Hubbry Logo
Yttrium barium copper oxideYttrium barium copper oxideMain
Open search
Yttrium barium copper oxide
Community hub
Yttrium barium copper oxide
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Yttrium barium copper oxide
Yttrium barium copper oxide
Yttrium barium copper oxide
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Yttrium barium copper oxide
Yttrium barium copper oxide structure
Yttrium barium copper oxide structure
Yttrium barium copper oxide crystal
Yttrium barium copper oxide crystal
Names
IUPAC name
barium copper yttrium oxide
Other names
YBCO, Y123, yttrium barium cuprate
Identifiers
3D model (JSmol)
ChemSpider
ECHA InfoCard 100.121.379 Edit this at Wikidata
EC Number
  • 619-720-7
  • InChI=1S/2Ba.2Cu.7O.2Y/q4*+2;7*-2;2*+3
    Key: YMLQHJRUACGKIM-UHFFFAOYSA-N
  • [O-2].[O-2].[O-2].[O-2].[O-2].[O-2].[O-2].[Cu+2].[Cu+2].[Y+3].[Y+3].[Ba+2].[Ba+2]
Properties
YBa2Cu3O7
Molar mass 666.19 g/mol
Appearance Black solid
Density 6.4 g/cm3[1][2]
Melting point >1000 °C
Insoluble
Structure
Based on the perovskite structure.
Orthorhombic
Hazards
GHS labelling:
GHS07: Exclamation mark
Warning
H302, H315, H319, H335
P261, P264, P270, P271, P280, P301+P312, P302+P352, P304+P340, P305+P351+P338, P312, P321, P330, P332+P313, P337+P313, P362, P403+P233, P405, P501
Related compounds
Cuprate superconductors
Related compounds
 Yttrium(III) oxide
Barium oxide
Copper(II) oxide
Except where otherwise noted, data are given for materials in their standard state (at 25 °C [77 °F], 100 kPa).
checkY verify (what is checkY☒N ?)

Yttrium barium copper oxide (YBCO) is a family of crystalline chemical compounds that display high-temperature superconductivity; it includes the first material ever discovered to become superconducting above the boiling point of liquid nitrogen [77 K (−196.2 °C; −321.1 °F)] at about 93 K (−180.2 °C; −292.3 °F).[3]

Many YBCO compounds have the general formula YBa2Cu3O7−x (also known as Y123), although materials with other Y:Ba:Cu ratios exist, such as YBa2Cu4Oy (Y124) or Y2Ba4Cu7Oy (Y247). At present, there is no singularly recognised theory for high-temperature superconductivity.

It is part of the more general group of rare-earth barium copper oxides (ReBCO) in which, instead of yttrium, other rare earths are present.

History

[edit]

In April 1986, Georg Bednorz and Karl Müller, working at IBM in Zurich, discovered that certain semiconducting oxides became superconducting at relatively high temperature, in particular, a lanthanum barium copper oxide becomes superconducting at 35 K. This oxide was an oxygen-deficient perovskite-related material that proved promising and stimulated the search for related compounds with higher superconducting transition temperatures. In 1987, Bednorz and Müller were jointly awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics for this work.

Following Bednorz and Müller's discovery, a team led by Paul Ching Wu Chu at the University of Alabama in Huntsville and University of Houston discovered that YBCO has a superconducting transition critical temperature (Tc) of 93 K.[3] The first samples were Y1.2Ba0.8CuO4, but this was an average composition for two phases, a black and a green one. Workers at Bell Laboratories identified the black phase as the superconductor, determined its composition YBa2Cu3O7−δ and synthesized it in single phase[4]

YBCO was the first material found to become superconducting above 77 K, the boiling point of liquid nitrogen, whereas the majority of other superconductors require more expensive cryogens. Nonetheless, YBCO and its many related materials have yet to displace superconductors requiring liquid helium for cooling.

Synthesis

[edit]

Relatively pure YBCO was first synthesized by heating a mixture of the metal carbonates at temperatures between 1000 and 1300 K.[5][6]

4 BaCO3 + Y2(CO3)3 + 6 CuCO3 + (1⁄2−x) O2 → 2 YBa2Cu3O7−x + 13 CO2

Modern syntheses of YBCO use the corresponding oxides and nitrates.[6]

The superconducting properties of YBa2Cu3O7−x are sensitive to the value of x, its oxygen content. Only those materials with 0 ≤ x ≤ 0.65 are superconducting below Tc, and when x ~ 0.07, the material superconducts at the highest temperature of 95 K,[6] or in highest magnetic fields: 120 T for B perpendicular and 250 T for B parallel to the CuO2 planes.[7]

In addition to being sensitive to the stoichiometry of oxygen, the properties of YBCO are influenced by the crystallization methods used. Care must be taken to sinter YBCO. YBCO is a crystalline material, and the best superconductive properties are obtained when crystal grain boundaries are aligned by careful control of annealing and quenching temperature rates.

Numerous other methods to synthesize YBCO have developed since its discovery by Wu and his co-workers, such as chemical vapor deposition (CVD),[5][6] sol-gel,[8] and aerosol[9] methods. These alternative methods, however, still require careful sintering to produce a quality product.

However, new possibilities have been opened since the discovery that trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), a source of fluorine, prevents the formation of the undesired barium carbonate (BaCO3). Routes such as CSD (chemical solution deposition) have opened a wide range of possibilities, particularly in the preparation of long YBCO tapes.[10] This route lowers the temperature necessary to get the correct phase to around 700 °C (973 K; 1,292 °F). This, and the lack of dependence on vacuum, makes this method a very promising way to get scalable YBCO tapes.

