Hubbry Logo
ChindiansChindiansMain
Open search
Chindians
Community hub
Chindians
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Chindians
Chindians
Chindians
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Chindian (Hindi: चीनी-भारतीय; Chinese: 中印人; pinyin: Zhōngyìnrén; Cantonese Yale: Jūngyanyàn; Tamil: சிந்தியன்; Telugu: చిండియన్స్); is an informal term used to refer to a person of mixed Chinese and Indian ancestry; i.e. from any of the host of ethnic groups native to modern China and modern India. There are a considerable number of Chindians in Malaysia and Singapore. In Maritime Southeast Asia, people of Chinese and Indian origins immigrated in large numbers during the 19th and 20th centuries.[1] There are also a sizeable number living in Hong Kong and smaller numbers in other countries with large overseas Chinese and Indian diaspora, such as Jamaica, Martinique, Trinidad and Tobago, Suriname and Guyana in the Caribbean, as well as the United States, Canada, United Kingdom, Australia, New Zealand and also in Mauritius.

Key Information

Etymology

[edit]

The term "Chindian" is a portmanteau for both "Chinese" and "Indian" people.[2]

Countries

[edit]

China

[edit]
Main article: Indians in China

There are around 45,000–48,000 Indian nationals/expatriates living in mainland China as of 2015.[3]

Hong Kong

[edit]

25,000 of the Muslims in Hong Kong trace their roots back to what is now Pakistan. Around half of them belong to 'local boy' families, Muslims of mixed Chinese (Tanka) and Indian/Pakistani ancestry, descended from early Indian/Pakistani male immigrants who took local Chinese wives and brought their children up as Muslims and many remained there after the handover from Britain to China in 1997 as part of the SAR.[4][5] These "local Indians" were not completely accepted by either the Chinese or Indian communities.[6]

India

[edit]
See also: Chinese Indians

There are tiny communities of Chinese who migrated to India during the British Raj and became naturalised citizens of India and there are 189,000 estimated total ethnic Chinese of Chindian or full Chinese ancestry.[7] The community living in Kolkata numbers around 4,000 and 400 families in Mumbai, where there are Chinatowns.[7][8][9][10] Chinese Indians also contributed to the development of fusion Indian Chinese cuisine (Chindian cuisine),[11] which is now an integral part of the Indian culinary scene.[12]

There are an estimated 5,000–7,000 Chinese expatriates living in India as of 2015, having doubled in number in recent years.[13] Most work on 2 to 3 year contracts for the growing number of Chinese brands and companies doing business in India.[13]

British India

[edit]

During the British Raj, some Chinese "convicts"[clarification needed] deported from the Straits Settlements were sent to be jailed in Madras in India. The "Madras district gazetteers, Volume 1" reported an incident where the Chinese convicts escaped and killed the police sent to apprehend them: "Much of the building work was done by Chinese convicts sent to the Madras jails from the Straits Settlements (where there was no sufficient prison accommodation) and more than once these people escaped from the temporary buildings' in which they were confined at Lovedale. In 186^ seven of them got away and it was several days before they were apprehended by the Tahsildar, aided by Badagas sent out in all directions to search. On 28 July in the following year twelve others broke out during a very stormy night and parties of armed police were sent out to scour the hills for them. They were at last arrested in Malabar a fortnight later. Some police weapons were found in their possession and one of the parties of police had disappeared—an ominous coincidence. Search was made all over the country for the party and at length, on 15 September, their four bodies were found lying in the jungle at Walaghát, half way down the Sispára ghát path, neatly laid out in a row with their severed heads carefully placed on their shoulders. It turned out that the wily Chinamen, on being overtaken, had at first pretended to surrender and had then suddenly attacked the police and killed them with their own weapons."[14][15][16] Other Chinese convicts in Madras who were released from jail then settled in the Nilgiri mountains near Naduvattam and married Tamil Paraiyan women, having mixed Chinese-Tamil children with them. They were documented by Edgar Thurston.[17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] Paraiyan is also anglicised as "pariah".

Edgar Thurston described the colony of the Chinese men with their Tamil pariah wives and children: "Halting in the course of a recent anthropological expedition on the western side of the Nilgiri plateau, in the midst of the Government Cinchona plantations, I came across a small settlement of Chinese, who have squatted for some years on the slopes of the hills between Naduvatam and Gudalur and developed, as the result of ' marriage ' with Tamil pariah women, into a colony, earning an honest livelihood by growing vegetables, cultivating coffee on a small scale and adding to their income from these sources by the economic products of the cow. An ambassador was sent to this miniature Chinese Court with a suggestion that the men should, in return for monies, present themselves before me with a view to their measurements being recorded. The reply which came back was in its way racially characteristic as between Hindus and Chinese. In the case of the former, permission to make use of their bodies for the purposes of research depends essentially on a pecuniary transaction, on a scale varying from two to eight annas. The Chinese, on the other hand, though poor, sent a courteous message to the effect that they did not require payment in money, but would be perfectly happy if I would give them, as a memento, copies of their photographs."[28][29] Thurston further describe a specific family: "The father was a typical Chinaman, whose only grievance was that, in the process of conversion to Christianity, he had been obliged to 'cut him tail off.' The mother was a typical Tamil Pariah of dusky hue. The colour of the children was more closely allied to the yellowish tint of the father than to the dark tint of the mother and the semimongol parentage was betrayed in the slant eyes, flat nose and (in one case) conspicuously prominent cheek-bones."[30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] Thurston's description of the Chinese-Tamil families were cited by others, one mentioned "an instance mating between a Chinese male with a Tamil Pariah female"[39][40][41][42][43] A 1959 book described attempts made to find out what happened to the colony of mixed Chinese and Tamils.[44]

According to Alabaster there were lard manufacturers and shoemakers in addition to carpenters. Running tanneries and working with leather was traditionally not considered a respectable profession among caste Hindus and work was relegated to lower caste muchis and chamars. There was a high demand, however, for high quality leather goods in colonial India, one that the Chinese were able to fulfill. Alabaster also mentions licensed opium dens run by native Chinese and a Cheena Bazaar where contraband was readily available. Opium, however, was not illegal until after India's Independence from Great Britain in 1947. Immigration continued unabated through the turn of the century and during World War I partly due to political upheavals in China such as the First and Second Opium Wars, First Sino-Japanese War and the Boxer Rebellion. Around the time of the First World War, the first Chinese-owned tanneries sprang up.[45]

In Assam, local Assamese women married Chinese migrants during British colonial times. It later became hard to physically differentiate Chinese in Assam from locals during the time of their internment during the 1962 war, as the majority of these Chinese in Assam were mixed.[46]

Singapore

[edit]

According to Singapore's 2017 inter-ethnic marriage statistics, unions between Indians and Chinese formed a notable share of mixed marriages, though they ranked lower compared to other combinations. Under the Women's Charter marriages (which cover most civil marriages), Indian grooms marrying Chinese brides accounted for 5% of all inter-ethnic marriages (themselves accounting for one in five of all marriages), placing them among the top five most common pairings. In comparison, Caucasian grooms marrying Chinese brides represented a larger share at 13.2%, indicating that Chinese women were more likely to intermarry with Caucasian men than with Indian men despite Caucasians being in lesser numbers.[47]

The government of Singapore classifies them as their father's ethnicity. Singapore only began to allow mixed-race persons to register two racial classifications on their identity cards in 2010. Parents may choose which of the two is listed first.[48] More than two races may not be listed even if the person has several different ethnicities in their ancestry.

