Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.

| Part of a series on |
| LGBTQ people |
|---|
|
|
Gay is a term that primarily refers to a homosexual person or the trait of being homosexual. The term originally meant "carefree", "cheerful', or "bright and showy".[1]
While scant usage referring to male homosexuality dates to the late 19th century, that meaning became increasingly common by the mid-20th century.[2] In modern English, gay has come to be used as an adjective, and as a noun, referring to the community, practices and cultures associated with homosexuality. In the 1960s, gay became the word favored by homosexual men to describe their sexual orientation.[3] By the end of the 20th century and beginning of the 21st century, the word gay was recommended by major LGBTQ groups and style guides to describe people attracted to members of the same sex,[4][5] although it is more commonly used to refer specifically to men.[6]
Since the 1980s, a new, pejorative use became prevalent in some parts of the world. Among younger speakers, the word has a meaning ranging from derision (e.g., equivalent to "rubbish" or "stupid") to a light-hearted mockery or ridicule (e.g., equivalent to "weak", "unmanly", or "boring"). The extent to which these usages still retain connotations of homosexuality has been debated and harshly criticized.[7][8][needs update] Because of the strongly offensive and homophobic insult, the use of gay as an insult is generally considered socially inappropriate, sometimes even legally restricted, especially in Canada.
History
[edit]Overview
[edit]
The word gay arrived in English during the 12th century from Old French gai, most likely deriving ultimately from a Germanic source.[2]
In English, the word's primary meaning was "joyful", "carefree", "bright and showy", and the word was very commonly used with this meaning in speech and literature. For example, the optimistic 1890s are still often referred to as the Gay Nineties. The title of the 1938 French ballet Gaîté Parisienne ("Parisian Gaiety"), which became the 1941 Warner Brothers movie, The Gay Parisian,[10] also illustrates this connotation. It was apparently not until the 20th century that the word began to be used to mean specifically "homosexual", although it had earlier acquired sexual connotations.[2]
The derived abstract noun gaiety remains largely free of sexual connotations and has, in the past, been used in the names of places of entertainment, such as the Gaiety Theatre in Dublin.
Sexualization
[edit]
The word may have started to acquire associations of sexual immorality as early as the 14th century, but had certainly acquired them by the 17th.[2] By the late 17th century, it had acquired the specific meaning of "addicted to pleasures and dissipations",[11] an extension of its primary meaning of "carefree" implying "uninhibited by moral constraints". A gay woman was a prostitute, a gay man a womanizer, and a gay house a brothel.[12][2] An example is a letter read to a London court in 1885 during the prosecution of brothel madam and procuress Mary Jeffries that had been written by a girl while enslaved inside of a French brothel:
I write to tell you it is a gay house ... Some captains came in the other night, and the mistress wanted us to sleep with them.[13]
The use of gay to mean "homosexual" was often an extension of its application to prostitution: a gay boy was a young man or boy serving male clients.[14]
Similarly, a gay cat was a young male apprenticed to an older hobo and commonly exchanging sex and other services for protection and tutelage.[2] The application to homosexuality was also an extension of the word's sexualized connotation of "carefree and uninhibited", which implied a willingness to disregard conventional or respectable sexual mores. Such usage, documented as early as the 1920s, was likely present before the 20th century,[2] although it was initially more commonly used to imply heterosexually unconstrained lifestyles, as in the once-common phrase "gay Lothario",[15] or in the title of the book and film The Gay Falcon (1941), which concerns a womanizing detective whose first name is "Gay". Similarly, Fred Gilbert and G. H. MacDermott's music hall song of the 1880s, "Charlie Dilke Upset the Milk" – "Master Dilke upset the milk, when taking it home to Chelsea; the papers say that Charlie's gay, rather a wilful wag!" – referred to Sir Charles Dilke's alleged heterosexual impropriety.[16] Giving testimony in court in 1889, the prostitute John Saul stated: "I occasionally do odd-jobs for different gay people."[17]
Well into the mid-20th century a middle-aged bachelor could be described as "gay", indicating that he was unattached and therefore free, without any implication of homosexuality. This usage could apply to women too. The British comic strip Jane, first published in the 1930s, described the adventures of Jane Gay. Far from implying homosexuality, it referred to her free-wheeling lifestyle with plenty of boyfriends (while also punning on Lady Jane Grey).
A passage from Gertrude Stein's Miss Furr & Miss Skeene (1922) is possibly the first traceable published use of the word to refer to a homosexual relationship. According to Linda Wagner-Martin (Favored Strangers: Gertrude Stein and her Family, 1995) the portrait "featured the sly repetition of the word gay, used with sexual intent for one of the first times in linguistic history", and Edmund Wilson (1951, quoted by James Mellow in Charmed Circle, 1974) agreed.[18] For example:
They were ... gay, they learned little things that are things in being gay, ... they were quite regularly gay.
— Gertrude Stein, 1922
The word continued to be used with the dominant meaning of "carefree", as evidenced by the title of The Gay Divorcee (1934), a musical film about a heterosexual couple.
