Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
V-2 rocket
View on Wikipedia
The V-2 rocket (German: Vergeltungswaffe 2, lit. 'Vengeance Weapon 2'), with the development name Aggregat-4 (A4), was the world's first long-range[4] guided ballistic missile. The missile, powered by a liquid-propellant rocket engine, was developed during the Second World War in Nazi Germany as a "vengeance weapon" and assigned to attack Allied cities as retaliation for the Allied bombings of German cities. The V2 rocket also became the first artificial object to travel into space by crossing the Kármán line (edge of space) with the vertical launch of MW 18014 on 20 June 1944.[5]
Key Information
Research of military use of long-range rockets began when the graduate studies of Wernher von Braun were noticed by the German Army. A series of prototypes culminated in the A4, which went to war as the V2. Beginning in September 1944, more than 3,000 V2s were launched by the Wehrmacht against Allied targets, first London and later Antwerp and Liège. According to a 2011 BBC documentary,[6] the attacks from V-2s resulted in the deaths of an estimated 9,000 civilians and military personnel, while a further 12,000 laborers and concentration camp prisoners died as a result of their forced participation in the production of the weapons.[7]
The rockets traveled at supersonic speeds, impacted without audible warning, and proved unstoppable. No effective defense existed. Teams from the Allied forces—the United States, the United Kingdom, France and the Soviet Union—raced to seize major German manufacturing facilities, procure the Germans' missile technology, and capture the V-2s' launching sites. Von Braun and more than 100 core R&D V-2 personnel surrendered to the Americans, and many of the original V-2 team transferred their work to the Redstone Arsenal, where they were relocated as part of Operation Paperclip. The US also captured enough V-2 hardware to build approximately 80 of the missiles. The Soviets gained possession of the V-2 manufacturing facilities after the war, re-established V-2 production, and moved it to the Soviet Union.
Development history
[edit]

During the late 1920s, a young Wernher von Braun bought a copy of Hermann Oberth's book, Die Rakete zu den Planetenräumen (The Rocket into Interplanetary Spaces). In 1928 a Raketenrummel or "Rocket Rumble" fad in the popular media was initiated by Fritz von Opel and Max Valier, a collaborator of Oberth, by experimenting with rockets, including public demonstrations of manned rocket cars and rocket planes. The “Rocket Rumble” was highly influential on von Braun as a teenage space enthusiast. He was so enthusiastic after seeing one of the public Opel-RAK rocket car demonstrations, that he constructed and launched his own homemade toy rocket car on a crowded sidewalk and was later taken in for questioning by the local police, until released to his father for disciplinary action.[8]
Starting in 1930, von Braun attended the Technische Hochschule in Charlottenburg (now Technische Universität Berlin), where he assisted Oberth in liquid-fueled rocket motor tests. Von Braun was working on his doctorate when the Nazi Party gained power in Germany. An artillery captain, Walter Dornberger, arranged an Ordnance Department research grant for von Braun, who from then on worked next to Dornberger's existing solid-fuel rocket test site at Kummersdorf. Von Braun's thesis, Construction, Theoretical, and Experimental Solution to the Problem of the Liquid Propellant Rocket (dated 16 April 1934), was kept classified by the German Army and was not published until 1960.[9] By the end of 1934 his group had launched multiple rockets, two of which reached heights of 2.2 and 3.5 km (1.4 and 2.2 mi), respectively.
At the time, many Germans were interested in American physicist Robert H. Goddard's research. Before 1939, German engineers and scientists occasionally contacted Goddard directly with technical questions. Von Braun used Goddard's plans from various journals and incorporated them into the building of the Aggregate (A) series of rockets, named for the German word for mechanism or mechanical system.[10]
After successes at Kummersdorf with the first two Aggregate series rockets, Braun and Walter Riedel began thinking of a much larger rocket in the summer of 1936,[11] based on a projected 25,000 kg (55,000 lb) thrust engine. In addition, Dornberger specified the military requirements needed to include a 1-ton payload, a range of 172 miles with a dispersion of 2 or 3 miles, and transportable using road vehicles.[12]: 50–51
After the A-4 project was postponed due to unfavorable aerodynamic stability testing of the A-3 in July 1936,[13][14] Braun specified the A-4 performance in 1937,[15] and, after an "extensive" series of test firings of the A-5 scale test model,[16] using a motor redesigned from the troublesome A-3 by Walter Thiel,[16] A-4 design and construction was ordered c. 1938–39.[17] During 28–30 September 1939, Der Tag der Weisheit (English: The Day of Wisdom) conference met at Peenemünde to initiate the funding of university research to solve rocket problems.[11]: 40 By late 1941, the Army Research Center at Peenemünde possessed the technologies essential to the success of the A-4. The four main technologies for the A-4 were large liquid-fuel rocket engines, supersonic aerodynamics, gyroscopic guidance and rudders in jet control.[3] At the time, Adolf Hitler was not particularly impressed by the V-2; he opined that it was merely an artillery shell with a longer range and much higher cost.[18]
During early September 1943, Braun promised the Long-Range Bombardment Commission[3]: 224 that the A-4 development was "practically complete/concluded",[14]: 135 but even by the middle of 1944, a complete A-4 parts list was still unavailable.[3]: 224 Hitler was sufficiently impressed by the enthusiasm of its developers, and needed a "wonder weapon" to maintain German morale,[18] so he authorized its deployment in large numbers.[19]
The V-2s were constructed at the Mittelwerk site by prisoners from Mittelbau-Dora, a concentration camp where 20,000 prisoners died.[20][21][page needed][22]
In 1943, an Austrian resistance group led by Heinrich Maier managed to send exact drawings of the V-2 rocket to the American Office of Strategic Services. Location sketches of V-rocket manufacturing facilities, such as those in Peenemünde, were also sent to the Allied general staff in order to enable Allied bombers to perform airstrikes. This information was particularly important for Operation Crossbow and Operation Hydra, both preliminary missions for Operation Overlord. The group was gradually captured by the Gestapo and most of the members were executed.[23][24][25][26][27]
Technical details
[edit]
The A4 used a 75% ethanol/25% water mixture (B-Stoff) for fuel and liquid oxygen (LOX) (A-Stoff) for oxidizer.[28] The water reduced the flame temperature, acted as a coolant by turning to steam, augmented thrust, tended to produce a smoother burn, and reduced thermal stress.[29]
Rudolf Hermann's supersonic wind tunnel was used to measure the A4's aerodynamic characteristics and center of pressure, using a model of the A4 within a 40 square centimeter chamber. Measurements were made using a Mach 1.86 blowdown nozzle on 8 August 1940. Tests at Mach numbers 1.56 and 2.5 were made after 24 September 1940.[30]: 76–78
At launch the A4 propelled itself for up to 65 seconds on its own power, and a program motor held the inclination at the specified angle until engine shutdown, after which the rocket continued on a ballistic free-fall trajectory. The rocket reached a height of 80 km (50 mi) or 264,000 ft after shutting off the engine.[31]
The fuel and oxidizer pumps were driven by a steam turbine, fueled by decomposition of concentrated hydrogen peroxide (T-Stoff) facilitated by a sodium permanganate (Z-Stoff) catalyst. Both the alcohol and oxygen tanks were an aluminum-magnesium alloy.[1]
The turbopump, rotating at 4,000 rpm, forced the fuel mixture and oxygen into the combustion chamber at 125 liters (33 US gallons) per second, where they were ignited by a spinning electrical igniter. The engine produced 8 tons of thrust during the preliminary stage whilst the fuel was gravity-fed, before increasing to 25 tons as the turbopump pressurised the fuel, lifting the 13.5 ton rocket. Combustion gases exited the chamber at 2,820 °C (5,100 °F), and a speed of 2,000 m (6,600 ft) per second. The oxygen to fuel mixture was 1.0:0.85 at 25 tons of thrust; as ambient pressure decreased with flight altitude, thrust increased to 29 tons.[12][32][33] The turbopump assembly contained two centrifugal pumps, one for the fuel mixture, and one for the oxygen. The turbine was connected directly by a shaft to the alcohol pump and through a flexible joint and shaft to the oxygen pump.[34] The turbopump delivered 55 kg (121 lb) of alcohol and 68 kg (150 lb) of liquid oxygen per second to a combustion chamber at 1.5 MPa (218 psi).[30]
Dr. Thiel's 25 ton rocket motor design relied on pump feeding, as opposed to earlier pressure-fed designs. The motor used centrifugal injection, and used both regenerative cooling and film cooling. Film cooling admitted alcohol into the combustion chamber and exhaust nozzle under slight pressure through four rings of small perforations. The mushroom-shaped injection head was removed from the combustion chamber to a mixing chamber, the combustion chamber was made more spherical while being shortened from 6 to 1-foot in length, and the connection to the nozzle was made cone shaped. The resultant 1.5 ton chamber operated at a combustion pressure of 1.52 MPa (220 psi). Thiel's 1.5 ton chamber was then scaled up to a 4.5 ton motor by arranging three injection heads above the combustion chamber. By 1939, eighteen injection heads in two concentric circles at the head of the 3 mm (0.12 in) thick sheet-steel chamber, were used to make the 25 ton motor.[12]: 52–55 [30]
The warhead was a source of trouble. The explosive used was amatol 60/40 detonated by an electric contact fuze. Amatol had the advantage of stability, and the warhead was protected by a thick layer of glass wool, but even so it could still explode during the re-entry phase. The warhead weighed 975 kilograms (2,150 lb) and contained 910 kilograms (2,010 lb) of explosive. The warhead's explosive percentage by weight was 93%, a very high portion compared to other types of munitions.
A protective layer of glass wool was also used for the fuel tanks to prevent the A-4 from forming ice, a problem which plagued other early ballistic missiles such as the balloon tank-design SM-65 Atlas which entered US service in 1959. The tanks held 4,173 kilograms (9,200 lb) of ethyl alcohol and 5,553 kilograms (12,242 lb) of oxygen.[35]

The V-2 was guided by four external rudders on the tail fins, and four internal graphite vanes in the jet stream at the exit of the motor. These 8 control surfaces were controlled by Helmut Hölzer's analog computer, the Mischgerät, via electrical-hydraulic servomotors, based on electrical signals from the gyros. The Siemens Vertikant LEV-3 guidance system consisted of two free gyroscopes (a horizontal for pitch and a vertical with two degrees of freedom for yaw and roll) for lateral stabilization, coupled with a PIGA accelerometer, or the Walter Wolman radio control system, to control engine cutoff at a specified velocity. Other gyroscopic systems used in the A-4 included Kreiselgeräte's SG-66 and SG-70. The V-2 was launched from a pre-surveyed location, so the distance and azimuth to the target were known. Fin 1 of the missile was aligned to the target azimuth.[36][30]: 81–82
Some later V-2s used "guide beams", radio signals transmitted from the ground, as an added input to the Mischgerät analog computer to keep the missile on course in azimuth.[37] The flying distance was controlled by the timing of the engine cut-off, Brennschluss, ground-controlled by a Doppler system or by different types of on-board integrating accelerometers. Thus, range was a function of engine burn time, which ended when a specific velocity was achieved.[32][12]: 203–204 [33] Just before engine cutoff, thrust was reduced to eight tons, in an effort to avoid any water hammer problems a rapid cutoff could cause.[29]
Dr. Friedrich Kirchstein of Siemens of Berlin developed the V-2 radio control for motor cutoff (German: Brennschluss).[14]: 28, 124 For velocity measurement, Professor Wolman of Dresden created an alternative of his Doppler[38]: 18 tracking system in 1940–41, which used a ground signal transponded by the A-4 to measure the velocity of the missile.[3]: 103 By 9 February 1942, Peenemünde engineer Gerd deBeek had documented the radio interference area of a V-2 as 10,000 metres (33,000 feet) around the "Firing Point",[39] and the first successful A-4 flight on 3 October 1942 used radio control to command motor cutoff.[13]: 12 Although Hitler commented on 22 September 1943 that "It is a great load off our minds that we have dispensed with the radio guiding-beam; now no opening remains for the British to interfere technically with the missile in flight",[14]: 138 about 20% of the operational V-2 launches were beam-guided.[13]: 12 [12]: 232 The Operation Pinguin V-2 offensive began on 8 September 1944, when Lehr- und Versuchsbatterie No. 444[38]: 51–2 (English: 'Training and Testing Battery 444') launched a single rocket guided by a radio beam directed at Paris.[39]: 47 Wreckage of combat V-2s occasionally contained the transponder for velocity and fuel cutoff.[11]: 259–260
The painting of the operational V-2s was mostly a ragged-edged pattern with several variations, but at the end of the war a plain olive green rocket was also used. During tests the rocket was painted in a characteristic black-and-white chessboard pattern, which aided in determining if the rocket was spinning around its longitudinal axis.

The original German designation of the rocket was "V2",[7][40] unhyphenated – exactly as used for any Third Reich-era "second prototype" example of an RLM-registered German aircraft design – but U.S. publications such as Life magazine were using the hyphenated form "V-2" as early as December 1944.[41]
Testing
[edit]The first successful test flight was on 3 October 1942, reaching an altitude of 84.5 kilometres (52.5 miles).[3] On that day, Walter Dornberger declared in a meeting at Peenemünde:
This third day of October, 1942, is the first of a new era in transportation, that of space travel...[13]17

Two test launches were recovered by the Allies: the Bäckebo rocket, the remnants of which landed in Sweden on 13 June 1944, and one recovered by the Polish resistance on 30 May 1944[42] from the Blizna V-2 missile launch site and transported to the UK during Operation Most III. The highest altitude reached during the war was 174.6 kilometres (108.5 miles) (20 June 1944).[3] Test launches of V-2 rockets were made at Peenemünde, Blizna and Tuchola Forest,[12]: 211 and after the war, at Cuxhaven by the British, White Sands Proving Grounds and Cape Canaveral by the U.S., and Kapustin Yar by the USSR.
