Hubbry Logo
Pauline Hanson's One NationPauline Hanson's One NationMain
Open search
Pauline Hanson's One Nation
Community hub
Pauline Hanson's One Nation
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Pauline Hanson's One Nation
Pauline Hanson's One Nation
from Wikipedia

Key Information

Seats in local government
Brighton (Tas.)[15]
1 / 9
Clarence (Tas.)[16]
1 / 12
Lake Macquarie (NSW)[17]
1 / 13
Campbelltown (NSW)[18]
1 / 15
Cessnock (NSW)[19]
1 / 13
Victor Harbor (SA)[20]
1 / 10
Mount Barker (SA)[21]
1 / 11
Esperance (WA)[22]
1 / 9

Pauline Hanson's One Nation (PHON), also known as One Nation (ON) or One Nation Party (ONP), is a right-wing populist political party in Australia. It is led by Pauline Hanson.[2][23]

One Nation was founded in 1997 by Hanson and her advisors David Ettridge and David Oldfield after Hanson was disendorsed as a federal candidate for the Liberal Party of Australia. The disendorsement came before the 1996 federal election following comments she made about Indigenous Australians.[24] Oldfield, a councillor on Manly Council in suburban Sydney and at one time an employee of Liberal minister Tony Abbott, was the organisational architect of the party.[25] Hanson sat as an independent for one year before forming Pauline Hanson's One Nation.

One Nation had electoral success in the late 1990s, before suffering an extended decline after 2001. Nevertheless, One Nation has had a profound impact on debates on multiculturalism and immigration in Australia.[26] Following Hanson's return as leader and the 2016 federal election, the party gained four seats in the Senate, including one for Hanson herself, in Queensland. Since 2025, the party has four seats in the senate.

The party's platform is conservative, denies the existence of climate change, and denounces economic rationalism and globalisation. One Nation's policies and platform have been characterised as racist and xenophobic by critics.[26]

History

[edit]

1997: One Nation founded

[edit]
One Nation leader Pauline Hanson

Shortly after being elected to federal parliament, Hanson formed the One Nation party with co-founders David Oldfield and David Ettridge. During the formative days of One Nation, Oldfield was employed by Liberal Party backbench MP Tony Abbott as a political advisor.[24] One Nation was launched on 11 April 1997, at an event held in Ipswich, Queensland.[27] The party was officially registered by the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) on 27 June.[28]

1998: First elections

[edit]
Percentage of first preference votes for One Nation in each electorate.

The 1998 Queensland state election produced One Nation's greatest electoral success, with the ALP winning 44 seats to be the largest party in the Assembly, the Coalition winning 32 seats and One Nation winning 11 seats. During the campaign, polling for One Nation led to commentators saying One Nation might secure the balance of power in a hung parliament.[29] During the campaign, all three major political parties suffered a decline in voter support due to One Nation having entered the fray. The National Party saw an 11.1% drop in support, their Liberal Party coalition partners lost 6.7% and Labor's vote dropped 4.0%.[29] To the surprise of many pundits, the One Nation Party received 22.7% of the first preference vote, giving them the second largest voter turnout for any party in Queensland during the 1998 election. One Nation drew the majority of its support from regional and rural Queensland, winning nine of its 11 seats in rural and regional electorates.[29]

With nearly 23% of the vote, One Nation gained a higher percentage of the vote than any other third party (i.e. not Labor or Coalition) at the state or territory level since Federation. This was also the only election at which a third party gained more votes than both the Liberal Party and the National Party considered separately.

Subsequently, the One Nation contingent in the Queensland Parliament split, with dissident members forming the rival City-Country Alliance in late 1999.[30]

At the 1998 federal election, Hanson contested the new seat of Blair after a redistribution effectively split Oxley in half. Hanson lost to Liberal candidate Cameron Thompson, and the One Nation candidate in Oxley lost the seat to ALP candidate Bernie Ripoll.[31] One Nation candidate Heather Hill was elected as a senator for Queensland. Hill's eligibility to sit as a senator was successfully challenged in Sue v Hill under the Australian Constitution on the basis that she had failed to renounce her childhood British citizenship, despite being a naturalised Australian citizen. The seat went to the party's Len Harris following a recount.[32]

Political scientists Ian McAllister and Clive Bean, in an analysis of the 1998 federal election, found that although it was assumed that One Nation supporters came from a traditionally conservative demographic, instead:

"in a number of significant respects it in fact tends more towards Labor's profile instead. One Nation support, for example, comes disproportionately from manual workers, trade union members, those who describe themselves as working class, the less well educated, men and people who never attend church – a list of characteristics which comes close to defining the archetypal Labor voter … [The evidence] suggests that it is Labor-style voters in rural areas – rather than the much more predominantly urban Labor voter – who are chiefly attracted to One Nation"[33]

Within a year of One Nation's electoral success, three of the 11 Queensland MPs elected had quit the party claiming the leadership had too much control over the party.[24]

Internal disputes and claims of corruption

[edit]

The party was affected by internal divisions and has split several times. Lawsuits involving ex-members did eventually force Hanson to repay approximately $500,000 of public funding won at the 1998 Queensland election amid claims by Abbott that the party was fraudulently registered. Abbott established a trust fund called "Australians for Honest Politics Trust" to help bankroll civil court cases against the party.[34] The suits alleged that the party was undemocratically constituted in order to concentrate all power in the hands of three people—Hanson, Ettridge and Oldfield (in particular Oldfield)—and that it technically had only two members: Ettridge and Hanson. Even though Hanson's fraud charges were dropped, the Electoral Commission of Queensland never reimbursed Hanson for the monies that they collected from the claim.[24]

The first Annual General Meeting of the One Nation party was held in April 1999, which critic Paul Reynolds said demonstrated that One Nation lacked organisation.[35]

At the 1999 New South Wales state election, David Oldfield was elected to the New South Wales Legislative Council. In October 2000, Hanson expelled Oldfield from the party after a disagreement.[24] His expulsion created even more instability in a party which was constantly embroiled in scandal and internal strife. Oldfield attacked Hanson publicly, saying that "everything including her maiden speech and every word of any consequence that she's said since, has actually been written for her".[24] Oldfield engineered a split within the party, creating One Nation NSW, in 2001.[24] The new party took advantage of electoral party registration laws to register itself as a political party under the 'One Nation' name with the NSW electoral commission, and achieved registration in April 2002.[24]

At the 2001 Western Australian state election One Nation won three seats in the state, however the party was reduced to 3 seats the same year at the 2001 Queensland state election. During the 2001 Australian federal election, the party's vote fell from 9% to 5.5%. Hanson failed in her bid to win a Senate seat from Queensland, despite polling a strong 10% of the primary vote. Hanson also failed to win a seat in the New South Wales Legislative Council.[24]

Electoral fraud charges

[edit]

In 2001, disendorsed One Nation candidate Terry Sharples accused the party of not having the 500 members needed for registration, and called for the party to be deregistered, which was carried by the Supreme Court. Hanson appealed the verdict but was unsuccessful.[36] Hanson appeared before the Brisbane Magistrates Court to face charges of electoral fraud, that same year. Hanson pleaded not guilty to the charges, claiming that she was being subjected to "a political witch-hunt." While court hearings proceeded, Hanson ran for a seat in the NSW Upper House as an independent, but only received 1.9 per cent of the vote.[24]

Both Ettridge and Hanson were found guilty of fraudulently registering One Nation and obtaining more than $500,000 from the AEC, in 2003. Crown lawyers accused them both of falsely claiming more than 500 people were party members when they were not truly members. Hanson was sentenced to three years in jail, stating outside the court that the verdict was "Rubbish, I'm not guilty... it's a joke".[24]

It was later disclosed that Abbott had been working behind the scenes to take Ettridge and Hanson down, meeting with several disgruntled One Nation members including Sharples. On November 6 of that same year, Hanson was released from prison after successfully appealing her conviction; she was acquitted on all counts.[24]

2004–2013: Electoral decline

[edit]

At the 2004 Queensland state election, One Nation polled less than 5% of the vote and its sole elected representative, Rosa Lee Long, acted as an independent. One Nation attempted to defend its Queensland Senate seat at the 2004 federal election, but lost it (effectively to the National Party). Len Harris's Senate term expired on 30 June 2005.[37]

On 8 February 2005, One Nation lost federal party status but was re-registered in time for the 2007 federal election. It still had state parties in Queensland and New South Wales. Subsequently, it created another state party in Western Australia. In the February 2005 Western Australian state election, the One Nation vote collapsed.[24]

In the 2006 South Australian state election, six One Nation candidates stood for the lower house. Their highest levels of the primary vote was 4.1% in the district of Hammond and 2.7% in Goyder, with the other four hovering around 1%. They attracted 0.8% (7559 votes) of the upper house vote. One Nation consequently won no seats in that election.[24]

In the 2006 Queensland state election, the party contested four of 89 seats, and its vote collapsed. It suffered a swing of 4.3% to be left with just 0.6% of the vote. Its only remaining seat in the state (and country), Tablelands, was retained with an increased majority by Rosa Lee Long.[38] Tablelands was abolished prior to the 2009 Queensland state election, with Lee Long failing to win the seat of Dalrymple.

In the 2012 Queensland state election the party unsuccessfully contested six seats. The party received only 2,525 first preference votes (representing 0.1% of the total cast) across the state.[39]

2013–2015: Hanson's return as leader

[edit]

Hanson rejoined One Nation as a rank-and-file member in 2013. Later that year, she unsuccessfully contested the Senate for New South Wales at the 2013 federal election. In 2014, Hanson was reappointed as leader by the One Nation executive.[40] She contested the seat of Lockyer for the party at the January 2015 Queensland state election, falling 114 votes short of defeating sitting Liberal National Party member Ian Rickuss.[41]

In 2013, it was reported by One Nation that the party had more than 5000 members, with the figure rising since Hanson returned as party leader.[42]

In July 2015, Hanson announced that the party was renamed the original "Pauline Hanson's One Nation" and contested in the Senate for Queensland at the 2016 federal election.[43]

In the lead up to the 2016 election, Hanson arranged a "Fed Up" tour that began in July 2015 as part of her re-election campaign, flying in a private plane to Rockhampton prior to a Reclaim Australia rally,[44] piloted by James Ashby.[45]

2016–present: Return to federal politics

[edit]
Pauline Hanson in a Jabiru J230 at Caboolture Airfield for the Caboolture Air Show. The aircraft has "Fed Up" slogan decals on the side (April 2016)

At the 2016 federal election the party polled 4.3% (+3.8) of the nationwide primary vote in the Senate. Only Queensland polled higher for the party than their nationwide percentage − the party polled 9.2% (+8.6) of the primary vote in that state. Pauline Hanson (QLD) and three other One Nation candidates − Malcolm Roberts (QLD), Brian Burston (NSW) and Rod Culleton (WA) were elected to the Senate.[46] Elected to the 3rd Queensland Senate spot, as per convention Hanson is serving a six-year term while the three other One Nation Senators who were elected in the last half of spots were appointed to three-year terms. Culleton was stripped of his seat in January 2017 after he was declared bankrupt. In March 2017, the High Court ruled that Culleton's election to the Senate was invalid in any event because of a criminal conviction in New South Wales. After a court-ordered recount, Culleton was replaced by the second candidate on the WA list, Peter Georgiou.[47]

Resignations, disendorsements and ineligibility

[edit]

Rod Culleton (WA) left the party in December 2016, after months of legal troubles and party infighting to sit as an independent bringing the number of party senators to three.[48][49] On 3 February 2017, the High Court of Australia ruled that Culleton's election was invalid due to a conviction for which he was subject to being sentenced at the time of the election, notwithstanding that the conviction was subsequently annulled. The resulting vacancy was filled by a recount of the votes at the election, which resulted in Peter Georgiou taking the seat and returning the One Nation representation in the Senate to four.

