Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Seneca people
View on WikipediaThe Seneca (/ˈsɛnɪkə/ SEN-ik-ə;[2] Seneca: Onöndowa'ga:' (O-non-dowa-gah), lit. 'Great Hill People')[3] are a group of Indigenous Iroquoian-speaking people who historically lived south of Lake Ontario, one of the five Great Lakes in North America. Their nation was the farthest to the west within the Six Nations or Iroquois League (Haudenosaunee) in New York before the American Revolution. For this reason, they are called "The Keepers of the Western Door."[4]
Key Information
In the 21st century, more than 10,000 Seneca live in the United States, which has three federally recognized Seneca tribes. Two of them are centered in New York: the Seneca Nation of Indians, with five territories in western New York near Buffalo; and the Tonawanda Seneca Nation. The Seneca-Cayuga Nation is in Oklahoma, where their ancestors were relocated from Ohio during the Indian Removal. Approximately 1,000 Seneca live in Canada, near Brantford, Ontario, at the Six Nations of the Grand River First Nation. They are descendants of Seneca who resettled there after the American Revolution, as they had been allies of the British and forced to cede much of their lands.
Name
[edit]The Seneca's own name for themselves is Onöndowa'ga:' or O-non-dowa-gah, meaning "Great Hill People"[5][6] The exonym Seneca is "the Anglicized form of the Dutch pronunciation of the Mohegan rendering of the Iroquoian ethnic appellative" originally referring to the Oneida. The Dutch applied the name Sennecaas promiscuously to the four westernmost nations, the Oneida, Onondaga, Cayuga, and Seneca, but with increasing contact the name came to be applied only to the latter. The French called them Sonontouans.[7] The Dutch name is also often spelled Sinnikins[8] or Sinnekars, which was later corrupted to Senecas.[9]
History
[edit]Seneca oral history states that the tribe originated in a village called Nundawao, near the south end of Canandaigua Lake, at South Hill.[10] Close to South Hill stands the 865-foot-high (264 m) Bare Hill, known to the Seneca as Genundowa.[11] Bare Hill is part of the Bare Hill Unique Area, which began to be acquired by the state in 1989.[12] Bare Hill had been the site of a Seneca (or Seneca-ancestral people) fort.
The first written reference to this fort was made in 1825 by the Tuscarora historian David Cusick in his history of the Seneca Indians.[13]
The traces of an ancient fort, covering about an acre, and surrounded by a ditch, and formerly by a formidable wall, are still to be seen on top of Bare Hill. They indicate defenses raised by Indian hands, or more probably belong to the labors of a race that preceded the Indian occupation. The wall is now about tumbled down, the stones seem somewhat scattered, and the ground is overgrown with brush.
— S. C. Cleveland, History of Yates County, New York (1873)
In the early 1920s, the material that made up the Bare Hill fort was used by the Town of Middlesex highway department for road fill.[13]
The Seneca historically lived in what is now New York state between the Genesee River and Canandaigua Lake. The dating of an oral tradition mentioning a solar eclipse yields 1142 AD as the year for the Seneca joining the Iroquois (Haudenosaunee).[14][15] Some recent archaeological evidence indicates their territory eventually extended to the Allegheny River in present-day northwestern Pennsylvania, particularly after the Iroquois destroyed both the Wenrohronon and Erie nations in the 17th century, who were native to the area. The Seneca were by far the most populous of the Haudenosaunee nations, numbering about four thousand by the seventeenth century.[16]
Seneca villages were located as far east as current-day Schuyler County (e.g. Catherine's Town and Kanadaseaga), south into current Tioga and Chemung counties, north and east into Tompkins and Cayuga counties, and west into the Genesee River valley. The villages were the homes and headquarters of the Seneca. While the Seneca maintained substantial permanent settlements and raised agricultural crops in the vicinity of their villages, they also hunted widely through extensive areas. They also executed far-reaching military campaigns. The villages, where hunting and military campaigns were planned and executed, indicate the Seneca had hegemony in these areas.[17]
Major Seneca villages were protected with wooden palisades. Ganondagan, with 150 longhouses, was the largest Seneca village of the 17th century, while Chenussio, with 130 longhouses, was a major village of the 18th century.
The Seneca nation has two branches: the western and the eastern. Each branch was individually incorporated and recognized by the Iroquois Confederacy Council. The western Seneca lived predominantly in and around the Genesee River, gradually moving west and southwest along Lake Erie and the Niagara River, then south along the Allegheny River into Pennsylvania. The eastern Seneca lived predominantly south of Seneca Lake. They moved south and east into Pennsylvania and the western Catskill area.[18]
The west and north were under constant attack from their powerful Iroquoian brethren, the Huron (Wyandot)[19] To the South, the Iroquoian-speaking tribes of the Susquehannock (Conestoga) also threatened constant warfare. The Algonquian tribes of the Mohican blocked access to the Hudson River in the east and northeast. In the southeast, the Algonkian tribes of the Lenape people (Delaware, Minnisink and Esopus) threatened war from eastern Pennsylvania, New Jersey and the Lower Hudson.[20][21]
The Seneca used the Genesee and Allegheny rivers, as well as the Great Indian War and Trading Path (the Seneca Trail), to travel from southern Lake Ontario into Pennsylvania and Ohio (Merrill, Arch. Land of the Senecas; Empire State Books, 1949, pp. 18–25). The eastern Seneca had territory just north of the intersection of the Chemung, Susquehanna, Tioga and Delaware rivers, which converged in Tioga. The rivers provided passage deep into all parts of eastern and western Pennsylvania, as well as east and northeast into the Delaware Water Gap and the western Catskills. The men of both branches of the Seneca wore the same headgear. Like the other Haudenosaunee, they wore hats with dried cornhusks on top. The Seneca wore theirs with one feather sticking up straight.[22]
Traditionally, the Seneca Nation's economy was based on hunting and gathering activities, fishing, and the cultivation of varieties of corn, beans, and squash. These vegetables were the staple of the Haudenosaunee diet and were called "the three sisters" (työhe'hköh). Seneca women generally grew and harvested varieties of the three sisters, as well as gathering and processing medicinal plants, roots, berries, nuts, and fruit. Seneca women held sole ownership of all the land and the homes. The women also tended to any domesticated animals such as dogs and turkeys.[citation needed]
Seneca men were generally in charge of locating and developing the town sites, including clearing the forest for the production of fields. Seneca men also spent a great deal of time hunting and fishing. This activity took them away from the towns or villages to well-known and productive hunting and fishing grounds for extended amounts of time. These hunting and fishing locations were altered and well maintained to encourage game; they were not simply "wild" lands.[23][24] Seneca men maintained the traditional title of war sachems within the Haudenosaunee. A Seneca war sachem was in charge of gathering the warriors and leading them into battle.
Seneca people lived in villages and towns. Archaeological excavations indicate that some of these villages were surrounded by palisades because of warfare.[citation needed] These towns were relocated every ten to twenty years [citation needed] as soil, game and other resources were depleted. During the nineteenth century, many Seneca adopted customs of their immediate American neighbors by building log cabins, practicing Christianity, and participating in the local agricultural economy.[citation needed]
Daily life of the Seneca
[edit]The Seneca traditionally lived in longhouses, which are large buildings that were up to 100 feet long and approximately 20 feet wide. The longhouses were shared among related families and could hold up to 60 people. Hearths were located in the central aisle, and two families shared a hearth. Over time they began to build cabins, similar to those of their American neighbors.
The main form of social organization is the clan, or ka'sä:te', nominally each descended from one woman. The Seneca have eight clans: Bear (nygawai'), Wolf (aga̓ta:yö:nih), Turtle (ha'no:wa:h), Beaver( nöganya'göh), Deer (neogë), Hawk (gaji'da:s), Snipe (nödzahgwë'), and Heron (jo̙äshä').[25] The clans are divided into two sides (moieties) – the Bear, Wolf, Turtle, and Beaver are the animal side, and the Deer, Hawk, Snipe, and Heron are the bird side.[26]
The Iroquois have a matrilineal kinship system; inheritance and property descend through the maternal line. Women are in charge of the clans. Children are considered born into their mother's clan and take their social status from her family. Their mother's eldest brother was traditionally more of a major figure in their lives than their biological father, who does not belong to their clan. The presiding elder of a clan is called the "clan mother". Despite the prominent position of women in Iroquois society, their influence on the diplomacy of the nation was limited. If the "clan mothers" do not agree with any major decisions made by the chiefs, they can eventually depose them.[citation needed]
Seneca Archery
[edit]Arrows from the area are made from split hickory, although shoots of dogwood and Viburnum were used as well. The eastern two feather style of fletching was used, although three radial feathers were also used.[27]
The Smithsonian Institution has an example of a Seneca bow, which was donated 1908.[28] It is made of unbacked hickory, and is 56.25 inches (142.9 cm) tip to tip. Although the string is missing for the specimen, when strung it would make a good "D" shape with slightly recurved tips, and was obviously made for bigger game. The tips are irregular in shape, which is typical from this region.[27]
Contact with Europeans
[edit]During the colonial period, the Seneca became involved in the fur trade, first with the Dutch and then with the British. This served to increase hostility with competing native groups, especially their traditional enemy, the Huron (Wyandot),[citation needed] an Iroquoian-speaking tribe located near Lac Toronto in New France.[citation needed]
In 1609, the French allied with the Huron (Wyandot) and set out to destroy the Iroquois. The Iroquois-Huron war raged until approximately 1650. Led by the Seneca, the Confederacy began a near 35-year period of conquest over surrounding tribes following the defeat of its most powerful enemy, the Huron (Wyandot). The Confederacy conducted Mourning Wars to take captives to replace people lost in a severe smallpox epidemic in 1635. Through raids, they stabilized their population after adopting young women and children as captives and incorporating them into the tribes. By the winter of 1648, the Confederacy, led by the Seneca, fought deep into Canada and surrounded the capital of Huronia. Weakened by population losses due to their own smallpox epidemics as well as warfare, the Huron (Wyandot) unconditionally surrendered. They pledged allegiance to the Seneca as their protector. The Seneca subjugated the Huron (Wyandot) survivors and sent them to assimilate in the Seneca homelands.[29]
In 1650, the Seneca attacked and defeated the Neutrals to their west. In 1653, the Seneca attacked and defeated the Erie to their southwest. Survivors of both the Huron and Erie were subjugated to the Seneca and relocated to the Seneca homeland. The Seneca took over the vanquished tribe's traditional territories in western New York.[30]
In 1675, the Seneca defeated the Andaste (Susquehannock) to the south and southeast. The Confederacy's hegemony extended along the frontier from Canada to Ohio, deep into Pennsylvania, along the Mohawk Valley and into the lower Hudson in the east. They sought peace with the Algonquian-speaking Mohegan (Mahican), who lived along the Hudson River. Within the Confederacy, Seneca power and presence extended from Canada to what would become Pittsburgh, east to the future Lackawanna and into the land of the Minnisink on the New York /New Jersey border.[31]
The Seneca tried to curtail the encroachment of white settlers. This increased tensions and conflict with the French to the north and west, and the English and Dutch to the south and east. As buffers, the Confederacy resettled conquered tribes between them and the European settlers, with the greatest concentration of resettlements on the lower Susquehanna.[32]
In 1685, King Louis XIV of France sent Marquis de Denonville to govern New France in Quebec. Denonville set out to destroy the Seneca Nation and in 1687 landed a French armada with "the largest army North America had ever seen" at Irondequoit Bay.[33] Denonville struck straight into the seat of Seneca power and destroyed many of its villages, including the Seneca's eastern capital of Ganondagan. Fleeing before the attack, the Seneca moved further west, east and south down the Susquehanna River. Although great damage was done to the Seneca homeland, the Seneca's military might was not appreciably weakened. The Confederacy and the Seneca moved into an alliance with the British in the east.[34]
Senecas' expanding influence and diplomacy
[edit]In and around 1600, the area currently comprising Sullivan, Ulster and Orange counties of New York was home to the Lenape Indians, an Algonquian-speaking people whose territory extended deep along the coastal areas of the mid-Atlantic coast, up into present-day Connecticut. They occupied the western part of Long Island as well. The Lenape nation was Algonkian-speaking and made up of the Delaware, Minnisink and Esopus bands, differentiated according to their territories. These bands later became known as the Munsee, based on their shared dialect. (Folts at pp 32) The Munsee inhabited large tracts of land from the middle Hudson into the Delaware Water Gap, and into northeast Pennsylvania and northwest New Jersey. The Esopus inhabited the Mid-Hudson valley (Sullivan and Ulster counties). The Minnisink inhabited northwest New Jersey. The Delaware inhabited the southern Susquehanna and Delaware water gaps. The Minnisink-Esopus trail, today's Route 209, helped tie this world together.
To the west of the Delaware nation were the Iroquoian-speaking Andaste/Susquehannock. To the east of the Delaware Nation lay the encroaching peoples of Dutch New Netherland. From Manhattan, up through the Hudson, the settlers were interested in trading furs with the Susquehannock occupying territory in and around current Lancaster, Pennsylvania. As early as 1626, the Susquehannock were struggling to get past the Delaware to trade with the Dutch in New Amsterdam (Manhattan). In 1634, war broke out between the Delaware and the Susquehannock, and by 1638, the defeated Delaware became tributaries to the Susquehanna.
