Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Pound (mass)
View on Wikipedia
| pound | |
|---|---|
One-pound avoirdupois weight, from the Musée des Arts et Métiers | |
| General information | |
| Unit system | |
| Unit of | mass |
| Symbol | lb |
| Conversions | |
| 1 lb in ... | ... is equal to ... |
| SI units | 0.45359237 kg |
| Avoirdupois | 16 ounces |
The pound or pound-mass is a unit of mass used in both the British imperial and United States customary systems of measurement. Various definitions have been used; the most common today is the international avoirdupois pound, which is legally defined as exactly 0.45359237 kilograms, and which is divided into 16 avoirdupois ounces.[1] The international standard symbol for the avoirdupois pound is lb;[2] an alternative symbol (when there might otherwise be a risk of confusion with the pound-force) is lbm[3] (for most pound definitions), # (chiefly in the U.S.),[4] and ℔[5] or ″̶[6] (specifically for the apothecaries' pound).
The unit is descended from the Roman libra (hence the symbol lb, descended from the scribal abbreviation, ℔). The English word pound comes from the Roman libra pondo ('the weight measured in libra'), and is cognate with, among others, German Pfund, Dutch pond, and Swedish pund. These units are now designated as historical and are no longer in common usage, being replaced by the metric system.
Usage of the unqualified term pound reflects the historical conflation of mass and weight. This accounts for the modern distinguishing terms pound-mass and pound-force.
Etymology
[edit]The word 'pound' and its cognates ultimately derive from a borrowing into Proto-Germanic of the Latin expression libra pondo ('the weight measured in libra'), in which the word pondo is the ablative singular of the Latin noun pondus ('weight').[7]
Current use
[edit]The United States and the Commonwealth of Nations agreed upon common definitions for the pound and the yard. Since 1 July 1959, the international avoirdupois pound (symbol lb) has been defined as exactly 0.45359237 kg.[8][9]
In the United Kingdom, the use of the international pound was implemented in the Weights and Measures Act 1963.[10]
The yard or the metre shall be the unit of measurement of length and the pound or the kilogram shall be the unit of measurement of mass by reference to which any measurement involving a measurement of length or mass shall be made in the United Kingdom; and—
- (a) the yard shall be 0.9144 metre exactly;
- (b) the pound shall be 0.45359237 kilogram exactly.
— Weights and Measures Act 1963, Section 1(1)[11]
An avoirdupois pound is equal to 16 avoirdupois ounces and to exactly 7,000 grains. The conversion factor between the kilogram and the international pound was therefore chosen to be divisible by 7 with a terminating decimal representation, and an (international) grain is thus equal to exactly 64.79891 milligrams.
In the United Kingdom, the process of metrication and European units of measurement directives were expected to eliminate the use of the pound and ounce, but in 2007 the European Commission abandoned the requirement for metric-only labelling on packaged goods there, and allowed for dual metric–imperial marking to continue indefinitely.[12][13]
In the United States, the Metric Conversion Act of 1975 declared the metric system to be the "preferred system of weights and measures" but did not suspend use of United States customary units, and the United States is the only industrialised country where commercial activities do not predominantly use the metric system,[14] despite many efforts to do so, and the pound remains widely used as one of the key customary units.[15][16]
Historical use
[edit]Historically, in different parts of the world, at different points in time, and for different applications, the pound (or its translation) has referred to broadly similar but not identical standards of mass or force.[a]
Roman libra
[edit]The libra (Latin for 'scale'/'balance') is an ancient Roman unit of mass that is now equivalent to 328.9 g (11.60 oz).[17][18][19] It was divided into 12 unciae (singular: uncia), or ounces. The libra is the origin of the abbreviation for pound, "lb".
In Britain
[edit]A number of different definitions of the pound have historically been used in Britain. Among these are the avoirdupois pound, which is the common pound used for weights, and the obsolete tower, merchants' and London pounds.[20] The troy pound and ounce remain in use only for the weight of precious metals, especially in their trade. The weights of traded precious metals, such as gold and silver, are normally quoted just in ounces (e.g. "500 ounces") and, when the type of ounce is not explicitly stated, the troy system is assumed.
The pound sterling money system, which was introduced during the reign of King Offa of Mercia (757–96), was based originally on a Saxon pound of silver. After the Norman conquest the Saxon pound was known as the tower pound or moneyer's pound.[21] In 1528, during the reign of Henry VIII, the coinage standard was changed by parliament from the tower pound to the troy pound.[22]
Avoirdupois pound
[edit]The avoirdupois pound, also known as the wool pound, first came into general use c. 1300. It was initially equal to 6,992 troy grains. The pound avoirdupois was divided into 16 ounces. During the reign of Queen Elizabeth I, the avoirdupois pound was redefined as 7,000 troy grains. Since then, the grain has often been an integral part of the avoirdupois system. By 1758, two Elizabethan Exchequer standard weights for the avoirdupois pound existed, and when measured in troy grains they were found to be of 7,002 grains and 6,999 grains.[23][24][b]
Imperial standard pound
[edit]In the United Kingdom, weights and measures have been defined by a long series of Acts of Parliament, the intention of which has been to regulate the sale of commodities. Materials traded in the marketplace are quantified according to accepted units and standards in order to avoid fraud. The standards themselves are legally defined so as to facilitate the resolution of disputes brought to the courts; only legally defined measures will be recognised by the courts. Quantifying devices used by traders (weights, weighing machines, containers of volumes, measures of length) are subject to official inspection, and penalties apply if they are fraudulent.
The Weights and Measures Act 1878 (41 & 42 Vict. c. 49) marked a major overhaul of the British system of weights and measures, and the definition of the pound given there remained in force until the 1960s. The pound was defined thus (Section 4): "The ... platinum weight ... deposited in the Standards department of the Board of Trade ... shall continue to be the imperial standard of ... weight ... and the said platinum weight shall continue to be the imperial standard for determining the imperial standard pound for the United Kingdom". Section 13 states that the weight in vacuo of this standard shall be called the imperial standard pound, and that all other weights mentioned in the act and permissible for commerce shall be ascertained from it alone. The first schedule of the act gave more details of the standard pound: it is a platinum cylinder nearly 1.35 inches (34 mm) high, and 1.15 inches (29 mm) diameter, and the edges are carefully rounded off. It has a groove about 0.34 inches (8.6 mm) from the top, to allow the cylinder to be lifted using an ivory fork. It was constructed following the destruction of the Houses of Parliament by fire in 1834, and is stamped "P.S. 1844, 1 lb" (P.S. stands for "Parliamentary Standard").
| Unit | Pounds | Ounces | Grains | Metric | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avdp. | Troy | Tower | Merchant | London | Metric | Avdp. | Troy | Tower | Troy | Tower | g | kg | |||||||||
| Avoirdupois | 1 | 175/144 | = 1.21527 | 35/27 | = 1.296 | 28/27 | = 1.037 | 35/36 | = 0.972 | ≈ 0.9072 | 16 | 14+7/12 | = 14.583 | 15+5/9 | = 15.5 | 7,000 | 9,955+5/9 | ≈ 454 | ≈ 5/11 | ||
| Troy | 144/175 | ≈ 0.8229 | 1 | 16/15 | = 1.06 | 64/75 | = 0.853 | 4/5 | = 0.8 | ≈ 0.7465 | 13+29/175 | ≈ 13.17 | 12 | 12+4/5 | = 12.8 | 5,760 | 8,192 | ≈ 373 | ≈ 3/8 | ||
| Tower | 27/35 | ≈ 0.7714 | 15/16 | = 0.9375 | 1 | 4/5 | = 0.8 | 3/4 | = 0.75 | ≈ 0.6998 | 12+12/35 | ≈ 12.34 | 11+1/4 | = 11.25 | 12 | 5,400 | 7,680 | ≈ 350 | ≈ 7/20 | ||
| Merchant | 27/28 | ≈ 0.9643 | 75/64 | = 1.171875 | 5/4 | = 1.25 | 1 | 15/16 | = 0.9375 | ≈ 0.8748 | 15+3/7 | ≈ 15.43 | 14+1/16 | = 14.0625 | 15 | 6,750 | 9,600 | ≈ 437 | ≈ 7/16 | ||
| London | 36/35 | ≈ 1.029 | 5/4 | = 1.25 | 4/3 | = 1.3 | 16/15 | = 1.06 | 1 | ≈ 0.9331 | 16+16/35 | ≈ 16.46 | 15 | 16 | 7,200 | 10,240 | ≈ 467 | ≈ 7/15 | |||
| Metric | ≈ 1.1023 | ≈ 1.3396 | ≈ 1.4289 | ≈ 1.1431 | ≈ 1.0717 | 1 | ≈ 17.64 | ≈ 16.08 | ≈ 17.15 | 7,716 | 10,974 | = 500 | = 1/2 | ||||||||
Redefinition in terms of the kilogram
[edit]The British Weights and Measures Act 1878 (41 & 42 Vict. c. 49) said that contracts worded in terms of metric units would be deemed by the courts to be made according to the Imperial units defined in the Act, and a table of metric equivalents was supplied so that the Imperial equivalents could be legally calculated. This defined, in UK law, metric units in terms of Imperial ones. The equivalence for the pound was given as 1 lb = 453.59265 g or 0.45359 kg, which made the kilogram equivalent to about 2.2046213 lb.
