Hubbry Logo
MennonitesMennonitesMain
Open search
Mennonites
Community hub
Mennonites
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Mennonites
Mennonites
from Wikipedia

Mennonites
Total population
Increase 2.13 million (2018)[1]
Regions with significant populations
United States500,469[1]
Ethiopia310,912[2]
Dem. Republic of the Congo225,581[2]
Bolivia150,000[3]
Canada149,422[1]
Mexico110,000[4]
Indonesia102,761[2]
Tanzania92,350[2]
Thailand63,998[2]
Zimbabwe50,287[2]
Germany47,492[4]
Paraguay36,009[4]
Kenya35,575[2]
Angola30,555[2]
Religions
Anabaptist
Scriptures
Bible

Mennonites are a group of Anabaptist Christian communities tracing their roots to the epoch of the Radical Reformation. The name Mennonites is derived from the cleric Menno Simons (1496–1561) of Friesland, part of the Habsburg Netherlands within the Holy Roman Empire, present day Netherlands. Menno Simons became a prominent leader within the wider Anabaptist movement and was a contemporary of Martin Luther (1483–1546) and Philip Melanchthon (1497–1560). Through his writings about the Reformation Simons articulated and formalized the teachings of earlier Swiss Anabaptist founders as well as early teachings of the Mennonites founded on the belief in both the mission and ministry of Jesus.[citation needed] Formal Mennonite beliefs were codified in the Dordrecht Confession of Faith (1632),[5] which affirmed "the baptism of believers only, the washing of the feet as a symbol of servanthood, church discipline, the shunning of the excommunicated, the non-swearing of oaths, marriage within the same church", nonresistance, and in general, more emphasis on "true Christianity" involving "being Christian and obeying Christ" as they interpret it from the Holy Bible.[6]

The majority of the early Mennonite followers, rather than fighting, survived by fleeing to neighboring states where ruling families were tolerant of their belief in believer's baptism. Over the years, Mennonites have become known as one of the historic peace churches, due to their commitment to pacifism.[7] Mennonites seek to emphasize the teachings of early Christianity in their beliefs, worship and lifestyle.[8][9]

Congregations worldwide embody various approaches to Mennonite practice, ranging from Old Order Mennonites (who practice a lifestyle without certain elements of modern technology) to Conservative Mennonites (who hold to traditional theological distinctives, wear plain dress and use modern conveniences) to mainline Mennonites (those who are indistinguishable in dress and appearance from the general population).[10] Mennonites can be found in communities in 87 countries on six continents.[11] Seven ordinances have been taught in many traditional Mennonite churches, which include "baptism, communion, footwashing, marriage, anointing with oil, the holy kiss, and the prayer covering."[6][12] The largest populations of Mennonites are found in Canada, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ethiopia, India, and the United States.[11] There are Mennonite settlements in Argentina, Belize, Bolivia,[13] Brazil, Mexico, Peru,[14] Uruguay,[15] Paraguay,[16] and Colombia.[17] The Mennonite Church in the Netherlands still continues where Simons was born.[18]

Though Mennonites are a global denomination with church membership from Europe, Asia, Africa and the Americas, certain Mennonite communities with ethno-cultural origins in Switzerland and the Netherlands bear the designation of ethnic Mennonites.[19] Across Latin America, Mennonite colonization has been seen as a driver of environmental damage, notably deforestation of the Amazon rainforest through land clearance for agriculture.[20][21][22]

History

[edit]
Spread of the early Anabaptists, 1525–1550

The early history of the Mennonites starts with the Anabaptists in the German and Dutch-speaking regions of central Europe. The German term is Täufer (Baptist) or Wiedertäufer ("re-Baptizers" or "Anabaptists" using the Greek ana ["again"]), as their persecutors called them.[23] These forerunners of modern Mennonites were part of the Protestant Reformation, a broad reaction against the practices and theology of the Roman Catholic Church. Its most distinguishing feature is the rejection of infant baptism, an act that had both religious and political meaning since almost every infant born in western Europe was baptized in the Roman Catholic Church.[citation needed] Other significant theological views of the Mennonites developed in opposition to Roman Catholic views or to the views of Protestant reformers such as Martin Luther and Huldrych Zwingli.

Some of the followers of Zwingli's Reformed church thought that requiring church membership beginning at birth was inconsistent with the New Testament example. They believed that the church should be completely removed from government (the proto–free church tradition), and that individuals should join only when willing to publicly acknowledge belief in Jesus and the desire to live in accordance with his teachings. At a small meeting in Zurich on 21 January 1525, Conrad Grebel, Felix Manz, and George Blaurock, along with twelve others, baptized each other.[24] This meeting marks the beginning of the Anabaptist movement. In the spirit of the times, other groups came to preach about reducing hierarchy, relations with the state, eschatology, and sexual license, running from utter abandon to extreme chastity. These movements are together referred to as the "Radical Reformation".

Many government and religious leaders, both Protestant and Roman Catholic, considered voluntary church membership to be dangerous—the concern of some deepened by reports of the Münster Rebellion, led by a violent sect of Anabaptists. They joined forces to fight the movement, using methods such as banishment, torture, burning, drowning or beheading.[25]: 142 

Despite strong repressive efforts of the state churches, the movement spread slowly around western Europe, primarily along the Rhine.[citation needed] Officials killed many of the earliest Anabaptist leaders in an attempt to purge Europe of the new sect.[25]: 142  By 1530, most of the founding leaders had been killed for refusing to renounce their beliefs. Many believed that God did not condone killing or the use of force for any reason and were, therefore, unwilling to fight for their lives. The non-resistant branches often survived by seeking refuge in neutral cities or nations, such as Strasbourg. Their safety was often tenuous, as a shift in alliances or an invasion could mean resumed persecution. Other groups of Anabaptists, such as the Batenburgers, were eventually destroyed by their unwillingness to fight. This played a large part in the evolution of Anabaptist theology. They believed that Jesus taught that any use of force to get back at anyone was wrong, and taught to forgive.[citation needed]

Menno Simons

In the early days of the Anabaptist movement, Menno Simons, a Catholic priest in the Low Countries, heard of the movement and started to rethink his Catholic faith. He questioned the doctrine of transubstantiation but was reluctant to leave the Roman Catholic Church. His brother, a member of an Anabaptist group, was killed when he and his companions were attacked and refused to defend themselves.[26] In 1536, at the age of 40, Simons left the Roman Catholic Church. He soon became a leader within the Anabaptist movement and was wanted by authorities for the rest of his life. His name became associated with scattered groups of nonviolent Anabaptists whom he helped to organize and consolidate.[27][28]

Fragmentation and variation

[edit]
An Evangelical Mennonite Church in Altkirch
Worship service at The Meeting Place in Winnipeg, Canadian Conference of Mennonite Brethren Churches

During the 16th century, the Mennonites and other Anabaptists were relentlessly persecuted. This period of persecution has had a significant impact on Mennonite identity. Martyrs Mirror, published in 1660, documents much of the persecution of Anabaptists and their predecessors, including accounts of over 4,000 burnings of individuals, and numerous stonings, imprisonments, and live burials.[29] Today, the book is still the most important book besides the Bible for many Mennonites and Amish, in particular for the Swiss-South German branch of the Mennonites. Persecution was still going on until 1710 in various parts of Switzerland.[30]

In 1693, Jakob Ammann led an effort to reform the Mennonite church in Switzerland and South Germany to include shunning, to hold communion more often, and other differences.[31] When the discussions fell through, Ammann and his followers split from the other Mennonite congregations. Ammann's followers became known as the Amish Mennonites or just Amish. In later years, other schisms among Amish resulted in such groups as the Old Order Amish, New Order Amish, Kauffman Amish Mennonite, Swartzentruber Amish, Conservative Mennonite Conference and Biblical Mennonite Alliance. For instance, near the beginning of the 20th century, some members in the Amish church wanted to begin having Sunday schools and participate in progressive Protestant-style para-church evangelism. Unable to persuade the rest of the Amish, they separated and formed a number of separate groups including the Conservative Mennonite Conference. Mennonites in Canada and other countries typically have independent denominations because of the practical considerations of distance and, in some cases, language. Many times these divisions took place along family lines, with each extended family supporting its own branch.

Political rulers often admitted the Menists or Mennonites into their states because they were honest, hardworking and peaceful.[citation needed] When their practices upset the powerful state churches, princes would renege on exemptions for military service, or a new monarch would take power, and the Mennonites would be forced to flee again, usually leaving everything but their families behind. Often, another monarch in another state would grant them welcome, at least for a while.

While Mennonites in Colonial America were enjoying considerable religious freedom, their counterparts in Europe continued to struggle with persecution and temporary refuge under certain ruling monarchs. They were sometimes invited to settle in areas of poor soil that no one else could farm. By contrast, in the Netherlands, the Mennonites enjoyed a relatively high degree of tolerance. Because the land still needed to be tended, the ruler would not drive out the Mennonites but would pass laws to force them to stay, while at the same time severely limiting their freedom. Mennonites had to build their churches facing onto back streets or alleys, and they were forbidden from announcing the beginning of services with the sound of a bell.

A strong emphasis on "community" was developed under these circumstances. It continues to be typical of Mennonite churches. As a result of frequently being required to give up possessions in order to retain individual freedoms, Mennonites learned to live very simply. This was reflected both in the home and at church, where their dress and their buildings were plain. The music at church, usually simple German chorales, was performed a cappella. This style of music serves as a reminder to many Mennonites of their simple lives, as well as their history as a persecuted people. Some branches of Mennonites have retained this "plain" lifestyle into modern times.

Statistics

[edit]

The Mennonite World Conference was founded at the first conference in Basel, Switzerland, in 1925 to celebrate the 400th anniversary of Anabaptism.[32] In 2022, the organization had 109 member denominations in 59 countries, and 1.47 million baptized members in 10,300 churches.[33]

Beliefs and practices

[edit]

The beliefs of the movement are those of the Believers' Church.[34]

One of the earliest expressions of Mennonite Anabaptist faith was the Schleitheim Confession, adopted on 24 February 1527.[35] Its seven articles covered:

  • The Ban (excommunication)
  • Breaking of bread (Communion)
  • Separation from and shunning of the abomination (the Roman Catholic Church and other "worldly" groups and practices)
  • Believer's baptism
  • Pastors in the church
  • Renunciation of the sword (Christian pacifism)
  • Renunciation of the oath (swearing as proof of truth)

The Dordrecht Confession of Faith was adopted on 21 April 1632, by Dutch Mennonites, by Alsatian Mennonites in 1660, and by North American Mennonites in 1725. It has been followed by many Mennonite groups over the centuries.[36] With regard to salvation, Mennonites believe:[37]

When we hear the good news of the love of God, the Holy Spirit moves us to accept the gift of salvation. God brings us into right relationship without coercion. Our response includes yielding to God's grace, placing full trust in God alone, repenting of sin, turning from evil, joining the fellowship of the redeemed, and showing forth the obedience of faith in word and deed. When we who once were God's enemies are reconciled with God through Christ, we also experience reconciliation with others, especially within the church. In baptism we publicly testify to our salvation and pledge allegiance to the one true God and to the people of God, the church. As we experience grace and the new birth, we are adopted into the family of God and become more and more transformed into the image of Christ. We thus respond in faith to Christ and seek to walk faithfully in the way of Christ.[37]

Traditionally, Mennonites sought to continue the beliefs of early Christianity and thus practice the lovefeast (which includes footwashing, the holy kiss and communion), headcovering, nonresistance, the sharing of possessions and nonconformity to the world; these things are heavily emphasized in Old Order Mennonite and Conservative Mennonite denominations.[38][39][40]

Seven ordinances have been taught in many traditional Mennonite churches, which include "baptism, communion, footwashing, marriage, anointing with oil, the holy kiss, and the prayer covering."[6]

In 1911, the Mennonite church in the Netherlands (Doopsgezinde Kerk) was the first Dutch church to have a female pastor authorized; she was Anne Zernike.[41]

There is a wide scope of worship, doctrine and traditions among Mennonites today. This section shows the main types of Mennonites as seen from North America. It is far from a specific study of all Mennonite classifications worldwide but it does show a somewhat representative sample of the complicated classifications within the Mennonite faith worldwide.

Moderate Mennonites include the largest denominations, the Mennonite Brethren and the Mennonite Church. In most forms of worship and practice, they differ very little from many Protestant congregations. There is no special form of dress and no restrictions on use of technology. Worship styles vary greatly between different congregations. There is no formal liturgy; services typically consist of singing, scripture reading, prayer and a sermon. Some churches prefer hymns and choirs; others make use of contemporary Christian music with electronic instruments. Mennonite congregations are self-supporting and appoint their own ministers. There is no requirement for ministers to be approved by the denomination, and sometimes ministers from other denominations will be appointed. A small sum, based on membership numbers, is paid to the denomination, which is used to support central functions such as the publication of newsletters and interactions with other denominations and other countries.

The distinguishing characteristics of moderate Mennonite churches tend to be ones of emphasis rather than rule. There is an emphasis on peace, community and service. However, members do not live in a separate community—they participate in the general community as "salt and light" to the world (Matthew 5:13,14). The main elements of Menno Simons's doctrine are retained but in a moderated form. Banning is rarely practiced and would, in any event, have much less effect than in those denominations where the community is more tightly knit. Excommunication can occur and was notably applied by the Mennonite Brethren to members who joined the military during the Second World War. Service in the military is generally not permitted, but service in the legal profession or law enforcement is acceptable. Outreach and help to the wider community at home and abroad is encouraged. The Mennonite Central Committee (MCC) is a leader in foreign aid provision.

