Hubbry Logo
Cat meatCat meatMain
Open search
Cat meat
Community hub
Cat meat
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Cat meat
Cat meat
from Wikipedia

A dish of cat meat in Vietnam.

Cat meat is meat prepared from domestic cats for human consumption. Some countries regularly serve cat meat, whereas others have only consumed some cat meat in desperation during wartime, famine or poverty.

History

[edit]

Prehistoric human feces have been found to contain bones from the wild cats of Africa.[1]

There are accounts from antiquity of cats being consumed in the Roman province of Gallia Narbonensis (southern France).[2] During the 18th century, domestic cats were used in the meat production in France, with published recipes surviving from 1740.[3] Cats were eaten in Spain during the 17th century.[2]

Cat meat was widely used as famine food during wartime, especially during both World Wars.[4]

Africa

[edit]
Cat-based dish, cooked in the Central African Republic.

In some cultures of Cameroon, there is a special ceremony featuring cat-eating that is thought to bring good luck.[5]

Asia

[edit]

China

[edit]

According to Humane Society International,[6] Agence France-Presse,[7] and the BBC,[8] cat meat is not widely eaten in China. But in Guangdong and Guangxi provinces of the Lingnan cultural region, some—especially older—people consider cat meat a good warming food during winter months.[9] In Guangdong, cat meat is a main ingredient in the traditional dish "dragon, tiger, phoenix" (snake, cat, chicken), which is said to fortify the body.[10]

Organized cat-collectors supply the southern restaurants with animals that often originate in Henan, Hubei, Anhui, and Jiangsu provinces.[10][11][12] On January 26, 2010, China launched its first draft proposal to protect the country's animals from maltreatment, including a measure to jail people—for periods up to 15 days—for eating cat or dog meat.[13]

In January 2006, the Chinese Animal Protection Network began organizing protests against dog and cat consumption, starting in Guangzhou, following up in more than ten other cities "with very optimal response from public."[14] Beijing News reported in 2014 and 2015 of Beijing and Tianjin authorities, respectively, discovering feral, and stray cats to be used as part of the cat meat trade, which drew outrage from many Chinese netizens.[8] A 2015 Animals Asia survey found that at least more than 70-80% of Chinese respondents agreed it was not acceptable to eat dogs and cats if they had been abused or tortured during feeding and slaughter.[9]

Japan

[edit]

In Japan, cats were sometimes eaten until the end of the Edo period.[15] In Okinawa, it was believed to be effective against costochondritis, bronchitis, lung disease, and hemorrhoids, and was eaten in the form of soups, such as Maya-no-Ushiru.[16]

India

[edit]

According to HuffPost and a few Indian news outlets in 2016, cat meat was being served as mutton in parts of Chennai and being consumed mainly by the Narikuravar community in the city.[17] There had been allegations made online in the same year that some Narikuravar people were hunting feral and stray cats for their meat in Bengaluru.[18]

Cat meat is a traditional protein consumed in the diet of the Irula people of southern India.[19]

Indonesia

[edit]

Cat meat has been featured at the Extreme Market in the North Sulawesi city of Tomohon.[20]

South Korea

[edit]

In South Korea, cat meat was historically brewed into a tonic as a folk remedy for neuralgia and arthritis, not commonly as food. Modern consumption is seen and more likely to be in the form of cat soup, though the number of people who consume cat soup is considered minimal, compared to a relatively popular dog meat.[21][22] Julien Dugnoille wrote in The Conversation that cat meat is mostly consumed by middle-aged working-class women for perceived health benefits, and that usually 10 cats are needed to produce a small bottle of cat, or goyangi, soju (an alcoholic elixir thought to keep arthritis at bay for a few weeks at a time).[23]

According to the animal protection organization, In Defense of Animals, 100,000 cats are killed yearly to make cat soju in South Korea. Cats are not farmed for their meat in the country, so the trade involves ferals and strays. Eating cat meat is highly stigmatized throughout the country, unlike eating dog meat, which is often criticized but not universally stigmatized.[24]

Malaysia

[edit]

According to the Malaysian branch of Friends of the Earth, cat meat is not illegal in Malaysia. The organisation reported that some Vietnamese nationals had been selling dog and cat meat in a couple of cities,[25] an allegation repeated by Coconuts Media.[26] According to The Star in 2012, cat meat was popular among some Myanmar nationals in the country.[27]

Taiwan

[edit]

In 2001, Taiwan officially banned the sale of cat and dog meat. In October 2017, Taiwan's national legislature, known as the Legislative Yuan, passed amendments to the country's Animal Protection Act which "bans the sale and consumption of dog and cat meat and of any food products that contain the meat or other parts of these animals", making it the first Asian country to ban the consumption of cat meat and dog meat.[28][29]

Vietnam

[edit]
Cats at a cat meat restaurant in Vietnam

As of 2015, cat meat is eaten in Vietnam.[30][31][32][33][34][35][36] It is generally seen on menus with the euphemism "tiểu hổ", literally "little tiger" or "baby tiger", rather than the literal "thịt mèo".[37] Cat galls have aphrodisiacal properties, according to people in North Vietnam.[38][39] In 2018, however, officials in the city of Hanoi urged citizens to stop eating dog and cat meat, citing concerns about the cruel methods with which the animals are slaughtered and the diseases this practice propagates, including rabies and leptospirosis. Another reason for this exhortation seems to be a concern that the practice of dog and cat consumption, most of which are stolen household pets,[40] could tarnish the city's image as a "civilised and modern capital".[41] According to data from a market research study by Four Paws, approximately 8% of people living in Hanoi have consumed cat meat in their lives.[40]

According to The Independent in April 2020, COVID-19 led to increased dog and cat meat sales in Vietnam (and Cambodia) due to their perceived health benefits against the virus.[42]

Europe

[edit]

Austria

[edit]

Section 6, Paragraph 2 of the law for the protection of animals enacted in 2004 prohibits the killing of cats and dogs for purposes of consumption as food or for other products.[43]

Belgium

[edit]

In January 2011, the Belgian Federal Agency for the Safety of the Food Chain stated that people are not allowed to kill random cats walking in their garden, but "nowhere in the law does it say that you can't eat your own pet cat, dog, rabbit, fish, or whatever. You just have to kill them in an animal-friendly way and only when necessary."[44]

Denmark

[edit]

In June 2008, three students at the Danish School of Media and Journalism published pictures of a cat being slaughtered and eaten in Citat, a magazine for journalism students to create a debate about animal welfare. The cat was shot by its owner, a farmer, and it would have been put down in any case. The farmer slaughtered the cat within the limits of Danish law. This led to criticism from Danish animal welfare group Dyrenes Beskyttelse,[45][46] and death threats received by the students.[47]

Italy

[edit]

In February 2010, on a television cooking show, the Italian food writer Beppe Bigazzi mentioned that during the famine in World War II, cat stew was a "succulent" and well-known dish in his home area of Valdarno, Tuscany. Later he claimed he had been joking, but added that cats used to be eaten in the area during famine periods, historically. He was widely criticised in the media for his comments and was ultimately dropped from the television network.[48]

Cat consumption is a stereotype attributed to Vicenzans in Vicenza, Italy.[2] They are jokingly called "magnagati", that means "cats eaters" in the local language.

