Respect all members: no insults, harassment, or hate speech.
Be tolerant of different viewpoints, cultures, and beliefs. If you do not agree with others, just create separate note, article or collection.
Clearly distinguish between personal opinion and fact.
Verify facts before posting, especially when writing about history, science, or statistics.
Promotional content must be published on the “Related Services and Products” page—no more than one paragraph per service. You can also create subpages under the “Related Services and Products” page and publish longer promotional text there.
Do not post materials that infringe on copyright without permission.
Always credit sources when sharing information, quotes, or media.
Be respectful of the work of others when making changes.
Discuss major edits instead of removing others' contributions without reason.
If you notice rule-breaking, notify community about it in talks.
Do not share personal data of others without their consent.
The Apache tribes fought the invading Spanish and Mexican peoples for centuries. The first Apache raids on Sonora appear to have taken place during the late 17th century. In 19th-century confrontations during the American Indian Wars, the U.S. Army found the Apache to be fierce warriors and skillful strategists.
The nine Apache tribes formed a nonprofit organization, the Apache Alliance. Tribal leaders convene at the Apache Alliance Summits, meetings hosted by a different Apache tribe each time.[12] The member tribes are the Apache Tribe of Oklahoma, Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation, Fort Sill Apache Tribe, Jicarilla Apache Tribe, Mescalero Apache Tribe, San Carlos Apache Tribe, Tonto Apache Tribe, White Mountain Apache Tribe, Yavapai-Apache Nation,[12] In 2021, "Lipan Apaches were present" at the summit.[13]
Apaches first encountered European and African people, when they met conquistadors from the Spanish Empire, and thus the term Apache has its roots in the Spanish language. The Spanish first used the term Apachu de Nabajo (Navajo) in the 1620s, referring to people in the Chama region east of the San Juan River. By the 1640s, they applied the term to Southern Athabaskan peoples from the Chama on the east to the San Juan on the west. The ultimate origin is uncertain and lost to Spanish history.[citation needed]
The first known written record in Spanish is by Juan de Oñate in 1598. The most widely accepted origin theory suggests Apache was borrowed and transliterated from the Zuni word ʔa·paču meaning "Navajos" (the plural of paču "Navajo").[note 1][14]J. P. Harrington reports that čišše·kʷe can also be used to refer to the Apache in general.
Another theory suggests the term comes from Yavapaiʔpačə meaning "enemy".[15] The Zuni and Yavapai sources are less certain because Oñate used the term before he had encountered any Zuni or Yavapai.[14] A less likely origin may be from Spanish mapache, meaning "raccoon".[14]
Modern Apache people use the Spanish term to refer to themselves and tribal functions, and so does the US government. However, Apache language speakers also refer to themselves and their people in the Apache term Indé meaning "person" or "people". A related Southern Athabascan–speaking tribe, the Navajo, refer to themselves as the Diné.[16]
The fame of the tribes' tenacity and fighting skills, probably bolstered by dime novels, was widely known among Europeans. In early 20th century Parisian society, the word Apache was adopted into French, essentially meaning an outlaw.[17]
The term Apachean includes the related Navajo people.
Many of the historical names of Apache groups that were recorded by non-Apache are difficult to match to modern-day tribes or their subgroups. Over the centuries, many Spanish, French and English-speaking authors did not differentiate between Apache and other semi-nomadic non-Apache peoples who might pass through the same area. Most commonly, Europeans learned to identify the tribes by translating their exonym, what another group whom the Europeans encountered first called the Apache peoples. Europeans often did not learn what the peoples called themselves, their autonyms.
While anthropologists agree on some traditional major subgrouping of Apaches, they have often used different criteria to name finer divisions, and these do not always match modern Apache groupings. Some scholars do not consider groups residing in what is now Mexico to be Apache. In addition, an Apache individual has different ways of identification with a group, such as a band or clan, as well as the larger tribe or language grouping, which can add to the difficulties in an outsider comprehending the distinctions.
In 1900, the US government classified the members of the Apache tribe in the United States as Pinal Coyotero, Jicarilla, Mescalero, San Carlos, Tonto, and White Mountain Apache. The different groups were located in Arizona, New Mexico, and Oklahoma.
In the 1930s, the anthropologist Greenville Goodwin classified the Western Apache into five groups (based on his informants' views of dialect and cultural differences): White Mountain, Cibecue, San Carlos, North Tonto, and South Tonto. Since then, other anthropologists (e.g. Albert Schroeder) consider Goodwin's classification inconsistent with pre-reservation cultural divisions. Willem de Reuse finds linguistic evidence supporting only three major groupings: White Mountain, San Carlos, and Dilzhe'e (Tonto). He believes San Carlos is the most divergent dialect, and that Dilzhe'e is a remnant, intermediate member of a dialect continuum that previously spanned from the Western Apache language to the Navajo.
John Upton Terrell classifies the Apache into western and eastern groups. In the western group, he includes Toboso, Cholome,[20] Jocome, Sibolo or Cibola, Pelone, Manso, and Kiva or Kofa. He includes Chicame (the earlier term for Hispanized Chicano or New Mexicans of Spanish/Hispanic and Apache descent) among them as having definite Apache connections or names which the Spanish associated with the Apache.
In a detailed study of New Mexico Catholic Church records, David M. Brugge identifies 15 tribal names that the Spanish used to refer to the Apache. These were drawn from records of about 1,000 baptisms from 1704 to 1862.[21]
The list below is based on Foster and McCollough (2001), Opler (1983b, 1983c, 2001), and de Reuse (1983).
The term Apache refers to six major Apache-speaking groups: Chiricahua, Jicarilla, Lipan, Mescalero, Plains, and Western Apache. Historically, the term has also been applied to the Comanches, Mojaves, Hualapais, and Yavapais, none of whom speak Apache languages.
Chiricahua historically lived in Southeastern Arizona and Northern Sonora and Chihuahua. Chíshí (also Tchishi) is a Navajo word meaning "Chiricahua, southern Apaches in general".[22]
Ch'úúkʾanén, true Chiricahua (Tsokanende, also Č'ók'ánéń, Č'ó·k'anén, Chokonni, Cho-kon-nen, Cho Kŭnĕ́, Chokonen) is the Eastern Chiricahua band identified by Morris Opler. The name is an autonym from the Chiricahua language.
Gileño (also Apaches de Gila, Apaches de Xila, Apaches de la Sierra de Gila, Xileños, Gilenas, Gilans, Gilanians, Gila Apache, Gilleños) referred to several different Apache and non-Apache groups at different times. Gila refers to either the Gila River or the Gila Mountains. Some of the Gila Apaches were probably later known as the Mogollon Apaches, a Central Apache sub-band, while others probably coalesced into the Chiricahua proper. But, since the term was used indiscriminately for all Apachean groups west of the Rio Grande (i.e. in southeast Arizona and western New Mexico), the reference in historical documents is often unclear. After 1722, Spanish documents start to distinguish between these different groups, in which case Apaches de Gila refers to the Western Apache living along the Gila River (synonymous with Coyotero). American writers first used the term to refer to the Mimbres (another Central Apache subdivision).
Mimbreño are the Tchihende, not a Chiricahua band but a central Apache division sharing the same language with the Chiricahua and the Mescalero divisions, the name being referred to a central Apache division improperly considered as a section of Opler's "Eastern Chiricahua band", and to Albert Schroeder's Mimbres, or Warm Springs and Copper Mines "Chiricahua" bands[23] in southwestern New Mexico.
Copper Mines Mimbreño (also Coppermine) were located on upper reaches of Gila River, New Mexico, having their center in the Pinos Altos area. (See also Gileño and Mimbreño.)
Warm Springs Mimbreño (also Warmspring) were located on upper reaches of Gila River, New Mexico, having their center in the Ojo Caliente area. (See also Gileño and Mimbreño.)
Ndendahe were a division comprising the Bedonkohe (Mogollon) group and the Nedhni (Carrizaleño and Janero) group, incorrectly called, sometimes, Southern Chirichua.
Mogollon was considered by Schroeder to be a separate pre-reservation Chiricahua band, while Opler considered the Mogollon to be part of his Eastern Chiricahua band in New Mexico. This is not to be confused with the precontact Mogollon culture.
Nedhni were the most southern group of the Central Apache, having their center in the Carrizal (Carrizaleño) and Janos (Janero) areas, in the Mexican state of Chihuahua.
The Jicarilla primarily live in Northern New Mexico and Southern Colorado. The term jicarilla comes from the Spanish word for "little gourd."
Carlana[25] (also Sierra Blanca) is Raton Mesa in Southeastern Colorado. In 1726, they joined the Cuartelejo and Paloma, and by the 1730s, they lived with the Jicarilla. The Llanero band of the Jicarilla or the Dáchizh-ó-zhn Jicarilla (defined by James Mooney) might be descendants of the Carlana, Cuartelejo, and Paloma. Parts of the group were called Lipiyanes or Llaneros. In 1812, the term Carlana was used to mean Jicarilla. The Flechas de Palo might have been a part of or absorbed by the Carlana (or Cuartelejo).
They were mentioned in 1718 records as being near the newly established town of San Antonio, Texas.[14] They expanded into Texas and south the Gulf of Mexico and Rio Grande. In the mid-18th century, some Lipan settled in and near Spanish missions in Texas.[27] Clashes with Comanche forced them into southern Texas and northern Mexico.[27]
Briefly in the late 1830s, the Lipan allied with the Republic of Texas; however, after Texas gained statehood in 1846, the Americans waged a brutal campaign against the Lipan, destroying Lipan villages and trying to force them from Texas. Most were forced onto the Mescalero Reservation and some went to Oklahoma.[26][27]
Pelones ("Bald Ones") lived far from San Antonio and far to the northeast of the Ypandes near the Red River of the South of North-Central Texas, although able to field 800 warriors, more than the Ypandes and Natagés together, they were described as less warlike because they had fewer horses than the Plains Lipan, their population were estimated between 1,600 and 2,400 persons, were the Forest Lipan division (Chishį́į́hį́į́, Tcici, Tcicihi – "People of the Forest", after 1760 the name Pelones was never used by the Spanish for any Texas Apache group, the Pelones had fled for the Comanche south and southwest, but never mixed up with the Plains Lipan division – retaining their distinct identity, so that Morris Opler was told by his Lipan informants in 1935 that their tribal name was "People of the Forest")[citation needed]
Faraones (also Fahanos,[28] Apaches Faraone, Paraonez, Pharaones, Taraones, or Taracones) is derived from Spanish Faraón meaning "Pharaoh." Before 1700, the name was vague. Between 1720 and 1726, it referred to Apache between the Rio Grande, the Pecos River, the area around Santa Fe, and the Conchos River. After 1726, Faraones only referred to the groups of the north and central parts of this region. The Faraones like were part of the modern-day Mescalero or merged with them. After 1814, the term Faraones disappeared and was replaced by Mescalero.
Sierra Blanca Mescaleros were a northern Mescalero group from the Sierra Blanca Mountains, who roamed in what is now eastern New Mexico and western Texas.
Sacramento Mescaleros were a northern Mescalero group from the Sacramento and Organ Mountains, who roamed in what is now eastern New Mexico and western Texas.
Guadalupe Mescaleros. were a northern Mescalero group from the Guadalupe Mountains, who roamed in what is now eastern New Mexico and western Texas.
Limpia Mescaleros were a southern Mescalero group from the Limpia Mountains (later named as Davis Mountains) and roamed in what is now eastern New Mexico and western Texas.
Natagés (also Natagees, Apaches del Natafé, Natagêes, Yabipais Natagé, Natageses, Natajes) is a term used from 1726 to 1820 to refer to the Faraón, Sierra Blanca, and Siete Ríos Apaches of southeastern New Mexico. In 1745, the Natagé are reported to have consisted of the Mescalero (around El Paso and the Organ Mountains) and the Salinero (around Rio Salado), but these were probably the same group, were oft called by the Spanish and Apaches themselves true Apaches, had had a considerable influence on the decision making of some bands of the Western Lipan in the 18th century. After 1749, the term became synonymous with Mescalero, which eventually replaced it.
Plains Apache (Kiowa-Apache, Naisha, Naʼishandine) are headquartered in Southwest Oklahoma. Historically, they followed the Kiowa. Other names for them include Ná'įįsha, Ná'ęsha, Na'isha, Na'ishandine, Na-i-shan-dina, Na-ishi, Na-e-ca, Ną'ishą́, Nadeicha, Nardichia, Nadíisha-déna, Na'dí'į́shą́ʼ, Nądí'įįshąą, and Naisha.
Querechos referred to by Coronado in 1541, possibly Plains Apaches, at times maybe Navajo. Other early Spanish might have also called them Vaquereo or Llanero.
Western Apache include Northern Tonto, Southern Tonto, Cibecue, White Mountain, and San Carlos groups. While these subgroups spoke the same language and had kinship ties, Western Apaches considered themselves as separate from each other, according to Goodwin. Other writers have used this term to refer to all non-Navajo Apachean peoples living west of the Rio Grande (thus failing to distinguish the Chiricahua from the other Apacheans). Goodwin's formulation: "all those Apache peoples who have lived within the present boundaries of the state of Arizona during historic times with the exception of the Chiricahua, Warm Springs, and allied Apache, and a small band of Apaches known as the Apache Mansos, who lived in the vicinity of Tucson."[31]
Cibecue is a Western Apache group, according to Goodwin, from north of the Salt River between the Tonto and White Mountain Apache, consisting of Ceder Creek, Carrizo, and Cibecue (proper) bands.
San Carlos. A Western Apache group that ranged closest to Tucson according to Goodwin. This group consisted of the Apache Peaks, Arivaipa, Pinal, San Carlos (proper) bands.
Arivaipa (also Aravaipa) is a band of the San Carlos Apache. Schroeder believes the Arivaipa were a separate people in pre-reservation times. Arivaipa is a Hispanized word from the O'odham language. The Arivaipa are known as Tsézhiné ("Black Rock") in the Western Apache language.
Pinal (also Pinaleño). One of the bands of the San Carlos group of Western Apache, described by Goodwin. Also used along with Coyotero to refer more generally to one of two major Western Apache divisions. Some Pinaleño were referred to as the Gila Apache.
Tonto. Goodwin divided into Northern Tonto and Southern Tonto groups, living in the north and west areas of the Western Apache groups according to Goodwin. This is north of Phoenix, north of the Verde River. Schroeder has suggested that the Tonto are originally Yavapais who assimilated Western Apache culture. Tonto is one of the major dialects of the Western Apache language. Tonto Apache speakers are traditionally bilingual in Western Apache and Yavapai. Goodwin's Northern Tonto consisted of Bald Mountain, Fossil Creek, Mormon Lake, and Oak Creek bands; Southern Tonto consisted of the Mazatzal band and unidentified "semi-bands".
White Mountain are the easternmost group of the Western Apache, according to Goodwin, who included the Eastern White Mountain and Western White Mountain Apache.
Coyotero refers to a southern pre-reservation White Mountain group of the Western Apache, but has also been used more widely to refer to the Apache in general, Western Apache, or an Apache band in the high plains of Southern Colorado to Kansas.
Llanero is a Spanish-language borrowing meaning "plains dweller". The name referred to several different groups who hunted buffalo on the Great Plains. (See also Carlanas.)
Lipiyánes (also Lipiyán, Lipillanes). A coalition of splinter groups of Nadahéndé (Natagés), Guhlkahéndé, and Lipan of the 18th century under the leadership of Picax-Ande-Ins-Tinsle ("Strong Arm"), who fought the Comanche on the Plains. This term is not to be confused with Lipan.
Apache rawhide playing cards c. 1875–1885, collection of NMAI.