The Iroquois Confederacy to the north was growing in strength and numbers, and the Seneca, as the most numerous and adventurous, began to travel extensively. Eastern Seneca traveled down the Chemung River to the Susquehanna River. At Tioga the Seneca had access to every corner of Munsee country. Seneca warriors traveled the Forbidden Path south to Tioga to the Great Warrior Path to Scranton and then east over the Minnisink Path through the Lorde's valley to Minisink. The Delaware River path went straight south through the ancient Indian towns of Cookhouse, Cochecton and Minnisink, where it became the Minsi Path.[35]
Using these ancient highways, the Seneca exerted influence in what is today Ulster and Sullivan counties from the Dutch colonial era onward. Historical evidence demonstrating Seneca presence in the Lower Catskills includes:
In 1657 and 1658, the Seneca visited, as diplomats, Dutch colonial officials in New Amsterdam.[36]
In 1659 and 1660, the Seneca interceded in the First Esopus War, which was going on between the Dutch and Esopus at current-day Kingston. The Seneca chief urged Stuyvesant to end the bloodshed and "return the captured Esopus savages".[37]
In 1675, after a decade of warfare between the Iroquois (mainly the Mohawk and Oneida) and the Andaste/Susquehannock, the Seneca finally succeeded in vanquishing their last remaining great enemy.(Parker at pp 49) Survivors were colonized in settlements along the Susquehanna River and were assimilated into the Seneca and Cayuga people.[citation needed]
In 1694, Captain Arent Schuyler, in an official report, described the Minnisink chiefs as being fearful of being attacked by the Seneca because of not paying wampum tribute to these Iroquois.[38]
Around 1700, the upper Delaware watershed of New York and Pennsylvania became home of the Minnisink Indians moving north and northwest from New Jersey, and of Esopus Indians moving west from the Mid-Hudson valley.[39]
By 1712, the Esopus Indians were reported to have reached the east Pepacton branch of the Delaware River, on the western slopes of the Catskill Mountains.[39]
From 1720 to the 1750s, the Seneca resettled and assimilated the Munsee into their people and the Confederacy.[39] Historical accounts had noted the difficulties encountered by the Seneca during this period and noted a dissolution of their traditional society under pressure of disease and encroachment by European Americans. But fieldwork at the 1715–1754 Seneca Townley-Read site near Geneva, New York, has recovered evidence of "substantial Seneca autonomy, selectivity, innovation, and opportunism in an era usually considered to be one of cultural disintegration".[40] In 1756, the Confederacy directed the Munsee to settle in a new satellite town in Seneca territory called Assinisink (where Corning developed) on the Chemung River. In this period, they developed satellite towns for war captives who were being assimilated near several of their major towns.[40] The Seneca received some of the Munsee's war prisoners as part of their negotiations.[39]
At a peace conference in Easton, Pennsylvania in 1758, the Seneca chief Tagashata required the Munsee and Minnisink to conclude a peace with the colonists and "take the hatchet out of your heads, and bury it under ground, where it shall always rest and never be taken up again".[41] A large delegation of Iroquois attended this meeting to demonstrate that the Munsee were under their protection.[41]
In 1759, as colonial records indicate, negotiators had to go through the Seneca in order to have diplomatic success with the Munsee.[42][43]
Despite the French military campaigns, Seneca power remained far-reaching at the beginning of the 18th century. Gradually, the Seneca began to ally with their trading partners, the Dutch and British, against France's ambitions in the New World. By 1760 during the Seven Years' War, they helped the British capture Fort Niagara from the French. The Seneca had relative peace from 1760 to 1775.[citation needed] In 1763 a Seneca war party ambushed a British supply train and soldiers in Battle of Devil's Hole, also known as the Devil's Hole massacre, during Pontiac's Rebellion.[citation needed]
After the American Revolutionary War broke out between the British and the colonists, the Seneca at first attempted to remain neutral but both sides tried to bring them into the action. When the rebel colonists defeated the British at Fort Stanwix, they killed many Seneca onlookers.[44]
Interactions with the United States
[edit]Pre-American Revolution Involvement
[edit]
The Seneca Tribe before the American Revolution had a prosperous society. The Iroquois Confederacy had ended the fighting amongst the war-based Iroquois tribes and allowed them to live in peace with each other.[45] Yet, despite this peace amongst themselves, the Iroquois tribes were all revered as fierce warriors and were reputed to control together a large empire that stretched hundreds of miles along the Appalachian Mountains.[46] The Seneca were a part of this confederacy with the Cayuga, Onondagas, Oneidas, Mohawks, and, later on, the Tuscaroras.[45] However, although the Seneca and Iroquois tribes had ceased fighting each other, they still continued to conduct raids on outsiders, or rather their European visitors.[45]
Despite the Iroquois continuing raids on their new European neighbors, the Iroquois tribes struck up profitable relationships with the Europeans, especially the English. In 1677, the English were able to make an alliance with the Iroquois league called the "Covenant Chain".[47] In 1768, the English renewed this alliance when Sir William Johnson, 1st Baronet signed the Treaty of Fort Stanwix in 1768. This treaty put the British in good favor with the Iroquois, as they felt that the British had their best interests in mind as well. The Americans, unlike the British, were disliked by the Seneca because of their continual disregard for the Treaty of Fort Stanwix.[48] Specifically, the Iroquois were enraged by the Americans movement into the Ohio Territory.[49] However, despite their continual encroachment on established Iroquois land, the Americans respected their skills at warfare and attempted to exclude them from their conflict with the British.[50] The Americans viewed their conflict with the British as a conflict meant to include only them. The Albany Council occurred in August, and the Iroquois Confederacy debated about the Revolution from August 25 to August 31.[49] The non-Iroquois present at the council consisted of important figures like Philip Schuyler, Oliver Wolcott, Turbutt Francis, Volkert Douw, Samuel Kirkland, and James Dean.[49] The Iroquois at the council were representatives from all the tribes, but the Mohawk, Oneidas, and Tuscaroras had the most representatives.[49] The Iroquois agreed with the Americans and decided at their Albany Council that they should remain as spectators to the conflict.[50] A Mohawk Chief named Little Abraham declared that "the determination of the Six Nations not to take any part; but as it is a family affair, to sit still and see you fight it out".[50] Thus, the Iroquois chose to remain neutral for the time being. They felt it would be best to stand aside while the Colonists and the British battled. They did not wish to get caught up in this supposed "family quarrel between [them] and Old England".[50]
Despite this neutrality, the anti-Native American rhetoric of the Americans pushed the Iroquois over to the side of the British.[51] The Americans put forth an extremely racist and divisive message. They viewed the Iroquois and other Native Americans as savages and lesser people. An example of this rhetoric came in the Declaration of Independence: "the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes, and conditions."[51] As a result of this terrible rhetoric, many Mohawk, Cayuga, Onondaga, and Seneca prepared to join the British.[51] However, many Oneida and Tuscarora were able to be swayed by an American missionary, Samuel Kirkland. The Iroquois nation began to divide as the Revolution continued and, as a result, they extinguished the council fire that united the six Iroquois nations, therefore ending the Iroquois Confederacy.[52] The Iroquois ended their political unity during the most turbulent time in their history. Two powers in the midst of battle pulled them apart to gain their skill as warriors. This divided the Iroquois and the tribes chose sides based on preference.
In addition to the push of American bigoted rhetoric, the British also continued to attempt to sway the Iroquois towards their side. One British attempt to sway the Iroquois was described by two Seneca tribesmen, Mary Jemison and Governor Blacksnake.[52] They both described the grandeur of the lavish gifts that the British bestowed upon the Iroquois.[53] Governor Blacksnake's account held many details about the luxurious treatment that they received from the British: "[I]mmediately after arrival the officers came to see us to See what wanted for to Support the Indians with Provisions and with the flood of Rum. they are Some of the ... warriors made use of this intoxicating Drinks, there was several Barrel Delivered to us for us to Drinked for the white man told us to Drinked as much as we want of it all free gratus, and the goods if any of us wishes to get for our own use."[54] Contingent to this generosity was the loyalty of the Iroquois to the British.[55] The Iroquois debated whether to side with the British or not. An argument to remain neutral until further development came from Governor Blacksnake's uncle Cornplanter, but Joseph Brant twisted his recommendation to wait as a sign of cowardice.[56] The British noticed that the Indian warriors were divided on the issue, so the British presented them with rum, bells, ostrich feathers, and a covenant belt.[57] The Americans attempted a similar wine and dine method on the Tuscarora and Oneidas.[57] In the end, the Mohawk, Onondaga, Cayuga, and Seneca sided with the British, and the Tuscarora and Oneida sided with the Americans.[58] From this point on, the Iroquois would have a serious role in the American Revolution. The war divided them and now they would be fighting against each other from 1777 till the end on opposite sides.
Involvement in the American Revolution
[edit]The Seneca chose to side with the British in the American Revolution. One of the earliest battles the Iroquois were involved in occurred on August 6, 1777, in Oriskany[59] During the Battle of Oriskany, Native Americans led a brutal attack against the rebel Americans where they "killed, wounded, or captured the majority of patriot soldiers".[59] The Seneca Governor Blacksnake described the battle from the viewpoint of the victorious Indians: "as we approach to a firghting we had preparate to make one fire and Run amongst them we So, while we Doing it, feels no more to Kill the Beast, and killed most all, the americans army, only a few white man Escape from us ... there I have Seen the most Dead Bodies all it over that I neve Did see."[59]
Author Ray Raphael made a connection between the Seneca warriors and Continental Army soldiers by noting that Blacksnake "was not unlike" known Revolutionary veterans "Joseph Plumb Martin and James Collins and other white American [veterans] who could never finally resolve whether killing was right or wrong".[60] As the war went on, many more brutal attacks and atrocities would be committed by both sides, notably the Sullivan Expedition, which devastated Iroquois and Seneca lands.

The Iroquois were involved in numerous other battles during the American Revolution. Notable raids like the Cherry Valley massacre and Battle of Minisink, were carefully planned raids on a trail laid out "from the Susquehanna to the Delaware Valley and over the Pine Hill to the Esopus Country".[citation needed] In 1778 Seneca, Cayuga, Onondaga, and Mohawk warriors conducted raids on white settlements in the upper Susquehanna Valley.[61] Although the Iroquois were active participants, Seneca like Governor Blacksnake were extremely fed up with the brutality of the war. He noted particularly on his behavior at Oriskany, and how he felt "it was great sinfull by the sight of God".[62]
Warriors like Blacksnake were feeling the mental toll of killing so many people during the American Revolution. As Raphael noted in his book, "warfare had been much more personal" for the Iroquois before the American Revolution.[60] During the revolution, these once proud Iroquois were now reduced to conducting brutal acts such as the killing of women and children at the Cherry Valley massacre and the clubbing of surviving American soldiers at Oriskany.[61] Although Seneca like Governor Blacksnake felt sorrow for their brutal actions, the Americans responded in a colder and more brutal fashion. This retaliation came in the Sullivan Expedition.
The planning of the Sullivan Expedition began in 1778 as a way to respond to the Iroquois victories and massacres.[60] This plan came about from the complaints of New Yorkers at the Continental Congress.[63] The New Yorkers had suffered from the massive Iroquois offensives from 1777 to 1778, and they wanted revenge. Besides the brutal battles described previously, the New Yorkers were especially concerned with Joseph Brant. Joseph Brant had Mohawk parents and British lineage, and at a young age, he was taken under the superintendent for Indian affairs.[64]
Brant grew to be a courteous and well-spoken man, and he took up the fight for the British because of harassment and discrimination from the Americans during the lead-up to the American Revolution.[65] Thus, Brant formed a military group known as Brant's Volunteers, which consisted of Mohawks and Loyalists.[65] Brant and his band of volunteers led many raids against hamlets and farms in New York, especially Tryon County.[63] As a result of Brant's exploits, the Iroquois offensives, and several massacres the Iroquois inflicted against colonial towns, in 1778 the Seneca and other western nations were attacked by United States forces as part of the Sullivan Expedition. George Washington called upon Continental Army General John Sullivan (general) to lead this attack upon the Iroquois.[66] He had received anywhere from 3000 to 4500 soldiers to fight the Iroquois.[60][63]
Overall, the Sullivan Expedition wreaked untold havoc and destruction upon the Iroquois lands, as the soldiers "destroy[ed] not only the homes of the Iroquois but their food stocks as well".[67] Seneca woman Mary Jemison recalled how the Continental soldiers "destroyed every article of the food kind that they could lay their hands on".[68] To make matters worse for the Iroquois, an especially hard winter in 1780 caused additional suffering for the downtrodden Iroquois.[69] The Sullivan Expedition highlighted a period of true total war within the American Revolution. The Americans looked to cripple the Iroquois. They accomplished that, but they instilled a deep hatred in the Iroquois warriors.
After the Sullivan Expedition the recovered Seneca, Cayuga, Onondaga, and Mohawk, angered by the destruction caused, resumed their raids on American settlements in New York.[70] These Iroquois tribes not only attacked and plundered the American colonists, they also set fire to Oneida and Tuscarora settlements.[70] The Iroquois continued their attacks upon the Americans, even after General Charles Cornwallis, 1st Marquess Cornwallis had surrendered at Yorktown in 1781.[70] They did not stop until their allies had caved in and surrendered. In 1782, the Iroquois had finally stopped fighting when the British General Frederick Haldimand recalled them "pending the peace the negotiations in Paris".[71]
The Iroquois also seemed to have a much larger knowledge of the war beyond the scope of New York. A letter from 1782 written by George Washington to John Hanson described intelligence captured from the British. In the letter, British soldiers encounter a group of Native Americans, and a discussion ensues. A soldier by the name of Campbell informs the Native Americans that the war ended and the Americans expressed their sorrow for the war.[72] However, an unknown Seneca sachem informed the British "that the Americans and [F]rench had beat the English, that the latter could no longer carry on the War, and that the Indians knew it well, and must now be sacrificed or submit to the Americans".[72]
After the American Revolution
[edit]With the Iroquois League dissolved, the nation settled in new villages along Buffalo Creek, Tonawanda Creek, and Cattaraugus Creek in western New York. The Seneca, Onondaga, Cayuga, and Mohawk, as allies of the British, were required to cede all their lands in New York State at the end of the war, as Britain ceded its territory in the Thirteen Colonies to the new United States. The late-war Seneca settlements were assigned to them as their reservations after the Revolutionary War, as part of the Treaty of Fort Stanwix in 1784.[73] Although the Oneida and Tuscarora were allies of the rebels, they were also forced to give up most of their territory.
On July 8, 1788, the Seneca (along with some Mohawk, Oneida, Onondaga, and Cayuga tribes) sold rights to land east of the Genesee River in New York to Oliver Phelps and Nathaniel Gorham of Massachusetts.[74]
On November 11, 1794, the Seneca (along with the other Haudenosaunee nations) signed the Treaty of Canandaigua with the United States, agreeing to peaceful relations. On September 15, 1797, at the Treaty of Big Tree, the Seneca sold their lands west of the Genesee River, retaining ten reservations for themselves. The sale opened up the rest of Western New York for settlement by European Americans. On January 15, 1838, the US and some Seneca leaders signed the Treaty of Buffalo Creek, by which the Seneca were to relocate to a tract of land west of the state of Missouri, but most refused to go.
The majority of the Seneca in New York formed a modern elected government, the Seneca Nation of Indians, in 1848. The Tonawanda Seneca Nation split off, choosing to keep a traditional form of tribal government. Both tribes are federally recognized in the United States.
Seneca today
[edit]While it is not known exactly how many Seneca there are, the three federally recognized tribes are the Seneca Nation of Indians and the Tonawanda Band of Seneca Indians in New York State and the Seneca-Cayuga Tribe of Oklahoma. A fourth group of Seneca people reside in Canada, where many are part of Six Nations in Ontario.