During the 2017 Western Australian state election, several One Nation candidates either quit or were disendorsed.[50] Dane Sorensen provided a copy of the party's Western Australian "candidate agreement" form for this election, which all candidates had to sign. It includes an "administration fee" of $250,000 if an elected candidate subsequently leaves the party.[51] One Nation previously formed a 'conservative bloc' with the Liberal Democratic Party and Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party in the Western Australia Legislative Council.[52]

On 27 October 2017, the full High Court, as Court of Disputed Returns, ruled that Malcolm Roberts had been ineligible to be elected to the Parliament. On 13 November, Senator Fraser Anning took Roberts' seat after a Senate recount. However, on the same day Anning left the party to become an Independent.[53]

On 14 June 2018, Senator Brian Burston announced his resignation from the party to sit as an independent, following a month-long clash with Hanson centred around the Turnbull Government's corporate tax cuts, on which Hanson had reversed her position. This reduced the party to 2 senators, with Hanson remaining the only member of One Nation elected at the 2016 Federal election.[54]

Hanson wears a burqa into the Senate

[edit]

Hanson drew widespread condemnation when she wore the full Islamic dress into Senate Question Time, before calling for the burqa to be banned in Australia. Audible gasps of shock were heard in the parliament. Liberal Party Senator and Attorney-General of Australia, George Brandis condemned Hanson's actions, declaring to the parliament that "To ridicule that community, to drive it into a corner, to mock its religious garments is an appalling thing to do. I would ask you to reflect on that". Senator Brandis received applause and praise from all sides of parliament for his response.[55]

"it is OK to be white"

[edit]

On 15 October 2018, a Senate motion brought by the party stating "it is OK to be white" was defeated 31–28 in a vote. The government expressed regret at the support the vote received, blaming it to an administrative error in which its senators were mistakenly instructed to vote positively. Critics noted that the phrase "it's OK to be white" has been associated with white supremacist rhetoric.[56]

Mark Latham joins One Nation

[edit]

Former Labor Party leader Mark Latham joined the party in November 2018 as leader for New South Wales.[57] He successfully contested a seat in the Legislative Council, winning it in March 2019.[58]

James Ashby controversies

[edit]

On 22 May 2017, a new scandal arose when a taped conversation between Hanson and political advisor James Ashby was released. The tape showed that Ashby had supported charging One Nation candidates inflated prices for campaign materials.[59][60]

In March 2019, One Nation was the subject of a two-part Al Jazeera documentary series asserting that the party was soliciting financial assistance from the National Rifle Association of America and Koch Industries in order to change Australian gun control laws.[61] Al Jazeera used an undercover reporter posing as a gun rights advocate.[62][63][64][65][66] In response, One Nation leader Pauline Hanson condemned the documentary as a "hit piece" by a Qatar government backed news agency and announced that she had filed a complaint with the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation.[67][64][65] Similar sentiments were echoed by the One Nation officials, James Ashby and Steve Dickson, who were featured in the documentary.[68] In response to the documentary, the Australian Electoral Commission said that none of the activities shown in the documentary violated section 326 of the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 since they occurred overseas.[64]

2019 election and Family Court claims

[edit]

At the May 2019 federal election, One Nation polled 5.40% (up 1.12%) for the nationwide Senate primary vote. The party polled higher than their national vote in Queensland, taking 10.27% up 1.08%, of the primary vote in the senate.

The PHON House of Representatives candidate for the Division of O'Connor, Dean Smith,[69][70] who won 8.4% (7,252) votes, was in December of the same year a target of recruitment for Neo-Nazi group The Base. In secretly recorded tapes of his "interview" by a recruiter, Smith tells of his hatred of immigrants and his wish to "save the race". He tells the recruiter that he had become "more and more extreme and passionate about my views", and disillusioned with One Nation and the possibility of a political solution. However, he was deemed too great a risk for The Base because of his political profile, so was not admitted into their ranks.[71]

Also in 2019, Hanson received widespread condemnation in the Australian media after claiming that domestic violence victims routinely lie to the Family Court. The Law Council of Australia called for the abandonment of a federal parliamentary inquiry into the family law system, citing concerns that the hearings were being used by Hanson for political purposes to undermine domestic violence claims made by women.[72]

2022 elections and the Albanese Government

[edit]

In April 2022, it was "formally confirmed" that during the 2022 South Australian state election that One Nation's Sarah Game won a seat within the South Australia legislative council (upper house) making history as One Nation's first member of South Australian parliament.[73]

In April 2022, Queensland MP George Christensen who had represented the division of Dawson for the Liberal National party announced he had joined One Nation with the intention of contesting for the Senate in the upcoming Federal election.[74]

One Nation ran 149 candidates in the 2022 federal election, the only seats where they did not run in were inner Melbourne-based Higgins and the rural Queensland seat of Kennedy, held by Bob Katter.[75] One Nation was criticised for running "ghost candidates" in several electorates for the 2022 federal election, who were not campaigning in the lead-up to the election and who had no online presence. Additionally, many did not live in the electorates they were listed as being the candidates for. Despite this, the AEC has said that it is not against the rules. One Nation had promised in the lead-up to the election that it would run candidates in all seats.[76]

In December 2022, One Nation won its first seat in Victorian parliament, with Rikkie-Lee Tyrrell winning a seat during the 2022 Victorian state election, representing the Northern Victoria Region in the Victorian Legislative Council.[77][78][79]

2023 and the Indigenous Voice to Parliament referendum

[edit]

On 17 January 2023, New South Wales MP, Tania Mihailuk, announced her intention to join the party, previously representing the electoral district of Bankstown for the Labor Party before becoming an independent. Mihailuk announced that she would run for a seat in the Legislative Council at the 2023 state election.[80]

One Nation contested the 2023 Narracan state supplementary election in Victoria on January 28, One Nation candidate Casey Murphy received 6.04% of the vote.[81]

One Nation increased their total from to two to three seats in the Legislative Council, with leader Mark Latham re-elected for another term, Tania Mihailuk filled the vacant seat left behind by Latham, who had previously resigned to recontest the upper house at the top of One Nations ticket.[82]

One Nation ran in the 2023 Fadden by-election, One Nation ran Sandy Roach, their candidate in the 2022 election, One Nation received 8.90% of the vote, coming in third place.[83]

In August 2023, Pauline Hanson intervened in the New South Wales state branch of the party, and removed Mark Latham as leader of the party in New South Wales.[84] On 22 August 2023, Mark Latham left the party to become an independent; he was joined by his colleague Rod Roberts.[85]

One Nation campaigned heavily against the Indigenous Voice to parliament in the referendum held in October that year, One Nation supported the No vote and was against holding a referendum on the matter. The referendum was defeated in all states and territories with the exception of the Australian Capital Territory.[86]

Tania Mihailuk was announced as the next leader of One Nation in New South Wales in December.[87]

2024 and 2025

[edit]

One Nation offered to support the Albanese Governments tax cut changes. Pauline Hanson stated that Anthony Albanese had broken his promise on tax cut changes, but was willing to support the changes because going against it would be like "throwing the baby out with the bathwater".[88]

Then United Australia Party National Director Craig Kelly joined One Nation on 27 February; he took the position of Federal Campaign Director for the party.[89] He left the party in late August.[90]

On 29 February, Independent Ben Dawkins, a member of the Western Australian Legislative Council, announced he would be joining One Nation, making him the first One Nation member in the State since the party lost all its seats in the 2021 Western Australian state election, which the Labor party won in a landslide.[91]

In early August, incumbent MP for Mirani Stephen Andrew announced his resignation from One Nation after they did not endorse him as their candidate for Mirani.[92] One Nation did not win any seats at the State election held that year, but did see a slight increase in its primary vote. New South Wales MLC Tania Mihailuk announced her resignation from One Nation on 20 December 2024.[93] Western Australian MLC Ben Dawkins had announced his own resignation three days earlier.

At the 2025 Western Australian state election One Nation had better fortunes and won two seats in the Western Australian Legislative Council, which saw State leader Rod Caddies elected to Parliament.[94]

In the lead-up to the 2025 Australian federal election, pollsters recorded an increase in One Nations primary vote, particularly near the end of the campaign period where the party began to come close to or surpass their result at the 1998 Australian federal election. One Nation ran 147 candidates in the House of Representatives, and a Senate team for each state and territory except for the Australian Capital Territory. One Nation won 6.4% of the vote in the House of Representatives, the second-best result for the party since its inception.[95] One Nation won a senate seat in New South Wales and Western Australia with Warwick Stacey and Tyron Whitten.

In May 2025, South Australian MLC Sarah Game quit the party, citing brand issues associated with One Nation, it came after her mother and leader of One Nation in South Australia, Jennifer Game, resigned from the party after she was not chosen to head the party ticket in the Legislative Council for the 2026 South Australian state election.[96]

State and territory branches

[edit]
Branch Leader Lower house seats Upper house seats
Pauline Hanson's One Nation – ACT No leader
0 / 25
Pauline Hanson's One Nation – New South Wales No leader[b]
0 / 93
0 / 42
Pauline Hanson's One Nation – Northern Territory No leader
0 / 25
Pauline Hanson's One Nation – Queensland James Ashby
0 / 93
Pauline Hanson's One Nation – South Australia No leader[c]
0 / 47
0 / 22
Pauline Hanson's One Nation – Tasmania No leader
0 / 35
0 / 15
Pauline Hanson's One Nation – Victoria Rikkie-Lee Tyrrell
0 / 88
1 / 40
Pauline Hanson's One Nation – Western Australia Rod Caddies
0 / 59
2 / 37

Ideology

[edit]

One Nation's policies and ideology have been described as based on ultranationalism,[97][98][99] right-wing populism,[2][100][5] populism,[101][102] and opposition to immigration.[103] Its policies have been also described as nationalist,[104][105][106] national-conservative,[104] socially conservative,[107] conservative,[108][109] and protectionist.[110] Its political position has been described as right-wing,[111] extreme right,[112] and far-right.[113][114]

Early years

[edit]

In its early years, One Nation's policies were said to be synonymous with opposition to affirmative action for Aboriginal communities. Some key themes of Pauline Hanson's 1998 maiden speech were opposition to what she said were increasingly high rates of immigration from Asian countries and an argument for economic protectionist policies.[115][116]

During its inception, One Nation rallied against Liberal and Labor immigration and multicultural policies which, it argued, were leading to "the Asianisation of Australia."[115]

Former Australian Prime Minister Paul Keating denounced Hanson in a speech in 1996, saying that she projected "the ugly face of racism" and was "dangerously divisive and deeply hurtful to many of her fellow Australians."[117]

Hanson and One Nation have disputed accusations of racism and argue that the main parties are out of touch with many Australians on the issues of immigration, asylum seekers, and multiculturalism; and have ended up adopting some of the policies One Nation initially called for.[118] Milton Osborne noted in 1999 that research indicated Hanson's initial supporters did not cite immigration as a major reason for their support for One Nation, but instead they were most concerned about economic issues and unemployment.[119] A 2001 study showed that One Nation had extensive informal ties and received endorsements from far-right movements due to the party requiring "the support of those groups in establishing the party and because of a convergence of interests".[120]

Contemporary

[edit]

Writer Hans-Georg Betz described One Nation and Pauline Hanson in 2019 as among "the first prominent radical right-wing populist entrepreneurs to mobilize popular resentment against a very specific target — the intellectual elite" and that in the twenty-first century where "today's army of self-styled commentators and pundits summarily dismissing radical right-wing populist voters as uncouth, uneducated plebeians intellectually incapable of understanding the blessings of progressive identity politics, Hanson's anti-elite rhetoric anno 1996 proved remarkably prescient, if rather tame." Betz also argued that One Nation differs from European right-wing parties by focusing on its own brand of populism which he termed Hansonism based on Hanson's personality and debates unique to Australian society.[121]

Despite the party's early image as an anti-immigration party, the party has - since 2016 - ran a number of migrant Chinese and Indian candidates in elections.[122][123][124][125]

Political scientist Ian McAllister argues the current version of One Nation from 2017 does not have much in the way of policy beyond an "anti-establishment stance"[126] while others have argued it has changed to focus its policies on opposition to Islam.[127][128]

During the 2017 Queensland state election, One Nation disendorsed its Bundamba candidate Shan Ju Lin after her anti-gay social media post. Lin accused James Ashby of deciding on Hanson's behalf that Lin should be disendorsed.[129] In December 2016, Andy Semple withdrew as a candidate for Currumbin, after the party told him to delete an LGBT joke on Twitter.[130]

Various One Nation election candidates have made anti-LGBT comments, such as one saying in 2019, "The only thing worse than a gay person with power is a woman", another in 2017 calling same-sex marriage "poof poof marriage" and making the comment, "You see when we consummate a marriage kids are generally born 9 mths later when gays consummate its [sic] just bum sex for enjoyment", and a third – also in 2017 – saying that "Norwegian homosexuals" are behind a "mind control program".[131]

Policies

[edit]

Immigration and asylum

[edit]