The Apache and Navajo speak related languages of the Athabaskan language family.[35] Other Athabaskan-speaking people in North America continue to reside in Alaska, western Canada, and the Northwest Pacific Coast.[35] Anthropological evidence suggests that the Apache and Navajo peoples lived in these same northern locales before migrating to the Southwest sometime between AD 1200 and 1500.[35]
The Apaches' nomadic way of life complicates accurate dating, primarily because they constructed less substantial dwellings than other Southwestern groups.[36] Since the early 21st century, substantial progress has been made in dating and distinguishing their dwellings and other forms of material culture.[37] They left behind a more austere set of tools and material goods than other Southwestern cultures.[citation needed]
The Athabaskan-speaking group probably moved into areas that were concurrently occupied or recently abandoned by other cultures. Other Athabaskan speakers, perhaps including the Southern Athabaskan, adapted many of their neighbors' technology and practices into their own cultures. Thus sites where early Southern Athabaskans may have lived are difficult to locate and even more difficult to firmly identify as culturally Southern Athabaskan. Recent advances have been made in the regard in the far southern portion of the American Southwest.[citation needed]
There are several hypotheses about Apache migrations. One[who?] posits that they moved into the Southwest from the Great Plains. In the mid-16th century, these mobile groups lived in tents, hunted bison and other game, and used dogs to pull travois loaded with their possessions. Substantial numbers of the people and a wide range were recorded by the Spanish in the 16th century.[citation needed]
In April 1541, while traveling on the plains east of the Pueblo region, Francisco Coronado referred to the people as "dog nomads." He wrote:
After seventeen days of travel, I came upon a 'rancheria' of the Indians who follow these cattle (bison). These natives are called Querechos. They do not cultivate the land, but eat raw meat and drink the blood of the cattle they kill. They dress in the skins of the cattle, with which all the people in this land clothe themselves, and they have very well-constructed tents, made with tanned and greased cowhides, in which they live and which they take along as they follow the cattle. They have dogs which they load to carry their tents, poles, and belongings.[38]
The Spanish described Plains dogs as very white, with black spots, and "not much larger than water spaniels."[39] Plains dogs were slightly smaller than those used for hauling loads by modern Inuit and northern First Nations people in Canada. Recent experiments show these dogs may have pulled loads up to 50 pounds (20 kg) on long trips, at rates as high as two or three miles per hour (3 to 5 km/h).[39] The Plains migration theory associates the Apache peoples with the Dismal River culture, an archaeological culture known primarily from ceramics and house remains, dated 1675–1725, which has been excavated in Nebraska, eastern Colorado, and western Kansas.[citation needed]
Although the first documentary sources mention the Apache, and historians have suggested some passages indicate a 16th-century entry from the north, archaeological data indicate they were present on the plains long before this first reported contact.[citation needed]
A competing theory[who?] posits their migration south, through the Rocky Mountains, ultimately reaching the American Southwest by the 14th century or perhaps earlier. An archaeological material culture assemblage identified in this mountainous zone as ancestral Apache has been referred to as the "Cerro Rojo complex".[40] This theory does not preclude arrival via a plains route as well, perhaps concurrently, but to date the earliest evidence has been found in the mountainous Southwest.[citation needed] The Plains Apache have a significant Southern Plains cultural influence.
When the Spanish arrived in the area, trade between the long-established Pueblo peoples and the Southern Athabaskan was well established. They reported the Pueblo exchanged maize and woven cotton goods for bison meat, and hides and materials for stone tools. Coronado observed the Plains people wintering near the Pueblo in established camps. Later Spanish sovereignty over the area disrupted trade between the Pueblo and the diverging Apache and Navajo groups. The Apache quickly acquired horses, improving their mobility for quick raids on settlements. In addition, the Pueblo were forced to work Spanish mission lands and care for mission flocks; they had fewer surplus goods to trade with their neighbors.[41]
In 1540, Coronado reported that the modern Western Apache area was uninhabited, although some scholars have argued that he simply did not see the American Indians. Other Spanish explorers first mention "Querechos" living west of the Rio Grande in the 1580s. To some historians, this implies the Apaches moved into their current Southwestern homelands in the late 16th and early 17th centuries. Other historians note that Coronado reported that Pueblo women and children had often been evacuated by the time his party attacked their dwellings, and that he saw some dwellings had been recently abandoned as he moved up the Rio Grande. This might indicate the semi-nomadic Southern Athabaskan had advance warning about his hostile approach and evaded encounter with the Spanish. Archaeologists are finding ample evidence of an early proto-Apache presence in the Southwestern mountain zone in the 15th century and perhaps earlier. The Apache presence on both the Plains and in the mountainous Southwest indicate that the people took multiple early migration routes.[citation needed]
In general, the recently arrived Spanish colonists, who settled in villages, and Apache bands developed a pattern of interaction over a few centuries. Both raided and traded with each other. Records of the period seem to indicate that relationships depended on the specific villages and bands: a band might be friends with one village and raid another. When war occurred, the Spanish would send troops; after a battle both sides would "sign a treaty" and go home.
The traditional and sometimes treacherous relationships continued after the independence of Mexico in 1821. By 1835 Mexico had placed a bounty on Apache scalps (see scalping), but certain villages still traded with some bands. When Juan José Compà, the leader of the Copper Mines Mimbreño Apaches, was killed for bounty money in 1837, Mangas Coloradas (Red Sleeves) or Dasoda-hae (He just sits there) became the principal chief and war leader; also in 1837 Soldado Fiero (a.k.a. Fuerte), leader of the Warm Springs Mimbreño Apaches, was killed by Mexican soldiers near Janos, and his son Cuchillo Negro (Black Knife) became the principal chief and war leader. They (being now Mangas Coloradas the first chief and Cuchillo Negro the second chief of the whole Tchihende or Mimbreño people) conducted a series of retaliatory raids against the Mexicans. By 1856, authorities in horse-rich Durango would claim that Indian raids (mostly Comanche and Apache) in their state had taken nearly 6,000 lives, abducted 748 people, and forced the abandonment of 358 settlements over the previous 20 years.[42]
When the United States went to war against Mexico in 1846, many Apache bands promised U.S. soldiers safe passage through their lands. When the U.S. claimed former territories of Mexico in 1846, Mangas Coloradas signed a peace treaty with the nation, respecting them as conquerors of the Mexicans' land. An uneasy peace with U.S. citizens held until the 1850s. An influx of gold miners into the Santa Rita Mountains led to conflict with the Apache. This period is sometimes called the Apache Wars.
The United States' concept of a reservation had not been used by the Spanish, Mexicans or other Apache neighbors before. Reservations were often badly managed, and bands that had no kinship relationships were forced to live together. No fences existed to keep people in or out. It was common for a band to be allowed to leave for a short period of time. Other times a band would leave without permission, to raid, return to their homeland to forage, or to simply get away. The U.S. military usually had forts nearby to keep the bands on the reservations by finding and returning those who left. The reservation policies of the U.S. caused conflict and war with the various Apache bands who left the reservations for almost another quarter century.
War between the Apaches and Euro-Americans has led to a stereotypical focus on certain aspects of Apache cultures. These have often been distorted through misunderstanding of their cultures, as noted by anthropologist Keith Basso:
Of the hundreds of peoples that lived and flourished in native North America, few have been so consistently misrepresented as the Apacheans of Arizona and New Mexico. Glorified by novelists, sensationalized by historians, and distorted beyond credulity by commercial film makers, the popular image of 'the Apache'—a brutish, terrifying semi-human bent upon wanton death and destruction—is almost entirely a product of irresponsible caricature and exaggeration. Indeed, there can be little doubt that the Apache has been transformed from a native American into an American legend, the fanciful and fallacious creation of a non-Indian citizenry whose inability to recognize the massive treachery of ethnic and cultural stereotypes has been matched only by its willingness to sustain and inflate them.[43]
In 1875, United States military forced the removal of an estimated 1,500 Yavapai and Dilzhe'e Apache (better known as Tonto Apache) from the Rio Verde Indian Reserve and its several thousand acres of treaty lands promised to them by the United States government. At the orders of Indian Commissioner L. E. Dudley, U.S. Army troops made the people, young and old, walk through winter-flooded rivers, mountain passes and narrow canyon trails to get to the Indian Agency at San Carlos, 180 miles (290 km) away. The trek killed several hundred people. The people were interned there for 25 years while white settlers took over their land. Only a few hundred ever returned to their lands. At the San Carlos reservation, the Buffalo soldiers of the 9th Cavalry Regiment—replacing the 8th Cavalry who were being stationed to Texas—guarded the Apaches from 1875 to 1881.[44]
Beginning in 1879, an Apache uprising against the reservation system led to Victorio's War between Chief Victorio's band of Apaches and the 9th Cavalry.
Most United States' histories of this era report that the final defeat of an Apache band took place when 5,000 US troops forced Geronimo's group of 30 to 50 men, women and children to surrender on September 4, 1886, at Skeleton Canyon, Arizona.[45] The Army sent this band and the Chiricahua scouts who had tracked them to military confinement in Florida at Fort Pickens and, subsequently, Ft. Sill, Oklahoma.
Many books were written on the stories of hunting and trapping during the late 19th century. Many of these stories involve Apache raids and the failure of agreements with Americans and Mexicans. In the post-war era, the US government arranged for Apache children to be taken from their families for adoption by white Americans in assimilation programs.[46]
All Apache peoples lived in extended family units (or family clusters); they usually lived close together, with each nuclear family in separate dwellings. An extended family generally consisted of a husband and wife, their unmarried children, their married daughters, their married daughters' husbands, and their married daughters' children. Thus, the extended family is connected through a lineage of women who live together (that is, matrilocal residence), into which men may enter upon marriage (leaving behind his parents' family).
When a daughter married, a new dwelling was built nearby for her and her husband. Among the Navajo, residence rights are ultimately derived from a head mother. Although the Western Apache usually practiced matrilocal residence, sometimes the eldest son chose to bring his wife to live with his parents after marriage. All tribes practiced sororate and levirate marriages.
Apache Indian girl carrying an olla (a water basket) on her head, c. 1900
Apache men practiced varying degrees of "avoidance" of his wife's close relatives, a practice often most strictly observed by distance between mother-in-law and son-in-law. The degree of avoidance differed by Apache group. The most elaborate system was among the Chiricahua, where men had to use indirect polite speech toward and were not allowed to be within visual sight of the wife's female relatives, whom he had to avoid. His female Chiricahua relatives through marriage also avoided him.
Several extended families worked together as a "local group", which carried out certain ceremonies, and economic and military activities. Political control was mostly present at the local group level. Local groups were headed by a chief, an influential man with an impressive reputation. The position was not hereditary, and was often filled by members of different extended families. The chief's influence was as strong as he was evaluated to be—no group member was obliged to follow the chief. Western Apache criteria for a good chief included: industriousness, generosity, impartiality, forbearance, conscientiousness, and eloquence in language.
Many Apache peoples joined several local groups into "bands". Banding was strongest among the Chiricahua and Western Apache, and weak among the Lipan and Mescalero. The Navajo did not organize into bands, perhaps because of the requirements of the sheepherding economy. However, the Navajo did have "the outfit", a group of relatives that was larger than the extended family, but smaller than a local group community or a band.
On a larger level, Western Apache bands organized into what Grenville Goodwin called "groups". He reported five groups for the Western Apache: Northern Tonto, Southern Tonto, Cibecue, San Carlos, and White Mountain. The Jicarilla grouped their bands into "moieties", perhaps influenced by the northeastern Pueblo. The Western Apache and Navajo also had a system of matrilineal "clans" organized further into phratries (perhaps influenced by the western Pueblo).
The notion of a tribe within Apache cultures is very weakly developed; essentially it was only a recognition "that one owed a modicum of hospitality to those of the same speech, dress, and customs."[47] The six Apache tribes had political independence from each other[48] and even fought against each other. For example, the Lipan once fought against the Mescalero.
The Apache tribes have two distinctly different kinship term systems: a Chiricahua type and a Jicarilla type.[49] The Chiricahua-type system is used by the Chiricahua, Mescalero, and Western Apache. The Western Apache kinship system differs slightly from the other two but shares similarities with the Navajo system.
The Jicarilla type, which is similar to the Dakota–Iroquois kinship systems, is used by the Jicarilla, Navajo, Lipan, and Plains Apache. The Navajo system is more divergent among the four, having similarities with the Chiricahua-type system. The Lipan and Plains Apache systems are very similar.
Hide painting depicting Apache girl's puberty ceremony, by Naiche (Chiricahua Apache), c. 1900, Oklahoma History Center
The Chiricahua language has four words for grandparent: -chú[note 2] "maternal grandmother", -tsúyé "maternal grandfather", -chʼiné "paternal grandmother", -nálé "paternal grandfather". Additionally, a grandparent's siblings are identified by the same word; thus, one's maternal grandmother, one's maternal grandmother's sisters, and one's maternal grandmother's brothers are all called -chú. Furthermore, the grandchild terms are reciprocal, that is, one uses the same term to refer to their grandchild. For example, a person's maternal grandmother is called -chú and that grandmother also calls that granddaughter -chú (i.e. -chú can mean the child of either your own daughter or your sibling's daughter.)
Chiricahua cousins are not distinguished from siblings through kinship terms. Thus, the same word refers to either a sibling or a cousin (there are not separate terms for parallel-cousin and cross-cousin). The terms depend on the sex of the speaker (unlike the English terms brother and sister): -kʼis "same-sex sibling or same-sex cousin", -´-ląh "opposite-sex sibling or opposite-sex cousin". This means if one is a male, then one's brother is called -kʼis and one's sister is called -´-ląh. If one is a female, then one's brother is called -´-ląh and one's sister is called -kʼis. Chiricahuas in a -´-ląh relationship observed great restraint and respect toward that relative; cousins (but not siblings) in a -´-ląh relationship may practice total avoidance.
Two different words are used for each parent according to sex: -mááʼ "mother", -taa "father". Likewise, there are two words for a parent's child according to sex: -yáchʼeʼ "daughter", -gheʼ "son".
A parent's siblings are classified together regardless of sex: -ghúyé "maternal aunt or uncle (mother's brother or sister)", -deedééʼ "paternal aunt or uncle (father's brother or sister)". These two terms are reciprocal like the grandparent/grandchild terms. Thus, -ghúyé also refers to one's opposite-sex sibling's son or daughter (that is, a person will call their maternal aunt -ghúyé and that aunt will call them -ghúyé in return).
Unlike the Chiricahua system, the Jicarilla have only two terms for grandparents according to sex: -chóó "grandmother", -tsóyéé "grandfather". They do not have separate terms for maternal or paternal grandparents. The terms are also used of a grandparent's siblings according to sex. Thus, -chóó refers to one's grandmother or one's grand-aunt (either maternal or paternal); -tsóyéé refers to one's grandfather or one's grand-uncle. These terms are not reciprocal. There is a single word for grandchild (regardless of sex): -tsóyí̱í̱.
There are two terms for each parent. These terms also refer to that parent's same-sex sibling: -ʼnííh "mother or maternal aunt (mother's sister)", -kaʼéé "father or paternal uncle (father's brother)". Additionally, there are two terms for a parent's opposite-sex sibling depending on sex: -daʼá̱á̱ "maternal uncle (mother's brother)", -béjéé "paternal aunt (father's sister).
Two terms are used for same-sex and opposite-sex siblings. These terms are also used for parallel-cousins: -kʼisé "same-sex sibling or same-sex parallel cousin (i.e. same-sex father's brother's child or mother's sister's child)", -´-láh "opposite-sex sibling or opposite parallel cousin (i.e. opposite-sex father's brother's child or mother's sister's child)". These two terms can also be used for cross-cousins. There are also three sibling terms based on the age relative to the speaker: -ndádéé "older sister", -´-naʼá̱á̱ "older brother", -shdá̱zha "younger sibling (i.e. younger sister or brother)". Additionally, there are separate words for cross-cousins: -zeedń "cross-cousin (either same-sex or opposite-sex of speaker)", -iłnaaʼaash "male cross-cousin" (only used by male speakers).
A parent's child is classified with their same-sex sibling's or same-sex cousin's child: -zhácheʼe "daughter, same-sex sibling's daughter, same-sex cousin's daughter", -gheʼ "son, same-sex sibling's son, same-sex cousin's son". There are different words for an opposite-sex sibling's child: -daʼá̱á̱ "opposite-sex sibling's daughter", -daʼ "opposite-sex sibling's son".
Apache lived in three types of houses. Tipis were common in the plains. Wickiups were common in the highlands; these were 8-foot-tall (2.4 m) framed of wood held together with yucca fibers and covered in brush. If a family member died, the wickiup would be burned. Apache of the desert of northern Mexico lived in hogans, an earthen structure for keeping cool.
