Hubbry Logo
Shoulder (road)Shoulder (road)Main
Open search
Shoulder (road)
Community hub
Shoulder (road)
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Shoulder (road)
Shoulder (road)
Shoulder (road)
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The shoulder of Saskatchewan Highway 11 in this picture (shown to the right of the solid white line) is wide enough to accommodate a stopped car without impeding the flow of traffic in the travel lanes

A shoulder (American English), hard shoulder (British English)[1] or breakdown lane (Australian English) is an emergency stopping lane by the verge on the outer side of a road or motorway. Many wider freeways, or expressways elsewhere have shoulders on both sides of each directional carriageway—in the median, as well as at the outer edges of the road, for additional safety. Shoulders are not intended for use by through traffic, although there are exceptions.

Purpose

[edit]

Shoulders have multiple uses, including:

  • Emergency vehicles such as ambulances, fire trucks and police cars may use the shoulder to bypass traffic congestion in some countries.
  • In the event of an emergency or breakdown, a motorist can pull into the shoulder to get out of the flow of traffic and obtain a greater degree of safety.
  • Active traffic management, used on busy multi-lane roads, may allow 'hard shoulder running' by general traffic at reduced speeds during periods of high traffic volumes.
  • In some places a "bus bypass shoulder" may be provided which allows bus services to pass stationary traffic.
  • Paved shoulders provide additional space should a motorist need to take evasive action (such as avoiding a wrong-way driver) or need to recover control of their vehicle before a run-off-road collision occurs.
  • In some rural areas without sidewalks, pedestrians and cyclists may be allowed to walk or ride on the shoulders.
  • On curbed roadways, shoulders move the gutter away from the travel lanes which reduces the risk of aquaplaning, and reduces splash and spray of stormwater onto pedestrians using any adjacent sidewalk.
  • Paved shoulders move water away from the roadway before it can infiltrate into the road's subbase, increasing the life expectancy of the road surface.
  • Shoulders help provide extra structural support of the roadway.
  • In some countries, when semi-truck drivers need sleep and there are no available parking spaces at truck stops and rest areas, either because there are no such facilities nearby or because all semi-truck parking spaces are filled to capacity, drivers may pull over to the highway shoulder and sleep in their truck cabin.
  • In some countries, parking in the shoulder is not prohibited by the law, and mushroom and berry pickers commonly use them on roads going through a forest.

General characteristics

[edit]
In Ireland, dashed yellow lines demarcate hard shoulders on non-motorways, as can be seen along this dual carriageway on the N11.

The shoulder is usually slightly narrower than a full traffic lane. In some cases, particularly on older rural roadways, shoulders that initially existed were hardened with gravel rather than being paved with asphalt, tarmac or concrete. In Britain, motorway shoulders are now paved, but are still known as "hard shoulders". Older, gravel shoulders have sometimes been termed soft shoulders by comparison. Because the paved surface ends at that point, they are less safe if they need to be used for emergency manoeuvres. Notably, the section of Ontario Highway 401 between Windsor and London had soft shoulders with a sharp slope which was blamed for facilitating vehicle rollovers, if drivers accidentally drifted off the paved section of the road and then overreacted after hitting the gravel. Modern practice is to build a continuous paved shoulder whenever possible.[2]

The US Federal Highway Administration encourages the placement of a Safety Edge—a 30° compacted taper on the end of the pavement drop-off—to ensure that any driver running off the edge of the roadway is better able to maintain control while trying to steer back onto the roadway. The Safety Edge is effective on roads where the shoulder is narrow or non-existent.[3]

To save money, the shoulder was often not paved to the same thickness as the through lanes, so if vehicles were to attempt to use it as a through lane regularly, it would rapidly deteriorate. In Britain, shoulder running can occur during roadworks, and full depth construction is now standard. In some metro areas, road authorities also allow shoulders to be used as lanes at peak periods. However, rural shoulders often collect various bits of road debris that can make driving there less safe.

Drivers will sometimes drift into the shoulder when being overtaken by passing vehicles, particularly on two-lane roads. However, it is extremely unsafe, and in most jurisdictions illegal, to abuse the shoulder by 'undertaking' passing vehicles that are nearer the centre of the road.

On older roads, the shoulder may disappear for short periods, near exits or when going across or under bridges or tunnels where the cost savings were thought to outweigh the safety benefits of the shoulder. Some roads have a narrow shoulder for significant distances. This makes it difficult for large vehicles to pull into the hard shoulder altogether.

The Jingjintang Expressway in north-eastern China is an example of this phenomenon. Its shoulder is only 2.4 metres (7.9 ft) wide, which is not wide enough for some automobiles—a standard lane in the U.S. and UK is 3.7 metres (12 ft). As a result, some motorists are unable to fully exit the mainline when they need to pull over, so they end up in a position that is halfway in the rightmost lane and only partly on the shoulder. The end result is often a traffic jam and occasionally a collision.

Bus bypass shoulder

[edit]
bus on shoulder
The Dulles Airport Express bypassing traffic using the shoulder lane

In some jurisdictions in the United States and Canada, buses are allowed to drive on the shoulder to pass traffic jams, which is called a bus-only shoulder or bus-bypass shoulder (BBS);[4] the term "bus-only shoulder lane" is incorrect from a technical and legal standpoint.[5] In Ontario, Highway 403 had its shoulders between Hurontario Street and Erin Mills Parkway widened in 2003 so they serve a dual purpose as bus lanes and accident lanes. In the Minneapolis–Saint Paul region of Minnesota, over 430 kilometres (270 mi) of shoulder have been designated for use by buses.[6] The Route 9 BBS in Central New Jersey which runs along two stretches of shoulders are dedicated for exclusive bus use during peak hours.[7][8] The bus lanes, which run for approximately 4.8 kilometres (3 mi), are the first component of a planned 32-kilometre (20 mi) BBS corridor.[9] In the Chicago area, Pace buses are authorised to use the shoulder of the Jane Addams Memorial Tollway, Edens Expressway, and Stevenson Expressway to avoid delays from traffic congestion.[10]

In the Seattle area, Community Transit and Sound Transit Express commuter buses are authorised to use the shoulders of Interstate 5 and Interstate 405 on small segments in Snohomish County as part of a pilot project that aims to reduce delayed bus trips.[11]

There are also some bus-bypass shoulders in the United Kingdom, on the motorways of Northern Ireland heading towards Belfast and the M90 motorway in Scotland towards Edinburgh.

Peak period use by all traffic

[edit]
Sign-controlled peak shoulder lane on Interstate 405 near Seattle, Washington, U.S.
The M42, with lowered speed limits and hard-shoulder running, as seen on the matrix Variable Message Sign (VMS) on the left.

