Hubbry Logo
Bihari languagesBihari languagesMain
Open search
Bihari languages
Community hub
Bihari languages
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Bihari languages
Bihari languages
Bihari languages
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Bihari
Geographic
distribution		India and Nepal
EthnicityBiharis (demonym)
Linguistic classificationIndo-European
Subdivisions
Language codes
ISO 639-1bh (deprecated)[1]
ISO 639-2 / 5bih
Glottologbiha1245

Bihari languages are a group of the Indo-Aryan languages.[2][3] The Bihari languages are mainly spoken in the Indian states of Bihar, Jharkhand, Uttar Pradesh, and West Bengal, and also in Nepal.[4][5] The most widely spoken languages of the Bihari group are Angika, Bhojpuri, Magahi and Maithili.

Despite the large number of speakers of these languages, only Maithili has been constitutionally recognised in India. Which gained constitutional status via the 92nd amendment to the Constitution of India, of 2003 (gaining assent in 2004).[6] Maithili and Bhojpuri have constitutional recognition in Nepal.[7] Bhojpuri-Awadhi-Magahi mix is also official in Fiji as Fiji Hindi. There are demands for including Bhojpuri and Magahi/Khortha in the 8th schedule of Indian constitution.

In Bihar, Hindi is the language used for educational and official matters.[8] These languages were legally absorbed under the overarching label Hindi in the 1961 Census. Such state and national politics are creating conditions for language endangerments.[9] After independence, Hindi was given the sole official status through the Bihar Official Language Act of 1950.[10] Hindi was displaced as the sole official language of Bihar in 1981, when Urdu was accorded the status of the second official language.[11]

Speakers

[edit]
See also: Languages in Bihar, Maithili language, Bhojpuri language, Angika, Bajjika, Magahi, Magadhi Prakrit, and Hindi in Bihar

The number of speakers of Bihari languages is difficult to indicate because of unreliable sources. In the urban region most educated speakers of the language name Hindi as their language because this is what they use in formal contexts and believe it to be the appropriate response because of unawareness.[clarification needed] The educated and the urban population of the region return Hindi as the generic name for their language.[12]

British linguist Grierson also mentioned that Bajjika, Angika and Surjapuri are also spoken in particular districts of Bihar. These languages are mostly spoken in rural areas.[13]

Languages and dialects

[edit]
Language[14] ISO 639-3 Scripts No. of speakers[12] Geographical distribution
Angika anp Devanagari; previously Kaithi; Anga Lipi 743,600[15] Eastern Bihar, North-eastern Jharkhand and Eastern Madhesh of Nepal
Bajjika – Devanagari; previously Tirhuta; Kaithi 8,738,000[citation needed] North-Central Bihar and Eastern Madhesh of Nepal
Bhojpuri bho Devanagari; previously Kaithi 52,245,300[16] Recognized language in Nepal, Official language in Fiji (as the Fiji Hindi) and Jharkhand (additional)

In India : Western Bihar, Eastern Uttar Pradesh, Western Jharkhand, Northern Chhattisgarh, Northeastern Madhya Pradesh

Terai region of Central Nepal

Khortha _(sometimes counted under Magahi) Devanagari; previously Tirhuta 8,040,000[17] South Bihar, North-eastern and North central Jharkhand
Kudmali (Panchpargania) kyw, tdb Devanagari; sometimes Bengali, Kaithi 556,809[17] South-Eastern Jharkhand, Southern West Bengal,[18] northern Odisha, Assam
Magahi mag Devanagari; previously Tirhuta; Kaithi, Siddham script 14,035,600[19] South Bihar, North Jharkhand and Eastern Madhesh of Nepal
Maithili mai Devanagari; previously Tirhuta, Kaithi 33,890,000[19] Northern and eastern Bihar, Jharkhand[20] and Eastern Madhesh of Nepal
Nagpuri (Sadri) sck Devanagari; previously Kaithi 5,100,000[17] West-central Jharkhand, North-eastern Chhattisgarh, Northwestern Odisha
Tharu thl, tkt, thr, the, thq, tkb, soi Devanagari 1,900,000[17][21] Terai regions of Nepal and some parts of border side areas of Uttar Pradesh, Uttrakhand and Bihar
Danuwar dhw Devanagari 46,000 [17][21] Nepal
Bote-Darai bmj, dry Devanagari 30,000[17][21] Nepal
Kumhali kra Devanagari 12,000[17][21] Nepal
Majhi mjz Devanagari 24,000[17][21] Nepal

References and footnotes

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Bihari languages

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Bihari languages are a proposed of the Eastern Indo-Aryan branch of the Indo-European language family, spoken predominantly in the Indian state of and adjacent areas of , , , and . The term "Bihari" was introduced by British linguist George Abraham Grierson in his (1883–1927), grouping Western Bihari (exemplified by Bhojpuri), Central Bihari (Magahi), and Eastern Bihari (Maithili) based on shared phonological, morphological, and lexical features diverging from neighboring Western Indo-Aryan varieties like Hindi-Urdu. These languages exhibit distinct grammatical traits, such as multiple verbal agreement markers allowing co-indexing of subjects and objects, and a preference for postpositional structures over prepositions, setting them apart from Standard while retaining Indo-Aryan roots traceable to spoken in ancient . Bhojpuri, with approximately 52 million speakers worldwide, dominates western Bihar and eastern Uttar Pradesh; Maithili, recognized as one of India's 22 scheduled languages, has around 21–34 million speakers concentrated in northeastern Bihar and southeastern Nepal; and Magahi, prevalent in central Bihar's Gaya and Patna divisions, claims 13–20 million users. Other varieties like and are sometimes included, though debates persist over their precise affiliation due to dialect continua and limited . A key challenge in assessing Bihari languages' vitality is their underreporting in official censuses, where speakers—particularly in urban or educated contexts—often self-identify with for socioeconomic or administrative reasons, inflating 's dominance and marginalizing Bihari recognition despite their independent literary traditions, such as Maithili's and Bhojpuri's folk epics. This subsumption reflects broader Indian linguistic policy favoring as a link , yet Bihari varieties sustain robust oral cultures, migration-driven diaspora communities (e.g., in , , and the ), and emerging media like , underscoring their resilience amid pressures from standardization and English education. Scholarly classifications, drawing from Grierson's empirical surveys rather than politically motivated consolidations, affirm their status as distinct lects with evolutionary trajectories from substrates, resisting reduction to mere "dialects" of .

Demographic and Geographic Context

Number and Distribution of Speakers

The Bihari languages are spoken by an estimated 100–120 million people worldwide, though exact totals remain uncertain due to widespread self-reporting as in official censuses, which groups non-scheduled Bihari varieties under the broader category. This undercounting affects primarily Bhojpuri, Magahi, and smaller varieties like and , while scheduled languages such as Maithili have more reliable data. Bhojpuri, the most widely spoken Bihari language, has approximately 50.5 million speakers based on 2011 extrapolations from data, with concentrations in western , eastern , and northwestern . Maithili accounts for about 13.6 million speakers in per the 2011 , supplemented by roughly 3 million in Nepal's eastern region. Magahi speakers number around 12.1 million, mainly in central and southern including and Gaya districts. Smaller varieties contribute several million more, but lack comprehensive enumeration. Geographically, over 80% of speakers reside in , centered in —where Bihari languages serve as everyday vernaculars despite Hindi's official dominance—and adjacent areas of and (eastern ). In , Bhojpuri and Maithili prevail in the lowlands bordering , comprising about 15% of the national population. communities, stemming from 19th-century indentured labor and modern economic migration, number several million in , , , , , and Gulf states, where Bhojpuri maintains vitality through media and cultural preservation. Urban migration within has also spread speakers to cities like and , often leading to Hindi-Bihari bilingualism.

