sites such as Blombos Cave in the form of bracelets,[5] beads,[6] art rock,[7] ochre used as body paint and perhaps in ritual,[1][7] though earlier examples of artistic expression such as the Venus of Tan-Tan and the patterns found on elephant bones from Bilzingsleben in Thuringia may have been produced by Acheulean tool-users such as Homo erectus prior to the start of the Middle Paleolithic period.[8] Activities such as catching large fish and hunting large game animals with specialized tools indicate increased group-wide cooperation and more elaborate social organization.[1]

In addition to developing advanced cultural traits, humans also first began to take part in long-distance trade between groups for rare commodities (such as ochre (which was often used for religious purposes such as ritual[7][9])) and raw materials during the Middle Paleolithic as early as 120,000 years ago.[1][10] Inter-group trade may have appeared during the Middle Paleolithic because trade between bands would have helped ensure their survival by allowing them to exchange resources and commodities such as raw materials during times of relative scarcity (i.e., famine or drought).[10]

Social stratification

[edit]

Evidence from archeology and comparative ethnography indicates that Middle Paleolithic people lived in small, egalitarian band societies similar to those of Upper Paleolithic societies and some modern hunter-gatherers such as the ǃKung and Mbuti peoples.[1][11] Both Neanderthal and modern human societies took care of the elderly members of their societies during the Middle Paleolithic.[10] Christopher Boehm (1999) has hypothesized that egalitarianism may have arisen in Middle Paleolithic societies because of a need to distribute resources such as food and meat equally to avoid famine and ensure a stable food supply.[12]

It has usually been assumed that women gathered plants and firewood and men hunted and scavenged dead animals through the Paleolithic.[13] However, Steven L. Kuhn and Mary Stiner from the University of Arizona suggest that this sex-based division of labor did not exist prior to the Upper Paleolithic. The sexual division of labor may have evolved after 45,000 years ago to allow humans to acquire food and other resources more efficiently.[13]

Nutrition

[edit]

Although gathering and hunting comprised most of the food supply during the Middle Paleolithic, people began to supplement their diet with seafood and began smoking and drying meat to preserve and store it. For instance the Middle Stone Age inhabitants of the region now occupied by the Democratic Republic of the Congo hunted large 1.8-metre (6 ft) long catfish with specialized barbed fishing points as early as 90,000 years ago,[1][14] and Neandertals and Middle Paleolithic Homo sapiens in Africa began to catch shellfish for food as revealed by shellfish cooking in Neanderthal sites in Italy about 110,000 years ago and Middle Paleolithic Homo sapiens sites at Pinnacle Point, in Africa.[1][15]

Anthropologists such as Tim D. White suggest that cannibalism was common in human societies prior to the beginning of the Upper Paleolithic, based on the large amount of "butchered human" bones found in Neandertal and other Middle Paleolithic sites.[16] Cannibalism in the Middle Paleolithic may have occurred because of food shortages.[17]

However it is also possible that Middle Paleolithic cannibalism occurred for religious reasons which would coincide with the development of religious practices thought to have occurred during the Upper Paleolithic.[18][19] Nonetheless it remains possible that Middle Paleolithic societies never practiced cannibalism and that the damage to recovered human bones was either the result of excarnation or predation by carnivores such as saber-toothed cats, lions and hyenas.[19]

Technology

[edit]
This is a drawing of a replica of an Acheulean hand-axe found during the Lower Paleolithic period. The tool in this drawing is made of black obsidian and is worked on both sides.

Around 200,000 BP Middle Paleolithic Stone tool manufacturing spawned a tool-making technique known as the Levallois technique or prepared-core technique, that was more elaborate than previous Acheulean techniques.[20][21] Wallace and Shea split the core artifacts into two different types: formal cores and expedient cores. Formal cores are designed to extract the maximum amount from the raw material while expedient cores are based more upon functional need.[22] This method increased efficiency by permitting the creation of more controlled and consistent flakes.[21] This method allowed Middle Paleolithic humans correspondingly to create stone-tipped spears, which were the earliest composite tools, by hafting sharp, pointy stone flakes onto wooden shafts. Paleolithic groups such as the Neanderthals who possessed a Middle Paleolithic level of technology appear to have hunted large game just as well as Upper Paleolithic modern humans[23] and the Neanderthals in particular may have likewise hunted with projectile weapons.[24]

Nonetheless Neanderthal usage of projectile weapons in hunting occurred very rarely (or perhaps never) and the Neanderthals hunted large game animals mostly by ambushing them and attacking them with mêlée weapons such as thrusting spears rather than attacking them from a distance with projectile weapons.[10][25] An ongoing controversy about the nature of Middle Paleolithic tools is whether there were a series of functionally specific and preconceived tool forms or whether there was a simple continuum of tool morphology that reflect the extent of edge maintenance, as Harold L. Dibble has suggested.[26]

The use of fire became widespread for the first time in human prehistory during the Middle Paleolithic, and humans began to cook their food c. 250,000 years ago.[27][28] Some scientists have hypothesized that hominids began cooking food to defrost frozen meat which would help ensure their survival in cold regions.[28] Robert K. Wayne, a molecular biologist, has controversially claimed, based on a comparison of canine DNA, that dogs may have been first domesticated during the Middle Paleolithic around or even before 100,000 BCE.[29]

Sites

[edit]

Cave sites

[edit]

Western Europe

[edit]

Middle East and Africa

[edit]