Structure

[edit]
Part of the lattice structure of yttrium barium copper oxide

YBCO crystallizes in a defect perovskite structure. It can be viewed as a layered structure: the boundary of each layer is defined by planes of square planar CuO4 units sharing 4 vertices. The planes can sometimes be slightly puckered.[5] Perpendicular to these CuO4 planes are CuO2 ribbons sharing 2 vertices. The yttrium atoms are found between the CuO4 planes, while the barium atoms are found between the CuO2 ribbons and the CuO4 planes. This structural feature is illustrated in the figure to the right.

Coordination geometry of metal centres in YBCO[11][6]
cubic {YO8} {BaO10} square planar {CuO4} square pyramidal {CuO5} YBa2Cu3O7- unit cell
puckered Cu plane Cu ribbons
Like many type-II superconductors, YBCO can exhibit flux pinning: lines of magnetic flux may be pinned in place in a crystal, with a force required to move a piece from a particular magnetic field configuration. A piece of YBCO placed above a magnetic track can thus levitate at a fixed height.[5]

Although YBa2Cu3O7 is a well-defined chemical compound with a specific structure and stoichiometry, materials with fewer than seven oxygen atoms per formula unit are non-stoichiometric compounds. The structure of these materials depends on the oxygen content. This non-stoichiometry is denoted by the x in the chemical formula YBa2Cu3O7−x. When x = 1, the O(1) sites in the Cu(1) layer (as labelled in the unit cell) are vacant and the structure is tetragonal. The tetragonal form of YBCO is insulating and does not superconduct. Increasing the oxygen content slightly causes more of the O(1) sites to become occupied. For x < 0.65, Cu-O chains along the b axis of the crystal are formed. Elongation of the b axis changes the structure to orthorhombic, with lattice parameters of a = 3.82, b = 3.89, and c = 11.68 Å.[12] Optimum superconducting properties occur when x ~ 0.07, i.e., almost all of the O(1) sites are occupied, with few vacancies.

In experiments where other elements are substituted on the Cu and Ba[why?] sites, evidence has shown that conduction occurs in the Cu(2)O planes while the Cu(1)O(1) chains act as charge reservoirs, which provide carriers to the CuO planes. However, this model fails to address superconductivity in the homologue Pr123 (praseodymium instead of yttrium).[13] This (conduction in the copper planes) confines conductivity to the a-b planes and a large anisotropy in transport properties is observed. Along the c axis, normal conductivity is 10 times smaller than in the a-b plane. For other cuprates in the same general class, the anisotropy is even greater and inter-plane transport is highly restricted.

Furthermore, the superconducting length scales show similar anisotropy, in both penetration depth (λab ≈ 150 nm, λc ≈ 800 nm) and coherence length, (ξab ≈ 2 nm, ξc ≈ 0.4 nm). Although the coherence length in the a-b plane is 5 times greater than that along the c axis it is quite small compared to classic superconductors such as niobium (where ξ ≈ 40 nm). This modest coherence length means that the superconducting state is more susceptible to local disruptions from interfaces or defects on the order of a single unit cell, such as the boundary between twinned crystal domains. This sensitivity to small defects complicates fabricating devices with YBCO, and the material is also sensitive to degradation from humidity.

Proposed applications

[edit]
Critical current (KA/cm2) vs absolute temperature (K), at different intensity of magnetic field (T) in YBCO prepared by infiltration-growth.[14]

Many possible applications of this and related high temperature superconducting materials have been discussed. For example, superconducting materials are finding use as magnets in magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic levitation, and Josephson junctions. (The most used material for power cables and magnets is BSCCO.)[citation needed]

YBCO has yet to be used in many applications involving superconductors for two primary reasons:

  • First, although single crystals of YBCO have a very high critical current density, polycrystals have a very low critical current density: only a small current can be passed while maintaining superconductivity. This problem is due to crystal grain boundaries in the material. When the grain boundary angle is greater than about 5°, the supercurrent cannot cross the boundary. The grain boundary problem can be controlled to some extent by preparing thin films via CVD or by texturing the material to align the grain boundaries.[citation needed]
  • A second problem limiting the use of this material in technological applications is associated with processing of the material. Oxide materials such as this are brittle, and forming them into superconducting wires by any conventional process does not produce a useful superconductor. (Unlike BSCCO, the powder-in-tube process does not give good results with YBCO.)[citation needed]

The most promising method developed to utilize this material involves deposition of YBCO on flexible metal tapes coated with buffering metal oxides. This is known as coated conductor. Texture (crystal plane alignment) can be introduced into the metal tape (the RABiTS process) or a textured ceramic buffer layer can be deposited, with the aid of an ion beam, on an untextured alloy substrate (the IBAD process). Subsequent oxide layers prevent diffusion of the metal from the tape into the superconductor while transferring the template for texturing the superconducting layer. Novel variants on CVD, PVD, and solution deposition techniques are used to produce long lengths of the final YBCO layer at high rates. Companies pursuing these processes include American Superconductor, Superpower (a division of Furukawa Electric), Sumitomo, Fujikura, Nexans Superconductors, Commonwealth Fusion Systems, and European Advanced Superconductors. A much larger number of research institutes have also produced YBCO tape by these methods.[citation needed]

The superconducting tape is used for SPARC, a tokamak fusion reactor design that can achieve breakeven energy production.[15]

Surface modification

[edit]

Surface modification of materials has often led to new and improved properties. Corrosion inhibition, polymer adhesion and nucleation, preparation of organic superconductor/insulator/high-Tc superconductor trilayer structures, and the fabrication of metal/insulator/superconductor tunnel junctions have been developed using surface-modified YBCO.[16]

These molecular layered materials are synthesized using cyclic voltammetry. Thus far, YBCO layered with alkylamines, arylamines, and thiols have been produced with varying stability of the molecular layer. It has been proposed that amines act as Lewis bases and bind to Lewis acidic Cu surface sites in YBa2Cu3O7 to form stable coordination bonds.