Approximately 10,000 Seneca live near Lake Erie.[citation needed] About 7,800 people are citizens of the Seneca Nation of Indians.[75] These members live or work on five reservations in New York: the Allegany (which contains the city of Salamanca); the Cattaraugus near Gowanda, New York; the Buffalo Creek Territory located in downtown Buffalo; the Niagara Falls Territory located in Niagara Falls, New York; and the Oil Springs Reservation, near Cuba. Few Seneca reside at the Oil Springs, Buffalo Creek, or Niagara territories due to the small amount of land at each. The last two territories are held and used specifically for the gaming casinos which the tribe has developed.[citation needed]
The Tonawanda Band of Seneca Indians has about 1,200 citizens who live on their Tonawanda Reservation near Akron, New York.[citation needed]
The third federally recognized tribe is the Seneca-Cayuga Tribe of Oklahoma who live near Miami, Oklahoma. They are descendants of Seneca and Cayuga who had migrated from New York into Ohio before the Revolutionary War, under pressure from European encroachment. They were removed to Indian Territory west of the Mississippi River in the 1830s.
Many Seneca and other Iroquois migrated into Canada during and after the Revolutionary War, where the Crown gave them land in compensation for what was lost in their traditional territories. Some 10,000 to 25,000 Seneca are citizens of Six Nations Reserve and reside on the Grand River Territory, the major Iroquois reserve, near Brantford, Ontario.[citation needed]
Enrolled members of the Seneca Nation also live elsewhere in the United States; some moved to urban locations for work.
The Seneca language was rated "critically endangered" in 2007, with fewer than 50 fluent speakers, primarily the elderly.[76] Efforts are currently underway to preserve and revitalize the language.[77][78][79]
Kinzua Dam displacement
[edit]The federal government through the Corps of Engineers undertook a major project of a dam for flood control on the Allegheny River. The proposed project was planned to affect a major portion of Seneca territory in Pennsylvania and New York. Begun in 1960, construction of the Kinzua Dam on the Allegheny River forced the relocation of approximately 600 Seneca from 10,000 acres (40 km2) of land which they had occupied under the 1794 Treaty of Canandaigua. They were relocated to Salamanca, near the northern shore of the Allegheny Reservoir that resulted from the flooding of land behind the dam. The Seneca had protested the plan for the project, filing suit in court and appealing to President John F. Kennedy to halt construction.
The Seneca lost their court case, and in 1961, citing the immediate need for flood control, Kennedy denied their request.[80][81] This violation of Seneca rights, as well as those of many other Indian Nations, was memorialized in the 1960s by folksinger Peter La Farge, who wrote, "As Long as the Grass Shall Grow".[82] It was also sung by Bob Dylan and Johnny Cash.
Leased land disputes
[edit]The United States Senate has never ratified the treaty that New York made with the Iroquois nations, and only Congress has the right to make such treaties. In the late 20th century, several tribes filed suit in land claims, seeking to regain their traditional lands by having the treaty declared invalid. The Seneca had other issues with New York and had challenged some long-term leases in court.
The dispute centers around a set of 99–year leases that were granted by the Seneca in 1890 for lands that are now in the city of Salamanca and nearby villages. In 1990, Congress passed the Seneca Settlement Act to resolve the long-running land dispute. The Act required the state to pay compensation and to provide some lands. The households that refused to accept Seneca ownership, fifteen in all, were evicted from their homes.[83] Then, in the early 2000s issues re-arose over Seneca use of settlement lands to establish casino gaming operations, which have generated considerable revenues for many tribes since the late 20th century.[84]
Grand Island claims
[edit]On August 25, 1993, the Seneca filed suit in United States District Court to begin an action to reclaim land allegedly taken from it by New York without having gained required approval of the treaty by the US Senate. Only the US government has the constitutional power to make treaties with the Native American nations. The lands consisted of Grand Island and several smaller islands in the Niagara River. in November 1993, the Tonawanda Band of Seneca Indians moved to join the claim as a plaintiff and was granted standing as a plaintiff.
In 1998, the United States intervened in the lawsuits on behalf of the plaintiffs in the claim to allow the claim to proceed against New York. The state had asserted that it was immune from suit under the Eleventh Amendment to the United States Constitution.[85] After extensive negotiations and pre-trial procedures, all parties to the claim moved for judgment as a matter of law.
By decision and order dated June 21, 2002, the trial court held that the Seneca ceded the subject lands to Great Britain in the 1764 treaties of peace after the French and Indian War (Seven Years' War). Thus, the disputed lands were no longer owned by the Seneca at the time of the 1794 Treaty of Canandaigua. The court found that the state of New York's "purchase" of the lands from the Seneca in 1815 was intended to avoid conflict with them, but it already owned it by virtue of Great Britain's defeat in the Revolution and the cession of its lands to the United States and by default to the states in which the colonial lands were located.[86]
The Seneca appealed the decision. The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the trial court's decision on September 9, 2004.[87] The Seneca sought review of this decision by the US Supreme Court, which on June 5, 2006, announced that it declined to hear the case, which left the lower court rulings in place.[88]
Thruway claims
[edit]On April 18, 2007, the Seneca Nation laid claim to a stretch of Interstate 90 that crosses the Cattaraugus Reservation for about three miles, in a section that runs on the northeast side of the lake from Erie, Pennsylvania to Buffalo, New York. They said that a 1954 agreement between the Seneca Nation and the New York State Thruway Authority, which granted the state permission to build the highway through their reservation in return for US$75,000, was invalid because it required federal approval.[89] The lawsuit demands that some of the toll money collected by the Thruway Authority for the use of this three-mile stretch of the highway be remitted to the Nation.[89][90] In 2011, Seneca President Robert Odawi Porter said that the Nation should be paid $1 every time a vehicle drives that part of the highway, amounting to tens of millions of dollars.[91] The Nation also disputed the state's attempts to collect cigarette taxes and casino revenue from tribal businesses operating within Seneca sovereign territory.[90] As of 2020[update], the lawsuit over the thruway was ongoing.[89]
The Seneca had previously brought suit against the state on the issue of highway easements. The court in 1999 had ruled that the State could not be sued by the tribe.[92] In Magistrate Heckman's "Report and Recommendation", it was noted that the State of New York asserted its immunity from suit against both counts of the complaint. One count was the Seneca Tribe's challenge regarding the state's acquisition of Grand Island and other smaller islands in the Niagara River, and the second count challenged the state's thruway easement.
Economy
[edit]Diversified businesses
[edit]The Seneca have a diversified economy that relies on construction, communications, recreation, tourism, and retail sales. They have recently started operating two tribal-owned gaming casinos and recreation complexes.
Several large construction companies are located on the Cattaraugus and Allegany Territories. Many smaller construction companies are owned and operated by Seneca people. A considerable number of Seneca men work in some facet of the construction industry.
Recreation is one component of Seneca enterprises. The Highbanks Campground (reopened May 2015 after being closed in 2013)[93] plays host to visitors in summer, as people take in the scenic vistas and enjoy the Allegheny Reservoir. Several thousand fishing licenses are sold each year to non-Seneca fishermen. Many of these customers are tourists to the region. Several major highways adjacent to or on the Seneca Nation Territories provide ready accessibility to local, regional and national traffic. Many tourists visit the region during the autumn for the fall foliage.
A substantial portion of the Seneca economy revolves around retail sales. From gas stations, smokeshops, and sports apparel, candles and artwork to traditional crafts, the wide range of products for sale on Seneca Nation Territories reflect the diverse interests of Seneca Nation citizens.
Seneca Medical Marijuana Initiative
[edit]According to Bill Wagner, an author writing for High Times, "Members of the Seneca Nation of Indians in western New York state voted up a referendum Nov. 3 (2016) giving tribal leaders approval to move towards setting up a medical marijuana business on their territories. The measure passed by a vote of 448-364, giving the Seneca Nation Council the power to draft laws and regulations allowing the manufacture, use and distribution of cannabis for medical purposes. "A decision on our Nation's path of action on medical cannabis is far from made", cautioned Seneca President Maurice A. John Sr. in comments to the Buffalo News. "But now, having heard from the Seneca people, our discussions and due diligence can begin in earnest."[94] Entering the marijuana industry is thought to help stimulate the economy of the Seneca Tribe and create local business, dispensaries and other types of jobs involving medical marijuana.
Tax-free gasoline and cigarette sales
[edit]The price advantage of the Senecas' ability to sell tax-free gasoline and cigarettes has created a boom in their economy. They have established many service stations along the state highways that run through the reservations, as well as many internet cigarette stores. Competing business interests and the state government object to their sales over the Internet. The state of New York believes that the tribe's sales of cigarettes by Internet are illegal. It also believes that the state has the authority to tax non-Indians who patronize Seneca businesses, a principle which the Seneca reject.
Seneca President Barry Snyder has defended the price advantage as an issue of sovereignty. Secondly, he has cited the Treaty of Canandaigua and Treaty of Buffalo Creek as the basis of Seneca exemption from collecting taxes on cigarettes to pay the state.[95]
The Appellate Division of the New York Supreme Court, Third Department had rejected this conclusion in 1994.[96] The court held that the provisions of the treaty regarding taxation was only with regard to property taxes. The New York Court of Appeals on December 1, 1994, affirmed the lower court's decision.[97]
The Seneca have refused to extend these benefits and price advantages to non-Indians, in their own words "has little sympathy for outsiders" who desire to do so,[98] They have tried to prosecute non-Indians who have attempted to claim the price advantages of the Seneca while operating a business on the reservation. Little Valley businessman Lloyd Long operated two Uni-Marts on the reservation which were owned by a Seneca woman. He was arrested after investigation by federal authorities at the behest of the Seneca Nation accusing the native woman of being a front for Long. In 2011 he was ordered by the court to pay more than one million dollars in restitution and serve five years on probation.[99]
In 1997, New York State had attempted to enforce taxation on reservation sales of gasoline and cigarettes to non-Indians. Numerous Seneca had protested by setting fire to tires and cutting off traffic to Interstate 90 and New York State Route 17 (the future Interstate 86).[100] Then Attorney General Eliot Spitzer attempted to cut off the Seneca Tribe's internet cigarette sales by way of financial deplatforming. His office negotiated directly with credit card companies, tobacco companies, and delivery services to try to gain agreement to reject handling Seneca cigarette purchases by consumers.[101] Another attempt at collecting taxes on gasoline and cigarettes sold to non-Indians was set to begin March 1, 2006; but it was tabled by the State Department of Taxation and Finance.[102]
Shortly after March 1, 2006, other parties began proceedings to compel the State of New York to enforce its tax laws on sales to non-Indians on Indian land. Seneca County filed a suit which was dismissed.[103] The New York State Association of Convenience Stores filed a similar suit, which was also dismissed.[104] Based on the dismissal of these proceedings, Daniel Warren, a member and officer of Upstate Citizens for Equality, moved to vacate the judgment dismissing his 2002 state court action. The latter was dismissed because the court ruled that he had lack of standing.[105]
In response to Governor Eliot Spitzer's inclusion of $200 million of revenue in his budget from the cigarette tax, the Seneca announced plans to collect a toll from all who travel the length of I-90 that goes through their reservation. In 2007 the Senecas rescinded the agreement that had permitted construction of the thruway and its attendant easement through their reservation.[106] Some commentators have contended that this agreement was not necessary or moot because the United States was already granted free right-of-passage across the Seneca land in the Treaty of Canandaigua.[107]
In 2008 Governor David Paterson included $62 million of revenue in his budget from the proposed collection of these taxes. He signed a new law requiring that manufacturers and wholesalers swear under penalty of perjury that they are not selling untaxed cigarettes in New York.[108]
A law to bar any tax-exempt organization in New York from receiving tax-free cigarettes went into effect June 21, 2011. The Seneca nation has repeatedly appealed the decision, continuing to do so as of June 2011, but has not gained an overturn of this law.[109] The state has enforced the law only on cigarette brands produced by non-Indian companies (including all major national brands). It has not attempted to collect taxes on brands that are entirely tribally produced and sold (these are generally lower-end and lower-cost brands that have always made up the majority of Seneca cigarette sales.)
Casinos
[edit]As states struggled to raise revenues, in the 1980s, some state legislatures prohibited state-sponsored gambling by authorizing state lotteries and other games of chance as a means to raise funds. In some cases, funds from such operations were earmarked for education or other worthy goals. Native American tribes asserted their right to run similar activities. With the US Supreme Court decision ruling in the late 1980s that federally recognized Native American tribes could establish gaming on their sovereign reservations, the Seneca Nation began to develop its gambling industry. It began, as states and other tribes did, with bingo.
In 2002, the Seneca Nation of Indians signed a Gaming Compact with the State of New York to cooperate in the establishment of three class III gambling facilities (casinos). It established the Seneca Gaming Corporation to manage its operations. The Seneca Nation of Indians owns and operates two casinos on its territory in New York State: one in Niagara Falls called Seneca Niagara which also reopened in online format during the pandemic[110] and the other in Salamanca, called Seneca Allegany.
Construction began on a third, the Seneca Buffalo Creek Casino, in downtown Buffalo. In 2007 the Seneca opened a temporary casino on its land in Buffalo after federal approval, to satisfy its agreement with the state, and moved to a permanent building in 2013. Some citizens have opposed all Indian gambling, but especially the Buffalo location. Additional controversy has been engendered because there were questions about whether the Seneca-controlled land met other status criteria for gambling as defined in the IGRA.[84]
Some civic groups, including a "broad coalition of Buffalo's political, business, and cultural leaders", have opposed the Seneca Nation's establishment of a casino in Buffalo. They believe the operations will adversely affect the economic and social environment of the already struggling city.[84] Opponents include the Upstate Citizens for Equality and Citizens for a Better Buffalo. In 2008 they won a lawsuit challenging the legality of the proposed casino in Buffalo, because of the status of the land.[111] It was not part of their original reservations but had been transferred in a settlement with the state.
On July 8, 2008, United States District Judge William M. Skretny issued a decision holding that the Seneca Buffalo Creek Casino is not on gaming-eligible lands.[112] The National Indian Gaming Commission is reviewing proposed Seneca regulations and weighing its appeal options.[113] The Seneca were given five days to respond or to face fines and a forced shutdown. They said they refuse to comply with the commission's order and will appeal.[113]
Given the declining economic situation because of a nationwide recession, in summer 2008 the Seneca halted construction on the new casino in Buffalo. In December 2008 they laid off 210 employees from the three casinos.[114]
Broadcasting
[edit]The nation has established an official broadcasting arm, "Seneca Broadcasting", to apply for and purchase radio station licenses. The company owned one commercial FM radio station (broadcasting at 105.9 MHz) licensed off-reservation to the village of Little Valley, which the company purchased from Randy Michaels in early 2009. That station, known as WGWE, signed on February 1, 2010, from studios in the city of Salamanca with a classic hits format and was owned and operated by the nation until its sale in December 2021. An earlier application, for a noncommercial FM station at 89.3 in Irving, New York, ran into mutual exclusivity problems with out-of-town religious broadcasters.[115]
Employment
[edit]Many Seneca people are employed in the local economy of the region as professionals, including lawyers, professors, physicians, police officers, teachers, social workers, nurses, and managers [citation needed].