In 1883, it was determined jointly by the standards department of the British Board of Trade and the Bureau International that 0.4535924277 kg was a better approximation, and this figure, rounded to 0.45359243 kg was given legal status by an Order in Council in May 1898.[25]
In 1959, based on further measurements and international coordination, the International Yard and Pound Agreement defined an "international pound" as being equivalent to exactly 0.45359237 kg.[25] This meant that the existing legal definition of the UK pound differed from the international standard pound by 0.06 milligrams. To remedy this, the pound was again redefined in the United Kingdom by the Weights and Measures Act 1963 to match the international pound, stating: "the pound shall be 0.453 592 37 kilogramme exactly",[11] a definition which remains valid to the present day.
The 2019 revision of the SI means that the pound is now defined precisely in terms of fundamental constants, ending the era of its definition in terms of physical prototypes.
Troy pound
[edit]A troy pound (abbreviated lb t[26]) is equal to 12 troy ounces and to 5,760 grains, that is exactly 373.2417216 grams.[27] Troy weights were used in England by jewellers. Apothecaries also used the troy pound and ounce, but added the drachms and scruples unit in the apothecaries' system of weights.
Troy weight may take its name from the French market town of Troyes in France where English merchants traded at least as early as the early 9th century.[28] The troy pound is no longer in general use or a legal unit for trade (it was abolished in the United Kingdom on 6 January 1879 by the Weights and Measures Act 1878), but the troy ounce, 1⁄12 of a troy pound, is still used for measurements of gems such as opals, and precious metals such as silver, platinum and particularly gold.[29]
Tower pound
[edit]
A tower pound is equal to 12 tower ounces and to 5,400 troy grains, which equals around 350 grams.[30] The tower pound is the historical weight standard that was used for England's coinage.[31] Before the Norman conquest in 1066, the tower pound was known as the Saxon pound. During the reign of King Offa (757–796) of Mercia, a Saxon pound of silver was used to set the original weight of a pound sterling.[21] From one Saxon pound of silver (that is a tower pound) the king had 240 silver pennies minted.[32][c] In the pound sterling monetary system, twelve pennies equaled a shilling and twenty shillings equaled a pound sterling.[34]
The tower pound was referenced to a standard prototype found in the Tower of London. The tower system ran concurrently with the avoirdupois and troy systems until the reign of Henry VIII, when a royal proclamation dated 1526 required that the troy pound be used for mint purposes instead of the tower pound.[35] No standards of the tower pound are known to have survived.[36]
The tower pound was also called the moneyers' pound (referring to the Saxon moneyers before the Norman conquest);[37] the easterling pound, which may refer to traders of eastern Germany, or to traders on the shore of the eastern Baltic sea, or dealers of Asiatic goods who settled at the London Steelyard wharf;[38] and the Rochelle pound by French writers, because it was also in use at La Rochelle.[39] An almost identical weight was employed by the Germans for weighing gold and silver.
The mercantile pound (1304) of 6750 troy grains, or 9600 Tower grains, derives from this pound, as 25 shilling-weights or 15 Tower ounces, for general commercial use. Multiple pounds based on the same ounce were quite common. In much of Europe, the apothecaries' and commercial pounds were different numbers of the same ounce.[citation needed][40][41]
| 1 mercantile pound (15 oz) | = | 9,600 Tower grains | = | 6,750 troy grains |
| 1 Tower pound (12 oz) | = | 7,680 Tower grains | = | 5,400 troy grains |
| 1 Tower ounce (20 dwt) | = | 640 Tower grains | = | 450 troy grains |
| 1 Tower pennyweight (dwt) | = | 32 Tower grains | = | 22+1⁄2 troy grains |
Merchants' pound
[edit]The merchants' pound (mercantile pound, libra mercantoria, or commercial pound) was considered to be composed of 25 rather than 20 Tower shillings of 12 pence.[42] It was equal to 9,600 wheat grains (15 tower ounces or 6,750 grains)[28] and was used in England until the 14th century[28] for goods other than money and medicine ("electuaries").[42]
London pound
[edit]This section's factual accuracy is disputed. (January 2021) |
The London pound is that of the Hansa, as used in their various trading places. The London pound is based on 16 ounces, each ounce divided as the tower ounce. It never became a legal standard in England; the use of this pound waxed and waned with the influence of the Hansa itself.
A London pound was equal to 7,200 troy grains (16 troy ounces) or, equivalently, 10,240 tower grains (16 tower ounces).
| 1 London pound (16 oz) | = | 1+1⁄3 tower pounds (1.25 Troy pounds) | = | 10,240 tower grains | = | 7,200 troy grains |
| 1 London ounce (20 dwt) | = | 1 tower (or troy) ounce | = | 640 tower grains | = | 450 troy grains |
| 1 London pennyweight | = | 1 tower (or troy) pennyweight | = | 32 tower grains | = | 22+1⁄2 troy grains |
In the United States
[edit]In the United States, the avoirdupois pound as a unit of mass has been officially defined in terms of the kilogram since the Mendenhall Order of 1893. That order defined the pound to be 2.20462 pounds to a kilogram. The following year, this relationship was refined as 2.20462234 pounds to a kilogram, following a determination of the British pound.[25]
In 1959, the United States National Bureau of Standards redefined the pound (avoirdupois) to be exactly equal to 0.453 592 37 kilograms, as had been declared by the International Yard and Pound Agreement of that year. According to a 1959 NIST publication, the United States 1894 pound differed from the international pound by approximately one part in 10 million.[1] The difference is so insignificant that it can be ignored for almost all practical purposes.[43]
Byzantine litra
[edit]The Byzantines used a series of measurements known as pounds (Latin: libra, Ancient Greek: λίτρα, romanized: litra). The most common was the logarikē litra (λογαρική λίτρα, "pound of account"), established by Constantine the Great in 309/310. It formed the basis of the Byzantine monetary system, with one litra of gold equivalent to 72 solidi. A hundred litrai were known as a kentēnarion (κεντηνάριον, "hundredweight"). Its weight seems to have decreased gradually from the original 324 g (11.4 oz) to 319 g (11.3 oz). Due to its association with gold, it was also known as the chrysaphikē litra (χρυσαφική λίτρα, "gold pound") or thalassia litra (θαλάσσια λίτρα, "maritime pound"), but it could also be used as a measure of land, equalling a fortieth of the thalassios modios.[44]
The soualia litra was specifically used for weighing olive oil or wood, and corresponded to 4/5 of the logarikē or 256 g (9.0 oz). Some outlying regions, especially in later times, adopted various local measures, based on Italian, Arab or Turkish measures. The most important of these was the argyrikē litra (αργυρική λίτρα, "silver pound") of 333 g (11.7 oz), found in Trebizond and Cyprus, and probably of Arab origin.[44]
French livre
[edit]Since the Middle Ages, various pounds (livre) have been used in France. Since the 19th century, a livre has referred to the metric pound, 500 g.
The livre esterlin is equivalent to about 367.1 grams (5,665 gr) and was used between the late 9th century and the mid-14th century.[45]
The livre poids de marc or livre de Paris is equivalent to about 489.5 grams (7,554 gr) and was used between the 1350s and the late 18th century.[45] It was introduced by the government of John II.
The livre métrique was set equal to the kilogram by the decree of 13 Brumaire an IX between 1800 and 1812. This was a form of official metric pound.[45]
The livre usuelle (customary unit) was defined as 500 g (18 oz) by the decree of 28 March 1812. It was abolished as a unit of mass effective 1 January 1840 by a decree of 4 July 1837,[45] but is still used informally.[citation needed]
German and Austrian Pfund
[edit]Originally derived from the Roman libra, the definition varied throughout the Holy Roman Empire in the Middle Ages and onward. For example, the measures and weights of the Habsburg monarchy were reformed in 1761 by Empress Maria Theresa of Austria.[46] The unusually heavy Habsburg (civil) pound of 16 ounces was later defined in terms of 560.012 g (19.7538 oz). Bavarian reforms in 1809 and 1811 adopted essentially the same standard as the Austrian pound. In Prussia, a reform in 1816 defined a uniform civil pound in terms of the Prussian foot and distilled water, resulting in a Prussian pound of 467.711 g (16.4980 oz).
