Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Reference ranges for blood tests
View on Wikipedia| Reference ranges |
|---|
|
In: |
Reference ranges (reference intervals) for blood tests are sets of values used by a health professional to interpret a set of medical test results from blood samples. Reference ranges for blood tests are studied within the field of clinical chemistry (also known as "clinical biochemistry", "chemical pathology" or "pure blood chemistry"), the area of pathology that is generally concerned with analysis of bodily fluids.[1][2][3]
Blood test results should always be interpreted using the reference range provided by the laboratory that performed the test.[4]
Interpretation
[edit]A reference range is usually defined as the set of values 95 percent of the normal population falls within (that is, 95% prediction interval).[5] It is determined by collecting data from vast numbers of laboratory tests.[6][7]
Plasma or whole blood
[edit]In this article, all values (except the ones listed below) denote blood plasma concentration, which is approximately 60–100% larger than the actual blood concentration if the amount inside red blood cells (RBCs) is negligible. The precise factor depends on hematocrit as well as amount inside RBCs. Exceptions are mainly those values that denote total blood concentration, and in this article they are:[8]
- All values in Hematology – red blood cells (except hemoglobin in plasma)
- All values in Hematology – white blood cells
- Platelet count (Plt)
A few values are for inside red blood cells only:
- Vitamin B9 (folic acid/folate) in red blood cells
- Mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC)
Units
[edit]- Mass concentration (g/dL or g/L) is the most common measurement unit in the United States. Is usually given with dL (decilitres) as the denominator in the United States, and usually with L (litres) in, for example, Sweden.[citation needed]
- Molar concentration (mol/L) is used to a higher degree in most of the rest of the world, including the United Kingdom and other parts of Europe and Australia and New Zealand.[9]
- International units (IU) are based on measured biological activity or effect, or for some substances, a specified equivalent mass.[citation needed]
- Enzyme activity (kat) is commonly used for e.g. liver function tests like AST, ALT, LD and γ-GT in Sweden.[10]
- Percentages and time-dependent units (mol/s) are used for calculated derived parameters, e.g. for beta cell function in homeostasis model assessment or thyroid's secretory capacity.[11]
Arterial or venous
[edit]If not otherwise specified, a reference range for a blood test is generally the venous range, as the standard process of obtaining a sample is by venipuncture. An exception is for acid–base and blood gases, which are generally given for arterial blood.[12]
Still, the blood values are approximately equal between the arterial and venous sides for most substances, with the exception of acid–base, blood gases and drugs (used in therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) assays).[13] Arterial levels for drugs are generally higher than venous levels because of extraction while passing through tissues.[13]
Usual or optimal
[edit]Reference ranges are usually given as what are the usual (or normal) values found in the population, more specifically the prediction interval that 95% of the population fall into. This may also be called standard range. In contrast, optimal (health) range or therapeutic target is a reference range or limit that is based on concentrations or levels that are associated with optimal health or minimal risk of related complications and diseases. For most substances presented, the optimal levels are the ones normally found in the population as well. More specifically, optimal levels are generally close to a central tendency of the values found in the population. However, usual and optimal levels may differ substantially, most notably among vitamins and blood lipids, so these tables give limits on both standard and optimal (or target) ranges. In addition, some values, including troponin I and brain natriuretic peptide, are given as the estimated appropriate cutoffs to distinguish healthy people from people with specific conditions, which here are myocardial infarction and congestive heart failure, respectively, for the aforementioned substances.[14][15][16]
Variability
[edit]References range may vary with age, sex, race, pregnancy,[17] diet, use of prescribed or herbal drugs and stress. Reference ranges often depend on the analytical method used, for reasons such as inaccuracy, lack of standardisation, lack of certified reference material and differing antibody reactivity.[18] Also, reference ranges may be inaccurate when the reference groups used to establish the ranges are small.[19]
Sorted by concentration
[edit]By mass and molarity
[edit]Smaller, narrower boxes indicate a more tight homeostatic regulation when measured as standard "usual" reference range.
Hormones predominate at the left part of the scale, shown with a red at ng/L or pmol/L, being in very low concentration. There appears to be the greatest cluster of substances in the yellow part (μg/L or nmol/L), becoming sparser in the green part (mg/L or μmol/L). However, there is another cluster containing many metabolic substances like cholesterol and glucose at the limit with the blue part (g/L or mmol/L).[citation needed]
The unit conversions of substance concentrations from the molar to the mass concentration scale above are made as follows:
- Numerically:
- Measured directly in distance on the scales:
- ,
where distance is the direct (not logarithmic) distance in number of decades or "octaves" to the right the mass concentration is found. To translate from mass to molar concentration, the dividend (molar mass and the divisor (1000) in the division change places, or, alternatively, distance to right is changed to distance to left. Substances with a molar mass around 1000g/mol (e.g. thyroxine) are almost vertically aligned in the mass and molar images. Adrenocorticotropic hormone, on the other hand, with a molar mass of 4540,[20] is 0.7 decades to the right in the mass image. Substances with molar mass below 1000g/mol (e.g. electrolytes and metabolites) would have "negative" distance, that is, masses deviating to the left. Many substances given in mass concentration are not given in molar amount because they haven't been added to the article.
The diagram above can also be used as an alternative way to convert any substance concentration (not only the normal or optimal ones) from molar to mass units and vice versa for those substances appearing in both scales, by measuring how much they are horizontally displaced from one another (representing the molar mass for that substance), and using the same distance from the concentration to be converted to determine the equivalent concentration in terms of the other unit. For example, on a certain monitor, the horizontal distance between the upper limits for parathyroid hormone in pmol/L and pg/mL may be 7 cm, with the mass concentration to the right. A molar concentration of, for example, 5 pmol/L would therefore correspond to a mass concentration located 7 cm to the right in the mass diagram, that is, approximately 45 pg/mL.
By units
[edit]Units do not necessarily imply anything about molarity or mass.

A few substances are below this main interval, e.g. thyroid stimulating hormone, being measured in mU/L, or above, like rheumatoid factor and CA19-9, being measured in U/mL.
