Hubbry Logo
CochiseCochiseMain
Open search
Cochise
Community hub
Cochise
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Cochise
Cochise
Cochise
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Dragoon Mountains in Southeastern Arizona, where Cochise hid with his warriors

Key Information

Cochise (/koʊˈtʃiːs/ koh-CHEESS; Apache: Shi-ka-She or A-da-tli-chi, lit. 'having the quality/strength of an oak'; later K'uu-ch'ish or Cheis, lit. 'oak'; c. 1805 – June 8, 1874) was the leader of the Chiricahui local group of the Chokonen and principal nantan of the Chokonen band of a Chiricahua Apache. A key war leader during the Apache Wars, he led an uprising that began in 1861 and persisted until a peace treaty was negotiated in 1872. Cochise County is named after him.[1]

Biography

[edit]

Cochise (or "Cheis") was one of the most noted Apache leaders (along with Geronimo and Mangas Coloradas) to resist intrusions by Mexicans and Americans during the 19th century. He was described as a large man (for the time), with a muscular frame, classical features, and long, black hair, which he wore in traditional Apache style. He was about 6 feet (1.8 m) tall and weighed about 175 pounds (79 kg).[2]: 21  In his own language, his name Cheis meant "having the quality or strength of oak."[2]: 22 

Cochise and the Chokonen-Chiricahua lived in the area that is now the northern region of Sonora, Mexico; New Mexico, and Arizona, which they had settled in sometime before the arrival of the European explorers and colonists.[3] As Spain and later Mexico attempted to gain dominion over the Chiricahua lands, the indigenous groups became increasingly resistant. Cycles of warfare developed, which the Apache mostly won. Eventually, the Spanish tried a different approach; they tried to make the Apache dependent (thereby placating them), giving them older firearms and liquor rations issued by the colonial government (this was called the "Galvez Peace Policy"). After Mexico gained independence from Spain and took control of this territory, it ended the practice, perhaps lacking the resources (and/or possibly the will) to continue it. The various Chiricahua bands resumed raiding in the 1830s to acquire what they wanted after the Mexicans stopped selling these goods to them.

As a result, the Mexican government began a series of military operations to stop the raiding by the Chiricahua, but they were fought to a standstill by the Apache. Cochise's father was killed in the fighting. Cochise deepened his resolve, and the Chiricahua Apache pursued vengeance against the Mexicans. Mexican forces captured Cochise at one point in 1848 during an Apache raid on Fronteras, Sonora, but he was exchanged for nearly a dozen Mexican prisoners.

Border tensions and fighting

[edit]

Beginning with early Spanish colonization around 1600, the Apache suffered tension and strife with European settlers until the greater part of the area was acquired by the United States in 1850 following the Mexican War. For a time, the two peoples managed peaceful relations. In the late 1850s, Cochise may have supplied firewood for the Butterfield Overland Mail stagecoach station at Apache Pass.[2]: 21 

The tenuous peace did not last, as American encroachment into Apache territory continued. In 1861, the Bascom affair was a catalyst for armed confrontation. An Apache raiding party had driven away a local rancher's cattle and kidnapped his 12-year-old stepson (Felix Ward, who later became known as Mickey Free). Cochise and his band were mistakenly accused of the incident (which had been carried out by another band, Coyotero Apache).[3] Army officer Lt. George Bascom invited Cochise to the Army's encampment in the belief that the warrior was responsible for the incident. Cochise maintained his innocence and offered to look into the matter with other Apache groups, but the officer tried to arrest him. Cochise escaped by drawing a knife and slashing his way out of the tent,[3] but was shot at as he fled.[3]

Bascom captured some of Cochise's relatives, who apparently were taken by surprise as Cochise escaped. Cochise eventually also took hostages to use in negotiations to free the Apache Indians.[3] However, the negotiations fell apart, because the arrival of U.S. troop reinforcements led Cochise to believe that the situation was spiraling out of his control. Both sides eventually killed all their remaining hostages. Cochise went on to carry out about 11 years of relentless warfare, reducing much of the Mexican/American settlements in southern Arizona to a burned-out wasteland. Dan Thrapp estimated the total death toll of settlers and Mexican/American travelers as 5,000, but most historians believe it was more likely a few hundred.[4]: 15–18  The mistaken arrest of Cochise by Lt. Bascom is still remembered by the Chiricahua's descendants today, who describe the incident as "Cut the Tent".[5]

Cochise joined his father-in-law Mangas Coloradas (Red Sleeves, Kan-da-zis Tlishishen), the powerful Chihenne-Chiricahua chief, in a long series of retaliatory skirmishes and raids on the white settlements and ranches.[3] The First Battle of Dragoon Springs was one of these engagements. During the raids, many people were killed, but the Apache quite often had the upper hand. The United States was distracted by its own internal conflict of the looming Civil War, and had begun to pull military forces out of the area. Additionally, the Apaches were highly adapted to living and fighting in the harsh terrain of the Southwest. Many years passed before the US Army, using tactics conceived by General George Crook[4]: 95–100  and later adopted by General Nelson A. Miles,[4]: 350–51  was able to effectively challenge the Apache warriors on their own lands.

Battle of Apache Pass

[edit]

At Apache Pass in 1862, Cochise and Mangas Coloradas, with around 500 fighters, held their ground against a New Mexico-bound force of California volunteers under General James Henry Carleton until carriage-mounted howitzer artillery fire was brought to bear on their positions in the rocks above.[6]

According to scout John C. Cremony and historian Dan L. Thrapp, the howitzer fire sent the Apaches into an immediate retreat. The Battle of Apache Pass was one of the rare pitched battles the Apaches fought against the Army. Normally, the Apaches' tactics involved guerrilla-style warfare. Capt. Thomas Roberts was persuaded by this conflict that it would be best to find a route around Apache Pass, which he did. Gen. Carleton continued unhindered to New Mexico and subsequently took over as commander of the territory.[6]

In January 1863, Gen. Joseph R. West, under orders from Gen. Carleton, captured Mangas Coloradas by luring him into a conference under a flag of truce. During what was to be a peaceful parley session, the Americans took Mangas Coloradas prisoner and later murdered him.[2]: 41–42  This fanned the flames of enmity between the encroaching Americans and the Apache. Cochise believed that the Americans had violated the rules of war by capturing and killing Mangas Coloradas during a parley session. Cochise and the Apache continued their raids against U.S. and Mexican settlements and military positions throughout the 1860s.

