Hubbry Logo
William Makepeace ThackerayWilliam Makepeace ThackerayMain
Open search
William Makepeace Thackeray
Community hub
William Makepeace Thackeray
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
William Makepeace Thackeray
William Makepeace Thackeray
William Makepeace Thackeray
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

William Makepeace Thackeray (/ˈθækəri/ THAK-ər-ee; 18 July 1811 – 24 December 1863) was an English novelist and illustrator. He is known for his satirical works, particularly his 1847–1848 novel Vanity Fair, a panoramic portrait of British society, and the 1844 novel The Luck of Barry Lyndon, which was adapted for a 1975 film by Stanley Kubrick.

Key Information

Thackeray was born in Calcutta, British India, and was sent to England after his father's death in 1815. He studied at various schools and briefly attended Trinity College, Cambridge, before leaving to travel Europe. Thackeray squandered much of his inheritance on gambling and unsuccessful newspapers. He turned to journalism to support his family, primarily working for Fraser's Magazine, The Times, and Punch. His wife Isabella suffered from mental illness. Thackeray gained fame with his novel Vanity Fair and produced several other notable works. He unsuccessfully ran for Parliament in 1857 and edited the Cornhill Magazine in 1860. Thackeray's health declined due to excessive eating, drinking, and lack of exercise. He died from a stroke at the age of fifty-two.

Thackeray began as a satirist and parodist, gaining popularity through works that showcased his fondness for roguish characters. Thackeray's early works were marked by savage attacks on high society, military prowess, marriage, and hypocrisy, often written under various pseudonyms. His writing career began with satirical sketches like The Yellowplush Papers. Thackeray's later novels, such as Pendennis and The Newcomes, reflected a mellowing in his tone, focusing on the coming of age of characters and critical portrayals of society. During the Victorian era, Thackeray was ranked second to Charles Dickens, but he is now primarily known for Vanity Fair.

Biography

[edit]

Early life

[edit]

Thackeray, an only child, was born in Calcutta,[a] British India, where his father, Richmond Thackeray (1 September 1781 – 13 September 1815), was secretary to the Board of Revenue in the East India Company. His mother, Anne Becher (1792–1864), was the second daughter of Harriet Becher and John Harman Becher, who was also a secretary (writer) for the East India Company.[1] His father was a grandson of Thomas Thackeray (1693–1760), headmaster of Harrow School.[2]

Richmond died in 1815, which caused Anne to send her son to England that same year, while she remained in India. The ship on which he travelled made a short stopover at Saint Helena, where the imprisoned Napoleon was pointed out to him. Once in England, he was educated at schools in Southampton and Chiswick, and then at Charterhouse School, where he overlapped with John Leech. Thackeray disliked Charterhouse,[3] and parodied it in his fiction as "Slaughterhouse". Nevertheless, Thackeray was honoured in the Charterhouse Chapel with a monument after his death.[4]

College education

[edit]

Illness in his last year at Charterhouse, during which he reportedly grew to his full height of 6 ft 3 in (1.91 m), postponed his matriculation at Trinity College, Cambridge, until February 1829.[2]

Never very keen on academic studies, Thackeray left Cambridge in 1830, but some of his earliest published writing appeared in two university periodicals, The Snob and The Gownsman.[5]

Self Caricature by Thackeray

Thackeray then travelled for some time on Continental Europe, visiting Paris and Weimar, where he met Johann Wolfgang von Goethe. He returned to England and began to study law at the Middle Temple, but soon gave that up. On reaching age 21, he came into his inheritance from his father, but he squandered much of it on gambling and on funding two unsuccessful newspapers, The National Standard and The Constitutional, for which he had hoped to write. He also lost a good part of his fortune in the collapse of two Indian banks. Forced to consider a profession to support himself, he turned first to art, which he studied in Paris, but did not pursue it, except in later years as the illustrator of some of his own novels and other writings.[citation needed]

Marriage and children

[edit]

Thackeray's years of semi-idleness ended on 20 August 1836, when he married Isabella Gethin Shawe (1816–1894), second daughter of Isabella Creagh Shawe and Matthew Shawe, a colonel who had died after distinguished service, primarily in India. The Thackerays had three children, all daughters: Anne Isabella (1837–1919), Jane (who died at eight months old), and Harriet Marian (1840–1875), who married Sir Leslie Stephen, editor, biographer and philosopher.[citation needed]

Professional journalist

[edit]

Thackeray now began "writing for his life", as he put it, turning to journalism in an effort to support his young family. He primarily worked for Fraser's Magazine, a sharp-witted and sharp-tongued conservative publication for which he produced art criticism, short fictional sketches, and two longer fictional works, Catherine and The Luck of Barry Lyndon. Between 1837 and 1840, he also reviewed books for The Times.[6]

He was also a regular contributor to The Morning Chronicle and The Foreign Quarterly Review. Later, through his connection to the illustrator John Leech, he began writing for the newly created magazine Punch, in which he published The Snob Papers, later collected as The Book of Snobs. This work popularised the modern meaning of the word "snob".[7]

Thackeray was a regular contributor to Punch between 1843 and 1854.[8]

Thackeray portrayed by Eyre Crowe, 1845

Mental decline of his wife and romantic relationships

[edit]

In Thackeray's personal life, his wife Isabella succumbed to depression after the birth of their third child in 1840. Finding that he could get no work done at home, he spent more and more time away, until September 1840, when he realised how grave his wife's condition was. Struck by guilt, he set out with his wife to Ireland. During the crossing, she threw herself from a water-closet into the sea, but she was pulled from the waters. They fled back home after a four-week battle with her mother. From November 1840 to February 1842, Isabella was in and out of professional care, as her condition waxed and waned.[2]

She eventually deteriorated into a permanent state of detachment from reality. Thackeray desperately sought cures for her, but nothing worked, and she ended up in two different asylums in or near Paris until 1845, after which Thackeray took her back to England, where he installed her with a Mrs. Bakewell at Camberwell. Isabella outlived her husband by 30 years, in the end being cared for by a family named Thompson in Leigh-on-Sea at Southend, until her death in 1894.[9][10] After his wife's illness, Thackeray never established another permanent relationship. He did pursue other women, however, in particular Mrs. Jane Brookfield and Sally Baxter. In 1851, Mr. Brookfield barred Thackeray from further visits or correspondence with Jane. Baxter, an American twenty years Thackeray's junior whom he met during a lecture tour in New York City in 1852, married another man in 1855.[citation needed]

Anti-Irish works for Punch

[edit]

In the early 1840s, Thackeray had some success with two travel books, The Paris Sketch Book and The Irish Sketch Book, the latter marked by its hostility towards Irish Catholics. However, as the book appealed to anti-Irish sentiment in Britain at the time, Thackeray was given the job of being Punch's Irish expert, often under the pseudonym Hibernis Hibernior ("more Irish than the Irish").[8] Thackeray became responsible for creating Punch's notoriously hostile and negative depictions of the Irish during the Great Irish Famine of 1845 to 1851.[8]

Status as a celebrity and lecture tours

[edit]

Thackeray achieved more recognition with his Snob Papers (serialised 1846/7, published in book form in 1848), but the work that really established his fame was the novel Vanity Fair, which first appeared in serialised instalments beginning in January 1847. Even before Vanity Fair completed its serial run, Thackeray had become a celebrity, sought after by the very lords and ladies whom he satirised. They hailed him as the equal of Charles Dickens.[11]

Portrait of William Makepeace Thackeray, c. 1863

He remained "at the top of the tree", as he put it, for the rest of his life, during which he produced several large novels, notably Pendennis, The Newcomes, and The History of Henry Esmond, despite various illnesses, including a near-fatal one that struck him in 1849 in the middle of writing Pendennis. He twice visited the United States on lecture tours during this period. Longtime Washington journalist B.P. Poore described Thackeray on one of those tours:

The citizens of Washington enjoyed a rare treat when Thackeray came to deliver his lectures on the English essayists, wits, and humorists of the eighteenth century. Accustomed to the spread-eagle style of oratory too prevalent at the Capitol, they were delighted with the pleasing voice and easy manner of the burly, gray-haired, rosy-cheeked Briton, who made no gestures, but stood most of the time with his hands in his pockets, as if he were talking with friends at a cozy fireside.[12]

Thackeray also gave lectures in London on the English humorists of the eighteenth century, and on the first four Hanoverian monarchs. The latter series was published in book form in 1861 as The Four Georges: Sketches of Manners, Morals, Court, and Town Life .[2]

Failed candidate for the Liberal Party

[edit]

In July 1857, Thackeray stood unsuccessfully as a Liberal for the city of Oxford in Parliament.[2] Although not the most fiery agitator, Thackeray was always a decided liberal in his politics, and he promised to vote for the ballot in extension of the suffrage and was ready to accept triennial parliaments.[2] He was narrowly beaten by Cardwell, who received 1,070 votes, as against 1,005 for Thackeray.[2]

Magazine editor

[edit]

In 1860, Thackeray became editor of the newly established Cornhill Magazine,[13] but he was never comfortable in the role, preferring to contribute to the magazine as the writer of a column called "Roundabout Papers".[14]

Health problems

[edit]

Thackeray's health worsened during the 1850s, and he was plagued by a recurring stricture of the urethra that laid him up for days at a time. He also felt that he had lost much of his creative impetus. He worsened matters by excessive eating and drinking and avoiding exercise, though he enjoyed riding (he kept a horse). He has been described as "the greatest literary glutton who ever lived". His main activity apart from writing was "gutting and gorging".[15] He could not break his addiction to spicy peppers, further ruining his digestion.

A granite, horizontal gravestone fenced by metal railings, among other graves in a cemetery
Thackeray's grave at Kensal Green Cemetery, London, photographed in 2014

Death and funeral

[edit]

On 23 December 1863, after returning from dining out and before dressing for bed, he suffered a stroke. He was found dead in his bed the following morning. His death at the age of fifty-two was unexpected and shocked his family, his friends and the reading public. An estimated 7,000 people attended his funeral at Kensington Gardens. He was buried on 29 December at Kensal Green Cemetery, and a memorial bust sculpted by Marochetti can be found in Westminster Abbey.[2]

Works

[edit]

Thackeray began as a satirist and parodist, writing works that displayed a sneaking fondness for roguish upstarts, such as Becky Sharp in Vanity Fair and the title characters of The Luck of Barry Lyndon and Catherine. In his earliest works, written under such pseudonyms as Charles James Yellowplush, Michael Angelo Titmarsh and George Savage Fitz-Boodle, he tended towards savagery in his attacks on high society, military prowess, the institution of marriage and hypocrisy.