By enzyme activity
[edit]
White blood cells
[edit]
Sorted by category
[edit]Ions and trace metals
[edit]Included here are also related binding proteins, like ferritin and transferrin for iron, and ceruloplasmin for copper.
| Test | Lower limit | Upper limit | Unit* | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sodium (Na) | 135,[21] 137[10][22] | 145,[10][22] 147[21] | mmol/L or mEq/L[21] | See hyponatremia or hypernatremia |
| 310,[23] 320[23] | 330,[23] 340[23] | mg/dL | ||
| Potassium (K) | 3.5,[10][21] 3.6[22] | 5.0,[10][21][22] 5.1 | mmol/L or mEq/L[21] | See hypokalemia or hyperkalemia |
| 14[24] | 20[24] | mg/dL | ||
| Chloride (Cl) | 95,[21] 98,[25] 100[10] | 105,[21] 106,[25] 110[10] | mmol/L or mEq/L[21] | See hypochloremia or hyperchloremia |
| 340[26] | 370[26] | mg/dL | ||
| Ionized calcium (Ca) | 1.03,[27] 1.10[10] | 1.23,[27] 1.30[10] | mmol/L | See hypocalcaemia or hypercalcaemia |
| 4.1,[28] 4.4[28] | 4.9,[28] 5.2[28] | mg/dL | ||
| Total calcium (Ca) | 2.1,[21][29] 2.2[10] | 2.5,[10][29] 2.6,[29] 2.8[21] | mmol/L | |
| 8.4,[21] 8.5[30] | 10.2,[21] 10.5[30] | mg/dL | ||
| Total serum iron (TSI) – male | 65,[31] 76[22] | 176,[31] 198[22] | μg/dL | See hypoferremia or the following: iron overload (hemochromatosis), iron poisoning, siderosis, hemosiderosis, hyperferremia |
| 11.6,[32][33] 13.6[33] | 30,[32] 32,[33] 35[33] | μmol/L | ||
| Total serum iron (TSI) – female | 26,[22] 50[31] | 170[22][31] | μg/dL | |
| 4.6,[33] 8.9[32] | 30.4[32] | μmol/L | ||
| Total serum iron (TSI) – newborns | 100[31] | 250[31] | μg/dL | |
| 18[33] | 45[33] | μmol/L | ||
| Total serum iron (TSI) – children | 50[31] | 120[31] | μg/dL | |
| 9[33] | 21[33] | μmol/L | ||
| Total iron-binding capacity (TIBC) | 240,[31] 262[22] | 450,[31] 474[22] | μg/dL | |
| 43,[33] 47[33] | 81,[33] 85[33] | μmol/L | ||
| Transferrin | 190,[34] 194,[10] 204[22] | 326,[10] 330,[34] 360[22] | mg/dL | |
| 25[35] | 45[35] | μmol/L | ||
| Transferrin saturation | 20[31] | 50[31] | % | |
| Ferritin – Males and postmenopausal females | 12[36] | 300[36][37] | ng/mL or μg/L | |
| 27[38] | 670[38] | pmol/L | ||
| Ferritin – premenopausal females | 12[36] | 150[36] – 200[37] | ng/mL or μg/L | |
| 27[38] | 330[38] – 440[38] | pmol/L | ||
| Ammonia | 10,[39] 20[40] | 35,[39] 65[40] | μmol/L | See hypoammonemia and hyperammonemia |
| 17,[41] 34[41] | 60,[41] 110[41] | μg/dL | ||
| Copper (Cu) | 70[30] | 150[30] | μg/dL | See hypocupremia or hypercupremia |
| 11[42][43] | 24[42] | μmol/L | ||
| Ceruloplasmin | 15[30] | 60[30] | mg/dL | |
| 1[44] | 4[44] | μmol/L | ||
| Phosphate (HPO42−) | 0.8 | 1.5[45] | mmol/L | See hypophosphatemia or hyperphosphatemia |
| Inorganic phosphorus (serum) | 1.0[21] | 1.5[21] | mmol/L | |
| 3.0[21] | 4.5[21] | mg/dL | ||
| Zinc (Zn) | 60,[46] 72[47] | 110,[47] 130[46] | μg/dL | See zinc deficiency or zinc poisoning |
| 9.2,[48] 11[10] | 17,[10] 20[48] | μmol/L | ||
| Magnesium | 1.5,[30] 1.7[49] | 2.0,[30] 2.3[49] | mEq/L or mg/dL | See hypomagnesemia or hypermagnesemia |
| 0.6,[50] 0.7[10] | 0.82,[50] 0.95[10] | mmol/L |
- Note: Although 'mEq' for mass and 'mEq/L' are sometimes used in the United States and elsewhere, they are not part of SI and are now considered redundant.
Acid–base and blood gases
[edit]If arterial/venous is not specified for an acid–base or blood gas value, then it generally refers to arterial, and not venous which otherwise is standard for other blood tests.[citation needed]
Acid–base and blood gases are among the few blood constituents that exhibit substantial difference between arterial and venous values.[13] Still, pH, bicarbonate and base excess show a high level of inter-method reliability between arterial and venous tests, so arterial and venous values are roughly equivalent for these.[51]
| Test | Arterial/Venous | Lower limit | Upper limit | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH | Arterial | 7.34,[22] 7.35[21] | 7.44,[22] 7.45[21] | |
| Venous | 7.31[52] | 7.41[52] | ||
| [H+] | Arterial | 36[21] | 44[21] | nmol/L |
| 3.6[53] | 4.4[53] | ng/dL | ||
| Base excess | Arterial & venous[52] | −3[52] | +3[52] | mEq/L |
| Oxygen partial pressure (pO2) | Arterial pO2 | 10,[21] 11[54] | 13,[54] 14[21] | kPa |
| 75,[21][22] 83[30] | 100,[22] 105[21] | mmHg or torr | ||
| Venous | 4.0[54] | 5.3[54] | kPa | |
| 30[52] | 40[52] | mmHg or torr | ||
| Oxygen saturation | Arterial | 94,[52] 95,[25] 96[30] | 100[25][30] | % |
| Venous | Approximately 75[25] | |||
| Carbon dioxide partial pressure (pCO2) | Arterial PaCO2 | 4.4,[21] 4.7[54] | 5.9,[21] 6.0[54] | kPa |
| 33,[21] 35[22] | 44,[21] 45[22] | mmHg or torr | ||
| Venous | 5.5,[54] | 6.8[54] | kPa | |
| 41[52] | 51[52] | mmHg or torr | ||
| Absolute content of carbon dioxide (CO2) | Arterial | 23[52] | 30[52] | mmol/L |
| 100[55] | 132[55] | mg/dL | ||
| Bicarbonate (HCO3−) | Arterial & venous | 18[30] | 23[30] | mmol/L |
| 110[56] | 140[56] | mg/dL | ||
| Standard bicarbonate (SBCe) | Arterial & venous | 21, 22[21] | 27, 28[21] | mmol/L or mEq/L[21] |
| 134[56] | 170[56] | mg/dL | ||
Liver function
[edit]| Test | Patient type | Lower limit | Upper limit | Unit | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total protein (TotPro) | 60,[21] 63[22] | 78,[21] 82,[22] 84[30] | g/L | See serum total protein Interpretation | |
| Albumin | 35[21][57] | 48,[22] 55[21] | g/L | See hypoalbuminemia | |
| 3.5[22] | 4.8,[22] 5.5[21] | U/L | |||
| 540[58] | 740[58] | μmol/L | |||
| Globulins | 23[21] | 35[21] | g/L | ||
| Total bilirubin | 1.7,[59] 2,[21] 3.4,[59] 5[10] | 17,[21][59] 22,[59] 25[10] | μmol/L | ||
| 0.1,[21] 0.2,[22] 0.29[60] | 1.0,[21][30] 1.3,[22] 1.4[60] | mg/dL | |||
| Direct/conjugated bilirubin | 0.0[21] or N/A[10] | 5,[21] 7[10][59] | μmol/L | ||
| 0[21][22] | 0.3,[21][22] 0.4[30] | mg/dL | |||