Notable Seneca
[edit]- Chief John Big Tree[116]
- Cornplanter (Gaiänt'wakê) (c. 1730s–1836), military leader[117]
- Jesse Cornplanter (Hayonhwonhish) (1889–1957), traditional artist[118]
- Governor Blacksnake (Thë:wö:nya's)[119]
- Destroy Town (Onondakai)[119]
- Guyasuta
- Half-King (Tanacharison)
- Traynor Ora Halftown
- Handsome Lake (Sganyodaiyo) (1735–1815), religious leader[119]
- George Heron
- Alice Lee Jemison, journalist and activist
- Mary Jemison (Deh-he-wä-nis)
- Little Beard (Si-gwa-ah-doh-gwih)
- John Mohawk (Sotsisowah)
- John Arthur Gibson (Skanyadai'iyo), Seneca Chief[120]
- Catherine Montour
- Arthur C. Parker (Gawaso Wanneh), anthropologist and author[121]
- Ely S. Parker (Donehogawa)[119]
- Maris Bryant Pierce (Ha-dya-no-doh, Swift Runner) (1811–1874), lawyer, land-rights activist, interpreter[122]
- Sanford Plummer (Ga-yo-gwa-doke), artist and author
- Red Jacket (Sagoyewatha) (c. 1750–1830), chief and orator[119]
- Sayenqueraghta or Kaieñãkwaahtoñ (c. 1707 – 1786), known as "Old King"
- Young King (Koyengquahtah)[123]
- Phyllis Bardeau (Gayanögwad) (1934-2023), author and Seneca Language educator.[124]
See also
[edit]Notes
[edit]- ^ (2000 Census)
- ^ Laurie Bauer, 2007, The Linguistics Student's Handbook, Edinburgh
- ^ "Culture". Seneca Nation of Indians. Retrieved 11 June 2020.
- ^ "The Western Door". Falls National Heritage Area. Retrieved August 24, 2023.
- ^ "History". SNI. Retrieved 2024-04-30.
- ^ "Seneca Nation of Indians - Official Website". SNI. Retrieved 2024-08-07.
- ^ Houghton, Frederick (1912). "The Seneca Nation from 1655 to 1687". Bulletin of the Buffalo Society of Natural Sciences. X (2): 364–464. Retrieved April 22, 2024.
- ^ Lewis, Joy. "Richmond History: Native American Presence, Honeoye Lake". The Owl Light. Owl Light News. Retrieved April 23, 2024.
- ^ Parker, Arthur C. (1926). An Anylitical History of the Seneca Indians. Rochester, New York: New York State Archaeological Association, Lewis Henry Morgan Chapter. p. 34. Retrieved April 23, 2024.
- ^ "Saint George, the Serpent". crookedlakereview.com. Archived from the original on 31 October 2015. Retrieved 10 October 2015.
- ^ "Canandaigua Lake, N.Y.: Of Indian Legends and Sylvan Trails". The New York Times. 1 October 2006. Archived from the original on 14 February 2017.
- ^ "Bare Hill Unique Area". ny.gov. Archived from the original on 23 September 2015. Retrieved 10 October 2015.
- ^ a b "Who Built the "Old Fort" on Bare Hill". crookedlakereview.com. Archived from the original on 23 September 2015. Retrieved 10 October 2015.
- ^ Bruce E. Johansen (Fall 1995). "Dating the Iroquois Confederacy" (PDF). Akwesasne Notes. New Series. 01 (3/04): 62–63. Retrieved 2010-05-23. [permanent dead link]
- ^ Bruce E. Johansen; Mann, Barbara Alice (2000). "Ganondagan". Encyclopedia of the Haudenosaunee (Iroquois Confederacy). Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 105. ISBN 978-0-313-30880-2. Retrieved 2010-05-23.
- ^ Anthony F.C. Wallace, The Death and Rebirth of the Seneca (New York: Vintage Books, 1969). ISBN 0-394-71699-X
- ^ (Houghton, Frederick. "The Migration of the Seneca Nation", American Anthropologist, New Series, Vol. 29, No 2 (April, 1927) pp. 241–250)
- ^ Parker, Arthur. The History of the Seneca Indians. Ira J. Freidman (1967); Empire State Historical Publications Series, XLIII, p. 13–20.
- ^ "Native American – The Iroquoians of Huronia". Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 2021-02-02.
- ^ Map 2: Seneca Nation of Indians v. State of New York, 206 F, Supp. 448 (2002) Appendix D
- ^ Parker, pp. 25–28)
- ^ Folts, James D. The Westward Migration of the Munsee Indians in the Eighteenth Century, The Challenge: An Algonquian Peoples Seminar. Map 4. Albany: New York State Bulletin No. 506, 2005. p. 32.
- ^ William Cronon, Changes in the Land: Indians, Colonists, and the Ecology of New England (New York: Hill and Wang, 1983). ISBN 0-8090-0158-6
- ^ Robert H. Keller & Michael F. Turek, American Indians & National Parks (Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 1998). ISBN 0-8165-2014-3
- ^ "Clan Cards". senecalanguage.com/. Retrieved May 10, 2023.
- ^ Chafe, Wallace L. (1963). Handbook of the Seneca language. Albany: University of the State of New York, State Education Dept. p. 27.
- ^ a b Berger, Billy. 2010. "Treasures of the Smithsonian. Part IV. Archery of the Northeastern United States" Seneca and Pamunkey: Seneca." Primitive Archer. Volume 18 (4). February–March 2010. pp. 16–199.
- ^ Smithsonian Institution, Department of Anthropology, Catalogue Number E-248722.
- ^ Parker, pp. 36–52; Merrill, pp. 78–83.
- ^ Parker at pp. 36–52; Merrill at pp. 78–83.
- ^ Parker at pp. 36–52; Merrill pp. 78–83.
- ^ Folts pp. 33–38
- ^ Pappas, Peter (12 July 1987). "Invaders Came from the North". Democrat and Chronicle. Retrieved April 20, 2022.
- ^ Houghton at p. 244
- ^ Wallace, Paul A. W. (1965). Indian Paths of Pennsylvania. Map 5. Harrisburg, Pa: Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission.
- ^ Edmund Bailey O'Callaghan and Berthonl Fernow, Eds., Documents Relative to the Colonial History of the State of New York (Albany: Weed, Parsons, 1881) [hereafter NYCD], 13:184
- ^ NYCD 13:114, 121, 124, 177–178, 184; See also The Senecas and the First Esopus War. NYCD, 13: 184–185.) In 1663 after the Second Esopus War, a Minnisink chief reported that the Seneca threatened to attack him (NYCD, 13:361.
- ^ NYCD, 4:98–99 "Seneca Power Over the Minnisink Indians"
- ^ a b c d Folts at p. 34
- ^ a b Jordan, Kurt A. (2013). "Incorporation and Colonization: Postcolumbian Iroquois Satellite Communities and Processes of Indigenous Autonomy," American Anthropologist 115 (1)
- ^ a b Herbert C. Kraft, The Lenape: Archaeology, History and Ethnography (Newark: New Jersey Historical Society, 1986), p. 230.
- ^ Robert S. Grumet, "The Minnisink Settlements: Native American Identity and Society in the Munsee Heartland, 1650–1778." In: The People of Minnisink, David Orr and Douglas Campana, Eds. (Philadelphia: National Park Service, 1991), p. 236
- ^ Grumet cites the Colonial Records of Pennsylvania, 8: 416)) By the end of the eighteenth century, the Munsee who had previously migrated to the upper Susquehanna region were living in Seneca communities.
- ^ Merrill at pp. 90–97
- ^ a b c Raphael, Ray (2001). A People's History of the American Revolution: How Common People Shaped the Fight for Independence. New York: New Press. p. 243. ISBN 978-1565846531.
- ^ "The League of the Iroquois | The Gilder Lehrman Institute of American History". gilderlehrman.org. 2011-11-29. Archived from the original on 2016-05-30. Retrieved 2016-04-26.
- ^ Raphael, Ray (2001). A People's History of the American Revolution: How Common People Shaped the Fight for Independence. New York: New Press. p. 244. ISBN 978-1565846531.
- ^ Raphael, Ray (2001). A People's History of the American Revolution: How Common People Shaped the Fight for Independence. New York: New Press. pp. 244–245. ISBN 978-1565846531.
- ^ a b c d Graymont, Barbara (1972). The Iroquois in the American Revolution. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press. pp. 71–72. ISBN 978-0815600831.
- ^ a b c d Raphael, Ray (2001). A People's History of the American Revolution: How Common People Shaped the Fight for Independence. New York: New Press. p. 245. ISBN 978-1565846531.
- ^ a b c Raphael, Ray (2001). A People's History of the American Revolution: How Common People Shaped the Fight for Independence. New York: New Press. p. 246. ISBN 978-1565846531.
- ^ a b Raphael, Ray (2001). A People's History of the American Revolution: How Common People Shaped the Fight for Independence. New York: New Press. p. 247. ISBN 978-1565846531.
- ^ Raphael, Ray (2001). A People's History of the American Revolution: How Common People Shaped the Fight for Independence. New York: New Press. pp. 247–248. ISBN 978-1565846531.
- ^ Raphael, Ray (2001). A People's History of the American Revolution: How Common People Shaped the Fight for Independence. New York: New Press. p. 197. ISBN 978-1565846531.
- ^ Raphael, Ray (2001). A People's History of the American Revolution: How Common People Shaped the Fight for Independence. New York: New Press. pp. 248–249. ISBN 978-1565846531.
- ^ Raphael, Ray (2001). A People's History of the American Revolution: How Common People Shaped the Fight for Independence. New York: New Press. pp. 249–250. ISBN 978-1565846531.
- ^ a b Raphael, Ray (2001). A People's History of the American Revolution: How Common People Shaped the Fight for Independence. New York: New Press. p. 250. ISBN 978-1565846531.
- ^ Raphael, Ray (2001). A People's History of the American Revolution: How Common People Shaped the Fight for Independence. New York: New Press. pp. 250–251. ISBN 978-1565846531.
- ^ a b c Raphael, Ray (2001). A People's History of the American Revolution: How Common People Shaped the Fight for Independence. New York: New Press. pp. 251–252. ISBN 978-1565846531.
- ^ a b c d Raphael, Ray (2001). A People's History of the American Revolution: How Common People Shaped the Fight for Independence. New York: New Press. p. 254. ISBN 978-1565846531.
- ^ a b Raphael, Ray (2001). A People's History of the American Revolution: How Common People Shaped the Fight for Independence. New York: New Press. pp. 252–253. ISBN 978-1565846531.
- ^ Raphael, Ray (2001). A People's History of the American Revolution: How Common People Shaped the Fight for Independence. New York: New Press. p. 253. ISBN 978-1565846531.
- ^ a b c Ferling, John (2015). Whirlwind: The American Revolution and the War That Won It. New York: Bloomsbury Press. p. 238.
- ^ Ferling, John (2015). Whirlwind. New York: Bloomsbury Press. pp. 239–240.
- ^ a b Ferling, John (2015). Whirlwind. New York: Bloomsbury Press. p. 240.
- ^ Ferling, John (2001). Whirlwind. New York: Bloomsbury Press. p. 241.
- ^ Raphael, Ray (2001). A People's History of the American Revolution: How Common People Shaped the Fight for Independence. New York: New Press. p. 255. ISBN 978-1565846531.
- ^ Raphael, Ray (2001). A People's History of the American Revolution: How Common People Shaped the Fight for Independence. New York: New Review. pp. 242–243.
- ^ Raphael, Ray (2001). A People's History of the American Revolution: How Common People Shaped the Fight for Independence. New York: New Press. p. 256. ISBN 978-1565846531.
- ^ a b c Raphael, Ray (2001). A People's History of the American Revolution: How Common People Shaped the Fight for Independence. New York: New Press. p. 257. ISBN 978-1565846531.
- ^ Raphael, Ray (2001). A People's History of the American Revolution: How Common People Shaped the Fight for Independence. New York: New Press. p. 258. ISBN 978-1565846531.
- ^ a b "Founders Online: From George Washington to John Hanson, 26 September 1782". founders.archives.gov. Retrieved 2019-12-24.
- ^ Merrill at pp. 90–97.
- ^ McKeveley, Blake (January 1939). "Historic Aspects of the Phelps and Gorham Treaty of July 4–8, 1788" (PDF). Rochester History. 1 (1). Rochester Public Library. ISSN 0035-7413. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2007-12-03. Retrieved 2008-01-05.
- ^ "Birth of a Nation". Seneca Nation of Indians. 2013. Archived from the original on 2014-07-25. Retrieved 2013-11-18.
- ^ "Seneca". endangeredlanguages.com. Retrieved Feb 18, 2022.
- ^ "Huge Push to Save Endangered Seneca Language". arizona.edu. Retrieved Feb 18, 2022.
- ^ "Researchers use AI to preserve Seneca language". rit.edu. Retrieved Feb 18, 2022.
- ^ "Allegany Seneca Language". sni.org. Retrieved Feb 18, 2022.
- ^ Bilharz, Joy Ann (1998). The Allegany Senecas and Kinzua Dam: forced relocation through two generations. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. p. 55. ISBN 0-8032-1282-8. Retrieved 2009-10-19.
- ^ 320 - "Letter to the President of the Seneca Nation of Indians Concerning the Kinzua Dam on the Allegheny River" Archived 2012-01-12 at the Wayback Machine, 11 Aug 1961, US Presidency, University of Santa Barbara, accessed 24 Mar 2009
- ^ Peter La Farge (1963). As Long as the Grass Shall Grow: Peter La Farge Sings of the Indians. Folkways Records. FN 2532.
- ^ Zito, Selena (June 5, 2011). Smokes cheap, tensions high. (Also titled "Portrait of a Failed American City.") Pittsburgh Tribune-Review. Retrieved July 28, 2012.
- ^ a b c Staba, David; Belson, Ken (4 Jul 2007). "Temporary Seneca Casino Opens in Downtown Buffalo". The New York Times. Archived from the original on August 23, 2014. Retrieved March 24, 2009.
- ^ "Seneca Indian Law Suit, Grande Island, NY". isledegrande.com. Archived from the original on 2016-03-03.
- ^ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-08-23. Retrieved 2016-02-09.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) - ^ "SENECA NATION OF INDIANS v. NEW YORK" (PDF). Findlaw. Archived (PDF) from the original on 15 September 2004. Retrieved 10 October 2015.
- ^ "2005-06 Term Supreme Court Cases Related to Indian Law". National Indian Law Library. Retrieved 8 March 2024.
- ^ a b c "Court allows Seneca lawsuit on Thruway to proceed". Observer Today. 4 September 2020.
- ^ a b Thompson, Carolyn (12 April 2018). "Seneca Nation renews fight with New York over Thruway". Associated Press.