Open-air sites

[edit]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Middle Paleolithic

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Middle Paleolithic, also known as the in African contexts, represents a pivotal stage in human prehistory characterized by the emergence of prepared-core technologies and more complex behavioral adaptations among archaic hominins. This period is defined by the production of standardized flakes and tools through innovative methods like the , which allowed for greater efficiency in tool manufacture, alongside evidence of , hunting with spears, and the controlled use of . Spanning roughly from 300,000 to 40,000 years ago, the Middle Paleolithic encompasses diverse regional traditions across Eurasia and Africa, with the earliest evidence dating back to around 300,000 years in sites like those in the Levant and South Africa. In Europe and western Asia, it aligns with the Mousterian industry, featuring retouched tools such as scrapers, points, and denticulates, while in Africa, the Middle Stone Age includes varied assemblages with points, backed tools, and early signs of symbolic expression like ochre use and shell beads. The period's end is marked by the transition to the Upper Paleolithic around 40,000 years ago in Eurasia, coinciding with the decline of Neanderthals and the spread of modern humans. Key cultural developments during this era include adaptations to diverse environments, such as cave occupations in colder European regions and open-air sites in warmer and Asian landscapes, reflecting improved mobility and resource exploitation. Hominins associated with the Middle Paleolithic primarily include Homo neanderthalensis in , who exhibited robust physiques suited for hunting large game and possibly engaged in early behaviors like burials, as well as archaic and anatomically modern Homo sapiens in , where evidence of cumulative cultural transmission appears. These innovations laid foundational groundwork for later human advancements, highlighting a shift toward more planned and socially mediated technologies.

Definition and Chronology

Temporal Boundaries

The Middle Paleolithic spans approximately 300,000 to 50,000 years (), representing a transitional phase in technological and . This period follows the , characterized by more rudimentary stone tools such as handaxes and choppers before 300,000 , and precedes the , marked by the emergence of blade technologies and more complex symbolic behaviors after 50,000 . The boundaries are not rigidly fixed globally, as regional variations influence the precise timing, but this timeframe provides a standard chronological framework based on archaeological evidence from and . A key transitional event signaling the onset of the Middle Paleolithic is the appearance of prepared-core techniques around 300,000 BP, exemplified by assemblages at in , dated to 315 ± 34 thousand years ago through and uranium-series methods. The , a hallmark prepared-core method involving the premeditated flaking of stone to produce standardized tools, emerges as a defining during this early phase. These developments indicate a shift toward more efficient and versatile lithic production compared to earlier periods. Debates persist regarding the exact endpoints, particularly the termination around 50,000 , due to overlapping cultural phases in different regions; for instance, in , the (the equivalent of the Middle Paleolithic) shows continuity with the starting approximately 50,000 , complicating a sharp delineation. techniques, including uranium-series dating—which measures the decay of uranium isotopes in materials like speleothems and —and , which assesses trapped electrons in heated flint, have been crucial in refining these boundaries. These methods provide age ranges with uncertainties of several thousand years, influencing interpretations of period transitions by confirming early dates for advanced technologies and late persistence of Middle Paleolithic traits in some areas.

Regional Variations

The Middle Paleolithic in is typically dated from approximately 325,000 to 35,000 years (), encompassing a series of glacial and cycles that influenced hominin adaptations and site distributions across the continent. This period ends with the extinction of Neanderthals around 40,000–35,000 , marking a transition to the as modern humans expanded. Regional characteristics include the predominance of lithic industries, with variations linked to environmental pressures such as cold climates during Marine Isotope Stage (MIS) 8 (~300,000–243,000 ), which prompted shifts in raw material use and settlement patterns. In , the contemporaneous period is termed the (MSA), spanning roughly 300,000 to 40,000 , and is notable for its overlap with the emergence and dispersal of early Homo sapiens. The MSA timeline begins with technological innovations around 315,000 BP at sites like , , and extends through phases of increased behavioral complexity until transitioning to the . Unlike the European record, African variations reflect more stable equatorial climates interspersed with arid phases, such as during MIS 4 (~71,000–59,000 BP), which drove migrations and adaptations in toolkits like Levallois techniques. Across , the Middle Paleolithic timeline extends from about 250,000 to 40,000 , with regional extensions influenced by diverse environments from the to . In the western parts, including the , Neanderthal-associated assemblages date to 250,000–50,000 , while eastern regions show evidence of occupations from at least 200,000 in sites like , . Potential influences are evident in genetic and archaeological traces persisting until around 50,000 , reflecting adaptations to high-altitude and arid conditions. These regional variations are shaped by climatic fluctuations, such as the cooling during MIS 8, which restricted habitable zones and prompted hominin migrations into around 200,000–100,000 BP. Migration patterns, including early Homo sapiens dispersals via the corridor, further modulated timelines by introducing technological exchanges and population overlaps with archaic groups like Neanderthals and Denisovans. Recent dating advancements from the 2020s, including optically stimulated luminescence at Tinshemet Cave in the , have refined the mid-Middle Paleolithic chronology to 130,000–80,000 , revealing prolonged coexistence and behavioral similarities between Neanderthals and early modern humans without distinct technological boundaries.

