Hubbry Logo
New PersianNew PersianMain
Open search
New Persian
Community hub
New Persian
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
New Persian
New Persian
New Persian
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
New Persian
فارسی نو, پارسی نو
Fārsi written in Persian calligraphy (Nastaʿlīq)
Native to
Native speakers
70 million[7]
(110 million total speakers)[6]
Early forms
Persian alphabet (Iran and Afghanistan)
Tajik alphabet (Tajikistan)
Hebrew alphabet
Persian Braille
Official status
Official language in
Regulated by
Language codes
ISO 639-1fa
ISO 639-2per (B)
fas (T)
ISO 639-3fas
Glottologfars1254
Linguasphere
58-AAC (Wider Persian)
> 58-AAC-c (Central Persian)
Areas with significant numbers of people whose first language is Persian (including dialects)
Persian Linguasphere.
Legend
  Official language
  More than 1,000,000 speakers
  Between 500,000 – 1,000,000 speakers
  Between 100,000 – 500,000 speakers
  Between 25,000 – 100,000 speakers
  Fewer than 25,000 speakers / none
This article contains IPA phonetic symbols. Without proper rendering support, you may see question marks, boxes, or other symbols instead of Unicode characters. For an introductory guide on IPA symbols, see Help:IPA.

New Persian (Persian: فارسی نو, romanized: fārsī-ye now), also known as Modern Persian (فارسی نوین) is the current stage of the Persian language spoken since the 8th to 9th centuries until now in Greater Iran and surroundings. It is conventionally divided into three stages: Early New Persian (8th/9th centuries), Classical Persian (10th–18th centuries), and Contemporary Persian (19th century to present).

Dari is a name given to the New Persian language since the 10th century, widely used in Arabic (see Istakhri, al-Maqdisi and ibn Hawqal) and Persian texts.[10] Since 1964, Dari has been the official name in Afghanistan for the Persian spoken there.

Classification

[edit]

New Persian is a member of the Western Iranian group of the Iranian languages, which make up a branch of the Indo-European languages in their Indo-Iranian subdivision.[11]

Indo-Iranian
(Aryan)
Proto Indo-Iranian
Indo-AryanProto-IranianNuristani
Iranian Languages
(Irani-Aryan)
Old IranianMiddle IranianNew Iranian
(Neo-Iranian)
Old PersianWesternEastern
SouthwesternNorthwesternSoghdian, Scythian, Khwarezmian, Bactrian
Middle Persian (Pārsīg/Sassanian Pahlavi)Median (Medic), Parthian
(Pahlavani/Arsacid Pahlavi)		Kurdish, Old Azeri, Tati, Balochi, Talyshi, Zaza, Mazanderani, Gilaki
Achomi
(Larestani)		LuriNew Persian
(Farsi)
Iranian Farsi
(Western)		Tajiki FarsiDari Farsi
(Eastern)
Tehrani, Isfahani, Etc...

The Western Iranian languages themselves are divided into two subgroups: Southwestern Iranian languages, of which Persian is the most widely spoken, and Northwestern Iranian languages, of which Kurdish is the most widely spoken.[11]

Etymology

[edit]

"New Persian" is the name given to the final stage of development of Persian language. The term Persian is an English derivation of Latin Persiānus, the adjectival form of Persia, itself deriving from Greek Persís (Περσίς),[12] a Hellenized form of Old Persian Pārsa (𐎱𐎠𐎼𐎿),[13] which means "Persia" (a region in southwestern Iran corresponding to modern-day Fars province). According to the Oxford English Dictionary, the term Persian as a language name is first attested in English in the mid-16th century.[14]

There are different opinions about the origin of the word Dari. The majority of scholars believes Dari refers to the Persian word dar or darbār "court" (دربار) as it was the formal language of the Sasanian dynasty.[15] The original meaning of the word dari is given in a notice attributed to Ibn al-Muqaffaʿ (cited by Ibn al-Nadim in Al-Fehrest).[16] According to him, "Pārsī was the language spoken by priests, scholars, and the like; it is the language of Fars." This language refers to the Middle Persian.[15] As for Dari, he says, "it is the language of the cities of Madā'en; it is spoken by those who are at the king's court. [Its name] is connected with presence at court. Among the languages of the people of Khorasan and the east, the language of the people of Balkh is predominant."[15]

History

[edit]

New Persian is conventionally divided into three stages:

  • Early New Persian (8th/9th centuries)
  • Classical Persian (10th–18th centuries)
  • Contemporary Persian (19th century to present)

Early New Persian remains largely intelligible to speakers of Contemporary Persian, as the morphology and, to a lesser extent, the lexicon of the language have remained relatively stable.[17]

Early New Persian

[edit]
Persian notes on Quranic booklets, written by a native of Tus called Ahmad Khayqani in 292 AH (905 CE).
A page from a manuscript of "Kitab al-Abniya 'an Haqa'iq al-Adwiya" by Abu Mansur Muwaffaq, Copied by Asadi Tusi in 447 AH (1055 CE).

New Persian texts written in the Arabic script first appear in the 9th-century.[18] The language is a direct descendant of Middle Persian, the official, religious and literary language of the Sasanian Empire (224–651).[19] However, it is not descended from the literary form of Middle Persian (known as pārsīk, commonly called Pahlavi), which was spoken by the people of Fars and used in Zoroastrian religious writings. Instead, it is descended from the dialect spoken by the court of the Sasanian capital Ctesiphon and the northeastern Iranian region of Khorasan, known as Dari.[18][20] Khorasan, which was the homeland of the Parthians, was Persianized under the Sasanians. Dari Persian thus supplanted the Parthian language, which by the end of the Sasanian era had fallen out of use.[18] New Persian has incorporated many foreign words, including from eastern northern and northern Iranian languages such as Sogdian and especially Parthian.[21]

The mastery of the newer speech having now been transformed from Middle into New Persian was already complete by the era of the three princely dynasties of Iranian origin, the Tahirid dynasty (820–872), Saffarid dynasty (860–903) and Samanid Empire (874–999), and could develop only in range and power of expression.[22] Abbas of Merv is mentioned as being the earliest minstrel to chant verse in the newer Persian tongue and after him the poems of Hanzala Badghisi were among the most famous between the Persian-speakers of the time.[23]

The first poems of the Persian language, a language historically called Dari, emerged in Afghanistan.[24] The first significant Persian poet was Rudaki. He flourished in the 10th century, when the Samanids were at the height of their power. His reputation as a court poet and as an accomplished musician and singer has survived, although little of his poetry has been preserved. Among his lost works are versified fables collected in the Kalila wa Dimna.[25]

The language spread geographically from the 11th century on and was the medium through which among others, Central Asian Turks became familiar with Islam and urban culture. New Persian was widely used as a trans-regional lingua franca, a task for which it was particularly suitable due to its relatively simple morphological structure and this situation persisted until at least the 19th century.[26] In the late Middle Ages, new Islamic literary languages were created on the Persian model: Ottoman Turkish, Chagatai, Dobhashi and Urdu, which are regarded as "structural daughter languages" of Persian.[26]

Classical Persian

[edit]
See also: List of Persian-language poets and authors

"Classical Persian" loosely refers to the standardized language of medieval Persia used in literature and poetry. This is the language of the 10th to 12th centuries, which continued to be used as literary language and lingua franca under the "Persianized" Turko-Mongol dynasties during the 12th to 15th centuries, and under restored Persian rule during the 16th to 19th centuries.[27]

Persian during this time served as lingua franca of Greater Persia and of much of the Indian subcontinent. It was also the official and cultural language of many Islamic dynasties, including the Samanids, Buyids, Tahirids, Ziyarids, the Mughal Empire, Timurids, Ghaznavids, Karakhanids, Seljuqs, Khwarazmians, the Sultanate of Rum, Delhi Sultanate, the Shirvanshahs, Safavids, Afsharids, Zands, Qajars, Khanate of Bukhara, Khanate of Kokand, Emirate of Bukhara, Khanate of Khiva, Ottomans and also many Mughal successors such as the Nizam of Hyderabad. Persian was the only non-European language known and used by Marco Polo at the Court of Kublai Khan and in his journeys through China.[28]

Contemporary Persian

[edit]
A variant of the Iranian standard ISIRI 9147 keyboard layout for Persian
Qajar dynasty

In the 19th century, under the Qajar dynasty, the dialect that is spoken in Tehran rose to prominence. There was still substantial Arabic vocabulary, but many of these words have been integrated into Persian phonology and grammar. In addition, under the Qajar rule numerous Russian, French, and English terms entered the Persian language, especially vocabulary related to technology.

The first official attentions to the necessity of protecting the Persian language against foreign words, and to the standardization of Persian orthography, were under the reign of Naser ed Din Shah of the Qajar dynasty in 1871.[citation needed] After Naser ed Din Shah, Mozaffar ed Din Shah ordered the establishment of the first Persian association in 1903.[29] This association officially declared that it used Persian and Arabic as acceptable sources for coining words. The ultimate goal was to prevent books from being printed with wrong use of words. According to the executive guarantee of this association, the government was responsible for wrongfully printed books. Words coined by this association, such as rāh-āhan (راه‌آهن) for "railway", were printed in Soltani Newspaper; but the association was eventually closed due to inattention.[citation needed]

A scientific association was founded in 1911, resulting in a dictionary called Words of Scientific Association (لغت انجمن علمی), which was completed in the future and renamed Katouzian Dictionary (فرهنگ کاتوزیان).[30]

Pahlavi dynasty

The first academy for the Persian language was founded on 20 May 1935, under the name Academy of Iran. It was established by the initiative of Reza Shah Pahlavi, and mainly by Hekmat e Shirazi and Mohammad Ali Foroughi, all prominent names in the nationalist movement of the time. The academy was a key institution in the struggle to re-build Iran as a nation-state after the collapse of the Qajar dynasty. During the 1930s and 1940s, the academy led massive campaigns to replace the many Arabic, Russian, French, and Greek loanwords whose widespread use in Persian during the centuries preceding the foundation of the Pahlavi dynasty had created a literary language considerably different from the spoken Persian of the time. This became the basis of what is now known as "Contemporary Standard Persian".