Regional Variations and Diaspora

The Bihari languages exhibit pronounced regional variations tied to Bihar's geographic divisions, as documented in early 20th-century linguistic surveys. Maithili predominates in the northeastern Mithila region, spanning districts such as Darbhanga, Madhubani, and Supaul, where it features subdialects influenced by local phonology and lexicon, including variants like Bajjika in the Vaishali area. Bhojpuri prevails in the western and northwestern zones, including Bhojpur, Saran, and Siwan districts, with dialects showing lexical borrowings from neighboring Awadhi and subdialects like Northern Standard Bhojpuri versus those in Gorakhpur-adjacent areas. Magahi occupies the central-southern belt around Gaya, Jehanabad, and Aurangabad, characterized by distinct verb conjugations and vocabulary reflecting Magadhan heritage, with variations between northern plains and southern plateau forms. These distributions reflect historical Prakrit substrates and limited mutual intelligibility, often requiring code-switching in inter-regional communication within Bihar. Diaspora communities preserve Bihari languages, particularly Bhojpuri, due to 19th- and early 20th-century indentured labor migrations from Bihar and eastern to British colonies. In , descendants of these migrants speak Mauritian Bhojpuri, with the 2011 Population and Housing recording it as the home language for 5.8% of the , or roughly 73,000 speakers, though heritage use extends beyond self-reported figures. Similar creolized or retained forms exist in , where Indo-Fijian communities (comprising 37% of the 2017 of 883,000) maintain Bhojpuri elements within ; , with an estimated 240,000 speakers of Bhojpuri-derived varieties per linguistic surveys; and , , and , where over 500,000 descendants collectively use it in cultural and religious contexts. Maithili has a more limited overseas , primarily among recent migrants in the UK and , but maintains vitality in Nepal's , with 3.18 million speakers (11.67% of the ) per the 2021 , often classified as an extension rather than strict . Magahi's is minimal, confined to small migrant pockets in Gulf states and urban , without large historical overseas settlements. These communities face toward host languages like English or Creole, yet sustain Bihari varieties through media, music, and festivals.

Historical Origins

Roots in Magadhi Prakrit and Apabhramsa

The Bihari languages, comprising Maithili, Bhojpuri, Magahi, and related varieties, descend from , an Eastern dialect of the Middle Indo-Aryan Prakrits spoken in the ancient region of southern Bihar from roughly the 3rd century BCE onward. This Prakrit served as the vernacular in the kingdom of , where Gautama Buddha is recorded to have preached, prioritizing it as an accessible medium over for disseminating teachings around the 5th century BCE. Linguistic surveys identify as the progenitor not only of Bihari languages but also of neighboring Eastern Indo-Aryan tongues like Bengali, Odia, and Assamese, evidenced by shared phonological shifts such as the simplification of intervocalic stops and retention of certain absent in Western Prakrits. By the 6th to 13th centuries CE, had transitioned into Apabhramsa, the final stage of Middle Indo-Aryan characterized by further phonetic erosion, loss of case endings, and emergence of periphrastic verb forms that prefigure modern Indo-Aryan syntax. , specifically its eastern variants (sometimes termed Purvi Apabhramsa), directly spawned the languages through regional differentiation, with texts like Jain and Buddhist inscriptions from providing transitional evidence of vocabulary and grammar bridging and nascent New Indo-Aryan forms. This evolution is marked by innovations such as the merger of aspirated and unaspirated stops in certain positions and the development of postpositional structures, distinguishing Bihari from Central Indo-Aryan lineages like . Particular Bihari varieties crystallized from Magadhi Apabhramsa around the 8th–12th centuries CE: Maithili emerged in the Mithila region by the 8th–9th century, retaining Apabhramsa-era literary registers seen in early manuscripts; Bhojpuri and Magahi followed in western and southern Bihar, respectively, with Magahi preserving closer ties to core Magadhi phonology, including implosive consonants derived from Prakrit murmured stops. Scholarly classifications, such as those in Grierson's Linguistic Survey of India, substantiate this lineage through comparative morphology, noting uniform Eastern features like the pleonastic genitive and analytic tenses across Bihari dialects, absent in Sauraseni-derived languages.

Medieval and Early Modern Development

The Bihari languages, descending from Magadhi Apabhramsa, began crystallizing as distinct during the medieval period (circa 8th–15th centuries), marking a transition from transitional Apabhramsa dialects to early New Indo-Aryan forms used in oral and literary contexts across eastern . This evolution occurred amid the decline of Prakrit-based courtly languages and the rise of regional kingdoms like the Karnatas and Oinwaras in Mithila, fostering expression in , , and devotional works. Proto-forms of Maithili, Bhojpuri, and Magahi emerged between the 8th and 11th centuries, with phonological shifts such as vowel and weakening distinguishing them from western Indo-Aryan varieties. Maithili exhibited the most robust literary development, transitioning to Early Maithili (12th–16th centuries) with prose and verse landmarks under royal patronage. Jyotirishwar Thakur's Varnanaratnakara (14th century) represents the earliest known Maithili prose work, a descriptive text blending rhythmic prose with dramatic elements influenced by Sanskrit models. Vidyapati (c. 1350–1448), a polymath-poet at the Oinwara court, elevated Maithili through his Padavali collection of over 195 love songs (kirtilata) on Krishna-Radha themes, blending eroticism, , and folk idioms; his works, also in Sanskrit and Apabhramsa, spread influence to and via Chaitanya's movement. Subsequent medieval authors like Umapati Upadhyaya (Parijataharananataka, 14th century) and Govindadas (17th century) extended this tradition in lyrical dramas (kirtaniya) and songs, solidifying Maithili's classical status by 1500. In contrast, Magahi and Bhojpuri lagged in written literature during this era, relying on oral traditions of songs, ballads, and bardic recitations amid sparse documentation. Magahi featured in Buddhist poetry (8th–12th centuries), with Caryapadas exhibiting proto-Magahi elements in mystical verses by tantric poets, considered a golden age for its esoteric before reverting to spoken use. Bhojpuri's initial phase (700–1100) involved dialectal consolidation from , followed by saintly compositions (1400–1700) in devotional bhajans, though surviving texts remain fragmentary and tied to folk genres rather than courtly patronage. Early modern developments (16th–18th centuries) saw gradual vernacular standardization under Mughal oversight, with Maithili advancing into Middle Maithili via epic translations (Mahakavyas) and grammars like Lochan's Rāgə-tərəṅginī (17th century), which termed it Mithilapabhramsa. Bhojpuri and Magahi gained traction in regional and Vaishnava hymns, influenced by Persian-Urdu contact but retaining core Indo-Aryan structures; however, written output remained limited until 19th-century colonial documentation, preserving oral repertoires over literary codification. This period laid groundwork for 19th-century revival, amid political fragmentation post-Oinwara rule.

