Al Smith
Al Smith
Main page
2256891

Al Smith

logo
Community Hub0 subscribers
Read side by side
from Wikipedia

Alfred Emanuel Smith (December 30, 1873 – October 4, 1944) was an American politician who served as the 42nd governor of New York from 1919 to 1920 and again from 1923 to 1928. He was the Democratic Party's presidential nominee in the 1928 presidential election, losing to Herbert Hoover of the Republican Party in a landslide.

Key Information

The son of an Irish American mother and a Civil War–veteran Italian American father, Smith was raised on the Lower East Side of Manhattan, New York City, near the Brooklyn Bridge. He resided in that neighborhood for his entire life. Although Smith remained personally untarnished by corruption, he—like many other New York Democrats—was linked to the notorious Tammany Hall political machine that controlled New York City politics during his era.[1] Smith served in the New York State Assembly from 1904 to 1915 and was the speaker of the Assembly in 1913. He also served as the sheriff of New York County from 1916 to 1917. He was first elected governor in 1918, lost his 1920 bid for re-election, and was elected again in 1922, 1924, and 1926. Smith was the foremost urban leader of the efficiency movement in the U.S. and was noted for achieving a wide range of reforms as governor.

Smith was the first Catholic to be the nominee for the U.S. presidency of a major party. His 1928 presidential candidacy mobilized both Catholic and anti-Catholic voters.[2] Many Protestants, particularly German Lutherans and Southern Baptists, feared his candidacy, believing that the pope in Rome would dictate his policies. Smith was also a committed "wet" (i.e., an opponent of Prohibition); as governor he had repealed New York State's prohibition law. Smith attracted voters who wanted beer, wine, and liquor and did not like dealing with criminal bootleggers, along with voters who were outraged that new criminal gangs had taken over the streets in most large and medium-sized cities.[3] Hoover, who was the incumbent Republican secretary of commerce, was aided by national prosperity, the absence of American involvement in war, and anti-Catholicism, and he defeated Smith in a landslide in 1928.

Smith then entered business in New York City, and became involved in the construction and promotion of the Empire State Building. He sought the 1932 Democratic presidential nomination, but was defeated by Franklin D. Roosevelt, his former ally and successor as governor. During the Roosevelt presidency, Smith became an increasingly vocal opponent of Roosevelt's New Deal.

Early life

[edit]
Smith c. 1890s

Smith was born at 174 South Street and raised in the Fourth Ward on the Lower East Side of Manhattan in 1873; he resided there for his entire life.[4] His mother, Catherine (née Mulvihill), was the daughter of Maria Marsh and Thomas Mulvihill, who were immigrants from County Westmeath, Ireland.[5] His father, baptised Joseph Alfred Smith in 1839, was the son of Emanuel Smith, an Italian marinaro (sailor).[citation needed] The elder Alfred Smith (Anglicized name for Alfredo Emanuele Ferraro) was the son of Italian and German[6][7] immigrants. He served with the 11th New York Fire Zouaves in the opening months of the Civil War.

Smith grew up with his family struggling financially in the Gilded Age; New York City matured and completed major infrastructure projects. The Brooklyn Bridge was being constructed nearby. "The Brooklyn Bridge and I grew up together", Smith would later recall.[8] His four grandparents were of ethnic German, Irish as well as Italian ancestry,[9] but Smith identified more with the Irish-American community and became its leading spokesman in the 1920s.

His father Alfred owned a small trucking firm, but died when Smith was 13. Aged 14, Smith had to drop out of St. James parochial school to help support the family, and worked at a fish market for seven years. Prior to dropping out of school, he served as an altar boy, and was strongly influenced by the Catholic priests he worked with.[10] He never attended high school or college, and claimed he learned about people by studying them at the Fulton Fish Market, where he worked for $12 per week. His acting skills made him a success on the amateur theater circuit. He became widely known, and developed the smooth oratorical style that characterized his political career.

Political career

[edit]
Charles F. Murphy and Smith in 1915

In his political career, Smith built on his working-class beginnings, identifying himself with immigrants and campaigning as a man of the people. Although indebted to the Tammany Hall political machine (and particularly to its boss, "Silent" Charlie Murphy), he remained untarnished by corruption and worked for the passage of progressive legislation.[11] It was during his early unofficial jobs with Tammany Hall that he gained renown as an orator.[12] Smith's first political job was in 1895, as an investigator in the office of the Commissioner of Jurors as appointed by Tammany Hall.

During his time as the Governor of New York, Smith became known as a progressive; David Farber wrote that "Smith became a strong and effective advocate of worker safety laws and championed, then and for years after, legislation aimed at giving workers more rights and protections against economic exploitation." He staunchly supported labor unions and pressed for protective legislation for the workers, stressing the need to expand the rights of working women in particular. A “New Era Progressive”, Smith advocated local governnment funded facilities and services such as hospitals, parks and schools in poor and working-class areas. Speaking of the role of the state in 1927, Smith said: "The State is a living force. It must have the ability to clothe itself with human understanding of the daily, living needs of those whom it is created to serve."[11] However, Smith envisioned a progressive vision based on state and local intervention, and decentralizing power to specific locales and communities. He was ambivalent with regard to federal economic intervention, which eventually led him to oppose the New Deal legislation.[13]

State legislature

[edit]
Smith's official State Assembly portrait, 1904

Smith was first elected to the New York State Assembly (New York Co., 2nd D.) in 1904, and was repeatedly elected to office, serving through 1915.[10] After being approached by Frances Perkins, an activist, to improve labor practices, Smith sought to improve the conditions of factory workers.

Smith served as vice chairman of the state commission appointed to investigate factory conditions after 146 workers died in the 1911 Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire. Meeting the families of the deceased Triangle factory workers left a strong impression on him. Together with Perkins and Robert F. Wagner, Smith crusaded against dangerous and unhealthy workplace conditions and championed corrective legislation.[12][14]

The Commission, chaired by State Senator Robert F. Wagner, held a series of widely publicized investigations around the state, interviewing 222 witnesses and taking 3,500 pages of testimony. They hired field agents to do on-site inspections of factories. Starting with the issue of fire safety, they studied broader issues of the risks of injury in the factory environment. Their findings led to thirty-eight new laws regulating labor in New York State, and gave each of them a reputation as leading progressive reformers working on behalf of the working class. In the process, they changed Tammany's reputation from mere corruption to progressive endeavors to help the workers.[15] New York City's Fire Chief John Kenlon told the investigators that his department had identified more than 200 factories where conditions resulted in risk of a fire like that at the Triangle Factory.[16]

The State Commission's reports led to the modernization of the state's labor laws, making New York State "one of the most progressive states in terms of labor reform."[17][18] New laws mandated better building access and egress, fireproofing requirements, the availability of fire extinguishers, the installation of alarm systems and automatic sprinklers, better eating and toilet facilities for workers, and limited the number of hours that women and children could work. In the years from 1911 to 1913, sixty of the sixty-four new laws recommended by the Commission were legislated with the support of Governor William Sulzer.[19]

Smith at his desk in the State Capitol, 1913

In 1911, the Democrats obtained a majority of seats in the State Assembly, and Smith became Majority Leader and Chairman of the Committee on Ways and Means. The following year, following the loss of the majority, he became the Minority Leader. When the Democrats reclaimed the majority after the next election, he was elected Speaker for the 1913 session. He became Minority Leader again in 1914 and 1915. In November 1915, he was elected Sheriff of New York County, New York. By now he was a leader of the Progressive movement in New York City and state. His campaign manager and top aide was Belle Moskowitz, a daughter of Jewish immigrants.[1]

Governor (1919–1920, 1923–1928)

[edit]
Gubernatorial portrait of Al Smith by Douglas Volk

After serving in the patronage-rich job of sheriff of New York County beginning in 1916, Smith was elected governor of New York in 1918 with the help of Tammany Boss Charles F. Murphy and James A. Farley, who brought Smith the upstate vote.[20]

In 1919, Smith gave the famous speech "A man as low and mean as I can picture",[21] making a drastic break with publisher William Randolph Hearst. Hearst, known for his notoriously sensationalist and largely left-wing position in the state Democratic Party, was the leader of its populist wing in the city. He had combined with Tammany Hall in electing the local administration, and had attacked Smith for starving children by not reducing the cost of milk.[22]

Smith lost his bid for re-election in the 1920 New York gubernatorial election, but was again elected governor in 1922, 1924 and 1926, with Farley managing his campaign. In his 1922 re-election, he embraced his position as an anti-prohibitionist. Smith offered alcohol to guests at the Executive Mansion in Albany, and repealed the state's Prohibition enforcement statute, the Mullan-Gage law.[23]

As governor, Smith became known nationally as a progressive who sought to make government more efficient and more effective in meeting social needs. Smith's assistant Robert Moses built the nation's first state park system and reformed the civil service, later gaining appointment as Secretary of State of New York. During Smith's time in office, New York strengthened laws governing workers' compensation, women's pensions and children and women's labor with the help of Frances Perkins, soon to be President Franklin D. Roosevelt's Labor Secretary.