Mass production

[edit]
SuperOx was able to produce over 186 miles of YBCO in 9 months for use in a fusion magnet.

In 1987, shortly after it was discovered, physicist and science author Paul Grant published in the U.K. Journal New Scientist a straightforward guide for synthesizing YBCO superconductors using widely-available equipment.[17] Thanks in part to this article and similar publications at the time, YBCO has become a popular high-temperature superconductor for use by hobbyists and in education, as the magnetic levitation effect can be easily demonstrated using liquid nitrogen as coolant.

In 2021, SuperOx, a Russian and Japanese company, developed a new manufacturing process for making YBCO wire for fusion reactors. This new wire was shown to conduct between 700 and 2000 Amps per square millimeter. The company was able to produce 186 miles of wire in 9 months, between 2019 and 2021, dramatically improving the production capacity. The company used a plasma-laser deposition process, on a electropolished substrate to make 12-mm width tape and then slit it into 3-mm tape.[18]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Yttrium barium copper oxide

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Yttrium barium copper oxide (YBCO), with the YBa₂Cu₃O₇, is a crystalline ceramic compound belonging to the family of high-temperature superconductors, capable of conducting with zero resistance at critical temperatures up to 93 K (−180 °C), which exceeds the of (77 K). This material revolutionized research upon its discovery in January 1987 by independent teams at the and the , marking the first demonstration of above temperatures and enabling practical cooling without expensive . Structurally, YBCO adopts an orthorhombic perovskite-like lattice, featuring layered copper-oxygen planes that are essential for its superconducting properties, with the oxygen content (often denoted as YBa₂Cu₃O_{7-δ}, where δ varies) critically tuning the transition temperature (T_c) through doping effects. As a , it allows penetration via vortices, supporting high critical current densities (J_c) in applied fields, which is vital for technological use. YBCO's significance lies in its potential for energy-efficient applications, including power transmission cables that minimize resistive losses, fault current limiters for grid protection, and high-field magnets for fusion reactors and particle accelerators. Thin-film and coated-conductor forms of YBCO enable compact devices like superconducting motors, generators, and systems, while ongoing research explores enhancements for room-temperature . Despite challenges like material brittleness and fabrication costs, YBCO remains a cornerstone of high-temperature , driving advancements in technologies.

Properties

Chemical Composition

Yttrium barium copper oxide (YBCO), also denoted as Y-123, possesses the YBa₂Cu₃O₇₋δ, where δ represents the oxygen non-stoichiometry parameter, typically ranging from 0 to 1 and reflecting deviations from the ideal oxygen content of 7 atoms per . This variability arises primarily from partial occupancy of oxygen sites in the crystal lattice, allowing fine-tuning of electronic properties through controlled oxygenation. The superconducting form of YBCO corresponds to the orthorhombic phase (Y-123), which forms when δ ≤ 0.5, whereas higher δ values (> 0.5) stabilize the non-superconducting tetragonal phase. A fully deoxygenated composition, YBa₂Cu₃O₆ (δ = 1), exemplifies the tetragonal variant and exhibits insulating behavior due to the absence of charge carriers. In its layered perovskite-like arrangement, serves as a trivalent cation positioned between consecutive CuO₂ planes, acting as a structural spacer that maintains layer separation without contributing directly to conduction. , as a divalent cation, occupies larger sites in the BaO layers flanking the CuO chains, facilitating charge balance in the reservoir layers. Copper atoms play dual roles: forming the square-planar CuO₂ sheets central to mechanisms and linear CuO chains that provide mobile oxygen and dope the system. Oxygen anions coordinate these metals, with chain-site oxygens particularly sensitive to δ, influencing hole doping and overall . The value of δ profoundly impacts material properties, including a peak superconducting transition temperature near δ ≈ 0.

Superconducting and Physical Properties

Yttrium barium copper oxide (YBCO), with the YBa₂Cu₃O₇₋ₓ, exhibits at a critical temperature Tc≈93T_c \approx 93 K, marking the first material to superconduct above the boiling point of (77 K) at . This TcT_c reaches its maximum for oxygen deficiencies in the range x≈0.07x \approx 0.07–0.15, corresponding to near-optimal doping levels that optimize the hole carrier concentration in the CuO₂ planes. Below TcT_c, YBCO demonstrates zero electrical resistance and the , expelling magnetic fields from its interior, consistent with its classification as a . In this regime, it supports penetration via vortices, with an upper critical field Hc2≈120H_{c2} \approx 120 T at low temperatures for optimally doped samples. The superconducting properties of YBCO are highly anisotropic due to its layered perovskite-like structure, which confines charge carriers primarily to the ab-plane (CuO₂ layers) while limiting transport along the c-axis. In the ab-plane, the critical JcJ_c can reach values up to 10610^6 A/cm² at 77 K and self-field, enabling high-power applications, whereas JcJ_c along the c-axis is significantly lower, often by orders of magnitude. This directional dependence arises from the weak interlayer coupling, resulting in pronounced differences in electrical and magnetic responses between in-plane and out-of-plane directions. Physically, YBCO appears as a black, brittle material with a of approximately 6.3 g/cm³. It high exceeding 1000 °C and exhibits anisotropic , with coefficients αa=13×10−6\alpha_a = 13 \times 10^{-6} K⁻¹ in the ab-plane and αc=12×10−6\alpha_c = 12 \times 10^{-6} K⁻¹ along the c-axis, reflecting its orthorhombic . In the normal state above TcT_c, YBCO displays metallic-like resistivity that is nearly linear in , accompanied by pseudogap behavior—a partial suppression of the near the starting at a T∗>TcT^* > T_c, which manifests as deviations from simple Fermi liquid transport and influences the material's electronic properties.