Associated Hominins

Neanderthals

Neanderthals ( neanderthalensis) were the primary hominins associated with the Middle in , inhabiting diverse environments from to between approximately 300,000 and 40,000 years . Their robust skeletal build, characterized by stocky limbs and a barrel-shaped chest, represented adaptations to cold climates under Bergmann's and Allen's rules, which favor larger body mass and shorter extremities for heat conservation in cooler regions. Neanderthals exhibited cold-adapted facial features, including broad noses that likely warmed inhaled air and large infraorbital foramina facilitating increased blood flow to the face for . Their cranial capacity averaged around 1,500 cm³, larger than that of modern humans, though this may reflect allometric scaling with body size rather than superior cognitive capacity. Genetic analyses reveal that Neanderthals diverged from the lineage leading to modern humans around 400,000–800,000 years ago. Interbreeding occurred between Neanderthals and early modern Homo sapiens populations, with evidence of multiple events, including early interbreeding around 140,000 years ago as shown by a child skeleton with mixed features from , and a primary pulse between 47,000 and 60,000 years ago, resulting in non-African modern humans carrying 1–2% Neanderthal-derived DNA on average, which influences traits such as and pigmentation. This genetic legacy underscores partial assimilation rather than complete replacement during their decline. Neanderthals demonstrated high mobility across Eurasian landscapes, adapting to glacial-interglacial cycles through seasonal migrations that tracked prey availability in varied terrains from steppes to forests. Their subsistence relied heavily on hunting large game, such as , , and mammoths, employing strategies that targeted prime-aged adults during specific seasons to maximize nutritional returns in energy-scarce environments. Evidence from isotopic and microwear studies of faunal remains confirms this focus on exploitation, supporting sustained populations in northern latitudes. Neanderthals disappeared from the fossil record around 40,000 years before present, coinciding with the arrival of modern humans in and marked fluctuations in climate during the early . Contributing factors included abrupt cold-dry periods that reduced habitable ranges and prey resources, intensifying competition with incoming Homo sapiens groups for limited territories and food. Assimilation through interbreeding further diluted distinct Neanderthal populations, as hybrid offspring integrated into expanding modern human networks. Brief temporal overlap with early modern humans in the , around 50,000–60,000 years ago, highlights potential early interaction zones. Recent archaeological findings from the 2020s, including Quina-style stone tools at the Longtan site in dated to approximately 40,000–50,000 years ago, suggest technological influence extended into , challenging prior views of their exclusively western Eurasian distribution. While no direct fossils have been recovered there, the presence of this -associated lithic technique implies migration or , supported by genomic models of archaic hominin dispersals.

Early Modern Humans

Early modern humans, or anatomically modern Homo sapiens, are characterized by a gracile skeletal build, a high and rounded , a globular braincase, and an average of approximately 1,350 cm³. These traits distinguish them from archaic hominins, reflecting adaptations for enhanced cognitive and social capabilities while maintaining a lighter, more linear physique suited to diverse environments. The origins of early modern humans trace back to around 300,000 years (BP), with the site in providing key fossil evidence. Discovered remains, including skulls and dental fragments dated to 315 ± 34 thousand years ago, exhibit a of modern facial features—such as a flat face and small teeth—combined with more archaic, elongated braincases. This supports a pan-African model of Homo sapiens , where modern morphology emerged gradually across the continent rather than in a single localized event. Initial dispersals began between approximately 100,000 and 60,000 BP, with early groups reaching the and subsequently . These migrations involved small populations that encountered and coexisted with Neanderthals in overlapping regions like the . Genetic evidence reveals higher variability in African Homo sapiens populations compared to non-African groups, reflecting a serial and population bottlenecks during these expansions that reduced diversity outside the continent. Recent discoveries from the 2020s, such as those at Tinshemet Cave in dated to around 97,000 BP (within 130,000–80,000 BP), indicate early interactions between Homo sapiens and Neanderthal-like hominins, evidenced by shared behavioral practices like flexed burials and uniform lithic technologies across mid- sites in the . This suggests potential cultural exchange or admixture during these dispersals, highlighting the dynamic nature of hominin encounters beyond .

Technological Advances

Lithic Technologies

The industry represents the predominant of the Middle Paleolithic in and the , characterized by flake-based tools produced through the and featuring side-scrapers, denticulates, and points for diverse functions such as cutting and scraping. This industry, dated approximately from 300,000 to 40,000 years ago, reflects a shift toward more standardized and versatile tool production compared to earlier phases, with assemblages often including retouched flakes and cores indicating repeated use and maintenance. Central to the and broader Middle Paleolithic toolkit is the Levallois , which emerged around 300,000 and allowed for the predetermination of flake shape through systematic flaking. The process involves initial core preparation by trimming the surface to create a convex platform and ridges, followed by preferential flaking to isolate a striking platform and remove predetermined flakes with controlled morphology, often using hard hammer percussion for efficiency and predictability. This method enabled the production of thin, sharp flakes suitable for into handles, marking a technological advance in planning and resource optimization during the Middle Paleolithic. Regional variations of Middle Paleolithic lithic technologies highlight adaptive diversity beyond the classic . In , the industry, part of the from Marine Isotope Stage 6 to 3 (approximately 145,000 to 30,000 years ago), is distinguished by tanged tools—pedunculated pieces with stems for , including points and scrapers—distributed from to Egypt's Western Desert. These tanged artifacts, often combined with Levallois flakes, suggest specialized use and regional technological structuring, with northeastern variants showing affinities to the Nubian Complex. In southern Africa, the Howiesons Poort techno-complex, dated to about 70,000–55,000 years ago, features backed segments—small, retouched tools with blunted edges for insertion into composite implements—alongside formal bone tools and diverse raw materials like and hornfels. These backed pieces indicate advanced strategies and microlithic precursors, reflecting environmental adaptations in South African cave and open-air sites. Raw material sourcing in Middle Paleolithic assemblages demonstrates forward planning, with evidence of distances up to 100 km from sites to occupation areas, as seen in Iberian and Central European contexts where flint and other lithics were selectively procured for quality and availability. Such movements, often involving diverse sources within 30–100 km radii, underscore economic strategies tied to mobility patterns and tool curation, with rarer long-distance imports exceeding this range in specific cases like the Eastern . Recent discoveries in 2025 have expanded the known distribution of Middle Paleolithic technologies into and the Aegean. At the Longtan site in southwest , dated to approximately 55,000 years ago, a complete Quina assemblage—including 14 cores, 53 scrapers, and resharpening flakes—reveals thick-flake production and multiscalar retouch akin to European variants, indicating diverse hominin dynamics and challenging prior views of limited Middle Paleolithic presence in . Similarly, submerged sites along the Ayvalık coast in Turkey's northeastern Aegean have yielded Levallois flakes, handaxes, and cleavers from Pleistocene contexts when sea levels were lower, suggesting a land bridge facilitated technological exchange and migration between and during the Middle Paleolithic.