Below is a description of Chiricahua wickiups recorded by anthropologist Morris Opler:
The home in which the family lives is made by the women and is ordinarily a circular, dome-shaped brush dwelling, with the floor at ground level. It is seven feet high at the center and approximately eight feet in diameter. To build it, long fresh poles of oak or willow are driven into the ground or placed in holes made with a digging stick. These poles, which form the framework, are arranged at one-foot intervals and are bound together at the top with yucca-leaf strands. Over them a thatching of bundles of big bluestem grass or bear grass is tied, shingle style, with yucca strings. A smoke hole opens above a central fireplace. A hide, suspended at the entrance, is fixed on a cross-beam so that it may be swung forward or backward. The doorway may face in any direction. For waterproofing, pieces of hide are thrown over the outer hatching, and in rainy weather, if a fire is not needed, even the smoke hole is covered. In warm, dry weather much of the outer roofing is stripped off. It takes approximately three days to erect a sturdy dwelling of this type. These houses are 'warm and comfortable, even though there is a big snow.' The interior is lined with brush and grass beds over which robes are spread ...
Frame of Apache wickiupChiricahua medicine man in wickiup with family
The woman not only makes the furnishings of the home but is responsible for the construction, maintenance, and repair of the dwelling itself and for the arrangement of everything in it. She provides the grass and brush beds and replaces them when they become too old and dry ... However, formerly 'they had no permanent homes, so they didn't bother with cleaning.' The dome-shaped dwelling or wickiup, the usual home type for all the Chiricahua bands, has already been described ... Said a Central Chiricahua informant.
Both the teepee and the oval-shaped house were used when I was a boy. The oval hut was covered with hide and was the best house. The more well-to-do had this kind. The tepee type was just made of brush. It had a place for a fire in the center. It was just thrown together. Both types were common even before my time ...
A house form that departs from the more common dome-shaped variety is recorded for the Southern Chiricahua as well:
... When we settled down, we used the wickiup; when we were moving around a great deal, we used this other kind ...[50]
Recent research has documented the archaeological remains of Chiricahua Apache wickiups as found on protohistoric and at historical sites, such as Canon de los Embudos where C. S. Fly photographed Geronimo, his people, and dwellings during surrender negotiations in 1886, demonstrating their unobtrusive and improvised nature."[51]
Various Apache containers: baskets, bowls and jars. Apache women wove yucca, willow leaves, or juniper bark into baskets that could hold heavy loads.[52]
Apache people obtained food from hunting, gathering wild plants, cultivating domestic plants, trade, or raiding neighboring groups for livestock and agricultural projects.[53]
Particular types of foods eaten by a group depending upon their respective environment.
Hunting was done primarily by men, although there were sometimes exceptions depending on animal and culture (e.g. Lipan women could help in hunting rabbits and Chiricahua boys were also allowed to hunt rabbits).
Apache jug
Hunting often had elaborate preparations, such as fasting and religious rituals performed by medicine men before and after the hunt. In Lipan culture, since deer were protected by Mountain Spirits, great care was taken in Mountain Spirit rituals to ensure smooth hunting. Slaughter follows religious guidelines (many of which are recorded in religious stories) prescribing cutting, prayers, and bone disposal. Southern Athabascan hunters often distributed successfully slaughtered game. For example, among the Mescalero a hunter was expected to share as much as half of his kill with a fellow hunter and needy people at the camp. Feelings of individuals about this practice spoke of social obligation and spontaneous generosity.
The most common hunting weapon before the introduction of European guns was the bow and arrow. Various hunting techniques were used. Some involved wearing animal head masks as a disguise. Whistles were sometimes used to lure animals closer. Another technique was the relay method where hunters positioned at various points would chase the prey in turns in order to tire the animal. A similar method involved chasing the prey down a steep cliff.
Eating certain animals was taboo. Although different cultures had different taboos, common examples included bears, peccaries, turkeys, fish, snakes, insects, owls, and coyotes. An example of taboo differences: the black bear was a part of the Lipan diet (although less common as buffalo, deer, or antelope), but the Jicarilla never ate bear because it was considered an evil animal. Some taboos were a regional phenomenon, such as fish, which was taboo throughout the southwest (e.g. in certain Pueblo cultures like the Hopi and Zuni) and considered to resemble a snake (an evil animal) in physical appearance.[54][55]
Western Apache hunted deer and pronghorns mostly in the ideal late fall. After the meat was smoked into jerky around November, they migrated from the farm sites in the mountains along stream banks to winter camps in the Salt, Black, Gila River and even the Colorado River valleys.
The Chiricahua mostly hunted deer followed by pronghorn. Lesser game included cottontail rabbits, opossums, squirrels, surplus horses, surplus mules, wapiti (elk), wild cattle and wood rats.
The Mescalero primarily hunted deer. Other game includes bighorn sheep, buffalo (for those living closer to the plains), cottontail rabbits, elk, horses, mules, opossums, pronghorn, wild steers, and wood rats. Beavers, minks, muskrats, and weasels were hunted for their hides but were not eaten.
The Jicarilla primarily hunted bighorn sheep, buffalo, deer, elk, and pronghorn. Other game included beaver, bighorn sheep, chief hares, chipmunks, doves, groundhogs, grouse, peccaries, porcupines, prairie dogs, quail, rabbits, skunks, snow birds, squirrels, turkeys and wood rats. Burros and horses were only eaten in emergencies. Minks, weasels, wildcats and wolves were not eaten but hunted for their body parts.
The Lipan ate mostly buffalo with a three-week hunt during the fall and smaller hunts until the spring. The second most utilized animal was deer. Fresh deer blood was drunk for health. Other animals included beavers, bighorns, black bears, burros, ducks, elk, fish, horses, mountain lions, mourning doves, mules, prairie dogs, pronghorns, quail, rabbits, squirrels, turkeys, turtles, and wood rats. Skunks were eaten only in emergencies.
Plains Apache hunters hunted primarily buffalo and deer. Other game included badgers, bears, beavers, fowl (including geese), opossums, otters, rabbits, and tortoises.
Influenced by the Plains Indians, Western Apaches wore clothing sewn from animal hides decorated with seed beads for clothing. These beaded designs historically resembled that of the Great Basin Paiute and is characterized by linear patterning. Apache beaded clothing was bordered with narrow bands of glass seed beads in diagonal stripes of alternating colors.[56] They made buckskin shirts, ponchos, skirts, and moccasins and decorated them with colorful beadwork.
The gathering of plants and other food was primarily done by women. The men's job was usually to hunt animals such as deer, buffalo, and small game. However, men helped in certain gathering activities, such as of heavy agave crowns. Numerous plants were used as both food and medicine and in religious ceremonies. Other plants were used for only their religious or medicinal value.
In May, the Western Apache baked and dried agave crowns pounded into pulp and formed into rectangular cakes. At the end of June and beginning of July, saguaro, prickly pear, and cholla fruits were gathered. In July and August, mesquite beans, Spanish bayonet fruit, and Emory oak acorns were gathered. In late September, gathering was stopped as attention moved to harvesting cultivated crops. In late fall, juniper berries and pinyonnuts were gathered.
The abundant agave (mescal) was also important to the Mescalero,[note 3] who gathered the crowns in late spring after reddish flower stalks appeared. The smaller sotol crowns were also important. The crowns of both plants were baked and dried. Other plants include: acorns, agarita berries, amole stalks (roasted and peeled), aspen inner bark (used as a sweetener), bear grass stalks (roasted and peeled), box elder inner bark (used as a sweetener), banana yucca fruit, banana yucca flowers, box elder sap (used as a sweetener), cactus fruits (of various varieties), cattail rootstocks, chokecherries, currants, dropseed grass seeds (used for flatbread), elderberries, gooseberries (Ribes leptanthum and R. pinetorum), grapes, hackberries, hawthorne fruit, and hops (used as condiment).
They also used horsemint (as a condiment), juniper berries, Lamb's-quarters leaves, locust flowers, locust pods, mesquite pods, mint (as a condiment), mulberries, pennyroyal (as a condiment), pigweed seeds (for flatbread), pine inner bark (as a sweetener), pinyon pine nuts, prickly pear fruit (dethorned and roasted), purslane leaves, raspberries, sage (as a condiment), screwbeans, sedge tubers, shepherd's purse leaves, strawberries, sunflower seeds, tumbleweed seeds (for flatbread), vetch pods, walnuts, western white pine nuts, western yellow pine nuts, white evening primrose fruit, wild celery (as a condiment), wild onion (as a condiment), wild pea pods, wild potatoes, and wood sorrel leaves.
The Jicarilla used acorns, chokecherries, juniper berries, mesquite beans, pinyon nuts, prickly pear fruit, yucca fruit, and many other kinds of fruits, acorns, greens, nuts, and seed grasses.
The Lipan heavily used agave (mescal) and sotol. Other plants include agarita, blackberries, cattails, devil's claw, elderberries, gooseberries, hackberries, hawthorn, juniper, Lamb's-quarters, locust, mesquite, mulberries, oak, palmetto, pecan, pinyon, prickly pears, raspberries, screwbeans, seed grasses, strawberries, sumac, sunflowers, Texas persimmons, walnuts, western yellow pine, wild cherries, wild grapes, wild onions, wild plums, wild potatoes, wild roses, yucca flowers, and yucca fruit. Other gathered food includes salt obtained from caves and honey.
The Plains Apache gathered chokecherries, blackberries, grapes, prairie turnips, wild onions, and wild plums, and many other fruits, vegetables, and tuberous roots.
The Navajo practiced the most crop cultivation, the Western Apache, Jicarilla, and Lipan less. The one Chiricahua band (of Opler's) and the Mescalero practiced very little cultivation. The other two Chiricahua bands and the Plains Apache did not grow any crops.
Interchanges between the Apache and European-descended explorers and settlers included trading. The Apache found they could use European and American goods.
Apaches distinguished raiding from war. Raiding was done in small parties with a specific economic purpose. War was waged in large parties (often clan members), usually to achieve retribution. Raiding was traditional for the Apache, but Mexican settlers objected to their stock being stolen. As tensions grew between the Apache and settlers, the Mexican government passed laws offering cash rewards for Apache scalps.[58]
Apache religious stories relate to two culture heroes (one of the Sun/fire:"Killer-Of-Enemies/Monster Slayer", and one of Water/Moon/thunder: "Child-Of-The-Water/Born For Water") who destroy several creatures harmful to humankind.[59]
Another story is of a hidden ball game, where good and evil animals decide whether or not the world should be forever dark. Coyote, the trickster, is an important being that often has inappropriate behavior (such as marrying his own daughter, etc.) in which he overturns social convention. The Navajo, Western Apache, Jicarilla, and Lipan have an emergence or Creation Story, while this is lacking in the Chiricahua and Mescalero.[59]
Most Southern Athabascan gods are personified natural forces that run through the universe. They may be used for human purposes through ritual ceremonies. The following is a formulation by the anthropologist Keith Basso of the Western Apache's concept of diyí':
The term diyí' refers to one or all of a set of abstract and invisible forces that are said to derive from certain classes of animals, plants, minerals, meteorological phenomena, and mythological figures within the Western Apache universe. Any of the various powers may be acquired by man and, if properly handled, used for a variety of purposes.[60]
Medicine men learn the ceremonies, which can also be acquired by direct revelation to the individual. Different Apache cultures had different views of ceremonial practice. Most Chiricahua and Mescalero ceremonies were learned through the transmission of personal religious visions, while the Jicarilla and Western Apache used standardized rituals as the more central ceremonial practice. Important standardized ceremonies include the puberty ceremony (Sunrise Dance) of young women, Navajo chants, Jicarilla "long-life" ceremonies, and Plains Apache "sacred-bundle" ceremonies.
Certain animals—owls, snakes, bears, and coyotes—are considered spiritually evil and prone to cause sickness to humans.
Many Apache ceremonies use masked representations of religious spirits. Sandpainting is an important ceremony in the Navajo, Western Apache, and Jicarilla traditions, in which healers create temporary, sacred art from colored sands. Anthropologists believe the use of masks and sandpainting are examples of cultural diffusion from neighboring Pueblo cultures.[61]
The Apaches participate in many religious dances, including the rain dance, dances for the crop and harvest, and a spirit dance. These dances were mostly for influencing the weather and enriching their food resources.
José de Urrutia estimated the Apache population in year 1700 at up to 60,000 people (or 12,000 warriors). Indian Affairs 1837 estimated the Apache population in 1837 at 20,280 people, this estimate was later repeated by official reports of Indian Affairs 1841 and 1844. In Indian Affairs 1857 "every possible estimate" has been gathered - from 18,000 warriors (which would indicate a total population of 90,000) down to 300. Many estimates did not include the whole body of the tribe and referred only to some bands or to a part of the area they roved over. In 1875 there were already on the reservations 9,248 Apaches (Indian Affairs 1875), this number does not include those who were still not on the reservations. The census of 1890 returned at least 7,218 (including 4,041 in Arizona) and the census of 1910 returned at least 6,119.[62]
During the 20th and 21st centuries Apache population has rebounded, reaching 148,936 in the USA according to the 2020 census.[63]
The Southern Athabascan branch was defined by Harry Hoijer primarily according to its merger of stem-initial consonants of the Proto-Athabascan series *k̯ and *c into *c (in addition to the widespread merger of *č and *čʷ into *č also found in many Northern Athabascan languages).
Proto- Athabascan
Navajo
Western Apache
Chiricahua
Mescalero
Jicarilla
Lipan
Plains Apache
*k̯uʔs
"handle fabric-like object"
-tsooz
-tsooz
-tsuuz
-tsuudz
-tsoos
-tsoos
-tsoos
*ce·
"stone"
tsé
tséé
tsé
tsé
tsé
tsí
tséé
Hoijer (1938) divided the Apache sub-family into an eastern branch consisting of Jicarilla, Lipan, and Plains Apache and a Western branch consisting of Navajo, Western Apache (San Carlos), Chiricahua, and Mescalero based on the merger of Proto-Apachean *t and *k to k in the Eastern branch. Thus, as can be seen in the example below, when the Western languages have noun or verb stems that start with t, the related forms in the Eastern languages will start with a k:
Western
Eastern
Navajo
Western Apache
Chiricahua
Mescalero
Jicarilla
Lipan
Plains Apache
"water"
tó
tū
tú
tú
kó
kó
kóó
"fire"
kǫʼ
kǫʼ
kųų
kų
ko̱ʼ
kǫǫʼ
kǫʼ
He later revised his proposal in 1971 when he found that Plains Apache did not participate in the *k̯/*c merger to consider Plains Apache as a language equidistant from the other languages, now called Southwestern Apachean. Thus, some stems that originally started with *k̯ in Proto-Athabascan start with ch in Plains Apache while the other languages start with ts.
Proto- Athabascan
Navajo
Chiricahua
Mescalero
Jicarilla
Plains Apache
*k̯aʔx̣ʷ
"big"
-tsaa
-tsaa
-tsaa
-tsaa
-cha
Morris Opler (1975) has noted cultural similarities of Jicarilla and Lipan with Eastern Apache language speakers and differences from Western Apache speakers, supporting Hojier's initial classification. Other linguists, particularly Michael Krauss (1973), have noted that a classification based only on the initial consonants of noun and verb stems is arbitrary and when other sound correspondences are considered the relationships between the languages appear more complex.
Apache languages are tonal. Regarding tonal development, all Apache languages are low-marked, which means that stems with a "constricted" syllable rime in the proto-language developed low tone while all other rimes developed high tone. Other Northern Athabascan languages are high-marked: their tonal development is the reverse. In the example below, if low-marked Navajo and Chiricahua have a low tone, then the high-marked Northern Athabascan languages, Slavey and Chilcotin, have a high tone, and if Navajo and Chiricahua have a high tone, then Slavey and Chilcotin have a low tone.
^Other Zuni words identifying specific Apache groups are wilacʔu·kʷe "White Mountain Apache" and čišše·kʷe "San Carlos Apache".
^All kinship terms in Apache languages are inherently possessed, which means they must be preceded by a possessive prefix. This is signified by the preceding hyphen.
^The name Mescalero is, in fact, derived from the word mescal, a reference to their use of this plant as food.
^Bruce, Barbara (November 19, 2021). "13th Annual Apache Alliance held in San Carlos". White Mountain Independent. Archived from the original on 1 August 2024. Retrieved 25 June 2024. According to a post by [Terry] Rambler on his Facebook page, "representatives of the White Mountain Apache Tribe, Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation, Fort Sill Apache Tribe, Mescalero Apache Tribe, and the Lipan Apaches were present."
^ abcdStanley Newman. (1958). Zuni dictionary. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; Stanley Newman. (1965). Zuni grammar. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press. (Newman, pp. 32, 63, 65; de Reuse, p. 385)
^"apache". Online Etymology Dictionary. Archived from the original on 2018-08-17. Retrieved 2018-08-20.