Capture, escape and retirement

[edit]
Cochise Stronghold, Dragoon Mountains, southeastern Arizona

Following various skirmishes, Cochise and his men were gradually driven into Arizona's Dragoon Mountains, but used the mountains for cover and as a base from which to continue attacks against white settlements. Cochise evaded capture and continued his raids against white settlements and travelers until 1872. In 1871, General Oliver O. Howard was ordered to find Cochise, and in 1872, Howard was accompanied by his aide 1st Lt Joseph A. Sladen and Captain Samuel S. Sumner to Arizona to negotiate a peace treaty with Cochise. Tom Jeffords, the Apache leader's only white friend, was also present. A treaty was negotiated on October 12, 1872.[7] Based on statements by Sumner and descriptions by Sladen, modern historians such as Robert M. Utley believe that Cochise's Spanish interpreter was Geronimo.[8]

After the peace treaty, Cochise retired to the short-lived Chiricahua Reservation (1872–1876), with his friend Jeffords as agent. He died of natural causes (probably abdominal cancer) in 1874, and was buried in the rocks above one of his favorite camps in Arizona's Dragoon Mountains, now called the Cochise Stronghold. Only his people and Tom Jeffords knew the exact location of his resting place, which they never disclosed.[9]

Many of Cochise's descendants reside at the Mescalero Apache Reservation near Ruidoso, New Mexico, and in Oklahoma with the Fort Sill Apache Tribe of Chiricahua Warm Springs Apache.[3]

Whether a portrait of Cochise exists is unknown; a reported portrait is actually that of a 1903 Pueblo of Isleta man named Juan Rey Abeita.[10]

Family

[edit]

Cochise married Dos-teh-seh (Dos-tes-ey, Doh-teh-seh – "Something-at-the-campfire-already-cooked", b. 1813), the daughter of Mangas Coloradas, who was the leader of the Warm Springs and Mimbreño local groups of the Chihenne band. Their children were Taza (1842–1876) and Naiche (1856–1919).[11]

[edit]
  • The US Navy tugboat USS Cochise (YTB-216) was named after him
  • In the Star Trek franchise, three starships were named after Cochise: USS Cochise (NCC-530, Cochise-class), USS Cochise (NCC-4345, Larson-class), and USS Cochise (Constellation-class)
  • The best-selling novel by Elliott Arnold in 1947 titled Blood Brother gives a fictionalized account of the latter part of the struggle and friendship between Tom Jeffords and Cochise.[12]
  • In 1950, director Delmer Daves turned Arnold's novel into a film retitled Broken Arrow, featuring James Stewart as Tom Jeffords and Jeff Chandler as Cochise. Broken Arrow is often credited as the first sound film to show a sympathetic picture of Native Americans and influenced the popular image of Native American people. The tall, handsome, deeply tanned Chandler, a Jewish actor born in Brooklyn, New York, portrayed Cochise as a noble, nearly tragic character forced to fight against the U.S. Army officers who led incursions into Apache territory.[12]
  • John Ford's representation of Cochise in the 1948 film Fort Apache was also positive to Native Americans, although in that film, Cochise spoke Spanish (a language the Apaches had learned from their Mexican enemies).[13]
  • Jeff Chandler again portrayed Cochise in the 1952 film The Battle at Apache Pass.[14] Taza, Son of Cochise (1954), stars Rock Hudson as his son, Taza.[14]
  • The film Conquest of Cochise released by Columbia Pictures in 1953 and starring John Hodiak as Cochise also showed Cochise as a caring man who wanted peace with whites.[15]
  • Broken Arrow is a TV series adapted from the 1950 film that told a fictionalized account of the historical relationship between Tom Jeffords (John Lupton) and Cochise (Michael Ansara); the show was aired on ABC in prime time from 1956 through 1958.[16]
  • Cochise was portrayed by Jeff Morrow in a 1961 episode of Bonanza.[17]
  • "Cochise" is an instrumental piece in the album Guitars, by Mike Oldfield.
  • Audioslave's debut single "Cochise" is named after the chief. In an interview, guitarist Tom Morello said that Cochise was "the last great American Indian chief to die free and absolutely unconquered. When several members of his family were captured, tortured, and hanged by the U.S. Cavalry, Cochise declared war on the entire Southwest.... Cochise the avenger, fearless and resolute, attacked everything in his path with an unbridled fury."[18]
  • The 2008 novel by Melody Groves titled Arizona War: A Colton Brothers Saga gives a fictionalized account of Cochise's dealings with the main characters, James and Trace Colton, during the early 1860s, including the Bascom affair of 1861 and the New Mexico-bound force of California volunteers under General James Henry Carleton during 1862.[19]
  • Wes Studi portrays Cochise in A Million Ways to Die in the West despite the film being set in 1882, eight years after Cochise's death.[20]
  • A statue of Cochise is shown as a meeting point between friends Jaime Reyes and Tye Longshadow in the Young Justice episode "Beneath".
  • A small lunar crater was named after Cochise, located near the landing site in the Taurus–Littrow valley, by the astronauts of Apollo 17.[21]
  • Phoenix-area theme park, Legend City (now defunct), featured a popular animatronic river ride called Cochise's Stronghold.[22]
  • An alien from the TV show Falling Skies is nicknamed "Cochise" by his human allies.

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Cochise

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Cochise (c. 1805 – June 8, 1874) was a Apache chief of the Chokonen band who directed armed resistance against Mexican and later American territorial expansion in the mountainous regions of present-day and during the mid-19th century. Born likely in the vicinity of the , he rose to prominence as a war leader following the death of predecessor Miguel Narbona around 1856 and assumed wider authority after the killing of in 1863. His band's operations emphasized suited to rugged terrain, including ambushes on supply lines and settlements, which inflicted significant casualties on U.S. forces amid broader conflicts. The pivotal of 1861 ignited intensified hostilities when U.S. Army Lieutenant George Bascom detained Cochise and his family amid a dispute over captured settlers and , culminating in the execution of Cochise's brother and other hostages after Cochise escaped. This betrayal spurred a decade of warfare, highlighted by the 1862 where Cochise's approximately 200 warriors assaulted Union troops but withdrew upon facing artillery fire from mountain howitzers. Cochise's strategic acumen prolonged Apache autonomy despite U.S. military superiority, though the campaigns involved mutual atrocities including raids on civilian targets. In 1872, facilitated by his alliance with Tucson superintendent Thomas Jeffords, Cochise negotiated a peace accord with General Oliver O. Howard, establishing the Reservation in southeastern —encompassing about 3,500 square miles—for his band's self-governance under Jeffords as agent. This arrangement endured briefly until tensions post-Cochise's death from probable led to its dissolution in 1876. His burial site remains undisclosed, speculated to be in the ' Cochise Stronghold.

