Hubbry Logo
KākāpōKākāpōMain
Open search
Kākāpō
Community hub
Kākāpō
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Kākāpō
Kākāpō
from Wikipedia

Kākāpō
Celebrity kākāpō Sirocco on Maud Island

Nationally Critical (NZ TCS)[2]
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Aves
Order: Psittaciformes
Superfamily: Strigopoidea
Family: Strigopidae
Bonaparte, 1849
Genus: Strigops
G.R. Gray, 1845
Species:
S. habroptilus
Binomial name
Strigops habroptilus
G.R. Gray, 1845

The kākāpō (Māori: [kaːkaːpɔː];[3] pl.: kākāpō; Strigops habroptilus), sometimes known as the owl parrot or owl-faced parrot, is a species of large, nocturnal, ground-dwelling parrot of the superfamily Strigopoidea. It is endemic to New Zealand.[4]

Kākāpō can be up to 64 cm (25 in) long. They have a combination of unique traits among parrots: finely blotched yellow-green plumage, a distinct facial disc, owl-style forward-facing eyes with surrounding discs of specially-textured feathers, a large grey beak, short legs, large blue feet, relatively short wings and a short tail. It is the world's only flightless parrot, the world's heaviest parrot, and also is nocturnal, herbivorous, visibly sexually dimorphic in body size, has a low basal metabolic rate, and does not have male parental care. It is the only parrot to have a polygynous lek breeding system. It is also possibly one of the world's longest-living birds, with a reported lifespan of up to 100 years.[5] Adult males weigh around 1.5–3 kilograms (3.3–6.6 lb); the equivalent figure for females is 0.950–1.6 kilograms (2.09–3.53 lb).

The anatomy of the kākāpō typifies the tendency of bird-evolution on oceanic islands. With few predators and abundant food, kākāpō exhibit island syndrome development, having a generally-robust torso physique at the expense of flight abilities, resulting in reduced shoulder- and wing-muscles, along with a diminished keel on the sternum. Like many other New Zealand bird species, the kākāpō was historically important to Māori, the indigenous people of New Zealand. It appears in Māori mythology. Heavily hunted in the past, it was used by the Māori both for its meat and for its feathers.

The kākāpō is critically endangered; the total known population of living individuals is 237 (as of 2025).[6] Known individuals are named, tagged and confined to four small New Zealand islands, all of which are clear of predators;[7] however, in 2023, a reintroduction to mainland New Zealand (Sanctuary Mountain Maungatautari) was accomplished.[8] Introduced mammalian predators, such as cats, rats, ferrets, and stoats almost wiped out the kākāpō. All conservation efforts were unsuccessful until the Kākāpō Recovery Programme began in 1995.

Taxonomy

[edit]
Lithograph by David Mitchell that accompanied Gray's original 1845 description

The kākāpō was formally described and illustrated in 1845 by the English ornithologist George Robert Gray. He created a new genus and coined the binomial name Strigops habroptilus. Gray was uncertain about the origin of his specimen and wrote, "This remarkable bird is found in one of the islands of the South Pacific Ocean."[9] The type location has been designated as Dusky Sound on the southwest corner of New Zealand's South Island.[10][11] The generic name Strigops is derived from the Ancient Greek strix, genitive strigos ("owl"), and ops ("face"), while its specific epithet habroptilus comes from habros ("soft"), and ptilon ("feather").[12]

In 1955 the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN) ruled that the genus name Strigops was feminine.[13] Based on this ruling many ornithologists used the form Strigops habroptila but in 2023 James L. Savage and Andrew Digby argued that under the current ICZN rules the specific epithet should be habroptilus.[14] This view was accepted by ornithologists and in 2024 the International Ornithological Congress Checklist and the eBird/Clements Checklist changed the spelling of the binomial name back to Strigops habroptilus.[15][16] The species is monotypic, as no subspecies are recognised.[15]

The name kākāpō is Māori, from kākā ("parrot") + ("night");[17] the name is both singular and plural.[18] "Kākāpō" is increasingly written in New Zealand English with the macrons that indicate long vowels.[19][20][21] The correct pronunciation in Māori is [kaːkaːpɔː]; other colloquial pronunciations exist, however. These include the British English /ˈkɑːkəp/ (KAH-kə-poh),[22] as defined in the Chambers Dictionary in 2003.[23]

The kākāpō is placed in the family Strigopidae together with the two species in the genus Nestor, the kea (Nestor notabilis) and the kākā (Nestor meridionalis). The birds are endemic to New Zealand.[15] Molecular phylogenetic studies have shown that the family Strigopidae is basal to the other three parrot families in the order Psittaciformes and diverged from them 33–44 million years ago. The common ancestor of the kākāpō and the two Nestor species diverged 27–40 million years ago.[24]

Earlier ornithologists felt that the kākāpō might be related to the ground parrots and night parrot of Australia due to their similar colouration, but this is contradicted by molecular studies;[25] rather, the cryptic colour seems to be adaptation to terrestrial habits that evolved twice convergently.[26]

Description

[edit]
A year-old kākāpō on Codfish Island / Whenua Hou.

The kākāpō is a large, rotund parrot. Adults can measure from 58 to 64 cm (23 to 25 in) in length with a wingspan of 82 cm (32 in). Males are significantly heavier than females with an average weight of 2 kg (4.4 lb) compared with just 1.5 kg (3.3 lb) for females.[27] Kākāpō are the heaviest living species of parrot and on average weigh about 400 g (14 oz) more than the largest flying parrot, the hyacinth macaw.[28]

The kākāpō cannot fly, having relatively short wings for its size and lacking the keel on the sternum (breastbone), where the flight muscles of other birds attach.[5] It uses its wings for balance and to break its fall when leaping from trees. Unlike many other land birds, the kākāpō can accumulate large amounts of body fat.[5]

The upper parts of the kākāpō have yellowish moss-green feathers barred or mottled with black or dark brownish grey, blending well with native vegetation. Individuals may have strongly varying degrees of mottling and colour tone and intensity – museum specimens show that some birds had completely yellow colouring. The breast and flank are yellowish-green streaked with yellow. The belly, undertail, neck, and face are predominantly yellowish streaked with pale green and weakly mottled with brownish-grey. Because the feathers do not need the strength and stiffness required for flight, they are exceptionally soft, giving rise to the specific epithet habroptila. The kākāpō has a conspicuous facial disc of fine feathers resembling the face of an owl; thus, early European settlers called it the "owl parrot". The beak is surrounded by delicate feathers which resemble vibrissae or "whiskers"; it is possible kākāpō use these to sense the ground as they walk with its head lowered, but there is no evidence for this. The mandible is variable in colour, mostly ivory, with the upper part often bluish-grey. The eyes are dark brown. Kākāpō feet are large, scaly, and, as in all parrots, zygodactyl (two toes face forward and two backward). The pronounced claws are particularly useful for climbing. The ends of the tail feathers often become worn from being continually dragged on the ground.[5]

The "whiskers" around the beak

Females are easily distinguished from males as they have a narrower and less domed head, narrower and proportionally longer beak, smaller cere and nostrils, more slender and pinkish grey legs and feet, and proportionally longer tail. While their plumage colour is not very different from that of the male, the toning is more subtle, with less yellow and mottling. Nesting females also have a brood patch of bare skin on the belly.[5]

The kākāpō's altricial young are first covered with greyish white down, through which their pink skin can be easily seen. They become fully feathered at approximately 70 days old. Juvenile individuals tend to have duller green colouration, more uniform black barring, and less yellow present in their feathers. They are additionally distinguishable because of their shorter tails, wings, and beaks. At this stage, they have a ring of short feathers surrounding their irises that resembles eyelashes.[5]

Like many other parrots, kākāpō have a variety of calls. As well as the booms (see below for a recording) and chings of their mating calls, they will often loudly skraark.[29]

The kākāpō has a well-developed sense of smell, which complements its nocturnal lifestyle.[30] It can distinguish between odours while foraging, a behaviour reported in only one other parrot species.[30] The kākāpō has a large olfactory bulb ratio (longest diameter of the olfactory bulb/longest diameter of the brain) indicating that it does, indeed, have a more developed sense of smell than other parrots.[30] One of the most striking characteristics of the kākāpō is its distinct musty-sweet odour.[29] The smell often alerts predators to the presence of kākāpō.[31]

As a nocturnal species, the kākāpō has adapted its senses to living in darkness. Its optic tectum, nucleus rotundus, and entopallium are smaller in relation to its overall brain size than those of diurnal parrots. Its retina shares some qualities with that of other nocturnal birds but also has some qualities typical of diurnal birds, lending to best function around twilight. These modifications allow the kākāpō to have enhanced light sensitivity but with poor visual acuity.[32]

Internal anatomy

[edit]
Skeleton

The skeleton of the kākāpō differs from other parrots in several features associated with flightlessness. Firstly, it has the smallest relative wing size of any parrot. Its wing feathers are shorter, more rounded, less asymmetrical, and have fewer distal barbules to lock the feathers together. The sternum is small and has a low, vestigial keel and a shortened spina externa. As in other flightless birds and some flighted parrots, the furcula is not fused but consists of a pair of clavicles lying in contact with each coracoid. As in other flightless birds, the angle between the coracoid and sternum is enlarged. The kākāpō has a larger pelvis than other parrots. The proximal bones of the leg and wing are disproportionately long and the distal elements are disproportionately short.[33]

The pectoral musculature of the kākāpō is also modified by flightlessness. The pectoralis and supracoracoideus muscles are greatly reduced. The propatagialis tendo longus has no distinct muscle belly. The sternocoracoideus is tendinous. There is an extensive cucularis capitis clavicularis muscle that is associated with the large crop.[33]

Genetics

[edit]