Varieties

[edit]

There are three standard varieties of modern Persian:

All these three varieties are based on the classic Persian literature and its literary tradition. There are also several local dialects from Iran, Afghanistan and Tajikistan which slightly differ from the standard Persian. The Hazaragi dialect (in Central Afghanistan and Pakistan), Herati (in Western Afghanistan), Darwazi (in Afghanistan and Tajikistan), Basseri (in Southern Iran), and the Tehrani accent (in Iran, the basis of standard Iranian Persian) are examples of these dialects. Persian-speaking peoples of Iran, Afghanistan, and Tajikistan can understand one another with a relatively high degree of mutual intelligibility.[31] Nevertheless, the Encyclopædia Iranica notes that the Iranian, Afghan and Tajiki varieties comprise distinct branches of the Persian language, and within each branch a wide variety of local dialects exist.[32]

The following are some languages closely related to Persian, or in some cases are considered dialects:

Standard Persian

[edit]
Main article: Standard Persian

Standard Persian is the standard variety of Persian that is the official language of the Iran[8] and Tajikistan[38] and one of the two official languages of Afghanistan.[39] It is a set of spoken and written formal varieties used by the educated persophones of several nations around the world.[40]

As Persian is a pluricentric language, Standard Persian encompasses various linguistic norms (consisting of prescribed usage). Standard Persian practically has three standard varieties with official status in Iran, Afghanistan, and Tajikistan. The standard forms of the three are based on the Tehrani, Kabuli, and Bukharan varieties, respectively.[41][42]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Sources

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

New Persian

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
New Persian is the modern iteration of the , an Indo-European member of the Western Iranian branch, that arose from in the aftermath of the 7th-century Muslim conquest of the . Early New Persian emerged as a in the 8th to 12th centuries CE, adopting a modified while retaining core Iranian grammatical structures and incorporating substantial lexicon due to Islamic cultural dominance. This phase produced foundational literary works, including Ferdowsi's , which preserved pre-Islamic Persian heritage amid . The language's evolution reflects causal shifts from imperial collapse and religious imposition, leading to simplified phonology and morphology compared to its predecessor, yet maintaining continuity in vocabulary and syntax. New Persian variants—Farsi in , in , and Tajik in —remain mutually intelligible, serving as official languages in these nations and influencing regional dialects through historical Persianate empires. Its script, derived from but augmented with four additional letters for Persian sounds, underscores adaptation to new ruling scripts without full supplanting of Iranian linguistic identity.

Linguistic Classification and Origins

Indo-Iranian Genealogy

New Persian is classified as a Southwestern Iranian language, belonging to the Western Iranian subgroup within the Iranian branch of the Indo-Iranian languages, which constitutes a major division of the Indo-European language family. The Iranian languages as a whole trace their origins to Proto-Iranian, which emerged from Proto-Indo-Iranian in Central Asia during the late third to early second millennium BCE, sharing close genetic ties with the Indo-Aryan languages but diverging through distinct phonological and morphological developments, such as the Iranian satemization of Indo-European stops. This Proto-Iranian stage gave rise to both Western and Eastern Iranian divisions, with Western Iranian further subdividing into Northwestern (e.g., Median, Parthian, and modern Kurdish) and Southwestern groups, the latter encompassing Persian and closely related languages like Luri and Bakhtiari. The Southwestern Iranian lineage specifically leads from Old Persian, attested in cuneiform inscriptions of the from the sixth to fourth centuries BCE, characterized by an inflected grammar with three genders, six cases, and a vocabulary reflecting imperial administration across a vast territory. evolved into (also known as Pahlavi), the administrative and literary language of the from roughly the third century BCE to the ninth century CE, which simplified the grammatical system by eliminating cases and genders while adopting the Pahlavi script derived from . served as the immediate ancestor of New Persian, retaining core lexical and syntactic features but undergoing significant analytic restructuring and vocabulary expansion, particularly after the Arab conquest in the seventh century CE, which introduced loanwords without fundamentally altering its Iranian substrate. New Persian proper emerged around the ninth century CE in the Fārs province of southwestern , initially as Early New Persian or Dārī, marking the transition to a fully analytic structure with periphrastic verb forms and the adoption of a modified , while preserving phonological traits like the retention of initial /w-/ and /h-/ from earlier stages that were lost in many other . This evolution reflects continuity in the Southwestern branch, distinguishing it from Northwestern through innovations such as the development of /d/ from Proto-Iranian *j- (e.g., Modern Persian *dān- "to know" versus Kurdish *zan-). Unlike (e.g., , Ossetic), which preserve more conservative features like ergativity, the Southwestern group, including New Persian, exhibits a shift toward subject-object-verb and reduced , adaptations likely influenced by contact with non-Iranian substrates in the . Persian remains the sole attested across all three historical stages—Old, Middle, and New—underscoring its central role in the genealogy.

Distinctions from Ancestral Stages

New Persian emerged as a distinct stage following the period, marked by gradual phonological simplifications that reduced the inherited vowel system from eight in to a more streamlined set of six short and long vowels in Early New Persian, facilitating easier articulation and contributing to its analytic character. Consonant clusters underwent , with initial clusters like *sp- becoming *isp- (e.g., spāh to New Persian sepāh ""), and word-final sounds such as -g were often lost or altered, reflecting natural drift rather than abrupt imposition. These shifts, occurring primarily between the 7th and 10th centuries CE, built on trends but accelerated under bilingual contact environments post-Islamic conquest, distinguishing New Persian's phonology as less conservative than its ancestral forms. Morphologically, New Persian further eroded the fusional elements of Old and Middle Persian, eliminating grammatical gender—retained in three forms (masculine, feminine, neuter) in Old Persian—and noun cases beyond a vestigial direct/indirect opposition, shifting reliance to postpositions and the ezāfe particle (-e) for relational marking. Verb conjugation simplified, with the loss of dual number and subjunctive distinctions blurring into indicative moods, contrasting Old Persian's richly inflected paradigm of six cases and three numbers; Middle Persian had already begun this reduction, but New Persian's analytic syntax, using particles like rā for direct objects, rendered it more isolating than its predecessors. This evolution prioritized clarity in multiracial, multilingual Persianate societies, where Middle Persian's residual inflections proved cumbersome for non-native scribes. Lexically, the advent of New Persian coincided with extensive Arabic borrowing, introducing over 40% non-native vocabulary by the classical period—terms for administration (dawlat "state"), religion (namāz ""), and (ʿelm "")—far exceeding the Parthian and loans in , which comprised under 20% of its core lexicon. While ancestral stages drew from Iranian roots, New Persian integrated these calques and direct loans without supplanting indigenous words entirely, as seen in retained terms like pedar "" from Proto-Iranian pitar, but this influx altered semantic fields, embedding Islamic cultural layers absent in pre-conquest Persian. The script transitioned from the cursive Pahlavi variants of —derived from and featuring ideograms (Aramaic logograms read in Persian)—to a modified by the CE, incorporating four additional letters (p, č, ž, g) to accommodate Persian phonemes unrepresented in Arabic. This change, post-651 CE , enabled diacritics for vowels, improving orthographic fidelity over Pahlavi's ambiguity, though it introduced right-to-left directionality contrasting Old Persian's left-to-right . Such reflected pragmatic utility in caliphal bureaucracies rather than linguistic rupture, as core grammar persisted.

Etymology and Terminology

Historical Naming Conventions

In the early Islamic period following the Arab conquest of Iran in the 7th century CE, the nascent New Persian language—emerging from Middle Persian substrates—was primarily designated using terms rooted in regional and ethnic identifiers from the Sasanian era. The term Pārsī (or Pārsīg), denoting the language "of Pars" (the southwestern province), was commonly applied to the southern Iranian varieties, particularly in Zoroastrian and Jewish literature, as evidenced by 8th-century translator Ibn al-Muqaffaʿ's distinctions between Pārsī and other dialects like Pahlevī (Parthian-influenced). This nomenclature reflected the language's continuity with Middle Persian (Pārsik), emphasizing its southwestern origins and use in administrative and religious texts preserved by non-Muslim communities into the 11th century. Concurrently, Dārī gained prominence for the northeastern (Khorasanian) variant, originally the court language of the Sasanian capitals like , which adapted under Abbasid rule and became the basis for literary New Persian by the . This term, possibly derived from dār ("" or "palace"), signified prestige and was used for the formalized speech of eastern Iranian elites, spreading westward as facilitated its documentation in works like the Šāhnāma (completed ca. 1010 CE). Composite designations such as Pārsi-ye Dārī ("Persian of the ") appeared in medieval texts to bridge regional forms, underscoring functional distinctions between vernacular southern Pārsī and the standardized eastern literary . By the 11th century, Fārsī—the Arabicized form of Pārsī, reflecting phonemic shifts in Arabic transcription—emerged in usage, as noted by poet Nāṣer-e Ḵosrow (ca. 1046 CE) to describe Persian spoken beyond . These conventions highlighted not only geographic variances but also sociolinguistic hierarchies, with Pahlevī retained by for "ancient" or Zoroastrian texts, distinguishing them from the evolving New Persian vernacular. Over time, such terms were employed synonymously in Persianate scholarship, though and Fārsī persisted as markers of dialectal prestige in and , respectively.