One Nation says that whilst it recognises the positive contributions of immigrants to Australian life, it supports a general reduction in the levels of net migration to "closer to the 20th century average of 70,000", to stabilise population numbers, citing economic, cultural and environmental arguments against mass migration. The party also calls for a travel ban on certain countries, similar to one enacted by the Trump administration in the United States, in order to combat radical Islam and prevent the immigration of people the party argues are more likely to reject Australian values and promote violent extremism. The party also supports stronger assimilation of immigrants. One Nation also seeks to withdraw Australia from the United Nations Refugee Convention and is opposed to the UN Global Compact on Migration.[118][132] Due to these statements, One Nation has been described as anti-Islam.[133][134]

Following the end of lockdowns in Australia as a result of COVID-19 pandemic in Australia, the party has voiced support for establishing a zero-net immigration policy, similar to the one Australia had introduced during the pandemic. One Nation supports permitting only highly skilled migrants from culturally cohesive countries to settle in Australia.[135]

The economy and employment

[edit]

One Nation supports a broadly protectionist platform, saying that it would review free trade agreements and revoke any "that are not in Australia's best interest", they also wish to reimplement import tariffs.[136][137] It is opposed to foreign ownership of Australian agricultural land and businesses, as well as the privatisation of water assets.[138] Wishing to prioritise jobs for Australian nationals, it would investigate "the abuse of foreign work visas."[139]

One Nation backed the Turnbull Government's controversial 2018 corporate tax cuts.[140][141][142]

The party would move foreign-owned multinationals out of the corporation tax system and into a transactions based system, saying that too many of them pay no tax on profits made in Australia.[143]

Domestic policies

[edit]

The party argues for the introduction of Citizens Initiated Referenda (CIR) and states it will review the salaries and pensions paid to Australian politicians. In 2021, the Senate approved a motion tabled by Pauline Hanson which called on the federal government to reject the teaching of critical race theory in Australian schools.[144] It also supports a ban on wearing the burqa in public spaces.[145][146] One Nation has backed Hanson's comments regarding downplaying scientific consensus on climate change.[147][148] During the debate on the Marriage Amendment (Definition and Religious Freedoms) Act 2017 which would legalise same-sex marriage in Australia, Hanson and other members of One Nation expressed their opposition to same-sex marriage. However, Hanson also stated the party would not take an official stance on same-sex marriage and that One Nation senators would be allowed a free vote on the issue.[149][150]

One Nation is broadly anti-abortion, particularly relating to late term abortions, with them favouring policies such as a gestational limit for abortions, banning sex-selective abortion, and doctors' rights to allow for them to object to performing such a procedure.[151]

One Nation members and parliamentarians have criticised the increasing use of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander flags alongside the Australian one.

The party wants to remove building code mandates, such as removing the requirement for new buildings to be wheelchair-compliant.[152] One Nation also wants to reduce funding for arts and abolish the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA).[152]

Law and order

[edit]

One Nation claims it will increase rehabilitation facilities for drug addicts and introduce life sentences for drug traffickers, Pauline Hanson has previously voiced her support of medicinal cannabis but strong objection to recreational drug usage and opposition to pill testing.[153] The party supports responsible gun ownership but wants tougher sentences for arms traffickers. The party also supports one law for all Australians and is opposed to any form of sharia law in Australia.[138]

Welfare and pensions

[edit]

One Nation is in favour of a substantial increase in the aged pension and disability support pension.[154] It was reported in 2016 that One Nation had voted with the Liberal government on a number of welfare cuts.[155] One Nation is also opposed to increasing the age of entitlement to 70 years, and supports a $100 a week increase under the work bonus scheme for pensioners.[156]

In 2024, One Nation cooperated with the Albanese government and minister Bill Shorten in reforming the National Disability Insurance Scheme to crack down on alleged misuse of the system and to reign in the growing costs of the program.[157]

COVID-19 vaccines

[edit]

Many politicians, commentators and scientists claim that One Nation senators have spread misinformation and conspiracies on the effectiveness and scientific basis of COVID-19 vaccines.[158][159] One Nation opposes vaccine mandates, but denies being against vaccinations. However, in 2021, One Nation MLC Mark Latham said that vaccinated people should be exempt from Sydney's COVID-19 lockdown.[160]

One Nation introduced legislation in 2021 pertaining to Covid-19 mandates, with the bill proposing banning discrimination on Covid-19 vaccination status in the fields of goods, services, facilities, employment, education, accommodation and sport. It was supported by 5 Liberal-National senators, it was not passed.[161]

Climate change

[edit]

One Nation senators are frequent critics of any action on climate change and have called climate science a "scam". One Nation has spread debunked conspiracy theories about climate change not occurring or being part of a plot by the United Nations.[162][163] The party wants Australia to withdraw from the Paris Climate Accords.[164]

Voting system and preferences

[edit]

In 2019, One Nation called for the abolition of full preferential voting in favour of optional preferential voting at House of Representatives elections. The announcement came shortly after Scott Morrison announced that the Liberal Party would preference One Nation behind Labor in several seats for the 2019 federal election.[165] In Australia, optional preferential voting is currently only used for Legislative Assembly elections in New South Wales and for council elections in most warded local government areas in Queensland.

One Nation is also against the use of group voting tickets, which are currently only used for Legislative Council elections in Victoria. The party has strongly criticised Glenn Druery, a "preference whispererer" who founded the Minor Party Alliance. In the lead-up to the 2022 state election, Hanson claimed that Druery was rigging the election in favour of the incumbent state Labor government of Daniel Andrews, after a leaked video showed that Druery was trying to create a crossbench that Labor could work with.[166] Prior to the incident, in 2017, Druery admitted that he had been directing the preferences of micro-parties away from One Nation since 1999.[167]

Other

[edit]

In March 2025, Hanson said the party wants Australia to leave the United Nations, the World Health Organization (WHO), and the World Economic Forum, cut funding for the National Disability Insurance Scheme and abolish the National Indigenous Australians Agency and the Department of Climate Change.[168]

Voter base

[edit]

Surveys of voters at the 1998 federal election and the 1998 Queensland state election found One Nation voters were more likely than other voters to be male, residents of rural electorates, blue-collar workers and firearm owners.[169] On measurements of political views, One Nation voters were distinguished by their anti-immigrant and anti-Aboriginal sentiments and by their dissatisfaction with or alienation from the political environment. On metrics of union membership, economic insecurity and identification as members of the working class, One Nation voters were nearly identical to Labor voters.[170] However, a clear majority of One Nation voters were former Liberal and National voters rather than former Labor voters.[171]

One Nation has historically performed best in regions where the Labor Party once performed well in, but in recent years have been trending more to the right over policies regarding mining and climate change. The regions where One Nation has seen the most electoral success are the Central Queensland, Darling Downs and Wide Bay–Burnett regions of Queensland and the Hunter Valley region of New South Wales, all of which are working-class regions that have historically relied on coal mining as part of their local economy, and all were once strongholds for the Labor Party.[citation needed]

Election results

[edit]

Federal

[edit]
Election year House of Representatives Senate
# votes % votes # seats +/– # votes % votes # seats # overall seats +/–
1998 936,621 Increase 8.43
0 / 148
Steady 0 1,007,439 Increase 8.99
1 / 40
1 / 76
Increase 1
2001 498,032 Decrease 4.34
0 / 150
Steady 0 644,364 Decrease 5.54
0 / 40
1 / 76
Steady 0
2004 139,956 Decrease 1.19
0 / 150
Steady 0 206,445 Decrease 1.73
0 / 40
0 / 76
Decrease 1
2007 32,650 Decrease 0.26
0 / 150
Steady 0 52,708 Decrease 0.42
0 / 40
0 / 76
Steady 0
2010 27,184 Decrease 0.22
0 / 150
Steady 0 70,672 Increase 0.56
0 / 40
0 / 76
Steady 0
2013 22,046 Decrease 0.17
0 / 150
Steady 0 70,851 Decrease 0.53
0 / 40
0 / 76
Steady 0
2016
(D-D)
175,020 Increase 1.29
0 / 150
Steady 0 593,013 Increase 4.28
4 / 76
4 / 76
Increase 4
2019 438,587 Increase 3.08
0 / 151
Steady 0 788,203 Increase 5.40
1 / 40
2 / 76
Decrease 2
2022 727,464 Increase 4.96
0 / 151
Steady 0 644,744 Decrease 4.29
1 / 40
2 / 76
Steady 0
2025 991,814 Increase 6.40
0 / 150
Steady 0 899,296 Increase 5.67
3 / 40
4 / 76
Increase 2

New South Wales

[edit]
Election year Legislative Assembly Legislative Council
# votes % votes # seats +/– # votes % votes # seats +/–
1999 281,147 Increase 7.53
0 / 93
Steady 0 225,668 Increase 6.34
1 / 42
Increase 1
2019 49,948 Decrease 1.10
0 / 93
Steady 0 306,933 Increase 6.90
2 / 42
Increase 2
2023 84,683 Increase 1.80
0 / 93
Steady 0 273,496 Decrease 5.92
3 / 42
Increase 1

Victoria

[edit]
Election year Legislative Assembly Legislative Council
# votes % votes # seats +/– # votes % votes # seats +/–
1999 8,181 Increase 0.29
0 / 88
Steady 0 Did not contest Legislative Council
2022 10,323 Decrease 0.28
0 / 88
Steady 0 76,734 Increase 2.04
1 / 40
Increase 1

Western Australia

[edit]
Election year Legislative Assembly Legislative Council
# votes % votes # seats +/– # votes % votes # seats +/–
2001 98,321 Increase 9.58
0 / 57
Steady 0 103,571 Increase 9.88
3 / 34
Increase 3
2005 17,580 Decrease 1.64
0 / 57
Steady 0 17,435 Decrease 1.59
0 / 34
Decrease 3
2008 Did not contest Legislative Assembly 7,012 Decrease 0.63
0 / 36
Steady 0
2017 65,192 Increase 4.93
0 / 59
Steady 0 110,480 Increase 8.19
3 / 36
Increase 3
2021 17,824 Decrease 1.26
0 / 59
Steady 0 21,259 Decrease 1.48
0 / 36
Decrease 3
2025 61,174 Increase 4.00
0 / 59
Steady 0 59,296 Increase 3.82
2 / 37
Increase 2

South Australia

[edit]
Election year House of Assembly Legislative Council
# votes % votes # seats +/– # votes % votes # seats +/–
2002 22,833 Increase 2.41
0 / 47
Steady 0 16,829 Increase 1.80
0 / 22
Steady 0
2006 2,591 Decrease 0.28
0 / 47
Steady 0 7,559 Decrease 0.81
0 / 22
Steady 0
2010 Did not contest House of Assembly 4,972 Decrease 0.51
0 / 22
Steady 0
2022 28,664 Increase 2.63
0 / 47
Steady 0 46,051 Increase 4.23
1 / 22
Increase 1

Queensland

[edit]
Election year Legislative Assembly
# votes % votes # seats +/–
1998 439,121 Increase 22.68
11 / 89
Increase 11
2001 179,076 Decrease 8.69
3 / 89
Decrease 8
2004 104,980 Decrease 4.88
1 / 89
Decrease 2
2006 13,207 Decrease 0.60
1 / 89
Steady 0
2009 9,038 Decrease 0.38
0 / 89
Decrease 1
2012 2,525 Decrease 0.10
0 / 89
Steady 0
2015 2,525 Increase 0.92
0 / 89
Steady 0
2017 371,193 Increase 13.73
1 / 93
Increase 1
2020 204,316 Decrease 7.12
1 / 93
Steady 0
2024 248,334 Increase 8.00
0 / 93
Decrease 1

Northern Territory

[edit]
Election year Legislative Assembly
# votes % votes # seats +/–
2001 1,074 Increase 1.32
0 / 25
Steady 0

Maps

[edit]

Leaders

[edit]

Federal

[edit]

Unlike the Queensland state leadership, the changes of the federal leadership of the party were largely undocumented (besides Hanson's terms), due to previously having low media attention and confusion of branch leadership within the party.