Various design issues were identified and solved during V-2 development and testing:
- To reduce tank pressure and weight, rapid flow turbopumps were used to increase pressure.[3]: 35
- A short and lighter combustion chamber without burn-through was developed by using centrifugal injection nozzles, a mixing compartment, and a converging nozzle to the throat for homogeneous combustion.[13]: 51
- Film cooling was used to prevent burn-through at the nozzle throat.[13]: 52
- Relay contacts were made more durable to withstand vibration and prevent thrust cut-off just after lift-off.[13]: 52
- Ensuring that the fuel pipes had tension-free curves reduced the likelihood of explosions at 1,200–1,800 m (4,000–6,000 ft).[13]: 215, 217
- Fins were shaped with clearance to prevent damage as the exhaust jet expanded with altitude.[13]: 56, 118
- To control trajectory at liftoff and supersonic speeds, heat-resistant graphite vanes were used as rudders in the exhaust jet.[13]: 35, 58
Air burst problem
[edit]Through mid-March 1944, only four of the 26 successful Blizna launches had satisfactorily reached the Sarnaki target area[39]: 112, 221–222, 282 due to in-flight breakup (Luftzerleger) on re-entry into the atmosphere.[43]: 100 (As mentioned above, one rocket was collected by the Polish Home Army, with parts of it transported to London for tests.) Initially, the German developers suspected excessive alcohol tank pressure, but by April 1944, after five months of test firings, the cause was still not determined. Major-General Rossmann, the Army Weapons Office department chief, recommended stationing observers in the target area – c. May/June, Dornberger and von Braun set up a camp at the centre of the Poland target zone.[44] After moving to the Heidekraut,[11]: 172–173 SS Mortar Battery 500 of the 836th Artillery Battalion (Motorized) was ordered[39]: 47 on 30 August[38] to begin test launches of eighty 'sleeved' rockets.[14]: 281 Testing confirmed that the so-called 'tin trousers' – a tube designed to strengthen the forward end of the rocket cladding – reduced the likelihood of air bursts.[43]: 100 [12]: 188–198
Production
[edit]
On 27 March 1942, Dornberger proposed production plans and the building of a launching site on the Channel coast. In December, Speer ordered Major Thom and Dr. Steinhoff to reconnoitre the site near Watten. Assembly rooms were established at Peenemünde and in the Friedrichshafen facilities of Zeppelin Works. In 1943, a third factory, Raxwerke, was added.[12]: 71–72, 84
On 22 December 1942, Hitler signed the order for mass production, when Albert Speer assumed final technical data would be ready by July 1943. However, many issues still remained to be solved even by the autumn of 1943.[45]
On 8 January 1943, Dornberger and von Braun met with Speer. Speer stated, "As head of the Todt organisation I will take it on myself to start at once with the building of the launching site on the Channel coast," and established an A-4 production committee under Degenkolb.[12]: 72–77
On 26 May 1943, the Long-Range Bombardment Commission, chaired by AEG director Petersen, met at Peenemünde to review the V-1 and V-2 automatic long-range weapons. In attendance were Speer, Air Marshal Erhard Milch, Admiral Karl Dönitz, Col. General Friedrich Fromm, and Karl Saur. Both weapons had reached the final stage of development, and the commission decided to recommend to Hitler that both weapons be mass-produced. As Dornberger observed, "The disadvantages of the one would be compensated by the other's advantages."[12]: 83–84, 87–92
| Period of production | Production |
|---|---|
| Up to 15 September 1944 | 1,900 |
| 15 September to 29 October 1944 | 900 |
| 29 October to 24 November 1944 | 600 |
| 24 November to 15 January 1945 | 1,100 |
| 15 January to 15 February 1945 | 700 |
| Total | 5200 |
On 7 July 1943, Major General Dornberger, von Braun, and Dr. Steinhof briefed Hitler in his Wolf's Lair. Also in attendance were Speer, Wilhelm Keitel, and Alfred Jodl. The briefing included von Braun narrating a movie showing the successful launch on 3 October 1942, with scale models of the Channel coast firing bunker, and supporting vehicles, including the Meillerwagen. Hitler then gave Peenemünde top priority in the German armaments program stating, "Why was it I could not believe in the success of your work? if we had had these rockets in 1939 we should never have had this war..." Hitler also wanted a second launch bunker built.[12]: 93–105
Saur planned to build 2,000 rockets per month, between the existing three factories and the Nordhausen Mittelwerk factory being built. However, alcohol production was dependent upon the potato harvest.[12]: 97, 102–105
A production line was nearly ready at Peenemünde when the Operation Hydra attack occurred. The main targets of the attack included the test stands, the development works, the Pre-Production Works, the settlement where the scientists and technicians lived, the Trassenheide camp, and the harbor sector. According to Dornberger, "Serious damage to the works, contrary to first impressions, was surprisingly small." Work resumed after a delay of four to six weeks, and because of camouflage to mimic complete destruction, there were no more raids during the next nine months. The raid resulted in 735 lives lost, with heavy losses at Trassenheide, while 178 were killed in the settlement, including Dr. Thiel, his family, and Chief Engineer Walther.[12]: 139–152 The Germans eventually moved production to the underground Mittelwerk in the Kohnstein where 5,200 V-2 rockets were built with the use of forced labour.[46]
Launch sites
[edit]
After the Operation Crossbow bombing, initial plans for launching from the massive underground Watten, Wizernes and Sottevast bunkers or from fixed pads such as near the Château du Molay[47] were dismissed in favour of mobile launching. Eight main storage dumps were planned and four had been completed by July 1944 (the one at Mery-sur-Oise was begun during August 1943 and completed by February 1944).[48] The missile could be launched practically anywhere, roads running through forests being a particular favourite. The system was so mobile and small that only one Meillerwagen was ever caught in action by Allied aircraft, during the Operation Bodenplatte attack on 1 January 1945[49] near Lochem by a USAAF 4th Fighter Group aircraft, although Raymond Baxter described flying over a site during a launch and his wingman firing at the missile without hitting it.
It was estimated that a sustained rate of 350 V-2s could be launched per week, with 100 per day at maximum effort, given sufficient supply of the rockets.[50]
Operational history
[edit]
The LXV Armeekorps z.b.V. formed during the last days of November 1943 in France commanded by General der Artillerie z.V. Erich Heinemann was responsible for the operational use of V-2.[52] Three launch battalions were formed in late 1943, Artillerie Abteilung 836 (Mot.), Grossborn, Artillerie Abteilung 485 (Mot.), Naugard, and Artillerie Abteilung 962 (Mot.). Combat operations commenced in Sept. 1944, when training Batterie 444 deployed. On 2 September 1944, the SS Werfer-Abteilung 500 was formed, and by October, the SS under the command of SS Lt. Gen Hans Kammler, took operational control of all units. He formed Gruppe Süd with Art. Abt. 836, Merzig, and Gruppe Nord with Art. Abt. 485 and Batterie 444, Burgsteinfurt and The Hague.[53]
After Hitler's 29 August 1944 declaration to begin V-2 attacks as soon as possible, the offensive began on 7 September 1944 when two were launched at Paris (which the Allies had liberated less than two weeks earlier), but both crashed soon after launch. On 8 September a single rocket was launched at Paris, which caused modest damage near Porte d'Italie.[11]: 218, 220, 467 Two more launches by the 485th followed, including one from The Hague against London on the same day at 6:43 pm.[14]: 285 – the first landed at Staveley Road, Chiswick, killing 63-year-old Mrs. Ada Harrison, three-year-old Rosemary Clarke, and Sapper Bernard Browning on leave from the Royal Engineers,[15]: 11 and one that hit Epping with no casualties.
The British government, concerned about spreading panic or giving away vital intelligence to German forces, initially attempted to conceal the cause of the explosions by making no official announcement, and euphemistically blaming them on defective gas mains.[54] The public did not believe this explanation and therefore began referring to the V-2s as "flying gas mains".[55] The Germans themselves finally announced the V-2 on 8 November 1944 and only then, on 10 November 1944, did Winston Churchill inform Parliament, and the world, that England had been under rocket attack "for the last few weeks".[56]
In September 1944, control of the V-2 mission was transferred to the Waffen-SS and Division z.V.[57][58]
Positions of the German launch units changed a number of times. For example, Artillerie Init 444 arrived in the southwest Netherlands (in Zeeland) in September 1944. From a field near the village of Serooskerke, five V-2s were launched on 15 and 16 September, with one more successful and one failed launch on the 18th. That same date, a transport carrying a missile took a wrong turn and ended up in Serooskerke itself, giving a villager the opportunity to surreptitiously take some photographs of the weapon; these were smuggled to London by the Dutch Resistance.[59] After that the unit moved to the woods near Rijs, Gaasterland in the northwest Netherlands, to ensure that the technology was not captured by the Allies. From Gaasterland V-2s were launched against Ipswich and Norwich from 25 September (London being out of range). Because of their inaccuracy, these V-2s did not hit their target cities. Soon after that only London and Antwerp remained as designated targets as ordered by Adolf Hitler himself, Antwerp being targeted in the period of 12 to 20 October, after which time the unit moved to The Hague.

Targets
[edit]During the succeeding months about 3,172 V-2 rockets were fired at the following targets:[61]
- Belgium, 1,664: Antwerp (1,610), Liège (27), Hasselt (13), Tournai (9), Mons (3), Diest (2)
- United Kingdom, 1,402: London (1,358), Norwich (43),[14]: 289 Ipswich (1)
- France, 76: Lille (25), Paris (22), Tourcoing (19), Arras (6), Cambrai (4)
- Netherlands, 19: Maastricht (19)
- Germany, 11: Remagen (Ludendorff Bridge) (11)
Antwerp, Belgium was a target for a large number of V-weapon attacks from October 1944 through to the virtual end of the war in March 1945, leaving 1,736 dead and 4,500 injured in greater Antwerp. Thousands of buildings were damaged or destroyed as the city was struck by 590 direct hits. Hitler's hope that the Port of Antwerp dock gates would be hit and the port put out of action was not achieved.[62] The largest loss of life by a single rocket attack during the war came on 16 December 1944, when the roof of the crowded Cine Rex was struck, leaving 567 dead and 291 injured.[63][64]
An estimated 2,754 civilians were killed in London by V-2 attacks with another 6,523 injured,[65] which is two people killed per V-2 rocket. The death toll in London did not meet the Nazis' full expectations, during early usage, as they had not yet perfected the accuracy of the V-2, with many rockets being misdirected and exploding harmlessly. Accuracy increased during the war, particularly for batteries where the Leitstrahl (radio guide beam) system was used.[66] Missile strikes that did hit targets could cause large numbers of deaths; 160 were killed and 108 seriously injured in one explosion at 12:26 pm on 25 November 1944, at a Woolworth's department store in New Cross, south-east London.[67] British intelligence also helped impede the effectiveness of the Nazi weapon, sending false reports via their Double-Cross System implying that the rockets were over-shooting their London target by 10 to 20 miles (16 to 32 km). This tactic worked; more than half of the V-2s aimed at London landed short of the London Civil Defence Region.[68]: 459 Most landed on less-heavily populated areas in Kent due to erroneous recalibration. For the remainder of the war, British intelligence maintained the ruse by repeatedly sending bogus reports implying that these failed rockets were striking the British capital with heavy loss of life.[69]
Possible use during Operation Bodenplatte
[edit]At least one V-2 missile on a mobile Meillerwagen launch trailer was observed being elevated to launch position by a USAAF 4th Fighter Group pilot defending against the massive New Year's Day 1945 Operation Bodenplatte strike by the Luftwaffe over the northern German attack route near the town of Lochem on 1 January 1945. Possibly, from the potential sighting of the American fighter by the missile's launch crew, the rocket was quickly lowered from a near launch-ready 85° elevation to 30°.[70]
Tactical use on German target
[edit]After the US Army captured the Ludendorff Bridge during the Battle of Remagen on 7 March 1945, the Germans were desperate to destroy it. On 17 March 1945, they fired eleven V-2 missiles at the bridge, their first use against a tactical target and the only time they were fired on a German target during the war.[71] They could not employ the more accurate Leitstrahl device because it was oriented towards Antwerp and could not be easily adjusted for another target. Fired from near Hellendoorn, the Netherlands, one of the missiles landed as far away as Cologne, 40 miles (64 km) to the north, while one missed the bridge by only 500 to 800 yards (460 to 730 m). They also struck the town of Remagen, destroying a number of buildings and killing at least six American soldiers.[72]
Final use
[edit]
The final two rockets exploded on 27 March 1945. One of these was the last V-2 to kill a British civilian and the final civilian casualty of the war on British soil: Ivy Millichamp, aged 34, killed in her home in Kynaston Road, Orpington in Kent.[73][74] A scientific reconstruction performed in 2010 demonstrated that the V-2 creates a crater 20 metres (66 feet) wide and 8 metres (26 feet) deep, ejecting approximately 3,000 tons of material into the air.[69]
Countermeasures
[edit]Big Ben and Operation Crossbow
[edit]Unlike the V-1, the V-2's speed and trajectory made it practically invulnerable to anti-aircraft guns and fighters, as it dropped from an altitude of 100–110 km (62–68 mi) at up to three times the speed of sound at sea level (approximately 3,550 km/h (2,206 mph)). Nevertheless, the threat of what was then code-named "Big Ben" was great enough that efforts were made to seek countermeasures. The situation was similar to the pre-war concerns about manned bombers and resulted in a similar solution, the formation of the Crossbow Committee, to collect, examine and develop countermeasures.
Early on, it was believed that the V-2 employed some form of radio guidance, a belief that persisted in spite of several rockets being examined without discovering anything like a radio receiver. This resulted in efforts to jam this non-existent guidance system as early as September 1944, using both ground and air-based jammers flying over the UK. In October, a group had been sent to jam the missiles during launch. By December it was clear these systems were not having any obvious effect, and jamming efforts ended.[75]
Anti-aircraft gun system (proposed)
[edit]General Frederick Alfred Pile, commander of Anti-Aircraft Command, studied the problem and proposed that enough anti-aircraft guns were available to produce a barrage of fire in the rocket's path, but only if provided with a reasonable prediction of the trajectory. The first estimates suggested that 320,000 shells would have to be fired for each rocket. About 2% of these were expected to fall back to the ground unexploded containing almost 90 tons of explosives, which would cause far more damage than the missile. At a 25 August 1944 meeting of the Crossbow Committee, the concept was rejected.[75]
Pile continued studying the problem and returned with a proposal to fire only 150 shells at a single rocket, with those shells using a new fuse that would greatly reduce the number that fell back to Earth unexploded. Some low-level analysis suggested that this would be successful against 1 in 50 rockets, provided that accurate trajectories were forwarded to the gunners in time. Work on this basic concept continued and developed into a plan to deploy a large number of guns in Hyde Park that were provided with pre-configured firing data for 2.5-mile (4.0-kilometre) grids of the London area. After the trajectory was determined, the guns would aim and fire between 60 and 500 rounds.[75]
At a Crossbow meeting on 15 January 1945 Pile's updated plan was presented with some strong advocacy from Roderic Hill and Charles Drummond Ellis. However, the Committee suggested that a test not be performed as no technique for tracking the missiles with sufficient accuracy had yet been developed. By March this had changed significantly, with 81% of incoming missiles correctly allotted to the grid square each fell into, or the one beside it. At a 26 March meeting Pile was directed to a subcommittee with RV Jones and Ellis to further develop the statistics. Three days later the team returned a report stating that if the guns fired 2,000 rounds at a missile there was a 1 in 60 chance of shooting it down. Plans for an operational test began, but as Pile later put it, "Monty beat us to it", as the attacks ended with the Allied capture of their launching areas.[75]
With the Germans no longer in control of any part of the continent that could be used as a launching site capable of striking London, they began targeting Antwerp. Plans were made to move the Pile system to protect that city, but the war ended before anything could be done.[75]
Direct attack and disinformation
[edit]The only effective defences against the V-2 campaign were to destroy the launch infrastructure—expensive in terms of bomber resources and casualties—or to cause the Germans to aim at the wrong place by disinformation. The British were able to convince the Germans to direct V-1s and V-2s aimed at London to less populated areas east of the city. This was done by sending deceptive reports on the sites hit and damage caused via the German espionage network in Britain, which was secretly controlled by the British (the Double-Cross System).[76]
According to the BBC television presenter Raymond Baxter, who served with the RAF during the war, in February 1945 his squadron was performing a mission against a V2 launch site, when they saw one missile being launched. One member of Baxter's squadron opened fire on it, without effect.[77]
On 3 March 1945, the Allies attempted to destroy V-2s and launching equipment in the "Haagse Bos" in The Hague by a large-scale bombardment, but due to navigational errors the Bezuidenhout quarter was destroyed, killing 511 Dutch civilians.