According to the British Butchers' Advocate, Dressed Poultry and the Food Merchant of 1904, "Just before Christmas, it is common for a group of young men in northern Italy to kill some cats, skin them, and soak them in water for two or three days. They are cooked with great care on Christmas day and served up hot about 1:30 p.m. after mass....Many people in Italy, 'on the quiet,' keep cats like the English do rabbits—to kill. A catskin there is worth ten pence, as the material for muffs for girls... Extraordinary care has to be taken in procuring the animals, for the Italian Society for the Protection of Cats is vigilant, and offenses against the law are followed by imprisonment only. We have no fines in Italy."[49]

According to The Dietetic & Hygienic Gazette in 1905, "Italy cultivates the cat for home consumption as English people raise rabbits. It is to be done on the quiet, however, for in spite of the profit in the business and the demand for the delicacy, the law has to be looked out for, and the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Cats is vigilant. Offenses against the law are visited with imprisonment. Cats are raised for the market nonetheless. Fattened on the finest of milk, a choice specimen will attain the weight of fifteen pounds."[50][51]

The Genoese song "Crêuza de mä", with lyrics by Fabrizio De André, cites the sweet-and-sour hash of "hare of roof tiles" (i.e. the cat, passed off as a sort of rabbit meat).

Switzerland

[edit]

According to the Food Safety and Veterinary Office, the sale of dog or cat meat is not allowed, but it is legal for people to eat their own animals.[52][53] The Swiss parliament rejected changing the laws to protect dogs and cats from human consumption in 1993.[54] An animal-rights group collected 16,000 signatures in 2014 to outlaw the consumption of cat meat in Switzerland.[55]

Other areas

[edit]

Cats were sometimes eaten as a famine food during harsh winters, poor harvests, and wartime. Cats gained notoriety as "roof rabbit" (Dachhase [de]) in Central Europe's hard times during and between World War I and World War II.[4]

Oceania

[edit]

Australia

[edit]

Indigenous Australians in the area of Alice Springs roast feral cats on an open fire. They have also developed recipes for cat stew. Some other inhabitants of the area have also taken up this custom, justified on the grounds that felines are "a serious threat to Australia's native fauna".[56]

South and North America

[edit]

Argentina

[edit]

In two 1996 TV reports from different networks, Telefe Noticias[57] and Todo Noticias,[58] some citizens in a shanty town in Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina, stated that, during an economic crisis, they had to feed the neighborhood children with cat meat, and commented, "It's not denigrating to eat cat, it keeps a child's stomach full".

Although the validity of these reports has been questioned in a book by journalists Gabriel Russo and Edgardo Miller,[59] these authors didn't produce any evidence nor taped confession of someone stating that was responsible for the forgery. Moreover, it's been reported that the then-mayor of Rosario was the source of the rumor that the TV networks fabricated the story just to discredit the city's municipal government.[60] In 2013, Josefa Villalba, a former municipal council member in 1996, stated that prior to the TV reports, she reported to the local municipal government the fact that children were being fed with cats, but the municipal government heads tried to silence her.[61] Contemporary reporting by the journalist Ricardo Luque of La Nación, a newspaper of record of Argentina, reproduced a quote from an inhabitant of the shanty town, "When the kids come to ask for something to eat, there's no point in giving them anything, so we go out and hunt cats, anything to feed them".[62]

Peru

[edit]

Cat is not a regular menu item in Peru, but is used in such dishes as fricassee and stews most abundant in two specific sites in the country: the southern town of Chincha Alta (Ica Region, Afro-Peruvian mostly) and the north-central Andean town of Huari (Ancash Region). Primarily used by Afro-Peruvians, cat cooking techniques are demonstrated every September during a festival known as "El Festival Gastronomico del Gato" (the Gastronomic Festival of the Cat) or "Miaustura", part of the festival of Saint Efigenia in the town of La Quebrada in San Luis District, Cañete.[63]

In October 2013, a judge banned the annual festival, which was held every September in La Quebrada to commemorate the arrival of settlers who were forced to eat cats to survive, citing it as cruel to the 100+ cats specifically bred for the event, which involves being kept in cages for a year prior the Festival. The judge also cited concerns over the safety of the meat, which drew criticism from residents who contend that cat meat is far richer than rabbit or duck, and that it has been long consumed globally without any deleterious effects.[64] The festival was nevertheless held again in 2017.[65]

That same month, magistrate María Luyo banned the festival of Curruñao in the small town of San Luis. Locals say that the festival, which sees cats being drowned, skinned, and tied to fireworks and blown up, dates back to the practice of eating cat on the part of African slaves who worked on sugar-cane plantations in colonial times, and is part of the religious celebrations of Santa Efigenia, an African-Peruvian folk saint. Luyo stated in her ruling that the festival "fomented violence based on cruel acts against animals which caused grave social damage and damaged public health", and that minors could be "psychologically damaged" by watching the events.[66]

United States

[edit]

In December 2018, the Dog and Cat Meat Trade Prohibition Act of 2018 was signed into federal law, making the commercial slaughter and trade of cat meat illegal and punishable by a fine of $5,000, except as part of Native American religious ceremonies. Previous to that bill, consuming cat meat was legal in 44 states.[67]

Religion

[edit]

Islam

[edit]

According to Islamic dietary laws, the consumption of cat meat is Haram as it is considered a terrestrial predator.[68][69]

Judaism

[edit]

Jewish Kashrut laws forbid consuming cat meat as it is a predator. As well as not being a predator, a mammal must both chew cud and have cloven hooves in order to be considered kosher.[70][71]

Opposition to cat meat consumption

[edit]