Historical Context

Apache Society and Raiding Economy

The were organized into three to five autonomous bands, such as the Chokonen and Nednhi, each comprising local groups of 10 to 30 extended families residing in temporary rancherías of wickiup dwellings. These groups operated without centralized tribal authority, emphasizing matrilocal and , with leadership vested in a nantan—a war leader or headman selected based on demonstrated abilities in combat, wisdom, and consensus-building rather than hereditary succession or coercive power. Social cohesion relied on units (go.ta), communal decision-making through informal councils, and values of , , and , which facilitated mobility and defense in the rugged terrain of and . Their economy centered on semi-nomadic subsistence adapted to the resource-scarce arid Southwest, where seasonal migrations between highland summer camps and lowland winter sites optimized access to and . Women primarily gathered wild like mescal (the , processed in communal pits), acorns, piñon nuts, and , while men hunted deer, , and smaller game using bows and traps; limited , such as dry-farmed corn and beans along streambeds, was practiced by fewer than 7% of families, often supplemented by caching surplus in caves. , acquired through early 17th-century trade and raids, revolutionized mobility, enabling extended travel and serving as a form of liquid wealth or emergency food. Raiding formed a core economic pillar, targeting settlements and Mexican ranchos for , , and trade goods to offset environmental limitations and pressures. Historical accounts document intensive campaigns into and Chihuahua, with Apaches seizing over 7,000 head of , , and mules by 1770, including 1,000 animals in a single 1770 incursion; raided items were often traded back to s, , or for and tools. This practice, peaking in frequency during post-harvest winters and springs, prioritized for warfare and transport and for labor or adoption, reflecting a pragmatic to rather than unprovoked aggression, as bands averaged 400 individuals and required external resources to sustain growth. Combat prowess in such raids elevated nantan status, intertwining social hierarchy with economic survival in decentralized units unbound by fixed territories.

U.S. Expansion into the Southwest

The , signed on February 2, 1848, concluded the Mexican-American War and resulted in Mexico ceding approximately 55 percent of its territory to the United States, including vast regions of the present-day American Southwest such as present-day , , and north of the . This acquisition, known as the Mexican Cession, encompassed roughly 525,000 square miles and established U.S. sovereignty over lands long traversed by groups for raiding and migration, shifting control from Mexican authorities—who had struggled to enforce order—to American expansionists driven by economic opportunities and the doctrine of , which justified territorial growth as a civilizing imperative. Subsequent to the cession, the of December 30, 1853, acquired an additional 29,670 square miles in and from for $10 million, primarily to facilitate a southern route and resolve ambiguous border demarcations from the 1848 treaty. This transaction solidified U.S. property claims in the region, enabling infrastructure development and settlement, but intensified pressures on indigenous land use as surveyors and engineers intruded into domains. The , ignited by discoveries at on January 24, 1848, accelerated overland migration, with tens of thousands of emigrants utilizing the —a route from Santa Fe through —exposing wagon trains to attacks that preyed on livestock, goods, and travelers, thereby heightening demands for federal protection of commerce and transit rights. U.S. government responses in the 1850s included diplomatic overtures to secure passage and curb depredations, exemplified by the Treaty with the signed on July 1, 1852, at Santa Fe, which bound leaders including to perpetual peace, cessation of raids on U.S. citizens or property, and guarantees of safe passage for Americans through their territories in exchange for protection and annuities. However, enforcement proved elusive, as non-adherence—rooted in persistent raiding for economic gain—undermined the agreement, prompting U.S. agents to withhold provisions and escalate military presence to assert over the acquired lands, where unchecked indigenous predation conflicted with settlers' property interests and the practical necessities of migration and ventures. These policies reflected a realist prioritization of territorial control and over indefinite tolerance of cross-border impunity, setting the stage for intensified confrontations as American settlement densities rose.

Early Life and Rise to Leadership

Origins and Chiricahua Role

Cochise was born around 1810 in the Apache territory, encompassing present-day southeastern and possibly northwestern , . Historical documentation of his early years remains limited, relying primarily on later oral traditions preserved by Apache descendants and fragmentary accounts from U.S. scouts and Mexican records, which often reflect the biases of colonial adversaries rather than neutral ethnography. No definitive records confirm his father's identity, though traditions suggest descent from a minor local leader within the Chokonen band, emphasizing the fluid, non-hereditary nature of Apache social structures. In his early adulthood during the 1830s and 1840s, Cochise participated in cross-border raids against settlements in and Chihuahua, a customary practice rooted in economic necessity and retaliation against incursions and slave-taking expeditions. These operations, documented in military reports and corroborated by oral histories, involved targeting and , during which Cochise reportedly demonstrated exceptional combat prowess, including an 1848 capture by forces followed by his exchange for prisoners. Such exploits, verified through U.S. scout testimonies from the 1850s onward, built his reputation for strategic acumen and personal bravery among the , distinguishing him in a society where leadership hinged on proven effectiveness in warfare rather than . By the mid-1850s, Cochise had ascended to nantan, or principal war leader, of the Chokonen band's Chiricahui local group, succeeding figures like around 1856 amid escalating regional tensions. This role within the —whose decentralized bands operated semi-autonomously across the Dragoon and —entailed coordinating defensive and raiding parties, drawing authority from consensus earned via successful engagements rather than formal inheritance, as evidenced by contemporary U.S. Army observations of his influence over several hundred warriors. His position solidified the Chokonens' focus on territorial control in and surrounding strongholds, setting the stage for interactions with American expansion while maintaining traditional raiding economies against southern neighbors.

