Hubbry Logo
FellatioFellatioMain
Open search
Fellatio
Community hub
Fellatio
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Fellatio
Fellatio
Fellatio
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

An illustration of a woman performing fellatio on a man

Fellatio (also known as fellation,[1] and in slang as blowjob, BJ, giving head, or sucking off)[2] is an oral sex act consisting of the stimulation of a penis by using the mouth.[3][4] Oral stimulation of the scrotum may also be termed fellatio,[5][6] or colloquially as teabagging.[7]

It may be performed by a sexual partner as foreplay before other sexual activities, such as vaginal or anal intercourse,[8][9] or as an erotic and physically intimate act of its own.[8][4] Fellatio creates a risk of contracting sexually transmitted infections (STIs), but the risk is significantly lower than that of vaginal or anal sex, especially for HIV transmission.[10][11][12]

Most countries do not have laws banning the practice of fellatio, though some cultures may consider it taboo.[8] People may also refrain from engaging in fellatio due to personal preference, negative feelings, or sexual inhibitions.[8] Commonly, people do not view oral sex as affecting the virginity of either partner, though opinions on the matter vary.[13][14][15][16]

Etymology

[edit]

The English noun fellatio comes from the Latin fellātus, the past participle of the verb fellāre, meaning "to suck".[17] In fellatio, the -us is replaced by the -io while the declension stem ends in -ion-, which gives the suffix the form -ion (cf. French fellation). The -io(n) ending is used in English to create nouns from Latin adjectives and it can indicate a state or action wherein the Latin verb is being, or has been, performed.

Further English words have been created based on the same Latin root. A person who performs fellatio upon another (i.e. who fellates) may be termed a fellator. Latin's gender based declension means this word may be restricted to describing a male. The equivalent term for a female is fellatrix.

Practice

[edit]

General

[edit]
Illustration by Édouard-Henri Avril (1849–1928) depicting fellatio

The essential aspect of fellatio is oral stimulation of the penis (including the shaft and glans) through sucking with the mouth, use of the tongue for licking, using the lips, or some combination.[8] One method is the sex partner taking the penis into the mouth and moving smoothly up and down to a rhythm while being careful to avoid contact with the teeth.[8] Fellatio also includes oral stimulation of the scrotum, whether licking, sucking or taking the entire scrotum into the mouth.[5][6] During the act, orgasm may be achieved and semen may be ejaculated into the partner's mouth.[8][4] When the penis is thrust into someone's mouth, it is called irrumatio, though the term is rarely used; "face-fucking" is a more prevalent colloquial term.[18]

Performing fellatio can trigger the gag reflex.[19]

It is physically possible for men with sufficient flexibility, penis size, or both, to perform fellatio on themselves as a form of masturbation, in an act called autofellatio. However, few men possess the flexibility and penis length to safely perform the necessary frontbend.[20]

Deposition of semen

[edit]
Further information: Semen § Ingestion

During fellatio, a partner may ingest semen from the penis. As late as 1976, some doctors were advising women in the eighth and ninth months of pregnancy not to swallow semen lest it induce premature labor, but it was later determined to be safe.[21]

The receiver of fellatio typically becomes sexually aroused. Once the prerequisite level of sexual stimulation has been achieved and ejaculation becomes imminent, the semen may be discharged onto his partner. The male may position his penis prior to ejaculation so that semen will be deposited onto his partner's face (known as a "facial"), or other body part such as their neck, chest or breast.[22]

Deep-throating

[edit]
A woman with the full length of a man's penis inside her mouth.
An illustration of a woman deep-throating a man

Deep-throating is a sexual act in which a person takes a partner's entire erect penis into the mouth and throat.[23] The technique and term became popularized by the 1972 pornographic film Deep Throat.[citation needed] For deep-throating, the penis must be long enough so that it can reach the back of the receiver's throat.[24]

Deep-throating can be difficult because of the natural gag reflex that is triggered when the soft palate is touched.[25][26] People have different sensitivities to this reflex. With practice, some learn to suppress it. Deep-throating leads to a different kind of sexual stimulation of the penis than regular fellatio: the tongue's movement is restricted during deep-throating and sucking becomes impossible;[27] the tightness of the pharynx can intensely stimulate the glans of the penis.

Other aspects

[edit]
An illustration of two men performing fellatio on each other in the 69 position

The male receiving fellatio receives direct sexual stimulation, while his partner may derive satisfaction from giving him pleasure. Giving and receiving fellatio may happen simultaneously in sex positions like 69 and daisy chain.

Fellatio is sometimes practiced when vaginal or anal penetration would create a physical difficulty for a sex partner. For example, it may be practiced during pregnancy instead of vaginal intercourse by couples wishing to engage in intimate sexual activity while avoiding the difficulty of vaginal intercourse during later stages of pregnancy.[28]

Other reasons why a woman may not wish to have vaginal intercourse include apprehension of losing her virginity or of becoming pregnant,[13][15] conditions such as endometriosis, vulvodynia/vestibulodynia, or vaginismus that make vaginal penetration painful or impossible, or because she may be menstruating.

Health aspects

[edit]

Sexually transmitted infections

[edit]

Chlamydia, human papillomavirus (HPV), gonorrhea, herpes, hepatitis (multiple strains), and other sexually transmitted infections (STIs) can be transmitted through oral sex.[10][11][29] Any sexual exchange of bodily fluids with a person infected with HIV, the virus that causes AIDS, poses a risk of infection. Risk of STI infection, however, is generally considered significantly lower for oral sex than for vaginal or anal sex, with HIV transmission considered the lowest risk with regard to oral sex.[11][12][30][31]

There is an increased risk of STI transmission if the receiving partner has wounds on their genitals, or if the giving partner has wounds or open sores on or in their mouth, or bleeding gums.[11][12][32] Brushing the teeth, flossing, or undergoing dental work soon before or after giving fellatio can also increase the risk of transmission, because all of these activities can cause small scratches in the lining of the mouth.[11][12] These wounds, even when they are microscopic, increase the chances of contracting STIs that can be transmitted orally under these conditions.[11][12] Such contact can also lead to more mundane infections from common bacteria and viruses found in, around and secreted from the genital regions. Because of the aforementioned factors, medical sources advise the use of condoms or other effective barrier methods when performing or receiving fellatio with a partner whose STI status is unknown.[10][11][12][29]

[edit]

Links have been reported between oral sex and oral cancer with HPV-infected people.[33]

A 2007 study suggested a correlation between oral sex and throat cancer. It is believed that this is due to the transmission of HPV, a virus that has been implicated in the majority of cervical cancers and which has been detected in throat cancer tissue in numerous studies. The study concludes that people who had one to five oral sex partners in their lifetime had approximately a doubled risk of throat cancer compared with those who never engaged in this activity and those with more than five oral sex partners had a 250 percent increased risk.[34][35][36]

Pregnancy and semen exposure

[edit]
See also: Paternal tolerance

Fellatio cannot result in pregnancy, as there is no way for ingested sperm to reach the uterus and fallopian tubes to fertilize an egg cell. At any rate, acids in the stomach and digestive enzymes in the gastrointestinal tract break down and kill spermatozoa.