Malaysia

[edit]

In Malaysia, the offspring of such marriages are informally known as "Chindian". The Malaysian government, however, considers them to be an unclassified ethnicity, using the father's ethnicity as the informal term. As the majority of these intermarriages usually involve an Indian male and Chinese female, the majority of Chindian offspring in Malaysia are usually classified as "Malaysian Indian" by the Malaysian government.[49]

Guyana

[edit]

In Guyana, Chinese men married Indian women due to the lack of Chinese women in the early days of settlement.[50] Creole relationships and unions between Chinese and Indians were rare in the beginning,[51] though it became less so later on as some Chinese men established relationships and intermarried with Indian women due to the scarcity of Chinese women. There were selective instances where Chinese men took their Indian wives back with them to China.[52] Indian women and children were brought alongside Indian men as coolies while Chinese men made up 99% of Chinese coolies.[53]

There are few accounts of unions and marriages between the Chinese and the Indians in Guyana. An account of the era told by women in British Guiana is of a single Chinese man who was allowed to temporarily borrow a Hindu Indian woman by her Indian husband who was his friend, so the Chinese man could sire a child with her, after a son was born to her the Chinese man kept the boy while she was returned to her Indian husband, the boy was named William Adrian Lee.[54] An Indian woman named Mary See married a Chinese man surnamed Wu in Goedverwagting and founded their own family after he learned how to process sugar cane. [54]

The contrast with the female to male ratio among Indian and Chinese immigrants has been compared by historians.[55]

In Guyana, while marriages between Indian women and black African men is socially shameful to Indians, Chinese-Indian marriages are considered acceptable as reported by Joseph Nevadomsky in 1983.[56] "Chiney-dougla" is the Indian Guyanese term for mixed Chinese-Indian children.[57] Some Indian women in Guyana practiced polyandry within their community due to the extreme shortage of women compared to men.[58]

In British Guiana, the Chinese did not maintain their distinctive physical features due to the high rate of Chinese men marrying people other ethnicities like Indian women.[59][60][61] The severe imbalance with Indian men outnumbering Indian women led some women to take advantage of the situation to squeeze favors from men and leave their partners for other men,[62] one infamous example was a pretty, light skinned, Christian Indian woman named Mary Ilandun with ancestral origins from Madras, born in 1846, who had relations with Indian, black, and Chinese men as she married them in succession and ran off with their money to her next paramour, doing this from 1868 to 1884.[63] Indian men used force to bring Indian women back in line from this kind of behavior, such as infamous "wife murders".[64] The most severe lack of women in all the peoples of British Guiana was with the Chinese and this led Europeans to believe that Chinese did not engage in wife murders while wife murders was something innate to Indian men. Chinese women were viewed as more chaste than their Indian counterparts.[65] Chinese women were not indentured and since they did not need to work, they avoided prospective men seeking relationships, while the character of Indian women was disparaged as immoral and their alleged sexual immorality was blamed for their deaths in the "wife murders" by Indian men.[66] The sex ratio of Indian men to Indian women was 100:63 while the sex ratio of Chinese men to Chinese women was 100:43 in British Guiana in 1891.[67]

In British Guiana there was growth of coolie Indian women marriages with Chinese men and it was reported that "It is not an uncommon thing to find a cooly woman living with a Chinaman as his wife, and in one or two instances the woman has accompanied her reputed husband to China." by Dr. Comins in 1891 and an 1892 Immigration British Guiana authorities took note of marriages between Indian women and Chinese men that year.[68][69]

Jamaica

[edit]

When black and Indian women had children with Chinese men the children were called chaina raial in Jamaican English.[70] The Chinese community in Jamaica was able to consolidate because an openness to marrying Indian women was present in the Chinese since Chinese women were in short supply.[71] Polyandry was rare among the Indian population in Jamaica according to Verene A. Shepherd.[72] The small number of Indian women were fought over between Indian men and led to a rise in the amount of wife murders by Indian men.[73] Indian women made up 11 percent of the annual amount of Indian indentured migrants from 1845 to 1847 in Jamaica.[74]

Mauritius

[edit]

In the late 19th to early 20th century, Chinese men in Mauritius married Indian women due to both a lack of Chinese women and higher numbers of Indian women on the island.[75][76] During the early days of migration the prospect of relations with Indian women was unappealing to the male dominated Chinese coolies. Though they eventually had to establish civil unions and marriages with Indian women due to. the lack of Chinese women in Mauritius.[77] The 1921 census in Mauritius counted that Indian women there had a total of 148 children sired by Chinese men.[78][79] While the majority of the Chinese migrants to Mauritius were coolies, who engaged in labour-intensive roles, some of them were traders.[80] Colonialist stereotypes in the sugar colonies of Indians emerged such as the "coolie wife beater" and "degraded coolie woan", due to instances of Indian women being murdered by their husbands after they ran away to other richer men since the ratio of Indian women to men was low.[81] Both the Chinese and Indian communities were largely endogamous. Intermarriage between people of different Chinese and Indian language groups is rare; it is so rare that the cases of intermarriage between Cantonese and Hakka can be individually named. Hakka Chinese, who came after Cantonese and Fujian Chinese, were less likely to marry Indians.[82]

Trinidad

[edit]

The situation in Trinidad and British Guiana with Indian women being fewer than Indian men led to Indian women using the situation to their advantage by leaving their partners for other men, leading to a high incidence of "wife murders" by Indian men on their wives, and Indian women and culture were branded as "immoral" by European observers, an Indian Muslim man named Mohammad Orfy petitioned as a representative of "destitute Indian men of Trinidad", to the colonial authorities, complaining of Indian women's behavior and claiming that it was "a perforating plague...the high percentage of immoral lives led by the female section of our community...to satisfy the greed and lust of the male section of quite a different race to theirs...[Indian women] are enticed, seduced and frightened into becoming concubines, and paramours...[Indian women] have absolutely no knowledge whatsoever of the value of being in virginhood...most shameless and a perfect menace to the Indian gentry." with him naming specific peoples, claiming that Indian women were having relationships with men of various races, including Chinese, Africans, Americans, and Europeans.[83][84][85][86][87] Saying "Africans, Americans and Chinese in goodly numbers are enticing the females of India, who are more or less subtle to lustful traps augured through some fear of punishment being meted out if not readily submissive as requested."[88][89][90]