Time cover, July 13, 1925

1924 presidential election

[edit]

In 1924, Smith unsuccessfully sought the Democratic nomination for president, advancing the cause of civil liberty by decrying lynching and racial violence. Roosevelt delivered the nominating speech for Smith at the 1924 Democratic National Convention in which he saluted Smith as "the Happy Warrior of the political battlefield."[1] Smith represented the urban, east coast wing of the party as an anti-prohibition "wet" candidate, while his main rival for the nomination, President Woodrow Wilson's son-in-law William Gibbs McAdoo, a former Secretary of the Treasury, stood for the more rural tradition and prohibition "dry" candidacy.[24] The party was hopelessly split between the two. An increasingly chaotic convention balloted 100 times before both men accepted that neither would be able to win the required two-thirds of the votes, and so each withdrew. On the 103rd ballot, the exhausted party nominated the little-known candidate John W. Davis of West Virginia, a former congressman and United States Ambassador to Great Britain who had been a dark horse presidential candidate in 1920. Davis lost the election by a landslide to Republican incumbent Calvin Coolidge, who won in part because of the prosperous times.

Undeterred, Smith returned to fight a determined campaign for the party's nomination in 1928. He was aided by the endorsement of Philip La Follette,[25] son of 1924 Progressive Party presidential candidate Robert M. La Follette, who died in 1925 seven months after receiving 16.62 percent of the popular vote—the fifth-highest proportion for any third-party presidential candidate.[note 1]

1928 presidential election

[edit]

Reporter Frederick William Wile made the oft-repeated observation that Smith was defeated by "the three P's: Prohibition, Prejudice and Prosperity".[26] The Republican Party was still benefiting from an economic boom, as well as a failure to reapportion Congress and the electoral college following the 1920 census,[27] which had registered a 15 percent increase in the urban population. The party was biased toward small-town and rural areas. Its presidential candidate Herbert Hoover, who headed the Census of 1920, did little to alter this state of affairs.

Historians agree that prosperity, along with widespread anti-Catholic sentiment against Smith, made Hoover's election inevitable.[28] He defeated Smith by a landslide in the 1928 United States presidential election, carrying five Southern states via crossover voting by conservative white Democrats.[note 2]

Political cartoon suggesting the Pope was the force behind Al Smith. The Good Citizen, November 1926. Publisher: Pillar of Fire Church, New Jersey.

The fact that Smith was Catholic and the descendant of Catholic immigrants was instrumental in his loss of the election of 1928.[10] Historical hostilities between Protestants and Catholics had been carried by national groups to the United States by immigrants, and centuries of Protestant domination allowed myths and superstitions about Catholicism to flourish. Long-established Protestants had viewed the waves of Catholic immigrants from Ireland, Italy and Eastern Europe since the mid-19th century with suspicion. In addition, many Protestants carried old fears related to extravagant claims of one religion against the other which dated back to the European wars of religion. They feared that Smith would answer to the Pope rather than the United States Constitution.

Scott Farris notes that the anti-Catholicism of American society was the sole reason behind Smith's defeat, as even contemporary Prohibition activists would admit that their main problem with the Democratic candidate was his faith and not any political view. Bob Jones Sr., a prominent Protestant pastor in South Carolina, said:

I'll tell you, brother, that the big issue we've got to face ain't the liquor question. I'd rather see a saloon on every corner of the South than see the foreigners elect Al Smith president.[29]

A Methodist newspaper in Georgia called Catholicism "a degenerate type of Christianity," while Southern Baptist newspapers ordered their readers to vote against Smith, claiming that he would close down Protestant churches, end freedom of worship and prohibit reading the Bible.[30] Charles Hillman Fountain, a Protestant writer, insisted that Catholics should be barred from holding any office.[31] Farris states that "More disturbing than the ridiculous and the dangerous was the respectable anti-Catholicism", as contemporary newspapers and Protestant churches tried to mask their anti-Catholicism as genuine concern. Protestant activists insisted that Catholicism represents an alien culture and medieval mentality, claiming that Catholicism is incompatible with American democracy and institutions.[32]

Catholics were portrayed as reactionary despite being more left-wing than mainstream American Protestant congregations at the time.[29] William Allen White, a renowned newspaper editor, warned that Catholicism would erode the moral standards of America, saying that "the whole Puritan civilization which has built a sturdy, orderly nation is threatened by Smith." While Herbert Hoover avoided raising the issue of Catholicism on the campaign trail, he defended the Protestant actions in a private letter:

There are many people of intense Protestant faith to whom Catholicism is a grievous sin, and they have as much right to vote against a man for public office because of that belief. That is not persecution.[29]

White rural conservatives in the South also believed that Smith's close association with Tammany Hall, the Democratic machine in Manhattan, showed that he tolerated corruption in government, while they overlooked their own brands of it. Another major controversial issue was the continuation of Prohibition, the enforcement of which was widely considered problematic. Smith personally favored the relaxation or repeal of Prohibition laws because they had given rise to more criminality. The Democratic Party split North and South on the issue, with the more rural South continuing to favor Prohibition. During the campaign, Smith tried to duck the issue with non-committal statements.[33]

Smith was an articulate proponent of good government and efficiency, as was Hoover. Smith swept the entire Catholic vote, which in 1920 and 1924 had been split between the parties; he attracted millions of Catholics, generally ethnic whites, to the polls for the first time, especially women, who were first allowed to vote in 1920. He lost important Democratic constituencies in the rural North as well as in Southern cities and suburbs. Smith did retain the loyalty of the Deep South, thanks in part to the appeal of his running mate, Senator Joseph Robinson from Arkansas, but lost five states of the Rim South to Hoover. Smith carried the popular vote in each of America's ten most populous cities, an indication of the rising power of the urban areas and their new demographics.

Smith was not a very good campaigner. His campaign theme song, "The Sidewalks of New York", had little appeal among rural Americans, who also found his 'city' accent slightly foreign when heard on radio. Smith narrowly lost his home state; New York's electors were biased in favor of rural upstate and largely Protestant districts. However, in 1928, his fellow Democrat Franklin D. Roosevelt (a Protestant of Dutch old-line stock) was elected to replace him as governor of New York.[34] Farley left Smith's camp to run Roosevelt's successful campaign for governor in 1928, and then Roosevelt's successful campaigns for the Presidency in 1932 and 1936.

Voter realignment

[edit]
Al Smith giving a speech

Some political scientists believe that the 1928 election started a voter realignment that helped develop Roosevelt's New Deal coalition.[35] One political scientist said, "...not until 1928, with the nomination of Al Smith, a northeastern reformer, did Democrats make gains among the urban, blue-collar and Catholic voters who were later to become core components of the New Deal coalition and break the pattern of minimal class polarization that had characterized the Fourth Party System."[36] However, historian Allan Lichtman's quantitative analysis suggests that the 1928 results were based largely on religion and are not a useful barometer of the voting patterns of the New Deal era.[37]

Lichtman notes that the sole defining issue of the election was anti-Catholicism, which radically realigned states' voting patterns. States that had never voted Republican after Reconstruction, such as Texas, Florida, North Carolina and Virginia, voted for Hoover, while Smith carried Massachusetts and Rhode Island—states that had never voted Democratic before save for 1912. Lichtman further proves this by pointing out that Smith and Hoover had very similar political views save for religion and Prohibition, and yet the 1928 election had a turnout of 57%, despite previous 1920s American elections having their turnouts below 50%.[29]

Christopher M. Finan (2003) says Smith is an underestimated symbol of the changing nature of American politics in the first half of the last century. He represented the rising ambitions of urban, industrial America at a time when the hegemony of rural, agrarian America was in decline, although many states had legislatures and congressional delegations biased toward rural areas due to a lack of redistricting after censuses. Smith was connected to the hopes and aspirations of immigrants, especially Catholics and Jews from eastern and southern Europe. Smith was a devout Catholic, but his struggles against religious bigotry were often misinterpreted when he fought the religiously inspired Protestant morality imposed by prohibitionists.

The 1928 election initiated a complete voter realignment of African-Americans, who overwhelmingly supported the Republican Party prior to 1928.[38] Hoover sought "Southern Strategy" for the election, and sided with the segregationist lily-white Republicans at the expense of the pro-civil rights black and tans.[39] Prominent African Americans were removed from positions of leadership in the Republican Party and replaced with lily-white Republicans in order to appeal to the segregationist South, and Hoover's spokesmen in the South spoke of his commitment to white supremacy.[40] Allan Lichtman wrote that Hoover "sought a permanent reorganization of southern Republicanism under the leadership of white racists."[39] This action was taken to exploit the unpopularity of Smith in the South, as Hoover and his cabinet were "convinced that white Southern votes were more essential to a Hoover win than black ones".[40] Hoover assured Southern voters that he "had no intention of appointing colored men" and pledged that he had "no intention—party platform notwithstanding—of foisting off an anti-lynch law on the white South";[40] at the same time, Hoover heavily emphasized "his rural-Protestant roots" and appealed to the white voters' anti-urban and anti-Catholic sentiments, while also portraying Smith as a pro-civil rights candidate.[40] According to Phylon, apart from the Catholics' perceived allegiance to the Pope over the United States, American anti-Catholicism was also racially motivated, as Southern Protestants "strongly opposed the church's liberal policies—particularly its uncompromising position against social and political segregation."[40]

