Hubbry Logo
Mourning of MuharramMourning of MuharramMain
Open search
Mourning of Muharram
Community hub
Mourning of Muharram
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Mourning of Muharram
Mourning of Muharram
Mourning of Muharram
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Mourning of Al-Muharram
Al-Muharram mourning gathering on the night of Ashura in Tehran, Iran
Observed byShia Muslims
Some Sunnis
SignificanceMarks the death of Husayn ibn Ali, grandson of the Islamic prophet Muhammad and the third Shia imam
Part of a series on
Husayn
Life
Remembrance
Perspectives
Related articles
Part of a series on
Shia Islam
Beliefs and practices
Days of remembrance
History
Branches and sects
Ahl al-Kisa
Holy women
icon Shia Islam portal

Mourning of Al-Muharram (Arabic: عَزَاءُ ٱلْمُحَرَّمِ, romanized: ʿAzāʾ Al-Muḥarram; Persian: عزاداری محرم, romanized: ʿAzādārī-i Muḥarram; Azerbaijani: Məhərrəmlik; محرمليک) is a set of religious rituals observed by Shia Muslims during the month of Al-Muharram, the first month of the Islamic calendar. These annual rituals commemorate the death of Husayn ibn Ali, grandson of the Islamic prophet Muhammad and the third Shia imam. Husayn and his small retinue were slaughtered in the Battle of Karbala on 10 Al-Muharram 61 AH (680 CE) against the army of the Umayyad caliph Yazid I (r. 680–683). The battle followed Husayn's refusal to pledge his allegiance to Yazid, who is often portrayed by Muslim historians as impious and immoral. In Shia Islam, Karbala symbolizes the eternal struggle between good and evil, the pinnacle of self-sacrifice, and the ultimate sabotage of Muhammad's prophetic mission. Historically, the event served to crystallize the Shia community into a distinct sect and remains an integral part of their religious identity to date.

Mourning for Karbala began with its female survivors, particularly Husayn's sister Zaynab, and evolved over time into distinct rituals that help define the Shia identity. Nowadays, most mourning rituals take place during the first ten days of Al-Muharram, culminating with processions in major Shia cities on the tenth day, known as Ashura. Often held in dedicated buildings, the main component of mourning ceremonies is the recitation of Karbala narratives intended to raise the sympathy of audience and move them to tears. Elegies and dirges are also chanted in such gatherings, as the participants strike their chests to share in the pain of Husayn and benefit from his intercession on the Day of Judgement. Extreme forms of self-flagellation are also sometimes practiced, often involving self-inflicted bloodshed. Such practices are highly controversial among the Shia, condemned by many Shia scholars, and outlawed in some Shia communities. Theatrical reenactment of Karbala narratives is a historically significant ritual found mostly in Iran.

Origins

[edit]

Muharram is the first month of the Islamic calendar[1] and one of the four sacred months in which warfare is prohibited in Islam.[2] In Shia Islam, the tenth of Muharram, known as Ashura, commemorates the death of Husayn ibn Ali, the grandson of the Islamic prophet Muhammad.[3] Husayn was killed, alongside most of his male relatives and his small retinue, on 10 Muharram 61 AH (10 October 680 CE) in the Battle of Karbala against the much larger army of the Umayyad caliph Yazid ibn Mu'awiya (r. 680–683), having been surrounded for some days and deprived of the drinking water of the nearby Euphrates river. After the battle, the women and children in Husayn's camp were taken prisoner and marched to the capital Damascus in Syria. The battle followed failed negotiations and Husayn's refusal to pledge his allegiance to Yazid, who is often portrayed by Muslim historians as impious and immoral.[4][5][6] The fight took place in the desert land of Karbala, en route to the nearby Kufa, whose residents had earlier invited Husayn to lead them against Yazid.[7]

Muharram rituals in Shia Islam

[edit]
See also: Rawda Khwani, Noha, Marsiya, Tatbir, Hussainiya, Ta'zieh, Nakhl Gardani, Bibi-Ka-Alam, and Hosay

In addition to pilgrimage to the shrine of Husayn, located in Karbala, Iraq,[8] Shia Muslims annually commemorate the events of Karbala throughout the months of Muharram and Safar,[9] following the precedent of their imams.[10] Most rituals take place during the first ten days of Muharram, culminating on the tenth with processions in major Shia cities.[10][11] The main component of ritual ceremonies (majalis, sg. majlis) is the narration of the stories of Karbala (rawza-khwani, qiraya),[12][10][13] and the recitation of elegies and dirges (nawha, niyaha, marsia-khwani),[14][15] all intended to raise the sympathy of audience and move them to tears.[16][17] A majlis often takes place in a dedicated building or structure, known variously as Husayniya, takiya, imambara, or azakhana.[14][18]

Self-flagellation

[edit]
Main article: Latmiya

Another component of mourning gatherings is the self-flagellation of participants to the rhythm of Karbala elegies.[15] Rooted in ancient Arab practices,[19][20] mild forms of self-flagellation, striking one's face and chest in grief (latm, sina-zani, matam),[15][14][21] are common today in mourning rituals,[22] intended to share in the pain of Husayn.[23] Striking one's back with special chains (zanjir-zani) is another harmless practice,[22] found in Iran and Iraq.[24][25] But there are also extreme forms of self-flagellation (tatbir, tiq-zani, qama-zani), in which the participants strike themselves, usually on the forehead or back, with knives, swords, or chains to which razor blades are attached.[22] Banned by Iran and the Shia Hezbollah party of Lebanon since the mid-90s,[26] instrumental self-flagellation has been condemned by many Shia clerics,[27] and it remains an often controversial practice among the Shia.[14]

Passion plays

[edit]
Shia passion play (ta'ziya) in Iran

Ta'ziya or shabih-khwani is the dramatic reenactment of Karbala narratives, practiced today in Iran, in Shia communities of the western Gulf shore, and in Lebanon.[28] The Arabic word ta'ziya itself is the verbal noun of azza (lit. 'to mourn').[28] Such plays may be performed in public spaces or dedicated buildings, like Husayniyas.[28] While Karbala is its focus, the ta'ziya repertoire also includes plays about early prophets and contemporary figures.[27] On Ashura, however, always the "martyrdom of Husayn" is reenacted in such performances.[28] Since the Islamic Revolution in 1978–1979, some ta'ziya performances are televised and sponsored by the Iranian government to preserve this fading tradition.[29] In Iraq, there are no widespread ta'ziya rituals today,[27] although an annual performance on Ashura in Karbala reenacts the burning of Husayn's tents after the battle by the Umayyads and the captivity of the women and children.[30]

Processions

[edit]
Procession of mourners in Iran

Processions of mourners (dasta, juloos, mawkib) annually march the streets in Muharram,[25] especially on Ashura,[15] chanting dirges and elegies,[31] sometimes accompanied by self-flagellation.[15][30] These processions typically start and end at the local Husayniya,[31] and occasionally represent various local guilds.[32] In Najaf, Iraq, mourners march on the eve of Ashura toward the shrine of Ali ibn Abi Talib, the first Shia imam, carrying decorative torches (masha'il).[30] In the tawarij march in Karbala, male and then female mourners walk barefoot to the shrine of Husayn in the afternoon of Ashura.[30] In such processions, often certain symbolic objects are carried by the mourners, particularly alam (lit. 'flag'), which signifies the ensign of Husayn at Karbala carried by his brother Abbas ibn Ali.[33][34] Nakhl (lit. 'date palm') is another such symbol—carried in a nakhl-gardani procession—signifying the bier of Husayn in Karbala, which was made of date palms, according to a legend.[33][35] Indian processions carry replicas of Husayn's bier or tomb, called ta'ziya, which shares the same name with the theatrical reenactments of Karbala in Iran.[25][36] The Ta'ziya is finally buried or submerged, submersion probably being a Hindu influence.[28][37] Similar processions take place in Trinidad as part of the annual Hosay commemoration, in which tadjah is the local equivalent of ta'ziya.[37]

Non-Shia rituals

[edit]
See also: Ashura § Ashura in Sunni Islam

The slaughter of Muhammad's grandson and his relatives shocked the whole Muslim community at the time,[38][6] and Karbala has been commemorated by some Sunni Muslims ever since, for instance in South Asia,[39] albeit these Sunni rituals may differ from their Shia counterparts. The Sunni remembrance of Karbala, however, has declined in recent times.[40] Indeed, for many other Sunnis, Ashura is instead an important festival in commemoration of the parting of the Red Sea by Moses.[39] It is viewed as a day of thanksgiving (shukr), a joyous occasion, celebrated through pious acts and acceptable expressions of delight.[41] In the Maghreb, for instance, Ashura is celebrated today through fasting, almsgiving, honoring the dead, special dishes, jumping over bonfires, and carnivals.[42] Muharram rituals also appear in Sufism, but therein Karbala is less of a tragedy, but rather the celebration of the eternal life of Husayn and his companions, who annihilated themselves in the Divine with their voluntary deaths.[43]

Significance

[edit]

Karbala paradigm

[edit]
Ashura demonstrations against the Pahlavids in Iran, 1978
Some have criticized the pageantry of mourning processions. The one painted above is dated circa 1850.
Distribution of free meals during Muharram, often to fulfil religious vows
Self-flagellation with swords in Turkey, dated Ashura 1909
Donating blood in Bahrain as an alternative to extreme self-flagellation