One of his earliest works, "Timbuctoo" (1829), contains a burlesque upon the subject set for the Cambridge Chancellor's Medal for English Verse.[16] (The contest was won by Tennyson with a poem of the same title, "Timbuctoo".) Thackeray's writing career really began with a series of satirical sketches now usually known as The Yellowplush Papers, which appeared in Fraser's Magazine beginning in 1837. These were adapted for BBC Radio 4 in 2009, with Adam Buxton playing Charles Yellowplush.[17]

Between May 1839 and February 1840 Fraser's published the work sometimes considered Thackeray's first novel, Catherine. Originally intended as a satire of the Newgate school of crime fiction, it ended up being more of a picaresque tale. He also began work, never finished, on the novel later published as A Shabby Genteel Story.

Title-page to Vanity Fair, drawn by Thackeray, who furnished the illustrations for many of his own books

Along with The Luck of Barry Lyndon, Thackeray is probably best known now for Vanity Fair. Literary theorist Kornelije Kvas wrote that "the meteoric rise of the heroine of Vanity Fair Rebecca Sharp is a satirical presentation of the striving for profit, power, and social recognition of the new middle class. Old and new members of the middle class strive to emulate the lifestyle of the higher class (noblemen and landowners), and thereby to increase their material possessions and to own luxury objects. In Vanity Fair, one can observe a greater degree of violation of moral values among members of the new middle class, for the decline of morality is proportionate to the degree of closeness of the individual to the market and its laws."[18] In contrast, his large novels from the period after Vanity Fair, which were once described by Henry James as examples of "loose baggy monsters", have largely faded from view, perhaps because they reflect a mellowing in Thackeray, who had become so successful with his satires on society that he seemed to lose his zest for attacking it. These later works include Pendennis, a Bildungsroman depicting the coming of age of Arthur Pendennis, an alter ego of Thackeray, who also features as the narrator of two later novels, The Newcomes and The Adventures of Philip. The Newcomes is noteworthy for its critical portrayal of the "marriage market", while Philip is known for its semi-autobiographical depiction of Thackeray's early life, in which he partially regains some of his early satirical power.

Also notable among the later novels is The History of Henry Esmond, in which Thackeray tried to write a novel in the style of the eighteenth century, a period that held great appeal for him. About this novel, there have been found evident analogies—in the fundamental structure of the plot; in the psychological outlines of the main characters; in frequent episodes; and in the use of metaphors—to Ippolito Nievo's Confessions of an Italian. Nievo wrote his novel during his stay in Milan where, in the "Ambrosiana" library, The History of Henry Esmond was available, just published.[19]

Not only Esmond but also Barry Lyndon and Catherine are set in that period, as is the sequel to Esmond, The Virginians, which is set partially in North America and includes George Washington as a character who nearly kills one of the protagonists in a duel.

Family

[edit]

Parents

[edit]

Thackeray's father, Richmond Thackeray, was born at South Mimms and went to India in 1798 at age sixteen as a writer (civil servant) with the East India Company. Richmond's father's name was also William Makepeace Thackeray.[20] Richmond fathered a daughter, Sarah Redfield, in 1804 with Charlotte Sophia Rudd, his possibly Eurasian mistress, and both mother and daughter were named in his will. Such liaisons were common among gentlemen of the East India Company, and it formed no bar to his later courting and marrying William's mother.[21]

Anne Becher and William Makepeace Thackeray by George Chinnery, c. 1813

Thackeray's mother, Anne Becher (born 1792), was "one of the reigning beauties of the day" and a daughter of John Harmon Becher, Collector of the South 24 Parganas district (d. Calcutta, 1800), of an old Bengal civilian family "noted for the tenderness of its women". Anne Becher, her sister Harriet and their widowed mother, also Harriet, had been sent back to India by her authoritarian guardian grandmother, Ann Becher, in 1809 on the Earl Howe. Anne's grandmother had told her that the man she loved, Henry Carmichael-Smyth, an ensign in the Bengal Engineers whom she met at an Assembly Ball in 1807 in Bath, had died, while he was told that Anne was no longer interested in him. Neither of these assertions was true. Though Carmichael-Smyth was from a distinguished Scottish military family, Anne's grandmother went to extreme lengths to prevent their marriage. Surviving family letters state that she wanted a better match for her granddaughter.[22]

Anne Becher and Richmond Thackeray were married in Calcutta on 13 October 1810. Their only child, William, was born on 18 July 1811.[23] There is a fine miniature portrait of Anne Becher Thackeray and William Makepeace Thackeray, aged about two, done in Madras by George Chinnery c. 1813.[24]

Anne's family's deception was unexpectedly revealed in 1812, when Richmond Thackeray unwittingly invited the supposedly dead Carmichael-Smyth to dinner. Five years later, after Richmond had died of a fever on 13 September 1815, Anne married Henry Carmichael-Smyth, on 13 March 1817. The couple moved to England in 1820, after having sent William off to school there more than three years earlier. The separation from his mother had a traumatic effect on the young Thackeray, which he discussed in his essay "On Letts's Diary" in The Roundabout Papers.

Descendants

[edit]

Thackeray is an ancestor of the British financier Ryan Williams, and is the great-great-great-grandfather of the British comedian Al Murray[25] and author Joanna Nadin.

Reputation and legacy

[edit]
Etching of Thackeray, c. 1867

During the Victorian era Thackeray was ranked second only to Charles Dickens, but he is now much less widely read and is known almost exclusively for Vanity Fair. The novel has become a fixture in university courses, and has been repeatedly adapted for the cinema and television.

In Thackeray's own day some commentators, such as Anthony Trollope, ranked his History of Henry Esmond as his greatest work, perhaps because it expressed Victorian values of duty and earnestness, as did some of his other later novels. It is perhaps for this reason that they have not survived as well as Vanity Fair, which satirises those values.

Thackeray saw himself as writing in the realistic tradition, and distinguished his work from the exaggerations and sentimentality of Dickens. Some later commentators have accepted this self-evaluation and seen him as a realist, but others note his inclination to use eighteenth-century narrative techniques, such as digressions and direct addresses to the reader, and argue that through them he frequently disrupts the illusion of reality. The school of Henry James, with its emphasis on maintaining that illusion, marked a break with Thackeray's techniques.

Charlotte Brontë dedicated the second edition of Jane Eyre to Thackeray.[26]

In 1887 the Royal Society of Arts unveiled a blue plaque to commemorate Thackeray at the house at 2 Palace Green, London, that had been built for him in the 1860s.[27] It is now the location of the Israeli Embassy.[28]

Thackeray's former home in Tunbridge Wells, Kent, is now a restaurant named after the author.[29]

Thackeray was also a member of the Albion Lodge of the Ancient Order of Druids at Oxford.[30]

Connection to Balasaheb Thackeray

[edit]

Indian popular Marathi politician Bal Thackeray's father Keshav Sitaram Thackeray was an admirer of William; Keshav later changed his surname from Panvelkar to "Thackeray".[31][32]

[edit]
  • Thackeray is portrayed by Michael Palin in the 2018 ITV television series Vanity Fair.
  • Miles Jupp plays Thackeray in the 2017 film The Man Who Invented Christmas.
  • Jonathan Keeble plays Thackery in the 2016 BBC audio drama Charlotte Brontë in Babylon.
  • A quote from Thackeray appears in episode 7 of JoJo's Bizarre Adventure. Will Anthonio Zeppeli's first name is possibly a reference to the English novelist William Makepeace Thackeray, who was quoted upon Zeppeli's death: "To love and win is the best thing. To love and lose, the next best."
  • Thackeray's quote "Mother is the name for God" appears in the 1994 movie The Crow.
  • Thackeray's "The Colonel" was mentioned by Anne Frank in The Diary of a Young Girl.

List of works

[edit]

Series

[edit]

Arthur Pendennis

  1. The History of Henry Esmond (1852) – ISBN 0-14-143916-5
  2. The Virginians (1857–1859) – ISBN 1-4142-3952-1
  3. Pendennis (1848–1850) – ISBN 1-4043-8659-9
  4. The Newcomes (1854–1855) – ISBN 0-460-87495-0
  5. A Shabby Genteel Story (Unfinished) (1840) – ISBN 1-4101-0509-1
  6. The Adventures of Philip (1861–1862) – ISBN 1-4101-0510-5

The Christmas Books of Mr M. A. Titmarsh
Thackeray wrote and illustrated five Christmas books as "by Mr M. A. Titmarsh". They were collected under the pseudonymous title and his real name no later than 1868 by Smith, Elder & Co.[33]

The Rose and the Ring was dated 1855 in its first edition, published for Christmas 1854.