Because kākāpō passed through a genetic bottleneck, in which their world population was reduced to 49 birds, they are extremely inbred and have low genetic diversity. This manifests in lower disease resistance and in fertility problems: 61% of kākāpō eggs fail to hatch.[34] Beginning in 2015, the Kākāpō 125+ project has sequenced the genome of all living kākāpō, as well as some museum specimens.[35] The project is a collaboration led by Genomics Aotearoa and a collaboration with a team of international collaborators.[36][37]

A DNA sequence analysis was performed on 35 kākāpō genomes of the surviving descendants of an isolated island population, and on 14 genomes, mainly from museum specimens, of the now extinct mainland population.[38] An analysis of the long-term genetic impact of small population size indicated that the small island kākāpō population had a reduced number of harmful mutations compared to the number in mainland individuals.[38] It was hypothesized that the reduced mutational load of the island population was due to a combination of genetic drift and the purging of deleterious mutations through increased inbreeding and purifying selection that occurred since the isolation of this population from the mainland about 10,000 years ago.[38] Purging of deleterious mutations occurs when there is selection against recessive or partially recessive detrimental alleles as they are expressed in the homozygous state.[38]

Habitat

[edit]

Before the arrival of humans, the kākāpō was widely distributed throughout both main islands of New Zealand.[39] Although it may have inhabited Stewart Island / Rakiura before human arrival, it has not been found in the extensive fossil collections from there.[40] Kākāpō lived in a variety of habitats, including tussocklands, scrublands and coastal areas. It also inhabited forests dominated by podocarps (rimu, mataī, kahikatea, tōtara), beeches, tawa, and rātā. In Fiordland, areas of avalanche and slip debris with regenerating and heavily fruiting vegetation – such as five finger, wineberry, bush lawyer, tutu, hebes, and coprosmas – became known as "kākāpō gardens".[41]

The kākāpō is considered to be a "habitat generalist".[5] Though they are now confined to islands free of predation, they were once able to live in nearly any climate present on the islands of New Zealand. They survived dry, hot summers on the North Island as well as cold winter temperatures in the sub-alpine areas of Fiordland. Kākāpō seem to have preferred broadleaf or mountain beech and Hall's tōtara forest with mild winters and high rainfall, but the species was not exclusively forest-dwelling.[42]

Ecology and behaviour

[edit]
Historic distribution of the kākāpō:
  Maximum distribution since 1840
  Fossil evidence

The kākāpō is primarily nocturnal; it roosts under cover in trees or on the ground during the day and moves around its territories at night.[4]

Though the kākāpō cannot fly, it is an excellent climber, ascending to the crowns of the tallest trees. It can also "parachute" – descending by leaping and spreading its wings. In this way it may travel a few metres at an angle of less than 45 degrees.[5] With only 3.3% of its mass made up of pectoral muscle, it is no surprise that the kākāpō cannot use its wings to lift its heavy body off the ground. Because of its flightlessness, it has very low metabolic demands in comparison to flighted birds. It is able to survive easily on very little or on very low quality food sources. Unlike most other bird species, the kākāpō is entirely herbivorous, feeding on fruits, seeds, leaves, stems, and rhizomes. When foraging, kākāpō tend to leave crescent-shaped wads of fiber in the vegetation behind them, called "browse signs".[43]

Having lost the ability to fly, it has developed strong legs. Locomotion is often by way of a rapid "jog-like" gait by which it can move several kilometres.[44] A female has been observed making two return trips each night during nesting from her nest to a food source up to 1 km (0.6 mi) away[45] and the male may walk from its home range to a mating arena up to 5 km (3 mi) away during the mating season (October–January).[46]

Individual nicknamed Trevor feeding on poroporo fruits, Maud Island

Young birds indulge in play fighting, and one bird will often lock the neck of another under its chin.[47] The kākāpō is curious by nature and has been known to interact with humans. Conservation staff and volunteers have engaged extensively with some kākāpō, which have distinct personalities.[48] Despite this, kākāpō are solitary birds.[49]

The kākāpō was a very successful species in pre-human New Zealand, and was well adapted to avoid the birds of prey which were their only predators. As well as the New Zealand falcon, there were two other birds of prey in pre-human New Zealand: Haast's eagle and Eyles' harrier.[50] All these raptors soared overhead searching for prey in daylight, and to avoid them the kākāpō evolved camouflaged plumage and became nocturnal. When a kākāpō feels threatened, it freezes, so that it is more effectively camouflaged in the vegetation its plumage resembles. Kākāpō were not entirely safe at night, when the laughing owl was active, and it is apparent from owl nest deposits on Canterbury limestone cliffs that kākāpō were among their prey.[51]

Kākāpō defensive adaptations were no use, however, against the mammalian predators introduced to New Zealand by humans. Birds hunt very differently from mammals, relying on their powerful vision to find prey, and thus they usually hunt by day.[50] Mammalian predators, in contrast to birds, often hunt by night, and rely on their sense of smell and hearing to find prey; a common way for humans to hunt kākāpō was by releasing trained dogs.[52][50] The kākāpō's adaptations to avoid avian predation have thus been useless against its new enemies, and the reason for its massive decline since the introduction of dogs, cats and mustelids (see Conservation: Human impact).[citation needed]

Breeding

[edit]
Hatching kākāpō egg

Kākāpō are the only flightless bird that has a lek breeding system.[53] Males loosely gather in an arena and compete with each other to attract females. Females listen to the males as they display, or "lek".[54] They choose a mate based on the quality of his display; they are not pursued by the males in any overt way. No pair bond is formed; males and females meet only to mate.[55]

During the courting season, males leave their home ranges for hilltops and ridges where they establish their own mating courts. These leks can be up to 5 kilometres (3 mi) from a kākāpō's usual territory and are an average of 50 metres (160 ft) apart within the lek arena. Males remain in the region of their court throughout the courting season. At the start of the breeding season, males will fight to try to secure the best courts. They confront each other with raised feathers, spread wings, open beaks, raised claws and loud screeching and growling. Fighting may leave birds with injuries or even kill them. Mating occurs only approximately every five years, with the ripening of the rimu fruit. In mating years, males may make "booming" calls for 6–8 hours every night for more than four months.[56]

The sound of a kākāpō booming

Each court consists of one or more saucer-shaped depressions or "bowls" dug in the ground by the male, up to 10 centimetres (4 in) deep and long enough to fit the half-metre length of the bird. The kākāpō is one of only a handful of birds in the world which actually constructs its leks.[53] Bowls are often created next to rock faces, banks, or tree trunks to help reflect sound:[57] the bowls themselves function as amplifiers to enhance the projection of the males' booming mating calls.[53] Each male's bowls are connected by a network of trails or tracks which may extend 50 metres (160 ft) along a ridge or 20 metres (70 ft) in diameter around a hilltop. Males meticulously clear their bowls and tracks of debris.[57]

To attract females, males make loud, low-frequency (below 100 Hz) booming calls from their bowls by inflating a thoracic sac.[58][59] They start with low grunts, which increase in volume as the sac inflates. After a sequence of about 20 loud booms, the male kākāpō emits a high-frequency, metallic "ching" sound.[60] He stands for a short while before again lowering his head, inflating his chest and starting another sequence of booms. The booms can be heard at least 1 kilometre (0.62 mi) away on a still night; wind can carry the sound at least 5 kilometres (3.1 mi).[57] Males boom for an average of eight hours a night; each male may produce thousands of booms in this time. This may continue every night for three or four months during which time the male may lose half his body weight. Each male moves around the bowls in his court so that the booms are sent out in different directions. These booms are also notorious for attracting predators, because of the long range at which they can be heard.[citation needed]

Females are attracted by the booms of the competing males; they too may need to walk several kilometres from their territories to the arena. Once a female enters the court of one of the males, the male performs a display in which he rocks from side to side and makes clicking noises with his beak.[5] He turns his back to the female, spreads his wings in display and walks backwards towards her. He will then attempt copulation for 40 minutes or more.[61] Once the birds have mated, the female returns to her home territory to lay eggs and raise the chicks. The male continues booming in the hope of attracting another female.[62]

Hatchlings

The female kākāpō lays 1–4 eggs per breeding cycle, with several days between eggs.[59][61] The nest is placed on the ground under the cover of plants or in cavities such as hollow tree trunks. The female incubates the eggs beginning after the first egg is laid, but is forced to leave the nest every night in search of food. Predators are known to eat the eggs, and the embryos inside can also die of cold in the mother's absence. Kākāpō eggs usually hatch within 30 days,[63] bearing fluffy grey chicks that are quite helpless. The female feeds the chicks for three months, and the chicks remain with the female for some months after fledging.[59] The young chicks are just as vulnerable to predators as the eggs, and young have been killed by many of the same predators that attack adults. Chicks leave the nest at approximately 10 to 12 weeks of age. As they gain greater independence, their mothers may feed the chicks sporadically for up to 3 months.[5][64]

The kākāpō is long-lived, with an average life expectancy of 60 (plus or minus 20) years, and tends to reach adolescence before it starts breeding.[61] Males start booming at about 5 years of age.[65] It was thought that females reached sexual maturity at 9 years of age, but four five-year-old females have now been recorded reproducing.[63][61] The kākāpō does not breed every year and has one of the lowest rates of reproduction among birds. Breeding occurs only in years when trees mast (fruit heavily), providing a plentiful food supply. Rimu mast occurs only every three to five years, so in rimu-dominant forests, such as those on Whenua Hou, kākāpō breeding occurs as infrequently.[66]

Another aspect of the kākāpō's breeding system is that a female can alter the sex ratio of her offspring depending on her condition. A female in good condition produces more male offspring (males have 30%–40% more body weight than females).[5] Females produce offspring biased towards the dispersive sex when competition for resources (such as food) is high and towards the non-dispersive sex when food is plentiful. A female kākāpō will likely be able to produce eggs even when there are few resources, while a male kākāpō will be more capable of perpetuating the species when there are plenty, by mating with several females.[67] This supports the Trivers–Willard hypothesis. The relationship between clutch sex ratio and maternal diet has conservation implications, because a captive population maintained on a high quality diet will produce fewer females and therefore fewer individuals valuable to the recovery of the species.[68]