In Shia Islam, the Battle of Karbala symbolizes the eternal struggle between good and evil, where Husayn is viewed as the exemplar of piety, sacrifice, and perseverance, while Yazid represents injustice, tyranny, and corruption.[44][45] The fate of Husayn, the third Shia imam, is regarded in Shi'ism as the acme of human suffering and self-sacrifice,[46] the wrong committed against him so grievous that its repercussions continue, generation after generation, until the eschatological uprising of Muhammad al-Mahdi, the last imam in Twelver Shi'ism, who is thought to be in occultation since 874.[47] Indeed, the victory of Yazid in Karbala is regarded in Shi'ism as the ultimate sabotage of Muhammad's prophetic mission, the sabotage that began much earlier with the appointment of Abu Bakr, instead of Ali ibn Abi Talib, to succeed Muhammad,[48] hence the saying, "Husayn was killed on the day of the Saqifa."[49][48] In Shia view, the preordained but voluntary uprising and sacrifice of Husayn thus preserved the true Islam for future generations,[50][51] as it awakened the Muslim community to its moral depravity under the Umayyads.[52] In return for his suffering, according to the Shia, Husayn was rewarded the divine prerogative of intercession on Day of Judgement for those followers who share in his pain.[53]

For Shias, mourning for Husayn is a means of remembering his suffering, an act of protest against oppression, a struggle for God (jihad), and as such an act of worship.[54][55] As an act of worship, mourning for Husayn is viewed as redemptive,[56][57] through which Shias seek atonement for their sins and the sins of all mankind.[58] By sharing in his pain, they also hope to benefit from the intercession of Husayn on the Day of Judgement.[58][23] Indeed, numerous traditions, attributed to Shia imams, count the divine rewards of mourning for Husayn, particularly weeping for him.[59][29] As an act of protest, on the other hand, mourning rituals parallel armed struggle which was often not an option for the Shia minority under oppressive regimes.[60] In recent times, Muharram rituals have increasingly developed a political dimension, as preachers compare oppressors now to the enemies of Husayn in Karbala.[14][61] However, while Karbala indeed provided the Shia with a model for righteous struggle against injustice and oppression,[62] this blueprint has not always translated into action,[63] as most Shia imams were themselves political quietists who lived under oppressive regimes.[64] Muharram rituals also help define and strengthen the Shia identity,[65] and the Karbala paradigm remains an integral part of Shia historical memory, theological understanding, and religious identity.[9] Husayn's martyrdom is often linked to the hagiography of John the Baptist.[66]

Criticism of Muharram rituals

[edit]

The colorful and emotional Muharram rituals of the Shia are condemned by Sunni scholars, possibly because of the Sunni emphasis on "puritanical piety and sobriety."[67] A Sunni hadith, attributed to Muhammad, reports that he profusely wept for the death of his infant son Ibrahim but forbade mourners from saying anything that would "irritate the Lord." However, there is also another version of the same hadith in Sunni sources, according to which Muhammad forbade raising one's voice in times of misfortune, or mutilating one's face, or tearing one's clothes.[68] By contrast, the Shia imam Ali ibn Husayn Zayn al-Abidin (d. 713) is known in Shi'ism for the intensity of his life-long grief over Karbala.[69] The only surviving son of Husayn, Zayn al-Abidin was too sick to fight in the Battle of Karbala.[70] He justified his many years of mourning by citing the Quranic story of Joseph, which describes how his father Jacob mourned his absence to the point that he lost his eyesight.[69] Whatever the case, wailing and striking one's face or chest in grief are ancient Arab traditions for mourning the dead.[19][20] Others have criticized mourning gatherings, suggesting that their resources should be directed towards the poor. In turn, proponents of Muharram rituals argue that feeding the poor is part of the Karbala culture,[71] usually to fulfill religious vows (nadhr) made by devotees.[72] The supporters add that displays of generosity are more common during the months of mourning.[71]

Extreme self-flagellation

[edit]

Forms of self-flagellation that involve bloodshed are often controversial among the Shia,[14] and have been condemned by many Shia clerics.[27][73] Through such practices, participants argue that they experience a fraction of the pain inflicted at Karbala,[74][75] show their willingness to self-sacrifice,[74][65] and atone for the sins of those Kufans who deserted Husayn.[23] Opponents respond that self-harm is forbidden in Islam,[73][76] that the spilt blood renders the body impure (najis) for daily prayers,[73][77] and that such practices project a negative image of Shi'ism.[30][73] Unlike mild forms of self-flagellation,[19][20] extreme self-mortification has no precedent in early Islam,[78] neither does it appear in the Quran.[79] In turn, supporters contend that these acts show their love for the House of Muhammad, made obligatory upon all Muslims in verse 42:23 of the Quran.[79] Despite the criticism, the Shia populace, at least in South Asia, seems reluctant to prevent such practices, either to defy Sunni criticism,[80] or to boost popular support for Muharram rituals among the Shia.[81] Elsewhere, bloody self-flagellation is outlawed in Iran and Lebanon, where donating blood is encouraged as an alternative.[30]

History of Muharram rituals

[edit]

Umayyads (r. 661–750)

[edit]

Commemoration of Karbala began shortly after the battle with its female survivors, including Husayn's sister Zaynab.[82][57] While in captivity in Damascus,[82] or later when they visited Karbala on their way back to Medina from Damascus,[83][84] the bereaved women held the earliest mourning gathering (majlis), in which they recounted the tragedy, shed tears, and struck their faces (latm) in grief.[19][85] Such instances of self-flagellation, striking one's face or chest, were already ancient Arab traditions for mourning the dead.[20] For years, Zayn al-Abidin and his sister Sakina (d. 735) may have continued to annually organize such mourning gatherings, which also featured Karbala elegies (nawha).[86] Alternatively, the first annual commemoration and the first pilgrimage may be attributed to Tawwabun,[19][27] that is, those Kufans who regretted deserting Husayn in Karbala: They are said to have gathered at his grave site on the first anniversary of his death, where they mourned his loss and recited elegies.[19] They also promised to unite and rise against the Umayyads, which they did in what became known as the Tawwabun uprising of 685.[19] Indeed, Karbala united the nascent Shia community,[87] the roots of which likely formed in the lifetime of the Islamic prophet Muhammad.[88] After Karbala, this community crystallized into a distinct sect that regards Shia imams, that is, Husayn and certain other descendants of Muhammad, as his rightful religious and temporal successors.[89]

Risking the Umayyads' wrath, the commemoration of Karbala continued in similar small and private gatherings,[19][90] held, for instance, at the houses of the Shia imams,[19][91] who also frequently encouraged the Shia community to follow suit.[92] Similarly, pilgrimage to Karbala remained limited and precarious in this period.[93] The imams also saw poetry as a vehicle to preserve and spread the ideals of Karbala.[94] In particular, the Shia imam Ja'far Sadiq (d. 765) is said to have regularly hosted poets who composed and recited Karbala elegies.[85] Indeed, the Umayyads actively worked to erase the memory of Karbala, as written accounts of the Battle of Karbala are absent from the literary corpus of this period.[95] Probably in the same vein, the Umayyad general al-Hajjaj ibn Yusuf (d. c. 714) declared Ashura a festive public holiday.[95] Nevertheless, the anger against the Umayyads for Karbala was in part responsible for their fall.[96][45]

Abbasids (r. 750–1258)

[edit]

The Abbasids, who claimed descent from Muhammad's uncle Abbas,[57] rallied the Shia support to overthrow the Umayyads, promising them a leader from the House of Muhammad, whom many Shias probably imagined to be an Alid, that is, a descendant of Muhammad through his only surviving daughter Fatima and his son-in-law Ali ibn Abi Talib, the first Shia imam.[97] Karbala was thus heavily featured in the anti-Umayyad polemics of the Abbasids.[95][86] As a result, the commemoration of Karbala surged in the form of literary accounts and pilgrimages.[95][98] Such pilgrimages were also highly encouraged by the Shia imams, including al-Sadiq.[93][86] In the early Abbasid period, commemorations of Karbala were even held publicly in mosques.[91] After assuming power, however, the Abbasids gradually turned against the Shia, many of whom were disillusioned with Abbasid, rather than Alid, caliphs.[97] Insofar as Shia Muharram rituals promoted Alids as the legitimate leaders,[90] the Abbasids also came to view such practices as a political threat.[97][90] For instance, the Abbasid caliph al-Mutawakkil (r. 847–861) demolished the shrine of Husayn and punished pilgrimage with death.[93][90] To prevent another Karbala, the Abbasids also kept the Shia imams under surveillance, and at times imprisoned, tortured, or killed them.[90][99]

Buyids (r. 934–1062)

[edit]

The first public Karbala processions happened under Buyids, the Shia dynasty that ruled parts of Iraq and Iran,[57][100] after the collapse of the central Abbasid caliphate.[101] On Ashura 963, during the reign of the first Buyid ruler Mu'izz al-Dawla (r. 945–967), markets were closed in Baghdad, Iraq,[102] and processions of black-garbed Shia mourners marched in the streets, weeping, wailing, and striking their faces and chests.[103] Such processions provoked violent Sunni riots and counter-processions, which involved, for instance, reenactments of the Battle of the Camel in 656 against Ali ibn Abi Talib.[103][102] Mourning processions also appeared under the Hamdanids in Syria and the Fatimids in Egypt, two other Shia states.[104][105] In Cairo, Egypt, however, deadly Sunni riots apparently discontinued the Shia processions during the reign of the Fatimid caliph al-Mu'izz li-Din Allah (r. 953–975).[106] Back in Iraq, dedicated buildings for Karbala gatherings can also be traced back to the Buyid period.[90][107]

Safavids (r. 1576 – c. 1736)