Al Smith was supportive of racial equality and appointed African Americans to the New York City school system and the New York City Civil Service Commission.[40] Major black newspapers throughout the United States such as The Chicago Defender, Baltimore Afro-American and Norfolk Journal and Guide endorsed Smith for president,[39] and prominent members of the NAACP supported Smith, with Walter Francis White writing that "Governor Smith is by far the best man available for the Presidency" and arguing that Smith's "nomination and election would be the greatest blow at bigotry that has ever been struck."[39] Smith attracted the attention of disheartened African-American voters, as he was unpopular in the South, faced prejudice as a Catholic, and had a reputation of a "spokesman for ethnic minorities in Northern cities".[39] As such, Smith's candidacy, coupled with Hoover's Southern concession, initiated abandonment of loyalty to the Republicans and embrace of the Democratic Party by African-American voters. Samuel O'Dell wrote in Phylon that 1928 black voters "bolted to the Democratic party in unprecedented numbers."[39]

Smith was also known as an economic progressive, and championed progressive reforms such as a shorter workweek, workers' compensation laws, as well as health and workplace safety reforms. Many of his reforms later inspired the New Deal, even though Smith himself came to oppose the New Deal legislation.[41] A hallmark of Smith's progressivism was his support for and extensive ties to New York labor unions; Smith believed that workers need to be protected from economic exploitation, and became known for legislation that expanded the power of labor unions, enhanced safety regulations, and provided essential services such as healthcare and education to impoverished neighbourhoods and working-class communities.[11] However, Smith said little about his economic progressivism on the 1928 campaign trail, as the public was largely supportive of the conservative economic vision that the incumbent Republican administration pursued, crediting it with the economic prosperity at the time.[42]

Opposition to Roosevelt and the New Deal

[edit]
Franklin D. Roosevelt (left) and Smith (right) in Albany, New York

Smith felt slighted by Roosevelt during the latter's governorship. They became rivals in the 1932 Democratic Party presidential primaries after Smith decided to run for the nomination against Roosevelt, the presumed favorite. At the convention, Smith's animosity toward Roosevelt was so great that he put aside longstanding rivalries to work with McAdoo and Hearst to block Roosevelt's nomination for several ballots. That coalition fell apart when Smith refused to work on finding a compromise candidate; instead, he maneuvered to become the nominee. After losing the nomination, Smith eventually campaigned for Roosevelt in 1932, giving a particularly important speech on behalf of the Democratic nominee at Boston on October 27 in which he "pulled out all the stops".[43]

Smith became highly critical of Roosevelt's New Deal policies, which he deemed a betrayal of good-government progressive ideals and ran counter to the goal of close cooperation with business. Smith joined the American Liberty League, an organization founded by conservative Democrats who disapproved of Roosevelt's New Deal measures and tried to rally public opinion against the New Deal. The League published pamphlets and sponsored radio programs, arguing that the New Deal was destroying personal liberty; however, the League failed to gain support in the 1934 or 1936 elections and rapidly declined in influence. It was officially dissolved in 1940.[44][45] Smith's antipathy to Roosevelt and his policies was so great that he supported Republican presidential nominees Alf Landon in the 1936 election and Wendell Willkie in the 1940 election.[1]

According to Jonathan Alter, the reasons for Smith's opposition to Roosevelt's New Deal were principally personal rather than ideological. Roosevelt wronged Smith in 1931 by opposing the proposal for an unequivocal stand for repeal of Prohibition postulated by Smith and his Northern progressive wing of the party.[46] Moreover, many of Smith's proposals and policies from his time as governor of New York were expanded and turned into federal legislation within the New Deal, leading Smith to believe that Roosevelt stole his ideas and was taking credit for them at his expense.[41] Speaking of Roosevelt in 1932, Smith proclaimed: "Frank Roosevelt just threw me out of a window."[47] Smith later abandoned his criticism of the New Deal once Roosevelt arranged for the Reconstruction Finance Corporation to rent space in the Empire State Building, which eased Smith's financial problems. Shortly before his death in 1944, Smith changed his view of Roosevelt completely, speaking to a reporter: "He [Roosevelt] was the kindest man who ever lived, but don't get in his way."[48]

Although personal resentment was one factor in Smith's break with Roosevelt and the New Deal, Christopher Finan (2003) argues that Smith was consistent in his beliefs and politics, suggesting that Smith always believed in social mobility, economic opportunity, religious tolerance, and individualism. Historian David Farber argues that while Smith was always a "firm believer in the use of government to right wrongs", his vision was ultimately based on decentralizing power to the states and local communities, which would have pursued public ownership and economic interventionism on the local and regional level. Smith was also far less supportive of direct federal intervention, on which "he was ambivalent, even uncertain."[13] Despite the break between the men, Smith and Eleanor Roosevelt remained close. In 1936, while Smith was in Washington, D.C., making a vehement radio attack on the President, she invited him to stay at the White House. To avoid embarrassing the Roosevelts, he declined. Historian Robert Slayton observes that Smith and Roosevelt did not reconcile until a brief meeting in June 1941, and he also suggests that during the early 1940s, the antipathy which Smith held toward his former ally had waned.[49] Upon the death of Smith's wife, Katie, in May 1944, Roosevelt sent Smith a note of personal condolence. Smith's grandchildren later recalled that he was greatly touched by it.[50]

Business life and later years

[edit]
Smith golfing with baseball great Babe Ruth in Coral Gables, Florida, in 1930.

After the 1928 election, Smith became the president of Empire State, Inc., the corporation that built and operated the Empire State Building. Construction for the building symbolically began on March 17, 1930, St. Patrick's Day, per Smith's instructions. Smith's grandchildren cut the ribbon when the world's tallest skyscraper opened on May 1, 1931, which was May Day, an international labor celebration. Its construction had been completed in only 13 months, a record for such a large project.

As with the Brooklyn Bridge, which Smith had seen being built from his Lower East Side boyhood home, the Empire State Building was both a vision and an achievement that had been constructed by combining the interests of all, rather than being divided by the interests of a few. Smith continued to promote the Empire State Building, which was derided as the "Empty State Building" due to a lack of tenants, in the years following its construction.[51][52]

In 1929, Smith was awarded the Laetare Medal by the University of Notre Dame, considered the most prestigious award for American Catholics.[53]

Smith (right) with Charles Francis Adams III in December 1929, during his time as director of Empire State, Inc.

In 1929 Smith was elected President of the Board of Trustees of the New York State College of Forestry at Syracuse University.[54] Knowing his fondness for animals, in 1934 Robert Moses made Al Smith the Honorary Night Zookeeper of the newly renovated Central Park Zoo. Though a ceremonial title, Smith was given keys to the zoo and often took guests to see the animals after hours.[55]

Smith was an early and vocal critic of the Nazi regime in Germany. He supported the Anti-Nazi boycott of 1933 and addressed a mass-meeting at Madison Square Garden against Nazism that March.[56] His speech was included in the 1934 anthology Nazism: An Assault on Civilization.[57] In 1938, Smith took to the airwaves to denounce Nazi brutality in the wake of Kristallnacht. His words were published in The New York Times article "Text of the Catholic Protest Broadcast" of November 17, 1938.[58][59]

Like most New York City businessmen, Smith enthusiastically supported American military involvement in World War II. Although he was not asked by Roosevelt to play any role in the war effort, Smith was an active and vocal proponent of FDR's attempts to amend the Neutrality Act in order to allow "Cash and Carry" sales of war equipment to be made to the British. Smith spoke on behalf of the policy in October 1939, to which FDR responded directly: "Very many thanks. You were grand."[60]

In 1939, Smith was appointed a Papal Chamberlain of the Sword and Cape, one of the highest honors which the Papacy bestowed on a layman.

Smith died at the Rockefeller Institute Hospital on October 4, 1944, of a heart attack, at the age of 70. He had been broken-hearted over the death of his wife from cancer five months earlier, on May 4, 1944.[61] He was funeralized at St. Patrick's Cathedral and is interred at Calvary Cemetery.[62][63]

Personal life

[edit]

On May 6, 1900, Al Smith married Catherine Ann Dunn, with whom he had five children.[1] He was a devout Catholic.

The gravesite of Governor Smith at Calvary Cemetery

Legacy

[edit]

Buildings and other landmarks named after Smith include the following:

Landmarks named after Al Smith
Alfred E. Smith Memorial Building at St. Vincent's Hospital Manhattan
The Alfred Smith School, PS 163
Alfred E. Smith Career and Technical Education High School in the South Bronx
The Alfred E. Smith Building in Albany, New York
Governor Alfred E. Smith Sunken Meadow State Park in Suffolk County
[edit]
The US Government issued a commemorative stamp honoring Albert E. Smith, issued in 1944
Sheet music for He's Our Al (1928)
  • Smith and Franklin D. Roosevelt were filmed by Lee de Forest in his DeForest Phonofilm sound-on-film process during the 1924 Democratic National Convention, which ran from June 21 to July 9. This film is now in the Maurice Zouary collection at the Library of Congress.[69]
  • In Sinclair Lewis' 1928 novel The Man Who Knew Coolidge, Smith is cited as an example of the opportunities "in this new and increasingly practical America for any bright fellow today!" [70]
  • A song entitled "He's Our Al" was dedicated for Smith in 1928, written by A. Seymour Brown and Albert Von Tilzer.
  • The Al Smith Dinner, first held in 1945 by the Alfred E. Smith Memorial Foundation, is an annual dinner to raise funds for Catholic charities in New York. It was typically attended by presidential candidates for much of the 20th century; however, it has become less influential in modern times.[71]
  • In Harry Turtledove's alternate history Southern Victory series, in which the Confederate States of America wins the American Civil War in 1862, Al Smith is elected President of the United States in 1936 on the Socialist Party ticket, defeating Democratic incumbent Herbert Hoover. As per the Richmond Agreement with Confederate President Jake Featherston, he allowed plebiscites to be held in the states of Kentucky, Sequoyah and Houston on re-admittance to the Confederacy; the rejection of readmittance in Sequoyah serves as a casus belli for the Second Great War in North America (1941–1944). Smith serves until 1942, when he is killed in a bombing raid on the Powel House in Philadelphia and is succeeded by his Vice President Charles W. La Follette (the fictional son of Robert M. La Follette).
  • Smith was portrayed by Alan Bunce in the 1960 film Sunrise at Campobello, and by Wilbur Fitzgerald in HBO's 2005 TV-movie Warm Springs. Both of these movies focus on Franklin D. Roosevelt's struggle with polio.[72]