| Alanine transaminase (ALT/ALAT[10]) | 5,[61] 7,[22] 8[21] | 20,[21] 21,[25] 56[22] | U/L | Also called serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (SGPT) | |
| Female | 0.15[10] | 0.75[10] | μkat/L | ||
| Male | 0.15[10] | 1.1[10] | |||
| Aspartate transaminase (AST/ASAT[10]) | Female | 6[62] | 34[62] | IU/L | Also called serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT) |
| 0.25[10] | 0.60[10] | μkat/L | |||
| Male | 8[62] | 40[62] | IU/L | ||
| 0.25[10] | 0.75[10] | μkat/L | |||
| Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) | 0.6[10] | 1.8[10] | μkat/L | ||
| Female | 42[61] | 98[61] | U/L | ||
| Male | 53[61] | 128[61] | |||
| Gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT) | 5,[61] 8[22] | 40,[61] 78[22] | U/L | ||
| Female | 0.63[63] | μkat/L | |||
| Male | 0.92[63] | μkat/L |
Cardiac tests
[edit]| Test | Patient type | Lower limit | Upper limit | Unit | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Creatine kinase (CK) | Male | 24,[64] 38,[22] 60[61] | 174,[30] 320[61] | U/L or ng/mL | |
| 0.42[65] | 1.5[65] | μkat/L | |||
| Female | 24,[64] 38,[22] 96[30] | 140,[30] 200[61] | U/L or ng/mL | ||
| 0.17[65] | 1.17[65] | μkat/L | |||
| CK-MB | 0 | 3,[22] 3.8,[10] 5[61] | ng/mL or μg/L[10] | ||
| Myoglobin | Female | 1[66] | 66[66] | ng/mL or μg/L | |
| Male | 17[66] | 106[66] | |||
| Cardiac troponin T (low sensitive) | 0.1[14] | ng/mL | 99th percentile cutoff | ||
| Cardiac troponin I
(high sensitive) |
0.03[14] | ng/mL | 99th percentile cutoff | ||
| Cardiac troponin T (high sensitive) | Male | 0.022[14] | ng/mL | 99th percentile cutoff | |
| Female | 0.014[14] | ng/mL | 99th percentile cutoff | ||
| newborn/infants | not established | more than adults [67][68] |
| Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) | |
| Interpretation | Range / Cutoff |
|---|---|
| Congestive heart failure unlikely | < 100 pg/mL[15][16] |
| "Gray zone" | 100–500 pg/mL[15][16] |
| Congestive heart failure likely | > 500 pg/mL[15][16] |
| NT-proBNP | ||
| Interpretation | Age | Cutoff |
|---|---|---|
| Congestive heart failure likely | < 75 years | > 125 pg/mL[69] |
| > 75 years | > 450pg/mL[69] | |
Lipids
[edit]| Test | Patient type | Lower limit | Upper limit | Unit | Therapeutic target |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Triglycerides | 10–39 years | 54[30] | 110[30] | mg/dL | < 100 mg/dL[70] or 1.1 mmol/L[70] |
| 0.61[71] | 1.2[71] | mmol/L | |||
| 40–59 years | 70[30] | 150[30] | mg/dL | ||
| 0.77[71] | 1.7[71] | mmol/L | |||
| > 60 years | 80[30] | 150[30] | mg/dL | ||
| 0.9[71] | 1.7[71] | mmol/L | |||
| Total cholesterol | 3.0,[72] 3.6[21][72] | 5.0,[10][73] 6.5[21] | mmol/L | < 3.9 mmol/L[70] | |
| 120,[22] 140[21] | 200,[22] 250[21] | mg/dL | < 150 mg/dL[70] | ||
| HDL cholesterol | Female | 1.0,[74] 1.2,[10] 1.3[72] | 2.2[74] | mmol/L | > 1.0[74] or 1.6[72] mmol/L 40[75] or 60[76] mg/dL |
| 40,[75] 50[77] | 86[75] | mg/dL | |||
| HDL cholesterol | Male | 0.9[10][74] | 2.0[74] | mmol/L | |
| 35[75] | 80[75] | mg/dL | |||
| LDL cholesterol (Not valid when triglycerides >5.0 mmol/L) |
2.0,[74] 2.4[73] | 3.0,[10][73] 3.4[74] | mmol/L | < 2.5 mmol/L[74] | |
| 80,[75] 94[75] | 120,[75] 130[75] | mg/dL | < 100 mg/dL[75] | ||
| LDL/HDL quotient | n/a | 5[10] | (unitless) |
Tumour markers
[edit]| Test | Patient type | Cutoff | Unit | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alpha fetoprotein (AFP) | 44[22] | ng/mL or μg/L | Hepatocellular carcinoma or testicular cancer | |
| Beta human chorionic gonadotrophin (β-hCG) | In males and non-pregnant females | 5[22] | IU/L or mU/mL | choriocarcinoma |
| CA19-9 | 40[22] | U/mL | Pancreatic cancer | |
| CA-125 | 30,[78] 35[79] | kU/L or U/mL | ||
| Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) | Non-smokers, 50 years | 3.4,[10] 3.6[80] | μg/L | |
| Non-smokers, 70 years | 4.1[80] | |||
| Smokers | 5[81] | |||
| Prostate specific antigen (PSA) | 40–49 years | 1.2–2.9[82] | μg/L[10][22] or ng/mL[30] | More detailed cutoffs in PSA – Serum levels |
| 70–79 years, non-African-American | 4.0–9.0[82] | |||
| 70–79 years, African-American | 7.7–13[82] | |||
| PAP | 3[30] | units/dL (Bodansky units) | ||
| Calcitonin | 5,[83] 15[83] | ng/L or pg/mL | Cutoff against medullary thyroid cancer[83] More detailed cutoffs in Calcitonin article |
Endocrinology
[edit]Thyroid hormones
[edit]| Test | Patient type | Lower limit | Upper limit | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH or thyrotropin) |
Adults – standard range |
0.3,[10] 0.4,[22] 0.5,[30] 0.6[84] | 4.0,[10] 4.5,[22] 6.0[30] | mIU/L or μIU/mL |
| Adults – optimal range |
0.3,[85] 0.5[86] | 2.0,[86] 3.0[85] | ||
| Infants | 1.3[87] | 19[87] | ||
| Free thyroxine (FT4) |
Normal adult | 0.7,[88] 0.8[22] | 1.4,[88] 1.5,[22] 1.8[89] | ng/dL |
| 9,[10][90] 10,[91] 12[92] | 18,[10][90] 23[92] | pmol/L | ||
| Child/Adolescent 31 d – 18 y |
0.8[88] | 2.0[88] | ng/dL | |
| 10[90] | 26[90] | pmol/L | ||
| Pregnant | 0.5[88] | 1.0[88] | ng/dL | |
| 6.5[90] | 13[90] | pmol/L | ||
| Total thyroxine | 4,[91] 5.5[22] | 11,[91] 12.3[22] | μg/dL | |
| 60[91][92] | 140,[91] 160[92] | nmol/L | ||
| Free triiodothyronine (FT3) | Normal adult | 0.2[91] | 0.5[91] | ng/dL |
| 3.1[93] | 7.7[93] | pmol/L | ||
| Children 2-16 y | 0.1[94] | 0.6[94] | ng/dL | |
| 1.5[93] | 9.2[93] | pmol/L | ||
| Total triiodothyronine | 60,[22] 75[91] | 175,[91] 181[22] | ng/dL | |
| 0.9,[10] 1.1[91] | 2.5,[10] 2.7[91] | nmol/L | ||
| Thyroxine-binding globulin (TBG) | 12[22] | 30[22] | mg/L | |
| Thyroglobulin (Tg) | 1.5[91] | 30[91] | pmol/L | |
| 1[91] | 20[91] | μg/L |
Sex hormones
[edit]The diagrams below take inter-cycle and inter-woman variability into account in displaying reference ranges for estradiol, progesterone, FSH and LH.