[edit]
Mourning rituals in Iran, dated 1682

Muharram rituals had reached Iran as early as the twelfth century,[14][108] but a new era began with the Safavid dynasty,[109] whose founder Ismai'l I (r. 1501–1524) is responsible for the wholesale conversion of Iran to Twelver Shi'ism. This transition was met with relatively little resistance locally, perhaps due to the popularity of Sufi orders in Iran.[110] Muharram rituals also helped spread Shia Islam inside Iran.[103] Over time, these rituals grew more elaborate artistically, where Shias freely expressed their identity without the threat of a Sunni majority. For instance, participants openly condemned (la'n) the first three caliphs–Abu Bakr, Umar, and Uthman–who are viewed in Shi'ism as the usurpers of the right of Ali ibn Abi Talib to succeed Muhammad.[111][112]

In the Safavid era, annual mourning gatherings (majalis) were held on the first ten days of Muharram in Husainiyyas, a term coined in this period for buildings dedicated to ritual mourning.[18][14] In such gatherings, narratives of Karbala were emotionally recounted in the ritual of rawza-khwani, which owes its name to the 1502–1503 book Rawzat al-shuhada,[14] perhaps the most famous collection of Karbala narratives to date.[104] The recitation of the book was later abandoned as trained story-tellers relied on their creative skills to conjure up the narratives.[17] Other notable Safavid rituals were Muharram processions and self-flagellation,[27] such as sina-zani (striking the chest), zanjir-zani (striking the back with chains), and tiq-zani or qama-zani (mortifying oneself with swords or knives).[14] The extreme acts of self-flagellation were new practices, as there is no evidence of self-inflicted bloodshed in early historical sources.[78] Such rituals likely originated in Turkish-speaking regions of Caucasus and Azerbayjan in Northern Iran,[113] introduced into Shi'ism by the Qizilbash, who formed the backbone of the Safavid military and were regarded as Ghulat because of their exaggerated veneration for the Shia imams.[114] In turn, extreme self-flagellation had perhaps reached these regions from Europe, where it was practiced by some Christians as a form of atonement.[115][116]

A major development in this period was the appearance of theatrical representations of Karbala narratives, known as ta'ziya or shabih-khwani.[14] Such theatrical reenactments were likely a natural outgrowth of the verbal reenactments in rawza-khwani,[29] and were rooted in pre-Islamic Iranian heritage, such as the epic poem Ayadgar-i Zariran and the legend of Siyavash,[78] or perhaps the dramatic reenactments of Karbala were inspired by the Christian Corpus Christi processions.[117] At any rate, these performances were popular,[106] often sponsored by the Safavid royals and other elites,[29] and even attended by the Safavid monarchs.[118] The new ritual was also approved by some Safavid scholars, such as the prominent Twelver jurist Majlisi (d. 1699),[119] while independent Shia clerics were initially critical of the performances, partly for their personification of a Shia imam.[106] From Iran, ta'ziya later reached Iraq and then Lebanon, but had limited success in the former.[120]

Modern times

[edit]
Takia Dawlat in a painting by Kamal-ol-molk, dated 1892

In Iran, the ritual condemnation of the first three caliphs was discontinued after the Safavids.[27][27] As early as the Qajar period (r. 1789–1925), Iranian rituals also extended to the month of Safar, due to the commemoration of Arbai'n, which marks forty days after the death of Husayn.[27] Also in the Qajar era, the theatrical reenactment of Karbala (ta'ziya) reached its peak.[29][119] In the Qajar capital Tehran, the most elaborate shows took place in Takia Dawlat, built by the Qajar monarch Naser al-Din Shah (r. 1848–1896).[27]

Ta'ziya fell into a slow decline in Iran afterward, to the point that it became a rarity in large cities by the 1940s under the Pahlavis (r. 1925–1979).[29] Besides the emergence of new art mediums,[40] the decline in ta'ziya can be partly explained by Pahlavi bans and restrictions,[29] as part of their program to modernize Iran.[28] The modernization was likely a guise, however, for the Pahlavis probably saw Muharram rituals as a political threat.[121][112] Indeed, as early as the 1909 constitutional revolution in Iran, mourning gatherings had assumed a political dimension as preachers compared Iranian oppressors to the enemies of Husayn in Karbala.[14][61] Eventually, the Pahlavis were toppled in the Iranian Revolution (1978–1979) through the continued efforts of dissidents, such as Ali Shariati (d. 1977),[23] who effectively used Karbala symbols and rituals against the regime.[122][14] Favoring the Sunni community, the Iraqi president Saddam Hussein (d. 2006) also banned Muharram rituals, but they resumed shortly after he was deposed in 2003.[123] In Saudi Arabia, such rituals have been banned since Ibn Saud reimposed Wahhabi rule over the country, although the ban has been defied at times by the discontented Shia minority, protesting what they perceive as Saudi discrimination.[124] In Lebanon, Muharram rituals show Iranian roots and were restrained until about the mid nineteenth century.[25] Later, Karbala symbolism was used there effectively against the Israeli occupation (1985–2000).[45][125] Extreme forms of self-flagellation have also been banned in Iran and the Hezbollah party of Lebanon since the mid-90s.[26]

South Asia

[edit]
Mourning gathering in Awadh, India, circa 1795

From Iraq and Iran, Muharram rituals, such as rawza-khwani,[17] eventually reached parts of South Asia. The rituals were perhaps introduced there by Timur (d. 1405), the founder of the Timurid Empire (r. 1370–1507),[126][127] or perhaps through the migration of some Iranian elites to South Asia.[127] Muharram rituals were later suppressed by the Mughals (r. 1526–1857) from the sixteenth century onward,[127] but reemerged when the Mughals weakened in the eighteenth century, for instance, in Awadh under the patronage of its Shia ruler Saadat Ali Khan I (d. 1739).[128] In particular, the Shia rulers of Awadh sponsored Mirza Dabeer (d. 1875) and Mir Anees (d. 1874), two prominent Karbala elegy composers in Urdu literature.[128] Perhaps also influenced by Iraq and Iran,[18] there were dedicated buildings for Muharram rituals in South Asia by the end of the sixteenth century,[103] known variously as imambarah, imambaragh, azakhana, Ashurakhana, and ta'ziyakhana.[18] These rituals even found their way to Trinidad when Indian immigrants settled there in the nineteenth century.[129] Influenced by local carnivals, however, Muharram rituals lost their mourning tone there.[129] This annual Hosay commemoration has survived to this day.[130]

[edit]
  • Muharram mourning gathering (majlis) in Iran
    Muharram mourning gathering (majlis) in Iran
  • Majlis in Iran
    Majlis in Iran
  • Majlis in Tanzania
    Majlis in Tanzania
  • Muharram mourning procession in Iran
    Muharram mourning procession in Iran
  • Muharram procession in India, with an azakhana in the background
    Muharram procession in India, with an azakhana in the background
  • Muharram procession in India carrying alams that symbolize the ensign of Husayn
    Muharram procession in India carrying alams that symbolize the ensign of Husayn
  • Muharram procession in India
    Muharram procession in India
  • Muharram procession in Syria
    Muharram procession in Syria
  • Submerging tabuiks in Indonesia in a mock funeral of Husayn
    Submerging tabuiks in Indonesia in a mock funeral of Husayn
  • A symbolic bier of Husayn (nakhl) in a mock funeral (nakhl-gardani) in Iran
    A symbolic bier of Husayn (nakhl) in a mock funeral (nakhl-gardani) in Iran
  • Nakhl-gardani in Iran
    Nakhl-gardani in Iran
  • Moving in a circle, mourners strike their chests (sina-zani) in Iran
    Moving in a circle, mourners strike their chests (sina-zani) in Iran
  • Sina-zani in Iran
    Sina-zani in Iran
  • Chains used in self-flagellation
    Chains used in self-flagellation (zanjir-zani)
  • Extreme self-flagellation in a Muharram procession in India
    Extreme self-flagellation in a Muharram procession in India
  • Night of Ashura in Iran
    Night of Ashura in Iran

See also

[edit]

Footnotes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Mourning of Muharram

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Mourning of Muharram consists of rituals and observances conducted mainly by Shia Muslims in the first ten days of the Islamic lunar month of Muharram to commemorate the martyrdom of at the . , grandson of the Prophet Muhammad and son of Ali ibn Abi Talib, was killed on 10 Muharram 61 AH (10 October 680 CE) by forces of the Umayyad caliph after refusing allegiance, an event viewed in Shia tradition as a stand against tyranny. These observances include public processions, recitation of elegies recounting the tragedy, and mourning assemblies known as where participants weep and listen to narratives of Husayn's suffering. Common practices encompass chest-beating (sina-zani) to express grief, symbolic representations such as carrying replicas of Husayn's standards (), and in some communities, more intense forms like chain-flagellation (zanjir-zani) or bloodletting (), though the latter have drawn criticism from Shia scholars for potentially distorting the event's message or causing unnecessary harm. The rituals underscore themes of sacrifice, resistance to injustice, and loyalty to the Prophet's household (Ahl al-Bayt), with Muharram serving as a period of reflection on moral and political legitimacy in Islamic history, particularly the schism between Shia and Sunni branches following the Prophet's death. While predominantly Shia, elements of Ashura observance exist among Sunnis as a day of fasting commemorating Moses' exodus, highlighting divergent interpretations of the same calendrical event.