In August 2017, the party's constitution was changed so that Hanson would be party President for as long as she may wish, and to choose her successor, who may also continue until resignation.[172]

No. Image Leader Electorate Term Notes
1 Pauline Hanson MP for Oxley (1996–1998) 11 April 1997 –
5 August 2002
First leadership
2 John Fischer MLC for Mining & Pastoral Regions
(2001–2005)
5 August 2002 –
1 June 2004
Also leader of One Nation WA
3 Ian Nelson 6 December 2009 –
24 March 2012
Also former party director and treasurer[173]
4 Jim Savage 13 May 2013 –
18 November 2014
Former party executive and leader of One Nation Queensland[174]
(1) Pauline Hanson Senator for Queensland
(2016–)
18 November 2014 –
present
Second leadership

New South Wales

[edit]
No. Image Leader Electorate Term Notes
1 David Oldfield MLC
(1997–2007)
City of Manly Alderman
(1991–1999)
27 March 1999 –
8 October 2000
Sacked as leader after party intervention
Later leader of breakaway party, One Nation NSW (2000–2004)
2 Brian Burston Senator for New South Wales
(2016–2019)
City of Cessnock Deputy Mayor
(1987–1999)
31 March 2010 –
17 June 2018
Resigned as leader after party intervention
3 Mark Latham MP for Werriwa
(1994–2005)
MLC
(2019–present)
Labor Opposition Leader
(2003–2005)
7 November 2018 –
14 August 2023
Sacked as leader after party intervention
4 Tania Mihailuk Mayor of Bankstown
(2006–2011)
MLC
(2023–present)
MLA for Bankstown
(2011–2023)
10 December 2023 –
20 December 2024
Resigned as leader over administrative and funding issues

Victoria

[edit]
No. Image Leader Electorate Term Notes
1 Andrew Carne 1997 –
21 May 1998
[175]
2 Robyn Spencer 21 May 1998 –
13 June 1998
Wife of South Australia leader Rodney Spencer, also former leader of AAFI
3 Rikkie-Lee Tyrrell MLC for Northern Victoria
(2022–present)
27 November 2022 –
present
First One Nation MP elected in Victoria

Western Australia

[edit]
No. Image Leader Electorate Term Notes
1 John Fischer MLC for Mining and Pastoral Region
(2001–2005)
10 February 2001 –
1 June 2004
Resigned, was also Federal leader of One Nation
2 Ron McClean 1 June 2004 –
9 January 2017
[176]
3 Colin Tincknell MLC for South West Region
(2017–2021)
9 January 2017 –
2023
Later President of One Nation Western Australia Division
4 Rod Caddies MLC
(2025–present)
2023 –
present

South Australia

[edit]
No. Image Leader Electorate Term Notes
1 Rodney Spencer 21 May 1998 –
13 June 1998
Wife is former One Nation Victoria leader Robyn Spencer. Also the leader of AAFI between 1989 and 2008
2 Jennifer Game 16 September 2021 –
17 May 2025
Daughter is former One Nation MLC Sarah Game. Resigned from party

Queensland

[edit]
No. Image Leader Electorate Term Notes
1 Heather Hill Senator for Queensland
(1998–1999)
21 May 1998 –
13 June 1998
Disqualified from Senate in 1999
2 Bill Feldman MLA for Caboolture
(1998–2001)
23 June 1998 –
14 December 1999
Inaugural Qld. parliamentary leader, resigned from party, leader of breakaway party, City Country Alliance (1999–2001)
3 Bill Flynn MLA for Lockyer
(2001–2004)
6 March 2001 –
7 February 2004
Defeated at election
4 Rosa Lee Long MLA for Tablelands
(2001–2009)
1 June 2004 –
20 March 2009
Only One Nation MP from 2004 until defeat in 2009
5 Steve Dickson MLA for Buderim
(2009–2017)
23 January 2017 –
30 April 2019
Resigned after scandal
6 James Ashby 20 September 2024 –
present
Chief of Staff to Pauline Hanson[177]

Australian Capital Territory

[edit]
No. Image Leader Electorate Term Notes
1 Shaun Nelson MLA for Tablelands
(1998–2001)
June 1997 –
December 1997
2 Chris Spence MLA for The Entrance
(2011–2015)
December 1997 –
January 1998
Later a Liberal MP

Members of parliament

[edit]

Current MPs

[edit]

Federal

[edit]

Victoria

[edit]

Western Australia

[edit]

Former MPs

[edit]

Donors

[edit]

A 2019 report found that Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party had received over $6,000 in disclosed donations from pro-gun groups during the 2011–2018 period, with concerns these donations threatened to compromise Australia's safety by undermining gun control laws.[178] The Queensland branch of the party received $17,000 from the agriculture sector (meat and sugar industry) between 2016 and 2021, totaling less than one percent of all publicly declared political donations during that period;[179] the state's two major parties (Labor, Liberal National) made up 85% of total publicly declared political donations, receiving $358,270 and $1,451,991, respectively.[179] The North Queensland-based Katter's Australian Party received over $280,000.[179]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia

One Nation (formerly 's One Nation) is an Australian political party founded by on 11 April 1997 in , with the aim of prioritizing Australian interests amid concerns over , , and national sovereignty. The party emerged from Hanson's independent candidacy in the 1996 federal election, where her outspoken views on and resonated with voters disillusioned by the major parties, leading to rapid growth and a 9% national primary vote in the 1998 federal election alongside 22% in .
One Nation's platform emphasizes controlled immigration to prevent infrastructure overload and cultural dilution, economic policies favoring Australian workers through measures like joint family tax filing and bans on foreign farmland sales, and reforms to foreign investment rules to safeguard sovereignty. Despite facing legal challenges and internal divisions in its early years, the party has secured legislative wins, including blocking cash transaction bans, initiating family law inquiries, and obtaining funding for regional infrastructure such as roads and community facilities. As of 2025, led by Hanson, it holds four seats in the Australian Senate, influencing crossbench dynamics on key issues like vaccine mandate scrutiny and apprenticeship programs.

Origins and Founding

Establishment in 1997

Pauline Hanson, having been elected as an independent for the Division of Oxley in the 1996 federal election after disendorsement by the Liberal Party, delivered her on 10 September 1996, in which she criticized multiculturalism, high immigration levels, and special privileges for , arguing that such policies divided the nation and disadvantaged working-class citizens. The speech resonated with rural and outer-suburban voters feeling alienated by and major-party consensus on social issues, prompting widespread public support and petitions urging Hanson to form a new political vehicle. On 23 February 1997, Hanson co-founded Pauline Hanson's One Nation with advisors David Oldfield, a former Liberal staffer, and David Ettridge, a party organizer, establishing the party as a response to perceived failures of the in addressing , economic , and cultural unity. The founding aimed to unify under a single , opposing what Hanson described as divisive policies that prioritized minorities over the majority. The party was formally launched to the public on 11 April 1997 at the Civic Hall in , with Hanson as leader, marking the official establishment of One Nation as a registered political entity focused on membership from disaffected conservatives. Initial organizational efforts emphasized rapid branch formation in , drawing on Hanson's personal popularity to build a membership base estimated at tens of thousands within months, fueled by anti-elite sentiment rather than institutional backing. This establishment reflected causal drivers of voter discontent with welfare dependencies, trade liberalization, and , positioning One Nation as a populist alternative unbound by traditional party disciplines.

Initial Policy Platform and Rise to Prominence

Pauline Hanson's One Nation was established on April 11, 1997, in , with an initial policy platform centered on social and , advocating a "Fortress " model of self-sufficiency, unity, and ethnic homogeneity. The platform targeted rural workers, primary producers, and small businesses impacted by , proposing economic including state-subsidized loans for farmers and small enterprises, opposition to foreign investment, and resistance to measures. It also called for ending government subsidies to ethnic and Aboriginal interest groups, criticizing these as fostering "reverse " and that divided Australians. The party's stance on immigration was particularly emphatic, opposing large-scale Asian migration on the grounds that it threatened cultural cohesion and economic opportunities for native-born ; this echoed Hanson's to federal on September 10, 1996, where she warned that was in danger of being "swamped by Asians," citing that 40 percent of migrants from 1984 to 1995 had been of Asian origin. She further argued against special privileges for Aboriginals, asserting that government policies promoted by providing land, funds, and facilities exclusively to them, and advocated for "one people, one nation, one flag" to preserve harmony. One Nation's rise to prominence stemmed directly from the public reaction to Hanson's independent victory in the March 1996 federal election for the seat of Oxley, where she achieved a 19.3 percent swing against the Liberal incumbent after being disendorsed for expressing grievances over and welfare. Her , delivered amid widespread media condemnation from establishment figures and parties, instead galvanized grassroots support among working-class and rural voters disillusioned with major parties' embrace of and , leading to rapid membership growth and fundraising for the new party. This backlash against perceived elite dismissal of ordinary Australians' concerns propelled One Nation from a fledgling entity to a national phenomenon within months, politicizing and race issues in a manner unprecedented since .

Early Electoral Success and Challenges

1998 Queensland Election Breakthrough

The , conducted on 13 June 1998, represented a pivotal breakthrough for Pauline Hanson's One Nation, a party established in April 1997. Contesting seats amid widespread voter discontent with economic deregulation, privatization, and federal measures following the Port Arthur massacre, One Nation captured significant support from rural and regional electorates traditionally aligned with the National Party. One Nation won 11 seats in the 89-member , securing 22.7% of the primary vote in the electorates it contested. This outcome constituted the strongest debut performance by any new in Australian history, surpassing prior gains and demonstrating the rapid mobilization of protest votes against perceived elite detachment in major parties. The party's elected members, including figures such as Charles Davidson and Joan Sheppard, positioned One Nation to hold influence in a fragmented where Labor secured 44 seats and the National-Liberal obtained 31 combined. Initially, One Nation's parliamentary presence amplified its platform emphasizing opposition to , , and further asset sales, though internal organizational strains soon emerged. This electoral surge underscored causal factors like regional economic grievances and distrust in establishment politics, rather than mere media , as evidenced by the vote's concentration in non-metropolitan areas. Following the 1998 Queensland state election success, Pauline Hanson's One Nation experienced significant internal divisions, particularly involving co-founder and national director David Oldfield. Oldfield, who had been instrumental in organizing the party's structure, clashed with Hanson over control and direction, leading to his expulsion from the party in October 2000 after a public disagreement. This rift prompted Oldfield to orchestrate a split, establishing a separate One Nation NSW branch in 2001 under state electoral laws, which further fragmented the party's national cohesion. The internal turmoil coincided with fraud allegations that challenged the party's foundational legitimacy. In 2001, former One Nation candidate Terry Sharples, who had been disendorsed, filed a complaint asserting that the party lacked the required 500 paid-up members for registration under Queensland electoral law when it was established in 1997. Sharples claimed the enrollment forms were fraudulently obtained or misrepresented, with many "members" not genuinely joining or paying fees, a contention initially upheld by Justice Angela Atkinson in August 1999, who ruled the registration was induced by fraud and misrepresentation. These allegations escalated into criminal charges against Hanson and party co-founder David Ettridge. On July 31, 2001, they were charged with three counts of under Queensland's for dishonestly inducing the Electoral Commissioner to register the party by falsely claiming 500 members. The trial concluded in August 2003 with a District Court jury convicting both on all counts; Hanson and Ettridge were each sentenced to three years' imprisonment, with Hanson serving 11 weeks before release on . However, in March 2004, the Queensland Court of Appeal quashed the convictions, ruling that the trial judge had misdirected the jury on the elements of , particularly regarding dishonest intent and the validity of bulk membership applications, effectively exonerating them. Critics, including some legal observers, argued the prosecution reflected political motivations amid the party's disruptive electoral impact, though prosecutors maintained it addressed verifiable irregularities in party formation.