Bringing Up Baby (1938) was the first film to use the word gay in an apparent reference to homosexuality. In a scene in which Cary Grant's character's clothes have been sent to the cleaners, he is forced to wear a woman's feather-trimmed robe. When another character asks about his robe, he responds, "Because I just went gay all of a sudden!" Since this was a mainstream film at a time, when the use of the word to refer to cross-dressing (and, by extension, homosexuality) would still be unfamiliar to most film-goers, the line can also be interpreted to mean, "I just decided to do something frivolous."[19]
In 1950, the earliest reference found to date for the word gay as a self-described name for homosexuals came from Alfred A. Gross, executive secretary for the George W. Henry Foundation, who said in the June 1950 issue of SIR magazine: "I have yet to meet a happy homosexual. They have a way of describing themselves as gay but the term is a misnomer. Those who are habitues of the bars frequented by others of the kind, are about the saddest people I've ever seen."[20]
Shift to specifically homosexual
[edit]By the mid-20th century, gay was well established in reference to hedonistic and uninhibited lifestyles[11] and its antonym straight, which had long had connotations of seriousness, respectability, and conventionality, had now acquired specific connotations of heterosexuality.[21] In the case of gay, other connotations of frivolousness and showiness in dress ("gay apparel") led to association with camp and effeminacy. This association no doubt helped the gradual narrowing in scope of the term towards its current dominant meaning, which was at first confined to subcultures. Gay was the preferred term since other terms, such as queer, were felt to be derogatory.[22] Homosexual is perceived as excessively clinical,[23][24][25] since the sexual orientation now commonly referred to as "homosexuality" was at that time a mental illness diagnosis in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM).
In mid-20th century Britain, where male homosexuality was illegal until the Sexual Offences Act 1967, to openly identify someone as homosexual was considered very offensive and an accusation of serious criminal activity. Additionally, none of the words describing any aspect of homosexuality were considered suitable for polite society. Consequently, a number of euphemisms were used to hint at suspected homosexuality. Examples include "sporty" girls and "artistic" boys,[26] all with the stress deliberately on the otherwise completely innocent adjective.
The 1960s marked the transition in the predominant meaning of the word gay from that of "carefree" to the current "homosexual". In the British comedy-drama film Light Up the Sky! (1960), directed by Lewis Gilbert, about the antics of a British Army searchlight squad during World War II, there is a scene in the mess hut where the character played by Benny Hill proposes an after-dinner toast. He begins, "I'd like to propose..." at which point a fellow diner interjects "Who to?", implying a proposal of marriage. The Benny Hill character responds, "Not to you for start, you ain't my type". He then adds in mock doubt, "Oh, I don't know, you're rather gay on the quiet."
By 1963, a new sense of the word gay was known well enough to be used by Albert Ellis in his book The Intelligent Woman's Guide to Man-Hunting. Similarly, Hubert Selby Jr. in his 1964 novel Last Exit to Brooklyn, could write that a character "took pride in being a homosexual by feeling intellectually and esthetically superior to those (especially women) who weren't gay...."[27] Later examples of the original meaning of the word being used in popular culture include the theme song to the 1960–1966 animated TV series The Flintstones, wherein viewers are assured that they will "have a gay old time." Similarly, the 1966 Herman's Hermits song "No Milk Today", which became a Top 10 hit in the UK and a Top 40 hit in the U.S., included the lyric "No milk today, it was not always so; The company was gay, we'd turn night into day."[28]
In June 1967, the headline of the review of the Beatles' Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band album in the British daily newspaper The Times stated, "The Beatles revive hopes of progress in pop music with their gay new LP".[29] The same year, the Kinks recorded "David Watts", which is about a schoolmate of Ray Davies, but is named after a homosexual concert promoter they knew, with the ambiguous line "he is so gay and fancy-free" attesting to the word's double meaning at that time.[30] As late as 1970, the first episode of The Mary Tyler Moore Show has the demonstrably straight Mary Richards' neighbor Phyllis breezily declaiming that Mary is still "young and gay", but in an episode about two years later, Phyllis is told that her brother is "gay", which is immediately understood to mean that he is homosexual.
Homosexuality
[edit]| Sexual orientation |
|---|

Sexual orientation, identity, behavior
[edit]The American Psychological Association defines sexual orientation as "an enduring pattern of emotional, romantic, and/or sexual attractions to men, women, or both sexes," ranging "along a continuum, from exclusive attraction to the other sex to exclusive attraction to the same sex."[31] Sexual orientation can also be "discussed in terms of three categories: heterosexual (having emotional, romantic, or sexual attractions to members of the other sex), gay/lesbian (having emotional, romantic, or sexual attractions to members of one's own sex), and bisexual (having emotional, romantic, or sexual attractions to both men and women)."[31]
According to Rosario, Schrimshaw, Hunter, Braun (2006), "the development of a lesbian, gay, or bisexual (LGB) sexual identity is a complex and often difficult process. Unlike members of other minority groups (e.g., ethnic and racial minorities), most LGB individuals are not raised in a community of similar others from whom they learn about their identity and who reinforce and support that identity. Rather, LGB individuals are often raised in communities that are either ignorant of or openly hostile toward homosexuality."[32]
The British gay rights activist Peter Tatchell has argued that the term gay is merely a cultural expression which reflects the current status of homosexuality within a given society, and claiming that "Queer, gay, homosexual ... in the long view, they are all just temporary identities. One day, we will not need them at all."[33]
If a person engages in sexual activity with a partner of the same sex but does not self-identify as gay, terms such as 'closeted', 'discreet', or 'bi-curious' may apply. Conversely, a person may identify as gay without having had sex with a same-sex partner. Possible choices include identifying as gay socially, while choosing to be celibate, or while anticipating a first homosexual experience. Further, a bisexual person might also identify as "gay" but others may consider gay and bisexual to be mutually exclusive. There are some who are drawn to the same sex but neither engage in sexual activity nor identify as gay; these could have the term asexual applied, even though asexual generally can mean no attraction, or involve heterosexual attraction but no sexual activity.