Between 1803 and 1815, all German regions west of the River Rhine were under French control, organised in the departements: Roer, Sarre, Rhin-et-Moselle, and Mont-Tonnerre. As a result of the Congress of Vienna, these regions again became part of various German states. However, many of these regions retained the metric system and adopted a metric pound of precisely 500 g (17.64 oz). In 1854, the pound of 500 g also became the official mass standard of the German Customs Union and was renamed the Zollpfund, but local pounds continued to co-exist with the Zollverein pound for some time in some German states. Nowadays, the term Pfund is sometimes still in use and universally refers to a pound of 500 g.[47]
Russian funt
[edit]The Russian pound (фунт, funt) is an obsolete Russian unit of measurement of mass. It is equal to 409.51718 g (14.445293 oz).[48] In 1899, the funt was the basic unit of weight, and all other units of weight were formed from it; in particular, a zolotnik was 1⁄96 of a funt, and a pood was 40 funty.
Skålpund
[edit]The Skålpund was a Scandinavian measurement that varied in weight between regions. From the 17th century onward, it was equal to 425.076 g (14.9941 oz) in Sweden but was abandoned in 1889 when Sweden switched to the metric system.
In Norway, the same name was used for a weight of 425.076 g (14.9941 oz). In Denmark, it equaled 471 g (16.6 oz).
In the 19th century, Denmark followed Germany's lead and redefined the pound as 500 g (18 oz).
Portuguese libra and arrátel
[edit]The Portuguese unit that corresponds to the pounds of different nations is the arrátel, equivalent to 16 ounces of Colonha, a variant of the Cologne standard. This arrátel was introduced in 1499 by Manuel I, king of Portugal. Based on an evaluation of bronze nesting weight piles distributed by Manuel I to different towns, the arrátel of Manuel I has been estimated to be of 457.8 g (16.15 oz). In the early 19th century, the arrátel was evaluated at 459 g (16.2 oz).[49]
In the 15th century, the arrátel was of 14 ounces of Colonha or 400.6 g (14.13 oz). The Portuguese libra was the same as 2 arráteis. There were also arráteis of 12.5 and 13 ounces and libras of 15 and 16 ounces. The Troyes or Tria standard was also used.[50]
Jersey pound
[edit]A Jersey pound is an obsolete unit of mass used on the island of Jersey from the 14th century to the 19th century. It was equivalent to about 7,561 grains (490 g (17 oz)). It may have been derived from the French livre poids de marc.[51]
Trone pound
[edit]The trone pound is one of a number of obsolete Scottish units of measurement. It was equivalent to between 21 and 28 avoirdupois ounces (about 600–800 g (21–28 oz)).
Metric pound
[edit]In many countries, upon the introduction of a metric system, the pound (or its translation) became an historic and obsolete term, although some have kept it as an informal term without a specific value. In German, the term is Pfund, in French livre, in Dutch pond, in Spanish and Portuguese libra, in Italian libbra, and in Danish and Swedish pund.
Though not from the same linguistic origin, the Chinese jīn (斤, also known as the "catty") in mainland China has a modern definition of exactly 500 g (18 oz), divided into 10 liǎng (两). Traditionally around 600 g (21 oz), the jin has been in use for more than two thousand years varying in exact value from one period to another, serving the same purpose as "pound" for the common-use measure of weight. In Hong Kong, for the purposes of commerce and trade between Britain and Imperial China in the preceding centuries, three Chinese catties were equivalent to four British imperial pounds, defining one catty as 604.78982 g (21.333333 oz) in weight precisely.
Hundreds of older pounds were replaced in this way. Examples of the older pounds are one of around 459–460 g (16.19–16.23 oz) in Spain, Portugal, and Latin America; one of 498.1 g (17.57 oz) in Norway; and several different ones in what is now Germany.
From the introduction of the kilogram scales and measuring devices are denominated only in grams and kilograms. A pound of product must be determined by weighing the product in grams as the use of the pound is not sanctioned for trade within the European Union.[52]
Use in weaponry
[edit]Smoothbore cannon and carronades are currently designated by the weight in imperial pounds of round solid iron shot of diameter to fit the barrel. A cannon that fires a six-pound ball, for example, is called a six-pounder. Standard sizes are 6, 12, 18, 24, 32, and 42 pounds; 60-pounders and 68-pounders also exist, along with other nonstandard weapons using the same scheme. Before the introduction of the metric system, countries that produced their own artillery generally used their national pound for these designations. See carronade.
A similar definition, using lead balls, exists for determining the gauge of shotguns and shotgun shells.
See also
[edit]Notes
[edit]- ^ The pound is often described as a unit of "weight", and the word "weight" can refer to either mass or force depending on context. Historically and in common parlance, "weight" refers to mass, but weight as used in modern physics is a force.
- ^ A difference of just 194.39673 milligrams
- ^ "Anglo-Saxon King Offa is credited with introducing the system of money to central and southern England in the latter half of the eighth century, overseeing the minting of the earliest English silver pennies – emblazoned with his name. In practice they varied considerably in weight and 240 of them seldom added up to a pound. There were at that time no larger denomination coins – pounds and shillings were merely useful units of account".[33] – Ed Lowther, BBC
References
[edit]- ^ a b United States National Bureau of Standards (25 June 1959). "Notices "Refinement of values for the yard and the pound"" (PDF). Retrieved 12 August 2006.
- ^ IEEE Std 260.1-2004, IEEE Standard Letter Symbols for Units of Measurement (SI Units, Customary Inch-Pound Units, and Certain Other Units)
- ^ Fletcher, Leroy S.; Shoup, Terry E. (1978), Introduction to Engineering, Prentice-Hall, ISBN 978-0135018583, LCCN 77024142.: 257
- ^ "pound sign". Oxford English Dictionary. Archived from the original on 3 April 2018.
- ^ "Letterlike Symbols | Range: 2100–214F" (PDF). The Unicode Standard, Version 15.0. Unicode Consortium. p. 2100/2123. Retrieved 28 April 2011.
2114 ℔ L B BAR SYMBOL
- ^ "The Dictionary of Medical and Surgical Knowledge". 1864. Retrieved 22 September 2016.
- ^ Oxford English Dictionary, s.v. 'pound'
- ^ Research Highlights of the National Bureau of Standards. United States: Department of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards. 1959. p. 13. Retrieved 12 July 2012.
- ^ Multiple sources:
- "Appendix 8".[vague] National Bureau of Standards. Archived 18 January 2009 at the Wayback Machine
- Bigg, P. H., et al. "Re-determination of the values of the imperial standard pound and of its parliamentary copies in terms of the international kilogramme during the years 1960 and 1961". National Physical Laboratory.
- "pound avoirdupois". Sizes.com. Archived 24 October 2019 at the Wayback Machine.
- ^ Quoted by Lord Justice Laws in the "Metric Martyrs" case: Thoburn v Sunderland City Council, Hunt v London Borough of Hackney, Harman & Dove v Cornwall County Council, Collins v London Borough of Sutton [2002] EWHC 195 (Admin)
- ^ a b "Weights and Measures Act 1963", legislation.gov.uk, The National Archives, 1963 c. 31
- ^ "EU gives up on 'metric Britain'". BBC News. 11 September 2007. Retrieved 4 May 2015.
- ^ Kelly, Jon (21 December 2011). "Will British people ever think in metric?". BBC News. Retrieved 4 May 2015.
- ^ "Appendix G – Weights and Measures". The World Factbook. Central Intelligence Agency. 17 January 2007. Archived from the original on 13 June 2007. Retrieved 4 February 2007.
- ^ "US 1988 law on metrification". Retrieved 21 September 2019.
- ^ "Countries not using SI". 22 March 2011. Retrieved 21 September 2019.
- ^ Zupko, Ronald Edward (1977). British weights & measures: a history from antiquity to the seventeenth century. Univ. of Wisconsin Press. p. 7. ISBN 9780299073404. Retrieved 27 November 2011.
- ^ Frederick George Skinner (1967). Weights and measures: their ancient origins and their development in Great Britain up to A.D. 1855. H.M.S.O. p. 65. ISBN 9789140059550. Retrieved 27 November 2011.
- ^ Chambers's encyclopaedia. Vol. 14. Pergamon Press. 1967. p. 476. Retrieved 27 November 2011.
- ^ "Grains and drams, ounces and pounds, stones and tons. Personal notes".
- ^ a b Zupko, Ronald Edward (1977). British weights & measures : a history from antiquity to the seventeenth century. Internet Archive. Madison : University of Wisconsin Press. p. 11. ISBN 978-0-299-07340-4.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: publisher location (link) - ^ Zupko, Ronald Edward (1977). British weights & measures : a history from antiquity to the seventeenth century. Internet Archive. Madison : University of Wisconsin Press. p. 78. ISBN 978-0-299-07340-4.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: publisher location (link) - ^ Skinner, F.G. (1952). "The English Yard and Pound Weight". Bulletin of the British Society for the History of Science. 1 (7): 184–6. doi:10.1017/S0950563600000646.
- ^ United States. National Bureau of Standards (1962). weights and measures. Taylor & Francis. pp. 22–24. GGKEY:4KXNZ63BNUF. Retrieved 26 December 2011.