  1. Mrs. Perkins's Ball (1846), as by M. A. Titmarsh
  2. Our Street
  3. Doctor Birch and His Young Friends
  4. The Kickleburys on the Rhine (Christmas 1850) – "a new picture book, drawn and written by Mr M. A. Titmarsh"[34]
  5. The Rose and the Ring (Christmas 1854) – ISBN 1-4043-2741-X

Novels

[edit]

Novellas

[edit]
  • Elizabeth Brownbridge
  • Sultan Stork
  • Little Spitz
  • The Yellowplush Papers (1837) – ISBN 0-8095-9676-8
  • The Professor, loosely based on the life of Edward Dando
  • Miss Löwe
  • The Tremendous Adventures of Major Gahagan
  • The Fatal Boots
  • Cox’s Diary
  • The Bedford-Row Conspiracy
  • The History of Samuel Titmarsh and the Great Hoggarty Diamond
  • The Fitz-Boodle Papers
  • The Diary of C. Jeames de la Pluche, Esq. with his letters
  • A Legend of the Rhine
  • A Little Dinner at Timmins's
  • Rebecca and Rowena (1850), a parodic sequel to Ivanhoe – ISBN 1-84391-018-7
  • Bluebeard's Ghost

Sketches and satires

[edit]

Play

[edit]
  • The Wolves and the Lamb

Travel writing

[edit]
  • Notes of a Journey from Cornhill to Grand Cairo (1846), under the name Mr M. A. Titmarsh.
  • The Paris Sketchbook (1840), featuring Roger Bontemps
  • The Little Travels and Roadside Sketches (1840)

Other non-fiction

[edit]
  • The English Humorists of the 18th Century (1853)
  • Four Georges (1860–1861) – ISBN 978-1410203007
  • Roundabout Papers (1863)
  • The Orphan of Pimlico (1876)
  • Sketches and Travels in London
  • Stray Papers: Being Stories, Reviews, Verses, and Sketches (1821–1847)
  • Literary Essays
  • The English Humorists of the 18th century: a series of lectures (1867)
  • Ballads
  • Miscellanies
  • Stories
  • Burlesques
  • Character Sketches
  • Critical Reviews
  • Second Funeral of Napoleon

Poems

[edit]
  • The Pigtail
  • The Mahogany Tree (1847)

See also

[edit]

Footnotes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Bibliography

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

William Makepeace Thackeray

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
William Makepeace Thackeray (18 July 1811 – 24 December 1863) was an English novelist, , and of the , renowned for his acute social satire and realistic depictions of human folly in works such as Vanity Fair (1847–1848). Born in Calcutta, , to parents of Anglo-Indian descent, Thackeray was orphaned of his father at a young age and sent to for education at and , from which he departed without a degree after dissipating much of his inheritance on and travel. Financial necessity drove Thackeray into journalism and freelance writing under pseudonyms like Michael Angelo Titmarsh, contributing essays, parodies, and illustrations to periodicals such as Fraser's Magazine and Punch. His to Isabella Shawe in 1836 produced three daughters, but his wife's mental collapse following childbirth left him to raise the family with assistance from relatives. Thackeray achieved literary prominence through serialized that critiqued class pretensions, moral hypocrisy, and the commodification of virtue in British society, with Vanity Fair—subtitled "A Novel Without a Hero"—establishing him as a rival to in popularity and influence. Subsequent major works included the semi-autobiographical (1849–1850), the historical novel Henry Esmond (1852), and The Newcomes (1853–1855), often featuring intricate illustrations by the author himself. In later years, Thackeray lectured on English humorists, edited , and reflected a more conservative outlook, though his narratives consistently exposed the illusions of and the corrupting effects of ambition. He died suddenly in at age 52, likely from complications of a long-standing spinal , leaving a legacy of novels that prioritize unflinching observation over moral resolution.

Early Life and Education

Birth and Family Origins

William Makepeace Thackeray was born on 18 July 1811 in Calcutta, then the capital of British India under rule. He was the only legitimate child of Richmond Thackeray and Anne Becher Thackeray. Richmond Thackeray, born on 1 September 1781 in South Mimms, , , entered service with the at age sixteen in 1798 as a junior civil servant known as a "." By the time of his son's birth, he had advanced to the senior position of secretary to the Board of Revenue in Calcutta, overseeing tax collection and administrative matters in . Prior to his , Richmond had fathered an illegitimate daughter, Redfield, with a local woman, reflecting common practices among British officials in during that era. Anne Becher, aged approximately twenty-two at Thackeray's birth, was the daughter of John Harman Becher, a physician and who had served in since 1786. Her family also had ties to the Company's administrative circles, with her brother Becher holding posts. The Thackerays' union exemplified the interconnected Anglo-Indian elite, where British expatriates often married within Company-connected families to consolidate social and professional networks. The Thackeray lineage traced back to yeomen farmers settled for generations at Hampsthwaite, a hamlet in the , . This rural English stock transitioned to imperial service across two prior generations: Thackeray's grandfather, William Makepeace Thackeray (1749–1813), had similarly pursued a career in the , establishing the family's prosperity through colonial administration rather than agrarian roots. Such trajectories were typical for mid-level British families leveraging Company opportunities for upward mobility in the early nineteenth century.

Childhood and Return to England

William Makepeace Thackeray was born on 18 1811 in Calcutta, then the capital of British India, as the only child of Richmond Thackeray, a high-ranking official serving as secretary to the board of revenue, and Anne Becher, whose family had Anglo-Indian roots. His early years were spent in the colonial environment of , where his father's position provided relative affluence, though Thackeray later recalled few specific details of this period beyond its influence on his depictions of Anglo-Indian society in works like Vanity Fair. Richmond Thackeray died of fever on 13 September 1815 at age 34, leaving an estate valued at £17,000 and prompting the decision to send the four-year-old William back to for his education and upbringing. In 1816, at approximately age five, Thackeray was dispatched alone to under the care of relatives, enduring a voyage that included a stop at St. Helena, where he reportedly caught a glimpse of the exiled Napoleon Bonaparte. Upon arrival, he resided initially with his paternal aunt, Mary Ritchie, in , experiencing a painful separation from his mother that he later described as a formative emotional trauma. Anne Thackeray remained in India, remarrying in 1817 to Major Henry William Carmichael-Smyth, an East India Company engineer and author, before joining her son in England in 1820. The family settled initially in , where Thackeray adapted to English life amid the stability provided by his stepfather's career and his father's legacy, though the early loss and transcontinental separation marked a pivotal shift from tropical colonial indulgence to the disciplined environment awaiting his formal schooling.

Formal Education and Early Influences

Thackeray received his early schooling at preparatory institutions in and following his return to from around 1817 after his father's death. In 1822, at age eleven, he entered in , a prominent public school then located at Smithfield, where he studied until 1828. His time there was marked by discomfort, including experiences of , poor , and a rigid disciplinary regime, which fostered a lasting aversion to institutional authority and informed his later satirical depictions of public schools as places of hypocrisy and brutality, such as the fictional Grey Friars in The Newcomes. Despite these hardships, Charterhouse exposed him to —emphasizing Latin and Greek—though he often evaded lessons by reading contemporary popular fiction, including Walter Scott's and Pierce Egan's Life in London, which sparked an early interest in vivid, socially observant narratives over rote scholarship. In February 1829, Thackeray matriculated at , under the tutelage of , but departed after less than a year in early 1830 without a degree, having prioritized , wine parties, and theatrical pursuits over rigorous study. This brief university stint reinforced his skepticism toward formal academia, as he later reflected on the distractions that undermined intellectual discipline, yet it also introduced him to Horace's odes, cultivating a taste for ironic, epigrammatic verse that echoed in his prose style. Cambridge's social milieu, blending aristocratic idleness with intellectual pretensions, further shaped his acute awareness of class pretensions and moral compromises, themes central to his mature works. Early influences extended beyond classrooms to personal and cultural roots: his Anglo-Indian upbringing, with its blend of British colonial rigidity and Eastern , instilled a detached evident in characters like those in Vanity Fair, while family storytelling—recounted by his grandmother and aunts—nurtured a flair unburdened by Victorian . Thackeray's budding talent for , honed through self-taught sketching at Charterhouse and friendships like that with John Leech, presaged his use of as satirical commentary, drawing from 18th-century precedents such as Henry Fielding's and Tobias Smollett's picaresque vigor, which he encountered in youthful readings and emulated in early parodies. These elements coalesced into a privileging empirical observation of human folly over idealistic abstractions, grounding his literary voice in causal realism derived from lived disillusionments rather than doctrinal .

Journalism and Early Literary Efforts

Financial Setbacks and Turn to Writing

Upon reaching his on 18 July 1832, Thackeray inherited approximately £20,000 from his , a substantial sum equivalent to a gentleman's fortune at the time. This windfall initially afforded him independence, but he soon squandered much of it through gambling— including a notable loss of over £1,500 in a single evening of cards during his Cambridge years—and unwise speculations. The bulk of the inheritance evaporated due to the collapse of an in which Thackeray had invested heavily, a failure tied to broader colonial financial instabilities. Compounding this, in 1833 he purchased The National Standard, a periodical venture that provided early journalistic experience but folded amid the banking crisis, leaving him with scant resources. Brief pursuits in law at the and art studies in (circa 1834–1835) yielded no viable career, as Thackeray lacked the discipline or aptitude to sustain them, further delaying financial recovery. These reversals intensified after his 1836 marriage to Isabella Shaen, when his stepfather funded a short-lived role as Paris correspondent for a newspaper that failed by 1837, prompting Thackeray's return to London in penury. With familial obligations mounting and no alternative prospects, he pivoted to professional freelance journalism, contributing satirical sketches and articles to outlets like Fraser's Magazine and Punch from the late 1830s onward, marking his committed turn to writing as a livelihood. This necessity honed his pseudonymous output, transforming personal exigency into a foundation for his later literary success.

Contributions to Magazines and Pseudonymous Works

Thackeray commenced his extensive contributions to periodicals in the mid-1830s, producing , art reviews, parodies, sketches, and short fiction primarily under pseudonyms to earn a living following the loss of his in failed banking . These pieces, often satirical in tone, appeared in outlets such as the New Monthly Magazine, Fraser's Magazine, and Punch, allowing him to experiment with narrative voices and while concealing his identity amid the competitive freelance market. Among his earliest pseudonymous efforts was the "Yellowplush Correspondence," serialized in the New Monthly Magazine from August 1837 to October 1838 under the persona of Charles Yellowplush, a semi-literate whose phonetic spelling mocked aristocratic pretensions and linguistic affectations. This series, comprising twelve letters, critiqued through the lens of domestic service, establishing Thackeray's penchant for ironic narration from below. He followed with contributions to Fraser's Magazine, beginning regularly in November 1837, where he adopted multiple pseudonyms including Michael Angelo Titmarsh for travel sketches and essays, and George Savage Fitz-Boodle for confessional tales exposing personal vanities. Over the next decade, Thackeray supplied Fraser's with approximately 88 verified items, ranging from book reviews to serialized fiction, often blending humor with pointed observations on contemporary . In Fraser's, Thackeray serialized his first extended prose work, Catherine (May 1839–February 1840), under the pseudonym of Ikey Solomons, a satirical burlesque of Newgate criminal romances popularized by authors like Edward Bulwer-Lytton, which subverted heroic criminal tropes by portraying petty theft and moral degradation. He also published The Luck of Barry Lyndon there in 1844 as Fitz-Boodle, a picaresque memoir of an Irish gambler's roguish exploits, drawing on historical memoirs for its first-person unreliability. Concurrently, from 1842 onward, Thackeray contributed over 150 pieces to Punch, including verse, prose satires, and illustrations under guises like the Fat Contributor, targeting political figures, literary pretenders, and social hypocrisies with visual and textual wit. These pseudonymous magazine outputs, totaling hundreds of items across periodicals, honed his realist satire by juxtaposing factual reportage with fictional exaggeration, influencing his later novelistic techniques.