Historical Origins

The Battle of Karbala and Its Immediate Aftermath

Following the death of Caliph on 15 Rajab 60 AH (April 22, 680 CE), his son assumed the caliphate, marking the first instance of hereditary succession in the Islamic polity, which contrasted with prior practices of consultation or election among companions of the Prophet . , grandson of the Prophet through his daughter Fatimah and son-in-law ibn Abi Talib, refused to pledge allegiance () to Yazid, viewing the succession as illegitimate and a deviation from claims favoring leadership within the Prophet's family (). This refusal stemmed from early partisan (Shia) assertions of Ali's rightful precedence after the Prophet's death in 632 CE, a position that persisted among some Kufan supporters who opposed Umayyad consolidation of dynastic power. Husayn departed Medina for Mecca in late April 680 CE, where he received letters from residents of pledging support and inviting him to lead them against Yazid. Accompanied by approximately 50 family members and supporters, including women and children, Husayn dispatched his cousin to verify the Kufan commitments; Muslim initially garnered thousands of pledges but was executed by the Umayyad governor upon the latter's arrival in . Undeterred by warnings, Husayn set out toward in early September 680 CE (2nd 61 AH), but Umayyad forces under Hurr ibn Yazid al-Tamimi intercepted his caravan of about 72 fighting men near , approximately 100 km northwest of , forcing it to halt on the 2nd of . From 7 , Umayyad commander , acting on orders from Ibn Ziyad to secure allegiance or suppress resistance, imposed a denying Husayn's camp access to the River, exacerbating thirst amid arid conditions. On 10 Muharram 61 AH (October 10, 680 CE), negotiations failed, leading to combat between Husayn's small contingent—comprising relatives, companions, and slaves—and an Umayyad army estimated at 4,000 to 30,000 troops, resulting in the martyrdom of Husayn and 72 males from his group, including his half-brother and sons Ali al-Akbar and Ali al-Asghar. Husayn himself was killed after individual duels and assaults depleted his ranks, with his head severed and mounted on a . The survivors, primarily women, children, and Husayn's ill son Ali ibn Husayn (Zayn al-Abidin), who was exempted from combat due to his condition, numbered around 20-30 and were taken captive alongside the martyrs' severed heads first to , where Ibn Ziyad rebuked them, then marched approximately 1,100 km to for presentation to Yazid. In , the captives were reportedly paraded and briefly detained, with accounts varying on the duration (three to seven days) before Yazid ordered their release and return to via caravan. Local tribesmen later buried the unburied bodies at under Husayn's tent sites, while Umayyad forces suffered minimal casualties, estimated in the dozens, reflecting the battle's asymmetry. These events, chronicled in detail by historian (d. 923 CE) through chains of transmission from eyewitnesses, underscored the Umayyad prioritization of political control over familial dissent, setting the stage for subsequent unrest without immediate ritual commemoration.

Initial Commemorative Practices

The earliest commemorative efforts after the martyrdom of at in October 680 CE arose from remorse among his would-be supporters in . The Tawwabin (Penitents), numbering several thousand and led by al-Khuzai, assembled in 684 CE to atone for their failure to assist him, vowing vengeance against the Umayyads. They marched to the site, where they visited the graves, wept profusely, and conducted collective lamentations as an act of remembrance and repentance before advancing to confront Umayyad forces. This movement culminated in their defeat at the on Jumada I 25, 65 AH (January 7, 685 CE), with most participants, including Sulayman, killed, marking one of the first organized expressions of grief tied to . Ali ibn al-Husayn, known as Zayn al-Abidin, the sole adult male survivor from Husayn's camp due to illness during the battle, sustained the memory through personal mourning and transmission of narratives. Confined under Umayyad surveillance in Medina, he recounted the events to followers in private settings, embedding the tragedy in supplicatory prayers and oral traditions that emphasized the injustice endured. Authentic reports indicate he grieved his father and companions lifelong, using these accounts to foster quiet adherence among supporters amid persecution, laying groundwork for familial preservation of Karbala's details without public fanfare. These spontaneous grief expressions transitioned into semi-structured recitations by the early 8th century, as documented in foundational Shia histories drawing from eyewitness chains. In and , small assemblies heard maqtal narrations—factual accounts of the martyrdom—recited by survivors' associates, evolving private family lamentations into communal oral remembrances focused on historical veracity rather than theatrical elements. Works like al-Mufid's Kitab al-Irshad (c. 1000 CE), compiling earlier , reference such practices originating immediately post-Karbala, including initial funerals at the site, underscoring a progression from raw sorrow to deliberate annual reflection without evidence of formalized rituals at this stage.

Theological Significance

Shia Interpretations and the Karbala Paradigm

In Shia theology, the Battle of Karbala on 10 Muharram 61 AH (10 October 680 CE) exemplifies the paradigm of principled resistance to illegitimate rule, as Imam Husayn ibn Ali, the third Shia Imam, rejected bay'ah (allegiance) to Yazid I, whose caliphate deviated from the prophetic model of governance rooted in justice. Husayn's stand, supported by a small contingent of family and followers, confronted Umayyad forces numerically superior by over 30 to 1, culminating in the martyrdom of Husayn and 72 companions, an event framed not as futile defeat but as a causal exposure of systemic zulm (oppression) inherent in rule lacking divine sanction through the Imamate. This interpretation prioritizes the historical sequence of events—Yazid's demand for submission, Husayn's migration from Medina to Mecca and then Kufa, and the ensuing blockade and battle—as evidence of tyranny's mechanics, rather than embellished narratives of supernatural intervention. Central to this framing is the Shia doctrine of , which posits the twelve infallible descendants of the Prophet via ibn Abi Talib as custodians of (divine justice) and authoritative interpreters of revelation, in contrast to elective models. Husayn's sacrifice preserved the purity of this lineage against assimilation into a regime accused of moral corruption, including public wine consumption and nepotistic appointments, thereby modeling the ethical imperative to prioritize truth over survival under zulm. The Karbala events thus embody causal realism in Shia thought: martyrdom as a deliberate act to delegitimize oppression, echoing the Prophet's designation of and his progeny at , and reinforcing that legitimate authority derives from nas (divine appointment) rather than popular consensus or force. The extends to Shia identity formation, where annual Muharram commemorations serve as a renewal of bay'ah to the principles of —justice, equity, and resistance—rather than passive lamentation. This process, evidenced in early Shia texts compiling narrations from subsequent Imams like , fosters communal solidarity by linking personal allegiance to the historical causal chain from , positioning believers as continuators of Husayn's stance against contemporary "Yazids." Authentic in Shia collections, such as those transmitted via Reza, underscore mourning as a means to internalize this paradigm, with narrations enjoining remembrance to safeguard the faith's ethical core, though unsubstantiated claims of prophetic foreknowledge are secondary to the doctrinal emphasis on evidentiary .

Sunni Perspectives and Alternative Observances

In , the observance of Muharram, particularly on the tenth day, emphasizes voluntary fasting as a practice rooted in prophetic tradition. This fast commemorates the deliverance of Prophet and the from Pharaoh's oppression, as the Prophet learned from in who marked the day similarly; he affirmed, "We have more right to Musa than you," fasted it himself, and instructed Muslims to follow suit. records that the Prophet continued this fast annually and encouraged its observance even after Ramadan's obligation was revealed, underscoring its merit in expiating minor sins of the preceding year. To differentiate from Jewish custom, Sunni scholars recommend combining the Ashura fast with the ninth day of (Tasu'a) or the eleventh, based on hadiths where the expressed intent to fast an additional day. This approach aligns with broader prophetic guidance to avoid mere imitation while preserving the act's spiritual reward, observed individually or communally without obligatory communal gatherings. Sunni views on Husayn ibn Ali's martyrdom at acknowledge it as a profound and against a descendant of the and Companion of noble lineage, warranting general Islamic responses like prayer for the deceased (du'a) and reflection on tyranny's consequences. However, specific Muharram mourning rituals—such as organized lamentations, dramatic reenactments, or public processions—are rejected as unsubstantiated by or authentic , constituting (religious innovations) that deviate from the sunnah's emphasis on moderation in grief. Medieval scholars like Ibn Taymiyyah (d. 1328 CE) explicitly condemned elaborate mourning assemblies and wailing over the dead, likening them to Jahiliyyah-era excesses forbidden by the , who instructed brevity in funerals and forbade tearing clothes or prolonged lamentation. Such critiques prioritize adherence to prophetic norms, viewing undue veneration of Husayn as risking elevation beyond Companions' status without scriptural basis, favoring instead quiet personal reflection on historical lessons of justice and patience during . Sunni practices thus remain restrained, focusing on fasting's expiatory value and ethical introspection over ritualized expressions of sorrow.

Core Rituals and Practices

Mourning Assemblies and Recitations

Mourning assemblies, referred to as majlis (singular: majlis al-Husayn), form the core non-physical component of Muharram observances in Shia communities, centered on seated gatherings for narrative recitation and collective lamentation. These sessions typically involve a preacher or reciter (wa'iz or zakir) delivering detailed accounts of the Battle of Karbala in 680 CE, chronologically recounting the martyrdom of Husayn ibn Ali and his companions, often drawing from survivor testimonies preserved in early Shia hadith collections. Interspersed are elegiac poems (noha or marsiya) recited to stir emotional responses, focusing on the suffering endured without incorporating dramatic enactments or processions. Sermons within the majlis highlight moral and ethical lessons from the events, such as steadfastness against tyranny, though interpretations vary by reciter. The historical roots of these assemblies trace to the immediate post-Karbala period, where family members of Husayn, including , publicly eulogized the slain in settings like the Umayyad court in around 680–681 CE, transforming personal grief into communal narrative sharing. By the late 7th century, groups like the Tawwabin (penitents) held similar lamentation sessions mourning their failure to aid Husayn, marking early formalized commemorations around 685 CE. During the Abbasid era (750–1258 CE), practices proliferated in private homes and husayniyyas despite intermittent suppression, as Abbasid authorities perceived them as potential threats to legitimacy due to their emphasis on Alid suffering; records indicate widespread adherence by the , with reciters using to encode resistance narratives. Key elements include participants wearing black clothing to signify mourning, a practice documented in medieval Shia texts as symbolic of ongoing grief for . Assemblies call for introspection on the causal factors leading to Husayn's stand against , such as the refusal to pledge allegiance amid perceived , fostering a shared sense of historical continuity. Empirically, these gatherings span the first ten days of , with intensity building to the tenth day (), corresponding to 10 Muharram 61 AH (October 10, 680 CE, ), when Husayn's death is commemorated; attendance peaks on , often involving thousands per venue in regions like and .