History

Discovery

In 1986, J. Georg Bednorz and , working at the Zurich Research Laboratory, reported the discovery of in an oxide compound of , , and (La-Ba-Cu-O) with a critical temperature (Tc) of approximately 35 K, marking the onset of research. Their findings, initially published in a modest journal to allow further verification, demonstrated a sharp drop in electrical resistance and initial signs of the , challenging the prevailing understanding that higher Tc values required metallic rather than ceramic materials. For this breakthrough, Bednorz and Müller were awarded the 1987 . The announcement ignited an intense global race among research groups to identify materials with even higher Tc values, spurring rapid experimentation with copper-oxide-based ceramics worldwide. In early 1987, independent teams led by . W. Chu at the and Maw-Kuen Wu at the synthesized yttrium barium copper oxide (YBa2Cu3O7–x), achieving a reproducible superconducting transition at Tc = 93 K under ambient pressure conditions. Wu's team, including Jim Ashburn and C. J. Torng, observed zero resistance on January 29, 1987, at UAH. The initial preparation involved a solid-state reaction of yttrium oxide, barium carbonate, and copper oxide powders, heated and ground in multiple cycles to form the compound. Superconductivity was confirmed through resistivity measurements indicating a sharp onset to zero resistance near 93 K and magnetic susceptibility tests revealing the Meissner effect, with diamagnetic expulsion of magnetic fields below Tc. This achievement positioned YBCO as the first practical high-Tc superconductor operable above the boiling point of liquid nitrogen (77 K), enabling easier cooling and broader potential applications.

Key Developments

Following the discovery of superconductivity in YBa₂Cu₃O₇ (YBCO) at 93 K, early structural analyses in 1987-1988 utilized X-ray diffraction to confirm its orthorhombic , revealing that oxygen annealing was essential for ordering oxygen atoms in the Cu-O chains, thereby stabilizing the phase and enabling optimal superconducting properties. In the 1990s, research focused on enhancing to improve the critical (J_c) in magnetic fields, with studies demonstrating that introducing impurities and defects, such as nanoscale particles, created effective pinning sites for vortices; for instance, later refinements in the 2000s incorporated BaZrO₃ nanoparticles, which formed coherent nanorods aligned with the c-axis, boosting J_c by up to an in applied fields. Theoretical advancements in superconductivity during the 1990s established d-wave symmetry through (ARPES) experiments, which revealed an anisotropic superconducting gap with nodes along the diagonal directions in the , consistent across hole-doped cuprates like YBCO and providing key insights into the unconventional mechanism. The saw significant progress in thin-film deposition techniques for coated conductors, including the development of rolling-assisted biaxially textured substrates (RABiTS) and (IBAD) for buffer layers, enabling the fabrication of kilometer-long flexible wires with high J_c over 1 MA/cm² at 77 K, paving the way for practical applications. The 1987 awarded to J. Georg Bednorz and for their pioneering work on in copper oxides spurred global research efforts, directly catalyzing the rapid identification and optimization of YBCO as the first material to exceed liquid-nitrogen temperatures.

Synthesis

Solid-State Synthesis

The solid-state synthesis of yttrium barium copper oxide (YBCO), specifically YBa₂Cu₃O₇₋ₓ, begins with the preparation of precursor powders in a stoichiometric ratio corresponding to Y:Ba:Cu = 1:2:3. High-purity yttrium oxide (Y₂O₃), (BaCO₃), and (CuO) are thoroughly mixed, typically by ball milling or mortar grinding, to ensure homogeneity and promote uniform reaction. The mixture is then calcined in air at temperatures between 900–950 °C for several hours (often 10–24 hours), during which the solid-state reaction occurs to form the tetragonal phase YBa₂Cu₃O₆ as the primary product. This step decomposes BaCO₃ and facilitates the of cations to form the desired perovskite-like structure. The overall reaction for the stage can be represented as: Y2O3+4BaCO3+6CuO→2YBa2Cu3O6+4CO2\mathrm{Y_2O_3 + 4 BaCO_3 + 6 CuO \rightarrow 2 YBa_2Cu_3O_6 + 4 CO_2} Following , the resulting powder is reground to break up agglomerates, pressed into pellets, and at temperatures of 920–960 °C (1193–1233 K) for 12–24 hours in air or flowing oxygen to densify the material and improve phase formation. Multiple firing cycles, involving intermediate grinding and recalcination, are commonly required to enhance reaction completeness and achieve better homogeneity. After , the tetragonal YBa₂Cu₃O₆ phase is oxygenated to the orthorhombic YBa₂Cu₃O₇₋ₓ phase by annealing in pure oxygen at 400–500 °C for 12–24 hours, which adjusts the oxygen (x ≈ 0–0.2) critical for ; the sample is then quenched or slowly cooled to to preserve this orthorhombic structure. Despite its simplicity, the solid-state method faces significant challenges in achieving high phase purity. Incomplete decomposition of BaCO₃ can lead to carbon contamination in the form of residual carbonates, which reacts back with the forming YBCO to regenerate impurities like BaCO₃, Y₂O₃, and CuO, thereby reducing the critical and overall superconducting performance. Additionally, the high temperatures promote the formation of secondary phases such as Y₂BaCuO₅ (green phase) or BaCuO₂ if the mixing is inhomogeneous, necessitating careful control of heating rates, atmosphere, and repeated processing steps to minimize these issues and obtain predominantly single-phase material.