As the ownership of cats as pets has become increasingly popular in China, opposition to cat meat consumption has also grown. In June 2006, a group of 40 animal welfare activists stormed Fangji Restaurant in Shenzhen, a restaurant specializing in cat meat, and managed to force the restaurant to stop selling cat meat.[72]

This occurred approximately two years after the establishment of the Chinese Animal Protection Network (CAPN),[73] which began organizing well-publicized protests against the consumption of dog and cat meat in January 2006, initially in Guangzhou and then in more than ten other cities.[74][75]

In February 2020, Four Paws published the market analysis report, “The Dog and Cat Meat Trade in Southeast Asia: A Threat to Animals and People", and together with the Change For Animals Foundation, called on the government of Vietnam to reinstate previous laws explicitly prohibiting the trade of cat meat.[76][77][78]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Cat meat is the flesh of domesticated cats (Felis catus) consumed as by humans, primarily in certain regions of such as and parts of , where it is prepared as stews, soups, or grilled dishes and attributed purported medicinal properties like improving vitality or treating ailments. The practice traces historical roots to periods of famine and wartime scarcity in , evolving into a cultural tradition among some demographics, including older generations who view it as a nutrient-dense protein source. In , an estimated one million cats are slaughtered annually for meat, often sourced through informal markets involving of pets or strays, with consumption peaking around events for supposed or benefits. Similar but less widespread practices persist in the , , and , though urban attitudes are shifting toward viewing cats as companions rather than . Culinary preparations emphasize cat's lean texture and flavor, sometimes combined with herbs or spices in dishes like "dragon-tiger-phoenix" soups that include multiple meats, but no peer-reviewed evidence substantiates unique nutritional superiority over other proteins; risks include bacterial contamination or parasites if not properly cooked, akin to undercooked or . The trade has sparked international controversies over , given cats' frequent sourcing from unregulated suppliers leading to inhumane slaughter methods, prompting bans in places like (2017), Shenzhen and in (2020, reclassifying cats as companions), and proposed prohibitions in (2025) and (effective 2027). These regulations reflect growing domestic opposition in , driven by pet ownership trends and concerns post-COVID-19, alongside pressure from animal advocacy groups, though enforcement varies and rural consumption continues. Historically, cat meat appeared sporadically in European contexts during scarcities, such as in or wartime , but remains in Western cultures where cats are predominantly pets.

Overview

Definition and Culinary Uses

Cat meat refers to the flesh and other edible parts derived from domestic cats ( catus) intended for human consumption. It is sourced primarily from stray or stolen cats rather than farmed animals, with preparation involving slaughter by methods such as drowning, bludgeoning, or electrocution, followed by hair removal via scalding or mechanical means, skin singeing, and butchering. In culinary contexts, cat meat is most commonly stewed, fried, or grilled, often with , to enhance flavor, and served as a in restaurants where diners may select live animals for immediate preparation. Dishes exclude organs like lungs, tail, feet, and ears, with bones sometimes used for balms; black cats command higher prices due to perceived purity and medicinal value, though no supports health claims such as repelling bad luck or alleviating ailments. Consumption is tied to cultural superstitions, such as eating at the lunar month's end for good fortune, rather than routine protein sourcing.

Nutritional Profile

The proximate composition of the empty, dehaired body of adult domestic cats (Felis catus), as determined by chemical analysis of 20 carcasses (14 males and 6 females), consists of approximately 62.3% , 20.0–21.7% crude protein, 11.2% (), and 4.5% on a wet tissue basis. Males exhibited slightly higher protein content (21.7%) compared to females (20.0%), with no significant differences in , , or .
ComponentPercentage (wet basis, mean ± SEM)
62.3 ± 0.68%
Crude Protein20.0–21.7% (females–males)
()11.2 ± 1.18%
4.5 ± 0.11%
The mineral content, expressed per 100 g of , includes (32.6 g), (18.6 g; Ca:P ratio 1.75), (4.7 g), magnesium (0.8 g), iron (97.5 mg), (63.7 mg), and (1.3 mg), with no significant sex-based variations. Essential in the protein fraction, relative to 100 mol , feature (113 mol), (82 mol), (78 mol), (71 mol), (54 mol), (47 mol), (41 mol), and (32 mol). These values reflect the overall carcass rather than isolated muscle tissue, but provide a baseline for the nutrient density of cat-derived , which is predominantly lean protein with moderate . Limited exist on vitamins or other micronutrients specific to cat for consumption.

Historical Context

Pre-Modern and Traditional Practices

In medieval Europe, domestic cats were primarily valued for and occasionally exploited for their pelts, with zooarchaeological evidence from sites revealing cutmarks on skeletal remains consistent with for production and incidental consumption during resource shortages or opportunistic hunting. Similar findings from 12th-13th century , , document systematic slaughter of cats via throat-slitting and , likely for both and edible , as indicated by the processing patterns on multiple individuals. These practices were not widespread but tied to utilitarian needs in agrarian or urban contexts where cats supplemented limited protein sources. Culinary texts from the period reflect awareness of as a viable, if marginal, foodstuff; the Catalan manuscript Llibre del Coch provides a detailed for roasted , instructing , evisceration, burial in earth for 24-48 hours to tenderize, followed by spicing and over coals. Such recipes suggest meat was prepared in times of necessity rather than preference, with preparation methods aimed at mitigating perceived off-flavors associated with the animal's diet. In northern Spain during early modern periods, consumption was documented anecdotally among rural populations, often without cultural stigma beyond practical survival. In pre-modern , direct evidence for routine cat meat consumption remains limited, with cats instead integrated into early farming communities around 5300 years ago in primarily as rodent hunters rather than food animals, as inferred from isotopic analysis of bones showing diets aligned with storage pests. Folk medicinal uses, such as brewing cat meat into tonics for or , appear in Korean traditions predating the , emphasizing therapeutic rather than culinary value. Traditional practices in regions like lack verified pre-colonial origins, with available historical data pointing to sporadic rather than entrenched use before modern intensification.

