Hubbry Logo
ChemotaxonomyChemotaxonomyMain
Open search
Chemotaxonomy
Community hub
Chemotaxonomy
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Chemotaxonomy
Chemotaxonomy
Chemotaxonomy
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Merriam-Webster defines chemotaxonomy as the method of biological classification based on similarities and dissimilarity in the structure of certain compounds among the organisms being classified. Advocates argue that, as proteins are more closely controlled by genes and less subjected to natural selection than the anatomical features, they are more reliable indicators of genetic relationships. The compounds studied most are proteins, amino acids, nucleic acids, peptides etc.

Physiology is the study of working of organs in a living being. Since working of the organs involves chemicals of the body, these compounds are called biochemical evidences. The study of morphological change has shown that there are changes in the structure of animals which result in evolution. When changes take place in the structure of a living organism, they will naturally be accompanied by changes in the physiological or biochemical processes.

John Griffith Vaughan and Victor Plouvier were among the pioneers of chemotaxonomy.

Biochemical products

[edit]

The body of any animal in the animal kingdom is made up of a number of chemicals. Of these, only a few biochemical products have been taken into consideration to derive evidence for evolution.

  1. Protoplasm: Every living cell, from a bacterium to an elephant, from grasses to the blue whale, has protoplasm. Though the complexity and constituents of the protoplasm increases from lower to higher living organism, the basic compound is always the protoplasm. Evolutionary significance: From this evidence, it is clear that all living things have a common origin point or a common ancestor, which in turn had protoplasm. Its complexity increased due to changes in the mode of life and habitat.
  2. Nucleic acids: DNA and RNA are the two types of nucleic acids present in all living organisms. They are present in the chromosomes. The structure of these acids has been found to be similar in all animals. DNA always has two chains forming a double helix, and each chain is made up of nucleotides. Each nucleotide has a pentose sugar, a phosphate group, and nitrogenous bases like adenine, guanine, cytosine, and thymine. RNA contains uracil instead of thymine. It has been proved in the laboratory that a single strand of DNA of one species can match with the other strand from another species. If the alleles of the strands of any two species are close, then it can be concluded that these two species are more closely related.
  3. Digestive enzymes are chemical compounds that help in digestion. Proteins are always digested by a particular type of enzymes like pepsin, trypsin, etc., in all animals from a single celled amoeba to a human being. The complexity in the composition of these enzymes increases from lower to higher organisms but are fundamentally the same. Likewise, carbohydrates are always digested by amylase, and fats by lipase.
  4. End products of digestion: Irrespective of the type of animal, the end products of protein, carbohydrates and fats are amino acids, simple sugars, and fatty acids respectively. It can thus be comfortably concluded that the similarity of the end products is due to common ancestry.
  5. Hormones are secretions from ductless glands called the endocrine glands like the thyroid, pituitary, adrenal, etc. Their chemical nature is the same in all animals. For example, thyroxine is secreted from the thyroid gland, irrespective of what the animal is. It is used to control metabolism in all animals. If a human being is deficient in thyroxine, it is not mandatory that this hormone should be supplemented from another human being. It can be extracted from any mammal and injected into humans for normal metabolism to take place. Likewise, insulin is secreted from the pancreas.
    If the thyroid gland from a tadpole is removed and replaced with a bovine thyroid gland, normal metabolism will take place and the tadpole will metamorphose into a frog. As there is a fundamental relationship among these animals, such exchange of hormones or glands is possible.
  6. Nitrogenous Excretory Products: Mainly three types of nitrogenous waste is excreted by living organisms; ammonia is a characteristics of aquatic life form, urea is formed by the land and water dwellers, uric acid is excreted by terrestrial life forms. A frog, in its tadpole stage excretes ammonia just like a fish. When it turns into an adult frog and moves to land, it excretes urea instead of ammonia. Thus an aquatic ancestry to land animal is established.
    A chick on up to its fifth day of development excretes ammonia; from its 5th to 9th day, urea; and thereafter, uric acid. Based on these findings, Baldwin sought a biochemical recapitulation in the development of vertebrates with reference to nitrogenous excretory products.
  7. Phosphagens are energy reservoirs of animals. They are present in the muscles. They supply energy for the synthesis of ATP. Generally, there are two types of phosphagens in animals, phosphoarginine (PA) in invertebrates and phosphocreatine (PC) in vertebrates. Among the echinoderms and prochordates, some have PA and others PC. Only a few have both PA and PC. Biochemically, these two groups are related. This is the most basic proof that the first chordate animals should have been derived only from echinoderm-like ancestors.
  8. Body fluid of animals: When the body fluids of both aquatic and terrestrial animals are analyzed, it shows that they resemble sea water in their ionic composition. There is ample evidence that primitive members of most of the phyla lived in the sea in Paleozoic times. It is clear that the first life appeared only in the sea and then evolved onto land. A further point of interest is that the body fluids of most animals contain less magnesium and more potassium than the water of the present-day ocean. In the past, the ocean contained less magnesium and more potassium. Animals' bodies accumulated more of these minerals due to the structure of DNA, and this characteristic remains so today. When the first life forms appeared in the sea, they acquired the composition of the contemporary sea water, and retained it even after their evolution onto land, as it was a favorable trait.
  9. Opsins: In the vertebrates, vision is controlled by two very distinct types of opsins, porphyropsin and rhodopsin. They are present in the rods of the retina. Fresh water fishes have porphyropsin; marine ones and land vertebrates have rhodopsin. In amphibians, a tadpole living in fresh water has porphyropsin, and the adult frog, which lives on land most of the time, has rhodopsin. In catadromous fish, which migrate from fresh water to the sea, the porphyropsin is replaced by rhodopsin. In an anadromous fish, which migrates from the sea to freshwater, the rhodopsin is replaced by porphyropsin. These examples show the freshwater origin of vertebrates. They then deviated into two lines, one leading to marine life and the other to terrestrial life.
  10. Serological evidence: In recent years,[when?] experiments made in the composition of blood offer good evidence for evolution. It has been found that blood can be transmitted only between animals that are closely related. The degree of relationship between these animals is determined by what is known as the serological evidence. There are various methods of doing so; the method employed by George Nuttall is called the precipitation method. In this method, anti-serum of the involved animals has to be prepared. For human study, human blood is collected and allowed to clot. Then, the serum is separated from the erythrocytes. A rabbit is then injected with a small amount of serum at regular intervals, which is allowed to incubate for a few days. This forms antibodies in the rabbit's body. The rabbit's blood is then drawn and clotted. The serum separated from the red blood cells is called the anti-human serum.