Traditionally, very modest dress was expected, particularly in Conservative Mennonite circles. As the Mennonite population has become urbanized and more integrated into the wider culture, this visible difference has disappeared outside of Conservative Mennonite groups.

The Reformed Mennonite Church, with members in the United States and Canada, represents the first division in the original North American Mennonite body. Called the "First Keepers of the Old Way" by author Stephen Scott, the Reformed Mennonite Church formed in the very early 19th century. Reformed Mennonites see themselves as true followers of Menno Simons's teachings and of the teachings of the New Testament. They have no church rules, but they rely solely on the Bible as their guide. They insist on strict separation from all other forms of worship and dress in conservative plain garb that preserves 18th century Mennonite details. However, they refrain from forcing their Mennonite faith on their children, allow their children to attend public schools, and have permitted the use of automobiles. They are notable for being the church of Milton S. Hershey's mother and famous for the long and bitter ban of Robert Bear, a Pennsylvania farmer who rebelled against what he saw as dishonesty and disunity in the leadership.

The Church of God in Christ, Mennonite, a group often called Holdeman Mennonites after their founder John Holdeman, was founded from a schism in 1859.[42] They emphasize Evangelical conversion and strict church discipline. They stay separate from other Mennonite groups because of their emphasis on the one-true-church doctrine and their use of avoidance toward their own excommunicated members. The Holdeman Mennonites do not believe that the use of modern technology is a sin in itself, but they discourage too intensive a use of the Internet and avoid television, cameras and radio.[43] The group had 24,400 baptized members in 2013.[44]

Old Order Mennonite horse and carriage

Old Order Mennonites cover several distinct groups. Some groups use horse and buggy for transportation and speak German while others drive cars and speak English. What most Old Orders share in common is conservative doctrine, dress, and traditions, common roots in 19th-century and early 20th-century schisms, and a refusal to participate in politics and other so-called "sins of the world". Most Old Order groups also school their children in Mennonite-operated schools.

  • Horse and Buggy Old Order Mennonites came from the main series of Old Order schisms that began in 1872 and ended in 1901 in Ontario, Pennsylvania, and the U.S. Midwest, as conservative Mennonites fought the radical changes that the influence of 19th century American Revivalism had on Mennonite worship. Most Horse and Buggy Old Order Mennonites allow the use of tractors for farming, although some groups insist on steel-wheeled tractors to prevent tractors from being used for road transportation. Like the Stauffer or Pike Mennonites (origin 1845 in Lancaster, Pennsylvania), the Groffdale Conference, and the Old Order Mennonite Conference of Ontario, they stress separation from the world, excommunication, and the wearing of plain clothes. Some Old Order Mennonite groups are unlike the Stauffer or Pike Mennonites in that their form of the ban is less severe because the ex-communicant is not shunned, and is therefore not excluded from the family table, shunned by their spouse, or cut off from business dealings.
  • Automobile Old Order Mennonites, also known as Weaverland Conference Mennonites (having their origins in the Weaverland District of the Lancaster Conference—also calling "Horning"), or Wisler Mennonites in the U.S. Midwest, or the Markham-Waterloo Mennonite Conference having its origins from the Old Order Mennonites of Ontario, Canada, also evolved from the main series of Old Order schisms from 1872 to 1901. They often share the same meeting houses with, and adhere to almost identical forms of Old Order worship as their Horse and Buggy Old Order brethren with whom they parted ways in the early 20th century. Although this group began using cars in 1927, the cars were required to be plain and painted black. The largest group of Automobile Old Orders are still known today as "Black Bumper" Mennonites because some members still paint their chrome bumpers black.

Stauffer Mennonites, or Pike Mennonites, represent one of the first and most conservative forms of North American Horse and Buggy Mennonites. They were founded in 1845, following conflicts about how to discipline children and spousal abuse by a few Mennonite Church members. They almost immediately began to split into separate churches themselves. Today these groups are among the most conservative of all Swiss Mennonites outside the Amish. They stress strict separation from "the world", adhere to "strict withdrawal from and shunning of apostate and separated members", forbid and limit cars and technology and wear plain clothing.

Conservative Mennonites are generally considered those Mennonites who maintain somewhat conservative dress, although carefully accepting other technology. They are not a unified group and are divided into various independent conferences and fellowships such as the Eastern Pennsylvania Mennonite Church Conference. Despite the rapid changes that precipitated the Old Order schisms in the last quarter of the 19th century, most Mennonites in the United States and Canada retained a core of traditional beliefs based on a literal interpretation of the New Testament scriptures as well as more external "plain" practices into the beginning of the 20th century. However, disagreements in the United States and Canada between conservative and progressive (i.e. less emphasis on literal interpretation of scriptures) leaders began in the first half of the 20th century and continue to some extent today.

Following World War II, a conservative movement emerged from scattered separatist groups as a reaction to the Mennonite churches drifting away from their historical traditions. "Plain" became passé as open criticisms of traditional beliefs and practices broke out in the 1950s and 1960s.[citation needed] The first conservative withdrawals from the progressive group began in the 1950s. These withdrawals continue to the present day in what is now the growing Conservative Movement formed from Mennonite schisms and from combinations with progressive Amish groups. While moderate and progressive Mennonite congregations have dwindled in size, the Conservative Movement congregations continue to exhibit considerable growth.[citation needed] Other conservative Mennonite groups descended from the former Amish-Mennonite churches which split, like the Wisler Mennonites, from the Old Order Amish in the latter part of the 19th century. (The Wisler Mennonites are a grouping descended from the Old Mennonite Church.) Other Conservative Mennonite churches descended from more recent groups that have left the Amish, like the Beachy Amish or the Tennessee Brotherhood Churches.

In North America, there are structures and traditions taught as in the Confession of Faith in a Mennonite Perspective[45] of Mennonite Church Canada and Mennonite Church USA.

Many Progressive Mennonite churches allow LGBTQ+ members to worship as church members. In some more conservative congregations and conferences, people who identify as LGBTQ+ have been banned from membership, and leading worship. The Germantown Mennonite Church in Germantown, Pennsylvania is one example of such a progressive Mennonite church.[46]

Most progressive Mennonite Churches place a great emphasis on the Mennonite tradition's teachings on pacifism and non-violence.[47] Some progressive Mennonite Churches are part of moderate Mennonite denominations (such as the Mennonite Church USA) while others are independent congregations.

Sexuality, marriage, and family mores

[edit]

Most Mennonite denominations hold a conservative position on homosexuality.[48]

The Brethren Mennonite Council for LGBT Interests was founded in 1976 in the United States and has member churches of different denominations in the United States and Canada.[48]

The Mennonite Church Canada leaves the choice to each church for same-sex marriage.[49]

The Mennonite Church in the Netherlands and the Mennonite Church USA which had 62,000 members in 2021, about 12% of American Mennonites,[50] permit same-sex marriage.[51][52]

Russian Mennonites

[edit]

The "Russian Mennonites" (German: "Russlandmennoniten")[53] today are descended from Dutch Anabaptists, who came from the Netherlands and started around 1530 to settle around Danzig and in West Prussia, where they lived for about 250 years. Starting in 1791 they established colonies in the south-west of the Russian Empire and beginning in 1854 also in Volga region and Orenburg Governorate. Their ethno-language is Plautdietsch, a Germanic dialect of the East Low German group, with some Dutch admixture. Today, many traditional Russian Mennonites use Standard German in church and for reading and writing.

In the 1770s Catherine the Great of the Russian Empire acquired a great deal of land north of the Black Sea (in present-day Ukraine) following the Russo-Turkish War and the takeover of the Ottoman vassal, the Crimean Khanate. Russian government officials invited Mennonites living in the Kingdom of Prussia to farm the Ukrainian steppes depopulated by Tatar raids in exchange for religious freedom and military exemption. Over the years Mennonite farmers and businesses were very successful.

In 1854, according to the new Russian government official invitation, Mennonites from Prussia established colonies in Russia's Volga region (Am Trakt Colony), and later in Orenburg Governorate (Neu Samara Colony).[54]

Between 1874 and 1880 some 16,000 Mennonites of approximately 45,000 left Russia. About nine thousand departed for the United States (mainly Kansas and Nebraska) and seven thousand for Canada (mainly Manitoba). In the 1920s, Russian Mennonites from Canada started to migrate to Latin America (Mexico and Paraguay), soon followed by Mennonite refugees from the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. Further migrations of these Mennonites led to settlements in Peru, Brazil, Uruguay, Belize, Bolivia and Argentina.

By the beginning of the 20th century, the Mennonites in Russia owned large agricultural estates and some had become successful as industrial entrepreneurs in the cities, employing wage labor. After the Russian Revolution of 1917 and the Russian Civil War (1917–1921), all of these farms (whose owners were called Kulaks) and enterprises were expropriated by local peasants or the Soviet government. Beyond expropriation, Mennonites suffered severe persecution during the course of the Civil War, at the hands of workers, the Bolsheviks and, particularly, the Anarcho-Communists of Nestor Makhno, who considered the Mennonites to be privileged foreigners of the upper class and targeted them. During expropriation, hundreds of Mennonite men, women and children were murdered in these attacks.[55] After the Ukrainian–Soviet War and the takeover of Ukraine by the Soviet Bolsheviks, people who openly practiced religion were in many cases imprisoned by the Soviet government. This led to a wave of Mennonite emigration to the Americas (U.S., Canada and Paraguay).

When the German army invaded the Soviet Union in the summer of 1941 during World War II, many in the Mennonite community perceived them as liberators from the communist regime under which they had suffered. Many Russian Mennonites actively collaborated with the Nazis, including in the rounding up and extermination of their Jewish neighbors, although some also resisted them.[56][57][58] When the tide of war turned, many of the Mennonites fled with the German army back to Germany where they were accepted as Volksdeutsche. The Soviet government believed that the Mennonites had "collectively collaborated" with the Germans. After the war, many Mennonites in the Soviet Union were forcibly relocated to Siberia and Kazakhstan. Many were sent to gulags as part of the Soviet program of mass internal deportations of various ethnic groups whose loyalty was seen as questionable. Many German-Russian Mennonites who lived to the east (not in Ukraine) were deported to Siberia before the German army's invasion and were also often placed in labor camps. In the decades that followed, as the Soviet regime became less brutal, a number of Mennonites returned to Ukraine and Western Russia where they had formerly lived. In the 1990s the governments of Kazakhstan, Russia and Ukraine gave these people the opportunity to emigrate, and the vast majority emigrated to Germany. The Russian Mennonite immigrants in Germany from the 1990s outnumber the pre-1989 community of Mennonites by three to one.

By 2015, the majority of Russian Mennonites and their descendants live in Latin America, Germany and Canada.

The world's most conservative Mennonites (in terms of culture and technology) are the Mennonites affiliated with the Lower and Upper Barton Creek Colonies in Belize. Lower Barton is inhabited by Plautdietsch speaking Russian Mennonites, whereas Upper Barton Creek is mainly inhabited by Pennsylvania Dutch language-speaking Mennonites from North America. Neither group uses motors or paint.[59]

North America

[edit]
Germantown Mennonite Meetinghouse, built 1770
Ten Thousand Villages Store in New Hamburg, Ontario
Valparaiso Mennonite Church, in Valparaiso, Indiana in the United States.

Persecution and the search for employment forced Mennonites out of the Netherlands eastward to Germany in the 17th century. As Quaker Evangelists moved into Germany they received a sympathetic audience among the larger of these German-Mennonite congregations around Krefeld, Altona, Hamburg, Gronau and Emden.[60] It was among this group of Quakers and Mennonites, living under ongoing discrimination, that William Penn solicited settlers for his new colony. The first permanent settlement of Mennonites in the American colonies consisted of one Mennonite family and twelve Mennonite-Quaker[61] families of German extraction who arrived from Krefeld, Germany, in 1683 and settled in Germantown, Pennsylvania. Among these early settlers was William Rittenhouse, a lay minister and owner of the first American paper mill. Jacob Gottschalk was the first bishop of this Germantown congregation. Four members of that early group of Mennonites and Mennonite-Quaker, Francis Daniel Pastorius, Abraham op den Graeff, Derick op den Graeff (both cousins to William Penn) and Garret Hendericks signed the first formal protest against slavery in the United States in 1688. The treatise was addressed to slave-holding Quakers in an effort to persuade them to change their ways.[62]

In the early 18th century, 100,000 Germans from the Palatinate emigrated to Pennsylvania, where they became known collectively as the Pennsylvania Dutch (from the Anglicization of Deutsch, which now means German but used to mean West Germanic). The Palatinate region had been repeatedly overrun by the French in religious wars, and Queen Anne had invited the Germans to go to the British colonies. Of these immigrants, around 2,500 were Mennonites and 500 were Amish.[63] This group settled farther west than the first group, choosing less expensive land in the Lancaster area. The oldest Mennonite meetinghouse in the United States is the Hans Herr House in West Lampeter Township.[64] A member of this second group, Christopher Dock, authored Pedagogy, the first American monograph on education. Today, Mennonites also reside in Kishacoquillas Valley (also known as Big Valley), a valley in Huntingdon and Mifflin counties in Pennsylvania.

During Colonial America, Mennonites were distinguished from other Pennsylvania Germans in three ways:[65] their opposition to the American Revolutionary War in which other German settlers participated on both sides; their resistance to public education; and their disapproval of religious revivalism. Contributions of Mennonites during their period include the idea of separation of church and state and opposition to slavery.