Processions and Dramatic Reenactments

Processions during the Mourning of Muharram serve as public demonstrations of communal solidarity, featuring symbolic elements such as the , a representing the steed of at the in 680 CE. These processions typically include participants carrying alam standards symbolizing Husayn's ensign, along with rhythmic chanting of elegies (latmiyat) to evoke shared mourning. Organized by local Shia communities, routes wind through urban centers, fostering collective expressions of grief and historical remembrance without fixed origins precisely dated to medieval but evolving as integral public rituals by the Safavid period. Dramatic reenactments, particularly ta'zieh passion plays, depict key episodes from the narrative, including the martyrdom of Husayn and his companions, performed by amateur actors in open-air settings or dedicated structures. Emerging as a formalized Shia theatrical tradition in during the under Safavid patronage, ta'zieh combines , music, and stylized combat to immerse audiences in the tragedy, often concluding with scenes of lamentation. In 2010, inscribed the ritual dramatic art of ta'zieh on the Representative List of the of Humanity, recognizing its role in preserving oral and performative traditions tied to religious events. These performances emphasize emotional over strict historical fidelity, with scripts drawing from medieval Shia rather than verbatim accounts of the 680 CE events. In major centers like and , processions and attract crowds numbering in the tens of thousands, necessitating coordinated safety measures such as tightened security perimeters and protocols to prevent stampedes amid dense gatherings. Community funding supports decorations, participant provisions, and route logistics, reinforcing the events' character while highlighting themes of and resistance central to Shia .

Physical Expressions of Grief

Physical expressions of grief in Muharram mourning primarily involve rhythmic striking of the chest, known as sina-zani or matam, performed by participants in processions or assemblies to symbolize sorrow for the martyrdom at Karbala. This practice, widespread among Shia Muslims in Iran, Iraq, Pakistan, and India, emerged as part of formalized rituals during the Buyid dynasty in the 10th century and intensified under the Qajar dynasty in Iran from the 18th to 20th centuries, often accompanying poetic recitations (latmiya). Participants form circles or lines, beating their chests in unison to the beat of dirges, with variations in intensity ranging from light tapping to forceful blows, but generally avoiding injury. More intense forms include zanjir-zani, where mourners use chains with small blades to lightly flagellate their backs, and tatbir, involving striking the forehead with a sword or blade to draw blood, both intended to emulate the wounds suffered by Husayn's companions. These bloodletting practices are limited to subsets of Shia communities, particularly in regions like southern Iraq, Pakistan, and parts of India, and gained prominence in the post-Safavid era but remain controversial even within Shia scholarship. Regional variations exist; for instance, in Iran, zanjir-zani may use blunted chains to minimize harm, while tatbir is rarer and often performed individually. Health risks from these rituals include transmission of bloodborne pathogens such as and and C, due to shared blood contact or unsterilized tools, with case reports documenting HIV seroconversion post-flagellation. Severe injuries, including deep lacerations and hospitalizations—such as over 200 cases in a single Iraqi town in 2025—underscore the potential for bacterial infections and excessive blood loss. Some Shia authorities, including Iran's Supreme Leader , issued a 1994 fatwa prohibiting tatbir as a fabricated tradition causing undue harm and reputational damage to , urging substitution with non-injurious mourning.

Historical Development

Early Suppression and Emergence (7th–9th Centuries)

Following the in 680 CE, the Umayyad caliphs, beginning with (r. 680–683 CE), suppressed public mourning for to affirm the legitimacy of their rule, which the Karbala events had undermined by portraying Yazid as a . This inhibition stemmed from the political threat posed by Alid loyalties, as sympathies for Husayn's family incited revolts and challenged Umayyad authority across provinces like , where pro-Alid sentiments persisted despite crackdowns. Mourning rituals thus survived through clandestine networks, with early commemorations confined to private homes of imams and their followers, involving weeping, lamentation poetry, and narratives of the martyrdom to preserve amid persecution. A notable early manifestation occurred with the Tawwabin ("Penitents") movement around 684 CE, when approximately 4,000 Kufans, led by , held secret assemblies vowing revenge for Husayn's death as atonement for their prior inaction; these gatherings emphasized mourning before escalating into open rebellion against Umayyad forces in 685 CE near , resulting in heavy losses. Such underground practices, documented in historical accounts, underscored the causal role of dynastic rivalry, as Umayyad governance viewed Karbala remembrances as incubators for dissent rather than mere religious observance. The Abbasid Revolution of 750 CE shifted dynamics, ushering in qualified tolerance for Shia rituals as the new caliphs leveraged anti-Umayyad narratives—including Karbala's tragedy—to legitimize their overthrow, permitting limited (mourning assemblies) in Shia-populated areas while still curbing public processions to preempt Alid-inspired uprisings. Abbasid authorities, wary of threats from Alid claimants like the descendants of Hasan and Husayn, maintained suppression of overt displays, as evidenced by intermittent persecutions of Shia gatherings that evoked revolutionary fervor, yet allowed recitations in controlled settings to co-opt rather than eradicate the tradition. By the , amid this partial liberalization, structured recitations of Karbala's events—foreshadowing formalized rawda-khani—emerged within Shia networks, focusing on vivid accounts of the martyrs' sufferings to foster devotion and resilience; these evolved from laments into narrative sessions held during , sustaining the paradigm despite caliphal oversight. This period marked the transition from purely covert survival to cautious institutionalization, driven by the Imams' encouragement of mourning as a theological bulwark against assimilation.

Medieval Formalization (10th–16th Centuries)

During the Buyid dynasty's control of (945–1055 CE), Twelver Shia mourning rituals transitioned from private observances to semi-public expressions under state patronage, reflecting the dynasty's leanings despite ruling a Sunni-majority . In 963 CE, Mu'izz al-Dawla (r. 945–967) mandated the closure of markets on , the erection of black-draped tents, and organized processions where participants recited elegies for Husayn ibn Ali's martyrdom while publicly denouncing his Umayyad killers, establishing the earliest documented state-enforced public commemorations. These measures, enforced by officials who flogged non-participants, intensified sectarian frictions, as Sunni chroniclers like recorded backlash including counter-demonstrations and violence against Shia mourners. Shia theologians further formalized the intellectual and liturgical framework for these rituals through detailed maqtal (martyrdom narratives) and biographical works, which became staples of mourning assemblies. Shaykh al-Mufid (d. 1022 CE), a prominent Buyid-era scholar, authored Kitab al-Irshad, providing a comprehensive account of Husayn's journey from Medina to Karbala, his final sermons, and the battle's casualties, drawing on earlier chains of transmission to authenticate the events for recitation in majlis gatherings. Such texts emphasized causal chains of betrayal and sacrifice, supporting the rituals' focus on empathetic lamentation over Husayn's 72 companions and family slain on 10 Muharram 61 AH (680 CE), while early poetic forms like rudimentary marsiya precursors emerged to evoke grief through verse. In the subsequent Seljuk (1037–1194 CE) and Mongol-influenced eras, Sunni dominance led to renewed persecutions, confining elaborate processions to Shia enclaves in such as and Rayy, where communities sustained practices through private rawda-khani (narrative readings) resilient against official bans. Precursors to dramatic reenactments appeared in heightened performative elements of these sessions, including role-assumed lamentations amid sporadic pogroms documented by contemporaries. Paralleling this in , the Ismaili (909–1171 CE) institutionalized majalis with state ceremonies, but diverged from Twelver emphases by integrating esoteric ta'wil (allegorical) interpretations tied to their living Imams rather than visceral public grief or self-mortification focused solely on Karbala's historical tragedy. By the 15th–16th centuries under Timurid and post-Mongol fragmentation, these rituals had embedded in Shia cultural resilience, with historiography expanding via works compiling eyewitness-derived accounts to counter Sunni dismissals of the events' significance.

State-Sponsored Expansion (Safavid Era Onward)

The establishment of the in 1501 by Shah Isma'il I, who proclaimed as the state religion of , represented a turning point in the institutionalization of Muharram mourning. This policy aimed to differentiate the nascent empire from its Sunni Ottoman rivals, mandating public observances of Husayn's martyrdom to forge a unified Shia identity among a predominantly Sunni population. Under Safavid rule (1501–1736), these rituals evolved from informal gatherings into state-endorsed spectacles, including organized processions and early forms of dramatic reenactments, which dramatized the to evoke communal grief and loyalty to the dynasty. Shahs like Abbas I (r. 1588–1629) promoted such practices, incorporating martial elements to symbolize resistance against Ottoman incursions, thereby leveraging devotional fervor for political consolidation and legitimacy rather than purely religious ends. Following the Safavid collapse, the (1789–1925) revived and amplified these traditions through royal patronage, constructing dedicated venues for performances. Naser al-Din Shah (r. 1848–1896), for instance, commissioned the Tekyeh Dowlat in , completed in 1868, as a grand octagonal theater hosting cycles attended by thousands, including the court, to reinforce monarchical ties to Shia heritage amid internal challenges. This elaboration extended to incentives for in processions, framing the rituals as instruments of dynastic stability and popular mobilization.