Modern Designations and Variants

In contemporary usage, New Persian is officially designated as Farsi (فارسی) in Iran, where it serves as the sole national language per the 1979 Constitution, spoken by approximately 53 million as a first language within the country. In Afghanistan, the variety is termed Dari (دری), an official language alongside Pashto under the 2004 Constitution, with around 12-15 million native speakers, reflecting its historical role as the court language of the region. In Tajikistan, it is known as Tajik (тоҷикӣ), the official language since independence in 1991, used by about 8 million speakers and codified with Russian influences from the Soviet era. Internationally, the overarching term Persian persists in linguistic and diplomatic contexts, encompassing these variants as standardized forms of the same Southwestern Iranian language continuum. These designations emerged post-20th century amid : "Farsi" derives from the endonym Pārsī, emphasized in to distinguish from influences; "Dari" references the "language of the court" (from Dār al-Salṭana), formalized in Afghan policy to highlight its pre-Islamic heritage; and "Tajik" aligns with ethnic nomenclature for Persian-speakers in , detached from Iranian connotations during Soviet . The variants exhibit high —estimated at 90-95% in spoken form—due to shared grammar, core lexicon from , and syntactic structure, though divergences arise from regional substrates and superstrates. Key distinctions include script: Iranian Farsi and Afghan Dari employ modified Perso-Arabic alphabets (Dari with four additional letters for sounds like /g/ and /ch/), while Tajik adopted Cyrillic in 1939 under Soviet policy, reverting partially to Latin proposals but retaining Cyrillic for official use, hindering cross-variant literacy without adaptation. Vocabulary varies by historical contact: Farsi incorporates heavier Arabic loanwords (up to 40% in formal registers, via Islamic scholarship); Dari features Pashto, Turkic, and some French/English terms from colonial and modern influences; Tajik shows Russian borrowings (e.g., "avtomobil" for car vs. Farsi "māshin") and Turkic elements, comprising 10-20% non-Persian elements in everyday speech. Phonological shifts include Tajik's merger of certain vowels and Dari's retention of classical /w/ as /v/ or /ow/, yet core intelligibility persists, as evidenced by cross-border media consumption and literature translation with minimal barriers. Peripheral variants, such as Hazaragi (with Mongolic substrata in central ) or Aimaq dialects, extend the continuum but remain non-standardized, often aligning closer to while incorporating Turkic or Mongolic features; these are not officially designated but contribute to the language's dialectal diversity without fracturing the New Persian macrolanguage status under (fas for Western Persian, tg for Tajik).

Historical Evolution

Post-Sasanian Transition

The Sasanian Empire fell to Arab Muslim forces in 651 CE, marking the end of Middle Persian as the dominant administrative and literary language of Iran. Following the conquest, Persian-speaking populations gradually adopted Islam and the Arabic script, adapted as Perso-Arabic, while Middle Persian persisted in Zoroastrian religious texts and among pockets of the population. This period saw the linguistic shift to Early New Persian, characterized by simplification of the inflectional system— including the loss of the izafa particle ī(g), direct object marker ō, and ergative verb constructions—alongside the retention of core Iranian grammatical structures. Arabic exerted substantial lexical influence, introducing thousands of loanwords for administration, religion, and science, though syntactic frameworks remained predominantly Iranian. The transition accelerated in eastern Iran, particularly , under Iranian Muslim dynasties like the Tahirids (820–872 CE) and Saffarids (861–1003 CE), where Persian regained prominence as a vehicle for local administration and literature. Saffarid ruler Ya'qub ibn al-Layth (r. 861–879 CE), limited in Arabic proficiency, actively promoted Persian usage, commissioning translations and compositions that bypassed Arabic intermediaries. Earliest attestations of New Persian appear in Judaeo-Persian documents, such as the Tang-i Azao inscription dated 751–752 CE and a commercial letter from Dandan Öilïq around 760 CE, reflecting commercial and epigraphic use among Jewish communities in regions like Sistān and Ahvāz. By the mid-9th century, prose and poetry in New Persian emerged, with the first recorded poem—a qasida by Abu'l-'Abbas of Marv—composed in 809 CE, though its preservation is uncertain. More reliably attested are verses by poets like Hanzala of Bādghīs (pre-873 CE) and Muhammad b. Vasif's qasida from 865 CE, signaling the language's literary viability. Notes in Persian on Quranic booklets, such as those by Ahmad Khayqānī of Tūs dated 905 CE, exemplify vernacular literacy's spread. This evolution positioned New Persian as a resilient medium, adapting foreign elements without supplanting its Iranian essence, under dynastic patronage that favored regional autonomy over full Arabization.

Early New Persian Period

The Early New Persian period encompasses the 8th through 12th centuries CE, representing the initial phase of Persian linguistic and literary development following the Sasanian Empire's collapse and the Islamic conquest of between 632 and 651 CE. This era saw the language evolve from with relatively minor phonetic and grammatical alterations, such as a shift toward accusative syntax from the earlier ergative alignment, while preserving core features like the eżāfa construction for genitive relations, particularly in southern dialects. expanded through heavy borrowing for religious, administrative, and scientific terms, though Iranian roots dominated everyday and epic , with some Parthian influences evident in terms like borz ("high") in . The adoption of the , modified with additional diacritics for Persian phonemes, enabled widespread literary production, supplanting earlier Pahlavi, Manichean, or Syriac systems used by religious minorities. Earliest surviving texts include brief inscriptions and documents, such as the Tang-i Azao rock inscription dated 751–752 CE and the Uiliq Chinese-Persian letter from circa 760 CE, attesting to administrative use in eastern . emerged first, with fragments traceable to the mid-9th century, including a qaṣīda by Abu'l-Abbas of Marv in 809 CE and works by Hanzala of Badghis before 873 CE; followed in the mid-10th century. Regional dialects from and , influenced by Parthian and Sogdian substrates, coalesced into a standardized literary form, often termed in early sources. Patronage under Iranian dynasties like the Samanids (819–999 CE) and (977–1186 CE) catalyzed literary growth, particularly in and eastern provinces, where Persian served as a vernacular counterweight to dominance in scholarship. (c. 858–941 CE), a Samanid court poet from near , composed over 100,000 verses in New Persian, establishing genres like the qaṣīda and ġazal adapted from models but infused with Iranian themes of nature and wisdom, earning him recognition as a foundational figure in . Prose milestones include Abu Ali Bal'ami's 963 CE translation and adaptation of al-Tabari's universal history into Persian, which introduced narrative techniques and reached broader audiences beyond Arabic-literate elites. This period's output, blending pre-Islamic epic traditions with Islamic motifs, set precedents for later classical works like Ferdowsi's Šāh-nāma (completed c. 1010 CE), preserving Iranian mythology amid .

Classical Persian Era

The Classical Persian Era, spanning approximately the 10th to 18th centuries CE, represented the maturation and widespread adoption of New Persian as a literary and administrative medium across the Persianate cultural sphere, from and to the and . Following the foundational advancements under the Samanids (819–999 CE), who patronized the language's revival against dominance, subsequent dynasties such as the (977–1186 CE) and Seljuks (1037–1194 CE) elevated it in courtly and scholarly contexts. This period's linguistic form exhibited stability, with grammar simplified from precedents—lacking inflectional cases, genders, and —relying instead on prepositions, , and the ubiquitous ezafe enclitic for possession and attribution (e.g., ketâb-e man, "my book"). Lexical expansion was a hallmark, incorporating an estimated 20–40% Arabic-derived terms in and , primarily for religious, philosophical, and administrative concepts, while core and syntax retained Indo-Iranian roots; for instance, verbs conjugated via prefixes and suffixes without person-number agreement shifts beyond tense. Prosody adapted Arabic quantitative meters to Persian's , featuring short and long syllables in patterns like the ramal or hazaj, enabling complex rhyme schemes in forms such as the (rhymed couplets for narrative epics) and (panegyric odes). Phonetic shifts from early New Persian stabilized, with uvular /q/ and /ɣ/ distinguishing classical texts from later vernaculars, though regional dialects influenced spoken variants minimally in written standards. Literary output defined the era's cultural prestige, with epic, lyric, and didactic genres flourishing; Ferdowsi's (completed c. 1010 CE), at over 50,000 distichs, chronicled Iranian mythology in deliberately Arabicism-minimal Persian to assert ethnic continuity post-conquest. Mystical and ethical works proliferated under Sufi influence, including Attar's Mantiq al-Tayr (c. 1177 CE) and Rumi's (completed 1273 CE), comprising 25,000 verses on spiritual allegory, alongside Sa'di's ethical treatises Gulistan (1258 CE) and Bustan (1257 CE). Later Timurid and Safavid patronage (14th–18th centuries) sustained this canon, with poets like (d. 1390 CE) innovating the for ambiguous erotic-mystical expression, influencing Ottoman divan poetry and Mughal chronicles. Classical Persian functioned as a supralingual vehicle, employed in Timurid Herat's academies (e.g., under , r. 1411–1449 CE) and Safavid Isfahan's bureaucracy, fostering cross-cultural transmission without supplanting local tongues. By the , under Afsharid and Zand disruptions, subtle divergences emerged—such as increased Turkic loans in eastern dialects—but the literary koine endured, resisting vernacular drift until 19th-century European contacts prompted modernization. This stasis underscores New Persian's resilience, adapting Islamic-Arabic elements while preserving syntactic autonomy, as evidenced in archival manuscripts from to .

Standardization in the Modern Age

In the twentieth century, the of New Persian advanced through state-sponsored institutions and policies in , , and , reflecting the language's pluricentric character with distinct official varieties: (Farsi), , and Tajik. These efforts emphasized orthographic consistency, lexical purification, and educational promotion, often in response to foreign linguistic influences and script reforms. In , the Pahlavi government initiated formal standardization with the founding of the Academy of Iran on May 20, 1935, tasked with protecting Persian from excessive , French, and English loanwords while developing neologisms and standardizing spelling rules, spacing, and diacritic usage in the Perso-Arabic script. Following the 1979 Islamic Revolution, the institution was restructured as the Academy of Persian Language and Literature (Farhangestān-e Zabān va Adab-e Fārsī) in 1987 under the Ministry of Education, continuing work on dictionaries, terminology committees, and resistance to radical script changes like Latinization proposals. These bodies prioritized empirical revival of pre-Islamic Persian roots over wholesale adoption of foreign terms, producing resources such as the Dehkhoda Dictionary expansions and official guidelines that influenced print media, broadcasting, and school curricula. Afghanistan's standardization of , the eastern variety of New Persian, gained momentum post-1920s independence, with official status alongside enshrined in the 1964 constitution and reinforced in subsequent charters. Government radio and education systems promoted a formalized aligned with classical literary Persian, approximating Tehran's urban dialect while accommodating regional accents as a for over 50% of the population. Orthographic norms retained the Perso-Arabic script with minor adaptations for Dari-specific phonemes, supported by Kabul's Academy of Sciences language section, which compiled glossaries and grammars to counter dominance and Soviet-era influences. In Tajikistan, Soviet policies from the 1929 establishment of the Tajik Soviet Socialist Republic drove standardization of Tajik as the state language, initially modifying the Perso-Arabic script in the early 1920s, shifting to Latin in 1927, and adopting Cyrillic by 1939 to facilitate Russification and literacy campaigns. This process incorporated Russian loanwords for technical terms while standardizing literary norms through state publishing and schools, elevating educated speech toward classical Persian models despite Cyrillic's divergence from Iranian and Afghan orthographies. Post-1991 independence, debates over reverting to Perso-Arabic or Latin scripts persisted, but Cyrillic remained dominant, with the Tajik Academy of Sciences overseeing ongoing lexical and grammatical codification.