Advanced Synthesis Methods

Chemical solution deposition (CSD) using (TFA) precursors represents a scalable, low-cost method for producing high-quality YBCO thin films, particularly for coated conductors. In this approach, metal trifluoroacetates of , , and are dissolved in solvents like or , spin-coated or dip-coated onto substrates such as buffered metal tapes, and then pyrolyzed to remove organic components, followed by crystallization in a humid oxygen atmosphere at temperatures around 700–800 °C. This process yields epitaxial YBCO films with critical current densities exceeding 1 MA/cm² at 77 K, owing to the controlled and growth that minimizes defects. The TFA route is advantageous for industrial scalability due to its compatibility with reel-to-reel processing and reduced material costs compared to vacuum-based techniques. Physical vapor deposition techniques, including pulsed laser deposition (PLD) and metal-organic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD), enable the fabrication of epitaxial YBCO thin films with precise compositional control and high crystallinity. PLD involves ablating a stoichiometric YBCO target using a pulsed excimer laser (e.g., KrF at 248 nm) in an oxygen ambient (typically 100–300 mTorr), depositing films on heated substrates like SrTiO₃ or LaAlO₃ at 700–800 °C, resulting in c-axis oriented films with smooth surfaces and superconducting transition temperatures near 90 K. This method excels in producing defect-free films for fundamental studies and devices, though it is limited by line-of-sight deposition. MOCVD, conversely, uses volatile metal-organic precursors such as β-diketonates (e.g., Y(thd)₃, Ba(thd)₂, Cu(thd)₂) vaporized and transported in a carrier gas to a heated substrate, allowing uniform deposition over large areas at 650–850 °C under reduced pressure. It has been optimized for coated conductors, achieving critical currents up to 300 A/cm-width at 77 K self-field. Both techniques facilitate oxygen stoichiometry control post-deposition via annealing in oxygen at 400–500 °C to achieve the optimal δ ≈ 0 for superconductivity. Recent innovations as of 2025 have focused on cost-reduced and scalable synthesis routes to enhance material homogeneity for YBCO. Hybrid oxide- methods, combining metal oxides with nitrate salts in aqueous or alcoholic solutions, followed by gelation and low-temperature (500–700 °C), reduce precursor costs by up to 50% while promoting uniform cation distribution and finer particle sizes (sub-micron range), leading to denser sintered pellets with improved phase purity. Complementing this, advanced sol-gel techniques using acetate or citrate precursors with chelating agents enable precise control over and , yielding homogeneous YBCO powders and films with reduced agglomeration and enhanced microstructural uniformity, as evidenced by narrower XRD peak widths and higher critical current densities in processed materials. These approaches prioritize environmental benignity and lower energy inputs compared to traditional routes. Post-2022 developments include additive manufacturing techniques for producing monocrystalline YBCO structures via followed by , enabling complex geometries with high critical currents (as of 2025). (ALD) has emerged for ultra-thin YBCO films with atomic-level thickness control, suitable for quantum devices (as of 2025). Enhanced PLD variants using off-axis configurations have improved uniformity and critical current densities comparable to conventional methods at 30–70 K (as of 2025). Techniques for synthesizing doped YBCO variants, such as incorporation of or silver, target enhanced to improve performance in . doping via co-precipitation of metal fluorides or post-annealing in HF atmospheres introduces nanoscale defects that act as pinning centers, boosting critical current densities by 20–30% at 77 K and 1 T, particularly along the c-axis, by distorting the lattice and creating oxygen vacancies. Silver doping, achieved by adding AgNO₃ to TFA or sol-gel precursors (0.5–5 mol%), promotes liquid-phase during processing at 700–900 °C, resulting in refined grain boundaries and increased intergranular connectivity, which enhances and raises the irreversibility line by up to 10 K in applied fields. These modifications maintain the orthorhombic YBCO structure while optimizing vortex dynamics for practical applications.

Structure

Crystal Structure

Yttrium barium copper oxide (YBCO), with the composition YBa₂Cu₃O₇, adopts an orthorhombic crystal structure characterized by the space group Pmmm and lattice parameters of approximately a = 3.82 Å, b = 3.89 Å, and c = 11.68 Å. This unit cell reflects a slight distortion from cubic symmetry, with the c-axis significantly elongated to accommodate the layered atomic arrangement. The structure features a distinctive layered configuration, consisting of CuO₂ planes that serve as the primary superconducting layers, interspersed with BaO planes and atoms positioned between successive CuO₂ layers. Along the b-axis, copper-oxygen chains form, comprising square-planar CuO₄ units linked by oxygen atoms, which contribute to the orthorhombic distortion by differentiating the a and b directions. This layering results in strong in physical properties, with conductivity predominantly occurring within the ab-plane. YBCO can be understood as a defect perovskite structure, where the ideal ABO₃ perovskite motif is modified by oxygen deficiencies and the inclusion of apical oxygen atoms coordinated to copper in the CuO₂ planes. In particular, oxygen vacancies occupy sites within the CuO chains along the b-axis, and their presence or ordering influences the material's superconducting behavior by altering the local coordination and valence states. For the oxygen-deficient variant YBa₂Cu₃O_{7-x}, a structural transition from orthorhombic to tetragonal symmetry occurs around x ≈ 0.5, marking a point where the a and b parameters become equivalent and superconductivity is suppressed. In the orthorhombic phase, this subtle lattice mismatch often leads to {110} twinning, where domains with interchanged a and b axes coexist to minimize strain energy.