- ^ Herbeck, Dan (12 April 2018). "Seneca Nation sues N.Y., says Thruway illegally built on its territory". The Buffalo News.
- ^ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2007-08-08. Retrieved 2007-03-18.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) US District Court, Seneca Tribe, et. al, v. State of New York, Gov. Pataki, et al., Feb 1999 - ^ "Highbanks Campground". Archived from the original on 11 October 2015. Retrieved 10 October 2015.
- ^ "Seneca Indian Nation Approves Medical Marijuana Initiative". High Times. 6 November 2015. Archived from the original on 2016-03-05. Retrieved 2016-02-25.
- ^ "Honor Indian Treaties - Learn More". honorindiantreaties.org. Archived from the original on 4 July 2007. Retrieved 10 October 2015.
- ^ "Snyder v. Wetzler, 193 A.D.2d 329" (PDF). upstate-citizens.org. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-08-23. Retrieved 5 May 2018.
- ^ Snyder v. Wetzler, 84 N.Y.2d 941 Archived 2016-07-10 at the Wayback Machine, Cornell University Law School
- ^ Chapman, Chris (2007-11-21). "Local Man; Business Targets Of Multi Agency Raids" Archived 2012-04-21 at the Wayback Machine, The Salamanca Press. Retrieved 2011-07-10.
- ^ "Cigarette sales scheme gets man 5 years’ probation" Archived 2011-07-14 at the Wayback Machine, The Buffalo News (2011-07-09). Retrieved 2011-07-10.
- ^ "Frens v State of New York (2006 NY Slip Op 51994(U))". state.ny.us. Retrieved 10 October 2015.
- ^ "Attorneys General And Philip Morris USA Reach Landmark Agreement To Reduce Illegal Internet Cigarette Sales" [permanent dead link], Office of the NY Attorney General
- ^ "www.ag.ny.gov - New York State Attorney General". state.ny.us. Retrieved 10 October 2015. [permanent dead link]
- ^ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2007-08-08. Retrieved 2006-12-31.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) - ^ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2007-08-08. Retrieved 2006-12-31.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) - ^ "Warren v. Spitzer, Billet, Poloncarz and Erie County". upstate-citizens.org. Archived from the original on 2016-03-03. Retrieved 10 October 2015.
- ^ Warner, Gene; Beebe, Michael (May 18, 2007). "Senecas start billing state for Thruway use of land". The Buffalo News. Retrieved March 8, 2024.
- ^ Christopher Smith, "Seneca Nation To New York State: Bring It On" Archived January 17, 2009, at the Wayback Machine, Buffalo Geek Blog, 14 Jan 2009, accessed 24 Mar 2009
- ^ "GOV SIGNS INDIAN CIGARETTE TAX BILL". New York Post. Associated Press. December 15, 2008. Archived from the original on December 19, 2008.
- ^ Gryta, Matt (2011-06-21). Setback spurs Senecas to top N.Y. appeal Archived 2011-06-24 at the Wayback Machine. The Buffalo News. Retrieved 2011-06-22.
- ^ "Seneca Niagara Online". Retrieved 2 November 2021.
- ^ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2007-06-23. Retrieved 2007-01-14.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) - ^ Citizens Against Casino Gambling, et al. v. Philip Hogen, et al., Citizens Against Casino Gambling Website Archived 2008-11-19 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ a b Chapman, Chris. "Battle for Buffalo Creek: Notice of Violation doesn't change operations", Salamanca Press.
- ^ Athan Kompos, "Unknown Future for Buffalo Creek Casino", WGRZ.com, Mar 2009
- ^ "NorthEast Radio Watch by Scott Fybush". fybush.com. Archived from the original on 19 October 2015. Retrieved 10 October 2015.
- ^ VanRyzin, Robert R. (2009). Fascinating Facts, Mysteries and Myths About U.S. Coins. Krause Publications. p. 10. ISBN 978-1440206504.
- ^ "Chief Cornplanter". Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission. Archived from the original on 2015-03-07. Retrieved 2015-05-02.
- ^ Lester, Patrick D. (1995). The Biographical Directory of Native American Painters. University of Oklahoma Press. ISBN 978-0806199368.
- ^ a b c d e "Historic Seneca Leaders". Seneca Nation of Indians. 2012. Archived from the original on 2015-05-09. Retrieved 2015-05-02.
- ^ Takeshi Kimura (2011). "The Biographical Essay of John A. Gibson (1850–1912), the Seneca Chief of the Six Nations Reserve, Ontario, Canada". 哲学・思想論, (Journal of Philosophical Thought). 3 (37). Journal University of Tsukuba: 33–67. Archived from the original on 2015-11-18. Retrieved Oct 4, 2015.
- ^ Porter, Joy (2001). To Be Indian: The Life of Seneca-Iroquois Arthur Caswell Parker, 1881–1955. Norman: Oklahoma University Press. p. 5. ISBN 0-8061-3317-1.
- ^ Johansen, Bruce Elliott; Mann, Barbara Alice (2000). Encyclopedia of the Haudenosaunee (Iroquois Confederacy). Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 249. ISBN 978-0-313-30880-2.
- ^ Morris, Robert (1897). A history of the treaty of Big Tree : and an account of the celebration of the one hundredth anniversary of the making of the treaty, held at Geneseo, N.Y., September the fifteenth, eighteen hundred ninety-seven. Dansville, NY: Bunnell. ISBN 978-1429734288.
{{cite book}}: ISBN / Date incompatibility (help) - ^ Bardeau, Phyllis E. Wms. (2002). onondowa'ga:' gwae:no' (PDF). Cattaraugus Territory: Seneca Nation Education Department. ISBN 0-9743377-0-6. Retrieved January 6, 2023.
References
[edit]- Merrill, Arch. Land of the Senecas. New York: American Book–Stratford Press, 1949.
Further reading
[edit]- Cadwallander Colden, The History of the Five Indian Nations: Depending on the Province of New York in America. New York: Cornell University Press, 1958.
- William Cronon, Changes in the Land: Indians, Colonists, and the Ecology of New England. New York: Hill and Wang, 1983.
- John Ferling, Whirlwind: The American Revolution and the War That Won It, New York: Bloomsbury Press, 2015.
- Barbara Graymont, The Iroquois in the American Revolution, Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 1972.
- Laurence M. Hauptman, Coming Full Circle: The Seneca Nation of Indians, 1848–1934. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press, 2019.
- —————, In the Shadow of Kinzua: The Seneca Nation of Indians since World War II. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 2014.
- Francis Jennings, The Ambiguous Iroquois Empire: The Covenant Chain Confederation of Indian Tribes with English Colonies. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 1984.
- Bruce E. Johansen (Fall 1995). "Dating the Iroquois Confederacy". Akwesasne Notes New Series. Vol. 1, no. 3–4. Retrieved 8 March 2024 – via ratical earth journal.
- Robert H. Keller & Michael F. Turek, American Indians & National Parks. Arizona: University of Arizona Press, 1998.
- Ray Raphael, A People's History of the American Revolution: How Common People Shaped the Fight for Independence, New York: New Press, 2001.
- Daniel K. Richter, The Ordeal of the Longhouse: The Peoples of the Iroquois League in the Era of European Colonization. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1992.
- Allen W. Trelease, Indian Affairs in Colonial New York: The Seventeenth Century. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1960.
- Anthony F.C. Wallace, The Death and Rebirth of the Seneca. New York: Vintage Books, 1969.
- Jeanne Winston Adler, Chainbreaker's War: A Seneca Chief Remembers the American Revolution. New York: Black Dome Press, 2002.
External links
[edit]- Official website
- Seneca Indian Collections: A bibliography, with links where available, from the Buffalo History Museum.
- Seneca Allegany Casino
- Seneca Niagara Casino
- Seneca Gaming Corporation
- Seneca language
- General Tonawanda/Haudenosaunee Information
- How the Sullivan-Clinton Campaign Dispossessed the Seneca
- Taxation on Seneca Territory
Seneca people
View on GrokipediaName and Etymology
Origins and Meanings
The Seneca people's autonym is Onödowá'ga: (also rendered as Onöndowa'ga: or O-non-dowa-gah), translating to "People of the Great Hill" in their Iroquoian language, a reference to the hilly terrain of their traditional homeland in what is now western New York State, including prominent features like the Allegheny Plateau escarpments.[6][7] This self-designation underscores their distinct identity within the Iroquois (Haudenosaunee) Confederacy, where each nation maintains unique linguistic and territorial markers—contrasting, for instance, with the Mohawk (Kanien'kehá:ka:, "People of the Flint") or Oneida (Onyota'a:ka, "People of the Upright Stone").[8] The exonym "Seneca" entered European usage via Dutch colonists in the early 17th century as "Senecas" or "Sinnekas," an adaptation of an Algonquian term—likely Mahican or Munsee Assinisink or Sinneken—denoting "place of the stone" or "stone people," in allusion to the abundant flint quarries near the Seneca's western territories along the Genesee River and Canandaigua Lake, which supplied material for tools and weapons traded regionally.[9][8] Alternative interpretations link it to the Seneca's position as the westernmost Iroquois nation, with Dutch records emphasizing their outpost location relative to eastern allies like the Mohawk.[10] French explorers and missionaries, encountering the Seneca around 1635 during expeditions into Iroquoia, recorded the name as "Tsonnontouans" or "Gens de la Grande Colline des Chênes," reflecting phonetic approximations of the autonym while noting their hill-dwelling habits and oak-rich lands.[11] These early European variants highlight how neighboring Algonquian-speaking groups, such as the Mahican to the east, applied descriptive toponyms rather than the Seneca's own ethnonym, avoiding direct adoption of Iroquoian terms amid intertribal rivalries; this contrasts with the more uniform "Iroquois" label (from Algonquian Irakwa, "real adders") applied broadly to the confederacy by Huron intermediaries.[8] Such adaptations preserved distinctions among the Five (later Six) Nations without conflating them into a monolithic entity, though phonetic shifts in colonial records occasionally led to orthographic inconsistencies like "Senecas" in Dutch trade logs versus French "Souhnontoouans."[9]Historical Usage and Variations
The exonym "Seneca" derives from a Dutch term used in New Netherland records to denote the westernmost Iroquois nation, appearing as "Sinnekas" in 17th- and early 18th-century colonial correspondence and trade logs, such as those of the Albany Indian Commissioners.[12] This variant reflected their strategic position guarding the western frontier of Iroquois territories, a role formalized in the Haudenosaunee Confederacy as "Keeper of the Western Door," a descriptor employed in diplomatic contexts to signify their responsibility for western defenses and alliances.[1] The name's adoption in early European documentation likely stemmed from Algonquian or Mohawk intermediaries, emphasizing geographic rather than self-identified traits.[10] By the 18th century, "Seneca" standardized in English-language treaties and records, as seen in the 1768 Treaty of Fort Stanwix, where Seneca leaders participated under that designation alongside other Iroquois nations.[13] Internally, the people maintained their autonym Onöndowa'ga: ("People of the Great Hill"), rooted in traditional oral histories referencing key settlements like those near prominent hills in western New York, though this term appeared sparingly in colonial translations.[1] In the 19th century, following land cessions and reservation establishments, "Seneca Nation" gained legal prominence in U.S. treaties, such as the 1802 agreement ceding lands along the Allegheny River and the 1832 treaty facilitating removals to Indian Territory (modern Oklahoma).[14][15] This usage solidified in federal recognitions of distinct Seneca communities, including the Seneca Nation of New York and the Seneca-Cayuga Tribe, marking a shift from fluid colonial references to formalized tribal entities amid reservation-era diplomacy, without altering the core geographic connotation of the exonym.[1]Pre-Columbian Origins
Archaeological and Genetic Evidence
Archaeological excavations in the Genesee Valley and western Finger Lakes region of New York have uncovered precontact sites associated with proto-Seneca or early Seneca groups, dating from approximately A.D. 1300, featuring corn-filled storage pits, longhouse structures, and evidence of maize (Zea mays) cultivation as a staple crop alongside beans and squash.[16] These sites indicate settled village life with palisaded enclosures for defense, reflecting a shift toward intensified horticulture and sedentism characteristic of late prehistoric Iroquoian adaptations in the region.[17] The transition to such patterns is evident in material culture, including collared pottery and triangular projectile points, linking these occupations to the broader Owasco and early historic Seneca sequences without direct European influence.[18] Genetic analyses of ancient mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) from Woodland period sites in southern Ontario, linked to proto-Iroquoian populations ancestral to groups like the Seneca, reveal predominant haplogroups A, B, C, and D, consistent with broader Native North American lineages and indicating maternal genetic continuity across the lower Great Lakes.[19] Stable isotope data from these remains corroborate heavy reliance on C4 plants like maize, aligning archaeological evidence of agricultural intensification with dietary shifts around A.D. 1000–1400.[19] Modern Seneca descendants exhibit similar mtDNA profiles, with haplogroups A2, B2, C1, and D1 subtypes, supporting long-term population stability in western New York rather than wholesale replacement.[20] Scholarly debate on Seneca origins contrasts models of gradual local evolution from regional Woodland cultures, such as Owasco (ca. A.D. 1000–1300), with evidence for rapid cultural coalescence via migrations from southern Appalachian or mid-Atlantic zones around A.D. 1400, inferred from synchronous village nucleation, matrilineal longhouses, and horticultural complexes appearing abruptly in the archaeological record.[21] Proponents of migration cite linguistic diversification patterns and discontinuities in pre-Iroquoian ceramics, challenging in situ gradualism by positing population movements as drivers of Iroquoian ethnogenesis, though genetic data show no stark breaks with prior regional inhabitants.[22] Local development advocates emphasize artifactual continuity in western New York, attributing innovations to diffusion rather than mass displacement.[18]Migration and Settlement Patterns
The Seneca occupied a core territory south of Lake Ontario, centered in the Genesee River valley of present-day western New York and extending southwestward along tributaries to the Allegheny River in northwestern Pennsylvania, where ecological conditions favored maize-based agriculture on fertile floodplain soils amid deciduous forests rich in game.[23] These settlements reflected causal adaptations to regional hydrology and topography, with villages sited on elevated ridges or knolls for defensive advantages against raids from neighboring groups like the Erie or Wenro, while maintaining proximity to streams for water and transportation without excessive flood risk.[23] [18] Pre-contact Seneca villages were semi-sedentary clusters of 20 to 100 longhouses, each accommodating 5 to 12 individuals, yielding populations of 1,000 to 2,000 per site, often palisaded and supplemented by satellite hamlets for hunting or fishing.[24] Settlement persistence lasted 10 to 20 years before relocation, driven by soil exhaustion from intensive corn, bean, and squash cultivation using fire-clearing and minimal fertilization, coupled with localized depletion of deer and small game essential for protein and hides.[25] This pattern aligned with ecological carrying capacity constraints in a temperate climate with reliable growing seasons of 150 to 180 frost-free days, enabling population support through surplus storage in bark bins but necessitating dispersal to regenerate resources via natural fallow cycles.[26] Archaeological data indicate minimal long-distance migration for the Seneca, with cultural continuity from Late Woodland predecessors like the Owasco phase (ca. 1000–1300 CE), evidenced by persistent pottery styles, maize processing tools, and village layouts evolving locally rather than through influxes from distant regions.[27] Population estimates derive from site surveys proxying densities at 0.5 to 1 person per 0.1 hectare in village cores, extrapolating to 10,000 to 12,000 Seneca ca. 1500 CE across 10 to 15 major sites, constrained by warfare attrition and subsistence yields of approximately 1,000 to 1,500 kg of maize per hectare annually.[25] [28] Inter-village alliances via kinship networks facilitated coordinated shifts, stabilizing dynamics amid periodic conflicts that favored compact, fortified habitations over expansive nomadic ranging.[29]Traditional Society and Culture
Language and Linguistics