Varieties and Dialects

Iranian Persian

, known domestically as Farsi, functions as the of and the primary medium for , , media, and . It is natively spoken by approximately 50.6 million people within , representing the majority ethnic Persian and serving as a for many among the country's ethnic minorities, such as Azeris and , thereby fostering national cohesion. The standard variety draws from the Tehran dialect, which has emerged as the prestige form due to urbanization and centralization of political power in the capital since the Qajar era. Standardization efforts intensified in the through the Academy of the Persian Language and , founded on May 20, 1935, by Pahlavi to systematize , , and vocabulary while reducing reliance on Arabic loanwords in favor of revived ancient Persian or newly coined terms. This institution continues to approve technical terminology, promote linguistic purity by substituting Perso-Arabic hybrids with indigenous equivalents—such as dāneshgāh for "university" derived from roots—and regulate usage in official domains to counterbalance historical Islamic influences. Such policies reflect a nationalist agenda prioritizing pre-Islamic Iranian heritage, though implementation varies, with Arabic-derived words persisting in religious and literary contexts. Distinct from Dari and Tajik, Iranian Persian features phonological shifts including the neutralization of certain vowel contrasts preserved in Dari, such as distinctions between short /e/ and /a/ in unstressed positions, contributing to a more streamlined spoken form. Lexically, it integrates greater numbers of European borrowings, particularly from French (e.g., siyāsat alongside calques for terms) and English in contemporary domains like and , alongside Turkic elements from Ottoman interactions, contrasting with Dari's retention of more vocabulary and archaic Perso-Arabic forms. Pronunciation diverges in realizations like the fricative /v/ for the letter vāv (versus approximant /w/ in Dari) and variable voicing of /q/ as /ɢ/ or /ɣ/ in urban standards. Regional dialects, including those of central Iran (e.g., Isfahani with softened consonants) and eastern provinces (e.g., Khorasani with retained archaisms), exhibit substrate influences from local languages but converge toward the Tehrani norm in formal settings, ensuring high across while maintaining subtle prosodic variations in intonation and rhythm.

Dari in Afghanistan

Dari, the eastern variety of New Persian spoken in , functions as one of the country's two official languages alongside and serves as the primary among diverse ethnic groups. It is native to ethnic , , and Aimaqs, while also widely adopted by and others for interethnic communication, education, and administration. Approximately 77% of 's uses Dari, reflecting its role in unifying a multilingual society where Pashto accounts for 48% amid significant bilingualism. The variety traces its roots to the post-Islamic evolution of New Persian in the Khorasan region, where it developed as the literary and court language from the onward, retaining closer ties to classical Persian forms than some western dialects. The modern designation "Dari" derives from "Darbari," denoting the language of the Samanid court in eastern and around the 10th century, though its official adoption in intensified in the to assert national distinction from Iranian Farsi amid Pashtun-centric . Dialects vary regionally, with the Kabul-based standard influencing media and education, while northern variants incorporate Turkic elements and southern ones show Pashto substrate effects; principal subdialects include Kabuli, Herati, and Hazaragi, the latter featuring Mongolic influences from Hazara heritage. Linguistically, Dari exhibits phonological conservatism, such as frequent realization of classical /w/ as rather than Iranian , and a more restricted inventory compared to , alongside lexical divergences like "shanbe" for (versus Iranian "shanbe") and greater retention of vocabulary due to religious and historical ties. It employs the Perso-Arabic script without the post-1930s Iranian orthographic reforms, preserving spellings like "خ" for classical /x/ sounds, ensuring high with —estimated at over 95%—despite these variances. Since the Taliban's return to power in August 2021, has faced systematic marginalization in official spheres, driven by the group's predominantly Pashtun composition and ideological preference for as the prestige language. Policies include removing from public signage and billboards shortly after takeover, substituting equivalents, and a July 2025 directive from the Ministry of Interior prohibiting in government correspondence to enforce primacy. These measures extend to media and education, where Persian terms like "danishjo" () have been banned in favor of neologisms, reflecting a broader effort despite 's entrenched role in and urban life.

Tajik in Central Asia

Tajik, also known as Tajiki, constitutes the Central Asian variety of New Persian, primarily spoken in Tajikistan and by ethnic Tajiks in Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, and Kazakhstan. It functions as the official national language of Tajikistan, where it predominates among the approximately 8 million native speakers in a population of over 9 million. Russian serves as an additional official interethnic language, reflecting lingering Soviet-era multilingualism. Prior to the 20th century, speakers in the region identified their speech as Farsi, without a distinct ethnolinguistic label separating it from other Persian dialects. Soviet nationalities policy in the 1920s elevated it to the status of a separate language, culminating in the establishment of the Tajik ASSR in 1924 and full SSR in 1929. Standardization efforts during the 1920s and 1930s, led by Russian and Tajik linguists, drew primarily from northern dialects spoken around Dushanbe and Khujand to form the basis of the modern literary standard. Orthographic reforms under Soviet influence transitioned Tajik from the Perso-Arabic script to a Latin-based alphabet in the late 1920s, before adopting the Cyrillic script in 1940 to facilitate Russification and administrative uniformity across the USSR. This Cyrillic system, with 33 letters including four unique to Tajik (ё, ю, я, э), remains in use today, despite post-independence discussions of reverting to Perso-Arabic or Latin scripts. The script divergence contributes to reduced written mutual intelligibility with Iranian Persian and Afghan Dari, though spoken forms retain high comprehension due to shared grammar and core vocabulary. Lexically, Tajik incorporates extensive Russian borrowings—estimated at over 2,500 terms—acquired during seven decades of Soviet rule, particularly in technical, administrative, and modern domains, such as kompyuter for computer or avtomobil for automobile. Post-1991 , de-Russification initiatives have sought to replace these with native or Perso-Arabic equivalents, though progress varies. Grammatical structure aligns closely with other New Persian varieties, featuring subject-object-verb order, ezafe constructions, and minimal , but exhibits minor phonological shifts, like the realization of /q/ as /ɣ/ in some contexts. Dialectal variation within Tajik includes northern dialects (e.g., around ), central dialects along the Zarafshan Valley, and southern dialects in and surrounding areas, which influence regional accents and vocabulary but do not impede standard comprehension. In , Tajik communities in and preserve dialects closer to classical Persian, historically significant as centers of Persianate culture. These peripheral varieties, sometimes using Perso-Arabic script informally, highlight Tajik's continuum with broader Persian linguistic heritage despite political and orthographic separations.

Peripheral Dialects

Peripheral dialects of New Persian encompass varieties spoken by ethnic minorities or in geographically isolated regions, often exhibiting substrate influences from non-Iranian languages or retention of archaic features due to limited contact with core standards. These include Hazaragi, Aimaq, and , which diverge phonologically and lexically from , , and Tajik while remaining mutually intelligible within the New Persian continuum. Such dialects typically arise among nomadic or historically marginalized groups, preserving elements like Turkic-Mongolic loanwords from medieval migrations. Hazaragi, spoken primarily by the people in central Afghanistan's region, northeastern , and parts of , numbers approximately 1.8 million speakers as of early estimates. It derives from but incorporates substantial Turco-Mongolian vocabulary—up to 10-15% in some registers—reflecting the ' descent from Mongol forces under in the 13th century, alongside minor Indian lexical elements from historical trade. Phonologically, Hazaragi retains inter-vocalic stops (e.g., /b/ for standard /v/ in words like kabul for "accept") and shows vowel shifts absent in core varieties, though mutual intelligibility with remains high at around 80-90%. Despite linguistic classification as a , Hazara advocates often assert its status as a distinct to emphasize ethnic identity. Aimaq, used by the semi-nomadic Aimaq tribal across northwestern and western , eastern , and sporadically in , features subdialects among subgroups like the Taimani, Jamshidi, and Firozkohi. This variety blends core with Turkic admixtures, estimated at 5-10% of , stemming from Oghuz Turkic interactions during Timurid and post-Mongol eras. Dialectal variation includes conservative retention of /w/ sounds (e.g., šoma pronounced with labial glide) and simplified conjugations compared to urban ; speakers total around 1-2 million, with gradual sedentarization eroding nomadic-specific idioms. Aimaq serves as a marker of tribal identity, distinct from urban Afghan Persian. Judeo-Persian, historically spoken by Iranian Jewish communities in central and eastern Persia until mass emigration post-1979, represents a scriptally and lexically distinct variant now largely confined to and small pockets. Written in Hebrew script with adaptations for Persian phonemes, it preserves archaisms like izafet constructions and vocabulary from Talmudic-era substrates, alongside Hebrew-Aramaic integrations (e.g., 5-10% Semitic loans in religious texts). Phonetic traits include uvular /q/ retention and avoidance of loans favoring native Iranian roots, differing from Muslim Persian norms; speaker numbers dwindled from tens of thousands in the early to under 5,000 fluent users by 2020s, with revitalization efforts limited by assimilation. As a minority , it exemplifies peripheral conservatism, uninfluenced by state standardization.