^Barnes, Thomas C.; Naylor, Thomas H.; Polzer, Charles W. Northern New Spain: A Research Guide. University of Arizona. Archived from the original on 10 May 2024. Retrieved 10 May 2024.
^Brugge, David M. (1968). Navajos in the Catholic Church Records of New Mexico 1694–1875. Window Rock, Arizona: Research Section, The Navajo Tribe.
^Similar words occur in JicarillaChíshín and LipanChishį́į́hį́į́ "Forest Lipan".
^Opler lists three Chiricahua bands, while Schroeder lists five
^Barnes, Thomas C.; Naylor, Thomas H.; Polzer, Charles W. Northern New Spain: A Research Guide. University of Arizona. Archived from the original on 10 May 2024. Retrieved 10 May 2024.
^ abcdeMay, Jon D. "Apache, Lipan". The Encyclopedia of Oklahoma History and Culture. Oklahoma Historical Society. Archived from the original on 8 May 2024. Retrieved 8 May 2024.
^ abcCarlisle, Jeffrey D. "Apache Indians". Texas Beyond History. Texas State Historical Association. Archived from the original on 23 August 2023. Retrieved 8 May 2024.
^Krzywicki, Ludwik (1934). Primitive society and its vital statistics. Publications of the Polish Sociological Institute. London: Macmillan. p. 524-526. Archived from the original on 2024-05-08. Retrieved 2024-05-08.
Basso, Keith H. (1969). "Western Apache witchcraft", Anthropological papers of the University of Arizona (No. 15). Tucson: University of Arizona Press,
Brugge, David M. (1968). Navajos in the Catholic Church Records of New Mexico 1694–1875. Window Rock, Arizona: Research Section, The Navajo Tribe.
Brugge, David M. (1983). "Navajo prehistory and history to 1850", in A. Ortiz (Ed.), Handbook of North American Indians: Southwest (Vol. 10, pp. 489–501). Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution.
Cordell, Linda S. Ancient Pueblo Peoples. St. Remy Press and Smithsonian Institution, 1994. ISBN0-89599-038-5.
Etulain, Richard W. New Mexican Lives: A Biographical History, University of New Mexico Center for the American West, University of New Mexico Press, 2002. ISBN0-8263-2433-9
Foster, Morris W; & McCollough, Martha. (2001). "Plains Apache", in R. J. DeMallie (Ed.), Handbook of North American Indians: Plains (Vol. 13, pp. 926–939). Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution.
Gatewood, Charles B. (Edited by Louis Kraft). Lt. Charles Gatewood & His Apache Wars Memoir. University of Nebraska Press, 2005. ISBN978-0-8032-2772-9.
Goodwin, Greenville (1969) [1941]. The Social Organization of the Western Apache. Tucson, Arizona: University of Arizona Press. LCCN76-75453.
Gunnerson, James H. (1979). "Southern Athapaskan archeology", in A. Ortiz (Ed.), Handbook of North American Indians: Southwest (Vol. 9, pp. 162–169). Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution.
Haley, James L. Apaches: A History and Culture Portrait. University of Oklahoma Press, 1997. ISBN0-8061-2978-6.
Hammond, George P., & Rey, Agapito (Eds.). (1940). Narratives of the Coronado Expedition 1540–1542. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
Henderson, Richard. (1994). "Replicating dog 'travois' travel on the northern plains", Plains Anthropologist, 39, 145–59.
Hodge, F. W. (Ed.). (1907). Handbook of American Indians. Washington.
Hoijer, Harry. (1938). "The southern Athapaskan languages", American Anthropologist, 40 (1), 75–87.
Hoijer, Harry. (1971). "The position of the Apachean languages in the Athapaskan stock", in K. H. Basso & M. E. Opler (Eds.), Apachean culture history and ethnology (pp. 3–6). Anthropological papers of the University of Arizona (No. 21). Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
Huld, Martin E. (1983). "Athapaskan bears", International Journal of American Linguistics, 49 (2), 186–195.
Krauss, Michael E. (1973). "Na-Dene", in T. A. Sebeok (Ed.), Linguistics in North America (pp. 903–978). Current trends in linguistics (Vol. 10). The Hague: Mouton. (Reprinted 1976).
Landar, Herbert J. (1960). "The loss of Athapaskan words for fish in the Southwest", International Journal of American Linguistics, 26 (1), 75–77.
Miles, General Nelson Appleton. (1897). Personal Recollections and Observations of General Nelson A. Miles embracing a brief view of the Civil War, or, From New England to the Golden Gate : and the story of his Indian campaigns, with comments on the exploration, development and progress of our great western empire. Chicago: The Werner Company.
Opler, Morris E. (1936a). "A summary of Jicarilla Apache culture", American Anthropologist, 38 (2), 202–223.
Opler, Morris E. (1936b). "The kinship systems of the Southern Athapaskan-speaking tribes", American Anthropologist, 38 (4), 620–633.
Opler, Morris E. (1941). An Apache life-way: The economic, social, and religious institutions of the Chiricahua Indians. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Opler, Morris E. (1975). "Problems in Apachean cultural history, with special reference to the Lipan Apache", Anthropological Quarterly, 48 (3), 182–192.
Opler, Morris E. (1983a). "The Apachean culture pattern and its origins", in A. Ortiz (Ed.), Handbook of North American Indians: Southwest (Vol. 10, pp. 368–392). Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution.
Opler, Morris E. (1983b). "Chiricahua Apache", in A. Ortiz (Ed.), Handbook of North American Indians: Southwest (Vol. 10, pp. 401–418). Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution.
Opler, Morris E. (1983c). "Mescalero Apache", in A. Ortiz (Ed.), Handbook of North American Indians: Southwest (Vol. 10, pp. 419–439). Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution.
Opler, Morris E. (2001). "Lipan Apache", in R. J. DeMallie (Ed.), Handbook of North American Indians: Plains (Vol. 13, pp. 941–952). Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution.
Reuse, Willem J., de. (1983). "The Apachean culture pattern and its origins: Synonymy", in A. Ortiz (Ed.), Handbook of North American Indians: Southwest (Vol. 10, pp. 385–392). Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution.
Schroeder, Albert H. (1963). "Navajo and Apache relationships west of the Rio Grande", El Palacio, 70 (3), 5–23.
Schroeder, Albert H. (1974a). "A study of the Apache Indian: Parts 1–3", in American Indian ethnology: Indians of the Southwest. New York: Garland.
Schroeder, Albert H. (1974b). "A study of the Apache Indian: Parts 4–5", American Indian ethnology: Indians of the Southwest. New York: Garland.
Schroeder, Albert H. (1974c). "The Jicarilla Apache", American Indian ethnology: Indians of the Southwest. New York: Garland.
Seymour, Deni J. (2004) "A Ranchería in the Gran Apachería: Evidence of Intercultural Interaction at the Cerro Rojo Site", Plains Anthropologist 49(190):153–192.
Seymour, Deni J. (2009a) "Nineteenth-Century Apache Wickiups: Historically Documented Models for Archaeological Signatures of the Dwellings of Mobile People", Antiquity 83(319):157–164.
Seymour, Deni J.(2009b) "Evaluating Eyewitness Accounts of Native Peoples along the Coronado Trail from the International Border to Cibola", New Mexico Historical Review 84(3):399–435.
Seymour, Deni J. (2010a) "Contextual Incongruities, Statistical Outliers, and Anomalies: Targeting Inconspicuous Occupational Events", American Antiquity 75(1):158–176.
Seymour, Deni J. (2010b) "Cycles of Renewal, Transportable Assets: Aspects of Ancestral Apache Housing", Plains Anthropologist (Spring or Summer issue)
Sweeney, Edwin R. (1998). Mangas Coloradas: Chief of the Chiricahua Apaches. University of Oklahoma Press. ISBN0-8061-3063-6
Terrell, John Upton. (1972). Apache chronicle. World Publishing. ISBN0-529-04520-6.
Tiller, Veronica E. (1983). "Jicarilla Apache", in A. Ortiz (Ed.), Handbook of North American Indians: Southwest (Vol. 10, pp. 440–461). Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution.
Witherspoon, Gary. (1983). "Navajo social organization", in A. Ortiz (Ed.), Handbook of North American Indians: Southwest (Vol. 10, pp. 524–535). Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution.
Worcester, Donald E. (1992). The Apaches: Eagles of the Southwest, University of Oklahoma Press. ISBN0-8061-1495-9.
† extinct language / ≠ extinct tribe / >< early, obsolete name of Indigenous tribe / ° people absorbed into other tribe(s) / * headquartered in Oklahoma today
The Apache comprise a confederation of culturally and linguistically affiliated Native American tribes whose traditional territories spanned the arid expanses of the southwestern United States—encompassing modern-day Arizona, New Mexico, Texas, and adjacent regions—and extended into northern Mexico, including Chihuahua and Sonora.[1][2][3]
Speaking dialects of the Southern Athabaskan language subgroup, which trace origins to proto-Athabaskan migrations from subarctic North America around 1000–1500 CE, the Apache adapted to diverse ecological niches through semi-nomadic patterns of hunting large and small game, gathering wild plants such as mescal and acorns, and later incorporating horses for enhanced mobility following Spanish introduction in the 16th century.[4][5]
Historically organized into autonomous bands like the Chiricahua, Mescalero, Jicarilla, and Western Apache, they sustained economies via resource extraction and inter-tribal trade, while employing kinship-based social structures that emphasized matrilineal clans and flexible leadership emergent in times of conflict.[1][6]
The Apache's defining characteristic emerged in their protracted resistance to successive waves of colonization, utilizing guerrilla tactics, deep terrain knowledge, and raiding expeditions to counter Spanish presidios from the 17th century, Mexican ranchos post-independence, and U.S. Army campaigns culminating in the Apache Wars of the mid-to-late 19th century.[7][8]
Prominent leaders such as Cochise of the Chokonen Chiricahua, who forged temporary alliances and evaded capture amid escalating border conflicts, and Geronimo of the Bedonkohe, whose final surrender in 1886 marked the effective end of organized Apache autonomy, embodied this adaptive defiance against overwhelming numerical and technological disparities.[9][10]
Though ultimately confined to reservations through treaties often breached by federal policies, Apache descendants have maintained linguistic vitality, ceremonial practices like the Girl's Puberty Rite, and economic diversification, underscoring a legacy of strategic endurance amid demographic pressures from warfare, disease, and displacement.[11]
Origins and Identity
Etymology and Naming Challenges
The designation "Apache" derives from the Zuni term apachu, signifying "enemy," originally applied by the Zuni to Navajo adversaries and subsequently adopted by Spanish explorers in the early 17th century to describe various Athabaskan-speaking nomadic groups encountered in the Southwest and Plains regions.[2][1] This exonym first appeared in written records around 1601 during Juan de Oñate's expeditions, where it referred to Southern Plains inhabitants perceived as hostile by Pueblo allies and Spanish forces.[12]Apache groups historically rejected this label, instead using autonyms such as Ndee, Inde, or Diné—all meaning "the people"—which emphasized local band or regional identities rather than a unified ethnic category.[2][1] For instance, Chiricahua bands referred to themselves as Ndee or Indé, while Western Apache subgroups like the White Mountain people employed similar self-referential terms tied to kinship and locale, underscoring a worldview centered on immediate communities over broad confederations.[12]These naming discrepancies posed significant challenges in historical documentation and intercultural relations, as European and Pueblo observers imposed the pejorative "Apache" (or variants like Apaches de Nabajú) on loosely affiliated bands exhibiting raiding economies and mobility, often conflating them with Navajo despite linguistic and cultural distinctions.[1] This external framing ignored indigenous divisions, such as dialectal barriers between Eastern (e.g., Jicarilla, Lipan) and Western groups, fostering misconceptions of homogeneity that persisted into U.S. treaty eras and reservation policies from the 1850s onward.[12] Modern tribal entities, like the San Carlos Apache Tribe established in 1871, retain "Apache" for administrative purposes under federal recognition, yet internal narratives prioritize band-specific heritage to counter the term's adversarial origins and imposed collectivity.[2]
Linguistic Classification and Genetic Evidence
The Apachean languages form a distinct subgroup within the Southern Athabaskan branch of the Athabaskan language family, which belongs to the broader Na-Dene phylum proposed by Edward Sapir in 1915. This classification rests on comparative reconstruction of shared innovations, including complex verb paradigms with up to 11,000+ stem forms per language, prefixal elements denoting tense-aspect-mood, and classifiers distinguishing handling of round, long, flexible, or animate objects. Proto-Athabaskan reconstructions, such as those by Keren Rice (2000), trace the family's homeland to the Mackenzie River basin in northwestern Canada around 2,500-3,000 years ago, with phonetic shifts like the development of fricatives and glottals distinguishing southern variants.[13]Subdivisions among Apachean languages—encompassing Western Apache, Navajo, Mescalero-Chiricahua, Jicarilla, Lipan, and Plains Apache—emerge from Harry Hoijer's 1940s analyses of verb-initial consonant reflexes, grouping them into Southwestern (e.g., Navajo-Western) and Plains (e.g., Lipan) clusters based on *ʔ- vs. *d- prototypes. Divergence estimates from glottochronology and lexicostatistics place Apachean splitting from other Southern Athabaskans (e.g., Kiowa Apache) at approximately 1,000-1,500 years ago, aligning with archaeological evidence of southward expansion. While academic linguistics prioritizes these structural diagnostics over geographic proximity, potential Na-Dene links to Siberian Yeniseian languages remain debated due to limited lexical cognates and reliance on areal diffusion rather than strict genetic descent.[14]Genetic analyses corroborate linguistic evidence for Athabaskan origins in the Subarctic, with Y-chromosome haplogroup Q-M3 subclades (formerly C3b) predominant in Apache and Navajo populations at frequencies of 40-60%, mirroring northern Athabaskans like Chipewyan but rare in non-Na-Dene Southwest groups. A 2008 study of 2,198 Native American males identified a distinct Athapaskan signature via short tandem repeat (STR) markers on Y-chromosome, indicating migration from Canada/Alaska circa 500-1,000 CE, followed by 20-50% admixture with local Uto-Aztecan and Puebloan maternal lineages (mtDNA haplogroups A2, B2, C1). This pattern holds in autosomal DNA, where Apache genomes cluster closer to northern Dene than to contemporaneous Southwest indigenes, supporting a bottleneck event during proto-Apachean dispersal rather than in situ evolution.[15][16][17]Mitochondrial DNA reveals higher regional continuity, with Apache haplogroup frequencies (e.g., 30-40% A2, 20% X2a) reflecting post-migration intermarriage, but Y-lineage discreteness underscores patrilocal clan structures inferred from ethnography. Peer-reviewed autosomal studies, including a 2012 PNAS analysis, affirm genetic divergence between Athabaskans and adjacent Algonquian or Eskimoan groups, ruling out recent shared ancestry and reinforcing linguistic isolation. Caveats include sampling biases in early datasets (pre-2000s, often <100 Apache individuals) and ethical constraints on Navajo/Apache participation, which limit resolution but do not undermine core migration signals derived from uniparental markers.[18][19]
Migration into the Southwest
The ancestors of the Apache peoples, as Southern Athabaskans, originated among proto-Athabaskan speakers in the subarctic regions of Alaska and western Canada, where linguistic divergence from Northern Athabaskan branches occurred over millennia.[20] Genetic analyses of Y-chromosome markers indicate that a small founding population of Athapaskans migrated southward, carrying subarctic haplogroups like C3b that distinguish them from earlier Southwest populations such as the Ancestral Puebloans.[21] This migration likely involved gradual dispersal rather than a single mass movement, driven by environmental pressures including post-Little Ice Age shifts and resource competition in the northern plains and Rockies, though direct causal evidence remains inferred from correlated site distributions.[22]Linguistic evidence, pioneered by Edward Sapir in the 1930s, establishes a north-to-south trajectory for Athabaskan languages, with Southern branches like Apachean showing innovations absent in northern dialects, supporting a proto-Apachean split around 1000–1200 AD followed by entry into the Southwest.[20] Archaeological correlates include proto-Apachean sites with forked-stick hogans, Athapaskan-style pottery, and maize-dependent economies appearing no earlier than the 14th century AD, such as tree-ring dated structures in the Rio Grande valley from the 1300s–1400s.[23] No verified Apachean material culture predates circa 1400 AD in the region, contrasting with claims of earlier arrivals and aligning with the absence of Athabaskan loanwords in pre-1500 Puebloan languages.[24]Migration routes likely combined highland corridors along the Rocky Mountains with lowland paths through the Great Plains, evidenced by transitional sites in the Dismal River aspect of Nebraska (post-1650 but indicative of earlier staging) and intermontane gateways into New Mexico.[25] By the early 16th century, Athapaskan groups had dispersed across Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas, adapting to arid environments through mobile foraging and limited horticulture, with the process concluding around 1525–1550 AD as subgroups like the Western Apache and Chiricahua differentiated territorially.[24] Genetic bottlenecks during this expansion, reflected in elevated frequencies of recessive disorders like Athabaskan severe combined immunodeficiency, underscore the small effective population size—estimated at under 300 founders for some lineages—facilitating rapid cultural adaptation but limiting archaeological visibility.[26]
Tribal Groups and Regional Variations
Western Apache Groups