Periods of Decline and Internal Turmoil

Post-1998 Setbacks and Electoral Erosion (1999-2013)

Following the breakthrough, Pauline Hanson's One Nation experienced rapid internal fragmentation, with several elected members defecting amid disputes over leadership and direction. In February 1999, tensions escalated when party co-founder David Oldfield was ousted from his role, prompting further dissent. By December 1999, a group of One Nation MPs, including Jack Paff and Bill Feldman, broke away to form the rival City Country Alliance (CCA), citing dissatisfaction with Hanson's control and party management. This split reduced One Nation's parliamentary representation from 11 seats to around four, exacerbating operational instability and loss of public funding tied to legislative numbers. The marked a sharp electoral downturn, with One Nation securing only three seats—Lockyer, , and Tablelands—despite retaining a primary vote share of approximately 11 percent, down from 22.7 percent in 1998. The party's vote was split further by the CCA and returning support to major parties, contributing to the National Party's collapse to seven seats and Labor's . In the concurrent federal election, One Nation's House primary vote fell to 7.07 percent, with founder Hanson losing her Oxley seat to Labor's Arch Bevis; nationally, the party garnered under 5 percent, winning no lower house seats. Legal challenges compounded the decline, culminating in the 2003 conviction of Hanson and co-founder Ettridge for related to the party's 1997 Queensland registration. The pair was found guilty of falsely claiming 500 paying members—many of whom were unaware or coerced—to meet eligibility thresholds and access over $500,000 in public funding from the Australian Electoral Commission. Hanson received a three-year sentence, serving 11 weeks before release on ; the Court of Appeal quashed the convictions in November 2003, citing insufficient evidence of intent to defraud. These proceedings, alongside suits and internal lawsuits, imposed severe financial burdens, leading to the party's effective and deregistration in several states by 2002. Subsequent elections underscored the erosion: In the 2004 federal poll, One Nation's national primary vote dropped below 2 percent, yielding no or gains. Queensland state elections in 2006 and 2009 saw zero seats won, with the party polling under 5 percent statewide; Hanson's independent-aligned candidacy in Beaudesert (2009) attracted just 3.4 percent. By 2013, ongoing leadership voids and candidate shortages had marginalized One Nation to fringe status, with minimal parliamentary presence and primary votes consistently under 3 percent in federal contests. This period reflected causal factors including voter backlash against infighting, major parties adopting One Nation-like policies on and economic , and the absence of sustained organizational .

Leadership Struggles and Party Splits

Following the victory that secured 11 seats for Pauline Hanson's One Nation, internal tensions rapidly emerged due to the party's centralized "troika" structure, comprising Hanson, co-founder David Ettridge, and advisor David Oldfield, which concentrated decision-making power and sidelined branch input. In early February 1999, three MPs, including deputy leader Dorothy Pratt, resigned, citing the leadership's refusal to devolve authority and accusing the troika of autocratic control. By March 1999, two more MPs—John Kingston and Jeff Knuth—were expelled for alleged disloyalty, exacerbating factional rifts. These disputes culminated in a major split in late 1999, when dissident MPs formed the rival City-Country (CCA), initially registered as One Nation before rebranding; by year's end, all 11 original One Nation MPs in the parliament had defected or been ousted, leaving the party without state parliamentary representation. The CCA, led by former One Nation state leader Bill Feldman, aimed to represent regional interests but disintegrated after failing to retain seats in subsequent elections. Further fragmentation occurred at the federal and state levels. In 2000, Oldfield was expelled by Hanson amid policy and control disagreements, prompting him to establish the splinter group One Nation NSW, which he led until its decline. By 2002, escalating internal revolts led to Hanson's own expulsion from the party she founded, as members challenged her leadership amid ongoing financial and legal pressures. These schisms, compounded by convictions against Hanson and Ettridge in 2003—which resulted in Hanson's 11-month imprisonment—contributed to the party's deregistration by the Australian Electoral Commission in 2004 and a prolonged period of electoral irrelevance through the late and early 2010s.

Revival and Modern Resurgence

Hanson's Return and Rebranding (2013-2016)

In March 2013, announced her intention to contest the seat in the upcoming federal election under the One Nation banner, marking her return to active politics after years of absence. She positioned the campaign around longstanding party themes of opposition to and economic , but the effort yielded only 1.14% of primary votes, failing to secure a position. The campaign faced setbacks, including the withdrawal of candidate Banister in August 2013 following inflammatory comments on , which drew media criticism and highlighted ongoing organizational challenges within the party. By November 2014, Hanson assumed of One Nation, having been endorsed by the party executive amid its "floundering" state since her 2002 departure, which she attributed to a deviation from founding principles of prioritizing Australian values and a "fair go." The change, formalized after a rank-and-file vote on November 29, aimed to revive the party by refocusing on issues such as foreign land ownership, , and resistance to mandatory certification, which Hanson argued were eroding national . This move distanced the party from prior internal drifts and positioned Hanson to rebuild its structure for state-level contests, including preparations for the 2015 election. Under Hanson's renewed control, One Nation undertook organizational modernization, including enhanced engagement to connect with disaffected voters on and border security concerns, efforts bolstered by advisor . The party contested the but failed to win seats, prompting further consolidation ahead of the 2016 federal poll. Revival strategies emphasized grassroots mobilization in , where support for policies like a proposed ban on Muslim and inquiries into Islam's societal impacts resonated amid public debates on , setting the stage for expanded candidate slates and heightened visibility.

2016 Federal Election and Senate Gains

In the 2016 Australian federal election, conducted on 2 July as a double dissolution to resolve parliamentary deadlock over Senate bills, Pauline Hanson's One Nation contested seats nationwide and achieved a notable resurgence by securing four positions in the Senate. The double dissolution format, which contested all 76 Senate seats rather than the usual half, lowered the quota threshold to approximately 7.7% per seat in most states, enabling minor parties like One Nation to capitalize on concentrated voter support. One Nation's Senate successes included and Malcolm Roberts elected in , where Hanson personally garnered 1.19 quotas (around 250,000 votes) on primary preferences alone, exceeding the required threshold without relying on subsequent distributions. Brian Burston secured a seat in via preference flows after accumulating sufficient votes to reach a quota, while won in under similar dynamics. Nationally, the party polled 4.3% of the primary vote (1,590,674 votes), reflecting targeted appeal in regional and outer-metropolitan areas amid dissatisfaction with major parties on issues like and economic . The party won no seats in the , where its primary vote stood at 0.7%, limited by uneven contestation across divisions. These gains positioned One Nation as the largest crossbench bloc alongside the Team, influencing dynamics during the 45th Parliament's formation under a narrow Liberal-National majority. The results underscored the party's revival since Hanson's 2013 candidacy relaunch, drawing on preferences from conservative voters and exploiting the optional preferential voting system's capacity for minor party breakthroughs in a fragmented electorate.

Key Events and Controversies (2017-2022)

In August 2017, One Nation faced potential deregistration in after the Electoral Commission of identified failures to comply with party requirements under state electoral laws, prompting referrals and investigations into administrative lapses. The party resolved the issues without immediate cancellation, allowing continued operations, though critics, including Labor figures, accused it of systemic organizational weaknesses. On 17 August 2017, Senator entered the Australian Senate chamber wearing a during to dramatize her push for a national ban on full-face coverings in public, arguing it concealed identity and posed security risks. The stunt elicited immediate outrage, with Attorney-General delivering an emotional rebuke, describing it as "appalling" and offensive to Muslim Australians, earning a from senators; Hanson's motion to ban burqas and niqabs failed 28-31. Supporters viewed it as highlighting legitimate integration concerns, while opponents labeled it inflammatory and discriminatory. Leading into the 2019 federal election, One Nation was embroiled in candidate selection scandals, most notably the resignation of Steve Dickson on 29 April 2019 after Al Jazeera released undercover footage from a 2015 US trip, where he made derogatory comments about Asian women, handled assault rifles, and discussed lobbying to weaken Australia's gun laws; the visit had been covertly funded by the National Rifle Association. The revelations, part of a broader probe into foreign influence on Australian politics, damaged the party's credibility on firearms policy, especially after Hanson's prior emphasis on tightening gun controls post-Port Arthur; Dickson claimed entrapment, but the party distanced itself. Additional disendorsements followed for candidates involved in lewd conduct or extremist associations, including strip club visits and inflammatory social media posts, forcing last-minute replacements. Despite these, One Nation secured 5.5% of the national primary vote but won no lower house seats, retaining two Senate positions including Hanson's. From 2020 onward, amid the , One Nation adopted a staunch opposition to government-imposed mandates, border closures, and lockdowns, positioning itself as a defender of and economic freedoms; Hanson repeatedly called for a to investigate the handling of the crisis, alleging overreach and inefficacy in measures. The party voted against pandemic-related legislation in the , including requirements for certain sectors, and Hanson tested positive for on 18 May 2022, days before the federal election, while continuing to criticize mandates. This stance resonated with anti-restriction voters but drew accusations of undermining efforts from mainstream outlets; empirically, One Nation's rhetoric aligned with surveys showing mandate fatigue, though no causal link to infection rates was established. In the 21 May 2022 federal election, One Nation maintained its two Senate seats—Hanson's in and Malcolm Roberts' in re-elected form—while achieving around 4.6% of the primary vote nationally, with modest state-level gains in but no breakthrough in the . Post-election analyses attributed limited growth to ongoing perceptions of , amplified by prior scandals, though the party claimed vindication in highlighting issues like cost-of-living pressures exacerbated by pandemic policies.

2022-2025 Developments: Elections, Policy Fights, and Growth

In the on 21 May, 's One Nation retained its two seats for () and Malcolm Roberts (), achieving a national primary vote of approximately 4.8%, but secured no seats in the despite fielding candidates in all 151 electorates. The party focused on campaigns highlighting opposition to high levels, support for nuclear energy, and criticism of mandates, though these did not translate to House gains amid a fragmented vote. Leading into 2023, One Nation vocally opposed the referendum, arguing it would divide Australians along racial lines and undermine equal representation, a stance aligned with the proposal's defeat by a 60-40 margin nationally. The party also clashed with the major parties over , advocating for a moratorium on renewable subsidies and promotion of gas and to address rising costs, citing empirical on household bills increasing by over 20% in prior years under green transitions. These positions drew media criticism for skepticism but resonated with voters concerned about affordability, as evidenced by internal party polling showing support spikes in regional areas. The on 26 October saw One Nation experience a setback, losing its sole seat previously held by Steve Andrew in Mirani and receiving a statewide primary vote of around 5%, insufficient for quota in most electorates amid LNP dominance. This decline was attributed by party insiders to preference deals favoring the LNP and voter fatigue in its home state, though Hanson framed it as a strategic focus shift to federal issues. In the 2025 federal election on 3 May, One Nation achieved notable gains, polling over 600,000 primary votes nationally and doubling its representation to four seats, including a surprise win by Tyron Whitten in after securing the sixth quota spot via preferences. Retaining Hanson and Roberts, the party campaigned on slashing to 70,000 net annually, freezing fuel excise, and cutting government waste by $100 billion over a decade to combat cost-of-living pressures, positions Hanson claimed influenced policy concessions. Post-election, One Nation reported a 70% increase in membership and establishment of dozens of new branches, alongside primary vote support doubling in subsequent polls to surpass the Greens, driven by dissatisfaction with moderation on and amid record net migration figures exceeding 500,000 annually. These developments signal organizational growth, with Hanson attributing it to authentic advocacy on verifiable economic pressures like shortages linked to population inflows, despite mainstream media portrayals emphasizing over data-driven critiques.

Ideology

Foundational Principles: and

Pauline Hanson's One Nation was founded in April 1997 in response to concerns articulated in Hanson's September 10, 1996, to federal parliament, where she warned that unchecked , particularly from , risked swamping Australia's cultural and social fabric, and that undermined national unity by fostering division rather than assimilation. The party's early platform emphasized as the preservation of Australian and identity, rejecting the notion of Australia as a mere "geographical area populated by 'world citizens'" and advocating for policies that prioritize the interests of existing citizens over international obligations. This included support for only from those willing to fully into Australian with "undivided ," viewing a unified national culture as essential for social cohesion and strength, drawing on historical examples of multicultural failures like Bosnia and . Central to One Nation's is the defense of Australian constitutional principles and opposition to supranational influences that erode national control, such as global trade agreements perceived to disadvantage domestic industries and workers. The party positions itself as safeguarding "Australia and Australian values" against external agendas, including restrictions on to maintain demographic and cultural stability, and prioritizing through policies like border protection and rejection of policies favoring foreign aid over domestic needs. This approach reflects a causal view that national prosperity and security depend on , with empirical critiques of post-White Australia Policy levels correlating with rising welfare costs and job competition for low-skilled Australians, as Hanson highlighted in her founding . Populism in One Nation's framework manifests as a direct challenge to political elites, major parties, and bureaucratic insiders, whom the party accuses of ignoring the concerns of ordinary Australians in favor of cosmopolitan or corporate interests. Founded to "speak for the voiceless and the powerless" against entrenched party systems, it appeals to rural, working-class, and regional voters feeling disenfranchised by globalization and urban-centric policies, promising to restore government accountability to the people rather than distant institutions. The party's slogan of putting "people before politics" underscores this anti-establishment stance, advocating for referendums on major issues and electoral reforms to amplify grassroots voices, while criticizing media and academic narratives that dismiss populist concerns as xenophobic without addressing underlying economic dislocations. This populism is rooted in observable disparities, such as the 1990s manufacturing decline and welfare dependency spikes, which Hanson attributed to elite mismanagement rather than market forces alone.