Terminology
[edit]Some reject the term homosexual as an identity-label because they find it too clinical-sounding;[24][25][34] they believe it is too focused on physical acts rather than romance or attraction, or too reminiscent of the era when homosexuality was considered a mental illness. Conversely, some reject the term gay as an identity-label because they perceive the cultural connotations to be undesirable or because of the negative connotations of the slang usage of the word.
Style guides, like the following from the Associated Press, call for gay over homosexual:
Gay: Used to describe men and women attracted to the same sex, though lesbian is the more common term for women. Preferred over homosexual except in clinical contexts or references to sexual activity.[6]
There are those who reject the gay label for reasons other than shame or negative connotations. Writer Alan Bennett[35] and fashion icon André Leon Talley[36] are out and open queer men who reject being labeled gay, believing the gay label confines them.
Gay community vs. LGBTQ community
[edit]Starting in the mid-1980s in the United States, a conscious effort was underway within what was then commonly called the gay community, to add the term lesbian to the name of organizations that involved both male and female homosexuals, and to use the terminology of gay and lesbian, lesbian/gay, or a similar phrase when referring to that community. Accordingly, organizations such as the National Gay Task Force became the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force. For many feminist lesbians, it was also important that lesbian be named first, to avoid the implication that women were secondary to men, or an afterthought.[37] In the 1990s, this was followed by a similar effort to include terminology specifically including bisexual, transgender, intersex, and other people, reflecting the intra-community debate about the inclusion of these other sexual minorities as part of the same movement. Consequently, the portmanteau les/bi/gay has sometimes been used, and initialisms such as LGBT, LGBTQ, LGBTQI, and others have come into common use by such organizations, and most news organizations have formally adopted some such variation.
Descriptor
[edit]The term gay can also be used as an adjective to describe things related to homosexual men, or things which are part of the said culture. For example, the term "gay bar" describes the bar which either caters primarily to a homosexual male clientele or is otherwise part of homosexual male culture.
Using it to describe an object, such as an item of clothing, suggests that it is particularly flamboyant, often on the verge of being gaudy and garish. This usage predates the association of the term with homosexuality but has acquired different connotations since the modern usage developed.
Use as a noun
[edit]The label gay was originally used purely as an adjective ("he is a gay man" or "he is gay"). The term has also been in use as a noun with the meaning "homosexual man" since the 1970s, most commonly in the plural for an unspecified group, as in "gays are opposed to that policy." This usage is somewhat common in the names of organizations such as Parents, Families and Friends of Lesbians and Gays (PFLAG) and Children of Lesbians And Gays Everywhere (COLAGE). It is sometimes used to refer to individuals, as in "he is a gay" or "two gays were there too," although this may be perceived as derogatory.[38] It was also used for comedic effect by the Little Britain character Dafydd Thomas. To avoid pejorative connotations, the adjective form can be used instead, e.g. "gay person" or "gay people".
Generalized pejorative use
[edit]When used with a derisive attitude (e.g., "that was so gay"), the word gay is pejorative. Though retaining other meanings, its use among young people as a term of disparagement is common; 97 percent of American LGBTQ middle and high school students reported hearing its negative use as of 2021.[7][39][40]
This pejorative usage has its origins in the late 1970s, with the word gaining a pejorative sense by association with the previous meaning: homosexuality was seen as inferior or undesirable.[41] Beginning in the 1980s, and especially in the late 1990s, the usage as a generic insult became common among young people.[7] Use of "gay" in some circumstances continues to be considered a pejorative in present day. As recently as 2023, the American Psychological Association described language like "that's so gay" as heterosexist and heteronormative.[42]
The pejorative usage of the word "gay" has been criticized as homophobic. A 2006 BBC ruling by the Board of Governors over the negative use of the word by Chris Moyles advises that "caution on its use"; however, it acknowledges its common use among young people to mean "rubbish" or "lame".[39]
The BBC's ruling was heavily criticized by the Minister for Children, Kevin Brennan, who stated in response that "the casual use of homophobic language by mainstream radio DJs" is:
"too often seen as harmless banter instead of the offensive insult that it really represents. ... To ignore this problem is to collude in it. The blind eye to casual name-calling, looking the other way because it is the easy option, is simply intolerable."[43]
Shortly after the Moyles incident, a campaign against homophobia was launched in Britain under the slogan "homophobia is gay", playing on the double meaning of the word "gay" in youth culture, as well as the popular perception that vocal homophobia is common among closeted homosexuals.[44]
The United States had its own popular campaign against the pejorative use of "gay" called Think B4 You Speak. It was created in 2008 in partnership with the Advertising Council, GLSEN, and Arnold NYC. This initiative created television, radio, print and web PSAs with goals "to motivate teens to become allies in the efforts to raise awareness, stop using anti-LGBT language and safely intervene when they are present and anti-LGBT harassment and behavior occurs."[45]