Electronic Structure

Yttrium barium copper oxide (YBCO), with the formula YBa₂Cu₃O_{6+δ}, is fundamentally a , where the undoped parent compound (δ=0) exhibits strong electron correlations that localize electrons in the copper 3d orbitals, resulting in an insulating state despite a half-filled band. Upon oxygen doping (increasing δ), are introduced primarily into the CuO₂ planes, transforming the system into a metal with a composed mainly of hybridized Cu 3d_{x²-y²} and in-plane O 2p_σ orbitals, as revealed by (ARPES) studies. This band structure features a large in the optimally doped regime (δ ≈ 1), reflecting the Zhang-Rice singlet formation where a on oxygen pairs with a Cu d to form an effective x²-y²-like band. The CuO₂ planes serve as the active layers hosting these quasiparticles, with chain contributions playing a secondary role in the overall electronic properties. The superconducting state in YBCO is characterized by an unconventional d-wave order parameter, Δ(k) ∝ (cos k_x - cos k_y)/2, which vanishes at nodes along the diagonals of the , leading to gap anisotropy and low-energy excitations near these points. This pairing symmetry, confirmed through phase-sensitive Josephson junction experiments and ARPES measurements of the superconducting gap, deviates from conventional s-wave in its mechanism, likely involving repulsive interactions mediated by antiferromagnetic spin fluctuations rather than attraction. Despite the d-wave form, the pairing exhibits BCS-like coherence factors, but the unconventional nature is evident in the absence of a sign change in the gap across the in a simple way, and in the sensitivity to disorder at the nodes. In the undoped parent compound YBa₂Cu₃O₆, short-range antiferromagnetic correlations dominate, arising from interactions between neighboring Cu²⁺ spins in the CuO₂ planes, with a Néel temperature suppressed by doping but persisting as dynamic fluctuations. Above the superconducting transition temperature T_c, a pseudogap phase emerges in underdoped YBCO (δ < 0.16), manifesting as a partial suppression of low-energy states near the antinodal regions of the , distinct from the full d-wave gap below T_c. This pseudogap is attributed to precursor pairing or competing orders, with ARPES revealing Fermi arcs in the nodal regions while antinodes show gapped behavior. In underdoped regimes, spin fluctuations play a central role, enhancing but also competing with through stripe-like orders—modulations of charge and density with periods of ~4 lattice spacings. experiments detect these dynamic spin fluctuations peaking near the antiferromagnetic wavevector (π,π), with enhanced spectral weight in underdoped YBCO, supporting their role in mediating d-wave . ARPES further evidences stripe-induced reconstruction, showing pocket-like features and reduced spectral weight in underdoped samples, while charge order observed via correlates with these dynamics.

Applications

Established Applications

Yttrium barium copper oxide (YBCO), a high-temperature superconductor, finds established use in superconducting s for and research, leveraging its high critical to produce stable, high magnetic fields at temperatures above 20 K. In (MRI) systems, YBCO-based coils facilitate cryogen-free designs operated with cryocoolers, minimizing dependency and enabling more compact and cost-effective scanners. A demonstrated 1.5 T prototype MRI using YBCO tapes achieved field uniformity of 40 ppm over a 12 cm diameter spherical volume at 20 K, highlighting its suitability for clinical applications. In particle accelerators, YBCO coils contribute to high-field magnets that guide particle beams efficiently. For instance, YBCO inserts have enabled all-superconducting magnets to reach record fields of 32 T at 4.2 K, combining with low-temperature superconductors for enhanced performance in facilities like the . These applications benefit from YBCO's high J_c in perpendicular fields, allowing compact designs for accelerator upgrades. YBCO is also integral to superconducting fault current limiters (SFCLs) in power grids, where its rapid transition from superconducting to resistive state upon exceeding the critical current quenches faults, limiting prospective currents by factors up to 20 while maintaining low impedance under normal operation. Resistive-type SFCLs using YBCO coated conductors have undergone successful full-scale testing, including a 12 kV/400 A device integrated into distribution networks, demonstrating economic viability for grid protection against short-circuit faults. Commercial developments, such as those by Corporation in collaboration with utilities, have deployed YBCO-based SFCLs since the early to address rising fault levels from grid interconnections. Superconducting quantum interference devices (SQUIDs) fabricated from YBCO enable ultrasensitive magnetometry in medical and geophysical sensing, detecting magnetic fields as low as 10 fT/Hz^{1/2}. In medicine, YBCO SQUIDs support non-invasive biomagnetic measurements, such as for brain activity mapping, with multichannel systems achieving sufficient for clinical diagnostics of neurological disorders. Geophysically, they are employed in magnetotelluric surveys to probe subsurface structures for mineral exploration, offering noise floors below 10 fT/Hz^{1/2} in field-deployable, liquid-nitrogen-cooled setups. Commercial production of YBCO tapes, scaled up since the 2010s by manufacturers like SuperPower Inc. and SuperOx, supports these applications with kilometer-length coated conductors capable of sustaining ~10 T fields at 20–40 K using cryocoolers, with critical currents exceeding 300 A at 77 K self-field.