Fire Use and Other Innovations

During the Middle Paleolithic, hominins achieved widespread control of between approximately 250,000 and 400,000 years BP, as evidenced by repeated features at sites such as in , where central hearths indicate habitual use for warmth and protection against predators. These , often reused over time, reflect a systematic integration of into daily activities, marking a key technological advancement beyond opportunistic burning. Spear technologies advanced significantly, with wooden spears discovered at Schöningen, Germany, dating to around 300,000 , demonstrating both thrusting and throwing variants designed for hunting large game. These spears, crafted from spruce wood with balanced proportions for aerodynamics. Bone tools and adhesives emerged as important innovations, with early techniques using birch tar documented in around 200,000 , allowing secure attachment of stone implements to wooden or bone handles. This multi-step process, involving controlled heating of , underscores complex pyrotechnology and planning in tool assembly. Evidence for shelter construction during this period is primarily inferred from site layouts and rare preserved features, suggesting the use of hides draped over wooden frames or simple branch supports to create temporary enclosures. At open-air and rockshelter sites, clustered artifacts and potential postholes imply structured living spaces designed for prolonged occupation. Recent 2020s discoveries, such as the 70,000 BP Neanderthal workshop at Zwoleń in Poland, reveal organized integration of fire and tool production, where hearths likely facilitated sharpening and maintenance of implements amid animal processing activities. This site highlights the sophisticated coordination of pyrotechnology with craftsmanship in late Middle Paleolithic contexts.

Cultural and Behavioral Aspects

Emergence of Behavioral Modernity

Behavioral modernity refers to the cognitive and cultural shift among hominins from primarily practical, immediate-response behaviors to more abstract thinking, evidenced by extended planning horizons exceeding one day and enhanced social learning mechanisms that allowed for the cumulative transmission of knowledge across generations. This transition is marked by increased foresight in and the ability to innovate based on shared experiences, distinguishing Middle Paleolithic populations from earlier hominins who relied more on opportunistic strategies. The emergence of these traits appeared sporadically in around 200,000 years before present (BP), with archaeological records from sites showing initial signs of planned activities and material exchanges, becoming more consistent and widespread by approximately 100,000 BP as populations adapted to diverse environments. Key evidence includes long-distance transport of raw materials, such as and silcrete, over distances up to 300 kilometers, indicating deliberate procurement strategies and networks that required anticipation of future needs. Additionally, repeated site maintenance over generations is documented at locations like in , where hearths, bedding, and structured living spaces were sustained through multiple occupations spanning thousands of years, suggesting intergenerational and site fidelity. Debates persist regarding whether Neanderthals achieved partial or if such traits were exclusive to Homo sapiens, with evidence from European and Levantine sites showing Neanderthals engaging in similar and resource transport but lacking the full cumulative cultural complexity seen in later sapiens populations. Recent findings from Tinshemet Cave in , dated to around 130,000–80,000 , reveal shared behavioral patterns between Neanderthals and early Homo sapiens, including uniform tool technologies and site use, challenging narratives of sapiens exclusivity and indicating convergent adaptations during coexistence in the . These foundational cognitive shifts laid the groundwork for later symbolic expressions, such as ritualistic practices, as advanced manifestations of abstract thought.

Social Organization

Middle Paleolithic societies are generally inferred to have been organized in small, mobile bands, with evidence from archaeological sites and genetic analyses indicating group sizes of approximately 20 individuals. These estimates derive from patterns of site occupation density, such as limited living floor areas at caves like Abric Romaní in , and the logistical demands of large game, which required coordinated efforts beyond solitary or very small family units. Cooperation was a hallmark of Middle Paleolithic , particularly evident in hunting strategies targeting large herbivores like and straight-tusked elephants. At sites such as in (ca. 400–200 kya), faunal remains show that hominins systematically processed high-quality meat from large game, implying division of labor and communal sharing among group members to maximize resource efficiency. Similarly, evidence from multiple European sites, including Neumark-Nord 1 in , demonstrates that Neanderthals hunted proboscideans weighing up to 13 tons over extended periods, necessitating team-based planning, ambushes, and transport that involved 20–30 individuals. Social stratification appears rare in Middle Paleolithic contexts, with most evidence pointing to egalitarian structures characterized by relatively uniform access to resources and minimal disparities in . Comparative ethnographic models of hunter-gatherers and the lack of pronounced differences in tool quality or site features across occupations support this view, as do limited burial assemblages where , if present, show little variation in quantity or type. Possible exceptions include subtle disparities in or tool inclusions at sites like Qafzeh Cave, suggesting occasional recognition of status through social bonds, though these are not indicative of rigid hierarchies. Genetic data from remains reveal kinship systems centered on small, closely related groups with evidence of female-biased dispersal, indicating occasional to form alliances between bands. Analysis of genomes from sites like Chagyrskaya Cave in identifies maternal lineages and close relatives within communities of about 20 individuals, alongside higher inbreeding levels consistent with limited , yet structured migration patterns that connected groups over distances of tens of kilometers. Burials, such as those at , further hint at social bonds through deliberate placement, potentially reinforcing ties. Insights from 2020s research, including the 2025 discovery of over 800 Middle Paleolithic artifacts in a dried lake bed in Iraq's Western Desert, suggest hominins engaged in seasonal aggregations around ephemeral water sources for resource exploitation and sharing. These Levallois flakes and tools, dated 250,000–400,000 years ago, imply adaptive mobility and cooperative use of desert paleolakes, expanding understanding of group interactions in arid environments.