Consumption During Crises

During severe food shortages induced by wars, sieges, and famines, populations in regions without established traditions of cat consumption have turned to cats as a protein source of last resort, often after exhausting other available foods. This practice reflects pragmatic responses to caloric deficits rather than cultural preference, with historical accounts documenting its occurrence across and when livestock and staples became unavailable. The Siege of Leningrad (September 1941–January 1944), during which German forces blockaded the city and caused an estimated 1 million civilian deaths from , saw residents consume cats, dogs, and even rats after pets were depleted. Survivors boiled leather goods, wallpaper paste, and spices for sustenance, underscoring the extremity of the crisis. Post-siege, cats were reintroduced from other regions to control infestations that threatened remaining food stores. In amid shortages, cat meat appeared in urban markets and taverns, particularly in and , leading to a 1943 decree by Benito Mussolini's regime banning its sale to preserve livestock for agriculture and prevent disease spread from unregulated slaughter. Enforcement was inconsistent due to wartime chaos, but the law highlighted official recognition of the practice as a desperation measure rather than normalized fare. Earlier, during the 1661–1663 in triggered by and poor harvests, families slaughtered cats, dogs, and wild animals for food, as chronicled in 17th-century accounts of widespread desperation. Similar episodes occurred in northern Spain's , where cat recipes emerged sporadically during agrarian crises, though never as a staple. These instances align with patterns in pet-keeping societies, where cats' utility as controllers typically spared them until human survival imperatives overrode such roles.

Global Consumption Patterns

Asia

Asia represents the primary region for cat meat consumption worldwide, with practices rooted in traditional cuisine and historical necessity during famines. Estimates indicate that approximately 10 million cats are slaughtered annually for human consumption globally, the vast majority in Asian countries. These figures derive from investigations by animal welfare organizations, which document sourcing from strays, theft, and unregulated farms, often involving significant animal suffering and public health risks due to lack of oversight.

China

In China, cat meat has been consumed historically, particularly in southern provinces, though less prominently than dog meat. Reports estimate up to 4 million cats are killed yearly for food, often in dishes like "dragon, tiger, phoenix" which combines snake, cat, and chicken. The trade persists despite growing pet ownership and urban opposition, with cats sourced via theft or black markets; no national ban exists, but local regulations in cities like Shenzhen prohibit sales. Consumption is attributed to beliefs in medicinal benefits, such as warming the body in winter, though empirical evidence for such claims is lacking.

Vietnam

Vietnam exhibits widespread cat meat consumption, especially in the north around and Thai Binh province, where it is marketed as "thịt mèo" or "little " for purported health benefits like treating . Over 1 million cats are trafficked annually for slaughter, despite a brief explicit ban on and consumption lifted in January 2020 amid challenges. Practices involve live markets and home slaughters, with weak veterinary controls raising zoonotic disease concerns; surveys show declining acceptance among younger demographics due to rising pet culture.

South Korea and Other East Asian Nations

In , cat meat consumption emerged more recently than , historically tied to rural practices but now marginal amid . A 2024 law bans the dog meat industry effective 2027, indirectly impacting cat trade through heightened scrutiny, though cats were never farmed at scale. In other East Asian countries like and , cat meat is rare or taboo, with no significant documented trade; banned it in 2017 under animal protection laws.

Southeast Asia

Southeast Asian nations including Cambodia, Indonesia, and Laos feature cat meat in local diets, often alongside dog, with combined estimates exceeding several million animals yearly across the region. In Cambodia, cats are sold in markets for soups believed to enhance vitality; Indonesia's consumption occurs in areas like Sulawesi, despite Islamic prohibitions in majority-Muslim regions. Trade involves cross-border smuggling, unregulated slaughter, and health risks from uninspected meat; advocacy groups report over 10 million dogs and cats affected regionally, with cats comprising a notable portion in Vietnam-adjacent areas. No comprehensive bans exist, though public campaigns and tourism pressures are fostering opposition.

China

Cat meat consumption in has traditionally occurred in southern provinces such as and , where it is prepared in dishes like stewed cat or incorporated into soups for purported medicinal benefits, though it remains marginal compared to other meats and is not part of mainstream cuisine. Estimates suggest approximately 4 million cats are slaughtered annually for meat, primarily sourced from stolen pets or unregulated farms, but these figures originate from advocacy groups and may reflect upper-bound projections amid declining practices. In response to concerns following the outbreak, China's Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs reclassified dogs and cats as companion animals in April 2020, effectively prohibiting their consumption nationwide by excluding them from livestock definitions. Cities like and implemented explicit bans on the sale and consumption of cat and that same year, with penalties including fines up to 30 times the animal's value for violations exceeding 10,000 CNY. These measures built on a broader February 2020 national decision to ban illegal wildlife trading and consumption, targeting risks from unregulated animal markets. Despite regulatory crackdowns, illegal cat meat trade persists in underground markets, driven by niche demand in rural or traditional settings, though rising pet ownership— with over 100 million companion animals by 2023— and shifting urban attitudes have reduced acceptance. Surveys in cities like indicate 95-99% public support for ending the trade, reflecting broader cultural evolution away from such practices. Enforcement varies regionally, with southern areas facing ongoing challenges from smuggling and black-market operations.

Vietnam

Cat meat consumption in primarily occurs in the northern regions, where it is viewed as a traditional with purported medicinal properties, such as warming the body during winter or warding off bad luck when eaten at the start of each . Dishes like thịt mèo (cat stew) are prepared by stewing cat meat with spices, ginger, and lemongrass, often served in rural areas and smaller cities rather than urban centers like . Estimates indicate that approximately 1 million cats are slaughtered annually for meat in , sourced largely from strays, stolen pets, or unregulated farms, though these figures originate from organizations advocating against the trade. The practice is more prevalent among lower-income groups, with surveys showing higher refusal rates in southern cities like compared to , where cultural acceptance remains stronger among older generations influenced by wartime protein shortages. Cat meat is less commercially dominant than but often featured in combination platters or as a folk remedy for ailments like , despite lacking scientific validation for such claims. Legally, cat meat consumption and trade are not prohibited nationally, though slaughter must comply with general laws requiring stunning before killing, enacted in 2018; enforcement remains inconsistent, with rabies transmission risks highlighted due to unregulated sourcing. Recent developments include growing public dialogue and local initiatives to curb the trade, driven by animal rights campaigns and health concerns, but no comprehensive ban exists as of 2025, with over 6 million dogs and cats collectively estimated killed yearly. Some northern restaurants have transitioned away from cat meat amid shifting attitudes, particularly among younger urbanites, yet the practice persists in traditional settings.