From 1812 to 1860, another wave of Mennonite immigrants settled farther west in Ohio, Indiana, Illinois and Missouri. These Swiss-German speaking Mennonites, along with Amish, came from Switzerland and Alsace-Lorraine, along with the Amish of northern New York State, formed the nucleus of the Apostolic Christian Church in the United States.

There were also Mennonite settlements in Canada from those who emigrated there chiefly from the United States (Upstate New York, Maryland, and Pennsylvania):

According to a 2017 report,[66]

"there are two basic strains of Mennonites in Canada: the Swiss-South German Mennonites came via Pennsylvania, and the Dutch-North German Mennonites came via Russia (Ukraine). In the late 1700s and early 1800s "Swiss" Mennonites from Pennsylvania settled in southern Ontario. In the 1870s, a large group of "Russian" Mennonites from Ukraine moved to southern Manitoba. Further waves of "Russian" Mennonites came to Canada in the 1920s and 1940s". In the last 50 years, Mennonites have been coming to Canada from Mexico.

During the 1880s, smaller Mennonite groups settled as far west as California, especially around the Paso Robles area.[67][68]

Old Order Mennonites and Amish are often grouped together in the popular press. That is incorrect, according to a 2017 report by Canadian Mennonite magazine:[66]

The customs of Old Order Mennonites, the Amish communities and Old Colony Mennonites have a number of similarities, but the cultural differences are significant enough so that members of one group would not feel comfortable moving to another group. The Old Order Mennonites and Amish have the same European roots and the language spoken in their homes is the same German dialect. Old Colony Mennonites use Low German, a different German dialect.

Moderate to progressive Mennonites

[edit]

"Old" Mennonite Church (MC)

[edit]

The Swiss-German Mennonites who immigrated to North America in the 18th and 19th centuries and settled first in Pennsylvania, then across the midwestern states (initially Ohio, Indiana, and Kansas), are the root of the former Mennonite Church denomination (MC), colloquially called the "Old Mennonite Church". This denomination had offices in Elkhart, Indiana, and was the most populous progressive Mennonite denomination before merging with the General Conference Mennonite Church (GCMC) in 2002.

Mennonite Brethren Church

[edit]

The Mennonite Brethren Church was established among Plautdietsch-speaking Russian Mennonites in 1860, and has congregations in more than 20 countries, representing about 500,000 members as of 2019.

Mennonite Church USA

[edit]

The Mennonite Church USA (MCUSA) and the Mennonite Church Canada are the resulting denominations of the 2002 merger of the (General Assembly) Mennonite Church and the General Conference Mennonite Church. Total membership in Mennonite Church USA denominations decreased from about 133,000, before the merger in 1998, to a total membership of 120,381 in the Mennonite Church USA in 2001.[69] In 2013, membership had fallen to 97,737 members in 839 congregations.[70] In 2016, it had fallen to 78,892 members after the withdrawal of the Lancaster Mennonite Conference.[71] In May 2021 the main page of their website stated a membership of about 62,000.[72]

Pennsylvania remains the hub of the denomination but there are also large numbers of members in Ohio, Indiana, Kansas, and Illinois.[73]

In 1983, the General Assembly of the Mennonite Church met jointly with the General Conference Mennonite Church in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, in celebration of 300 years in the Americas. Beginning in 1989, a series of consultations, discussions, proposals, and sessions (and a vote in 1995 in favor of merger) led to the unification of these two major North American Mennonite bodies into one denomination organized on two fronts – the Mennonite Church USA and the Mennonite Church Canada. The merger was "finalized" at a joint session in St. Louis, Missouri in 1999, and the Canadian branch moved quickly ahead. The United States branch did not complete their organization until the meeting in Nashville, Tennessee in 2001, which became effective 1 February 2002.

The merger of 1999–2002 at least partially fulfilled the desire of the founders of the General Conference Mennonite Church to create an organization under which all Mennonites could unite. Yet not all Mennonites favored the merger. The Alliance of Mennonite Evangelical Congregations represents one expression of the disappointment with the merger and the events that led up to it.

Mennonite Church Canada

[edit]

Mennonite Church Canada is a conference of Mennonites in Canada, with head offices in Winnipeg, Manitoba. As of 2003, the body had about 35,000 members in 235 churches. Beginning in 1989, a series of consultations, discussions, proposals, and sessions led to the unification of two North American bodies (the Mennonite Church & General Conference Mennonite Church) and the related Canadian Conference of Mennonites in Canada into the Mennonite Church USA and the Mennonite Church Canada in 2000.

The organizational structure is divided into five regional conferences. Denominational work is administered through a board elected by the delegates to the annual assembly. MC Canada participates in the Canadian Council of Churches, the Evangelical Fellowship of Canada, and the Mennonite World Conference.

Conservative Mennonites

[edit]

Conservative Mennonites include numerous groups that identify with the more conservative or traditional element among Mennonite or Anabaptist groups but not necessarily Old Order groups. The majority of Conservative Mennonite churches historically has an Amish and not a Mennonite background. They emerged mostly from the middle group between the Old Order Amish and Amish Mennonites. For more, see Amish Mennonite: Division 1850–1878.[74]

Those identifying with this group drive automobiles, have telephones and use electricity, and some may have personal computers. They also have Sunday school, hold revival meetings, and operate their own Christian schools/parochial schools.

According to a University of Waterloo report, "of the estimated 59,000 Mennonites in Ontario, only about twenty percent are members of conservative groups". The same report estimated that "there are about 175,000 Mennonites in Canada".[75]

Old Colony Mennonites

[edit]

Old Colony Mennonites are conservative Mennonite groups who are the majority of German speaking so-called Russian Mennonites that originated in the Chortitza Colony in Russia, including the Chortitza, Reinlander, and Sommerfelder groups, which are now most common in Latin America and Canada. There are some 400,000 Russian Mennonites in the world, including children and not yet baptized young people. They should not be confused with Old Order Mennonites with whom they have some similarities.

Old Order Mennonites

[edit]

The Old Order Mennonite are living a lifestyle similar to or a bit more liberal than the Old Order Amish. There were more than 27,000 adult, baptized members of Old Order Mennonites in North America and Belize in 2008/9. The total population of Old Order Mennonites groups including children and adults not yet baptized normally is two to three times larger than the number of baptized, adult members, which indicates that the population of Old Order Mennonites was roughly between 60,000 and 80,000 in 2008/9.

Alternative service

[edit]
Mennonite conscientious objector Harry Lantz distributes rat poison for typhus control in Gulfport, Mississippi (1946).

During World War II, Mennonite conscientious objectors were given the options of noncombatant military service, serving in the medical or dental corps under military control, or working in parks and on roads under civilian supervision. Over 95% chose the latter and were placed in Alternative Service camps.[76] Initially the men worked on road building, forestry and firefighting projects. After May 1943, as a labor shortage developed within the nation, men were shifted into agriculture, education and industry. The 10,700 Canadian objectors were mostly Mennonites (63%) and Doukhobors (20%).[77]

In the United States, Civilian Public Service (CPS) provided an alternative to military service during World War II. From 1941 to 1947, 4,665 Mennonites, Amish and Brethren in Christ[78] were among nearly 12,000 conscientious objectors who performed work of national importance in 152 CPS camps throughout the United States and Puerto Rico. The draftees worked in areas such as soil conservation, forestry, fire fighting, agriculture, social services and mental health.

The CPS men served without wages and with minimal support from the federal government. The cost of maintaining the CPS camps and providing for the needs of the men was the responsibility of their congregations and families. Mennonite Central Committee coordinated the operation of the Mennonite camps. CPS men served longer than regular draftees, not being released until well past the end of the war. Initially skeptical of the program, government agencies learned to appreciate the men's service and requested more workers from the program. CPS made significant contributions to forest fire prevention, erosion and flood control, medical science and reform of the mental health system.

Schisms

[edit]

Prior to emigration to America, Anabaptists in Europe were divided between those of Dutch/North German and Swiss/South German background. At first, the Dutch/North German group took their name from Menno Simons, who led them in their early years. Later the Swiss/South German group also adopted the name "Mennonites". A third group of early Anabaptists, mainly from south-east Germany and Austria were organized by Jakob Hutter and became the Hutterites. The vast majority of Anabaptists of Swiss/South German ancestry today lives in the US and Canada, while the largest group of Dutch/North German Anabaptists are the Russian Mennonites, who live today mostly in Latin America.

A trickle of North German Mennonites began the migration to America in 1683, followed by a much larger migration of Swiss/South German Mennonites beginning in 1707.[79] The Amish are an early split from the Swiss/South German, that occurred in 1693. Over the centuries many Amish individuals and whole churches left the Amish and became Mennonites again.

After immigration to America, many of the early Mennonites split from the main body of North American Mennonites and formed their own separate and distinct churches. The first schism in America occurred in 1778 when Bishop Christian Funk's support of the American Revolution led to his excommunication and the formation of a separate Mennonite group known as Funkites. In 1785 the Orthodox Reformed Mennonite Church was formed, and other schisms occurred into the 21st century. Many of these churches were formed as a response to deep disagreements about theology, doctrine, and church discipline as evolution both inside and outside the Mennonite faith occurred. Many of the modern churches are descended from those groups that abandoned traditional Mennonite practices.

Larger groups of Dutch/North German Mennonites came to North America from the Russian Empire after 1873, especially to Kansas and Manitoba. While the more progressive element of these Mennonites assimilated into mainstream society, the more conservative element emigrated to Latin America. Since then there has been a steady flow of Mennonite emigrants from Latin America to North America.[citation needed]

These historical schisms have had an influence on creating the distinct Mennonite denominations, sometimes using mild or severe shunning to show its disapproval of other Mennonite groups.

Some expelled congregations were affiliated both with the Mennonite Church and the General Conference Mennonite Church. The latter did not expel the same congregations. When these two Mennonite denominations formally completed their merger in 2002 to become the new Mennonite Church USA and Mennonite Church Canada denominations, it was still not clear, whether the congregations that were expelled from one denomination, yet included in the other, are considered to be "inside" or "outside" of the new merged denomination. Some Mennonite conferences have chosen to maintain such "disciplined" congregations as "associate" or "affiliate" congregations in the conferences, rather than to expel such congregations. In virtually every case, a dialogue continues between the disciplined congregations and the denomination, as well as their current or former conferences.[80]

Schools

[edit]
The Goshen College Music Center in Goshen, Indiana, Mennonite Church USA.

Several Mennonite groups established schools, universities and seminaries.[81] Conservative groups, like the Holdeman, have not only their own schools, but their own curriculum and teaching staff (usually, but not exclusively, young unmarried women).

Mennonite teacher holding class in a one-room, eight-grade school house, Hinkletown, Pennsylvania, March 1942

Ethnic Mennonites

[edit]

Though Mennonites are a global denomination with church membership from Europe, Asia, Africa and the Americas, certain Mennonite communities that are descended from émigrés from Switzerland and Russia bear the designation of ethnic Mennonites.[19]

In contemporary society, Mennonites are described either as a religious denomination with members of different ethnic origins,[82][83] or as both an ethnic group and a religious denomination. There is controversy among Mennonites about this issue, with some insisting that they are simply a religious group, while others argue that they form a distinct ethnic group.[84] Historians and sociologists have increasingly started to treat Mennonites as an ethno-religious group,[85] while others have begun to challenge that perception.[86] Discussion also exists as to the term "ethnic Mennonite"; conservative Mennonite groups, who speak Pennsylvania Dutch, Plautdietsch (Low German), or Bernese German fit well into the definition of an ethnic group, while more liberal groups and converts in developing countries do not.

List of Mennonites surnames

[edit]

This is a list of surnames common among Mennonites in Canada originating (indirectly) from Russia, in descending frequency. The number in brackets indicates the number of places they are higher than on a 20-entry list of surnames of Mennonites in Canada originating (indirectly) from Russia. This list only includes surnames higher on the list concerning West Prussian Mennonites than on the list of surnames of Mennonites in Canada.[87]

* name not on the 20-entry list

Surnames of Frisians include Abrahams, Arens, Behrends, Cornelius, Daniels, Dirksen, Doercksen, Frantzen, Goertzen, Gossen, Harms, Lowen, Thiessen, Petkau, Heinrichs, Jantzen, Pauls, Peters, Siemens, and Woelms.[88] Surnames that mostly occur in Frisian congregations include Adrian, Brandt, Buller, Caspar, Flaming, Hamm, Harms, Isaak, Kettler, Kliewer, Knels, Stobbe, Teus, Töws, and Toews,[89] additionally, Pauls,[90] Peters,[91] Unruh,[90] and Fransen and Schmidt.[90] Nickel also is a name mainly of Frisian Mennonites denomination.[92] Unger is a name in congregation of Frisian Mennonites denomination.[93] Foth/Vodt and Arentsen are most likely of Frisian congregations.[94]

Environmental impacts

[edit]

Loading logs at Puerto Casado in the Paraguayan Chaco (photograph from the H. S. Bender collection). There is a long history of American countries facilitating remote settlements of skilled and determined Mennonite farmers as a convenient way of clearing land for agriculture.[20]

Across Latin America, Mennonite colonization has been seen as a driver of environmental damage associated with land clearance in countries including Belize, Bolivia, Colombia, Mexico, Paraguay,[21] and Peru,[20] while indigenous peoples in Suriname have expressed similar concerns.[95] Since the early- to mid-twentieth century, Mennonite colonization has brought a characteristic, religious approach to cultivation (not generally found in either peasant or corporate farming) and the potential to impact a range of different biomes.[20] Mennonite farmers have cleared large areas of wilderness (greater than the size of the Netherlands) across major transnational regions of Latin America such as the Gran Chaco, the Chiquitano, and the Amazon rainforest.[20] In the process, they have unintentionally devastated many precious natural habitats, often leading to conflict with indigenous peoples.[20][21] Their commercial success in transforming previously wild lands to make way for soybean production and cattle ranching appears to have provided inspiration for others, including some conglomerates that have reproduced the model on a massive scale.[21] While habitat destruction by Mennonite colonies has been on a smaller scale overall than that recently inflicted by a few very large corporations, the environmental damage is increasingly being contested,[20] sometimes in the form of legal challenges.[96]