Clinical research has tentatively linked fellatio with immune modulation,[37] indicating it may reduce the chance of complications during pregnancy. The potentially fatal complication pre-eclampsia was observed to occur less in women who regularly engaged in fellatio, with those who also ingested their partner's semen being at the least risk.[38] The results were consistent with the fact that semen contains TGF-β1, the exchange of which between partners has a causal reduction in risk of pre-eclampsia caused by an immunological reaction. However, fellatio is not the only viable mechanism for the transmission of TGF-β1.[37][39][40]

Cultural views

[edit]

Virginity

[edit]

Oral sex is commonly used as a means of preserving virginity, especially among heterosexual pairings; this is sometimes termed technical virginity (which additionally includes anal sex, manual sex and other non-penetrative sex acts, but excludes penile-vaginal sex).[13][14][15][41] The concept of "technical virginity" or sexual abstinence through oral sex is particularly popular among teenagers in the United States,[15][32][42] including with regard to teenage girls who not only fellate their boyfriends to preserve their virginities, but also to create and maintain intimacy or to avoid pregnancy.[15] Other reasons given for the practice among teenage girls are peer-group pressure and as their introduction to sexual activity.[15] Additionally, gay males may regard fellatio as a way of maintaining their virginities, with penile-anal penetration defined as resulting in virginity loss, while other gay males may define fellatio as their main form of sexual activity.[13][16]

Legality

[edit]
See also: Islamic views on oral sex

Fellatio is legal in most countries. Laws of some jurisdictions regard fellatio as penetrative sex for the purposes of sexual offenses with regard to the act, but most countries do not have laws which ban the practice, in contrast to anal sex or extramarital sex. In Islamic literature, the only forms of sexual activity that are consistently explicitly prohibited within marriage are anal sex and sexual activity during menstruation.[43] However, the exact attitude towards oral sex is a subject of disagreements between modern scholars of Islam. Authorities considering it "objectionable" do so because of the penis' supposedly impure fluids coming in contact with the mouth.[44] Others emphasize that there is no decisive evidence to forbid oral sex.[45]

In Malaysia, fellatio is illegal, but the law is seldom enforced. Under Malaysia's Section 377A of the Penal Code, the introduction of the penis into the anus or mouth of another person is considered a "carnal intercourse against the order of nature" and is punishable with imprisonment of 20 years maximum and whipping.[46]

Tradition

[edit]
Depiction of fellatio on Attic red-figure kylix, c. 510 BC

Galienus called fellatio lesbiari since women of the island of Lesbos were supposed to have introduced the practice of using one's lips to give sexual pleasure.[47]

Oral sex depicted in the Kama Sutra

The Ancient Indian Kama Sutra, dating from the first century AD, describes oral sex,[48] discussing fellatio in great detail (the Kama Sutra has a chapter on auparishtaka (or oparishtaka), "mouth congress")[49] and only briefly mentioning cunnilingus. However, according to the Kama Sutra, fellatio is above all a characteristic of eunuchs (or, according to other translations, of effeminate homosexuals or trans women similar to the modern Hijra of India), who use their mouths as a substitute for female genitalia.[50]

Vātsyāyana, the author of the Kama Sutra, states that it is also practiced by "unchaste women", but mentions that there are widespread traditional concerns about this being a degrading or unclean practice, with known practitioners being evaded as love partners in large parts of the country. The author appears to somewhat agree with these attitudes, claiming that "a wise man" should not engage in that form of intercourse while acknowledging that it can be appropriate in some unspecified cases.[51][52]

The Moche culture of ancient Peru depicted fellatio in their ceramics.[53]

In some cultures, such as Cambodia, Chinese in Southeast Asia, northern Manchu tribes along Amur River,[54] Sambians in Papua New Guinea, Thailand, Telugus of India, Native Hawaiians and other Pacific Islanders, briefly taking the penis of a male infant or toddler into one's mouth was considered a nonsexual form of affection or even a form of ritual, greeting, respect, parenting love, or lifesaving.[55][56][57][58] According to some sources, it was an ancient Chinese custom for grandmothers, mothers, and elder sisters to calm their baby boys with fellatio.[59][60] It has also been reported that some modern Chinese mothers have performed fellatio to their moribund sons as affection and means for lifesaving, because they culturally believe that when the penis is completely retracted into the abdomen, the boy or man will die.[58][61][62]

Other animals

[edit]
Main articles: Animal sexual behavior and Non-reproductive sexual behavior in animals § Oral sex
Female bats perform fellatio to increase copulation time. This species is the only non-primate known to exhibit this behaviour.[63]

Flying foxes (a type of bat) have been observed engaging in oral sex.[64] Indian flying fox males will lick a female's vulva both before and after copulation, with the length of pre-copulation cunnilingus positively correlated with length of copulation.[65] The fruit bat Cynopterus sphinx, has been observed to engage in fellatio during mating. Pairs spend more time copulating if the female licks the male than if she does not.[63][66] Male Livingstone's fruit bats have been observed engaging in homosexual fellatio, although it is unknown if this is an example of sexual behavior or social grooming.[67] Bonin flying foxes also engage in homosexual fellatio, but the behavior has been observed independently of social grooming.[64]

See also

[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Fellatio.

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Fellatio

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Fellatio is the sexual act of orally stimulating a man's using the , , or . This practice, a subset of , has been documented across diverse cultures and historical periods, with artistic representations appearing in ancient civilizations such as , , and pre-Columbian , indicating its longstanding presence in human ual behavior. Empirical surveys of modern populations reveal high prevalence rates, with over 80% of men and 70% of women born after 1942 reporting lifetime experience giving or receiving , including fellatio, and similar proportions in younger cohorts engaging in it as a common component of heterosexual and same-sex encounters. While often associated with sexual pleasure and intimacy, fellatio carries documented health risks, as it facilitates transmission of sexually transmitted infections such as , , , , and from an infected partner to the , throat, or genitals, though the probability varies by pathogen and .

Definition and Etymology

Definition

Fellatio refers to the sexual act of oral stimulation of the using the , lips, or . This form of oral-genital contact typically involves rhythmic sucking, licking, or enveloping motions to produce sexual pleasure for the recipient. It is distinct from , which targets female genitalia, and may occasionally encompass stimulation of the or surrounding areas, though the remains the primary focus. The act can be performed by individuals of any or on a partner and is often reciprocal in sexual encounters, though it functions unilaterally in providing stimulation to the . may or may not occur, with potentially swallowed, spat, or avoided through withdrawal, depending on participant preferences and hygiene considerations. Anatomically, it engages the sensitive endings of the and , contributing to via mechanoreceptors responsive to pressure and friction.

Etymology

The English noun derives from New Latin fellātiō, formed as a noun of action from Latin fellāre ("to suck"), with the past participle stem fellāt- and the suffix -iō. The root verb fellāre traces to the Proto-Indo-European dʰeh₁(i)-, meaning "to suck" or "to suckle". This etymological lineage reflects the act's core mechanism of oral suction applied to the . The term entered English in the late 19th century, with the tracing its first attestations to borrowings partly from Latin fellation-/fellatio and partly from German Fellatio, initially in medical and sexological contexts. Its earliest recorded use in English dates to 1877, though it gained wider currency in around 1885–1890 as a clinical descriptor for penile oral . Prior to this, related concepts were denoted in Latin texts or vernacular without the standardized term, such as in ancient Roman writings where fellator denoted the performer derogatorily.

Biological Foundations

Anatomy and Physiology

The , the primary organ stimulated in fellatio, consists of the erectile corpora cavernosa and corpus spongiosum enclosed in fibrous tunica albuginea, with the forming the distal expansion of the corpus spongiosum. The is densely innervated, containing over 4,000 free endings, primarily Meissner's corpuscles and Krause-Finger end-organs, which confer heightened tactile sensitivity to light touch, , and changes induced by oral contact. The , a mucocutaneous fold on the ventral -shaft junction, represents another focal with concentrated sensory receptors from the , a branch, amplifying pleasure from lingual or labial stimulation. The penile shaft provides broader surface area for suction and rhythmic motion, while preputial skin (in uncircumcised individuals) adds gliding texture, though reduces some sensory redundancy without eliminating responsiveness. In the performing partner's oral cavity, the lips offer precise encircling pressure via contraction, the tongue delivers dynamic licking and swirling through intrinsic and extrinsic musculature, and the facilitates suction via negative pressure generation. , secreted by parotid, submandibular, and sublingual glands at rates up to 1-7 mL/min during stimulation, acts as a mucin-rich , reducing coefficients on penile mucosa through glycoprotein films, though its 99% water content leads to rapid evaporation compared to commercial alternatives. may increase salivary flow via autonomic modulation, enhancing lubrication efficacy. Physiologically, oral stimulation triggers afferent signals via Aδ and C-fibers in the , synapsing in the sacral (S2-S4) and projecting to the paraventricular nucleus for hypothalamic integration, initiating parasympathetic outflow from the nervi erigentes. This releases in cavernosal , elevating cGMP to induce , engorgement, and with tumescence pressures reaching 100-150 mmHg. Sustained input maintains plateau phase and pre-ejaculatory emissions, culminating in sympathetic (T12-L2) mediated : rhythmic bulbospongiosus contractions expel at velocities up to 45 km/h via urethral , with sensory feedback looping through spinothalamic tracts for perceived pleasure. Individual variability arises from nerve density (e.g., sensitivity peaks in youth) and levels influencing receptor expression.