The Western Apache comprise several interrelated bands historically occupying east-central Arizona, sharing the Western Apache language and cultural practices centered on matrilineal clans, seasonal foraging, and raiding economies. Traditional divisions include the White Mountain, Cibecue, San Carlos (encompassing Aravaipa and Pinal subgroups), and Tonto (Dilzhé'é, further split into Northern and Southern) groups, each controlling distinct territories defined by mountain ranges, rivers, and valleys.[27] These groups maintained autonomous local bands led by headmen, with alliances formed through kinship and mutual defense against external threats.[28]The White Mountain group, sometimes termed Coyotero Apache, traditionally ranged across the elevated plateaus and forests of the White Mountains, relying on pine nut gathering, hunting, and agriculture in river valleys. Their descendants form the core of the White Mountain Apache Tribe, whose Fort Apache Indian Reservation spans approximately 1.6 million acres across Apache, Gila, and Navajo counties, established around historic U.S. military sites like Fort Apache built in 1870. The tribe numbers around 14,620 individuals, preserving traditions through sites like the White Mountain Apache Culture Center and Museum.[29][30][31]Adjacent to the White Mountain were the Cibecue, inhabiting canyons along Cibecue Creek and associating closely with White Mountain bands through intermarriage and shared clans; five clans were unique to Cibecue, reflecting localized adaptations to riparian environments. Today, Cibecue communities integrate within the White Mountain Apache Tribe, with historical events like the 1881 Battle of Cibecue Creek highlighting their resistance to U.S. assimilation efforts led by medicine men such as Nock-ay-det-klinne.[32]The San Carlos group, including Aravaipa and Pinal bands, occupied lower elevations along the San Carlos River and Gila River drainages, known for mescal harvesting and conflicts with settlers. The San Carlos Apache Reservation, established by executive order on November 9, 1871, and formalized in 1872, covers 1.8 million acres in Gila, Graham, and Pinal counties, initially confining 4,200 Apache and Yavapai; enrollment reached 17,000 by 2023. The tribe operates economic ventures like casinos and maintains cultural practices amid historical relocations.[33][34]The Tonto, or Dilzhé'é ("people with high-pitched voices"), divided into Northern and Southern subgroups, roamed the rugged Mogollon Rim and Tonto Basin, adapting to arid uplands with emphasis on deer hunting and Yavapai alliances. Forcibly removed to the San Carlos Reservation in 1875 after the Rio Verde Subagency's dissolution, survivors returned to Payson after two decades; the Tonto Apache Tribe governs an 85-acre reservation there, with 110 enrolled members as of 1994 data.[35][36]
Chiricahua, Mescalero, and Ndendahe
The Chiricahua Apache occupied territories spanning southeastern Arizona, southwestern New Mexico, and northern Mexico, including parts of Sonora and Chihuahua, where they adapted to rugged mountainous terrain through hunting, gathering, and raiding.[37] Subdivided into bands such as the Chokonen (centered in the Dragoon Mountains), Chihenne (around the Mimbres and Gila Rivers), Bedonkohe (Mogollon highlands), and Ndendahe (also known as Ndé'ndái or "Enemy People," associated with southern Chiricahua locales like the Pinery area), these groups shared a Southern Athabaskan dialect and matrilineal kinship systems but maintained distinct local leadership and seasonal migrations.[5] Their subsistence emphasized deer hunting with bows and snares, mescal agave processing, and opportunistic livestock raids following Spanish introduction of horses around 1600, enabling greater mobility across desert and sierra environments.[38]The Mescalero Apache, closely related linguistically and culturally to the Chiricahua via the Mescalero-Chiricahua language branch, ranged across the Sacramento and Guadalupe Mountains of central New Mexico, extending into western Texas and northern Mexico's Chihuahuan Desert.[3] Named by Spanish observers for their heavy dependence on mescal (Agave parryi) hearts, which were roasted in large pits for food and fiber, the Mescalero emphasized small-game hunting, wild plant foraging, and post-contact bison pursuits on horseback, residing in temporary wickiup brush shelters suited to their semi-nomadic cycles.[39] Unlike the more sierra-bound Chiricahua bands, Mescalero groups exploited broader plains interfaces, fostering expertise in guerrilla tactics and horsemanship that defined their warfare against colonial intruders from the 17th century onward.[40]Ndendahe, often classified as a Chiricahua subgroup or the broader Tchihende (Red Paint People) division encompassing Mescalero influences, inhabited transitional zones in southwestern New Mexico and adjacent Mexico, with historical strongholds near the Animas and Peloncillo Mountains.[8] Referred to internally as Ndé (The People) variants, they integrated Chiricahua raiding traditions with localized adaptations to piñon-juniper woodlands, relying on acorn gathering, mule deer hunts, and sacred mountain-centric cosmology that reinforced territorial defense.[41] These groups exhibited minimal dialectal divergence from core Chiricahua but diverged in band exogamy practices and response to Mexican independence-era pressures, with Ndendahe bands like the Bronco Apache maintaining fierce autonomy into the mid-19th century through hit-and-run ambushes on silver mining outposts.[42] Intermarriage and shared enemies blurred strict boundaries, yet territorial ecology shaped variations: Chiricahua emphasized highland evasion, Mescalero plains raiding, and Ndendahe hybrid resource strategies, all underpinned by animistic beliefs in power places like White Mountain.[43]
Jicarilla and Lipan
The Jicarilla and Lipan Apache constitute eastern branches of the Apachean peoples, characterized by their Athabaskan languages and historical ties to the southern Plains and eastern Southwest. Linguistic evidence indicates a close relationship between Jicarilla and Lipan dialects, with the Lipan likely diverging from Jicarilla ancestors relatively recently, supporting their classification within Eastern Apachean.[44][45] Both groups adapted to semi-nomadic lifestyles involving hunting, gathering, and raiding, though the Jicarilla incorporated more sedentary elements influenced by proximity to Pueblo communities.The Jicarilla Apache traditionally occupied territories in present-day northern New Mexico and southern Colorado, utilizing forested and mountainous regions for subsistence through hunting, foraging, and limited agriculture. Following displacement from the Plains around the early 18th century, they integrated into enclaves near Spanish and Pueblo settlements, adopting traits such as basketry techniques and horse culture while maintaining raiding economies.[46] By 1845, their population numbered approximately 800 individuals, recovering to around 1,800 by the late 20th century and reaching 3,254 enrolled members by 2010 on their reservation in northern New Mexico. The Jicarilla Reservation, established in 1907, spans about 750,000 acres of range and forest land, supporting livestock production and small-scale farming.[47]In contrast, the Lipan Apache ranged across eastern Texas and northern Mexico, emerging in the region by the 1600s as nomadic hunters and gatherers who prioritized mobility over farming. They faced intense pressures from Comanche incursions and European colonization, leading to significant population decline; by 1875, only about 300 remained, dispersed in small bands across Texas and Coahuila, Mexico.[48] Unlike the Jicarilla, the Lipan did not establish a formal reservation, and their descendants today form non-federally recognized communities, with some integrating into other Apache groups like the Mescalero.[49] Historical records document their resistance to Spanish missions and involvement in borderland conflicts, reflecting a resilient but fragmented trajectory.[50]
Plains Apache
The Plains Apache, also known as the Kiowa Apache or Naisha, are a Southern Athabaskan-speaking people who diverged from other Apachean groups to adopt a Plains nomadic lifestyle centered on bison hunting, distinguishing them from the more agrarian Southwest Apache bands.[51][52] Their language, Plains Apache (Na'isha), represents the most divergent branch of the Apachean subfamily, reflecting early separation and cultural adaptation to the Southern Plains environment by at least the 16th century.[51][53]Historically termed Kiowa Apaches due to their close alliance with the Kiowa tribe—formed around the early 19th century after southward migration along the eastern Rocky Mountains—the Plains Apache maintained distinct identity, governance, and ceremonies while sharing territory in present-day southwestern Oklahoma, the Texas Panhandle, and adjacent areas.[52][53] This partnership involved mutual defense against rivals like the Comanche and Ute, joint raids on settlements, and intermarriage, though Plains Apache bands operated semi-autonomously under leaders such as the Kataka (meaning "those from the north").[54] By the 1830s, their population was estimated at around 200–300 individuals, reflecting the hazards of Plains warfare and disease.[52]Subsistence relied on communal bison hunts using horses acquired via Spanish trade and raiding, supplemented by gathering wild plants and occasional farming along rivers like the Washita; they constructed tipis from hides, contrasting with the wickiups of Southwestern Apaches, and participated in Plains rituals like the Sun Dance after Kiowa influence.[54][55] Social organization emphasized matrilineal clans, with leadership based on prowess in warfare and hunting rather than heredity, and women managed camps and processed hides for clothing, tools, and trade.[52]European contact intensified through Spanish expeditions in the 16th–18th centuries, introducing horses and firearms that facilitated their Plains expansion, followed by U.S. conflicts culminating in the 1867 Treaty of Medicine Lodge, which confined them to a reservation in Indian Territory (Oklahoma) alongside Kiowa and Comanche.[56][57] Resistance leaders like Toch-a-way resisted relocation, but by 1875, most were settled at Fort Sill; factionalism arose between accommodationists and traditionalists, mirroring broader Apache divisions.[58]In 1972, federal recognition formalized the Apache Tribe of Oklahoma, separating administratively from Kiowa and Comanche with headquarters in Anadarko; as of recent tribal records, enrollment stands at approximately 2,500 members, though the language has fewer than 10 fluent speakers, prompting revitalization efforts including youth immersion programs.[54][53] Cultural preservation emphasizes bison hunts, traditional crafts like beadwork, and oral histories documenting pre-reservation autonomy, countering assimilation pressures from boarding schools and land allotments under the 1901 Jerome Agreement.[54]
Pre-Colonial and Early Contact History
Subsistence and Territorial Expansion
The ancestors of the Apache peoples, originating from Athabaskan-speaking groups in subarctic North America, undertook a southward migration into the Southwest between approximately 1000 and 1500 CE, driven by factors including climatic shifts and the pursuit of bison herds.[24] Genetic analyses of Y-chromosome markers in modern Athapaskan descendants, including Apache and Navajo populations, corroborate this trajectory from northern homelands, with divergence occurring en route and settlement patterns evident by the 15th century.[21] Archaeological and linguistic evidence places proto-Apache bands entering regions of present-day eastern Arizona, New Mexico, west Texas, and northern Mexico, where they established fluid territorial claims through small, mobile bands rather than fixed boundaries.[20] This expansion displaced or competed with indigenous groups like the Jumano and Puebloan peoples, facilitating Apache control over key resource corridors by the time of Spanish arrival in 1540.[59]Upon reaching the arid and semi-arid Southwest, Apache groups adapted a flexible, nomadic subsistence strategy emphasizing hunting and gathering to exploit variable ecosystems, with bands seasonally relocating between mountains, plains, and river valleys.[60] Primary protein sources included deer, pronghorn antelope, javelina, rabbits, and smaller game pursued with bows, arrows, and snares, while vegetal foods such as mescal agave hearts (roasted for staples), acorns, piñon nuts, berries, and wild greens formed caloric bases gathered by women.[61] Limited agriculture emerged among western and some eastern bands through adoption of maize, beans, and squash from Puebloan neighbors via trade or intermarriage, though it remained secondary to foraging due to the unsuitability of marginal lands for intensive farming and the preference for mobility.[60] Intertribal raiding supplemented resources, targeting sedentary groups for foodstuffs, tools, and captives, which enhanced band resilience in resource-scarce periods without reliance on stored surpluses.[62]This subsistence model supported territorial consolidation by enabling Apache bands to maintain low population densities—typically 50 to 200 individuals per group—and rapid responses to environmental pressures, such as droughts that reduced game or plant yields.[63] Matrilineal kinship structures distributed labor efficiently, with men focusing on hunting and defense, and women on processing gathered foods and crafting implements like baskets and pottery for storage and transport.[64] By the early 16th century, these adaptations had positioned Apache territories as buffers between Plains bison hunters to the east and Pueblo agriculturalists to the west, fostering economic exchanges that included hides, salt, and shells while minimizing vulnerabilities to localized famines.[62]
Initial Encounters with Europeans
The earliest documented encounters between Apache peoples and Europeans occurred during the Spanish expedition led by Francisco Vázquez de Coronado in 1540–1542, as the explorers traversed the Southern Plains in search of the fabled kingdom of Quivira.[65] Coronado's forces met nomadic groups known as the Querechos, described by expedition chronicler Pedro de Castañeda as seminomadic bison hunters living in hide-covered tipis and relying on dogs for transport, who traded dried meat and hides for Spanish goods such as awls and knives.[12] Modern scholars, drawing on linguistic, archaeological, and ethnographic evidence, identify these Querechos as proto-Apache or Plains Apache groups, noting their Athabaskan cultural traits and mobile hunting lifestyle distinct from settled Puebloan peoples.[66] Initial interactions were largely peaceful, with Querechos providing guides and information, though the Spaniards viewed them through a lens of cultural superiority, describing their poverty and lack of permanent settlements.[67]Subsequent Spanish explorations in the late 16th century, including Juan de Oñate's 1598 expedition into New Mexico, yielded the first explicit written references to "Apaches" as distinct from other indigenous groups, encountered in the vicinity of the Río Grande and eastern plains.[62] Oñate's records note Apache bands raiding Pueblo villages and engaging in opportunistic trade, marking a shift from the Querechos' earlier amiability to more wary relations amid Spanish colonization efforts.[68] These encounters introduced Apaches to horses, likely captured from Spanish herds by the early 1600s, which profoundly enhanced their mobility for hunting and raiding, though direct exchanges remained limited and often mediated through Pueblo intermediaries.[62] For Western Apache groups, initial contacts were indirect or delayed until the late 16th century, when Spanish advances disrupted traditional trade networks with neighboring tribes.[69]Apache responses to these early meetings varied by subgroup and circumstance, with Plains-oriented bands like the Lipan demonstrating adaptability through selective trade, while southern groups faced encroaching Spanish missions that provoked resistance against enslavement and resource competition.[48] No large-scale conflicts erupted immediately, but the introduction of European goods, diseases, and equestrian technology laid groundwork for future tensions, as Apaches leveraged horses to expand territorial influence across the Southwest.[70] Historical accounts from Spanish sources, while valuable for chronology, reflect ethnocentric biases that portrayed Apaches as inherently bellicose, a narrative contested by archaeological evidence of their pre-contact economic flexibility.[12]
Raiding Economy and Intertribal Relations
The Apache economy was characterized by a flexible subsistence system combining hunting, gathering wild plants (which constituted 60-65% of diet), limited small-scale agriculture (primarily corn on plots of about 0.5 acres per family), and raiding as a supplementary strategy for acquiring resources.[27] Raiding intensified after the acquisition of horses from Spanish sources in the early 1600s, enabling equestrian mobility by the 1670s and targeting livestock such as horses, cattle from Mexican settlements, and sheep or goats from Navajo groups.[62][27] These raids were organized by local group leaders, often conducted seasonally in fall alongside hunting expeditions, and served economic purposes by providing meat, hides, and tradeable goods rather than constituting the primary sustenance.[27] Resource pressures, including water scarcity in arid regions and famines linked to declining bison herds, further incentivized raids on sedentary settlements clustered near reliable water sources like the Rio Grande, as documented in Spanish records of 1715 attacks near Santa Fe.[71]Intertribal relations among Apache bands were marked by competition for territory and resources, with occasional hostilities even within broader Apache groupings, though clans provided cross-group mutual aid.[27] Apache groups initially controlled southern and central Plains bison-hunting territories by 1686, trading hides with Pueblos, but faced displacement southward by Comanche expansion in the 18th century, forging them into mortal enemies and prompting some Apache bands like the Jicarilla and Lipan to seek Spanish alliances against Comanche, Ute, and Caddoan Norteño incursions.[62][72] Relations with Pueblos shifted from pre-1600s conflict and raiding to temporary alliances, such as during the 1680 Pueblo Revolt where Apaches aided in expelling Spanish forces, killing or capturing over 400 colonists.[62] Conflicts with Navajo, fellow Athabaskans who diverged linguistically and economically toward more herding, involved mutual livestock raids over shared grazing lands, with Western Apache groups like the White Mountain particularly vulnerable to Navajo attacks.[27] Northern Tonto Apaches intermingled and allied with Yavapai, reflecting adaptive regional ties amid broader rivalries.[27]
Conflicts and Warfare
Wars with Spain and Mexico