In the United Kingdom, usage of the hard shoulder is known as "hard shoulder running". A pilot project on an 18-kilometre (11 mi) stretch of the M42 motorway, near Birmingham, began in September 2006. Active traffic management with special signage, new laybys and a controlled variable speed limit have been put in place to improve safety. This has proved very successful, with journey times decreasing by 26% northbound and 9% southbound. Drivers can also better predict their journey times as the variability decreased by 27%. The average accident rate dropped from 5.2 to 1.5 per month.[12] It has also proved popular with motorists, 60% of whom want to see it expanded to other English motorways.[citation needed] This 'smart motorway' system has been expanded to the M6,[13] M1[14] and M25,[15] as well as parts of the M60 and M62.[16]

In the United States, on Interstate 93 between Exit 35 (formerly 41)[17] and Exit 43 (formerly 46)[18] and SR 3 between Exit 27 (formerly 12)[19] and Exit 38 (formerly 16)[20] in the Boston metro area, cars are allowed to use the shoulder as they would a normal lane during morning and evening rush hours. The same scheme is employed elsewhere, such as on Interstate 580 in California on the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge, and on Interstate 405 between SR 527 and I-5 in Bothell.[21]

Emergency use by all traffic

[edit]
Emergency shoulder use (left shoulder only) on eastbound Interstate 4 prior to the forecast arrival of Hurricane Milton on October 7, 2024

Florida has developed a plan for the use of inside shoulders by moving traffic during hurricane evacuations on portions of Interstate 4 (eastbound from Tampa to Celebration), Interstate 10 (westbound from Jacksonville to Tallahassee), Interstate 75 (northbound from Naples to I-10; both directions from Naples to Ft. Lauderdale), Interstate 95 (northbound from West Palm Beach to near Jacksonville), Florida's Turnpike (northbound from Boynton Beach to Kissimmee and Winter Garden to I-75), and Florida State Road 528 (westbound through rural Orange County).[22][23][24] Florida's ESU plan prohibits trucks, busses, and trailers from driving on the shoulder and limits the speed limit to 50 mph on the shoulder, which is typically only 10 feet (3.0 m) wide compared to the standard 12 feet (3.7 m) width of highway travel lanes and contains rumble strips.[22] The shoulder-use plan was implemented in place of labour- and resource-intensive contraflow lane reversal, in which both sides of an interstate highway are used for one direction of traffic.[24]

The first implementation of the plan occurred on 8–9 September 2017 before the arrival of Hurricane Irma.[25][26][27] Florida implemented ESU again in October 2024 prior to the arrival of Hurricane Milton, which underwent explosive intensification from a Category 1 into a Category 5 hurricane two days before its forecast landfall on the west central Gulf Coast of Florida as a major hurricane which prompted a large evacuation from the Tampa Bay and Sarasota-Bradenton areas.[28][29] Texas has also considered emergency shoulder use for hurricane evacuations.[24]

Increased cyclist safety

[edit]

Although direct rear impacts only make up 3% of motorist-on-cyclist collisions,[citation needed] they are a more prominent collision type in arterial road type situations. When they occur in such circumstances, they are also associated with significantly increased risk of fatality. Data collated by the OECD indicates that rural locations account for 35% or more of cycling fatalities in Denmark, Finland, France, Great Britain, Japan, the Netherlands, and Spain.[30]

The use of appropriately designed segregated space on arterial or interurban routes appears to be associated with reductions in overall risk. In Ireland, the provision of hard shoulders on interurban routes in the 1970s reportedly resulted in a 50% decrease in accidents.[31] It is reported that the Danes have also found that separate cycle tracks lead to a reduction in rural collisions.[32]

In some countries, the use of shoulders is optional for cyclists, who may choose not to use it for reasons such as: it being too narrow, inviting dangerously close passes at high speed by motorists; it having a road surface unsuitable for cycling or putting the path of the cyclist in direct conflict with the paths of other road users, such as those turning across the shoulder. Generally, the usable width of the road begins where one can ride without increased danger of falls, jolts or blowouts. A road may have a gravel shoulder, its edge may be covered with sand or trash and the pavement may be broken.[33]

Characteristics in various countries

[edit]

Australia

[edit]

In a similar manner to Canada, Italy and the United States, the shoulders located on the side of Australia's highways are normally used as an emergency lane in the case of a breakdown or by emergency vehicles in the case of road congestion. However, no mandatory regulations exist to wear a high-visibility jacket when dismounting from the vehicle stopped in an emergency lane.

A recent study conducted by the National Coroners Information System (NCIS) in Australia[34] has revealed 29 closed case fatalities (and at least a dozen case fatalities still under coronial investigation) that had been reported to Australian coroners where a person was "struck in an emergency lane after their vehicle had stopped" between July 2000 and November 2010.[35]

Canada and the United States

[edit]
A break in the shoulder line is used by California to warn of upcoming freeway exits in foggy areas[36]

The right-hand shoulder is separated by a solid white line, and the left-hand shoulder (if the road is one-way, such as part of a divided highway) is separated from the leftmost through lane by a solid yellow line. On many roads, the lines are supplemented by reflective raised pavement markers or rumble strips to provide additional visual and tactile feedback to drivers crossing the lines.

On freeways in foggy areas of California, there is an obvious break in the line of the shoulder before every exit. This is to help drivers find their exits in heavy fog (especially the dangerous tule fog).[37]

France

[edit]
French highway, with dashed shoulder markings and sign explaining their significance

In France, roadway shoulders are usually 2.5 metres (8.2 ft) wide, or 3 metres (10 ft) wide when the roadway carries more than 2,000 vehicles per day. The main difference from other European countries is that the white line is dashed, typically 39 metres (128 ft) long with gaps 13 metres (43 ft) long. The design is intended to provide a guide for drivers to maintain a safe distance between vehicles. Road signs can be found along motorways, to indicate the safe distance (1 line = too close, 2 lines = safe distance). At some points (tunnel, bridge, narrow road with no shoulder, tight curve) the edge line becomes solid.

Ireland

[edit]
A junction on the M4 motorway in Ireland, with an unbroken yellow line (that peels away and follows the sliproad) demarcating the hard shoulder.

Full-width hard shoulders are provided on most new, upgraded (from the 1980s onwards), and major national roads in the Republic of Ireland, especially on wide two-lane and dual-carriageway roads (the shoulders on most 2+1 roads are narrow however). They are defined within the official document the Rules of the Road as a part of the road that should normally only be used by cyclists and pedestrians. Their provision of on interurban routes in the 1970s reportedly resulted in a 50% decrease in accidents involving pedal cyclists.[31]

The hard shoulder is usually demarcated by road markings in the form of a single dashed yellow line with the addition of yellow cat's eyes. On motorways, and at critical points on other routes (e.g. between junctions or interchanges, or beneath overpasses) a solid yellow line is used, denoting additional restrictions on usage of the hard shoulder. At junctions and on-ramps and off-ramps, the yellow line peels away into the turn, with a dashed white line (with green cats' eyes) denoting a lane division following the main route (i.e. in most cases the road remains the same width, and a turn lane takes the place of the hard shoulder).

In the 2000s, Bus Éireann coaches were allowed to use the hard shoulders on national roads into Dublin. However, dedicated bus lanes are now present on sections of some routes, such as the N7 Naas Road, and such use of actual hard shoulder is not universal.

Italy

[edit]

The shoulders located on the sides of Italy's highways are normally used as emergency lanes in case of breakdown or by emergency vehicles in case of queues. According to the regulation in force, it is mandatory to wear a high visibility jacket when dismounting from a vehicle stopped in an emergency lane.[38]

Normally one is not allowed to drive on the shoulder, but in case of traffic blockage, use of the shoulder is allowed to reach an exit if it is within 500 metres.