Linguistic Classification

Position within Indo-Aryan Family

The Bihari languages, including Maithili, Bhojpuri, Magahi, , and , are classified as a subgroup within the Eastern Indo-Aryan branch of the , which belong to the Indo-European family. This positioning reflects their derivation from Middle Indo-Aryan Prakrits, particularly , and distinguishes them from Central and Western Indo-Aryan groups through shared eastern innovations in , , and morphology. Early systematic classification by George Grierson in 1903 grouped Maithili, Magahi, and Bhojpuri as core Eastern Indo-Aryan varieties spoken across and adjacent regions. In lexicostatistical analyses using Swadesh lists, Bihari languages like Maithili exhibit close lexical affinities with other Eastern Indo-Aryan tongues such as Bengali, Assamese, and Odia—for instance, cognates for "" (Maithili gāch, Bengali gach, Odia gaccha) and "" aligning with eastern patterns. These ties position Bihari as part of a continental New Indo-Aryan continuum, though not always forming a tight with Bengali-Odia due to intermediate dialectal gradients. Bihari varieties are sometimes termed Magadhan languages, emphasizing their historical core in the ancient region. Classification debates persist, with some scholars aligning Bihari more closely to like based on vocabulary and (e.g., alignment with Eastern dialects), or proposing an independent branch due to unique features like dual gender-classifier systems in Magahi. Others note their role in the broader while underscoring eastern connections to Assamese, Bengali, and Oriya. Despite such variance, the Eastern Indo-Aryan designation remains predominant in genealogical trees, supported by shared retentions from stages and regional continuity.

Distinction from Hindi and Eastern Neighbors

Bihari languages form a distinct within the Eastern Indo-Aryan branch of the Indo-Aryan family, originating from , in contrast to , which derives from Śaurasenī Prakrit and belongs to the Central or Midland . This separation was formalized by George Abraham Grierson in the (completed between 1894 and 1928), where he classified Bihari varieties—such as Maithili, Magahi, and Bhojpuri—as a cohesive group bounded to the west by languages like Awadhi and Bagheli, emphasizing their independent phonological and morphological evolution rather than subsuming them under . Despite this linguistic demarcation, Indian census classifications from 1971 onward have often aggregated Bihari speakers (except Maithili) under "" for administrative purposes, reflecting political standardization rather than philological criteria, with over 120 million speakers affected by this shift. Key phonological distinctions include Bihari's prominent use of the retroflex flap /ɽ/ (ḍa) in intervocalic positions, as in Magahi baɽ ("much") versus Hindi bahut, and a tendency toward vowel centralization absent in Hindi's more peripheral vowel system. Grammatically, Bihari languages feature analytic tendencies with postpositional markers and verb forms retaining Eastern innovations, such as the future suffix -b-/-eb* (e.g., Bhojpuri jaeb "will go"), differing from Hindi's periphrastic future in -egā (e.g., jāegā). Lexically, Bihari draw heavily from Magadhi substrates with fewer Persian-Arabic loans than Hindi, resulting in low mutual intelligibility—estimated below 50% between standard Hindi and Bhojpuri. These traits underscore Bihari's non-dialectal status relative to Hindi, as mutual unintelligibility exceeds thresholds for dialect continua (typically >80% lexical similarity). Relative to eastern neighbors like Bengali and Odia, both also Eastern Indo-Aryan but forming separate subgroups, Bihari languages share broad areal features such as conjunctive verb chaining but lack exclusive major innovations with either. For instance, while Bengali and Odia exhibit parallel developments in prosody (e.g., remnants) and morphology (e.g., similar systems), Bihari diverge through unique retroflexion patterns and case not mirrored in Odia's conservative nominal declensions or Bengali's extensive cliticization. Maithili aligns more closely with Bengali in pronominal forms and lexicon (e.g., shared ā̃ for first-person plural), but Magahi and Bhojpuri show greater divergence from Odia via simplified consonant clusters and Dravidian-influenced syntax, yielding asymmetric —higher between Maithili-Bengali (~60%) than Bhojpuri-Odia (~30%). This positions Bihari as a transitional yet autonomous cluster, with no shared phonological shifts unique to Bihari-Bengali or Bihari-Odia pairs beyond pan-Eastern traits.

Major Varieties

Maithili

Maithili is an Eastern Indo-Aryan language of the Bihari group, primarily spoken in the Mithila region spanning northern Bihar and adjacent areas of Jharkhand in India, as well as the eastern Terai region of Nepal. The 2011 Census of India recorded 13,583,464 native speakers in India, concentrated in districts such as Darbhanga, Madhubani, Supaul, Saharsa, and Samastipur, with smaller populations in West Bengal and Jharkhand. In Nepal, the 2011 census reported 3,092,530 speakers, mainly in provinces like Koshi and Madhesh, making Maithili the second-most spoken language after Nepali. Total speakers across both countries exceed 16 million, though diaspora communities in cities like Kolkata and Mumbai add to usage without precise enumeration. Linguistically, Maithili distinguishes itself from neighboring Bhojpuri and Magahi through retained archaic features from , including a richer system of case endings in nominal and a complex verbal morphology with distinct tenses for aspectual nuances, such as the use of auxiliary verbs like ləg for inchoative meanings. Phonologically, it features ten vowels with length contrast (e.g., /i/ vs. /i:/) and aspirated stops as phonemic, alongside retroflex and dental contrasts absent or less pronounced in western Bhojpuri dialects; for instance, Maithili preserves intervocalic /r/ and /l/ distinctions more faithfully than Magahi's mergers. with Bhojpuri decreases westward, with Maithili speakers often requiring adaptation for communication in core Bhojpuri areas, due to lexical divergences—Maithili draws more heavily from (about 40-50% core vocabulary) compared to Bhojpuri's Persian-Arabic influences from Mughal-era contact. Grammatically, Maithili employs postpositions and a subject-object-verb order, with gender agreement in adjectives and numerals, setting it apart from the more analytic tendencies in Magahi. Historically, Maithili emerged as a distinct literary medium by the , with poets like composing in a standardized form that influenced Bengali and Oriya traditions, predating widespread vernacular use in those languages./4_Deepesh%20Kumar%20Thakur.pdf) British linguist George Grierson first classified it separately from dialects in 1881, leading to its recognition as an independent language rather than a dialect. Included in India's Eighth Schedule in 2003, Maithili uses script officially, though the indigenous Mithilakshar (Tirhuta) persists in cultural contexts and was added to in 2007 for preservation. Standardization efforts, driven by institutions like the Maithili Akademi since the 1960s, focus on unifying dialects—such as Eastern (Thethi) and Western (Soutari)—but face challenges from dominance in education and media, limiting full resolution.