Feeding

[edit]

The beak of the kākāpō is adapted for grinding food finely. For this reason, the kākāpō has a very small gizzard compared to other birds of their size. It is entirely herbivorous, eating green shoots, leaf buds, rhizomes and tubers of native plants, as well as seeds, fruits, pollen, moss, fungi and even the sapwood of trees.[69] A study in 1984 identified 25 plant species as kākāpō food.[4] It is specifically fond of the fruit of the rimu tree, and will feed on it exclusively during seasons when it is abundant. The kākāpō strips out the nutritious parts of the plant out with its beak, leaving a ball of indigestible fibre. These little clumps of plant fibres are a distinctive sign of the presence of the bird.[43] The kākāpō is believed to employ bacteria in the fore-gut to ferment and help digest plant matter.[70]

Kākāpō diet changes according to the season. The plants eaten most frequently during the year include some species of Lycopodium ramulosum, Lycopodium fastigium, Schizaea fistulosa, Blechnum minus, Blechnum procerum, Cyathodes juniperina, Dracophyllum longifolium, Olearia colensoi and Thelymitra venosa. Individual plants of the same species are often treated differently. Kākāpō may forage heavily in certain areas, leaving, on occasion, more than 30 droppings and conspicuous evidence of herbivory.[4] These areas, which are mostly dominated by mānuka and yellow silver pine, range from 100 – 5,000 sq. metres (1,076 – 53,820 sq. feet) per individual.[4]

Preserved coprolites of kākāpō have been studied to obtain information on the historic diet of the bird. This research has identified 67 native plant genera previously unrecorded as food sources for kākāpō including native mistletoes as well as Dactylanthus taylorii.[71]

Conservation

[edit]

Fossil records indicate that in pre-Polynesian times, the kākāpō was New Zealand's third most common bird[50] and it was widespread on all three main islands. However, the kākāpō population in New Zealand has declined massively since human settlement of the country, and its conservation status as ranked by the Department of Conservation continues to be "Nationally Critical".[2] Since the 1890s, conservation efforts have been made to prevent extinction. The most successful scheme has been the Kākāpō Recovery Programme; this was implemented in 1995 and continues to this day.[72] Kākāpō are absolutely protected under New Zealand's Wildlife Act 1953.[73] The species is also listed under Appendix I of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) meaning international export/import (including parts and derivatives) is regulated.[74]

Human impact

[edit]
Specimens at the Vienna Museum of Natural History: thousands of kākāpō were collected for museums across the world.

The first factor in the decline of the kākāpō was the arrival of humans. Māori folklore suggests that the kākāpō was found throughout the country when the Polynesians first arrived in Aotearoa 700 years ago.[75] Subfossil and midden deposits show that the bird was present throughout the North and South Island before and during early Māori times.[76] Māori hunted the kākāpō for food and for their skins and feathers, which were made into cloaks.[75]

Due to its inability to fly, strong scent and habit of freezing when threatened, the kākāpō was easy prey for the Māori and their dogs. Its eggs and chicks were also preyed upon by the Polynesian rat or kiore, which the Māori brought to New Zealand as a stowaway.[54] Furthermore, the deliberate clearing of vegetation by Māori reduced the habitable range for kākāpō. Although the kākāpō was extinct in many parts of the islands by the time Europeans arrived,[77] including the Tararua and Aorangi Ranges,[78] it was locally abundant in parts of New Zealand, such as the central North Island and forested parts of the South Island.[76]

Although kākāpō numbers were reduced by Māori settlement, they declined much more rapidly after European colonisation.[79] Beginning in the 1840s, Pākehā settlers cleared vast tracts of land for farming and grazing, further reducing kākāpō habitat. They brought more dogs and other mammalian predators, including domestic cats, black rats and stoats.[80] Europeans knew little of the kākāpō until Gray described it from a skin in 1845. As the Māori had done, early European explorers and their dogs ate kākāpō. In the late 19th century, the kākāpō became well known as a scientific curiosity, and thousands were captured or killed for zoos, museums and collectors. Most captured specimens died within months. From at least the 1870s, collectors knew the kākāpō population was declining; their prime concern was to collect as many as possible before the bird became extinct.[citation needed]

In the 1880s, large numbers of mustelids (stoats, ferrets and weasels) were released in New Zealand to reduce rabbit numbers,[81] but they also preyed heavily on many native species including the kākāpō. Other browsing animals, such as introduced deer, competed with the kākāpō for food, and caused the extinction of some of its preferred plant species. The kākāpō was reportedly still present near the head of the Whanganui River as late as 1894, with one of the last records of a kākāpō in the North Island being a single bird caught in the Kaimanawa Ranges by Te Kepa Puawheawhe in 1895.[78]

Early protection efforts

[edit]

In 1891, the New Zealand government set aside Resolution Island in Fiordland as a nature reserve. In 1894, the government appointed Richard Henry as caretaker. A keen naturalist, Henry was aware that native birds were declining, and began catching and moving kākāpō and kiwi from the mainland to the predator-free Resolution Island. In six years, he moved more than 200 kākāpō to Resolution Island. By 1900, however, stoats had swum to Resolution Island and colonised it; they wiped out the nascent kākāpō population within 6 years.[82]

In 1903, three kākāpō were moved from Resolution Island to the nature reserve of Little Barrier Island (Hauturu-o-Toi) north-east of Auckland, but feral cats were present and the kākāpō were never seen again. In 1912, three kākāpō were moved to another reserve, Kapiti Island, north-west of Wellington. One of them survived until at least 1936, despite the presence of feral cats for part of the intervening period.[82]

By the 1920s, the kākāpō was extinct in the North Island and its range and numbers in the South Island were declining.[77] One of its last refuges was rugged Fiordland. There, during the 1930s, it was often seen or heard, and occasionally eaten, by hunters or roadworkers. By the 1940s, reports of kākāpō were becoming scarce.[citation needed]

1950–1989 conservation efforts

[edit]
Sinbad Gully in Fiordland, seen between the mountains on the far side of a fiord, was one of the last strongholds of the kākāpō on mainland New Zealand.[83]

In the 1950s, the New Zealand Wildlife Service was established and began making regular expeditions to search for the kākāpō, mostly in Fiordland and what is now the Kahurangi National Park in the northwest of the South Island. Seven Fiordland expeditions between 1951 and 1956 found only a few recent signs. Finally, in 1958 a kākāpō was caught and released in the Milford Sound / Piopiotahi catchment area in Fiordland. Six more kākāpō were captured in 1961; one was released and the other five were transferred to the aviaries of the Mount Bruce Bird Reserve near Masterton in the North Island. Within months, four of the birds had died and the fifth died after about four years. In the next 12 years, regular expeditions found few signs of the kākāpō, indicating that numbers were continuing to decline. Only one bird was captured in 1967; it died the following year.[84]

By the early 1970s, it was uncertain whether the kākāpō was still an extant species. At the end of 1974, scientists located several more male kākāpō and made the first scientific observations of kākāpō booming. These observations led Don Merton to speculate for the first time that the kākāpō had a lek breeding system.[54] From 1974 to 1978 a total of 18 kākāpō were discovered in Fiordland, but all were males. This raised the possibility that the species would become extinct, because there might be no surviving females. One male bird was captured in the Milford area in 1975, christened "Richard Henry", and transferred to Maud Island. All the birds the Wildlife Service discovered from 1951 to 1976 were in U-shaped glaciated valleys flanked by almost-vertical cliffs and surrounded by high mountains. Such extreme terrain had slowed colonisation by browsing mammals, leaving islands of virtually unmodified native vegetation. However, even here, stoats were present and by 1976 the kākāpō was gone from the valley floors and only a few males survived high on the most inaccessible parts of the cliffs.[5]

Before 1977, no expedition had been to Stewart Island to search for the bird. In 1977, sightings of kākāpō were reported on the island.[5] An expedition to Rakiura found a track and bowl system on its first day; soon after, it located several dozen kākāpō. The finding in an eight-thousand-hectare (twenty-thousand-acre) area of fire-modified scrubland and forest raised hope that the population would include females. The total population was estimated at 100 to 200 birds.[85]

Mustelids have never colonised Stewart Island, but feral cats were present. During a survey, it was apparent that cats killed kākāpō at a rate of 56% per year.[86] At this rate, the birds could not survive on the island and therefore an intensive cat control was introduced in 1982, after which no cat-killed kākāpō were found.[5] However, to ensure the survival of the remaining birds, scientists decided later that this population should be transferred to predator-free islands; this operation was carried out between 1982 and 1997.[87]

Kākāpō Recovery programme

[edit]
Kākāpō translocations 1974–1992[87]
Translocated to Number of kākāpō Deaths < 6 months Survived as of November 1992
Maud Island (1974–81) 9 (6♂, 3♀) 3 (2♂, 1♀) 4 (2♂, 2♀)
Little Barrier Island (1982) 22 (13♂, 9♀) 2 (1♂, 1♀) 15–19 (10–12♂, 5–7♀)
Codfish Island / Whenua Hou (1987–92) 30 (20♂, 10♀) 0 20–30 (13–20♂, 7–10♀)
Maud Island (1989–91) 6 (4♂, 2♀) 0 5 (3♂, 2♀)
Mana Island (1992) 2 (2♀) 1 (1♀) 1 (1♀)
Total 65 (43♂, 22♀) 6 (3♂, 3♀) 41–55 (27–36♂, 14–19♀)
Note: ♂ = males, ♀ = females.

In the 1980s the kākāpō were translocated to islands with no predators to maintain their genetic diversity, to avoid spreading harmful diseases, and to reduce interbreeding.[38]

In 1989, a Kākāpō Recovery plan was developed, and a Kākāpō Recovery programme was established in 1995.[88] The New Zealand Department of Conservation replaced the Wildlife Service for this task.