United Kingdom

[edit]
A2 at Leyton Cross, United Kingdom.

Full width hard shoulders are usually provided only on motorways and are usually 3.3 metres (11 ft) wide, but there are exceptions. Some motorways do not have hard shoulders at all (for example the A57(M) and many smart motorways where the hard shoulder has been converted into a running lane, named all lane running smart motorways) and there are a small number of dual carriageway A-roads which do possess hard shoulders (for example, parts of the A1, A2 and A27). Hard shoulders are always marked with a reflecting solid white line which is 20 centimetres (7.9 in) wide and is provided with a rumble strip. A line of red cats' eyes is also used, and is placed to the side of the line.

On many modern non-motorway roads, hard strips are provided. These are usually 1 metre (3.3 ft) wide, and are bounded by thinner solid white lines, and often without a rumble strip.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Shoulder (road)

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A shoulder is the paved or unpaved portion of a roadway contiguous with the traveled way, extending from the edge of the travel lane to the beginning of the foreslope or a barrier, primarily designed to accommodate stopped vehicles for use and to provide lateral support to the pavement structure. serve multiple critical functions beyond , including facilitating pavement drainage to prevent water accumulation, offering space for operations and storage, enhancing sight for drivers, and providing recovery areas for errant vehicles to safely re-enter the roadway. They also support increased highway capacity by allowing slower vehicles or bicycles to travel outside the main lanes, thereby improving overall traffic flow and reducing conflicts. In terms of , well-designed shoulders contribute to lower accident rates by minimizing edge drop-offs and providing structural stability that extends pavement life. Design standards for shoulders vary by roadway , traffic volume, and location, but typically emphasize widths of 8 to for freeways and major highways to ensure usability, with paved surfaces using materials similar to the mainline pavement for . Cross-slopes are generally set between 2% and 6% to promote effective drainage without compromising vehicle stability, and in superelevated sections, slopes adjust to match the curve's geometry. These elements ensure shoulders not only meet functional needs but also integrate with broader roadside safety features like guardrails.

Overview and Purpose

Definition and Terminology

A road is defined as the portion of the roadway contiguous with the traveled way, designed to accommodate stopped vehicles for use and to provide lateral support of the pavement structure. This distinguishes it from a , which separates opposing traffic lanes in the center of the , and a verge, which refers to the unpaved or grassy strip of land adjacent to the shoulder beyond the roadway edge. Terminology for road shoulders varies by region and surface type. In the United States, a "paved shoulder" or simply "" typically denotes a hard-surfaced area, while a "soft shoulder" describes an unpaved or edge that may be unstable for use. In the and some European contexts, the term "hard shoulder" specifically refers to the paved emergency lane on motorways, contrasting with softer, unpaved verges. Other synonyms include "emergency lane" for the functional aspect in high-speed corridors and "," which in certain uses denotes a raised earthen strip along the roadside, often beyond the shoulder itself, though it can overlap in meaning with unpaved shoulders in rural settings. The term "" in road originates from early 20th-century practices, where it analogized the road's edge to the anatomical shoulder supporting the body's main structure, with the first documented use for roadway edges appearing around amid the expansion of paved highways. To understand shoulders, key elements of road include the , which encompasses the paved surface for vehicular including but excluding shoulders, and the traveled way, defined as the portion dedicated to vehicle movement exclusive of shoulders, berms, sidewalks, or areas. Shoulders primarily enable stops and access, as explored further in related functional discussions.

Primary Functions

The primary functions of a road shoulder revolve around enhancing and by providing dedicated space adjacent to the traveled lanes. These functions include serving as a refuge for disabled vehicles, accommodating activities, facilitating pavement drainage to prevent accumulation, offering lateral clearance to mitigate edge-related risks, and supporting limited traffic maneuvers in certain contexts. Standards such as those from the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) emphasize these roles to ensure shoulders meet minimum performance criteria without encroaching on the main roadway. One core function is emergency stopping for disabled vehicles, where the shoulder provides sufficient space for a vehicle to pull over completely off the travel lanes, activate hazard lights, and allow access for or repairs. This refuge area enables drivers to exit the flow of traffic safely, reducing the risk of secondary collisions, and facilitates rapid response by services or . For instance, (FHWA) guidelines highlight shoulders as essential for accommodating stopped vehicles in such scenarios, with a minimum width of 10 feet (approximately 3 meters) recommended on freeways to ensure full vehicle accommodation and safe access. On rural roads, even narrower paved shoulders of 2 to 4 feet (0.6 to 1.2 meters) can serve this purpose for smaller vehicles, though wider dimensions are preferred for larger trucks. Shoulders also provision space for road maintenance crews, enabling repairs, debris removal, and equipment staging without obstructing lanes. This dedicated area allows workers to operate safely during patching, resurfacing, or clearing hazards, minimizing disruptions to normal operations. FHWA technical advisories specify that paved shoulders should be designed to support these activities, with widths of at least 2 to 3 feet (0.6 to 0.9 meters) outside the traveled way providing adequate room for tools and personnel, while full 10- to 12-foot (3- to 3.7-meter) shoulders on higher-volume roads accommodate heavier machinery. Additionally, shoulders contribute lateral clearance to prevent edge-of-pavement accidents and improve for drivers near the roadway edge. By separating from curbs, ditches, or barriers, they allow vehicles to recover from minor deviations without striking obstacles, thereby reducing run-off-road crashes. from FHWA indicates that shoulders of 6 feet (1.8 ) or more provide critical lateral offset, enhancing sight lines and driver comfort, with crash reductions observed as width increases on rural two-lane roads. In low-speed rural areas, shoulders play a role in management by permitting safe passing of slower vehicles on two-lane roads, where sight distance may be limited. This function allows a following vehicle to temporarily use the shoulder to overtake without crossing the centerline into oncoming , improving overall efficiency on undivided roadways. FHWA studies on rural highways note that shoulders of 4 to 8 feet (1.2 to 2.4 meters) support this maneuver, tying directly to reduced delay and safer operations in low-volume settings.