Phonology

Consonant System

The consonant phoneme inventory of New Persian comprises 23 distinct segments, a system that has remained largely stable since Early New Persian while incorporating uvular and glottal elements from loanwords. These phonemes are articulated across various places and manners, with no phonemic aspiration or voicing contrasts beyond standard stops and fricatives; voiced fricatives like /β/ and /δ/ from intervocalic of /b/ and /d/ in Early New Persian merged into stops or by the classical period.
Manner of ArticulationBilabialLabiodentalDental/AlveolarPostalveolarPalatalVelarUvularGlottal
p bt dk ɡq
tʃ dʒ
f vs zʃ ʒx ɣh
Nasalmn
Lateral approximantl
Rhoticr
Glidesj
This inventory reflects Iranian Persian standards, where /q/ surfaces as [ɢ] or [ɣ] in native words but retains in formal or Arabic-derived contexts; /r/ is typically a trill or flap [ɾ], and /x ɣ/ denote voiceless and voiced velar fricatives. In Dari and Tajik varieties, distinctions like /q/ vs. /ɣ/ may neutralize further, with Tajik influenced by Cyrillic orthography showing occasional mergers such as /v/ and /w/. Consonant clusters are restricted, prohibiting syllable-initial combinations except in loanwords, which often undergo epenthesis or simplification to adhere to (C)V(C) syllable structure. Allophonic variations include palatalization of /t d s z/ before /i j/, yielding [tʲ dʲ sʲ zʲ], and devoicing of word-final obstruents in careful speech.

Vowel System and Prosody

The vowel system of New Persian features six monophthongs, categorized as three short vowels (/a/, /e/, /o/) and three long vowels (/ā/, /ī/, /ū/), with phonetic realizations including [æ] or for short /a/, or [ə] (in unstressed positions) for /e/, and for /o/; long /ā/ as [ɒː], /ī/ as [iː], and /ū/ as [uː]. This six-vowel structure emerged from , where length was phonemically contrastive, but in later New Persian stages and modern varieties, duration distinctions have partially eroded, with vowel quality becoming primary, though lengthening occurs in stressed or open syllables. Four diphthongs (/ai/, /au/, /ei/, /ou/) also appear, primarily in loanwords or archaic forms, but they often monophthongize in contemporary speech (e.g., /ai/ to [eː] or [ɛi]). Lexical stress in New Persian is largely predictable and defaults to the final for nouns, adjectives, and most adverbs (e.g., ketâb '' stressed as ke.tâb), reflecting a right-edge alignment that favors heavy (CVːC or ) when present. Verbs exhibit stress on the final of their stem or ending, with proclitic prefixes (e.g., ne- 'not', mi- for progressive) shifting it leftward onto the prefix (e.g., né-xarid-am 'I didn't buy'). loanwords may retain penultimate stress (e.g., madrasé ''), but native patterns dominate, and stress does not alter word meaning, unlike in languages with lexical stress. Phrasal prosody organizes into accentual phrases (APs), the smallest domain bearing a pitch accent ((L+)H*) on the lexically stressed , often encompassing one plus enclitics, terminated by a high (h) or low (l) boundary tone. Intonational phrases (IPs) group one or more APs; declaratives feature a falling nuclear contour ending in L%, while yes/no questions rise to H% with elevated pitch register (100–148 Hz vs. 89–125 Hz in statements) and final vowel lengthening (up to 210 ms). Wh-questions align the wh-word as the nuclear AP with heightened pitch, followed by deaccenting and L% closure, supporting focus marking without dedicated morphological cues. This system underscores Persian's syllable-timed rhythm, with stress cued by duration, intensity, and F0 rise rather than strict sensitivity.

Grammar

Morphological Features

New Persian morphology is characterized by significant simplification from earlier Iranian stages, with the loss of , case inflections (beyond specific enclitics like -rā for definite direct objects), and , resulting in a largely analytic system supplemented by agglutinative elements. Inflectional processes primarily involve suffixes for plurality and verbal person-number agreement, while derivation employs a mix of suffixes and limited prefixes, often drawing on native Iranian roots or loans. The ezafe enclitic -(e/y)e serves as a key , linking nouns to possessors, modifiers, or complements in a head-initial dependency structure, e.g., ketâb-e man ("my book"). Nouns lack inherent gender marking and case endings, with singularity unmarked and plurality indicated by suffixes such as -hâ (predominantly for inanimates and increasingly all nouns) or -ân (for animates, especially humans), alongside vestigial patterns like broken plurals (e.g., ketâb "" to kotob) or suffixal -ât/-in in loanwords. is not morphologically encoded on nouns themselves but emerges contextually or via the indefinite suffix -i (e.g., ketâb-i "a "), applicable across numbers. Derivational suffixes on nouns include diminutives like -ak (doxtar-ak "little girl") and agentives like -gar (âhângar ""), with prefixes such as na- for (na-dâd "non-existent"). Adjectives inflect minimally, showing no agreement in , number, or case with the nouns they modify; they follow the head via ezafe and form comparatives with - (bozorg-tar "larger") and superlatives with -tarin (bozorg-tarin "largest"). Derivation yields adjectival forms via suffixes like -i (irâni "Iranian") or -âne (dânesmand-âne "scholarly"), and prefixes including por- (por-sang "full of stones") or bi- (bi-sar "headless"). Verbs derive from a limited set of roots (often around 200 simple lexemes), frequently combining into complex predicates with light verbs (e.g., kardan "to do" in zadan kardan "to hit"), and distinguish present and past stems for tense formation. uses person-number suffixes (e.g., -am for 1SG, -and for 3PL) on stems, with prefixes mi- for habitual present (mi-ravam "I go habitually") and be- for subjunctive or imperative (be-rav "go!"); employs na- or ne-. Non-finite forms include infinitives (past stem + -an, e.g., raftan "to go") and participles, supporting periphrastic constructions for aspects like perfective (e.g., rafte-am "I have gone"). lacks dedicated morphology, relying on analytic structures with the verb šodan "to become" and participles. Pronouns exhibit enclitic forms for possession or objects (e.g., man "I" to -am), with limited ; personal pronouns distinguish direct/indirect series but lack case beyond context. Overall, derivation favors suffixation for lexical expansion, incorporating Arabic masdar forms as nouns, while remains sparse, emphasizing and particles for .

Syntactic Patterns

New Persian follows a basic subject-object-verb (SOV) in declarative clauses, with modifiers typically preceding the verb and noun phrases exhibiting head-initial structure despite the overall head-final tendencies in verb phrases. This canonical order allows flexibility for or focus, but deviations are constrained by syntactic rules governing adjacency and dependency. A defining feature of noun phrases is the ezafe construction, an enclitic linker realized as /=e/ (or /=je/ after vowels) that binds a head , , or preposition to its attributive, , or descriptive dependents, forming complex s through chaining. For instance, the "the white wedding dress of Maryam" translates as lebās-e arusi-e sefid-e Maryam, where each ezafe reiterates to connect successive modifiers to the head. This construction, inherited from Middle Persian's genitive linker ī and solidified in New Persian as a head-marking , applies to nominal, adjectival, and some prepositional phrases but is absent with definite determiners like in 'this' or proper names in direct attribution. Direct objects undergo via the enclitic =rā, which obligatorily attaches to definite, specific, or animate objects to signal their role, while indefinite or non-specific objects remain unmarked. An example is Maryam zan-i (=rā) dar kuche did ('Maryam saw a (=the) woman in the street'), where =rā emphasizes specificity or topicality. This marker evolved from Middle Persian's indirect object dative rāy, progressively specializing as a direct object indicator in New Persian by the 10th-12th centuries, correlating with transitivity and prominence. Predicates frequently employ complex predicate structures, pairing a non-verbal host (noun, , preposition, or particle) with a to convey nuanced semantics, as simplex verbs number only around 250 in common use. verbs like zadan 'hit' or dādan 'give' supply tense, aspect, and argument structure, as in harf zadan 'to talk' (lit. 'word hit') or sili zadan 'to slap'. These constructions, prominent since Early New Persian, expand the verbal lexicon and exhibit syntactic behaviors distinct from full verbs, such as host incorporation and aspectual restrictions. Negation applies syntactically through the prefix na- (or ne- before imperfective mi-) on the verb stem, yielding forms like na-xarid 'did not buy', with scope over the entire predicate and compatibility with negative concord elements like hič 'no/none' for emphatic denial. Yes/no questions prepend the particle āyā to the declarative clause while preserving SOV order, as in Āyā Maryam ketāb rā xarid? ('Did Maryam buy the book?'), or rely on rising intonation without inversion; wh-questions front the interrogative (e.g., ki, čē) but retain underlying SOV for the remainder.

Orthography

Perso-Arabic Script Mechanics

The Perso-Arabic script for New Persian consists of 32 letters, extending the 28-letter Arabic alphabet with four additional characters to represent phonemes absent in Arabic: پ for /p/, چ for /tʃ/, ژ for /ʒ/, and گ for /ɡ/. This adaptation occurred following the Arab conquest of Persia in the , with the script standardized for Persian by the CE. Letters are rendered in a cursive, right-to-left script, where most connect to adjacent letters, exhibiting four positional variants: isolated (standalone), initial (word-start), medial (internal), and final (word-end). Six letters—ا, د, ذ, ر, ز, and و—do not connect to a following letter, disrupting the ligature flow and requiring distinct handling in word formation. No uppercase or lowercase distinctions exist, and the script lacks inherent short vowel markers in everyday use, relying on reader familiarity for disambiguation. Short vowels (/a/, /e/, /o/, /i/, /u/) are optionally indicated by diacritical marks (harakat) above or below consonants, such as َ for /a/ or ِ for /i/, but these are rarely employed in printed or handwritten Persian due to contextual predictability. Long vowels are explicitly represented: آ or ا for /ɒː/, و for /uː/, and ی or ى for /iː/. Consonants like ق (/ɢ/ or /ɣ/), غ (/ɣ/), and ح (/h/) distinguish uvular and pharyngeal sounds from origins, though Persian pronunciation simplifies some, such as merging emphatic sounds into plain equivalents. The /v/ sound uses either و or ى depending on position, adding minor orthographic flexibility. Numerals follow the Eastern Arabic-Indic system (٠١٢٣٤٥٦٧٨٩), distinct from Western Arabic digits, and are written left-to-right within right-to-left text. This script's defectiveness for short vowels necessitates rote memorization for literacy, as homographs like کل ("kal", meaning mole or class) versus گل ("gol", meaning flower) differ only in unwritten vowels. Despite these challenges, the system effectively conveys New Persian's phonology, with ambiguities resolved through syntactic and lexical context rather than explicit marking.