Bhojpuri

Bhojpuri is an Eastern Indo-Aryan language spoken primarily in the northern and eastern regions of , including western , eastern , and northwestern , as well as the belt of . It serves as the mother tongue for communities in districts such as Bhojpur, Saran, and , with significant populations in , , , , and due to 19th-century indentured labor migrations. The records approximately 50.6 million speakers within the country, representing about 4.2% of the , while global estimates, including and , exceed 52 million. Linguistically, Bhojpuri descends from , an ancient vernacular of the region dating to the 7th-12th centuries CE, evolving through Apabhramsa stages into its modern form by the medieval period. It forms part of the Bihari subgroup within , sharing phonological and grammatical traits with neighbors like Maithili and Magahi but maintaining mutual unintelligibility with standard , despite occasional administrative classification under the Hindi umbrella for census purposes. Key phonological features include six oral vowels (with tense-lax distinctions), aspirated sonorants such as /ṇʰ/ and /mʰ/ in contrastive pairs, and a inventory of around 34 phonemes, including retroflex and aspirated stops. Grammatically, it employs subject-object-verb , postpositions, and a rich system of honorifics via forms and terms, with ergative alignment in tenses for transitive verbs. Bhojpuri exhibits four principal dialect clusters—Northern (around ), Southern Standard (Bhojpur-Saran areas), Western Standard (eastern ), and Nagpuria ()—which are mutually intelligible but vary in and , such as vowel shifts and integration from Persian or Awadhi. Historically written in the script until the late , it transitioned to following British colonial standardization around 1894, though persists in some folk manuscripts. Literature includes early folk collections like the 1728 Baarah Maasi song anthology in , evolving into modern prose, poetry, and theater by figures such as in the , often reflecting rural life and social critique. Despite its vitality, Bhojpuri lacks full official recognition in beyond the Eighth Schedule, contributing to with in education and media.

Magahi

Magahi, also known as Magadhi, is an Eastern Indo-Aryan language belonging to the Bihari subgroup, spoken primarily in the Magadh region encompassing southern and northern in , with smaller communities in , , and the region of . It serves as the vernacular for daily communication among its speakers, who number approximately 12.1 million according to the , though underreporting occurs due to official classification as a dialect. The language's core distribution includes districts such as , Gaya, Nalanda, , , and , extending into areas like and . Magahi exhibits distinct dialectal variations, broadly categorized as Standard Magahi (central to the Patna-Gaya belt), Eastern Magahi, Western Magahi, and Mixed Magahi, with sub-dialects including Khortha (prevalent in ) and others like Kurmali and Khontai identified in early surveys. These varieties reflect geographic and social influences, with Khortha showing substrate effects from local in . Despite mutual intelligibility challenges between peripheral dialects and the standard form, speakers maintain cultural cohesion through shared , folk songs like (birth songs), and oral traditions rooted in the historical empire. Linguistically, Magahi features postpositional constructions rather than prepositions, agglutinative suffixation on nouns for case marking (e.g., genitive -ke or -ra), and conjugation patterns that encode tense, aspect, and levels. Its pronominal system includes distinctions, such as three forms for second-person singular (tu for intimate, eh for honorific, and apne for high honorific), reflecting social hierarchy in address. Phonologically, it preserves Eastern Indo-Aryan traits like the merger of ṛ into a or i, aspirated stops, and a system with short/long distinctions, though specific prosodic patterns include stress-timed and moraic structure in syllables. Lexically, core vocabulary derives from , with loans from Persian (administrative terms) and English (modern domains), while nominal classifiers and definite markers like -waa (indicating familiarity) add nuance to reference. Historically written in script until the mid-20th century, Magahi now predominantly uses , adapted with conventions like for word-final schwa, though standardization remains limited due to with in and media. Efforts for recognition include inclusion in the Eighth Schedule of the Indian Constitution as part of Hindi dialects, but advocates argue for separate status to preserve its vitality amid urbanization and migration pressures. classifies it as endangered institutionally, despite robust L1 transmission in rural heartlands.

Minor Varieties like Angika and Bajjika

, spoken primarily in the region encompassing districts such as , , Banka, and parts of , , , , , and in , as well as Santhal in and limited areas in eastern , numbers approximately 745,600 speakers as of recent estimates. Classified within the Eastern Indo-Aryan branch of the Indo-Aryan family as a Bihari language, Angika exhibits phonological and lexical traits aligning it closely with Maithili, including verb forms reminiscent of those in Maithili and Bengali, though it maintains distinct regional innovations that have led some linguists to advocate for its recognition as a separate rather than a dialect. Historically surveyed by George Grierson as a Maithili dialect, Angika's independent status is supported by its geographic isolation and cultural assertions, particularly amid efforts to preserve it against dominance by and neighboring varieties like Magahi to the west. Bajjika, also known as Vajjika, occupies the Bajjikanchal area in northern , including districts like Sheohar, , , , and Vaishali, with over 200,000 speakers extending into and an estimated 20 million in based on 2001 census extrapolations. As another Eastern Indo-Aryan Bihari variety, shares lexicogrammatical features with Maithili, such as case marking and syntax, but diverges phonologically in consonant realizations, positioning it as a western offshoot of Maithili with transitional elements toward Bhojpuri influences in border zones. Like , early classifications by Grierson subsumed under Maithili, yet contemporary analyses highlight its challenges and sociolinguistic vitality, with over 11.4 million adult speakers in underscoring its scale despite lacking Eighth Schedule recognition under India's . These minor varieties, while less documented than Maithili, Bhojpuri, or Magahi, contribute to the Bihari continuum through shared innovations from Magadhi Prakrit roots, including retroflex sounds and postpositional structures atypical of western Indo-Aryan tongues, yet they face endangerment risks from Hindi standardization and migration-driven code-switching. Efforts to script Bajjika in Devanagari or Kaithi and Angika in similar systems reflect ongoing pushes for literary autonomy, though empirical data on dialectal variation remains sparse compared to major Bihari languages. Their classification debates stem from mutual intelligibility gradients—higher with Maithili than with Magahi or Bhojpuri—emphasizing geographic and caste-based divergence over rigid linguistic boundaries.

Core Linguistic Features

Phonological Characteristics

Bihari languages possess consonant inventories characteristic of , with stops exhibiting four-way contrasts—voiceless unaspirated, voiceless aspirated, voiced unaspirated, and voiced breathy (murmured)—at bilabial, dental, retroflex, palatal, and velar places of articulation, alongside glottal elements in some varieties. Fricatives are typically limited to /s/ and /h/, with affricates patterning like stops; nasals, laterals, and trills/flaps show two- or four-way contrasts involving aspiration. This yields 28–32 across major varieties, including retroflex series that distinguish them from neighboring Western . Vowel systems vary but commonly feature 6–10 monophthongs distinguished by height, backness, rounding, length, and nasality, with nasalization phonemic and applicable to all oral vowels. In Maithili, the inventory includes short /ɪ ʊ ə/ and long /i e æ a o ɔ u/, plus two rising diphthongs /əi əu/. Bhojpuri maintains six vowels contrasted by five tongue heights and lip positions, with nasal counterparts. Magahi aligns closely with 10 vowels, all nasalizable. Length contrasts are phonemic, as in pərə ('fills') versus pɑrɑ ('fills repeatedly'), and gemination occurs intervocalically after short vowels for emphasis or morphological purposes. Suprasegmental features include syllable structure with an obligatory vocalic nucleus, optionally flanked by (CVC maximal), and words averaging 2–3 syllables. Morphophonological processes such as assimilation (e.g., stop + nasal yielding geminate nasal), across boundaries, and occasional or metathesis facilitate , particularly in compounds. Bihari varieties often devoice word-final and substitute alveolar /s/ for palato-alveolar /ʃ/ in loanwords, reflecting substrate influences and divergence from Standard . These traits underscore causal adaptations for regional , preserving Eastern Indo-Aryan distinctions like robust aspiration while adapting to local articulatory norms.