When such a serum is treated with that of blood of monkeys or apes, a clear white precipitate is formed. When the serum is treated with the blood of any other animal like dogs, cats, or cows, no precipitate appears. It can thus be concluded that humans are more closely related to monkeys and apes. As a result, it has been determined that lizards are closely related to snakes, horses to donkeys, dogs to cats, etc. This systematic position of Limulus was controversial for a long time, but has been found to show that human serum is more closely related to arachnids than to crustaceans.

The field of biochemistry has greatly developed since Darwin's time, and this serological study is one of the most recent pieces of evidence of evolution. A number of biochemical products like nucleic acids, enzymes, hormones and phosphagens clearly show the relationship of all life forms. The composition of body fluid has shown that the first life originated in the oceans. The presence of nitrogenous waste products reveal the aquatic ancestry of vertebrates, and the nature of visual pigments points out the fresh water ancestry of land vertebrates. Serological tests indicate relationships within these animal phyla.

Paleontology

[edit]

When only fragments of fossils, or some biomarkers remain in a rock or oil deposit, the class of organisms that produced it can often be determined using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy[1]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Chemotaxonomy

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Chemotaxonomy is a subdiscipline of that classifies organisms, particularly and microorganisms, based on their chemical constituents, especially secondary metabolites such as alkaloids, , terpenoids, and , which serve as biochemical markers to infer evolutionary relationships and phylogenetic affinities. This approach complements traditional morphological and molecular methods by revealing chemical similarities and differences that may not be evident through physical traits alone, enabling more precise delineation and identification. The principles of chemotaxonomy rest on the assumption that closely related organisms share conserved biosynthetic pathways, resulting in similar chemical profiles that reflect their genetic heritage and evolutionary history. Originating in the mid-20th century, the field gained prominence in the with pioneering studies on secondary metabolites, such as those by Alston and colleagues, who demonstrated the taxonomic utility of chemical variation in distinguishing . Over time, advances in have integrated chemotaxonomy into polyphasic , combining it with genomic and proteomic data to enhance classification accuracy across kingdoms, including higher like those in the and families, as well as through analysis of components and . Key methods in chemotaxonomy include chromatographic techniques such as (HPLC) for quantifying and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) for identifying volatile s, alongside spectroscopic tools like (NMR) and Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy for structural elucidation. These techniques facilitate the creation of chemical fingerprints, often analyzed via statistical methods like (PCA) to group taxa based on patterns. Applications extend to medicinal plant authentication, where chemotaxonomy prevents adulteration by verifying species identity through unique profiles, supports biodiversity conservation by clarifying taxonomic ambiguities, and aids in by linking chemical diversity to pharmacological potential. In microbial , it has been instrumental in delineating genera and species of Actinobacteria by examining isoprenoid quinones and compositions. Despite challenges like environmental influences on variability, ongoing integration with and promises to refine its role in modern .

Definition and Principles

Definition

Chemotaxonomy is the and identification of organisms based on similarities and differences in their chemical constituents, particularly secondary metabolites such as alkaloids, , and terpenoids. This approach primarily targets but extends to microbes, animals, and fossils, where chemical profiles reveal phylogenetic relationships. Chemotaxonomy focuses on natural chemical profiles for taxonomic purposes, unlike , which emphasizes the extraction and evaluation of medicinal compounds from natural sources. Chemotaxonomy, also known as chemosystematics, integrates chemical data with evolutionary relationships to refine classifications. The term was coined in the mid-20th century, deriving from "chemo-" (chemical) and "" (classification). It complements by providing biochemical data alongside quantitative analyses of morphological traits.

Underlying Principles

Chemotaxonomy is based on the observation that closely related organisms tend to share similar chemical constituents due to common evolutionary origins and conserved biosynthetic processes. This principle underscores that variations in secondary metabolites often mirror phylogenetic relationships, providing a biochemical basis for that complements morphological data. For instance, taxa exhibiting analogous chemical profiles are likely to share ancestry, as these compounds arise from inherited genetic mechanisms rather than environmental influences alone. Central to this approach are biosynthetic pathways, which serve as reliable markers because the enzymes and genes governing compound production are typically conserved within taxonomic groups. These pathways, such as those for isoprenoids in , produce secondary metabolites that are taxonomically restricted, reflecting evolutionary divergence and convergence. The specificity of these pathways allows chemotaxonomists to infer relationships by tracing the distribution of pathway-derived compounds across lineages, where shared intermediates or end products indicate close relatedness. For example, in the family, distinct biosynthetic routes correlate directly with tribal phylogenies derived from molecular data. Chemical markers operate hierarchically in classification, with finer distinctions at lower taxonomic levels and broader patterns at higher ones. At the genus level, specific compounds like certain alkaloids may delimit boundaries, while at the family level, classes such as terpenoids provide overarching signatures that unite diverse genera. This tiered utility enables chemotaxonomy to resolve ambiguities in traditional systems by aligning chemical distributions with evolutionary hierarchies. Integration with further strengthens chemotaxonomy by incorporating chemical data as character states to support monophyletic groupings. In analyses, the presence or absence of particular metabolites traces evolutionary transitions, reinforcing hypotheses of when chemical profiles align with molecular phylogenies. This synergy helps validate monophyletic clades, as conserved biosynthetic traits often delineate branches in phylogenetic trees, enhancing the robustness of taxonomic revisions.