Economic Nationalism and Protectionism

Pauline Hanson's One Nation has long championed , prioritizing Australian in , , and to shield domestic employment from global competition. The party's stance stems from opposition to tariff reductions implemented under neoliberal reforms, which it argues accelerated decline and regional job losses. In her , 1996, to , Hanson stated that "reduced tariffs on foreign goods that compete with local products seem only to cost Australians their jobs," advocating a return to higher barriers to favor local producers over imports. This position aligned with One Nation's early platform, which sought to protect , , and primary industries through selective restrictions rather than broad agreements. The party's policies emphasize "Australia first" measures, including limits on foreign in critical sectors like farming and to prevent overseas entities from undercutting local operators. One Nation has criticized for eroding national control over resources, proposing instead that revenues from commodities such as coal and be reinvested domestically to bolster and job creation. This approach contrasts with mainstream parties' embrace of multilateral deals, which One Nation views as prioritizing corporate interests over workers in electorates hit by factory closures, such as those in and during the 1990s and 2000s. In recent years, One Nation has intensified calls for targeted amid perceived threats from low-cost imports, particularly from . On February 20, 2025, the party urged imposition of s on steel imports following operational woes at the , arguing that such measures would preserve thousands of jobs and maintain sovereign capacity against dumped goods. Similarly, in March 2025, Hanson endorsed U.S. President Donald Trump's regime as a model for protecting industry, advocating "smart s" in to rebuild , secure supply chains, and encourage "buy Australian" preferences in . These proposals aim to counter import surges in sectors like electric vehicles, where One Nation has warned of risks from overreliance on foreign dominance. By framing as essential for economic resilience, the party positions itself against what it describes as elite-driven that favors multinational profits over Australian livelihoods.

Shifts in Contemporary Focus

In the years following Pauline Hanson's return to federal parliament in 2016, One Nation's rhetoric evolved from its emphasis on economic competition from Asian migration to a heightened focus on cultural and security threats posed by Muslim , including calls for bans on wearing and restrictions to prevent law influences. This shift reflected broader concerns over integration failures and Islamist rather than race alone, though foundational opposition to high-volume persisted to safeguard jobs and . By the 2020s, the party linked unchecked migration—exceeding 500,000 net arrivals annually under Labor governments—to exacerbating shortages and cost-of-living pressures, advocating reductions to 130,000–160,000 per year alongside caps on of farmland. Contemporary priorities expanded to robust opposition against net-zero emissions targets by 2050, framing them as economically ruinous for manufacturing, small businesses, and energy affordability, with repeated motions to repeal such commitments. This stance positioned One Nation as a defender of industries and practical like over what it described as ideologically driven renewable transitions, contributing to voter shifts from major parties amid perceived Liberal-National compromises. Post-2020, the party intensified scrutiny of government overreach during the , rejecting vaccine mandates and highlighting health system strains from lockdowns and policy responses, while pushing for reforms to address ongoing inadequacies in care access. Additional emphases emerged on free speech protections against , family-oriented tax reforms allowing joint filing for couples with dependents, and pro-life positions, reflecting a pivot toward defending traditional social structures amid cultural debates. These developments broadened One Nation's appeal to conservatives disillusioned with establishment parties, evidenced by doubled seats and primary vote gains in the 2025 federal election.

Policies

Immigration, Multiculturalism, and National Identity

Pauline Hanson's One Nation advocates for大幅 reducing levels to prioritize Australian citizens' access to , jobs, and infrastructure, arguing that unchecked inflows exacerbate shortages and wage suppression. The party's policy proposes capping annual visas at 130,000, slashing net migration by over 570,000 compared to Labor government targets, which exceeded 235,000 annually despite earlier promises. This cap aims to enforce and end abuses of skilled and student visas that enable chain migration and undercutting of local labor. The policy includes immediate deportation of an estimated 75,000 illegal entrants, encompassing visa overstayers, unlawful workers, and non-residents, to uphold legal enforcement, safeguard public services, and mitigate security risks from unvetted arrivals. One Nation calls for reinstating Temporary Protection Visas for asylum seekers, withdrawing from the UN Refugee Convention, and deporting any visa holders convicted of crimes, positioning these measures as essential for national sovereignty. An eight-year probationary period before granting citizenship or welfare access is proposed to verify migrants' contributions and loyalty, with refusal of entry to those from countries promoting ideologies—such as extremism—incompatible with Australian democratic values. On multiculturalism, One Nation rejects policies fostering parallel communities, insisting instead on full assimilation into Australia's mainstream , where migrants pledge undivided allegiance and integrate without retaining divided loyalties. Party figures criticize reductions in requirements for migrants, warning they hinder assimilation, strain systems, and erode social cohesion by allowing non-integration. Hanson has argued that Australians were never given a democratic say on transitioning to a multi-racial society, framing as an imposed shift that dilutes unity without public consent. Regarding , One Nation emphasizes preserving Australia's foundational heritage and values—rooted in Western liberal traditions—against erosion from mass , which it claims fragments cohesion and prioritizes foreign interests over native-born citizens. The party views high migration as actively destroying cultural landmarks and identity, advocating a "net zero" approach in regions like to admit only skilled entrants from culturally compatible backgrounds who reinforce rather than challenge the national fabric. This stance aligns with Hanson's longstanding contention that excessive inflows, particularly from non-assimilating groups, risk overwhelming Australia's capacity for social harmony and .

Economic and Employment Policies

One Nation advocates economic nationalism, emphasizing protectionist measures to safeguard Australian industries from globalization and free trade agreements deemed detrimental to national interests. The party proposes reviewing and revoking free trade deals that fail to prioritize Australian manufacturing, agriculture, and jobs, arguing that such agreements have contributed to deindustrialization and job losses. This stance aligns with historical positions, including calls in the 1990s to restore import tariffs to bolster domestic production. Protectionism extends to restricting foreign ownership of land, particularly farmland, to prevent overseas control of key economic assets. In policy, One Nation prioritizes "Australians first" for job opportunities, linking high levels to suppression and in sectors like and . The party opposes workforce casualization, favoring full-time to provide and benefits. To foster skills development, it supports an scheme offering 75% coverage in the first year, tapering to 25% in the third, often tied to projects in regional areas. Policies also target job creation in specific industries, such as promoting domestic timber use ("Local Wood First") to sustain and self-sufficiency in building materials. Long-term job growth is seen as deriving primarily from expansion, with government roles limited to incentives rather than direct intervention. Fiscal policies focus on reducing government waste and lowering taxes to stimulate and ease cost-of-living pressures. One Nation proposes cutting $90 billion in annual spending, targeting inefficient initiatives, to return approximately $40 billion to taxpayers through relief. Measures include splitting and returns for families with dependent children, raising the tax-free threshold to $35,000 for self-funded retirees, and allowing aged and pensioners to earn more without benefit reductions. To address and fuel costs—key drivers of —the party advocates halving the fuel to 26 cents per liter for three years and reforming electricity markets to favor coal, gas, and , aiming for a 20% reduction in bills. investment in rail, roads, , and is prioritized to generate while capping to align with economic capacity.

Welfare, Family, and Social Issues

One Nation's welfare policies focus on curbing dependency and eliminating waste in . In 2025, party spokesperson Lee Hanson noted that roughly 50% of depend on welfare payments, urging reforms to prioritize efficient allocation over unchecked expansion. The party advocates slashing up to $90 billion annually in federal waste, which includes scrutinizing welfare programs for sustainability. A key proposal, introduced in January 2025, permits aged pensioners and veterans to supplement income through work without benefit reductions, aiming to encourage among retirees. In family policy, One Nation prioritizes tax relief and structural reforms to strengthen household units. Its 2025 Family Tax Policy enables couples with at least one dependent to file jointly by splitting income equally, potentially lowering liabilities by up to $10,000 per year and providing greater financial flexibility for child-rearing. The party seeks to overhaul by discouraging protracted court battles, promoting and fairness in assessments. Core principles include upholding parental against legislative overreach and safeguarding children's bonds with both biological parents, grandparents, and kin. Past platforms proposed abolishing specialized courts in favor of tribunals staffed by non-legal experts to expedite resolutions. On broader social issues, One Nation emphasizes universal equality, rejecting race- or ethnicity-based privileges in policy and resource distribution. In March 2025, it committed to terminating Indigenous land claims grounded in unverified traditional narratives, restoring uniform legal rights for all citizens. The party calls for auditing federal Indigenous expenditures—totaling billions annually—to ensure aid targets need rather than identity, promoting self-sufficiency over perpetual subsidies. Senator Pauline Hanson has opposed medical interventions promoting gender transition in minors, contending in June 2023 parliamentary debate that such approaches foster long-term reliance on hormone therapies without addressing underlying issues. This stance aligns with the party's insistence on equal treatment devoid of ethnic or identity exemptions.

Law, Order, and National Security

Pauline Hanson's One Nation advocates stringent measures to combat rising rates, prioritizing community safety through tougher bail laws and sentencing guidelines that detain dangerous repeat offenders. In , the party proposes amending legislation to deny bail based on risk to the rather than offender rehabilitation, expanding detention facilities without amenities perceived as incentives for reoffending, and mandating restitution from young offenders to victims, with parental liability for neglect contributing to delinquency. These policies draw from observed failures in current systems, such as facilities treated as "holiday camps," and include intervention programs like military-style boot camps modeled on successful initiatives with 90% reduction rates. The party's approach extends to victim support and , calling for judges appointed with emphasis on victims' impacts, dedicated counseling and financial aid for affected families, and community panels to scrutinize lenient court decisions on persistent criminals. In , One Nation's 2025 youth policy targets repeat offenders by requiring compensation to victims for , holding neglectful parents financially accountable where family oversight failures enable offending, and establishing oversight for magistrates to justify grants that lead to further s while on release. Such state-level proposals reflect a broader commitment to accountability, contrasting with perceived leniency in mainstream approaches that One Nation argues exacerbates waves. On , One Nation emphasizes border integrity as foundational to internal safety, pledging to deport approximately 75,000 illegal migrants including visa overstayers and unlawful non-citizens, while immediately removing visa holders convicted of crimes to prevent among non-residents. The party supports reintroducing Temporary Protection Visas to deter boat arrivals by blocking pathways to , withdrawing from the UN Refugee Convention to reclaim sovereign control over intake, and barring entrants from countries promoting ideologies incompatible with Australian values, such as those fostering . Annual visa caps at 130,000—slashing projected inflows by over 500,000—aim to alleviate strains on , welfare, and resources that indirectly heighten vulnerabilities. Complementing these, One Nation backs restoring responsible firearm ownership rights for law-abiding citizens, arguing that post- restrictions disproportionately disarm the compliant while criminals evade laws, thereby undermining personal and community defense capabilities. This stance aligns with the party's critique of overregulation that erodes freedoms without curbing threats from illegal weapons or border incursions.

Environmental and Energy Policies

Pauline Hanson's One Nation maintains skepticism toward claims of catastrophic anthropogenic global warming, asserting that three decades of Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) research have failed to produce conclusive evidence justifying policies that impose significant economic costs, such as net zero emissions targets by 2050. The party advocates withdrawing from the 2016 Paris Agreement, arguing that its per-capita carbon reduction mandates would lead to slowed economic growth, job losses in resource sectors, and higher energy prices without verifiable benefits. One Nation supports ongoing climate research but insists on repeatable, empirical data free from methodological flaws, such as those highlighted in historical controversies like the 2009 Climategate emails or inconsistencies in proxy temperature reconstructions; it cites long-term Australian records, including the Nobby’s Weather Station data from 1862, as showing no overall warming trend. In energy policy, One Nation prioritizes reliable, affordable power through a diversified mix leveraging Australia's abundant resources, including , , hydro, and nuclear, while criticizing over-dependence on intermittent renewables as a driver of blackouts and cost inflation. The party proposes constructing new ultra-supercritical -fired power stations, exploring small modular nuclear reactors, and repealing the federal nuclear energy ban to enhance baseload capacity and . It calls for phasing out taxpayer subsidies for wind and solar projects—while honoring existing contracts—and restricting such installations on prime , rainforests, or coastal zones to prevent and food production losses. Specific initiatives include building the $5.4 billion Hell’s Gate Dam near for hydro generation and reforming rules to foster competition, aiming to cut household and business power bills by at least 20%. On broader environmental management, One Nation emphasizes practical, locally informed over ideologically driven regulations, promoting measures like controlled back-burning, early warning systems, infrastructure, and rehabilitation bonds for resource projects to mitigate disasters and preserve . The party supports sustainable fishing, monitoring, and habitat restoration for species like koalas, but opposes stringent land-clearing restrictions that hinder farming and , favoring balanced use of native vegetation for economic viability. In July 2025, Senator moved to rescind Australia's net zero commitment in the , a motion defeated 32–22, underscoring the party's rejection of such targets as unsubstantiated and harmful to national interests.