Electoral history

[edit]

New York gubernatorial elections, 1918–1926

[edit]
1918 General election results[73]
Governor candidate Running Mate Party Popular Vote
Alfred E. Smith Harry C. Walker Democratic 1,009,936 (47.37%)
Charles S. Whitman Edward Schoeneck (Republican),
Mamie W. Colvin (Prohibition)
Republican,
Prohibition
995,094 (46.68%)
Charles Wesley Ervin Ella Reeve Bloor Socialist 121,705 (5.71%)
Olive M. Johnson August Gillhaus Socialist Labor 5,183 (0.24%)

1920 General election results
Governor candidate Running Mate Party Popular Vote
Nathan L. Miller Jeremiah Wood Republican 1,335,878 (46.58%)
Alfred E. Smith George R. Fitts Democratic 1,261,812 (44.00%)
Joseph D. Cannon Jessie Wallace Hughan Socialist 159,804 (5.57%)
Dudley Field Malone Farmer-Labor 69,908 (2.44%)
George F. Thompson Edward G. Deltrich Prohibition 35,509 (1.24%)
John P. Quinn Socialist Labor 5,015 (0.17%)

1922 General election results
Governor candidate Running Mate Party Popular Vote
Alfred E. Smith George R. Lunn Democratic 1,397,670 (55.21%)
Nathan L. Miller William J. Donovan Republican 1,011,725 (39.97%)
Edward F. Cassidy Theresa B. Wiley Socialist,
Farmer-Labor
109,119 (4.31%)
George K. Hinds William C. Ramsdell Prohibition 9,499 (0.38%)
Jeremiah D. Crowley John E. DeLee Socialist Labor 9,499 (0.38%)

1924 General election results
Governor candidate Running Mate Party Popular Vote
Alfred E. Smith George R. Lunn Democratic 1,627,111 (49.96%)
Theodore Roosevelt Jr. Seymour Lowman Republican 1,518,552 (46.63%)
Norman Mattoon Thomas Charles Solomon Socialist 99,854 (3.07%)
James P. Cannon Franklin P. Brill Workers 6,395 (0.20%)
Frank E. Passonno Milton Weinberger Socialist Labor 4,931 (0.15%)

1926 General election results
Governor candidate Running Mate Party Popular Vote
Alfred E. Smith Edwin Corning Democratic 1,523,813 (52.13%)
Ogden L. Mills Seymour Lowman Republican 1,276,137 (43.80%)
Jacob Panken August Claessens Socialist 83,481 (2.87%)
Charles E. Manierre Ella McCarthy Prohibition 21,285 (0.73%)
Benjamin Gitlow Franklin P. Brill Workers 5,507 (0.19%)
Jeremiah D. Crowley John E. DeLee Socialist Labor 3,553 (0.12%)

United States presidential election, 1928

[edit]
Electoral results
Presidential candidate Party Home state Popular vote Electoral
vote
Running mate
Count Percentage Vice-presidential candidate Home state Electoral vote
Herbert Hoover Republican California 21,427,123 58.2% 444 Charles Curtis Kansas 444
Alfred E. Smith Democratic New York 15,015,464 40.8% 87 Joseph Taylor Robinson Arkansas 87
Norman Thomas Socialist New York 267,478 0.7% 0 James H. Maurer Pennsylvania 0
William Z. Foster Communist Illinois 48,551 0.1% 0 Benjamin Gitlow New York 0
Other 48,396 0.1% Other
Total 36,807,012 100% 531 531
Needed to win 266 266
  • Source (Popular Vote): Leip, David. "1928 Presidential Election Results". Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections. Retrieved July 28, 2005.
  • Source (Electoral Vote): "Electoral College Box Scores 1789–1996". National Archives and Records Administration. Retrieved July 28, 2005.

Works

[edit]
  • Campaign Addresses of Governor Alfred E. Smith, Democratic Candidate for President 1928. Washington, DC: Democratic National Committee, 1929.
  • Progressive Democracy: Addresses & State Papers. 1928.
  • Up to Now: An Autobiography (The Viking Press, 1929)

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Alfred Emanuel Smith (December 30, 1873 – October 4, 1944) was an American politician who served four non-consecutive terms as Governor of New York, from 1919 to 1920 and 1923 to 1928.[1][2]
As the Democratic Party's nominee in the 1928 presidential election, Smith became the first Roman Catholic candidate nominated by a major party, though he lost decisively to Republican Herbert Hoover amid widespread anti-Catholic sentiment and his opposition to Prohibition.[3][4]
Nicknamed the "Happy Warrior" for his energetic campaigning style, Smith rose from humble beginnings in New York City's Lower East Side, entering politics through Tammany Hall and advocating for urban immigrants and workers.[2][5]
During his governorship, he enacted progressive reforms including expansions to workers' compensation, limitations on working hours for women and children, improved housing standards, and the establishment of state parks, laying groundwork for modern social welfare policies in the state.[5][2]

Early Life and Entry into Politics

Birth, Family, and Upbringing

Alfred Emanuel Smith was born on December 30, 1873, in a tenement on the Lower East Side of Manhattan, New York City.[6] [7] His father, Alfred Emanuel Smith Sr., worked as a teamster and shipping clerk of Italian and German descent, with the family surname originally Ferraro before being anglicized to Smith.[7] [8] His mother, Catherine Mulcahey, was of Irish Catholic ancestry and maintained the family's Roman Catholic faith.[9] The Smiths were a working-class family in the immigrant-dense neighborhood, with one younger sister, Mary, and initially lived in relative comfort supported by the father's small trucking business.[10] Smith attended St. James Parochial School in the Lower East Side but received only a limited education.[1] His father, a Civil War veteran, died in 1886 after a period of ill health when Smith was about 13 years old, necessitating the boy to leave school in the seventh grade to help support the family.[7] [6] At age 14, Smith began working at the Fulton Fish Market, handling tasks such as unloading boats and sorting fish for several years.[1] [6] This early immersion in manual labor amid the bustling, multi-ethnic tenement life of the Lower East Side shaped his understanding of urban working-class struggles.[2]

Initial Jobs and Political Awakening

Following the completion of his elementary education at age 14 in 1887, Smith entered the workforce to assist his widowed mother, securing employment at the Fulton Fish Market on Manhattan's Lower East Side. There, he performed strenuous manual labor from 4 a.m. until 5 p.m. daily, handling fish and related tasks, which earned him about $15 per week or roughly $800 annually.[11][10] This role immersed him in the harsh realities of urban working-class life amid New York's immigrant communities. In 1895, at age 21, Smith's involvement with the Tammany Hall Democratic machine led to his appointment as an investigator—or alternatively described as a clerk or process server—in the office of the New York City Commissioner of Jurors, marking his first public sector position.[6][2] This patronage job provided stability and an entry point into political networks, where his reliability and emerging oratorical skills, honed through local amateur theater, gained notice within the organization.[2] Through a decade of dedicated party service, including grassroots campaigning and administrative duties, Smith demonstrated loyalty to Tammany, culminating in his nomination and election to the New York State Assembly in November 1903, representing the East Side district.[1][12] This transition from laborer to elected official represented his political awakening, as immersion in machine politics revealed opportunities for advocating working-class interests through legislative channels, shifting his focus from personal survival to broader urban reform.[6]

New York State Political Ascendancy

State Assembly Service

Alfred Emanuel Smith was elected to the New York State Assembly from the 2nd District of New York County in November 1903, with backing from Tammany Hall, and began his service in the 1904 legislative session.[2][1] He served continuously through the 1915 session, totaling 12 years, during which he transitioned from a novice legislator to a prominent Democratic leader despite initial unfamiliarity with legislative procedures.[2][13] Smith's legislative skills, including effective oratory and bill drafting, propelled his rapid ascent; by 1911, he was appointed Assembly Majority Leader and chairman of the Ways and Means Committee.[12][14] In 1913, he was elected Speaker of the Assembly, a position he used to advance moderate progressive measures amid Tammany's machine politics.[2][15] A pivotal role came in June 1911, following the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire that killed 146 workers on March 25; Governor John Alden Dix appointed Smith vice-chairman of the newly formed Factory Investigating Commission, alongside Senator Robert F. Wagner as chairman.[15][16] The commission, active from August 1911 to 1915, conducted over 1,000 inspections across factories in New York and other states, uncovering widespread violations of fire safety, sanitation, and labor standards, including child labor and excessive work hours.[17][18] Smith's hands-on investigations, often personally visiting sites, contributed to landmark reforms enacted by 1913–1915, such as mandatory fire escapes, sprinkler systems, building code upgrades, a 54-hour workweek for women and children, and strengthened enforcement via a dedicated factory inspection bureau.[19][2] These changes directly addressed causal factors in industrial accidents, prioritizing empirical evidence from site probes over prior inadequate regulations.[20] Smith's Assembly tenure emphasized pragmatic governance, balancing urban immigrant interests with anti-corruption efforts, though critics noted his Tammany ties occasionally tempered bolder reforms.[12] He declined renomination in 1915 to accept appointment as sheriff of New York County, marking the end of his legislative service.[2]