History

Early Foundations

The foundations of chemotaxonomy originated in the 19th century, when botanists began incorporating chemical variations into plant classification to complement morphological approaches. Augustin Pyramus de Candolle, a pioneering taxonomist, emphasized in his 1816 work the role of chemical properties in identifying plants for medicinal and industrial uses, foreshadowing their systematic application in taxonomy. These early efforts highlighted how biochemical differences, such as the presence of specific exudates, could reveal relationships obscured by physical traits alone. By the , prior to the formal adoption of the term "chemotaxonomy," initial applications focused on secondary metabolites like essential oils and resins to differentiate closely related , as exemplified in R. D. Gibbs's comparative studies that demonstrated their utility in systematic . These chemical investigations emerged partly in response to limitations in cytology and morphology, where ambiguous traits in hybrid or convergent taxa necessitated additional biochemical evidence to clarify evolutionary relationships and refine classifications.

Modern Developments

The formalization of chemotaxonomy as a distinct occurred in 1963 with the publication of Biochemical Systematics by Richard E. Alston and Billie L. Turner, which synthesized chemical data with systematic principles to support phylogenetic classifications. This work emphasized the role of secondary metabolites as reliable markers for resolving taxonomic ambiguities, marking a shift from chemical observations to a structured methodological framework. During the and , chemotaxonomy began integrating with emerging techniques, such as DNA hybridization, to complement chemical profiles in . Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), developed in this era, enabled precise analysis of volatile compounds, enhancing chemotaxonomic resolution in families like the Leguminosae. These interdisciplinary approaches addressed limitations of purely morphological or chemical methods, fostering hybrid datasets for evolutionary inference. From the onward, the rise of revolutionized chemotaxonomy by enabling comprehensive profiling of small molecules across biological systems, building on advances in analytical technologies like and . This era saw applied to systematic studies, where large-scale datasets revealed phylogenetic patterns previously undetectable, such as in pathways. Key events included the coining of "" in the late , which expanded chemotaxonomic tools to include untargeted screening of entire metabolomes for taxonomic delimitation. In the 2000s, chemotaxonomy advanced in microbial through lipid profiling, particularly using phospholipid (PLFA) analysis to differentiate bacterial lineages based on membrane lipid compositions. These methods gained prominence in environmental , where lipid biomarkers supported community structure assessments in diverse ecosystems. The 2010s witnessed milestones in for chemotaxonomy, particularly in fungal classification using volatile organic compounds (VOCs), with () enabling rapid, non-invasive profiling of emissions. Studies demonstrated species-specific VOC patterns across fungal clades, such as sesquiterpenes in endophytic species, aiding trophic mode predictions and phylogenetic alignments. Automated extraction protocols for fungal specimens further scaled metabolite discovery, integrating volatiles into multi-omics frameworks for precise identification. Recent milestones through 2025 include the development of micro- and nanoengineered devices for rapid chemotaxonomic authentication of , leveraging high-throughput sensors to detect signature metabolites like non-proteogenic . These advances, combined with integrated morphological-chemotaxonomic-molecular approaches, have enhanced resolution in complex taxa, such as in biodiversity hotspots. Paleontological extensions of these methods briefly apply biomarkers to records for ancient microbial reconstructions.

Biochemical Markers

Types of Chemical Compounds

Chemotaxonomy relies on both primary and secondary metabolites as biochemical markers to delineate taxonomic relationships among organisms. Primary metabolites, essential for basic cellular functions and growth, include proteins, , and , which serve as stable basal indicators of phylogenetic proximity. For instance, storage proteins in , such as globulins and albumins, exhibit conserved patterns across related taxa, reflecting evolutionary conservation in biosynthetic pathways. Secondary metabolites, not directly involved in growth but often taxon-specific, provide finer resolution for classification due to their diverse chemical structures and restricted distributions. Alkaloids, nitrogen-containing compounds, are prominent markers; tropane alkaloids, for example, characterize the family, occurring in genera like and Atropa, and aiding in tribal delineations within the order . , polyphenolic compounds, similarly show family-level specificity; anthocyanins, responsible for pigmentation, predominate in species, with cyanidin derivatives serving as diagnostic traits in genera such as and . Terpenoids, derived from units, include monoterpenes that define the family, where compounds like and 1,8-cineole occur abundantly in essential oils of genera such as and , supporting subfamilial classifications. Distribution patterns of these compounds often align with taxonomic boundaries, enhancing chemotaxonomic utility. Iridoids, cyclopentanoid monoterpenes, exemplify taxon-specific occurrence, being widespread in the family across genera like and , where they function as glycosides and delineate subfamilies like . This specificity arises from conserved biosynthetic pathways, such as the mevalonate route, which limits compound production to certain lineages. Volatile compounds further extend chemotaxonomy to non-plant organisms, including and microbes. Essential oils, rich in terpenoids and phenolics, mark plant families like and , while pheromones—such as terpene-based aggregation signals in bark beetles—aid in order and family distinctions; in microbes, volatile fatty acids differentiate bacterial genera in .

Selection and Use of Markers

In chemotaxonomy, the selection of biochemical markers is guided by several key criteria to ensure their reliability in taxonomic classifications. Markers must exhibit stability, being primarily under genetic control rather than influenced by environmental factors, which allows for consistent expression across populations of a . Heritability is another essential attribute, as it confirms that the chemical traits are passed down through generations and can serve as reliable indicators of evolutionary relationships. Additionally, diagnostic value is paramount, requiring markers to be unique or characteristic to specific taxa, enabling clear differentiation from closely related groups. These selected markers play a crucial role in phylogenetic reconstruction by functioning as synapomorphies—shared derived characters that define clades. For instance, the presence or absence of specific compounds, such as certain alkaloids in lineages, can be plotted on cladograms to infer evolutionary branching patterns. This approach treats chemical traits analogously to morphological ones, providing evidence for monophyletic groups when corroborated across multiple taxa. Chemotaxonomic analyses often distinguish between qualitative and quantitative uses of markers to address different levels of taxonomic resolution. Qualitative assessments focus on the presence or absence of compounds, which is particularly useful for higher-level classifications, while quantitative approaches examine ratios or concentrations of compounds to detect infraspecific variation, such as in delineation. For example, variations in the ratio of lactones within species can reveal subtle genetic differences. To enhance robustness, chemical markers are integrated with other data types in numerical taxonomy through character weighting schemes. Chemical characters may be assigned weights based on their stability and diagnostic power relative to morphological or molecular data, allowing for multivariate analyses that produce more accurate dendrograms. This integration ensures that chemotaxonomic evidence contributes proportionally to overall systematic conclusions without overshadowing other lines of evidence.