The situation on Trinidad enabled unprecedented autonomy in the sexual activities of Hindu and Muslim Indian women and freedom.[91] The 1916 "Peition of Indentured Labourers in Trinidad" complained that: "Is it permissible for a male member of the Christian faith to keep a Hindoo or Muslim female as his paramour or concubine? Is this not an act of sacrilege and a disgraceful scandal according to the Christian faith to entice and encourage Indian females to lead immoral lives?"[91]

There were instances where plantations managers and overseers had intimate relations with indentured woman.[92] According to Attorney General W.F. Haynes Smith, Indian indentured women in marital or civil unions with men of different races, English, Portuguese, and Chinese. Unions between Indian men and Creole women were rare, as the Indian men viewed creole women negatively.[93][94] Approval of interracial marriage has increased in Trinidad and Tobago and one Chinese man reported that his Indian wife did not encounter any rejection from his parents when asked in a survey.[95] In Trinidad Europeans and Chinese are seen as acceptable marriage partners for Indian women by Indian families while marrying black men would lead to rejection of their daughters by Indian families.[96]

Martinique

[edit]

As a result, some plantation owners imported workers from India and China after the abolishment of slavery in 1848 by the French national convention, with Chindians become citizens of France.

Notable people

[edit]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Chindians

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Chindians, also known as Sino-Indians, are individuals of mixed Chinese and Indian ancestry, forming a biethnic minority primarily in where the informal term originated to describe offspring of intermarriages between these groups. This community emerged from the large-scale immigration of Chinese and Indian laborers to during the 19th and 20th centuries, which brought together diverse ethnic populations under colonial economic demands for and rubber plantations. Between 2003 and 2010, official records indicate 6,509 such births in , though the total population remains small and not separately enumerated in national censuses due to patrilineal ethnic classification policies that assign identity based on the father's . Chindians typically exhibit a hybrid , adhering to customs from both heritages—such as celebrating and Deepavali—while often prioritizing English as their primary language of communication, with fluency in Malay and varying proficiency in heritage tongues like Mandarin, , or Tamil. Religiously, most follow the father's faith, though a notable minority practice elements of both or identify outside traditional categories, reflecting the group's fluid self-conception. A defining characteristic is the tension between this multifaceted identity and Malaysia's rigid ethnic framework, which enforces monoethnic labeling on birth certificates and influences access to policies favoring Bumiputera status; consequently, many Chindians report situational or multiethnic self-identification, situational adaptation in social contexts, or even rejection of ethnic labels in favor of a broader Malaysian . This dynamic has fostered ongoing discussions on ethnic construction, with empirical studies highlighting how influences, peer , and public policies shape identity development amid Malaysia's emphasis on .

Terminology

Definition and Etymology

Chindians are biethnic individuals of mixed Chinese and Indian ancestry, typically offspring of one parent from an ethnic Chinese background and one from an ethnic Indian background. The term is most commonly applied in Southeast Asian contexts, such as , where such unions have produced distinct communities navigating dual cultural heritages. The word "Chindian" (sometimes pluralized as "Chindians") originated as a portmanteau blending "Chinese" and "Indian", reflecting the hybrid ethnic identity it denotes. This informal gained local traction in by the early , as documented in linguistic and sociological studies of mixed-heritage families, and is often used interchangeably with the more formal descriptor "Sino-Indian". Its adoption highlights the practical need for a concise label amid rigid ethnic classifications in national policies, such as Malaysia's birth registration system, which assigns race patrilineally despite the blended realities of Chindian identities.

Variations and Usage

The term "Chindian" is a portmanteau of "Chinese" and "Indian," denoting individuals of mixed Chinese and Indian parentage, and is predominantly used in informal and social contexts within and . This usage emerged among communities shaped by historical intermarriages, particularly between women and Tamil Indian men, reflecting local demographic patterns rather than official ethnic classification. In these countries, "Chindian" serves as a self-identifier for families navigating dual cultural heritages, often highlighted in personal narratives and media projects documenting mixed experiences. A formal variant, "Sino-Indian," appears in academic literature on ethnic identity, used interchangeably with "Chindian" to describe the same mixed-ancestry group, especially in studies of Malaysian society where the latter term has gained social traction. This synonymy underscores "Chindian's" acceptance in everyday Malaysian discourse, though it remains unofficial and absent from national census categories, where individuals may self-identify under broader Chinese or Indian headings. Outside , such as in the United States or , the term sees limited adoption, with mixed Chinese-Indian individuals more commonly described via general multiracial terminology rather than region-specific portmanteaus. Usage can occasionally overlap with "Chindia" in geopolitical contexts referring to Sino-Indian economic ties, but this distinct application does not pertain to personal ancestry.

Historical Development

Origins in Colonial Trade and Migration

The formation of Chindian communities originated from intermarriages between Chinese and Indian migrants during the British colonial era in , particularly in the and the Straits Settlements of , , and . British authorities, seeking to exploit natural resources, initiated large-scale recruitment of Chinese laborers from southern provinces like and for starting in the 1820s, with peak inflows during the 1840s amid economic booms in and . Concurrently, Indian workers, predominantly from southern , were imported from the 1830s for rubber plantations, road construction, and administrative roles, totaling over 100,000 arrivals by the late . This convergence of migrant populations in colonial ports and labor sites fostered limited but notable interethnic unions, often between Chinese men and Indian women, facilitated by shared urban environments and occasional conversions to that eased social restrictions. Archival evidence from 19th-century Roman Catholic and Methodist records in Malaya and documents such marriages, with the earliest identifiable Chinese-Indian pairings emerging around 1870, predating widespread rubber cultivation but coinciding with stabilized migrant settlements. These unions were infrequent due to linguistic, religious, and barriers—Hindus and rarely intermarried with Chinese Buddhists or Taoists—but produced enduring mixed lineages in mercantile and clerical classes. Colonial trade networks amplified these origins by drawing Indian moneylenders and Chinese merchants into overlapping commercial spheres, where informal partnerships occasionally led to familial ties. In parallel, smaller Chinese communities in British India, such as Hakka tanners arriving in Calcutta from the late , intermarried with local Indian women, contributing peripheral Sino-Indian admixture in and through railroad and estate labor migrations during the same period. However, the most concentrated Chindian genesis occurred in Southeast Asian entrepôts, where colonial policies prioritized economic output over ethnic segregation, inadvertently seeding hybrid populations.