Pre-War Relations with Settlers

In the late 1850s, Cochise's Chokonen band of Chiricahua Apache engaged in limited economic cooperation with American interests through the , which established a stage station at in 1858. Cochise permitted the station's construction and allowed his people to supply firewood to the facility in exchange for gifts and payments, facilitating safer passage for mail coaches along the southern route from to . This arrangement reflected pragmatic opportunism, as the Apaches benefited from trade goods while maintaining control over the strategic pass in the . Despite these interactions, raiding persisted as a core element of Apache subsistence and warfare economy, particularly targeting settlements in and Chihuahua. bands under Cochise's influence conducted cross-border incursions throughout the decade, stealing livestock and captives to sustain their horse-based nomadic lifestyle, with reports indicating organized parties active in as late as 1860. Such activities strained relations with s, as stolen horses from often circulated in Arizona networks, exacerbating grievances over losses estimated in the dozens per incident, though comprehensive annual tallies remain elusive in contemporary accounts. U.S. government overtures aimed to curb these raids through diplomacy, exemplified by the 1852 Treaty with the Apache at Santa Fe, which pledged U.S. protection via military posts and trading houses while obligating Apache signatories—including allied leaders like Mangas Coloradas—to cease incursions into Mexico and maintain peace with American citizens. The treaty promised donations and implements as incentives for compliance, though implementation was inconsistent, revealing Apache willingness to exploit such ambiguities for short-term gains without full cessation of hostilities. These efforts highlighted underlying strategic calculations by Cochise's band, balancing temporary amity with American expansion against traditional raiding imperatives. Tensions escalated amid accelerating U.S. encroachment, including the 1853 formalizing boundaries and the establishment of Fort Buchanan in 1856 to secure emigrant trails and mining operations around Tubac. Mineral discoveries, such as silver at the Santa Rita mines, drew prospectors into resource zones, competing for water, game, and forage, while military presence inadvertently disrupted local ecologies and heightened perceptions of territorial infringement. Settler reports frequently cited livestock depredations as retaliation, underscoring the causal friction between autonomy and inbound American settlement pressures.

Outbreak of Conflict

The Bascom Affair

On January 27, 1861, Apaches raided the ranch of rancher John Ward near Fort Buchanan in the Arizona Territory, driving off about 20 head of cattle and abducting Ward's 12-year-old stepson, Felix Ward. The perpetrators were identified as members of the Chiricahua Apache band, though chief Cochise later denied personal responsibility or knowledge of the boy's location, attributing it possibly to a subordinate group or allies. Lieutenant George N. Bascom, a 24-year-old officer of the 7th U.S. acting under orders from Fort Buchanan, led 54 soldiers to , arriving on February 4, 1861, to demand the child's recovery and restitution. During a in a Sibley tent under a flag of truce, Bascom accused Cochise of ; Cochise rejected the charge, offered to search for the boy within 10 days, and proposed recovering him through Apache networks. Bascom, prioritizing immediate compliance per directives amid rising pressures, refused the delay and detained Cochise's wife, adult son, brother Coyuntura, two nephews, and three other warriors as leverage. Cochise escaped by slashing the tent with a knife, but Coyuntura tripped during flight and was recaptured; the women and child remained held. Cochise responded by seizing four employees from the adjacent station, killing one outright and holding the rest for barter. Bascom rebuffed exchange proposals unless Felix Ward was produced first, reflecting U.S. insistence on unconditional restitution over partial deals—a stance clashing with customs where captives served as tradeable assets for negotiation or adoption, not fixed demands. Failed talks escalated when Cochise, on February 8, mounted a raid capturing 42 horses and mules while executing his white prisoners after no agreement emerged. U.S. troops discovered the mutilated bodies of the four executed captives on , 1861, leading Bascom to hang the six Apache male hostages—including Coyuntura and the nephews—from oak trees near the following day, February 19, despite protests from subordinates like Surgeon John B. D. Irwin. This tit-for-tat violence stemmed from Bascom's inexperience and rigid adherence to orders amid eroded trust, compounded by Cochise's misjudgment that prior U.S. tolerance of his Mexican raids would extend to flexible ; empirical records show no prior lethal Apache attacks on Americans under Cochise until this breakdown. The hangings prompted Cochise's immediate vow of retribution, igniting raids that killed at least 10 settlers within weeks and fracturing the where Cochise had curbed depredations north of the in exchange for informal . While cultural gaps in captive handling fueled the —Apaches viewed seizures as reversible tools, not irrevocable crimes—the core causal trigger lay in reciprocal escalations from unfounded attribution and inflexible ultimatums, verifiable via contemporaneous dispatches rather than later partisan narratives.

Immediate Escalation to War

Following the executions in the on February 19, 1861, Cochise initiated widespread retaliatory raids across southern Arizona Territory, targeting American overland stations and settlements as acts of vengeance rather than mere defense. In alliance with , his father-in-law and leader of the allied Mimbreño Apache band, Cochise coordinated strikes that destroyed five stations within 60 days and resulted in approximately 150 American deaths from attacks. These operations included a April 1861 at Doubtful Canyon, where warriors killed nine men attempting to reestablish a mail station, and raids near Stein's Peak that claimed five more victims. The raids extended to Tucson vicinity and vital supply routes, with Apache forces seizing livestock in quantities that cumulatively exceeded thousands of head during 1861-1862, crippling ranching operations and forcing evacuations. The , erupting in April 1861, exacerbated U.S. vulnerabilities by prompting the abandonment of forts like Buchanan and Bowie, stripping Arizona of regular troops and enabling Apache dominance over mountain passes and trails. Cochise's emphasized rapid hit-and-run ambushes leveraging intimate terrain knowledge in strongholds like the , but inherent constraints—such as bands totaling around 1,000 individuals with roughly 200 warriors—precluded large-scale offensives or prolonged engagements against potential U.S. reinforcements. This opportunistic raiding quantified Apache aggression as the primary escalator, countering American narratives of purely reactive measures amid the post-Bascom breakdown.

Military Leadership in the Apache Wars

Guerrilla Tactics and Border Raids

Cochise's warfare centered on guerrilla tactics that leveraged the band's superior mobility, terrain familiarity, and hit-and-run operations to target vulnerable supply lines and settlements while minimizing direct confrontations with U.S. troops. Warriors frequently set ambushes from concealed positions in the ' boulder fields and rock spires, using decoy maneuvers to lure pursuers into unfavorable ground before striking and withdrawing rapidly on horseback. These methods proved effective for sustaining raids across and into , , where bands captured women and children—often assimilating them into society to bolster numbers amid ongoing attrition from disease and combat losses—but at the expense of civilian lives, as attacks routinely involved killings of non-combatants to secure livestock, provisions, and captives. The scale of these border raids exacerbated settler displacement and economic disruption, with empirical records indicating Apache actions under leaders like Cochise contributed to hundreds of murders and property losses estimated in the millions of dollars during the , directly prompting U.S. Army expansions including new forts and troop increases to protect mining districts and overland routes. Annual incursions terrorized isolated ranches and stages, forcing abandonment of ventures in areas like Tubac and Tucson, as the raids' economic raiding economy prioritized short-term gains over sustained territorial control, ultimately straining Apache resources through retaliatory campaigns. Adaptations to U.S. counteroffensives included evasion via cross-border flights into and dispersal into impenetrable strongholds, where Cochise's forces exploited the land's natural defenses to avoid encirclement by larger infantry units. Yet, internal divisions among subgroups—such as the Chokonen led by Cochise versus autonomous bands like those of —limited unified large-scale operations, as differing alliances and local raiding priorities fragmented responses to military pressure.