Design and Construction

Physical Characteristics

Road shoulders are typically paved or unpaved strips adjacent to the travel , designed to provide a margin for while facilitating drainage and . Their physical layout emphasizes continuity along the roadway to ensure consistent usability, with widths and slopes varying by road classification to balance functionality and space constraints. Shoulders are engineered to slope away from the travel lanes, promoting water runoff to prevent hydroplaning and structural damage. Standard shoulder widths range from 1.5 to 4 meters, depending on the road class, with higher-speed facilities like highways requiring at least 3 meters to accommodate stops and vehicles. On rural two-lane roads, minimum widths are often around 2 meters, while urban arterials may feature narrower shoulders of 1.5 meters or integrate them within lines. Cross slopes for drainage typically measure 2 to 5 percent, with shoulders sloped at least 1 percent steeper than adjacent lanes to direct water toward ditches or gutters; this ensures effective runoff without compromising vehicle stability. Shoulders maintain continuity over long stretches, though interruptions may occur at intersections or bridges where space limitations apply. Surface types for shoulders include paved options like asphalt or , which offer durability and all-weather access suitable for high-traffic areas, and unpaved variants such as or turf, which are more cost-effective but prone to and rutting in wet conditions. Paved surfaces provide a smooth, stable base that reduces edge drop-offs and supports occasional vehicle use, whereas unpaved shoulders lower construction costs yet require frequent maintenance to address , , and irregular slopes. The choice between types influences , with paved shoulders resisting degradation better on highways but adding to initial expenses. Markings and signage delineate shoulder boundaries to guide drivers, including solid or dashed edge lines painted along the pavement interface, typically 100-150 mm wide in white or yellow. Rumble strips, milled or raised patterns parallel to edge lines, alert drivers to unintended drift by producing vibration and noise, often placed 150-300 mm from the lane edge on paved shoulders. Delineators, reflective posts spaced 12-24 meters apart, enhance visibility at night or in poor weather, marking shoulder edges especially on curves or rural sections. These features collectively reinforce the shoulder's separation from travel lanes without obstructing access. Shoulders integrate with roadside elements to enhance protection and drainage, such as guardrails or barriers installed 1-2 meters beyond the shoulder edge on steep embankments to contain errant vehicles. Drainage features like ditches or culverts run parallel to shoulders, capturing runoff from the sloped surface to prevent pooling. In constrained areas, shoulders may abut barriers that double as drainage channels, ensuring water flows away from the roadway. Adaptations for road types reflect usage patterns: highways feature continuous, wide paved shoulders for high-speed emergency access, often exceeding 3.5 meters with integrated rumble strips. Rural roads prioritize unpaved or shoulders of 2-3 meters for cost efficiency, focusing on drainage slopes to handle variable . Urban arterials incorporate narrower, curb-adjacent shoulders or intermittent paved sections to manage and space, maintaining continuity where feasible amid development.

Materials and Standards

Road shoulders are commonly constructed using a variety of materials selected for their durability, cost-effectiveness, and ability to withstand environmental stresses such as , loads, and . Asphalt, often in the form of bituminous-aggregate mixtures, is favored for its flexibility, which allows it to accommodate minor ground movements and without cracking, making it suitable for areas prone to freeze-thaw cycles. , typically , offers superior longevity and resistance to heavy loads, with a often exceeding 20-40 years, though it can be more susceptible to cracking under extreme temperature fluctuations. Unpaved shoulders frequently employ aggregate materials like , , , or recycled crushed , which provide adequate drainage but are less durable against and rutting compared to paved options. These materials' resistance to is enhanced by factors such as proper aggregate gradation and binder quality in asphalt or , ensuring long-term structural integrity. Construction techniques for road shoulders emphasize integration with the main pavement to ensure seamless load distribution and minimize edge failures. Materials are typically placed in multiple layers—often two or more for stability—with each layer compacted to specified before the next is added, using rollers or vibratory equipment to achieve uniform thickness and slope. Compaction is critical, targeting at least 95% of maximum at optimum content to prevent settlement, and is often verified using methods like the sand cone test. This layering approach is integrated during initial building, aligning the shoulder's with the pavement's foundation for cohesive performance. International standards guide the materials and construction of road shoulders to meet minimum requirements for safety and performance, including load-bearing capacity. In the United States, the American Association of and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) provides comprehensive specifications in its Guide Specifications for Highway Construction, mandating that paved shoulders use durable aggregates and binders with structural integrity matching or approaching the main lanes, often requiring a minimum load-bearing capacity equivalent to 80-100% of the adjacent pavement based on index values. Unpaved shoulders must achieve specific compaction levels and material gradations to support loads without excessive deformation. In Europe, standards such as those from the (CEN) under Eurocode 7 for geotechnical design emphasize and bearing capacity testing, recommending shoulders with at least 100 kPa ultimate bearing capacity for low-volume roads, adjusted for conditions. These guidelines ensure shoulders can handle occasional heavy loads, such as from maintenance vehicles, while promoting uniformity across projects. Maintenance of road shoulders focuses on preserving structural integrity and preventing hazards like drop-offs or erosion, with resurfacing typically required every 10-20 years to align with main pavement overlays, depending on traffic and climate. Erosion control measures include maintaining positive slopes for drainage, installing geotextiles for stabilization on aggregate shoulders, and regular grading to restore cross-sections, which can reduce sediment runoff by up to 50% when combined with vegetative cover. Modern designs increasingly incorporate environmental adaptations, such as permeable materials, to manage stormwater effectively. Porous asphalt and pervious concrete shoulders allow water infiltration through voids in the surface, reducing runoff and mitigating flooding on adjacent lanes, while a underlying stone reservoir provides temporary storage before infiltration into the subgrade. These systems, reinforced with geogrids where needed, enhance durability in high-rainfall areas by minimizing hydrostatic pressure on the pavement edge.

Operational Uses

Routine and Emergency Access

Road shoulders serve as designated areas for routine pull-overs during breakdowns, allowing drivers to position their vehicles entirely off the main travel lanes to minimize risks to oncoming . Guidelines recommend that vehicles clear the pavement edge by at least 4 feet, with the entire vehicle ideally positioned on the shoulder to avoid encroaching into active lanes. For optimal , shoulders should be paved and at least 8 feet wide, enabling stable footing and space for hazard warning devices like reflective triangles placed 100 to 500 feet behind the vehicle in the direction of . Right-side shoulders are preferred for such stops, accounting for over 90% of breakdown occurrences due to their typical wider design compared to left shoulders. Legal frameworks in the strictly regulate civilian use of road shoulders, prohibiting driving or parking on them except in cases of mechanical failure or when directed by authorities. Under New York Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1131, no may drive upon the shoulder of a unless authorized by the or when stopping, standing, or parking is lawful, with limited exceptions for tow trucks responding to incidents if lanes are obstructed. Similarly, Transportation Code § 545.058 permits driving on an improved shoulder to the right of the main roadway if necessary and safe, but only to stop, stand, or park where prohibited elsewhere; accelerate or decelerate when entering or leaving the roadway; pass a slower in the same direction; or avoid a collision. On the left shoulder, it is limited to disabled vehicles. These rules ensure shoulders remain available for their primary safety roles while preventing unauthorized travel that could endanger all road users, with misuse resulting in fines and points on a driver's . Emergency vehicles, including ambulances, police cars, and trucks, routinely utilize shoulders to navigate around congestion and access incident scenes swiftly, often treating them as designated bypass lanes. The (FHWA) highlights that shoulders provide critical refuge and access for , with delays in shoulder utilization during incidents leading to prolonged congestion periods. Dynamic lane control systems enhance this function by using electronic signals to open or close shoulders in real time based on incident detection via and sensors, allowing temporary designation as travel lanes for emergency passage while maintaining closure options for hazards like debris. Such systems, compliant with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) Section 4M.02, employ steady green arrows to indicate openness or red X symbols for closure during urgent situations. Case studies demonstrate the positive impact of shoulder access on emergency response times during highway incidents. In during in 2017, emergency shoulder use was activated on northbound I-75 and eastbound I-4 to support the evacuation of 6.8 million residents, with simulation models showing it reduced delays compared to contraflow operations while preserving opposite lanes for inbound emergency vehicles and supplies. This approach kept interchanges open for essential services, minimizing response disruptions and enabling faster overall incident management without significant increases in secondary collisions. Technological aids integrated into shoulders have long supported routine and access, with boxes emerging as a key feature in the 1970s and 1980s. California's (Caltrans) expanded its motorist aid system during this period under legislative mandates like Senate Bill 1199 (1985), which established the Service Authority for Freeway () Call Box Program, installing thousands of free-standing units along freeways to connect stranded drivers directly to the for breakdowns or hazards, generating over 100,000 calls annually statewide. Electronic signage for emergencies, introduced in the late , further aids access by displaying dynamic warnings and directions on shoulders, such as closure alerts during incidents, with FHWA-guided implementations improving real-time coordination since the 1980s. These tools, often placed every half-mile on high-speed roads, facilitate quicker recovery and reduce exposure times for vulnerable vehicles.