The Apache tribes initiated raids against Spanish settlements in northern New Spain during the 1700s, targeting livestock, horses, and other resources to sustain their mobile, raiding-based economy.[2] These incursions intensified in the 1730s, prompting Spain to bolster frontier defenses with additional forts and troops.[2] By the 1770s, conflicts reached their height, as Apache groups exploited the vast terrain for hit-and-run attacks that disrupted mining operations, missions, and ranchos in regions like Sonora and Chihuahua.[2]Spain responded with a network of presidios—fortified garrisons designed for patrol and deterrence—established across Sonora and northern Mexico from 1692 to 1776, including key outposts like Janos (founded around 1693) and Tucson (1775).[73] Early efforts emphasized punitive expeditions, such as the 1732 campaign against Lipan and Natagé Apaches to curb raids on Coahuila and Texas provinces.[74] However, sustained military pressure proved costly; by the late 18th century, policies shifted toward pacification through establecimientos de paz (peace establishments), where Apaches settled near presidios and received government rations of corn, meat, and tools.[75] By 1793, roughly 2,000 Apaches had relocated to eight such sites, including 400 at Janos and 800 near El Paso, fostering a fragile peace sustained by these subsidies until Spanish rule ended.[75][76]Mexican independence in 1821 dismantled this arrangement, as cash-strapped authorities abandoned remote presidios and halted rations, reigniting Apache raids for survival amid economic hardship.[2][76] Chihuahua formally declared war in 1830, while Sonora's 1835 scalp bounty law incentivized civilians and mercenaries with 100 pesos per scalp from Apache males aged 14 or older, leading to brutal reprisals including village massacres.[76] A pivotal escalation occurred in 1837 with the Johnson Massacre, where American trapper James Johnson and allies killed Gila Apache leader Juan Jose Compa and over 20 followers during supposed peace talks, spurring widespread retaliation under emerging leaders like Mangas Coloradas.[76]Apache forces, leveraging superior knowledge of arid landscapes and small-unit tactics, inflicted heavy economic damage through livestock theft and ambushes, depopulating frontier districts in Sonora and Chihuahua.[2] Mexican countermeasures, including hired scalp hunters like James Kirker—who claimed bounties for hundreds of scalps by 1846—failed to achieve decisive victories due to Apache dispersal and alliances with other tribes.[76] These wars persisted until the Mexican-American War (1846–1848), after which the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo ceded Apache-inhabited territories north of the Rio Grande to the United States, shifting the primary conflict arena northward.[2]
Apache Wars with the United States
The Apache Wars with the United States consisted of armed conflicts between various Apache groups and U.S. military forces in the Southwest, spanning from 1849 to 1886. These wars arose after the U.S. acquired New Mexico and Arizona territories from Mexico via the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo in 1848, bringing American settlers, miners, and soldiers into direct competition with Apache lands and raiding territories. Apaches, who had long practiced an economy based on raiding Mexican settlements for livestock and captives, faced a more systematic U.S. response involving pursuit, forts, and campaigns aimed at subduing resistance to facilitate expansion.[77][78]Early efforts at pacification included the Treaty with the Apache signed on July 1, 1852, at Santa Fe, which promised annuities and protection in exchange for ceasing hostilities, though enforcement was inconsistent and many Apaches viewed it as non-binding. Similar agreements, like the 1855 treaty with the Mescalero Apache, sought peace but failed amid ongoing raids and retaliatory strikes. The first dedicated U.S. Army campaigns against Apaches commenced in 1849 in New Mexico, targeting groups led by figures such as Mangas Coloradas, who united Mimbreño and other bands against incursions. By the 1850s, conflicts escalated as American overland migration and mining increased Apache attacks on wagon trains and communities.[79][80][78]A pivotal escalation occurred with the Bascom Affair on February 19, 1861, near Fort Buchanan in Arizona Territory. Following a January 27 raid by Aravaipa or Pinal Apaches on rancher John Ward's property—resulting in the kidnapping of his 12-year-old son Felix—U.S. Army Lieutenant George Bascom detained Chiricahua leader Cochise and his family during peace talks at Apache Pass, falsely accusing him of the abduction. Cochise escaped after killing a guard, but Bascom hanged six Apache hostages, prompting Cochise to execute four confined Americans and initiate prolonged guerrilla warfare. This incident, rooted in miscommunication and cultural misunderstandings, ignited the Chiricahua War (1861–1872), characterized by Apache ambushes on military columns and civilian targets.[9][76]During the 1860s, U.S. forces under commanders like George Crook employed scorched-earth tactics, including destroying Apache food stores and water sources, while Apaches under Cochise and Mangas Coloradas utilized hit-and-run raids across rugged terrain. The Battle of Apache Pass on July 15–16, 1862, saw Chiricahua warriors ambush a Union column from California, killing two soldiers before being repelled by artillery fire—the first use of howitzers against Apaches—leading to the establishment of Fort Bowie to secure the route. Mangas Coloradas was killed under controversial circumstances in January 1863 after surrendering under a flag of truce, his body mutilated by American troops, further fueling resistance. Over this decade, military records indicate more than 1,600 Apaches killed in combat, compared to 108 U.S. soldiers and 244 civilian deaths.[9][81]Subsequent phases involved Warm Springs (Chihenne) leader Victorio's uprising from 1877 to 1880, evading reservation confinement through raids in New Mexico and Mexico until his death in the Battle of Tres Castillos on October 14, 1880, by Mexican forces. Geronimo, a Bedonkohe Chiricahua, led final campaigns from 1881 to 1886, breaking out of the San Carlos Reservation multiple times with small warrior bands, conducting cross-border raids that terrorized settlers. U.S. General George Crook's 1885–1886 pursuit, aided by Apache scouts, pressured Geronimo, who surrendered temporarily in March 1886 before fleeing again. On September 4, 1886, Geronimo and 35 followers capitulated to General Nelson Miles in Skeleton Canyon, Arizona, ending large-scale Apache warfare.[82][77]The wars concluded with most Apaches relocated to reservations like San Carlos, marking a decisive U.S. victory through superior numbers, technology, and persistence, though at high cost in lives and resources—over 5,000 total deaths estimated in some post-1860 hostilities. Apache strategies of mobility and intelligence networks proved effective against conventional armies but unsustainable against sustained pressure and internal divisions. This era transitioned Apaches from autonomous raiders to reservation-dependent populations, with leaders like Geronimo imprisoned in Florida and Oklahoma until his death in 1909.[76]
Key Military Leaders and Strategies
Prominent Apache military leaders during the Apache Wars included Mangas Coloradas, Cochise, Victorio, and Geronimo, each employing tactics suited to the rugged Southwest terrain against superior U.S. and Mexican forces. Mangas Coloradas, chief of the Mimbreño Apache, coordinated raids across New Mexico and Chihuahua in the 1830s and 1840s, amassing a following of up to 1,000 warriors before his capture and killing by U.S. troops in January 1863 following the Battle of Apache Pass.[9]Cochise, leader of the Chokonen Chiricahua band, initiated a major uprising in 1861 after the Bascom Affair, where U.S. Lieutenant George Bascom wrongly seized Apache hostages, leading to widespread raids that disrupted Arizona settlements until a peace treaty in 1872.[9]Victorio, a Warm Springs Apache chief, escaped confinement in 1877 and waged a campaign from 1879 to 1880, evading U.S. Army pursuits through the Black Range mountains and conducting ambushes that killed over 40 soldiers and civilians before his death in October 1880 at Tres Castillos, Mexico.[77]Geronimo, a Bedonkohe Chiricahua medicine man who rose to war leader after his family's massacre in 1858, led small bands in cross-border raids from 1876 to 1886, surrendering only after U.S. General George Crook's negotiations in March 1886 and a subsequent breakout, with final capture by General Nelson Miles in September 1886.[83]Apache strategies emphasized guerrilla warfare, leveraging mobility, terrain knowledge, and small-unit tactics to counter numerically superior adversaries. Warriors operated in bands of 10-50, conducting hit-and-run raids to capture livestock, weapons, and captives while avoiding pitched battles, as seen in Geronimo's zigzag charges and ambushes during the 1858 Oatman raid response.[83] They utilized the Sierra Madre and Dragoon Mountains for hideouts, signaling with heliographs or smoke, and dispersed forces to evade detection, forcing U.S. troops into prolonged pursuits that strained logistics.[84] This asymmetrical approach inflicted disproportionate casualties—U.S. forces lost hundreds in skirmishes—while minimizing Apache exposure, though it ultimately yielded to relentless Army campaigns involving Apache scouts and improved cavalry mobility by the 1880s.[85]
Internal Divisions and Apache Scouts
The Apache people were organized into loosely confederated, autonomous bands, including the Western Apache (such as San Carlos and White Mountain subgroups), Chiricahua, Mescalero, Jicarilla, Lipan, and Plains Apache, which often operated independently with minimal centralized authority, fostering internal divisions in their responses to external pressures like European and American expansion.[86] These divisions manifested in intertribal rivalries and differing strategies toward colonizers, where some bands engaged in raiding against rivals or settlers while others sought accommodation or alliances.[87] During the Apache Wars (1849–1886), such factionalism intensified, with bands like the Chiricahua under leaders Cochise and Geronimo mounting prolonged resistance through guerrilla tactics, while Western Apache groups, including San Carlos and White Mountain, increasingly cooperated with U.S. forces to secure rations, protection from raids, or advantages over hostile kin.[88][89]The U.S. Army capitalized on these internal schisms by enlisting Apache scouts from cooperative bands to combat resistant ones, a strategy formalized under the Army Reorganization Act of August 1, 1866, which authorized up to 1,000 Native American scouts for reconnaissance, tracking, and combat roles.[90][89]General George Crook, appointed to command the Department of Arizona in 1871, aggressively recruited scouts from the White Mountain and San Carlos Apaches—numbering around 350 by 1882—to pursue Chiricahua raiders, including cross-border expeditions into Mexico, leveraging the scouts' intimate knowledge of terrain, trails, and enemy tactics.[88][91] These scouts, often serving in short-term enlistments of 3–6 months, performed duties as guides, interpreters, and fighters, earning recognition such as Medals of Honor awarded in 1875 to individuals like Alchesay, a White Mountain Apache who later aided in Geronimo's 1886 capture.[90][89]Despite their effectiveness—exemplified by scouts' pivotal role in Geronimo's surrender on March 27, 1886, at Cañon de los Embudos in Sonora—the use of Apache scouts against their own people deepened internal fissures, occasionally sparking mutinies, such as the 1881 Battle of Cibecue Creek where 23 White Mountain scouts rebelled against U.S. forces pursuing medicine man Nakaidoklini, leading to trials and executions at Fort Grant.[88][90] Under leaders like Al Sieber, chief of Apache scouts, these units operated from bases such as Fort Apache and San Carlos, blending military discipline with traditional skills, though enlistment sometimes reflected pragmatic survival amid reservation hardships rather than unified loyalty.[90][91] Scout service persisted beyond the wars' end in 1886, with units maintaining small numbers into the 20th century—only eight remaining by 1924 and the last four retiring in 1947—highlighting how band-level divisions enabled U.S. pacification while sowing long-term intratribal distrust.[88]
Traditional Culture and Social Organization
Kinship and Matrilineal Systems
The Apache social structure centered on matrilineal kinship, where descent, inheritance, and primary social affiliations passed through the mother's line, forming the basis of family units and clan membership across groups such as the Western Apache, Chiricahua, and Mescalero.[92][93] This system emphasized extended matrilineal families as the core economic and residential units, typically comprising a senior woman, her daughters, their husbands, and unmarried sons, with men integrating into their wives' households upon marriage—a practice known as matrilocal residence that strengthened female-centered resource control.[39][94] Women held authority over dwellings, agricultural plots, and gathered resources, while men contributed through hunting and raiding but deferred to maternal kin in decisions affecting household continuity.[28]Western Apache clans exemplified this matrilineality most explicitly, with over 50 exogamous clans—named after ancestral sites or features—grouped into three unnamed phratries that regulated marriage prohibitions and fostered alliances through graded relatedness (close, distant, or unrelated).[93][32] Clan exogamy prevented intra-clan unions, promoting genetic diversity and intertribal ties, though bilateral reckoning of kinship tempered strict matrilineality in everyday relations, as paternal ties influenced informal networks without overriding maternal descent.[95]Kinship terminology reflected these dynamics, distinguishing parallel and cross-cousins to guide avoidance behaviors and marriage preferences, such as sororal polygyny (a man marrying sisters) or levirate (widow marrying brother-in-law), which preserved matrilineal property flows.[96][94]Among Chiricahua and Mescalero Apache, matrilineal principles similarly anchored local bands—small, flexible groups of 20–50 kin—but with less formalized clans; instead, extended matrifamilies coordinated raiding, ceremonies, and resource sharing, where a woman's kin network defined leadership eligibility and inheritance of horses or tools.[37][39] These systems adapted to nomadic pressures, prioritizing maternal lines for stability amid high mobility, as evidenced by oral traditions tracing band origins to female ancestors.[97] Variations existed, with some reckoning incorporating paternal input for warfare alliances, yet matrilineality persisted as the causal foundation for social cohesion, resisting patrilineal impositions from colonial contacts.[95]
Housing, Clothing, and Daily Life
Traditional Apache housing featured wickiups, dome-shaped dwellings constructed by driving oak or willow poles into the ground to form a frame, which was then covered with grass, brush, or thatch for insulation.[98] These semi-permanent structures were typically built by women and positioned near the maternal household to align with matrilocal residence patterns, where a newly married woman remained close to her mother and sisters.[5] Wickiups accommodated small family units and could be quickly assembled or dismantled to suit the Apache's mobile lifestyle across arid southwestern terrains.Apache clothing was primarily made from buckskin, derived from deer or other hides tanned for pliability.[99] Women wore buckskin dresses, often dyed yellow using mineral paints and adorned with fringes or beads, while men used breechcloths in summer and added buckskin shirts or leggings in colder seasons; both genders wore moccasins with upturned toes for rugged terrain.[100] These garments emphasized functionality for foraging and raiding, with post-contact trade introducing cloth elements but buckskin remaining central to pre-reservation attire.[101]Daily life revolved around matrilineal extended families, where lineage traced through mothers, shaping resource sharing and residence.[93] Women managed foraging for plants like mescal and agave, processed hides, prepared food, and oversaw childcare, while men focused on hunting large game such as deer and occasional raiding for horses or goods.[101] Gender roles allowed flexibility, with women occasionally participating in hunts, though divisions persisted to optimize survival in resource-scarce environments; children apprenticed under same-sex kin, learning skills through observation and practice in small, kin-based bands.[102]
Food Sources and Resource Use
The Apache peoples traditionally secured sustenance through a combination of hunting, foraging wild plants, limited horticulture among certain subgroups, and raiding for foodstuffs from neighboring groups. Hunting provided a primary protein source, with men targeting large game such as deer, pronghornantelope, and elk using bows, arrows, and spears, while smaller animals like rabbits and birds were snared or pursued with throwing sticks. In the southern Great Plains, Lipan Apache bands relied heavily on bison hunts, which supplied meat, hides, and bones for tools after communal drives or individual stalks.[103][12]Foraging constituted a significant portion of the diet, particularly for Western Apache groups, where wild plants accounted for approximately 40% of caloric intake, gathered seasonally by women using baskets and digging sticks. Key resources included mescal agave hearts roasted in earth ovens for their starchy content, yucca fruits and flowers, acorns from Emory oak processed into flour, sumac berries, and wild greens like amaranth. These practices were adapted to arid environments, with groups employing fire to enhance forage availability for game and regenerate plant growth, as evidenced by dendrochronological records of controlled burns in oak woodlands.[93][64][104]Horticulture supplemented these methods among sedentary Western Apache bands, contributing about 25% of the diet through small-scale cultivation of corn, beans, squash, and pumpkins in irrigated valley plots tended by women. Nomadic Eastern and Plains Apache groups, however, practiced minimal farming, prioritizing mobility for raiding corn from Pueblo and Mexican settlements to acquire domesticated foods without investment in fields. Overall meat comprised 35% of the Western Apache diet, dominated by venison, underscoring a balanced yet opportunistic resource strategy shaped by ecological niches and intertribal dynamics.[93][64][105]
Warfare Tactics and Cultural Significance