Tammany Hall Affiliation and Machine Politics

Smith entered politics through the Democratic Party's Tammany Hall organization, the dominant political machine in New York City, which controlled patronage jobs, voter turnout among immigrant communities, and nominations for public office. In the mid-1890s, he joined the local Tammany chapter in Manhattan's Lower East Side, serving as a social hub and gateway to opportunity; by 1895, Tammany appointed him as an investigator in the office of the city commissioner of jurors, his initial salaried political role.[21] [2] This entry reflected Tammany's strategy of rewarding loyal workers from working-class districts with entry-level positions, fostering dependency on the machine's hierarchy of district leaders and bosses who dispensed favors in exchange for votes and service. Under district leader Thomas "Tom" Foley, a key Tammany figure in the 14th Assembly District, Smith secured the Democratic nomination and won election to the New York State Assembly in November 1903, representing a machine-dominated area where opposition was minimal due to organized turnout and intimidation tactics.[22] [14] Tammany's broader machine politics relied on a pyramid of influence: bosses like Foley mobilized ethnic blocs—Irish, Italian, and Jewish voters—through jobs, housing aid, and protection from nativist exclusion, while extracting kickbacks from contractors and utilities; this system, though efficient in delivering services to underserved immigrants, perpetuated corruption, as evidenced by scandals under prior leaders like Richard Croker, who amassed personal fortunes via graft until his 1902 ouster.[1] Smith's rapid ascent, including majority leader roles by 1906 and speakership in 1913, depended on such machinery, yet he avoided personal scandal, leveraging oratorical skill and legislative diligence to build alliances beyond pure patronage.[12] Charles Francis Murphy, Tammany's grand sachem from 1902 to 1924, emerged as Smith's primary patron, viewing him as a modernizer who could legitimize the machine amid reform pressures; Murphy, known for "silent" rule that emphasized discipline over flamboyant corruption, backed Smith's promotions to sheriff of New York County in 1915 (via Tammany appointment) and president of the Board of Aldermen in 1917.[23] [24] Their alliance exemplified machine evolution: Murphy shifted Tammany toward policy influence, supporting Smith's investigations into industrial safety after the 1911 Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire, which yielded labor reforms without dismantling patronage cores like civil service exemptions that funneled jobs to loyalists.[25] While critics, including upstate Republicans and progressive insurgents, decried Tammany as a "boss-ridden" entity stifling meritocracy—evidenced by its resistance to direct primaries and control over 80% of Manhattan's Democratic posts by 1910—Smith's tenure demonstrated how machine insiders could harness its resources for broader governance, though ultimate loyalty ensured its endurance.[12][26]

Governorship Achievements and Challenges

Elections, Terms, and Administrative Reforms

Alfred E. Smith secured the Democratic nomination and was elected Governor of New York on November 5, 1918, taking office on January 1, 1919, for a two-year term ending January 1, 1921.[1] His initial victory capitalized on wartime discontent with incumbent Charles Whitman, marking Smith's transition from state assembly leadership to executive authority.[7] However, Smith lost re-election in November 1920 during the national Republican landslide favoring Warren G. Harding, receiving approximately 46% of the vote against Nathan L. Miller.[1] Smith regained the governorship in the 1922 election, defeating incumbent Miller with 55% of the vote, and secured re-election in 1924 against Theodore Roosevelt Jr. and in 1926 against Ogden Mills, serving continuous terms from January 1, 1923, to January 1, 1929.[7] These victories reflected his growing popularity amid post-war recovery and urban voter support, though he declined to seek a fifth term in 1928 to pursue the Democratic presidential nomination.[1] Across his four terms, Smith focused on enhancing executive efficiency, distinguishing his administration through structural changes rather than mere patronage continuity. In his first term, Smith created the Reconstruction Commission on June 5, 1919, tasked with investigating state government operations to recommend retrenchment, reorganization, and efficiency improvements amid fiscal pressures from post-World War I expansion.[7] The commission's reports laid groundwork for subsequent reforms, identifying redundancies in the fragmented bureaucracy inherited from prior administrations. During his later terms, Smith achieved major administrative restructuring, culminating in 1924 with the consolidation of roughly 189 disparate state departments, boards, and commissions into a cabinet-style executive branch, where department heads reported directly to the governor, reducing overlap and enhancing accountability.[7] Complementing this, he implemented New York's executive budget system via constitutional amendment, enabling the governor to formulate and submit a unified budget proposal to the legislature, thereby centralizing fiscal planning and curbing fragmented appropriations that had previously inflated costs.[7] These measures, rooted in efficiency-driven analysis, modernized state administration and influenced national progressive governance models.[27]

Progressive Legislation and Fiscal Policies

During his governorships (1919–1920 and 1923–1928), Alfred E. Smith pursued progressive reforms aimed at enhancing state administration efficiency while expanding social services, often balancing increased targeted expenditures with measures to curb waste and reduce certain taxes. In 1919, he established the Reconstruction, Retrenchment, and Reorganization Commission to analyze and streamline government operations, which recommended consolidating fragmented agencies and centralizing fiscal oversight under the executive. This effort culminated in the Statutory Realignment of State Government Act of 1924, reorganizing approximately 189 state departments into a more cohesive cabinet system with departmental secretaries, thereby reducing administrative redundancies and improving accountability for public spending.[2][28] Smith also advocated for an executive budget system, which shifted budgetary preparation and control from the legislature to the governor's office, enabling more disciplined fiscal planning; although fully implemented under his successor, Smith submitted preparatory budgets aligned with this model by the late 1920s.[2] On the social front, Smith's legislation strengthened labor protections building on his earlier assembly work. He improved state workers' compensation laws to provide broader coverage and benefits for injured employees, enhanced pensions for widows and mothers, and tightened child labor restrictions to limit exploitative employment of minors, positioning New York ahead of many states in these areas. In housing, Smith signed legislation in 1920 exempting improvements on new residential construction from property taxes for a period (while taxing land values), spurring a surge in building activity amid postwar shortages and contributing to urban resurgence without broad tax hikes. He also expanded state support for public health initiatives, mental hygiene departments, conservation efforts including parks and water resources, and hydroelectric development to promote rural electrification.[19][29] Education saw marked fiscal prioritization, with the state budget for schools rising from $7 million in the 1918–1919 fiscal year to $70 million by 1926–1927, alongside doubling average teachers' salaries to attract and retain qualified personnel. Despite these expansions, Smith maintained fiscal conservatism by cutting inefficiencies; real estate taxes were reduced annually, dropping from $32,467,458 in 1923 to lower levels that relieved homeowners and farmers, while state debt was curtailed through retrenchment. In 1925, he enacted an $8.5 million income tax reduction, preserving a $4 million surplus for contingencies, demonstrating a policy of funding progressive priorities via reorganization savings rather than unchecked borrowing or levies.[2][30][31]

Criticisms of Corruption and Patronage

Smith's close affiliation with Tammany Hall, the dominant Democratic political machine in New York City, drew persistent accusations from Republican opponents and reformers that his governorship perpetuated a system reliant on patronage and vulnerable to corruption, even as he pursued administrative efficiencies. Critics, including figures like U.S. Secretary of Commerce Herbert Hoover during the 1928 presidential campaign, portrayed Smith as beholden to Tammany bosses such as Charles F. Murphy and later John F. Curry, arguing that machine support translated into favoritism toward party loyalists in state appointments and contracts.[32] This view held that Smith's political ascent, beginning with a patronage position as a process server in 1895, exemplified how Tammany's influence extended into state governance, prioritizing loyalty over merit in distributing jobs and resources.[33] Although Smith implemented reorganization measures under the 1919-1920 Reconstruction Commission to streamline state bureaucracy and centralize executive authority—efforts that expanded government functions but were assailed by detractors as a pretext for enlarging Tammany's patronage pool—contemporary reports highlighted tensions within the Democratic ranks over limited spoils. Party leaders complained in early 1927 that Smith maintained a low state payroll amid these reforms, resisting demands for broader distribution of positions, which underscored his partial detachment from machine expectations yet fueled claims of selective favoritism toward trusted allies like Belle Moskowitz in advisory roles.[34][35] Reform advocates, drawing on Tammany's historical scandals under bosses like William M. Tweed decades earlier, contended that Smith's reluctance to fully sever ties enabled indirect corruption, such as inflated contracts or unqualified appointees in departments like public works, though no direct evidence implicated Smith personally in financial impropriety during his terms from 1919-1920 and 1923-1928. These criticisms intensified amid broader scrutiny of urban machine politics, with opponents leveraging Tammany's reputation to question the integrity of Smith's progressive agenda, including infrastructure projects and welfare expansions that required substantial state funding. For instance, while Smith's executive budget system and merit-based civil service expansions aimed to curb waste, skeptics argued they masked ongoing patronage in unregulated areas, contributing to perceptions of inefficiency and insider dealing.[36] Historians note that such attacks were often politically expedient, amplified by anti-urban and anti-immigrant sentiments, yet they reflected genuine concerns over the era's spoils system, where Democratic control under Smith distributed thousands of state jobs—estimated at over 50,000 by the mid-1920s—predominantly to machine-aligned individuals, sustaining voter mobilization at the expense of impartial administration.[26] Smith's defenders countered that his record of fiscal restraint, with balanced budgets averaging $200 million annually, demonstrated accountability absent in prior administrations, but the patronage critique persisted as a hallmark of opposition rhetoric against his machine-rooted power base.