| Test | Patient type | Lower limit | Upper limit | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dihydrotestosterone | adult male | 30 | 85 | ng/dL |
| Testosterone | Male, overall | 8,[96] 10[97] | 27,[96] 35[97] | nmol/L |
| 230,[98] 300[99] | 780–1000[98][99] | ng/dL | ||
| Male < 50 years | 10[10] | 45[10] | nmol/L | |
| 290[98] | 1300[98] | ng/dL | ||
| Male > 50 years | 6.2[10] | 26[10] | nmol/L | |
| 180[98] | 740[98] | ng/dL | ||
| Female | 0.7[97] | 2.8–3.0[97][10] | nmol/L | |
| 20[99] | 80–85[99][98] | ng/dL | ||
| 17α-Hydroxyprogesterone | male | 0.06[30] | 3.0[30] | mg/L |
| 0.18[100] | 9.1[100] | μmol/L | ||
| Female (Follicular phase) | 0.2[30] | 1.0[30] | mg/L | |
| 0.6[100] | 3.0[100] | μmol/L | ||
| Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) |
Prepubertal | <1[101] | 3[101] | IU/L |
| Adult male | 1[101] | 8[101] | ||
| Adult female (follicular and luteal phase) |
1[101] | 11[101] | ||
| Adult female (Ovulation) | 6[101] 95% PI (standard) |
26[101] 95% PI) | ||
| 5[102] 90% PI (used in diagram) |
15[102] (90% PI) | |||
| Post-menopausal female | 30[101] | 118[101] | ||
| Luteinizing hormone (LH) |
Female, peak | 20[102] 90% PI (used in diagram) |
75[102] (90% PI) |
IU/L |
| Female, post-menopausal | 15[103] | 60[103] | ||
| Male aged 18+ | 2[104] | 9[104] | ||
| Estradiol (an estrogen) |
Adult male | 50[105] | 200[105] | pmol/L |
| 14[106] | 55[106] | pg/mL | ||
| Adult female (day 5 of follicular phase, and luteal phase) |
70[105] | 500,[105] 600[105] | pmol/L | |
| 19[106] | 140,[106] 160[106] | pg/mL | ||
| Adult female – free (not protein bound) | 0.5[107] | 9[107] | pg/mL | |
| 1.7[107] | 33[107] | pmol/L | ||
| Post-menopausal female | N/A[105] | < 130[105] | pmol/L | |
| N/A[106] | < 35[106] | pg/mL | ||
| Progesterone |
Female in mid-luteal phase (day 21–23) | 17,[102] 35[108] | 92[108] | nmol/L |
| 6,[102] 11[109] | 29[109] | ng/mL | ||
| Androstenedione | Adult male and female | 60[103] | 270[103] | ng/dL |
| Post-menopausal female | < 180[103] | |||
| Prepubertal | < 60[103] | |||
| Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate | Adult male and female | 30[110] | 400[110] | μg/dL |
| SHBG |
Adult female | 40[111] | 120[111] | nmol/L |
| Adult male | 20[111] | 60[111] | ||
| Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) |
13–45 years | 0.7[112] | 20[112] | ng/mL |
| 5[113] | 140[113] | pmol/L |
Other hormones
[edit]| Test | Patient type | Lower limit | Upper limit | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) | 2.2[114] | 13.3[114] | pmol/L | |
| 20[22] | 100[22] | pg/mL | ||
| Cortisol | 09:00 am | 140[115] | 700[115] | nmol/L |
| 5[116] | 25[116] | μg/dL | ||
| Midnight | 80[115] | 350[115] | nmol/L | |
| 2.9[116] | 13[116] | μg/dL | ||
| Growth hormone (fasting) | 0 | 5[21] | ng/mL | |
| Growth hormone (arginine stimulation) | 7[21] | n/a | ng/mL | |
| IGF-1 |
Female, 20 yrs | 110[117] | 420[117] | ng/mL |
| Female, 75 yrs | 55[117] | 220[117] | ||
| Male, 20 yrs | 160[117] | 390[117] | ||
| Male, 75 yrs | 48[117] | 200[117] | ||
| Prolactin |
Female | 71,[118] 105[118] | 348,[118] 548[118] | mIU/L |
| 3.4,[118] 3.9[118] | 16.4,[118] 20.3[118] | μg/L | ||
| Male | 58,[118] 89[118] | 277,[118] 365[118] | mIU/L | |
| 2.7,[118] 3.3[118] | 13.0,[118] 13.5[118] | μg/L | ||
| Parathyroid hormone (PTH) | 10,[119] 17[120] | 65,[119] 70[120] | pg/mL | |
| 1.1,[10] 1.8[121] | 6.9,[10] 7.5[121] | pmol/L | ||
| 25-hydroxycholecalciferol (a vitamin D) – Standard reference range |
8,[30][122] 9[122] | 40,[122] 80[30] | ng/mL | |
| 20,[123] 23[124] | 95,[124] 150[123] | nmol/L | ||
| 25-hydroxycholecalciferol – Therapeutic target range |
30,[125] 40[126] | 65,[126] 100[125] | ng/mL | |
| 85,[70] 100[126] | 120,[70] 160[126] | nmol/L | ||
| Plasma renin activity | 0.29,[127] 1.9[128] | 3.7[127][128] | ng/(mL·h) | |
| 3.3,[129] 21[130] | 41[129][130] | mcU/mL | ||
| Aldosterone |
Adult | 19,[129] 34.0[129] | ng/dL | |
| 530,[131] 940[131] | pmol/L | |||
| Aldosterone-to-renin ratio |
Adult | 13.1,[132] 35.0[132] | ng/dL per ng/(mL·h) | |
| 360,[132] 970[132] | pmol/liter per μg/(L·h) |
Vitamins
[edit]Also including the vitamin B12)-related amino acid homocysteine.