Proposed and Emerging Applications

Yttrium barium copper oxide (YBCO), a high-temperature superconductor with a critical temperature above 77 K, enabling liquid nitrogen cooling, is being explored for advanced applications in fusion energy. In the SPARC tokamak project, developed by Commonwealth Fusion Systems (CFS) and MIT, YBCO-based high-temperature superconducting (HTS) magnets generate magnetic fields up to 20 tesla, allowing for a compact design that aims to achieve net energy gain. These magnets, constructed from REBCO tapes including YBCO formulations, were successfully tested in 2021, demonstrating stability under extreme conditions. SPARC, under construction as of 2025, is expected to begin initial operations by 2027, potentially revolutionizing fusion reactors by enabling smaller, more efficient systems compared to traditional low-temperature superconductors. YBCO is proposed for enhancing high-speed trains through systems that leverage its zero-resistance properties for stable, low-friction propulsion. Research has shown that optimizing YBCO's critical and pinning forces can improve stability at speeds exceeding 500 km/h, reducing and enabling lighter vehicle designs. Prototypes using YBCO bulks have demonstrated dynamic stability during high-frequency operations equivalent to speeds. In , YBCO HTS cables are envisioned as lossless lines capable of carrying bulk power with minimal AC losses, addressing urban grid congestion. A triplex YBCO cable design achieves losses of 0.054 W/m at 1 kA and 50 Hz, significantly lower than conventional cables while maintaining equivalent capacity in a compact form factor under 135 mm . This enables underground installations with reduced and lower construction costs. For quantum computing, YBCO serves as a barrier material in Josephson junctions, facilitating the creation of π-loops and qubits with enhanced coherence for annealing-based processors. Grain-boundary YBCO junctions enable silent phase qubits that exploit d-wave superconductivity for low-noise quantum operations, potentially advancing scalable quantum bits beyond conventional niobium systems. Recent studies on MoRe/YBCO junctions demonstrate stable manipulation of π-states, paving the way for hybrid quantum annealing architectures. Recent developments from 2023 to 2025 highlight YBCO's emerging role in renewable and sectors. Partnerships and initiatives are integrating YBCO into superconducting generators for offshore wind turbines, aiming for 10-15 MW units with reduced weight and higher efficiency through HTS windings. In electric , YBCO-based partially superconducting motors are under investigation for high-power-density propulsion, with studies showing potential for 2.5 MW designs cooled by to support hybrid-electric . Experimental HTS induction/synchronous motors using YBCO tapes have validated torque outputs suitable for all-electric flight, targeting reduced emissions in regional .

Fabrication and Production

Surface Modification

Surface modification of yttrium barium copper oxide (YBCO) thin films is crucial for optimizing performance in superconducting devices, particularly by tailoring surface chemistry and introducing defects to enhance and interface properties. One prominent approach involves chemical modification through the deposition of self-assembled monolayers (SAMs), such as those formed from alkylamines or thiols, which can be applied using techniques like to create tunnel junctions. These monolayers adsorb onto the YBCO surface, altering electronic properties at the interface; for instance, in films, SAMs of organic molecules have been shown to tune the critical (T_c) by modulating carrier doping near the surface. Lewis acid-base interactions play a key role in these chemical modifications, where amine groups act as Lewis bases that coordinate with undercoordinated copper sites on the YBCO surface, forming stable bonds that improve to overlying layers and mitigate surface oxidation. This coordination enhances charge transfer within the CuO_2 planes, leading to subtle improvements in superconducting properties, such as an increase in the metal-to-superconductor transition temperature by up to 3 K following immersion in solvents like that facilitate chlorine incorporation and surface passivation. To further enhance vortex pinning, physical techniques like and are employed to create artificial pinning centers on YBCO surfaces. , often using argon-oxygen mixtures, patterns the surface to introduce nanoscale defects that act as pinning sites, while implantation with light ions (e.g., He^+) generates controlled defect arrays, enabling tunable pinning landscapes without significantly degrading bulk . These surface modifications yield measurable improvements in device performance, including increases in (J_c) in thin films due to enhanced , which is particularly beneficial for Josephson junctions where precise control over weak links is required. Such enhancements arise from the combined effects of chemical passivation and defect engineering, supporting applications in high-sensitivity superconducting electronics. The anisotropic conductivity inherent to YBCO surfaces can be briefly leveraged in these modifications to direct pinning along specific crystallographic directions.

Mass Production Techniques

Mass production of yttrium barium copper oxide (YBCO) primarily revolves around the fabrication of coated conductors in the form of flexible tapes, which are essential for practical applications requiring long lengths and high current densities. Two dominant processes for producing these biaxially textured substrates are Rolling-Assisted Biaxially Textured Substrates (RABiTS) and . In the RABiTS approach, a nickel-based tape is mechanically deformed through rolling to achieve biaxial texture, followed by epitaxial deposition of buffer layers and the YBCO superconductor layer using techniques such as metal-organic deposition (MOD) or pulsed laser deposition (PLD), enabling low-cost, high-speed manufacturing suitable for kilometer-scale production. The IBAD method, in contrast, involves depositing a textured buffer layer, typically , onto a non-textured metal substrate using an to induce crystallographic alignment, which then supports the growth of high-quality YBCO films with critical current densities exceeding 1 MA/cm² over meter lengths. A notable in scaling YBCO wire production was achieved by SuperOx in , where over 300 km of 4 mm-wide YBCO tape was manufactured in just nine months using PLD on IBAD-MgO buffered substrates, primarily for fusion applications. These wires incorporated Y₂O₃ nanoparticles for enhanced , achieving engineering critical current densities (J_E) greater than 700 A/mm² at 20 K and 20 T for 87% of the production, with record values exceeding 2000 A/mm² at 4.2 K and 20 T. This large-volume output demonstrated the feasibility of industrial-scale PLD, though it required optimized tension control to mitigate mechanical damage during deposition of thick YBCO layers (up to 3.5 µm) on thin substrates. Recent advances in additive manufacturing have expanded capabilities beyond traditional tape geometries. In 2025, researchers demonstrated 3D-ink-printing of polycrystalline YBCO (YBa₂Cu₃O₇₋ₓ + Y₂BaCuO₅) precursors, followed by and epitaxial growth to form monocrystalline structures, enabling the fabrication of complex shapes such as toroidal coils and tubes with high shape fidelity. This method leverages a percolated Y₂BaCuO₅ to support single-crystal transformation, yielding critical current densities of approximately 2.1 × 10⁴ A/cm² at 77 K self-field—approximately 66 times higher than polycrystalline counterparts—and supporting persistent currents in intricate 3D architectures. Despite these progresses, of YBCO faces significant challenges, including high costs around $150/kA·m as of for coated conductors at then-current volumes, inherent as a material leading to mechanical fragility in wire form, and performance yields below 90% due to variations in texture uniformity and defect sensitivity. Solutions to address these include continuous reel-to-reel , which integrates deposition, characterization, and feedback control to ensure uniform performance over long lengths while minimizing waste and improving scalability, as well as emerging low-cost methods like chemical solution deposition (CSD).