Methods and Techniques

Sample Collection and Preparation

Sample collection in chemotaxonomy requires careful strategies to ensure representativeness and minimize variability in chemical profiles, which can be influenced by environmental factors, developmental stages, and . For studies, specimens are typically harvested at specific maturity stages, such as fully expanded leaves or flowering periods, to standardize content across samples. specimens, including dried duplicates, are deposited in herbaria for verification and future reference, as demonstrated in analyses of species where samples from multiple Chinese provinces were collected and archived at the China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences. In microbial chemotaxonomy, such as for Actinobacteria, biomass is harvested from standardized culture media like at phases to capture consistent cellular compositions. Multiple replicates per , often two or more, are gathered from diverse but controlled sources to account for intraspecific variation. Preservation methods aim to halt enzymatic degradation and preserve chemical integrity without introducing artifacts. Common approaches include shock-freezing in followed by storage at -80°C, which effectively quenches metabolic activity in fresh plant tissues like leaves. Freeze-drying or air-drying is preferred for long-term storage of materials, as seen in grass pollen studies where specimens from the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, were acetone-washed and air-dried to remove surface contaminants while maintaining stability. For field collections, silica gel drying facilitates rapid preservation during transport, preventing oxidation in heat-sensitive samples. Solvent fixation, such as immersion, is occasionally used for immediate halting of reactions but is less common due to potential solvent interactions with target compounds. Extraction techniques are tailored to the class of biochemical markers, ensuring efficient isolation of secondary metabolites like alkaloids, terpenoids, or sugars for subsequent analysis. Solvent-based methods predominate, with methanol-water mixtures (e.g., 75:25 v/v acidified with ) employed for polar compounds via ultrasonication or homogenization, as in the preparation of samples where 1 g of pulverized material was extracted with 25 mL for 30 minutes. For volatiles, isolates essential oils without thermal degradation, while non-polar may require chloroform-methanol-water partitions. In microbial applications, whole-cell with (e.g., 0.25 N at 121°C for 15 minutes) releases sugars for derivatization with 1-phenyl-3-methyl-5-pyrazolone prior to analysis. These steps prepare extracts that lead directly into chromatographic techniques for metabolite profiling. Quality control measures are essential to avoid and ensure across samples. Tools and workspaces are sterilized, and samples are handled with gloves to prevent exogenous chemicals from altering profiles; for instance, background subtraction in spectroscopic preparations mitigates atmospheric interference. involves processing replicates in triplicate, calculating relative standard deviations (typically <5% for key markers), and incorporating internal standards during extraction to normalize for recovery efficiency. Pooled samples are routinely included to monitor batch variability, aligning with guidelines for robust chemotaxonomic data.

Analytical Methods

Analytical methods in chemotaxonomy involve a suite of laboratory techniques designed to detect, separate, and identify chemical markers, such as secondary metabolites, , and proteins, from biological samples following appropriate . These methods enable the of biochemical profiles that support taxonomic , with chromatographic and spectroscopic approaches forming the cornerstone of analysis. , including extraction and purification, serves as a prerequisite to ensure compatibility with these techniques. Chromatographic methods are widely employed for the initial screening and detailed separation of compounds in chemotaxonomic studies. (TLC), often in its high-performance variant (HPTLC), is utilized for rapid, qualitative screening of polar lipids, fatty acids, sugars, and other markers due to its simplicity, low cost, and ability to handle multiple samples simultaneously. For instance, two-dimensional TLC on plates has been applied to separate polar lipids in Actinobacteria, revealing diagnostic patterns for genus-level identification. (HPLC), with detectors like diode array or pulsed amperometric detection, provides higher resolution for quantitative separation of non-volatile compounds, such as in or carbohydrates in berry fruit seeds, achieving separation efficiencies that support precise quantification. (GC) excels in analyzing volatile and semi-volatile compounds, including terpenoids in and fatty acids in microbial samples, offering high sensitivity for trace-level detection in essential oils and products. Spectroscopic techniques complement chromatography by providing structural information essential for marker identification. (MS) determines molecular weights and fragmentation patterns, facilitating the structural elucidation of complex metabolites like alkaloids or peptides in and microbial taxa. (NMR) spectroscopy, particularly 1H and 2D-NMR variants, offers detailed insights into molecular structures through analysis, enabling the confirmation of terpenoids or in herbal extracts with high specificity and non-destructive profiling. These methods are often selected based on sample complexity, with MS favored for sensitivity and NMR for comprehensive elucidation in chemotaxonomic authentication. Hyphenated techniques integrate separation and detection for enhanced profiling accuracy. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) couples GC separation with MS identification, ideal for volatile markers such as thymol in Thymus species, providing high-throughput analysis of essential oil compositions. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) similarly combines HPLC or ultra-performance LC (UPLC) with MS, enabling the detection of non-volatile compounds like capsaicinoids in Capsicum, with improved resolution for polar metabolites. These approaches generate comprehensive chemical fingerprints, reducing ambiguity in marker assignment. Recent advances through 2025 have incorporated platforms, such as ultra-performance liquid chromatography quadrupole (UPLC-QTOF-MS), which deliver high-resolution, untargeted profiling of entire metabolomes in taxa like Aster , identifying up to 67 compounds per sample for robust chemotaxonomic differentiation. This integration with enhances the scalability and precision of analyses, addressing previous limitations in throughput and structural coverage.