19th–20th Century Transformations

In 19th-century British India, Muharram mourning rituals underwent hybridization with local Hindu and regional customs, particularly through the prominence of taziya processions. Taziyas, symbolic replicas of Husayn's tomb, were crafted using indigenous architectural motifs and paraded in elaborate displays that echoed elements of Indian festivals like Ganapati immersions, fostering syncretic practices among Shia communities in Lucknow and other centers. This adaptation, documented in colonial-era paintings from the 1830s onward, reflected both cultural exchange and British administrative tolerance of public gatherings as long as they avoided unrest. Under the in , Reza Shah's modernization drive from 1925 to 1941 imposed restrictions on observances to curb perceived religious fanaticism and promote secular nationalism. Public processions, , and theatrical performances were banned or driven indoors in major cities like and by the 1930s, reducing the scale of rituals and shifting emphasis toward controlled, state-approved expressions of piety. These policies, enforced amid broader reforms like unveiling, aimed to align religious practices with European-inspired modernity but faced clerical resistance, leading to underground or moderated gatherings. The 1979 Iranian Revolution marked a pivotal revival, with Khomeini leveraging symbolism—equating the Pahlavi regime to Yazid's tyranny—to mobilize mass dissent, culminating in demonstrations on December 11, 1978, that drew millions and accelerated the monarchy's fall. Post-revolution, the institutionalized expansive state-sponsored rituals, reversing Pahlavi suppressions and integrating them into revolutionary ideology, with attendance swelling to tens of millions annually by the 1980s. This era also saw technological shifts, as radio broadcasts from the 1940s and television from the 1960s evolved into nationwide live transmissions of via the (IRIB), extending rituals' reach beyond physical participants and facilitating diaspora engagement.

Controversies and Criticisms

Debates Over Self-Mortification Practices

Within , debates over self-mortification practices during Muharram , such as tatbir (striking the forehead with a to draw blood) and zanjir-zani ( with bladed chains), center on their alignment with Islamic jurisprudence () and potential for physical and reputational harm. Proponents view these acts as legitimate expressions of grief and emulation of the suffering endured by Imam Husayn and his companions at in 680 CE, arguing they foster solidarity and devotion without violating core tenets if no permanent damage occurs. Such rituals evolved from earlier forms of latmiyat (physical self-beating on the chest or head) as symbolic protests against injustice, drawing on narrations () emphasizing for the . Leading Shia authorities, however, have issued fatwas restricting or prohibiting extreme bloodletting. Ali Khamenei, in a 1994 ruling later reiterated in 2016, declared tatbir a "wrongful and fabricated tradition" that contravenes Quranic injunctions against (Quran 4:29, "Do not throw yourselves into destruction") and damages Islam's image by appearing irrational or pagan-like to outsiders. Similarly, Ali al-Sistani has ruled that such practices are impermissible if they cause serious bodily harm, weaken the body, or expose Shia beliefs to ridicule, prioritizing the preservation of religious dignity over visceral displays. These positions reflect (independent reasoning) weighing devotional intent against sharia's emphasis on rationality and , with opponents arguing that uncontrolled self-injury deviates from prophetic models of measured mourning. Empirical data underscores the risks, with medical case reports documenting transmission of blood-borne pathogens during communal . For instance, shared blades have facilitated among participants, as blades contaminated with infected blood cause micro-abrasions leading to direct inoculation. Comparable studies link the practice to hepatitis B and C outbreaks, with surveys in Pakistani Shia communities revealing high prevalence of these viruses correlated with rituals involving unsterilized mourning blades. In response, many Shia scholars and communities advocate alternatives like organized drives, which symbolically "shed blood" for the cause of Husayn while benefiting the ill and avoiding —practices endorsed as superior acts of charity during . These internal contentions highlight a tension between emotional and jurisprudential caution, with fatwas evolving in the 1990s–2000s amid globalization's of Shia rituals. While milder sina-zani (chest-beating) remains widely accepted as non-injurious, the stricter views from Khamenei and Sistani have influenced reductions in extreme practices in and , favoring recitations and processions that emphasize intellectual reflection on Karbala's lessons over physical extremity.

Theological and Sectarian Objections

Sunni scholars have issued fatwas condemning Shia mourning rituals during Muharram as forms of (religious innovation) lacking basis in the or , arguing that transforming into an annual occasion for elaborate grief contradicts the Prophet Muhammad's practice of on that day in commemoration of divine deliverance, not mourning. Salafi and Wahhabi authorities further classify such practices as deviations approaching shirk (), particularly when they involve excessive of Husayn or rituals evoking pre-Islamic pagan lamentations, which they deem un-Quranic and prone to idolatrous excess. A core scriptural objection centers on prohibitions against self-harm and exaggerated grief expressions, as articulated in authentic : "He is not one of us who slaps his cheeks, tears his clothes, and follows the ways and traditions of the [pre-Islamic ignorance]." This narration from and underscores that physical acts like chest-beating or in mourning violate Islamic injunctions against bodily harm, with scholars like Ibn Taymiyyah extending this to deem self-mortification as impermissible akin to pagan customs. Critiques of (passion plays) highlight theological concerns over historical revisionism, where dramatizations often amplify the villainy of Umayyad figures like Yazid beyond corroborated accounts in early sources, fostering sectarian narratives that prioritize emotional over factual fidelity to events at in 680 CE. Such portrayals are seen by Sunni exegetes as promoting bias against companions of the Prophet, potentially undermining unity by retrofitting history to justify ritual excess rather than adhering to verified transmissions in works like al-Tabari's history. These objections have manifested in sectarian friction, including historical clashes during Muharram processions in , where Sunni opposition to perceived provocative rituals has sparked ; for example, between 1989 and 2004, over 1,800 incidents of sectarian conflict resulted in nearly 700 deaths, many tied to processional disputes in mixed areas. Wahhabi-influenced groups have cited these tensions to reinforce calls for suppressing rituals deemed divisive, viewing them as catalysts for fitna (strife) rather than pious remembrance.

Political Exploitation and Modern Misuses

During the , Muharram processions in December 1978 served as critical platforms for political mobilization against the Pahlavi monarchy. Ayatollah , exiled in , directed followers to participate in mourning rituals on (Muharram 9) and (Muharram 10), transforming traditional grief into protests demanding the Shah's overthrow; estimates indicate over a million marched in on Tasua, swelling to two million on Ashura. Ta'ziyeh performances and associated networks facilitated the dissemination of Khomeini's smuggled cassette tapes, embedding revolutionary rhetoric within religious symbolism to amplify anti-regime sentiment. In post-2003 , Muharram observances escalated into arenas of sectarian strife, where Shia processions faced attacks from Sunni insurgents, prompting retaliatory actions by Shia militias that deepened communal rifts. Militias such as those aligned with exploited these gatherings for recruitment and power displays, intertwining ritual mourning with paramilitary posturing amid the power vacuum following Saddam Hussein's fall. Contemporary misuses persist, as evidenced in during Muharram 2023, when widespread protests incorporated anti- chants during , explicitly analogizing the Battle of Karbala's resistance to Yazid's tyranny with opposition to the Islamic Republic's governance. State efforts to co-opt the rituals for regime loyalty were defied, with demonstrators repurposing Husayn's martyrdom narrative to critique current . Analysts have critiqued such instrumentalizations for perpetuating cycles of division and , arguing that the rituals' emphasis on victimhood and vengeance narratives causally contributes to militancy by framing political adversaries as modern equivalents of historical oppressors like Yazid. In and beyond, this politicization has been linked to heightened sectarian tensions, where mourning events provide ideological fuel for armed groups seeking legitimacy through religious symbolism.

Contemporary Observance and Global Spread

Regional Variations in the Middle East

In Iran, the Islamic Republic orchestrates nationwide Muharram observances, emphasizing ta'zieh theatrical reenactments of Imam Husayn's martyrdom at Karbala, performed across thousands of venues from urban theaters to rural husseiniyyas during the first ten days of the month. These state-supported rituals, broadcast on national media, integrate mourning with themes of revolutionary sacrifice, drawing participation from urban centers like Tehran to remote villages, where processions feature chest-beating (sina-zani) and self-flagellation in some communities. Political influences shape the scale, as government subsidies and security mobilize millions, while environmental factors like summer heat prompt hydration stations along routes. Iranian pilgrims form a significant portion of the Arba'een trek from Najaf to Karbala, with over 3 million crossing into Iraq in recent years. Iraq hosts the epicenters of regional mourning at and , where Husseiniya halls—communal centers for lamentation—fill with recitations of Karbala elegies and massive processions converging on Imam Husayn's shrine on and Arba'een. Suppressed under Saddam Hussein's Ba'athist regime, which viewed Shia rituals as threats to Sunni dominance, practices resurged post-2003 invasion, enabling open gatherings but exposing them to insurgent violence. Between 2014 and 2017, ISIS targeted processions with bombings, such as the November 2014 Karbala attack killing dozens, amid the group's territorial control in northern ; security has since intensified with drone surveillance and barriers. The 2024 Arba'een drew over 21 million participants to these sites, strained by desert conditions requiring extensive medical and logistical support. In , shapes Muharram processions in Shia strongholds like Beirut's southern suburbs, merging elegies for Husayn with rhetoric framing current conflicts—such as clashes with —as extensions of Karbala's injustice, often displaying weaponry and banners of fallen commanders during marches. These events, attended by tens of thousands, reinforce group cohesion amid Lebanon's sectarian politics and economic woes, with urban density influencing compact, flag-draped routes rather than expansive rural treks. Bahrain's Shia majority observes Muharram through subdued processions and gatherings in villages like Diraz, but faces systematic restrictions from the Sunni Al Khalifa monarchy, including bans on public displays, mosque closures, and arrests of clerics and mourners during the 2025 observances, affecting over 60 individuals amid accusations of . Political tensions, rooted in post-2011 uprising grievances, politicize rituals, with authorities citing to limit scale, while Bahrain's geography confines events to controlled urban pockets under heavy surveillance.