National Political Ambitions

1924 Democratic Convention Bid

Alfred E. Smith, the four-term Governor of New York, sought the Democratic presidential nomination at the 1924 convention as the standard-bearer for the party's urban, immigrant, and anti-Prohibition factions.[37][38] His candidacy emphasized progressive reforms like labor protections and opposition to lynching, while challenging the growing influence of the Ku Klux Klan within the party.[38] Smith's bid highlighted deep intraparty divisions between the Northeast's "wet" (anti-Prohibition) Catholics and Jews and the rural South and West's "dry" Protestants, many sympathetic to Prohibition and wary of urban machines like Tammany Hall.[39][40] The convention convened at Madison Square Garden in New York City on June 24, 1924, and lasted 16 days until July 9, requiring 103 ballots to nominate a candidate—the longest in U.S. history.[37][40] On June 26, Franklin D. Roosevelt, despite his recent polio-related illness, delivered Smith's nominating speech, famously dubbing him the "Happy Warrior of the political battlefield."[37] Smith secured 241 votes (about 22 percent) on the first ballot, drawing support primarily from Northeastern states but none from the South.[37][38] His vote share rose to 27 percent by the 15th ballot and peaked at 32.8 percent on the 87th, yet he never approached the two-thirds majority needed under party rules.[38] The deadlock stemmed from Smith's Catholicism, which fueled Ku Klux Klan opposition—evident in events like the burning of his effigy by 20,000 Klan members in New Jersey—and his inability to bridge sectional lines.[37][39] Rival William Gibbs McAdoo, tied to the Teapot Dome scandal and quietly courting Klan backing, dominated early ballots but faced similar resistance from urban delegates.[40] Efforts to condemn the Klan explicitly in the platform failed by a slim margin, exacerbating tensions and prolonging the stalemate after 61 ballots.[40][39] Smith withdrew after the 99th ballot, paving the way for compromise nominee John W. Davis on the 103rd.[39][38] Though unsuccessful, his strong showing—bolstered by advisors like Belle Moskowitz—exposed the party's fractures over Prohibition, nativism, and religious prejudice, positioning him as a frontrunner for 1928.[37][40]

1928 Presidential Campaign Dynamics

The Democratic National Convention convened in Houston, Texas, from June 26 to 29, 1928, where Al Smith secured the presidential nomination on the first ballot, reflecting strong party support following the divisive 1924 convention.[41] To appeal to Southern and Prohibition-supporting Democrats, Smith chose Senator Joseph Taylor Robinson of Arkansas, a Protestant advocate of the 18th Amendment, as his vice-presidential running mate.[41] Smith's acceptance speech on August 22, 1928, at the New York State Capitol in Albany outlined his platform, emphasizing state-level experimentation in governance and opposition to federal overreach in areas like alcohol regulation.[42] Smith conducted an energetic campaign, traveling extensively by train to deliver speeches in industrial states and urban centers, targeting immigrant and working-class voters with promises of progressive reforms modeled on his New York governorship, such as improved public housing and labor protections including the 40-hour workweek for women.[41] His distinctive New York accent and advocacy for repealing national Prohibition positioned him as a champion of urban, "wet" interests against rural, Protestant "drys."[43] In opposition, Herbert Hoover pursued a low-key strategy, delivering seven radio addresses that touted Republican economic prosperity and administrative efficiency while avoiding personal attacks on Smith.[43] Hoover's platform endorsed strict enforcement of Prohibition, aligning with evangelical and rural constituencies.[43] A defining dynamic was the role of Smith's Roman Catholicism, marking the first nomination of a Catholic by a major party, which elicited widespread opposition grounded in fears of papal authority superseding national loyalty and cultural clashes with Protestant norms.[43][41] Anti-Catholic rhetoric proliferated, including Ku Klux Klan endorsements of Hoover, ministerial denunciations of New York as the "seat of Satan," and pamphlets warning of Vatican influence, particularly alienating Southern Democrats despite the region's historical party loyalty.[43][41][44] This prejudice, compounded by Prohibition divides, fractured Smith's coalition, with rural and Southern voters defecting to Hoover even as Smith mobilized ethnic urban bases in the Northeast.[44] The election on November 6, 1928, resulted in Hoover's landslide triumph, capturing 58.2% of the popular vote (21,391,993 ballots) and 444 electoral votes across 40 states, while Smith garnered 40.9% (15,016,169 votes) and 87 electoral votes from just eight states, including Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and select Southern holdouts like Alabama.[43][44] The outcome highlighted enduring urban-rural and cultural fault lines, with Smith's loss in his home state of New York underscoring the potency of religious and sectional dynamics over policy appeals.[41]

Defeat, Anti-Catholicism, and Electoral Shifts

In the presidential election held on November 6, 1928, Democratic nominee Al Smith suffered a decisive defeat to Republican Herbert Hoover, securing only 87 electoral votes to Hoover's 444, despite garnering 40.8% of the popular vote (15,016,443 votes) compared to Hoover's 58.2% (21,427,123 votes).[45] [46] Smith's strength was concentrated in urban, immigrant-heavy Northeastern states like New York, Massachusetts, and New Jersey, where he won eight states totaling 87 electoral votes, but he failed to carry the Solid South or rural Midwest, regions where Protestant majorities predominated.[41] This electoral disparity reflected not just policy differences—such as Smith's opposition to Prohibition versus Hoover's support—but a broader rural-urban cultural divide exacerbated by Smith's New York City roots and perceived machine politics ties.[47] Anti-Catholic prejudice played a significant causal role in Smith's loss, as he was the first Roman Catholic major-party nominee, igniting fears among Protestant voters of papal influence over American governance.[4] Campaigns disseminated innuendoes portraying Smith as loyal to the Vatican rather than the Constitution, with whispers of "Rum, Romanism, and Rebellion" echoing 1884 slurs, and overt attacks from groups like the Ku Klux Klan amplifying claims that Catholic allegiance would subordinate U.S. sovereignty to Rome.[48] [21] In the South, despite Smith's "wet" stance appealing to anti-Prohibition sentiments, white Protestant voters defected en masse; Hoover, a Quaker, carried states like Virginia, North Carolina, Florida, and Texas—unprecedented for a Republican—due to mobilized religious opposition rather than purely economic factors.[41] Quantitative analyses, such as county-level voting data, show Catholic-heavy precincts delivering strong Smith margins, but Protestant rural areas swung heavily against him, with anti-Catholic sermons and pamphlets correlating to vote suppression or shifts of 10-20% in key battlegrounds.[49] The election precipitated lasting electoral realignments by crystallizing religion as a voting cleavage, reinforcing Democratic reliance on urban Catholic and ethnic blocs while alienating white Southern Protestants, who began drifting toward the GOP.[41] Smith's poor showing—failing to win his home region beyond the Northeast—highlighted the limits of machine-driven mobilization against nativist backlash, contributing to a temporary Democratic nadir before Franklin D. Roosevelt's 1932 coalition integrated Catholic voters at rates of 70-80% without similar prejudice derailing urban gains.[50] This shift underscored causal realism in voter behavior: prejudice acted as a veto factor overriding Smith's progressive appeal on issues like welfare and infrastructure, delaying Catholic presidential viability until John F. Kennedy's 1960 campaign explicitly addressed similar fears.[51] Yet, empirical evidence tempers claims of anti-Catholicism as the sole driver; Hoover's victory margins aligned with 1920s Republican prosperity dominance, suggesting prejudice amplified but did not solely manufacture the outcome.[52]

Ideological Break and Anti-New Deal Stance

Transition from Ally to Opponent of FDR

Alfred E. Smith and Franklin D. Roosevelt maintained a political alliance rooted in New York Democratic politics, where Smith, as four-term governor, endorsed Roosevelt as his successor in the 1928 gubernatorial election following Smith's own unsuccessful presidential bid that year.[34] Roosevelt's victory in November 1928, by a margin of over 100,000 votes, solidified their partnership, with Smith providing guidance during Roosevelt's first term, which saw continuity in progressive state reforms like budget balancing and infrastructure improvements.[5] Tensions emerged during the 1932 Democratic National Convention in Chicago, where Smith sought the presidential nomination anew but faced Roosevelt's surging support from party bosses and delegates; Smith received 190 votes on the first ballot but withdrew after the third, paving the way for Roosevelt's nomination on the fourth ballot with 945 votes.[53] Despite this rivalry, Smith campaigned for Roosevelt in the general election, contributing to the landslide victory over Herbert Hoover on November 8, 1932, with Roosevelt securing 472 electoral votes to Hoover's 59.[5] The alliance fractured as Roosevelt implemented the New Deal starting in March 1933, with Smith voicing early objections to federal overreach, such as the abandonment of balanced budgets and the expansion of national bureaucracy, which he viewed as deviations from the 1932 Democratic platform's emphasis on fiscal responsibility and state-level innovation.[54] By 1934, Smith's critique intensified, arguing that programs like the National Industrial Recovery Act centralized power unconstitutionally and stifled private enterprise, contrasting his own gubernatorial record of efficiency-driven reforms without massive deficits.[55] This ideological divergence—Smith favoring decentralized, business-accommodating progressivism over Roosevelt's nationalistic interventionism—culminated in Smith's co-founding of the American Liberty League in August 1934 to advocate limited government and oppose New Deal excesses.[55] Smith's public rupture peaked in a January 25, 1936, address titled "Betrayal of the Democratic Party," where he accused Roosevelt of forsaking platform promises against socialism and dictatorship, labeling New Deal policies as "organized, legalized banditry" that undermined American individualism.[54] While some contemporaries attributed Smith's stance partly to personal resentment over the 1932 snub, primary evidence underscores substantive policy disputes, including opposition to deficit spending exceeding $30 billion by 1936 and regulatory intrusions into state affairs.[55][56]