Data Analysis and Interpretation

Data analysis in chemotaxonomy involves processing quantitative and qualitative chemical profiles—such as concentrations or presence/absence matrices derived from analytical techniques—to reveal patterns of variation among taxa and infer evolutionary relationships. Chemometric tools are essential for handling the high-dimensionality of these datasets, enabling the identification of biochemical markers that correlate with taxonomic boundaries. These methods transform raw spectral or chromatographic data into interpretable structures, such as plots or dendrograms, to support hypotheses about delimitation and phylogeny. Principal component analysis (PCA) is a widely used unsupervised technique for visualizing patterns in chemotaxonomic data by reducing multidimensional datasets to principal components that capture the largest variance. In PCA, chemical variables like metabolite concentrations are autoscaled and projected onto a lower-dimensional space, allowing researchers to observe clustering of samples by species or genus without prior assumptions about group membership. For instance, PCA applied to cannabinoid profiles in Cannabis strains has revealed distinct chemotypes aligned with genetic lineages, demonstrating its utility in resolving intraspecific diversity. Similarly, in the Celastraceae family, PCA of triterpenoid distributions highlighted intergeneric relationships. This approach aids in detecting outliers or environmental influences on chemical variation, providing a foundation for further taxonomic refinement. Cluster analysis complements PCA by grouping taxa based on chemical similarities, often using hierarchical methods like Ward's algorithm or unweighted pair-group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) to generate dendrograms that reflect taxonomic hierarchies. These techniques partition datasets into clusters where intra-cluster chemical resemblance exceeds inter-cluster differences, facilitating the recognition of natural groupings. In Hawaiian Anthurium cultivars, hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) of phenolic compounds separated commercial standards from ornamental variants, corroborating morphological classifications with chemical evidence. For microbial chemotaxonomy, such as in Alternaria fungi, k-means clustering on mass spectrometry data identified metabolite signatures defining species complexes, enhancing resolution beyond traditional morphology. Cluster validation often involves silhouette scores or cophenetic correlation to ensure robust groupings. Similarity indices quantify the overlap between chemical profiles of taxa, particularly for binary presence/absence data, supporting distance-based clustering or ordination. The Jaccard coefficient, defined as the ratio of shared compounds to total unique compounds (J = |A ∩ B| / |A ∪ B|), measures set similarity without weighting absences, making it suitable for sparse chemotaxonomic matrices. The Dice coefficient, a related metric (D = 2|A ∩ B| / (|A| + |B|)), emphasizes shared presences and is less sensitive to unequal sampling. In species, clustering using the Jaccard coefficient delineated five taxa based on and phenolic patterns, aligning with anatomical data. For subfamilies, Dice-based similarity analysis confirmed chemical congruence with classical . These indices are foundational for constructing distance matrices in broader phylogenetic contexts. Integrating chemical data into phylogenetic analysis treats compounds as discrete characters or continuous traits to construct evolutionary trees, bridging chemotaxonomy with molecular systematics. Distance methods, such as on similarity matrices, generate trees where branch lengths reflect chemical divergence, useful for initial hypothesis testing. Parsimony approaches, implemented via software like PAUP*, seek trees minimizing evolutionary changes (steps) in chemical character states, assuming compounds evolve via gains or losses. In fungi, parsimony analysis integrating molecular and chemotaxonomic data resolved ordinal relationships, with consistency indices validating tree robustness. This integration tests whether chemical evolution follows phylogenetic signal, often quantified by permutation tests for character independence. Specialized software facilitates these analyses, with MVSP (Multi-Variate Statistical Package) offering user-friendly tools for PCA, , and construction on chemotaxonomic matrices. In Astragalus studies, MVSP's Ward linkage method grouped ecotypes by Rf values, supporting infraspecific taxonomy. Open-source R packages extend capabilities for large datasets; ChemoSpec handles spectral alignment, PCA, and HCA for metabolite profiles, while ade4 supports multivariate ordination like for presence/absence data. These tools, often integrated with pipelines, enable reproducible workflows, such as autoscaling via prcomp() in base followed by factoextra for visualization. Adoption of such software has democratized chemotaxonomic inference, allowing integration with genomic data for hybrid phylogenies.

Applications

In Systematic Classification

Chemotaxonomy plays a pivotal role in resolving taxonomic uncertainties at the species level, particularly in distinguishing hybrids and cryptic species that exhibit morphological similarity but differ in their profiles. In the family, lactones (STLs) have been instrumental in identifying hybrid origins and novel chemical variants. For instance, hybrids between Helianthus annuus and H. petiolaris produce up to 19% novel STLs not present in parental species, enabling differentiation of hybrid lineages through qualitative and quantitative chemical analysis. Similarly, chemical fingerprinting via (HPLC) and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) has revealed distinct and profiles in morphologically cryptic species, supporting their delimitation as separate taxa despite overlapping appearances. At the family and genus levels, flavonoids serve as reliable markers to support or challenge existing classifications within systematic hierarchies. In , over 800 flavonoid compounds across 4,700 occurrences have been cataloged, demonstrating consistent patterns that align with tribal and generic boundaries, such as the prevalence of 6-hydroxyflavones in certain subtribes. These distributions have refuted some proposed genera by highlighting chemical discontinuities, while reinforcing in others through shared patterns. Such evidence from flavonoid chemotaxonomy provides a biochemical layer to morphological and anatomical data, aiding in the refinement of higher-level plant phylogenies. Infrageneric variation is often manifested as intraspecific chemotypes, representing chemical races within a species that reflect ecotypic adaptations or genetic diversity. These chemotypes, defined by variations in secondary metabolites like terpenoids or phenolics, allow for the recognition of subpopulations without morphological divergence; for example, in Thymus vulgaris, GC-MS analysis identifies distinct essential oil profiles corresponding to geographic or environmental isolates. This approach elucidates hidden biodiversity and supports delimitation of subspecies or varieties in systematic classification. Chemotaxonomic complements by addressing limitations in molecular phylogenies, such as incomplete resolution in recent divergences or hybridization events. Integrating metabolite profiles with markers like rbcL and matK enhances , filling gaps where genetic alone fails to capture phenotypic or ecological distinctions. Parallel applications in microbial , using or protein profiles, underscore chemotaxonomy's broader utility in resolving taxonomic hierarchies across kingdoms.