Practices in South Asia and Diaspora Communities

In India and Pakistan, Muharram observances feature elaborate public processions known as juloos, where participants carry alams—ornate standards symbolizing the encampment of Husayn ibn Ali—and tazias, replica shrines representing his tomb in Karbala. These processions, often spanning several kilometers through urban centers like Lucknow, Mumbai, and Karachi, incorporate rhythmic chest-beating (sina-zani) and, in some cases, chain-flagellation (zanjir-zani) on Ashura, drawing crowds of thousands. Self-mortification practices, including striking with blades or knives, occur but face periodic regulation by local authorities to curb excess, as seen in Bengaluru processions where participants use curved knives on chains. Cultural syncretism is evident in regions like Karnataka and Maharashtra, where mourners, including Hindus, paint tiger stripes on their bodies and perform tiger dances, blending Shia rituals with local folk traditions symbolizing ferocity and protection. Mughal-era patronage from the 16th to 19th centuries fostered these urban traditions, with emperors like permitting public taziya-dari to promote communal harmony, elevating imambaras as centers for mourning assemblies (). Post-1947 Partition, while no nationwide bans on tazias were imposed, heightened sectarian tensions in led to sporadic restrictions on routes and practices amid Sunni opposition, exemplified by the 1983 Karachi riots during Muharram processions that killed dozens and exposed deepening Shia-Sunni divides fueled by Deobandi backlash. In , taziya crafting persists as a hereditary in places like , though urban processions have scaled back in some areas due to security concerns. Among diaspora communities in the UK, US, and , practices adapt to legal and cultural contexts, emphasizing indoor majlis in husseinias with recitations of marthiya poetry and controlled matam (chest-beating), while avoiding bladed self-flagellation prohibited under animal cruelty and public safety laws. Communities in and host nightly gatherings from the 1st to 10th of , focusing on educational sermons and noorani (light-based) rituals to evoke Karbala's events without physical harm. The rise of digital platforms has amplified reach, with live-streamed majlis on attracting global viewers; for instance, centers like Al-Khoei in New York and Hussainiyah Passmore in Canada broadcast sessions drawing thousands, sustaining ties to South Asian roots amid assimilation pressures. These adaptations prioritize spiritual reflection over spectacle, reflecting pragmatic responses to Western norms while preserving core lamentation.

Recent Developments and Adaptations

In the 21st century, the Mourning of Muharram has increasingly incorporated digital technologies, with sermons and processions live-streamed on platforms such as and , enabling global participation beyond physical gatherings. This shift, accelerated by the , has expanded access to rituals for communities and remote observers, as seen in Dutch Shi'a adaptations where online uploads alter traditional material conditions of observance. However, such raises concerns among traditionalists about the dilution of embodied, communal sensory experiences central to azadari. Responses to criticisms of extreme self-mortification practices, including , have prompted reforms emphasizing symbolic alternatives like during Muharram in . Since the 2010s, Iranian Blood Transfusion Organization campaigns have collected tens of thousands of units annually on and , framing donation as a meritorious act commemorating Imam Husayn's sacrifice, with over 37,000 units gathered in 2010 alone and sustained efforts replacing injurious rituals. Guidance from some Shi'a marja' and clerics, who deem irrational or un-Islamic, supports this pivot toward health-conscious expressions, aligning with broader calls to mitigate risks of infection and injury. Political adaptations have intensified, with Muharram rituals invoked in protests against . In during 2023 Ashura observances, participants symbolically repurposed Karbala narratives—equating the regime's oppression to Yazid's tyranny—through alternative mourning attire and acts, transforming ceremonies into veiled dissent amid ongoing unrest. Conversely, in , state restrictions have targeted perceived extremes, barring women from vocal mourning, prohibiting children's participation in 2025 Ashura events, and confining ceremonies to mosques while condemning self-torture as non-Islamic Persian customs, reflecting efforts to moderate public expressions. Globalization and health awareness have contributed to declining engagement in hazardous practices, particularly among , as evidenced by institutional promotions of and regulatory curbs, though empirical data on participation rates remains limited. These adaptations underscore a tension between preserving ritual essence and adapting to modern scrutiny, with digital tools and reforms facilitating wider, less physically intense observance up to 2025.