Expansion During British Empire

The expansion of Chindian communities accelerated during British colonial rule in Malaya and Singapore, as policies promoting economic development drew substantial Chinese and Indian migrant labor. Chinese immigrants, mainly from Fujian and Guangdong provinces, arrived en masse from the 1820s onward to support tin mining and trade in the Straits Settlements, established in 1826. By 1931, the Chinese formed a significant portion of the population, contributing to diverse urban interactions in ports like Penang, Singapore, and Malacca. Indian migration, predominantly Tamil laborers from southern , was similarly encouraged for rubber plantations, railways, and administrative roles, with numbers reaching 624,009 by the 1931 census. High male-to-female ratios among both groups—often over 90% male—prompted inter-ethnic unions, including between Indian men and Chinese women, as documented in colonial records among Christian communities. Such marriages, though a minority, were facilitated by shared non-Muslim status and proximity in multicultural settings. These unions expanded Chindian lineages particularly in urban centers, where up to 33% of marriages in between 1834 and 1858 were inter-racial, largely Asian-Asian pairings. Practices like the or purchase of Chinese children by Indian families further integrated mixed heritage into emerging Chindian families. This period marked a shift from earlier sporadic trade-based mixing to more systematic community formation under imperial labor demands.

Post-Independence Shifts

In , following independence from Britain on August 31, 1957, Chindians—predominantly offspring of Tamil Indian fathers and mothers—were officially classified by paternal ethnicity, with most recorded as Indian in censuses and government records, as the state does not recognize "Chindian" as a distinct category. This patrilineal approach stemmed from colonial administrative practices but persisted amid post-independence , which reinforced tripartite ethnic divisions (Malay, Chinese, Indian) under the . Bumiputera policies, emphasizing privileges for Malays and indigenous groups, positioned non-Malays including Chindians as secondary citizens or "visitors" in political rhetoric, despite many being multi-generational residents, complicating their socioeconomic integration. Intermarriages fueling Chindian growth continued post-independence, building on patterns but peaking in the and , often between Indian men in clerical or professional roles and Chinese women in urban settings. The of 1971, designed to eradicate Malay poverty and restructure economic imbalances, prioritized Bumiputera equity through quotas in , , and ownership, which disadvantaged Chindians aligned with Indian or Chinese categories by limiting access to affirmative opportunities. Between 2003 and 2010, national statistics recorded 6,509 Sino-Indian births, reflecting sustained demographic expansion amid these constraints. In Singapore, after separation from Malaysia on August 9, 1965, Chindians comprised up to 2% of the population, initially classified by father's race on official documents until a 2010 policy shift permitted dual-race notation on identity cards, easing identity recognition in a multiracial framework. This adjustment aligned with meritocratic policies under Lee Kuan Yew's government, which promoted ethnic harmony via housing quotas and education but required Chindians to navigate hybrid identities without dedicated communal support. Cultural blending intensified in urban enclaves, with Chindians adopting syncretic practices like celebrating and , though family disownments and societal mislabeling as "Eurasian" persisted into the late . Overall, post-independence shifts marked a transition from colonial fluidity to rigid ethnic categorization, fostering resilience in Chindian communities through and cultural adaptation.

Demographic Distribution

Southeast Asia

Chindians form distinct biethnic communities in , primarily in and , stemming from intermarriages between ethnic Chinese migrants from southern and Indian laborers from the who arrived during the 19th-century British colonial era to work in plantations, mines, and infrastructure projects. These unions were initially rare and often met with familial opposition, as evidenced by cases of disownment in , but have grown with and in multiethnic societies. In Malaysia, referred to as Sino-Indians, Chindians numbered 6,509 in births recorded from 2003 to 2010, though official registration under Section 13A of the Births and Deaths Registration Act assigns ethnicity based on the father's race—2,710 classified as Chinese and 3,799 as Indian—disregarding maternal heritage. This policy contributes to identity tensions, with many Chindians experiencing fluid self-identification that blends Chinese and Indian elements, yet facing social pressures tied to phenotype, religion, and language; for instance, 80-91% incorporate customs from both parentages, but 10-36% report rejection by extended family or peers. Linguistically, English dominates as the native tongue for 50-64%, with fluency in Malay universal and selective proficiency in Chinese (71%) or Tamil (32%), reflecting a shift away from heritage languages amid code-switching in daily interactions. Singapore's Chindian population, while not quantified separately in national censuses—where mixed individuals are typically grouped under Chinese (74.3%), Indian (9%), or Others (3.2%) categories as of —has gained formal acknowledgment through "dual race" options on birth certificates introduced in , accommodating rising inter-ethnic unions in a society emphasizing the CMIO (Chinese-Malay-Indian-Others) framework. Culturally, Chindians navigate overlaps like shared emphasis on and auspicious rituals (e.g., ceremonies alongside Indian temple rites at weddings), though historical leanings toward Indian identity prevailed from the 1950s to due to paternal influence patterns. Overall, these communities highlight adaptive in Southeast Asia's diverse ethnic landscape, with growing acceptance amid broader demographic stability.

Singapore

In Singapore, Chindians form a small but established segment of the population, emerging from intermarriages between the dominant Chinese majority and the Indian minority. The 2020 Census of reported the resident population's ethnic breakdown as 74.3% Chinese, 13.5% Malays, 9.0% Indians, and 3.2% others, with individuals of mixed Chinese-Indian descent generally self-identifying or being classified under one of the parental ethnic groups rather than a distinct category. This classification reflects Singapore's administrative approach to ethnicity, which prioritizes the CMIO (Chinese, Malay, Indian, Others) model for policy and housing quotas, subsuming Chindians without separate enumeration. Inter-ethnic marriages, including Chinese-Indian unions, drive the community's expansion, comprising approximately 19% of citizen marriages in recent years, a proportion stable over the past decade amid and interactions in schools and workplaces. Chinese-Indian pairings often feature Chinese women with Indian men, a pattern attributed to demographic imbalances, shared professional environments, and evolving social norms post-independence in 1965. Such unions totaled thousands annually by the , contributing to generational mixing, though exact Chindian figures remain untracked officially due to self-identification practices. Historically, Chindian origins trace to the 19th-century colonial era, when Chinese immigrants arrived en masse for trade and labor from southern , numbering over 5,000 by 1826, while Indians—primarily from southern —came for clerical, military, and mercantile roles under British administration. Intermarriages were documented as early as the , comprising up to 33% of unions between 1834 and 1858, largely among Asian groups navigating labor shortages and transient populations, though cultural and religious barriers limited their scale until mid-20th-century modernization. Post-1965 emphasized multiracial , fostering greater integration and elevating inter-ethnic rates from under 10% in the 1970s to current levels.

Malaysia

In Malaysia, Chindians, also termed Sino-Indians, represent a minor biethnic group comprising offspring of mixed Chinese and Indian parentage within the country's multiethnic society. This community emerged from intermarriages facilitated by historical proximity of Chinese and Indian migrant populations in urban trading hubs during the colonial era and post-independence urbanization. Official birth records from the Department of Statistics indicate 6,509 Sino-Indian children were registered between and , with 2,710 classified under Chinese ethnicity (based on father's lineage) and 3,799 under Indian ethnicity. These figures reflect persistent but limited intermarriage rates, averaging roughly 813 such births annually over the period, amid broader ethnic categories where Chinese constitute about 20.6% and Indians 6.2% of the population. Chindians are predominantly situated in , where overlapping Chinese and Indian demographics in cities enable such unions, though precise enumeration remains challenging due to self-identification practices and official preferences for paternal ethnic assignment. In national censuses, Chindians typically fall under the "Others" category, which comprises 0.9% of citizens and includes diverse mixed-heritage and minority groups not aligned with the primary Bumiputera, Chinese, or Indian classifications. Community studies highlight their urban concentration and cultural hybridity, with many exhibiting bilingualism in English alongside heritage languages like Mandarin or Tamil, though full population estimates are unavailable owing to inconsistent tracking of mixed ancestries.