- ^ a b c Barbrow, L.E.; Judson, L.V. (1976). Weights and measures standards of the United States – A brief history. Archived from the original on 11 May 2008.
- ^ Capotosto, R. (1983). 200 Original Shop Aids and Jigs for Woodworkers. Sterling Publishing Company, Inc.
- ^ United States National Bureau of Standards. "Appendix C of NIST Handbook 44, Specifications, Tolerances, and Other Technical Requirements for Weighing and Measuring Devices, General Tables of Units of Measurement" (PDF). p. C-14.
- ^ a b c Zupko, Ronald Edward (1 December 1985). Dictionary of Weights and Measures for the British Isles: The Middle Ages to the 20th Century. DIANE Publishing. ISBN 0-87169-168-X.
- ^ "Status Report of U.S. Government Gold Reserve" Archived 3 October 2015 at the Wayback Machine, Bureau of the Fiscal Service
- ^ Ross, Lester A. (1983). Archaeological Metrology: English, French, American, and Canadian Systems of Weights and Measures for North American Historical Archaeology (PDF). National Historic Parks and Sites Branch, Parks Canada, Environment Canada. p. 20. ISBN 978-0-660-11336-4.
- ^ Kampmann, Ursula (29 April 2013). Drachm, Dirham, Thaler, Pound: Money and currencies in history from earliest times to the euro. Conzett. p. 56. ISBN 978-3-03760-029-0.
- ^ Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Pound". Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 21: Payn–Polka (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 115.
- ^ Lowther, Ed (14 February 2014). "A short history of the pound". BBC News. BBC. Archived from the original on 21 July 2021. Retrieved 22 July 2021.
- ^ Geva, Benjamin (1 November 2011). The Payment Order of Antiquity and the Middle Ages: A Legal History. Bloomsbury. p. 88. ISBN 978-1-84731-843-5.
- ^ "A proclamation of Henry VIII". 5 November 1526. Proclamation 112 in Paul L. Hughes and James F. Larkin, editors. Tudor Royal Proclamations. Volume 1. New Haven: Yale University Press,1964. Archived 22 February 2014 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ R. D. Connor and A. D. C. Simpson. Weights and Measures in Scotland. A European Perspective. National Museums of Scotland and Tuckwell Press, 2004, page 116, quoting from H. W. Chisholm, Seventh Annual Report of the Warden for the Standards ... for 1872–73 (London, 1873), quoting from 1864 House of Commons Paper. Archived 22 February 2014 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ "Tower pound". Sizes.com. Retrieved 17 September 2016.
- ^ Facsimile of First Volume of Ms. Archives of the Worshipful Company of Grocers of the City of London A.D. 1345–1463. 1886.
- ^ The English manual of banking. 1877. Retrieved 17 September 2016.
- ^ "Weights used for gold". Tax Free Gold. Retrieved 14 January 2011.
- ^ "A brief history of the pound". The Dozenal Society of Great Britain. Retrieved 14 January 2011.
- ^ a b Ruffhead, Owen, ed. (1763a), The Statutes at Large, vol. I: From Magna Charta to the End of the Reign of King Henry the Sixth. To which is prefixed, A Table of the Titles of all the Publick and Private Statutes during that Time, London: Mark Basket for the Crown, pp. 148–149. (in English) & (in Latin) & (in Norman)
- ^ United States National Bureau of Standards. "Appendix C of NIST Handbook 44, Specifications, Tolerances, and Other Technical Requirements for Weighing and Measuring Devices, General Tables of Units of Measurement" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 26 November 2006. "In Great Britain, the Yard, the Avoirdupois Pound, the troy pound, and the Apothecaries pound are identical with the units of the same names used in the United States." (The introduction to this appendix makes it clear that the appendix is only for convenience and has no normative value: "In most of the other tables, only a limited number of decimal places are given, therefore making the tables better adopted to the average user.")
- ^ a b Schilbach, Erich (1991). "Litra". In Kazhdan, Alexander P. (ed.). Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium. Oxford University Press. p. 1238. ISBN 0-19-504652-8.
- ^ a b c d Sizes, Inc. (16 March 2001). "Pre-metric French units of mass livre and smaller". Retrieved 12 August 2006.
- ^ Hille, K.C. (1831). "Medicinal-Gewicht". Magazin für Pharmacie und die dahin einschlagenden Wissenschaften. Heidelberg: 268.
- ^ Entry for Pfund Archived 2 May 2022 at the Wayback Machine at Duden.online.
- ^ Cardarelli, F. (2004). Encyclopaedia of Scientific Units, Weights and Measures: Their SI Equivalences and Origins (2nd ed.). Springer. p. 122. ISBN 1-85233-682-X.
- ^ Luís Seabra Lopes, "As Pilhas de Pesos de Dom Manuel I: Contributo para a sua Caracterização, Inventariação e Avaliação", Portugalia: Nova Série, vol. 39, Universidade do Porto, 2018, p. 217-251.
- ^ Luís Seabra Lopes, "Sistemas Legais de Medidas de Peso e Capacidade, do Condado Portucalense ao Século XVI", Portugalia: Nova Série, vol. 24, 2003, p. 113-164.
- ^ Sizes, Inc. (28 July 2003). "Jersey pound". Retrieved 12 August 2006.
- ^ The Council of the European Communities (27 May 2009). "Council Directive 80/181/EEC of 20 December 1979 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to Unit of measurement and on the repeal of Directive 71/354/EEC". Retrieved 14 September 2009.
External links
[edit]Pound (mass)
View on GrokipediaDefinition and Standards
Exact Equivalence and Legal Definitions
The international avoirdupois pound is legally defined as exactly 0.45359237 kilograms, a standardization adopted on July 1, 1959, through an agreement among the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and South Africa to align imperial units with metric equivalents for enhanced precision and interoperability.[3] This exact conversion factor—derived from equating the yard to precisely 0.9144 meters and preserving the established pound-to-yard ratio—replaced prior national approximations that had permitted minor discrepancies due to prototype artifacts.[3] In the United States, this definition serves as the legal standard for mass in commerce, trade, and metrology, as codified in federal references including NIST handbooks and regulations governing quantity declarations, which mandate the avoirdupois pound for non-metric weight expressions while tying it to the SI kilogram.[4] Similarly, the United Kingdom and Commonwealth nations incorporated the identical value into their statutory instruments post-1959, ensuring uniformity in legal metrology.[3] This post-1959 equivalence achieves unprecedented exactness by anchoring the pound to the international kilogram, which from 1889 to 2019 was realized via a platinum-iridium prototype but has since 2019 been redefined through fundamental constants—the Planck constant, speed of light, and cesium hyperfine transition frequency—thereby linking the unit indirectly to the meter (via light's propagation) and second without reliance on physical artifacts.[5] Prior historical pounds, often calibrated against varying brass or iron standards, lacked such invariance, introducing uncertainties up to several parts per million across jurisdictions.[3]Relation to the Kilogram and International Prototype
The international avoirdupois pound is defined as exactly 0.45359237 kilograms, a relation fixed by international agreement among major English-speaking nations in 1959 to ensure consistency in scientific and commercial measurements.[6] Prior to the 2019 SI revision, this kilogram was realized through traceability to the International Prototype Kilogram (IPK), a platinum-iridium artifact maintained at the International Bureau of Weights and Measures (BIPM) since 1889. National metrology bodies, including the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (formerly the National Bureau of Standards), relied on secondary prototypes calibrated periodically against the IPK; NIST's K20 cylinder, for example, functioned as the primary U.S. national mass standard until it was superseded.[5] These artifacts provided the practical basis for disseminating the kilogram—and thus the pound—through calibration chains, though they were subject to gradual mass drift due to surface contamination and cleaning effects. The 26th General Conference on Weights and Measures, held in November 2018, approved the SI redefinition effective May 20, 2019, which fixed the kilogram by assigning an exact value to the Planck constant (h = 6.62607015 × 10^{-34} J⋅s), rendering the IPK and national prototypes obsolete as primary standards.[7] The pound's numerical equivalence to 0.45359237 kg remains unaltered, but its metrological foundation now derives indirectly from this invariant constant, with kilogram realizations achieved via apparatus-independent methods such as the Kibble (watt) balance or silicon sphere X-ray crystal density measurements. This transition enhances long-term reproducibility in precision metrology, as the former IPK had exhibited a net mass loss of about 50 μg over 130 years, introducing uncertainties in traceability that artifact-based systems could not fully mitigate.[8] In non-SI customary systems like the U.S., the pound continues as a derived unit for legal and practical purposes, with calibrations now anchored to SI realizations for stability against environmental or handling-induced variations.[6]Etymology and Linguistic Origins
Derivation from Latin and Indo-European Roots
The English word "pound," denoting a unit of mass, originates from the Old English pund, which was borrowed into Proto-Germanic as *pundą from the Latin ablative phrase libra pondō, literally translating to "a pound by weight."[9] This construction combined libra, the Latin term for the Roman unit of weight equivalent to approximately 327.45 grams, with pondō, the ablative form of pondus meaning "weight" or "that which is weighed."[10] The borrowing occurred in the early medieval period, reflecting the influence of Roman metrology on Germanic-speaking regions through trade and coinage standardization, where the term denoted a specific weight of silver.[9] In Latin, libra primarily signified "scales" or "balance," evoking the instrument used for weighing, and secondarily the standard weight balanced against commodities; its abbreviation as "lb" (later pluralized as "lbs") persists in English from this root, independent of the word "pound" itself. Meanwhile, pondus derived from the verb pendere, meaning "to weigh" or "to hang" (as in suspending an object on a scale), emphasizing the causal action of measurement through suspension and equilibrium.[11] This verb traces to Proto-Italic *pendō, ultimately from the Proto-Indo-European root *(s)pen- "to draw, stretch, or spin," which connoted extension or tension, as in stretching fibers or drawing out weight in balance—concepts foundational to early weighing practices. The adaptation into Old English pund around the 8th century marked a phonological shift typical of Germanic integration of Latin loanwords, with the "d" sound preserved from *pondō and cognates emerging across West Germanic languages, such as Old High German pfunt (modern German Pfund) and Old Dutch pond (modern Dutch pond).[9] These parallels indicate a shared Proto-Germanic borrowing rather than independent derivations, disseminated via Carolingian economic reforms in the 8th–9th centuries that standardized weights for commerce.[9] Further cognates appear in North Germanic (Danish and Swedish pund) and, through later medieval borrowing, in Slavic languages like Polish funt and Russian funt, borrowed from Low German variants of Pfund.[12] This linguistic diffusion underscores the term's deep embedding in Indo-European traditions of metrological terminology, rooted in the PIE *(s)pen- stem's semantic field of tension and measure.Evolution in English and Related Languages