South Korea and Other East Asian Nations

In , cat meat consumption emerged more recently than that of , primarily as a medicinal tonic rather than a . Traditionally, cats were boiled or fermented into goyang soju (also called goyangi soju), a thick tonic purported to alleviate , , and , with an estimated 100,000 cats slaughtered annually in the early 2000s for this purpose, sourced mainly from strays and ferals rather than dedicated farms. This practice contrasted with direct culinary use, though some cat meat appeared in soups or stews. Cat meat use has declined significantly amid rising pet ownership, with cats now held by a growing share of households—second only to dogs among pets—and viewed increasingly as companions rather than commodities. While not explicitly covered by the January 2024 legislation banning , slaughter, and sale for consumption (effective February 2027), cat meat remains legal but uncommon, subject to broader animal protection laws prohibiting unauthorized slaughter since April 2023. In , verifiable data on cat meat is scarce due to limited access, but it is not farmed commercially and appears confined to sporadic use of strays, without evidence of widespread cultural practice. Japan lacks any historical or contemporary tradition of cat meat consumption, reflecting cultural norms favoring cats as pets or mousers. prohibited the trade, sale, and consumption of cat and dog meat in April 2017, imposing fines of $1,640 to $8,200 on violators, marking Asia's first such nationwide ban and signaling prior marginal practices.

Southeast Asia

In Cambodia, cat meat forms part of a broader trade estimated to involve millions of animals annually across , with cats often sourced from thefts, strays, or imports and consumed in rural areas or urban eateries as an accompaniment to alcohol, sometimes marketed as "special meat." Investigations by the animal welfare group , which conducted undercover surveys, document cat meat sales in Phnom Penh markets and restaurants, though precise cat-specific figures remain elusive amid combined estimates of 2-3 million dogs and additional cats slaughtered yearly in the country. In , cat meat consumption is confined to certain regions, notably where it is trafficked alongside over one million dogs annually for local dishes, despite opposition from the Muslim majority who view it as due to religious norms against carnivorous animals. Local bans, such as the 2023 prohibition at Extreme Market in and proposed 2025 restrictions in , reflect declining tolerance, with trade persisting through informal networks rather than mainstream cuisine. Elsewhere in the region, such as , , and the , cat meat reports are infrequent and typically anecdotal, associated with isolated ethnic practices or wartime shortages rather than established culinary traditions, with no large-scale trade documented. U.S. congressional resolutions from highlight the practice's existence in these nations but urge enforcement of anti-cruelty laws without quantifying prevalence.

Africa

In Africa, cat meat consumption remains marginal and regionally confined, often linked to , opportunistic , or localized cultural practices rather than forming a staple of . Unlike in certain Asian nations where it is commercially traded on a large scale, documented instances in Africa typically involve small-scale from or owned animals, with no evidence of industrialized supply chains. Animal welfare organizations report sporadic trade, but empirical surveys indicate low prevalence overall, potentially exaggerated by advocacy groups focused on broader issues. A 2015 survey across five towns in involving 1,237 respondents found that 34% had consumed meat at least once, with 54% of those citing it as a source amid limited protein alternatives. Procurement often came from personal pets or neighbors rather than markets, reflecting economic necessity in rural areas where ownership serves dual utility for and occasional meat. The study noted meat's non-preferred status compared to other proteins like or , and highlighted health risks including potential transmission of from undercooked flesh. In , a niche group in known locally as "cat eaters" has been documented hunting wild cats and occasionally domestic ones since at least the early , consuming them grilled or in stews for purported medicinal benefits against or as a . This practice, involving an estimated small cadre of hunters, stems from traditional beliefs in cats' invigorating properties but does not extend to widespread adoption, with most Cameroonians viewing cats as pets or vermin controllers. Reports emphasize brutal killing methods like clubbing, raising welfare concerns, though no national consumption statistics exist. Ghana's features informal cat meat sales in soups prepared at roadside spots, where it is colloquially termed "" and valued for its texture in stews with spices and . This custom, observed as of , ties into broader acceptance of unconventional meats in northern and eastern areas facing protein shortages, but remains culturally specific and not indicative of national norms. efforts by groups like the for Cruelty-Free target such trades for and hygiene risks, yet lack quantitative data on volume. Elsewhere, anecdotal claims of cat meat use in countries like or surface in advocacy literature, often conflated with or hunting, but peer-reviewed or journalistic evidence is scant and unquantified. In 's urban centers like , isolated reports suggest occasional inclusion in "bushmeat" markets, driven by famine history or affordability, though regulatory pushes since aim to curb it amid campaigns. Overall, African consumption patterns prioritize survival over ritual or commerce, with no verified large-scale metrics comparable to Asian figures exceeding millions annually.

Europe

In Europe, cat meat consumption has historically occurred primarily during periods of severe food shortages, such as sieges and wars, rather than as a routine dietary practice. During the Franco-Prussian Siege of Paris in 1870-1871, residents resorted to eating cats, dogs, rats, and even zoo animals like and camels after conventional food supplies dwindled, with cat meat sold at prices of 20 to 40 cents per pound alongside other unconventional sources. Similar desperation marked in , where cats frequently vanished from homes and reappeared on menus disguised as or other meats amid and . These episodes reflect pragmatic responses to caloric deficits rather than cultural preference, with cat meat often prepared in stews or roasts to mask its flavor, as documented in contemporary accounts from northern and other regions where it was not normative even in pre-modern times. Today, consumption remains exceedingly rare across , viewed as due to widespread pet ownership and norms that emerged post-. In most countries, it is either explicitly banned or restricted to non-commercial contexts, with no evidence of organized trade or markets. enacted a on killing dogs and cats for meat in 1986, motivated by post-war shifts away from crisis-era practices. similarly bans the practice outright, aligning with broader European aversion except in historical scarcity. Switzerland stands as a notable exception, where permits individuals to slaughter and consume cats or dogs from their own farms for personal use, provided the animals are deemed fit and not sold commercially—a policy rooted in rural traditions but rarely exercised. The Swiss Food Safety and Veterinary Office confirms that while sale of such is prohibited under regulations on animal-origin foods, private consumption of home-raised animals avoids legal penalty, though groups have campaigned for a full ban since at least 2014, citing ethical concerns amid negligible documented cases. In practice, no supermarkets or restaurants offer cat , and public surveys indicate it is not culturally accepted, with consumption limited to anecdotal rural or survivalist instances. Other nations like the allow personal consumption without explicit bans but report no verifiable modern incidents, reinforcing the continent-wide norm against it.