The Seneca language, Onöndowa'ga: Gawë:nö', is a member of the Northern Iroquoian branch of the Iroquoian language family, alongside languages such as Cayuga, Onondaga, Oneida, and Mohawk.[30] It exhibits polysynthetic and agglutinative characteristics, with verbs capable of incorporating extensive morphological elements to encode pronominal arguments, tense, aspect, and evidentiality within single words.[31] This structure results in high fusionality due to historical phonological changes, many occurring in the 18th century, which obscure morpheme boundaries and contribute to its complexity.[31] Seneca verbs feature a rich system of prefixes—ranging from 58 to 61 in Northern Iroquoian languages—marking agents, patients, and beneficiaries, alongside suffixes for modality and causation, allowing for concise expression of entire propositions.[32] While sharing typological traits with sister languages, mutual intelligibility between Seneca and others like Mohawk remains limited, as divergent sound changes and lexical evolution necessitate dedicated study for comprehension, even among proximate varieties such as Cayuga. Documentation efforts commenced in the 19th century, driven by missionaries including Asher Wright, who produced grammatical analyses, Bible translations, and vocabularies that preserved early forms amid oral traditions.[33] By 2022, fewer than 50 fluent native speakers persisted, primarily elders, classifying Seneca as critically endangered due to intergenerational transmission loss from historical assimilation policies like boarding schools.[34] Revitalization initiatives by the Seneca Nation include immersion programs, such as the Deadiwënöhsnye's Gëjóhgwa' for youth and adult verbal proficiency courses, which emphasize conversational skills with fluent speakers.[35] Community surveys indicate these efforts foster positive attitudes and partial proficiency gains, yet effectiveness remains constrained, with no substantial rise in fluent speakers documented and calls for enhanced integration to achieve fuller revival.[36]Kinship, Governance, and Iroquois Confederacy Role
The Seneca, as part of the Haudenosaunee (Iroquois) Confederacy, organized society around a matrilineal kinship system, where descent, inheritance, and clan membership passed through the female line.[37][38] Clans—typically animal totems such as Wolf, Bear, Turtle, or Hawk—linked individuals to a common female ancestor, with women holding custodianship over clan lands and resources; children inherited their mother's clan, ensuring exogamous marriages to prevent intra-clan unions.[37][38] This structure emphasized maternal authority in social reproduction, contrasting patrilineal European systems encountered later, though empirical records from early ethnographies indicate clans numbered eight among the Seneca, varying slightly by community.[39] Governance operated through consensus in longhouse councils, where decisions required unanimity among clan representatives to maintain balance.[40] Clan mothers, selected by elder women for wisdom and adherence to tradition, nominated and could depose male sachems (peace chiefs) to represent clans in deliberations; these women advised sachems on clan interests, named children from prescribed clan lists, and vetted marriages for compatibility.[41][39][40] While this system idealized harmony through matrilineal checks on male leadership, archaeological evidence of pre-Confederacy skeletal trauma and fortified villages in Seneca territories—dating to circa 1300–1500 CE—reveals endemic inter-clan and inter-village conflicts, suggesting power imbalances and factional disputes often disrupted consensus in practice.[42] As the westernmost Haudenosaunee nation, the Seneca served as "Keepers of the Western Door," positioned to manage diplomacy and alliances with tribes beyond the Confederacy's core territories, such as those in the Ohio Valley and Great Lakes.[43] This role leveraged their geographic extent—from the Genesee River to Lake Erie—and population size, estimated at 4,000–5,000 in the early 1600s, enabling them to broker peace wampum belts and conduct raids or negotiations to secure western frontiers.[44] In the Grand Council at Onondaga, Seneca delegates held eight sachem seats, influencing confederacy-wide policies while retaining autonomy in local affairs.[40] The Iroquois Confederacy's formation, per Haudenosaunee oral tradition, occurred around 1142 CE under the Great Peacemaker and Hiawatha, uniting five nations (including Seneca) via the Great Law of Peace to end cycles of mourning wars and vendettas.[45] This date draws from wampum-recorded eclipse references corroborated by astronomical data, yet archaeological consensus favors a later 15th-century origin, citing gradual integration evidenced by shared pottery styles and longhouse expansions rather than abrupt unification.[46][47] Such debates highlight idealized narratives of seamless pre-contact unity, as proxy data like tree-ring chronologies from violent site destructions indicate persistent regional strife until confederative structures solidified amid demographic pressures from warfare and migration.[45]Economy, Subsistence, and Technology
The Seneca maintained a self-sufficient economy grounded in mixed subsistence strategies, with agriculture as the foundation supporting settled longhouse villages in western New York and adjacent regions. They cultivated the "Three Sisters"—interplanted corn (Zea mays), beans (Phaseolus vulgaris), and squash (Cucurbita spp.)—in nutrient-efficient polycultures that maximized yields on fertile alluvial soils near rivers and lakes, such as those along the Genesee and Allegheny.[4][1] These crops provided the caloric and nutritional core of the diet, complemented by gathered wild plants like nuts, berries, and maple sap.[1] Hunting and fishing supplemented agricultural output, ensuring dietary diversity and resource resilience during seasonal shortfalls. Men primarily pursued large game such as deer, bear, and turkey using bows with stone-tipped arrows, wooden clubs, and snares, while communities netted fish from streams and Great Lakes tributaries, targeting species like salmon and sturgeon.[1] This foraging contributed protein and fats, with evidence from archaeological sites indicating managed deer populations through controlled burns to enhance habitats.[48] Technological adaptations emphasized perishable organic materials over durable metals, reflecting environmental availability rather than metallurgical innovation. Tools included bone awls for hideworking, wooden digging sticks and hoes for planting, and bark containers for storage; weaponry comprised flint-knapped projectile points hafted to wooden shafts.[49] No evidence exists of smelting or widespread iron use pre-contact, though native copper from Lake Superior sources was sporadically cold-hammered into ornaments and small implements via long-distance exchange.[50] Regional trade networks facilitated access to non-local materials, underscoring economic interdependence among northeastern tribes. The Seneca exchanged agricultural surpluses and forest products for marine shells from Atlantic coastal groups—used to craft wampum beads and belts for diplomacy and tallying—and copper nuggets from Great Lakes intermediaries, integrating them into rituals and tools without altering core subsistence.[51] These exchanges, documented archaeologically in shell artifacts at Iroquoian sites, operated through kin-based alliances rather than centralized markets, sustaining technological limits while enabling cultural cohesion.[52]Religion, Warfare, and Social Practices
The traditional Seneca religion encompassed an animistic worldview in which all elements of nature possessed consciousness and inherent spiritual power known as orenda, enabling transformation and influence over the physical world.[53] This orenda was not centralized in a singular deity but distributed across beings, animals, and natural forces, with rituals aimed at harnessing it for balance and efficacy in daily life.[53] Deities and spirits, such as the creator figure and various nature entities, featured in myths that explained cosmic order, good versus evil, and human obligations to maintain harmony through ceremonies like dream fulfillment and seasonal observances.[53] Central to healing practices was the False Face Society, a ritual group among the Seneca and broader Iroquois that employed carved wooden masks representing forest spirits to expel illness-causing entities.[54] Members, initiated through personal visions or cures, conducted public and private rites involving incantations, tobacco smoke, and mask dances to invoke the masks' orenda for therapeutic power, particularly against ailments attributed to malevolent spirits.[54] These ceremonies, performed seasonally or in response to epidemics, underscored the Seneca emphasis on communal reciprocity with the spiritual realm to avert misfortune.[55] Seneca warfare, integral to Iroquois strategy, primarily served to replace population losses from disease or conflict through captive acquisition, while also securing territory and resources amid intertribal rivalries.[56] Raids targeted enemies like the Huron and Algonquian groups, with warriors employing ambushes, scalping, and ritual taunts to demoralize foes, as documented in 17th-century Jesuit accounts of Iroquois campaigns.[57] Captives faced adoption into Seneca families to replenish kin networks or, if deemed irredeemable, ritual torture and execution, practices rooted in mourning wars where victims' suffering symbolically appeased the spirits of deceased relatives.[56] Torture methods included prolonged burning, flaying, and dismemberment, often communal events where participants derived spiritual merit from endurance or infliction, as evidenced in captive narratives from the Beaver Wars era (circa 1600–1701).[56] These acts, while declining in frequency post-contact due to European influences and demographic shifts, reflected a causal logic of vengeance and replenishment rather than gratuitous cruelty, with historical records noting variability based on captive utility.[56] Warfare thus intertwined with religion, as victories and captives reinforced orenda through war bundles and post-raid feasts. Social practices among the Seneca revolved around matrilineal kinship systems, where clan membership passed through mothers, enforcing obligations like mutual aid, marriage exogamy, and dispute resolution to maintain group cohesion.[58] Extended families resided in longhouses, with elders mediating conflicts via consensus, prioritizing restitution over retribution for internal offenses to preserve alliances within the Iroquois Confederacy.[58] These structures, documented in ethnographic accounts, minimized intratribal violence by channeling aggression externally, though empirical evidence from regional skeletal remains indicates perimortem trauma primarily from warfare rather than endemic homicide.[58] Communal dances and councils further reinforced social bonds, embedding ethical norms of reciprocity derived from mythic precedents.[53]European Contact to Colonial Era
Initial Encounters and Trade
The Seneca, as members of the Haudenosaunee (Iroquois) Confederacy, first encountered European traders indirectly through eastern confederacy nations in the early 1600s, with direct involvement in the fur trade emerging by the 1630s via Dutch posts at Fort Orange (modern Albany), established in 1614. Dutch merchants exchanged beaver pelts for European manufactures, positioning the Seneca—located in western New York—as key intermediaries who procured furs from Ohio Valley sources and relayed them eastward, bypassing French-dominated routes to the north.[59][60] This trade introduced transformative goods, including firearms, iron axes, knives, and copper kettles, which supplanted stone and bone tools and enhanced hunting and processing efficiency; by the 1640s, arquebuses and matchlocks comprised a growing portion of imports, altering Seneca self-sufficiency by fostering reliance on ammunition and repairs from European smiths. French traders and Jesuit missionaries extended contact to Seneca villages by the 1650s, offering similar items alongside evangelical efforts, though Dutch alliances predominated until the 1664 English conquest of New Netherland.[61][62][63] Epidemics transmitted along trade networks, including smallpox outbreaks in the 1630s and measles in the 1640s, decimated Seneca populations, with Jesuit accounts and archaeological correlations indicating declines of approximately 50% or more across Haudenosaunee territories by 1675, exacerbating labor shortages in agriculture and trapping. These losses stemmed from lack of immunity to Old World pathogens, compounded by disrupted social structures, though adoption practices partially mitigated demographic collapse.[25][64] The fur trade incentivized a pivot from balanced subsistence—maize, squash, beans, and hunting—to intensified beaver trapping for export, yielding short-term prosperity but depleting local beaver stocks by the 1670s and entrenching dependency on imported textiles, ironware, and weaponry, which required sustained pelt volumes to acquire. This economic reorientation undermined traditional reciprocity-based exchange, prioritizing volume over sustainability and integrating Seneca villages into Atlantic commodity chains.[65][60]Beaver Wars and Territorial Expansion
The Beaver Wars, spanning roughly from the 1630s to the 1680s, involved the Haudenosaunee Confederacy, including the Seneca as its westernmost nation, in a series of campaigns aimed at securing control over fur-bearing territories amid intensifying European trade demands. Driven by the need to supply beaver pelts to Dutch traders in exchange for goods, the Seneca and other Iroquois nations targeted neighboring groups like the Huron (Wendat) and Erie to eliminate competition and expand hunting grounds. Initial skirmishes escalated in the 1640s, with Seneca war parties, leveraging superior access to Dutch firearms, launching devastating raids that disrupted Huron trade networks allied with the French. By 1649, coordinated Iroquois assaults, including Seneca forces, led to the effective destruction of Huron settlements, scattering survivors and opening access to lands between Lakes Ontario and Huron.[66][67] Seneca-led conquests extended further in the 1650s, culminating in the subjugation of the Erie around 1653–1656, whose territory along the southern shores of Lake Erie provided direct pathways to Ohio River valley hunting areas rich in beaver. These victories, facilitated by an early firearms imbalance—where Dutch-supplied muskets outmatched traditional weapons of rivals until French arms proliferation in the 1660s—enabled the Seneca to assert dominance over former Erie and Neutral lands, extending their influence southward into what is now northern Ohio. Captives from these conflicts, numbering in the thousands across the Confederacy (with Seneca incorporating several thousand Erie and Huron individuals through adoption to bolster depleted populations from warfare and disease), were integrated into Seneca villages, sustaining social structures while fueling further expansion. This territorial reach monopolized pelt flows to Albany traders, enhancing Seneca economic leverage.[60][67] However, the intensive exploitation of beaver populations in newly controlled regions precipitated ecological depletion, as overhunting exhausted local stocks by the late 1600s, compelling repeated westward pushes but yielding diminishing returns. By approximately 1700, the scarcity of prime pelts in core Haudenosaunee territories undermined trade volumes, weakening the Confederacy's bargaining power with Europeans and exposing vulnerabilities to counter-allied forces. This resource exhaustion, rooted in the causal dynamics of unchecked extraction for European markets, marked the onset of a prolonged economic strain for the Seneca, independent of later colonial entanglements.[60][68]Alliances in Colonial Conflicts
The Seneca, as the westernmost nation of the Iroquois Confederacy, engaged in pragmatic diplomacy during colonial conflicts to safeguard territorial interests and trade networks, often aligning temporarily with European powers while leveraging the Confederacy's collective neutrality policy to maintain autonomy. Following the exhaustion from the Beaver Wars, the Iroquois pursued a balanced approach inaugurated by the Grand Settlement of 1701, which formalized peace with the French via the Great Peace of Montreal and commitments to Pennsylvania colonists, establishing a framework for neutrality between British and French rivals to avoid total subjugation.[69][70] This policy enabled the Seneca to trade furs and foodstuffs with both sides, preserving confederacy cohesion amid external pressures, though it drew accusations from French officials of duplicity when Iroquois warriors sporadically aided British campaigns. In King William's War (1689–1697), the Seneca contributed to Iroquois raids alongside British colonial forces against French settlements and allied tribes, responding to prior French attacks on Seneca villages in 1687, yet the Confederacy avoided full commitment to either belligerent, prioritizing internal recovery over decisive entanglement.[57] By contrast, in subsequent conflicts like Queen Anne's War (1702–1713), the reinforced neutrality post-1701 held, with Seneca leaders abstaining from major hostilities to focus on diplomacy and western expansion, thereby frustrating British expectations of unwavering alliance while deterring French reprisals.[71] This selective non-involvement preserved Seneca autonomy but invited mutual recriminations: British traders complained of lost military leverage, while French agents viewed Iroquois restraint as opportunistic betrayal rather than principled balance. As tensions escalated toward the French and Indian War (1754–1763), Seneca pragmatism tilted pro-British, driven by colonial encroachments on western lands and British assurances of territorial protection in exchange for warrior support against French forts.[72] Treaty records document this quid pro quo; for instance, the 1764 Niagara Portage Treaty saw Seneca sachems grant British forces unimpeded access to a two-mile corridor along the portage path—ceding practical control over a key trade artery—for explicit guarantees of defense against rival incursions and preservation of hunting grounds.[73] Initial Seneca overtures to the French, rooted in longstanding fur trade ties, yielded to confederacy-wide alignment with Britain by mid-war, as empirical diplomatic correspondence reveals British gifts and land covenants outweighing French offers, though postwar British failure to enforce these guarantees fueled later distrust without negating the alliance's short-term strategic gains.[74]Revolutionary and Early National Period