Evolutionary Hypotheses

One posits that fellatio functions to prolong the duration of copulation and enhance lubrication, thereby increasing the efficiency of sperm transfer during vaginal intercourse. Observations in short-nosed bats (Cynopterus sphinx) demonstrate that females performing fellatio during extend copulation time by about 30% relative to non-fellatio matings, with providing lubrication that sustains male and reduces friction. This mechanism is proposed to parallel , where pre-intercourse fellatio could similarly maintain penile rigidity and facilitate deeper thrusting, optimizing insemination success under ancestral conditions of variable opportunities. In the framework of sperm competition theory, fellatio may relate to adaptations addressing multi-male mating risks, where sperm from different males compete for fertilization. Human evolutionary models suggest that oral stimulation could indirectly influence ejaculate dynamics, such as through arousal-induced changes in semen parameters or as a precursor to displacement behaviors during intercourse, akin to thrusting patterns that expel rival sperm. Empirical data indicate cross-cultural prevalence of fellatio, occurring in nearly all documented human societies, implying deep evolutionary integration rather than recent cultural invention, potentially as a tactic to modulate paternity certainty or partner investment. Alternative explanations invoke pair-bonding and reciprocity, drawing from primate analogs like bonobos, where oral-genital contact serves affiliative roles beyond , reducing intra-group and promoting coalitions. In humans, female-initiated fellatio might reinforce long-term monogamous bonds by signaling sexual commitment or eliciting provisioning, with oxytocin release from such intimate acts enhancing attachment stability. These hypotheses remain speculative, as direct fossil or genetic evidence is absent, and variation in modern practices correlates more with cultural norms than uniform selection pressures; however, the behavior's persistence across diverse populations supports non-trivial adaptive origins over neutral pleasure alone.

Practice and Techniques

Basic Techniques

Basic techniques of fellatio primarily center on the use of the , , and to provide to the , with emphasis on erogenous zones such as the and , which contain high concentrations of endings responsive to , , and . The recipient typically lies or sits while the performer kneels or positions themselves accordingly, allowing for controlled access to the genitalia. Initial contact often begins with gentle licking along the shaft and underside to build gradually, as abrupt deep insertion can cause discomfort. Key methods include:
  • Licking: Employing the tongue to trace the length of the shaft, circling the , or focusing on the with flat, broad strokes or pointed flicks, which heighten sensitivity through varied textures and pressures.
  • Suction: Forming a seal with the around the or upper shaft while applying gentle vacuum pressure, often combined with bobbing motions of the head to simulate rhythmic thrusting; should cushion teeth to prevent abrasion, with first-time performers particularly focusing on covering teeth with lips in an 'O' shape and using careful movements; while banana practice may not fully address size differences or jaw fatigue, concentration aids avoidance, alongside tips such as limiting depth, emphasizing tongue and lip use, and relaxing the jaw.
  • Hand integration: Grasping the base of the shaft with one hand to provide manual stroking in coordination with oral movements, maintaining via or external aids to enhance glide and control depth.
  • Scrotal stimulation: Oral contact with the testicles, including licking or sucking, termed 玉舐め (tamaname) for licking and 玉しゃぶり (tamashaburi) for sucking in Japanese sexual practices; often employed as foreplay or combined with penile fellatio.
Pacing starts slow to acclimate the recipient, progressing to firmer or faster actions based on feedback, as individual preferences vary by penile sensitivity and state. production aids lubrication, reducing friction risks, though performers may need to manage gag by limiting depth initially. These fundamentals prioritize mutual comfort and communication to optimize pleasure without overstimulation. Effective communication in partnered fellatio emphasizes respecting the performing partner's willingness and boundaries, avoiding any form of coercion or pressure. Discussions should occur in non-sexual settings, such as during casual activities, using "I" statements to express interests, for example: "I enjoy our intimate moments and believe trying fellatio could enhance our closeness—what are your thoughts?" Partners should attentively listen to concerns, including hygiene, taste, texture, past experiences, or perceived inequality, without rebuttal. Potential solutions include improving hygiene practices, ensuring reciprocity through mutual oral stimulation, or initiating with light, gradual attempts. If reluctance persists, accepting the decision without repeated pressure is essential to maintain trust and relational integrity.

Solo Practice

Solo practice of fellatio techniques commonly employs phallic substitutes such as a peeled banana or a realistic silicone dildo to simulate penile stimulation. A banana offers accessibility and softness suitable for beginners, while covering it with a condom ensures hygiene and minimizes mess or irritation. Dildos, particularly those with suction cups for hands-free mounting, provide durability for repeated use. For deep throat training, body-safe silicone dildos with realistic firmness and dual-density construction, such as the Vixen VixSkin Leo which mimics an erect penis's texture, are recommended. Other options include SquarePegToys' The Slim line, designed for throat depth play, and customizable deep throat trainers from Silicone Nozzles. Emphasis is placed on starting with average girth and progressing gradually for safe practice. Practiced techniques mirror partnered methods and include:
  • Licking the shaft and head, with emphasis on the frenulum using swirling tongue motions.
  • Gentle sucking combined with head bobbing to accommodate increasing depth and train the gag reflex through nasal breathing and swallowing practice.
  • Coordinating hand stroking with oral actions to establish rhythm.
  • Utilizing saliva or water-based lubricant for smooth motion.
Practicing before a mirror allows observation of technique and promotes gradual progression to build confidence and reduce discomfort for eventual partnered application.

Variations and Positions

Fellatio occurs in multiple positions that influence accessibility, comfort, and depth of stimulation. In one prevalent configuration, the receiving partner lies on a surface such as a , with legs parted, while the performing partner kneels or positions themselves between the legs, enabling upright posture for the performer and straightforward access to the for oral contact. This setup allows the performer to incorporate hand movements alongside mouth stimulation without strain. A reciprocal variation is the 69 position, where partners align head-to-genitals in opposite directions, permitting simultaneous fellatio and ; typically, one partner lies on their back as the other straddles face-down or assumes a orientation to reduce . This mutual arrangement demands coordination to maintain balance and rhythm. For enhanced depth, known as deep throating (also called throat fucking)—a variation where the penis enters the pharynx deeply, differing from standard fellatio in which it remains primarily in the mouth—the "head hanging off bed" position (also known as "head over the edge" or "upside down blowjob") involves the receiving partner lying on their back on a with their head and neck extended off the edge, allowing the mouth and to align in a straight line due to gravity. The giving partner stands or kneels at the head end of the bed and inserts their penis into the receiver's mouth, enabling deeper penetration and control over thrusting while minimizing gag reflex activation through gravity-assisted relaxation. This technique often requires suppression of the gag reflex, head alignment such as tilting backward, relaxation of the throat and jaw, and temporary breath-holding, with key challenges including overcoming the strong gag reflex through practice, trust, and communication between partners; it carries risks of neck strain, discomfort, choking, throat rawness, bruising, gagging, and vomiting, or rarely serious injuries like hypopharyngeal perforation from blunt trauma, which can lead to complications such as mediastinitis. Deep throating is generally not inherently dangerous when performed consensually with awareness of personal limits, gradual progression, proper breathing techniques, communication, and avoiding numbing agents. Prioritizing consent and stopping if uncomfortable is essential, and using barriers such as condoms can reduce sexually transmitted infection risks. Related practices such as gentle head guiding by the receiving partner using light touch on the head or hair, or minimal holding, emphasize ongoing consent, prior discussion of boundaries and non-verbal signals (e.g., tapping the thigh to stop), gradual progression, and constant monitoring for discomfort to allow performer control and avoid injury, particularly in cases involving throat or jaw sensitivities. Standing positions, where the performer kneels before a upright receiver, offer control over thrusting and are suited to shorter durations due to potential performer . These positional choices adapt to physical constraints, partner heights, and preferences for dominance or intimacy.