Assessment
[edit]The German V-weapons (V-1 and V-2) cost the equivalent of about US$500 million.[78] Given the relatively smaller size of the German economy, this represented an industrial effort equivalent to but slightly less than that of the U.S. Manhattan Project that produced the atomic bomb. 6,048 V-2s were built, at a cost of approximately 100,000 ℛ︁ℳ︁ (£2,370,000 in 2011) each[citation needed]; 3,225 were launched. SS General Hans Kammler, who as an engineer had constructed several concentration camps including Auschwitz, had a reputation for brutality and had originated the idea of using concentration camp prisoners as slave laborers for the rocket program. More people died manufacturing the V-2 than were killed by its deployment.[79]
... those of us who were seriously engaged in the war were very grateful to Wernher von Braun. We knew that each V-2 cost as much to produce as a high-performance fighter airplane. We knew that German forces on the fighting fronts were in desperate need of airplanes, and that the V-2 rockets were doing us no military damage. From our point of view, the V-2 program was almost as good as if Hitler had adopted a policy of unilateral disarmament.
The V-2 consumed a third of Germany's fuel alcohol production and major portions of other critical technologies.[81] Due to a lack of explosives, some warheads were simply filled with concrete, using the kinetic energy alone for destruction, and sometimes the warhead contained photographic propaganda of German citizens who had died in Allied bombings.[82]
The psychological effect of the V-2 was considerable, as the V-2, traveling faster than the speed of sound, gave no warning before impact (unlike bombing planes or the V-1 flying bomb, which made a characteristic buzzing sound). There was no effective defence and no risk of pilot or crew casualties. An example of the impression it made is in the reaction of American pilot and future nuclear strategist and Congressional aide William Liscum Borden, who in November 1944 while returning from a nighttime air mission over Holland saw a V-2 in flight on its way to strike London:[83][84] "It resembled a meteor, streaming red sparks and whizzing past us as though the aircraft were motionless. I became convinced that it was only a matter of time until rockets would expose the United States to direct, transoceanic attack."[85]
With the war all but lost, regardless of the factory output of conventional weapons, the Nazis resorted to V-weapons as a tenuous last hope to influence the war militarily (hence Antwerp as V-2 target), as an extension of their desire to "punish" their foes and most importantly to give hope to their sympathizers with their miracle weapon.[18] The V-2 did not affect the outcome of the war, but it resulted in the development of the intercontinental ballistic missiles of the Cold War, which were also used for space exploration.[86]
Unfulfilled plans
[edit]A submarine-towed launch platform was tested successfully, making it the prototype for submarine-launched ballistic missiles. The project codename was Prüfstand XII ("Test stand XII"), sometimes termed the rocket U-boat. If deployed, it would have allowed a U-boat to launch V-2 missiles against United States cities, though only with considerable effort (and limited effect).[87] Hitler, in July 1944, and Speer, in January 1945, made speeches alluding to the scheme,[88] though Germany did not possess the capability to fulfill these threats.
While interned after the war by the British at CSDIC camp 11, Dornberger was recorded saying that he had begged the Führer to stop the V-weapon propaganda, because nothing more could be expected from one ton of explosive. To this Hitler had replied that Dornberger might not expect more, but he (Hitler) certainly did.[citation needed]
According to decrypted messages from the Japanese embassy in Germany, twelve dismantled V-2 rockets were shipped to Japan.[89] These left Bordeaux in August 1944 on the transport U-boats U-219 and U-195, which reached Jakarta in December 1944. A civilian V-2 expert was a passenger on U-234, bound for Japan in May 1945 when the war ended in Europe. The fate of these V-2 rockets is unknown.[citation needed]
Post-war use
[edit]
At the end of the war, a competition began between the United States and the USSR to retrieve as many V-2 rockets and staff as possible.[90] Three hundred rail-car loads of V-2s and parts were captured and shipped to the United States and 126 of the principal designers, including Wernher von Braun and Walter Dornberger, were captives of the Americans. Von Braun, his brother Magnus von Braun, and seven others decided to surrender to the United States military (Operation Paperclip) to ensure they were not captured by the advancing Soviets or shot dead by the Nazis to prevent their capture.[91]
After the Nazi defeat, German engineers were relocated to the United States, the USSR, France and the United Kingdom where they further developed the V-2 rocket for military and civilian purposes.[92] The V-2 rocket also laid the foundation for the liquid fuel missiles and space launchers used later.[93]
United States
[edit]
Operation Paperclip recruited German engineers and Special Mission V-2 transported the captured V-2 parts to the United States. At the close of the Second World War, more than 300 rail cars filled with V-2 engines, fuselages, propellant tanks, gyroscopes, and associated equipment were brought to the railyards in Las Cruces, New Mexico, so they could be placed on trucks and driven to the White Sands Proving Grounds, also in New Mexico.
In addition to V-2 hardware, the U.S. Government delivered German mechanization equations for the V-2 guidance, navigation, and control systems, as well as for advanced development concept vehicles, to U.S. defence contractors for analysis. During the 1950s, some of these documents were useful to U.S. contractors in developing direction cosine matrix transformations and other inertial navigation architecture concepts that were applied to early U.S. programs, such as the Atlas and Minuteman guidance systems as well as the Navy's Subs Inertial Navigation System.[94]
A committee was formed with military and civilian scientists to review payload proposals for the reassembled V-2 rockets. By January 1946, the U.S. Army Ordnance Corps invited civilian scientists and engineers to participate in developing a space research program using the V-2. The committee was initially named the "V2 Rocket Panel", then the "V2 Upper Atmosphere Research Panel", and finally the "Upper Atmosphere Rocket Research Panel".[95] This resulted in an eclectic array of experiments that flew on V-2s and helped prepare for American manned space exploration. Devices were sent aloft to sample the air at all levels to determine atmospheric pressures and to see what gases were present. Other instruments measured the level of cosmic radiation.

Only 68 percent of the V-2 trials were considered successful.[96] On 29 May 1947, a Modified V-2 had an error in its guidance, and landed near Juarez, Mexico, causing an international incident.[97]
The U.S. Navy attempted to launch a German V-2 rocket at sea—one test launch from the aircraft carrier USS Midway was performed on 6 September 1947 as part of the Navy's Operation Sandy. The test launch was a partial success; the V-2 went off the pad but splashed down in the ocean only some 10 km (6 mi) from the carrier. The launch setup on the Midway's deck is notable in that it used foldaway arms to prevent the missile from falling over. The arms pulled away just after the engine ignited, releasing the missile. The setup may look similar to the R-7 Semyorka launch procedure but in the case of the R-7 the trusses hold the full weight of the rocket, rather than just reacting to side forces.
The PGM-11 Redstone rocket is a direct descendant of the V-2.[98]
USSR
[edit]
The USSR captured a number of V-2s and staff, letting them stay in Germany for a time.[99] The first work contracts were signed in the middle of 1945. During October 1946 (as part of Operation Osoaviakhim) they were obliged to relocate to Branch 1 of NII-88 on Gorodomlya Island in Lake Seliger where Helmut Gröttrup directed a group of 150 engineers.[100] In October 1947, a group of German scientists supported the USSR in launching rebuilt V-2s in Kapustin Yar. The German team was indirectly overseen by Sergei Korolev, one of the leaders of the Soviet rocketry program.
The first Soviet missile was the R-1, a duplicate of the V-2 manufactured completely in the USSR, which was launched first during October 1948. From 1947 until the end of 1950, the German team elaborated concepts and improvements for extended payload and range for the projects G-1, G-2 and G-4. The German team had to remain on Gorodomlya island until as late as 1952 and 1953. In parallel, Soviet work emphasized larger missiles, the R-2 and R-5, based on further developing the V-2 technology with using ideas of the German concept studies.[101] Details of Soviet achievements were unknown to the German team and completely underestimated by Western intelligence until, in November 1957, the satellite Sputnik 1 was launched successfully to orbit by the Sputnik rocket based on R-7, the world's first intercontinental ballistic missile.[102][page needed]
France
[edit]
Between May and September of 1946, CEPA, the forerunner to today's French space agency CNES, undertook the recruitment of approximately thirty German engineers, who had previous experience working on rocket programs for Nazi Germany at the Peenemünde Army Research Center.[103] Much like their counterparts in the United Kingdom, the United States, and the Soviet Union, France's objective was to acquire and advance the rocket technology developed by Germany during World War II. The initial initiative, known as the Super V-2 program, had plans for four rocket variants capable of achieving ranges of up to 3,600 km (2,200 mi) and carrying warheads weighing up to 1,000 kg (2,200 lb). However, this program was canceled in 1948.
From 1950 to 1969, the research done on the Super V-2 program was repurposed to develop the Véronique sounding rocket, which became the first liquid-fuel research rocket in Western Europe and was ultimately capable of carrying a 100 kg (220 lb) payload to an altitude of 320 km (200 mi).[104] The Véronique program then led to the Diamant rocket and the Ariane rocket family.
UK
[edit]
During October 1945, the Allied Operation Backfire assembled a small number of V-2 missiles and launched three of them from a site in northern Germany. The engineers involved had already agreed to relocate to the US when the test firings were complete. The Backfire report, published in January 1946, contains extensive technical documentation of the rocket, including all support procedures, tailored vehicles and fuel composition.[105]
In 1946, the British Interplanetary Society proposed an enlarged man-carrying version of the V-2, named Megaroc. It could have enabled sub-orbital spaceflight similar to, but at least a decade earlier than, the Mercury-Redstone flights of 1961.[106][107]
China
[edit]The first Chinese Dongfeng missile, the DF-1 was a licensed copy of the Soviet R-2; this design was produced during the 1960s.[citation needed]
Surviving V-2 examples and components
[edit]This section needs additional citations for verification. (September 2016) |


At least 20 V-2s still existed during 2014.
Australia
[edit]- One at the Australian War Memorial, Canberra, including a complete Meillerwagen transporter. The rocket has the most complete set of guidance components of all surviving A4s. The Meillerwagen is the most complete of the three examples known to exist. Another A4 was on display at the RAAF Museum at Point Cook outside Melbourne. Both rockets are now in Canberra.[108][109]
Netherlands
[edit]- One example, partly skeletonized, is in the collection of the Nationaal Militair Museum. In this collection are also a launching table and some loose parts, as well as the remains of a V-2 that crashed in The Hague immediately after launch.
Poland
[edit]- Several large components, including the hydrogen peroxide tank and reaction chamber, the propellant turbopump and the HWK rocket engine chamber (partly cut-out) are displayed at the Polish Aviation Museum in Kraków.
- A reconstruction of a V-2 missile containing multiple original recovered parts is on display at the Armia Krajowa Museum in Kraków.[110][failed verification]
France
[edit]- One engine at Cité de l'espace in Toulouse.
- V-2 display including engine, parts, rocket body and many documents and photographs relating to its development and use at La Coupole museum, Wizernes, Pas de Calais.
- One rocket body with no engine, one complete engine, one lower engine section and one wrecked engine on display in museum La Coupole.
- One engine complete with steering pallets, feed lines and tank bottoms, plus one cut-out thrust chamber and one cut-out turbopump at the Snecma (Space Engines Div.) museum in Vernon.
- One complete rocket in WWII wing of the Musée de l'Armée (Army Museum) in Paris.
Germany
[edit]- One complete V2 rocket[111] and several engines at the Deutsches Museum in Munich.[112]
- One engine at the German Museum of Technology in Berlin.[113]
- One engine at the Deutsches Historisches Museum in Berlin.
- One rusty engine in the original V-2 underground production facilities at the Dora-Mittelbau concentration camp memorial site.
- One rusty engine in Buchenwald concentration camp.
- One replica was constructed for the Historical and Technical Information Centre in Peenemünde,[114] where it is displayed near what remains of the factory where it was built.
United Kingdom
[edit]
- One at the Science Museum, London.[115]
- One, at the Imperial War Museum, London.[116]
- The RAF Museum possesses two rockets, one of which is displayed at its Cosford site.[117] The Museum also owns a Meillerwagen, a Vidalwagen, a Strabo crane, and a firing table with towing dolly.
- One at the Royal Engineers Museum in Chatham, Kent.
- A propulsion unit (minus injectors) is in Norfolk and Suffolk Aviation Museum near Bungay.
- A complete turbo-pump is at Solway Aviation Museum, Carlisle Airport as part of the Blue Streak Rocket exhibition.
- The venturi segment of a V-2 discovered in April 2012 was donated to the Harwich Sailing Club after it was found buried in a mudflat.[118]
- Fuel combustion chamber recovered from the sea near Clacton at the East Essex Aviation Museum, St Oysth.
- A gyroscope unit, a turbo pump unit and a steam generating chamber are on display at the National Space Centre in Leicester.[119][120][121]
United States
[edit]Complete missiles
- One at the Flying Heritage Collection, Everett, Washington[122]
- One at the National Museum of the United States Air Force, including complete Meillerwagen, Dayton, Ohio.[123]
- One (checkerboard-painted) at the Cosmosphere in Hutchinson, Kansas.[124]
- One at the National Air and Space Museum, Washington, D.C.[125]
- One at the Fort Bliss Air Defense Museum, El Paso, Texas.
- One (yellow and black) at Missile Park, White Sands Missile Range in White Sands, New Mexico.[126][127]
- One at Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Alabama.
- One at the U.S. Space & Rocket Center in Huntsville, Alabama.
Components
- One engine at the Stafford Air & Space Museum in Weatherford, Oklahoma.[128]
- One engine at the U.S. Space & Rocket Center in Huntsville, Alabama.
- Two engines at the National Museum of the United States Air Force.[129] (one was transferred from United States Army Ordnance Museum in Aberdeen, Maryland in about 2005 when the museum closed).
- Combustion chambers and other components plus a U.S. built engine at the Steven F. Udvar-Hazy Center in Dulles, Virginia.
- One engine at the Museum of Science and Industry in Chicago.
- One rocket body at Picatinny Arsenal in Dover, New Jersey.
- One engine in the Auburn University Engineering Laboratory.
- One engine in the Exhibit Hall adjacent to the Blockhouse building on the Historic Cape Canaveral Tour in Cape Canaveral, Florida.
- One engine at Parks College of Engineering, Aviation and Technology in St. Louis, Missouri.
- One engine and tail section at New Mexico Museum of Space History in Alamogordo, New Mexico.
See also
[edit]- Gravity's Rainbow – 1973 novel by Thomas Pynchon
- Wasserfall – German surface-to-air missile
Notes
[edit]- ^ a b Kennedy, Gregory P. (1983). Vengeance Weapon 2: The V-2 Guided Missile. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press. pp. 27, 74.