Development of Satirical Style

Thackeray's satirical style took shape in his pseudonymous contributions to periodicals, notably Fraser's Magazine, where he cultivated irony and social critique through unconventional narrators. Beginning with The Yellowplush Correspondence in 1837–1838, written as Charles James Yellowplush, a , Thackeray used phonetic spelling and servant's-eye observations to expose the vanities and hypocrisies of the elite, marking an initial foray into class-based that distanced the author from direct responsibility while sharpening his parodic edge. This technique drew from the magazine's combative tradition, fostering Thackeray's ability to blend humor with moral indictment. Subsequent pseudonymous series expanded this approach, incorporating of literary conventions to underscore societal flaws. In Catherine (serialized 1839–1840 in Fraser's), Thackeray burlesqued Newgate-style criminal romances, inverting heroic narratives to highlight ethical decay and the allure of vice, thereby critiquing both popular fiction and its cultural impact. The Fitz-Boodle Papers (1842–1843), appearing across Fraser's and Punch, employed semi-autobiographical sketches under George Savage Fitz-Boodle to lampoon sentimentalism and social ambition, refining Thackeray's voice toward subtler character dissection. By 1844, with The Luck of Barry Lyndon serialized in Fraser's, Thackeray demonstrated stylistic maturation in picaresque form, narrating through an unrepentant Irish rogue to satirize 18th-century military and aristocratic pretensions, echoing Fielding's irony while introducing retrospective moral framing that tempered raw cynicism with realism. These early efforts, rooted in journalistic constraints and pseudonymity, evolved Thackeray's satire from flamboyant caricature toward the panoramic, empathetic realism of his mature novels, prioritizing causal exposure of human folly over mere ridicule.

Major Works and Literary Career

Vanity Fair: Breakthrough and Satirical Realism

Vanity Fair: A Novel without a Hero was issued in twenty monthly parts from January 1847 to July 1848, with Thackeray providing his own illustrations for each installment. This serialization represented his breakthrough, achieving widespread acclaim and financial success that elevated him from journalistic obscurity to a prominent ist, often compared to in contemporary reviews. Unlike his prior pseudonymous works, the novel's panoramic scope and incisive critique of social climbing secured its status as his defining achievement, selling steadily and influencing subsequent . The work exemplifies satirical realism through its unflinching portrayal of human flaws amid the Napoleonic era's upheavals, rejecting heroic archetypes in favor of morally ambiguous figures like the cunning and the naive Amelia Sedley. Thackeray's narrative eschews sentimentality, instead deploying irony and authorial intrusions to expose the era's class pretensions, mercenary marriages, and ethical hypocrisies, as seen in Becky's ruthless ascent from to . This approach contrasted with Dickens's more idealized characterizations, emphasizing causal consequences of ambition and folly in a deterministic social order. Thackeray's realism manifests in detailed, observational depictions of domestic and public life, grounded in empirical social dynamics rather than romantic exaggeration, thereby critiquing the "vanity fair" of worldly pursuits as a metaphor for inescapable human vanity. Critics have noted his "terrible power to detect and expose sham," achieved through parody of sentimental tropes and a detached, worldly narrator who underscores the futility of social striving. The novel's enduring impact lies in this blend of satire and verisimilitude, influencing later realists by prioritizing psychological depth over moral resolution.

Later Novels and Historical Fiction

Pendennis (1848–1850), serialized in monthly parts, traces the development of its protagonist Arthur Pendennis from provincial youth to man-about-town, incorporating semi-autobiographical elements such as Thackeray's own experiences with debt, literary ambition, and social pretensions. The novel critiques the hypocrisies of literary and journalistic circles while emphasizing moral growth through disillusionment, though its episodic structure drew some contemporary complaints of diffuseness. Shifting from contemporary satire, Thackeray's The History of Henry Esmond (1852), his first major historical , is framed as a posthumous written in late-17th- and early-18th-century to immerse readers in the era of Queen Anne's reign. The titular narrator, raised as a supposed bastard at Castlewood Hall, grapples with Catholic-Protestant tensions, Jacobite intrigues, and the , ultimately achieving legitimacy and exile in ; the work's historical fidelity stems from Thackeray's research into primary documents, though its sentimental resolution and stylistic archaisms elicited mixed responses, with praise for authenticity from some like and discomfort from others over plot contrivances. The Newcomes (1853–1855), narrated by Pendennis as editor, examines the upward mobility and domestic frailties of an Anglo-Indian military family across generations, centering on the honorable yet rigid Colonel Thomas Newcome and his artist son Clive. Through subplots involving mercenary marriages and financial scandals, it exposes Victorian respectability's undercurrents of snobbery and emotional repression, serialized with illustrations by the author and Richard Doyle. Extending the Esmond lineage, The Virginians (1857–1859), another historical work, spans the mid-18th century from plantations to society, following twin grandsons George and Harry Warrington as they confront the , familial divisions, and transatlantic cultural clashes. Loosely connected to via minor characters, the novel critiques colonial ambitions and aristocratic decay but suffered from protracted , resulting in less unified plotting than its predecessor. Thackeray's final novels, The Adventures of Philip (1861–1862) and the fragmentary Denis Duval (1864, incomplete at his death), blend contemporary and historical elements—Philip revisiting Newcome themes of and , while Duval evokes 18th-century —reflecting his waning health and experimental impulses amid declining sales. These later efforts prioritized moral introspection over the sharp of his early career, influencing subsequent Victorian historical novelists through their blend of factual reconstruction and psychological depth.

Shorter Pieces, Essays, and Illustrations

Thackeray composed a wide array of shorter pieces and essays, often serialized pseudonymously in periodicals to sharpen satirical commentary on . Beginning in the late 1830s, he contributed to Fraser's Magazine under pseudonyms like Charles James Yellowplush for The Yellowplush Papers (1837–1838), a series of sketches narrated by a exposing aristocratic follies through phonetic spelling and ironic observation. Similarly, the Fitz-Boodle Papers (1842–1843) appeared in Fraser's Magazine under George Savage Fitz-Boodle, blending semi-autobiographical essays with fictional vignettes on , loss, and social mores. His essays in Punch gained particular acclaim, including Notes on a Journey from Cornhill to Grand (1846), a comic travelogue, and The Book of Snobs (1846–1847), originally "The Snobs of England," which dissected class pretensions via 50 numbered portraits under the pseudonym Michael Angelo Titmarsh; these were compiled into book form in 1848. Travel sketches like The Irish Sketch-Book (1843) and The Paris Sketch-Book (1840) combined observation with mild satire, drawing from his continental sojourns. Shorter fiction, such as The Great Hoggarty Diamond (1841) under Titmarsh, critiqued financial speculation and domestic intrigue. Thackeray frequently illustrated his own writings, employing caricatural etchings and drawings to amplify ironic effects. He supplied vignettes and portraits for magazine contributions in Fraser's Magazine and Punch, including early Cambridge-era etchings of university life published posthumously. His style featured distorted features and exaggerated expressions, evident in self-portraits and satirical figures that mirrored textual barbs against hypocrisy. These visuals, often self-produced during his bohemian artistic phase in and (1834–1835), underscored his multifaceted critique of social vanities.

Personal Life

Marriage to Isabella Shaen

Thackeray met Isabella Gethin Shawe (1816–1894), the second daughter of Irish colonel John Shawe and Isabella Creagh Shawe, while studying art in in the mid-1830s. The couple married on 20 August 1836 in , after which they resided in a modest apartment there, with Thackeray supporting them through freelance journalism. The early years of the marriage, from 1836 to 1838, were reportedly the happiest period for the pair, marked by the birth of their first daughter, Anne Isabella, in June 1837. The couple had three daughters in quick succession: Anne Isabella in 1837, Jane in 1839 (who died in infancy), and Harriet Marian in 1840. Isabella's health deteriorated severely following the birth of Harriet Marian, when she developed puerperal mania—a form of —leading to delusions, erratic behavior, and an attempted by . Thackeray initially cared for her at home and sought treatments, including consultations with physicians and a trip to to visit her family, but her condition persisted without recovery. By the early 1840s, Isabella was placed under permanent supervision, first with family friends and later in institutional care, though Thackeray maintained financial responsibility and occasional visits until her death in 1894. The separation profoundly affected Thackeray, who never remarried and incorporated themes of domestic tragedy and maternal fragility into works like Vanity Fair, reflecting the personal toll of his wife's enduring mental illness without full institutionalization until later years.

Family Dynamics and Children's Lives

Thackeray and his wife Isabella Gethin Shawe, married in 1836, had three daughters in quick succession: Anne Isabella in June 1837, Jane in early 1839, and Harriet Marian on May 27, 1840. Jane died at eight months old in August 1839. In the fall of 1840, shortly after Harriet's birth, Isabella suffered a severe mental breakdown, manifesting as profound depression and withdrawal, from which she never recovered; she exhibited catatonia-like indifference to her surroundings, including her husband and surviving children. The illness profoundly altered family dynamics, with Thackeray effectively assuming sole responsibility for raising and Harriet while arranging for Isabella through her relatives, including placements in Ireland and later ; he provided financial support for her until his death and visited periodically, but the couple lived apart permanently, without . Facing acute financial strain from earlier investments and now family obligations, Thackeray intensified his writing to sustain the household, often relocating to cheaper locales in with the children for periods to reduce expenses. He employed governesses and relied on extended family for assistance in childcare, fostering a peripatetic but intellectually stimulating environment amid his growing literary circle. Thackeray proved a devoted, if preoccupied, father, prioritizing his daughters' welfare and education; Anne later recalled his affectionate involvement in their daily lives and exposure to prominent figures like Alfred Tennyson, shaping their cultural milieu. , the eldest, pursued writing influenced by her father's example, publishing novels such as The Story of Elizabeth in 1863 and editing his correspondence and works posthumously, while marrying civil servant Richmond Ritchie in 1877 and living until 1919. Harriet, known as "Minny," married biographer in 1867, bore a Laura in 1870—who later required institutionalization due to intellectual disabilities—and died on November 28, 1875, at age 35 during her second pregnancy. Thackeray's commitment to his children's futures persisted until his own death in 1863, with Anne assuming a protective role over her sister thereafter.