Symbolic Practices

One of the key indicators of symbolic behavior during the Middle Paleolithic is the practice of intentional burials, which suggest emerging beliefs in an or ritual treatment of the dead. At Qafzeh Cave in , dated to approximately 100,000 years ago, archaeologists uncovered the remains of up to 15 early modern humans (Homo sapiens) in deliberate graves, some accompanied by red and marine shells transported from over 35 kilometers away. These associations imply symbolic significance, as the ochre was applied to bodies or , and the shells may have served as ornaments, pointing to ritualistic practices beyond mere disposal of remains. Evidence of art and ornamentation further demonstrates abstract thought. In Blombos Cave, South Africa, around 75,000 years ago, early modern humans engraved complex patterns on ochre pieces, including crosshatched designs that exceed functional purposes and indicate deliberate aesthetic or symbolic intent. Similarly, Neanderthals in Europe utilized eagle talons for jewelry as early as 130,000 years ago; at the Krapina site in Croatia, eight white-tailed eagle talons bear cut marks and notches consistent with stringing for necklaces, suggesting personal adornment and cultural expression. The widespread use of red ochre for body decoration and rituals underscores its role in symbolic practices across hominin groups. Early Neanderthals applied red in contexts indicative of bodily adornment, such as staining on tools and bones, potentially for purposes during the Middle Paleolithic. Recent analyses confirm ochre's multifunctional role, including as a for skin decoration in social or ceremonial settings, with over 7,500 fragments recovered from Levantine sites showing distant sourcing that highlights its valued symbolic properties. Neanderthals also produced abstract engravings on cave walls, providing direct evidence of their capacity for marking. In Spain's El Castillo Cave, a series of red disk and hand-stencil motifs, dated to over 64,000 years ago via uranium-thorium dating of overlying carbonate crusts, represent the earliest known cave art and demonstrate abstract design. A 2025 study revealed deliberate geometric engravings on flint tools from Levantine Middle Paleolithic sites, including Qafzeh Cave (~90,000–100,000 years ago), Manot Cave, and , analyzed using 3D surface methods to confirm and alignment with tool topography, indicating early expression and abstract thinking among hominins. In 2025, excavations at Tinshemet Cave in revealed new insights into cross-species symbolic overlap during the mid-Middle Paleolithic (circa 130,000–80,000 years ago). The site yielded five intentional burials of early modern humans with archaic features, dated to 97,000–106,000 years ago, including articulated skeletons positioned in flexed poses and associated with large red chunks and snail shells as potential grave goods. These findings, mirroring practices at nearby Qafzeh and Skhul caves, indicate behavioral uniformity in ritual interment and use among Homo sapiens and Neanderthal-like groups, suggesting shared symbolic traditions in the .

Subsistence Strategies

Dietary Patterns

Middle Paleolithic populations, including Neanderthals and early modern humans, maintained an omnivorous diet dominated by animal protein, with high reliance on meat from large herbivores such as , , and mammoths. This is corroborated by stable nitrogen isotope ratios (δ¹⁵N) in bone collagen, which position these hominins as top-level carnivores, comparable to or exceeding those of associated predators. foods, including nuts, seeds, and tubers, supplemented the diet, with from dental revealing consumption of cooked starchy like wild in some contexts. In coastal regions, such as , Neanderthals incorporated like seals and , as indicated by faunal remains and isotopic data. Isotopic analyses further highlight regional variations in protein sources. In European Neanderthal sites, δ¹³C values consistently reflect a C₃-dominated with minimal input from C₄ plants, underscoring a focus on herbivores. Conversely, in African contexts associated with early modern humans, such as the Lake Victoria basin, δ¹³C signatures in associated and sediments suggest access to C₄ grasslands, implying diets with notable contributions from grazers or directly from C₄ resources like sedges and grasses, potentially elevating plant-based protein intake. These patterns indicate adaptive flexibility, with high-protein diets tailored to local , though overall meat dependence remained pronounced across regions. Food processing methods enhanced nutritional efficiency and safety. , evidenced by hearths and thermally altered sediments at sites like , allowed tenderization of tough meat and improved digestibility, increasing caloric availability. Such practices likely mitigated risks from raw consumption, including pathogens, while preserving fats essential for energy. Dietary patterns exhibited seasonal fluctuations to optimize nutrition. Winter diets emphasized fat-rich resources, such as migrating , to meet elevated energetic demands, as reconstructed from intra-tooth enamel isotope sampling showing shifts in δ¹⁸O-correlated protein sources. Summer diversified intake with and smaller , balancing macronutrients and providing micronutrients like vitamins from greens and nuts, based on zooarchaeological assemblages and isotopic variability at sites like Payre. Debates persist regarding as a potential dietary strategy. Cut-marked and fractured human bones at sites like Moula-Guercy, , exhibit patterns akin to those on game animals, suggesting nutritional exploitation during scarcity, though ritual interpretations cannot be ruled out. Similar evidence from El Sidrón, , supports occasional conspecific consumption, possibly supplementing protein in harsh environments, but its frequency remains contested.

Resource Exploitation Methods

During the Middle Paleolithic, hominins employed ambush hunting strategies to target large game, positioning themselves near water sources or natural traps to surprise herds of equids and cervids. Evidence from the Schöningen 13II-4 site in reveals repeated ambushes along a paleolakeshore, where groups of over 50 horses were killed using wooden spears approximately 200,000 years ago, as indicated by butchered remains and associated flint artifacts. Similarly, at Abric Romaní in , dated to 43,000–55,000 years ago, mortality profiles from 97 individuals (47 equids and 50 cervids) across multiple levels show selective ambushes targeting prime adults, with cut marks on 2.84–11% of bones and percussion marks on 2.53–20%, confirming these as kill sites with multiple animal skeletons. The debate on scavenging versus active in the Middle Paleolithic centers on a mixed subsistence , with suggesting scavenging played a role in accessing megaherbivores while primary dominated for medium-sized ungulates. Archaeozoological assemblages from European and Southwest Asian sites indicate that hominins opportunistically scavenged larger carcasses, such as those of mammoths or rhinoceroses, often competing with carnivores, but relied on organized hunts for more predictable medium game like deer and to meet nutritional needs. This opportunistic approach is supported by taphonomic analyses showing varied modification patterns, including tooth marks from predators alongside human cut marks, highlighting the flexibility of predatory behaviors without exclusive reliance on one method. Plant gathering involved the use of grinding stones to process seeds and starchy tubers, emerging as a key method in during the around 105,000–170,000 years ago. At sites like Border Cave in , starch residues on 23% of stone tools indicate processing of cooked geophytes and grasses, providing a reliable source amid fluctuating animal availability. In the Niassa Rift of , similar artifacts from layers dated to the reveal intensive starch acquisition from sorghum and other grasses, underscoring the role of gathered in diversifying resource exploitation. Exploitation of fish and small game intensified in later Middle Paleolithic phases, particularly in coastal or riverine environments, using bone harpoons and inferred traps. In West Central Africa, harpoon-like bone points dated to about 75,000 years ago facilitated for aquatic resources, while faunal remains from Levantine Middle Paleolithic sites show sporadic but deliberate targeting of and through opportunistic trapping or netting. Small mammal bones with cut marks from assemblages further indicate systematic snaring or digging out of and lagomorphs, supplementing diets during periods of large scarcity. Recent 2025 discoveries from a dried lakebed in Iraq's western desert highlight diverse resource exploitation in arid settings during the Middle Paleolithic. A survey by researchers from the identified over 850 artifacts, including Middle Paleolithic tools for processing plants and animals, suggesting adaptive strategies like seasonal gathering and in water-scarce environments.