References

  1. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Barium-copper-yttrium-oxide
  2. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9692559/
  3. https://ethw.org/Milestones:Superconductivity_at_93_Kelvin%2C_1987
  4. https://ethw.org/First-Hand:Discovery_of_Superconductivity_at_93_K_in_YBCO:_The_View_from_Ground_Zero
  5. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19910010150/downloads/19910010150.pdf
  6. https://www.energy.gov/science/articles/nasem-bringing-fusion-us-grid-2021
  7. https://www.energy.gov/oe/articles/wire-making-techniques-hts-coated-conductors-fact-sheet
  8. https://www6.slac.stanford.edu/news/2022-02-09-study-raises-new-possibilities-triggering-room-temperature-superconductivity-light
  9. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10062695/
  10. https://web.njit.edu/~tyson/supercon_papers/Oxygen_Content_vs_c-axis.pdf
  11. https://cornerstone.lib.mnsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1345&context=etds
  12. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1211.1298
  13. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.908
  14. https://www.superconductors.org/terms.htm
  15. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0925838821009610
  16. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/6810655
  17. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-55959-1
  18. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01303701
  19. https://www.aps.org/apsnews/2023/03/bednorz-muller-high-temperature-superconductivity
  20. https://ieeemilestones.ethw.org/Milestone-Proposal:Discovery_of_Superconductivity_at_93_K_in_Yttrium_Barium_Copper_Oxide
  21. https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg12316734-800/
  22. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/1987/summary/
  23. https://www.depts.ttu.edu/phas/cees/Instruction/PHYS_5300-19/Activities/YBCO_superconducting.pdf
  24. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA258281.pdf
  25. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1359028607000344
  26. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0927796X97000193
  27. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/apl/article/58/11/1211/58052/Laser-deposition-of-YBa2Cu3O7-films-using-a-pulsed
  28. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/admi.202102501
  29. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260700721_Synthesis_of_Al2O3_nanoparticles_highly_distributed_in_YBa2Cu3O7_superconductor_by_citrate-nitrate_auto-combustion_reaction
  30. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2022/na/d2na00333c
  31. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-56708-x
  32. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2025/mh/d5mh00323g
  33. https://www.cell.com/iscience/fulltext/S2589-0042%2825%2901521-4
  34. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S092145341000345X
  35. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9369561/
  36. https://pubs.aip.org/avs/sss/article/1/4/381/366872/Orthorhombic-YBa2Cu3O7-Cleaved-Single-Crystal-by
  37. http://www.hewat.net/science/papers/1987%20Structures%20of%20superconducting%20Ba2YCu3O7%20and%20semiconducting%20Ba2YCu3O6%20between%2025C%20and%20750C.pdf
  38. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01418619208201554
  39. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.78.17
  40. https://www.nature.com/articles/nphys998
  41. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1007.4027
  42. https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/9511130
  43. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.2134
  44. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.84.1383
  45. https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms8705
  46. https://arxiv.org/pdf/cond-mat/0507031
  47. https://www.nature.com/articles/nphys2456
  48. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.90.054514
  49. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5472374/
  50. https://nationalmaglab.org/news-events/news/new-world-record-magnet-fulfills-superconducting-promise/
  51. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8636984/
  52. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4275918/
  53. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/224501638_Development_of_Resistive_Fault_Current_Limiters_Based_on_YBCO_Coated_Conductors
  54. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/rsi/article/77/10/101101/1017955/Superconducting-quantum-interference-device
  55. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359028697800988
  56. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-81559-z
  57. https://global-sei.com/technology/tr/bn65/pdf/65-10.pdf
  58. https://news.mit.edu/2021/MIT-CFS-major-advance-toward-fusion-energy-0908
  59. https://cfs.energy/technology/hts-magnets/
  60. https://fortune.com/2025/10/02/nuclear-fusion-online-commercial-ai-power/
  61. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280095184_The_Effect_of_Critical_Parameters_of_High_Temperature_Superconductor_YBCO_in_Magnetic_Levitation_Trains
  62. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0921453407008568
  63. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1361-6668/ab7053
  64. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S092145342300076X
  65. https://escholarship.org/content/qt06f908pf/qt06f908pf.pdf
  66. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1401.3603
  67. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/adma.19970090218
  68. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382593431_Enhancement_of_YBCO_superconductivity_by_chemical_surface_treatment
  69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-024-13243-7
  70. http://www.ispc-conference.org/ispcdocs/ispc10/content/10/10-2.4-19.pdf
  71. https://arxiv.org/html/2407.14189v1
  72. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.11.044082
  73. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jap/article/124/23/233905/155845/Enhancing-the-critical-current-of-YBa2Cu3O7-thin
  74. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263655737_YBCO_superconductor_wire_based_on_IBAD-textured_templates_and_RCE_of_YBCO_Process_economics
  75. https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2023/09/markets-and-future-costs-of-superconducting-magnets-and-superconducting-wire.html
  76. https://uh-ir.tdl.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/1aafd2d2-d729-46cc-b4ee-19bdf5519f5c/content
  77. https://indico.cern.ch/event/441807/attachments/1154774/1659387/Selvamanickam_CERN_presentation_09-15_v2.pdf
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.