Romantic Relationships and Personal Struggles

Thackeray formed an intense platonic attachment to Jane Octavia Brookfield, wife of his acquaintance William Henry Brookfield, after meeting her in 1842. Their correspondence and meetings fostered a profound and emotional bond, with Thackeray professing deep love, though no evidence indicates ; Brookfield reciprocated affection but prioritized her marriage. In 1851, her husband forbade further contact, severing the relationship and inflicting lasting emotional pain on Thackeray, which he channeled into characters like Laura Bell in . During his 1852–1853 lecture tour in the United States, Thackeray encountered Sally Baxter, the nineteen-year-old daughter of a New York family that hosted him; her vivacious charm captivated him, inspiring the character Beatrix Esmond in The Newcomes. He pursued her ardently through letters and proposals, but Baxter rejected him and married Edward Pigott in 1855, leaving Thackeray with another unrequited infatuation that deepened his sense of isolation. These romantic disappointments, alongside the ongoing care for his mentally ill wife and daughters, fueled Thackeray's pervasive melancholy, which Anthony Trollope described as making him feel "much older than his years" amid life's acute sufferings. He frequently alluded to personal despondency in private letters and works, viewing himself as burdened by premature weariness from domestic tragedy and thwarted desires. His later years saw health erosion from excessive eating and drinking, culminating in a ruptured and death at age fifty-two on December 24, 1863, though these indulgences stemmed partly from coping with emotional voids rather than per se.

Public Engagements and Later Career

Lecture Tours and Public Persona

Thackeray initiated public lectures in the early 1850s to supplement his income amid ongoing financial strains from publishing ventures and family support. His debut series, The English Humorists of the Eighteenth Century, comprised seven lectures on figures including Jonathan Swift, Joseph Addison and Richard Steele, Alexander Pope, and Henry Fielding, delivered first in London and Edinburgh from late 1851 into 1852. These were expanded into a transatlantic tour of the United States from October 1852 to April 1853, where he addressed packed venues in cities such as New York, Philadelphia, Boston, and Richmond, often to audiences exceeding 2,000. The lectures emphasized biographical details intertwined with Thackeray's satirical observations on literary character and societal foibles, earning critical praise for their erudition and engaging prose style. The American tour proved financially remunerative, with Thackeray grossing approximately £4,000 in fees after expenses, a sum that alleviated debts and funded subsequent works like The Newcomes. Accompanied by painter , who sketched scenes and later published With Thackeray in America (1893), Thackeray navigated the rigors of travel—including steamer crossings and hotel stays—while maintaining a schedule of up to three lectures per week. Audience reception was largely enthusiastic, with reports of rapt attention and applause, though Thackeray privately critiqued aspects of American culture, such as , in correspondence. In 1855–1856, Thackeray undertook a second U.S. tour, presenting The Four Georges, a quartet of lectures on the Hanoverian kings from George I to , covering their reigns, personalities, and cultural impacts. Delivered in locales including New York, , Savannah, and Augusta (where he spoke on February 11–12, 1856), the series again drew sizable crowds and was subsequently given in Britain, such as in 1857. This tour reinforced his transatlantic popularity, with lectures published in and as a volume, blending historical narrative with Thackeray's ironic detachment from monarchical pretensions. Thackeray's public persona as a embodied the Victorian gentleman-scholar: affable yet discerning, with a conversational delivery that eschewed theatricality in favor of understated wit and moral insight. He projected literary authority without arrogance, refusing P.T. Barnum's proposition for a joint illustrated periodical to preserve his independence, as noted in Crowe's account. Contemporary observers, including , lauded his success in captivating diverse audiences through precise phrasing and humorous anecdotes, though his stature—over six feet tall—and deliberate pacing sometimes drew comments on a perceived melancholy undertone. These engagements elevated Thackeray beyond novelist to cultural ambassador, disseminating British literary heritage while subtly critiquing universal human vanities.

Editorial Positions and Publishing Ventures

In the early 1830s, following financial setbacks from the failure of an in which his inheritance was invested, Thackeray ventured into by acquiring and The National Standard and Journal of Literature, Science, Music, Theatricals, and the Fine Arts, a weekly publication launched on 5 January 1833. He assumed ownership and editorial control around May 1833, contributing reviews, articles on and , and serving as Paris correspondent during trips abroad, but the paper struggled with low circulation and ceased operations by February 1834. This short-lived enterprise highlighted Thackeray's initial foray into periodical ownership and management, though it yielded financial losses and limited lasting impact. Thackeray's subsequent career emphasized freelance contributions to magazines like Fraser's Magazine, where he published numerous essays, satires, and reviews under pseudonyms from the late 1830s onward, but without formal editorial authority. His most prominent editorial role came in 1859, when publisher George Smith appointed him the inaugural editor of the newly founded , a monthly aimed at blending serial fiction, essays, and illustrations for a middle-class audience. Thackeray received an annual salary of £1,000—later doubled—and oversaw content from January 1860 to March 1862, serializing works by and alongside his own, such as Lovett the Widower (1861) and the essay series Roundabout Papers. Under his tenure, circulation peaked at approximately 110,000 copies, reflecting the magazine's commercial success amid competition from rivals like Once a Week. Thackeray, however, found the administrative demands burdensome, preferring creative contributions over oversight, and resigned in April 1862 citing health strains and editorial fatigue. His Cornhill involvement marked a pivotal venture, elevating his status while fostering a platform for Victorian realism in and , though it did not lead to further sustained pursuits.

Political Aspirations and Electoral Defeats

Thackeray, though primarily known for his literary pursuits, expressed decided liberal political views throughout his career, advocating reforms such as the introduction of the while maintaining a measured, non-agitational stance on public issues. His satirical writings critiqued Victorian social hypocrisies but reflected an underlying preference for preserving established hierarchies, distinguishing his —focused on electoral and administrative improvements—from more radical ideologies. This blend of reformist inclination and motivated his brief foray into electoral during a period of heightened interest in parliamentary representation following the 1857 general election, triggered by the resignation of Lord Palmerston's ministry. In July 1857, Thackeray stood as the Liberal candidate for the Oxford City constituency in the , campaigning on promises of impartiality, support for the , and opposition to corruption in governance. He positioned himself against the incumbent Edward Cardwell, a with government ties, framing the contest as one between literary independence and political machinery; Thackeray's address emphasized his outsider status, decrying the substitution of candidates by party interests and appealing to Oxford's intellectual electorate with appeals to fairness over partisanship. The election, held amid broader national scrutiny of urban constituencies' practices, saw allegations of , though Thackeray's campaign relied on personal and public speeches rather than organized machinery. Thackeray secured 1,017 votes to Cardwell's 1,070, resulting in a narrow defeat by 53 votes—a margin that underscored the constituency's divided sentiments but ended his parliamentary bid. Contemporary observers, including Thackeray himself in private correspondence, attributed the loss partly to last-minute shifts in voter allegiance and the strength of Cardwell's establishment support, with some estimating the gap as high as 60-67 votes amid disputed tallies. Following the defeat, Thackeray expressed relief in letters, viewing it as a fortunate escape from the drudgery of legislative duties ill-suited to his temperament, and promptly refocused on literary endeavors, including the of The Virginians. No further electoral attempts followed, marking the episode as a singular, unsuccessful venture into rather than a sustained aspiration.

Social and Political Perspectives

Critiques of Victorian Hypocrisy and Snobbery

Thackeray's Vanity Fair, serialized monthly from January 1847 to July 1848, exemplifies his sharp critique of Victorian through its panoramic portrayal of English society during the . The , subtitled "A Novel Without a Hero," features no virtuous protagonists, instead presenting characters universally compromised by ambition, deceit, and moral compromise, thereby exposing the era's social pretensions as a "vanity fair" akin to John Bunyan's allegorical marketplace of worldly follies. Thackeray illustrates via figures like , whose ruthless social ascent via marriage and intrigue highlights the elite's tolerance for vice when masked by charm and status-seeking. This narrative structure compels readers to confront their own participation in societal vanities, as Thackeray weaves omniscient commentary to underscore the causal link between class obsession and ethical erosion. Complementing his fiction, Thackeray's non-fiction satire The Book of Snobs (1848), compiled from "The Snobs of " series in Punch (1846–1847), systematically catalogs snobbery's forms across classes, defining a snob as one who "meanly admires mean things" in pursuit of unearned prestige. He targets the middle class's emulation of aristocratic vices and the aristocracy's self-delusion, arguing that snobbery perpetuates social stagnation by prioritizing appearances over merit. Through ironic vignettes, Thackeray reveals how deference to rank fosters widespread dissimulation, as individuals feign tastes and allegiances to signal superiority, a rooted in his observation of post-Regency 's rigid hierarchies. These works collectively indict Victorian society's causal reliance on to sustain class distinctions, with Thackeray's realism deriving from personal experiences of financial and social observation, eschewing romantic idealization for unflinching depiction of human flaws. His emphasis on self-examination distinguishes his from mere , positioning snobbery not as isolated but as systemic incentive misalignment rewarding artifice over authenticity.

Conservative Outlook on Society and Reform

Thackeray's satirical portrayals of , as in Vanity Fair (1848), exposed snobbery, moral pretensions, and class pretensions without advocating structural overhaul, reflecting a conservative acceptance of social hierarchies as inevitable despite their corruptions. He critiqued and affectation through irony rather than reformist zeal, contrasting with Charles Dickens's humanitarian impulses, and dismissed sentimental novels addressing poverty as fostering superficial absent practical remedies. In his political engagements, Thackeray initially aligned with liberal extensions of , such as supporting the during his 1853 candidacy for Oxford University, yet his core outlook privileged preservation of existing institutions over . By later years, his views hardened into explicit , equating threats to property rights with outright theft and favoring Edmund Burke-inspired resistance to disruptive agitations. Regarding Irish affairs, Thackeray opposed Gladstonian concessions, endorsing to maintain the Anglo-Irish Union and viewing nationalist demands as perils to imperial stability, a stance emblematic of his broader wariness toward reforms eroding . This perspective informed his and , where societal ills warranted moral and personal restraint, not legislative intervention or egalitarian leveling.