Archaeological Sites

European Sites

Europe's Middle Paleolithic archaeological record is dominated by occupations, with key sites revealing insights into their adaptations, mortuary practices, and technological traditions across diverse environmental contexts. These sites, spanning from the early stages of the period around 300,000 years ago to its close near 40,000 years ago, highlight presence in varied landscapes, from river valleys to coastal regions, often preserved in caves or open-air settings influenced by Pleistocene glaciations. La Ferrassie in southwestern stands as a cornerstone site for understanding social behavior, particularly through its evidence of intentional burials. Excavations have uncovered at least seven individuals, including adults and children, interred in shallow pits during the Middle Paleolithic, dated to approximately 70,000 years (). These burials, such as that of a two-year-old child in a deliberately dug pit filled with sterile sediment, suggest deliberate mortuary practices rather than incidental deposition. Associated with these remains are abundant stone tools, including side-scrapers, points, and flakes crafted from local flint, indicative of typical lithic technology. Recent radiocarbon and confirms the site's sequence spans Marine Isotope Stage (MIS) 5, providing a chronological anchor for regional activities. In the , the site in provides evidence of early Neanderthal-like hominins from a pre-Middle Paleolithic transitional context. A partial cranium, consisting of the occipital and right parietal bones from an adult female, was recovered from Middle Pleistocene gravels dated to about 400,000 BP, placing it at the onset of Neanderthal evolutionary development prior to the main Middle Paleolithic (starting ~300,000 BP). This fossil exhibits archaic features transitional between and classic s, such as a thickened occipital torus, supporting its classification as proto-Neanderthal. The site's open-air context, along a former Thames River terrace, also preserved faunal remains and early Acheulean-Mousterian transitional tools, illustrating early hominin exploitation of temperate woodlands during interglacial periods. Vindija Cave in northern represents a late occupation, offering genomic and chronological data on the final phases of their European presence. remains from layers G1 and G3, including a fragmentary cranium (Vi 208.16) and other bones, date to around 40,000 BP via direct radiocarbon analysis, aligning with the Middle to Upper Paleolithic transition. High-coverage genome sequencing from these specimens reveals low levels of admixture with early modern humans, indicating genetic isolation in late populations rather than widespread interbreeding at this site. The cave's stratified deposits also contain tools and faunal assemblages reflecting cold-steppe adaptations, underscoring resilience during climatic shifts. A recently discovered submerged site along the Aegean coastline of Turkey, near , provides evidence of Middle Paleolithic activity along potential migration routes into . Survey work in 2025 identified 138 stone tools, including Levallois flakes and handaxes characteristic of technology, from now-submerged coastal terraces exposed during the . These artifacts, dated broadly to the Middle Paleolithic based on typology, suggest the region served as a land bridge connecting to the , facilitating hominin dispersal amid lowered sea levels. The site's underwater preservation highlights how post-glacial sea-level rise has obscured coastal evidence. Preservation of Middle Paleolithic sites in varies significantly between cave and open-air contexts, profoundly shaped by repeated glaciations. Cave sites like Vindija and La Ferrassie offer superior stratigraphic integrity due to natural protection from erosion and sediment accumulation, preserving hearths, tools, and bones in stable microenvironments. In contrast, open-air sites such as and the Aegean coastal exposures are more susceptible to periglacial processes, including and solifluction, which disrupt layers and scatter artifacts during cold phases of the Pleistocene. Glacial cycles exacerbated this by promoting fluvial reworking in riverine settings, leading to a historical in research toward karstic formations and underrepresentation of transient open-air occupations.