The Monitoring of the Andean Amazon Project (MAAP), conducted by the Amazon Conservation Association, has identified Mennonite colonization as a new driver of deforestation in Bolivia and Peru.[22] In Peru, MAAP has identified over 7,000 hectares (27 square miles) of rainforest lost to deforestation between 2017 and 2023 following the arrival of Mennonite settlers,[96] and their colonies have been charged with illegal deforestation.[95][97]

On the Yucatán Peninsula in Mexico, agricultural expansion following Mennonite settlement has been a driver of deforestation of the native tropical rainforest.[98][99] In July 2018, Mexican Mennonites were fined $500,000 for unauthorized logging on 1,445 hectares (5½ square miles) of forested ejidos (shared ownership lands) in Quintana Roo.[99]

Controversies

[edit]

As of 2007, the Quebec government imposed a standard curriculum on all schools (public and private). While private schools may add optional material to the compulsory curriculum, they may not replace it. The Quebec curriculum was unacceptable to the parents of the only Mennonite school in the province.[100] They said they would leave Quebec after the Education Ministry threatened legal actions. The province threatened to invoke youth protection services if the Mennonite children were not registered with the Education Ministry; they either had to be home-schooled using the government-approved material, or attend a "sanctioned" school. The local population and its mayor supported[101] the local Mennonites. The Evangelical Fellowship of Canada wrote that year to the Quebec government to express its concerns[102] about this situation. By September 2007, some Mennonite families had already left Quebec.[103]

Between 2005 and 2009, more than 100 girls and women in the Manitoba Colony of Bolivia were raped at night in their homes by a group of colony men who sedated them with animal anesthetic.[104] Girls and women, including elderly women and relatives to the perpetrators, reported these attacks, but were at first dismissed as "wild female imagination", or else attributed to ghosts or demons. Eventually a group of colony men were caught in the act. The colony elders, deciding that the case was too difficult to handle themselves, called local police to take the perpetrators into custody in 2011.[105] The youngest victim was three years old, and the oldest was 65.[106] The offenders used a type of gas used by veterinarians to sedate animals during medical procedures. Despite long custodial sentences for the convicted men, an investigation in 2013 reported continuing cases of similar assaults and other sexual abuses. Canadian author Miriam Toews has made these crimes the center of her 2018 novel Women Talking.[107][108][109] Connections between farmers and Mexican drug cartels in the state of Chihuahua have seen their parallels across Mexico throughout the Mexican drug war.[110]

Sexual misconduct cases

[edit]

Service projects

[edit]

The Mennonite Disaster Service, based in North America, is a volunteer network of Anabaptist churches which provide both immediate and long-term responses to hurricanes, floods, and other disasters in the U.S. and Canada.[111]

Mennonite Central Committee (MCC), founded on 27 September 1920, in Chicago, Illinois,[112] provides disaster relief around the world alongside their long-term international development programs. In 1972, Mennonites in Altona, Manitoba, established the MCC Thrift Shops[113] which has grown to become a worldwide source of assistance to the needy.[114]

Since the latter part of the 20th century, some Mennonite groups have become more actively involved with peace and social justice issues, helping to found Christian Peacemaker Teams and Mennonite Conciliation Service.[115]

Membership

[edit]
Children in an Old Order Mennonite community selling peanuts near Lamanai in Belize

According to a 2018 census by the Mennonite World Conference (MWC), it has 107 member denominations in 58 countries, and 1.47 million baptized members.[116] Their membership in 2023 included 108 denominations from 60 countries, and around 1.45 million baptized members in over 10,180 congregations. As of 2023, 84% of baptized members in MWC member churches were African, Asian or Latin American, and 16% were located in Europe and North America.[117]

Africa has the highest membership growth rate by far, with an increase of 10% to 12% every year, particularly in Ethiopia due to new conversions. African Mennonite churches underwent a dramatic 228% increase in membership during the 1980s and 1990s, attracting thousands of new converts in Tanzania, Kenya, and the Congo.[118] Programs were also founded in Botswana and Swaziland during the 1960s.[119] Mennonite organizations in South Africa, initially stifled under apartheid due to the Afrikaner government's distrust of foreign pacifist churches, have expanded substantially since 1994.[119] In recognition of the dramatic increase in the proportion of African adherents, the Mennonite World Conference held its assembly in Bulawayo, Zimbabwe, in 2003.[118]

In Latin America growth is not as high as in Africa, but strong because of the high birth rates of traditional Mennonites of German ancestry. Growth in Mennonite membership is steady and has outpaced total population growth in North America, the Asia/Pacific region and Caribbean region. Europe has seen a slow and accelerating decline in Mennonite membership since about 1980.[120][121]

Organization worldwide

[edit]
Bethesda Mennonite Church in Henderson, Nebraska, U.S.
Old Order Mennonite children from San Ignacio, Paraguay.

The most basic unit of organization among Mennonites is the church. There are hundreds or thousands of Mennonite churches and groups, many of which are separate from all others. Some churches are members of regional or area conferences. And some regional or area conferences are affiliated with larger national or international conferences. There is no single world authority on among Mennonites, however there is a Mennonite World Committee (MWC) includes Mennonites from 60 countries.[117] The MWC does not make binding decisions on behalf of members but coordinates Mennonite causes aligning with the MWC's shared convictions.

For the most part, there is a host of independent Mennonite churches along with a myriad of separate conferences with no particular responsibility to any other group. Independent churches can contain as few as fifty members or as many as 20,000 members. Similar size differences occur among separate conferences. Worship, church discipline and lifestyles vary widely between progressive, moderate, conservative, Old Order and orthodox Mennonites in a vast panoply of distinct, independent, and widely dispersed classifications. There is no central authority that claims to speak for all Mennonites, as the 20th century passed, cultural distinctiveness between Mennonite groups has decreased.[122]

The largest Mennonite/Anabaptist groups are:

  1. Mennonite Brethren (426,581 members in 2010 worldwide)[123]
  2. Old Order Amish (383,565 members in 2023 worldwide)[124]
  3. Meserete Kristos Church in Ethiopia (295,500 members in 2017; over 500,000 attendance)[125]
  4. Old Colony Mennonite Church (120,000 in the U.S., Canada, Mexico, Bolivia, Paraguay, Belize and Argentina)
  5. Communauté Mennonite au Congo (86,600 members)[126]
  6. Old Order Mennonites (60,000 to 80,000 members in the U.S., Canada and Belize)
  7. Mennonite Church USA (about 62,000 members in the United States)[127]
  8. Kanisa La Mennonite Tanzania (50,000 members in 240 congregations)
  9. Conservative Mennonites (30,000 members in over 500 U.S. churches)[128]
  10. Mennonite Church Canada (26,000 members in 2018)[129]
  11. Church of God in Christ, Mennonite (24,400 members, of whom 14,804 (2013 data) were in U.S., 5,081 in Canada, and the remainder in Africa, Asia, Central and South America, the Caribbean, and Europe)[44]

Organization: North America

[edit]
Alexanderwohl Mennonite Church in rural Goessel, Kansas
Bethel College, North Newton, Kansas

In 2015, there were 538,839 baptized members organized into 41 bodies in the United States, according to the Mennonite World Conference.[11] The largest group of that number is the Old Order Amish. According to the Association of Religion Data Archives, in 2001 there were 80,820 Old Order Amish church members living in the United States.[130] The U.S. Conference of Mennonite Brethren Churches comprises 34,500 members.[123] 27,000 are part of a larger group known collectively as Old Order Mennonites.[131][132] Another 78,892 of that number are from the Mennonite Church USA.[71]

Total membership in Mennonite Church USA denominations decreased from about 133,000, before the MC-GC merger in 1998, to about 114,000 after the merger in 2003. In 2016 it had fallen to under 79,000. Membership of the Mennonite Church USA is on the decline.[71][121]

Canada had 143,720 Mennonites in 16 organized bodies as of 2015.[11] Of that number, the Canadian Conference of Mennonite Brethren Churches had 37,508 baptized members[123] and the Mennonite Church Canada had 31,000 members.[133]

As of 2012, there were an estimated 100,000 Old Colony Mennonites in Mexico.[134][135] These Mennonites descend from a mass migration in the 1920s of roughly 6,000 Old Colony Mennonites from the Canadian provinces of Manitoba and Saskatchewan. In 1921, a Canadian Mennonite delegation arriving in Mexico received a privilegium, a promise of non-interference, from the Mexican government. This guarantee of many freedoms was the impetus that created the two original Old Colony settlements near Patos Nuevo Ideal, Durango, Cuauhtémoc, Chihuahua and La Honda, Zacatecas.[136]

On the other hand, the Mennonite World Conference cites only 33,881 Mennonites organized into 14 bodies in Mexico.[11]

Organization: Africa

[edit]

Organization: Europe

[edit]
Mennonite Church in Hamburg-Altona, Germany

Germany has the largest contingent of Mennonites in Europe. The Mennonite World Conference counts 47,202 baptized members within 7 organized bodies in 2015.[11] The largest group is the Bruderschaft der Christengemeinde in Deutschland (Mennonite Brethren), which had 20,000 members in 2010.[123] Another such body is the Union of German Mennonite Congregations or Vereinigung der Deutschen Mennonitengemeinden. Founded in 1886, it has 27 Congregations with 5,724 members and is part of the larger "Arbeitsgemeinschaft Mennonitischer Gemeinden in Deutschland" or AMG (Assembly/Council of Mennonite Churches in Germany),[137] which claims 40,000 overall members from various groups. Other AMG member groups include: Rußland-Deutschen Mennoniten, Mennoniten-Brüdergemeinden(Independent Mennonite Brethren congregations), WEBB-Gemeinden, and the Mennonitischen Heimatmission.[138] However, not all German Mennonites belong to this larger AMG body. Upwards of 40,000 Mennonites emigrated from Russia to Germany starting in the 1970s.[137]

The Mennonite presence remaining in the Netherlands, Algemene Doopsgezinde Societeit or ADS (translated as General Mennonite Society), maintains a seminary, as well as organizing relief, peace, and mission work, the latter primarily in Central Java and New Guinea. They have 121 congregations with 10,200 members according to the World Council of Churches,[18] although the Mennonite World Conference cites only 7680 members.[11]

Switzerland had 1800 Mennonites belonging to 14 Congregations which are part of the Konferenz der Mennoniten der Schweiz (Alttäufer), Conférence mennonite suisse (Anabaptiste) (Swiss Mennonite Conference).[139]

In 2015, there were 2078 Mennonites in France. The country's 32 autonomous Mennonite congregations have formed the Association des Églises Évangéliques Mennonites de France.[140]

While Ukraine was once home to tens of thousands of Mennonites, in 2015 the number totalled just 499. They are organized among three denominations: Association of Mennonite Brethren Churches of Ukraine, Church of God in Christ, Mennonite (Ukraine), and Evangelical Mennonite Churches of Ukraine (Beachy Amish Church – Ukraine).[141]

The U.K. had but 326 members within two organized bodies as of 2015.[11] There is the Nationwide Fellowship Churches (UK) and the larger Brethren in Christ Church United Kingdom.[142] Additionally, there is the registered charity, The Mennonite Trust (formerly known as "London Mennonite Centre"), which seeks to promote understanding of Mennonite and Anabaptist practices and values.[143]

Proselytism

[edit]

There is an organisation called Gospel Tract and Bible Society (GTBS), affiliated to Church of God in Christ, Mennonite which prints religious tracts in the US and distributes them worldwide, claiming to publish and distribut tracts in 59 languages in 149 countries.[144][145] The Canadian branch spent C$745,772 on foreign activities in 2022.[146] In some cases unwanted leaflets are distributed in, for example, a predominantly Muslim country, causing alarm.[147]

[edit]

Mennonites have been portrayed in many areas of popular culture, especially literature, film, and television.[148] Notable novels about or written by Mennonites include A Complicated Kindness by Miriam Toews, Peace Shall Destroy Many by Rudy Wiebe, The Salvation of Yasch Siemens by Armin Wiebe, The Russlander by Sandra Birdsell, A Year of Lesser by David Bergen, A Dream of a Woman by Casey Plett, and Once Removed by Andrew Unger.[149] Rhoda Janzen's memoir Mennonite in a Little Black Dress was a best-seller.[149] In 1975 Victor Davies composed the Mennonite Piano Concerto and in 1977 composer Glenn Gould featured Manitoba Mennonites in his experimental radio documentary The Quiet in the Land, part three of his Solitude Trilogy.[150] In the 1990s, photographer Larry Towell documented the lives of Canadian and Mexican Mennonites, subsequently published in a volume by Phaidon Press.[151] In 2007, Mexican director Carlos Reygadas directed Silent Light, the first ever feature film in the Russian Mennonite dialect of Plautdietsch.[152] Other films depicting Mennonites include I Propose We Never See Each Other Again After Tonight, as well as All My Puny Sorrows and the Oscar-winning Women Talking, both based on Miriam Toews novels. Mennonites have also been depicted on television, including the show Pure, and in episodes of Schitt's Creek, Letterkenny[153] and The Simpsons, which was created by Matt Groening, himself of Russian Mennonite descent.[154] Andrew Unger's satirical news website The Unger Review (formerly called The Daily Bonnet) pokes fun at Mennonite culture and traditions.[155][156]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Bibliography

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Mennonites are a branch of Anabaptist that emerged in the 16th century during the in , particularly in , , and the , with followers coalescing around the teachings of the Dutch priest (1496–1561), who rejected , advocated for , and promoted nonviolent discipleship amid widespread . Central to Mennonite identity are commitments to derived from ' teachings in the , communal mutual aid, voluntary church membership, and ethical separation from worldly powers, practices that led to martyrdoms such as that of in 1569 and subsequent migrations to regions like , , and for religious liberty. Today, Mennonites number approximately 2.13 million baptized members in 86 countries, spanning conservative Old Order groups that maintain and horse-drawn transport to more assimilated congregations engaged in higher education, missions, and humanitarian efforts through organizations like Mennonite Central Committee. While unified by Anabaptist confessions emphasizing Christ-centered faith and service, the tradition features internal diversity and historical schisms over issues like technology use and church discipline, reflecting adaptations to modern contexts without compromising core tenets of and community accountability.