Apache warfare tactics centered on guerrilla operations conducted by small, autonomous bands of 5 to 50 warriors, who favored ambushes, rapid strikes, and evasion over pitched battles. These methods exploited the Apaches' exceptional knowledge of southwestern deserts and mountains, enabling them to launch surprise attacks on settlements and supply lines before melting into the landscape.[84] Mobility was enhanced by horses acquired through raids on Spanish and Mexican herds starting in the 17th century, allowing war parties to cover 50 to 100 miles daily while sustaining themselves with minimal provisions.[106] Night raids and feigned retreats drew pursuers into kill zones, where warriors used the terrain for cover; this asymmetry frustrated larger, supply-dependent forces from Spain, Mexico, and the United States across three centuries of conflict.[107]Training commenced in boyhood with rigorous physical conditioning, including long-distance running barefoot over rough terrain to build endurance, alongside instruction in stealth, tracking, and horsemanship. Elders guided youth through dihoke trials—solitary quests involving fasting and survival exercises—to cultivate hunting skills transferable to combat, fostering self-reliance and tactical acumen without formal military hierarchies.[85] Armaments evolved from traditional sinew-backed recurve bows firing arrows with snake venom or plant toxins for lethality, hardwood clubs for close quarters, and lances for mounted charges, to include captured muskets, revolvers, and carbines by the 19th century, which Apaches maintained and adapted through raiding.[106]In Apache culture, warfare transcended defense, integral to economic sustenance via plunder of livestock, goods, and captives that redistributed wealth and sustained matrilineal bands. Raiding parties targeted not primarily for slaughter but acquisition, with horses symbolizing status and enabling further expeditions; a successful warrior might amass dozens, elevating his band's mobility and prestige.[108]Revenge formed a core ethical imperative, where the murder of a relative disrupted spiritual harmony, compelling blood feuds that could span generations and unify disparate groups against common foes, as seen in responses to Spanish massacres in the 1830s.[109]Martial prowess defined manhood, measured by coup counts—touching an enemy or stealing items mid-battle—while spiritual beliefs framed victory as diya (power) granted by ancestors or mountain spirits, rendering surrender or capture dishonorable equivalents to spiritual defeat.[2] This ethos permeated social organization, where war leaders gained voluntary followings through demonstrated bravery, reinforcing individualism amid communal survival needs.[3]
Spiritual Beliefs and Practices
Traditional Apache spirituality emphasized a worldview where supernatural powers inhabited natural phenomena, such as mountains, animals, and weather, remaining neutral toward good and evil rather than inherently moral forces.[110] These powers could be accessed by individuals through rituals and personal quests, with the universe viewed as containing an abundant supply of spiritual energy available for human use.[111] Central to this system was reverence for Usen, the Creator or Life Giver, alongside sacred entities like the Ga'an or Mountain Spirits, whom Usen dispatched to instruct the Apache in harmonious living with the land and community.[112] Beliefs incorporated directional cosmology, honoring the four cardinal directions, Mother Earth, and celestial bodies including the sun, moon, and North Star as guiding deities.[113]Medicine men, known as diyi or shamans, served as primary spiritual intermediaries, employing herbs, chants, dances, and paraphernalia like sacred pollen (hoddentin from tule reeds) to diagnose illnesses attributed to spiritual imbalances or malevolent influences and to restore harmony.[114] Their practices, documented in late 19th-century ethnographies, involved extracting confessions of wrongdoing from patients via intimidation or hypnosis-like techniques and performing exorcisms against perceived disease-causing entities.[115] Women also participated as healers in some contexts, though men dominated major ceremonies.[116]Rites of passage formed core practices, including elaborate puberty ceremonies for girls, such as the Na'í'í'ees or Sunrise Ceremony among Mescalero Apache, marking the transition to womanhood through four days of dancing, singing, and symbolic reenactments of White Painted Woman's mythic journey, believed to confer fertility, strength, and protective powers to participants and observers.[3] Boys and adults undertook vision quests, isolating themselves in remote areas—often mountains—to fast and pray for guardian spirits or personal power songs, seeking vocational guidance or empowerment against adversity.[92] These quests, typically initiated at puberty, emphasized direct communion with the supernatural without intermediaries.[117]Daily observances integrated spirituality via offerings of pollen or tobacco to spirits before hunts, travels, or meals, reinforcing causal links between ritual adherence and prosperity, while taboos against disrespecting natural sites preserved ecological and spiritual balance.[110] Variations existed across Apache bands, with Western Apache focusing more on individual power acquisition and Chiricahua incorporating warrior-oriented invocations, but shared animistic foundations persisted pre-contact.[5]
Reservation Period and Defeat
Forced Relocation and Population Decline
Following the surrender of Geronimo on September 4, 1886, the United States Army transported approximately 500 Chiricahua Apaches, including warriors, women, and children, as prisoners of war to Fort Marion in Saint Augustine, Florida. The relocation involved a lengthy rail journey under guard, exposing the group to unfamiliar environments and initial hardships.[82][118]The Florida exile proved deadly due to the subtropical climate, which contrasted sharply with the arid Southwest, fostering diseases like malaria, tuberculosis, and pneumonia among the detainees confined in former fort barracks with poor ventilation and sanitation. Mortality rates soared, with reports indicating significant losses in the first year alone as the population dwindled from illness and inadequate care. In April 1887, the surviving prisoners—reduced by disease outbreaks—were transferred to Mount Vernon Barracks in Alabama, where damp conditions and continued epidemics further eroded their numbers, with over one-quarter perishing during the eastern imprisonment phase.[119][120]By 1894, after nearly eight years of captivity, the remaining roughly 300 Chiricahua were relocated by train to Fort Sill in Oklahoma Territory, integrated into the Comanche, Kiowa, and Wichita reservation, though still held as prisoners until formal release in stages through 1913. A subset, including Geronimo who died in 1909, remained in Oklahoma, forming the basis of the Fort Sill Apache Tribe, while others were permitted return to Mescalero or other Southwest reservations. The prolonged exile halved the Chiricahua population through direct mortality and disrupted family structures, compounding declines from prior warfare.[121][122][123]Parallel forced consolidations affected other Apache bands, such as the Western Apache and allied Yavapai, herded onto the San Carlos Reservation in Arizona Territory during the 1870s under orders to centralize "hostile" groups. In 1875, following the abolition of the Rio Verde sub-agency, about 1,500 Yavapai and Tonto Apache endured a 180-mile forced march in winter conditions to San Carlos, suffering exposure, starvation, and disease en route. The reservation's harsh terrain—scorching summers, contaminated water sources, and overcrowding—earned it the epithet "San Carlos Hellhole," where epidemics of dysentery and respiratory illnesses claimed many lives, accelerating population drops from lost access to traditional resources.[33][124]These relocations, enacted to pacify frontier expansion, inflicted demographic devastation on Apache peoples through immediate casualties, endemic diseases amplified by confinement, and cultural disruption inhibiting recovery. While precise Apache-wide figures remain elusive, reservation censuses from the 1880s to 1900 reflect totals in the low thousands across groups like San Carlos (around 1,300 by 1886) versus broader pre-war estimates exceeding 5,000, underscoring a late-19th-century nadir driven by these policies alongside earlier conflicts and epidemics.[121][125]
Assimilation Policies and Resistance
In the late 19th century, following the surrender of Chiricahua Apache leaders like Geronimo on September 4, 1886, the United States government shifted from military conquest to systematic assimilation efforts targeting Apache societies on reservations such as San Carlos and Fort Apache in Arizona Territory.[126] These policies, rooted in the broader federal agenda to erode tribal communal structures, included the General Allotment Act of February 8, 1887 (Dawes Act), which subdivided reservation lands into individual 160-acre parcels for heads of households, 80 acres for singles, and smaller allotments for orphans, with "surplus" lands opened to non-Apache settlement.[127] Implementation on Apache reservations, beginning in the 1890s, fragmented traditional matrilineal land use and facilitated the transfer of millions of acres to white farmers and ranchers, undermining Apache economic self-sufficiency and cultural ties to territory.[128]Complementing land policies, the federal government enforced cultural suppression through off-reservation boarding schools modeled after the Carlisle Indian Industrial School, founded in 1879, where Apache children—often forcibly removed by military escorts—faced mandates to abandon their language, clothing, and rituals in favor of English instruction, vocational training, and Christianity. By the 1880s, hundreds of San Carlos and White Mountain Apache youth were enrolled, subjected to corporal punishment for speaking Athabaskan dialects or performing ceremonies, with high rates of disease mortality exceeding 20% in some facilities due to overcrowding and poor sanitation.[11] Additional measures outlawed traditional practices, such as the 1883 Code of Religious Offenses banning Apache dances and medicine lodges until their partial repeal in 1934, aiming to dismantle spiritual systems integral to Apache identity.[129]Apache resistance manifested in both overt defiance and covert preservation. Parents on reservations like San Carlos concealed children to evade enrollment, while enrolled students organized secret language classes and ritual recitations, contributing to intergenerational transmission despite prohibitions.[130]Geronimo, imprisoned in Florida and Alabama until 1894 before relocation to Fort Sill, Oklahoma, rejected full integration by refusing to farm allotments and instead dictated his 1906 autobiography to preserve Chiricahua oral histories and critique U.S. policies.[131] Communal ranching and ceremonial revivals persisted underground, sustaining kinship networks against allotment's individualistic ethos, though enforcement and economic coercion limited organized revolt post-1886.[11] These efforts delayed but did not prevent demographic and cultural erosion, with Apache populations on reservations declining from approximately 5,000 in 1890 to under 3,000 by 1920 amid assimilation pressures.[132]
Post-Defeat Reorganization
Following Geronimo's surrender on September 4, 1886, approximately 500 Chiricahua Apache, including warriors and non-combatants, were designated prisoners of war and transported to Florida for imprisonment at Forts Marion and Pickens, where disease outbreaks caused significant mortality.[82] Relocated to Mount Vernon Barracks, Alabama, in 1887 due to malaria, and then to Fort Sill, Oklahoma, in 1894, their numbers dwindled to about 300 by 1900 from tuberculosis and other illnesses, with children often separated for Carlisle Indian School education.[119] In 1913, after 27 years of captivity, survivors numbering around 261 were released; roughly 240 elected to join the Mescalero Reservation in New Mexico, integrating with local Mescalero bands through shared kinship ties and ceremonies, while the remainder stayed at Fort Sill, laying groundwork for the later Apache Tribe of Oklahoma.[119][3]Western Apache groups on pre-existing reservations like San Carlos (established 1872) and Fort Apache underwent enforced transition from mobile band-based economies to sedentary agency-managed farming and livestock operations, with traditional leaders collaborating via appointed councils to distribute rations and mediate disputes amid land losses from allotments under the 1887 Dawes Act.[69] The Jicarilla Apache, confined to a northern New Mexico reservation formalized in 1887 and expanded to 750,000 acres by 1907, similarly reoriented toward ranching and limited agriculture under federal agents, preserving clan structures for internal governance.[133] Social reorganization emphasized matrilineal extended families as core units for resource sharing and decision-making, countering assimilation pressures from boarding schools and missionary activities, though raiding traditions waned with U.S. military enforcement.[53]The Indian Reorganization Act of June 18, 1934, marked a pivotal shift, enabling Apache tribes to adopt constitutions and charters for self-governance; the Mescalero Apache, incorporating Chiricahua and Lipan elements, ratified theirs in 1936, creating an elected tribal council to oversee lands held in federal trust and economic enterprises, halting further allotments.[134][3] The San Carlos Apache followed suit, organizing under Section 16 of the IRA to form business committees for resource management.[135] This framework restored limited sovereignty, allowing adaptation of traditional authority—such as headmen roles—into modern administrative bodies while fostering economic diversification beyond subsistence.[53]
Modern Apache Societies
Federally Recognized Tribes and Governance
The United States federally recognizes eight tribes with direct Apache ancestry, granting them sovereign status, eligibility for Bureau of Indian Affairs services, and rights under treaties and federal law. These include the Apache Tribe of Oklahoma, Fort Sill Apache Tribe of Oklahoma, Jicarilla Apache Nation (New Mexico), Mescalero Apache Tribe (New Mexico), San Carlos Apache Tribe (Arizona), Tonto Apache Tribe (Arizona), White Mountain Apache Tribe (Arizona), and Yavapai-Apache Nation (Arizona).[136] Recognition stems from historical treaties, executive orders, and acts of Congress, with most tribes achieving formal status through the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934 or subsequent legislation, though the Fort Sill Apache Tribe's recognition was restored in 2011 after termination in 1963.[136]Tribal governance typically features elected councils as the primary legislative and executive bodies, often with constitutions establishing separation of powers into executive, legislative, and judicial branches. For instance, the Mescalero Apache Tribe's government divides authority among these branches, with an eight-member Tribal Council electing a President and Vice President for two-year terms to handle executive functions like resource management and intergovernmental relations.[137] The White Mountain Apache Tribe operates via a 14-member council elected from districts, authorized to enact laws on internal matters such as land use and membership enrollment.[138] Similarly, the Yavapai-Apache Nation's constitution delineates three independent branches, with the Tribal Council serving as the legislature.[139]The Fort Sill Apache Tribe vests supreme authority in a General Council of all adult members, which delegates operations to an elected Business Committee for daily administration, reflecting a blend of traditional consensus with modern representative structures.[140] Elections occur at intervals specified in tribal constitutions, generally every two to four years, with eligibility tied to enrolled membership criteria based on blood quantum or descent, enforced to maintain cultural continuity.[137] These governments exercise jurisdiction over reservations totaling over 4 million acres across Arizona, New Mexico, and Oklahoma, adjudicating civil disputes, regulating economic enterprises like casinos under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988, and negotiating compacts with states.[136] Federal oversight remains limited, preserving tribal autonomy except in areas like criminal law under Public Law 280 where applicable.[141]
Economic Adaptations and Achievements
Following their confinement to reservations in the late 19th century, Apache tribes adapted economically by leveraging federal allotments for limited agriculture and ranching, supplemented by wage labor off-reservation and traditional crafts like basketry and silversmithing for sale to tourists.[142] These efforts were constrained by arid lands unsuitable for intensive farming, leading to persistent poverty and unemployment rates often exceeding 40% into the late 20th century.[143] The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988 marked a pivotal adaptation, enabling tribes to establish casinos on reservation lands, which generated substantial revenue for diversification into hospitality, energy, and manufacturing.[144]Gaming has become a cornerstone, with Apache-operated casinos contributing to tribal self-sufficiency; for instance, the San Carlos Apache Tribe's Apache Gold Casino and others in Arizona have supported broader economic output amid statewide tribal gaming revenues exceeding $2 billion shared with the state since 2002.[144] The Mescalero Apache Tribe transitioned from cattle and timber—primary pre-gaming revenue sources—as to resorts like the Inn of the Mountain Gods, combining casinos with skiing and golf to create jobs and fund infrastructure.[145] Similarly, the White Mountain Apache Tribe operates the Sunrise Park Resort ski area alongside gaming, alleviating chronic unemployment through seasonal tourism.[142]Natural resource extraction provides another key adaptation, particularly for the Jicarilla Apache Nation, whose 1 million-acre reservation in New Mexico's San Juan Basin yields oil and gas production via the Jicarilla Apache Energy Corporation, financing tribal operations and drilling over dozens of wells since the 1980s.[146] The San Carlos Apache Tribe sustains forestry and ranching enterprises, managing timber harvests and cattle operations to generate employment, though these face challenges from environmental regulations and market fluctuations.[147] Achievements include projects like the Tonto Apache Tribe's Apache Corners development, projected to yield $89.2 million in economic output and 1,043 jobs by integrating retail and housing.[148] Overall, these ventures have reduced dependency on federal aid, with tribes like the Mescalero investing gaming proceeds in solar projects and education to enhance long-term resilience.[149]
Legal Battles and Land Disputes