- ^ 10% of the Mittelwerk rockets used a guide beam for cutoff.
- ^ a b c d e f g h Neufeld, Michael J (1995). The Rocket and the Reich: Peenemünde and the Coming of the Ballistic Missile Era. New York: The Free Press. pp. 73, 74, 101, 281. ISBN 978-0-02-922895-1. Archived from the original on 28 October 2019. Retrieved 15 November 2019.
- ^ "Long-range" in the context of the time. See NASA history article Archived 7 January 2009 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ Neufeld, 1995 pp 158, 160–162, 190
- ^ Ramsey 2016, p. 89.
- ^ a b "Am Anfang war die V2. Vom Beginn der Weltraumschifffahrt in Deutschland". In: Utz Thimm (ed.): Warum ist es nachts dunkel? Was wir vom Weltall wirklich wissen. Kosmos, 2006, p. 158, ISBN 3-440-10719-1.
- ^ Neufeld, Michael (2008). Von Braun: Dreamer of Space, Engineer of War. Vintage. pp. 52–54, 62–64. ISBN 978-0307389374.
- ^ Konstruktive, theoretische und experimentelle Beiträge zu dem Problem der Flüssigkeitsrakete. Raketentechnik und Raumfahrtforschung, Sonderheft 1 (1960), Stuttgart, Germany
- ^ Christopher, John (2013). The Race for Hitler's X-Planes: Britain's 1945 Mission to Capture Secret Luftwaffe Technology. Kent: Spellmount Publishers, p. 110. ISBN 978-0752464572
- ^ a b c d e Ordway, Frederick I III; Sharpe, Mitchell R. (2003). Godwin, Robert (ed.). The Rocket Team. Apogee Books Space Series 36. p. 32. ISBN 1-894959-00-0.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Dornberger, Walter (1954). V-2. New York: The Viking Press, Inc. pp. 17–18, 120, 122–123, 132.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j Dornberger, Walter (1952). V-2. New York: Viking. English translation 1954.
- ^ a b c d e f g Irving, David (1964). The Mare's Nest. London: William Kimber and Co. p. 17.
- ^ a b Middlebrook, Martin (1982). The Peenemünde Raid: The Night of 17–18 August 1943. New York: Bobbs-Merrill. p. 19.
- ^ a b Christopher, p.111.
- ^ Braun, Wernher von (Estate of); Ordway III, Frederick I (1985) [1975]. Space Travel: A History. New York: Harper & Row. p. 45. ISBN 0-06-181898-4.
- ^ a b c Irons, Roy (2002). Hitler's Terror Weapons: The Price of Vengeance. Collins. p. 181. ISBN 978-0-00-711262-3.
- ^ Hakim, Joy (1995). A History of Us: War, Peace and all that Jazz. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 100–104. ISBN 0-19-509514-6.
- ^ Hunt, Linda (1991). Secret Agenda: The United States Government, Nazi Scientists, and Project Paperclip, 1945 to 1990. New York: St. Martin's Press. pp. 72–74. ISBN 0-312-05510-2.
- ^ Béon, Yves (1997). Planet Dora: A Memoir of the Holocaust and the Birth of the Space Age. translated from the French La planète Dora by Béon & Richard L. Fague. Westview Press. ISBN 0-8133-3272-9.
- ^ "Dora and the V–2". uah.edu. Archived from the original on 29 June 2014.
- ^ "Im Netz der Verräter" [On the traitor network]. Der Standard (in German). 4 June 2010. Archived from the original on 12 April 2020. Retrieved 12 April 2020.
- ^ Hansjakob Stehle (5 January 1996). "Die Spione aus dem Pfarrhaus". Die Zeit.
- ^ Peter Broucek (2008). "Die österreichische Identität im Widerstand 1938–1945", p 163.
- ^ C. Thurner "The CASSIA Spy Ring in World War II Austria: A History of the OSS's Maier-Messner Group" (2017), p. 35.
- ^ "Operation Crossbow – Preliminary missions for the Operation Overlord". 19 February 2016.
- ^ Dungan, T. "The A4-V2 Rocket Site". Archived from the original on 31 May 2011. Retrieved 2 June 2011.
- ^ a b Sutton, George (2006). History of Liquid Propellant Rocket Engines. Reston: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. pp. 740–753. ISBN 978-1-56347-649-5.
- ^ a b c d Hunley, J.D. (2008). Preludes to U.S. Space-Launch Vehicle Technology: Goddard Rockets to Minuteman III. Gainesville: University Press of Florida. pp. 67–76. ISBN 978-0-8130-3177-4.
- ^ The History Channel V2 Factory: Nordhausen 070723
- ^ a b Zaloga 2003 p19
- ^ a b A-4/V-2 Rocket, Instruction Manual (in English). Periscope Film LLC. 2012. pp. 8–9, 135, 144. ISBN 978-1-937684-76-1.
- ^ "A4 / V2 Rocket in detail: Turbopump". YouTube. 3 July 2019.
- ^ War machine encyclopedia, Limited publishing, London 1983 pp. 1690–92 [ISBN missing]
- ^ Stakem, Patrick H. The History of Spacecraft Computers from the V-2 to the Space Station, 2010, PRB Publishing, ASIN B004L626U6
- ^ Helmut Hoelzer's Fully Electronic Analog Computer used in the German V2 (A4) rockets. Archived 28 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine (PDF, English, German)
- ^ a b c Pocock, Rowland F. (1967). German Guided Missiles of the Second World War. New York: Arco Publishing Company, Inc. pp. 51, 52.
- ^ a b c d Klee, Ernst; Merk, Otto (1965) [1963]. The Birth of the Missile: The Secrets of Peenemünde. Hamburg: Gerhard Stalling Verlag. p. 47.
- ^ Kliebenschedel, Thomas. "A4 (V2) Raketenfertigung in Friedrichshafen 1942–1945" (in German). Archived from the original on 5 June 2019. Retrieved 9 May 2019.
- ^ "V-2: Nazi Rocket Details Are Finally Revealed". LIFE. Vol. 17, no. 26. 25 December 1944. pp. 46–48. Archived from the original on 28 April 2016. Retrieved 29 October 2015.
- ^ # (Polish) Michał Wojewódzki, Akcja V-1, V-2, Warsaw 1984, ISBN 83-211-0521-1
- ^ a b Johnson, David (1982). V-1, V-2: Hitler's Vengeance on London. New York: Stein and Day. p. 100. ISBN 978-0-8128-2858-0.
- ^ Neufeld 1995 pp. 221–222
- ^ Speer, Albert (1995). Inside the Third Reich. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson. pp. 496–497. ISBN 978-1-84212-735-3.
- ^ Ruggles, Richard; Brodie, Henry (1947). "An Empirical Approach to Economic Intelligence in World War II". Journal of the American Statistical Association. 42 (237): 72–91. doi:10.2307/2280189. JSTOR 2280189.
- ^ Jones, R. V. (1978). Most Secret War: British Scientific Intelligence 1939–1945. London: Hamish Hamilton. p. 433. ISBN 0-241-89746-7.
- ^ "V-Weapons Crossbow Campaign". Allworldwars.com. Archived from the original on 4 February 2009. Retrieved 27 April 2010.
- ^ Ordway & Sharpe 1979 p. 256
- ^ Walker, John (27 September 1993). "A Rocket a Day Keeps the High Costs Away". Archived from the original on 3 November 2008. Retrieved 14 November 2008.
- ^ "Antwerp, "City of Sudden Death"". v2rocket.com. Archived from the original on 3 July 2015. Retrieved 31 July 2015.
- ^ "LXV Armeekorps z.b.V." www.axishistory.com. Archived from the original on 25 July 2019. Retrieved 25 July 2019.
- ^ Zaloga, Steven (2008). German V-Weapon Sites 1943–45. Oxford: Osprey Publishing. pp. 53–56. ISBN 978-1-84603-247-9.
- ^ Ramsey 2016, p. 96.
- ^ Hall, Charlie (28 February 2022). "'Flying Gas Mains': Rumour, Secrecy, and Morale during the V-2 Bombardment of Britain" (PDF). Twentieth Century British History. 33 (1): 52–79. doi:10.1093/tcbh/hwab029. ISSN 0955-2359.
- ^ Winston Churchill, Prime Minister (10 November 1944). "German Long-Range Rockets". Parliamentary Debates (Hansard). Commons. col. 1653-4. Archived from the original on 20 April 2014.
- ^ "Division z.V." History of the European Axis nations during the Second World War. 25 May 2013. Archived from the original on 17 November 2018. Retrieved 23 June 2019.
- ^ "A4/V2 Sites in Westerwald". www.v2rocket.com. Archived from the original on 1 May 2018. Retrieved 11 June 2018.
- ^ van Dijk, A.H.; Eekman, P.G.; Roelse, J.; Tuynman, J. (1984). Walcheren onder vuur en water 1939–1945 (in Dutch). Middelburg: Den Boer Middelburg/Uitgevers. p. 98. ISBN 90-70027-82-8.
- ^ Bisbach, Emily. "The last V2 on London". West End at War. Archived from the original on 4 February 2016. Retrieved 31 July 2015.
- ^ "V2 Rocket Facts". World War 2 Facts. Archived from the original on 15 December 2013. Retrieved 14 December 2013.
- ^ Trigg 2020, pp. 21, 22, 52.
- ^ King & Kutta 1998, p. 281.
- ^ "V2Rocket.com "Antwerp, The City of Sudden Death"". Archived from the original on 3 July 2015.
- ^ "Air Raid Precautions – Deaths and injuries". tiscali.co.uk. Archived from the original on 8 March 2007.
- ^ "Mobile Firing Operations & Locations". V2Rocket.com. Archived from the original on 13 August 2007.
- ^ Stephen Henden. "Flying Bombs and Rockets, V2 Woolworths New Cross". flyingbombsandrockets.com. Archived from the original on 14 December 2012. Retrieved 23 March 2011.
- ^ Jones RV; Most Secret War 1978
- ^ a b Blitz Street; Channel 4, 10 May 2010
- ^ Ordway & Sharpe 1979, p. 256.
- ^ ""The Watch on the Rhine" Everyday Life of the Soldiers at the Bridge". Friedensmuseum Brücke von Remagen. Archived from the original on 23 September 2015. Retrieved 25 November 2014.
- ^ "V-2s on Remagen; Attacks on the Ludendorff Bridge". V2Rocket.com. Archived from the original on 14 November 2014. Retrieved 14 November 2014.
- ^ Foster, Vicki. "65th anniversary of the V2 rocket landing in Orpington" Archived 10 September 2016 at the Wayback Machine, News Shopper, Orpington, Kent, 2 April 2010.
- ^ "Barking and Dagenham Post". Archived from the original on 23 November 2020. Retrieved 30 September 2020.
- ^ a b c d e Jeremy Stocker, "Britain and Ballistic Missile Defence, 1942–2002" Archived 20 September 2017 at the Wayback Machine, pp. 20–28.
- ^ Ramsey 2016, p. 100.
- ^ "V2ROCKET.COM – Den Haag (The Hague, Wassenaar, Hoek van Holland (Hook of Holland)". www.v2rocket.com. Archived from the original on 23 February 2018. Retrieved 28 February 2018.
- ^ Neufeld 1995, pp. 190–191. Neufeld provides by far the most detailed analysis of the price of the project. Other price estimates of "$2 billion," or "50% more than the Manhattan Project" can be found elsewhere on the internet, but are not credible. For a more detailed analysis, see this article's Talk section.
- ^ "Mittelwerk / DORA". v2rocket.com. Archived from the original on 19 July 2013.
- ^ Dyson, Freeman (1979). Disturbing the Universe. Harper & Row. p. 108. ISBN 978-0-465-01677-8.
- ^ Oberg, Jim; Sullivan, Dr. Brian R (March 1999). "'Space Power Theory". U.S. Air Force Space Command: Government Printing Office. p. 143. Archived from the original on 3 February 2009. Retrieved 28 November 2008.
- ^ Irons, Roy (2002). Hitler's Terror Weapons: The Price of Vengeance. Collins. ISBN 978-0-00-711262-3.
- ^ Hewlett, Richard G.; Duncan, Francis (1969). Atomic Shield, 1947–1952. A History of the United States Atomic Energy Commission. Vol. 2. University Park, Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press. p. 180.
- ^ Rhodes, Richard (1995). Dark Sun: The Making of the Hydrogen Bomb. New York: Simon & Schuster. p. 357.
- ^ Herken, Gregg (1985). Counsels of War. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. p. 11.
- ^ "This Week in EUCOM History: February 6–12, 1959". EUCOM. 6 February 2012. Archived from the original on 21 September 2012. Retrieved 8 February 2012.
- ^ "Hitler's Rocket U-boat Program – history of WW2 rocket submarine". Uboataces.com. Archived from the original on 3 April 2010. Retrieved 27 April 2010.
- ^ Article in San Diego Times c.25 July 1944
- ^ Besant, John Stalin's Silver concerning the sinking of SS John Barry near Aden in 1944
- ^ "We Want with the West", Time Magazine, 9 December 1946.
- ^ "Wernher von Braun". 2 May 2001. Archived from the original on 23 August 2009. Retrieved 4 July 2009.
- ^ Robert C. Harding (2012). Space Policy in Developing Countries: The Search for Security and Development on the Final Frontier. Routledge. pp. 34–35. ISBN 978-1-136-25789-6. Archived from the original on 20 September 2017.
- ^ Paul I. Casey (2013). APOLLO: A Decade of Achievement. JS Blume. p. 19. ISBN 978-0-9847163-0-2. Archived from the original on 20 September 2017. Retrieved 9 February 2016.
- ^ "V2 Information". X-Factorial.com. Archived from the original on 14 December 2013. Retrieved 14 December 2013.
- ^ See: Johan A.M. Bleeker, Johannes Geiss, and Martin C.E. Huber, ed.s, The Century of Space Science, vol. 1 (Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001) p. 41. Archived 28 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine See also: SpaceLine.org Archived 13 November 2012 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ "V-2 Rocket Components". U.S. Army, White Sands Missile Range. 2010. Archived from the original on 2 September 2013. Retrieved 14 December 2013.
- ^ Beggs, William. "Hermes Program". Archived from the original on 30 September 2011. Retrieved 1 December 2008.
- ^ "Redstone rocket". centennialofflight.net. Archived from the original on 20 February 2014. Retrieved 27 April 2010.
- ^ Zak, Anatoly (2012). "End of a honeymoon". RussianSpaceWeb.com. Archived from the original on 4 January 2016. Retrieved 23 June 2019.
- ^ Zak, Anatoly (5 August 2012). "History of the Gorodomlya Island". RussianSpaceWeb.com. Archived from the original on 10 April 2016. Retrieved 23 June 2019.
- ^ Cutter, Paul (29 September 2009). "Helmut Groettrup … the captured Russian who was Russian POW rocket scientist" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 27 February 2020. Retrieved 19 May 2019.
- ^ Maddrell, Paul (2006). Spying on Science: Western Intelligence in Divided Germany 1945–1961. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-926750-7.