In Old English, the term pund referred to a unit of weight derived from Latin pondo ("by weight") through West Germanic forms, establishing its foundational role in measuring mass.[13] By the Middle English period, this evolved into "pound," retaining its primary denotation for mass while extending to currency via the pound sterling, which denoted a specific weight of sterling silver (originally 240 silver pennies equaling one pound tower weight).[14] This linguistic duality underscored the economic interdependence of weight standards and coinage value in medieval trade, with the term's versatility persisting in English-speaking regions. The abbreviation "lb" entered English usage in the late 14th century, directly from Latin libra (the Roman unit of balance or scales underlying the pound), often as part of libra pondo ("pound weight").[14] Scribes adopted "lbs" as a plural marker by adding an "s" to the abbreviated form, a convention that arose to clarify multiples despite libra being grammatically singular; this persisted as a standardized irregularity in English orthography, even as "lb" remained applicable to both singular and plural quantities.[14] Cognates in related languages, such as French livre, mirrored this evolution by denoting both a mass unit (one pound of silver, subdivided into 16 onces) and the kingdom's chief currency from the Carolingian era onward.[15] The livre's dual semantic load—tied to the intrinsic value of silver weight in coins—endured until the French Revolution's monetary reforms of 1795, which decimalized currency under the franc (set equivalent to one livre for continuity but detached from traditional weight nomenclature), thereby disentangling monetary from mass terminology while the weight sense lingered in specialized metric transitions.[16]Ancient Origins
Roman Libra and Its Subdivisions
The Roman libra (plural librae), also known as the Roman pound, functioned as the fundamental unit of mass during the Roman Republic and Empire, with modern reconstructions estimating its weight at approximately 327.45 grams based on historical analyses of bronze standards and coinage.[17] This value derives from comparisons with surviving artifacts and textual references, though slight variations existed due to regional production tolerances, ranging typically from 322 to 329 grams across the empire.[18] The libra was subdivided into 12 uncae (singular uncia, meaning "one-twelfth"), each equivalent to roughly 27.3 grams, reflecting a duodecimal system that facilitated fractional divisions for commerce and engineering.[19] Further subdivisions included the sextans (1/6 uncia), quadrans (1/4 uncia), and smaller units like the semuncia (1/2 uncia), enabling precise measurements in daily transactions. Employed extensively from the Republican era (c. 509 BCE) onward, the libra standardized weights for trade in goods such as grain, metals, and textiles, as well as military logistics including soldier pay and equipment rations.[18] Bronze libra weights, often cast with official markings from municipal authorities, have been recovered from archaeological contexts, providing direct evidence of standardized enforcement; for instance, excavations at Pompeii and Herculaneum yielded weights averaging around 323 grams, consistent with imperial-era norms despite minor deviations from ideal values.[20] Balance scales (statera) paired with these weights, frequently made of bronze, facilitated verification in markets and workshops, underscoring the libra's role in economic reliability across provinces.[21] The libra also underpinned early Roman coinage through its equivalence to the as, a bronze coin initially minted to weigh exactly one libra of copper (aes rude standardized into bars and later coins), thereby merging mass measurement with monetary value in the libral standard system predating silver denarii.[22] This integration, evident from mid-Republic aes grave coins weighing near 270-320 grams (post-reduction from full libra), ensured that fiscal transactions reflected tangible metal content, promoting trust in republican commerce until inflationary debasements in the 3rd century BCE.Pre-Roman and Early Influences
The Babylonian mina, a key unit in Mesopotamian commerce dating to the second millennium BCE, weighed approximately 504 grams based on talent standards of 30.24 kilograms divided into 60 minas, facilitating trade in metals and goods that extended westward via Phoenician networks around 1000 BCE.[23] Similarly, the Egyptian deben, standardized at 91 grams during the New Kingdom (c. 1550–1069 BCE), measured commodities like grain and precious metals, with artifacts demonstrating its use in exchange systems that intersected Mediterranean routes, potentially seeding comparative weighing practices in emerging Greek polities.[24] These Near Eastern standards provided causal precedents for weight hierarchies—mina as a mid-tier unit akin to later pounds—through mercantile diffusion, as evidenced by shared metrological ratios in Levantine and Aegean contexts, though direct equivalence to Roman forms remains inferential from trade artifacts rather than unbroken lineage. In Greek Sicily, the litra emerged as a regional weight unit by the fifth century BCE, referenced by Herodotus in descriptions of silver measures (Histories 7.26), with Sicilian variants approximating 320 grams based on numismatic and balance evidence from colonies like Syracuse, acting as a bridge between Eastern heavier minas and Italic adaptations. This unit, tied to local silver trade and differing from Attic talents, reflected intermediary evolution: Greek merchants recalibrated Eastern imports for colonial economies, incorporating variability from bronze or stone alloys that caused empirical deviations of 5–10% in surviving exemplars, underscoring pre-standardization flux driven by material inconsistencies and assay tolerances rather than uniform imperial decree. Such non-uniformity, observable in archaeological hoards from Sicilian sites, highlights causal realism in metrology—local fabrication and erosion precluded precision, compelling Romans to inherit and refine these influences amid expanding hegemony.Medieval and Early Modern Developments in Britain
Avoirdupois Pound Establishment
The avoirdupois system originated in medieval England as a distinct method for weighing bulk commodities, particularly wool, which dominated the economy from the late 13th to 15th centuries and involved international trade with regions like Italy.[25][26] Unlike the troy system reserved for precious metals and drugs, avoirdupois weights emphasized practicality for heavier, non-precious goods, with subdivisions including the stone (14 pounds) and clove (7 pounds) tailored to wool sacks.[27] By the mid-14th century, Winchester standards under Edward III (circa 1357) reflected its use, and a 1353 statute addressed fraud by requiring uniform weights for "aver de pois" merchandise such as wools, stating that merchants could not buy by one weight and sell by another.[27][25] The pound itself was defined as 16 ounces, providing better divisibility into halves, quarters, and eighths compared to earlier mercantile variants, which enhanced efficiency in trade transactions for larger quantities.[25] This structure made the avoirdupois pound heavier—approximately 454 grams when standardized—than the 12-ounce troy pound of about 373 grams, accommodating the scale of commodity dealings without the finer precision needed for metals.[27] In the late 15th century, Henry VII formalized the system through a 1496 royal commission that inquired into British weights and measures, standardizing the avoirdupois pound at 16 troy ounces (7,680 grains) for general commercial use while specifying a wool variant of 16 ounces at 7,000 grains total in 1497; brass and bronze prototypes were distributed to towns, with older standards destroyed to enforce uniformity.[27][25] By the 16th century, under Henry VIII, it was redefined precisely as 7,000 troy grains (equivalent to 453.592 grams), aligning with barley or wheat grain counts and solidifying its basis for everyday bulk weighing.[27] This grain-derived mass persisted, distinguishing avoirdupois from lighter systems and supporting enforcement against variants through parliamentary acts.[28]Troy, Tower, and Merchants' Pounds
The troy pound, comprising 12 troy ounces or 5,760 grains and equivalent to 373.24 grams, served as the specialized unit for weighing precious metals like gold and silver in medieval Britain.[29][30] This system, rooted in traditional English commercial practices, was applied in assaying and trade contexts from at least the 13th century onward.[31] The Tower pound, lighter at 5,400 grains or approximately 350 grams, was designated for minting coinage at the Tower of London, reflecting its distinct role in monetary production separate from broader commercial weights.[32] In 1526, under Henry VIII, this unit was abolished and replaced by the troy pound to standardize mint operations with precious metals assay standards, increasing the effective weight basis by about 6.67%.[33] The merchants' pound, defined as 15 troy ounces or 7,200 grains, facilitated trade with continental partners, including those from Rhineland regions via Hanseatic influences, allowing for larger consignments in bulk transactions.[34][35] It gained prominence in English commerce around the late 13th century but was gradually phased out by the early 15th century as standardized local systems, such as the emerging London pound, supplanted it for domestic and international dealings.[34]London Pound Standardization