Controversies Over Irish Commentary and Nationalism

Thackeray's The Irish Sketch Book (1843), drawn from his travels across in the summer of 1842, elicited criticism for its ambivalent commentary on Irish society during Daniel O'Connell's Repeal campaign, which sought to undo the Act of Union. In the two-volume work, Thackeray documented encounters with poverty, noting the "sublime" romanticization of Irish misery as a backhanded compliment to British rule, while highlighting contrasts between opulent landlords and destitute tenants. He critiqued absentee English proprietors for exacerbating hardships but reserved sharper satire for Irish traits he deemed self-perpetuating, such as alleged indolence, superstition, and over-reliance on clerical authority, which he saw as hindering progress under the Union. These observations, published amid rising agitation for legislative independence, annoyed Irish readers by portraying the nation as incapable of self-rule without English oversight, reinforcing a paternalistic view that prioritized stability over repeal. Critics have since faulted the Sketch Book for embedding colonial discourse, where Thackeray positioned himself as an objective observer countering crude stereotypes yet perpetuating subtler ones of Irish volatility and cultural inferiority. Gunther Klotz argues that Thackeray's contempt stemmed less from than from disillusionment with Irish "romanticism," but the text's emphasis on internal flaws—such as priestly influence stoking division—implicitly blamed the colonized for their plight, aligning with English liberal-conservative of O'Connell's . Thackeray viewed Ireland's chief obstacles as endogenous, stating that the Irish themselves posed the greatest threat to improvement, a stance that undercut nationalist calls for by implying cultural immaturity necessitated continued integration with Britain. This perspective extended to The Luck of Barry Lyndon (1844), where the titular Irish adventurer embodies stereotypes of cunning roguery, duplicity, and alcoholism, set against 18th-century upheavals including Jacobite risings that echoed contemporary unionist anxieties. Though Thackeray later expressed guarded sympathy for Irish aspirations during an 1855 visit, his 1840s works fueled charges of anti-Irish prejudice, with modern scholars like Kenneth L. Brewer decrying the Sketch Book as a for denying Irish agency through devaluation of their cultural identifiers. Such portrayals, while satirical in intent, contributed to a broader English narrative skeptical of , prioritizing empirical critique of Irish conditions over endorsement of political separation. Thackeray's reluctance to engage Irish issues deeply post-1840s underscores the polarizing reception of his commentary as emblematic of Victorian ambivalence toward colonial kin.

Death and Immediate Aftermath

Health Decline and Final Years

Thackeray's health deteriorated progressively during the 1850s, marked by chronic —likely stemming from youthful —and recurring spasms, with approximately a dozen episodes reported in 1854 alone, alongside depressive episodes linked to earlier severe illnesses including a prolonged 1849 affliction and Roman fever contracted in 1853. These conditions, compounded by his sedentary habits and overindulgence in food and alcohol, limited his productivity and physical vitality, though he relocated to more comfortable residences, including 36 Onslow Square in 1853 and a newly built home at 2 Palace Green, , in 1861. In his final years, Thackeray sustained literary output despite infirmity, assuming the editorship of from 1860 to 1862, during which he serialized Lovel the Widower (January–June 1860), The Adventures of Philip (January 1861–August 1862), and ongoing Roundabout Papers essays through 1863. He commenced Denis Duval for the Cornhill in May 1864, advancing only a few installments before his sudden death rendered it incomplete. On 24 December 1863, Thackeray succumbed at age 52 to a cerebral hemorrhage from a ruptured in the , discovered after he retired early complaining of head pain. He was interred on 30 December at , drawing some 2,000 mourners including literary contemporaries.

Death, Funeral, and Estate

William Makepeace Thackeray died suddenly on December 24, 1863, at his home, 36 Onslow Square, , , aged 52. He had returned from dining out, retired to bed complaining of a severe , and was found dead the following morning by his servant. The cause was a cerebral hemorrhage resulting from a burst . His funeral took place on December 29, 1863, with nearly 2,000 mourners attending the burial at in . The reflected his prominence in literary circles, though it was marked by restraint consistent with his personal style; no elaborate preceded the interment. Thackeray's features a plain slab enclosed by iron railings, now weathered but preserving his legacy among Victorian notables interred there. Thackeray's will ensured provision for his wife, Isabella, who remained institutionalized due to mental illness, and his surviving daughters, and Harriet Marian ("Minny"). His personal library was auctioned by Christie, Manson & Woods shortly after his death, underscoring the value of his collected works and memorabilia. The estate's management facilitated the posthumous publication and editing of his writings, primarily overseen by , sustaining family financial stability through literary royalties.

Legacy and Reception

Victorian-Era Critical Responses

Thackeray's Vanity Fair (1847–1848), subtitled A Novel Without a Hero, elicited a range of responses from Victorian critics, who praised its satirical dissection of social ambition and hypocrisy while often faulting its perceived moral ambiguity and absence of redemptive figures. G. H. Lewes, a prominent critic and partner of George Eliot, commended the novel's fulfillment of its realist aims in portraying flawed humanity but critiqued its partial success due to intrusive authorial interruptions that disrupted narrative immersion and trivialized serious themes like the Battle of Waterloo. Similarly, Elizabeth Rigby, writing in the Quarterly Review (January 1849), highlighted Thackeray's skillful integration of acute social observation with philosophical insight, though she noted the work's challenge to conventional heroic ideals. The Edinburgh Review (January 1848), in an early assessment of Thackeray's oeuvre, expressed reluctance to elevate characters like Becky Sharp as paragons of virtue, viewing the novel's cynicism as a departure from uplifting moral narratives prevalent in contemporary fiction. Subsequent works faced scrutiny for extending this unflinching realism. The History of Pendennis (1848–1850), with its semi-autobiographical focus on a young man's worldly education, drew criticism for amplifying the misanthropic tendencies of Vanity Fair, though some reviewers appreciated its nuanced character development as a corrective to overly schematic villain-hero dichotomies. Phillips's notice in provoked Thackeray's ire for undervaluing the novel's introspective depth, reflecting broader unease among critics who preferred Dickens's sentimental resolutions over Thackeray's emphasis on personal failings and social compromises. , a fellow novelist, later defended Thackeray's approach in his 1879 study, arguing that captured the prosaic realities of middle-class aspiration with unmatched fidelity, positioning Thackeray as superior in depicting everyday ethical struggles without contrived optimism. The History of Henry Esmond (1852), Thackeray's historical novel set in the early , garnered acclaim for its stylistic elegance and historical but provoked controversy over its plot's taboo elements, including implied incestuous tensions that Victorian reviewers deemed unseemly. Contemporaries like those in the North British Review championed it as a literary pinnacle, valuing its innovation and restraint against the era's melodrama, yet the and others echoed discomfort with its subdued moral framework, contrasting it unfavorably with more didactic . Thackeray's rivalry with permeated these responses; while Dickens's works were lauded for emotional warmth and social advocacy, Thackeray's were often seen as intellectually sharper but colder, with critics like noting philosophical divergences where Thackeray prioritized causal in human folly over Dickensian reformist hope. By the 1850s, Thackeray's reputation solidified as a master satirist, though his reluctance to impose clear ethical judgments left some reviewers, per Trollope's analysis, preferring his unvarnished truths to sentimental alternatives.

Comparisons to Contemporaries like Charles Dickens

Thackeray and Charles Dickens, both prominent Victorian novelists, were frequently compared during their lifetimes, with Dickens achieving greater commercial success and public acclaim due to his serialized works' broad appeal, selling tens of thousands of copies per installment by the 1840s. Thackeray, while respected for novels like Vanity Fair (1848), which critiqued social climbing without resolution, often envied Dickens' popularity, viewing his contemporary's sentimentality as overly simplistic compared to his own ironic realism. In literary style, Dickens employed an emotionally charged, descriptive prose rich in symbolic emblems and vivid caricatures, as seen in (1853) with its critique of Chancery bureaucracy through exaggerated figures, fostering a monological imagination that engaged middle-class readers through sentiment. Thackeray, conversely, favored a more deliberative, simile-driven and conversational tone, evident in Vanity Fair's table-talk among educated characters, delivering with understatement rather than Dickens' ornate flourishes. This led Thackeray to claim that Dickens refined his prose in (1850) by adopting lessons from Vanity Fair's realism, moving away from earlier excesses. Thematically, Dickens emphasized social reform, family perseverance, and moral redemption, portraying systemic injustices like in Oliver Twist (1838) with empathetic, justice-oriented narratives that inspired activism. Thackeray, drawing from his middle-class background, targeted and snobbery as inherent commodities in society, as in Vanity Fair where characters like exploit moral facades without redemption, reflecting a skeptical view of human ambition over Dickens' optimistic arcs. Character portrayal highlighted their ethical divergences: Dickens crafted relatable, sentimental figures with clear binaries—heroes enduring trials for growth, villains embodying —to impart didactic lessons, rooted in assumptions of redeemable goodness. Thackeray depicted morally ambiguous antiheroes and flawed elites, using irony to underscore universal failings, as with Amelia Sedley's naive decline, avoiding Dickens' idealized resolutions in favor of cynical observation. Their personal rivalry, though tempered by civility—Dickens reportedly saved Thackeray's life during an 1849 illness—manifested in mutual critiques, with Thackeray dismissing Dickens' works as mawkish and Dickens privately resenting Thackeray's , yet both acknowledged each other's influence in London's literary circles. Critical reception favored Dickens as the era's moral voice, outselling Thackeray significantly (e.g., (1848) had more buyers than Vanity Fair), while Thackeray was praised for intellectual depth but faulted for alienating readers seeking uplift.