| Test | Patient type | Standard range | Optimal range | Unit | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower limit | Upper limit | Lower limit | Upper limit | |||
| Vitamin A | 30[30] | 65[30] | μg/dL | |||
| Vitamin B9 (Folic acid/Folate) – Serum |
Age > 1 year | 3.0[133] | 16[133] | 5[134] | ng/mL or μg/L | |
| 6.8[135] | 36[135] | 11[135] | nmol/L | |||
| Vitamin B9 (Folic acid/Folate) – Red blood cells |
200[133] | 600[133] | ng/mL or μg/L | |||
| 450[135] | 1400[135] | nmol/L | ||||
| Pregnant | 400[133] | ng/mL or μg/L | ||||
| 900[133] | nmol/L | |||||
| Vitamin B12 (Cobalamin) | 130,[136] 160[137] | 700,[136] 950[137] | ng/L | |||
| 100,[138] 120[10] | 520,[138] 700[10] | pmol/L | ||||
| Homocysteine |
3.3,[139] 5.9[139] | 7.2,[139] 15.3[139] | 6.3[70] | μmol/L | ||
| 45,[140] 80[140] | 100,[140] 210[140] | 85[70] | μg/dL | |||
| Vitamin C (Ascorbic acid) | 0.4[30] | 1.5[30] | 0.9[70] | mg/dL | ||
| 23[141] | 85[141] | 50[70] | μmol/L | |||
| 25-hydroxycholecalciferol (a vitamin D) | 8,[30][122] 9[122] | 40,[122] 80[30] | 30,[125] 40[126] | 65,[126] 100[125] | ng/mL | |
| 20,[123] 23[124] | 95,[124] 150[123] | 85,[70] 100[126] | 120,[70] 160[126] | nmol/L | ||
| Vitamin E | 28[70] | μmol/L | ||||
| 1.2[70] | mg/dL | |||||
Toxic Substances
[edit]| Test | Limit type | Limit | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lead | Optimal health range | < 20[25] or 40[30] | μg/dL |
| Blood ethanol content | Limit for drunk driving | 0,[142] 0.2,[142] 0.8[142] | ‰ or g/L |
| 17.4[143] | mmol/L |
Hematology
[edit]Red blood cells
[edit]These values (except Hemoglobin in plasma) are for total blood and not only blood plasma.
| Test | Patient | Lower limit | Upper limit | Unit | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hemoglobin (Hb) | Male | 2.0,[144] 2.1[21][145] | 2.5,[144] 2.7[21][145] | mmol/L | Higher in neonates, lower in children. |
| 130,[10] 132,[22] 135[21] | 162,[22] 170,[10] 175[21] | g/L | |||
| Female | 1.8,[144] 1.9[21][145] | 2.3,[144] 2.5[21][144][145] | mmol/L | Sex difference negligible until adulthood. | |
| 120[10][21][22] | 150,[10] 152,[22] 160[21][30] | g/L | |||
| Hemoglobin subunits (sometimes displayed simply as "Hemoglobin") | Male | 8.0,[146] 8.4[146] | 10.0,[146] 10.8[146] | mmol/L | 4 per hemoglobin molecule |
| Female | 7.2,[146] 7.6[146] | 9.2,[146] 10.0[146] | |||
| Hemoglobin in plasma | 0.16[21] | 0.62[21] | μmol/L | Normally diminutive compared with inside red blood cells | |
| 1 | 4 | mg/dL | |||
| Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) | < 50 years | 3.6[10] | 5.0[10] | % of Hb | |
| > 50 years | 3.9[10] | 5.3[10] | |||
| Haptoglobin | < 50 years | 0.35[10] | 1.9[10] | g/L | |
| > 50 years | 0.47[10] | 2.1[10] | |||
| Hematocrit (Hct) | Male | 0.39,[10] 0.4,[22] 0.41,[21] 0.45[30] | 0.50,[10] 0.52,[22] 0.53,[21] 0.62[30] | L/L | |
| Female | 0.35,[10] 0.36,[21] 0.37[22][30] | 0.46,[10][21][22] 0.48[30] | L/L | ||
| Child | 0.31[22] | 0.43[22] | L/L | ||
| Mean corpuscular volume (MCV) | Male | 76,[30] 82[22] | 100,[30] 102[22] | fL | Cells are larger in neonates, though smaller in other children. |
| Female | 78[22] | 101[22] | fL | ||
| Red blood cell distribution width (RDW) | 11.5[22] | 14.5[22] | % | ||
| Mean cell hemoglobin (MCH) | 0.39[21] | 0.54[21] | fmol/cell | ||
| 25,[21] 27[10][30] | 32,[30] 33,[10] 35[21] | pg/cell | |||
| Mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC) | 4.8,[147] 5.0[147] | 5.4,[147] 5.6[147] | mmol/L | ||
| 31,[22] 32[10][30] | 35,[22] 36[10][30] | g/dL or %[note 1] | |||
| Erythrocytes/Red blood cells (RBC) | Male | 4.2,[30] 4.3[10][21][22] | 5.7,[10] 5.9,[21] 6.2,[22] 6.9[30] | x1012/L or million/mm3 |
|
| Female | 3.5,[21] 3.8,[22] 3.9[10] | 5.1,[10] 5.5[21][22] | |||
| Infant/Child | 3.8[22] | 5.5[22] | |||
| Reticulocytes | Adult | 26[10] | 130[10] | x109/L | |
| 0.5[21][22] | 1.5[21][22] | % of RBC | |||
| Newborn | 1.1[22] | 4.5[22] | % of RBC | ||
| Infant | 0.5[22] | 3.1[22] | % of RBC | ||
| Immature reticulocyte fraction (IRF) | Adult | 1.6[148] | 12.1[148] | % of reticulocytes | |
| Reticulocyte hemoglobin equivalent | Adult | 30.0[148] | 37.6[148] | % | |
| 24.1[149] | 35.8[149] | pg | |||
| Immature platelet fraction (IPF) | Adult | 0.8[148] | 5.6[148] | % |
White blood cells
[edit]These values are for total blood and not only blood plasma.