Grammatical Structures and Syntax

Bihari languages, as Eastern Indo-Aryan tongues, adhere to a canonical subject-object-verb (SOV) , with postpositions marking rather than prepositions. This structure aligns with broader Indo-Aryan patterns but permits flexibility for or emphasis, as subjects or objects may front for pragmatic effect while maintaining verb-final position. Unlike Hindi, which retains split ergativity with oblique marking on transitive subjects in perfective tenses, Bihari varieties such as Maithili, Bhojpuri, and Magahi have lost ergative case alignment, employing nominative subjects across tenses and relying on postpositional phrases for agentivity. Nouns typically lack distinct oblique forms, expressing case via postpositions attached to a genitive or locative base; pronouns, however, inflect for oblique case to indicate objects or possession. This results in a predominantly head-final syntax, where modifiers precede heads in noun phrases (e.g., adjectives before nouns, possessors before possessed). Verb morphology is agglutinative and synthetic, with finite verbs conjugating for tense-aspect-mood (TAM), gender, number, and person, often agreeing with the subject in non-past tenses but showing variability in perfective forms influenced by discourse prominence or object features. In Bajjika, a minor Bihari variety, verb agreement follows pragmatic principles prioritizing topical elements over syntactic subjects, such as defaulting to masculine singular when the logical subject is indefinite or backgrounded. Subordination employs non-finite verb forms like infinitives or participles, with relative clauses typically preceding their heads via correlative constructions (e.g., jo...vo in Maithili equivalents). These features underscore a shift toward analytic tendencies in Eastern Indo-Aryan, reducing inflectional complexity relative to Old Indo-Aryan while preserving rich TAM distinctions through auxiliaries and participles.

Lexicon and External Influences

Vocabulary Composition

The vocabulary of Bihari languages, including Maithili, Bhojpuri, and Magahi, primarily comprises words—evolved forms derived from via and Apabhramsa stages, reflecting their descent from spoken in ancient . These form the core stock for everyday concepts, kinship terms, and basic actions, with phonetic shifts such as the loss of intervocalic consonants and vowel simplifications characteristic of Eastern Indo-Aryan evolution. Maithili exhibits a higher proportion of tatsama words—unmodified borrowings directly from —compared to Bhojpuri and Magahi, particularly in literary, religious, and formal registers, where Sanskrit lexemes remain phonetically intact and resist sound changes affecting tadbhavas. Grierson's comparative analysis identifies numerous such tatsama integrations in Maithili paradigms, enhancing its affinity while tadbhavas dominate vernacular speech across the group. In contrast, Bhojpuri and Magahi favor tadbhavas for broader accessibility, with tatsamas appearing more sporadically in elevated contexts. Loanwords from Persian and , introduced during medieval Muslim administrations in (e.g., under the from the 13th century and Mughals from the 16th), constitute a notable layer, especially in administrative, legal, and abstract domains such as (kagaz for /) and . These borrowings, often adapted via Hindustani intermediaries, permeate all major varieties, though less densely than in Western . Recent English influences, accelerating post-1947 , appear in technology, education, and urban slang (e.g., computer, mobile), reflecting modernization in Bihar's lexicon. elements—non-Sanskritic words of potential pre-Indo-Aryan substrate origin, possibly from Austroasiatic sources—persist in rustic or agricultural terms, though their extent remains under-documented in comparative studies.

Borrowings and Contact Effects

The lexicon of Bihari languages reflects extensive contact with neighboring linguistic traditions, primarily through lexical borrowings from and as foundational sources, alongside Perso- influences from medieval Islamic administrations. In Maithili, for example, loanwords from , Persian, and Turkish appear in domains such as , daily objects, and abstract concepts, often shared with adjacent Indo-Aryan varieties like Bengali due to regional and overlaps. Similarly, Bhojpuri incorporates Persian-derived terms, particularly in historical and administrative vocabulary, though literary efforts from the onward sought to purge these in favor of -derived alternatives to align with emerging nationalist linguistic purification movements. These Perso- elements, numbering in the hundreds across semantic fields like law (qanoon variants) and , entered via Urdu-mediated contact during the Mughal era (1526–1857), when served as a key provincial hub. Substrate effects from pre-Indo-Aryan Austroasiatic languages, especially Munda varieties spoken by indigenous groups in Bihar and adjacent Jharkhand, manifest in both lexical items and grammatical convergences. Munda loans contribute to rural and tribal-specific vocabulary in Magahi and Bhojpuri, such as terms for flora, fauna, and kinship extensions, reflecting millennia of bilingualism in mixed communities. This contact has induced areal features like enhanced verb serialization and classifier-like structures in eastern Bihari varieties, diverging from western Indo-Aryan patterns and evidencing causal substrate pressure rather than mere superstrate dominance. Quantitative studies estimate Austroasiatic substrate contributions at 5–10% of basic lexicon in these languages, concentrated in core vocabulary absent in Sanskrit. Contemporary contact with English, accelerated post-1947 through and , introduces neologisms in (computer, mobile) and across Maithili, Bhojpuri, and Magahi, often code-switched in urban dialects. These borrowings, while superficially integrated, show phonological adaptation to Bihari , such as vowel epenthesis, and remain more prevalent in formal registers than in . Historical purging trends persist in some revitalization efforts, prioritizing indigenous or Sanskritic forms over foreign accretions.

Scripts, Writing, and Standardization

Traditional and Modern Scripts

The traditional script for most Bihari languages, including Bhojpuri and Magahi, was Kaithi, an abugida derived from the Brahmi script and widely employed in northern India from the medieval period through the 19th century for administrative, legal, and personal documentation such as land records, diaries, letters, and folk literature. Kaithi facilitated writing in these languages due to its simplicity and adaptability to Indo-Aryan phonology, serving as the primary medium in Bihar's Kayastha communities and courts until the British colonial emphasis on standardized scripts diminished its use around the late 19th century. For Maithili, a Bihari language with distinct literary traditions, the historical Mithilakshar (also known as Tirhuta) was predominant from at least the 14th century, alongside secondary use of Kaithi for practical records, reflecting regional scholarly practices in the Mithila region. In the modern era, has become the standard script across all Bihari languages, driven by post-independence linguistic policies in favoring its uniformity for and related vernaculars in education, printing, and official communication since the mid-20th century. This shift marginalized and Tirhuta, though isolated pockets of persist in folk manuscripts and cultural revivals, with Tirhuta occasionally employed in Maithili cultural contexts in and . Digital encoding efforts, including 's inclusion in (added in version 6.1 in following proposals documenting its historical role), have enabled limited contemporary experimentation, but remains dominant due to widespread font availability and institutional support.