African and Middle Eastern Sites

The Middle Paleolithic in and the is marked by key archaeological sites that provide evidence of early Homo sapiens evolution and technological advancements, particularly through the use of Levallois techniques and associated cultural materials. These regions, as the cradle of modern human origins, reveal a continuum of hominin development from archaic forms to anatomically modern humans, with sites spanning approximately 300,000 to 80,000 years ago. Discoveries here highlight the pan-African emergence of Homo sapiens and early dispersals into the , where interactions with other hominin groups occurred. Jebel Irhoud in stands as one of the earliest sites associated with Homo sapiens, yielding fossils dated to around 315,000 years ago through of associated heat-treated flint artifacts. The site features a partial cranium, mandible, and other skeletal elements exhibiting a mix of modern and archaic traits, such as a modern-like facial structure combined with an elongated braincase. Accompanying these remains are stone tools, including Levallois cores and flakes, indicating prepared-core reduction techniques typical of the period. This assemblage pushes back the timeline for Homo sapiens origins, suggesting a North African contribution to the species' pan-African dispersal. In , preserves evidence of sophisticated material culture from the , with engraved pieces and shell beads dated to approximately 100,000–75,000 years ago via optically stimulated luminescence. The artifacts, including a notable block with crosshatched incisions, demonstrate deliberate abstract patterning, while Nassarius kraussianus shell beads show and staining, suggesting use as personal ornaments. These finds, recovered from Still Bay and post-Still Bay layers, underscore early technological and aesthetic innovations among Homo sapiens populations in . The Levant sites of Qafzeh and Skhul Caves in document presence outside , with burials and artifacts dated to about 120,000–90,000 years ago using and electron spin resonance methods. Qafzeh Cave contains at least 15 Homo sapiens skeletons, some intentionally buried with red ochre and marine shells, while Skhul yields ten individuals in similar contexts, associated with Levallois-Mousterian toolkits including points and scrapers. These remains exhibit fully modern skeletal morphology, contrasting with contemporaneous Neanderthal fossils elsewhere in the region, and indicate a brief Out-of-Africa migration pulse during Marine Isotope Stage 5. A more recent discovery at Tinshemet Cave in , reported in 2025, provides direct evidence of coexistence between Homo sapiens and Neanderthals around 130,000–80,000 years ago, based on stratified layers with overlapping tool assemblages and burial features analyzed through radiocarbon and OSL dating. The site includes human remains and artifacts showing behavioral uniformity, such as shared strategies and use, without clear segregation by hominin group. This mid-Middle Paleolithic evidence from the suggests prolonged interactions rather than replacement, refining models of hominin dynamics during early dispersals. Border Cave in offers a rich sequence of occupations from about 200,000 to 75,000 years ago, featuring diverse artifacts that reflect increasing behavioral complexity among early modern humans. Excavations reveal bone tools like awls and points, ostrich eggshell beads, and notched stones, dated via uranium-series and ESR on associated fauna, indicating specialized hunting and processing activities. The Howiesons Poort layer, around 75,000 years ago, includes small bladelets and backed tools, alongside evidence of heat-treated silcrete, pointing to advanced pyrotechnology and resource management in a diverse ecological setting.

Asian Sites

The Middle Paleolithic in is marked by significant archaeological evidence from diverse environments, extending from Siberian caves to tropical Southeast Asian sites and arid , revealing hominin adaptations and dispersals during this period (approximately 300,000 to 40,000 years ago). Key discoveries highlight the presence of archaic hominins like Denisovans and Neanderthal-like technologies, alongside early Homo sapiens, challenging previous notions of limited occupation in the continent's eastern and southern extents. Recent excavations have expanded the known geographical range, though preservation issues persist in many areas. Denisova Cave in Siberia's Altai Mountains provides some of the earliest and most direct evidence of Denisovan occupation during the Middle Paleolithic, with hominin remains and stone tools dating back to around 200,000 years (). Excavations have uncovered a juvenile female finger bone and teeth attributed to , alongside lithic artifacts including cores, scrapers, and denticulates from Early Middle Paleolithic layers. These assemblages indicate sustained use of the cave by , with genetic analyses confirming their distinct archaic lineage and potential interbreeding with Neanderthals and modern humans in the region. The site's multilayered deposits also yield faunal remains suggesting a cold environment, underscoring Denisovan adaptations to high-altitude, glacial conditions. In southern , the Longtan site in Province has yielded Quina-like stone tools in 2025 excavations, suggesting the reach of Neanderthal-associated technologies into around 55,000 , earlier than previously thought for such sophisticated reduction methods in the region. The assemblage includes thick flakes, cores, and scrapers characteristic of the Quina system, typically linked to s in and the , produced through discoid for hide processing and . This discovery, from systematic digs between 2019 and 2020, implies cultural exchanges or parallel innovations among hominins in subtropical environments, expanding the timeline of Middle Paleolithic variability in . While direct Neanderthal fossils are absent, the tool morphology points to possible Neanderthal presence or influence far beyond their traditional western range. Further south, the Tam Pa Ling Cave in has produced Homo sapiens dental remains dated to 86,000–68,000 years ago, indicating presence in during the Middle Paleolithic. These teeth, part of a faunal context including large mammals like and bovids, suggest Homo sapiens dispersal into tropical landscapes by Marine Isotope Stage 4. Associated sediments show evidence of cave occupation amid fluctuating climates, with the fossils highlighting morphological affinities to early East Asian modern humans. This find, alongside nearby sites like Tam Hay Marklot, supports a southern route for Homo sapiens out-of-Africa migrations through around 80,000–60,000 BP. In the western fringes of Asia, a 2025 survey in Iraq's Western Desert uncovered over 800 lithic artifacts from a dried Pleistocene lake bed in the Al-Shabakah area, dating to the Middle Paleolithic and demonstrating hominin adaptations to arid conditions. The collection includes hand axes, scrapers, and flakes from seven sites, with Middle Paleolithic pieces (roughly 300,000–40,000 BP) indicating opportunistic use of ephemeral water sources for tool manufacture and resource gathering in hyper-arid settings. These surface finds, preserved due to deflation in the desert pavement, reveal recurrent hominin activity in marginal environments, with tool types suggesting Levallois and discoid techniques suited to exploiting sparse vegetation and fauna. Archaeological investigations of Middle Paleolithic face substantial challenges, particularly poor organic preservation in tropical climates, which degrade bone and plant remains through high humidity, acidity, and bioturbation. In regions like southern and , dense and seasonal flooding further obscure sites, limiting recovery of perishable materials and complicating stratigraphic integrity. Despite these hurdles, ongoing discoveries are expanding the known range of Middle Paleolithic hominins, revealing a more dynamic continental presence with chronological overlaps to European sequences around 50,000 .