Bus and Transit Integration

Bus bypass shoulders refer to designated paved areas along the roadway edge that enable buses to overtake stopped or slowed traffic, particularly in congested urban highways or at bottlenecks. These adaptations prioritize public transit vehicles to enhance service reliability without requiring extensive new . In practice, operations allow transit buses to utilize the shoulder during peak periods, typically with speed limits 10-15 mph above general traffic speeds to maintain . Implementation examples include the United Kingdom's "bus lane on verge" configurations, where shoulders are widened and surfaced specifically for bus use along verges (roadside edges) to facilitate in high-traffic corridors. In the United States, high-occupancy (HOV) shoulder lanes often permit transit buses, as seen in Minnesota's extensive network of bus-only shoulders, which spans over 250 miles and, as of 2023, exceeds 300 miles, and has been in operation since the early . Other U.S. examples include dynamic shoulder use on Virginia's I-66, where buses access shoulders during congestion via real-time . Design modifications for bus and transit integration emphasize durability and clear guidance. Shoulders are reinforced with at least 7 inches of pavement thickness to accommodate heavy bus loads, often requiring upgrades to stormwater inlets and a minimum width of 10 feet (12 feet preferred) to ensure safe passage. Signage includes static ground-mounted panels indicating permitted use, such as "Buses May Use Shoulder 6-9 AM Weekdays," with no need for diamond lane markings due to low bus volumes. These features minimize conflicts while allowing shared access, where buses yield to emergency vehicles per standard protocols. The primary benefits of these integrations include reduced congestion and faster transit times, with studies showing average savings of 4-5 minutes per trip on congested corridors like Washington's I-5. Since the , adoption has grown, particularly in 14 U.S. states, leading to improved on-time performance (up to 99% in trials) and increased ridership by enhancing person-throughput on express routes. These low-cost measures, ranging from $1,500 to $100,000 per lane-mile, provide effective relief compared to building new lanes, which can cost $2-10 million per mile. Challenges arise from potential conflicts with emergency use and maintenance access, as shoulders traditionally serve as refuge areas, requiring buses to yield and creating occasional delays for . Safety concerns at ramp junctions have been noted, though incident rates remain low, with no fatalities reported in long-term operations like Minnesota's over a . Maintenance scheduling must also account for bus traffic to prevent premature wear, necessitating coordinated operations between transit agencies and highway authorities.

Peak Period Utilization

Peak period utilization of road shoulders involves temporarily converting them into travel lanes for general during times of high congestion, a known as dynamic shoulder use or part-time shoulder use. This approach enhances freeway capacity by opening the —typically the left or right paved area adjacent to main lanes—based on real-time conditions, using barriers, , or dynamic controls to delineate its use. It serves as an extension of bus-on-shoulder operations, broadening access to all eligible vehicles during rush hours to mitigate bottlenecks without permanent changes. Operational rules for dynamic shoulder use emphasize controlled activation to ensure and efficiency. Activation often occurs during predefined peak windows, such as 6-9 a.m. and 3-7 p.m. on weekdays, or dynamically when congestion exceeds thresholds detected by sensors. Speed limits on the are typically reduced—e.g., 35-50 mph compared to 65 mph in general lanes—to account for narrower widths and potential hazards, with enforcement relying on dynamic signage, automated speed cameras, and presence to prevent misuse. Vehicle restrictions may apply, excluding heavy trucks, and drivers must yield to emergency vehicles at all times. Notable implementations include Minnesota's priced dynamic shoulder lanes (PDSL) on I-35W in , operational since a 2009 pilot, where the 17-19 foot left shoulder opens to buses, carpools, and toll-paying single-occupant vehicles during peak congestion, spanning 2.5 miles with signage every 0.5 miles. In , Caltrans has introduced a part-time left shoulder travel lane pilot on southbound US 101 near Pismo Beach, activated daily from 2-7 p.m. to relieve recurring bottlenecks in the Five Cities area, converting the existing paved shoulder into a general traffic lane via static controls. These examples demonstrate adaptation to regional needs, with Minnesota's system emphasizing and California's focusing on fixed-hour relief for commuter flows. Evaluations of peak period shoulder utilization highlight significant benefits, such as a 14% increase in throughput and 38% reduction in travel times on Colorado's I-70 dynamic shoulder during weekend peaks, alongside an 18% speed improvement in general lanes. Capacity gains generally range from 10-25% by adding an effective lane without widening, reducing overall delay and improving reliability. Safety monitoring is integral, with studies showing no adverse crash trends in Minnesota's PDSLs and an 8% overall crash reduction on Virginia's I-66 dynamic implementation, attributed to smoother flows offsetting potential shoulder-specific risks like lane-changing errors. Ongoing assessments use and models to refine operations. Technological support enables precise management of shoulder activation. Variable message signs mounted over the shoulder display green arrows for open use or red X's for closure, updated in real-time by Centers (TMCs). Loop detectors, cameras, and sensors monitor traffic volume, speeds, and incidents, triggering openings when thresholds like speeds below 45 mph are met, ensuring responsive deployment during unpredictable peaks.

Safety and Accessibility

Cyclist and Pedestrian Benefits

Road shoulders provide cyclists with additional space to operate outside the main travel lanes, particularly in rural areas where dedicated bike lanes are often absent. By serving as shared paths, paved shoulders allow cyclists to maintain a consistent position away from faster-moving vehicles, thereby reducing the risks associated with maneuvers and close passes. This separation helps mitigate the likelihood of rear-end or sideswipe collisions, which are common concerns for bicyclists on high-speed rural highways. For instance, the recommends paved shoulders as an effective accommodation for bicycles on such roadways, enhancing overall comfort and predictability for non-motorized users. For pedestrians, shoulders function as temporary refuges on low-traffic roads, offering a stable, off-roadway surface for walking or crossing where sidewalks are unavailable. In these settings, advisory , such as "Share the Road" or pedestrian-specific warnings, encourages motorists to yield and promotes safe usage of the shoulder space. This is particularly beneficial in rural or suburban environments, where pedestrians may need to traverse short distances along the roadway; research indicates that paved shoulders can reduce crashes involving pedestrians walking along roadways by up to 71 percent by providing a dedicated area separated from . Key design features further amplify these benefits, including smooth transitions from the travel lane to the to prevent abrupt drops that could endanger users, and wider shoulders in bike-friendly corridors to accommodate shared use. A minimum paved shoulder width of 1.5 meters (5 feet) is often recommended for effective cyclist accommodation on minor collectors and similar roads, ensuring sufficient lateral clearance for safe passage. Studies, including those from the , demonstrate that such features contribute to significant reductions in cyclist accidents, particularly "struck from behind" incidents in rural contexts, by promoting lateral separation between bicycles and vehicles. To enhance accessibility for vulnerable users, shoulders can integrate ADA-compliant elements, such as sloped ramps for wheelchair access and along edges to aid visually impaired s in detecting boundaries. These integrations ensure that non-motorized facilities remain inclusive, allowing individuals with disabilities to utilize shoulders safely as part of broader routes.