The first action of the plan was to relocate all the remaining kākāpō to suitable islands for them to breed. None of the New Zealand islands were ideal to establish kākāpō without rehabilitation by extensive re-vegetation and the eradication of introduced mammalian predators and competitors. Four islands were finally chosen: Maud, Little Barrier, Codfish and Mana.[87] Sixty-five kākāpō (43 males, 22 females) were successfully transferred onto the four islands in five translocations.[87] Some islands had to be rehabilitated several times when feral cats, stoats and weka kept appearing. Little Barrier Island was eventually viewed as unsuitable due to the rugged landscape, the thick forest and the continued presence of rats, and its birds were evacuated in 1998.[89] Along with Mana Island, it was replaced with two new kākāpō sanctuaries: Chalky Island (Te Kākahu-o-Tamatea) and Anchor Island.[5] The entire kākāpō population of Codfish Island was temporarily relocated in 1999 to Pearl Island in Port Pegasus while rats were being eliminated from Codfish.[90] All kākāpō on Pearl and Chalky Islands were moved to Anchor Island in 2005.[91]

Supplementary feeding

[edit]

A key part of the Recovery Programme is the supplementary feeding of females. Kākāpō breed only once every two to five years, when certain plant species, primarily Dacrydium cupressinum (rimu), produce protein-rich fruit and seeds. During breeding years when rimu masts supplementary food is provided to kākāpō to increase the likelihood of individuals successfully breeding.[92] In 1989, six preferred foods (apples, sweet potatoes, almonds, Brazil nuts, sunflower seeds and walnuts) were supplied ad libitum each night to 12 feeding stations. Males and females ate the supplied foods, and females nested on Little Barrier Island in the summers of 1989–1991 for the first time since 1982, although nesting success was low.[93]

Supplementary feeding affects the sex ratio of kākāpō offspring, and can be used to increase the number of female chicks by deliberately manipulating maternal condition.[94] During the winter of 1981, only females lighter than 1.5 kg (3.3 lb) were given supplementary feeding to avoid raising their body condition, and the sex ratio results in 1982 were close to parity, eliminating the male-biased sex ratios in the unrestricted feeding.[citation needed]

Today commercial parrot food is supplied to all individuals of breeding age on Whenua Hou and Anchor. The amount eaten and individual weights are carefully monitored to ensure that optimum body condition is maintained.[61]

Nest management

[edit]
Department of Conservation worker with chicks

Kākāpō nests are intensively managed by wildlife conservation staff. Before Polynesian rats were removed from Whenua Hou, the rats were a threat to the survival of young kākāpō. Of 21 chicks that hatched between 1981 and 1994, nine were either killed by rats or died and were subsequently eaten by rats.[92] Kākāpō nest protection was intensified after 1995 by using rat traps and rat poison stations as soon as a kākāpō nest was detected. A small video camera and infra-red light source would watch the nest continuously and scare approaching rats with flashing lights and loud popping sounds.[citation needed]

All kākāpō islands are now rat-free, but infrared cameras still allow rangers to remotely monitor the behaviour of females and chicks in nests. Data loggers record when mother kākāpō come and go, allowing rangers to pick a time to check on the health of chicks, and also indicate how hard females are having to work to find food. Because mother kākāpō often struggle to successfully rear multiple chicks, Kākāpō Recovery rangers will move chicks between nests as needed.[61]

Eggs are often removed from nests for incubation to reduce the likelihood of accidents, such as lost eggs or crushing. If chicks become ill, are not putting on weight, or there are too many chicks in the nest (and no available nest to move them to) they will be hand-reared by the Kākāpō Recovery team.[61] In the 2019 season, eggs were also removed from nests to encourage females to re-nest. By hand-raising the first group of chicks in captivity and encouraging females to lay more eggs, the Kākāpō Recovery Team hoped that overall chick production would be increased.[95] By the end of February 2020, the bird's summer breeding season, these efforts led to the production of 80 chicks, "a record number."[96]

Monitoring

[edit]

To monitor the kākāpō population continuously, each bird is equipped with a radio transmitter.[92] Every known kākāpō, barring some young chicks, has been given a name by Kākāpō Recovery Programme officials, and detailed data is gathered about every individual.[36] GPS transmitters are also being trialled to provide more detailed data about the movement of individual birds and their habitat use.[61] The signals also provide behavioural data, letting rangers gather information about mating and nesting remotely.[36] Every individual kākāpō receives an annual health check and has their transmitter replaced.[citation needed]

Reintroduction

[edit]

The Kākāpō Recovery programme has been successful, with the numbers of kākāpō increasing steadily. Adult survival rate and productivity have both improved significantly since the programme's inception. However, the main goal is to establish at least one viable, self-sustaining, unmanaged population of kākāpō as a functional component of the ecosystem in a protected habitat.[97] To help meet this conservation challenge, Resolution Island (20,860 ha (51,500 acres)) in Fiordland has been prepared for kākāpō re-introduction with ecological restoration including the eradication of stoats.[98][5] Ultimately, the Kākāpō Recovery vision for the species is to restore the mauri (Māori for "life-force") of the kākāpō by breeding 150 adult females.[99]

Four males were re-introduced to Sanctuary Mountain Maungatautari in the North Island on 21 July 2023, becoming the first kākāpō living in mainland New Zealand in almost 40 years.[8] Despite extensive improvements to the perimeter fence, in October 2023, one of the kākāpō escaped by using a downed tree to climb out. The bird was located using the signal from its GPS transmitter and returned to the sanctuary.[100] A second group of six birds was introduced to the sanctuary in September. However, two further kākāpō found a way over the fence, and in November the Department of Conservation temporarily removed three birds from the sanctuary to a southern predator-free island, leaving the kākāpō population in the sanctuary at seven. The Department commented that "Kākāpō are flightless but are excellent climbers who can use their wings to parachute from treetops".[101]

Fatal fungal infection

[edit]

In 2019 an outbreak of the fungal disease aspergillosis among kākāpō on the island of Whenua Hou infected 21 individuals and led to 9 deaths: two adults, five chicks and two juveniles. Over 50 birds were transported to veterinary centres for diagnostics and treatment.[102]

Population timeline

[edit]
Cat control in 1982 slowed a sharp decline in kākāpō numbers, and they have recently increased under the Kākāpō Recovery plan. Red arrows indicate breeding years. Numbers become less precise before 1995, with the 1977 figure perhaps out by 50 birds.[103]
  • 1977: Kākāpō rediscovered on Stewart Island / Rakiura
  • 1989: Most kākāpō are removed from Rakiura to Whenua Hou and Hauturu-O-Toi
  • 1995: Kākāpō population consists of 51 individuals; beginning of the Kakapo Recovery Programme
  • 1999: Kākāpō removed from Hauturu
  • 2002: A significant breeding season led to 24 chicks being hatched
  • 2005: 41 females and 45 males, including four fledglings (3 females and 1 male); kākāpō established on Anchor Island[5]
  • 2009: The total kākāpō population rose to over 100 for the first time since monitoring began.[104] Twenty-two of the 34 chicks had to be hand-reared because of a shortage of food on Codfish Island.[105]
  • December 2010: Death of the oldest known kākāpō, "Richard Henry", possibly 80 years old.[106]
  • 2012: Seven kākāpō transferred to Hauturu, in an attempt to establish a successful breeding programme. Kākāpō were last on the island in 1999.[107]
  • March 2014: With the kākāpō population having increased to 126, the bird's recovery was used by Melbourne artist Sayraphim Lothian as a metaphor for the recovery of Christchurch, parallelling the "indomitable spirit of these two communities and their determination to rebuild".[108][109]
  • 2016: First breeding on Anchor; a significant breeding season, with 32 chicks; kākāpō population grows to over 150
  • 2018: After the death of 3 birds, the population reduced to 149 birds.[110]
  • 2019: An abundance of rimu fruit and the introduction of several new technologies (including artificial insemination and 'smart eggs') helped make 2019 the best breeding season on record, with over 200 eggs laid and 72 chicks fledged. According to the Kākāpō Recovery Team at the New Zealand Department of Conservation, this was the earliest and longest breeding season yet.[111][112] Population reached 200 juvenile or older birds on 17 August 2019.[113]
  • 2022: The population increased to 252 birds after a productive breeding season and successful artificial insemination.[114]
  • 2023: Birds are reintroduced to the mainland for the first time.[8][115]
  • 2024: As of September 2024, the population had declined slightly to 243 individuals.[116]

In Māori culture

[edit]

The kākāpō is associated with a rich tradition of Māori folklore and beliefs. The bird's irregular breeding cycle was understood to be associated with heavy fruiting or "masting" events of particular plant species such as the rimu, which led Māori to credit the bird with the ability to tell the future.[117] Used to substantiate this claim were reported observations of these birds dropping the berries of the hinau and tawa trees (when they were in season) into secluded pools of water to preserve them as a food supply for the summer ahead; in legend this became the origin of the Māori practice of immersing food in water for the same purpose.[117]

Use for food and clothing

[edit]
Feathers

The Māori considered the meat of the kākāpō a delicacy and, when the bird was widespread, hunted it for food.[75] One source states that its flesh "resembles lamb in taste and texture",[117] although European settlers have described the bird as having a "strong and slightly stringent [sic] flavour".[75]

In breeding years, the loud booming calls of the males at their mating arenas made it easy for Māori hunting parties to track the kākāpō down, and it was also hunted while feeding or when dust-bathing in dry weather. The bird was caught, generally at night, using snares, pitfall traps, or by groups of domesticated Polynesian dogs which accompanied hunting parties – sometimes they would use fire sticks of various sorts to dazzle a bird in the darkness, stopping it in their tracks and making the capture easier.[117] Cooking was done in a hāngī or in gourds of boiling oil.[118] The flesh of the bird could be preserved in its own fat and stored in containers for later consumption – hunters of the Ngāi Tahu iwi would pack the flesh in baskets made from the inner bark of tōtara tree or in containers constructed from kelp.[119] Bundles of kākāpō tail feathers were attached to the sides of these containers to provide decoration and a way to identify their contents.[75][119] The Māori also used the bird's eggs for food.[117]