Standardization Challenges and Efforts

The standardization of Bihari languages faces primary obstacles from profound dialectal heterogeneity and the pervasive influence of in formal domains, which often subsumes these languages as mere variants without distinct codification. Bhojpuri, Magahi, and Maithili exhibit significant phonological, lexical, and grammatical divergences across subregions—for example, Bhojpuri speakers in and districts display variations in vowel quality and consonant clusters that hinder consensus on normative forms. Magahi's dialects, including standard, eastern, and mixed varieties, further complicate unification due to inconsistent script usage, with dominating modern writing despite historical reliance on , and occasional Bengali or Odia scripts in eastern areas creating a multiscriptal environment. Maithili, though more codified than its peers, grapples with the erosion of its indigenous Tirhuta script in favor of , particularly in , exacerbating identity dilution amid Hindi's administrative hegemony. Resource scarcity compounds these issues, as Bhojpuri and Magahi lack comprehensive standardized grammars, dictionaries, or corpora suitable for computational , rendering them "less-resourced" despite millions of speakers; Maithili fares slightly better but still suffers from incomplete dialectal integration into its standard form centered on varieties. Efforts to address this include academic initiatives developing linguistic baselines and corpora for applications in these languages, aiming to quantify similarities and enable tool-building. Revitalization movements have emerged, particularly for , with advocacy for its inclusion in India's Eighth Schedule of scheduled languages to foster institutional standardization through formal education and media; organizations like the International Institute for Bhojpuri Language Development (IIBLD) work toward this by promoting , , and digital resources to elevate it beyond dialectal status. For Maithili, preservation campaigns focus on digitizing and Unicode-encoding the since the early 2000s to sustain its cultural specificity against assimilation. Magahi efforts remain nascent, centered on documenting dialects and advocating script revival, though broader sociolinguistic studies highlight resistance to over-standardization that might erode regional vitality. These initiatives, while promising, contend with debates over balancing purity against Hindi-influenced hybridization, as evidenced in Bhojpuri literary circles emphasizing existing traditions without rigid imposition.

Literary and Cultural Role

Historical Literature

The historical literature of Bihari languages centers primarily on Maithili, which developed a sophisticated poetic tradition by the medieval period, while Magahi and Bhojpuri relied more on oral forms until recent centuries. Maithili works from this era often blended devotional themes with secular , reflecting the cultural milieu of Mithila. Vidyapati Thakur (c. 1352–1448), a Maithili from Bisapi village in modern , stands as the most influential figure, authoring over 1,000 poems in Maithili alongside treatises on ethics, politics, and . His padavali collection features lyrical expressions of shringara rasa (erotic sentiment) as a for divine love between and Krishna, earning him the title "Maithil Kavi Kokil" (cuckoo of Maithili poetry). These compositions, composed under the patronage of Mithila kings like Shiv Singh, circulated widely in manuscript form and later inspired movements, with echoes in the works of 16th-century saint Chaitanya and 19th-20th-century Bengali poets. Earlier Maithili texts, such as the 14th-century drama Prijataharana by Umapati, depict Krishna's pastimes with gopis, marking one of the language's initial literary forays into narrative verse. Magahi's historical output remains sparse in written records, dominated by itinerant bards reciting folk epics, ballads, and devotional songs rather than codified texts; surviving examples include 18 Ramayanas and translations of religious works like two Qurans and three Bibles, alongside scattered verses in Siddha-Natha traditions from the medieval period. These oral-derived forms trace to Magadha's roots but evaded widespread scripting until the 19th century. Bhojpuri literature historically manifested through unscripted folklore, including lorikis (narrative songs) and kahaniyan (tales) on rural life and heroism, with written composition only commencing around amid colonial printing presses; pre-20th-century influences appear in regional variants of epics like the . This oral emphasis underscores the languages' communal transmission before standardization efforts.

Contemporary Usage in Media and Folklore

Bhojpuri, the most widely spoken Bihari language, dominates contemporary media through its dedicated film industry, which produces 60-70 films annually as of 2024, primarily featuring songs, dialogues, and narratives in the language to engage audiences in , eastern , and . These productions often incorporate folk elements like and chaita songs, blending traditional with modern , though challenges persist in theatrical distribution and calls for higher-quality akin to established Indian directors. Multiplex expansion in the region is viewed as key to future growth, potentially elevating Bhojpuri media beyond rural theaters. Maithili appears in state-sponsored media in Nepal, where the Rashtriya Samachar Samiti launched news bulletins in the language on October 21, 2024, alongside Awadhi, Bhojpuri, and Tharu, while the newspaper added Maithili editions to broaden access. In , digital platforms sustain Maithili usage, with content creation aiding preservation among youth as of 2025, often merging motifs like jhyaure songs into videos and podcasts. Magahi, while less prominent in formal media, features in regional audio content and channels disseminating folk performances. Folklore traditions endure orally across Bihari languages, with Magahi folk songs—such as netua dayal and those tied to rites of passage—continuing to encode myths, ethical norms, and agrarian life during festivals and ceremonies. In Maithili and Magahi, recent scholarly documentation revives women's songs like (birth laments) and jat-jatin ( dances), countering dominance and fostering community events. Bhojpuri similarly persists in and songs, integrated into media for cultural continuity. These practices resist , though pressures necessitate active revitalization.

Sociopolitical Status and Debates

Official Recognition in India and Nepal

In , Maithili is the sole Bihari language granted recognition under the Eighth Schedule to the Constitution, incorporated via the 92nd Constitutional Amendment Act effective April 15, 2003, which enables its development, promotion in education, and limited administrative use without conferring full official status at the union level. Bhojpuri, Magahi, and other Bihari varieties such as lack inclusion in the Eighth Schedule, remaining ineligible for central government support programs reserved for scheduled languages, despite demands for their addition based on speaker populations exceeding 100 million combined per the 2011 Census. At the state level in , where Bihari languages predominate, holds primary official status under the Official Language Act of 1950, with added as a second official language in 1981 to accommodate Muslim communities; neither Maithili nor other Bihari languages receive co-official designation, though Maithili benefits from its national scheduled status for cultural and educational initiatives in northern districts like and Madhubani. In , the 2015 Constitution establishes Nepali (in script) as the federal while classifying all mother tongues—including Maithili and Bhojpuri—as national languages entitled to preservation and promotion, without granting them federal administrative authority. Maithili, spoken by approximately 11.7% of 's population per the 2021 census, ranks as the second-most prevalent native language after Nepali and receives provincial-level acknowledgment in Koshi and s, where it supports local and under constitutional provisions allowing subnational linguistic policies. Bhojpuri, mother tongue to about 6% of Nepalis concentrated in (Province No. 2), similarly holds status but no binding official role; a January 23, 2025, bill by the sought to designate Maithili, Bhojpuri, , , and English as co-official alongside Nepali to reflect demographic realities in the region, but it was withdrawn on January 24 amid backlash over potential fragmentation and implementation challenges. Magahi has negligible presence and recognition in compared to its Indian stronghold. This framework underscores causal tensions between linguistic pluralism and administrative unity, with empirical data from 's Central Bureau of Statistics indicating over 120 indigenous languages yet persistent dominance of Nepali in official domains.