Broader Safety Enhancements

Road shoulders serve as forgiving edges that allow errant vehicles to recover from run-off-road () trajectories, providing a recoverable surface that mitigates the severity of such incidents compared to abrupt roadside obstacles like ditches or barriers. Paved shoulders, in particular, enable drivers to regain control without immediate collision, thereby reducing the likelihood of rollover or impact with fixed objects, which are common causes of fatalities in single-vehicle crashes. Studies indicate that implementing paved shoulders can lower injury crashes by up to 71% on straight road segments, with fatality rates decreasing proportionally due to the increased margin for error. In incident response scenarios, shoulders provide essential space for personnel to deploy control devices such as flares, cones, and , facilitating safe scene management without encroaching on travel lanes. This dedicated area allows responders to establish protective perimeters, reducing the exposure of workers and disabled vehicles to passing and thereby minimizing the risk of secondary accidents, which account for up to 20% of all crashes in some analyses. By enabling quick clearance and coordinated response, shoulders enhance overall recovery and protect against chain-reaction collisions during breakdowns or minor incidents. Empirical data from post-2000 evaluations, including those by the and state departments of transportation, demonstrate that adequate shoulders (typically 4-6 feet paved) contribute to a 10-20% reduction in edge-related crashes, encompassing ROR and sideswipe events along roadway margins. For instance, a comprehensive study of non-Interstate roads found 13.5% fewer ROR crashes and 16.4% fewer single-vehicle ROR incidents at sites with paved shoulders after 10 years, underscoring their long-term safety impact. Similar findings from reported a 46% drop in injury and fatal accidents following shoulder stabilization on two-lane roads. Recent innovations in the 2020s have introduced "smart shoulders" equipped with embedded sensors, such as and systems, for real-time hazard detection including stopped vehicles, , or pedestrians on the shoulder. These technologies, often integrated into intelligent transportation systems, alert drivers and authorities to potential dangers, further preventing secondary incidents and enhancing proactive safety measures. However, shoulders can present drawbacks if misused, such as drivers treating them as travel lanes, which increases the risk of sideswipe collisions with merging traffic, particularly when markings are faded or absent, leading to confusion and higher crash rates in those scenarios. Proper and are critical to mitigate these risks and maintain shoulders' primary safety function.

Global Variations

Australia and New Zealand

In and , road shoulders in rural and remote areas are designed with adaptations to the unique challenges of low-traffic volumes, vast distances, and environmental hazards, prioritizing cost-effectiveness and multi-purpose functionality over urban standards. Austroads guidelines recommend shoulder widths of 1.5 to 3.0 meters for most rural roads, with gravel construction common in low-volume areas to minimize expenses, as unsealed shoulders require less initial investment and maintenance compared to sealed options. Sealing is advised for shoulders adjacent to higher-speed sections or safety barriers to enhance stability and reduce edge damage, particularly where traffic exceeds 750 vehicles per day. In remote regions, such as the , roads often incorporate widened sections—effectively functioning as extended shoulders—reaching seal widths of at least 10 meters over 1,200-meter lengths to serve as emergency airstrips for the Royal Flying Doctor Service, allowing aircraft landings in medical crises. These shoulders support driver in animal-prone areas by providing recovery for errant vehicles, enabling swerves to avoid collisions with wildlife like , which are prevalent on rural highways. Road verges, including unsealed shoulders, also integrate with broader by acting as buffer zones that facilitate animal movement and reduce , complementing structures like underpasses. For management on long-haul routes, guidelines urge drivers to pull over onto shoulders for rest breaks every two hours, though not legally mandatory for light vehicles; this practice is emphasized in remote areas lacking frequent rest areas. Post-2020, designs have evolved to incorporate flood resilience, especially in coastal and flood-prone rural zones, with updates focusing on elevating or reinforcing shoulders using sealed pavements to withstand inundation and erosion. New Zealand Transport Agency (NZTA) standards mirror this approach, specifying minimum sealed shoulder widths of 1.0 to 1.5 meters on rural state highways, with unsealed gravel options favored for low-volume roads to control costs while ensuring basic recovery space. These adaptations distinguish rural shoulders from urban ones by emphasizing durability in sparse-traffic environments, where unsealed surfaces predominate to allocate limited budgets toward essential widening for safety and emergency use.

North America

In North America, road shoulders on interstate and national highways are governed by federal and provincial/state standards emphasizing safety and emergency access. In the United States, the (FHWA) and American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) mandate a minimum 10-foot (3-meter) paved outside shoulder and 4-foot (1.2-meter) inside shoulder on the Interstate System to accommodate breakdowns, maintenance, and evasive maneuvers. These standards have been in place since the Interstate System's design policies were formalized in the 1950s and updated in subsequent decades. In , the Transportation Association of Canada (TAC) Geometric Design Guide recommends paved shoulder widths of 1.5 to 3 meters on rural highways, with variations by province to account for traffic volume, climate, and terrain; for instance, prairie provinces like and often specify wider shoulders (up to 3 meters or more) on high-speed rural routes to facilitate agricultural vehicle passage and snow removal. Shoulders serve operational roles beyond emergencies, including temporary . In the U.S., some states like permit high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes on shoulders during peak periods to boost capacity, with dynamic signing to indicate availability. Emergency pull-off areas are typically spaced every 1 to 2 miles on interstates, providing designated safe stops integrated into the shoulder design. Rumble strips, milled into paved shoulders to alert drifting drivers, became a standard feature on U.S. interstates in the following FHWA endorsements for run-off-road crash reduction. Recent developments in the 2020s emphasize integrating intelligent transportation systems (ITS) with shoulder infrastructure for adaptive use. FHWA initiatives promote dynamic part-time shoulder use, where sensors, variable message signs, and algorithms open shoulders to traffic during congestion while monitoring speeds and incidents, as seen in pilot programs in states like Minnesota and Colorado. In Canada, provinces such as Ontario are exploring similar ITS enhancements for Trans-Canada Highway shoulders to improve reliability in variable weather conditions. Legally, non-emergency use of shoulders is prohibited across to prevent hazards, with fines varying by jurisdiction—typically $100 to $500 in the U.S. for violations like unauthorized driving on the shoulder, plus points on licenses. Exceptions apply to authorized aid vehicles, such as ambulances, tow trucks, and police, which may use shoulders for response without penalty. In , similar provincial laws impose fines up to CAD 500, with exemptions for emergency services.