As well as eating the meat of the kākāpō, Māori would use kākāpō skins with the feathers still attached or individually weave in kākāpō feathers with flax fibre to create cloaks and capes.[118][119][120] Each one required up to 11,000 feathers to make.[121] Not only were these garments considered very beautiful, they also kept the wearer very warm.[118][121] They were highly valued and considered as taonga (treasures), so much so that the old Māori adage "You have a kākāpō cape and you still complain of the cold" was used to describe someone who is never satisfied.[118] Only one cloak fully made of kākāpō feathers is known to still exist.[122] It dates from the 1810s–1820s and is held in the Perth Museum in Scotland; the museum in collaboration with the British Museum and Māori advisers have restored the cloak.[122][123] Kākāpō feathers were also used to decorate the heads of taiaha, but were removed before use in combat.[75][119][121]

Despite this, the kākāpō was also regarded as an affectionate pet by the Māori. This was corroborated by European settlers in New Zealand in the 19th century, among them George Edward Grey, who once wrote in a letter to an associate that his pet kākāpō's behaviour towards him and his friends was "more like that of a dog than a bird".[117]

In the media

[edit]

The conservation of the kākāpō has made the species well known. Many books and documentaries detailing the plight of the kākāpō have been produced in recent years, one of the earliest being Two in the Bush, made by Gerald Durrell for the BBC in 1962.[124]

A feature-length documentary, The Unnatural History of the Kakapo[125] won two major awards at the Reel Earth Environmental Film Festival. Two of the most significant documentaries, both made by NHNZ, are Kakapo – Night Parrot (1982) and To Save the Kakapo (1997).

Sirocco on Maud Island

The BBC's Natural History Unit featured the kākāpō, including a sequence with Sir David Attenborough in The Life of Birds. It was one of the endangered animals Douglas Adams and Mark Carwardine set out to find for the radio series and book Last Chance to See. An updated version of the series has been produced for BBC TV, in which Stephen Fry and Carwardine revisit the animals to see how they are getting on almost 20 years later, and in January 2009, they spent time filming the kākāpō on Codfish Island / Whenua Hou.[83][126] Footage of a kākāpō named Sirocco attempting to mate with Carwardine's head was viewed by millions worldwide, leading to Sirocco becoming "spokes-bird" for New Zealand wildlife conservation in 2010.[127] Sirocco became the inspiration for the party parrot, a popular animated emoji frequently associated with the workflow application Slack.[128]

The kākāpō was featured in the episode "Strange Islands" of the documentary series South Pacific, originally aired on 13 June 2009,[129] in the episode "Worlds Apart" of the series The Living Planet,[130] and in episode 3 of the BBC's New Zealand Earth's Mythical Islands.[131]

In a 2019 kākāpō awareness campaign, the Kākāpō Recovery Programme New Zealand National Partner, Meridian Energy, ran a Search for a Saxophonist to provide suitable mood music for encouraging mating to coincide with the 2019 kākāpō breeding season. The search and footage from the islands where breeding was taking place were featured on the Breakfast programme.[132] The kākāpō was featured in the mobile game "Kākāpō Run" [133] developed by a UK conservation charity. This game aimed to raise support for kākāpō conservation by engaging players in fun, educational gameplay. A study found that playing the game helped increase positive attitudes and actions related to kākāpō protection, such as support for managing invasive predators and responsible pet care, though it did not lead to more donations.[134]

The bird was voted New Zealand's bird of the year in 2008 and 2020.[135][136]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Sources

[edit]
  • Higgins, P.J., ed. (1999). "Strigops habroptilus Kakapo" (PDF). Handbook of Australian, New Zealand & Antarctic Birds. Vol. 4: Parrots to Dollarbird. Melbourne, Victoria: Oxford University Press. pp. 633–646. ISBN 978-0-19-553071-1. Archived from the original (PDF) on 17 June 2024. Retrieved 10 June 2023.

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
The kākāpō (Strigops habroptilus) is a large, flightless, nocturnal parrot endemic to New Zealand, characterized by its owl-like facial disc, finely blotched yellow-green plumage for forest camouflage, and ground-dwelling habits that distinguish it from all other parrot species. As the world's heaviest parrot, adults reach lengths of up to 64 cm and weights of 1.5–4 kg, with males larger than females, and they exhibit solitary behavior, climbing trees for food but relying on strong legs for terrestrial movement due to vestigial wings. Critically endangered on the IUCN Red List, the species has dwindled to 237 known living individuals as of October 2025, primarily due to predation and competition from invasive mammals introduced by human settlers, which decimated populations on the mainland after Polynesian and European arrivals. Conservation efforts since the 1980s, led by New Zealand's Department of Conservation, have focused on translocating birds to predator-free islands, intensive monitoring via radio-tracking, genetic management to combat inbreeding, and habitat manipulation to boost breeding during irregular rimu mast years, when males perform lekking displays to attract females. These interventions have stabilized the population from a low of around 50 birds in the 1990s, though ongoing challenges include low reproductive rates, disease risks from low genetic diversity, and the need for sustained predator eradication to enable potential mainland reintroduction.

Taxonomy and Phylogeny

Evolutionary Origins

The kākāpō (Strigops habroptilus) represents the sole extant member of the genus Strigops, which forms a to the genus Nestor (encompassing the , Nestor notabilis, and , Nestor meridionalis), together comprising the family Strigopidae within the order Psittaciformes. Molecular phylogenetic analyses indicate that Strigopidae diverged from other lineages during the , approximately 82 million years ago, consistent with a Gondwanan origin predating the final separation of from the Australian-Antarctic landmass around 80–85 million years ago. This basal position underscores the family's status as a Gondwanan , with subsequent diversification driven by vicariance and isolation rather than recent dispersal from , contrary to earlier morphological assumptions linking it to Australian ground parrots. Within Strigopidae, the divergence of Strigops from Nestor occurred during the Oligocene, around 28–33 million years ago, following the establishment of New Zealand as an isolated landmass after the Oligocene drowning events circa 23–34 million years ago. This split coincided with the emergence of flightless and nocturnal adaptations in the kākāpō lineage, likely facilitated by the absence of mammalian predators and the predominance of forested habitats with abundant understory resources. Phylogenetic reconstructions from multilocus DNA sequences refute close affinities with Australian taxa, emphasizing instead an endemic New Zealand radiation shaped by long-term isolation. Direct fossil evidence of kākāpō ancestors remains scarce, with no pre-Pleistocene remains identified, though subfossil bones and coprolites from deposits confirm its pre-human abundance across mainland . Indirect support comes from Miocene fossils of other large, flight-reduced parrots in , such as the extinct Heracles inexpectatus (approximately 19 million years old, weighing up to 7 kg), which illustrate parallel evolutionary trends toward and terrestriality in island psittaciforms, though not direct progenitors. These patterns align with island biogeographic principles, where relaxed predation pressure and resource stability favor reduced dispersal ability and specialized sensory traits, such as the kākāpō's forward-facing, owl-like facial disk for enhanced low-light detection.

Genetic Diversity and Polymorphisms

The kākāpō (Strigops habroptilus) has experienced substantial reductions in due to serial bottlenecks, with genomic analyses estimating a loss of approximately 70–80% of its heterozygosity since the 1800s, driven by , predation, and human impacts. This has resulted in one of the lowest levels of among avian , with observed heterozygosity across loci averaging around 0.004–0.005, reflecting long-term isolation and small effective sizes estimated at fewer than 50 individuals in recent centuries. Elevated coefficients, often exceeding 0.2 in founder lineages, contribute to homozygosity of deleterious alleles, exacerbating risks of through reduced fitness. Inbreeding depression is evident in reproductive traits, including smaller clutch sizes (typically 1–2 eggs versus historical norms), hatching success rates below 50% in some cohorts, and high rates of early embryonic lethality linked to homozygous recessive mutations. However, whole-genome sequencing of nearly the entire extant population (around 250 individuals as of 2023) reveals fewer accumulated harmful mutations than predicted for such prolonged inbreeding, attributed to purging of deleterious variants during prehistoric bottlenecks dating back over 10,000 years. This resilience suggests historical selective pressures may have optimized the genome against severe depression, though ongoing management via pedigree tracking and artificial insemination aims to maximize outbreeding and preserve adaptive potential. Polymorphisms in the kākāpō genome are limited but include notable structural variants, such as a color polymorphism manifesting as green (dominant) and olive (recessive) feather morphs in approximately 10–15% of individuals, controlled by a single locus with alleles influencing iridescent barbule nanostructures. This polymorphism likely persisted via balancing selection from extinct apex predators like Haast's eagle (Hieraaetus moorei), where olive morphs may have evaded visual detection in understory habitats, as inferred from haplotype divergence and predation modeling. Microsatellite markers further reveal moderate polymorphism, with 30 loci developed for kinship analysis showing 5–20 alleles per locus, enabling precise monitoring of relatedness in captive breeding programs to mitigate further diversity erosion. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from population genomics, totaling over 10 million identified sites, underscore bottlenecks but confirm retention of functional variants in immune and metabolic genes sufficient for short-term viability.