Modern Evaluations and Enduring Influence

In the twentieth century, Thackeray's reputation endured as a key realist novelist, though often secondary to and in scholarly assessments, with Vanity Fair (1848) consistently ranked among the English language's greatest novels for its panoramic social satire and moral complexity. Critics have emphasized his challenging narrators and intricate ethical portrayals, viewing them as precursors to modernist techniques rather than mere Victorian moralizing, countering earlier charges of cynicism by attributing such perceptions to misreadings of his nuanced realism. Into the twenty-first century, Thackeray studies have persisted but with diminished prominence compared to contemporaries; for instance, recent surveys note his absence from influential works like Amanda Anderson's The Powers of Distance (2001) or Sharon Marcus's analyses of Victorian form, reflecting a scholarly shift toward more ideologically aligned figures. Thackeray's enduring influence manifests in literary traditions of satirical realism, drawing from eighteenth-century models like Addison and Steele while informing later novelists' depictions of social . His works continue to appear in academic syllabi and popular discourse, with Vanity Fair inspiring numerous adaptations that reinterpret its themes of ambition and commodification; notable examples include the 2004 film directed by , which accentuates Indian colonial elements and critiques capitalist excess, and the 2018 ITV miniseries, praised for modernizing Becky Sharp's agency amid post-#MeToo sensitivities. These adaptations, however, have drawn criticism for softening Thackeray's unsparing to render characters more sympathetic, potentially diluting the original's exposure of human vanity. Overall, Thackeray's legacy persists through his stylistic innovations, such as in Henry Esmond (1852), which influenced historical fiction's blend of irony and authenticity, sustaining interest in his technique across peer-reviewed analyses.

Comprehensive Bibliography

Principal Novels

Vanity Fair, subtitled A Novel without a Hero, was serialized monthly in Punch from January 1847 to July 1848, with twenty illustrations by Thackeray himself, before appearing as a single volume in 1848. The narrative spans the period from the end of the through the , centering on the social climbing of and the contrasting fortunes of the Sedley and Osborn families amid England's class structure. Its initial print run reached 7,000 copies, marking Thackeray's breakthrough to widespread recognition despite mixed reviews on its moral ambiguity. The History of Pendennis, subtitled His Fortunes and Misfortunes, His Friends and His Greatest Enemy, appeared serially from November 1848 to December 1850, narrated by an older Arthur Pendennis reflecting on his youthful struggles in education, love, and entry into London's literary and journalistic circles. Drawing semi-autobiographically from Thackeray's own experiences of , early writing, and social observation, the novel critiques the pretensions of bohemian and while tracing Pendennis's maturation from provincial naivety to pragmatic cynicism. It sold steadily, building on Vanity Fair's success, though some contemporaries noted its episodic structure and personal revelations as less unified than its predecessor. The History of Henry Esmond, published in three volumes in 1852, adopts a in 18th-century to recount the titular character's life from orphaned youth through service in Queen Anne's court and Marlborough's campaigns, grappling with Jacobite intrigue, unrequited love, and religious schisms. Thackeray researched historical details extensively, emulating the period's style to immerse readers in events like the and the 1715 rebellion, while embedding themes of honor and disillusionment akin to his contemporary works. Praised for its stylistic fidelity, the novel nonetheless divided readers, with sales lagging behind Vanity Fair due to its archaic language and subdued tone. The Newcomes: Memoirs of a Most Respectable Family, serialized from 1853 to 1855 with contributions from Arthur Pendennis as narrator, follows Colonel Thomas Newcome, a retired officer, as he reintegrates into English society, managing his son Clive's artistic ambitions amid family rivalries, financial schemes, and marital discord in the 1830s and 1840s. The plot highlights the Colonel's against the venality of relatives like the banker Sir Barnes Newcome, reflecting Thackeray's observations of middle-class respectability and imperial returns. It achieved strong sales through its illustrated monthly parts but received criticism for sentimentality, particularly in the Colonel's poignant decline. The Virginians: A Tale of the Last Century, serialized from 1857 to 1859 as a sequel to Henry Esmond, shifts focus to Esmond's twin grandsons, George and Harry Warrington, tracing their paths from plantations through Years' , American independence, and English society up to 1782. Incorporating transatlantic elements, including colonial life and the War's prelude, the contrasts vitality with European decadence, loosely linking back to via shared characters. Though ambitious in scope, it faced tepid reception for diluting Thackeray's satirical edge with historical sprawl and uneven pacing, selling fewer copies than earlier successes. These works, often issued in serial format with Thackeray's own etchings, exemplify his shift from early picaresque tales to expansive social chronicles, prioritizing over plot contrivance. Later efforts like The Adventures of Philip (1861–62), extending the saga, marked a decline in vigor amid health issues, but the principal novels solidified his status as a chronicler of Victorian .

Novellas and Shorter Narratives

Thackeray's shorter narratives, often serialized in periodicals like Fraser's Magazine, blend , , and picaresque elements, reflecting his early journalistic style and critique of social pretensions. These works, predating his major novels, popular genres such as criminal biographies, adventure tales, and fairy stories, while showcasing his illustrative talents. Catherine: A Story, serialized from May 1839 to August 1840 in Fraser's Magazine under the G. Savage Fitz-Boodle, mocks the sensational novels by chronicling the sordid life of Catherine Hayes, a historical 18th-century murderess executed in ; Thackeray drew from Fielding's and real trial records to exaggerate her villainy into comic absurdity, emphasizing moral decay over heroic redemption. The narrative spans her thefts, affairs, and execution, with Thackeray using ironic footnotes to underscore the futility of romanticizing crime. In 1844, The Memoirs of Barry Lyndon, Esq. Writ by Himself appeared serially in Fraser's Magazine, presenting a first-person account of Redmond Barry's opportunistic rise from Irish pauper to Prussian gambler and British gentleman during the Seven Years' War, only to end in ruin; at around 100,000 words, it functions as a novella-length picaresque, laced with Thackeray's intrusive irony to expose the protagonist's self-delusions and societal hypocrisies. The work incorporates historical details like military campaigns and duels, but subverts them to critique ambition and duplicity. Thackeray's burlesques, collected posthumously but originating in the 1830s and 1840s, include parodic sketches such as "Novels by Eminent Hands" (1847), spoofing contemporaries like Dickens and Bulwer-Lytton through exaggerated stylistic mimicry; "The Diary of C. Jeames de la Pluche, Esq." (1845–1846), a phonetic on footmen aspiring to ; "The Adventures of Major Gahagan" (1838–1839), an Orientalist of hyperbolic heroism; "A Legend of the Rhine" (1840s); and "Rebecca and Rowena" (1846), a sequel to Scott's that lampoons with absurd resolutions. These pieces, often illustrated by Thackeray, highlight his versatility in short-form . The Rose and the Ring; or, The History of Prince Giglio and Prince Bulbo. A Fireside for Great and Small Children was published as a book in 1854 by Smith, Elder & Co., featuring Thackeray's own chromolithographed illustrations; this novella-length parodies royal intrigues and moral fables through enchanted artifacts that induce beauty and valor, culminating in egalitarian twists that deflate aristocratic pomposity. Intended for family reading, it subtly critiques and gender roles via characters like the scheming Queen Angelica. Later efforts include the unfinished Denis Duval (serialized in Cornhill Magazine from January to November 1864, completed posthumously by others), a historical tale of and Jacobite intrigue set in 18th-century , valued for its vivid local color despite truncation by Thackeray's death. These shorter forms laid groundwork for his novelistic irony, prioritizing character flaws over plot resolution.

Non-Fictional Writings and Journalism

Thackeray commenced his journalistic career in the late , contributing articles, reviews, and satirical sketches to periodicals including Fraser's Magazine and The New Monthly Magazine, often under pseudonyms such as Michael Angelo Titmarsh. These pieces encompassed literary and , as well as , reflecting his early financial struggles after losses from failed newspapers like The National Standard. By 1842, he became a regular contributor to Punch, producing humorous essays and caricatures that sharpened his satirical style, though he ceased major involvement by 1854. Among his early journalistic works, The Yellowplush Papers (1837–1838), published in Fraser's Magazine, featured faux-naïve narrations by a fictional to lampoon pretentious society and literary pretensions. His Punch contributions included Jeames's Diary (1845–1846), a of lower-class aspirations, and the serialized Snobs of England (1846–1847), which examined social climbing and compiled into The Book of Snobs (1848), establishing the contemporary usage of "snob" as a term for those affectedly superior. Travel sketches formed another strand, such as The Paris Sketch-Book (1840), compiling observations from his continental journeys, The Irish Sketch-Book (1843), and Notes on a Journey from Cornhill to Grand Cairo (1846), drawn from a Punch-funded trip. In his later years, Thackeray delivered public lectures that doubled as non-fictional prose. The English Humorists of the Eighteenth Century originated as a series of six talks at Willis's Rooms, , from May to July 1851, surveying figures like Swift, Fielding, and Sterne; expanded for American tours in 1852–1853, it appeared in book form in 1853. Similarly, The Four Georges (1860–1861) stemmed from lectures on the Hanoverian monarchs delivered during a 1855–1856 U.S. tour and serialized in , offering biographical sketches critical of courtly vices yet tempered by historical realism. As founding editor of from 1860 to 1862, Thackeray penned reflective essays under the "Roundabout Papers" banner, appearing weekly until 1863 and covering topics from literature to personal reminiscences; these were collected posthumously in 1863, showcasing his mature, introspective voice. His , blending wit with moral insight, influenced Victorian periodical culture, though often undervalued amid his fictional output.