Historical Origins

Anabaptist Foundations in the

The Anabaptist movement arose amid the Protestant in , , in 1525, as radicals sought deeper reforms beyond those of Ulrich Zwingli, particularly rejecting and state-enforced religion. Initially supporters of Zwingli's critiques of Catholic practices, figures like and diverged over the pace and extent of change, insisting on scriptural fidelity for practices such as following personal faith confession. On January 21, 1525, after Zurich authorities prohibited dissemination of their views, Grebel baptized George Blaurock in Felix Manz's home, with Blaurock then baptizing others, initiating the practice of adult "rebaptism" that defined the movement. This foundational act underscored Anabaptist convictions that baptism requires conscious repentance and faith, rendering invalid as a mere ritual without covenantal commitment. The movement quickly spread through house churches emphasizing voluntary membership, communal discipline, and ethical separation from worldly powers, contrasting magisterial Reformers' alliances with civil authorities. In February 1527, convened Swiss Anabaptist leaders at Schleitheim to produce the first formal confession of faith, outlining seven articles: , the ban for unrepentant sin, restricted Lord's Supper, avoidance of evil associations, qualified pastoral leadership, rejection of the sword (magistracy, oaths, and ), and voluntary communal aid without . These tenets enshrined , church-state separation, and a model, prioritizing discipleship over sacramentalism or coercion, which fueled rapid growth but invited as threats to . Anabaptists viewed the state as ordained for unbelievers' restraint but illegitimate for enforcing faith, refusing oaths and arms-bearing to maintain . By mid-1527, despite executions like Manz's drowning in Zurich's River that same year, the movement had expanded to South Germany, , and the Netherlands, laying groundwork for pacifist traditions later formalized among Mennonites.

Role of Menno Simons and Early Organization

, born in 1496 in Witmarsum, , initially trained as a Roman Catholic priest and was ordained in 1524, serving in various parishes until 1536. The execution of his brother as an Anabaptist in 1535, combined with his scriptural studies and dismay over the violent of 1534–1535, led him to reject Catholicism and align with Anabaptist principles, including , which he underwent around 1536. Simons emerged as a key organizer of the nonviolent Anabaptist faction in the Low Countries, traveling extensively to preach, baptize, and establish congregations amid persecution from both Catholic and Protestant authorities. His theological writings, such as Dat Fundament des Christelijcken Lerens (Foundation of Christian Doctrine) published between 1539 and 1540, articulated core doctrines including the rejection of infant baptism, emphasis on personal faith, pacifism, and church discipline through excommunication for unrepentant sin. These texts provided a stabilizing framework, distinguishing his followers from radical Anabaptist groups and promoting a disciplined community life centered on scriptural obedience and mutual accountability. Under Simons' influence, early organization took shape through decentralized, congregational structures featuring ordained elders and deacons for teaching, , and aid to the needy, often meeting in homes to evade authorities. He prioritized forming "pure churches" of regenerate believers, enforcing separation from worldly alliances and state churches, which fostered resilience but also internal divisions over issues like the ban (avoidance of excommunicated members). By the time of his death in 1561 near Wüstenfelde, , Simons had helped consolidate scattered Anabaptist groups into a recognizable movement in the and , with his followers increasingly identified as Mennonites due to his prominent . This early structure emphasized voluntary membership, communal ethics, and , laying foundations for subsequent Mennonite endurance despite ongoing threats.

Persecutions and Early Migrations

The Anabaptist movement encountered severe persecution shortly after its emergence in , , on January 21, 1525, when baptized George Blaurock, initiating adult baptisms in defiance of practices upheld by both Catholic and emerging Protestant authorities. This act, rejecting state-enforced and emphasizing , led to immediate arrests and executions, as civil magistrates viewed Anabaptists as threats to due to their and separation from worldly powers. , an early leader among the , was drowned in the River on January 5, 1527, by authorities, becoming the first Anabaptist . Persecution spread rapidly, with Anabaptists imprisoned in 's towers where they were left to die without removal of bodies, and executions by drowning, burning, and sword becoming common across , South Germany, and . By the 1530s, violence escalated amid fears of radical Anabaptist uprisings like the Münster Rebellion of 1534-1535, though most Swiss Brethren and emerging Mennonite groups rejected violence; records indicate around 12,522 documented Anabaptist cases in court proceedings from 16th-century South and Central Germany, Switzerland, and Austria, with thousands executed. In 1531, executions reached approximately 1,000 in certain regions, 600 in Ensisheim, and 73 in Linz within six weeks. Dutch Anabaptists faced intensified oppression under Habsburg Catholic rule and the Inquisition, with burnings and drownings prevalent; Dirk Willems, arrested for his faith, escaped prison in 1569 but returned to rescue his pursuer who slipped on thin ice, leading to his recapture and execution by burning at the stake on May 16 near Asperen in the Netherlands. These events were later chronicled in Thieleman J. van Braght's Martyrs Mirror (1660), which details over 4,000 martyrs from apostolic times through the 17th century, including 803 named Anabaptists primarily from the Low Countries. To evade execution and forced recantation, early Anabaptists and Mennonites undertook migrations within during the 16th and 17th centuries, seeking tolerant enclaves amid ongoing state-church alliances. fled Zurich's cantons to , where communal Hutterite groups formed, and to South Germany's Alsace-Lorraine and Palatinate regions, with settlements emerging as early as the 1520s and growing through the century despite sporadic expulsions. Dutch Mennonites, consolidated under from the 1530s, migrated eastward from the to the Vistula Delta in starting in the mid-16th century, invited for their dyke-building expertise and granted limited religious freedoms by Polish authorities. Further movements led to the and valleys, where communities persisted under economic privileges but faced periodic bans; by the late , groups numbering in the hundreds relocated to the Palatinate around 1671 for relative safety.

Major Migrations and Diaspora

Settlement in Russia and Eastern Europe

In the late 1780s, Russian Empress Catherine II invited Mennonite families from the Vistula Delta region of to settle in the newly acquired southern territories of the , offering land grants and incentives to develop agriculture in underpopulated areas near the . Russian delegates visited Prussian Mennonite communities in 1786, presenting favorable terms that included perpetual land ownership, low-interest loans for settlement, and freedom from obligations, prompting initial migrations beginning in 1788. The first major Mennonite colony, Chortitza, was established in 1789 along the Dnieper River in what is now , , comprising approximately 462 families who received about 45,000 desiatins (roughly 123,000 acres) of land for farming and village development. These settlers, primarily of Dutch and North German Anabaptist descent, formalized their status through a Privilegium—a charter of privileges—granted by Catherine II in 1800, which guaranteed religious liberty, exemption from (with provisions for alternative forestry or medical roles introduced later), internal , and tax exemptions for initial decades to encourage economic establishment. A second, larger colony, , followed in 1803 southeast of Chortitza, accommodating around 1,200 families on over 100,000 desiatins, fostering rapid growth through communal organization, wheat farming innovations, and wool production that integrated with Russian markets. By the 1840s, these colonies had expanded to include daughter settlements like Bergtal (1848) and Am Trakt (1860s), with Mennonite populations reaching approximately 20,000–30,000, sustained by high birth rates, internal migrations from (adding 204 families in 1819 alone), and agricultural prosperity that positioned them as model colonists in imperial eyes. The Privilegium's assurances of cultural and linguistic autonomy—using (Plattdeutsch) in schools and churches—allowed preservation of Anabaptist practices amid Orthodox Russian dominance, though tensions arose from pressures and envy of their economic success, evidenced by periodic petitions to renew privileges under subsequent tsars like Alexander I. Limited settlements also occurred in eastern European fringes of the empire, such as (modern and ), where smaller groups arrived in the 1860s seeking additional land amid overcrowding in core colonies. This phase marked a peak of voluntary settlement, with Mennonites contributing to imperial policies while maintaining doctrinal separation from state churches.

Expansion to North America and Beyond

The first permanent Mennonite settlement in North America was established in Germantown, Pennsylvania, in 1683, when thirteen Dutch-speaking Mennonite and Quaker families arrived from Krefeld, Germany, aboard the ship Concord and landed in Philadelphia on October 6. Led by Francis Daniel Pastorius, these immigrants purchased land from William Penn, drawn by promises of religious tolerance and freedom from persecution that had plagued Anabaptists in Europe. This community quickly developed agricultural and craft economies, with the first Mennonite meetinghouse constructed in 1708, marking the beginning of organized worship in the New World. Subsequent waves of Swiss and German Mennonites migrated to Pennsylvania throughout the 18th century, fleeing ongoing religious and political pressures in Europe, and expanding settlements into the Shenandoah Valley of Virginia and other frontier areas. By the early 19th century, economic opportunities and land availability prompted further dispersal to Ohio, Indiana, and Illinois, where communities maintained distinctive practices like mutual aid and plain dress amid growing American society. These migrations preserved Mennonite identity through endogamy and church discipline, even as some assimilated into broader Protestantism. A major influx occurred in the 1870s when approximately 18,000 Mennonites emigrated from the to , prompted by the Tsarist government's revocation of privileges such as military exemptions and German-language schooling. Around 7,000 settled in , , establishing reserves like the East and West Reserves with negotiated exemptions from and public education to safeguard their pacifist convictions and cultural autonomy. Others moved to and in the United States, founding colonies such as those in the , where they introduced durable hard varieties that boosted regional . Beyond North America, Mennonite expansion accelerated in the 20th century, particularly into Latin America, as groups sought isolation from modernism and state conscription. In the 1920s, conservative Mennonites from Canada migrated to Chihuahua, Mexico, forming colonies like Manitoba Colony to evade compulsory education laws promoting assimilation. From Mexico and Canada, further relocations in the 1930s and 1940s established settlements in Paraguay's Chaco region, such as Fernheim and Menno, where over 10,000 Mennonites arrived by mid-century, developing self-sufficient agricultural enterprises including dairy and cotton production. Similar colonies proliferated in Bolivia and Belize, with Paraguay hosting 25 colonies by 2020, reflecting a pattern of strategic land acquisition for communal living and economic independence. These diaspora movements, totaling over 200 colonies across nine Latin American countries, prioritized religious liberty and separation from worldly influences, often negotiating with governments for exemptions akin to those in North America.

20th-Century Relocations and Conflicts


Following the Bolshevik Revolution and Russian Civil War, Mennonites in the Soviet Union faced acute persecution, including land confiscations, anti-religious campaigns, and famine, leading to organized emigration efforts in the early 1920s. The Mennonite Central Committee, formed in 1920, provided relief amid widespread starvation, while the Canadian Mennonite Board of Colonization, established October 18, 1920, enabled over 21,000 Mennonites to relocate to Canada from 1923 to 1930. These migrations were driven by the need to preserve communal autonomy, religious practices, and exemption from military service under Soviet conscription policies.
Mennonites remaining in the USSR endured further devastation during the 1930s collectivization and the famine of 1932–1933, which targeted Ukrainian agricultural regions and inflicted heavy losses on ethnic German communities, including Mennonites, through engineered food shortages and repression. By , surviving populations confronted dual threats from Soviet deportations—over 400,000 ethnic Germans, encompassing Mennonites, were forcibly relocated eastward in 1941 to prevent alleged Nazi collaboration—and Nazi occupation in , where some faced coercion into auxiliary roles amid partisan warfare. Postwar refugee waves, facilitated by relief organizations, saw approximately 8,000 Soviet Mennonites resettle in from 1947 to 1951, with others directing to . In parallel, North American Mennonites undertook secondary relocations to evade assimilation pressures. Canadian provinces' 1917 compulsory secular education laws, requiring English instruction, prompted about 7,000 Old Colony Mennonites to migrate to Mexico's Chihuahua state starting in 1922, founding colonies like Manitoba Colony with Mexican government assurances for private schools, German language use, and pacifist exemptions. Similarly, in 1927, roughly 1,600 families established the Menno Colony in Paraguay's Gran Chaco, fleeing educational conflicts and seeking isolation to maintain traditional practices amid modernization. These moves preserved cultural and theological distinctives but involved hardships like arid terrains and disease. Twentieth-century conflicts extended to conscientious objection in host nations. During World Wars I and II, U.S. and Canadian Mennonites resisted combat, opting for camps where over 4,000 served in forestry, mental health, and agriculture from 1941 to 1947, averting relocations but straining community resources. In Latin American outposts, isolated colonies largely avoided direct wartime involvement but navigated local land disputes and economic pressures, reinforcing patterns of strategic withdrawal to safeguard and separation from state power.