Research has looked into the use and effect of the pejorative. In a 2013 article published in the Journal of Interpersonal Violence, University of Michigan researchers Michael Woodford, Alex Kulick and Perry Silverschanz, alongside Appalachian State University professor Michael L. Howell, argued that the pejorative use of the word "gay" was a microaggression.[46] They found that college-age men were more likely to repeat the word pejoratively if their friends said it, while they were less likely to say it if they had lesbian, gay or bisexual peers.[46] A 2019 study used data collected in a 2013 survey of cisgender LGBQ+ college students to evaluate the effects of microaggressions like "that's so gay" and "no homo."[47] It found that increased exposure to the phrase "that's so gay" was significantly associated with greater developmental challenge (a measure of academic stressors).[47] Research published in the Journal of Youth and Adolescence in 2021 finds that use of anti-gay banter among Midwestern middle and high school students such as "that's so gay" is perceived less negatively and more humorously if the person saying it is a friend.[48]
Parallels in other languages and cultures
[edit]- The concept of a "gay identity" and the use of the term gay may not be used or understood the same way in non-Westernised cultures, since modes of sexuality may differ from those prevalent in the West.[49]
- For example, two-spirit is a term used by some Indigenous people in the United States and Canada to describe Indigenous people in their communities who do not conform to Western expressions of gender and sexuality. It functions as a modern, pan-Indian umbrella term, much like the use of queer or LGBTQ by non-Natives. Some Indigenous people identify as both two-spirit and gay.[50][51] For some traditional Native Americans, who usually use terms in their own languages for these individuals rather than the English neologism, two-spirit is not interchangeable with the "LGBT Native American" or "gay Indian"[52] sexual and gender identity labels because it is a sacred, spiritual, and ceremonial role that is recognized and confirmed only by tribal elders of the two-spirit person's ceremonial community.[50]
- The German equivalent for "gay", "schwul", which is etymologically derived from "schwül" (hot, humid), also acquired the pejorative meaning within youth culture.[53]
See also
[edit]- Deviance (sociology) – Action or behavior that violates social norms
- Gay bashing – Violence against and bullying of LGBTQ people
- Gay gene (Xq28)
- Hate speech
- Human sexuality
- Human Rights Campaign – LGBTQ civil rights advocacy group
- Labeling theory – Sociological theory
- LGBTQ themes in mythology
- List of gay, lesbian or bisexual people
- List of LGBTQ events
- Men who have sex with men
- Opposition to LGBTQ rights
- Religion and sexuality
- Sexual practices between men
- Sexual practices between women
- Social stigma
- Tu'er Shen – Chinese deity of homosexual love and sex
References
[edit]- ^ Hobson, Archie (2001). The Oxford Dictionary of Difficult Words (1st ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0195146738.
- ^ a b c d e f g Harper, Douglas (2001–2013). "Gay". Online Etymology dictionary. Archived from the original on 19 February 2006. Retrieved 13 February 2006.
- ^ "Gay". Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford University Press. Archived from the original on 21 May 2018. Retrieved 13 February 2018.
- ^ "GLAAD Media Reference Guide - LGBTQ Terms". GLAAD. 24 February 2022. Archived from the original on 23 April 2022. Retrieved 27 March 2023.
- ^ "Avoiding Heterosexual Bias in Language". American Psychological Association. Archived from the original on 21 March 2015. Retrieved 14 March 2015. (Reprinted from American Psychologist, Vol 46(9), Sep 1991, 973-974 Archived 3 June 2018 at the Wayback Machine)
- ^ a b "GLAAD Media Reference Guide" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 12 November 2011. Retrieved 25 September 2011.
- ^ a b c Winterman, Denise (18 March 2008). "How 'gay' became children's insult of choice". BBC News. Archived from the original on 2 February 2014. Retrieved 29 May 2013.
- ^ "Anti-gay abuse seen to pervade U.S. schools". Archived from the original on 1 March 2007.
- ^ "The Great Social Evil". Archived from the original on 2 April 2016. Retrieved 5 September 2012. Punch magazine, Volume 33, 1857, page 390. A stand-alone editorial cartoon, no accompanying article.
- ^ xoregos (2 December 1941). "The Gay Parisian (1941)". IMDb. Archived from the original on 9 February 2017. Retrieved 1 July 2018.
- ^ a b "gay, adj., adv., and n. (OED Third Edition)". Oxford English Dictionary. June 2008.
- ^ "Definition of gay". Dictionary.com. Retrieved 7 May 2022.[permanent dead link]
- ^ English Girls Decoyed To France, The Sentinel, Issue 73, May 1885, London, p415
- ^ Muzzy, Frank (2005). Gay and Lesbian Washington, D.C. Arcadia Publishing. p. 7. ISBN 978-0738517537.
- ^ Brewer, E. Cobham (1898). "Dictionary of Phrase and Fable". Archived from the original on 15 March 2006. Retrieved 8 January 2006.
- ^ John Major (2012) My Old Man, page 87 and note
- ^ Kaplan, Morris (1999). "Who's Afraid Of John Saul? Urban Culture and the Politics of Desire in Late Victorian London". GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies. 5 (3): 267–314. doi:10.1215/10642684-5-3-267. ISSN 1064-2684. S2CID 140452093. Archived from the original on 12 November 2015.
- ^ Martha E. Stone, Sept–Oct 2002. "Who were Miss Furr and Miss Skeene?" Archived 25 October 2012 at the Wayback Machine, The Gay & Lesbian Review Worldwide.
- ^ "Bringing Up Baby". Archived from the original on 30 June 2006. Retrieved 24 November 2005.
- ^ "The Truth About Homosexuals", Sir, June 1950, Sara H. Carleton, New York, p. 57.
- ^ Harper, Douglas (2001–2013). "Straight". Online Etymology dictionary. Archived from the original on 28 December 2010. Retrieved 20 December 2010.
- ^ Howard, Philip (7 June 1976). "A queer use of an inoffensive little word". The Times. London. p. 12. Archived from the original on 1 May 2011. Retrieved 19 October 2009.(subscription required)
- ^ "Media Reference Guide - Offensive Terms To Avoid". GLAAD. 9 September 2011. Archived from the original on 20 April 2012. Retrieved 24 May 2012.