Battle of Apache Pass and U.S. Counteroffensives

In July 1862, elements of the Column, advancing under General James H. Carleton to reinforce Union forces in , encountered a strong ambush by approximately 140-150 Chiricahua warriors led by Cochise and at . The U.S. troops, including Company A of the 1st Cavalry numbering about 94 men, faced attacks from on July 15, with the s employing their knowledge of the terrain and superior numbers in small arms fire. However, the deployment of two mountain howitzers provided decisive firepower, repelling the warriors and inflicting heavy casualties estimated at 30 to over 60 s killed, compared to minimal U.S. losses in the engagement itself—primarily from an earlier skirmish where two soldiers and several civilians died. This marked a rare direct confrontation where guerrilla advantages were overcome by organized artillery support, exposing vulnerabilities in sustaining attacks against well-supplied conventional forces. Following the battle, the U.S. Army established on July 28, 1862, at to secure the vital water source and stage route against further incursions, directly countering Cochise's control over the area. Carleton's broader campaign involved the California Column's continued advance, which disrupted raiding patterns by protecting supply lines and enabling punitive expeditions; sustained serious wounds during the pass fighting, diminishing his effectiveness and contributing to temporary withdrawals. These operations highlighted the limits of when facing an enemy with reliable logistics and firepower, as could not indefinitely contest fortified positions or escorted convoys without risking unsustainable attrition. Subsequent U.S. counteroffensives under Carleton extended to campaigns against allied groups, including the , employing aggressive patrols that forced retreats and strained Apache resources by denying access to traditional and raiding grounds. The establishment of multiple posts and the column's scorched-earth elements in related operations exacerbated famine conditions among the , as destroyed caches and guarded settlements curtailed their economic reliance on captures, compelling a reevaluation of prolonged resistance. This phase represented a causal turning point, demonstrating that while Apache leadership under Cochise remained adaptive, the integration of forts, , and sustained military pressure eroded their strategic initiative, paving the way for eventual without immediate surrender.

Path to Peace

Diplomatic Efforts and Tom Jeffords

Tom Jeffords, serving as superintendent of mails for the from 1867, cultivated trust with the Chiricahua Apaches through principled conduct, including protecting their water sources along stage routes and conducting equitable trades without deception. This approach contrasted with prevalent practices of exploitation, positioning Jeffords as a reliable intermediary amid persistent raids on mail lines that had claimed numerous lives by the late 1860s. In late 1870, Jeffords ventured alone into Cochise's stronghold in the to negotiate cessation of attacks on overland stages, marking the inception of direct personal diplomacy. Subsequent clandestine meetings in 1870 and 1871 solidified a grounded in Jeffords' unwavering , which Cochise explicitly praised as exceptional compared to customary Apache strategic deceptions in warfare and negotiations reported in contemporary accounts. Cochise's receptivity reflected pragmatic calculations: after a of attrition from U.S. counteroffensives, including fortified posts and superior like repeating rifles, his band's raiding efficacy had waned, with sustained operations increasingly costly against expanding American such as telegraph lines enabling rapid reinforcements. Personal factors, including Cochise's emerging health decline from what was later identified as gastrointestinal ailments, further inclined him toward de-escalation rather than indefinite conflict. These private overtures demonstrated Cochise's strategic realism over romanticized inevitability of peace, as Jeffords' correspondence with territorial officials underscored the chief's conditional willingness to only with proven truthful envoys. By mid-1871, Jeffords' established channel facilitated assurances of for federal representatives, bridging sporadic truces into structured dialogue without reliance on military . This phase highlighted Jeffords' role not as a mere broker but as a catalyst leveraging earned credibility to temper Apache against inexorable U.S. expansion.

Negotiations with General Howard and 1872 Treaty

In October 1872, U.S. Army Brigadier General Oliver O. Howard, tasked by President Ulysses S. Grant with securing peace in the Southwest, convened negotiations with Cochise at Council Rock in the foothills of the Dragoon Mountains, Arizona Territory. Accompanied by interpreter Tom Jeffords, Howard yielded to Cochise's demands for a dedicated reservation on traditional Chiricahua lands, spanning approximately the area between the Dragoon and Chiricahua Mountains, rather than relocating the band to distant sites like San Carlos. This verbal agreement, formalized on October 12, designated Cochise as principal chief of the Chiricahuas and committed his warriors to abstain from raids on settlers and U.S. interests, in exchange for provisions and autonomy within the reserve. The accord's provisions emphasized non-interference, prohibiting U.S. military incursions into the reservation and forgoing immediate forced marches, which contrasted with prior policies under commissioners like Vincent Colyer that had prioritized consolidated reserves. President Grant's subsequent on December 14, 1872, withheld the specified tract from public sale, establishing the Reservation and enabling initial supply distributions under agent Jeffords. However, lacking congressional ratification, the arrangement relied on executive discretion, rendering it vulnerable to policy shifts. From a causal perspective, the agreement functioned as a pragmatic expedient, granting the U.S. a four-year interlude to reinforce territorial control amid ongoing border vulnerabilities, yet it disregarded the entrenched reliance on raiding as an economic and cultural mainstay, which empirical patterns indicated would resurface absent sustained . Cochise's pledge, while sincere under Howard's personal assurances, presupposed unchanging incentives, ignoring recidivism risks evidenced in prior truces that dissolved with leadership changes or resource scarcities. Breaches materialized empirically by , when post-Cochise eviction orders dismantled the reserve, underscoring the pact's provisional nature over any enduring resolution.

Later Years and Death

Reservation Life and Health Decline

Following the establishment of the Chiricahua Reservation in October 1872, Cochise and approximately 1,200 of his followers settled in the and under the administration of Indian agent . The U.S. Indian Bureau supplied rations, clothing, and tools to sustain the band until self-sufficiency could be achieved, reflecting the government's policy for reservation Indians. Traditional nomadic raiding and gathering practices clashed with sedentary reservation life, leading to challenges in adaptation; agricultural initiatives, including provision of seeds and implements, yielded minimal results due to arid conditions and lack of irrigation infrastructure. Agent reports from the period highlighted general compliance with stipulations, such as abstaining from raids, but documented underlying band frictions over ration distribution and spatial constraints within the reservation's boundaries. Simmering resentments persisted among the Apaches due to encroachments by miners and settlers, who pressured federal authorities to limit the reservation's extent despite Jeffords' efforts to shield the inhabitants. Cochise's personal health began deteriorating in 1873 with the onset of intense abdominal pains and appetite loss, symptoms consistent with as diagnosed retrospectively by contemporary observers. By early 1874, these progressed to severe immobility, confining him to his camp in the Stronghold area, where he relied on traditional healing amid the band's uneasy transition to reservation existence.