The Magna Carta, sealed by King John on June 15, 1215, mandated uniform measures of wine, ale, corn, and cloth across England, explicitly referencing the London quarter as the standard for dyed and russet cloth and for corn, positioning London as the kingdom's de facto reference for trade weights amid widespread local variations.[36] This clause addressed chronic abuses in measurement practices, where merchants exploited discrepancies to inflate or deflate values, thereby promoting London's emerging role as a central trade hub with verifiable standards.[37] In the 14th century, royal ordinances under Edward II and Edward III reinforced uniformity, with London's Guildhall emerging as a primary site for verifying and stamping trade weights, including early pound variants used for wool and merchandise.[34] These efforts countered fragmented local pounds—such as the lighter Tower pound of 5,400 troy grains or the sterling pound tied to coinage—by favoring London's mercantile practices, which emphasized practical consistency for international commerce over rigid subdivisions like the 12-ounce troy system.[38] The Guildhall's standards, enforced through guild oversight and royal assizes, gradually influenced provincial adoption, though enforcement remained inconsistent due to regional guild autonomy and smuggling incentives. By the early 16th century, under Henry VII, the London mercantile pound was formalized as 7,680 troy grains (equivalent to 16 troy ounces), distinct from the avoirdupois pound emerging for staple goods like wool at approximately 6,992 grains, solidifying London's standards as a bridge to national prototypes.[38][34] This 1497 standard, maintained at the Guildhall, prioritized export trade accuracy, weighing about 498 grams and reflecting adjustments from medieval wheat-grain calibrations to align with Hanseatic and continental exchanges, though it coexisted with the lighter troy pound for precious metals until further reforms.[34]Continental European Variants
French Livre and Its Reforms
The livre, a traditional French unit of mass derived from the Latin libra, was standardized during the Carolingian era in the 8th century under Charlemagne, with a theoretical weight of approximately 409.32 grams based on surviving metrological artifacts and coinage analyses.[39] This Carolingian livre served as the foundation for subsequent French weight systems, initially tied to silver coinage reforms around AD 793–794, where it equated to the mass of silver in 240 denarii, though regional variations emerged over time as local standards diverged from the imperial prototype.[40] By the late medieval period, the livre de poids commonly used for commodities was subdivided into 16 onces, each approximately 30.59 grams, reflecting an avoirdupois-style system distinct from the 12-ounce troy variants employed in precious metals.[41] Variations persisted across French provinces, with the Paris livre stabilizing around 489.5 grams by the early modern era, equivalent to about 1.079 avoirdupois pounds, as documented in historical trade records and legal decrees.[42] These inconsistencies, ranging from 380 to 552 grams depending on locale, prompted reform efforts culminating in the Revolutionary period's metrological overhaul.[41] In the late 18th century, the French Academy of Sciences proposed decimal subdivisions to rationalize units like the livre, aiming for universality based on natural constants such as Earth's meridian quadrant.[43] Although a 500-gram "livre métrique" was briefly considered as a transitional metric-aligned pound during this shift, the National Convention's 1795 decree formalized the gram instead, derived from one cubic centimeter of water, rejecting the livre to fully decimalize and sever ties with feudal variability.[44] Napoleon reinstated limited customary units in 1812, defining the livre métrique precisely at 500 grams for retail and agriculture to ease adoption, but it was phased out by 1837 in favor of pure metric standards.[44] [45] The livre endured in French colonial legacies, notably Quebec, where pre-metric French units informed local practices in trade and agriculture until Canada's national metrication initiative began in 1970, enforcing gram-based measures by the mid-1970s amid residual customary references in rural and historical contexts.[42]German and Austrian Pfund
The Pfund served as the primary unit of mass in Germanic regions of the Holy Roman Empire, with values varying by locality due to the empire's fragmented political structure comprising hundreds of semi-autonomous city-states, principalities, and territories. The Rhineland Pfund, centered on Cologne standards, weighed approximately 467.7 grams (derived from two Cologne Mark of 233.856 grams each) and functioned as a key commercial benchmark for northern trade routes, influencing weights in areas like Prussia where a 1816 reform formalized a civil Pfund of 467.711 grams based on volumetric definitions involving distilled water.[46][47] Southern variants diverged, as seen in Württemberg contexts where the Pfund approximated 467.59 grams, reflecting incremental adjustments for local commerce rather than imperial uniformity.[46] Trade guilds and leagues, such as the Hanseatic League, mitigated discrepancies through calibrated brass prototypes enforced at markets and ports; Hamburg standards, for instance, subdivided the Pfund into 32 Loth (with a Mark of 16 Loth), promoting consistency in bulk goods like grain and metals across Baltic and North Sea networks, as evidenced by preserved sets of nested brass weights traceable to 16th-18th century guild inspections.[48] These localized enforcements underscored the Pfund's role in mercantile reliability amid imperial disunity, where discrepancies could reach 10-20% between regions without such oversight. In Habsburg Austria, the Wiener Pfund was notably heavier at about 560.06 grams, aligned with 16-ounce subdivisions and used in civil and apothecary contexts until reforms in 1871-1872 transitioned it to the 500-gram Zollpfund under customs union pressures, though Bavarian equivalents from 1809-1811 reforms mirrored this heavier scale before broader metric adoption.[47] This divergence from lighter northern standards highlighted persistent regionalism, with Austrian weights calibrated via brass artifacts for imperial trade until 19th-century centralization efforts.[47]Russian Funt and Eastern Equivalents
The Russian funt (фунт), serving as the standard pound-like unit of mass in Tsarist Russia, weighed approximately 408–409.5 grams and represented a distinctly heavier Eastern counterpart to Western European pounds.[49] This value was subdivided into 32 lots (лот), with each lot equating to roughly 12.75–12.8 grams, facilitating precise measurements in trade and administration.[50] The funt's heft reflected adaptations for bulk commodities prevalent in Russian commerce, diverging from lighter Roman-derived standards.[51] Standardization efforts under Peter the Great in the early 18th century aligned the funt with emerging imperial metrology, building on pre-reform variability while promoting uniformity across the expanding empire.[52] Though roots traced to medieval Slavic and possibly Byzantine-influenced systems via Kievan Rus' trade networks, the funt evolved into a practical tool for imperial governance rather than strict continuity from ancient precedents.[53] It persisted as the dominant mass unit for everyday and official purposes, including the fur trade—a cornerstone of Siberian economic expansion—and gunpowder distribution for military logistics, until the Bolshevik government's compulsory adoption of the metric system in 1918.[54][55] Eastern equivalents, such as the analogous funt in Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth territories (often mirroring the Russian mass at around 410 grams), shared this heavier profile due to regional trade interconnections, contrasting with lighter Germanic or French variants.[56] These units underscored a broader Eastern European divergence in mass standards, prioritizing robustness for expansive land-based economies over maritime precision. Post-1918, residual funt references lingered in archival and folk contexts, but metric enforcement eradicated practical application.[54]Scandinavian and Iberian Variants
In Scandinavia, the skålpund functioned as a primary unit of mass in Sweden and Norway, typically equivalent to 425 grams and subdivided into 2 mark (each approximately 212.5 grams).[57] This unit, employed in regional trade including commodities like butter, consisted of 16 smaller divisions known as skålar, reflecting practical adaptations for local commerce from medieval times through the early modern period. Variations existed across regions, with Norwegian standards occasionally differing slightly before 1683, when the skålpund aligned closer to 425-428 grams in standardized forms. In the Iberian Peninsula, Portugal's arrátel emerged as the foundational weight unit by the late medieval era, fixed at 16 onças (ounces) under a 1499 decree by King Manuel I and equating to roughly 459 grams.[58] This measure supported colonial exports, including staples like salt cod, persisting as a trade benchmark until metric reforms in the mid-19th century.[59] In salt cod transactions—vital to exchanges between Norwegian producers and Portuguese markets—humidity levels influenced dried product weights, as relative humidity exceeding 75% prompted salt to absorb atmospheric moisture, necessitating empirical conditioning and weighing protocols to mitigate variability in mass during storage and transport.[60]Adoption and Evolution in the United States
Colonial Inheritance and Early Definitions