- ^ a b "Gay Adjectives vs. Lesbian Nouns". The New Gay. 16 September 2008. Archived from the original on 24 October 2008. Retrieved 4 August 2009.
- ^ a b James Martin (4 November 2000). "The Church and the Homosexual Priest". America The National Catholic Weekly Magazine. Archived from the original on 11 November 2010. Retrieved 4 August 2009.
- ^ Cocks, H. A. (2002). "'Sporty' Girls and 'Artistic' Boys: Friendship, Illicit Sex, and the British 'Companionship' Advertisement, 1913-1928". Journal of the History of Sexuality. 11 (3): 457–482. doi:10.1353/sex.2003.0008. PMID 17396374. S2CID 7018936.
- ^ Selby Jr., Hubert "Last Exit To Brooklyn" NY: Grove Press, 1988 p. 23 copyright 1964
- ^ "The Lyrics Library – Herman's Hermits – No Milk Today". Archived from the original on 5 December 2008. Retrieved 24 November 2008.
- ^ "The Beatles revive hopes of progress in pop music with their gay new LP". The Times. London. 2 June 2007. Archived from the original on 30 May 2010. Retrieved 3 May 2010.(subscription required)
- ^ Savage, Jon "The Kinks: The Official Biography" London: Faber and Faber, 1984 pp. 94–96
- ^ a b "Understanding sexual orientation and homosexuality". APA. 2008. Archived from the original on 5 May 2012. Retrieved 24 May 2012.
- ^ Rosario, M.; Schrimshaw, E.; Hunter, J.; Braun, L. (2006). "Sexual identity development among lesbian, gay, and bisexual youths: Consistency and change over time". Journal of Sex Research. 43 (1): 46–58. doi:10.1080/00224490609552298. PMC 3215279. PMID 16817067.
- ^ Tatchell, Peter (27 November 2006). "Just a phase". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on 30 August 2013. Retrieved 3 May 2010.
- ^ "AIDS and Gay Catholic Priests: Implications of the Kansas City Star Report" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 May 2011.
- ^ "Alan Bennett rejected 'gay label'". BBC News. 6 May 2014. Archived from the original on 9 September 2018. Retrieved 22 June 2018.
- ^ Sieczkowski, Cavan (12 August 2013). "Vogue's André Leon Talley Rejects 'Gay' Label, Admits To 'Very Gay Experiences'". HuffPost. Archived from the original on 15 May 2017. Retrieved 18 September 2018.
- ^ Lesbian Ethics, pp. 13–21.
- ^ The American Heritage Book of English Usage. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. 1996. p. 197. ISBN 978-0547563213. Archived from the original on 12 October 2018. Retrieved 30 July 2016.
- ^ a b Sherwin, Adam (6 June 2006). "Gay means rubbish, says BBC". The Times. London. Archived from the original on 30 April 2011. Retrieved 3 May 2010.(subscription required)
- ^ Kosciw, J. G., Clark, C. M., & Menard, L. (2022). The 2021 National School Climate Survey: The experiences of LGBTQ+ youth in our nation's schools. New York: GLSEN.
- ^ "Many heterosexual college males say 'That's so gay,' but why? | University of Michigan News". ns.umich.edu. 29 January 2013. Archived from the original on 1 March 2016. Retrieved 23 May 2017.
- ^ Nadal, Kevin Leo Yabut (2023), "An introduction to microaggressions: Understanding definitions and impact.", Dismantling everyday discrimination: Microaggressions toward LGBTQ people., Washington: American Psychological Association, pp. 3–16, doi:10.1037/0000335-001, ISBN 978-1-4338-4015-9, retrieved 3 May 2023
- ^ Grew, Tony. "BBC's attitude to homophobic language 'damages children'". Pink News. London. Archived from the original on 28 March 2009. Retrieved 4 March 2009.
- ^ "Young Liberal Democrats launch 'homophobia is gay' campaign". Pink News. 2006. Archived from the original on 12 October 2008. Retrieved 5 October 2008.
- ^ "Think B4 You Speak Educator's Guide". GLSEN. 14 October 2008. p. 5.
- ^ a b Howell, Michael L.; Kulick, Alex; Silverschanz, Perry; Woodford, Michael R. (January 2013). ""That's so Gay" Heterosexual Male Undergraduates and the Perpetuation of Sexual Orientation Microagressions on Campus". Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 28 (2): 416–435. doi:10.1177/0886260512454719. PMID 22929342. S2CID 206562816.
- ^ a b Mathies, Nicole; Coleman, Todd; McKie, Raymond M.; Woodford, Michael R.; Courtice, Erin Leigh; Travers, Robb; Renn, Kristen A. (3 July 2019). "Hearing "that's so gay" and "no homo" on academic outcomes for LGBQ + college students". Journal of LGBT Youth. 16 (3): 255–277. doi:10.1080/19361653.2019.1571981. ISSN 1936-1653. S2CID 151176310.
- ^ Wang, Yueyao; Marosi, Christopher; Edgin, Megan; Horn, Stacey S. (1 October 2021). "Adolescents' Judgment of Homophobic Name-Calling: The Role of Peer/Friend Context and Emotional Response". Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 50 (10): 1939–1951. doi:10.1007/s10964-021-01470-8. ISSN 1573-6601. PMID 34245427. S2CID 235785836.