Involvement in the American Revolution
The Seneca, as the westernmost nation of the Iroquois Confederacy, predominantly allied with the British Crown during the American Revolution, motivated by longstanding trade ties, promises of protection against settler encroachment, and the perceived strength of British forces.[75] This alignment saw Seneca warriors, numbering several hundred, integrate with Loyalist units such as Butler's Rangers under Colonel John Butler and collaborate with Mohawk leader Joseph Brant in frontier operations.[76] Their participation emphasized raiding American settlements to disrupt Patriot expansion and supply lines, reflecting a strategy to preserve territorial integrity amid escalating colonial pressures. Seneca forces played key roles in major incursions, including the Wyoming Valley raid on July 3, 1778, where combined British, Loyalist, and Iroquois attackers defeated a Patriot militia, resulting in approximately 340 American deaths, many executed post-surrender by Native warriors.[77] Similarly, in the Cherry Valley Massacre on November 11, 1778, Seneca alongside other Iroquois and Rangers killed around 30 civilians and 16 soldiers, targeting non-combatants in a pattern that intensified frontier terror.[78] These and subsequent actions contributed to hundreds of settler casualties, undermining American morale and agriculture in New York and Pennsylvania borderlands, though exact aggregates vary due to dispersed engagements.[79] Despite this predominant British orientation, internal divisions persisted within Seneca communities, countering narratives of uniform allegiance. Initially, some leaders like sachem Guyashuta advocated neutrality to avoid entanglement in colonial conflicts, declaring in 1776 that Seneca lands would not serve as passage for either side's armies.[80] Contemporary narratives, such as that of adopted captive Mary Jemison, highlight familial and communal splits mirroring broader Iroquois fissures, with pockets of reluctance or pro-American sympathy amid coercion by British agents.[81] While minority, these divisions—estimated in some accounts as affecting up to a third through neutrality or quiet opposition—stemmed from wariness of British reliability and kinship ties across lines.[82] The Seneca's firm British commitment exacerbated the Confederacy's fracture, pitting them against pro-American Oneida and Tuscarora kin, igniting intra-Iroquois hostilities that eroded the League's diplomatic cohesion.[3] This schism, devoid of unified council authority post-1777, diminished collective leverage in postwar treaties, exposing Seneca to unilateral land pressures as the defeated alliance failed to enforce prior neutrality pacts or territorial guarantees.[83]Post-Revolution Treaties and Land Cessions
Following the American Revolutionary War, the Seneca Nation, devastated by military campaigns, negotiated the Treaty of Fort Stanwix on October 22, 1784, with the United States at Fort Stanwix (now Rome, New York). This agreement compelled the Six Nations, including the Seneca as the westernmost members, to cede extensive southern territories encompassing much of present-day western Pennsylvania, parts of New York south of the Niagara River, and areas along the Ohio River boundary.[84] The cessions, spanning approximately 6 million acres, reflected the weakened position of the Iroquois Confederacy after allying with the British, though Seneca negotiators viewed it as a necessary concession for peace rather than solely coerced submission.[85] Leaders like Cornplanter, a prominent Seneca chief and war captain turned diplomat, participated in these discussions, prioritizing alliance with the victorious United States to avert further conflict, a strategy that preserved immediate survival but underestimated long-term settler expansion.[86] Subsequent diplomacy culminated in the Treaty of Canandaigua, signed on November 11, 1794, by U.S. Commissioner Timothy Pickering and fifty sachems and chiefs representing the Six Nations, including key Seneca figures such as Cornplanter, Red Jacket, and Halftown.[87] This treaty established perpetual peace and friendship, with the United States formally acknowledging Seneca sovereignty over reserved lands west of the Genesee River, encompassing about 200,000 acres in western New York as protected reservations.[87] Article VII specifically guaranteed these Seneca territories against intrusion, providing a legal bulwark intended to halt further encroachments; however, Cornplanter's advocacy for accommodation—rooted in pragmatic realism about U.S. military superiority—overlooked internal factionalism and the fragility of treaty enforcement amid rising land speculation.[86] By around 1800, Seneca communities had begun rebuilding, leveraging these reservations for subsistence amid gradual demographic stabilization post-war losses.[88] Boundary ambiguities and settler violations soon eroded these gains, prompting additional cessions. The 1797 Treaty of Big Tree, negotiated with private land companies like Phelps and Gorham, fragmented Seneca holdings east of the Genesee into individual allotments for a modest annuity, effectively privatizing communal lands and inviting further sales.[89] Federal involvement continued with the 1802 Treaty of Washington, where Seneca leaders, again including Cornplanter's influence, relinquished a triangular tract between Buffalo Creek and the Niagara River—roughly 70,000 acres—for $100,000, ostensibly to resolve squatters but accelerating dispossession.[14] By the 1820s, persistent disputes over pre-1784 boundaries and New York State's assertive claims led to treaties like the 1821 agreement ceding remaining unsubdivided lands near the Tonawanda and Buffalo creeks, highlighting negotiators' recurring miscalculation that partial concessions would safeguard core reservations against inexorable demographic pressures from American settlement.[90] These pacts, legally binding under federal recognition, underscore a pattern where Seneca diplomacy traded territory for nominal security, often prioritizing short-term stability over unified resistance.[91]Sullivan-Clinton Campaign Impacts
The Sullivan-Clinton Campaign, conducted in August and September 1779 under Major General John Sullivan and Brigadier General James Clinton, systematically razed over 40 Seneca and Cayuga villages in western New York, destroying an estimated 160,000 bushels of corn along with orchards, gardens, and other food stores critical to their agrarian economy.[92][93] Sullivan's forces, numbering around 4,000 Continentals and militia, targeted the Seneca heartland in response to Iroquois raids allied with the British, burning longhouses and scattering inhabitants while encountering minimal resistance after the Battle of Newtown on August 29.[94] This scorched-earth approach left vast swaths of territory depopulated, with primary accounts documenting the incineration of structures housing thousands and the uprooting of sustenance crops that sustained up to 5,000 individuals.[92] Immediate consequences included widespread displacement, as survivors fled northward to British Fort Niagara or scattered into refugee networks among allied tribes, precipitating short-term famine exacerbated by the loss of harvested fields during a critical season.[94] British provisioning at Niagara mitigated total starvation for many, but oral histories and contemporary reports describe acute hunger and exposure deaths among the elderly and children in the ensuing "Destruction's Winter."[95] Despite this, Seneca resilience enabled partial rebuilding by 1780 through kin-based migrations and improvised agriculture on marginal lands, leveraging pre-existing trade ties with other Iroquois nations for seed stocks and support, though population centers remained vulnerable.[96] Strategically, the campaign failed to halt Iroquois-British raids, as evidenced by continued incursions into Pennsylvania in 1780 that prompted British counter-offensives, indicating insufficient neutralization of warrior bands who had dispersed beforehand.[97] However, the devastation weakened Seneca negotiating power, accelerating post-war land cessions under duress; by the 1784 Treaty of Fort Stanwix, they relinquished vast territories east of the Genesee River to the United States, marking an irreversible contraction of their aboriginal domain without commensurate compensation.[98] This outcome reflected not total cultural disruption—Seneca social structures and practices persisted amid relocation—but a causal pivot toward dependency on reduced reserves and external alliances.[94]19th Century Transformations
Handsome Lake Revival Movement
In 1799, Seneca leader Handsome Lake (Sganyodaiyo, c. 1735–1815), recovering from a near-fatal illness attributed to alcohol abuse and social despair following colonial wars and land losses, reported visions from supernatural messengers conveying the Gaiwiio ("Good Word" or "Good Message").[99] These visions outlined a syncretic moral code blending traditional Iroquois spiritual practices—such as thanksgiving rituals and clan governance—with Christian-influenced principles like monogamy, industry, and rejection of vices, drawing partial inspiration from Quaker missionaries who emphasized temperance and pacifism.[100] Handsome Lake, supported by influential kin like his half-brother Cornplanter, preached this code across Seneca villages, establishing the Longhouse Religion (also known as the Pagan Code or Handsome Lake Religion) centered in communal longhouses for ceremonies rejecting full assimilation into Christianity.[101] The Gaiwiio comprised approximately 33 prescriptive articles prohibiting alcohol consumption, witchcraft, love charms, abortion, gambling, and domestic quarrels while promoting plow agriculture, animal husbandry, and stable family units to counter post-Revolutionary economic collapse and cultural erosion.[99] Temperance mandates empirically reduced alcohol-related disruptions in adherent communities, fostering sobriety and communal labor that aided short-term recovery from epidemics and poverty, as evidenced by Quaker observers noting decreased intoxication by 1809.[102] However, the anti-witchcraft edicts, framing sorcery as a cause of misfortune, incited accusations and confessions under duress; historical Seneca accounts document executions of suspected witches in the early 1800s, including burnings and poisonings, which exacerbated factionalism and unjust deaths amid grief-driven paranoia rather than verifiable causation.[103] While the movement's puritanical reforms provided a framework for cultural resilience against assimilation pressures, its mixed legacy reflects causal trade-offs: temperance and moral discipline preserved social cohesion for adherents, yet witchcraft purges inflicted tangible harm without empirical basis, contributing to internal divisions that persisted into the mid-19th century.[101] The Longhouse Religion endures today among a minority of Seneca and broader Haudenosaunee practitioners, who maintain its rituals as a bulwark for traditional identity amid modernization, though adherence has declined with broader Christian conversion and secular influences.[100]Reservation Establishment and Internal Divisions
In the early 19th century, the Seneca retained core reservations including Allegany and Cattaraugus following the 1797 Treaty of Big Tree, but faced intensified pressures from New York State land encroachments and federal removal policies.[104] The 1838 Treaty of Buffalo Creek, signed under duress by a minority of chiefs, mandated relocation to a reserve in Kansas Territory in exchange for ceding New York lands, yet widespread refusals among the Seneca—driven by attachment to ancestral territories—limited emigration to a small fraction, fostering distrust between pro-removal and anti-removal factions while solidifying hold on the remaining reservations.[105][106] By the 1840s, disputes over annuity distributions from prior land sales and ineffective traditional governance amid settler intrusions prompted radical internal reform. On November 13, 1848, Seneca leaders at Allegany and Cattaraugus reservations adopted a constitution establishing elected councils, effectively "dehorning" hereditary life chiefs and instituting two-year terms for councillors chosen by male suffrage over 21, marking a shift to republican structures separate from the broader Haudenosaunee Confederacy.[107] This upheaval, ratified despite opposition, centralized authority on the two primary reservations while excluding smaller holdings like Oil Springs, but it deepened factionalism by pitting traditionalists—who favored matrilineal hereditary leadership—against reformers advocating merit-based or elected roles akin to Iroquois "Pine Tree Chiefs," selected for wartime prowess or civic merit rather than birthright, thereby eroding unified decision-making on land defenses.[107][108] The mid-1850s oil strikes at Oil Springs Reservation, part of Seneca territory near modern Cuba, New York, further accentuated wealth disparities as lessees extracted "Seneca oil" for emerging industrial uses, generating royalties that benefited select individuals and councils but fueled resentments over unequal distribution and non-native squatter encroachments.[109] These economic rifts compounded political divides, with traditionalists viewing resource exploitation as cultural erosion and progressives seeing it as leverage against poverty, ultimately weakening collective bargaining in ongoing state disputes over reservation boundaries and taxation.[109] By this period, the Seneca population numbered approximately 6,000 across New York holdings, strained by emigration, disease, and internal discord.[110]Resistance to Assimilation Policies
The Seneca Nation opposed the federal push for land allotment under the Dawes Severalty Act of February 8, 1887, which sought to dissolve communal tribal holdings into individual parcels of 160 acres per family head to foster agricultural self-sufficiency and citizenship. Seneca leaders rejected these measures, viewing them as threats to tribal sovereignty and collective land tenure; consequently, their reservations escaped allotment, retaining communal ownership intact unlike over two-thirds of Native lands lost nationally by 1934.[111][112] The Gaiwiio, or Code of Handsome Lake—a religious revival from 1799 blending Iroquois traditions with selective Christian morals—exerted ongoing influence, encouraging resistance to missionary schools that promoted full cultural erasure. Adherents prioritized oral traditions and ceremonial practices over Euro-American literacy and vocational training, limiting enrollment in Quaker and other denominational institutions established on reservations in the early to mid-1800s.[113] Legal efforts yielded mixed results in defending territorial integrity, with successes including mid-century proceedings that affirmed Seneca claims to disputed properties in the Genesee Valley region, such as Oil Springs, against non-Native encroachments.[114] Yet, such resistance often perpetuated educational gaps; by 1900, illiteracy among Native Americans broadly hovered below 50% for adults, with Seneca communities showing analogous patterns due to preference for kin-based upbringing over formalized instruction, hindering integration into wage labor and commercial farming.[115] This rigidity in cultural institutions, while preserving social cohesion, constrained adaptive responses to industrial economic shifts, as communal decision-making slowed individual capital accumulation and skill acquisition.[116]20th Century Challenges and Adaptations
Kinzua Dam Construction and Displacement
The Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir project, authorized by the Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938, aimed to control severe flooding on the Allegheny River that had repeatedly devastated downstream areas including Pittsburgh, where over 50 floods occurred between 1900 and 1936. Construction by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers began in 1960, with the dam completed in 1965 and the reservoir operational by 1966, creating a 24-mile-long body of water spanning Pennsylvania and New York. The engineering rationale prioritized large-scale flood storage capacity, as studies indicated Kinzua offered superior protection compared to alternative sites like Conewango or Tionesta, with lower costs and fewer non-Indian displacements despite impacting Seneca lands.[117][118][119] The project required federal condemnation of roughly 10,000 acres—about one-third of the Allegany Reservation—flooding nine Seneca communities and displacing approximately 600 individuals from 160 families, many of whom had resided there for generations. The Seneca Nation mounted legal challenges, citing the 1794 Treaty of Canandaigua's guarantee of reservation lands, but U.S. District Court denied an injunction in Seneca Nation of Indians v. Brucker (1958), affirming congressional authority under the plenary power doctrine to override treaty rights for public works. Protests included petitions, congressional testimony, and alliances with conservationists, yet Congress enacted the necessary appropriations in 1958, enabling land acquisition through eminent domain. Partial mitigations involved relocating some cultural sites and graves, though critics noted incomplete preservation of sacred areas.[120][121][122] Under Public Law 88-533 signed in 1964, the Seneca Nation received $15,000,053 in compensation, covering direct land damages, severance impacts, relocation housing, and infrastructure like roads and utilities for affected families. Funds supported new settlements on remaining reservation lands, though many relocatees faced socioeconomic disruptions including lost farmland and community cohesion. Economically, the reservoir has averted flood damages exceeding $1 billion regionally while generating hydroelectric power up to 400,000 kilowatts annually, yielding net benefits per Corps analyses that weighed broad flood prevention against localized Seneca losses—benefits realized through reduced insurance costs, preserved infrastructure, and enhanced navigation, underscoring the causal trade-offs of infrastructure prioritizing majority population centers over indigenous minorities.[123][124][125]Federal Termination Threats and Sovereignty Assertions
The federal termination policy of the 1950s, formalized through House Concurrent Resolution 108 on August 1, 1953, sought to dissolve tribal governments and transfer lands into non-Indian ownership for over 100 tribes, but encountered resistance and ultimate failure in cases like the Seneca Nation due to the tribe's demonstrated self-governance capacity and strategic advocacy.[126] Unlike terminated groups such as the Menominee of Wisconsin, the Seneca avoided dissolution by leveraging their pre-existing elected council system—established in 1848 to replace traditional chiefly appointments—which evidenced administrative autonomy and undermined federal pretexts for intervention.[127] This policy's broader critiques highlight its causal disconnect from empirical tribal readiness, as evidenced by the low termination success rate (only 109 tribes affected out of thousands) and subsequent reversals, reflecting overreach in assuming assimilation viability without rigorous assessment of sovereign institutions.[128] In response to termination threats, the Seneca Nation pursued economic planning initiatives in the 1950s, including resource allocation and infrastructure development on reservations, to affirm fiscal independence and deter legislative targeting. These efforts, coupled with population recovery—reaching approximately 8,000 enrolled members by 1980—illustrated demographic and communal stability that contradicted termination's assimilationist assumptions.[1] Concurrently, the Nation asserted treaty rights through litigation, such as in Seneca Nation of Indians v. United States (1964), where courts examined federal breaches of 1794 treaty obligations regarding land protections, reinforcing legal sovereignty against erosion.[129] Internal governance reforms during this era further entrenched the elected council's authority over hereditary chiefs, streamlining decision-making to align with federal self-determination criteria and insulating against termination by showcasing adaptive, democratic structures. This evolution, rooted in 19th-century constitutional foundations but refined amid mid-20th-century pressures, contributed to the policy's collapse, as President Nixon's July 1970 Special Message to Congress explicitly abandoned termination in recognition of tribes' inherent self-governing rights. The Seneca's navigation of these threats underscores how tribal agency, rather than federal fiat, preserved sovereignty amid systemic policy flaws.Economic Shifts and Modernization Efforts
During the mid-20th century, the Seneca Nation experienced a marked decline in traditional agriculture, which had long formed the backbone of reservation economies, as small-scale farming proved increasingly unviable amid land fragmentation from prior allotments and broader rural economic pressures affecting Native communities.[112] By the 1930s through the 1960s, many Seneca shifted toward off-reservation wage labor in manufacturing, construction, and service sectors, alongside entrepreneurial ventures in small businesses such as trucking and retail on or near reservations, reflecting adaptive responses to isolation and limited local opportunities rather than reliance on federal aid.[130] Over 500 Seneca individuals served in World War II, acquiring technical and vocational skills that facilitated postwar economic diversification, including mechanics, welding, and management roles upon return.[131] These veterans contributed to community modernization efforts, yet Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) relocation and vocational programs of the 1950s yielded limited long-term success due to inadequate funding, cultural mismatches, and persistent barriers to urban integration.[132] Reservation geography in rural western New York exacerbated economic challenges, as geographic isolation restricted access to industrial job centers and markets, causally impeding full economic assimilation and prompting substantial out-migration; by 1970, approximately half of enrolled Seneca resided off-reservation to pursue stable employment.[133] This dispersion underscored entrepreneurial initiative, with families leveraging kinship networks for job placements and remittances supporting reservation-based micro-enterprises, countering tendencies toward welfare dependency observed in some federally supported Native groups.[134]Contemporary Seneca Nation
Governance Structure and Elections
The Seneca Nation's governance is defined by its 1848 constitution, which establishes a tripartite system with separation of powers among legislative, executive, and judicial branches.[135] The legislative branch consists of a council of 16 members, with eight elected from each of the Allegany and Cattaraugus territories for four-year terms, ensuring representation from the Nation's primary reservations.[136] The executive branch includes a president, treasurer, and clerk, each elected nation-wide for two-year terms, with leadership alternating between the two territories to prevent dominance by one community and promote balanced governance.[5] The judicial branch features elected peacemakers serving as judges in a court system that handles civil and criminal matters, with surrogates for probate, further embedding democratic election principles across all branches.[135] Elections occur every two years on the first Tuesday in November, fostering competitiveness through multiple candidates and political parties within the Nation.[137] In the 2024 general election, J.C. Seneca secured the presidency with approximately 87-90% of the vote against challenger Mike General, reflecting strong voter engagement despite the lopsided outcome.[138] [139] Debates persist over term limits, as the constitution's rotation requirement between territories functions as a de facto limit on consecutive service from the same base, though no absolute caps exist, raising concerns about potential entrenchment in smaller electorates prone to familial or factional influences that could heighten corruption risks.[5] Compared to the traditional Haudenosaunee Confederacy structure, where Seneca leaders (sachems) held positions through consensus selection with emphasis on lifelong deliberation and clan balance, the modern elected system enhances accountability via periodic voting and majority rule but diminishes the emphasis on extended consensus, potentially accelerating decisions at the cost of broader buy-in.[140] This shift, formalized in 1848 amid pressures for self-determination, prioritizes electoral responsiveness over hereditary or consensus-driven continuity observed in traditional Iroquois governance.[141]Demographics and Community Locations
The Seneca Nation of Indians, the largest contemporary political entity representing the Seneca people, has an enrolled citizenship of over 8,500 members as of recent official records.[136] These members are dispersed across the United States, with concentrations in western New York and adjacent areas of Pennsylvania, reflecting patterns of urban migration common among many Native American tribes. While the reservations function as cultural and administrative hubs, a substantial majority of citizens reside off-territory, often in nearby cities such as Buffalo, Salamanca, and Pittsburgh, due to employment and educational opportunities.[136] The Nation's primary communities are anchored on three federally recognized territories in New York State. The Allegany Territory, the largest at approximately 21,000 acres, is located in Cattaraugus County near the town of Salamanca along the Allegheny River.[136] The Cattaraugus Territory covers about 13,000 acres, primarily in Cattaraugus County but extending into Erie County near Gowanda and the Cattaraugus Creek.[136] The smallest, Oil Spring Territory, consists of one square mile divided between Allegany and Cattaraugus Counties northwest of Cuba, serving mainly ceremonial purposes with limited resident population.[136] These lands, totaling around 35,000 acres, support community governance, housing, and traditional practices amid surrounding non-Native development.[136] Demographic data from U.S. Census Bureau profiles for American Indian and Alaska Native populations in these counties indicate a median age higher than the national average for Native groups, with ongoing challenges in sustaining on-reservation residency amid broader regional economic pressures.[142]Economic Enterprises and Diversification
The Seneca Nation's primary economic enterprises center on gaming operations, including the Seneca Niagara Resort & Casino in Niagara Falls, New York, and other facilities under Seneca Gaming Corporation, which collectively drive substantial revenue generation. These casinos contributed to an estimated $1.9 billion in total economic output for Western New York in 2024, encompassing direct gaming activities and multiplier effects from visitor spending and supply chains.[143] Seneca Gaming Corporation reported revenues of approximately $538.7 million, primarily from slot machines, table games, and hospitality services, though exact figures fluctuate with market conditions and compact terms requiring a 25% share of slot revenue to New York State.[144] [145] Complementing gaming, the Nation leverages sovereign tax exemptions for on-reservation sales of gasoline and cigarettes, which generate additional untaxed revenue streams and attract regional customers, bolstering fiscal self-sufficiency without state interference. These ventures, while profitable, underscore a historical pattern of resource extraction tied to reservation geography, yet they remain secondary to gaming in scale. To mitigate over-reliance on gaming, which exposes the economy to tourism volatility and regulatory shifts, the Seneca Nation has pursued diversification through entities like Seneca Holdings, established in 2009 as a private equity arm managing non-gaming investments in sectors such as federal contracting, environmental services, travel, and professional sports, including the 2025 acquisition of a National Lacrosse League franchise.[146] [147] The Seneca Nation of Indians Economic Development Company (SNIEDC) further supports small business loans and financial services for tribal members, fostering entrepreneurship.[148] In the 2010s, the Nation approved medical cannabis initiatives, leading to the establishment of the Cannabis Department and retail dispensaries like Nativa Cannabis, which promote on-territory cultivation and sales to spur sovereign economic growth.[149] [150] These efforts have elevated employment, with gaming and related enterprises supporting over 8,000 direct and indirect jobs in 2024, many held by tribal members. Per capita income for American Indian/Alaska Native populations in New York, including Seneca territories, stands at approximately $30,254, surpassing national Native averages but trailing state medians due to persistent structural barriers.[143] [151] Despite revenue gains, critics note that heavy gaming dependence risks long-term sustainability, prompting ongoing pushes for broader portfolio expansion to align with intergenerational economic resilience.[152]Recent Developments and Initiatives
In April 2025, Seneca Nation President Brian Parker signed an executive order initiating the restoration of the Kinzua "Take Area," targeting the reclamation of lands submerged by the Kinzua Dam between elevations 1,340 and 1,365 feet.[153] This effort, part of the broader "Reclaim Kinzua" campaign, addresses historical displacements from the 1960s and seeks federal cooperation to return approximately 1,000 acres of territory flooded for flood control purposes.[154] On August 5, 2025, the Seneca Nation, through its subsidiary Seneca Holdings, LLC, acquired the Rochester Knighthawks professional lacrosse franchise from the Pegula family, securing the team's future in Rochester, New York.[155] The purchase, described as historic by league officials, reinforces economic diversification while promoting lacrosse—a sport originating with Iroquois peoples including the Seneca—as a vehicle for cultural preservation and community engagement.[156] Throughout 2025, the Seneca Nation extended short-term gaming compact agreements with New York State amid stalled negotiations for a long-term replacement to the 2002 pact, which grants exclusive casino rights west of State Route 14 in exchange for revenue sharing.[157] Nation leaders accused the state of bad-faith bargaining and insufficient engagement since talks resumed in July, emphasizing the compact's role in funding essential services without taxpayer subsidies. An independent economic impact study released in October 2025 quantified the Nation's contributions at nearly $2 billion annually to Western New York's economy as of 2024, sustaining over 8,000 jobs through gaming, energy, and other enterprises.[143] This underscores ongoing modernization initiatives, including a January 2025 sale of renewable energy certificates by Seneca Environmental to Pinterest, advancing sustainable development goals.[158]Notable Individuals
Pre-20th Century Figures
Cornplanter (c. 1732 – February 18, 1836), born at Conewangus on the Genesee River, served as a principal Seneca war chief allied with the British during the American Revolutionary War, leading raids against colonial settlements that contributed to Iroquois military efforts.[159] [160] After the war, he transitioned to diplomacy, addressing President George Washington in 1790 alongside other chiefs to demand compensation for lands seized during conflicts and encroachments by settlers.[161] [162] His negotiations helped secure the Treaty of Canandaigua on November 11, 1794, ratified by over 50 Haudenosaunee leaders including Cornplanter, which the U.S. government affirmed as recognizing Seneca land rights and sovereignty over territories in western New York, effectively restoring substantial areas previously ceded under duress.[163] [164] Red Jacket (c. 1750 – January 20, 1830), or Sagoyewatha, a Wolf Clan war chief and renowned orator, participated in British-aligned Seneca raids during the Revolutionary War and War of 1812, yet post-war advocated against further land losses.[165] He opposed the 1823-1826 land cessions to the Ogden Land Company, rallying Seneca resistance to preserve reservations by rejecting sales that would reduce holdings to minimal tracts, emphasizing communal retention over individual gain.[166] [167] Red Jacket also resisted Christian missionary incursions, delivering a 1805 address at Buffalo Creek that critiqued efforts to supplant Seneca traditions with European religion, arguing from observed inconsistencies in missionary claims and defending indigenous spiritual autonomy based on ancestral practices.[168] [165] Mary Jemison (1743–1833), abducted at age 15 by Shawnee raiders allied with French forces in 1758 near present-day Adams County, Pennsylvania, was ransomed to and adopted by a Seneca family on the Genesee River, renamed Dehgewanus to replace a deceased daughter.[169] [170] Her 1824 narrative, dictated to James E. Seaver, documents full assimilation into Seneca society—she married twice, bore children who integrated as tribal members, farmed, and endured wartime displacements—offering empirical evidence of Iroquois adoption efficacy, where captives underwent mourning rituals and kinship integration, often leading to voluntary retention over repatriation due to familial bonds and cultural adaptation.[171] [172] Despite opportunities post-Revolution to rejoin Euro-American kin, Jemison affirmed contentment in Seneca life, highlighting causal factors like reciprocal obligations and communal support in sustaining long-term incorporation.[173]