Health and Pandemic Response

Pauline Hanson's One Nation has prioritized bolstering regional , advocating for incentives to train and retain more doctors, nurses, and allied professionals in rural and remote areas to address shortages exacerbated by urban-centric funding models. The party supports decentralizing management by returning control to local boards and reducing bureaucratic central positions, aiming to improve efficiency and responsiveness in services. In , One Nation has criticized state government budget cuts and planning failures, proposing reforms to restore capacity in emergency departments and elective surgeries strained by underinvestment. During the , One Nation opposed mandatory policies, viewing them as coercive overreaches that eroded and public trust in institutions. Party leader introduced the Vaccination Status (Prevention of ) Bill 2022, which sought to prohibit against unvaccinated individuals in employment, travel, and services, arguing that such measures lacked proportionality given emerging data on efficacy and side effects. The party has consistently called for a federal to investigate the response, including lockdowns, border closures, and rollouts, citing official reports that acknowledged restrictions' role in diminishing confidence in health authorities. One Nation's stance extended to questioning the urgency of mass vaccination campaigns, with Hanson voting against federal initiatives framing shots as an immediate imperative, instead emphasizing voluntary approaches and early treatment options like and , which the party argued were prematurely dismissed despite international trials showing potential benefits. In state contexts, such as Victoria, the party referenced Sweden's lighter-touch strategy—avoiding strict lockdowns in favor of targeted protections—as a model that preserved economic activity and without commensurate increases. Post-pandemic, One Nation has advocated exiting the , contending that its influence compromised national sovereignty during crisis decision-making.

Electoral and Governance Reforms

Pauline Hanson's One Nation advocates for the introduction of citizen-initiated referendums (CIR) as a mechanism to enhance in . Under this proposal, citizens could initiate legislation or referendum questions, bypassing traditional parliamentary processes to allow greater public input on policy decisions. This policy builds on the party's longstanding commitment to community-based referendums, first articulated in its platform as a means to empower voters against elite-driven . The party argues that CIR would restore accountability to elected representatives by subjecting major legislative changes to public approval, particularly on issues like , taxation, and constitutional amendments. One Nation has repeatedly pushed for this reform in parliamentary debates, including during discussions on the 2023 Indigenous Voice referendum, where Senator Hanson proposed CIR as an alternative to top-down constitutional processes. Proponents within the party, such as former MP Dorothy Pratt, have emphasized its role in fostering direct democratic involvement, a stance dating back to the party's early campaigns. In addition to federal governance reforms, One Nation state branches have proposed changes to structures. The branch policy calls for removing politics from local councils to prioritize community interests over partisan agendas, aiming to reduce ideological influences in municipal . This reflects a broader critique of bureaucratic overreach and centralized control, though federal platforms focus more on CIR as the primary tool for systemic reform. No specific proposals for altering federal electoral mechanics, such as preferential voting or composition, have been prominently advanced by the , which has benefited from post-2016 Senate voting changes without advocating further alterations.

Organizational Structure

Federal Leadership and Governance

Pauline serves as the leader of Pauline Hanson's One Nation's federal parliamentary team, a position she has held since July 2, 2016. She additionally acts as the party's in the , appointed from July 2, 2019. The federal remains centralized under , with no publicly delineated roles within the parliamentary contingent, reflecting the party's small size and her foundational influence. Following the May 2025 federal election, One Nation expanded its Senate representation to four seats from two in the prior term, comprising Hanson for , Malcolm Roberts for , Tyron Whitten for , and Warwick Stacey for . This increase, achieved through a primary vote of 6.4 percent, positions the party to attain formal parliamentary party status, enabling greater procedural influence such as dedicated allocations. In federal , One Nation operates as a crossbench force in the , lacking House of Representatives seats, and focuses on scrutinizing through debates, inquiries, and targeted amendments. The party's senators prioritize bills affecting , controls, and economic , frequently opposing measures perceived to erode Australian in favor of supranational commitments. Historical precedents include negotiating support for government initiatives in exchange for policy concessions, though alliances remain ad hoc and principle-driven rather than coalition-bound. One Nation's approach emphasizes restoring parliamentary oversight of executive actions, advocating for referendums on major treaties and stricter fiscal in federal budgeting.

State and Territory Branches

Pauline Hanson's One Nation organizes its activities through semi-autonomous state and territory branches, which handle local membership recruitment, candidate selection for subnational elections, and community outreach while adhering to the party's federal policy framework and directives from the national executive led by Senator . These branches function as grassroots hubs, emphasizing direct member involvement in policy advocacy and campaigning, with recent expansions in 2025 aimed at broadening regional presence, such as the launch of a new branch in ' area. The branch, founded in in 1997 as the party's birthplace, serves as its operational core and is formally designated the Pauline Hanson's One Nation Queensland Division, managing state-level operations independently yet in coordination with federal leadership. It coordinates local events, policy adaptation to regional concerns like rural economies, and has historically driven the party's national momentum through strong member mobilization. New South Wales and branches maintain dedicated structures for contesting state polls, with the latter featuring a leadership team under figures like Rod Caddies, focusing on issues such as impacts in regional electorates. South Australia's division, active since at least with renewed candidate fielding in recent cycles, prioritizes and contests across 19 seats. Victoria's branch engages through member events and parliamentary representation, exemplified by MP Rikkie-Lee Tyrrell's activities, though internal signage disputes have highlighted tensions with federal messaging on topics like and migration. Tasmania, Northern Territory, and Australian Capital Territory branches exist primarily for localized advocacy and federal Senate support, with limited standalone electoral infrastructure but growing through social media coordination and federal alignment; Tasmania's efforts emphasize conservative voter outreach in rural areas, while Northern Territory operations tie into broader indigenous policy debates under national oversight. Overall, branch efficacy varies by state, with Queensland and Western Australia demonstrating higher organizational maturity due to sustained electoral participation, whereas newer or peripheral divisions rely more heavily on federal resources for activation.

Membership and Funding Sources

Pauline Hanson's One Nation solicits annual membership subscriptions from supporters, offering benefits such as participation in policy development and voting in candidate pre-selections, with fees reduced during economic hardships like the to broaden accessibility. Subscriptions up to $1,500 per financial year qualify for tax deductions under Australian electoral law, aligning with the party's emphasis on involvement over elite funding. Exact membership figures are not publicly disclosed by the party or required in official returns, reflecting its status as party reliant on dedicated but limited volunteer bases rather than mass enrollment seen in major parties. The party's primary revenue stems from public electoral reimbursements, calculated at approximately 44 cents per eligible vote exceeding a 4% primary vote threshold per electorate. For the 2025 federal election, One Nation received $2.98 million in such funding despite securing no seats, based on its 6.4% national primary vote. This mechanism provides stable income tied to electoral performance, supplementing smaller private contributions in a system where disclosure thresholds ($16,900 in 2023-24) limit visibility of sub-threshold donations. Private donations form a secondary source, often from individuals and smaller entities rather than large corporations, as the party positions itself against big-business influence. Aggregated disclosures indicate 36 reportable donations totaling $532,809, with an average of $14,800 per contribution, though these figures span multiple years and exclude undisclosed amounts below thresholds. State-level records, such as in South Australia, show additional inflows like $395,070 for early 2025, primarily for campaign activities. Internal transfers between party branches have historically accounted for significant portions of reported funds, as seen in pre-2020 data where affiliated entities contributed over 50% of totals. Party officials noted improving donation inflows in 2025, amid rising poll support, but without reliance on foreign or institutional mega-donors.

Electoral Performance

Federal Election Results

Pauline Hanson's One Nation first contested Australian federal elections in 1998, achieving a national primary vote of approximately 9 percent but securing no seats in either the or the . The party has never won a seat in the across subsequent elections, with its support concentrated in the , where preferential voting and state-based quotas have occasionally enabled breakthroughs. In the 2016 federal election, One Nation secured four Senate seats: and Malcolm Roberts in , Brian Burston in , and in (though Culleton's election was later voided due to eligibility issues). This marked the party's first federal parliamentary representation since its formation. By the 2019 election, internal divisions and candidate issues reduced its haul to two seats, both in (Hanson and Roberts). The party retained these two positions through the 2022 election amid fluctuating primary support. The 2025 federal election represented a resurgence, with One Nation receiving over 600,000 first-preference votes nationally and doubling its representation to four seats. Retaining its incumbents, the party gained additional positions through Tyron Whitten in and Warwick Stacey in , capitalizing on preferences in competitive races.
Election YearHouse SeatsSenate SeatsNotes
199800Peak early primary vote of ~9%.
2001–201300Declining primary votes below 2%.
201604Initial federal breakthrough.
201902Retained core Queensland support.
202202Stability amid national volatility.
202504Expansion to NSW and WA.

State and Territory Election Results

In , the birthplace of the party, Pauline Hanson's One Nation achieved its most significant state-level success at the 1998 election, where it captured 11 seats with a primary vote share of 22.8 percent across contested districts. This breakthrough disrupted the two-party dominance, contributing to the defeat of the incumbent National-Liberal . However, internal divisions and candidate scandals led to rapid attrition, with most seats lost by the early . The party's fortunes revived somewhat in the 2017 Queensland election, securing one seat (Mirani) with a statewide primary vote of approximately 13.7 percent. Support collapsed in the 2020 election, yielding zero seats and a reduced primary vote, amid voter shifts to Labor and other minor parties. The 2024 election further diminished the party's presence, with no seats retained and primary support falling below previous levels, signaling ongoing challenges in maintaining a parliamentary foothold.
Election YearPrimary Vote (%)Seats Won
199822.811
13.71
2020~7.50
2024<60
In , One Nation won three seats in the at the state election, despite failing to secure any seats, with preferences influencing outcomes in several races. These gains were short-lived, as the party lost all representation in the 2021 election amid declining vote shares. In other states, results have been marginal. In , the party has contested multiple elections but achieved limited legislative representation, primarily through seats in select cycles. In , One Nation secured one seat in the 2022 election, held by until her defection in 2025. Contests in Victoria, , and territories like the and have yielded no seats, with primary votes typically under 5 percent. Overall, state and territory performances underscore One Nation's regional variability, strongest in and resource-dependent areas, but prone to volatility due to preference flows and internal instability.

Key Personnel

Current Parliamentary Representatives

In the federal parliament, Pauline Hanson's One Nation holds four seats in the following the 2025 election, with no representation in the . The party's senators are (Queensland, leader and serving since 2016 with term continuing post-2022), Malcolm Roberts (Queensland, re-elected in 2025), Sean Bell (, elected 2025), and Tyron Whitten (, elected 2025). At the state level, the party maintains one seat in the . Stephen Andrew serves as the Member for Mirani, elected in 2020 and retained in subsequent elections. No current representation is held in other state or territory parliaments, though the party has pursued expansions in and .
ParliamentRepresentativePosition and Division/StateElected
Pauline HansonSenator for 2016 (ongoing)
Malcolm RobertsSenator for 2025
Sean BellSenator for 2025
Tyron WhittenSenator for 2025
Queensland Legislative AssemblyStephen AndrewMLA for Mirani2020

Historical Leaders and Notable Figures

Pauline Hanson established Pauline Hanson's One Nation in April 1997, following her disendorsement as a Liberal Party candidate for the 1996 federal election, with David Ettridge and David Oldfield as co-founders providing organizational and advisory support. Ettridge, a businessman, acted as the party's national director from its inception until 2000, overseeing administrative operations during its rapid expansion ahead of the 1998 Queensland state election. Oldfield, previously a staffer for Liberal MP Tony Abbott and a Manly Council councillor, served as principal advisor to Hanson from 1997 to 2000 and functioned as the party's de facto deputy leader, architecting its structure and campaign strategies. Oldfield was elected to the as a One Nation member in March 1999, representing the party until 2007, though internal disputes led to his expulsion from the party in 2000 amid accusations of disloyalty by Hanson. Ettridge and Hanson faced legal challenges in 2003 when convicted of fraudulently registering the party as a political entity to access electoral funding, resulting in ; Ettridge was to 12 months, serving part of it before release on . These events contributed to early factionalism, with the party splintering after securing 11 seats in the 1998 election, many of which were lost to defections by figures such as Jeff Knuth and Peter Wellington. Other notable early figures included Len Harris, who succeeded Hanson as the party's first federal senator in 1999 after her independent win in Oxley was overturned, holding the Queensland Senate seat until 2005. The party's initial success relied on grassroots organizers and candidates like Bill Feldman, who later led the Queensland branch, reflecting a structure dependent on Hanson's personal appeal and the co-founders' logistical efforts before internal conflicts eroded cohesion.