In Paleontology

In paleontology, chemotaxonomy relies on fossilized chemical biomarkers, such as , steranes, and hopanes, which serve as molecular proxies for identifying ancient taxa and reconstructing evolutionary relationships. Steranes, derived from eukaryotic sterols, and hopanes, from bacterial , are particularly valuable in sedimentary rocks, where they indicate the presence of early microbial communities. For instance, C27 and C29 steranes in 1.64 billion-year-old Barney Creek Formation shales suggest algal contributions, with algal sterols preserved as these biomarkers providing evidence for eukaryotic diversification before the . These compounds withstand geological alteration, allowing paleontologists to infer taxonomic affiliations even in the absence of morphological fossils. Applications of these biomarkers extend to distinguishing extinct plant lineages, notably through terpenoid analysis in Carboniferous amber deposits dating to approximately 320 million years ago. In Illinois Basin coal seams, Class Ic amber exhibits polylabdanoid structures and biomarkers like calitrisate, characteristic of pre-conifer gymnosperms such as medullosan pteridosperms, highlighting early resin-producing capabilities in these taxa before the dominance of modern . Such chemical signatures enable differentiation of gymnosperm groups in amber inclusions, offering insights into paleoecological roles and biosynthetic pathways analogous to those in contemporary . Techniques like pyrolysis-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (Py-GC-MS) are essential for analyzing insoluble organic matter, such as , in paleontological samples. This method thermally degrades macromolecular s to release bound biomarkers, revealing s and hydrocarbons from otherwise intractable residues in shales and cherts. Evolutionary insights from chemotaxonomy include tracing angiosperm origins through chemical signatures in sediments around 100 million years ago. Aliphatic and aromatic biomarkers, such as oleanane and ursane derivatives, in Japanese and angiosperm s indicate the radiation of flowering plants, correlating with morphological evidence of their diversification during the . These signatures, preserved in leaf compressions and coals, provide timelines for angiosperm and , supplementing records with molecular evidence of their rise to ecological prominence.

In Medicinal Plant Identification

Chemotaxonomy serves as a vital tool in authenticating medicinal plants by generating chemical fingerprints that reveal unique secondary metabolite profiles, enabling the detection of adulteration and substitution in herbal products. This approach ensures the safety and efficacy of treatments derived from these plants, particularly in global markets where misidentification can compromise therapeutic outcomes. For instance, in Panax ginseng, ginsenosides act as key chemotaxonomic markers, distinguishable via high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS), allowing differentiation from common adulterants such as Panax quinquefolius. Such methods have identified adulteration rates as high as 24% in commercial ginseng products, often involving non-root parts or unrelated species, underscoring the need for routine chemotaxonomic verification. In , chemotaxonomy guides the targeted screening of related within taxonomic groups to uncover novel bioactive compounds, leveraging shared biosynthetic pathways for efficiency. A prominent example is the family, where taxonomic classification directed the collection of bark from in the 1960s, leading to the isolation of (Taxol), a diterpenoid with potent anti-cancer activity against , ovarian, and cancers. Subsequent chemotaxonomic analyses using chromatographic fingerprints and have mapped distributions across , facilitating the identification of analogs like and supporting sustainable sourcing from related taxa. Standardization of herbal medicines relies on chemotaxonomic principles through the selection of characteristic marker compounds that reflect species-specific chemical profiles, as outlined in (WHO) guidelines. These markers, such as or terpenoids unique to particular genera or families, must be analytically quantifiable using techniques like (TLC) or HPLC to verify identity, purity, and potency in formulations. By incorporating such profiles, WHO standards promote consistent , reducing variability due to environmental or harvesting factors while aligning with pharmacopoeial requirements for global trade. Recent advancements in the 2020s have integrated with chemotaxonomy for enhanced in traditional systems like , where plant variability poses challenges to standardization. Metabolomic approaches, employing untargeted LC-MS profiling, have enabled comprehensive mapping of bioactive metabolites in Ayurvedic herbs, identifying adulterants and optimizing extraction for formulations such as . These techniques support evidence-based , thereby advancing sustainable practices.

Case Studies

Plant Chemotaxonomy Examples

In the family, tropane alkaloids serve as key chemotaxonomic markers for distinguishing genera, with notable differences in composition and abundance between Atropa and . Atropa species, such as Atropa belladonna, predominantly accumulate alongside , reflecting their medicinal significance and Eurasian distribution. In contrast, species like exhibit higher proportions of relative to , correlating with their psychoactive properties and broader global spread. These variations in alkaloid profiles have facilitated genus-level classifications within the tribe Datureae. Within the Rutaceae family, coumarins and limonoids provide critical evidence for resolving subfamilial relationships, particularly in the , which encompasses taxa. Limonoids such as limonin and obacunone are ubiquitous in seeds and hybrids, with limonin typically dominating over deacetylnomilin, while related genera like Poncirus, Microcitrus, and Fortunella share similar profiles. Coumarins, including isopimpinellin in Aeglopsis chevalieri and in Cneoridium dumosum, further delineate tribal boundaries and support the taxonomic alignment of these compounds across subfamilies. Their biosynthetic consistency has reinforced classifications in , aiding in the distinction of subfamilies like from Rutoideae. Pyrrolizidine alkaloids () have played a pivotal role in the chemotaxonomy of , enabling refinements to generic and subfamilial boundaries through their structural diversity and distribution patterns. These alkaloids, featuring necine bases like heliotridine and retronecine in mono- or diester forms, occur across nearly all genera, serving as reliable markers for species delimitation and phylogenetic inference. Studies from the to , building on earlier surveys, integrated PA profiles to support taxonomic revisions, such as segregating genera like and Cynoglossum based on alkaloid esterification variations. This chemical evidence complemented morphological data, leading to updated classifications that resolved ambiguities in the family's .