- ^ Bailey, J. Michael; Vasey, Paul; Diamond, Lisa; Breedlove, S. Marc; Vilain, Eric; Epprecht, Marc (2016). "Sexual Orientation, Controversy, and Science". Psychological Science in the Public Interest. 17 (2): 45–101. doi:10.1177/1529100616637616. PMID 27113562. Archived from the original on 11 June 2020. Retrieved 7 September 2019.
- ^ a b Estrada, Gabriel (2011). "Two Spirits, Nádleeh, and LGBTQ2 Navajo Gaze". American Indian Culture and Research Journal. 35 (4): 167–190. doi:10.17953/aicr.35.4.x500172017344j30 (inactive 1 July 2025).
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of July 2025 (link) - ^ Pruden, Harlan; Edmo, Se-ah-dom (2016). "Two-Spirit People: Sex, Gender & Sexuality in Historic and Contemporary Native America" (PDF). National Congress of American Indians Policy Research Center. Archived from the original (PDF) on 8 July 2023. Retrieved 26 August 2023.
- ^ "A Spirit of Belonging, Inside and Out". The New York Times. 8 October 2006. Archived from the original on 9 April 2023. Retrieved 28 July 2016.
'The elders will tell you the difference between a gay Indian and a Two-Spirit,' [Criddle] said, underscoring the idea that simply being gay and Indian does not make someone a Two-Spirit.
- ^ Robert Sedlaczek, Roberta Baron: leet & leiwand. Das Lexikon der Jugendsprache, Echomedia, 2006, ISBN 3-901761-49-7
Further reading
[edit]- Cory, Donald Webster (1951). The Homosexual in America: A Subjective Approach. Greenberg. p. 107. Chapter 9 ("Take My Word For It") includes a valuable discussion of the term "gay.".
- Leap, William (1995). Beyond the Lavender Lexicon: Authenticity, Imagination, and Appropriation in Lesbian and Gay Language. Taylor & Francis. p. 360. ISBN 978-2-88449-181-5.
External links
[edit]Background
Band formation and early years
12 Rods originally formed in May 1992 in Oxford, Ohio, as Ryan’z Bihg Hed, when Ryan Olcott was a high school senior at Talawanda High School. The initial lineup included Olcott, Matt Flynn, Daniel Perlin, drummer Christopher McGuire, and Olcott's older brother Ev running sound. Intended as a one-off project for a classmate's backyard graduation party ("Field Fest 3"), with just two weeks to prepare, Olcott—who had primarily trained as a drummer—taught himself guitar and vocals, composing around 10 to 12 original songs during this period.[5] They debuted at the party, where Ev recorded the performance on his boom box, resulting in their sole release as Ryan’z Bihg Hed: the cassette Helikopter Hundrid Dolurz. The band disbanded immediately after but reformed six months later as 12 Rods with a slightly adjusted lineup.[5][6] The band's debut performance as 12 Rods was raw and unpolished but captivated the audience, solidifying their commitment to continue.[6] Olcott quickly assumed the role of primary songwriter and producer, directing the group's direction to focus on structured compositions rather than unstructured jamming, drawing from a DIY ethos that emphasized self-taught skills and home recording. Ev Olcott later joined as a multi-instrumentalist and engineer, alongside McGuire on drums; none of the core members had prior experience in their respective roles beyond Olcott's percussion background.[6][5] Early influences stemmed from the indie rock and experimental scenes, with Olcott incorporating pop structures subverted by abrupt shifts, drones, and harmonic surprises, reflecting a broader 1990s trend toward innovative songcraft.[6] In 1993, following interest from a producer who heard their four-track demos, the band traveled to Minneapolis, Minnesota, to immerse themselves in the vibrant local music scene known for acts like The Replacements and a culture of experimental freedom; they fully relocated by 1995.[6][5] There, they began playing house shows and producing additional self-recorded demos. This period marked their transition into the mid-1990s Minnesota indie landscape, culminating in the recording of their debut tape Bliss? at Metro Studios over a weekend-plus.[6]Preceding releases
Prior to the release of Gay?, 12 Rods issued their debut album Bliss? on May 15, 1993, as a cassette through the local independent label Güd Music.[7] Recorded at Metro Studios in Minneapolis, Minnesota, the album captured the band's early sound in a raw, lo-fi production style characterized by noisy, angular space rock drenched in reverb.[7][5][6] Bliss? runs approximately 54 minutes across 12 tracks, including "Stella," "Repeat," "Choke," "When Comes Sunday," "Day By Day," "I Am Faster," "Come Down on Me," "Megabright," "Tell A Lie," "Mr. Whipple," "Bliss," and "Rainman."[7] Standout tracks like "I Am Faster" and "Megabright" highlight Ryan Olcott's songwriting, blending experimental indie rock with neo-psychedelic and shoegaze elements, often exploring surreal, introspective themes through chaotic energy and emotive synth-pop influences.[7][5] The lo-fi aesthetic, featuring reverb-heavy guitars, saxophone, and recorder accents, reflected the band's DIY ethos during their formative years in Oxford, Ohio, and early time in Minneapolis.[7][5] Critically, Bliss? received modest acclaim within indie and underground circles for its frenetic, innovative approach and Olcott's distinctive songwriting, though its commercial reach was limited, with only a few hundred copies sold.[5][8] Reviews praised the album's chaotic yet earnest blend of genres, including snotty prog and hypersexed space-age R&B, positioning it as a cult favorite in lo-fi and alternative rock scenes.[5] This underground buzz helped establish 12 Rods' reputation, paving the way for their signing with V2 Records in 1996 as the label's first American act, following the success of their self-released gay? EP.[9][6]Recording and production
Studio process