| Test | Patient type | Lower limit | Upper limit | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| White Blood Cell Count (WBC) | Adult | 3.5,[10] 3.9,[150] 4.1,[22] 4.5[21] | 9.0,[10] 10.0,[150] 10.9,[22] 11[21] |
|
| Newborn | 9[151] | 30[151] | ||
| 1 year old | 6[151] | 18[151] | ||
| Neutrophil granulocytes (A.K.A. grans, polys, PMNs, or segs) |
Adult | 1.3,[10] 1.8,[150] 2[151] | 5.4,[10] 7,[150] 8[151] | x109/L |
| 45–54[21] | 62,[21] 74 | % of WBC | ||
| Newborn | 6[151] | 26[151] | x109/L | |
| Neutrophilic band forms | Adult | 0.7[151] | x109/L | |
| 3[21] | 5[21] | % of WBC | ||
| Lymphocytes | Adult | 0.7,[10] 1.0[150][151] | 3.5,[150] 3.9,[10] 4.8[151] | x109/L |
| 16–25[21] | 33,[21] 45 | % of WBC | ||
| Newborn | 2[151] | 11[151] | x109/L | |
| Monocytes | Adult | 0.1,[10] 0.2[152][153] | 0.8[10][151][153] | x109/L |
| 3,[21] 4.0 | 7,[21] 10 | % of WBC | ||
| Newborn | 0.4[151] | 3.1[151] | x109/L | |
| Mononuclear leukocytes (Lymphocytes + monocytes) |
Adult | 1.5 | 5 | x109/L |
| 20 | 35 | % of WBC | ||
| CD4+ T cells | Adult | 0.4,[22] 0.5[25] | 1.5,[25] 1.8[22] | x109/L |
| Eosinophil granulocytes | Adult | 0.0,[10] 0.04[153] | 0.44,[153] 0.45,[151] 0.5[10] | x109/L |
| 1[21] | 3,[21] 7 | % of WBC | ||
| Newborn | 0.02[151] | 0.85[151] | x109/L | |
| Basophil granulocytes | Adult | 40[150] | 100,[10][153] 200,[151] 900[150] | x106/L |
| 0.0 | 0.75,[21] 2 | % of WBC | ||
| Newborn | 0.64[151] | x109/L |
Coagulation
[edit]| Test | Lower limit | Upper limit | Unit | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thrombocyte/Platelet count (Plt) | 140,[22] 150[10][21] | 350,[10][30] 400,[21] 450[22] | x109/L or x1000/μL |
|
| Mean platelet volume (MPV) | 7.2,[154] 7.4,[155] 7.5[156] | 10.4,[155] 11.5,[156] 11.7[154] | fL | |
| Prothrombin time (PT) | 10,[25] 11,[21][157] 12[22] | 13,[25] 13.5,[157] 14,[22] 15[21] | s | PT reference varies between laboratory kits – INR is standardised |
| INR | 0.9[10] | 1.2[10] | The INR is a corrected ratio of a patient's PT to normal | |
| Activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) | 18,[22] 30[10][25] | 28,[22] 42,[10] 45[25] | s | |
| Thrombin clotting time (TCT) | 11 | 18 | s | |
| Fibrinogen | 1.7,[22] 2.0[10] | 3.6,[10] 4.2[22] | g/L | |
| Antithrombin | 0.80[10] | 1.2[10] | kIU/L | |
| 0.15,[158] 0.17[159] | 0.2,[158] 0.39[159] | mg/mL | ||
| Bleeding time | 2 | 9 | minutes | |
| Viscosity | 1.5[160] | 1.72[160] | cP |
Immunology
[edit]Acute phase proteins
[edit]Acute phase proteins are markers of inflammation.
| Test | Patient | Lower limit | Upper limit | Unit | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) |
Male | 0 | Age÷2[161] | mm/h | ESR increases with age and tends to be higher in females.[162] |
| Female | (Age+10)÷2[161] | ||||
| C-reactive protein (CRP) | 5,[10][163] 6[164] | mg/L | |||
| 200,[165] 240[165] | nmol/L | ||||
| Alpha 1-antitrypsin (AAT) | 20,[166] 22[167] | 38,[167] 53[166] | μmol/L | ||
| 89,[168] 97[10] | 170,[10] 230[168] | mg/dL | |||
| Procalcitonin | 0.15[169] | ng/mL or μg/L |
Isotypes of antibodies
[edit]| Test | Patient | Lower limit | Upper limit | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IgA | Adult | 70,[10] 110[170] | 360,[10] 560[170] | mg/dL |
| IgD | 0.5[170] | 3.0[170] | ||
| IgE | 0.01[170] | 0.04[170] | ||
| IgG | 800[170] | 1800[170] | ||
| IgM | 54[170] | 220[170] |
Autoantibodies
[edit]Autoantibodies are usually absent or very low, so instead of being given in standard reference ranges, the values usually denote where they are said to be present, or whether the test is a positive test. There may also be an equivocal interval, where it is uncertain whether there is a significantly increased level.
| Test | Negative | Equivocal | Positive | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| anti-SS-A (Ro) | < 1.0[171] | n/a | ≥ 1.0[171] | Units (U) |
| anti-SS-B (La) | < 1.0[172] | n/a | ≥ 1.0[172] | |
| Anti ds-DNA | < 30.0[173] | 30.0–75.0[173] | > 75.0[173] | International Units per millilitre (IU/mL) |
| Anti ss-DNA | < 8[174] | 8–10[174] | > 10[174] | Units per millilitre (U/mL) |
| Anti-histone antibodies | < 25[174] | n/a[174] | > 25[174] | |
| Cytoplasmic anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (c-ANCA) |
< 20[174] | 21–30[174] | > 30[174] | |
| Perinuclear anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (p-ANCA) |
< 5[174] | n/a | > 5[174] | |
| Anti-mitochondrial antibodies (AMA) | < 0.1[175] | 0.1-0.9[175] | ≥ 1.0[175] | Units (U) |
| Rheumatoid factor (RF) | < 20 | 20–30 | > 30[22] | Units per millilitre (U/mL) |
| Antistreptolysin O titre (ASOT) in preschoolers |
> 100 | |||
| ASOT at school age | > 250[22] | |||
| ASOT in adults | > 125[22] |
| Test | Negative | Low/weak positive | Moderate positive | High/strong positive | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anti-phospholipid IgG | < 20[174] | 20–30[174] | 31–50[174] | > 51[174] | GPLU/mL[174] |
| Anti-phospholipid IgM | < 1.5[174] | 1.5–2.5[174] | 2–9.9[174] | > 10[174] | MPL /mL[174] |
| Anti-phospholipid IgA | < 10[174] | 10–20[174] | 21–30[174] | > 31[174] | arb U/mL[174] |
| Anti-citrullinated protein antibodies | < 20[174] | 20–39[174] | 40–59[174] | > 60[174] | EU[174] |
Other immunology
[edit]| Test | Lower limit | Upper limit | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Serum free light chains (FLC): kappa/lambda ratio | 0.26[176] | 1.65[176] | (unitless) |
Other enzymes and proteins
[edit]| Test | Lower limit | Upper limit | Unit | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Serum total protein | 60,[21] 63[22] | 78,[21] 82,[22] 84[30] | g/L | |
| Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) | 50[30] | 150[30] | U/L | |
| 0.4[61] | 1.7[61] | μmol/L | ||
| 1.8[10] | 3.4[10] | μkat/L | < 70 years old[10] | |
| Amylase | 25,[21] 30,[22] 53[30] | 110,[22] 120,[177] 123,[30] 125,[21] 190[61] | U/L | |
| 0.15[10] | 1.1[10] | μkat/L | ||
| 200[165] | 240[165] | nmol/L | ||
| D-dimer |
n/a | 500[178] | ng/mL | Higher in pregnant women[179] |
| 0.5[10] | mg/L | |||
| Lipase | 7,[22] 10,[30] 23[61] | 60,[22] 150,[30] 208[61] | U/L | |
| Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) | 23[61] | 57[61] | U/L | |
| Acid phosphatase | 3.0[61] | ng/mL | ||
| Eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) | 2.3[10] | 16[10] | μg/L |
Other electrolytes and metabolites
[edit]Electrolytes and metabolites: For iron and copper, some related proteins are also included.