Core Beliefs and Theology

Scriptural Authority and Pacifism

Mennonites regard the as the ultimate authority for faith and practice, viewing it as divinely inspired by the to provide instruction in and righteous living. This Anabaptist heritage emphasizes obedience to scriptural commands over human traditions or civil mandates, as exemplified in Acts 5:29, where apostolic priority is given to divine over human authority. Community interpretation, guided by the , applies scripture to daily life, rejecting hierarchical overrides in favor of congregational discernment. Central to Mennonite theology is , or , rooted in teachings, particularly ' in :38-48, which commands , loving enemies, and non-retaliation against evil. This doctrine extends to rejecting oaths, , and , interpreting Christ's example and words as prohibiting force even in self-defense or national conflicts. , the 16th-century leader whose name the group bears, reinforced this by urging Anabaptists to forswear arms and embrace suffering, as seen in his writings condemning violent reform and promoting patient endurance under persecution. Nonresistance manifests as active peacemaking through forgiveness and service, historically leading to martyrdoms like that of Dirk Willems in 1569, who rescued his pursuer before his execution, embodying scriptural mercy over vengeance. While core to Mennonite identity as a "historic peace church," adherence varies across branches, with conservative groups maintaining strict refusal of warfare and progressive ones adapting to modern contexts like conscientious objection during World Wars I and II. This scriptural commitment has shaped Mennonite responses to state demands, prioritizing kingdom ethics over civic loyalty.

Adult Baptism and Church Discipline

Adult baptism, or , constitutes a foundational ordinance among Mennonites, administered exclusively to individuals who have undergone personal repentance and professed conscious faith in Jesus Christ, usually during adolescence or later. This immersion or pouring with water symbolizes inner cleansing from sin, a public pledge of covenantal obedience to Christ, and formal incorporation into the body of believers as disciples committed to mutual accountability. Originating in the , the practice emerged on January 21, 1525, when performed the first recorded adult rebaptisms in , rejecting as unbiblical and emphasizing voluntary faith over sacramental inheritance. The 1632 , a seminal Mennonite document, codified this as "the baptism of believers only," underscoring its role in and separation from state-established traditions. Mennonite confessions uniformly require baptism following sincere repentance and acceptance of Christ as , with no recognition of for membership; those baptized as infants must undergo upon profession of faith. Performed in the name of the Father, Son, and per Matthew 28:19, it marks the transition from catechumenal instruction—often involving classes on , , and community life—to full participatory status, including eligibility for communion and leadership roles. Church discipline functions as a corrective mechanism to uphold scriptural holiness, foster repentance, and safeguard communal integrity, drawing from passages like Matthew 18:15-17 and 1 Corinthians 5:1-13. Initiated through private confrontation by fellow members or leaders for persistent sin—such as moral lapses, doctrinal deviation, or refusal of accountability—the process escalates stepwise: gentle rebuke, involvement of witnesses, church-wide admonition, and, absent repentance, temporary or permanent exclusion from fellowship. The Dordrecht Confession mandates the "ban" or of unrepentant excommunicants to prevent sin's spread, historically entailing avoidance in business, social interaction, and even family relations to prompt self-examination and return. While progressive Mennonite bodies prioritize reconciliation through counseling and forgiveness, minimizing exclusion, conservative and Old Order groups enforce stricter avoidance—resembling the Amish Meidung—limiting communion and association with disciplined members to reinforce covenant obligations. Discipline's remains restorative, aiming to liberate from sin's bondage and reintegrate the offender, though historical applications have varied amid cultural pressures and internal debates over severity. In all cases, it underscores the voluntary, accountable nature of Mennonite , where initiates a lifelong commitment subject to communal oversight.

Separation from the World and Community Focus

Mennonites interpret biblical injunctions such as Romans 12:2—"Do not conform to the pattern of , but be transformed by the renewing of your mind"—and 2 Corinthians 6:17 as mandates for nonconformity to worldly values and practices. This doctrine, rooted in Anabaptist two-kingdom , distinguishes the "kingdom of Christ" as a voluntary of believers from the coercive "kingdom of this ," requiring separation to avoid compromise with , , and state power. The 1995 Confession of Faith in a Mennonite Perspective articulates this as a call to separate from evil without total withdrawal, refusing participation in worldly sin while engaging society through witness and service. In practice, separation manifests in conservative Mennonite groups through modest dress (e.g., plain clothing, head coverings for women), avoidance of worldly amusements like television or dancing, and limits on technology such as automobiles or electricity to preserve community cohesion over individualism. These measures, emphasized since the 19th century, aim to visibly differentiate believers and resist cultural assimilation, though progressive Mennonites interpret nonconformity more inwardly, focusing on ethical stances like pacifism rather than external uniformity. Historical migrations, such as to Russia in the 1780s or North America in the 1870s, often preserved separation by forming isolated colonies. Complementing separation, Mennonites prioritize community as an alternative structure, embodying mutual aid drawn from Galatians 6:2—"Carry each other's burdens"—through informal networks or formal plans for financial assistance during hardships like crop failure or medical needs, historically supplanting commercial insurance to foster interdependence. This ethic, practiced since Anabaptist origins in the 1520s, supported survival amid persecution and expanded via organizations like Mennonite Central Committee, which by 1924 distributed over $1 million in aid to rebuild communities post-World War I. Church discipline, including the Meidung (avoidance) of unrepentant members, reinforces communal accountability, ensuring ethical alignment over personal autonomy. In 2020s demographics, such practices sustain tight-knit enclaves, with over 2 million global Mennonites relying on congregational support for education, healthcare, and disaster relief.

Practices and Lifestyle Variations

Worship and Sacraments

Mennonite services, held primarily on Sundays, center on congregational , extemporaneous , scripture exposition, and preaching from the , reflecting Anabaptist priorities of scriptural fidelity and communal discernment. constitutes the core participatory element, frequently unaccompanied in conservative settings to emphasize and avoid worldly distractions. Readings typically include passages from both the Old and New Testaments, underscoring the holistic authority of scripture in guiding and practice. Practices vary by subgroup: Old Order and adhere to austere, non-liturgical formats without musical instruments or formal vestments, prioritizing unadorned devotion. Progressive congregations, conversely, may integrate contemporary hymns, instrumental accompaniment, or structured liturgies while retaining core Anabaptist emphases on and . These differences stem from divergent interpretations of separation from the world, with conservatives enforcing stricter boundaries against . Mennonites recognize two ordinances—baptism and the Lord's Supper—rather than sacraments that inherently impart grace, viewing them instead as obedient symbols of Christ's commands and the believer's commitment. , administered by pouring or immersion following personal repentance and faith profession, signifies death to sin, cleansing, and covenant entry into the church body; is rejected as contrary to voluntary discipleship. It typically occurs in adolescence or adulthood, often around ages 13-14 in some communities, and is prerequisite for full membership. The Lord's Supper, observed periodically—often biannually or quarterly—memorializes ' sacrificial death through shared bread and cup (usually unfermented to symbolize purity), fostering and unity among participants who first examine themselves. to many traditions, foot washing accompanies this ordinance, enacted in pairs to embody Christ's example of and mutual servanthood, reinforcing ongoing spiritual cleansing and equality within the congregation. While nearly universal among global Mennonites as of the mid-20th century, its frequency and emphasis persist more rigorously in conservative groups, waning in progressive ones amid broader liturgical adaptations.

Family, Marriage, and Gender Roles

Mennonites view as a lifelong covenant between one man and one , rooted in biblical teachings that emphasize mutual commitment in Christ. is strictly monogamous, with historical practices involving negotiations over conditions, though modern ceremonies have shifted from private home events to congregational church weddings. Conservative Mennonite groups prohibit and , regarding as an ongoing sin requiring separation from the adulterous union, and historically excluded remarried individuals from membership as late as 1905. In traditional communities, such as Mennonites, individuals often marry young, around ages 18 or 19, reinforcing -centered unions. Family structures prioritize the nuclear unit of one , one , and children, with an emphasis on viewing offspring as blessings from . Traditional and conservative Mennonite families tend to be larger than societal averages; for instance, in 1876-1884 , , families averaged 7.45 children, while Paraguayan Mennonites averaged 8.4 and related Hutterite groups 10.4. However, progressive Mennonite families average around 2.3 children per woman aged 20 and over, reflecting assimilation into broader cultural declines. Child-rearing focuses on instilling , values, and practical skills, with conservative groups often limiting children's centrality compared to mainstream cultures to emphasize collective family discipline. Gender roles in Mennonite communities traditionally align with complementarian interpretations of Scripture, positioning husbands as heads of the household and wives in supportive domestic capacities. Women in conservative settings manage cooking, cleaning, child-rearing, gardening, food preservation, and aspects of livestock care, such as poultry, while refraining from teaching or leading men in church services. In Low German Mennonite and similar traditional groups, women's roles remain centered on the family sphere, with obedience to male authority upheld as biblical. Progressive Mennonite organizations, however, promote women's leadership to counter patriarchal structures, enabling greater participation in church and societal roles, though this diverges from core Anabaptist emphasis on male headship in conservative branches.

Economic and Technological Engagement


Mennonites traditionally prioritize agriculture, craftsmanship, and entrepreneurship, often operating family-owned farms, mills, factories, and trucking firms as expressions of stewardship and self-reliance. This economic model, adapted from 19th-century industrialization in the United States, emphasizes frugality and community mutual aid over dependence on external welfare or commercial insurance. Mutual aid networks provide financial and labor support during hardships, such as barn raisings or crop failures, functioning as an alternative to public assistance. Organizations like Mennonite Economic Development Associates (MEDA), founded in 1985, extend this approach globally by promoting business solutions to poverty in developing regions, impacting over 10 million people through microfinance and enterprise training by 2023.
Technological engagement varies significantly by group, with conservative and Old Order Mennonites restricting innovations like automobiles, electricity, and to preserve communal bonds, , and separation from worldly influences. These groups often use horse-drawn carriages and shared telephones, viewing unrestricted technology as a to and . In contrast, progressive Mennonite communities integrate modern tools for efficiency in farming, , and , such as GPS-guided tractors or selective online platforms filtered for moral content. This selective adoption, seen in entrepreneurial hubs like , —where Mennonites comprise about 4% of the national population and drive exports—balances innovation with ethical constraints. Economic success in Mennonite communities often correlates with these adaptations; for instance, in , post-1940 immigration led to diversified enterprises employing thousands, contributing to sectors like and by the 1980s. companies, such as Mennonite Mutual Insurance established in 1899, insure over 20,000 policies in farm and church properties as of 2024, blending faith-based risk-sharing with professional management. Globally, Mennonite ventures in , exemplified by stores like operational since 1946, channel profits toward artisan empowerment in over 50 countries.

Denominational Branches

Old Order and Conservative Mennonites

Old Order Mennonites originated from splits within mainstream Mennonite churches during the late , driven by opposition to progressive reforms such as the introduction of Sunday schools, revivalism, and the shift to English preaching. In , , a key division occurred in , resulting in the formation of 15 initial meetinghouses for the conservative faction. These groups uphold Anabaptist principles of separation from worldly influences through rigorous practices, including exclusive use of horse-drawn buggies for transportation, plain unpatterned clothing without zippers or jewelry, and rejection of grid electricity, telephones, and automobiles to foster humility and communal interdependence. Distinct from Amish customs, Old Order Mennonites conduct worship in fixed meetinghouses equipped with benches, emphasizing orderly services in Pennsylvania German or High German, with preaching lasting two to three hours biweekly. Their population of horse-and-buggy adherents surpasses 38,000 across North American settlements in the United States, , and , reflecting sustained growth through large families and low assimilation rates. Conservative Mennonites, tracing to Amish-Mennonite heritage, established the Conservative Mennonite Conference in 1910 amid debates over modernization, initially as the Conservative Amish Mennonite Conference before dropping "Amish" in 1957. They permit selective modern technologies, such as automobiles (typically in black or dark hues without ornamentation), home , and use in fields, while banning televisions, radios, and to guard against cultural contamination. Dress codes mandate , with women wearing head coverings during worship and men often sporting beards post-marriage, alongside plain or subdued apparel. In 2023, the conference rebranded as the Rosedale Network, signaling continued adaptation while prioritizing evangelism, Bible institutes, and mutual aid. Compared to Old Order groups, Conservatives exhibit greater societal engagement, including public schools with vocational extensions and missionary outreach, yet enforce church discipline, including shunning for unrepentant sin, albeit less severely. Both branches affirm pacifism, adult baptism, and footwashing as ordinances, but Conservatives' moderated separation allows for economic diversification beyond farming, such as small businesses, sustaining their communities amid demographic shifts.

Russian Mennonites and Ethnic Traditions


Russian Mennonites originated from Dutch and Prussian Anabaptist migrants invited by Catherine the Great to settle in the Russian Empire's Black Sea region starting in the late 18th century, with the first families arriving in 1788 after an 11-week journey by wagon train. These settlers received privileges including religious tolerance, exemption from military service, and land grants, enabling the establishment of prosperous agricultural colonies in areas now part of Ukraine. By the mid-19th century, the population had grown significantly, fostering a distinct ethno-religious community characterized by shared cultural and theological practices.
Central to Russian Mennonite ethnic identity is the language, a dialect derived from East with Dutch influences, preserved as their primary in-group communication tool despite multilingualism in host societies. This dialect, along with for church and literacy, distinguishes them from other Mennonite branches and reinforces communal bonds in settings like and . Conservative subgroups maintain traditional dress, such as head coverings for women and simple clothing, alongside endogamous marriage practices to preserve cultural continuity. Cultural traditions emphasize agrarian self-sufficiency, with foods like cottage cheese perogies (Vereniki), farmer sausage (Foarma Worscht), and summer borscht reflecting Russian imperial influences adapted to Mennonite communal meals and festivals. Family and church-centered life, including strict community discipline and pacifist non-resistance, persisted amid migrations triggered by tsarist Russification policies in the 1870s—when approximately 18,000 emigrated to North American prairies—and Bolshevik upheavals in the 1920s, which displaced another 21,000 to Canada. These relocations, often in organized groups to retain village structures, sustained ethnic enclaves where Plautdietsch folklore, hymns, and mutual aid networks endure, even as assimilation pressures vary by generation and location.