Semen Handling

In fellatio, semen handling refers to the management of ejaculate post-orgasm, with common options including (swallowing), expectoration (spitting), or external deposition such as on the face or body. Swallowing entails direct into the digestive system, where —primarily composed of water (90-95%), seminal plasma, and spermatozoa—is broken down by gastric acids and enzymes, akin to other ingested proteins and fluids, with no risk of as cannot survive the gastrointestinal environment. Semen's average volume per ejaculation ranges from 2-5 milliliters, containing for energy, , enzymes like , phospholipids, trace minerals (e.g., at 0.15 mg/mL, calcium at 0.027 mg/mL), and proteins including and immunoglobulins, though these micronutrients occur in negligible amounts insufficient for meaningful dietary contribution. Taste and texture vary by factors like diet, hydration, and smoking, often described as slightly alkaline (pH 7.2-8.0) with a mild salty or bitter flavor; self-reported experiences among women receiving ejaculate in the mouth during fellatio highlight greater variation, including salty, bitter, fishy, bleach-like, chlorine-like, raw chestnut, or metallic tastes, and viscous, thick, gel-like or mucus-like textures that may evoke physiological reactions such as nausea, gagging, discomfort, or a sense of throat clogging upon swallowing, though some report neutral, warm, or intimate sensations. Psychologically, responses range from feelings of intimacy, love, or excitement—particularly with a trusted partner—to perceptions of humiliation, objectification, or aversion, with many women tolerating the experience despite dislike of the sensory qualities primarily to please their partner, underscoring the highly individualized nature of these encounters. These subjective factors influence preferences for or alternatives, including withdrawal of the penis prior to ejaculation to avoid intraoral deposition altogether. Common reasons for preferring this approach include aversion to the taste (often bitter or salty) and texture (thick or slimy) of semen, discomfort with swallowing, and personal boundaries or preferences. While sexually transmitted infection transmission risks arise from oral-genital contact regardless of ejaculation location, swallowing semen itself poses no inherent health risks in the absence of infections. Health risks of swallowing include transmission of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) via pathogens in semen, such as (gonorrhea), (chlamydia), (syphilis), herpes simplex virus, human papillomavirus (HPV), hepatitis B virus, and, rarely, HIV, which can establish pharyngeal infections or systemic spread despite partial inactivation by saliva and stomach acid. Swallowing does not substantially elevate HIV risk beyond oral exposure, estimated at under 0.04% per act due to low viral titers and digestive barriers, but gonorrhea and chlamydia pharyngitis risks remain notable without barriers like condoms. Spitting mitigates prolonged mucosal contact but offers limited protection against initial exposure during fellatio. Rare human seminal plasma affects an estimated 1-5% of individuals, potentially causing localized itching, swelling, or upon ingestion, treatable with antihistamines or desensitization in severe cases. No verified nutritional or therapeutic benefits exist for routine swallowing; purported mood elevations from trace serotonin or oxytocin lack controlled evidence, as are claims of preeclampsia reduction via paternal antigen exposure, which derive from small, correlational studies prone to . Pre-ejaculatory fluid ("pre-cum") handling follows similar protocols, though it contains fewer and pathogens.

Health Implications

Infectious Disease Risks

Fellatio poses risks for transmission of several sexually transmitted infections (STIs), primarily from an infected to the performer's or , though bidirectional transmission is possible if the performer harbors oral infections. Bacterial STIs such as and are among the most readily transmitted via this act, with the performer at elevated risk of acquiring pharyngeal infections upon contact with infected , , or urethral discharge. For , studies indicate that performing fellatio on an infected partner substantially increases the likelihood of infection, with fellatio identified as a higher-risk oral act compared to or due to direct exposure to genital fluids. Pharyngeal acquisition follows a similar mechanism, though detection and symptomatic presentation in the throat are less common than genital cases. Syphilis transmission occurs if oral contact involves a penile or mucous patch, allowing spirochetes to enter through mucosal abrasions or microtears in the mouth; empirical data from surveillance systems confirm oral-genital contact as a documented route, particularly in primary syphilis stages. Viral STIs like (HSV), particularly HSV-2, can transfer from genital lesions to oral sites during fellatio, resulting in oral herpes outbreaks; conversely, performers with active oral HSV-1 may transmit to the partner's genitals, though type-specific immunity often limits cross-infection severity. Human papillomavirus (HPV) transmission via fellatio links to oral HPV infections, with cohort studies associating receptive oral-penile contact with increased odds of oral HPV detection, potentially persisting asymptomatically. HIV transmission risk through fellatio remains low per act, estimated at 0.04% or less in studies of men who have sex with men when is unknown or positive, primarily requiring factors like performer oral trauma, high in the partner, or into the mouth to facilitate rare mucosal entry. Systematic reviews affirm this risk as very low but not negligible, contrasting sharply with higher rates for receptive anal or vaginal intercourse. Non-STI pathogens, such as , may transmit via semen exposure to oral cuts, though mitigates this; general respiratory or gastrointestinal microbes pose minimal specific risks beyond routine close contact. Risk elevation correlates with factors like multiple partners, lack of barriers (e.g., condoms), and concurrent oral health issues such as , underscoring the causal role of direct fluid and contact in transfer.

Cancer Associations

Fellatio is linked to an elevated risk of oropharyngeal (OPSCC), a type of cancer affecting the base of the , tonsils, and other pharyngeal tissues, primarily through the sexual transmission of high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) strains, especially HPV-16. HPV accounts for 60% to 70% of OPSCC cases in the United States, with oral-genital contact, including fellatio, serving as a key vector for viral entry into the oropharyngeal mucosa. Epidemiological data indicate that the performer's exposure during fellatio heightens susceptibility, as HPV particles from infected genital skin or mucosa can establish persistent oral infection, a precursor to oncogenic transformation over years or decades. Multiple cohort and case-control studies demonstrate a dose-response relationship, where greater lifetime numbers of oral sex partners correlate with higher of oral HPV prevalence and subsequent OPSCC incidence; for instance, early analyses reported escalation with partner count, independent of other sexual behaviors. A 2016 review estimated that widespread practices contribute to rising HPV-16-associated OPSCC rates, particularly among men under 50, paralleling shifts in sexual norms since the mid-20th century. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of sexual behavior indicators, including frequency and partner numbers, confirm positive associations with head and neck cancers, though effect sizes vary ( ratios typically 1.5–3.0 for high-exposure groups). Transmission efficiency is higher from to during fellatio due to anatomical factors and in penile sites, though men performing fellatio on infected partners also face notable , as evidenced in studies of men who have with men. Not all oral HPV infections progress to cancer; only a fraction (estimated 1–2% lifetime among infected individuals) develop , modulated by factors like immune status, , and viral persistence rather than fellatio alone. Some meta-analyses position as a risk marker tied to HPV exposure rather than a direct causal agent, emphasizing that variables like overall sexual activity must be controlled. No robust evidence supports fellatio causing non-HPV-related oral cancers or protective effects; claims of independent from exposure lack empirical backing and contradict HPV-centric models. HPV (e.g., ) targeting types 16 and 18 reduces oral HPV acquisition and projected OPSCC incidence by up to 90% in vaccinated cohorts, underscoring prevention via immunization over behavioral modification.