Script Variations and Reforms

The primary orthographic variation among New Persian varieties stems from geopolitical history: (Farsi) and Afghan Persian () employ the Perso-Arabic script, a right-to-left with 32 letters adapted from by adding پ /p/, چ /tʃ/, ژ /ʒ/, and گ /ɡ/ to represent sounds absent in Arabic. Tajik, however, uses a Cyrillic-based alphabet of 33 letters, introduced during Soviet rule to distance it from Perso-Arabic influences associated with and . This divergence creates barriers to in written form, despite high spoken comprehension among varieties. Minor variations exist within Perso-Arabic usage: Farsi orthography in favors simplified modern spellings (e.g., omitting certain diacritics for short s, which are implied contextually), while in retains more conservative conventions influenced by classical Persian and , such as fuller use of optional vowel markers (zer, zabar, pesh) in religious or formal texts. These differences arise from local standardization efforts rather than fundamental script changes, with both adhering to the same letter inventory and joining rules. Reforms have been most pronounced in Tajik orthography. Following Tajikistan's 1991 independence, a 1998 spelling reform abolished obsolete Cyrillic letters like ц (/ts/, rare in native vocabulary) and adjusted digraphs to better match Tajik phonology, reducing Russified elements while retaining Cyrillic dominance. Earlier shifts included adoption of a Latin alphabet in 1928 for anti-religious romanization, replaced by Cyrillic in 1940 amid Stalinist policies; post-Soviet Latinization proposals in the 1990s failed due to implementation costs, teacher retraining needs, and geopolitical aversion to Persian-script revival linked to Iranian cultural influence. In 2019, President Emomali Rahmon mandated updates to the Tajik orthographic dictionary to standardize vocabulary and curb excessive Russification. In Iran and Afghanistan, reforms have been limited and unsuccessful. Iranian intellectuals since the 19th century proposed phonetic simplifications or Latinization to address the Perso-Arabic script's ambiguities (e.g., unwritten short vowels leading to homographs), but these faced resistance from cultural guardians emphasizing ties to classical literature and Islam. A 2025 initiative in Germany developed Latin-script teaching materials for Persian diaspora, but it lacks official adoption in Iran. Afghan Dari remains unreformed under Taliban governance, prioritizing scriptural fidelity over modernization. Marginal movements like "Parsig" advocate reviving pre-Islamic Pahlavi script elements for purism, but they hold no institutional sway.

Lexicon

Core Iranian Vocabulary

The core Iranian vocabulary of New Persian consists of terms inherited from (c. 3rd–9th centuries CE) and earlier stages such as (c. 6th–4th centuries BCE), preserving Indo-Iranian roots in foundational semantic fields like , numerals, body parts, and natural elements. These native words form the substrate of everyday speech, largely unaffected by the influx of approximately 8,000 loanwords that entered post-7th-century Islamic , which primarily impacted learned, administrative, and abstract domains rather than basic . Linguistic continuity is evident in Early New Persian texts (8th–12th centuries CE), where native terms coexisted with but were not supplanted by borrowings, as seen in works like the Šāh-nāme (c. 1010 CE) by , which minimized elements to emphasize Iranian heritage. Key examples illustrate this retention:
  • Kinship and family: Terms such as pedar (father), mādar (mother), barādar (brother), and xāhar (sister) derive directly from Middle Persian equivalents (pidar, mādar, brādar, xāhar), tracing to Proto-Iranian *pitar-, *mātar-, *brātar-, and xwahar-, respectively, maintaining phonetic and semantic stability over millennia.
  • Numerals: The decimal system features native Iranian roots, including yek (one, from Proto-Iranian *ēwa), do (two, from *dwa), se (three, from *θri), čahār (four, from *čathwar-), and panj (five, from *panča), unchanged in core usage since Old Persian inscriptions.
  • Body and health: Words like sar (head), dast (hand), pa (foot), and pezešk (physician or medicine) persist from Middle Persian (sr, dast, pāy, wišibuz), with pezešk exemplifying professional terms rooted in pre-Islamic Iranian healing traditions.
  • Nature and environment: Native designations include āb (water, from Old Persian ap-), ātaš (fire, from Avestan ātar- via Middle Persian ādur), zamin (earth or ground, from Proto-Iranian *zam-), bāğ (garden, from Middle Persian wāg), and zemestān (winter, from Middle Persian zimištān), reflecting ancient Zoroastrian cosmological emphases on elemental forces.
  • Religious and existential concepts: Despite Islamic influence, core terms for spiritual practices remained Iranian, such as xodā (God), jān (soul), gonāh (sin), namāz (prayer), and rūza (fasting), avoiding Arabic synonyms like allāh or ṣalāh in vernacular contexts.
This native core, estimated to comprise 50–60% of high-frequency vocabulary in spoken New Persian, underscores the language's resilience, with Arabic loans often limited to formal registers (e.g., 8.8% in Ferdowsi's Šāh-nāme versus higher in later prose). Dialectal variants like and Tajik preserve similar Iranian bases, though with Turkic or Russian overlays in some regions. Efforts to purify lexicon, as in 20th-century Iranian academies, have revived obscure native synonyms (e.g., did for see, over Arabic bin-), but core terms require no such intervention due to their entrenched nativity.

Loanwords and Borrowing Dynamics

New Persian lexicon incorporates a substantial number of loanwords, predominantly from , reflecting the linguistic impact of the 7th-century Arab conquest and subsequent Islamization. Approximately 8,000 loanwords remain in current use, comprising about 40% of a standard 20,000-word literary vocabulary. These borrowings entered primarily through bilingual and administrative needs, with the proportion rising from around 30% in the to 50% by the , driven by literary styles favoring ornate . Semantic fields dominated by include abstract concepts (36% of loans), cultural and intangible terms (54%), and to a lesser extent tangible objects (10%), such as religious terms (ṣalāt ''), scientific nomenclature (ʿelm ''), and governance (ḥokumat ''). Loanwords undergo phonetic and morphological adaptation to align with and grammar; for instance, Arabic emphatic consonants are simplified (e.g., ṣ to /s/), and feminine endings diversify into concrete -at (810 items, e.g., ketābat 'writing') or abstract -a (640 items, e.g., maʿnā 'meaning'). Borrowing peaked by the 13th century, after which nativist movements produced Persian neologisms (e.g., melli-yat '' from Arabic roots), reducing reliance on new Arabic imports post-1930s reforms. Secondary sources include , with roughly 600 Turkish loanwords integrated via historical interactions under Turkic dynasties, often in military and pastoral domains, though constituting a minor fraction compared to . European influences emerged in the amid modernization, with French providing 1,200–4,000 terms in , administration, and (e.g., kerāvāt 'cravat' from cravate, with epenthetic vowel for initial clusters). English loans, numbering in the hundreds (e.g., 340 documented in dictionaries and media), have surged in contemporary colloquial speech for globalized concepts like and , showing partial phonetic shifts (e.g., kompyūter 'computer') and semantic narrowing. Borrowing dynamics favor domains lacking robust native equivalents, such as abstract or modern , mediated by elite literacy, trade, and conquest rather than substrate replacement. Adaptation prioritizes Persian core phonemes, preserving donor forms in formal registers while colloquial variants accelerate integration. Efforts by the Persian Language Academy since 1935 promote calques and revivals to counter foreign influx, yet sustains English borrowing, particularly in urban youth slang and . This selective permeability underscores Persian's resilience, maintaining Indo-Iranian roots amid areal convergence.

Literary Tradition

Foundational Texts and Authors

The development of New Persian commenced with in the , exemplified by a attributed to Abu'l-'Abbās of Marv, composed in 809 CE to celebrate the arrival of the future caliph in the city. This early work, preserved in anthologies, reflects the nascent synthesis of Iranian linguistic elements with and poetic forms under Samanid patronage in and . Abu ʿAbd Allāh Jaʿfar ibn Muḥammad al-Rūdhakī (c. 858–941 CE), serving as court poet to the Samanids, stands as the inaugural major figure in New Persian poetry, with surviving fragments—approximately 1,000 verses—encompassing qasidas, ghazals, and rubāʿīyat that blend , wisdom, and lyrical themes. His compositions, intelligible to modern speakers, established metrical and stylistic norms derived from models but infused with Persian vocabulary and imagery, influencing subsequent poets despite the loss of most of his estimated 100,000 couplets. Abū Manṣūr Daqīqī (c. 935–977 CE), a Zoroastrian from , advanced epic composition by versifying around 1,000 couplets of Iranian legends in New Persian, initiating a project based on prose sources like the Shahnameh-ye Abu Mansuri compiled in 957 CE. His death by halted this effort, but Ferdowsī incorporated Daqīqī's verses into the definitive epic. Abū al-Qāsim Ḥasan Ferdowsī Ṭūsī (c. 940–1020 CE) completed the in 1010 CE after three decades of labor, producing over 50,000 distichs that chronicle mythical kings, heroes like , and historical dynasties up to the Arab conquest, thereby safeguarding Iranian cultural identity against predominant Arabic literary dominance. Early prose emerged alongside , with Abū ʿAlī Muḥammad Balʿamī (d. c. 992 CE), a Samanid , authoring the Tārīkh-nāma-yi Balʿamī around 963 CE as the first extensive original text in New Persian. This adaptation and abridgment of al-Ṭabarī's Arabic chronicle integrates Islamic and pre-Islamic narratives, employing straightforward syntax and vocabulary that laid groundwork for historiographical and administrative writing in the language.