- ^ Reuter, Claus (2000). The V2 and the German, Russian and American Rocket Program. German Canadian Museum of Applied History. pp. 179–180. ISBN 978-1-894643-05-4.
- ^ "Véronique and Vesta". Archived from the original on 20 October 2007.
- ^ Report on operation 'Backfire' Recording and analysis of the trajectory. Vol. 5. Ministry of Supply. 1946.
- ^ "How a Nazi rocket could have put a Briton in space". BBC. Archived from the original on 14 November 2016. Retrieved 16 November 2016.
- ^ "Megaroc". BIS. Archived from the original on 30 October 2016. Retrieved 16 November 2016.
- ^ "Treloar Centre ACT. 7 July 2009". NSW Rocketry Association Inc. Archived from the original on 20 March 2016. Retrieved 12 January 2017.
- ^ Australia's Nazi rockets: How German V-2 flying bombs made their way Down Under Archived 29 September 2017 at the Wayback Machine ABC News, 29 September 2017. Retrieved 29 September 2017.
- ^ "Ekspozycja stała". Muzeum AK (in Polish). Archived from the original on 24 November 2020. Retrieved 21 May 2020.
- ^ "V2-Rakete (A4-Rakete)". Archived from the original on 1 February 2023. Retrieved 1 February 2023.
- ^ "A-4-Rakete ("V2"), 1945 (Original)". Deutsches Museum (in German). Retrieved 24 August 2021.
- ^ Turner, Adam (6 September 2015). "Geek Pilgrimage: V2 rocket engine – Deutsches Technikmuseum Berlin". Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved 21 May 2020.
- ^ The Peenemünde replica incorporates many original components along with re-manufactured ones and was put together by a group that included Reinhold Krüger, who worked as an apprentice at Peenemünde during the war. Klaus Felgentreu. "Reinhold Krüger (18.02.1930 – 29.05.2005)" (in German). Förderverein Peenemünde „Peenemünde – Geburtsort der Raumfahrt" e.V. Retrieved 17 August 2021.
- ^ "V2 Rocket, A4 missile". Science Museum Group. Retrieved 21 May 2020.
- ^ "V2 (VERGELTUNGS-WAFFE 2) ROCKET (SECTIONED)". Imperial War Museums. Retrieved 21 May 2020.
- ^ "German Army V2 (Assembly 4)". Royal Air Force Museum. Retrieved 21 May 2020.
- ^ "More pictures of V2 recovery operation at Harwich". ITV News. April 2012. Archived from the original on 1 April 2012.
- ^ "V-2 Gyroscope". National Space Center. Retrieved 21 May 2020.
- ^ "V-2 Turbo Pump". National Space Center. Retrieved 21 May 2020.
- ^ "V-2 Steam Generating Chamber". National Space Center. Retrieved 21 May 2020.
- ^ "Mittelwerk GmbH V-2 Rocket". Flying Heritage & Combat Armor Museum. Retrieved 21 May 2020.
- ^ "V-2 with Meillerwagen". National Museum of the United States Air Force. Retrieved: 3 January 2017.
- ^ "HALL OF SPACE". Cosmosphere. Retrieved 21 May 2020.
- ^ "V-2 Missile". National Air and Space Museum. Smithsonian Institution. Retrieved 21 May 2020.
- ^ "V-2 Rocket on Display at the White Sands Missile Range Museum". White Sands Missile Range Museum. Archived from the original on 3 February 2020. Retrieved 21 May 2020.
- ^ The White Sands Missile Range exhibit is Mittelwerk rocket #FZ04/20919 captured during Special Mission V-2 and is painted with a yellow and black paint scheme resembling that of the first V-2 launched at WSMR on 16 April 1946.
- ^ "EXHIBITS". Stafford Air & Space Museum. Retrieved 21 May 2020.
- ^ "V-2 Rocket". National Museum of the United States Air Force. Retrieved: 3 January 2017.
References
[edit]- Oberg, Jim; Sullivan, Dr. Brian R (original draft) (March 1999). "'Space Power Theory". U.S. Air Force Space Command: Government Printing Office. p. 143. Archived from the original on 3 February 2009. Retrieved 28 November 2008. 24,000 fighters could have been produced instead of the inaccurate V-weapons.
- Harris, Arthur T; Cox, Sebastion (1995). Despatch on War Operations: 23rd February, 1942, to 8th May, 1945. F. Cass. p. xliii. ISBN 0-7146-4692-X. Retrieved 4 July 2008.
- King, Benjamin; Kutta, Timothy J. (1998). Impact: The History of Germany's V-Weapons in World War II. Rockville Centre, New York: Sarpedon Publishers. ISBN 1-885119-51-8. (Alternately: Impact: An Operational History of Germany's V Weapons in World War II.) Staplehurst, Kent: Spellmount Publishers. ISBN 1-86227-024-4. Da Capo Press; Reprint edition, 2003: ISBN 0-306-81292-4.
- Ramsey, Syed (2016). Tools of War: History of Weapons in Modern Times. Vij Books India Pvt Ltd. ISBN 978-93-86019-83-7.
- Neufeld, Michael J. (1995). The Rocket and the Reich: Peenemünde and the Coming of the Ballistic Missile Era. New York: The Free Press. ISBN 978-0-02-922895-1.
- Ordway, Frederick I III; Sharpe, Mitchell R (1979). The Rocket Team. Apogee Books Space Series 36. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell. ISBN 1-894959-00-0.
- Trigg, Jonathan (2020). To VE-Day through German Eyes: The Final Defeat of Nazi Germany. Stroud UK: Amberley. ISBN 978-1-4456-9944-8.
- Zaloga, Steven (2003). V-2 Ballistic Missile, 1942–52. New Vanguard. Oxford: Osprey Publishing. ISBN 978-1-84176-541-9.
Further reading
[edit]- Dungan, Tracy D. (2005). V-2: A Combat History of the First Ballistic Missile. Westholme Publishing. ISBN 1-59416-012-0.
- Hall, Charlie (2022). 'Flying Gas Mains': Rumour, Secrecy, and Morale during the V-2 Bombardment of Britain', Twentieth Century British History, 33:1, pp. 52–79.
- Huzel, Dieter K. (ca. 1965). Peenemünde to Canaveral. Prentice Hall Inc.
- Piszkiewicz, Dennis (1995). The Nazi Rocketeers: Dreams of Space and Crimes of War. Westport, Conn.: Praeger. ISBN 0-275-95217-7.
External links
[edit]- "The German A4 Rocket (Main Title)" Information Film of Operation Backfire from IWM
- '"Chute Saves Rockets Secrets", September 1947, Popular Science article on US use of V-2 for scientific research
- "Reconstruction, restoration & refurbishment of a V-2 rocket". NASA. Archived from the original on 15 June 2013. Retrieved 14 February 2023., spherical panoramas of the process and milestones.
- Hermann Ludewig Collection, The University of Alabama in Huntsville Archives and Special Collections Files of Hermann Ludewig, Deputy of Design Chief and later Chief of Acceptance and Inspection on the V-2 program
- German footage of V-2 launch tests
- German footage of V-2 operational transport and launch procedure
V-2 rocket
View on GrokipediaThe V-2 rocket, officially designated Aggregat-4 (A-4), was the world's first long-range guided ballistic missile, developed by Nazi Germany during World War II as a surface-to-surface weapon powered by a liquid-propellant engine using ethanol and liquid oxygen.[1][2] It measured 14 meters in length, weighed approximately 12,900 kilograms at launch, achieved a range of 320 kilometers, and delivered a 1,000-kilogram high-explosive warhead at supersonic speeds exceeding 5,000 kilometers per hour upon re-entry.[3] Under the leadership of Wernher von Braun and Walter Dornberger at the Peenemünde Army Research Center, the program produced over 6,000 units, with roughly 3,000 fired operationally from September 1944 against targets including London and Antwerp, inflicting around 9,000 civilian deaths due to its inability to be intercepted or warned against.[3][4] Production increasingly relied on forced labor from concentration camp prisoners at facilities like Mittelbau-Dora, where an estimated 20,000 workers perished from brutal conditions, highlighting the program's reliance on coerced manpower amid resource shortages.[3] Despite limited strategic impact from inaccuracy and high failure rates, the V-2 demonstrated pioneering ballistic trajectory and guidance via gyroscopes, influencing post-war rocketry programs in the United States and Soviet Union through captured hardware and personnel.[2]
Origins and Development
Pre-War Foundations
The foundations of the V-2 rocket originated in Germany's interwar rocketry experiments, building on theoretical advancements in liquid-propellant propulsion inspired by Hermann Oberth's 1923 publication Die Rakete zu den Planetenräumen, which outlined the principles of multi-stage rockets for space travel.[5] In 1927, the Verein für Raumschiffahrt (VfR) was founded in Breslau to advance practical rocketry, initially focusing on amateur efforts to achieve sustained liquid-fuel burns using combinations like liquid oxygen and gasoline.[6] The VfR's work emphasized empirical testing, with early static firings demonstrating thrust generation, though full flights remained limited by instability and funding shortages.[7] Wernher von Braun, a physics student born in 1912, became involved with the VfR around 1929, conducting private experiments with homemade liquid-fueled engines and model gliders to explore propulsion stability.[8] By 1930, VfR members, including von Braun's associates, achieved the first controlled liquid-propellant engine tests, producing measurable thrust for short durations, which validated the feasibility of bipropellant systems over solid fuels for higher specific impulse.[5] These efforts transitioned from hobbyist pursuits to structured development, with von Braun's group fabricating engines that informed subsequent designs, despite frequent failures due to combustion instability and material limitations.[6] Military interest emerged in 1932 when Army ordnance officer Walter Dornberger recognized the potential of VfR rockets to circumvent Versailles Treaty restrictions on heavy artillery, leading to secret funding for von Braun's team at the Kummersdorf proving grounds starting November 1, 1932.[9] This support enabled the Aggregat series: the A-1, completed in 1933 as a 1.5-meter proof-of-concept with a 300 kg thrust engine using alcohol and liquid oxygen, underwent ground tests but failed in flight due to inadequate stabilization.[10] The A-2, refined with improved gyros, achieved two successful launches from Borkum Island on December 19 and 20, 1934, reaching altitudes of approximately 2.2 kilometers and demonstrating controlled ascent for the first time.[1] These milestones established the basic architecture—liquid-fueled turbopump, graphite nozzle, and inertial guidance precursors—that scaled to the A-4 (V-2) design by 1936, prioritizing range over manned spaceflight amid escalating rearmament.[11] The A-3 tests in 1937 further iterated guidance via nose-mounted vanes and accelerometers, though launches ended in structural failures, underscoring the need for supersonic aerodynamics resolved in later wartime efforts.[9]Peenemünde Research Center
The Peenemünde Army Research Center (Heeresversuchsanstalt Peenemünde, or HVP) was established in 1937 as one of five military proving grounds under the German Army Weapons Office, with construction beginning the prior year on Usedom Island in the [Baltic Sea](/page/Baltic Sea) to enable long-range testing over water.[12][13][14] The site, spanning approximately 25 square kilometers, featured advanced facilities including laboratories, assembly halls, and test stands designed for liquid-propellant rocket experiments.[15] Under Major Walter Dornberger's command, the center focused on ballistic missile development, with Wernher von Braun serving as technical director for the rocket program starting in 1937.[16][17] The Army team advanced the Aggregat (A-series) rockets, progressing from smaller prototypes tested earlier at Kummersdorf to larger designs requiring Peenemünde's expansive range.[18] Key infrastructure included Test Stand VII, a massive steel framework completed in 1942 for full-scale A-4 (later V-2) vertical launches, enabling static firings and flight tests of the 12-meter, liquid-fueled missile.[19] After failed attempts in June and August 1942, the first successful A-4 launch occurred on October 3, 1942, reaching an altitude of 84.5 kilometers and validating the design's supersonic capabilities.[19] Parallel efforts refined the engine, developed by Walter Thiel's team using alcohol and liquid oxygen for 25 tons of thrust, alongside guidance systems for inertial navigation.[14] The center's work accelerated under high priority after Hitler's December 22, 1942, order designating the A-4 as a strategic weapon, integrating interdisciplinary teams of engineers and scientists despite resource constraints.[20] Early pre-production occurred at facilities like Werk Süd's Fertigungshalle 1 (F1), producing test vehicles amid expanding operations that employed thousands by 1943.[21] Peenemünde's isolation and secrecy facilitated breakthroughs in rocketry, laying the technical foundation for the V-2's operational deployment, though vulnerabilities to reconnaissance emerged by mid-1943.[22]Relocation and Acceleration Under Pressure
The RAF's Operation Hydra bombing raid on the Peenemünde research center occurred on the night of 17–18 August 1943, involving 596 bombers that dropped over 1,800 tons of explosives, targeting test stands, production facilities, and worker housing.[22] The attack killed approximately 600 personnel, including key engineers and scientists, and destroyed significant infrastructure, prompting German authorities to assess a delay of several months in the V-2 program.[23] In response, Albert Speer, the armaments minister, ordered the dispersal and relocation of V-2 development and production to mitigate further Allied air strikes, with remaining assembly at Peenemünde halted by late September 1943.[24] Primary production shifted to the Mittelwerk underground complex beneath Kohnstein Mountain near Nordhausen in Thuringia, where tunnels excavated since November 1943 enabled protected assembly lines spanning 20 tunnels and accommodating up to 12,000 workers.[25] This facility, operational for V-2 manufacturing from January 1944, relied on forced labor from the adjacent Mittelbau-Dora concentration camp, which expanded from 2,000 prisoners in late 1943 to over 60,000 by mid-1944, with mortality rates exceeding 20% due to starvation, disease, and executions.[26] Research elements, including Wernher von Braun's team, were partially relocated to secure sites like the Kohnstein area and dispersed facilities in eastern Germany to continue testing and refinement under camouflage and dispersal protocols.[27] Under intensifying wartime pressure, Adolf Hitler and SS leader Heinrich Himmler demanded accelerated V-2 output to deploy "retaliation weapons" against Allied advances, overriding technical readiness concerns and pushing premature mass production despite unresolved guidance and reliability issues.[28] By early 1944, this urgency led to the integration of unskilled forced labor into assembly, resulting in initial high defect rates—up to 40% of early Mittelwerk rockets failing quality checks—but enabling the first combat-ready V-2s by September 1944 after iterative fixes.[29] The relocation, while shielding production from bombing, imposed logistical strains, including raw material shortages and transportation disruptions, yet yielded approximately 6,000 V-2s assembled at Mittelwerk before Allied liberation in April 1945.[26]Technical Design
Propulsion System
The V-2 rocket's propulsion system utilized a single-chamber liquid-propellant rocket engine that generated thrust through the combustion of a fuel-oxidizer mixture.[3] The engine burned a bipropellant combination of 75% ethyl alcohol and 25% water as fuel (designated B-Stoff) with liquid oxygen as the oxidizer (A-Stoff), achieving a specific impulse of approximately 215 seconds.[30] [3] This configuration produced a sea-level thrust of 25 metric tons (approximately 56,000 pounds-force), enabling the rocket to accelerate to speeds exceeding 5,000 km/h during its roughly 60-second burn phase.[31] [32] Propellants were stored in separate tanks within the rocket's fuselage and delivered to the combustion chamber under high pressure via a turbopump assembly, marking one of the first applications of such a system in a large-scale rocket engine.[33] The turbopump, powered by a steam turbine, drew fuel and oxidizer from the tanks at rates of roughly 55 kg/s for alcohol and 68 kg/s for liquid oxygen, injecting them through a multi-orifice injector head designed to ensure efficient mixing and stable combustion.[34] [35] The turbine itself was driven by high-temperature steam generated from the catalytic decomposition of concentrated hydrogen peroxide (C-Stoff) over a potassium permanganate catalyst, providing the necessary power without relying on direct propellant tapping.[35] [36] The combustion chamber and exhaust nozzle featured a double-wall construction with film cooling, where a thin layer of fuel was injected along the inner surfaces to absorb heat and prevent meltdown at temperatures reaching 2,500°C.[33] [36] This regenerative cooling approach, combined with the engine's short nozzle optimized for the missile's overall length constraints, allowed sustained operation despite the era's material limitations, such as the use of steel and copper alloys.[37] Ignition occurred spontaneously upon propellant mixing due to the hypergolic-like reaction facilitated by the injector design, eliminating the need for an external igniter.[3] The system's reliability was enhanced through iterative testing at Peenemünde, though early prototypes suffered from combustion instability addressed via injector refinements.[38]Guidance and Control