Death, Burial, and Succession

Cochise died on June 8, 1874, around 10:00 a.m., in his stronghold within the Dragoon Mountains of southeastern Arizona Territory, succumbing to what was likely stomach or abdominal cancer after a prolonged illness. Close relatives alone prepared his body per Chiricahua Apache tradition, which emphasized secrecy to avoid desecration by enemies, while others kept distance out of fear associated with death. His remains, accompanied by weapons, a horse, and a dog, were interred in an undisclosed rocky crevice; the precise burial location has never been revealed, thwarting legends and speculation. Tom Jeffords, the sole non-Apache witness and Cochise's longtime confidant, observed the rites, confirming the adherence to customary practices over romanticized accounts. Taza, Cochise's eldest son, assumed leadership of the Chiricahua band immediately following his father's death, maintaining the fragile peace established by the 1872 treaty. Taza's tenure proved short-lived; he contracted pneumonia and died on September 26, 1876, during a delegation to Washington, D.C., to protest U.S. intentions to abolish the Chiricahua Reservation. This succession vacuum facilitated federal enforcement of relocation to the San Carlos Reservation later in 1876, effectively ending the era of Chiricahua autonomy under Cochise's direct lineage and precipitating internal divisions that fueled renewed hostilities, notably under Geronimo's defiance. The transition underscored the causal fragility of treaty-based independence, as U.S. administrative pressures overrode Apache internal governance.

Family and Personal Traits

Kinship Network

Cochise adhered to Chiricahua Apache practices permitting multiple wives, which facilitated alliances among bands. His principal wife, Dos-teh-seh (meaning "something at the campfire already cooked"), was the daughter of Chihenne chief Mangas Coloradas; their marriage in the late 1830s united the Chokonen band under Cochise with Mangas Coloradas's group, enhancing military and resource-sharing ties across Apache territories. A second wife, from the Chokonen band and unnamed in primary accounts, bore him daughters in the early 1860s. Dos-teh-seh gave birth to Cochise's two sons: , circa 1842, and , circa 1856. Taza was positioned as heir, while Naiche later assumed leadership roles post-1874. The daughters from the second wife, Dash-den-zhoos and Naithlotonz, died young, their names subsequently avoided per Apache mourning customs. Cochise's brother Coyuntura acted as a key advisor until his capture and hanging by U.S. George Bascom's forces on February 19, 1861, during negotiations over a kidnapped boy; this execution, alongside two nephews, severed a vital link and prompted Cochise's retaliatory raids, solidifying band resolve. A younger brother, , provided counsel noted for its levity amid conflicts. Such marital and fraternal networks underpinned resistance, with inter-band ties via wives like Dos-teh-seh enabling coordinated actions against incursions. Adoption of captives into kin groups further blurred biological and social lines, incorporating outsiders to bolster numbers and loyalty, though specific instances tied to Cochise remain sparsely recorded.

Character and Interpersonal Integrity

Cochise earned a reputation among U.S. observers for unwavering , a trait that distinguished him from many leaders who frequently employed deception in dealings with settlers and military officials. , the superintendent of mails who forged a personal bond with Cochise and served as his interpreter, attested that Cochise "never lied," emphasizing a code where unanswerable questions prompted direct refusal rather than evasion. This reliability contrasted with broader practices, where warriors often prioritized survival through ambiguity in negotiations, as evidenced by repeated breaches by other bands. Jeffords' trust in Cochise's word was instrumental in facilitating initial contacts, underscoring how such enabled diplomatic breakthroughs amid pervasive mutual suspicion. General , during the 1872 council at Camp Grant on October 11-12, similarly perceived Cochise as truthful, noting his adherence to agreed terms without duplicity, which contrasted with experiences of by other indigenous groups. Contemporary accounts, including those from Lieutenant Joseph Sladen who accompanied , described Cochise as keeping his commitments "till the day of his death," as recalled by interpreter Fred Hughes, who observed Cochise's interactions post-treaty. This pattern of forthrightness, while ruthless in wartime adherence to vendettas, built that U.S. officials like Jeffords and cited as foundational to the four-year peace that followed the treaty. Cochise's blended with unyielding , eliciting profound from subordinates who viewed disobedience as unthinkable, akin to a defying the U.S. President. Observers like Hughes noted that Cochise's mere glance subdued dissent among the fractious , reflecting empirical command through demonstrated prowess rather than coercion alone. Captain Joseph praised him as "as fine an Indian as I ever laid my eyes on," highlighting a personal magnetism that unified warriors despite Apache norms favoring individual . This and command style, admired by honest interlocutors yet feared by adversaries for its resolve in raids, causally underpinned the viability of sustained peace, as fractured bands under less reliable chiefs dissolved into renewed conflict.

Legacy and Debates

Contributions to Apache Resistance

Cochise's leadership extended Apache resistance in the from the on February 1861 through guerrilla campaigns until the 1872 treaty, delaying systematic U.S. military control over lands for over a decade. His forces employed against supply lines and settlements, evading larger U.S. Army expeditions, such as the 1862 where warriors under Cochise and ambushed a column of approximately 3,000 volunteers but withdrew strategically after encountering fire. This prolonged conflict necessitated the stationing of U.S. troops at forts like Bowie, established in 1862 to protect key passes, thereby diverting military resources from post-Civil War Reconstruction efforts elsewhere. Tactically, Cochise unified disparate Apache bands, including Chokonen, Chihene, and elements of Western Apaches, into temporary coalitions that amplified raiding effectiveness and preserved short-term autonomy for cultural practices amid encroachment. His coordination fostered resilience, as bands shared intelligence and resources to counter U.S. campaigns, such as those following the 1863 killing of , which might otherwise have fragmented resistance. This unity enabled Apaches to adapt survival strategies, including retreats to strongholds in the , maintaining territorial influence until negotiations. The empirical pressure of sustained resistance compelled U.S. policy adaptations, culminating in the October 1872 agreement with General Oliver O. Howard, which established a localized Reservation on ancestral lands rather than distant consolidations. This recognized Cochise's demands for agency autonomy under , marking a tactical victory in averting immediate forced relocation and allowing provisional preservation of band structures. Such shifts reflected the causal impact of military evasion on federal strategy, prioritizing containment over eradication in the short term.