Language Versus Dialect Controversy

The classification of Bihari languages—primarily Maithili, Bhojpuri, and Magahi—as either independent languages or dialects of has been a point of contention among linguists, policymakers, and regional advocates. Linguistically, these varieties belong to the Eastern Indo-Aryan branch, deriving from , which distinguishes them from the Shauraseni Prakrit origins of Standard in the Western Indo-Aryan continuum. This separation is evidenced by differences in (e.g., retention of Old Indo-Aryan sounds like intervocalic /r/ in Maithili), (e.g., distinct case markings and verb conjugations in Bhojpuri), and , with limited to Standard speakers, often requiring exposure or adaptation for comprehension. In Indian censuses and official frameworks, Bhojpuri and Magahi have historically been subsumed under the "" category, inflating Hindi's speaker base to over 500 million by grouping non-mutually intelligible varieties, a practice critics attribute to post-independence efforts prioritizing Hindi as a unifying medium. Maithili, however, achieved recognition as the eighth Scheduled Language under the Indian Constitution in 2003 following sustained advocacy, including a 2001 highlighting its independent literary tradition dating to the 14th century and separate code (mai), underscoring that political classification does not align with philological evidence. Proponents of dialect status argue shared script use and some lexical overlap, but these are contact-induced rather than indicative of genetic unity, as Bihari varieties form a among themselves with higher internal intelligibility. The debate reflects broader tensions in India's , where regional languages face marginalization amid promotion, leading to calls for reclassification; for instance, Bhojpuri's over 50 million speakers (per 2011 census estimates) and cultural output, including and folk traditions, support demands for Scheduled status akin to Maithili's. Linguistic scholarship, including classifications, treats them as distinct languages with ISO codes (bho for Bhojpuri, mag for Magahi), rejecting dialect subsumption based on structural autonomy rather than sociopolitical convenience. This controversy persists, with ongoing petitions and academic critiques emphasizing that designations undermine preservation efforts for these heritage varieties.

Preservation and Revitalization Initiatives

The Bihar government has undertaken several measures to promote Bihari languages, including the establishment of language academies for Bhojpuri, Maithili, and Magahi, among others, to foster their development and usage. In September 2022, the state pledged institutional support for eight languages, encompassing Maithili, Bhojpuri, Magahi, Angika, and Bajjika, aiming to provide structured preservation frameworks. Additionally, in October 2022, initiatives were announced to revive the historical Kaithi script, traditionally used for writing Bhojpuri, Magahi, Angika, and related varieties, through government promotion and potential integration into education. By March 2025, proposals emerged to unify these academies under a single governing body to improve management, funding, and service conditions for better efficacy. Efforts to incorporate Bihari languages into have included attempts at mother-tongue instruction in primary schools using Maithili, Magahi, and Bhojpuri; however, a 2021 initiative faltered due to inadequate planning and implementation, highlighting persistent challenges in execution. Community-driven activities, such as cultural festivals where Maithili is used in rituals and songs, contribute to informal preservation by maintaining oral traditions among speakers. Organizations like the Aripana Foundation in support broader cultural development in , indirectly aiding language vitality through and community programs, though specific linguistic projects remain limited. Despite these steps, revitalization faces hurdles from Hindi's dominance and uneven official recognition, with only Maithili listed in India's Eighth Schedule, leaving others like Bhojpuri and Magahi vulnerable to decline without sustained policy enforcement. Experts advocate for expanded recognition and resources akin to those for to ensure the survival of these spoken by millions.