Physical Characteristics

External Morphology

The kākāpō (Strigops habroptilus) is the heaviest extant species, with adults exhibiting pronounced in size. Males average approximately 2.0 kg in weight (ranging from 1.6 to 4.0 kg), while females average about 1.5 kg (ranging from 1.3 to over 2.0 kg); individuals can gain up to 1 kg of fat prior to breeding seasons. Total body length reaches up to 64 cm, with a robust, rotund build adapted for terrestrial life, including short, rounded wings and a slightly de-curved tail. Plumage provides camouflage in forest understory, featuring yellowish moss-green or olive-green upperparts finely barred or mottled with dark brownish-grey or black. The breast and flanks are yellowish-green streaked with yellow, while the belly is yellow with pale green streaks; tail and wing feathers are barred brownish-grey or mottled with pale yellow. Juveniles display duller coloration with finer black barring and reduced yellow tones. A distinctive facial disc composed of fine, hair-like sensory feathers surrounds the face, contributing to an owl-like appearance and aiding nocturnal navigation. The is broad and robust, with a bluish-grey upper featuring an tip and cutting edge, and a lower that is -colored with five longitudinal ridges; this structure forms a grinding apparatus suited for processing fibrous material. Legs are short and robust, blue-grey with smooth scales, supporting a waddling and enabling agile ; feet are large, scaled, and zygodactyl, with cream-colored soles in adults and paler pinkish-grey tones in females, which possess slenderer tarsi overall. Females exhibit narrower heads, proportionately longer s and wings, and relatively longer tails compared to males.

Internal Anatomy and Physiology

The kākāpō exhibits a low field metabolic rate, measured at approximately 1.3 times the predicted for birds of similar mass using doubly-labelled water techniques on free-living individuals, attributable to its flightlessness and sedentary, nocturnal that minimizes expenditure. Body temperature varies between 37.1°C and 41.3°C, independent of body size or ambient conditions, reflecting physiological adaptations to temperate island environments with reduced thermoregulatory demands. Visual and are specialized for low-light conditions, with orbital convergence at 59°—far exceeding the 16.3° average in parrots—enabling greater binocular overlap for in dim environments. photoreceptors feature elongated outer and inner segments (99.59–101.25 µm), enhancing light capture, though low cell density (87–89 cells/mm²) results in poor , consistent with reliance on other senses like olfaction during nocturnal foraging. Corresponding brain regions, including the optic tectum, nucleus rotundus, and entopallium, are reduced relative to diurnal parrots, indicating diminished dependence on the tectofugal visual pathway. The digestive tract is adapted for folivory, featuring short, stout mandibles (upper 30.5 mm long, 20 mm wide at base), a wide (12 mm), thick (6 mm) tongue with keratinized pads, and a thick pharyngeal pad that facilitate grinding and extracting juices from fibrous , producing compact "chews" of indigestible residue. Internal structures include a well-defined (34 × 31 mm), proventriculus (35 mm long), spherical (25 mm diameter), and five intestinal loops without caeca, differing from nectar-adapted relatives like the kaka, which has a narrower, fimbriated tongue. The gastrointestinal , dominated by Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes in adults, supports of plant material, though juveniles show higher Proteobacteria abundance potentially linked to diet transitions. Reproductive physiology follows an annual gonadal cycle driven by increasing day length post-winter, with testicular growth in males peaking in spring and regression by autumn, as assessed via fecal metabolites in free-living populations. However, and breeding occur irregularly, only during mast fruiting events of podocarps every 2–5 years, when supplementary triggers final maturation despite the photoperiodic baseline, decoupling gonadal from actual . The aligns with general avian design, incorporating rigid lungs and for unidirectional airflow, but computed reveals unique features in kākāpō lungs, including a network of large parabronchi adjacent to the , potentially aiding efficient in a flightless, low-activity species. Bacterial communities in the upper include Proteobacteria and Firmicutes, varying by individual and environment, with implications for susceptibility in this managed population.

Adaptations and Ecology

Behavioral Adaptations

The kākāpō (Strigops habroptilus) displays behavioral adaptations shaped by its evolution in a mammalian predator-free environment, emphasizing energy conservation, camouflage, and reproductive efficiency over flight or speed. Primarily nocturnal, individuals forage actively at night and roost during the day in burrows, tree cavities, or under dense vegetation to minimize exposure to diurnal avian threats, such as the extinct Haast's eagle. This crepuscular pattern aligns with their cryptic green plumage and low metabolic rate, allowing sustained activity over several kilometers of ground travel or tree climbing without diurnal overheating. Solitary by nature, kākāpō maintain stable home ranges for years, interacting minimally outside breeding seasons, with occasional loose groups of 2–4 females and juveniles forming transiently. This asocial structure reduces competition for resources in dense forests and supports their slow reproductive cycle, where breeding occurs irregularly every 2–4 years, triggered by episodic masting events like rimu (Dacrydium cupressinum) abundance. Males employ a system, establishing fixed display arenas on ridges or hilltops with cleared tracks leading to excavated bowls up to 3 meters in diameter; here, they perform no , conserving energy for vocal displays that attract females from distances of 300–400 meters on flat terrain or up to 5 kilometers in mountainous areas. Central to lekking is the male's booming vocalization, a deep, low-frequency call produced by inflating thoracic , emitted every 1–2 seconds for up to 8 hours nightly over 2–3 months (typically to ). Each bout ends with a high-pitched "ching" to signal availability, potentially totaling thousands of calls per male per season and enabling mate location in dense, foggy forests where visual cues are limited. When disturbed, kākāpō exhibit a freeze response, remaining motionless to leverage their mottled against foliage, an effective evasion against historical aerial predators but maladaptive against introduced mammalian hunters like stoats or cats, which detect them via scent or . They also possess an enhanced olfactory sense relative to other parrots, aiding nocturnal by distinguishing plant odors and possibly individual scents, though direct evidence for scent-based communication remains observational rather than experimentally confirmed.

Diet and Foraging

The kākāpō (Strigops habroptilus) maintains a strictly herbivorous diet consisting exclusively of matter, including leaves, stems, roots, fruits, seeds, nectar, and fungi. Faecal analysis and studies confirm a generalist feeding strategy encompassing trees, shrubs, grasses, ferns, mosses, and liverworts, with dietary breadth historically encompassing 24 plant orders, 56 families, and 67 native genera—many unrecorded in contemporary samples. Seasonal availability drives flexibility; for instance, on , crop contents and feces from 1977–1981 revealed heavy reliance on podocarps like rimu (Dacrydium cupressinum) and miro (Prumnopitys ferruginea) during fruiting periods, supplemented by monocots, ferns, and angiosperm leaves otherwise. Foraging occurs nocturnally, with individuals traveling up to several kilometers nightly across rugged terrain, climbing trees and shrubs using powerful legs and a prehensile bill to access foliage and fruits. Bill morphology, featuring a hooked tip and chisel-like edge, facilitates stripping fibrous vegetation, reflecting adaptation to this low-nutrient, high-fiber intake processed via a voluminous crop and muscular gizzard. Breeding seasons amplify selectivity toward energy-dense foods; females provision chicks predominantly with lipid-rich rimu fruits, yielding crop samples averaging 8% fruit by volume, though overall nestling diets post-60 days exhibit nutrient deficiencies and elevated indigestible fiber. In non-breeding years, diets shift toward foliage and less caloric items, correlating with reduced energy expenditure. Modern managed populations on predator-free islands show contracted dietary diversity compared to prehistoric ranges, underscoring ecological disruptions from habitat alteration and predator exclusion.

Reproduction and Mating System

The kākāpō exhibits a lek polygynous , unique among species, in which males establish display territories at communal leks consisting of track-and-bowl systems on ridges or hilltops. Males prepare these sites by clearing tracks leading to one or more bowls, where they perform nocturnal booming displays from late October or December through March, inflating thoracic to produce deep calls at intervals of 1–2 seconds, audible up to 5 km in mountainous terrain. Females travel considerable distances to leks, selectively copulate with preferred males—often multiple times with the same or different individuals—and receive no post-copulatory assistance from males, who provide no . Breeding occurs irregularly every 2–4 years (ranging to 2–7 years in some populations), synchronized with mast fruiting events of podocarp trees, particularly rimu (Dacrydium cupressinum), which provide the high-energy food resources necessary for females to support . In non-mast years, gonadal development proceeds annually, but and nesting are suppressed without sufficient abundance, reflecting an adaptive response to environmental variability rather than physiological limitation. Egg-laying typically commences in late January to early February during breeding seasons, with clutches consisting of 1–4 eggs ( 2.53, mode 3). Incubation, performed solely by the female, lasts approximately 30 days (range 28–31 days) and begins with the first egg, resulting in asynchronous hatching. Females leave eggs and young nestlings unattended nightly for 1–4 hours to forage, resuming brooding upon return. Chicks remain in the nest for an average of 72.4 days before fledging, with females continuing to feed them for up to 6 months during a prolonged dependency period averaging 246 days for fledglings; chick survival is low due to starvation risks in suboptimal food years and other factors.

Habitat and Historical Distribution

Pre-Human Range

Prior to the arrival of Polynesian settlers around 1250–1300 CE, the kākāpō (Strigops habroptilus) maintained a broad distribution across New Zealand's mainland, encompassing the North Island, South Island, and Stewart Island (Rakiura). Subfossil remains, including abundant skeletal elements from late Quaternary deposits, confirm the species' presence and commonality across these islands, with bones frequently recovered from caves, dunes, and swamp sites on both the North and South Islands. Fossil records indicate that kākāpō were regionally abundant in pre-human ecosystems, with no evidence of significant range contraction attributable to natural factors prior to human impacts. Palaeoecological analyses of these deposits reveal that the species exploited diverse forested habitats within this range, from lowland podocarp-broadleaf forests to higher-altitude woodlands, reflecting its adaptation to New Zealand's pre-human vegetation mosaic. Radiocarbon-dated bones, spanning the up to the immediate pre-human period, further support sustained population viability across the without indications of localized extirpations.