Moderate and Progressive Groups

Moderate Mennonite groups integrate more seamlessly with broader evangelical , retaining Anabaptist emphases on , , and service without mandating distinctive dress or technology restrictions. These congregations prioritize biblical authority, especially ' teachings, while allowing personal discretion in lifestyle choices such as vehicle use and media consumption. Unlike stricter branches, they conduct Sunday schools, revival meetings, and operate integrated educational systems rather than insular parochial schools. The , formed in 2001 by merging the General Conference Mennonite Church and the Mennonite Church, exemplifies moderate adaptation, with over 100,000 members across 800 congregations as of recent reports. Its core practices include adult by pouring or immersion, footwashing as a symbol of service during communion (observed biannually), and congregational discernment for , though is rare and restorative. is upheld through nonviolent witness and support for organizations like Mennonite Central Committee, which channels member contributions into global relief efforts, but individual conscientious objection rather than absolute separation from society defines engagement. Progressive subgroups within these bodies further emphasize , , and theological flexibility, often framing as active peacemaking amid systemic violence rather than mere withdrawal. They promote higher education and professional vocations, sponsoring institutions like , where curricula blend Anabaptist ethics with liberal arts and sciences. Worship incorporates contemporary elements like praise bands and , with many ordaining women and affirming diverse family structures, though tensions arise over scriptural interpretations of sexuality. Mennonite Brethren churches, originating in 1860 and now numbering around 500,000 worldwide, lean evangelical in outreach, prioritizing personal conversion experiences and missions while de-emphasizing ethnic traditions for broader appeal. These groups' openness to fosters demographic growth in urban areas and among non-ethnic adherents, but critics within argue it dilutes separation from worldly influences, potentially eroding distinctives like . Empirical data from church reports show higher retention rates tied to , with progressive congregations reporting 70-80% youth retention versus lower figures in conservative settings, attributed to adaptive discipleship models.

Global Demographics and Organization

Mennonite World Conference (MWC) records approximately 2.13 million baptized believers affiliated with its member churches across 86 countries, based on the most recent comprehensive directory. This figure reflects reporting from 111 member churches and networks as of mid-2025.
RegionPercentage of Membership
37%
and Pacific21%
3%
Latin America and Caribbean9%
30%
Global Mennonite membership has shown steady expansion since the early , driven primarily by efforts and natural increase in the Global South. From 2015 to 2018, total baptized membership grew by 0.7 percent, with and the Pacific region experiencing a 2 percent rise in that interval. Growth rates in and have outpaced those in traditional European and n strongholds, where assimilation, secularization, and lower birth rates among progressive groups have led to stagnation or modest declines in some denominations. Projections for continued trends indicate sustained increase in developing regions, supported by high fertility in conservative communities and ongoing evangelism, though precise post-2018 data remains limited due to the triennial nature of MWC censuses. In countries like Ethiopia and India, membership exceeds 250,000 each, underscoring the shift toward a majority non-Western demographic. Overall, the faith's global footprint has expanded from European origins to a diverse, majority-Southern Hemisphere presence by the 21st century.

Regional Concentrations and Growth Areas

The primary regional concentrations of Mennonites are in , where longstanding communities form about 30% of the estimated 2.13 million global baptized believers, totaling roughly 639,000 individuals. In the United States, dense settlements exist in Pennsylvania's Lancaster County, home to tens of thousands in Old Order groups emphasizing traditional practices; ; and , with overall U.S. membership exceeding 300,000 across various denominations. Canada features major clusters in (over 35,000 adherents), , and , contributing to a national total nearing 200,000, often in rural agricultural settings. Africa constitutes the foremost growth area, encompassing 37% of worldwide membership or approximately 788,100 baptized members, with accelerated expansion via local conversions and high fertility rates in the (hundreds of thousands) and (over 200,000). This surge reflects indigenous since the mid-20th century, outpacing traditional regions.
RegionPercentage of Global TotalApproximate Baptized Members
Africa37%788,100
Asia and Pacific21%447,300
30%639,000
and Caribbean9%191,700
Europe3%63,900
Asia and the Pacific region accounts for 21% or about 447,300 members, with notable growth in through autonomous congregations adopting Anabaptist distinctives. hold 9%, roughly 191,700, concentrated in conservative colonies across (tens of thousands in the Chaco region), , , and emerging settlements in and , fueled by migrations from and the U.S. seeking land autonomy and avoidance of modernization pressures. sustains a marginal 3% or 63,900, mainly in ancestral areas like , the , and , with minimal net growth amid . These patterns indicate a southward and eastward demographic shift, with Africa and Asia driving increases through evangelism and demographics, while North American cores stabilize via retention in insular groups and Latin expansions via relocation.

Institutional Structures

Mennonite institutional structures emphasize congregational autonomy, with local churches retaining primary authority over internal affairs such as pastoral appointments, budget approvals, and doctrinal application, while delegating certain responsibilities to elected boards or elder teams. This polity reflects Anabaptist principles of believer's baptism and voluntary church membership, avoiding hierarchical oversight common in other Christian traditions. Congregations frequently affiliate with regional or area conferences for collaborative ministries, resource sharing, and mission coordination, though these bodies lack binding authority over members. In the United States, , formed in 2001 through the merger of the General Conference Mennonite Church and the Mennonite Church, consists of 14 area conferences including the Allegheny Mennonite Conference and the Central Plains Mennonite Conference, which connect local churches to denominational programs in , relief, and evangelism. Similarly, Mennonite Church Canada operates through provincial structures like , featuring a board of nine elected positions overseeing task groups and committees aligned with core themes of Christ-centered ministry. Internationally, the Mennonite World Conference (MWC), established in 1925 with headquarters in , , functions as a global communion rather than a governing authority, fostering fellowship among Anabaptist-rooted churches through worship, service, and witness. As of June 2025, MWC encompasses one international association and 111 national member churches across 61 countries, accounting for roughly 2.13 million baptized adherents. Its General Council, comprising church leaders, convenes every three years to discern shared concerns, shape organizational mandates, and promote mutual learning, without imposing doctrines or policies. Variations exist among subgroups; conservative and Old Order Mennonites often maintain independent or minimally affiliated structures, prioritizing traditional community oversight over formal denominational ties, while progressive groups engage more actively in conference systems for social initiatives. These arrangements enable decentralized resilience, as evidenced by sustained global growth despite historical persecutions and migrations.

Social and Cultural Contributions

Education and Intellectual Achievements

Mennonite education has historically emphasized literacy and religious instruction to support personal Bible study and community values, with parochial schools common among conservative groups limiting formal schooling to the eighth grade to prioritize practical skills and faith formation over secular higher education. In traditional settings, such as Old Order Mennonite communities in Pennsylvania, instruction often occurs in one-room schools teaching core subjects alongside Anabaptist doctrines in languages like Pennsylvania Dutch or High German. These systems trace back to Russian Mennonite traditions, where private schools integrated vocational training with religious education, resisting state mandates to preserve cultural and doctrinal integrity, as seen in Chihuahua colonies where reforms gradually incorporated more formal curricula over fifty years starting in the 1970s. Progressive and moderate Mennonite branches established higher education institutions in the late 19th and early 20th centuries to blend Anabaptist principles with academic rigor, including founded in 1894 in , Bethel College established in 1888 in , originating as a school in 1917 in , in , and Hesston College as a in . These institutions, affiliated with or similar bodies, enroll thousands annually and emphasize , peace studies, and interdisciplinary approaches informed by and community ethics, with programs fostering Anabaptist values amid broader academic pursuits. Canadian examples include , which integrates Mennonite studies with general degrees. Intellectual achievements among Mennonites center on , , and Anabaptist , with scholars like Guy F. Hershberger advancing nonresistance doctrines through works on social conscience and biblical in the mid-20th century, influencing Mennonite ethical frameworks. Historians such as Cornelius Krahn contributed to archival preservation and scholarship on Mennonite heritage, while Paul Toews specialized in Mennonite history at , authoring key texts on migration and identity. These efforts, often tied to church-affiliated seminaries like Anabaptist Mennonite Biblical Seminary, have produced a body of literature defending Anabaptist distinctives against , though conservative of academia limits broader scientific or philosophical output compared to population size. Mennonite education's focus on moral formation over individualistic achievement has yielded contributions in applied fields like relief work rather than mainstream intellectual paradigms.

Agricultural Innovations and Community Self-Sufficiency

Mennonite immigrants from Russia introduced Turkey Red hard red winter wheat to the United States in 1874, planting it in counties such as Butler, Harvey, Marion, McPherson, and Reno in Kansas. This variety, selected over generations in Ukraine for its drought resistance and high yields, thrived on the Great Plains where previous wheat strains failed due to harsh winters and dry conditions. Bernhard Warkentin, a Mennonite miller in Kansas, actively distributed the seed and promoted its cultivation, leading to its rapid adoption and the establishment of hard red winter wheat as a staple crop that supported the region's agricultural economy. Along with the wheat, these settlers brought advanced practices including crop rotation, fallowing fields to restore soil fertility, and careful seed selection, which enhanced productivity on marginal lands without relying on chemical inputs. In Pennsylvania, earlier Mennonite communities cleared forests, constructed durable barns for efficient storage and livestock management, and integrated orchards and vegetable gardens to diversify output and buffer against market fluctuations. These methods reflected a commitment to stewardship of land resources, prioritizing long-term viability over short-term exploitation. Community self-sufficiency among Mennonites manifested through mutual aid systems, where members collectively assisted in tasks like barn-raising and harvesting, reducing dependence on external labor or credit. This cooperative model, rooted in Anabaptist principles of non-resistance and communal support, enabled small-scale farms to remain viable amid economic pressures, often employing low-input techniques such as rotational grazing to maintain soil health and livestock productivity. In regions like Manitoba and Iowa, divisions persist between those favoring organic methods and chemical agriculture, yet both approaches underscore a cultural emphasis on ethical land use and independence from industrialized supply chains. Such practices have sustained Mennonite agricultural communities for centuries, fostering resilience against environmental and economic variability.

Humanitarian Service and Relief Work

Mennonite humanitarian efforts are primarily channeled through inter-Mennonite agencies emphasizing disaster relief, long-term development, and , rooted in Anabaptist commitments to and mutual aid. The Mennonite Central Committee (MCC), established in 1920 to deliver food aid amid and disease in (now ), has coordinated global responses for over a century, addressing immediate needs while promoting sustainable community empowerment. Similarly, Mennonite Disaster Service (MDS), formalized in 1952 after early responses to U.S. Midwest floods and integrated into MCC by 1955, mobilizes volunteers for post-disaster reconstruction in the United States and , focusing on home repairs and hope restoration through Christian service. MCC's work spans emergency relief to structural initiatives, including responses to the 1920s Ukrainian famine, where initial shipments sustained thousands of families, and modern crises like the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami in , , where it facilitated interfaith recovery partnerships amid widespread devastation. In recent years, MCC has aided hunger crises exacerbated since 2020, with its Canadian branch allocating $46.9 million in fiscal 2024 to international programs ($39.3 million), domestic ($2.8 million), and grants ($4.8 million), reflecting efficient resource deployment rated at 78% program spending by independent evaluators. MDS complements this with volunteer-driven operations, drawing over 5,000 participants annually from Mennonite, , and Brethren in Christ communities to execute cleanup and rebuilding, such as supplying 12,000 tons of feed to 194 drought-affected farmers in 2021. These efforts underscore a consistent pattern of mobilization, with MDS responding to events like in 2005 through long-term rebuilding and MCC extending to over 50 countries via partnerships that prioritize local agency over top-down intervention. Historical data indicate MCC's early 20th-century shipments to alone distributed millions of pounds of supplies, establishing a model of impartial that persists in annual disaster responses worldwide. While effective in tangible outcomes, such as restored housing units and agricultural support, the agencies' pacifist framework sometimes intersects with advocacy, though core impacts remain verifiable through audited financials and project logs rather than self-reported narratives.