Other Physiological Effects

Performing fellatio can lead to temporomandibular joint (TMJ) strain or exacerbation of temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) in susceptible individuals, due to the repetitive jaw extension and muscle tension required. TMDs, affecting 5-12% of the population, involve pain in the jaw joint and surrounding muscles, and activities like oral sex have been reported to trigger symptoms such as jaw popping or discomfort, particularly when the mouth is held open wide for extended periods. Claims that performing fellatio significantly shapes the face or chin, such as defining the jawline, lack scientific evidence and originate from online myths and unsubstantiated anecdotes. No peer-reviewed studies support permanent structural changes to facial morphology from such repetitive jaw movements in adults. Contact with during fellatio carries a rare risk of human seminal plasma , an allergic reaction to proteins in the fluid, manifesting as localized itching, , swelling, or in severe cases, upon ingestion or mucosal exposure. This condition affects a small subset of individuals, with symptoms appearing within minutes of exposure, and documented cases include reactions from oral , potentially compounded by allergens or medications in the . Swallowing semen post-fellatio is generally physiologically benign, as it consists primarily of water, proteins, sugars, and trace minerals that are digested similarly to other ingested proteins, with negligible nutritional impact (e.g., about 5-25 calories per ). However, beyond allergies, no robust supports significant systemic benefits or harms from oral , as absorption differs from vaginal exposure studied in limited on mood effects. Advanced techniques like deep throating heighten risks of throat rawness, bruising, gagging, vomiting, and rarely serious injuries such as hypopharyngeal perforation from blunt trauma, which can lead to complications including mediastinitis. It is generally not inherently dangerous when performed consensually with awareness of personal limits, gradual progression, proper breathing techniques, communication, and avoidance of numbing agents, though participants should prioritize consent, stop if uncomfortable, and consider barriers like condoms to reduce STI transmission risks. Choking or aspiration events remain uncommon without predisposing factors like impaired .

Historical Perspectives

Ancient and Pre-Modern References

Depictions of fellatio appear in , including on an red-figure dating to approximately 510 BC, which illustrates a scene involving oral stimulation of the . Erotic motifs featuring phallic imagery and sexual acts were common in Greek and , often linked to deities like , though explicit fellatio scenes were less frequent than in later . Such representations suggest fellatio was known and visually documented in classical Greek culture by the 6th century BC. In , fellatio is evidenced in Pompeian frescoes from the AD, where wall paintings in brothels and bathhouses depict men and women engaged in acts, indicating its practice in commercial and private contexts. Roman literature, including works by and , references , often portraying it as degrading or associated with prostitutes, with terms distinguishing (thrusting into the mouth) from fellatio, the latter viewed as submissive. Romans considered performing or receiving fellatio humiliating for freeborn men, associating it with loss of dominance, though it occurred among slaves and in . The , composed in around the 1st to 3rd century AD, dedicates a chapter to "aupariṣṭhaka" or mouth congress, detailing eight techniques of fellatio performed by women or third-gender individuals on men, including motions like circling, biting, and kissing the . This text treats fellatio as a refined sexual within the broader framework of (pleasure), ritualized and instructional, contrasting with prohibitions in contemporaneous Dharmasastra texts. Pre-modern European references are scarcer and typically condemnatory, as seen in 11th-century penitentials like the Corrector sive Medicus, which prescribe penances of up to two years for engaging in , implying its occurrence despite ecclesiastical opposition to non-procreative acts. Medieval Christian , influenced by Augustine and Aquinas, restricted sex to within , rendering fellatio sinful and unnatural, with sparse artistic or literary endorsements compared to antiquity.

Religious and Moral Developments

In , fellatio was positively depicted in and mythology, symbolizing and divine acts, as evidenced by artifacts showing oral-genital contact in temple reliefs and myths involving gods like and . This contrasts with Greco-Roman attitudes, where performing fellatio was often viewed as degrading and submissive, particularly for free men, associating it with slaves or prostitutes rather than moral virtue. In , the (composed around the 3rd to 4th century CE) dedicates a chapter to aupariṣṭhaka (mouth congress), detailing techniques for as a legitimate form of sexual pleasure within the kama (desire) pursuit, though some later texts like the Bhagavata Purana (c. 9th-10th century CE) condemn it as impure. Jewish , drawing from Talmudic sources, generally permits oral stimulation of the by a short of to avoid wasting seed, viewing it as non-procreative but not inherently forbidden if leading to vaginal intercourse, though some medieval authorities restricted due to purity concerns. Early Christianity, influenced by Stoic and Jewish ethics, classified non-procreative acts like fellatio as sodomitic or contrary to natural law, with Church Fathers such as Clement of Alexandria (c. 150-215 CE) and medieval theologians prohibiting climax outside vaginal union to prioritize procreation. Pope Pius XII reaffirmed this in 1951, deeming oral acts to climax gravely immoral even in marriage. In Islam, scholarly opinions diverge: many Sunni jurists deem oral sex permissible (halal) between spouses as foreplay if clean and consensual, citing lack of explicit Quranic prohibition, though others classify it as makruh (disliked) due to potential impurity from fluids. Moral developments intensified in the medieval period across Abrahamic faiths, equating fellatio with vice amid ascetic reforms, as seen in canon law's emphasis on marital debt fulfillment solely via procreative means. By the 19th-20th centuries, some Protestant and Latter-day Saint groups explicitly banned it—e.g., a 1982 LDS Church letter deeming oral sex "unnatural, impure, or unholy" for temple worthiness—reflecting Victorian prudery's fusion with religious doctrine. Contemporary shifts show persistence of prohibitions in orthodox circles alongside permissive interpretations in liberal theology, driven by reinterpretations of scriptural silence on explicit acts.

Cultural and Social Dimensions

Traditional and Religious Views

In many traditional societies, fellatio encountered taboos linked to the perceived purity of the mouth as an organ for eating and speech, rendering oral-genital contact ritually impure or degrading, particularly in African and some Asian cultures where such acts were avoided or stigmatized outside specific ritual contexts. Within Judaism, halakhic opinions vary, but medieval authorities like Rabbi Isaac Elchanan permitted oral stimulation of the penis by a wife provided ejaculation occurs only vaginally to fulfill procreative obligations, while emission into the mouth was prohibited as wasteful seed; some Rishonim extended stringencies to cunnilingus, deeming it forbidden due to direct contact with the vagina. Orthodox interpretations often restrict non-vaginal acts, with debates persisting on whether a husband performing oral sex on his wife violates Torah principles, though mutual pleasure within marriage is affirmed if aligned with ritual purity. Christian perspectives derive from biblical silence on the act, leading to interpretive diversity; evangelical sources argue it is biblically permissible within heterosexual marriage if consensual and not substitutive for intercourse, citing Song of Solomon's imagery of oral-like intimacy (e.g., "your love is better than wine" and licking motifs) as endorsement of varied marital expression, though pre-marital oral sex constitutes per 13:4's marriage-bed purity mandate. Conservative denominations emphasize mutual agreement without coercion, while some historical sects condemned it alongside for deviating from procreative norms, reflecting patristic emphases on restraint. Islamic predominantly deems fellatio makruh or within marriage due to the impurity (najis) of sexual fluids entering the mouth, as ruled by Hanafi and other schools prohibiting ingestion of mani or madhi; fatwas from Darul Iftaa affirm that oral contact with genitals risks filth transfer, rendering it unlawful, though some contemporary scholars permit non-swallowing variants if avoiding impurity, a minority view contested for lacking support. Outside marriage, it incurs penalties, with no prophetic precedent endorsing it. Hindu texts present conflicting stances: the (c. 3rd-4th century CE) dedicates a chapter to "auparishtaka" (mouth congress), detailing techniques for fellatio and as permissible for pleasure in licit unions, yet puranic sources like Srimad Bhagavatam 5.26.26 condemn such non-vaginal () acts as sinful, associating them with degradation and karmic retribution, reflecting broader dharmic prioritization of procreation over . Buddhist traditions classify fellatio as (kamesu micchacara), with tantric and texts prohibiting non-vaginal penetration of orifices like the mouth as addictive and defiling; the in 1997 explicitly deemed with one's spouse misconduct, echoing Padmasambhava's warnings against "inappropriate orifice" use, which incurs negative karma by fixating on sensory craving over detachment. ![Kama Sutra illustration depicting oral intimacy][center]