and

In the , motorways feature a continuous paved hard shoulder on the left-hand side, designated exclusively for situations such as vehicle breakdowns or s. Drivers must pull onto the hard shoulder if their vehicle fails, positioning it as far to the left as possible while activating hazard lights and exiting the vehicle to stand behind the barrier. To address temporary dangers, overhead gantries display a 'X' , closing the hard shoulder or adjacent lanes and prohibiting all traffic from using them, with enforcement via cameras and fines up to £100 plus three penalty points for violations. In the , hard shoulder policies align closely with those in the , requiring use only for emergencies on motorways, though rural and national roads frequently incorporate soft shoulders—unpaved grass or gravel verges—rather than fully surfaced lanes. Both nations follow directives mandating a minimum hard shoulder width of 2.5 meters on motorways to ensure safe emergency access. Since the 2010s, the has advanced systems, converting hard shoulders into operational live lanes during congestion via gantry-controlled variable speed limits and red 'X' signals, enhancing capacity on key routes like the M1 and M25 without expanding physical infrastructure. Safety protocols emphasize mandatory hard shoulder use for breakdowns, supplemented on smart motorways by emergency refuge areas spaced approximately every 1.5 kilometers (ideally 1 kilometer where feasible) to provide secure stopping points in all-lane running configurations. Following safety concerns over all-lane running schemes, post-2022 government reviews led to the cancellation of all new smart motorway projects in 2023, with substantial investments continuing for safety upgrades on existing schemes as of 2025, including additional refuge areas and stopped vehicle detection technology. Debates on full reinstatement of permanent hard shoulders on existing sections persist, with increasing pressure from campaigners and organizations like the AA and RAC in 2024-2025 calling for their return following data indicating higher killed and serious injury rates on all-lane running sections.

Continental Europe

In , autoroutes feature hard shoulders typically measuring 3 meters in width to provide space for stops and , with lanes sometimes narrowed to 3.2 meters during peak congestion when the shoulder is temporarily opened for traffic. These shoulders are equipped with an system, featuring orange call boxes positioned approximately every 2 kilometers along the motorway, allowing drivers to contact assistance services directly for breakdowns or incidents. This infrastructure supports rapid response, as motorists are instructed to park on the hard shoulder, activate hazard lights, and retreat behind safety barriers while awaiting help. Italy's autostrade designs mirror many French practices in terms of functionality but incorporate variations suited to diverse , with rural sections often featuring unpaved or shoulders to manage costs and drainage in less urbanized areas. Compliance with EU Directive 2008/96/EC ensures systematic road safety assessments, including evaluations of shoulder conditions to mitigate risks like run-off-the-road incidents, though implementation emphasizes network-wide audits rather than uniform paving mandates. These shoulders serve primarily for emergencies, with breakdown procedures requiring vehicles to pull over and use reflective gear, similar to neighboring countries, while rural unpaved edges facilitate agricultural access without compromising core safety standards. In , shoulders function as dedicated emergency lanes alongside unrestricted speed sections where no general limit applies, though an advisory speed of 130 km/h is recommended to enhance . These paved shoulders, typically 2.5 to 3 meters wide, include integrated breakdown bays and frequent service areas spaced 30 to 60 kilometers apart, allowing safe off-road parking for vehicle issues without obstructing traffic flow. Scandinavian countries, such as and , prioritize snow-clearable shoulder designs, incorporating extended outer lanes or "blower lanes" on storm-prone routes to facilitate efficient plowing and minimize drift accumulation from wind or barriers. Guardrails are often minimized or replaced with open designs to prevent snow trapping, ensuring shoulders remain functional during harsh winters for both emergency use and maintenance. Across continental Europe, road shoulder practices have harmonized since the 1990s through the (TEN-T) policy, established in 1996, which promotes consistent infrastructure standards for safety and interoperability on major routes. This framework, bolstered by Directive 2008/96/EC, mandates safety audits that address shoulder adequacy, influencing designs to include paved edges for cyclists on low-traffic rural networks where dedicated paths are impractical. In the 2020s, EU initiatives under the Biodiversity Strategy have driven additions like vegetated shoulders, where reduced mowing allows wildflower growth to support pollinators and soil health without impeding drainage or visibility. These green enhancements, piloted in several member states, align with broader goals to integrate ecological benefits into roadside management.