Criticisms and Alternative Viewpoints

Settlers in 19th-century and frequently characterized Cochise's raids not as legitimate resistance but as predatory banditry, involving theft of , destruction of property, and indiscriminate killings that terrorized communities and stalled . Contemporary accounts described groups under Cochise as "marauding thieves and murderers" who targeted ranches for horses, guns, and food, often without distinction between military and civilian targets, framing such actions as violations of emerging property rights rather than defensive warfare. This perspective posits that U.S. military responses, including campaigns post-1861, were causally justified by the cumulative economic devastation—thousands of lost—and direct threats to settlement, countering narratives that attribute conflict solely to provocations like the . Empirical records indicate the scale of harm from Cochise's forces exceeded provocation-only accounts, with an estimated 150 and soldiers killed between and 1863 alone, alongside widespread enslavement and of women and children from and American communities for labor or . Pre-Bascom raids, such as those in involving and a child's abduction, initiated cycles of retaliation, but practices extended to captive-taking for , including sales in regional markets, which inflicted hundreds of victims annually across broader conflicts in the 1850s. These actions, documented in dispatches and testimonies, underscore a pattern of opportunistic predation that fueled justified U.S. escalation, as raids persisted post-truces and targeted supply lines, causing disproportionate civilian suffering relative to territorial defense claims. Critiques of Cochise's leadership highlight opportunistic alliances, such as temporary pacts with against U.S. forces while raiding mutual Mexican adversaries, which prioritized short-term gains over strategic cohesion. Military analyses of the note his reliance on guerrilla tactics—hit-and-run ambushes without adaptation to sustained campaigns or beyond sporadic negotiations—prolonging intra-Apache hardships and failing to secure long-term territorial control amid growing U.S. numerical superiority by the . This inflexibility, per post-war assessments, contributed to the band's dispersal and reservation confinement, reflecting a tactical ceiling that romanticized "" resilience overlooked empirical limits of nomadic raiding against industrialized armies. Alternative viewpoints diverge sharply: right-leaning interpretations, drawing from and economic analyses, portray Cochise as an obstacle to civilization, whose raids systematically undermined property rights and , necessitating federal intervention to enable development. In contrast, left-leaning academic narratives often frame him as a victim of imperial expansion, emphasizing U.S. violations while downplaying agency in initiating violence; however, data on intra-tribal conflicts— including inter-band warfare and captive enslavement for labor or —reveal a pre-colonial culture of endemic raiding among groups, complicating pure victimhood by showing mutual predation that predated significant U.S. presence. Such internal dynamics, involving hundreds of traded or integrated annually, indicate that societies were not inherently pacific but engaged in and vendettas, challenging idealized tropes and supporting causal realism in attributing conflict to intersecting expansionist pressures rather than unilateral aggression.

Influence on U.S. Policy and Development

The prolonged under Cochise's leadership from 1861 to 1872 significantly hindered U.S. settlement and infrastructure development in the , rendering vast regions unsafe for miners, ranchers, and surveyors. Raids and guerrilla tactics disrupted economic activities, postponing major mining operations and railroad construction until the conflicts subsided; for instance, the discovery of silver at Tombstone in 1877 did not lead to a full boom until the , after resistance waned following Cochise's and subsequent military campaigns. The Southern Pacific Railroad's extension to Tucson occurred in March 1880, coinciding with reduced threats, which facilitated the transport of goods and settlers previously deterred by the insecurity. Cochise's 1872 agreement with General Oliver O. Howard marked a tactical pivot in U.S. Indian policy from aggressive extermination rhetoric—evident in earlier calls by territorial officials for eradication—to negotiated reservations on ancestral lands, reflecting President Ulysses S. Grant's broader "Peace Policy" emphasizing containment over annihilation. This Reservation, spanning southeastern , served as a short-term pragmatic model for , allowing Cochise to govern his people autonomously under U.S. oversight with as agent, though its dissolution by in 1876 under Grant demonstrated the policy's ultimate fragility and reversion to forced relocation. In the long term, the resolution of Cochise-led resistance contributed to Arizona's demographic and , clearing obstacles to statehood achieved on , 1912. U.S. data records Arizona's non-Indian population at 9,658 in , surging to 40,440 by 1880 and 194,207 by 1900, driven by mining output (e.g., production rising from negligible levels to national prominence post-1880) and agricultural settlement once incursions ceased. This stabilization enabled federal investment in roads, telegraphs, and land surveys, transforming the territory from a frontier liability into a viable state with diversified extractive industries.

Portrayals in Media: Fact vs. Romanticization

In mid-20th-century Western films, Cochise is frequently depicted as a stoic, honorable leader inclined toward , particularly through his with Tucson superintendent , as dramatized in Broken Arrow (1950), directed by and based on Elliott Arnold's 1947 novel Blood Brother. Jeff Chandler's portrayal earned an Academy Award nomination and was lauded for humanizing figures by emphasizing restraint and negotiation in forging the 1872 peace treaty, yet the film fictionalizes events, streamlining complex tribal dynamics—such as omitting Cochise's brothers—and prioritizing individual heroism over collective warfare strategies. This romanticization contrasts with historical evidence of Cochise's role as a chief who orchestrated brutal cross-border raids from the 1830s into the 1860s, targeting and American settlements in and with tactics including ambushes, livestock theft, and hostage-taking to sustain warrior bands and exact vengeance. Following the 1861 , where U.S. Army Lt. George Bascom seized hostages, Cochise retaliated by killing captives and escalating attacks that claimed civilian lives across southeastern , embodying an ethos of relentless guerrilla offense rather than the film's implied pacifism. warfare under leaders like Cochise incorporated and for psychological terror, as noted in U.S. reports and bounty records, practices rooted in pre-contact traditions amplified by 19th-century scarcity and cycles. Subsequent media, including , Son of Cochise (1954), perpetuates this selective focus on noble succession and treaty-making while sidelining the offensive raids that prolonged the until 1886, with Cochise's forces evading superior numbers through terrain mastery and hit-and-run operations. Arnold's novel, though drawing on some verifiable events like Jeffords' , embellishes for sympathetic appeal, portraying Apaches as morally superior amid incursions—a that influenced public perception but elides primary accounts of Apache-initiated hostilities, such as the 500-warrior assault at in 1862. Contemporary critiques and documentaries often amplify revisionist views attributing Apache solely to territorial defense, yet U.S. dispatches and journals proactive raiding economies under Cochise, involving hundreds of fatalities and captives, which media depictions dilute to align with anti-stereotype reforms of the onward. Such portrayals, while countering earlier savage stereotypes, impose a causal lens favoring Native restraint over the mutual escalation evident in frontier records, where Apache tactics like ritual sustained terror as a deliberate strategy.