Current Managed Habitats

The kākāpō population, totaling 237 individuals as of October 2025, is confined to managed, predator-controlled sites to mitigate extinction risks from introduced mammals. These habitats consist primarily of offshore islands in southern with eradicated or suppressed predators, supplemented by a fenced mainland sanctuary. Intensive management by the Kākāpō Recovery Programme includes tracking via radio transmitters, supplemental feeding during non-mast years, and periodic translocations to balance and breeding success. Whenua Hou/Codfish Island, located 3 km west of /Rakiura and covering 1,396 hectares of rimu-dominated forest, serves as the primary breeding and recovery hub. The first kākāpō were translocated there in , followed by eradication in , enabling sustained reproduction tied to rimu masting cycles every 3–5 years. Pukenui/Anchor Island (1,140 hectares) in Tamatea/Dusky Sound, , hosts a breeding population established in 2005 after stoat eradication in 2001. Its rimu forest similarly supports boom-bust , with birds transferred from sites like to bolster numbers. Te Kākahu-o-Tamatea/Chalky Island in maintains a smaller managed group, contributing to overall genetic representation through translocations from other islands. Predator-free since eradication efforts, it features suitable podocarp forest but limited public access due to rugged terrain. Coal Island/Te Puka-Hereka (1,163 hectares) in received a trial cohort of non-breeding males in May 2024 via translocation from Anchor Island, testing viability amid ongoing stoat trapping rather than full eradication. This site evaluates expansion potential without diverting breeding birds. On the mainland, Sanctuary Mountain (3,400 hectares) in , enclosed by a 47 km pest-proof , holds a small group of males translocated starting July 2023, marking the first North Island presence in over a century. Additional transfers in September 2023 from Codfish, Anchor, and Chalky Islands aim to assess booming behavior and long-term reintroduction feasibility, though predator incursions remain a monitored .

Threats and Population Decline

Natural Vulnerabilities

The kākāpō's flightlessness, an adaptation to its historically predator-poor island environment, severely limits its capacity for predator evasion and recolonization, exposing it to any capable hunter. In pre-human ecosystems, this trait made it prey for the extinct (Hieraaetus moorei), a visually oriented whose attacks drove evolutionary selection for kākāpō traits like polymorphic green-olive plumage for and a behavioral freeze response to avoid detection from above. Reproductive constraints amplify these risks, as breeding occurs only during irregular mast-fruiting events of podocarps such as rimu (Dacrydium cupressinum), which provide the caloric surplus needed for females to provision offspring; these cycles happen every 2–4 years, enforcing erratic population fluctuations rather than consistent growth. The lek-based exacerbates this, with males investing heavily in nocturnal booming displays at fixed sites to attract females but offering no assistance in incubation or rearing, thereby placing full energetic burden on females who must fast while guarding eggs and chicks. Intrinsic fertility limitations further hinder recruitment, with studies documenting early embryonic mortality and affecting up to 40% of eggs even under optimal conditions, independent of or in remnant populations. Combined with delayed (typically 5–9 years) and low baseline densities from territoriality, these traits yield inherently slow recovery from natural perturbations like stochastic fruit failures or isolated predation events.

Anthropogenic Impacts

The arrival of Polynesian settlers around the 13th century initiated significant anthropogenic pressures on kākāpō populations, including direct hunting for meat and feathers, as well as habitat modification through fires for and the introduction of the kiore (Pacific , Rattus exulans), which preyed on eggs and chicks. These activities correlated with local extirpations, particularly in the , where forest clearance appears to have been a primary driver of decline. European colonization from the late exacerbated these impacts through intensified —kākāpō were valued for their palatable flesh and used in trade—and widespread for farming and timber, which fragmented and reduced suitable podocarp-broadleaf habitats across both main islands. By the , European observers noted rapid population crashes in the , attributing them partly to habitat loss but increasingly to predation by newly introduced mammals. The introduction of additional invasive predators during the colonial era, including domestic cats (Felis catus), stoats (Mustela erminea), ship rats (Rattus rattus), and Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus), inflicted catastrophic losses, as kākāpō's ground-nesting and nocturnal habits offered little defense against these efficient hunters of adults, juveniles, and eggs. Stoats and cats were particularly devastating, with historical records indicating near-total wipeout of mainland populations by the mid-20th century, reducing kākāpō to isolated remnants on predator-free islands like (Rakiura). Combined with ongoing land clearance, these introductions shifted kākāpō from widespread abundance to critically endangered status, with fewer than 100 individuals surviving by the 1970s.

Disease and Genetic Challenges

The kākāpō population has undergone severe bottlenecks, resulting in the loss of approximately 70-80% of its since the 1800s and elevated levels of . This manifests in reduced , including high rates of hatching failure—61% of eggs fail to hatch, with 73% showing no signs of embryonic development—and smaller clutch sizes, attributable to . is particularly pronounced among individuals from /Rakiura, where shared genetic ancestry contributes to widespread infertility. Despite these pressures, genomic analyses reveal that has purged many deleterious mutations over millennia of isolation, with contemporary kākāpō carrying an average of 18 potentially harmful variants per individual, compared to 34 in 19th-century specimens. However, the ongoing small continues to drive and loss of variation, heightening vulnerability to environmental stressors and limiting adaptive potential. Kākāpō are susceptible to infectious diseases exacerbated by their ground-dwelling habits, during breeding seasons, and limited immune diversity from . , caused by the Aspergillus fumigatus, poses a acute threat; a 2019 outbreak on Anchor Island affected 21 birds during a successful nesting period, killing 9 via respiratory infection, with a single fungal strain implicated across affected sites. This event underscored how spore accumulation in predator-free island environments, combined with post-breeding physiological stress, can trigger mass morbidity in immunologically naive populations. Ongoing monitors and other pathogens, as low impairs disease resistance.

Conservation History and Strategies

Early Recognition and Māori Utilization

The , Polynesian settlers who arrived in approximately 700 years ago, encountered the kākāpō as a widespread, flightless, nocturnal inhabiting podocarp-broadleaf forests across both main islands. They recognized its distinctive traits, naming it kākāpō—derived from kākā (parrot) and (night)—reflecting its crepuscular and nocturnal habits, booming calls, and ground-dwelling behavior, which contrasted with flying parrots familiar from . This nomenclature indicates early observation of its ecology, including its reliance on fruiting cycles of trees like rimu (Dacrydium cupressinum) for breeding booms, though specific pre-colonial accounts remain oral and sparsely documented in written records. Māori utilized the kākāpō primarily as a food source, exploiting its tame nature and poor flight to hunt individuals easily, particularly during the summer breeding season when males' loud lekking displays made them locatable. Hunters often employed dogs to detect the well-camouflaged birds in undergrowth, targeting both sexes amid rākau mānawa (mast fruiting) events that synchronized population booms. Beyond meat, valued for its taste and yield, the species provided materials: feathers were plucked or sourced from skins to craft prestigious kahu kākāpō , combining kākāpō plumes with those of other birds like kiwi for insulation and status symbols; examples from the early , such as a full cloak collected around 1810–1820s, attest to this practice's established tradition. Skins were also fashioned into capes, and rendered fat served as oil, underscoring the bird's role as a versatile (treasured resource) in pre-contact society.

Colonial Era to Mid-20th Century Efforts

European settlers in during the hunted kākāpō for meat and skins, exacerbating the species' decline already underway from introduced predators such as stoats and through forest clearance. In recognition of the mounting threats, the in 1891 gazetted Resolution Island in Dusky Sound, , as the country's first dedicated wildlife sanctuary aimed at protecting ground-dwelling birds including the kākāpō. In 1894, conservationist Richard Henry was appointed as the island's caretaker and curator, initiating one of the earliest systematic translocation efforts by capturing and transferring hundreds of kākāpō—estimates range from nearly 400 to over 700 individuals—along with kiwi and other flightless birds from mainland to the presumed predator-free Resolution Island. Henry employed dogs to locate and pens to hold the birds during transport by rowboat, marking an innovative, hands-on approach informed by his observations of the kākāpō's nocturnal habits and vulnerability to stoats. However, stoats reached the island around 1900, likely by swimming across from the mainland, leading to the rapid extirpation of the translocated population and rendering the initiative a failure despite its pioneering intent. Following this setback, organized conservation efforts for kākāpō lapsed for several decades, with the receiving sporadic legal protections under early acts but no substantial interventions amid broader priorities like and predator control challenges. The establishment of the New Zealand Wildlife Service in revived targeted actions, prompting over 60 expeditions into remote areas through the 1950s and into the 1960s to search for surviving birds via booming calls and tracks. These efforts yielded few captures—primarily six males between and the early 1970s—with most succumbing shortly after in captivity due to stress and inadequate husbandry knowledge, underscoring the kākāpō's sensitivity and the era's limited understanding of its biology. By the mid-20th century, remnant populations were confined to inaccessible Fiordland valleys, numbering likely in the low dozens and skewed toward males, as stoats disproportionately preyed on females and juveniles.

Intensive Recovery Programme (1970s–Present)

The Kākāpō Recovery Programme originated in the 1970s with initial translocation efforts by the New Zealand Wildlife Service, which transferred five male kākāpō from to Maud Island between 1974 and 1981 to safeguard them from mainland threats. Despite early discoveries of small populations, including 18 birds in in 1977 and booming calls indicating an estimated 200 individuals on [Stewart Island](/page/Stewart Island) (Rakiura), predation by introduced predators like cats necessitated escalated interventions. In the 1980s, the programme intensified with the evacuation of the Rakiura population to predator-free islands, including transfers of 18 birds in 1982 to Codfish Island (Whenua Hou), Maud Island, and (Te Hauturu-o-Toi), following cat eradication on the latter in 1980. Eradication of and possums from Codfish Island in 1986 further enhanced sanctuary conditions, and the Department of Conservation assumed management in 1987, marking a shift to coordinated, intensive oversight. A formal recovery plan was developed in 1989, emphasizing population assessment and threat mitigation. By the 1990s, the programme addressed acute challenges, such as the detection of kiore (Pacific s) near nests in 1993, which contributed to chick losses; the population had dwindled to 51 individuals by 1995, with only three of 12 chicks surviving due to predation. eradication on Codfish Island in 1998 enabled improved breeding outcomes, while supplementary feeding regimes were introduced to synchronize irregular breeding cycles—tied to rimu tree mast events—with human-managed nutrition, boosting fertility rates. All surviving kākāpō were relocated from mainland remnants during this period, establishing managed island populations. Subsequent decades focused on predator eradications, including stoats from Anchor Island in 2001 and rats from in 2004, alongside continuous radio-tracking, genetic monitoring to mitigate , and hand-rearing of chicks to enhance survival. These intensive techniques, including trials and veterinary interventions for diseases, have driven population recovery; from 51 birds in 1995, numbers reached 237 by October 2025, all under active management on offshore islands. Recent milestones include reintroductions to semi-contained mainland sites like in 2023, testing scalability toward self-sustaining populations, though ongoing challenges persist from low and episodic breeding failures.