Americas and Oceania

In the , cat meat consumption is exceedingly rare and largely confined to isolated historical or cultural practices rather than widespread dietary norms. The explicitly prohibits the slaughter of cats for human consumption under the Dog and Cat Meat Trade Prohibition Act of 2018, which bans such activities nationwide to protect companion animals, reflecting a cultural view of cats as pets rather than food sources. Sporadic reports of consumption exist in rural or immigrant communities, but these lack systematic evidence and are not representative of broader societal practices. In , a notable exception occurred during Feast of St. Efigenia in the village of La Quebrada, San Luis de Cañete, where up to 100 cats were reportedly drowned, butchered, and consumed as stews or grilled dishes, purportedly for their properties or to commemorate enslaved ancestors' survival on cat meat during colonial times. This event, held in , drew international criticism for animal cruelty and was suspended by a provincial in 2013 following complaints, with subsequent enforcement preventing its revival. Most Peruvians view cats as companions, not cuisine, and no large-scale commercial trade exists. Isolated anecdotes from other South American countries like or suggest occasional rural consumption during scarcity, but these remain unverified and culturally marginal without empirical documentation of prevalence or scale. Across , cat meat consumption is virtually nonexistent, aligning with strong cultural taboos against eating companion animals in nations like and . While maintains no federal ban on personal consumption, a occasionally imports cat meat from , primarily for niche or illicit demand rather than local production or tradition. High pet ownership rates—over 29% of Australian households have cats—and veterinary surveys indicate cats are fed commercial or meat-based pet foods, not harvested for human use. similarly reports no documented cases, with and frameworks prioritizing cats as domestic animals over potential food sources. Overall, regional attitudes emphasize ethical and legal barriers, rendering cat meat irrelevant to mainstream diets.

Cultural and Religious Dimensions

Views Favoring Consumption

In certain regions of , particularly , cat meat consumption is motivated by traditional beliefs that it wards off misfortune and promotes good fortune. Locals report eating it during the or consuming black cat meat specifically to repel bad luck or alleviate skin conditions. These practices stem from longstanding , where cat meat is viewed as a prophylactic against adversity rather than mere sustenance. Perceived medicinal properties also underpin favorable views, with some Vietnamese attributing therapeutic effects to cat bones for treating asthma and osteoporosis. In South Korea, middle-aged working-class women consume cat meat for its reputed health advantages, such as warming the body during winter, aligning with broader zootherapeutic traditions in the region. Older generations in Vietnam similarly hold that it confers vitality, though younger cohorts increasingly favor it for taste over such claims. Economically, cat meat serves as an accessible protein source in areas of dietary , supplementing inadequate where other meats are cost-prohibitive. This utility is particularly noted in impoverished or wartime contexts, where it functions analogously to other unconventional proteins, providing essential without the ethical distinctions applied to companion animals in Western cultures. Proponents argue from a relativistic standpoint that cultural norms normalize it as , akin to rabbits or , emphasizing efficient resource use over species-specific taboos.

Views Opposing or Restricting Consumption

In many Western societies, cats are culturally regarded as companion animals valued for their affectionate and independent traits, fostering a profound against their consumption as food. This view posits that the unique human-feline bond, akin to familial relationships, renders eating cats morally repugnant, distinguishing them from utilitarian like or . Animal advocates reinforce this by highlighting the of cats and the ethical inconsistency of condemning their slaughter while accepting that of less "charismatic" , though critics argue such distinctions stem from anthropomorphic rather than objective criteria. Opposition has intensified even in traditional consuming regions of , driven by rising pet ownership and . A 2025 survey in , , revealed 99% public support for banning cat and dog meat sales, reflecting a generational shift where younger urbanites increasingly view as pets rather than edibles. In , approximately 59.8% of respondents in a study reported refusing dog or cat meat, citing ethical concerns over the trade's brutality, including live transport in cramped conditions and slaughter methods like bludgeoning to purportedly enhance tenderness. These sentiments underscore a prioritizing animal companionship over culinary tradition. Religiously, Islamic often restricts cat meat consumption, classifying cats among fanged carnivores prohibited as food per hadiths attributing such rulings to the Prophet Muhammad, who reportedly favored cats as clean yet deemed their meat (disliked) or (forbidden) by dominant scholarly opinions. In contrast, lacks explicit scriptural bans on cat meat following declarations that all foods are clean (Acts 10:9-16), though some denominations invoke unclean animal lists—where cats, as predators, might analogize to forbidden species—and cultural revulsion aligns with broader ethics urging compassion toward creation. Hindu and Buddhist traditions, emphasizing (non-violence), do not single out cats but generally discourage meat-eating, with stricter adherents viewing any sentient being's slaughter as karmically burdensome, indirectly opposing practices like cat meat trade amid calls for .

Health and Safety Considerations

Potential Nutritional Advantages

Cat meat, derived from the muscle and organ tissues of domestic cats, serves as a source of animal-based protein in regions where it is consumed, potentially offering complete profiles similar to other mammalian meats. In nutritionally marginal diets, such as those observed in rural , opportunistic consumption of cat meat provides an irregular but valuable protein supplementation, helping to address deficiencies common in areas with limited access to diverse protein sources. Limited empirical analyses exist on its proximate composition, but as lean , cat meat likely delivers high-quality protein with essential amino acids like and , alongside bioavailable micronutrients such as iron and (e.g., niacin, B12), which support metabolic functions and production—benefits inherent to unprocessed tissues over alternatives. These attributes position cat meat as a potentially efficient caloric source for protein in low-resource settings, though comprehensive comparative studies against staples like or are absent, reflecting the topic's under-researched status outside cultural consumption contexts.