References

  1. https://rpo.library.utoronto.ca/poets/thackeray-william-makepeace
  2. https://exhibits.lib.byu.edu/literaryworlds/thackeray.html
  3. https://victorianweb.org/authors/wmt/wmtbio.html
  4. https://ancestors.familysearch.org/en/L44Q-PLQ/william-makepeace-thackeray-1811-1863
  5. https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Thackeray-26
  6. https://www.deadtreepublishing.com/pages/william-makepeace-thackeray
  7. https://www.geni.com/people/Richmond-Thackeray-Esq/6000000011048321811
  8. https://orlando.cambridge.org/people/25716706-060c-4ec5-bdb2-6f95012a63fb
  9. https://www.cliffsnotes.com/literature/v/vanity-fair/william-makepeace-thackeray-biography
  10. https://www.geni.com/people/William-Thackeray/6000000011014160734
  11. https://www.notablebiographies.com/St-Tr/Thackeray-William-Makepeace.html
  12. https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/1911_Encyclop%25C3%25A6dia_Britannica/Thackeray%2C_William_Makepeace
  13. https://spartacus-educational.com/Jthackeray.htm
  14. https://victorianweb.org/authors/wmt/chron.html
  15. https://www.britannica.com/biography/William-Makepeace-Thackeray
  16. https://thecharterhouse.org/blog/william-makepeace-thackeray-brother-novelist/
  17. https://www.victorianweb.org/authors/wmt/greyfriars.html
  18. https://www.trin.cam.ac.uk/about/historical-overview/trinity-in-literature/
  19. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27712916
  20. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40371417
  21. https://authorscalendar.info/wmthacke.htm
  22. https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/the-william-makepeace-thackeray-library-richard-pearson/1123556728
  23. https://www.amazon.com/Contributions-Punch-William-Makepeace-Thackeray/dp/144380181X
  24. https://literariness.org/2019/05/30/analysis-of-william-makepeace-thackerays-novels/
  25. https://victorianweb.org/authors/wmt/pva185.html
  26. https://baylor-ir.tdl.org/bitstreams/16173ba2-9f73-4816-8dfb-1902af4c4c20/download
  27. https://archive.org/details/vanityfairnovelw1848thac
  28. https://www.litcharts.com/lit/vanity-fair
  29. https://www.cliffsnotes.com/literature/v/vanity-fair/critical-essays/satire-in-vanity-fair
  30. https://literariness.org/2025/05/21/analysis-of-william-makepeace-thackerays-vanity-fair/
  31. https://farabi.university/storage/files/3050306333654b2c1608f0a427172966_Lecture%252013%2520%281%29.pdf
  32. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/literature-and-writing/history-pendennis-william-makepeace-thackeray
  33. https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/7265
  34. https://literariness.org/2025/05/06/analysis-of-william-makepeace-thackerays-the-history-of-henry-esmond/
  35. https://standardebooks.org/ebooks/william-makepeace-thackeray/the-history-of-henry-esmond
  36. https://literariness.org/2025/05/12/analysis-of-william-makepeace-thackerays-the-newcomes/
  37. https://www.bbrarebooks.com/pages/books/WMT018/william-makepeace-thackeray/the-newcomes-memoirs-of-a-most-respectable-family
  38. https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/8123
  39. https://www.epubbooks.com/book/803-the-virginians
  40. https://www.bookseriesinorder.com/william-makepeace-thackeray/
  41. https://archive.org/details/bub_gb_GuINAAAAQAAJ
  42. https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstreams/ad1165c8-9b88-487e-ac07-f43432f49df8/download
  43. https://geniuses.club/genius/william-makepeace-thackeray
  44. https://susannahfullerton.com.au/20-august-1836-william-makepeace-thackeray-marries/
  45. https://kimberlyevemusings.blogspot.com/2021/04/mrs-william-makepeace-thackeray.html
  46. https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Thackeray-143
  47. https://bulletin.ukahn.org/women-with-postpartum-psychosis-and-their-babies-then-and-now/
  48. https://blog.bookstellyouwhy.com/william-makepeace-thackerays-imprudent-marriage
  49. https://eafitzsimons.wordpress.com/2013/09/03/219/
  50. https://www.encyclopedia.com/people/literature-and-arts/english-literature-19th-cent-biographies/william-makepeace-thackeray
  51. https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/139788931/harriet_marian-stephen
  52. https://josephsmithfoundation.org/wiki/william-makepeace-thackeray/
  53. https://elizabethgaskellhouse.co.uk/discovering-miss-thackeray/
  54. https://collections.etoncollege.com/online-exhibition/a-victorian-legacy-anne-thackeray-ritchies-life-and-writings/
  55. https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Thackeray-12
  56. https://victorianweb.org/books/aplin.html
  57. https://www.americanheritage.com/thackeray-love
  58. https://www.npg.org.uk/collections/search/person/mp05103/jane-octavia-brookfield-nee-elton
  59. http://authorscalendar.info/wmthacke.htm
  60. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/18645/18645-h/18645-h.htm
  61. https://www.the-tls.com/lives/biography/unscandalous
  62. https://archive.org/details/englishhumourist00thacrich
  63. https://lostmuseum.cuny.edu/archive/with-thackeray-in-america-a-visit-to
  64. https://encyclopediavirginia.org/primary-documents/chapter-iv-an-excerpt-from-with-thackeray-in-america-by-eyre-crowe-1893/
  65. https://www.augustachronicle.com/story/news/2021/02/11/british-author-william-makepeace-thackeray-spoke-augusta/4421448001/
  66. https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/288071487
  67. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/29363/29363-h/29363-h.html
  68. https://www.online-literature.com/anthony-trollope/thackeray/7/
  69. https://academic.oup.com/book/2316/chapter/142458987
  70. https://library.harvard.edu/sites/default/files/static/onlineexhibits/thackeray/chapter2.html
  71. https://www.jstor.org/stable/515245
  72. https://victorianweb.org/periodicals/cornhill/cornhill.html
  73. https://www.oxforddnb.com/display/10.1093/ref:odnb/9780198614128.001.0001/odnb-9780198614128-e-36138
  74. https://www.nytimes.com/1940/01/16/archives/cornhill-magazine-of-london-suspends-was-founded-by-thackeray-may.html
  75. https://www.victorianweb.org/authors/wmt/mp.html
  76. https://www.oxoniensia.org/volumes/1995/windscheffel.pdf
  77. https://www.nytimes.com/1864/01/11/archives/william-makepeace-thackeray.html
  78. http://www.sonofthesouth.net/leefoundation/civil-war/1864/january/william-makepeace-thackeray.htm
  79. https://ijhssnet.com/journals/Vol_7_No_1_January_2017/4.pdf
  80. https://online.scuola.zanichelli.it/performerheritage-files/text-bank-vol2/TB47_Thackeray.pdf
  81. https://www.ucm.es/data/cont/docs/119-2014-02-19-William%2520Makepeace%2520Thackeray.pdf
  82. http://etheses.uin-malang.ac.id/44284/1/02320104.pdf
  83. https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Dictionary_of_National_Biography%2C_1885-1900/Thackeray%2C_William_Makepeace
  84. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/irish-literature-in-transition-18301880/england-and-ireland-tory-and-whig-thackeray-trollope-arnold/8A3AA251923B4B131AC8A9CC83AF25BD
  85. http://www.ricorso.net/rx/az-data/authors/t/Thackeray_WM/life.htm
  86. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/victorian-literature-and-culture/article/angloirish-threat-in-thackerays-and-trollopes-writings-of-the-1840s/61617890F77B36C8FC67188C4F363369
  87. https://www.lwcurrey.com/pages/books/114150/william-makepeace-thackeray-mr-m-a-titmarsh/the-irish-sketch-book-by-mr-m-a-titmarsh-pseudonym
  88. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/victorian-literature-and-culture/article/squab-and-the-idler-a-cosmopolitan-colonial-dialogue-in-the-calcutta-star-between-william-thackeray-and-james-hume/3399F6523A57B5F1D948570282D4D891
  89. https://www.irishtimes.com/opinion/barry-to-a-t-frank-mcnally-on-the-surprising-authenticity-of-thackeray-s-irish-classic-barry-lyndon-1.4452604
  90. https://www.londonremembers.com/subjects/william-thackeray
  91. https://incompetech.com/authors/thackeray/
  92. https://victorianweb.org/art/parks/kensalgreen/17.html
  93. https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/1933/william_makepeace-thackeray
  94. https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=nnc1.1002392208
  95. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4172856
  96. https://www.enotes.com/topics/vanity-fair/critical-essays/critical-overview
  97. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1910/08/contemporary-opinions-of-thackeray/644535/
  98. https://victorianweb.org/authors/wmt/pegasus/ch5d.html
  99. https://victorianweb.org/authors/trollope/thackeray/3.html
  100. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3044082
  101. https://www.jstor.org/stable/29533188
  102. https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/18645
  103. https://www.nottinghilleditions.com/blog/victorian-gossip-the-rivalry-between-dickens-and-w-m-thackeray/
  104. https://gourmaha.ac.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Dickens-and-Thackeray_compressed.pdf
  105. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44372465
  106. https://psychosocial.com/index.php/ijpr/article/view/3196
  107. https://www.jstor.org/stable/449713
  108. https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/abstract/document/obo-9780199799558/obo-9780199799558-0078.xml
  109. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/363424986_Recent_Thackeray_Studies_2009-2022
  110. https://scholarlypublishingcollective.org/psup/dickens/article/53/2/322/317664/Recent-Thackeray-Studies-2009-2022
  111. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1898/11/some-aspects-of-thackeray/636819/
  112. https://trace.tennessee.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1278&context=utk_gradthes
  113. http://ncgsjournal.com/issue162/richardson.html
  114. https://www.uww.edu/documents/colleges/cac/TheatreDance/Study%2520Guides/20-vanityfair-studyguide.pdf
  115. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/481788/summary
  116. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/43750/summary
  117. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24302006
  118. http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/2511
  119. https://www.yesterdaysclassics.com/products/the-history-of-henry-esmond-esq-by-william-makepeace_thackeray
  120. http://www.online-literature.com/thackeray/henry-esmond/
  121. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/literature-and-writing/newcomes-william-makepeace-thackeray
  122. https://www.bbrarebooks.com/pages/books/WT014/william-makepeace-thackeray/the-virginians-a-tale-of-the-last-century
  123. https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/6364777-the-virginians
  124. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/57966/57966-h/57966-h.htm
  125. https://www.addall.com/books-in-order/william-makepeace-thackeray/
  126. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/2675/2675-h/2675-h.htm
  127. http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/1969
  128. https://editions.covecollective.org/edition/catherine
  129. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/4558/4558-h/4558-h.htm
  130. https://onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/webbin/book/lookupname?key=Thackeray%252C%2520William%2520Makepeace%252C%25201811%252D1863
  131. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26812326
  132. https://librivox.org/author/81
  133. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/2608/2608-h/2608-h.htm
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.