References

  1. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/pavement/t504029.cfm
  2. https://www.scdot.org/content/dam/scdot-legacy/business/pdf/roadway/highwaydesign_Rev06.pdf
  3. https://dot.ca.gov/-/media/dot-media/programs/design/documents/chp0300-a11y.pdf
  4. https://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/pr2cl.htm
  5. https://opentransportationjournal.com/VOLUME/2/PAGE/7/PDF/
  6. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/construction/pubs/ots15002.pdf
  7. https://www.etymonline.com/word/shoulder
  8. https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/fhwahop15023/ch1.htm
  9. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/programadmin/y2kgb.cfm
  10. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/programadmin/clearzone.cfm
  11. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/safety/15030/006.cfm
  12. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/safety/08063/
  13. https://epg.modot.org/index.php/231.4_Shoulder_Width
  14. https://www.txdot.gov/manuals/des/rdw/chapter-4--basic-design-criteria/4-10-cross-sectional-elements/4-10-4-pavement-cross-slope.html
  15. https://onlinepubs.trb.org/Onlinepubs/trr/1976/594/594-014.pdf
  16. https://www.intrans.iastate.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/shoulder-design-tr531.pdf
  17. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-10/documents/2003_07_24_nps_gravelroads_appd_0.pdf
  18. https://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/htm/2009/part3/part3b.htm
  19. https://mdotwiki.state.mi.us/design/index.php/Pavement_Markings
  20. https://ris.dls.virginia.gov/uploads/24VAC30/DIBR/9f3c2003009~4.pdf
  21. https://wsdot.wa.gov/publications/manuals/fulltext/m22-01/1610.pdf
  22. https://www.pa.gov/content/dam/copapwp-pagov/en/penndot/documents/public/pubsforms/publications/pub%252033.pdf
  23. https://onlinepubs.trb.org/Onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_rpt_254.pdf
  24. https://ruraldesignguide.com/visually-separated/paved-shoulder
  25. https://www.scdot.org/content/dam/scdot-legacy/business/pdf/roadway/revisedchapters/Chapter%252014%2520Local%2520Roads%2520and%2520Streets.pdf
  26. https://onlinepubs.trb.org/Onlinepubs/trcircular/142/142-004.pdf
  27. https://asphaltindustrial.com/blogs/asphalt-industrial-blog/concrete-vs-asphalt-roads
  28. https://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6822&context=td
  29. https://www.globalgilson.com/blog/properties-of-aggregates-strength-durability
  30. https://onlinepubs.trb.org/Onlinepubs/hrbbulletin/151/151-009.pdf
  31. https://mdotwiki2.state.mi.us/construction/index.php?title=307_-_Aggregate_Shoulders_and_Approaches
  32. https://store.transportation.org/Common/DownloadContentFiles?id=2044
  33. https://www.apmgs.ro/files/documente/AASHTO_-_Guide_Specifications_for_Highway_Construction__Tenth_Edition_2020.pdf
  34. https://www.ngm2016.com/uploads/2/1/7/9/21790806/eurocode_7_-_geotechnical_designen.1997.1.2004.pdf
  35. https://unece.org/DAM/trans/main/tem/temdocs/TEM-Std-Ed3.pdf
  36. https://www.altoconstruction.com/how-often-should-i-get-my-asphalt-resurfaced
  37. https://dirtandgravel.psu.edu/wp-content/uploads/ESM_Field_Guide.pdf
  38. http://conf.tac-atc.ca/english/annualconference/tac2014/s-38/schaus.pdf
  39. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/pavement/pubs/hif23076.pdf
  40. https://constrofacilitator.com/methods-and-equipments-used-for-effective-road-shoulder-rebuilding/
  41. https://site.utah.gov/dps-fire/wp-content/uploads/sites/19/2015/04/Vehicle-Breakdown-Safety-Fact-Sheet10-18-10.pdf
  42. https://gofleetadvisor.com/where-to-place-your-dot-safety-triangle-kit-if-you-break-down/
  43. https://law.justia.com/codes/new-york/vat/title-7/article-25/1131/
  44. https://codes.findlaw.com/tx/transportation-code/transp-sect-545-058/
  45. https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/fhwahop10023/chap3.htm
  46. https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/fhwahop15023/ch7.htm
  47. https://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/
  48. https://transportationops.org/case-studies/emergency-shoulder-use-during-hurricane-irma
  49. https://dot.ca.gov/-/media/dot-media/programs/traffic-operations/documents/trafficops/202510-tom-ch-115-call-boxes-and-motorist-aid-a11y.pdf
  50. https://dot.ca.gov/programs/public-affairs/faqs
  51. https://www.transitwiki.org/TransitWiki/index.php/Bus-on-shoulder
  52. https://mst.org/wp-content/media/Final-Bus-on-Shoulder-Branch-Line-Feasibility-Report-062718.pdf
  53. https://www.metrotransit.org/speed-reliability
  54. https://nacto.org/wp-content/uploads/2-7_APTA-Designing-Bus-Rapid-Transit-Running-Ways_2010.pdf
  55. https://www.dot.state.mn.us/metro/teamtransit/pdf/Bus-Only-Shoulders-Report.pdf
  56. https://www.soundtransit.org/blog/platform/buses-shoulder-mean-faster-transit-trips-i-5-southbound-lynnwood
  57. https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/fhwahop19029/appb.htm
  58. https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/congestionpricing/value_pricing/projects/involving_tolls/hot_lanes/mn_pricedymshldlanes.htm
  59. https://dot.ca.gov/caltrans-near-me/district-5/district-5-current-projects/05-1g680
  60. https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/fhwahop15023/apa.htm
  61. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/safety/pedbike/05085/chapt14.cfm
  62. https://highways.dot.gov/safety/pedestrian-bicyclist/safety-countermeasures/state-best-practice-policy-shoulders-and
  63. https://caltap.org/safety-countermeasures
  64. https://www.access-board.gov/prowag/complete.html
  65. https://ctre.iastate.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/updated_paved_shoulders_w_cvr1.pdf
  66. https://www.roadsafety-dss.eu/assets/data/pdf/synopses/Shoulder_Implementation_shoulder_type_14062017.pdf
  67. https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/fhwahop08057/50.htm
  68. https://streetsurvival.info/shoulder/
  69. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1817&context=ktc_researchreports
  70. https://navtechradar.com/problems-we-solve/intelligent-transport-systems/automatic-incident-detection/hard-shoulder-monitoring/
  71. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/safety/09032/
  72. https://www.dulaneylauerthomas.com/blog/dangers-of-using-highway-shoulders-as-your-own-personal-lane.cfm
  73. https://austroads.gov.au/publications/road-design/agrd03
  74. https://www.roadvision.ai/blog/the-role-of-shoulders-in-road-safety-and-design-in-australia
  75. https://austroads.gov.au/publications/road-design/ap-r188-01
  76. https://austroads.gov.au/resources/documents/supporting-documents/webinars/Webinar_AGRD_Part3_Session_1.pdf
  77. https://www.flyingdoctor.org.au/sant/world-first-medi-jet-highway-landing/
  78. https://completeuteandvanhire.com.au/driving-with-kangaroos-in-australia-the-wrong-place-at-the-wrong-time/
  79. https://www.nzta.govt.nz/assets/resources/research/reports/692/692-road-edge-effects-on-ecosystems.pdf
  80. https://www.transport.nsw.gov.au/roadsafety/topics-tips/fatigue
  81. https://www.mauriceblackburn.com.au/blog/road-injury/wake-up-to-the-signs-of-driver-fatigue/
  82. https://www.nsw.gov.au/ministerial-releases/improving-road-resilience-during-floods-upper-hunter
  83. https://theconversation.com/intense-rain-landslides-and-potholes-everywhere-how-climate-change-is-trashing-australias-roads-264328
  84. https://nzta.govt.nz/assets/resources/state-highway-geometric-design-manual/docs/shgdm-part-6.pdf
  85. https://www.nzta.govt.nz/walking-cycling-and-public-transport/cycling/cycling-standards-and-guidance/cycling-network-guidance/designing-a-cycle-facility/between-intersections/sealed-shoulders
  86. https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/fhwahop15023/index.htm
  87. https://highways.dot.gov/safety/rwd/keep-vehicles-road/rumble-strips/technical-advisory-shoulder-and-edge-line-rumble-strips
  88. https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/atdm/approaches/ptshoulderuse.htm
  89. https://www.gov.uk/guidance/the-highway-code/breakdowns-and-incidents-274-to-287
  90. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/red-x-means-dont-drive-in-that-lane
  91. https://nationalhighways.co.uk/road-safety/the-hard-shoulder/
  92. https://www.rsa.ie/road-safety/campaigns/motorway-safety
  93. https://cdn.tii.ie/publications/DN-GEO-03031-10.pdf
  94. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5fb67beae90e0720906df981/smart-motorway-safety-evidence-stocktake-and-action-plan.pdf
  95. https://nationalhighways.co.uk/media/rarb00qi/smart-motorways-third-year-progress-report-final.pdf
  96. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/all-new-smart-motorways-scrapped
  97. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/68ca9c35995dfd01bff0bfec/draft-ris-3.pdf
  98. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/apr/15/department-for-transport-urged-to-put-hard-shoulders-on-smart-motorways
  99. https://www.autoexpress.co.uk/news/366233/bring-back-hard-shoulder-safety-stocktake-prompts-new-calls-scrap-smart-motorways
  100. https://www.fleetpoint.org/road-building-repairs/smart-motorways/increasing-calls-for-reinstating-hard-shoulders/
  101. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0968090X10001695
  102. https://www.autoroutes.fr/en/accidents.htm
  103. https://www.autoroutes.fr/en/breakdown.htm
  104. https://road-safety.transport.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2023-11/NWA-Handbook8.pdf
  105. https://www.mdpi.com/2313-576X/7/1/6
  106. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:02008L0096-20191216
  107. https://www.gettingaroundgermany.info/autobahn.shtml
  108. https://www.roadex.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/roadexspbsummary0111.pdf
  109. https://proceedings-sapporo2002.piarc.org/en/pdf/doc_pdf/communications/VI41e.pdf
  110. https://www.fehrl.org/news/boosting-biodiversity-on-and-around-roads-key-initiatives-from-serrp-viii
  111. https://environment.ec.europa.eu/topics/nature-and-biodiversity/green-infrastructure_en
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.