References

  1. https://jolr.ru/files/%28190%29jlr2016-14-3-4%28227-258%29.pdf
  2. http://www.languageinindia.com/dec2022/vinodkumarmorphologicalprocessesmagahifinal.pdf
  3. https://censusindia.gov.in/nada/index.php/catalog/45247/download/48954/LSI_BIHAR.pdf
  4. https://www.walshmedicalmedia.com/open-access/magahi-and-magadh-language-and-people.pdf
  5. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Abhishek-Kashyap/publication/307970526_Lexicogrammar_of_the_Bihari_Languages_a_metafunctional_survey/links/5b21f572458515270fc6ef09/Lexicogrammar-of-the-Bihari-Languages-a-metafunctional-survey.pdf
  6. https://digital.library.unt.edu/explore/collections/BPLR/
  7. https://sources.mandala.library.virginia.edu/sites/mandala-sources.lib.virginia.edu/files/pdf-files/572.pdf
  8. https://repository.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp/record/2010723/files/ggr_046007.pdf
  9. https://web.mit.edu/rbhatt/www/24.956/l1.pdf
  10. https://www.outlookindia.com/national/how-grouping-of-languages-inflated-number-of-hindi-speakers-news-195648
  11. https://www.ijfmr.com/papers/2024/6/34380.pdf
  12. https://iwslt.org/2024/low-resource
  13. https://ruralindiaonline.org/en/library/resource/linguistic-survey-of-india-bihar/
  14. https://www.worlddata.info/languages/bhojpuri.php
  15. https://www.ijfmr.com/papers/2024/6/34250.pdf
  16. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Bihari-languages
  17. https://scope-journal.com/assets/uploads/doc/804f0-1055-1066.202410498.pdf
  18. https://ijcrt.org/papers/IJCRT2010219.pdf
  19. https://ia601405.us.archive.org/25/items/in.ernet.dli.2015.507576/2015.507576.The-Languages_text.pdf
  20. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/language-and-linguistics/apabhramsha-language
  21. https://en.banglapedia.org/index.php/Apabhrangsha
  22. https://www.academia.edu/7849443/An_Introduction_to_Languages_used_in_India
  23. http://lisindia.ciil.org/Maithili/Maith_hist.html
  24. https://www.mithilamanch.org/maithili-language/50-history-and-linguistic-classification-of-maithili.html
  25. https://asian.washington.edu/sites/asian/files/documents/research/the_dialectology_of_indic.pdf
  26. https://ia804603.us.archive.org/21/items/a-survey-of-maithili-literature/A%20Survey%20of%20Maithili%20Literature.pdf
  27. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-18146-7_11
  28. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-origin-and-development-of-Bhojpuri-Southworth-Tiwari/9c5c800b6c08996264770010769d0905f981d2e4
  29. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24652488
  30. https://shuddhashar.com/languages-to-dialects-of-hindi-a-relegation-of-the-languages-of-bihar-in-the-agenda-of-hindi-nationalism/
  31. https://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs-proceedings/ICPhS2011/OnlineProceedings/RegularSession/Mishra/Mishra.pdf
  32. https://www.academia.edu/7805607/Bihari_Hindi_as_a_mixed_language
  33. https://www.academia.edu/3423423/Pronominals_A_Comparative_Study_of_the_Languages_of_Bihar_and_West_Bengal
  34. https://india-dd.wdfiles.com/local--files/lang:mai/mai.pdf
  35. https://giwmscdnone.gov.np/media/app/public/62/posts/1709445766_41.pdf
  36. https://learnlipi.com/maithili/
  37. https://languageinindia.com/oct2013/asadmaithili.pdf
  38. https://www.redalyc.org/journal/6638/663872611009/html/
  39. http://ijlc.thebrpi.org/journals/ijlc/Vol_2_No_1_March_2014/7.pdf
  40. https://api.pageplace.de/preview/DT0400.9783110811698_A19976886/preview-9783110811698_A19976886.pdf
  41. https://www.languageinindia.com/june2025/shantanumaithili.pdf
  42. https://www.dynamiclanguage.com/the-bhojpuri-language-and-its-global-presence/
  43. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Manish_Singh114/publication/344255358_Variations_in_Bhojpuri_A_sociolinguistic_study/links/5f60ff6d4585154dbbd52871/Variations-in-Bhojpuri-A-sociolinguistic-study.pdf
  44. https://www.academia.edu/45566555/A_GRAMMAR_OF_BHOJPURI_A_Dissertation_Submitted_to_the_Faculty_of_Humanities_and_Social_Sciences_of_Tribhuvan_University_in_Fulfillment_of_the_Requirements_for_the_Degree_of_Doctor_of_Philosophy_in_LINGUISTICS
  45. https://ijels.com/upload_document/issue_files/21IJELS-107202036-TheHierarchy.pdf
  46. https://www.mustgo.com/worldlanguages/bhojpuri/
  47. https://iecor.clld.org/languages/magahi
  48. https://www.scribd.com/document/246697531/Magahi-language
  49. https://www.glossa-journal.org/article/7675/galley/22261/download/
  50. https://www.academia.edu/9979008/_The_Prosody_of_Stress_and_Rhythm_in_Magahi_Ph_D_Thesis
  51. https://ojs.ub.uni-konstanz.de/jsal/index.php/fasal/article/view/340/Sharma-FASAL-14
  52. https://www.ethnologue.com/language/mag/
  53. https://www.omniglot.com/writing/angika.htm
  54. https://www.ijcrt.org/papers/IJCRT2501058.pdf
  55. https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-similarities-between-the-Bihari-languages-Angika-Bajjika-Maithili-and-Magahi-and-the-Bengali-Bangla-language
  56. https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=116871960610448&id=109181811379463&set=a.109483098016001
  57. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259569512_The_Bajjika_language_and_speech_community_Abhishek_Kumar_Kashyap
  58. https://site.outlookindia.com/traveller/regulars/quick_guides_languages_of_bihar/
  59. https://www.academia.edu/30198953/On_the_linguistic_resources_of_Bajjika
  60. https://www.academia.edu/45186266/A_Linguistic_Description_of_Bhojpuri_Mother_Tongue_Spo_ken_in_Bihar
  61. https://www.ijsr.net/archive/v9i10/SR201026030150.pdf
  62. https://jasas.info/wp-content/themes/jasas/pdf/relevance/ijsas_vol07/159_Miki%2520Nishioka-and-Rajesh-Kumar.pdf
  63. https://people.umass.edu/bhatt/papers/mit-nov2007-handout.pdf
  64. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378216612002056
  65. http://lisindia.ciil.org/Maithili/Maithili.html
  66. http://lisindia.ciil.org/Maithili/Maith_struct.html
  67. https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.49393
  68. https://archive.org/details/dli.csl.7539
  69. https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.13945
  70. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/366210612_Lexical_Comparison_in_Maithili_and_Bengali
  71. https://open.uct.ac.za/server/api/core/bitstreams/3ec47539-9ced-44e0-95a2-0d2718ae8f65/content
  72. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/489929c1
  73. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354221839_Indo-Aryan_-_a_house_divided_Evidence_for_the_east-west_Indo-Aryan_divide_and_its_significance_for_the_study_of_northern_South_Asia
  74. https://www.unicode.org/L2/L2005/05343-kaithi.pdf
  75. https://www.omniglot.com/writing/kaithi.htm
  76. https://www.endangeredalphabets.net/kaithi/
  77. https://scriptsource.org/entry/e98dpuze8q
  78. https://www.omniglot.com/writing/maithili.htm
  79. https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/gipan/article/download/48920/36495/144607
  80. https://www.esijournals.com/image/catalog/Journal%2520Paper/SAHCA/2022/No%25202%2520%282022%29/4_Deepesh%2520Kumar%2520Thakur.pdf
  81. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341040220_Basic_Linguistic_Resources_and_Baselines_for_Bhojpuri_Magahi_and_Maithili_for_Natural_Language_Processing
  82. https://elibrary.tucl.edu.np/bitstreams/310a0861-eaf3-423e-95c9-7eb9c6ecd4bf/download
  83. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356642823_Linguistic_Resources_for_Bhojpuri_Magahi_and_Maithili_Statistics_about_Them_Their_Similarity_Estimates_and_Baselines_for_Three_Applications
  84. https://jogira.com/bhojpuri-language-cultural-region-and-people/
  85. https://www.iibld.org/about-us
  86. https://bhojpurisahityangan.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Sociology-Of-Bhojpuri-Language.pdf
  87. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/patna/bhojpuri-has-its-own-literature-grammar/articleshow/105865880.cms
  88. https://www.outlookindia.com/culture-society/an-introduction-to-bihari-literature-weekender_story-247755
  89. https://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR1907O21.pdf
  90. https://southasia.ucla.edu/culture/literature/vidyapati/
  91. https://www.wisdomlib.org/concept/vidyapati
  92. https://theeasternroots.com/maithili-poet-vidyapati-the-timeless-voice-who-inspired-rabindranath-tagore/
  93. https://thesouthfirst.com/the-language-question/magahi-a-language-that-refuses-to-die-despite-hindi-imperialism/
  94. https://madrascourier.com/books-and-films/jayanth-patis-fool-bahadur-narrates-the-tale-of-a-place-rife-with-endless-intrigues/
  95. https://globalbihari.com/the-first-ever-written-poems-in-magahi/
  96. https://www.indianetzone.com/bhojpuri_literature
  97. https://www.hindustantimes.com/entertainment/bhojpuri-cinema-needs-filmmakers-like-satyajit-ray-prakash-jha-101712310779643.html
  98. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/bhojpuri/movies/news/filmmaker-saket-saurabh-bhojpuri-film-industry-has-a-bright-future-ahead/articleshow/109399685.cms
  99. https://www.nationalheraldindia.com/entertainment/multiplexes-are-the-future-of-bhojpuri-cinema-amrapali-dubey
  100. https://ddnews.gov.in/en/nepals-state-media-expands-news-services-with-maithili-awadhi-bhojpuri-and-tharu-editions/
  101. https://www.poojn.in/post/28014/maithili-languages-place-in-indias-linguistic-landscape-a-2025-perspective?srsltid=AfmBOoqnMmsRUY5zMhsTNurQZHh36EiM6qPEOVizNkrK99YTQf2cEG4s
  102. https://www.ijfmr.com/papers/2025/3/45840.pdf
  103. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/393467272_ECHOES_OF_THE_DIVINE_CULTURAL_MEMORY_AND_MYTH_IN_MAGAHI_FOLK_SONGS
  104. https://www.ijcrt.org/papers/IJCRT2509317.pdf
  105. https://www.orchidsinternationalschool.com/blog/folk-song-of-bihar
  106. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336285113_Magahi_Folk_Songs_Kaleidoscope_of_Life
  107. https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstreams/711aa8d1-0ea8-4c39-b841-1573b924f52c/download
  108. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/patna/states-native-languages-being-pushed-to-oblivion/articleshow/89711759.cms
  109. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/education/news/bihar-government-proposes-one-unified-body-for-8-language-academies-in-the-state/articleshow/118921717.cms
  110. https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/the-endangered-and-extinct-languages-of-indiapptx/265582230
  111. https://www.indiatvnews.com/news/india/bihar-government-to-promote-historical-kaithi-script-used-for-a-variety-of-indo-aryan-languages-bhajpuri-angika-bajjika-awadhi-bhojpuri-magahi-2022-10-05-813807
  112. https://m.thewire.in/article/society/bihar-as-indigenous-languages-get-a-raw-deal-mother-tongue-education-project-fails
  113. https://theannapurnaexpress.com/story/49789/
  114. https://aripanafoundation.org/language-and-culture/
  115. https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/hindi-belt-languages-must-thrive-bhojpuri-maithili-experts-2000315-2022-09-14
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.