The recording sessions for the gay? EP took place in 1995 following 12 Rods' relocation to Minneapolis from Oxford, Ohio, where the band had formed in 1992. These sessions, which spanned several months, emphasized a raw, DIY approach with live band takes layered with overdubs to capture their experimental pop sound.[6][10] Frontman Ryan Olcott adopted a hands-on role throughout the process, directing arrangements, performing on multiple instruments including guitar and synthesizer, and co-engineering the tracks alongside his brother Ev Olcott. The core lineup—Ryan Olcott on vocals, guitar, and synthesizer; Ev Olcott on synthesizer, guitar, and vocals; Christopher McGuire on drums; and Matthew Foust contributing on bass—collaborated closely, fostering a dynamic where Olcott's instinctive songwriting drove the sessions while the group refined ideas collectively. This collaborative energy built on earlier influences from their 1993 Bliss tape, adapting lo-fi elements into a more structured yet unconventional format.[10][6] As an emerging act signed to the newly formed V2 Records, the band faced budget constraints typical of label support for developing artists, which necessitated a resourceful, self-reliant workflow. Recording duties fell to the Olcott brothers using available equipment, reflecting the era's indie ethos and limiting sessions to essential tracking rather than extensive experimentation. These limitations ultimately contributed to the EP's intimate, unpolished aesthetic.[6][10] A key milestone came in late 1995 with the completion of initial demos, which were then refined during final sessions to achieve the EP's cohesive blend of abrupt shifts, melodic hooks, and textural depth. This polishing phase ensured the six tracks—spanning nearly 40 minutes—felt unified despite their genre-blending structure, setting the stage for the EP's release in January 1996.[6]Technical aspects
The EP Gay? was self-produced by 12 Rods, resulting in a raw, lo-fi aesthetic that characterized their early work.[11][6] Engineering duties were handled primarily by band multi-instrumentalist Ev Olcott, who is credited with recording the tracks.[11] The production incorporated ambient synth chords and dreamy, reverb-laden guitars to foster spacey, atmospheric textures, blending shoegaze sprawl with pop-rock elements.[12] Techniques such as multi-tracking contributed to the dense instrumentation, while subtle, propulsive drumming patterns added dynamic layers without overpowering the mix.[6] The total runtime stands at 38:04, achieved through tight editing that eliminated filler and sustained the EP's intense momentum across its six tracks.[13]Musical content
Composition and structure
Gay? is a six-track extended play (EP) by the American indie rock band 12 Rods, released in 1996, that blends indie rock with neo-psychedelic and new wave influences, drawing parallels to Devo's style while incorporating experimental elements.[14][15][16] The EP's overall structure emphasizes extended song durations, with an average length exceeding six minutes and a total runtime of 38:04, allowing for expansive development across its tracks: "Red" (6:17), "Make-Out Music" (3:52), "Gaymo" (6:10), "Mexico" (6:23), "Friend" (5:32), and "Revolute" (9:50).[16] This format facilitates a cohesive yet dynamic listening experience, balancing catchy pop melodies with structural surprises that disrupt conventional song forms.[6] Compositionally, the EP features shifting dynamics, including lightning-fast stop/start breaks and abrupt phrase interruptions, often achieved through studio manipulation to create tension and release.[16] Tracks employ unexpected elements such as inserted pauses, droning sections, and harmonic surprises, which resolve into melodic resolutions, reflecting the band's intuitive approach to arrangement that prioritizes emotional flow over rigid progression.[6] For instance, "Revolute," the longest piece at nearly ten minutes, showcases a multi-part structure that builds from introspective segments to more intense climaxes, exemplifying the EP's progressive tendencies.[16] These traits contribute to a caustic yet cathartic sound, where dissonance occasionally gives way to harmonious lifts.[6] Instrumentation plays a central role in the EP's textural depth, with prominent ethereal guitar layers providing a shoegaze-like haze, complemented by propulsive percussion that drives rhythmic complexity.[6] Ambient synth pads add spacey, atmospheric undertones, evoking space-country and quiet storm influences, while occasional jazzy inflections enhance the melodic sophistication.[16] This combination draws from indie rock's raw energy but infuses it with experimental ambiguity, as seen in the interplay between robotic vocal yelps and slowed-down effects that underscore the band's evolving identity.[16] The result is a structurally innovative work that prioritizes surprise and intuition in its formal elements.[6]Lyrical themes
The lyrical themes in Gay? revolve around surreal romance, identity confusion, and emotional ambiguity, often conveyed through Olcott's ironic or playful detachment that underscores the band's exploration of interpersonal complexities.[6] These motifs appear recurrently across the record, portraying relationships as dreamlike and disorienting, where affection intertwines with uncertainty in ways that challenge conventional emotional narratives. The EP's title originated from an inside joke among band members about their non-straight experiences, intended to provoke thought on identity and outsider status without derogatory intent.[6] Olcott's abstract lyricism blends personal introspection with absurd imagery, such as metaphors of longing depicted through everyday objects morphing into symbols of alienation, creating a voice that feels both confessional and whimsically distant.[6] This approach draws from influences in quiet storm and adult contemporary traditions, evoking intimacy amid chaos by layering vulnerable admissions over seemingly nonchalant phrasing, which heightens the sense of emotional undercurrents.[16] Queer undertones are evident in tracks like "Gaymo" and "Friend," where themes of ambiguous friendships and perceived 'wrongness' in relationships suggest explorations of sexuality and normalcy as a meta-commentary on societal tensions.[17]Release and promotion
Distribution details