Virginity, Morality, and Gender Roles

In many contemporary Western cultural contexts, is narrowly defined as the absence of penile-vaginal intercourse, permitting fellatio—whether giving or receiving—as a form of sexual activity that does not constitute virginity loss. This technical preservation of virginity through is particularly noted among adolescents and young adults, who report using it to engage sexually while adhering to abstinence pledges focused on intercourse. Such definitions, however, vary by individual and subgroup; conservative religious interpretations often classify any premarital genital contact, including fellatio, as forfeiting due to broader prohibitions on sexual impurity. Moral evaluations of fellatio frequently intersect with religious doctrines emphasizing procreation, purity, and marital exclusivity. Major Abrahamic faiths have historically imposed taboos on , viewing it as deviating from natural intercourse oriented toward reproduction; , , and each codified restrictions, with often prohibiting it extramaritally as lustful or unnatural, deeming it outside marriage (and even within for many scholars due to ritual impurity concerns), and permitting it spousally under conditions avoiding prohibited seed emission. These stances prioritize causal linkages between sex and family formation, critiquing non-procreative acts as morally disordered, though enforcement has waned in secularized societies where personal overrides traditional . Gender roles shape fellatio's moral and social framing, with heterosexual norms casting women as primary givers to men, reinforcing expectations of female submissiveness and male dominance in sexual exchanges. Empirical from samples show men reporting higher rates of receiving fellatio than women do cunnilingus, aligning with scripts where women's performance signals relational investment or compliance. This asymmetry amplifies perceived female vulnerability, as sociocultural pressures link women's fellatio provision to emotional risks and power concessions, while men's reception faces less stigma. Historically, such roles echo pre-modern views associating oral acts with or dishonor, particularly when performed by women or lower-status individuals, though modern shifts toward mutuality challenge these without fully eroding underlying disparities. The legality of fellatio between consenting adults in private varies by , but it is permitted in most countries under frameworks prioritizing individual privacy and autonomy in sexual conduct. In liberal democracies, it is typically unregulated unless involving public exposure, minors, , or commercial exchange. Non-consensual fellatio is universally classified as a form of or in modern legal systems, with some jurisdictions—such as the —explicitly defining oral penetration as capable of constituting under statutes like the Sexual Offences Act 2003. In the United States, sodomy laws criminalizing oral sex were widespread until the Supreme Court's ruling in on June 26, 2003, which held that private consensual sexual conduct between adults violates the of the Fourteenth Amendment. The statute at issue prohibited "deviate ," defined to include oral and anal acts between persons of the same sex, but the decision effectively nullified similar laws in 13 other states and protected such conduct regardless of participants' genders. Prior to this, enforcement targeted both homosexual and heterosexual acts in states like and Georgia, though prosecutions had become rare by the late due to evolving social norms and judicial scrutiny. Public performance remains prosecutable under or laws in all states, with penalties varying by locality. Internationally, fellatio is criminalized in jurisdictions retaining broad or "unnatural offenses" statutes, often rooted in colonial-era codes or , though application to heterosexual acts is inconsistent and frequently unenforced. As of 2023, approximately 63 countries maintain laws punishing , which may encompass depending on statutory definitions, with harsher penalties in nations like ( under the ) or parts of under codes in northern states. In , of the —enacted in 1860—criminalized "carnal intercourse against the order of nature," including , until its partial for consenting adults by the in Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India on September 6, 2018. Islamic states such as and prohibit non-vaginal sexual acts under punishments for (unlawful sexual intercourse), potentially including fellatio even within marriage, with documented executions or floggings for related offenses. Commercial fellatio, as part of , faces additional restrictions: it is illegal in most U.S. states under anti-prostitution statutes, with exceptions like certain counties where licensed brothels permit it. In contrast, countries like the and regulate it within legalized sex work frameworks, requiring health checks and taxation since reforms in 2000 and 2002, respectively. Age-of-consent laws universally bar involvement of minors, with fellatio on or by those below the threshold (typically 16–18) treated as or , carrying mandatory minimum sentences in places like the U.S. federal system under 18 U.S.C. § 2243. Enforcement disparities persist, with data from sources like the U.S. Department of Justice indicating higher prosecution rates for same-sex acts historically, reflecting prior biases in legal application rather than statutory text.

Modern Controversies and Normalization

In contemporary Western societies, fellatio has undergone significant normalization, with surveys indicating widespread participation among adults. Data from the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project show that over 80% of men and 70% of women born after 1942 reported giving or receiving at some point in their lives, with these proportions remaining consistent across subsequent cohorts into the . Among adolescents aged 15-19, the National Survey of Family Growth reported that 48% of males and 45% of females had engaged in by 2006-2008, often preceding vaginal intercourse. Self-reported frequency among sexually active adults averages about five instances per month, reflecting its integration into routine intimate behaviors. This normalization correlates with broader cultural shifts, including reduced stigma in media portrayals and sex-positive discourse since the late . Historical analyses note a reversal from earlier eras, where was less prevalent than intercourse; by the 1990s, it had become more common in certain demographics, such as heterosexual white and higher-educated groups, influenced by evolving attitudes toward sexual variety. However, asymmetries persist: Canadian surveys from the 2010s found 63% of men but only 44% of women receiving fellatio, with men rating the experience more pleasurably on average. Controversies surrounding fellatio in modern contexts often center on its introduction to youth and perceived risks of premature sexualization. In the early 2000s, media-driven "fellatio scares" amplified anecdotal reports of teenage "rainbow parties"—group oral sex events—fueling parental anxieties, though empirical evidence suggested these were exaggerated urban legends rather than widespread phenomena. Sex education curricula have sparked debates, with 27% of U.S. parents in a 2000 Kaiser Family Foundation poll deeming discussions of oral sex inappropriate for schools, amid concerns over explicit content like demonstrations or terminology. Recent examples include 2023 reports of middle school lessons incorporating graphic depictions of oral and anal sex, prompting backlash from conservative groups arguing it normalizes high-risk behaviors without sufficient emphasis on abstinence or parental rights. Feminist critiques have also highlighted power dynamics, with some analyses framing fellatio as a tool of male dominance in heterosexual encounters, potentially reinforcing unequal pleasure reciprocity—studies indicate women often perform it primarily to please partners, foster intimacy, or as foreplay and reciprocity, with 78.4% citing partner pleasure as the top motivation, despite only 28% finding it very pleasurable personally, whereas women report higher enjoyment from receiving cunnilingus due to physiological ease of orgasm. For example, an Ms. Magazine survey found 80% of respondents preferred cunnilingus over performing fellatio. In non-Western or conservative subcultures, it remains stigmatized as dishonorable or lacking self-respect, clashing with globalizing media influences. These tensions underscore ongoing negotiations between empirical prevalence and normative concerns, with public health data affirming low but non-zero transmission risks for infections like HPV and gonorrhea via oral routes, though such details pertain more to physiological sections.