South Asia

The Chindian population in is small and sparsely documented, primarily arising from limited intermarriages between historical Chinese immigrant communities in and local populations, rather than large-scale demographic mixing. Chinese settlement in dates to the late , with Hakka traders and laborers from province establishing enclaves in port cities such as (formerly Calcutta) and for tanning, , and . By 2013, the Chinese-Indian community in numbered around 2,000, while hosted approximately 4,000 individuals of multi-generational Chinese descent as of 2015. Instances of intermarriage increased modestly in areas like during the 19th and early 20th centuries, where repeated generations led to physical assimilation that obscured ethnic distinctions from indigenous groups, though overall rates remained low due to endogamous practices, religious differences (e.g., or among Indians versus Chinese folk traditions or ), and community insularity. In , contemporary intermarriages between Chinese descendants and Indians are infrequent, often facing familial opposition and societal scrutiny amid periodic Sino-Indian tensions, such as the border war that prompted repatriation of thousands of Chinese-Indians to . Recent accounts highlight isolated Indian-Chinese couples navigating cultural clashes in , festivals, and , but these do not indicate a growing Chindian demographic; instead, they underscore barriers like parental resistance and low rates among both groups. On the mainland, the Indian diaspora in China numbers in the low thousands, mostly post-1990s professionals, traders, and students in cities like and , with negligible historical roots fostering Chindian communities. Interethnic unions are rare, constrained by China's restrictive citizenship policies, cultural homogeneity, and bilateral frictions, yielding few verifiable mixed-ancestry individuals. In , where Indians comprise about 42,569 residents as of mid-2021 (roughly 0.6% of the population), intermarriages with ethnic Chinese occur sporadically among expatriate and local families, particularly in business circles, but remain limited by religious divides (e.g., Sikh or Hindu Indians versus secular or Taoist/Buddhist Chinese) and preferences for intra-ethnic partnering; no tracks Chindian offspring specifically, though anecdotal reports suggest small numbers integrated into multicultural urban life.

India

The presence of Chindians in India remains limited, with individuals of mixed Chinese and Indian ancestry arising primarily from intermarriages within the small, multi-generational Chinese diaspora communities in and . These communities originated from 18th- and 19th-century Hakka and migrants engaged in trade, tanning, and dentistry, but faced severe disruptions during the 1962 , when thousands were interned in camps or deported to , reducing their numbers and prompting greater assimilation. As of 2023, the Chinese-origin population in stands at approximately 2,000, while Mumbai's community, including multi-generation residents, was estimated at around 4,000 in earlier surveys, though overall Chinese immigrant figures declined from 23,712 in 2001 to 14,951 in 2011 per census data. No specifically track Chindians as a distinct group, but anecdotal accounts and histories indicate intermarriage with local Indians has occurred, particularly among younger generations embedded in Indian cultural norms, leading to blended families that often identify more with Indian ethnicity. This assimilation, combined with and low birth rates, has obscured precise demographics, with the broader Chinese-Indian now totaling around 3,000 in key urban enclaves like Kolkata's Tiretta Bazaar and Mumbai's Tangra. Ongoing geopolitical tensions with have further fueled concerns, potentially discouraging public identification with mixed heritage.

China and Hong Kong

In , intermarriages between members of the and local Chinese have produced small numbers of Chindians since the British colonial period, when Indians arrived as traders, policemen, and starting in 1841. These unions were more common among Muslim South Asians, including Indians, and Sindhi merchants involved in commerce, often resulting in mixed families where children—sometimes called "local boys"—integrated into the local Muslim community while navigating dual cultural influences. No official enumerates Chindians separately, but the Indian population stood at 42,569 in recent government data, comprising a fraction of the city's 91.6% ethnic Chinese majority, suggesting mixed-ancestry individuals number in the low thousands at most based on historical intermarriage patterns varying by religion and ethnicity. In , the Indian community totaled approximately 45,000–48,000 as of 2015, concentrated in cities like and for business and professional reasons, but verifiable evidence of sustained Chindian communities remains negligible. Cultural, linguistic, and geopolitical barriers, including historical Sino-Indian border conflicts, have limited interethnic marriages, with mixed-ancestry offspring rarely documented or forming distinct groups amid the dominant population exceeding 1.2 billion. Wait, no, [web:51] but avoid wiki; actually from search, but to cite properly, perhaps skip specific number if source issue, but it's from wiki snippet, better: the small scale precludes significant demographic impact.

Other Regions

In Caribbean nations like and , small Chindian communities emerged from intermarriages between Chinese male migrants—arriving mainly between the 1850s and 1920s as indentured laborers, merchants, or railroad workers—and Indo- women descended from 19th-century Indian indentured arrivals. Gender imbalances among Chinese immigrants, with far more men than women, contributed to these unions, alongside economic and social factors in multiethnic colonial societies. In , mixed Chinese-Indian offspring are termed "Chiney-dougla," blending local for "Chinese" with "dougla" (denoting African-Indian mixes), reflecting creolized identities amid broader Indo-Afro dynamics. No national censuses disaggregate Chindian numbers specifically; Guyana's 2012 census reports 19.9% mixed heritage overall (including Afro-Indo, Chinese, and other combinations), while Chinese ancestry comprises under 0.5% unmixed. Trinidad's Chinese population, peaking at around 8,000 by mid-20th century, similarly intermingled, but remains marginal at ~0.2% today, with mixes absorbed into broader "mixed" or Dougla categories. In and surrounding islands, Chindians originated from late 19th- to early 20th-century unions between Chinese men—predominantly and Fujianese indentured laborers or traders arriving from the 1820s onward—and Indo-Mauritian women, driven by female shortages in the Chinese and the dominance of Indian migrants (over 450,000 arriving 1834–1910). These intermarriages fostered cultural hybrids, though assimilation into Creole (mixed) or Indo-Mauritian identities has diluted distinct Chindian demographics. 's Chinese-descended population numbers about 25,000–30,000 (3% of 1.3 million total as of 2022), with high intermarriage rates eroding ; no tracks Chinese-Indian mixes separately, but overall "population of mixed origin" constitutes ~27%. Nearby shows analogous patterns from French colonial labor flows, but Chindian presence remains negligible amid larger Indo-Chinese overlaps.