American Liberty League and Policy Critiques

In 1934, Al Smith aligned with the newly formed American Liberty League, a coalition of conservative Democrats, Republicans, and business leaders who opposed President Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal programs as encroachments on constitutional limits, private enterprise, and states' rights.[57] The organization, officially launched on August 22, 1934, under the presidency of former Democratic National Committee chairman Jouett Shouse, aimed to defend "the American form of constitutional representative republic" against what it described as federal overreach, including the National Industrial Recovery Act (NIRA) and Agricultural Adjustment Act (AAA), which it argued delegated legislative powers unconstitutionally to the executive branch and promoted cartel-like controls on industry and agriculture.[58] Smith, who had mentored Roosevelt as his successor in New York, emerged as a prominent spokesman for the League, leveraging his stature as the 1928 Democratic presidential nominee to critique the administration's shift toward centralized planning and deficit financing, which he viewed as a betrayal of Jeffersonian principles of limited government.[55] Smith's policy critiques centered on the New Deal's economic interventions, which he contended fostered dependency, inefficiency, and authoritarian tendencies rather than genuine recovery from the Great Depression. In a June 20, 1936, address at a Liberty League dinner titled "Betrayal of the Democratic Party," Smith lambasted Roosevelt's agenda as "socialism pure and simple," arguing that measures like massive public works spending and regulatory agencies supplanted individual initiative with bureaucratic dictate, leading to unbalanced budgets exceeding $30 billion in proposed expenditures—far beyond the party's historical fiscal conservatism.[54] He specifically decried the abandonment of balanced budgets, a hallmark of his own New York governorship where he vetoed excessive spending, and warned that the New Deal's "alphabet soup" of agencies eroded property rights and free markets, echoing the League's broader platform against wealth redistribution and government monopolies as paths to "planned economy" tyranny.[57] Smith's opposition stemmed from empirical observations of state-level progressivism's limits; he believed sustainable reform required voluntary cooperation and local control, not federal mandates that, by 1936, had ballooned the national debt to over $33 billion while unemployment lingered above 16 percent.[58] The League, with Smith's vocal support, issued pamphlets and legal analyses challenging New Deal constitutionality, such as the 1935 Supreme Court invalidation of the NIRA in A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States, which vindicated critiques of improper delegation of powers.[58] However, Smith's efforts faced accusations of elitism, as the League's funding from industrialists like the Du Pont family fueled Roosevelt's portrayal of it as a front for "economic royalists," despite Smith's working-class roots and prior advocacy for labor protections like minimum wages.[55] By 1936, amid the League's campaigns against the Wagner Act's union favoritism and emerging Social Security proposals as intergenerational Ponzi schemes, Smith urged Democrats to reclaim the party from what he called a "raw dictatorship" disguised as relief, prioritizing causal mechanisms of market recovery—such as reduced regulation and tax relief—over expansive entitlements that he argued distorted incentives and prolonged stagnation.[54] Though the League dissolved by 1940, its platform, amplified by Smith, highlighted tensions between interventionist statism and classical liberal restraint, influencing later conservative coalitions.[57]

Defense of Limited Government Principles

Smith co-founded the American Liberty League on August 22, 1934, alongside figures like John W. Davis and Jouett Shouse, to champion constitutional government, private enterprise, and individual liberties against the perceived overreach of Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal programs.[59][54] The League's manifesto emphasized preserving "the right to liberty and the pursuit of happiness" through limited federal intervention, rejecting both communist and fascist dictatorships in favor of decentralized authority and free-market principles.[60] Smith viewed the New Deal's alphabet agencies and regulatory expansions—such as the National Recovery Administration and Agricultural Adjustment Administration—as violations of federalism, concentrating power in Washington at the expense of state sovereignty and local decision-making.[61] In a January 25, 1936, address at a Washington, D.C., anti-New Deal dinner hosted by the Liberty League, Smith lambasted Roosevelt's policies for fostering fiscal irresponsibility, with federal spending ballooning from $4.6 billion in fiscal year 1933 to over $8 billion by 1936, much of it through deficit financing.[62] He condemned government speculation in commodities via entities like the Farm Board, arguing it distorted markets and burdened taxpayers, and called for slashing "useless commissions and offices" to restore balanced budgets—a principle he had applied as New York governor by reorganizing state bureaucracy and achieving surpluses despite progressive reforms.[62][63] Smith declared the New Deal a "betrayal" of Democratic ideals, equating its central planning to socialism and insisting that "this country was organized on the principles of a representative democracy," where federal authority should be confined to enumerated powers rather than dictating economic life.[54] Smith's advocacy extended to defending property rights and voluntary cooperation over coercive regulation, warning that New Deal experiments eroded self-reliance and invited bureaucratic tyranny.[55] He urged a return to Jeffersonian restraint, prioritizing efficient administration over expansive welfare schemes, as evidenced by his gubernatorial record of streamlining New York's government into fewer, more accountable departments while vetoing pork-barrel spending.[54] Though the League's efforts faltered amid Roosevelt's 1936 landslide, Smith's stance highlighted early conservative critiques of administrative state growth, influencing later arguments for constitutional limits on executive power.[61]

Post-Political Career and Demise

Business Roles and Empire State Involvement

Following his defeat in the 1928 presidential election, Alfred E. Smith transitioned from politics to private business in New York City, assuming the presidency of Empire State, Inc., a corporation established to finance, construct, and manage what would become the Empire State Building.[1][2] Formed by a group including General Motors executive John J. Raskob and former New York Central Railroad president Alfred P. Sloan, the company acquired the site of the demolished Waldorf-Astoria Hotel at Fifth Avenue and 34th Street for $14 million in 1929, with Smith announced as its head on August 30 of that year to leverage his name recognition for publicity and investor appeal.[64][65] Construction began on March 17, 1930, under architects Shreve, Lamb & Harmon, proceeding at a record pace of about four and a half stories per week despite the onset of the Great Depression, and the 102-story, 1,250-foot structure (including mooring mast) opened to tenants on May 1, 1931, at a total cost of $40.948 million—$25 million under budget.[66] Smith, who maintained an office on the 102nd floor, actively promoted the project as a symbol of American resilience and urban ambition, inviting his successor as governor, Franklin D. Roosevelt, to the opening ceremony.[65] Although Smith's role as president provided ceremonial leadership and public endorsement, operational control increasingly shifted to financial backers like Raskob and later Pierre S. du Pont after initial funds were depleted, reflecting his position more as a figurehead than hands-on executive.[66] Empire State, Inc. operated the building through the 1930s, navigating high vacancy rates (averaging 85% until World War II) amid economic hardship, yet Smith's association sustained its visibility, including through newsreels and events that drew crowds to the observatories.[66] He retained the presidency until his death in 1944, during which time the venture symbolized his post-political pivot to real estate and development, though it yielded limited personal financial returns compared to his political influence.[1] No other major corporate directorships or ventures are prominently documented in his later career, with his efforts centered on this flagship project.[2]

Health Decline and Death

Smith's wife, Catherine, died of pneumonia on May 4, 1944, after a five-week illness at St. Vincent's Hospital in New York City.[67] Deeply grieved by the loss of his partner of over four decades, Smith's own health rapidly declined in the ensuing months. By late September 1944, he was admitted to Rockefeller Institute Hospital on York Avenue, where his condition was reported as serious on October 1.[68] Smith's status turned critical on September 30, prompting the administration of the Catholic Church's last rites; an Apostolic Benediction was also extended from the Vatican.[69] Surrounded by family members, he suffered a fatal heart attack at 6:28 a.m. on October 4, 1944, at age 70.[69] He was interred at Calvary Cemetery in Long Island City, Queens.[1]

Personal Dimensions

Marriage, Children, and Catholic Faith

Smith married Catherine Ann Dunn on May 6, 1900, at St. Augustine's Church in the Bronx, New York City.[70] The couple had five children: Alfred E. Smith Jr., Arthur W. Smith, Catherine A. Smith (later Quillinan), Emily S. Warner, and one other daughter.[71] [1] Catherine Dunn Smith, born in 1875, supported her husband's political career while maintaining a low public profile, and she predeceased him, dying on May 4, 1944, at age 68 after a brief illness.[67] [72] Smith was raised in the Roman Catholic faith by his Irish-born mother, Rosanna Shields Smith, in New York City's Lower East Side, where his family attended St. James Church.[49] A lifelong devout Catholic, he regularly practiced his religion, including daily Mass attendance when possible, and publicly affirmed his beliefs in a 1927 Atlantic Monthly article, stating: "I believe in the worship of God according to the faith and practice of the Roman Catholic Church" while rejecting any divided loyalty to a foreign power.[73] His faith shaped his personal life and political resilience, though it drew prejudice during his 1928 presidential bid as the first Catholic major-party nominee.[74] Smith and his family are interred at Calvary Cemetery in Queens, New York, reflecting their enduring Catholic ties.[21]