Voter Base and Support

Demographics and Geographic Strongholds

Pauline Hanson's One Nation draws its strongest electoral support from , where the party originated in in 1997 and maintains a dedicated base in regional and rural areas. In state elections, One Nation has secured seats in electorates such as Lockyer, Nanango, and Burdekin, reflecting concentration in Southeast 's outer suburban fringes, coastal regions, and inland rural districts affected by economic shifts in and . Federally, the party's primary vote peaks in divisions like Capricornia, Wide Bay, and , often exceeding 15-20% in regional contests, compared to under 5% in urban centers like or . This geographic pattern underscores a reliance on non-metropolitan voters disillusioned with major parties on issues like resource industry regulations and infrastructure neglect. Demographically, One Nation voters defy simplistic stereotypes of impoverished rural , instead comprising a middling prosperous group largely in rather than . Analysis of voter profiles indicates support spans urban fringes and regional areas, with significant backing from those prioritizing reduction—83% favoring substantial cuts—and tougher policies, including 88% endorsing the penalty. The base skews secular, with 60% rarely or never attending church, and holds nostalgic views of pre-globalization , yet exhibits a preference for larger intervention over libertarian ideals. Recent polling post-2025 federal election shows surging appeal among conservative-leaning voters, aged 35-64, in working-class trades and sectors, particularly those prioritizing and energy affordability over climate mandates. Historical data from the late reinforces these patterns, with One Nation's breakthrough in driven by rural and semi-rural constituencies responding to economic grievances like tariff reductions impacting and farming. While national support hovers at 10-14% in 2025 polls, the party's enduring strongholds remain tied to 's non-urban demographics, where attitudinal alignment on and sustains loyalty amid broader populist shifts. Support for Pauline Hanson's One Nation primarily arises from voters' apprehensions about unchecked levels exacerbating shortages, overload, and suppression in low-skilled sectors, as evidenced by record net overseas migration figures exceeding 500,000 annually in recent years under Labor governments. The party's advocacy for slashing to sustainable levels aligns with these concerns, positioning it as a bulwark against policies perceived to prioritize over national interests. Additional drivers include resistance to net-zero emission mandates, viewed as economically burdensome without commensurate global action, and a broader rejection of elite-driven that supporters argue dilutes Australian cultural cohesion and . Empirical analyses of earlier support bases, such as the 1998 Australian Study, link One Nation voting to heightened anti- sentiments and distrust of preferential treatment in welfare systems, rather than pure economic deprivation. Polling for One Nation has exhibited volatility tied to economic pressures and disillusionment, peaking in the late amid globalization anxieties before subsiding in the due to internal party fractures. A resurgence occurred around 2016, coinciding with Pauline Hanson's re-election and broader populist sentiments, yielding federal House primary votes around 1-2% but higher preferences. Following the May 2025 federal election, where One Nation garnered under 6% primary support amid Labor's landslide, recent Newspoll surveys in October 2025 record a near-doubling to 11%, surpassing the Greens and reaching highs unseen since 1998, as voters migrate over and rifts. This uptick reflects causal links to post-election policy failures, including persistent cost-of-living strains and housing unaffordability, rather than transient media hype. Following the Bondi Beach mass shooting in December 2025, support surged further, with a January 2026 DemosAU poll recording 23%—the highest since 1998 and tying the Coalition—linked to intensified voter concerns over immigration and national security.

Impact and Reception

Policy Influences and Achievements

One Nation's parliamentary presence has primarily enabled influence through crossbench leverage in the since Pauline Hanson's election in 2016, where the party has negotiated amendments, forced inquiries, and blocked bills deemed contrary to its priorities on and individual rights. In 2019, One Nation senators moved a successful motion to defeat the Currency (Restrictions on the Use of Cash) Bill, preventing restrictions on transactions exceeding $10,000 and averting steps toward a cashless economy. Similarly, the party opposed the Ensuring Integrity Bill 2019, rejecting amendments that would have enhanced government oversight of unions, citing risks to worker accountability. In state politics, particularly , One Nation MPs have achieved targeted legislative wins, such as enacting a ban on fake international lotteries to safeguard local newsagents from foreign competition. The party also negotiated a 15% pay rise for ambulance officers and halved the CEO's salary, redirecting savings to operational needs. Federally, One Nation advocacy contributed to securing public funding for Spinraza and Zolgensma treatments for , benefiting 17 children and prompting a push for expansion. The party's platform has shaped broader policy debates, notably on immigration caps, skepticism toward , and opposition to rapid net-zero transitions, prompting major parties to address voter concerns on housing pressures from migration and energy costs. One Nation introduced the COVID-19 Vaccination Status (Prevention of Discrimination) Bill 2021, which garnered over 200,000 petition signatures in 22 days and triggered a Senate inquiry exposing mandate inconsistencies. It also influenced a $1.2 billion initiative, aiming to create over 100,000 positions, and supported revisions to the Dairy Industry Code of Conduct for fairer farmer contracts. Funding secured through negotiations includes $500 million for regional roads and specific allocations like $8 million for the Fitzroy Hospice and $23 million for Stadium upgrades. In the Senate, One Nation pushed for a banning full-face coverings, aligning with a 2018 chamber prohibiting burqas and niqabs during proceedings. While direct bill passage remains limited as a minor party, these efforts demonstrate causal impacts via blocking overreach and amplifying empirical critiques of elite-driven policies, though mainstream adoption often dilutes original proposals.

Criticisms, Media Portrayals, and Debunked Narratives

One Nation has faced persistent criticisms for its stances on , , and indigenous policies, with opponents labeling the party as xenophobic and divisive. Hanson's 1996 , in which she warned that Australia risked being "swamped by Asians" due to high rates, drew immediate condemnation as racially inflammatory from figures like then-Prime Minister and multicultural advocates. Similar accusations arose from party opposition to mass migration from non-Western countries and critiques of as incompatible with Australian values, with critics such as Greens Senator arguing these reflect nativist prejudice. Internal party instability, including frequent defections and leadership disputes—such as the 2025 departure of South Australian MP —has also been cited as evidence of organizational dysfunction undermining its claims to represent unified national interests. Mainstream media outlets, including ABC and , have predominantly portrayed One Nation as a far-right, extremist force, emphasizing controversies like Hanson's 2017 burqa stunt in and animated videos accused of spreading disinformation on elections and origins. This coverage often amplifies allegations, such as the 2024 Federal Court ruling that Hanson's tweet telling Faruqi to "piss off back to " violated section 18C of the Act, describing it as "a strong form of ." Hanson has countered that such portrayals stem from biased media narratives that distort her focus on cultural integration and economic , forcing her to combat public misconceptions through alternative channels like . Advocacy groups, including the Global Project Against Hate and , have classified One Nation as a hate group based on these statements, though such designations originate from ideologically aligned organizations rather than neutral empirical assessments. Among narratives challenged or refuted, the 2003 criminal conviction of Hanson and co-founder David Ettridge for electoral fraud—resulting in three-year sentences for improperly registering the party to claim public funding— was overturned on appeal by the Court of Appeal on November 6, 2003, after which they were released following 11 weeks in custody; the court found insufficient evidence of intent to defraud. Claims equating One Nation's critiques with blanket have been contested by the party's selection of Asian-Australian candidates, such as in 2017 Western Australian elections, who argued the platform targets policy failures like and crime rates rather than ethnicity. Recent assertions, including Independent Senator Lidia Thorpe's 2024 statement that Hanson was "convicted of " over the Faruqi tweet, misrepresent the civil finding under as a criminal verdict, prompting Hanson to issue legal notices to media outlets for repeating the error. Supporters maintain that systemic biases in academia and public broadcasters inflate these charges to delegitimize populist concerns over , evidenced by polling showing One Nation's support among working-class voters prioritizing over .

Major Controversies and Responses

Pauline Hanson's 1996 in the , in which she stated that was "in danger of being swamped by Asians" and criticized policies alongside perceived favoritism toward Aboriginal welfare, drew widespread condemnation as racially inflammatory. The remarks, delivered on September 10, , prompted accusations of promoting and led to a surge in reported attacks on , tripling in the following months according to some accounts. Hanson responded by refusing to retract her statements, asserting that they reflected legitimate concerns over rapid rates—net overseas migration reached 103,000 annually by the late 1990s—and the economic burdens of , which she estimated cost billions in taxpayer funds. She maintained that her critique targeted policy failures in integration and rather than individuals' race, a position she reiterated in subsequent defenses against charges. In 2003, Hanson and One Nation co-founder David Ettridge were convicted in District Court of for falsely registering 500 members to qualify the party for public funding, securing over $500,000 from the Australian Electoral Commission; both received three-year sentences, with Hanson serving 11 weeks before release. The case, prosecuted under state criminal code provisions against fraudulent corporate registration, was appealed successfully in November 2003 when the Court of Appeal ruled the trial judge misdirected the jury on the definition of "corporation," overturning the convictions unanimously. Hanson described the prosecution as politically motivated persecution by establishment forces opposed to One Nation's challenge to bipartisan consensus on and , a echoed by supporters who highlighted procedural irregularities and the brevity of her incarceration relative to the sentence. One Nation has faced internal divisions, including high-profile expulsions and defections, such as that of former adviser David Oldfield in 2000 amid allegations of financial impropriety and power struggles, contributing to electoral setbacks like the party's collapse in state elections by 2001. These splits, often amplified by media coverage of interpersonal conflicts, were attributed by party insiders to infiltrations and betrayals, with Hanson expelling members she accused of undermining core nativist principles; the party responded by centralizing control under her leadership to prevent further fragmentation, enabling a resurgence with representation by 2016. Hanson's 2017 appearance wearing a during , intended to dramatize security risks and gender oppression associated with full-face coverings, provoked rebukes from and Labor leaders who deemed it a mocking ridiculing Muslim women. Citing incidents like the June 2017 attack allegedly involving burqa-clad assailants, she advocated a national ban, arguing the garment concealed identities in public spaces and symbolized subjugation incompatible with Australian values. Hanson defended the action as necessary to force parliamentary debate on an issue ignored by major parties, rejecting claims of Islamophobia by framing her position as cultural rather than racial, focused on verifiable threats like identity verification failures in courts and airports. During the , One Nation opposed vaccine mandates, with Hanson introducing a bill in November 2021 to prohibit against unvaccinated workers, garnering cross-party support from five senators before rejection. She cited UK data at rallies claiming higher deaths among double-vaccinated individuals, though fact-checks noted this misrepresented age-adjusted rates where unvaccinated mortality remained elevated. In response to mandates affecting police and other sectors, Hanson argued they violated bodily and , later claiming vindication in 2024 after a ruling deemed certain police mandates unlawful for lacking rational connection to goals. The party positioned this as evidence of overreach by state authorities, prioritizing individual choice over coerced compliance amid data showing mandates correlated with higher uptake but also workforce disruptions. Accusations of racism intensified in 2022 when Hanson told Greens Senator to "piss off back to " following the latter's criticism of then-Prime Minister ; a Federal Court ruling in August 2024 found this constituted racial vilification under the Racial Discrimination Act, citing Hanson's pattern of derogatory statements. Hanson appealed the decision in November 2024, contending it conflated criticism of cultural practices—such as immigration from high-risk source countries—with immutable race, and submitted evidence of similar toward white senators to argue selective outrage. One Nation has consistently rebutted racism labels by emphasizing policy-based objections to multiculturalism's empirical costs, including welfare strain (Aboriginal dependency rates exceeding 50% in remote areas per data) and integration failures evidenced by higher crime rates among certain migrant cohorts, framing such discourse as suppressed realism rather than .

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.