| Test | Patient type | Lower limit | Upper limit | Unit | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Osmolality | 275,[21] 280,[30] 281[10] | 295,[21] 296,[30] 297[10] | mOsm/kg | Plasma weight excludes solutes | |
| Osmolarity | Slightly less than osmolality | mOsm/L | Plasma volume includes solutes | ||
| Urea | 3.0[180] | 7.0[180] | mmol/L | BUN – blood urea nitrogen | |
| 7[21] | 18,[21] 21[22] | mg/dL | |||
| * Uric acid[22] | 0.18[21] | 0.48[21] | mmol/L | ||
| Female | 2.0[30] | 7.0[30] | mg/dL | ||
| Male | 2.1[30] | 8.5[30] | mg/dL | ||
| Creatinine | Male | 60,[10] 68[181] | 90,[10] 118[181] | μmol/L | May be complemented with creatinine clearance |
| 0.7,[182] 0.8[182] | 1.0,[182] 1.3[182] | mg/dL | |||
| Female | 50,[10] 68[181] | 90,[10] 98[181] | μmol/L | ||
| 0.6,[182] 0.8[182] | 1.0,[182] 1.1[182] | mg/dL | |||
| BUN/Creatinine Ratio | 5[30] | 35[30] | – | ||
| Plasma glucose (fasting) | 3.8,[21] 4.0[10] | 6.0,[10] 6.1[183] | mmol/L | See also glycated hemoglobin (in hematology) | |
| 65,[22] 70,[21] 72[184] | 100,[183] 110[30] | mg/dL | |||
| Full blood glucose (fasting) | 3.3[10] | 5.6[10] | mmol/L | ||
| 60[184] | 100[184] | mg/dL | |||
| Random glucose | 3.9[185] | 7.8[185] | mmol/L | ||
| 70[186] | 140[186] | mg/dL | |||
| Lactate (Venous) | 4.5[30] | 19.8[30] | mg/dL | ||
| 0.5[187] | 2.2[187] | mmol/L | |||
| Lactate (Arterial) | 4.5[30] | 14.4[30] | mg/dL | ||
| 0.5[187] | 1.6[187] | mmol/L | |||
| Pyruvate | 300[30] | 900[30] | μg/dL | ||
| 34[188] | 102[188] | μmol/L | |||
| Ketones | 1[189] | mg/dL | |||
| 0.1[189] | mmol/L | ||||
Medication
[edit]| Test | Lower limit | Upper limit | Unit | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Digoxin | 0.5[190] | 2.0[190] | ng/mL | Narrow therapeutic window |
| 0.6[190] | 2.6[190] | nmol/L | ||
| Lithium | 0.4,[191] 0.5,[192][193] 0.8[194] | 1.3[192][193] | mmol/L | Narrow therapeutic window |
| Paracetamol | 30[195] | mg/L | Risk of paracetamol toxicity at higher levels | |
| 200[195] | μmol/L |
See also
[edit]Notes
[edit]- ^ The MCHC in g/dL and the mass fraction of hemoglobin in red blood cells in % are numerically identical in practice, assuming a RBC density of 1g/mL and negligible hemoglobin in plasma.
References
[edit]- ^ Miri-Dashe, Timzing; Osawe, Sophia; Tokdung, Monday; Daniel, Nenbammun; Choji, Rahila Pam; Mamman, Ille; Deme, Kurt; Damulak, Dapus; Abimiku, Alash'le (2014). "Comprehensive reference ranges for hematology and clinical chemistry laboratory parameters derived from normal Nigerian adults". PLOS ONE. 9 (5) e93919. Bibcode:2014PLoSO...993919M. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0093919. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 4022493. PMID 24832127.
- ^ Lo, Y. C.; Armbruster, David A. (April 2012). "Reference Intervals of Common Clinical Chemistry Analytes for Adults in Hong Kong". EJIFCC. 23 (1): 5–10. ISSN 1650-3414. PMC 4975210. PMID 27683403.
- ^ DomBourian, Melkon G.; Helander, Louise; Annen, Kyle; Campbell, Alice (2025). "Chemistry & Hematology Reference Intervals". Current Diagnosis & Treatment: Pediatrics. McGraw Hill.
- ^ "Reference Ranges and What They Mean". Lab Tests Online (USA). Archived from the original on 28 August 2013. Retrieved 22 June 2013.
- ^ Bangert, Stephen K.; Marshall, William J., eds. (2008). Clinical biochemistry: metabolic and clinical aspects (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone/Elsevier. p. 19. ISBN 978-0-443-10186-1.
- ^ Boyd, James C. (January 2010). "Defining laboratory reference values and decision limits: populations, intervals, and interpretations". Asian Journal of Andrology. 12 (1): 83–90. doi:10.1038/aja.2009.9. ISSN 1745-7262. PMC 3739683. PMID 20111086.
- ^ "Reference Ranges & What They Mean". Lab Tests Online-UK.
- ^ Bransky A, Larsson A, Aardal E, Ben-Yosef Y, Christenson RH (2021). "A Novel Approach to Hematology Testing at the Point of Care". J Appl Lab Med. 6 (2): 532–542. doi:10.1093/jalm/jfaa186. PMC 7798949. PMID 33274357.
- ^ Dart, Richard C. (2004). "Units of measurement". Medical toxicology (3, illustrated ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. p. 34. ISBN 978-0-7817-2845-4.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab ac ad ae af ag ah ai aj ak al am an ao ap aq ar as at au av aw ax ay az ba bb bc bd be bf bg bh bi bj bk bl bm bn bo bp bq br bs bt bu bv bw bx by bz ca cb cc cd ce cf cg ch ci cj ck cl cm cn co cp cq cr cs ct cu cv cw cx cy cz da db dc dd de df dg dh di dj dk dl dm dn do dp dq dr ds dt du dv dw Reference range list from Uppsala University Hospital ("Laborationslista"). Artnr 40284 Sj74a. Issued on April 22, 2008
- ^ Hill, Nathan R.; Levy, Jonathan C.; Matthews, David R. (11 July 2013). "Expansion of the Homeostasis Model Assessment of β-Cell Function and Insulin Resistance to Enable Clinical Trial Outcome Modeling Through the Interactive Adjustment of Physiology and Treatment Effects: iHOMA2". Diabetes Care. 36 (8): 2324–2330. doi:10.2337/dc12-0607. ISSN 0149-5992. PMC 3714535. PMID 23564921.
- ^ "Reference Interval and Critical Results Table" (PDF). Blood Gas Laboratory. VCU Health Pathology.
- ^ a b c Dufour, D. Robert (April 2000). "Arterial versus venous reference ranges". Medical Laboratory Observer. Archived from the original on 2005-04-21.