Persona as the "Happy Warrior"

The epithet "Happy Warrior" was coined by Franklin D. Roosevelt in his nominating address for Smith at the 1924 Democratic National Convention in New York City on June 26, 1924, where Roosevelt described him as "the Happy Warrior of the political battlefield." [75] The phrase drew inspiration from William Wordsworth's 1807 poem Character of the Happy Warrior, which extols a figure of moral fortitude, resilience in adversity, and joyful commitment to duty amid strife.[76] This label persisted throughout Smith's career, symbolizing his buoyant demeanor and tenacious spirit in confronting political opposition, from Tammany Hall intrigues to national campaigns marred by anti-Catholic prejudice.[77] Smith embodied the "Happy Warrior" through an irrepressible optimism and combative yet affable style, often wielding humor and folksy anecdotes to disarm critics and rally supporters.[78] Rising from Manhattan's Lower East Side tenements without formal higher education, he cultivated an everyman persona—complete with his signature brown derby hat, cigar, and thick New York accent—that resonated with urban immigrants and working-class voters, positioning him as a scrappy defender of the underdog.[2] His early triumph in an oratory contest at age 11 foreshadowed a lifetime of persuasive rhetoric; as a speaker, he blended sharp intellect with streetwise candor, delivering addresses that lampooned adversaries while advocating factory safety laws and infrastructure reforms during his New York Assembly tenure from 1903 to 1915.[77] Resilience defined Smith's "happy" aspect, as he repeatedly rebounded from defeats without bitterness, maintaining a forward-looking vigor that contrasted with the era's cynical machine politics.[79] After narrowly losing the 1920 gubernatorial race to Nathan L. Miller, he secured victory in 1922 by over 500,000 votes, implementing progressive policies like state parks expansion and mental health reforms while navigating Prohibition-era tensions.[80] Even in the grueling 103-ballot deadlock at the 1924 convention—where Southern delegates blocked his nomination over his wet (anti-Prohibition) stance and Catholic faith—Smith's camp projected defiant cheer, with him quipping publicly about the chaos rather than retreating in defeat.[81] This unflagging positivity extended to his personal life; a devout Catholic and devoted husband to Katie Cahill since 1906, Smith shunned Jazz Age excesses for family outings and vaudeville tunes like those of the Mulligan Guards, reinforcing his image as a grounded fighter unswayed by glamour or setback.[82] The persona's authenticity stemmed from Smith's causal realism in governance—prioritizing empirical fixes like workmen's compensation (enacted 1910) over ideological posturing—and his willingness to battle entrenched interests, such as exposing corruption in the 1915-1918 New York State Factory Investigating Commission, which he co-chaired after the Triangle Shirtwaist fire.[83] Critics, including some later New Dealers, dismissed his cheer as naivety amid 1928's 40.4 million to 15 million electoral rout, but contemporaries like Roosevelt lauded it as emblematic of principled combativeness.[55] Smith's "Happy Warrior" archetype thus highlighted a pre-welfare-state progressivism: optimistic individualism fused with pragmatic resilience, influencing figures from urban reformers to future anti-collectivist Democrats.[56]

Enduring Legacy

Long-Term Political Impact

Al Smith's 1928 presidential campaign mobilized urban immigrant and Catholic voters, forging a coalition that foreshadowed the New Deal electorate but ultimately shifted Democratic leadership toward Franklin D. Roosevelt's more centralized approach.[84] Despite his loss to Herbert Hoover amid anti-Catholic prejudice, Smith's emphasis on economic reforms for workers and the unemployed during prosperity highlighted class-based progressivism, influencing the party's ideological evolution by presenting voters with stark choices on governance scale.[84] This effort reconfigured American politics, boosting Democratic registration in key areas and setting the stage for the 1930s realignment, though Smith critiqued the federal expansion that followed.[84] His post-1932 opposition to the New Deal, culminating in the 1934 founding of the American Liberty League, marked a pivotal intra-party challenge, galvanizing conservative Democrats against perceived constitutional overreach and bureaucratic growth.[55] In his January 25, 1936, speech "Betrayal of the Democratic Party," Smith accused Roosevelt of abandoning the 1932 platform's promises of reduced expenditures and states' rights, likening New Deal policies to socialism and warning of class warfare incitement.[54] This stance amplified factional rifts, echoing sentiments among Southern conservatives like Senators Harry Byrd and Carter Glass, and presaged the Democratic Party's long-standing internal tensions over federal power that contributed to mid-century conservative defections.[55] Smith's advocacy for federalist progressivism—rooted in New York state reforms like hospital expansions and regulatory responses to crises such as the 1911 Triangle Shirtwaist fire—offered an enduring alternative to Roosevelt's model, prioritizing local efficiency and inclusion over national administrative states.[56] By championing "E pluribus unum" governance for multiethnic societies without expansive federalism, he influenced debates on limited-government liberalism, though overshadowed by the New Deal's dominance, his critique underscored persistent conservative strains within Democratic thought.[56] This legacy highlighted the trade-offs in party realignment, where Smith's urban pragmatism yielded to broader welfare expansions, shaping evaluations of 20th-century ideological shifts.[56]

Ideological Reappraisals and Controversies

Following his support for Franklin D. Roosevelt's 1932 presidential nomination, Smith publicly broke with the administration in 1934, denouncing the New Deal as a "betrayal" of the Democratic Party's platform, which had promised balanced budgets, reduced expenditures, and avoidance of class warfare rhetoric.[54] In a June 1934 address organized by the American Liberty League, Smith argued that New Deal policies like deficit spending and expansive federal intervention exceeded constitutional limits and threatened individual enterprise, contrasting sharply with his own gubernatorial reforms in New York, which emphasized state-level efficiency and fiscal restraint rather than national centralization.[54] [55] Smith co-founded the American Liberty League on August 22, 1934, alongside figures like John W. Davis and business leaders such as Pierre du Pont, positioning it as a defender of constitutional liberties against what it termed socialist encroachments in programs like the National Recovery Administration.[55] The League, funded primarily by industrialists, distributed pamphlets and speeches critiquing New Deal measures as inflationary and dictatorial, with Smith delivering key addresses, including one in 1935 outlining opposition to Roosevelt's reelection on grounds of economic orthodoxy.[85] This stance drew accusations from New Deal supporters that Smith was a mouthpiece for corporate interests, alienated from urban workers he once championed, though Smith maintained his critique stemmed from principled adherence to limited government and anti-monopoly traditions dating to his Tammany Hall days.[56] Controversies surrounding Smith's position intensified during the 1936 election, where his Liberty League affiliation led to portrayals as a reactionary outlier, with Roosevelt dismissing critics as economic royalists in his Madison Square Garden speech; the League's failure to sway voters—evidenced by FDR's 523-electoral-vote landslide—prompted claims it inadvertently bolstered New Deal consensus by highlighting intra-party divisions.[61] Detractors, including some former allies, attributed his vehemence to personal resentment over Roosevelt's succession, yet Smith's consistent pre-1932 advocacy for balanced budgets and opposition to federal overreach, as in his resistance to Prohibition-era mandates, suggests ideological consistency rather than mere sour grapes.[56] [86] In modern reappraisals, particularly among conservative historians, Smith's anti-New Deal posture is viewed as prescient foresight into the risks of administrative overreach and dependency, positioning him as a proponent of a "liberalism that might have been"—one rooted in local innovation and private initiative without the welfare state's expansion, distinct from the progressive urbanism he pioneered in New York.[56] This perspective contrasts with mid-20th-century narratives that marginalized him as embittered, emphasizing instead how his warnings about fiscal irresponsibility anticipated post-New Deal inflationary pressures and bureaucratic growth documented in economic analyses of the era.[55] Such reevaluations highlight Smith's defense of constitutional federalism as aligning with later critiques from figures like Barry Goldwater, though his Catholic identity and urban base complicate tidy partisan categorizations.[56]

Modern Commemorations

The Alfred E. Smith Memorial Foundation Dinner, established in 1946 by Francis Cardinal Spellman under the auspices of the Archdiocese of New York, annually honors Smith's contributions to public service and his Catholic faith through a white-tie fundraising event for charities aiding vulnerable women and children.[87] Held at the Waldorf Astoria New York, the dinner traditionally features humorous speeches by the major-party presidential nominees, with the 80th iteration occurring on October 16, 2025, and raising $7.3 million for Archdiocesan programs.[88] This event perpetuates Smith's memory as New York's "Happy Warrior" and underscores his role as the first Catholic major-party presidential nominee.[89] Public infrastructure named for Smith includes the Alfred E. Smith State Office Building in Albany, completed in 1931 as the city's inaugural skyscraper and continuing to house New York State agencies.[90] Educational facilities bearing his name encompass P.S. 163 Alfred E. Smith School on Manhattan's Upper West Side, a Pre-K through 5th-grade public elementary school serving approximately 580 diverse students, and the historic Alfred E. Smith School (formerly P.S. 1) on the Lower East Side, originally opened in 1897.[91][92] These institutions reflect Smith's emphasis on education and urban reform during his governorship.

References

User Avatar
No comments yet.