References

  1. https://en.wikishia.net/view/Muharram_mourning
  2. https://www.thesquarecentre.org/2019/06/19/mourning-rituals-in-shia-islam-from-the-battle-of-karbala-to-tatbir/
  3. https://www.criticalmuslim.io/the-massacre-of-karbala/
  4. https://themuslimvibe.com/western-muslim-culture/why-do-shia-muslims-beat-themselves
  5. https://al-islam.org/al-tawhid/vol2-no1-muharram-1405-ah/editorial-about-muharram/significance-months-muharram-safar
  6. https://blogs.iu.edu/muslimvoices/2024/07/21/commemorating-sacrifice-and-resilience-understanding-the-importance-of-ashura-by-asshad-hassan/
  7. https://ahmedamiruddin.files.wordpress.com/2016/07/karbala.pdf
  8. https://www.al-islam.org/shiite-encyclopedia/tragedy-karbala-reported-sunnis-part-1
  9. https://en.al-shia.org/arrival-of-the-captives-of-karbala-to-syria/
  10. https://al-islam.org/al-serat/vol-4-no-1/tawwabin-repenters-ian-keith-anderson-howard/defeat-tawwabin
  11. https://en.wikishia.net/view/Tawwabun_Uprising
  12. https://al-islam.org/al-tawhid/vol13-n1-1996/karbala-enduring-paradigm-islamic-revivalism-sayyid-wahid-akhtar/karbala
  13. https://al-islam.org/life-imam-zayn-al-abidin-baqir-sharif-al-qurashi/chapter-7-tragedies-karbala
  14. https://al-islam.org/revolution-imam-al-husayn-shaykh-muhammad-mahdi-shams-ad-din-al-amili/rites-remembrance-al-husayn
  15. https://al-islam.org/articles/history-and-philosophy-aza-imam-husayn-bashir-hassanali-rahim
  16. https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/martinkramer/files/shia_introduction_comp.pdf
  17. https://www.academia.edu/Documents/in/the_karbala_paradigm
  18. https://www.inkoffaith.com/post/authentic-summary-karbala
  19. https://al-islam.org/theory-justice-sayyid-ruhullah-musawi-khomeini/chapter-2-concepts-and-theories-adl-islam
  20. https://dl.twelfth-imam.ir/book02/appendix_5.pdf
  21. https://thequran.love/2025/05/06/shia-islams-emphasis-on-ahl-al-bayt-historical-centrality-and-modern-evolution/
  22. https://brill.com/view/journals/ihiw/6/3/article-p300_4.xml
  23. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA496820.pdf
  24. https://shiapen.com/comprehensive/chapter-fifteen-the-stance-of-ahlulbayt-as-regarding-the-commemoration-of-ashura/
  25. https://www.al-islam.org/articles/we-cry-husayn-so-did-prophet-islam-sayyid-yasser-al-madani
  26. https://sunnah.com/bukhari:2004
  27. https://sunnah.com/bukhari:1892
  28. https://yaqeeninstitute.org/read/post/fasting-ashura-what-is-ashura-and-why-is-it-important
  29. https://itqan.academy/blog/ashura-fasting
  30. https://islamqa.info/en/answers/4033
  31. https://www.muslimink.com/islam/aqeedah/top-10-muharram-misconceptions/
  32. https://www.islam21c.com/islamic-law/ashura-10th-of-muharram-a-day-of-joy-or-grief/
  33. https://www.middleeasteye.net/discover/what-is-ashura-how-do-shia-sunni-muslims-observe
  34. https://www.shiachat.com/forum/uploads/documents/mourning_history.pdf
  35. https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/99053/9789004716148_webready_content_text.pdf
  36. https://academic.oup.com/book/27257/chapter/196866916
  37. https://pubs.lib.uiowa.edu/mathal/article/2728/galley/111530/view/
  38. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/art-of-resistance-in-islam/rites-of-mourning-within-shii-islam/70C5A64256A5254DA26E97E0EF577220
  39. https://al-islam.org/tears-karbala-liakat-dewji/majlis-1-majaalis-al-husayn
  40. https://thekashmirwalla.com/zuljanah-behind-symbol-of-imam-hussains-last-companion/
  41. https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/slideshow-ashura-the-unique-face-of-shia-islam/
  42. https://iranpress.com/content/284465/pakistan-observes-ashura-with-solemn-processions
  43. https://ich.unesco.org/en/RL/ritual-dramatic-art-of-tazye-00377
  44. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/373377584_From_ritual_to_performance_Ta%27zieh_in_Iran_today
  45. https://apnews.com/article/iraq-ashoura-karbala-security-pilgrims-2c1f5a219f61e245cb9718c1609d19f9
  46. https://www.htsyndication.com/daily-times/article/thousands-gather-in-karbala-for-ashura-rituals-under-tight-security/91423805
  47. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/critical-pakistan-studies/article/what-sadness-for-husain-comparative-ethnographic-analysis-of-two-muharram-celebrations-in-sindh-and-punjab-pakistan/2F410B2BB430FC7B285E3FB44C3924F7
  48. https://www.irangashttour.com/2021/09/05/muharram-in-iran/
  49. https://brill.com/downloadpdf/book/9789004207561/B9789004207561-s006.pdf
  50. https://www.jcpsp.pk/article-detail/pselfflagellation-an-unaddressed-risk-factor-of-hepatitis-b-and-c-transmission-among-shiite-muslimsorp
  51. https://tatbir.org/
  52. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6881901/
  53. https://www.kurdistan24.net/en/story/850167/ashura-mourning-in-khanaqin-sends-hundreds-to-hospital
  54. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1570949
  55. https://historyofislam.org/umayyad-caliphate/religious-beliefs/
  56. https://islamichistory.info/2022/08/24/the-martyrdom-of-hussain-what-happened-next/
  57. http://ijtihadnet.com/wp-content/uploads/The-Mourning-of-History-and-the-History-of-Mourning.pdf
  58. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/234675870.pdf
  59. https://www.shiachat.com/forum/uploads/documents/mourning_transformed.pdf
  60. https://escholarship.mcgill.ca/downloads/xp68kh002.PDF
  61. https://al-islam.org/articles/journey-imam-husayn-shaykh-al-mufid
  62. https://shiamuslimgenocide.com/persecution-of-shia-muslims-in-1400-years-history-of-islam-syed-mustajab-haider-naqvi/
  63. https://iranicaonline.org/articles/historiography-iv
  64. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Safavid-dynasty
  65. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Ismail-I-shah-of-Iran
  66. https://oxfordre.com/asianhistory/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190277727.001.0001/acrefore-9780190277727-e-769
  67. https://roosevelt.ucsd.edu/_files/mmw/mmw13/ShiiRitualsandPowerPages139to156.pdf
  68. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/iranian-studies/article/rituals-of-commemoration-rituals-of-selfinvention-safavid-religious-colleges-and-the-collective-memory-of-the-shia/02AF510F3DC88C407CD3605D89FFED83
  69. https://persianarcharchives.org/2022/02/05/tekyeh-dowlat-the-royal-tazieh-theater-of-tehran/
  70. https://www.ivysci.com/en/articles/3375070__Why_did_Qajar_elites_become_such_enthusiastic_patrons_of_tazyah_A_simple_question_with_a_complex_ans
  71. https://www.tehrantimes.com/news/451764/Tekyehs-echo-Muharram-mourning-through-history
  72. http://www.sahapedia.org/history-taziya-india-symbol-muharram-mourning
  73. https://www.theheritagelab.in/paintings-muharram-india/
  74. https://daak.substack.com/p/muharram-in-the-19th-century-indian
  75. https://jcrir.ut.ac.ir/article_100897_303e5c60fb140cd31f793e52a1f85367.pdf
  76. https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/document/63264/ssoar-hsr-2019-3-chavoshian-Secular_Atmospheres_Unveiling_and_Urban.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  77. https://janetafary.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/30.3.20.-Afary.pdf
  78. http://en.imam-khomeini.ir/en/n46776/Significance-of-holding-mourning-ceremonies-in-Muharram-from-Imam-Khomeini-s-viewpoint
  79. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-iranian-revolution-a-timeline-of-events/
  80. https://digitalcommons.providence.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1026&context=history_undergrad_theses
  81. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-history-of-iran/popular-entertainment-media-and-social-change-in-twentiethcentury-iran/891E9E5A0EF1D450A2F6A6F9610AD73B
  82. https://www.collectiveijtihad.org/blog/self-flagellation
  83. https://www.shiachat.com/forum/topic/235083067-justification-for-matam/
  84. http://english.khamenei.ir/news/4209/Tatbir-is-a-wrongful-and-fabricated-tradition-Imam-Khamenei
  85. https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/abstract/document/obo-9780195390155/obo-9780195390155-0136.xml?rskey=QkEzrj&result=160&print
  86. https://tatbir.org/?page_id=98
  87. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350291379_Taimoor_Hussainet_al_Knowledge_Attitude_And_Perception_Of_Hazara_Population_Of_Quetta_Pakistan_Towards_Hepatitis_B_And_C_Flagellation_With_Mourning_Blades_As_A_Hitherto_Unaddressed_Risk_Factor_Indo_Am
  88. https://rahyafteha.ir/en/3815/blood-donation-instead-tatbir-among-shia-muslims/
  89. https://islamqa.info/en/answers/101268
  90. https://ebnhussein.com/2020/08/27/sunni-salafi-scholarship-and-the-condemnation-of-the-heresies-of-the-nawasib-and-rawafid-on-ashura/
  91. https://www.transcend.org/tms/2025/07/blood-in-the-sand-how-ashura-transformed-from-islamic-historys-greatest-tragedy-to-peace-destroying-sectarian-turmoil-part-2/
  92. https://muslimmemo.com/self-flagellation-muharram-islam/
  93. https://www.academia.edu/29046025/An_Anthropological_Study_on_the_Origin_and_Content_of_Tazieh
  94. https://www.hudson.org/national-security-defense/weeding-out-the-heretics-sectarianism-in-pakistan
  95. https://ebnhussein.com/2020/08/28/ashura-between-ahlus-sunnah-and-heretics/
  96. https://al-islam.org/imam-khomeini-short-biography-hamid-algar/islamic-revolution-1978-79
  97. https://historydraft.com/story/iranian-revolution/timeline/330
  98. https://jisasr.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Liminality-and-Experience-The-1979-Revolution-in-Iran-and-Shia-Religious-Symbols-PDF.pdf
  99. https://www.nonviolent-conflict.org/iranian-revolution-1977-1979/
  100. https://www.ros.hw.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/10399/4709/AhmedJ_0421_sossSS.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y
  101. https://www.rferl.org/a/iraq-militias-sectarian-violence/25023363.html
  102. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/13/world/middleeast/ashura-iran-protests.html
  103. https://www.ncr-iran.org/en/news/ashura-2023-delivering-a-crushing-blow-to-the-heart-of-clerical-hypocrisy-in-iran/
  104. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/sectarianism-as-the-source-of-extremism-in-the-middle-east/
  105. https://rasanah-iiis.org/english/monitoring-and-translation/reports/the-political-exploitation-of-ashura-in-iran/
  106. https://asiasociety.org/time-out-memory-taziyeh-total-drama
  107. https://iranpress.com/content/227546/muharram-mourning-what-iran-known-for
  108. https://www.iranintl.com/en/202508086232
  109. https://en.964media.com/37788/
  110. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/nov/03/iraq-shias-muharram-ashura
  111. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/8/25/millions-of-shia-muslim-pilgrims-gather-in-iraq-for-arbaeen
  112. https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/article-753000
  113. https://today.lorientlejour.com/article/1420755/ashura-in-lebanon-marked-by-parallels-with-the-gaza-war.html
  114. https://www.adhrb.org/2025/07/ashura-2025-in-bahrain-religious-persecution-and-restrictions-on-freedom-of-worship-and-belief/
  115. https://iqna.ir/en/news/3493806/restrictions-on-muharram-mourning-ceremonies-reported-in-bahrain-again
  116. https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/18/world/shiite-muslims-ashura-holy-day-intl-hnk
  117. https://www.deccanherald.com/india/karnataka/tigers-of-muharram-and-the-colours-of-harmony-879459.html
  118. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/videos/news/muharram-2020-local-artists-paint-children-as-tiger-in-aurangabad/videoshow/77833942.cms
  119. http://vsgoi.blogspot.com/2014/12/muharram-during-delhi-sultanate-and.html
  120. https://www.cfr.org/timeline/modern-sunni-shia-tensions
  121. https://yorkspace.library.yorku.ca/bitstreams/9f7dc919-3fba-4e35-9ca3-08faf26589d0/download
  122. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pzSieAms4MQ
  123. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7KJzufTC1k4
  124. https://zenodo.org/records/7875334/files/Aleeha.pdf?download=1
  125. https://ojs.letras.up.pt/index.php/tm/article/view/13174
  126. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0048721X.2022.2053038
  127. https://asianethnology.scholasticahq.com/article/140556-expanded-ritual-shi-i-islamic-videography-in-lahore
  128. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3159261/
  129. https://www.timesnownews.com/spiritual/ashura-a-day-of-mourning-and-blood-donation-for-muslims-article-111638619
  130. https://ifpnews.com/blood-donation-ashura-mourning/
  131. https://www.tehrantimes.com/news/407271/Iranians-commemorate-Imam-Hussein-martyrdom-by-donating-blood
  132. https://www.newarab.com/news/iranians-use-muharram-religious-ceremonies-protest
  133. https://jam-news.net/ashura-in-azerbaijan-women-banned-from-crying-children-barred-from-entering-mosques/
  134. https://www.azernews.az/nation/228675.html
  135. https://asianethnology.scholasticahq.com/article/140550-mu-arram-mourning-and-its-detractors-shi-i-ritual-resilience-in-azerbaijan
  136. https://bakuresearchinstitute.org/en/why-was-ashura-observed-over-two-days-in-azerbaijan-this-year/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.