The V-2 employed an inertial guidance system relying on gyroscopes and accelerometers to maintain trajectory without external references, a design choice driven by concerns over radio jamming by Allied forces.[39][3] This self-contained approach used two free gyroscopes—one horizontal for pitch control and one vertical with two degrees of freedom for yaw and roll—to stabilize the rocket's attitude relative to a pre-launch reference orientation.[40] The Siemens Vertikant LEV-3 system integrated these gyros on a stabilized platform with Cardan suspension, achieving drift rates of 0.1–0.2 degrees per minute to preserve spatial alignment during flight.[40] A pendulous integrating gyroscopic accelerometer (PIGA) measured acceleration along the flight path, precessing at a rate proportional to velocity to signal the analog computer when the predetermined burnout speed—typically around 1,600 meters per second—was reached, triggering engine cutoff after approximately 60–70 seconds of burn.[39] The analog computer processed gyroscope feedback and PIGA data via potentiometers and servo mechanisms to command steering adjustments, ensuring the rocket followed a near-vertical launch followed by a pitch-over to a trajectory angle of about 43–49 degrees.[40][3] Control authority derived from four graphite vanes in the exhaust nozzle for jet deflection during powered flight and four aerodynamic rudders on the tail fins for post-burnout corrections in the atmosphere, with the system limiting angle of attack to under 3 degrees.[40][41] Operational accuracy varied, with prototype tests in 1943 yielding a circular error probable (CEP) of 4.5 km at full range, though combat deployments against Britain averaged 12 km CEP, partly due to manufacturing inconsistencies and disinformation efforts.[3] A late-war radio beam update introduced in December 1944 aimed to refine lateral guidance to a 2 km CEP in tests, but it saw limited field use amid production disruptions.[3] The system's development stemmed from extensive A-5 subscale testing (1938–1939) for supersonic stability, prioritizing autonomy over beam-riding alternatives deemed vulnerable.[3] Despite innovations like integrating accelerometers for velocity cutoff, inherent gyro drift and lack of mid-course corrections confined the V-2 to area targeting rather than precision strikes.[42][39]Payload and Performance Metrics
The V-2 rocket's payload consisted of a single warhead weighing 1,000 kilograms, containing 910 kilograms of Amatol explosive packed within a thin steel casing.[43][44] This warhead was designed for high-explosive impact upon terminal velocity descent, detonated by a simple impact fuze without altimeter or proximity options.[1] Key performance metrics included a launch mass of approximately 12,800 to 13,000 kilograms, a length of 14 meters, and a diameter of 1.65 meters.[2][45] The rocket achieved a maximum range of 320 kilometers when launched at a 45-degree angle, with an apogee of up to 160 kilometers on ballistic trajectories.[1][2] Peak velocity reached 5,580 to 5,760 kilometers per hour during powered flight, following a 65-second burn of its liquid-propellant engine.[2][46] Accuracy was limited by inertial guidance relying on gyroscopes and accelerometers, with prototype tests in 1943 yielding a circular error probable (CEP) of 4.5 kilometers, where 50% of impacts fell within that radius and all within 17 kilometers. Operational deployments suffered from production inconsistencies, resulting in effective CEPs of 10 to 12 kilometers or worse, rendering precise targeting infeasible.| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Warhead Explosive Yield | 910 kg Amatol |
| Maximum Range | 320 km |
| Maximum Velocity | ~5,760 km/h |
| Apogee (Trajectory) | >160 km |
| Guidance CEP (Prototype) | 4.5 km |
Production and Logistics
Manufacturing Facilities
Following the RAF's Operation Hydra bombing raid on the Peenemünde Army Research Center on August 17, 1943, which destroyed significant portions of the above-ground V-2 development and early production infrastructure, German authorities accelerated the relocation of rocket manufacturing to hardened underground sites to evade further Allied aerial attacks.[47][26] The principal facility established for large-scale V-2 assembly was the Mittelwerk, a vast subterranean factory complex excavated within the Kohnstein gypsum mountain near Nordhausen in Thuringia, Germany, approximately 300 kilometers southwest of Peenemünde.[48][49] Construction of the tunnel network began in October 1943 under the direction of the Organisation Todt, utilizing dynamite and manual labor to create two parallel main tunnels, each about 1.5 kilometers long and 12 meters high, connected by 46 cross-tunnels and 13 vertical shafts for ventilation, transport, and rail access.[27][26] These tunnels housed assembly halls where V-2 components—engines, airframes, and guidance systems—arrived by rail from dispersed suppliers across Germany, enabling final integration under controlled conditions shielded from bombing.[47][27] Operated by Mittelwerk GmbH, a nominally independent entity contracted by the SS and tied to Krupp interests, the facility prioritized rapid output over worker safety or quality control, with production lines spanning the tunnel floors and using overhead rails for moving rocket sections.[26][27] Initial assembly began in December 1943, scaling to full operations by early 1944, during which the site produced the majority of the approximately 5,200 V-2 rockets manufactured overall, though exact Mittelwerk attribution varies due to incomplete records.[47][26] Supplementary underground sites, such as smaller tunnels in the Harz Mountains and relocated component factories, supported the effort, but Mittelwerk remained the core hub for missile finalization until evacuation in April 1945 amid advancing Allied forces.[48][27]Workforce and Resource Allocation
The V-2 production program at the Mittelwerk underground factory, operational from early 1944, primarily utilized forced labor from the Mittelbau-Dora concentration camp complex, with over 60,000 prisoners deported there between August 1943 and March 1945 for tunnel excavation and rocket assembly.[50] [51] Initially, around 10,000 prisoners were allocated to digging the Kohnstein Mountain tunnels, transitioning to semi-skilled assembly tasks as production ramped up, supplemented by a smaller cadre of German engineers and overseers for quality control.[50] Prisoner types included political detainees, Soviet POWs, and Hungarian Jews, with the camp population reaching at least 12,000 by fall 1944 amid brutal conditions that prioritized output over worker survival.[48] [50] Labor allocation reflected wartime shortages of skilled German workers, leading to the reassignment of prisoners from other camps like Buchenwald, with mortality exceeding 20,000 deaths from exhaustion, disease, executions for sabotage (over 200 public hangings), and death marches by war's end.[51] [48] This system enabled assembly of approximately 6,000 V-2 rockets, though high turnover necessitated continuous influxes, diverting transport and administrative resources from frontline needs.[50] Resource allocation to the V-2 program consumed up to 2 billion Reichsmarks, equivalent to Germany's largest single armaments effort and roughly matching Allied Manhattan Project expenditures, prioritizing exotic materials like liquid oxygen, ethyl alcohol (sourced from distilling scarce agricultural stocks), steel casings, and graphite vanes over conventional munitions.[29] Each rocket required about 3 tons of 75% ethyl alcohol fuel mixed with water, straining Germany's synthetic fuel production amid Allied bombing campaigns.[1] Despite directives for high priority, supply disruptions and inefficiencies—exacerbated by sabotage—limited output to under 1,000 operational launches, representing 0.7-0.8% of annual Nazi expenditures but tying up critical metals and propellants that could have supported aircraft or artillery.[52]Output Challenges and Sabotage
The relocation of V-2 production to the underground Mittelwerk facility near Nordhausen in late 1943, following Allied bombing of Peenemünde on August 17, 1943, introduced significant logistical and organizational challenges, as the tunnel complex required extensive excavation and adaptation for assembly lines, delaying full-scale output until early 1944.[27] Initial production rates were low due to the technical complexity of the rocket's liquid-fuel engine and guidance systems, compounded by shortages of precision components and the need to train a workforce largely composed of unskilled forced laborers, resulting in frequent defects and rework.[53] By mid-1944, Mittelwerk employed approximately 2,500 German overseers and 5,000 prisoners, yet output remained below targets set by Albert Speer, with monthly production reaching only around 300-400 units by September 1944 despite ambitions for 1,000 or more, hampered by supply disruptions from Allied air raids on transportation networks.[54] Forced labor from the Dora-Mittelbau concentration camp, which supplied over 60,000 prisoners between August 1943 and March 1945, exacerbated quality issues, as malnutrition, exhaustion, and lack of expertise led to high error rates in assembly; an estimated 20,000 prisoners died from these conditions, further straining workforce continuity.[50][55] German authorities attributed many failures—such as premature engine shutdowns or structural weaknesses in up to 20-30% of early launches—to inherent unreliability, but postwar analyses indicate production flaws contributed substantially to the V-2's operational unreliability, with field reports noting inconsistent performance traceable to manufacturing variances.[56] Sabotage by prisoners formed a deliberate resistance effort, with acts including loosening screws, introducing faulty welds, and omitting circuit components during assembly, which delayed timelines and increased failure rates; approximately 200 Jewish inmates coordinated such disruptions in the Mittelbau system.[57][56] Underground networks, building on Buchenwald resistance groups, systematically undermined production to hinder weapon deliveries, though Gestapo surveillance and brutal reprisals limited scale; over 200 prisoners were publicly hanged in the tunnels on charges of sabotage between 1944 and 1945.[58] These efforts, while risking immediate execution, contributed to the V-2 program's inefficiencies, as evidenced by persistent quality complaints from test ranges and combat units, though quantifying exact impact remains challenging due to overlapping factors like material scarcity.[53]  to exploit range advantages while evading Allied air superiority.[62] Batteries relocated frequently after each salvo—often firing 2 to 4 rockets per setup—to counter reconnaissance, though guidance inaccuracies limited precision, with many deviating several kilometers from intended urban centers.[29] In the first weeks, roughly 30 V-2s were launched against Britain alone, escalating psychological terror due to the weapon's speed exceeding sound, rendering air raid sirens ineffective post-impact detection.[63] Early operational challenges included a launch failure rate around 20-30% from engine or guidance malfunctions, compounded by rushed field preparations and fuel handling risks, yet the deployments demonstrated the V-2's potential for area saturation against civilian populations despite these defects.[3] Allied intelligence, via Ultra decrypts and agent reports, soon identified launch signatures but struggled with preemptive disruption given the mobility.[22]Major Campaigns and Targets
The V-2 rocket's combat deployment began on 8 September 1944, with the first operational launches targeting Paris, France, and shortly thereafter Chiswick, a suburb of London, England.[64] These initial strikes marked the start of a ballistic missile offensive aimed at Allied cities and infrastructure, intended to inflict terror, disrupt supply lines, and retaliate for Allied bombing campaigns. Over the ensuing months, until the cessation of launches in March 1945, German forces fired more than 3,000 V-2s at Western European targets, with the majority directed at urban centers to maximize psychological and material impact.[65][63] London emerged as the primary target in Britain, receiving approximately 1,358 of the 1,403 V-2s aimed at English cities between September 1944 and March 1945.[65] The attacks, which continued sporadically until 27 March 1945, resulted in around 2,754 civilian deaths and 6,523 injuries, with impacts scattered across the metropolitan area due to the weapon's inherent inaccuracy.[62] No effective early warning was possible given the supersonic speed of the V-2, leading to sudden detonations that compounded the terror effect, though the overall strategic disruption to Allied operations remained limited.[66] Antwerp, Belgium, became the most heavily targeted location on the continent after its liberation on 4 September 1944, as its port handled up to 80% of Allied supplies by late 1944.[64] The first V-2 struck the city on 13 October 1944, followed by 1,610 launches through March 1945, causing 1,736 deaths and extensive damage to docks and residential areas.[65][67] Additional targets included Liège (36 V-2s), Hasselt (10), and Maastricht (3) in Belgium; Paris (19) and Lille (4) in France; and Rotterdam and The Hague (96 combined) in the Netherlands, with these strikes aimed at hindering troop concentrations and logistics but yielding minimal military dividends relative to the resources expended.[65] Isolated attempts targeted tactical objectives, such as the Ludendorff Bridge at Remagen in March 1945, but failed due to guidance limitations.[62]Final Phases and Tactical Adaptations
As Allied forces advanced into western Europe in late 1944, German V-2 operations shifted emphasis toward the port of Antwerp, which received 1,610 impacts compared to 1,359 on London, reflecting its strategic value as a supply hub for the Allied invasion.[3] This redirection began in October 1944 following orders from Heinrich Himmler, with batteries like 444 temporarily focusing on Antwerp before resuming London strikes.[62] Launch sites relocated eastward from initial coastal positions in the Netherlands, such as The Hague area, to inland German locations like Hermeskeil and Burgsteinfurt to evade advancing troops and air attacks.[62][68] Tactical adaptations emphasized mobility to counter Allied air superiority, employing Meillerwagen transporters that allowed rapid deployment from concealed woodland sites, enabling setup, fueling, and launch within 30-60 minutes before relocation.[66][68] Launch rates intensified, with individual batteries achieving up to nine firings in a single day by late October 1944, and overall daily totals reaching 20-30 rockets at peak in early 1945, supported by underground production peaking at around 600 units monthly.[62][69] Guidance refinements included a radio beam update system introduced in December 1944, which reduced circular error probable to 2 km in tests, though operational accuracy averaged 12 km due to factors like British electronic countermeasures.[3] By March 1945, operations dwindled as fuel shortages and site overruns mounted; Allied bombing targeted remaining infrastructure, such as the Haagse Bos on March 3, while launches continued sporadically from sites like Hachenburg until March 16.[3] The final V-2 struck Antwerp on March 27, 1945, with another aimed at London hours earlier, marking the effective end of the campaign as German forces abandoned or destroyed equipment amid total defeat.[70][71] In total, approximately 3,170 combat launches occurred from September 1944 to March 1945, but these adaptations failed to alter the war's outcome, prioritizing terror over precision amid resource constraints.[3]Effectiveness Evaluation
Accuracy and Reliability Data
The V-2 rocket exhibited limited accuracy, with prototype tests in 1943 yielding a circular error probable (CEP) of 4.5 kilometers, meaning 50% of impacts fell within that radius of the target.[3] Operational performance was further compromised by guidance system limitations, including gyroscopic drift and atmospheric reentry errors, rendering it unsuitable for precision strikes against specific infrastructure. In combat campaigns against London and Antwerp, approximately one-third of launched V-2s struck within city limits, with the remainder dispersing over broader areas due to these inaccuracies.[72] British intelligence operations exacerbated this by disseminating false impact reports through double agents, prompting German adjustments that shifted mean points of impact away from intended targets, though actual missile precision was somewhat better than perceived by Axis evaluators.[3] Reliability during early production testing in 1944 was poor, with an 80% in-flight failure rate attributed to structural disintegrations from multiple causes, including fuel turbopump vibrations and aerodynamic instabilities, which were partially mitigated in later batches.[3] Operationally, of the roughly 3,000 V-2s launched against Allied targets from September 1944 to March 1945, a significant portion suffered pre-launch failures due to rushed assembly under slave labor conditions, transport damage, or fueling issues, though exact combat-era success rates are not precisely quantified in declassified records.[1] Post-capture U.S. firings of V-2s between 1946 and 1952 recorded 20-30% major failures, often from similar guidance and propulsion flaws, highlighting inherent design vulnerabilities despite wartime improvements. Overall, the weapon's low per-rocket lethality—averaging about two civilian fatalities per strike in London—stemmed from combined inaccuracy and occasional detonation failures on impact.[73]Strategic and Tactical Impact