The American colonies directly inherited the British avoirdupois pound, defined as 7,000 grains and comprising 16 ounces, as the standard unit for weighing commodities in everyday commerce and trade.[61] This system, rooted in medieval English practices refined by the 14th century, was transported by settlers and enforced through colonial governance structures modeled on English precedents.[62] British standards served as the primary reference, with colonists replicating brass weights and scales imported from England or crafted locally to match them.[62] In the 1630s, early New England settlements such as Plymouth Colony—formalized under a 1620 patent and subsequent royal confirmations—and the Massachusetts Bay Colony integrated these weights into local ordinances for fair exchange. Plymouth's governance, drawing from English common law, applied avoirdupois to mercantile activities like provisioning ships and distributing goods, while Massachusetts Bay enacted specific regulations requiring millers to weigh grain inputs and outputs against standard measures to prevent fraud.[61] These practices ensured consistency in bulk commodities, though enforcement relied on appointed sealers verifying weights against English-derived prototypes. Despite this foundational uniformity in the pound, colonial implementations showed localized discrepancies, particularly in aggregate measures like the bushel, which equated to 28 pounds in Connecticut but 32 pounds in New Jersey, reflecting adjustments for regional agriculture and trade customs.[61] The base grain—originally approximated by the weight of three barleycorns—varied slightly due to inconsistent local calibrations using natural references like barley or wheat until brass standards proliferated.[61] Such variations persisted amid decentralized authority, with colonies maintaining independent assayers rather than unified oversight. As revolutionary pressures mounted, the Continental Congress in 1776 endorsed continuity of these inherited British weights for interstate commerce and supply logistics, embedding the principle of uniformity in early confederation debates to facilitate economic coordination among the United Colonies.[63] This affirmation preserved the avoirdupois pound's role in wartime requisitions and trade, bridging colonial practices to post-independence frameworks without immediate redefinition.[62]19th-Century Standardization
In response to the demands of industrialization and expanding commerce, the United States sought to establish uniform national standards for weights and measures in the mid-19th century, drawing directly from British prototypes to ensure compatibility with inherited trade practices. A joint resolution of Congress on June 14, 1836, authorized the Secretary of the Treasury to procure a complete set of standard weights and measures, including the avoirdupois pound, and distribute copies to the states, territories, and customs houses.[64] These prototypes were crafted as precise replicas of the British parliamentary standards of 1855, with the avoirdupois pound defined as exactly 7,000 grains, aligning it with the imperial pound then in use across transatlantic commerce.[65] This effort aimed to supplant inconsistent local variations inherited from colonial eras, promoting reliability in manufacturing, shipping, and market transactions. The American Civil War (1861–1865) intensified the push for standardization, as discrepancies in weights could disrupt munitions production and logistics, where precise measurements for gunpowder, projectiles, and supplies were critical for battlefield efficacy. Federal oversight through the Treasury and War Departments enforced adherence to the 1836 prototypes in ordnance factories and contractors, ensuring consistency in artillery shells—such as the 6-pounder field gun projectiles weighing approximately 5.8 to 6 pounds—and powder charges to minimize variances that might affect range or reliability.[66] This wartime application underscored the practical imperatives of causal uniformity in mass production, bridging artisanal inconsistencies toward industrialized precision without altering the pound's definition. By 1866, amid post-war reconstruction and international metric advocacy, Congress enacted the Metric Act (Public Law 39-183) on July 28, legalizing the metric system's use in domestic and foreign commerce while explicitly retaining the avoirdupois pound and other customary units as the default for everyday applications.[67] The law authorized the Treasury to fabricate and distribute metric equivalents alongside imperial standards but imposed no mandate for metric adoption, preserving the pound's primacy in U.S. statutes, coinage, and trade to avoid disrupting entrenched economic habits.[68] This dual authorization reflected pragmatic realism: metric familiarity for global interfaces, yet fidelity to the pound for internal stability, as verified through ongoing Treasury calibrations against the 1836 baselines.20th-Century Mendenhall Order and Modern Maintenance
In 1893, the United States Treasury Department, under Superintendent of Weights and Measures Thomas Corwin Mendenhall, issued an order on April 5 redefining the customary yard and avoirdupois pound in terms of metric prototypes held by the International Bureau of Weights and Measures.[69] This Mendenhall Order established the international prototype meter as the base for length and the international prototype kilogram for mass, setting the pound at exactly 453.5924277 grams to align U.S. standards with international metric artifacts while preserving customary units for practical use.[69] The order did not abolish imperial units but subordinated them to metric fundamentals, facilitating scientific and trade consistency without immediate metrication.[70] This linkage was refined through an international agreement effective July 1, 1959, among the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and South Africa, which standardized the avoirdupois pound at exactly 0.45359237 kilograms.[3] The adjustment reconciled slight discrepancies between U.S. and Commonwealth definitions arising from prototype calibrations, adopting a value derived from averaged measurements to ensure interoperability in global commerce and metrology.[71] The National Bureau of Standards (predecessor to NIST) implemented this for all calibrations, maintaining the pound's fixed ratio to the kilogram while allowing customary units to persist in legal and industrial contexts.[3] Following the 2019 redefinition of the International System of Units (SI), which fixed the kilogram via the Planck constant rather than physical artifacts, the pound's value remained unchanged at 0.45359237 kg, with traceability ensured through NIST's realization of the SI kilogram.[5] NIST maintains this by calibrating national mass standards, including legacy prototypes like the K20 kilogram (a U.S. copy of the international prototype), against quantum-based methods such as the Kibble balance and xenon-filled silicon sphere volume determinations.[5] These processes provide continuous verification and dissemination of the pound's mass equivalent, supporting precision measurements in sectors reliant on customary units despite the shift to invariant SI constants.[5] NIST's role extends to accrediting state laboratories and issuing certificates that link working weights to the defined kilogram, preserving metrological continuity without altering the 1959 pound value.[5]Current and Residual Uses
Legal Status in the United States
The Fair Packaging and Labeling Act of 1966 requires that declarations of net quantity of contents on most consumer packages include both U.S. customary units—such as the avoirdupois pound and ounce—and equivalent metric units, with the customary units often presented as the primary declaration for products like food and meat.[72] This dual-labeling mandate, updated in 1992 to incorporate metric equivalents, ensures the pound remains legally permissible and visible on packaging without requiring metric exclusivity.[72] No federal statute mandates the sole use of metric units in private commerce or consumer applications; the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988 designates the metric system as the preferred measurement system for U.S. trade and commerce but imposes no compulsory conversion, allowing the avoirdupois pound to retain full legal validity alongside metric alternatives.[73] The pound dominates everyday transactions, including retail sales and agricultural practices such as livestock auctions, where animal weights are typically quoted and sold by the pound.[74] State laws reinforce this status by explicitly incorporating the avoirdupois pound into regulatory frameworks. For instance, Virginia defines a "ton" as 2,000 pounds avoirdupois for livestock weighing by certified weighmasters, while Florida statutes use the same definition for commercial feed and fertilizers.[75][76] Although some states have explored metric promotion, customary units like the pound persist without prohibition, reflecting the absence of enforced metric-only policies at any government level.[73]United Kingdom and Commonwealth Persistence
In the United Kingdom, the Weights and Measures Act 1985 established a dual system of measurement, defining both the pound (0.45359237 kilograms) and the kilogram as legal units of mass, permitting their concurrent use in trade and commerce under specified conditions.[77] This legislation facilitated a hybrid approach post-metrication, where metric units predominate in scientific, industrial, and most retail contexts, but imperial units like the pound remain permissible for supplementary labeling on packaged goods and for the sale of loose items such as fruits and vegetables in quantities not exceeding 1 kilogram equivalent.[78] Road signage continues to employ imperial units exclusively, with distances marked in miles and yards, and speed limits in miles per hour, as required by the Traffic Signs Regulations, reflecting persistent practical reliance on familiar imperial measures for public safety and navigation.[79] Following Brexit, the UK government initiated a consultation in June 2022 to review EU-derived restrictions on imperial units for sales and markings, aiming to expand options for traders by potentially allowing pounds as primary units in more retail scenarios.[80] However, the December 2023 government response confirmed retention of metric primacy, citing overwhelming public and stakeholder opposition—99% of consultation respondents favored maintaining existing rules—while noting that scientific and technical fields remain firmly metric-based due to international standards alignment.[81] Among Commonwealth nations, Canada pursued metrication from 1970, with formal completion targeted by 1985 through the Weights and Measures Act amendments, yet pounds endure in residual applications like household recipes, personal body weight, and some consumer goods labeling despite official metric mandates.[82] Australia achieved substantial metric conversion by the early 1980s, following the Metric Conversion Act 1970, but imperial pounds persist informally in cooking recipes and niche sectors such as clothing sizing, underscoring cultural inertia over full eradication.[83]Global Holdouts and Niche Applications