Key Techniques and Innovations

The Kākāpō Recovery Programme has pioneered supplementary feeding to synchronize and amplify breeding cycles, independent of sporadic rimu (Dacrydium cupressinum) fruit masting that historically limited to once every 2–4 years. Introduced in September 1989 on , this method deploys nutrient-dense foods including apples, potatoes, oats, and high-fat pellets at monitored stations, prompting females to reach optimal body condition and nest more frequently; studies documented regular station use by birds, with breeding peaks correlating to feeding access, though summer usage dipped during natural mating. This innovation has induced multiple breeding events annually, contributing to higher chick production despite variable natural forage. Telemetry and monitoring technologies form the backbone of intensive management, with smart transmitters—such as the female-specific and male-oriented Check Mate—logging GPS locations, activity patterns, and physiological data within a 10 m radius over ranges up to 3 km, supplemented by automated stations and aerial Sky Ranger surveys. Nest kits integrate infrared cameras, motion sensors, and beam triggers for continuous remote surveillance, enabling rapid detection of or distress; these systems recovered 21% of the population after a 2010 transmitter failure and minimize human disturbance compared to manual tracking. Experimental 3D-printed "smart eggs" (trialed in 2019) emit programmable sounds and could incorporate real-time sensors for enhanced egg viability assessment. Assisted reproduction addresses profound fertility challenges, including 40% infertile eggs and 20% early embryo mortality tied to and sperm abnormalities. Artificial insemination, refined through global collaborations like those with the International Centre for Birds of Prey, yields first successes in by simulating multiple matings—females naturally inseminated by several males lay more viable eggs—and uses DNA fingerprinting (minisatellite/microsatellite loci) to select donors carrying underrepresented alleles from lineages like Fiordland founder Richard Henry. Semen collection combines abdominal massage with electric stimulation for higher yields, followed by quality analysis and for on-demand use; drone trials have tested rapid transport to remote nests, boosting in a population bottlenecked at under 150 individuals. Hand-rearing and incubation innovations mitigate parental failures during rimu crop shortfalls, as in 2009 when 26 of 33 required intervention; protocols achieve 100% post-release in select cohorts, with 41% of birds hand-reared by 2018, aided by egg/chick swaps and pellet diets tailored for nutritional deficits. Predator management innovations, including kiore (Rattus exulans) eradications on Whenua Hou (Codfish Island) in 1998 and Te Hauturu-o-Toi in 2004 via aerial poisoning and trapping, have established secure habitats, with ongoing stoat controls on semi-mainland sites like Anchor Island.

Reintroduction Attempts and Outcomes

Reintroduction efforts for the kākāpō began in the 1970s with translocations from to other sites, but initial attempts largely failed due to predation by introduced mammals such as cats and stoats. Between 1974 and 1992, 65 birds were moved from , yet survival rates remained low without complete predator eradication, prompting a shift to offshore islands cleared of . Successful translocations commenced in 1987 to Whenua Hou/Codfish Island, where 30 birds (20 males, 10 females) were released between 1987 and 1992 following rat eradication in 1998; this site has since become the primary hub for the recovery programme, supporting breeding during rimu (Dacrydium cupressinum) masting events and contributing to through intensive . Additional early releases occurred to (starting 1987, with challenges including outbreaks leading to high initial mortality) and Maud Island (1989–1991, six birds), though populations there did not establish long-term due to limited breeding success and constraints. By 1997, at least 78% of translocated birds to these islands were known to be alive, marking improved survival compared to mainland efforts, albeit with persistently low natural productivity from high egg infertility rates exceeding 50%. Further expansions included Pukenui/Anchor Island in 2005, after stoat eradication in 2001, where the site has facilitated successful breeding cycles tied to forest mast events, helping to distribute population pressure from capacity-limited islands like Codfish. Mana Island received two birds in , but did not sustain a viable group. These island-based efforts, combined with supplementary feeding, , and genetic monitoring, reversed the decline: from 51 known individuals in 1995 to a peak of 252 in 2022, with adult survival rates exceeding 90% under managed conditions. However, outcomes remain dependent on ongoing interventions, as natural recruitment is irregular and low, averaging fewer than 20 chicks annually without human assistance. Recent mainland trials aim to test scalability beyond islands, starting with a small group of males translocated to in July 2023 for viability assessment in a fenced predator-proof ; of the initial release, some birds escaped the , leading to the relocation of three back to southern islands in 2023 to mitigate risks. In May 2024, another trial began on Coal Island (Te Puka-Hereka) with males to evaluate breeding potential amid residual threats. These attempts highlight persistent challenges like dispersal behavior and predator incursion risks on the mainland, where full establishment remains uncertain without expanded eradication efforts.

Historical Estimates

Prior to human arrival around 1300 AD, the kākāpō population is estimated to have numbered in the hundreds of thousands, inferred from its widespread distribution across New Zealand's forests and genetic analyses indicating a large before Polynesian settlement. Genetic evidence suggests no significant occurred with arrival, implying that hunting and introduced rats (kiore) caused localized declines but not a species-wide crash. By the time of European contact in the late , kākāpō had become scarce on the and were confined to remote forests such as , though still locally abundant in some areas before accelerated declines from clearance, hunting, and predator introductions like cats and stoats. further reduced numbers through direct exploitation, with thousands collected for museums and , exacerbating the trend initiated under Māori utilization. In the early 20th century, sightings became rare, with kākāpō known primarily from isolated populations; by the 1950s, they were considered nearly extinct outside this region, and only a single individual was captured in 1967. Intensive surveys in the 1970s revealed approximately 200 individuals on (Rakiura), predominantly males, alongside about 18 in , marking the last wild mainland strongholds before the onset of organized recovery efforts. These estimates, derived from targeted expeditions enabled by helicopters, underscored a total population under 250 by the late 1970s, with ongoing predation driving further losses to 51 known birds by 1995.

Modern Census Data (Up to 2025)

The Kākāpō Recovery Programme enables a complete census of the species through continuous individual tracking, with all birds named, fitted with radio transmitters, and located via systematic island searches. This monitoring, conducted by the New Zealand Department of Conservation, accounts for births, deaths, and translocations, providing precise population tallies without sampling errors typical of less tractable species. As of October 2025, the known population totals 237 individuals, distributed across three predator-free islands: Codfish Island/Whenua Hou (the primary site), Anchor Island, and . The population reached a recent high of 252 in August 2022, incorporating chicks from a major breeding season that year. By the 2022–2023 reporting period, the count was 248, reflecting interim mortality. Numbers then declined to 237 by late 2025, attributable to natural deaths—including from and —and the lack of breeding in 2023, 2024, and 2025, as kākāpō reproduction depends on multi-year cycles of rimu (Dacrydium cupressinum) fruit masting. No substantial breeding occurred in 2025 due to insufficient rimu seedfall, but monitoring indicates conditions for a potential "bumper" event in 2026, which could increase fledging rates if predator control and supplementary feeding succeed.

Cultural and Societal Role

Māori Perspectives and Uses

In Māori tradition, the kākāpō derives its name from the words kākā (parrot) and (night), reflecting its nocturnal habits. Ngāi Tahu, the predominant of New Zealand's , regards the kākāpō as a taonga—a treasured species—with deep cultural, spiritual, and traditional associations tied to their ancestral lands. Historically, utilized kākāpō as a source, valuing the meat as a delicacy despite its strong, slightly stringent flavor. hunted the birds annually during summer months, coinciding with the males' breeding booms that aided detection, often employing dogs to locate the well-camouflaged individuals. The skins, preserved with feathers intact, were softened and fashioned into luxurious garments such as kahu kākāpō (cloaks) and kakahu (capes), particularly for women and valued for their exceptional softness. These items underscored the bird's role as a resource in pre-colonial .

Conservation Icon and Public Engagement

The kākāpō serves as a for conservation in , emblematic of the nation's efforts to combat through intensive predator control and habitat management. Its quirky traits—flightlessness, nocturnal activity, and booming mating calls—have endeared it to the public, transforming it into a symbol that drives awareness and fundraising for broader ecological restoration. Conservation campaigns leverage these attributes to highlight the impacts of introduced predators, securing support from , volunteers, and international donors. Sirocco, a hand-raised male born on March 23, 1997, exemplifies the kākāpō's role in public outreach after gaining notoriety in 2009 during the series , where he attempted to mount presenter Mark Carwardine, an event that underscored the species' imprinting issues and mating behaviors. Designated as the official spokesbird for conservation, has toured facilities, addressed parliament, and maintained a presence to educate audiences on kākāpō threats and recovery needs. His celebrity status has amplified visibility, contributing to and sponsorship drives by the Kākāpō Recovery Programme. Engagement initiatives include the Department of Conservation's adoption program, allowing individuals to sponsor named kākāpō, and live-streamed "Kākāpō Cams" that offer glimpses into and rearing processes. Corporate partners like provide funding alongside publicity efforts to promote the species' story. The annual competition, organized by Forest & Bird, further boosts involvement; the kākāpō won in 2020 amid record public voting, generating heightened awareness of native bird threats, though it was excluded from the 2022 poll to encourage support for less charismatic species. These strategies have mobilized community action, including volunteer participation in monitoring and advocacy for predator eradication on islands like Rakiura.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.