The V-2's tactical utility was severely constrained by its ballistic nature and absence of mid-course corrections, yielding a circular error probable of roughly 4.5 kilometers in pre-operational tests, which worsened to about 17 kilometers under combat conditions.[3][74] This dispersion precluded strikes on pinpoint military objectives, reducing the weapon to broad-area terror attacks on population centers like London and Antwerp, where its supersonic speed and silent approach prevented evasion or interception once fired.[75] From 8 September 1944 to 2 March 1945, German forces launched approximately 3,172 operational V-2s, with around 1,358 targeted at London (resulting in 517 recorded impacts) and over 1,600 at Antwerp.[3][4] Casualties from these barrages were significant but regionally concentrated: in London, V-2 strikes caused about 2,700 deaths and 6,500 injuries, while Antwerp endured higher tolls, including a single 16 December 1944 impact on a crowded cinema that killed 271 civilians.[4] Tactically, the rockets inflicted sporadic disruption—such as temporary port closures in Antwerp—but failed to halt Allied logistics; despite over 1,000 impacts, Antwerp's throughput surged to record levels by early 1945, underscoring the V-2's inability to degrade supply lines meaningfully.[76] The weapon's unpredictability amplified short-term psychological strain, evoking dread due to instantaneous detonation without warning, yet empirical assessments of morale in Britain revealed no collapse in civilian resolve or production, as government censorship and resilience measures mitigated panic. Strategically, the V-2 campaign yielded negligible influence on the war's trajectory, diverting Allied air resources minimally toward production sites like Peenemünde while consuming German industrial capacity equivalent to thousands of fighter aircraft without commensurate returns.[29] Intended as a vengeance tool to erode enemy will and retaliate for Allied bombings, it instead exemplified resource misallocation, with more fatalities (around 20,000) incurred in slave labor production at facilities like Mittelbau-Dora than from its combat use.[77] Post-campaign analyses by Allied commands confirmed no alteration in operational tempo or strategic decisions, affirming the V-2's role as a high-cost propaganda gesture rather than a decisive factor.[22]Resource Cost-Benefit Analysis
The V-2 program demanded substantial financial and material resources from Nazi Germany amid wartime shortages. Production of approximately 6,084 missiles incurred unit costs of around $17,877 each, with early units at Peenemünde requiring 10,000–20,000 man-hours and later underground assembly at Mittelwerk reducing this to about 7,500 man-hours per rocket. [3] [1] These efforts consumed critical metals, alcohol-based fuels, and precision components, diverting them from conventional armaments like aircraft and tanks that faced acute supply constraints by 1944. [29] Human costs were exceptionally high, as 95% of output relied on forced labor from roughly 20,000 prisoners in the Mittelwerk facility, where at least 10,000 perished from exhaustion, disease, and executions under SS oversight. [3] [1] This mortality rate exceeded the program's combat impact, with analyses confirming that more Allied prisoners died in V-2 production and facility construction than civilians killed by the weapons themselves—by a factor greater than two to one. [78] Militarily, the V-2 yielded limited tangible benefits despite launching up to 3,225 in combat, mainly against Antwerp and London from September 1944 to March 1945. [3] Strikes inflicted sporadic devastation, such as the deadliest incident killing 567 at an Antwerp cinema on December 16, 1944, but overall accuracy was poor, with impacts often deviating kilometers from targets due to guidance limitations. [29] While supersonic speed prevented interception and generated psychological terror—evident in civilian panic and temporary morale dips—the weapons disrupted few strategic assets, as Allied bombing campaigns and ground advances neutralized launch sites and supply lines more effectively than the V-2 hindered enemy operations. [29] From a cost-benefit perspective, the program represented a net loss, as each V-2 equated in expense to a high-performance fighter yet delivered damage inferior to manned bomber raids, which risked pilots but allowed mid-course corrections and larger payloads. [29] Resource allocation to V-2 development and deployment—prioritized under Hitler's "vengeance weapon" directive—forewent scalable alternatives like enhanced fighter production or defensive aircraft, contributing to Luftwaffe attrition without altering the war's trajectory. Empirical outcomes underscore causal inefficiencies: high production fatalities, material waste, and negligible strategic denial outweighed terror effects, rendering the V-2 a resource sink that accelerated Germany's industrial collapse rather than Allied setbacks. [78] [29]Countermeasures and Allied Responses
Intelligence and Disruption Efforts
Allied intelligence on the German V-2 rocket program began with the Oslo Report, delivered anonymously to British authorities in November 1939 by German physicist Hans Ferdinand Mayer, which identified Peenemünde as a key rocket test site and described early long-range missile development efforts.[79] [80] Initially met with skepticism due to its detailed claims exceeding known Allied capabilities, the report gained credibility through subsequent aerial reconnaissance; by May 1942, RAF photo interpreters had imaged unusual structures at Peenemünde, and by April 1943, the Allied Central Interpretation Unit confirmed V-2 rocket assembly via high-altitude photography from specialized squadrons.[81] [82] These intelligence findings prompted Operation Crossbow, a dedicated Allied campaign launched in August 1943 to disrupt V-weapon development and deployment sites across occupied Europe, prioritizing them second only to immediate invasion-support missions.[83] The operation's first major strike, Operation Hydra, involved 596 RAF Bomber Command aircraft raiding Peenemünde on the night of 17-18 August 1943, dropping approximately 1,800 tons of bombs that destroyed test stands, assembly halls, and housing, while killing key engineer Walter Thiel and an estimated 178-400 personnel, including scientists and forced laborers.[22] The raid, conducted in three waves at altitudes of 7,000-11,000 feet despite losing 40 aircraft and 235-360 aircrew, delayed V-2 operational readiness by two to six months, forcing dispersal of research to alternative sites like Blizna, Poland, and accelerating underground production shifts.[22] [84] Follow-up efforts under Crossbow included U.S. Army Air Forces bombings of V-2 infrastructure, such as 110 B-24 sorties against sites at Watten and Siracourt on 8 February 1944, and over 300 B-26 missions on the same day, contributing to over 10,000 total sorties by August 1944 that damaged storage depots, launch platforms, and supply lines, though mobile launchers proved elusive.[83] Production at the Mittelwerk underground factory near Nordhausen, relocated post-Peenemünde to evade bombing, faced internal disruption from prisoner sabotage; around 200 Jewish inmates at Mittelbau-Dora concentration camp deliberately introduced defects into V-2 components, such as misaligned gyroscopes and faulty wiring, risking execution but slowing assembly rates amid the site's 60,000 prisoners working under SS oversight from August 1943 to March 1945.[57] Despite these measures, the V-2 achieved first combat use on 8 September 1944 against Paris, as Allied intelligence could not fully prevent deployment but constrained its scale and timing.[83]Defensive Measures
Allied defensive measures against the V-2 rocket were severely limited by its ballistic trajectory, which reached altitudes of up to 80-90 kilometers before re-entering the atmosphere at speeds exceeding 3,500 kilometers per hour, rendering interception by aircraft or anti-aircraft artillery impossible with 1940s technology.[60][23] Attempts by Royal Air Force fighters to engage V-2s during ascent or descent failed due to the rocket's rapid acceleration and lack of a sustained engine signature for targeting after burnout.[85] Ground-based radar systems, such as those employed by British defenses, could not reliably track the missile's high-altitude path or provide actionable intercept data, as the V-2 followed a parabolic arc undetectable until terminal descent.[86] Civil defense in targeted areas like London and Antwerp relied on passive protections, including reinforced shelters and evacuation protocols, but these proved inadequate without prior warning. In London, where V-2 strikes from September 8, 1944, to March 27, 1945, killed approximately 2,700 civilians, no air raid sirens were sounded for incoming V-2s, as the rockets produced no audible engine noise during descent—unlike the V-1 "buzz bombs"—leaving residents with seconds or no notice before impact.[87][86] Underground facilities like London Underground stations served as impromptu shelters during alerts, but sporadic use reflected the unpredictability; many casualties occurred in homes or streets due to the sudden nature of attacks.[88] In Antwerp, the primary continental target receiving over 1,600 V-2 impacts between October 1944 and March 1945—resulting in 4,000-9,000 deaths—similar constraints applied, with Belgian and Allied civil authorities promoting shelter usage in basements and bunkers while urging port workers to remain on duty despite risks.[22][89] Launch detection improved marginally by late 1944 through radar monitoring of sites in The Hague, allowing some post-launch alerts, but the 300-320 kilometer flight time provided insufficient evacuation windows, exacerbating the "city of sudden death" moniker.[90] These measures mitigated few impacts, as V-2 warheads detonated on surface contact without fuze arming delays, maximizing blast effects in densely populated zones.[91]Post-Launch Mitigation
The V-2 rocket's supersonic speed, reaching over 3,500 km/h during re-entry, and its ballistic trajectory made interception impossible with World War II-era technology, as Allied fighters and anti-aircraft guns could not match its velocity or altitude.[92][63] No successful attempts to destroy V-2s in flight occurred, despite recognition of the need for such defenses.[93] Impacts occurred without prior audible warning, as the sonic boom followed the explosion; flight times from launch sites in the Netherlands to London averaged five minutes, precluding effective air raid alerts.[63][87] British authorities initially censored reports of V-2 strikes, attributing explosions to gas leaks to maintain morale, until Prime Minister Winston Churchill publicly acknowledged the attacks on 6 November 1944.[94] Post-impact mitigation relied on civil defense organizations, including rescue squads, fire brigades, and medical teams, which responded to debris clearance, firefighting, and casualty treatment. In London, where 1,054 V-2s landed between 8 September 1944 and 27 March 1945, these efforts addressed widespread structural damage and approximately 2,724 fatalities.[94][29] Similar responses in Antwerp, hit by over 1,600 V-2s and suffering around 4,000 deaths, prioritized sustaining port operations vital for Allied supply lines through rapid repairs and shelter provisions.[29][62] Allied radar systems, such as those tracking re-entry phases, enabled backtracking of trajectories to identify launch sites, facilitating preemptive bombing that indirectly reduced subsequent launches rather than mitigating individual missiles.[95] Overall, the V-2 campaign exposed vulnerabilities in defending against ballistic threats, with mitigation limited to enhancing societal resilience and accelerating ground advances to eliminate mobile launchers.[96]Controversies and Ethical Dimensions
Forced Labor in Production
Following the Royal Air Force bombing of the Peenemünde research facility on August 17, 1943, German authorities relocated much of the V-2 rocket production to underground facilities to evade further Allied air attacks.[28] The primary site selected was the Kohnstein mountain near Nordhausen in Thuringia, where prisoners from concentration camps were compelled to excavate extensive tunnel networks for the Mittelwerk factory complex.[48] The Mittelbau-Dora concentration camp, initially established in late summer 1943 as a subcamp of Buchenwald, served as the central hub for this forced labor operation.[48] Starting with approximately 1,000 prisoners transferred from Buchenwald in August 1943, the camp population expanded rapidly, with around 60,000 individuals deported to the Mittelbau camp system by March 1945.[51] Prisoners, including political detainees, Jews, and Soviet POWs, were subjected to grueling 12-hour shifts in unstable tunnels lacking ventilation and daylight, initially focused on excavation before shifting to V-2 assembly by early 1944.[48] [50] Conditions in the camp were lethal, with workers enduring malnutrition, exposure to toxic fumes, cave-ins, and brutal SS oversight under General Hans Kammler, resulting in up to 25,000 deaths across the Mittelbau complex, including at least 10,000 directly tied to V-2 production labor.[28] Executions for suspected sabotage exceeded 200 public hangings, while diseases like typhus and dysentery claimed numerous lives amid deliberate neglect of prisoner welfare to prioritize output.[48] Despite these horrors, prisoner resistance through subtle sabotage contributed to production delays and defects in the rockets.[48] Wernher von Braun, technical director of the V-2 program, was integral to the production chain reliant on this slave labor, with program leadership approving its use after the Peenemünde dispersal.[28] He visited the Nordhausen facilities in January 1944, aware that SS-provided concentration camp inmates formed the bulk of the workforce, though his primary focus remained engineering advancements.[28] By late 1944, the Mittelwerk produced the majority of the approximately 5,800 operational V-2 rockets launched, underscoring the scale of exploitation in sustaining the weapon's deployment.[28]Leadership Accountability
![Mittelbau-Dora concentration camp, site of V-2 slave labor][float-right](./assets/Germany%252C_Th%C3%BCringen%252C_Nordhausen%252C_KZ_Dora-Mittelbau_ The V-2 rocket program's leadership, including Wernher von Braun as technical director and Walter Dornberger as military commander at Peenemünde, bore responsibility for overseeing production that relied extensively on forced labor from concentration camps, particularly Mittelbau-Dora, where an estimated 20,000 prisoners died due to brutal conditions between 1943 and 1945.[28][97] Von Braun visited the underground Mittelwerk factory multiple times and was aware of the slave labor conditions, as documented in his own post-war statements and eyewitness accounts from engineers, though he minimized his direct involvement.[98][99] SS-Obergruppenführer Hans Kammler, appointed in 1944 to supervise V-weapon production, directed the transfer of prisoners to Dora and enforced SS control over the facilities, contributing to the high mortality rates from starvation, disease, and executions.[100] Post-war accountability was limited primarily to lower-level perpetrators through the Dora Trial, held from August to December 1947 as part of the Dachau proceedings, where 16 former SS guards, kapos, and Mittelwerk officials were tried for war crimes including murder and mistreatment of prisoners.[101] The trial resulted in 12 convictions, including five death sentences (one commuted) and life imprisonment for others, focusing on individual acts of brutality rather than systemic leadership decisions in the rocket program.[101] Mittelwerk managing director Georg Rickhey was acquitted due to insufficient evidence linking him directly to specific killings, despite his role in operations.[101] Key program leaders evaded prosecution. Von Braun, Dornberger, and engineer Arthur Rudolph were investigated but not charged, with U.S. authorities under Operation Paperclip sanitizing their records to secure their expertise for American rocketry, prioritizing Cold War advantages over judicial review despite documented complicity in slave labor.[102][103] Dornberger was briefly detained by British forces in 1945 and testified at Nuremberg on technical matters but faced no war crimes trial, later joining U.S. firms like Bell Aircraft.[104] Kammler, whose oversight facilitated the deaths of thousands, disappeared in May 1945 and was officially declared dead in 1947 without trial, though unverified claims of U.S. capture persist.[100] This selective impunity reflected Allied strategic calculations, as evidenced by declassified documents showing awareness of the leaders' Nazi ties yet deliberate non-prosecution to counter Soviet gains.[105]Strategic Misjudgments by German Command