In Non-Human Animals

Observed Behaviors

Fellatio, defined as oral stimulation of the male genitalia, has been documented in multiple non-human species through direct observation in wild, captive, or laboratory settings. These behaviors vary in frequency, context, and participants, often occurring during or alongside copulation. Observations are primarily limited to mammals and arachnids, with rigorous documentation in bats, primates, bears, and harvestmen. In the short-nosed fruit bat (Cynopterus sphinx), females routinely perform fellatio during dorsoventral copulation by lowering their heads to lick the shaft or base of the male's . This behavior was observed in 69% of 57 recorded copulations lasting over 10 seconds, with licking durations ranging from 0.5 to over 17 seconds. A positive exists between licking time and overall copulation duration, extending it by approximately 15 seconds per second of oral contact, potentially as a to prolong intromission or influence . This marks the first non-primate species with regular fellatio documentation, observed in a study of wild-caught bats in . Among , bonobos (Pan paniscus) exhibit fellatio as part of their extensive sexual repertoire, including non-reproductive and same-sex interactions for tension reduction and social bonding. Observations include oral-genital contact between males and females or among males, though less frequent than genito-genital rubbing. Similar behaviors occur in other primates like baboons and rhesus macaques, often in affiliative or playful contexts among juveniles or adults. In captive brown bears (Ursus arctos), two orphaned males at Zagreb Zoo engaged in repeated male-male fellatio over four years, with one bear licking the other's penis to ejaculation multiple times daily. This atypical behavior, absent in non-orphaned bears at the facility, suggests long-term effects from early maternal deprivation disrupting normal development. No wild observations of ursid fellatio exist. In the harvestman arachnid , females performed fellatio by licking the male's in 44% of trials, particularly when showing reluctance to copulate, such as attempting to flee. This occurred post-copulation in some cases and correlated with reduced female risk, observed in a 2024 study of 180 trials.

Potential Functions

In short-nosed fruit bats (Cynopterus sphinx), female fellatio during dorsoventral copulation has been empirically linked to extended duration, with a positive observed: for each second of penile licking, copulation time increased by an average of 3.3 seconds across 57 recorded matings. This prolongation, from a baseline of about 13 seconds without licking to over 30 seconds with it, is hypothesized to enhance transfer by sustaining through increased penile and rigidity. Supporting data from video analysis showed licking primarily at the penis shaft or base, coinciding with intromission and thrust cycles. Alternative or complementary functions proposed for bat fellatio include penile to facilitate smoother intromission and reduce friction-induced discomfort, as well as 's antimicrobial properties potentially mitigating sexually transmitted transmission—a benefit documented in mammalian generally but untested specifically in these s. These explanations align with the ' polygynous , where males defend female groups in leaf tents, potentially favoring behaviors that maximize per-copulation insemination efficiency amid competition. Among , fellatio appears more tied to non-reproductive social roles than direct fertility enhancement. In bonobos (Pan paniscus), oral-genital stimulation, including fellatio, occurs frequently but primarily as affiliative play among juveniles or tension-reducing interactions in mixed-sex or same-sex dyads, substituting for in this female-dominant species. Observations in wild and captive groups indicate it reinforces bonds and alleviates conflict, with adults engaging less routinely than in bonding contexts like genito-genital rubbing. Similar patterns in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) suggest stress relief during captivity or resource scarcity, as seen in sanctuary males performing fellatio amid heightened arousal. In harvestmen (order , e.g., ), fellatio functions as a compensatory tactic to avert or when rejecting copulation attempts. A 2024 field study documented s licking penises post-refusal, correlating with reduced persistence and lower trauma risk, interpreted as an evolved strategy to balance mating costs in with aggressive s and no . This behavior underscores fellatio's role in modulating intersexual conflict rather than promoting insemination. Across taxa, proposed functions remain non-mutually exclusive and often speculative, with empirical support strongest for copulation prolongation in bats; broader claims like or await controlled tests, as self-reported animal motivations are inaccessible.