References

  1. https://www.nps.gov/chir/learn/historyculture/apache-wars-cochise.htm
  2. https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/june-8/apache-chief-cochise-dies
  3. https://ehrafworldcultures.yale.edu/cultures/nt08/summary
  4. https://in.nau.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/128/2018/08/NMSU-07-ek.pdf
  5. https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/treaty-of-guadalupe-hidalgo
  6. https://history.state.gov/milestones/1830-1860/texas-annexation
  7. https://www.britannica.com/event/Gadsden-Purchase
  8. https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/goldrush-california/
  9. https://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/apa1852.asp
  10. https://camnnation.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/SCAT-35-J.Welch_.2017Treaty.SantaFe.BATES_.pdf
  11. https://www.historynet.com/chiricahua-chief-cochise/
  12. https://www.thoughtco.com/cochise-biography-4175357
  13. https://oxfordre.com/americanhistory/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780199329175.001.0001/acrefore-9780199329175-e-951
  14. https://www.legendsofamerica.com/na-cochise/
  15. https://www.dragoonarizona.com/chiricahua-apache/chiricahua-apache-history/cochise
  16. https://www.nps.gov/fobo/learn/historyculture/the-chiricahua-apache.htm
  17. https://nativepartnership.org/cochise-1812-1874/
  18. https://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/downloads/49/49_p0055_p0060.pdf
  19. https://www.nps.gov/fobo/learn/historyculture/bascom-affair.htm
  20. https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2991&context=nmhr
  21. https://www.executedtoday.com/2015/02/19/1861-the-bascom-affair-hangings-apache-war-triggers/
  22. https://spartacus-educational.com/WWcochise.htm
  23. https://www.truewestmagazine.com/article/and-the-war-begins/
  24. https://truewestmagazine.com/article/the-alleged-bascom-affair/
  25. https://lazykoranch.info/apaches-of-the-southwest-new-mexico-arizona/
  26. https://www.jstor.org/stable/30235442
  27. https://www.landofcochise.com/people3.html
  28. https://digitalcommons.dartmouth.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2087&context=appalachia
  29. https://www.jstor.org/stable/45404619
  30. https://worldhistoryedu.com/apache-wars-history-commanders-major-facts/
  31. https://npshistory.com/publications/fobo/nrr-2016-1361-nsv.pdf
  32. https://www.nps.gov/fobo/learn/historyculture/the-battle-of-apache-pass.htm
  33. https://battlefieldtravels.com/fort-bowie/
  34. https://www.nps.gov/articles/ftbowie.htm
  35. https://truewestmagazine.com/the-treacherous-murder-of-mangas-colorados/
  36. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA273161.pdf
  37. https://armyhistory.org/fort-bowie-arizona/
  38. https://www.historynet.com/traders-unlikely-bond-cochise-forged-peace/
  39. https://southernarizonaguide.com/tom-jeffords-chiricahua-apache-reservation/
  40. https://www.dragoonarizona.com/chiricahua-apache/chiricahua-apache-history/cochise/tom-jeffords
  41. https://southernarizonaguide.com/the-great-cochise-becomes-a-reservation-indian-to-save-his-people/
  42. https://treaties.okstate.edu/treaties/executive-order-chiricahua-reservation
  43. https://www.desertusa.com/desert-people/cochise-death.html
  44. https://ictnews.org/archive/native-history-apache-chief-and-crusader-for-peace-cochise-walks-on/
  45. https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/7373566/cochise
  46. https://www.roadsideamerica.com/story/83432
  47. http://cochiseresearch.blogspot.com/2011/07/cochises-familyinner-circle.html
  48. https://www.dragoonarizona.com/chiricahua-apache/chiricahua-apache-history/bascom-affair
  49. https://southernarizonaguide.com/in-their-own-words-cochise-the-people-who-knew-him/
  50. https://learningenglish.voanews.com/a/a-23-a-2004-03-20-2-1-83119077/122357.html
  51. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.12987/9780300189001-010/html
  52. https://www.desertusa.com/desert-people/chiricahua-apaches.html
  53. https://www.nlm.nih.gov/nativevoices/timeline/752.html
  54. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/biography/cochise
  55. https://southernarizonaguide.com/local-history/southeast-arizona-the-apache-wars/
  56. https://www.heritage-history.com/index.php?c=read&author=drake&book=indians&story=apaches
  57. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA436261.pdf
  58. https://historycollection.com/before-the-colonists-the-long-history-of-native-american-tribal-warfare/
  59. https://www.zocalopublicsquare.org/how-the-apaches-maintained-control-of-the-u-s-mexico-border-for-much-of-the-19th-century/
  60. https://statemuseum.arizona.edu/online-exhibit/culture-history-southern-arizona/american
  61. https://www.ancestry.com/historical-insights/migration-settlement/settlement/arizona-territory-population-boom
  62. https://depts.washington.edu/moving1/Arizona.shtml
  63. https://www.census.gov/library/publications/1872/dec/1870a.html
  64. https://filmyap.substack.com/p/broken-arrow-1950
  65. https://escholarship.org/content/qt9j89975j/qt9j89975j_noSplash_f7807c79df5a9ada0d88ae31e697d33f.pdf
  66. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/literature-and-writing/blood-brother-elliott-arnold
  67. https://www.oupress.com/9780806126067/cochise/
  68. https://english.elpais.com/culture/2023-06-05/the-long-and-fierce-struggle-of-the-apaches.html
  69. https://www2.arpel.org/index.jsp/s10255/242147/apache_warrior_vs_us__cavalryman-1846__86__combat.pdf
  70. https://www.sedona.net/apache-wars
  71. https://sk.sagepub.com/book/mono/interracial-communication/chpt/race-ethnicity-interracial-communication-the-mass
  72. https://www.arizonahighways.com/archive/issues/chapter/Doc.855.Chapter.4
  73. https://www.notesfromthefrontier.com/post/cochise-great-apache-warrior-and-chief
  74. https://explorethearchive.com/apache-wars
  75. https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1352&context=hist_etds
  76. http://www.nativeamerican.co.uk/brokenarrow.html
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.