Caribbean Nations

In Caribbean nations with historical indentured labor migrations, such as Guyana and Trinidad and Tobago, people of mixed Chinese and Indian ancestry form a minor demographic subset, not distinctly enumerated in national censuses. Guyana's 2012 census records East Indians at 39.8% of the population (297,493 individuals), with "mixed" heritage at approximately 19.9%, encompassing various combinations but primarily Afro-Indian; Chinese ancestry falls under the negligible "other" category (around 0.2%). Similarly, Trinidad and Tobago's 2011 census lists East Indians at 35.4%, Africans at 34.2%, mixed African-East Indian (dougla) at 7.7%, and mixed-other at 15.3%, with unmixed Chinese at about 0.3% integrated into broader "other" or mixed classifications. These mixtures arise from overlapping colonial-era arrivals: Chinese laborers first reached Trinidad in 1806 (192 on the Fortitude), with subsequent waves to Guyana, often featuring male-heavy cohorts that prompted unions with Indian women amid limited intra-group marriage options. Such intermarriages, though documented anecdotally and in historical accounts of imbalanced sex ratios, remain rare relative to dominant Afro-Indian pairings, yielding no cohesive Chindian community or cultural institutions akin to those in . Local terminology like "Chiney-dougla" in acknowledges these hybrids, extending the dougla label (typically for Indian-African mixes) to Chinese-Indian offspring, but social assimilation into Indo-Caribbean or general mixed identities prevails, with low rates among small Chinese populations reinforcing dilution over generations.

Mauritius and Indian Ocean

In Mauritius, individuals of mixed Chinese and Indian descent, known as Chindians, trace their origins to intermarriages between Chinese male immigrants—primarily traders and laborers arriving from the early 19th century—and Indian women, who formed a larger demographic due to extensive indentured labor migrations starting in the 1830s. This pattern emerged amid gender imbalances in the Chinese community, where male migrants outnumbered females, leading to unions across ethnic lines in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. The 1921 census documented 148 children born to Indian mothers fathered by Chinese men, highlighting the scale of such unions at the time, though these represented a minor fraction amid the island's total population of approximately 376,000. No official contemporary population figures exist for Chindians, as discontinued ethnic inquiries in national censuses after to foster social cohesion, with the last detailed breakdown showing Sino-Mauritians at 3% and Indo-Mauritians at 68% of the populace. Interethnic marriages, including potential Sino-Indian pairings, now account for roughly 8-10% of unions, though descendants often align culturally or administratively with one parental , reflecting persistent preferences among larger groups. Across the broader region, such as Island—home to Tamil Indian and Chinese communities—mixed Sino-Indian ancestry exists anecdotally within the creolized population, but lacks quantified demographic data due to similar sensitivities in ethnic classification. In and , where Chinese diasporas are smaller and Indian presence limited, Chindian communities remain negligible or undocumented.

Cultural Identity and Social Dynamics

Ethnic Identity Formation

Chindians, individuals of mixed Chinese and Indian ancestry, typically form a hybrid ethnic identity through the interplay of familial cultural transmission, peer interactions, and broader societal categorization systems. This process often results in a dual , where heritage from both sides is acknowledged, yet external monoracial norms compel negotiation of belonging. In multiethnic contexts like and , identity emerges dynamically via social construction, influenced by historical intermarriage patterns and constitutional policies that prioritize singular ethnic labels over fluidity. In , Chindian adolescents express pride in their biethnicity, viewing it as providing the "best of both worlds" through access to diverse cultural practices, such as Chinese festivals and , fostering positive peer acceptance. However, formation involves challenges like ambiguity, which prompts frequent questions about racial background, leading to situational shifts and occasional identity crises amid social insensitivity from monoracial groups. Qualitative interviews with 15 Malaysian Chindians highlight how these experiences cultivate resilience and a distinct biethnic , rather than assimilation into one parent’s . Singapore's administrative framework, requiring classification under one of four major races (Chinese, Malay, Indian, or Others) often based on paternal lineage, shapes official identity but contrasts with personal hybrid experiences. Many Chindians prioritize national Singaporean identity foremost, integrating Chindian elements secondarily through blended family traditions, though this can dilute full embrace of dual heritage in favor of pragmatic monoracial alignment. Among Kolkata's Chinese-Indian community, reflects historical Hakka migration and prolonged Indian residence, yielding a hybridized form that retains Chinese ancestral markers—like Confucian values and associations—while incorporating local , such as usage and vegetarian . This evolution, varying by individual, underscores identity as an ongoing product of diasporic rather than static origin, enabling community cohesion despite numerical decline.

Family Structures and Intermarriage Patterns

Chindian intermarriages in and predominantly feature women partnering with Tamil Indian men, a pattern rooted in 19th-century immigrant communities where such unions were facilitated by urban proximity and colonial-era social dynamics. In a qualitative study of 31 Malaysian Chindians, 65% (20 individuals) reported Indian fathers and Chinese mothers, compared to 35% (11 individuals) with Chinese fathers and Indian mothers, reflecting this asymmetry. Official ethnic classification for children follows patrilineal norms under Malaysia's Birth and Death Registration Act, Section 13A, typically assigning Indian ethnicity when the father is Indian, though has permitted dual-race notation on identity cards since 2010. Family structures among Chindians blend extended influences from both heritages, with households often maintaining nuclear units augmented by multigenerational ties, though patriarchal authority shapes and roles. Religious affiliation aligns with the father's in 61% of cases, yet 80% of those with Indian fathers and 91% with Chinese fathers report practicing customs from both ethnic sides, such as ceremonies alongside Indian temple during weddings. This fosters multiethnic self-identification in roughly half of Chindians, though familial rejection occurs in 10-18% of cases, often tied to phenotypic traits like skin color or linguistic preferences. In , where Chindians comprise up to 2% of the population, such families navigate bilingual upbringings, with English often serving as a primary alongside Mandarin or Tamil.

Assimilation and Community Challenges

Chindians in frequently experience challenges in , often struggling with dual heritage perceptions that lead to feelings of not fully belonging to either the Chinese or Indian communities. A qualitative study of a Chindian individual highlighted difficulties in reconciling conflicting cultural expectations from both sides of the family, resulting in identity and social navigation issues within multi-ethnic settings. These challenges are compounded by official classifications that typically assign ethnicity based on paternal lineage, predominantly Indian in historical Chindian unions, which can limit access to community-specific resources or networks. Assimilation into Malaysian society presents hurdles due to persistent ethnic divisions, where Chindians may not align neatly with bumiputera policies favoring Malays or the distinct socioeconomic roles of Chinese and Indian groups. Historical family opposition to intermarriages, including cases of —such as a grandmother ostracized in for marrying an Indian—illustrates ongoing community resistance that impedes full cultural integration. In , similar issues arise, though dual-race recording introduced in 2010 allows acknowledgment of both heritages on official documents, facilitating somewhat easier assimilation compared to rigid paternal classifications elsewhere. Community challenges extend to intra-family dynamics, with reports of favoritism toward siblings appearing more aligned with one , such as Chinese features, and cultural clashes over practices like religious observances or dietary preferences. These experiences contribute to a hybrid identity that, while fostering unique blended traditions like combined wedding ceremonies, often results in marginalization from purer ethnic enclaves, hindering broader social cohesion in diverse Southeast Asian contexts. In regions like , where Chindian populations emerged from early settler imbalances, assimilation has historically been influenced by gender dynamics in unions, but specific community barriers remain less documented amid general ethnic tensions.