The German high command, particularly Adolf Hitler, misjudged the V-2's potential by elevating it to a priority "vengeance weapon" (Vergeltungswaffe) in response to defeats like Stalingrad in early 1943, despite its inability to reverse the war's trajectory. Development under Wernher von Braun began in the 1930s, but mass production was only ordered on December 22, 1942, with operational deployment delayed until September 8, 1944—by which point Allied forces had landed in Normandy and were advancing rapidly.[29][88] This timing reflected a persistent optimism bias, as Hitler initially dismissed the A-4 (V-2 prototype) as merely "an artillery shell with a longer range and much higher cost" in 1940 but later insisted on its deployment to terrorize London and Antwerp, ignoring its limited strategic utility against entrenched Allied logistics.[29][88] Resource allocation represented a profound miscalculation, with the V-2 program consuming up to 2 billion Reichsmarks—Germany's most expensive armaments effort—and diverting critical materials, fuel (including alcohol from potato crops), and approximately 60,000 forced laborers, resulting in at least 20,000 deaths at production sites like Mittelbau-Dora.[29] These inputs could have bolstered conventional defenses, such as Luftwaffe fighters needed to contest Allied air superiority, yet command prioritized technological novelty over pragmatic needs amid fuel shortages and bombing campaigns.[29] Albert Speer, as Armaments Minister, later acknowledged the V-weapons' inefficiency, noting their high cost yielded negligible results compared to cheaper anti-aircraft systems that might have mitigated Allied raids.[106] Tactically, the V-2's inaccuracy—a circular error probable of about 8 miles—limited it to area bombardment rather than precise strikes on military targets, delivering just 3,000 tons of explosives over seven months, far less than a single RAF bomber sortie.[29][88] Despite inflicting around 2,700 civilian deaths in London from 1,054 impacts between September 1944 and March 1945, it failed to disrupt the Normandy supply lines or shatter morale, as launches ceased by March 27, 1945, with sites overrun.[88] This underscored a doctrinal error in favoring unproven "wonder weapons" over mass-produced aircraft or fortifications, exacerbating Germany's resource scarcity without causal impact on the war's end.[29]Post-War Exploitation
United States Acquisition
In the closing months of World War II, U.S. forces captured substantial quantities of V-2 rockets and components from German sites, including a trainload of missiles discovered near Demker, Germany, in April 1945 by soldiers of the 35th Infantry Division.[107] By May 22, 1945, initial shipments of these captured V-2 parts had reached Antwerp for transatlantic transport to the United States, where they were directed to White Sands Proving Ground in New Mexico for analysis and reassembly.[108] Engineers assembled approximately 67 V-2 rockets from these components, conducting static tests starting March 15, 1946, and flight tests through 1952, with the first vertical launch occurring on April 16, 1946, reaching an altitude of about 5 miles before destruct due to a guidance failure.[109][110][111] Parallel to hardware recovery, U.S. intelligence prioritized personnel acquisition, with Wernher von Braun—chief developer of the V-2—and several senior colleagues surrendering to American troops on May 2, 1945, in Rüette, Bavaria, after evacuating Peenemünde documentation southward to avoid Soviet capture.[112] Von Braun led an initial group of over 100 rocket specialists relocated to Fort Bliss, Texas, under provisional arrangements that evolved into Operation Paperclip, a broader program initiated in summer 1945 to import German technical experts despite their Nazi affiliations.[113][114] This team, augmented to around 130 by 1950, collaborated on V-2 disassembly, reverse-engineering, and launches as part of Project Hermes, providing the U.S. Army with direct insights into liquid-fueled propulsion, guidance systems, and supersonic aerodynamics that accelerated domestic missile development.[115] The combined hardware and expertise haul positioned the United States ahead in post-war rocketry, enabling early experiments like the Bumper program—V-2s augmented with WAC Corporal upper stages for higher-altitude probes—and laying groundwork for the Redstone missile, though inefficiencies in reassembly highlighted gaps in replicating German production without full factory schematics.[116] Over 70 V-2 derivatives were eventually fired from White Sands, yielding data on upper-atmosphere phenomena and structural stresses absent from prior American efforts.[109]Soviet Program Integration
The Soviet Union captured numerous V-2 rockets and components from German production sites, such as the Mittelwerk factory in Nordhausen, as Allied forces advanced in early 1945.[117] These acquisitions included over 100 missiles in various states of assembly, enabling initial disassembly and analysis by Soviet engineers.[118] On October 22, 1946, Soviet authorities executed Operation Osoaviakhim, forcibly relocating about 2,200 German specialists, including approximately 120 rocketry experts, to the USSR to accelerate missile development.[119] Helmut Gröttrup, formerly responsible for V-2 guidance systems under Wernher von Braun, led a group of around 70 German engineers at Gorodomlya Island near Moscow, where they reconstructed V-2 replicas using captured hardware.[120] Under Gröttrup's direction, the team conducted 12 test launches of V-2 copies between 1946 and 1947, achieving 10 successes that validated the technology and trained Soviet personnel.[119] These efforts informed domestic production, culminating in a Soviet Council of Ministers resolution on April 14, 1948, to manufacture the R-1, a near-identical copy of the V-2 with minor adaptations like Soviet-produced alcohol and liquid oxygen propellants.[121] The R-1's maiden flight occurred on September 18, 1948, from the Kapustin Yar test range, reaching a range of 270 kilometers with a launch mass of 13.43 metric tons.[122] Over 20 R-1 launches followed by 1950, confirming reliability and paving the way for improved variants like the R-2.[121] German contributions, while instrumental in rapid prototyping, were phased out as Soviet chief designer Sergei Korolev integrated the knowledge into indigenous designs, repatriating most specialists by mid-1948.[119] This integration shortened Soviet development timelines by years, establishing a foundation for ballistic missiles and space launch vehicles.[117]Other Nations' Uses
In the immediate aftermath of World War II, the United Kingdom conducted Operation Backfire, a joint Anglo-American effort to evaluate captured V-2 rockets under British oversight. Three V-2 launches occurred from a site near Cuxhaven, Germany, on October 1, 2, and 4, 1945, utilizing German personnel including former Peenemünde engineers supervised by Allied forces. The first launch failed due to a guidance malfunction, the second achieved partial flight before control loss, and the third reached an apogee of approximately 80 kilometers, providing data on rocket performance and telemetry. This operation yielded technical reports on V-2 propulsion, guidance, and aerodynamics, informing early British missile development without leading to independent production.[123][124] France independently pursued V-2-derived technology through the Véronique sounding rocket program, initiated in the late 1940s with contributions from German engineers previously involved in the A-4 project. Véronique incorporated V-2 elements such as liquid-propellant engines using nitric acid and turpentine, scaled-down for atmospheric research to altitudes up to 65 kilometers initially. The first Véronique test flight occurred on October 28, 1949, from the Vernon facility, marking France's entry into rocketry; subsequent variants like Véronique N and NA extended capabilities, with launches from sites including Hammaguir in Algeria starting in 1952. This program laid groundwork for French liquid-fueled rocketry, influencing later vehicles like the Ariane series, though reliant on captured German expertise amid limited domestic resources.[125] Australia acquired several disassembled V-2 rockets in 1947 through British channels as part of the Anglo-Australian Joint Project, transporting them to the Woomera test range for reassembly and static testing. These specimens supported early guided weapons research, including propulsion and structural analysis, though no full launches were conducted due to logistical constraints and focus on derivative designs like the Long Range Weapon trials. Preserved V-2 components remain at the Australian War Memorial, exemplifying post-war Allied dissemination of German technology for joint defense initiatives amid Cold War preparations.[38][126]Technological Legacy
Influence on Ballistic Missiles
The V-2 represented the first operational long-range guided ballistic missile, incorporating liquid-propellant rocketry, inertial guidance via gyroscopes, and a reentry body designed for supersonic flight, which established foundational technologies for all subsequent ballistic missile systems.[3] [1] These innovations enabled missiles to follow a parabolic trajectory after boost phase burnout, reaching altitudes of up to 80-100 km before descending on targets with speeds exceeding Mach 3, a profile emulated in post-war designs despite the V-2's inaccuracy of around 17 km CEP.[22] In the Soviet Union, captured V-2 hardware and documentation facilitated the rapid development of the R-1 missile, a direct copy manufactured domestically with modifications to fuel systems for ethanol and liquid oxygen, achieving its first successful test launch on October 18, 1948, from Kapustin Yar.[121] [122] The R-1 entered service in 1950 as the USSR's initial tactical ballistic missile, with production exceeding 1,000 units, and served as the technological precursor to clustered-engine derivatives like the R-2 (1953) and the R-11/Scud series, which proliferated globally and formed the basis for many Cold War-era short- and intermediate-range ballistic missiles.[122] [127] The United States leveraged V-2 expertise through Operation Paperclip, relocating engineers like Wernher von Braun to develop the Redstone missile, which retained core V-2 elements such as turbopump-fed propulsion and graphite-bearing guidance but scaled up to a 75,000 lbf thrust engine for a range of 200 km.[128] [129] Deployed by the U.S. Army in 1958, the Redstone directly influenced the Jupiter intermediate-range ballistic missile (IRBM) and Pershing systems, bridging to larger liquid-fueled ICBMs like the Titan II, while early post-war firings of assembled V-2s at White Sands from 1946 validated and refined these adaptations.[130] [115] Beyond superpowers, V-2 principles informed programs in other nations; for instance, France's Véronique sounding rocket, first launched in 1949, adapted V-2 aerodynamics and propulsion for early ballistic research, contributing to the Diamant launcher and subsequent missile capabilities.[127] Overall, the V-2's demonstration of powered boost to suborbital velocities and minimal atmospheric guidance needs proved causal to the feasibility of nuclear-armed ballistic missiles, enabling the strategic deterrence architectures of the Cold War despite its wartime operational limitations.[96] [131]Contributions to Space Exploration
The V-2 rocket marked the first human-engineered object to reach outer space, with a test launch on June 20, 1944, achieving an apogee of 176 kilometers, exceeding the Kármán line boundary of 100 kilometers commonly defining the edge of space.[132] This suborbital trajectory provided initial data on high-altitude flight dynamics, though wartime constraints limited scientific instrumentation.[133] Following World War II, the United States repurposed over 60 captured V-2 rockets for upper-atmosphere research at White Sands Proving Ground in New Mexico, with the first American launch occurring on April 16, 1946.[109] These flights, totaling 67 between 1946 and 1950, carried instruments to measure cosmic radiation, ionospheric conditions, and solar ultraviolet radiation, yielding foundational empirical data on the space environment that informed early space science.[134] Notably, on October 24, 1946, V-2 No. 13 captured the first photographs of Earth from space at an altitude of about 105 kilometers using a 35 mm motion picture camera, revealing the planet's curvature and atmospheric layers.[135] The V-2's technological components, including its liquid oxygen and alcohol propulsion system generating 25 metric tons of thrust, served as a prototype for sounding rockets and influenced multi-stage designs like the Bumper series, where a V-2 boosted a WAC Corporal upper stage to 400 kilometers on February 24, 1949—the highest altitude for a U.S. rocket until 1956.[1] German engineers led by Wernher von Braun, relocated via Operation Paperclip, adapted V-2 guidance and engine principles into the Redstone rocket, which launched America's first satellite attempt in 1958 and the Mercury-Redstone flights carrying Alan Shepard and Gus Grissom in 1961.[136] This lineage extended to the Jupiter and Saturn vehicles, culminating in the Saturn V that enabled the Apollo lunar missions, with V-2 innovations in turbopump-fed engines and inertial navigation proving scalable for orbital and interplanetary exploration.[137] Soviet engineers similarly reverse-engineered V-2 copies as the R-1 rocket starting in 1948, contributing to their early space achievements like Sputnik 1 in 1957 through derived liquid-fuel technologies.[138]Surviving Examples and Preservation
Approximately 20 original V-2 rockets from World War II survive today, having been captured by Allied forces and subsequently preserved in museums for study and display.[139] These examples, often incomplete or restored, illustrate the engineering of the Aggregat-4 design, including its liquid-propellant engine and guidance systems. Preservation efforts focus on conserving components exposed to corrosion from propellants like ethanol and liquid oxygen, with restorations addressing structural integrity for public exhibition.[140] In the United States, the National Air and Space Museum in Washington, D.C., houses a complete V-2 missile that underwent restoration in 2023, involving disassembly, cleaning, and reassembly on a launch table to prevent further degradation.[141] [1] The National Museum of the United States Air Force in Dayton, Ohio, displays a V-2 rocket recovered from wartime production sites, emphasizing its role as the first long-range ballistic missile with a range exceeding 300 kilometers.[137] The Kansas Cosmosphere and Space Center in Hutchinson maintains a restored V-2 with its engine intact, one of several handled by their SpaceWorks team for conservation.[140] European institutions also preserve V-2 artifacts. The Imperial War Museum in London exhibits a sectioned V-2, cut to reveal internal components such as the combustion chamber and control systems, aiding educational displays on its supersonic flight profile.[142] In France, the La Coupole museum near Saint-Omer features a partial V-2 replica alongside original components, contextualized within the site's history as a planned launch bunker.[140] The Australian War Memorial in Canberra preserves a V-2, transported post-war for analysis and now displayed to highlight Allied intelligence efforts in countering the weapon.[140]| Museum/Institution | Location | Description |
|---|---|---|
| National Air and Space Museum | Washington, D.C., USA | Restored complete V-2, displayed upright since 1976 with 2023 conservation.[141] [143] |
| National Museum of the US Air Force | Dayton, Ohio, USA | Full V-2 from Mittelwerk factory, with transport cradle exhibit.[137] [63] |
| Kansas Cosmosphere | Hutchinson, Kansas, USA | Restored V-2 with motor, verified original components.[140] |
| Imperial War Museum | London, UK | Sectioned V-2 showing internals, recovered post-1944 launches.[142] |
| Australian War Memorial | Canberra, Australia | Captured V-2 for post-war testing and preservation.[140] |