References

  1. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fellatio
  2. https://www.webmd.com/sex/how-to-give-blow-job
  3. https://www.yahoo.com/news/history-oral-sex-fellatios-ancient-153200784.html
  4. https://wtfarthistory.com/post/71866265277/ceramic-vessel-depicting-fellatio-moche-culture
  5. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6327665/
  6. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0255371
  7. https://www.cdc.gov/sti/about/about-sti-risk-and-oral-sex.html
  8. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8786430/
  9. https://nursing.unboundmedicine.com/nursingcentral/view/Tabers-Dictionary/745487/0/fellatio_fellation
  10. https://www.betterhealth.vic.gov.au/health/healthyliving/Oral-sex
  11. https://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/fellatio
  12. https://www.webmd.com/sex/what-is-oral-sex
  13. https://www.dictionary.com/browse/fellatio
  14. https://www.etymonline.com/word/fellatio
  15. https://www.oed.com/dictionary/fellatio_n
  16. https://www.mensxp.com/health/sexual-health/93794-erogenous-zones-for-males.html
  17. https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/erogenous-zones
  18. https://teachmeanatomy.info/pelvis/the-male-reproductive-system/penis/
  19. https://www.hims.com/blog/erogenous-zones
  20. https://www.healthline.com/health/healthy-sex/erogenous-zones
  21. https://english.elpais.com/society/2023-05-12/is-saliva-a-good-lubricant-myths-about-sex-debunked-by-science.html
  22. https://lubeology.com/in-defense-of-saliva-a-hot-take-on-the-use-of-saliva-for-lube/
  23. https://www.quora.com/Human-Physiology-How-is-saliva-production-affected-during-arousal
  24. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10851294/
  25. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7356224/
  26. https://www.everydayhealth.com/sexual-health/the-male-orgasm.aspx
  27. https://open.oregonstate.education/anatomy2e/chapter/physiology-arousal-orgasm/
  28. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1521690X0700036X
  29. https://www.science.org/content/article/little-fellatio-goes-long-way
  30. https://www.medicaldaily.com/oral-sex-going-down-evolutionary-roots-386318
  31. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10429105/
  32. https://www.animalbehaviorandcognition.org/uploads/journals/3/13.Pham_Shackelford_FINAL.pdf
  33. https://www.psypost.org/researchers-explore-the-evolutionary-roots-of-cunnilingus/
  34. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-handbook-of-evolutionary-perspectives-on-sexual-psychology/female-provision-of-oral-sex/044FF02429219880668CC48E1C688495
  35. https://www.healthline.com/health/healthy-sex/oral-sex
  36. https://badgirlsbible.com/blowjob-techniques
  37. https://www.masterclass.com/articles/oral-sex-guide
  38. https://sense.info/en/sex/sex-techniques/fellatio
  39. https://www.lelo.com/blog/boys-girls-guide-giving-great-head-part-1/
  40. https://badgirlsbible.com/how-to-avoid-using-teeth-during-a-blow-job
  41. https://www.annsummers.com/content-hub/better-sex/blowjob-guide.html
  42. https://japanesesexterms.com/2024/11/14/70-words-for-blowjob-handjob-titjob-and-footjob-in-japanese/
  43. https://www.healthline.com/health/healthy-sex/how-to-give-a-blowjob
  44. https://vixencreations.com/products/leo
  45. https://www.squarepegtoys.com/product/the-slim/
  46. https://siliconenozzles.com/collections/deep-throat-training-62
  47. https://www.reddit.com/r/SexToys/comments/acbq8s/need_a_squishy_silicone_dildo_for_a_beginner/
  48. https://www.cosmopolitan.com/uk/love-sex/sex/a20880929/blowjob-positions-men-like/
  49. https://blog.kinkly.com/8-steps-to-giving-a-great-blow-job/
  50. https://www.mindbodygreen.com/articles/oral-sex-positions
  51. https://bestsexpositions.com/11-blowjob-positions/
  52. https://www.healthline.com/health/healthy-sex/how-to-deep-throat
  53. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8356189/
  54. https://badgirlsbible.com/blowjob-positions
  55. https://www.jordangrayconsulting.com/sexiest-positions-for-blowjobs/
  56. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/body/semen
  57. https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/swallowing-semen
  58. https://www.news-medical.net/health/Semen-Physiology.aspx
  59. https://www.webmd.com/sex-relationships/how-many-nutrients-are-in-semen
  60. https://www.sfcityclinic.org/faq/spit-or-swallow-does-it-affect-sti-risk
  61. https://www.healthline.com/health/healthy-sex/swallowing-semen
  62. https://www.menshealth.com/sex-women/a36716318/spit-or-swallow-blowjob/
  63. https://www.news-medical.net/health/Swallowing-Semen.aspx
  64. https://www.ashasexualhealth.org/oral-sex-stis/
  65. https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/oral-sex-std-risk-chart
  66. https://www.evvy.com/blog/odds-of-getting-std-from-oral
  67. https://ihpi.umich.edu/news/better-education-needed-about-oral-sex-disease-risk-poll-young-people-shows
  68. https://www.cdc.gov/std/treatment-guidelines/STI-Guidelines-2021.pdf
  69. https://www.womensclinicofatlanta.com/can-oral-sex-cause-an-sti/
  70. https://www.jwatch.org/ac200301010000006/2003/01/01/assessing-transmission-risk-fellatio
  71. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/rr/rr7004a1.htm
  72. https://www.aidsmap.com/news/dec-2008/oral-sex-risk-very-low-not-zero-concludes-systematic-review
  73. https://www.natap.org/2002/Dec/121902_1.htm
  74. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/sexually-transmitted-infections-%28stis%29
  75. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2840968/
  76. https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/hpv/oropharyngeal-cancer.html
  77. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4956823/
  78. https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/news/newsroom/news-releases/2021/01/behaviors-surrounding-oral-sex-may-increase-hpv-related-cancer-risk
  79. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10078185/
  80. https://www.hpvworld.com/articulos/oral-hpv-transmission-and-oropharyngeal-cancer/
  81. https://ecancer.org/en/news/19411-timing-and-intensity-of-oral-sex-may-affect-risk-of-oropharyngeal-cancer
  82. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26372414/
  83. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1877782115001745
  84. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10978235/
  85. https://www.foxchase.org/blog/can-i-really-get-throat-cancer-oral-sex-michael-douglas-says-so
  86. https://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12916-022-02233-3
  87. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26107371/
  88. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jebm.12159
  89. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1743609515340959
  90. https://sph.umich.edu/pursuit/2019posts/hpv-head-and-neck-cancer-010419.html
  91. https://www.moffitt.org/newsroom/news-releases/moffitt-study-reveals-insights-into-oral-hpv-incidence-and-risks-in-men-across-3-countries/
  92. https://tmj.org/living-with-tmj/stigmas-and-related-topics/intimacy/
  93. https://www.tmjplus.com/the-effects-of-tmj-on-relationships/
  94. https://www.aafp.org/pubs/afp/issues/2023/0100/temporomandibular-disorders.html
  95. https://www.issm.info/sexual-health-headlines/jaw-disorders-and-their-effect-on-sexual-health
  96. https://www.health.harvard.edu/staying-healthy/does-your-face-need-a-workout
  97. https://www.healthline.com/health/facial-exercises-are-they-bogus
  98. https://www.healthline.com/health/healthy-sex/semen-allergy
  99. https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/semen-allergy
  100. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6424187/
  101. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12049024/
  102. https://www.webmd.com/lung/what-is-aspiration
  103. https://listverse.com/2019/10/18/10-shocking-pieces-of-erotic-art-from-the-ancient-world/
  104. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24369184/
  105. https://www.ancient-origins.net/artifacts-other-artifacts/erotic-art-ancient-greece-and-rome-009652
  106. https://factsanddetails.com/world/cat56/sub369/entry-6316.html
  107. https://talesoftimesforgotten.com/2022/01/18/shocking-taboo-sex-in-ancient-greece-and-rome/
  108. https://www.maxim.com/maxim-man/history-of-blowjobs-2016-5/
  109. https://www.salon.com/2000/05/22/oral_history/
  110. https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/f6u1ks/did_people_do_blowjobs_in_the_medieval_times/
  111. https://english.elpais.com/culture/2022-11-15/everything-you-always-wanted-to-know-about-medieval-sex-but-were-afraid-to-ask.html
  112. https://www.salon.com/2023/01/29/ancient-egyptians-were-so-into-oral-sex-they-put-it-in-their-religion-and-religious-art/
  113. https://www.wisdomlib.org/hinduism/essay/kamashastra-study/d/doc1474532.html
  114. https://sacred-texts.com/sex/kama/kama209.htm
  115. https://hinduism.stackexchange.com/questions/39829/is-oral-sex-forbidden-or-is-a-sin-in-hinduism
  116. https://utj.org/viewpoints/responsa/is-oral-sex-permitted/
  117. https://ph.yhb.org.il/en/14-02-19/
  118. https://www.catechism.cc/articles/church-teaching-oral-sex.htm
  119. https://islam.stackexchange.com/questions/29771/is-it-halal-to-have-oral-sex-with-the-spouse
  120. https://rabaah.com/oral-sex-in-islam-according-to-sunni-scholars.html
  121. https://www.byzcath.org/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/424848/question-on-the-morality-of-sex
  122. https://www.mormonmarriages.com/blog/whats-the-churchs-standard-regarding-oral-sex
  123. https://soh.church/what-does-the-bible-say-about-oral-sex/
  124. https://www.desiringgod.org/interviews/is-oral-sex-okay
  125. https://www.gotquestions.org/Bible-oral-sex.html
  126. http://www.todayschristianwoman.com/articles/2008/september/7m2055.html
  127. https://daruliftaa.com/nikah-marriage/the-issue-of-oral-sex/
  128. https://www.amjaonline.org/fatwa/en/83467/please-reconsider-your-fatwa-permitting-oral-sex
  129. https://islamqa.info/en/answers/2487
  130. https://metro.co.uk/2018/12/14/how-do-buddhists-have-sex-8249020/
  131. https://www.reddit.com/r/Buddhism/comments/d16jut/why_did_padmasambhava_say_that_oral_and_anal_sex/
  132. https://tricycle.org/beginners/buddhism/third-precept/
  133. https://www.sheknows.com/parenting/articles/953393/teen-talk-does-oral-sex-count/
  134. https://www.plannedparenthood.org/blog/is-a-person-still-a-virgin-if-they-have-oral-sex
  135. http://socioguide.blogspot.com/2015/05/sociology-of-sexuality-virginity.html
  136. https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3068&context=dissertations
  137. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23311908.2017.1418643
  138. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321977226_Perception_of_vulnerability_in_young_females%27_experiences_of_oral_sex_Findings_from_the_focus_group_discussions
  139. https://www.oyez.org/cases/2002/02-102
  140. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/539/558/
  141. https://lambdalegal.org/case/lawrence-v-texas/
  142. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/lawrence_v._texas
  143. https://antigaylaws.org/all-countries-alphabetical/
  144. https://www.humandignitytrust.org/lgbt-the-law/map-of-criminalisation/
  145. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr056.pdf
  146. https://bespokesurgical.com/2020/03/09/oral-sex-in-america/
  147. https://slate.com/technology/2008/05/was-oral-sex-always-normal.html
  148. https://reason.com/2006/05/05/the-great-fellatio-scare-2/
  149. https://www.kff.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/sex-education-in-america-summary.pdf
  150. https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/you-wont-believe-what-these-extremists-teaching-your-kids-about-sex
  151. https://www.csus.edu/faculty/m/fred.molitor/docs/gender%20and%20oral%20sex.pdf
  152. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/strictly-casual/201602/how-pleasurable-is-oral-sex-hookup-partners
  153. https://msmagazine.com/2012/04/09/is-fellatio-finished/
  154. https://www.reddit.com/r/psychoanalysis/comments/1ad0aya/oral_sex_is_considered_dishonorable_in_my_culture/
  155. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9377381/
  156. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2762080/
  157. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24899532/
  158. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-77209-9
  159. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19862320/
  160. https://www.psychologytoday.com/au/blog/animal-emotions/201404/can-evolutionary-biology-tell-us-whats-kinky
  161. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/bonobos-use-sex-to-cool-tempers/
  162. https://www.livescience.com/46364-brown-bears-caught-performing-oral-sex.html
  163. https://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/thoughtful-animal/does-oral-sex-confer-an-evolutionary-advantage-evidence-from-bats/
  164. https://primate.wisc.edu/primate-info-net/pin-factsheets/pin-factsheet-bonobo/
  165. https://brill.com/view/journals/beh/158/1/article-p77_6.xml
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.