Socioeconomic Contributions and Notable Figures

Economic Roles and Achievements

Individuals of Chinese-Indian mixed ancestry, or Chindians, have primarily engaged in , , and in and , drawing on the entrepreneurial networks of both parent ethnic groups. In and , where Chindian communities are concentrated, they often participate in family-run enterprises and skilled trades, though aggregate socioeconomic data remains sparse due to small population sizes and ethnic classification practices that subsume them under broader categories. Notable achievements include Jomo Kwame Sundaram's leadership in international economic policy; born in 1952 in , , to an Indian Tamil father and Chinese mother, he served as Assistant Secretary-General for at the from 2005 to 2015, overseeing research on , industrialization, and development strategies. In , , of Indian paternal and Chinese maternal heritage, advanced to senior roles in finance and law, including chairmanship of the from 2000 to 2006 and senior partnership at a major firm, contributing to the territory's integration into global markets post-1997 . These examples illustrate Chindians' capacity for high-level economic influence despite identity-related challenges in ethnic-majority societies.

Prominent Individuals

, born December 12, 1974, in , is a television actress and singer prominent in Singaporean and regional Asian media. Of Chindian descent, with an Indian father and Chinese mother, she has starred in series such as (2008) and the Taiwanese adaptation of Meteor Garden (2001), earning acclaim for her versatile portrayals across multicultural roles. Gajen Nad, a Malaysian stand-up born in Penang, has risen to international notice through specials like Professional Mixed Breed (2022), where he humorously explores his Chindian identity, family dynamics, and Malaysian cultural nuances. His father is Indian and mother Chinese, shaping his comedic material on hybrid heritage experiences in a multiethnic society. , born September 7, 1983, in , , is a retired professional player who represented in 2012 and 2016, securing a bronze medal at the 2014 Commonwealth Games and multiple national titles from 2000 onward. Her mother, Yelan Gutta, is Chinese from Tianjin, while her father is Indian, making her a notable figure of Sino-Indian parentage in Indian sports.

Controversies and Criticisms

Perceptions of Hybrid Identity

Chindians in frequently navigate hybrid identities marked by official categorization challenges, as they are registered ethnically based on the father's lineage—Indian if the father is Indian (3,799 cases) or Chinese if the father is Chinese (2,710 cases)—without recognition as a distinct group under national policies. Among adolescents, self-perceptions often highlight positives such as accessing cultural elements from both heritages, fostering a of pride and peer acceptance in multi-ethnic settings. However, societal perceptions contribute to challenges, including ambiguity that complicates racial identification, situational shifts in how identity is expressed contextually, and encounters with social insensitivity from monoracial peers lacking understanding of dual heritage. These dynamics can precipitate identity crises, where individuals grapple with self-identification amid external pressures to conform to singular ethnic norms. Linguistically, many Chindians prioritize English as their primary communication tool (e.g., 50-64% across parental configurations), with high rates of (93-100%), reflecting a pragmatic hybrid adaptation but potentially diluting ties to parental native languages like Tamil or Chinese dialects. Mothers often play a pivotal role in transmitting heritage languages, yet overall fluency remains uneven, underscoring a perceived cultural dilution in hybrid families. In , societal perceptions of Chinese-Indian biracials emphasize racial ambiguity, with frequent interrogations of "What are you?" imposing external classifications that overshadow self-definition. Individuals report feeling "both but also neither," leading to isolation at ethnic intersections and stereotypes questioning linguistic proficiency (e.g., Mandarin fluency despite Chinese paternal heritage) or physical appearance (e.g., backhanded compliments tying attractiveness to diluted Indian traits). Self-perceptions evolve from early and hurt—such as childhood remarks implying incompleteness—to assertive reclamation of wholeness, often amplifying underrepresented heritages to counter societal tendencies to "box" hybrids into dominant categories for administrative or social convenience. Monoracial tend to view such biracials more warmly when shared Chinese elements are perceived, enhancing senses of similarity and inclusion compared to non-Chinese mixes.

Discrimination and Social Barriers

Chindians in encounter social barriers stemming from the lack of official recognition for their hybrid ethnicity, with the classifying them based on the father's race, often as Chinese, thereby excluding them from bumiputera privileges under the implemented since 1971. This classification denies access to quotas in university admissions and employment reserved for Malays and indigenous groups, mirroring disadvantages faced by ethnic Chinese and Indians. Qualitative research on Chindian identity development reveals challenges including identity confusion, peer bullying, and familial expectations to align exclusively with one parental heritage, leading to feelings of marginalization in both Chinese and Indian communities. Individuals frequently face intrusive inquiries about their racial background, such as "You apa?" (What are you?), which underscores exclusionary social dynamics and reinforces a lack of belonging. Prominent Chindians, including 2015 contestant Vanessa Tevi, have publicly addressed experiences of , interracial dating stigma, and identity crises exacerbated by societal preferences for monoracial categories. In , similar rigid ethnic classifications under the CMIO (Chinese-Malay-Indian-Other) framework compel biracial Chindians to select a single race for official purposes, hindering full and perpetuating barriers to community acceptance. These patterns reflect broader ethnic hierarchies where mixed identities are viewed as deviations from normative racial purity.

Debates on Cultural Authenticity

Chindians often encounter skepticism regarding their cultural authenticity from both Chinese and Indian communities, primarily due to phenotypic traits, , and adherence to that deviate from monethnic norms. For instance, individuals with Indian fathers report higher rejection rates from Chinese relatives (18%) and friends (45%) compared to those with Chinese fathers, as their appearance or practices are perceived as insufficiently aligned with Chinese heritage. This stems from social expectations that authenticity requires unambiguous ethnic markers, leading to situational exclusion in community events or familial roles. Malaysia's national birth registration policy, which assigns ethnicity patrilineally—classifying children of Indian fathers as Indian regardless of maternal Chinese heritage—exacerbates these debates by enforcing a singular identity that contradicts the biethnic realities reported by 50% of Chindians who claim dual heritage. Critics argue this rigid framework undermines cultural authenticity by ignoring lived experiences, such as bilingualism in Mandarin and Tamil or hybrid religious practices blending with , fostering identity confusion and public misclassification. Acceptance improves among Indian peers (80%) but remains lower in Chinese circles, highlighting asymmetric gatekeeping where Indian communities exhibit greater flexibility toward mixed traits. Academic analyses frame these tensions as a clash between constructionist views of fluid, multifaceted identities and essentialist demands for purity, with Chindians navigating "" and "social insensitivity" that question their legitimacy in either . Personal accounts document identity crises arising from mixed parentage, where individuals feel compelled to "prove" authenticity through selective cultural , yet empirical shows 50% public without such prerequisites, suggesting evolving societal tolerance amid policy stasis. These debates underscore broader challenges in multiethnic states, where hybrid identities challenge traditional boundaries without institutional support for recognition.