Enduring Cultural Influence

New Persian literary works, particularly like Ferdowsi's completed in 1010 CE, have sustained Iranian cultural identity by preserving pre-Islamic myths and history in the vernacular, countering after the Islamic conquest and fostering national consciousness that persists in modern . This epic, comprising approximately 50,000 couplets, draws on oral traditions to narrate kings from mythical times to the Arab invasion, embedding Zoroastrian ethics and heroism that influenced subsequent Persianate and art across and . Sufi mysticism in New poetry, exemplified by Rumi's (completed around 1273 CE) with over 25,000 verses, has shaped spiritual practices beyond , promoting themes of divine and ego transcendence that resonated in Ottoman, Indian, and later global Sufi orders, with translations into over 20 languages by the 21st century facilitating its adoption in . Hafez's (14th century), known for ghazals blending profane and sacred , endures in Persian-speaking societies through practices like fal-nama and has impacted literary forms in and Turkish poetry, as seen in Mughal court adaptations where Persian models dominated elite culture until the 19th century. In the Persianate world, New Persian served as a for administration and from the 11th to 19th centuries, influencing Uighur, Chagatai, and Indo-Persian traditions by providing genres like the and that structured epics and panegyrics in regions from to the Deccan. European engagement, initiated by 17th-century translations and amplified by Goethe's praise of in West-Östlicher Divan (1819), integrated Persian motifs into , though direct causal impact on Western canons remains limited compared to its dominance in Islamic intellectual circles. Contemporary endurance manifests in annual recitations of in and communities, alongside Rumi's verses in global , underscoring the poetry's adaptability to secular contexts without diluting its metaphysical core.

Sociolinguistic Profile

Speaker Demographics

New Persian, encompassing its principal varieties of (Farsi), , and Tajik, is natively spoken by approximately 70 million people globally, with an additional 50 million using it as a . These speakers are predominantly concentrated in southwestern and , reflecting the historical Persianate cultural sphere, though significant communities exist due to 20th-century migrations, including those following the 1979 Iranian Revolution and conflicts in . Native speakers primarily belong to Indo-Iranian ethnic groups such as , , and , with many others in multilingual regions adopting it early as a prestige language. In Iran, Farsi is the dominant variety, serving as the mother tongue for roughly 55% of the population, or about 49 million individuals out of a total of 89 million as of recent estimates. This includes not only ethnic Persians but also related groups like Lurs and Gilaks whose dialects align closely with standard New Persian. Afghanistan hosts around 11 million native Dari speakers, mainly among Tajiks and Hazaras in urban centers like Kabul and Herat, comprising a significant portion of the country's 40 million population where it functions as a lingua franca alongside Pashto. In Tajikistan, Tajik—written in Cyrillic—is the first language for about 7.5 to 8 million people, representing over 80% of the nation's 10 million residents, with concentrations in the Pamir and Zeravshan valleys. Smaller pockets exist in Uzbekistan (around 1.5 million Tajik speakers) and Pakistan, often tied to cross-border ethnic ties.
Country/TerritoryVarietyApproximate Native SpeakersPercentage of National Population
Farsi49 million55%
Afghanistan11 million~25-30%
Tajik7.5-8 million80%+
Tajik1.5 millionN/A
Expatriate communities add several million more speakers, particularly in and . In the United States, over 300,000 Persian speakers were recorded in the 2000 census, with current estimates exceeding 500,000 Iranian-origin residents maintaining the language across generations, concentrated in cities like and . Similar patterns hold in and , where post-revolutionary and waves have preserved New Persian in household and cultural use, though intergenerational shift toward host languages occurs among younger demographics. Urban speakers predominate overall, with literacy rates above 90% in official contexts, but rural and minority varieties show dialectal variation and occasional with local tongues.

Official and Institutional Roles

In , New Persian, referred to as Farsi, is designated as the and script by Article 15 of the 1979 , which mandates its use in official documents, correspondence, textbooks, and as the of the population. This provision requires legislative acts and governmental communications to be conducted in Farsi, reinforcing its centrality in state administration and legal proceedings. In the education system, Farsi serves as the primary from primary through higher education levels, with centralized curricula supervised by the Ministry of Education emphasizing its exclusive use in most public schools, though limited accommodations exist for minority languages under Article 15's allowance for local dialects in press and literature. In , the Afghan variety of New Persian, known as , holds co-official status alongside under the 2004 (Article 35), functioning as a key language for government operations, parliamentary debates, and judicial proceedings in non-Pashtun-dominant regions. is employed extensively in national media, such as broadcasts, and in educational institutions, where it is the language of instruction for approximately 50% of the population and dominates urban schooling and university curricula. In Tajikistan, the Central Asian variety of New Persian, termed Tajik, is enshrined as the state language by the 1994 Law on Language, serving as the medium for official government documentation, legislative processes, and public administration, though Russian retains a role as the interethnic language in bilingual contexts. In education, Tajik is the principal language of instruction in primary and secondary schools, with curricula developed in Tajik script (Cyrillic since 1939), while higher education often incorporates Russian for technical subjects; efforts to expand Tajik's institutional dominance include state strategies for teacher training and curriculum localization since the 1990s.

Contemporary Dynamics

Technological and Digital Adaptation

The adaptation of New Persian to digital technologies has required addressing the complexities of its Arabic-derived script, which features right-to-left directionality, contextual letter shaping, and four positional forms for many characters. These attributes, inherited from traditional practices, initially hindered mechanical reproduction, as evidenced by delays in adopting presses in until the 19th century and subsequent limitations that favored simplified, non-cursive representations. In the era, established ISIRI 3342 as the national standard for Persian text encoding on December 6, 1992, utilizing an 8-bit ASCII-based logical scheme to represent the 32 letters of the , including extensions like پ, چ, ژ, and گ. This preceded broader adoption, which integrates Persian within the block (U+0600–U+06FF), enabling consistent rendering across platforms since Unicode 1.0, with full shaping support refined in later versions through standards like . However, legacy systems like the corporate Iran System encoding persisted, complicating and normalization in electronic text processing. Input methods evolved with phonetic keyboards, such as Keyman's Farsi Unicode layout, allowing Roman-to-Persian transliteration on standard hardware, alongside native layouts in operating systems like Windows, which include a dedicated Persian keyboard since early versions. Major platforms provide language packs for Persian interface localization, supporting in , distributions via projects like Persian Computing Wiki, and Android/iOS apps with RTL-aware rendering. Persistent challenges in digital processing include accurate handling of zero-width non-joiners for pseudo-spaces to prevent malformed word connections, variable widths affecting layout algorithms, and normalization of variant forms in tasks. These issues contribute to errors in and search indexing, as noted in studies on Persian corpora like Hamshahri, a TREC-style collection of articles from 1996–2002 used for . Recent efforts focus on frameworks to improve dataset quality and script analysis, though low-resource status limits progress compared to high-resource languages.

Policy Debates and Standardization Efforts

Standardization efforts for New Persian, encompassing its variants in (Farsi), Afghanistan (), and (Tajik), have focused on orthographic rules, vocabulary purification, and institutional regulation, often shaped by national policies post-20th century. In , the Academy of Persian Language and Literature, established in 1935 under Pahlavi, initiated formal measures to standardize and limit foreign linguistic influences, particularly Arabic loanwords integrated after the 7th-century Islamic . This body continues to promote neologisms derived from Persian roots, as seen in ongoing campaigns to replace Arabic-derived terms in technical and administrative contexts, though implementation varies due to entrenched usage in religious and legal texts. Post-1979 Islamic Revolution policies emphasized Persian as a unifying medium while mandating script and calendar standards within the first year of governance frameworks. In , holds co-official status with under the 2004 , prompting debates over nomenclature to balance ethnic linguistic equities; the term "" was adopted in the 1960s to distinguish it from Iranian Farsi, despite and shared literary heritage, as native speakers often refer to it as Persian. efforts include regional for and media, but persistent Pashto-Dari tensions have led to policies favoring bilingualism, with serving as the de facto in urban areas. These dynamics reflect postcolonial , where linguistic policies amplify minor dialectal differences to assert over pan-Persian unity. Tajikistan's Tajik variant, using Cyrillic script since 1940 under Soviet policy, has sparked script reform debates since independence in 1991, with proposals to revert to Perso-Arabic or adopt Latin to enhance ties with Iran and Afghanistan while reducing Russian cultural dominance. Government initiatives in the 1990s explored Perso-Arabic revival for cultural alignment, but Cyrillic persists due to practical educational inertia and Russophone elite influence, with no consensus achieved by 2023. Broader policy discussions across variants question full standardization versus preserving dialectal diversity, as regional languages bolster rather than undermine a core Persian standard. Cross-border debates highlight tensions between viewing Farsi, , and Tajik as unified or distinct, with specialists arguing for recognition as standard varieties of one amid political fragmentation. Efforts like international proficiency tests (e.g., SAMFA since ) aim to foster shared norms for non-native learners, but national policies prioritize sovereignty over pan-Iranian linguistic convergence.