The Apache tribes have pursued legal actions to assert treaty-based land rights, challenge federal land transfers for resource development, and contest state impositions on reservation resources, often invoking federal preemption under statutes like the Indian Timber Regulations or the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA). These disputes frequently highlight tensions between tribal sovereignty, sacred site protections, and economic interests in mining or logging, with courts applying balancing tests to weigh government interests against tribal claims.[150][151]In White Mountain Apache Tribe v. Bracker (1980), the U.S. Supreme Court held that Arizona's motor carrier license and use fuel taxes on a non-Indian logging contractor operating on White Mountain Apache reservation lands were preempted by comprehensive federal regulations governing tribal timber harvesting under the Indian Reorganization Act and the Tribe's management plan. The 7-2 decision emphasized that federal oversight of tribal forests, intended to promote economic self-sufficiency, displaced state taxation absent congressional consent, as the activity occurred entirely on trust lands with tribal proceeds funding government operations. This ruling established a framework for evaluating federal preemption in on-reservation economic activities, influencing subsequent cases on state interference with tribal resource use.[150][152]A prominent modern dispute centers on Oak Flat (Chi'chil Bildagoteel), a sacred site in Arizona's Tonto National Forest used by the San Carlos Apache Tribe and other Apache groups for ceremonies tied to creation stories and ancestral remains. Under Section 3003 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015, Congress mandated a land exchange transferring 2,422 acres including Oak Flat from the U.S. Forest Service to Resolution Copper Mining LLC (a joint venture of Rio Tinto and BHP) for a proposed underground copper mine expected to yield 1.9 billion pounds of copper over decades but requiring subsidence that would destroy surface features. Apache Stronghold, representing Apache interests, sued in 2021 alleging RFRA violations, arguing the transfer substantially burdens religious exercise without adequate justification; the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld dismissal in 2024, finding the government's compelling interest in national economic security and energy transition minerals outweighed the claim under Employment Division v. Smith precedents, as alternative worship sites exist. The Supreme Court denied certiorari on May 27, 2025, but concurrent lawsuits persisted, including a July 2025 federal suit by four Apache women challenging the land swap's validity under treaty rights and environmental laws, and a June 2025 temporary block by U.S. District Judge Steven Logan pending review of NEPA compliance and aboriginal title claims. On August 18, 2025, the Ninth Circuit issued an emergency injunction halting the transfer amid environmental and cultural preservation arguments from the San Carlos Apache Tribe and allies.[151][153][154]Other disputes include Mescalero Apache efforts for land exchanges to reclaim ancestral state trust lands, as proposed in ongoing negotiations with New Mexico's State Land Office for parcels tied to historical occupancy, though no final transfer has occurred as of 2025. Water rights litigation has also arisen, such as the Yavapai-Apache Nation's quantification of senior rights to the Verde River under the Winters doctrine, culminating in a November 2024 settlement agreement providing 4,000 acre-feet annually and infrastructure funding to resolve claims dating to 19th-century executive orders, averting prolonged federal court battles. These cases underscore persistent Apache assertions of aboriginal title and reserved rights against encroachment, with outcomes varying based on judicial deference to federal statutes over state or private development claims.[155][156][157]
Cultural Revitalization Efforts
In the late 20th and early 21st centuries, Apache tribes initiated systematic programs to counteract the erosion of traditional knowledge resulting from forced assimilation and boarding school policies, emphasizing language immersion, oral history documentation, and ceremonial continuity.[158] These efforts often rely on elder-led initiatives and grant funding, such as those from the National Endowment for the Humanities, to document and transmit practices like storytelling and kinship protocols.[159]Language revitalization forms the core of many Apache cultural recovery projects, with tribes developing curricula and materials to increase fluency among youth. The San Carlos Apache Tribe's Language Preservation Program, operational since at least 2023, focuses on creating a culturally grounded framework to enhance Apache language proficiency and intergenerational well-being through workshops and educational resources.[158] Similarly, the Apache Language Consortium, comprising educators and speakers from Arizona Apache communities, produces textbooks, dictionaries, flashcards, and posters to support beginner and advanced learners in schools and community settings.[160] The Mescalero Apache Tribe's Ndé Bizaa' initiative defends language and cultural identity by archiving recordings and promoting daily use, building on earlier 2011 efforts to compile dictionaries and expand oral archives amid declining speaker numbers.[161][162]Cultural centers and advisory bodies further sustain traditions by curating artifacts, hosting retreats, and advising on resource management aligned with historical practices. The White Mountain Apache Tribe's Culture Center and Museum serves as a repository for oral histories, photographs, and objects, facilitating public education and internal transmission of heritage since its establishment.[163] On the San Carlos Apache Reservation, the Elders Cultural Advisory Council, active since 2008, oversees preservation activities including Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act compliance and youth mentorship in crafts like basketry and beadwork.[164] The Fort Sill Apache Tribe's Cultural and Language Program teaches Chiricahua dialect through structured studies, integrating it with historical narratives of relocation and resilience.[165]Revival of ecological and ceremonial knowledge integrates cultural recovery with land stewardship, as seen in Western Apache collaborations to restore Emory oak groves—key to traditional foods and medicines—guided by elders' ecological insights.[166] Mescalero Apache communities maintain puberty rites for girls, a practice documented as ongoing in 2019, which reinforces social roles and spiritual continuity through dances and runs symbolizing endurance.[167] These initiatives, while facing challenges from urbanization and limited fluent speakers, have documented increased youth participation in classes and events, preserving elements like fire stewardship protocols verified through tree-ring analysis as pre-colonial practices.[168]
Languages and Demography
Apachean Language Family
The Apachean language family, equivalently termed the Southern Athabaskan subgroup, represents a genetically cohesive branch within the broader Athabaskan (Dene) language family of North America. This classification stems from shared phonological and morphological innovations diverging from Proto-Athabaskan, including the systematic merger of stem-initial consonants *k̯ and *c, which distinguishes it from northern and Pacific Coast Athabaskan varieties.[169][170] Linguist Harry Hoijer formalized much of this subgrouping in his 1938 work, emphasizing verb stem pronunciations and pronominal patterns to delineate internal relations.[171]The family encompasses seven primary languages: Navajo, Western Apache, Chiricahua, Mescalero, Jicarilla, Lipan, and Plains Apache (also known as Kiowa-Apache).[170] Hoijer's framework divides them into a Plains subgroup (comprising solely Plains Apache) and a Southwestern subgroup, further split into Western (Navajo and Western Apache) and Eastern branches (Jicarilla, Lipan, Mescalero, and Chiricahua, with Mescalero and Chiricahua often treated as mutually intelligible).[172] This structure reflects degrees of mutual intelligibility—high between Mescalero and Chiricahua, moderate between Western Apache dialects and Navajo, and lower across broader divides—supported by comparative reconstructions of verb paradigms and lexicon.[170]Apachean languages exhibit hallmark Athabaskan traits, including polysynthetic verb complexes that integrate subject and object pronouns, tense-aspect-mood markers, and up to four position classes of prefixes into a single word, often exceeding 50 morphemes in length.[170]Verb stems employ classificatory elements to encode the shape, consistency, or animacy of manipulated objects, as detailed in Hoijer's analyses of stem sets.[172] Tonal systems vary but are prominent, with Navajo featuring high and low tones arising from Proto-Athabaskan fricatives and stops via historical tone splits; other varieties like Western Apache retain pitch accents or stress-based intonation.[170] Basic word order is subject-object-verb, with noun incorporation allowing compact expressions of events. These features underscore the family's syntactic and semantic complexity, adapted to encoding motion, handling, and spatial relations with precision.[170]
Current Speakers and Endangered Status
The primary Apachean languages spoken today, excluding Navajo, include Western Apache, Jicarilla, and Mescalero-Chiricahua, with a combined total of approximately 15,000 to 18,000 speakers concentrated in reservations in Arizona, New Mexico, and Oklahoma.[173][174] Western Apache has the largest speaker base, with an estimated 13,000 to 14,000 fluent speakers, including about 6,000 on the San Carlos Apache Reservation and 7,000 on the Fort Apache Reservation. Jicarilla Apache counts around 500 native speakers as of 2015, primarily among elders on the Jicarilla Apache Reservation in northern New Mexico. Mescalero-Chiricahua Apache has roughly 1,500 speakers, mainly on the Mescalero Apache Reservation in New Mexico and smaller communities in Mexico.[175]Plains Apache (also known as Kiowa Apache) became extinct in 2008 with the death of its last fluent speaker, Alfred Chalepah Jr., though revitalization efforts continue using archival materials.[159]These languages are uniformly classified as endangered due to intergenerational transmission failure, with children increasingly adopting English as their first language amid urbanization, boarding school legacies, and limited institutional support. Western Apache is rated "definitely endangered" by UNESCO, as speakers are mostly over age 50 and few children acquire fluency at home.[176] Jicarilla and Mescalero-Chiricahua are deemed "severely endangered," with no normative use among youth and reliance on community immersion programs for preservation.[177][178][175] Revitalization initiatives, such as tribal language nests, online dictionaries, and university partnerships, aim to document and teach dialects, but demographic shifts—including out-migration and low birth rates—exacerbate decline, projecting potential loss of fluency within one to two generations absent intensified interventions.[179][180]
Population Trends and Genetic Continuity
The Apache populations underwent severe declines during the 19th century, primarily due to protracted conflicts with United States and Mexican military forces, compounded by epidemics and displacement. Prior to the onset of the Apache Wars in 1861, the Chiricahua Apache subgroup numbered approximately 1,200 individuals.[2] Similarly, 19th-century estimates for the Western Apache totaled fewer than 5,000.[93] These reductions reflected broader patterns among Plains and Southwest Indigenous groups, where warfare and introduced diseases halved or more severely impacted numbers between 1800 and 1900.[181]Confinement to reservations after the surrender of key leaders like Geronimo in 1886 marked a demographic nadir, but stabilization occurred by the late 19th century, followed by modest recovery in the early 20th century and accelerated growth thereafter.[181] This rebound stemmed from reduced mortality via federal health interventions, though enrollment criteria emphasizing blood quantum limited official counts relative to self-identification. For example, the White Mountain Apache Tribe's population increased 7.9% from 2000 to 2010.[182] As of 2023, the San Carlos Apache Tribe reported 17,000 enrolled members, while the Tonto Apache Tribe had about 110.[33][148] Self-reported Apache ancestry reached 191,823 in the 2022 American Community Survey, though tribal enrollment across Apache nations totals under 100,000, reflecting stricter genealogical verification.[183]Genetic analyses confirm substantial continuity from proto-Athabaskan migrants who entered the Southwest circa 1400–1500 CE, displacing or absorbing local groups. Y-chromosome data reveal elevated frequencies of haplogroup Q-M3 subclades (e.g., Q-M242) distinctive to Athapaskans, tracing paternal origins to subarctic source populations and indicating minimal male-mediated gene flow post-migration.[16][15] Maternal mtDNA profiles show greater admixture with indigenous Southwest lineages (e.g., A2, B2, C1, D1 haplogroups from Puebloan or Uto-Aztecan sources), consistent with historical intermarriage patterns that incorporated local females while preserving Athabaskan paternal dominance.[15]This admixture, combined with isolation on reservations, produced founder effects evident in higher incidences of recessive disorders like Athabaskan brainstem dysgenesis and Navajo neuropathy, which are rare outside these groups and signal genetic bottlenecks during the southern migration.[26] Autosomal studies further document low European or African admixture in core Apache cohorts (typically <10% in enrolled members), affirming endogenous continuity despite colonial pressures, with Navajo and Apache sharing near-identical profiles due to recent common ancestry.[184][185] Such patterns underscore causal links between migration dynamics, endogamy, and preserved distinctiveness, countering narratives of wholesale genetic disruption.[15]
Notable Apaches
Historical Warriors and Leaders
Mangas Coloradas, a Chiricahua Apache chief born circa 1793, emerged as a unifying leader of Mimbreño and other Apache bands in the early 19th century, directing raids against Mexican settlements in Sonora and Chihuahua during the 1830s and 1840s to counter scalp bounties and territorial incursions.[3] By the 1850s, following the Mexican-American War, he negotiated temporary peaces with U.S. forces while continuing resistance, allying with Cochise in battles such as the July 15, 1862, fight at Apache Pass against Union troops equipped with artillery.[9] Captured under a flag of truce at Fort McLane in January 1863, he was killed by U.S. soldiers who shot him while allegedly attempting escape, an event that escalated Apache hostilities.[9]Cochise, leader of the Chokonen band of Chiricahua Apache in the mid-19th century, initiated prolonged guerrilla warfare after the 1861 Bascom Affair, where U.S. Lieutenant George Bascom wrongly accused him of kidnapping, leading to the execution of his relatives and retaliatory strikes across Arizona Territory.[9] He coordinated with Mangas Coloradas in the 1862 Apache Pass engagement, repelling initial attacks but withdrawing due to superior firepower, and sustained resistance from strongholds in the Dragoon Mountains, evading capture over a 500-mile frontier for over a decade.[9] In 1872, Cochise negotiated a reservation in the Chiricahua Mountains with General Oliver O. Howard and agent Tom Jeffords, securing a brief peace until his death from stomach cancer in 1874.[9]Victorio, a Warm Springs Apache leader born circa 1825, mounted a fierce campaign of resistance starting in 1877 when U.S. authorities attempted to relocate his band from Ojo Caliente to the San Carlos Reservation, fleeing with followers to conduct raids in New Mexico and Mexico. His forces, numbering up to 200 warriors including his sister Lozen, outmaneuvered U.S. and Mexican troops in 1879–1880, defeating elements of the 9th Cavalry at engagements like Las Animas Canyon on September 18, 1879.[186] Pursued relentlessly, Victorio was killed on October 15, 1880, at Tres Castillos, Mexico, by Tarahumara scouts aiding Mexican forces, marking the end of his band's organized resistance.[187]Geronimo, a Bedonkohe Chiricahua medicine man born in 1829, rose to war leadership after Mexican troops massacred his family in 1858, prompting cross-border raids that intensified following Cochise's death.[83] Rejecting confinement at San Carlos, he escaped in 1881 and led a small band of 30–40 warriors in hit-and-run tactics across Arizona, New Mexico, and Sonora, evading thousands of U.S. soldiers until surrendering to General George Crook on March 27, 1886, only to break out days later before final capitulation to General Nelson Miles on September 4, 1886.[83] His campaigns exemplified Apache mobility and knowledge of terrain, prolonging conflict until the exhaustion of resources forced submission.[83]
Modern Figures and Contributions
Kathleen Wesley-Kitcheyan became the first woman elected chairperson of the San Carlos Apache Tribe in 2004, marking a significant milestone in tribal leadership.[188] During her tenure, she prioritized addressing the methamphetamine crisis on the reservation, linking it to 120 suicide attempts and 84 suicides since 2002, as well as 63 babies born addicted in the prior year.[189] Kitcheyan advocated for federal resources to combat substance abuse, emphasizing its role in broader community health challenges.[189]In her subsequent role as a professor at San Carlos Apache College, Kitcheyan has focused on preserving and revitalizing the Apache language, history, and culture, contributing to educational programs that maintain linguistic continuity amid declining speakers.[190] Her efforts align with tribal initiatives to integrate traditional knowledge into modern curricula, fostering cultural resilience.[190] She has highlighted external indifference to Apache language preservation, underscoring the internal drive for these programs.[191]Lorenzo Baca, of Mescalero Apache and Isleta Pueblo descent, has advanced Apache representation in literature and arts through poetry and cultural expression, drawing on indigenous themes to document and share tribal narratives.[192] His work contributes to broader Native American artistic contributions, emphasizing personal and communal experiences in contemporary contexts.[142]Margo Tamez, an Apache scholar and author, has produced works exploring indigenous sovereignty, border issues, and cultural identity, influencing academic and activist discourses on Apache resilience.[41] These modern figures exemplify shifts toward leadership in governance, education, and creative fields, adapting historical strengths to contemporary tribal needs.[142]