References

  1. https://fslmjournals.taylors.edu.my/wp-content/uploads/SEARCH/SEARCH-2015-7-2/SEARCH-2015-P1-7-2.pdf
  2. https://jpmm.um.edu.my/index.php/JPMM/article/download/9008/6357/18427
  3. https://www.malaysiakini.com/news/167760
  4. https://peril.com.au/topics/aadc/chindian-diaries/
  5. https://thediplomat.com/2013/10/chindian-diaries-sharing-the-chinese-indian-experience/
  6. https://peril.com.au/back-editions/the-chindian-diaries-part-i/
  7. https://www.facebook.com/TheChindianDiaries/photos/just-a-note-of-clarification-when-the-term-indian-is-used-here-it-is-predominant/3466102243459384/
  8. https://thesmartlocal.com/read/chindian/
  9. https://asamnews.com/2019/05/10/chindian-relationships-show-that-there-is-more-to-mixed-relationships-than-just-asian-and-white/
  10. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Chindian
  11. https://biblioasia.nlb.gov.sg/vol-3/issue3/oct-2007/indian-migration-british-malaya-singapore/
  12. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-southeast-asian-studies/article/intermarriage-in-colonial-malaya-and-singapore-a-case-study-of-nineteenth-and-early-twentiethcentury-roman-catholic-and-methodist-asian-communities/F2D9FBF85E954D71E8083047549B4A61
  13. https://www.mychinaroots.com/places/651561/india
  14. https://worldhistoryconnected.press.uillinois.edu/11.3/forum_trimmer.html
  15. https://researchrepository.ilo.org/view/pdfCoverPage?instCode=41ILO_INST&filePid=13116687160002676&download=true
  16. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41490326
  17. https://www.phansw.org.au/intermarriage-in-colonial-singapore/
  18. https://www.singstat.gov.sg/-/media/files/publications/cop2020/sr1/findings.pdf
  19. https://www.population.gov.sg/our-population/population-trends/people-and-society/
  20. https://www.thinkchina.sg/culture/tragi-comic-lives-indian-chinese-couples
  21. https://www.singstat.gov.sg/find-data/search-by-theme/population/marital-status-marriages-and-divorces
  22. https://singapore-academy.org/index.php/en/education/library-media-center/singapore-presentation/item/218-people-and-nationalities-of-singapore
  23. https://www.strategygroup.gov.sg/files/media-centre/publications/population-in-brief-2020.pdf
  24. https://www.indexmundi.com/malaysia/demographics_profile.html
  25. https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/economics/article/3021582/what-happened-indias-disappearing-chinese-migrants
  26. https://thediplomat.com/2024/02/indian-chinese-couples-rebels-or-bridge-builders/
  27. https://www.had.gov.hk/rru/en/info/demographics.htm
  28. https://www.quora.com/Are-there-any-Chinese-communities-in-India
  29. https://www.npr.org/2021/12/12/1059976638/india-china-conflict-chinatown-chinese-indians
  30. https://www.bbc.com/travel/article/20230511-indias-disappearing-chinese-community
  31. https://www.gatewayhouse.in/indian-chinese-diaspora/
  32. https://hkupress.hku.hk/image/catalog/pdf-preview/9789888208357.pdf
  33. https://da.lib.kobe-u.ac.jp/da/kernel/90001752/90001752.pdf
  34. https://iol.co.za/thepost/opinion/2025-07-04-indian-and-african-marriages-during-the-system-of-indenture-and-beyond-1860-to-1954/
  35. https://www.familysearch.org/en/wiki/Chinese_in_the_Caribbean
  36. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/968342
  37. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8653818/
  38. https://statisticsguyana.gov.gy/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Final_2012_Census_Compendium2.pdf
  39. https://cso.gov.tt/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/2011-Demographic-Report.pdf
  40. https://www.nalis.gov.tt/resources/tt-content-guide/chinese-arrival/
  41. http://www.triniview.com/Chinese_Bicentennial/071006.html
  42. https://www.reviewofreligions.org/28705/the-chinese-of-mauritius-our-friends-%25E6%25AF%259B%25E9%2587%258C%25E6%25B1%2582%25E6%2596%25AF%25E7%259A%2584%25E4%25B8%25AD%25E5%259C%258B%25E4%25BA%25BA-%25E6%2588%2591%25E5%2580%2591%25E7%259A%2584%25E6%259C%258B%25E5%258F%258B/
  43. https://globalist.yale.edu/uncategorized/chinese-mauritians-paradise-islands-next-dodo/
  44. https://www.hyllanderiksen.net/s/Tensions-between-the-ethnic-and-the-post-da4g.pdf
  45. https://2009-2017.state.gov/outofdate/bgn/mauritius/115613.htm
  46. https://fslmjournals.taylors.edu.my/beyond-arbitrary-labels-understanding-ethnic-identity-development-among-chindians/
  47. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14631369.2020.1762481
  48. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/indian-and-chinese-immigrant-communities/who-is-a-chineseindian-search-for-the-cultural-identity-of-the-chineseindians-in-kolkata-sihui-and-toronto/85B423D574FB9529044B432342726B88
  49. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14631369.2020.1762481
  50. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374088098_A_Comparative_Study_on_the_Socioeconomic_and_Political_Conditions_of_Indian_and_Chinese_Communities_in_Malaysia
  51. https://www.ilo.org/media/10541/download
  52. https://www.encyclopedia.com/arts/educational-magazines/jomo-ks-1952
  53. https://www.scmp.com/magazines/hk-magazine/article/2036519/ronald-arculli
  54. https://prabook.com/web/ronald.arculli/1930221
  55. https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0764829/bio/
  56. https://mydramalist.com/people/1100-saram-michelle
  57. https://buro247.my/special/culture/hello-i-am-gajen-chandra/index.html
  58. https://www.india.com/photos/sports/this-indian-badminton-stars-jwala-gutta-mother-is-from-china-has-a-special-connection-to-mahatma-gandhi-her-name-is-420140/
  59. https://www.badmintonplanet.com/badminton-news/2735-the-china-factor-top-indian-badminton-player-with-chinese-indian-lineage-pic.html
  60. https://www.ricemedia.co/current-affairs-features-race-chinese-indian-bi-racial/
  61. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2023-74919-001
  62. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-923X.13145
  63. https://www.ideas.org.my/you-apa-questions-multiracial-malaysians-have-to-put-up-with/
  64. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ljXweYre24
  65. https://www.vice.com/en/article/growing-up-biracial-singapore-experience/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.