Associated Health Risks

Consumption of cat meat presents health risks stemming from zoonotic pathogens that cats can harbor, particularly when sourced from unvaccinated strays, , or inadequately inspected animals prevalent in informal markets. These risks are compounded by frequent unhygienic slaughter practices, lack of regulatory oversight, and incomplete cooking, which fail to eliminate viable microorganisms. Bacterial infections represent a primary concern, with Salmonella species contaminating meat via fecal matter during processing, potentially causing salmonellosis characterized by diarrhea, fever, and abdominal cramps onset 1-3 days post-ingestion. Cats, as carriers, shed these bacteria in feces, and cross-contamination occurs readily in live-market settings without sanitation protocols. Similar risks apply to Campylobacter and Escherichia coli, which thrive in undercooked or raw preparations common in some culinary traditions. Parasitic infections include trichinellosis from Trichinella spp. larvae encysted in cat muscle tissue, acquired by cats consuming raw infected prey; human ingestion of undercooked meat leads to intestinal invasion, myositis, and systemic symptoms like fever and periorbital edema, with larvae persisting lifelong. Toxoplasmosis, caused by Toxoplasma gondii, poses risks via tissue cysts in infected cat meat, though cats primarily transmit oocysts fecally; undercooked consumption can disseminate bradyzoites, especially hazardous to immunocompromised individuals or fetuses, causing chorioretinitis, encephalitis, or congenital defects. Viral zoonoses, notably rabies (), arise from handling or consuming meat from infected cats in endemic areas like parts of , where vaccination gaps persist; while gastric acids and cooking typically inactivate the , insufficient heat (below 70°C) or raw preparation enables oral transmission, progressing to fatal . Reports from meat trades highlight elevated rabies incidence due to cross-species movement and poor . Other pathogens, such as Leptospia or , may transmit via contaminated tissues, though evidence specific to cat meat remains limited to general zoonotic potential. In regions like , where cat meat trade volumes reach thousands annually amid lax enforcement, these hazards are intensified by pet theft and inter-provincial transport of diseased animals, undermining rabies control efforts and fostering antimicrobial-resistant strains from untreated infections. No large-scale outbreaks tied exclusively to cat meat are documented, but analogous risks underscore the causal pathway from unregulated sourcing to human . Thorough cooking to internal temperatures exceeding 74°C mitigates most threats, yet cultural preferences for rare or stewed preparations sustain vulnerabilities.

Jurisdictions Permitting Consumption

In , consumption of cat meat remains legal, with the practice integrated into certain regional cuisines, particularly in northern provinces where it is marketed as having purported health benefits such as improving stamina. The , while often unregulated and involving informal slaughter, faces no national prohibition on personal or small-scale consumption, contributing to an estimated annual slaughter of around 1 million cats for meat. China permits cat meat consumption at the national level, though local bans exist in cities such as and since April 2020, which prohibit the sale and consumption of cat and as part of broader animal protection measures. In unaffected regions like and , cat meat is consumed sporadically, often in dishes combined with other meats, but enforcement of hygiene and sourcing standards is inconsistent. Switzerland allows individuals to consume cat meat from animals they own personally, provided no commercial production or sale occurs, as stipulated by the Federal Food Safety and Veterinary Office regulations that restrict only the processing and distribution of cat and dog meat for human consumption. This exception stems from the absence of a blanket ban on private slaughter for personal use, though the practice is rare and culturally stigmatized. In , cat meat consumption lacks a national ban and occurs in select regions, such as parts of the southeast, where it is incorporated into traditional soups and stews amid ongoing for prohibition due to health and welfare concerns. Similar permissiveness applies in , where no explicit legal restrictions prevent personal or market-based consumption. Other jurisdictions without comprehensive bans include , , and parts of outside the 36 local regions that have enacted prohibitions by 2023; in these areas, cat meat trade persists informally despite growing international pressure for regulation.

Bans and Enforcement Challenges

Several jurisdictions have enacted explicit prohibitions on the slaughter, sale, and consumption of cat meat, often as part of broader or regulations. In the , the Dog and Cat Meat Trade Prohibition Act of 2018, incorporated into the Agriculture Improvement Act, criminalizes the knowing slaughter, transportation, possession, purchase, sale, or donation of cats or dogs for consumption, with penalties including fines up to $1,000 for individuals. implemented a nationwide ban on the slaughter of cats and dogs for food in 2017, imposing fines of up to NT$250,000 (approximately $7,800) for violations, marking it as the first Asian territory to do so explicitly for both species. In , consumption and sale of cat meat have been prohibited since 1950 under public health and animal protection ordinances, yet enforcement persists through periodic raids. Local bans in , such as Shenzhen's 2020 prohibition classifying cats as companion animals ineligible for consumption amid post-COVID restrictions, carry fines up to 200,000 yuan (about $28,000), but lack national uniformity. In , cat meat consumption is restricted in most countries through general animal slaughter laws requiring humane methods and prohibiting the commercialization of pets, though explicit bans vary. For instance, commercial sale is illegal across the under food safety and welfare directives, with standing out as permitting private slaughter and personal consumption by farmers—primarily in rural Alpine regions—while banning commercial preparation or sale. Other nations like the and effectively bar trade via welfare statutes, though personal consumption loopholes exist without commercial involvement. Enforcement faces significant hurdles, including persistent underground markets fueled by cultural traditions and economic incentives. In , despite the decades-old ban, authorities raided an unlicensed restaurant in 2023, seizing 35 kg of smuggled cat and from , and prosecuted three individuals in 2024 for serving such dishes, highlighting cross-border and evasion tactics like hidden operations in flats. Taiwan's has seen improved compliance in urban areas through public awareness campaigns, but rural lags due to limited inspections and theft for illicit supply chains. In , local prohibitions like Shenzhen's are undermined by inconsistent application, with activists reporting ongoing underground trade in non-banned regions supplying urban markets, exacerbated by risks from unregulated sourcing and weak rural oversight. Broader challenges include stakeholder resistance from traders reliant on the industry for , constraints for monitoring vast informal networks, and difficulties distinguishing legally sourced strays from stolen pets in supply chains. In regions with partial bans, such as Switzerland's allowance for personal use, low reported incidence reduces urgency, but campaigns cite ethical concerns over unreported rural practices during holidays like . These issues persist despite international resolutions, such as U.S. ional calls for global enforcement, as cultural autonomy and enforcement gaps allow trade to adapt via black markets rather than cease.

Economic and Trade Dynamics

Markets and Supply Chains

The primary markets for cat meat are concentrated in , particularly and parts of southern , where demand drives an estimated annual consumption of around one million cats in alone. Supply chains typically begin with the capture of or of domestic pets from urban and rural areas, as large-scale commercial farming of cats for meat is rare and undocumented in credible reports. These animals are often sourced informally by traders who operate in networks spanning provinces, with contributing significantly to supply amid limited regulation. Transportation occurs in overcrowded, unsanitary conditions, such as cramped cages on trucks or motorcycles, facilitating movement from theft hotspots to northern Vietnamese regions like Hanoi, where cat meat restaurants cluster. Slaughter typically happens at informal abattoirs or on-site at markets and eateries, followed by processing into dishes like "little tiger" stew, sold fresh in wet markets or directly to consumers valuing it for purported medicinal properties. In China, supply chains overlap with the more prominent dog meat trade, as seen in events like the Yulin festival, where cats are occasionally sourced similarly through local capture and informal trade networks, though cat-specific volumes remain lower and less quantified. Across , the trade's scale reaches into the millions when including dogs, with an estimated 10 million animals slaughtered yearly in countries like , , and , underscoring the informal, pet-theft-driven nature of cat supply that evades official oversight. International elements are minimal, confined to regional cross-border smuggling, such as from to , but lack evidence of formalized export chains due to cultural localization and sporadic bans. These chains persist amid economic incentives for low-cost protein in rural areas, though advocacy reports highlight inefficiencies like high disease transmission risks from unregulated sourcing.