Liberia persists as a notable global holdout for the avoirdupois pound outside major Anglo-American contexts, retaining imperial units in everyday commerce, agriculture, and construction due to its 19th-century founding by American colonists and enduring economic ties with the United States. Despite official adoption of the metric system in the 1970s and renewed government commitments to metrication in the 2010s, practical usage of pounds for weighing produce, livestock, and building materials remains widespread, particularly in rural areas and informal markets like those in Monrovia. As of 2024, incomplete infrastructure and cultural familiarity hinder full transition, with imperial measures comprising a significant portion of non-official transactions.[84][85][86] In niche international applications, the related troy pound—defined as 12 troy ounces or approximately 373.24 grams—endures in the global trade of precious metals and certain gemstones, such as opals, where it provides a standardized reference for bulk valuations transcending national metric systems. This unit, lighter than the avoirdupois pound, facilitates precise quoting in commodity exchanges and refining operations worldwide, including in metric-dominant regions like Europe and Asia, due to its entrenched role in historical assay standards and modern market conventions. Adoption persists because deviations could disrupt pricing consistency in high-value transactions involving gold, silver, and platinum.[87][88]Specialized and Proposed Variants
Byzantine Litra and Eastern Mediterranean Use
The Byzantine litra (λίτρα), inherited from the Roman libra and standardized under Constantine I at approximately 327.45 grams, served as the principal unit of mass in the Eastern Roman Empire from the 4th century onward, with weights stabilizing around 322–324 grams by the early medieval period.[89][90] Archaeological exemplars, such as a 6th-century bronze weight from Hadrianopolis weighing 323.90 grams, confirm this range, reflecting centralized imperial oversight to ensure uniformity in fiscal and commercial transactions across Eastern Mediterranean provinces.[91] In Constantinople, the empire's commercial nexus from the 7th to 15th centuries, the litra measured luxury imports like silk—bolstered by the state's silkworm monopoly after 552—and spices routed through Levantine and Black Sea ports, enabling precise taxation and exchange in a hub linking Europe, Asia, and Africa.[92] This application extended the litra's utility as a bridge between Byzantine Orthodox domains and adjacent Islamic realms, where shared trade corridors necessitated compatible standards amid fluctuating borders and alliances. The unit's division into 12 ounces (ounkia) further accommodated granular weighing, while one litra of gold equated to 72 nomismata (solidi coins of ~4.55 grams each), tying mass directly to monetary value for gold bullion and coinage assays.[89] Post-1453 Ottoman administration in former Byzantine territories absorbed elements of this system, with the ratl (ratl ilmî, ~321 grams) mirroring the litra for bulk goods and influencing hierarchical subdivisions down to the dirhem (~3 grams), thus perpetuating Eastern Mediterranean continuity in Orthodox-influenced Balkan and Anatolian markets despite metric shifts elsewhere.[93][94]Jersey, Trone, and Local Island Pounds
The Jersey pound served as a local unit of mass in the Channel Islands, particularly for agricultural commodities like butter and produce, with a value approximating 450 grams based on historical Norman-influenced standards akin to the Rouen pound of 18 ounces.[95] This variant persisted in insular trade until the mid-19th century, when imperial standards were imposed via local ordinances around 1844, reflecting the islands' legal autonomy as Crown dependencies exempt from direct parliamentary oversight until then.[95] Geographic isolation and economies reliant on cross-channel smuggling fostered retention of such non-mainland measures, enabling small-scale, self-regulated commerce less vulnerable to English customs enforcement.[96] In Scotland, the trone represented a regional weight system for market goods, with the trone pound varying between 21 and 28 avoirdupois ounces (approximately 600–800 grams), subdivided into 20 trone ounces for practical divisions in burgh transactions.[97] Primarily applied at public trone scales to coarse commodities such as wool, cheese, and tallow—where allowances for wastage were customary—it differed from finer troy weights used by apothecaries and jewelers, emphasizing utility in everyday local exchanges over precision for precious materials.[98] Though efforts to standardize began with the 1618 Assize of Weights (ratified 1624), trone measures endured in peripheral and island contexts until formal abolition under the British Weights and Measures Act of 1824, which aligned Scottish practices with imperial uniformity.[97][95] These insular pounds underscored decentralized metrology in outlying British realms, where enforcement challenges and reliance on intra-island or smuggling-linked trade preserved variants for small-scale dealings, distinct from centralized avoirdupois adoption on the mainland.[95] Verification by local officials, such as Jersey's sub-inspectors or Scotland's tron-keepers, further insulated these systems until legislative convergence in the 19th century.[95]Metric Pound Concepts and Rejections
In 1812, during the Napoleonic era, France introduced the livre usuelle as part of the mesures usuelles system, defining it precisely as 500 grams to serve as a transitional unit bridging traditional French pounds (varying regionally around 400–500 grams) and the full metric system, facilitating domestic and export trade by approximating common European weights.[99] This "metric pound" was subdivided decimally into 10 onces of 50 grams each, aligning with metric principles while remaining close to the avoirdupois pound's 453.592 grams, with the intent to minimize disruption for merchants dealing with Anglo-American trade where the pound was a staple.[100] The unit was short-lived, abolished in 1840 as France recommitted to pure metric kilogram standards, reflecting practical resistance to hybrid systems that retained pre-revolutionary nomenclature amid full decimalization efforts.[99] Similar concepts emerged elsewhere for export compatibility. Denmark briefly established a 500-gram metric pound in the early 19th century as part of its metric adoption, aiming to ease cross-border commerce with pound-using neighbors, though it too yielded to standard kilograms by mid-century.[100] In the Netherlands, while full metrication occurred in 1820 without formal livre adoption, transitional decimal weights influenced trade practices briefly before standardization. Proposals for such units persisted into the 20th century; for instance, the U.S. Metric Study of 1965–1971 explicitly considered a 500-gram "metric pound" divided into 10 ounces of 50 grams for consumer packaging labels, allowing declarations like "10 oz. = 1 lb. = 500 grams" to dual-label goods without fully abandoning familiar terms.[99] Rejections in Anglo-Saxon countries stemmed from prohibitive trade disruption costs and incompatibility with entrenched infrastructure. Redefining the pound to 500 grams would necessitate recalibrating millions of scales, machinery, and recipes optimized for the avoirdupois system's binary subdivisions (1 lb = 16 oz = 256 drams), creating errors in non-decimal contexts like bulk commodities where 500 grams equates awkwardly to legacy fractions, unlike the cleaner but alien kilogram.[99] The U.S. Metric Conversion Act of 1975, establishing a voluntary board to coordinate shifts, faltered for mass units partly because hybrid proposals like the 500-gram pound failed to overcome inertia: industries estimated billions in retooling costs for marginal gains, as global partners increasingly tolerated imperial alongside metric, rendering forced approximation unnecessary.[101] Empirical assessments showed that partial reforms amplified confusion without proportional efficiency, as existing tools and worker habits resisted decimal mismatches, prioritizing continuity in high-volume sectors like agriculture and manufacturing over theoretical alignment.[102] Ultimately, these concepts were sidelined in favor of either retaining the traditional pound or adopting pure metric grams/kilograms, underscoring that transitional units amplified rather than resolved conversion frictions.Distinctions in Physics and Engineering
Pound-Mass versus Pound-Force
The distinction between the pound-mass (lbm or lbm) and pound-force (lbf or lbf) arises in the customary units of the United States, where the pound serves dual roles as a measure of mass and the force produced by gravity acting on that mass under standard conditions, complicating Newton's second law without dimensional adjustments.[103] The pound-mass is defined as a unit of mass exactly equal to 0.45359237 kilograms, established by the 1959 international yard and pound agreement between the United States and other nations to align with metric standards. In contrast, the pound-force is the force exerted by one pound-mass at standard gravity (exactly 9.80665 m/s²), equating to approximately 4.448222 newtons.[104] This duality requires engineers to distinguish explicitly, as conflating the two can yield errors in calculations where mass and force are not interchangeable without accounting for gravitational acceleration. In the foot-pound-second (FPS) system prevalent in American engineering, the slug serves as an alternative mass unit to sidestep the pound-mass/force ambiguity, defined such that a force of one pound-force accelerates one slug at one foot per second squared.[105] Given standard gravity of approximately 32.174 feet per second squared, one slug equals about 32.174 pounds-mass, preserving F = m·a without additional constants in coherent formulations.[105] However, when retaining the pound-mass for convenience in non-coherent systems, the dimensional constant gc (32.174 lbm·ft/lbf·s²) must be incorporated into equations like F = (m·a)/gc to ensure unit consistency, as the pound-mass alone does not yield force directly under acceleration without this factor.[2]| Unit | Symbol | Definition | SI Equivalent |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pound-mass | lbm | Mass unit from avoirdupois pound | 0.45359237 kg (exact) |
| Pound-force | lbf | Gravitational force on 1 lbm at standard g = 9.80665 m/s² | 4.448222 N |
| Slug | slug | Mass accelerated 1 ft/s² by 1 lbf; ≈32.174 lbm under standard g | ≈14.59390 kg |