Microbial Chemotaxonomy Examples

In bacterial chemotaxonomy, (FAME) profiles serve as key markers for classifying Actinobacteria, a phylum encompassing diverse genera like and , where specific compositions, such as branched-chain and iso/anteiso acids, distinguish phylogenetic groups. For instance, gas chromatography-based FAME analysis has enabled the identification of novel Actinobacteria isolates by correlating patterns with 16S rRNA sequences, revealing genus-specific signatures like high levels of C16:0 and C18:1ω9c in species. A prominent example is the genus within Actinobacteria, where mycolic acids—long-chain, α-branched β-hydroxy s unique to mycobacteria—provide robust chemotaxonomic resolution; (HPLC) of mycolic acid derivatives differentiates over 100 species based on chain length, functional groups (e.g., α-, methoxy-, and keto-mycolates), and distribution patterns. Fungal chemotaxonomy often relies on secondary metabolites, particularly polyketides, to delineate within genera like , which produce over 300 such compounds influencing taxonomy and ecology. Polyketide synthases generate structurally diverse metabolites like and sterigmatocystins, whose profiles via liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) differentiate Aspergillus sections, such as Flavi (aflatoxin producers) from Nidulantes (non-producers), aiding in resolving cryptic species complexes. In and related pathogens, polyketide-derived gliotoxins exhibit species-specific production patterns, with quantitative confirming their role in distinguishing invasive isolates from environmental strains through unique biosynthetic expressions. Algal classification employs as lineage tracers, with exemplifying chemotaxonomic utility in (Phaeophyceae), a group within the eukaryotic Chromalveolata supergroup. , an allenic absent in but dominant in (up to 70% of total ), correlates with photosynthetic adaptations and phylogenetic placement, as confirmed by pigment profiling via HPLC that links its presence to evolution alongside diatoms and haptophytes. This carotenoid's from via epoxidation and allenic bond formation traces eukaryotic algal divergences, with quantitative variations (e.g., higher in Laminariales orders) supporting suprageneric classifications in marine ecosystems. In clinical diagnostics during the 2020s, biomarkers from microbial chemotaxonomy have advanced identification, particularly for via mycolic acids detected in or serum using , targeting species-specific mycolate clusters. Similarly, (VOC) profiling via gas chromatography- has enabled non-invasive breath-based diagnosis of invasive in immunocompromised patients, correlating signatures with PCR-confirmed infections. These approaches integrate chemotaxonomic markers into point-of-care tools, enhancing rapid differentiation of bacterial and fungal s from contaminants.

Limitations and Future Directions

Challenges and Limitations

One major challenge in chemotaxonomy is environmental plasticity, where chemical profiles exhibit significant variation due to external factors such as soil composition, , altitude, and seasonal changes, often the genetic signals intended for taxonomic . This intraspecific variability in secondary metabolites can lead to misidentification, as ecological stresses like or herbivory induce shifts in compound production that mimic interspecific differences. For instance, in like those in the genus , environmental influences alter the accumulation of biomarkers such as , complicating reliable chemotaxonomic markers. Ontogenetic changes further complicate chemotaxonomic applications, as chemical compositions are highly dependent on the developmental stage, age, or tissue maturity of the organism, necessitating standardized sampling protocols to ensure comparability. In many plant , secondary metabolite profiles evolve predictably with growth phases—for example, defensive compounds like iridoids in increase from seedling to mature stages, independent of growth-defense trade-offs. Similarly, in Piper , ontogenetic shifts activate distinct biosynthetic pathways, resulting in divergent chemical signatures across life stages that can obscure phylogenetic relationships if not accounted for. These age-related variations demand rigorous control in sample collection, yet inconsistencies in timing often undermine the reproducibility of chemotaxonomic studies. Data comparability remains a persistent limitation due to the absence of comprehensive, universal databases for chemical traits, which hinders cross-study integration and broad taxonomic applications. Without standardized repositories that catalog profiles across taxa, researchers face difficulties in validating chemotaxonomic hypotheses or scaling analyses to higher taxonomic levels, as existing collections are often fragmented or technique-specific. This gap is particularly acute in microbial chemotaxonomy, where incomplete reference datasets exacerbate challenges in linking chemical data to phylogenetic frameworks. Efforts to build such databases are ongoing, but current incompleteness limits the field's ability to achieve consensus on chemical markers. Finally, the cost and accessibility of high-tech analytical methods pose substantial barriers, restricting chemotaxonomy's application in resource-limited settings like biodiversity hotspots. Techniques such as (HPLC), gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), and (NMR) require expensive equipment and skilled personnel, making them impractical for fieldwork in remote or underfunded regions. In megadiverse areas, such as tropical forests, this inaccessibility delays the documentation of chemical diversity, perpetuating knowledge gaps in conservation and . While portable alternatives are emerging, their adoption remains limited by ongoing infrastructural and financial constraints. Recent advancements in chemotaxonomy are increasingly incorporating multi-omics integration, combining with and to provide a more holistic understanding of systematic relationships. This approach links genetic, protein, and profiles to elucidate biosynthetic pathways and evolutionary patterns in organisms, particularly , enhancing taxonomic beyond traditional morphological or single-omics methods. For instance, pairing transcriptomics with data allows for the identification of gene- associations in specialized , supporting chemotaxonomic delineation of and chemotypes across phylogenetic groups. Statistical and machine learning-based integration strategies, such as weighted analysis (WGCNA) and multi-omics (MOFA), have been applied to datasets from like , revealing integrated molecular mechanisms that refine taxonomic boundaries and aid in biodiversity conservation. Artificial intelligence (AI) and (ML) are transforming chemotaxonomy through predictive modeling of chemical and automated discovery. Neural networks and other ML algorithms, including support vector machines (SVM) and random forests, analyze profiles to taxa with high accuracy, as demonstrated in studies on Angiosperms using sulfur-containing compounds for chemoinformatic . These models predict metabolic system by reconstructing ancestral content and forecasting pathway divergences, enabling the anticipation of chemical diversity in uncharacterized lineages. In the 2020s, composite ML frameworks have streamlined taxonomical , identifying for and evolutionary with reduced computational overhead. Non-invasive techniques, particularly portable mass spectrometry (MS), are enabling real-time field-based chemotaxonomy, minimizing sample destruction and expanding applications in remote or biodiverse environments. Miniaturized MS systems integrated with microfluidic devices detect secondary metabolites like and terpenoids directly from plant tissues, supporting rapid authentication of medicinal species without extensive preparation. Complementary non-invasive methods, such as (SERS) nanosensors, provide spectral fingerprints for on-site profiling, enhancing portability and accuracy in herbal market surveillance and conservation efforts. Global initiatives are fostering collaborative through expanded databases like the Natural Products Magnetic Resonance Database (NP-MRD), which in significantly updated its holdings to over 281,000 compounds and 5.5 million NMR spectra. These enhancements, including improved submission tools and predictive spectral calculations, facilitate dereplication and structure elucidation of natural products, directly supporting chemotaxonomic research by standardizing chemical taxonomy data across international communities. Such resources promote integrative analyses, accelerating discoveries in systematic biology and sustainable utilization of .