Socioeconomic Role

In , the cat meat trade sustains informal livelihoods for trappers, transporters, slaughterers, and vendors, particularly in rural and peri-urban areas where formal employment opportunities are scarce. Workers involved describe it as a primary or supplemental income source, often filling economic gaps in low-wage contexts, with operations relying on low-cost capture of strays and farm animals via snares or . Annual estimates indicate around 1 million cats enter this , supporting small-scale restaurants and markets despite regulatory pressures. This activity parallels the larger sector, which constitutes a notable economic driver through similar channels. Consumption patterns reflect socioeconomic stratification, with regular cat meat eaters—primarily men in —favoring it as an accompaniment to alcohol during social gatherings or lunar rituals believed to ward off misfortune, rather than as staple for the destitute. Cat meat commands a premium over , pricing it as a modest luxury for middle- to lower-income groups rather than a poverty staple, though broader wild meat trades in underscore protein access amid uneven development. Animal welfare organizations, which dominate reporting on the trade, emphasize health and ethical risks while often minimizing its role in sustaining peripheral economies, potentially reflecting advocacy priorities over neutral economic analysis. In and Southeast Asian fringes, underground persistence post-restrictions indicates residual economic incentives for operators, including cross-border that bolsters local traders amid urbanization's disruptions to traditional protein sourcing. Overall, the trade's scale—part of an estimated 30 million annual dog and cat slaughters across —remains niche relative to mainstream , yet it exemplifies how cultural niches underpin informal resilience in transitioning economies.

Debates and Controversies

Animal Welfare Perspectives

In regions where cat meat consumption persists, such as parts of and , animal welfare organizations have documented severe suffering during transportation, confinement, and slaughter. Cats are frequently transported in overcrowded wire cages stacked atop one another, often without access to food, water, or ventilation, leading to deaths from , , shock, or injury prior to slaughter. Slaughter practices in these trades commonly involve inhumane methods lacking pre-slaughter stunning, including drowning, bludgeoning with hammers, and immersion in boiling water while conscious, which prolong distress and pain as evidenced by investigative reports. These conditions contrast with regulated livestock industries, where stunning protocols aim to render animals insensible before killing, though enforcement in cat meat supply chains remains minimal due to informal, unregulated operations. The World Small Animal Veterinary Association (WSAVA) has condemned the dog and cat meat trade for its inherent welfare violations, citing the from sourcing—often stolen pets or strays—and the absence of breeding standards that exacerbate and injury. Estimates indicate several million cats annually endure these processes in alone, amplifying cumulative harm. Advocacy groups like and Animals Asia argue that such practices fail basic sentience-based criteria for minimizing suffering, independent of cultural norms, as cats exhibit pain responses comparable to other mammals.

Arguments for Cultural Autonomy

Proponents of cultural autonomy contend that practices like cat meat consumption, rooted in longstanding traditions in regions such as and parts of , represent valid expressions of local heritage that external actors should not override. In , cat meat has been integrated into regional cuisines for generations, often prepared as dishes believed to provide warming effects during winter or medicinal benefits for ailments like , reflecting adaptive uses of available protein sources in agrarian societies. Such traditions underscore the principle that dietary norms evolve from environmental, historical, and social contexts unique to each culture, rather than conforming to imported standards. Cultural relativism forms a core argument, positing that judgments of edibility are society-specific and not universally prescriptive; for instance, while cats hold companion status in Western contexts, their classification as livestock in certain Asian communities parallels how pigs or rabbits are viewed elsewhere, rendering prohibitions ethnocentric. Defenders highlight the hypocrisy in critiquing these practices while overlooking comparable animal uses in other traditions, such as beef consumption amid Hindu reverence for cows, arguing that moral taboos on cats lack objective grounding beyond acculturation. This relativism extends to ethical frameworks, where animal welfare assessments should incorporate local values rather than impose singular paradigms, as seen in resistances to bans framed as cultural imperialism. National further bolsters these arguments, asserting that sovereign states hold the prerogative to regulate practices based on domestic consensus, free from pressures by international groups that may prioritize anthropomorphic Western sentiments over indigenous priorities. In analogous debates over in , traditionalists invoke over 2,000 years of history tied to and Confucian principles, rejecting external moral overlays as neo-colonial. Similarly, for cat meat, autonomy advocates emphasize that while science can inform standards—like humane slaughter—ultimate ethical determinations reside with the culture, avoiding the pitfalls of that disregard contextual variances in human-animal relations. This stance prioritizes , allowing societies to weigh traditions against evolving norms without coerced abandonment.

Impacts of International Advocacy

International non-governmental organizations, including Humane Society International and , have conducted campaigns exposing the cat meat trade's practices in , leading to documented reductions in visible market activities and increased local regulatory scrutiny. In , where an estimated one million cats are trafficked annually for consumption, advocacy-driven surveys revealed that 95% of respondents viewed cat meat as unrepresentative of national culture, prompting municipal-level enforcement actions and public pledges against the trade in cities like by 2023. In , global attention to the Yulin Lychee and Dog Meat Festival—often encompassing cat meat—has pressured authorities to de-emphasize the event since 2010, with official statements in 2020 discouraging cat consumption amid pandemic-related health concerns and activist investigations documenting theft and slaughter of pets. This resulted in Shenzhen's 2020 municipal ban on cat and dog meat sales, influenced by domestic activists leveraging international media exposure, though nationwide enforcement lagged. Collaborations with tourism operators in have leveraged economic incentives, with major firms pledging to highlight welfare issues in 2020, potentially deterring visitors and contributing to a reported 20-30% decline in attendance and volume in affected areas by 2023. Such efforts have accelerated generational shifts, with urban youth consumption dropping due to awareness campaigns, but have also spurred underground operations and cultural resistance claims in rural regions. In , advocacy targeting —the last Western nation without explicit prohibitions—intensified in 2014, citing estimates of hundreds of thousands of annual cat and dog consumption instances, yet yielded no federal ban by 2025, highlighting limits of external pressure absent domestic consensus. Overall, these initiatives have fostered policy dialogues and partial market contractions, though persistent weak enforcement underscores challenges in altering entrenched supply chains.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.