Gay?, the debut EP by the American alternative rock band 12 Rods, was released in 1996 by V2 Records, marking the group's entry into major-label distribution following their independent beginnings.[14] The release was issued primarily in CD format as a four-track EP, with catalog number 63881-27509-2, and was manufactured and distributed by BMG Distribution under license to V2 Records, Inc.[14] V2 Records, newly established in 1996 by Virgin Records founder Richard Branson, specialized in alternative and indie-leaning acts, offering a platform for emerging artists like 12 Rods with relatively modest promotional resources compared to larger labels.[18] The artwork featured a minimalist design including an insert photograph by Daniel Corrigan, contributing to the EP's raw, lo-fi aesthetic.[14] No limited pressing quantities or initial indie distribution specifics were documented for this release, though it represented a transitional step for the band from self-released material to broader commercial availability.[11]Marketing efforts
The promotion of the Gay? EP emphasized grassroots tactics to engage indie and alternative audiences, beginning with targeted outreach to college radio stations and coverage in indie zines. This initial push was amplified by Pitchfork's endorsement, as the then-fledgling online publication—operating as a Minnesota-based zine—awarded the EP its first-ever 10.0 rating in May 1996, hailing it as a groundbreaking work that restored "faith in the future of music."[6][19] Unlike many label releases of the era, no major singles were issued from Gay?, limiting mainstream radio exposure; however, the track "Gaymo" was spotlighted in early previews for its infectious, twangy hook and poignant lyrics about longing, such as "I would talk forever if every word I said would make you laugh until you cried."[20] To cultivate direct fan connections, 12 Rods undertook a modest tour in 1996, performing at small Midwest venues like those in Minneapolis and surrounding areas, which helped generate local buzz through word-of-mouth and community support following their win in a City Pages music poll.[21] A pivotal marketing move came via V2 Records' promotional efforts, including the band's track "Make Out Music" on the label's 1997 sampler compilation, which distributed the EP's wistful standout to a wider network of alternative rock enthusiasts and retailers.[22] This inclusion, alongside the label's signing of 12 Rods as its inaugural American act, extended the EP's reach beyond initial indie circles.[6]Reception
Contemporary reviews
Upon its release in 1996, the EP Gay? by 12 Rods garnered strong praise from critics, who highlighted its bold sound and emotional resonance amid the dominant post-grunge landscape. Pitchfork assigned it a perfect 10.0 rating—one of the site's earliest such scores—in a May 1, 1996, review by Jason Josephes, who lauded the EP's innovative blend of noise, melody, and raw vulnerability as a groundbreaking debut that captured profound emotional depth.[19] AllMusic critic Bryan Carroll echoed this enthusiasm, describing Gay? as a formative document of the band's evolution, with songs that hinted at emerging mature styles such as space-country and ambient synth textures, while noting its rough edges as evidence of a dynamic group still refining its voice.[16] Contemporary coverage in other 1990s outlets emphasized the EP's underground appeal and its contrast to mainstream alt-rock trends, positioning it as a fresh, subversive entry in the indie scene.[15]Later evaluations
In the years following its 1996 release, the EP Gay? by 12 Rods has been reevaluated as a foundational artifact of mid-1990s indie rock, particularly within the Minneapolis scene. A 2020 article in The Ringer by Rob Harvilla revisited Pitchfork's inaugural 10.0 rating for the EP, framing it as an "overlooked gem" that exemplified the site's early championing of hyper-local, ambitious underground talent amid a vibrant subculture of misfits and college radio darlings.[23] Harvilla highlighted how Gay?, alongside similar local releases, captured the "effortless" zine-like enthusiasm of Pitchfork's origins, positioning the EP as a key entry in the indie canon despite its archival obscurity on the site today.[23] Scholarly and historical accounts have further contextualized Gay? within the evolution of Minnesota's rock scene. In his 2018 book The Hopefuls: Chasing a Rock 'n' Roll Dream in the Minnesota Music Scene, Paul V. Allen discusses the EP as part of the broader trajectory of independent acts navigating the transition from 1990s alt-rock to early-2000s indie experimentation, emphasizing 12 Rods' role in a network of Minneapolis musicians pushing genre boundaries. Reappraisals have noted the EP's prescience in blending indie rock with neo-psychedelic and dream pop elements.[5] While Gay? has seen no major physical reissues beyond a 2003 remixed and remastered digital edition, its availability on streaming platforms since the 2010s has facilitated a wave of rediscovery among online crate-diggers and Midwestern indie enthusiasts.[24] This digital resurgence, coupled with the band's 2023 reunion and archival releases, has solidified the EP's legacy as an enduring touchstone for noisy, personal indie rock from the pre-internet era.[6]Track listing and personnel
Track details
The album Gay? consists of six tracks, all written by Chris Rioux. The tracklist is as follows:- "Red" (6:17) – An opening instrumental build that establishes the album's sonic foundation through gradual layering of textures.
- "Make-Out Music" (3:51) – An upbeat rocker characterized by energetic rhythms and catchy hooks, providing a lively contrast to the opener.
- "Gaymo" (6:09) – A synth-driven groove that explores pulsating electronic elements and repetitive motifs for a danceable yet introspective feel.
- "Mexico" (6:23) – An atmospheric travelogue evoking wanderlust with expansive soundscapes and subtle melodic shifts.
- "Friend" (5:34) – An introspective ballad focusing on emotional depth through sparse arrangements and vocal vulnerability.
- "Revolute" (9:31) – The epic closer featuring evolving layers of instrumentation that build to a climactic resolution, tying together the album's themes.