References

  1. https://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/persian-language-1-early-new-persian/
  2. https://sites.la.utexas.edu/persian_online_resources/history-of-the-language/new-persian/
  3. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-history-of-iran/rise-of-the-new-persian-language/A9A28D952D8A5433B4020A66AAFB066A
  4. https://www.cais-soas.com/CAIS/Languages/newpersian.htm
  5. https://www.loc.gov/exhibits/thousand-years-of-the-persian-book/writing-systems-and-scripts.html
  6. https://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/iran-vi-iranian-languages-and-scripts
  7. https://aspirantum.com/blog/iranian-languages
  8. https://langsci-press.org/catalog/view/235/1822/1848-1
  9. https://shs.hal.science/halshs-02985361v1/document
  10. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1719875/FULLTEXT01.pdf
  11. https://academic.oup.com/book/36358/chapter/319890851
  12. https://plc.sas.upenn.edu/persian
  13. https://persianlanguageonline.com/persian-background/
  14. https://www.dynamiclanguage.com/understanding-the-arabic-vs-farsi-writing-systems-similarities-differences-and-historical-context/
  15. https://ajammc.com/2018/01/08/parsig-and-pahlavi/
  16. https://fis-iran.org/our-programs/noruz-lectures/the-origins-of-literary-persian/
  17. https://www.khorasanzameen.net/archive/langs/dari.html
  18. https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/what-countries-speak-farsi
  19. https://asiasociety.org/persian-language
  20. https://effectivelanguagelearning.com/language-guide/persian-language/
  21. https://www.argotrans.com/blog/farsi-persian-language-unlocks-irans-market-potential
  22. https://invisibleeast.web.ox.ac.uk/timeline-landing-page
  23. https://docs.filologi.no/persisk/Lazard_RiseNewPersian.pdf
  24. https://yarshater.ucla.edu/research/a-history-of-persian-literature/
  25. https://persian.religion.ucsb.edu/resources/literature/
  26. https://yarshater.ucla.edu/articles/persian-poetry/
  27. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/291271971_New_Persian_Expansion_standardization_and_inclusivity
  28. https://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/farhangestan/
  29. https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/34676/chapter/295530567
  30. https://thediplomat.com/2017/11/afghanistans-persian-linguistic-identity/
  31. https://persianlanguageonline.com/introduction-to-afghan-persian-dari-part-1-general-remarks-and-phonology/
  32. https://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/tajik-ii-tajiki-persian/
  33. https://celcar.indiana.edu/materials/language-portal/tajiki.html
  34. https://uu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:166375/FULLTEXT02.pdf
  35. https://lrr.modares.ac.ir/article_6586_en.html
  36. https://www.dimproject.net/2020/01/27/fas-profile/
  37. https://www.rferl.org/a/afghanistan-dari-farsi-persian-language-dispute/28840560.html
  38. https://asiasociety.org/education/dari
  39. https://www.parstimes.com/language/dari/
  40. https://persianlanguageonline.com/introduction-to-afghan-persian-dari-part-2-vocabulary-and-expressions/
  41. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-the-international-phonetic-association/article/dari-afghan-persian/E6FE187B387C9A3C2C2B79A3278BC697
  42. https://thediplomat.com/2023/08/decoding-the-talibans-anti-persianism/
  43. https://www.geocurrents.info/blog/2023/08/22/afghanistans-language-policies-and-the-cartographic-marginalization-of-persian-farsi/
  44. https://8am.media/eng/talibans-hostility-toward-persian-language-journalists-at-some-media-outlets-face-pressure/
  45. https://www.ethnologue.com/language/tgk/
  46. https://www.orexca.com/tajikistan/population/language.htm
  47. https://www.parstimes.com/language/tajik/
  48. https://www.silverbaytrans.com/post/facts-and-history-about-the-tajik-language
  49. https://www.academia.edu/10442551/Russian_Loanwords_in_Persian_and_Tajiki_Languages
  50. https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/bitstreams/349509a6-2abf-4a2b-96ac-7d12ebee2b1d/download
  51. https://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/judeo-persian-viii-judeo-persian-language/
  52. https://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/hazara-4/
  53. https://finto.fi/lexvo/en/page/aiq
  54. https://www.ida.liu.se/~jalma87/dabire/dabire.pdf
  55. https://www.ijhssnet.com/journals/Vol_4_No_6_1_April_2014/23.pdf
  56. https://ijals.usb.ac.ir/article_2675_28f0ccd6a1021cbe9ab1dc972655c141.pdf
  57. https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/bitstream/1807/32874/1/RohanyRahbar_Elham_201206_PhD_thesis.pdf
  58. https://sites.la.utexas.edu/persian_online_resources/phonology/
  59. https://people.ucsc.edu/~mtoosarv/papers/toosarvandani_2004_JRAS.pdf
  60. https://twpl.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/twpl/article/download/6296/3284
  61. https://cla-acl.ca/pdfs/actes-2008/CLA2008_Sadat-Tehrani.pdf
  62. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0024384112001271
  63. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28112017/
  64. https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00751629/document
  65. http://www.languagesgulper.com/eng/Farsi.html
  66. https://www.academia.edu/42846867/Persian_Morphology
  67. https://www.glossa-journal.org/article/id/11592/
  68. https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01614243/document
  69. https://typologyatcrossroads.unibo.it/article/download/13883/14092/55698
  70. https://sites.la.utexas.edu/persian_online_resources/sentence-structure/scentence-types/
  71. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Iranian-languages/Writing-systems
  72. https://aspirantum.com/blog/persian-alphabet
  73. https://www.omniglot.com/writing/persian.htm
  74. https://sites.la.utexas.edu/persian_online_resources/the-writing-system/initial-medial-final-and-freestanding-letters/
  75. https://openbooks.lib.msu.edu/persian/chapter/1-1-persian-alphabet-overview/
  76. https://www.persiandee.com/view/alphabet/currentLesson/0
  77. https://preply.com/en/blog/farsi-alphabet-guide/
  78. https://sites.la.utexas.edu/persian_online_resources/the-writing-system/
  79. https://www.chaiandconversation.com/2019/fundamentals-reading-and-writing-persian-farsi-its-easier-you-think
  80. https://aclanthology.org/2024.lrec-main.1459.pdf
  81. https://www.shirinschool.com/blogs/grammar/who-fought-over-persian-script-reformers-guardians-and-what-really-happened
  82. https://rylandscollections.com/2022/10/06/iranian-languages-and-scripts/
  83. https://old.asiaplustj.info/en/news/tajikistan/power/20191004/president-orders-to-improve-orthographic-dictionary-of-tajik-language
  84. https://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=68939
  85. https://eurasianet.org/on-language-the-many-flavors-of-persian-in-eurasia
  86. https://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/arabic-v/
  87. https://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/arabic-i/
  88. https://turkishstudies.net/turkishstudies?mod=makale_ing_ozet&makale_id=16090
  89. https://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/france-xvi-loan-words-in-persian/
  90. https://journals.pan.pl/Content/109628?format_id=1
  91. https://www.iranchamber.com/literature/articles/history_literature.php
  92. https://asia.library.cornell.edu/dissertations-theses/rudaki-the-father-of-persian-poetry-a-critical-translation-along-with-commentary-and-historical-background-of-the-poetry-of-the-tenth-century-persian-poet-abu-abdullah-jaafar-ibn-mohammad-rudaki/
  93. https://shahnameh.fitzmuseum.cam.ac.uk/literary
  94. https://www.columbia.edu/cu/center-for-iranian-studies/programs-and-pubs/main/pub-list/index.html
  95. https://ferdowsi.org/an-introduction-to-classical-persian-prose/
  96. https://ierj.in/journal/index.php/ierj/article/download/4569/5382/9772
  97. https://www.worldhistory.org/article/1554/ten-great-persian-poets/
  98. https://rikigpt.com/the-impact-of-persian-poetry-on-sufism-and-its-global-philosophical-resonance/
  99. https://newspaper.irandaily.ir/7950/8/18779
  100. https://www.granthaalayahpublication.org/Arts-Journal/ShodhKosh/article/download/5401/4894/28600
  101. https://shc.stanford.edu/arcade/interventions/persianate-words-and-worlds
  102. https://www.iranmirrorbd.com/en/2016/03/10/the-influence-of-persian-literature-on-world-literature/
  103. https://surfiran.com/mag/persian-poetrys-impact-on-iran/
  104. https://www.worlddata.info/languages/persian.php
  105. https://www.iranchamber.com/literature/articles/persian_language.php
  106. https://www.instagram.com/reel/DQCXhIbj6_G/
  107. https://www.worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/what-countries-speak-farsi
  108. https://www.tomedes.com/translator-hub/farsi-language
  109. https://translatorswithoutborders.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Farsi-and-Dari-Factsheet-English.pdf
  110. https://www.iranchamber.com/government/laws/constitution_ch02.php
  111. https://ecnl.org/sites/default/files/files/2021/IranConstitution.pdf
  112. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44217-024-00276-7
  113. https://translatorswithoutborders.org/language-data-for-afghanistan/
  114. https://www.familysearch.org/en/wiki/Tajikistan_Languages
  115. http://tajemb-my.org/education/education-in-tajikistan/
  116. https://web.ece.ucsb.edu/~parhami/pubs_folder/f50-cc-computers-writing-in-persian-e-180831.pdf
  117. https://web.ece.ucsb.edu/~parhami/pubs_folder/parh20-visual-lang-comp-writing-persian-e.pdf
  118. https://persian-computing.org/wiki/History
  119. https://www.w3.org/International/alreq/
  120. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1404.4740
  121. https://keyman.com/keyboards/farsi_unicode?bcp47=pes
  122. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/globalization/keyboards/kbdfa
  123. https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/language-packs-for-windows-a5094319-a92d-18de-5b53-1cfc697cfca8
  124. https://persian-computing.org/wiki/
  125. https://developer.android.com/training/basics/supporting-devices/languages
  126. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-431X/13/8/212
  127. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0950705109000677
  128. https://www.irpljournal.com/article_207060_40cade7268c422ea0716de5ce70bef51.pdf
  129. https://tlll.ir/2020/04/14/an-analysis-of-the-conflict-of-pashto-and-dari-languages-of-afghanistan/
  130. https://ajammc.com/2015/10/05/exclusionary-politics-persian-language-pedagogy/
  131. https://www.asianews.it/news-en/%25E2%2580%258BThe-Eternal-Alphabet-Dispute-in-Central-Asia-63040.html
  132. https://gfsis.org/en/cyrillic-vs-latin-linguistic-struggle-for-reducing-russian-influence-2/
  133. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/18793665231185795
  134. https://www.tehrantimes.com/news/495451/Preserving-regional-languages-helps-fortify-standard-Persian
  135. https://nceeer.org/papers/211-persian-dari-and-tajik-in-central-asia.pdf
  136. https://en.tums.ac.ir/en/news/66/persian-language-proficiency-test-samfa-farsi-standardization-skills-assessment-in-collaboration-with-national-organization-of-educational-testing
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.