Political and Civic Engagement

Pacifism and Non-Resistance in Practice

Mennonite non-resistance, rooted in the Sermon on the Mount's command to "not resist an evil person" (Matthew 5:39), entails refraining from violence, retaliation, or participation in warfare, emulating ' endurance of injustice without reprisal. This doctrine, formalized in Mennonite confessions since the , extends to rejecting through force and military oaths, prioritizing and enemy love over coercive power. Historical Anabaptist-Mennonite communities faced for this stance, as exemplified by in 1569, who rescued his arresting pursuer from drowning before his own execution by burning, embodying sacrificial non-retaliation. In practice, Mennonites have consistently registered as conscientious objectors during conflicts, opting for rather than . During , approximately 12,000 Mennonites served in the U.S. (CPS) program from 1941 to 1947, comprising about 40% of all conscientious objectors; they contributed over 2.2 million man-days in 151 camps, performing tasks like forest firefighting, , and , often without pay under Selective Service administration. Similar patterns occurred in and , where Mennonites endured or labor camps for refusing , reinforcing community bonds through shared witness despite public scorn labeling them as unpatriotic. Contemporary applications include Mennonite Central Committee (MCC)-led peacebuilding initiatives, such as conflict mediation in regions like Colombia and Democratic Republic of Congo since the 1980s, emphasizing restorative justice over punitive measures. Conservative subgroups, like Old Order Mennonites, maintain stricter avoidance of even non-combat military roles or police service, while progressive groups engage in advocacy against nuclear proliferation and for disarmament treaties. Internal debates persist, with some critiquing a shift from apolitical non-resistance to activist involvement, yet empirical data shows sustained low military participation rates, with less than 1% of U.S. Mennonites enlisting post-Vietnam era per church records. This practice fosters self-sufficient communities reliant on mutual aid, avoiding reliance on state violence for protection. Challenges arise in pluralistic societies, where non-resistance intersects with legal obligations; for instance, during the 2003 , Mennonite objectors pursued legal exemptions, highlighting tensions between and . Despite variations—evidenced by historical instances of armed in frontier settings—the core commitment endures, verified by denominational censuses showing over 95% adherence to pacifist vows in credentialed clergy.

Conservatism and Family Values Alignment

Mennonites in conservative branches, such as Old Order and Conservative Mennonite groups, maintain strong adherence to traditional family structures, emphasizing lifelong heterosexual marriage, procreation within wedlock, and distinct gender roles that prioritize male headship and female homemaking. These groups view the family as the foundational unit of church and society, with doctrines rooted in Anabaptist confessions like the , which underscore marital fidelity and parental authority over child-rearing. Data from Mennonite family studies indicate high rates and low divorce incidences compared to broader populations, with historical church resolutions, such as the 1905 Mennonite Church decision barring divorced and remarried individuals from membership, reflecting a commitment to indissoluble unions. Fertility patterns underscore this alignment, with more conservative subgroups exhibiting significantly larger family sizes; for instance, Old Colony Mennonites in report a of 9.5 live births per over age 45, surpassing even Hutterite rates in some metrics, while a direct correlation exists between doctrinal conservatism and family size across Mennonite communities. Such demographics stem from opposition to artificial contraception and , entrusting family growth to rather than human intervention. In contrast, more assimilated Mennonite groups show lower averages, around 2.3 children per in mid-20th-century censuses of progressive conferences. On , reject homosexual practice as incompatible with biblical teachings, viewing it as contrary to the created order of male-female complementarity in , as articulated in church positions labeling such acts as . This stance aligns with broader , though mainstream bodies like have diverged since 2022 by repealing denominational prohibitions on pastors officiating same-sex unions, prompting schisms and highlighting intra-group tensions between traditionalism and accommodation to cultural shifts. Conservative factions prioritize nonconformity to worldly norms, fostering self-sufficient communities that resist and feminism's erosion of familial authority. Politically, while Anabaptist and allegiance to divine over national authority historically limit partisan engagement, Mennonite often converge with conservative platforms on issues like opposition and traditional marriage advocacy; theological conservatives, for example, supported Barry Goldwater's campaign against perceived moral decay. Yet, this alignment is selective, as non-resistance precludes endorsement, and some progressive Mennonites critique capitalism's family-disrupting effects, illustrating a principled rather than ideological grounded in scriptural literalism and communal discipline.

Interactions with Government and Law

Mennonites have historically sought legal accommodations from governments to preserve their religious practices, particularly exemptions from , oaths, and , often secured through charters or court rulings. In the 1870s, Canadian provincial governments granted Mennonite immigrants from privileges including perpetual exemptions from military duty and the right to educate children in their own schools, reflecting pragmatic incentives to attract skilled farmers despite underlying tensions over . Similarly, in the United States, early Mennonite settlements benefited from colonial and state-level assurances of , though enforcement varied. These arrangements stemmed from Mennonite willingness to pay alternative taxes or perform civilian labor in lieu of militia service, underscoring a pattern of negotiated coexistence rather than outright . Conscientious objection to war has defined many Mennonite-government interactions, especially during 20th-century conflicts. In , conservative Mennonites in the U.S. refused even roles, leading to 138 court-martials for draft resistance, as they viewed any military involvement as compromising non-resistance principles. During , U.S. Mennonites participated in the (CPS) program, where approximately 4,200 Mennonite men served in 152 camps, undertaking forestry, soil conservation, and medical research—including voluntary starvation experiments at the to study effects—without pay beyond basic allowances. In , wartime exemptions for conscientious objectors were expanded by a 1940 to include Christians with firm beliefs against combat, allowing Mennonites alternative service amid public stigma labeling as disloyalty. , Mennonites lobbied for recognition of status, influencing policies like the U.S. Selective Service's provisions for religious objectors. Legal conflicts over education and community practices persist among conservative groups. Conservative Amish Mennonites, akin to , secured U.S. exemptions from compulsory schooling beyond in the 1972 decision, which balanced free exercise rights against state interests, citing the groups' insular lifestyles and vocational training as sufficient for self-sufficiency. Old Order Mennonites have invoked similar accommodations under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA) of 2000 to challenge zoning restrictions on agricultural operations, horse-drawn vehicles, and church buildings, arguing that such regulations substantially burden religious exercise without compelling justification. Mennonites generally avoid litigation, interpreting 1 Corinthians 6:1-8 as prohibiting Christians from suing each other or relying on secular courts, but they pursue it defensively in property disputes or when core freedoms are threatened, as in historical land title cases in . In modern global contexts, Mennonite communities negotiate varying degrees of autonomy. In and , maintain exemptions from and social security contributions in exchange for self-reliant farming, though they comply with broader civil laws while rejecting . Canadian Mennonites faced a 1919 immigration ban alongside due to pacifist exemptions, lifted only after , highlighting recurring government suspicion of non-assimilation. These interactions reflect Mennonite prioritization of separation from state coercion, often yielding pragmatic exemptions that enable communal preservation amid legal pressures.

Controversies and Criticisms

Internal Schisms and Doctrinal Disputes

The Mennonite movement has been characterized by recurrent schisms, primarily driven by tensions between maintaining traditional Anabaptist separation from worldly influences and adapting to cultural or evangelistic pressures, with disputes centering on the application of , avoidance practices, and communal purity rather than core beliefs like or . These divisions reflect a commitment to congregational discernment, where minority groups often form new fellowships to preserve perceived biblical fidelity, resulting in over a dozen major branches by the . A foundational occurred in 1693 within Swiss and Alsatian Mennonite communities, when elder advocated stricter enforcement of for unrepentant members, biannual communion instead of annual, and uniform to embody non-conformity, leading to the formation of the as a separate group rejecting what they viewed as lax discipline in the parent body. This split, unresolved until later reconciliations in , underscored early debates over the rigor of Meidung (avoidance) and social separation as essential to holiness. In , the 1847 division in the Mennonite Conference arose from conflicts over "new measures" inspired by revivalism, including prolonged meetings, anxious bench practices for , and emotional testimonies, which conservatives deemed disruptive to and traditional quietism; the progressive faction, led by John Oberholtzer, formed the Eastern Mennonite Church, emphasizing missions and , while the majority retained stricter boundaries. Mid-19th-century Russian Mennonite communities experienced parallel fractures: in 1859, John Holdeman separated from his congregation (with roots in Russian migration) to establish the , Mennonite, citing widespread doctrinal compromise, insufficient emphasis on visible church holiness, and lax teachings, insisting on strict discipline including and uniform standards for assurance. Concurrently, the 1860 Mennonite Brethren emerged from pietistic influences promoting personal conversion experiences, lay preaching, for regenerated believers, and active missions, which traditionalists opposed as undermining communal authority and risking worldly entanglement; this group, initially excommunicated, grew through evangelism amid Russian state pressures. 20th-century divisions often revolved around modernization, such as the 1901 formation of the Virginia Old Order Mennonites from the Virginia Conference over automobile use and higher education, viewed as eroding family cohesion and non-resistance; similar Old Order splits in (1889 onward) rejected rubber-tired vehicles and telephones as concessions to . More recent disputes, like the departure of the Lancaster Mennonite Conference from , highlighted irreconcilable views on , with departing groups prioritizing scriptural prohibitions on same-sex relations and traditional marriage over inclusive policies. These conflicts illustrate causal patterns where assimilation pressures prompt conservative withdrawals to safeguard doctrinal and ethical distinctives against perceived internal dilution.

Health and Modernity Conflicts

Certain conservative Mennonite subgroups, particularly Old Order and , exhibit tensions between traditional emphases on divine through and communal support and reliance on modern medical technologies and pharmaceuticals. These groups often view illness as a spiritual matter amenable to faith-based remedies, such as treatments or powwowing (a form of folk ), delaying or forgoing interventions like or until crises arise. In contrast, progressive Mennonite denominations integrate conventional care seamlessly, with many members pursuing medical professions. This variability stems from interpretations of biblical non-resistance and Gelassenheit (yieldedness to God's will), which can conflict with proactive medical consumerism. Vaccination hesitancy represents a prominent flashpoint, with rates in insular Mennonite communities falling well below national averages and precipitating outbreaks of vaccine-preventable diseases. In , a 2025 measles outbreak affected dozens in Mennonite-heavy areas, where overall MMR coverage stood at 82% but dropped to approximately 18% among homeschooled or private-school attendees due to parental exemptions and distrust of pharmaceutical mandates. Similarly, in , , Mennonite colonies reported 70% unvaccinated rates amid a 2025 measles surge, attributed to cultural insularity and preference for natural immunity over injections, despite no formal doctrinal prohibition. During the , Amish-Mennonite counties in the U.S. showed 1.6% lower uptake than comparable areas, correlating with elevated from respiratory illnesses, as communities prioritized in-person worship and home remedies over masks, distancing, or boosters. Endogamy within geographically and socially closed Mennonite populations has amplified the prevalence of rare recessive genetic disorders, creating ongoing challenges in accessing genetic screening and specialized treatments that clash with communal . Dutch-German Mennonite lineages, tracing to 16th-century founders, exhibit founder effects for conditions like Troyer syndrome (a form of ) and GM2 gangliosidosis variant AB, with carrier frequencies up to 1 in 12 in affected kindreds due to repeated cousin marriages. In and clinics serving , clinics have documented over 20 such disorders, often unmanaged until severe due to uninsured status and reluctance toward or , which conflict with pro-life convictions. The Clinic for Special Children in , established in 1989 for uninsured Amish and Mennonite youth, treats hundreds annually for these conditions, highlighting how isolation preserves but elevates morbidity from untreatable metabolic and neurological ailments without broader . These conflicts extend to healthcare financing and infrastructure, where mutual aid societies replace commercial , covering basics but straining against escalating costs of high-tech interventions like organ transplants or neonatal intensive care. In rural , Old Order Mennonite women face barriers to and nutrition, exacerbating poverty-linked health disparities and from untreated congenital issues. Empirical data indicate that while faith communities foster resilience—evidenced by lower chronic disease rates from lifestyles emphasizing physical labor and whole foods—their aversion to preventive paradigms can result in higher acute intervention needs, as seen in 2021 U.S. analyses of excess deaths tied to deferred routine screenings.

Historical Moral Failures and Ethical Lapses

In the Nazi-occupied territories of and during , some Mennonite settlers participated in or benefited from collaborationist activities, including service in units that facilitated and the seizure of Jewish property under Nazi policies. Mennonite communities in these regions, numbering around 35,000, often viewed the German invasion as liberation from Soviet persecution, leading to instances where individuals denounced or accepted confiscated assets, with postwar Mennonite aid efforts by organizations like the Mennonite Central Committee (MCC) sometimes overlooking these ties when resettling beneficiaries in the . In Danzig (now Gdansk), Mennonite voters supported the in , perceiving alignment with conservative Christian values, and post-war relief workers noted a high proportion of former Nazis among recipients without public reckoning. Although Mennonites issued the first organized protest against in the American colonies on February 18, 1688, via the Germantown and Mennonites' petition decrying it as incompatible with Christian liberty, some adherents later contravened this stance by owning enslaved people. In and during the 18th and 19th centuries, individual Mennonites held slaves despite church disciplines prohibiting it, prompting conferences in 1846 and 1852 to reiterate bans on ownership and hiring of slaves, with for violators. Records from indicate sales of enslaved individuals by Mennonite families on public markets as late as the , reflecting a gap between doctrinal and economic practices in frontier settlements. The Anabaptist practice of Meidung ( or avoidance) of excommunicated members, formalized in early confessions like the 1632 Confession, has historically enforced community discipline but led to ethical criticisms for inducing isolation, crises, and familial rupture, particularly when applied to youth diverging from norms. In conservative Mennonite groups, extends to social and economic exclusion, correlating with higher rates of depression and among those expelled, as documented in ex-member testimonies and studies of insular religious communities. This mechanism, intended as restorative per 1 Corinthians 5, has instead perpetuated cycles of control, with historical cases in 19th-century migrations where shunned individuals faced destitution amid group solidarity. Church responses to by leaders represent recurrent institutional lapses, exemplified by theologian John Howard Yoder's pattern of coercing and assaulting at least 30 women from the 1970s through the 1990s, often under academic or ecclesiastical pretexts, while Mennonite seminaries and conferences dismissed complaints to protect his influence. Yoder's enablers, including senior figures aware of allegations since 1972, prioritized his pacifist scholarship over accountability, delaying public acknowledgment until 2013. Similar patterns emerged in other cases, such as pastoral abuse in Midwest conferences during the , where hierarchical opacity and victim-blaming compounded harm, undermining claims of ethical distinctiveness.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.