References

  1. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12299962/
  2. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1319610322000588
  3. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10772130/
  4. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.142.3592.545
  5. https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/49255
  6. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14142234
  7. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/chemotaxonomy
  8. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/chemotaxonomy
  9. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/370784576_An_Updated_Review_on_Taxonomy_and_Chemotaxonomy
  10. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/003466677690052X
  11. https://www.dictionary.com/browse/chemotaxonomy
  12. https://www.biologydiscussion.com/living-organism/taxonomy-living-organism/branches-of-taxonomy-4-branches/44591
  13. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.142.3592.545
  14. https://www.plantsjournal.com/archives/2016/vol4issue3/PartB/4-2-17.pdf
  15. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12031440/
  16. https://jcheminf.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13321-023-00778-w
  17. https://www.scielo.br/j/qn/a/hGCHFnJ6kKRHYC6nrFZxnRD/?lang=en
  18. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3499480/
  19. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0031942207004335
  20. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/6074390_ChemInform_Abstract_The_Evolution_of_Chemosystematics
  21. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165993623003126
  22. https://www.mdpi.com/2218-1989/4/3/699
  23. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8386160/
  24. https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/74291/j.1574-6968.2000.tb09207.x.pdf%3Bsequence=1
  25. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/analytical-geomicrobiology/lipid-biomarkers-in-geomicrobiology-analytical-techniques-and-applications/2243532182D1466A8CF84A75903958D8
  26. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7835917/
  27. https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-021-02198-8
  28. https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/15/7/4526
  29. https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/15/12/899
  30. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/397110488_Advances_in_plant_taxonomy_integrating_morphological_chemotaxonomic_molecular_and_phylogenetic_approach
  31. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/chemotaxonomy
  32. https://www.biologydiscussion.com/plant-taxonomy/chemotaxonomy-meaning-stages-and-significance/30483
  33. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10746874/
  34. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031942299004756
  35. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0031942216300681
  36. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/11896686_Flavonoids_as_chemotaxonomic_markers_for_Asteraceae
  37. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11207455/
  38. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330863758_Phytochemistry_Chemotaxonomy_Ethnopharmacology_and_Nutraceutics_of_Lamiaceae
  39. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0031942288870304
  40. https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/20/7/13422
  41. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/230547790_Essential_oil_components_as_pheromones_A_review
  42. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6723273/
  43. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1878614612001043
  44. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9590267/
  45. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0026265X19319423
  46. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-31120-2
  47. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1934578X0800300617
  48. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jf502187c
  49. https://profils-profiles.science.gc.ca/en/publication/chemotaxonomic-profiling-canadian-alternaria-populations-using-high-resolution-mass
  50. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11525320/
  51. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/eb74/a0957bc71e6b053453cb6bf818eacc0bb39a.pdf
  52. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11557-006-0124-6
  53. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222970801_Chemotaxonomic_analysis_of_Astragalus_caprinus_Fabaceae_based_on_the_flavonic_patterns
  54. https://cran.r-project.org/package=ChemoSpec
  55. https://bsapubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2307/2656824
  56. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0305197801000333
  57. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-65136-6_5
  58. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0146638025001275
  59. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0146638010000756
  60. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235423863_Aliphatic_and_aromatic_terpenoid_biomarkers_in_Cretaceous_and_Paleogene_angiosperm_fossils_from_Japan
  61. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/pharmacology/articles/10.3389/fphar.2020.612071/full
  62. https://www.cancer.gov/research/progress/discovery/taxol
  63. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/5365078_Chemotaxonomic_Study_of_Medicinal_Taxus_Species_with_Fingerprint_and_Multivariate_Analysis
  64. https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/medicines/norms-and-standards/guidelines/quality-control/trs1003-annex1-marker-substances-herbal-medicine-quality-control.pdf
  65. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/394434489_Metabolomics-Driven_Standardization_of_Herbal_Medicine_Advances_Applications_and_Sustainability_Considerations
  66. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/12569214_Chemotaxonomy_and_geographical_distribution_of_tropane_alkaloids
  67. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0305197806000391
  68. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031942200821500
  69. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286422105_Limonoids_and_the_Chemotaxonomy_of_Citrus_and_the_Rutaceae_Family
  70. https://www.mdpi.com/1424-2818/6/2/188
  71. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0305197818301911
  72. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4711186/
  73. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5725476/
  74. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC88994/
  75. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4290622/
  76. https://microbialcellfactories.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1475-2859-8-24
  77. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3131562/
  78. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2203708119
  79. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4311178/
  80. https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nph.15020
  81. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0031-9422(00)00411-8
  82. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3364714/
  83. https://bsapubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.3732/ajb.94.1.56
  84. https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/10/6/1085
  85. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10886-005-7100-5
  86. https://academic.oup.com/sysbio/article/69/6/1231/5820981
  87. https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/14/14/2234
  88. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989421004595
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.