References

  1. https://www.nature.com/scitable/knowledge/library/a-primer-on-paleolithic-technology-83034489/
  2. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-history-of-africa/cultures-of-the-middle-palaeolithicmiddle-stone-age/8891F8A871AE5D38AEA4721397629666
  3. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/social-sciences/middle-paleolithic
  4. https://www.academia.edu/29124912/When_did_the_Middle_Paleolithic_begin
  5. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28593967/
  6. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25258079/
  7. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5943315/
  8. https://www.academia.edu/21493146/Radiometric_dates_for_the_Middle_Palaeolithic_sequence_of_Payre_Ard%25C3%25A8che_France_
  9. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9618083/
  10. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/full/10.1086/673529
  11. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3102382/
  12. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/full/10.1086/694173
  13. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4920294/
  14. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/essential-timeline-understanding-evolution-homo-sapiens-180976807/
  15. https://humanorigins.si.edu/evidence/human-fossils/species/homo-sapiens
  16. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9586385/
  17. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7612221/
  18. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-60140-6
  19. https://humanorigins.si.edu/research/climate-and-human-evolution/climate-effects-human-evolution
  20. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4485136/
  21. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-025-02110-y
  22. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4005592/
  23. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1095643323000533
  24. https://socialsci.libretexts.org/Courses/Lake_Tahoe_Community_College/ANT-103%253A_Physical_Biological_Anthropology/11%253A_Archaic_Homo/11.02%253A_Neanderthal_Lifeways_and_Intelligents
  25. https://evolution-outreach.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1007/s12052-010-0250-0
  26. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2001037025002156
  27. https://news.berkeley.edu/2024/12/12/a-new-timeline-for-neanderthal-interbreeding-with-modern-humans/
  28. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2025/08/250821094434.htm
  29. https://www.nhm.ac.uk/discover/news/2024/december/neanderthals-homo-sapiens-interbred-within-past-50000-years.html
  30. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-08314-6
  31. https://hal.science/hal-03908371v1/file/Berlioz%2520et%2520al%25202023.pdf
  32. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/environmental-archaeology/articles/10.3389/fearc.2025.1545249/full
  33. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/modern-humans-didnt-kill-neanderthals-weather-did-180970167/
  34. https://www.si.edu/stories/why-did-neanderthals-go-extinct
  35. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12002189/
  36. https://www.cnn.com/2025/04/01/science/stone-tools-discovery-neanderthals-china
  37. https://www.nature.com/scitable/knowledge/library/testing-models-of-modern-human-origins-with-96639156/
  38. https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-025-08472-3
  39. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1505071112
  40. https://www.nature.com/articles/nature22336
  41. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-83023-0
  42. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1017511108
  43. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2318903121
  44. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-025-02110-y
  45. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/earth-and-planetary-sciences/mousterian
  46. https://oxfordre.com/anthropology/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190854584.001.0001/acrefore-9780190854584-e-28
  47. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1040618212031813
  48. https://oxfordre.com/anthropology/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190854584.001.0001/acrefore-9780190854584-e-34
  49. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047248425000685
  50. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0305440308000526
  51. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2418029122
  52. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2025/10/251011105529.htm
  53. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0305440313004068
  54. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-37904-w
  55. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2320484121
  56. https://www.haaretz.com/archaeology/2019-11-13/ty-article-magazine/.premium/prehistoric-superglue-may-reveal-neanderthal-experiments-200-000-years-ago/0000017f-dc80-df9c-a17f-fe9846de0000
  57. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1907828116
  58. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0305440324001754
  59. https://www.ancient-origins.net/news-history-archaeology/neanderthal-workshop-poland-0022366
  60. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3048993/
  61. https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.105113
  62. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4157217/
  63. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12520-009-0008-1
  64. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-05283-y
  65. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0047248407001108
  66. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.0900564106
  67. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.add8186
  68. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4143610/
  69. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/321801
  70. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666979X24001770
  71. https://archaeology.org/news/2025/02/03/paleolithic-artifacts-discovered-in-iraq/
  72. https://humanorigins.si.edu/evidence/behavior/burial/qafzeh-oldest-intentional-burial
  73. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/24200199_Shells_and_ochre_in_Middle_Paleolithic_Qafzeh_Cave_Israel_indications_for_modern_behavior
  74. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0047248408002340
  75. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/26257796_Engraved_Ochres_from_the_Middle_Stone_Age_Levels_at_Blombos_Cave_South_Africa
  76. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0118282
  77. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3277516/
  78. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.ads2797
  79. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aap7778
  80. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12520-024-02111-4
  81. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.0903821106
  82. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.0805474105
  83. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4933918/
  84. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12063642/
  85. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5699840/
  86. https://www.academia.edu/23327923/2016_Morin_et_al_Middle_Palaeolithic_Diets_A_Critical_Examination_of_the_Evidence_
  87. https://www.academia.edu/4389884/Hunting_and_Scavenging_by_Early_Humans_The_State_of_the_Debate
  88. https://liberalarts.tamu.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/14/2019/08/vol22_num4.pdf
  89. https://www.academia.edu/391548/Mozambican_Grass_Seed_Consumption_During_the_Middle_Stone_Age
  90. https://www.palomar.edu/anthro/homo2/mod_homo_5.htm
  91. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6005578/
  92. https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/archaeology/a63654903/1-5-million-year-old-tools/
  93. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aao1887
  94. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-77611-z
  95. https://www.donsmaps.com/ferrassietools.html
  96. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/jqs.3236
  97. https://www.kentonline.co.uk/kent/news/meet-the-400-000-year-old-resident-of-kent-234864/
  98. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2352409X20304594
  99. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6185897/
  100. https://www.cell.com/cell-genomics/fulltext/S2666-979X%2824%2900177-0
  101. https://archaeology.org/news/2025/10/06/survey-spots-paleolithic-tools-along-turkeys-aegean-coastline/
  102. https://www.anthropology.net/p/when-the-sea-was-a-road-early-humans
  103. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1040618214005217
  104. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1040618209003760
  105. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6245798/
  106. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aap8369
  107. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0047248409000207
  108. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0047248404001307
  109. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.041588898
  110. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1204213109
  111. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3421194/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.