- ^ a b c d e Ashvarya Mangla. "Troponins". medscape. Retrieved 2017-07-24. Updated: Jan 14, 2015
- ^ a b c d Brenden CK, Hollander JE, Guss D, et al. (May 2006). "Gray zone BNP levels in heart failure patients in the emergency department: results from the Rapid Emergency Department Heart Failure Outpatient Trial (REDHOT) multicenter study". American Heart Journal. 151 (5): 1006–11. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2005.10.017. PMID 16644322.
- ^ a b c d Strunk A, Bhalla V, Clopton P, et al. (January 2006). "Impact of the history of congestive heart failure on the utility of B-type natriuretic peptide in the emergency diagnosis of heart failure: results from the Breathing Not Properly Multinational Study". The American Journal of Medicine. 119 (1): 69.e1–11. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.04.029. PMID 16431187.
- ^ Abbassi-Ghanavati, M.; Greer, L. G.; Cunningham, F. G. (2009). "Pregnancy and Laboratory Studies". Obstetrics & Gynecology. 114 (6): 1326–31. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c2bde8. PMID 19935037. S2CID 24249021.
- ^ Armbruster, David; Miller, Richard R. (August 2007). "The Joint Committee for Traceability in Laboratory Medicine (JCTLM): A Global Approach to Promote the Standardisation of Clinical Laboratory Test Results". The Clinical Biochemist Reviews. 28 (3): 105–14. PMC 1994110. PMID 17909615.
- ^ Meeker, William Q.; Hahn, Gerald J. (1982). "Sample Sizes for Prediction Intervals". Journal of Quality Technology. 14 (4): 201–206. doi:10.1080/00224065.1982.11978821.
- ^ PROOPIOMELANOCORTIN; NCBI / POMC Retrieved on September 28, 2009
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab ac ad ae af ag ah ai aj ak al am an ao ap aq ar as at au av aw ax ay az ba bb bc bd be bf bg bh bi bj bk bl bm bn bo bp bq br bs bt bu bv bw bx by bz ca cb cc cd ce cf cg ch ci cj ck cl cm cn co cp cq cr cs ct cu cv cw cx cy cz da db dc dd Last page of Deepak A. Rao; Le, Tao; Bhushan, Vikas (2007). First Aid for the USMLE Step 1 2008 (First Aid for the Usmle Step 1). McGraw-Hill Medical. ISBN 978-0-07-149868-5.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab ac ad ae af ag ah ai aj ak al am an ao ap aq ar as at au av aw ax ay az ba bb bc bd be bf bg bh bi bj bk bl bm bn bo bp bq br bs bt bu bv bw bx by bz ca cb cc cd ce cf cg ch ci cj ck cl cm cn co cp cq cr cs ct cu cv cw cx cy cz da db Normal Reference Range Table Archived 2011-12-25 at the Wayback Machine from The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas. Used in Interactive Case Study Companion to Pathologic basis of disease.
- ^ a b c d Derived from molar values using molar mass of 22.99 g•mol−1
- ^ a b Derived from molar values using molar mass of 39.10 g•mol−1
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Merck Manuals > Common Medical Tests > Blood Tests Last full review/revision February 2003
- ^ a b Derived from molar values using molar mass of 35.45 g•mol−1
- ^ a b Larsson L, Ohman S (November 1978). "Serum ionized calcium and corrected total calcium in borderline hyperparathyroidism". Clin. Chem. 24 (11): 1962–65. doi:10.1093/clinchem/24.11.1962. PMID 709830.
- ^ a b c d Derived from molar values using molar mass of 40.08 g•mol−1
- ^ a b c Derived from mass values using molar mass of 40.08 g•mol−1
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab ac ad ae af ag ah ai aj ak al am an ao ap aq ar as at au av aw ax ay az ba bb bc bd be bf bg bh bi bj bk bl bm bn bo bp bq br bs bt bu bv bw bx by bz Blood Test Results – Normal Ranges Archived 2012-11-02 at the Wayback Machine Bloodbook.Com
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l Slon S (2006-09-22). "Serum Iron". University of Illinois Medical Center. Archived from the original on 2006-10-28. Retrieved 2006-07-06.
- ^ a b c d Diagnostic Chemicals Limited > Serum Iron-SL Assay Archived 2009-01-06 at the Wayback Machine July 15, 2005
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Derived from mass values using molar mass of 55.85 g•mol−1
- ^ a b Table 1. Page 133" Clinical Chemistry 45, No. 1, 1999 (stating 1.9–3.3 g/L)
- ^ a b Derived by dividing mass values with molar mass
- ^ a b c d Ferritin by: Mark Levin, MD, Hematologist and Oncologist, Newark, NJ. Review provided by VeriMed Healthcare Network
- ^ a b Andrea Duchini. "Hemochromatosis Workup". Medscape. Retrieved 2016-07-14. Updated: Jan 02, 2016
- ^ a b c d e Derived from mass values using molar mass of 450,000 g•mol−1
- ^ a b Mitchell ML, Filippone MD, Wozniak TF (August 2001). "Metastatic carcinomatous cirrhosis and hepatic hemosiderosis in a patient heterozygous for the H63D genotype". Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 125 (8): 1084–87. doi:10.5858/2001-125-1084-MCCAHH. PMID 11473464.
- ^ a b Diaz J, Tornel PL, Martinez P (July 1995). "Reference intervals for blood ammonia in healthy subjects, determined by microdiffusion". Clin. Chem. 41 (7): 1048. doi:10.1093/clinchem/41.7.1048a. PMID 7600690.
- ^ a b c d Derived from molar values using molar mass of 17.03 g/mol
- ^ a b Derived from mass values using molar mass of 63.55 g•mol−1
- ^ "Reference range for copper". GPnotebook.
- ^ a b Derived from mass using molar mass of 151kDa
- ^ Walter F. Boron (2005). Medical Physiology: A Cellular And Molecular Approaoch. Elsevier/Saunders. p. 849. ISBN 978-1-4160-2328-9.
- ^ a b "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2010-03-07. Retrieved 2010-01-17.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) - ^ a b Derived from molar values using molar mass of 65.38 g/mol
- ^ a b Derived from mass values using molar mass of 65.38 g/mol
- ^ a b Derived from molar values using molar mass of 24.31 g/mol
- ^ a b Derived from mass values using molar mass of 24.31 g/mol
- ^ Middleton P, Kelly AM, Brown J, Robertson M (August 2006). "Agreements between arterial and central venous values for pH, bicarbonate, base excess, and lactate". Emerg Med J. 23 (8): 622–24. doi:10.1136/emj.2006.035915. PMC 2564165. PMID 16858095.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l The Medical Education Division of the Brookside Associates / ABG (Arterial Blood Gas) Retrieved on Dec 6, 2009
- ^ a b Derived from molar values using molar mass of 1.01 g•mol−1
- ^ a b c d e f g h Derived from mmHg values using 0.133322 kPa/mmHg
- ^ a b Derived from molar values using molar mass of 44.010 g/mol
- ^ a b c d Derived from molar values using molar mass of 61 g/mol
- ^ "Reference range (albumin)". GPnotebook.
- ^ a b Derived from mass using molecular weight of 65kD
- ^ a b c d e Derived from mass values using molar mass of 585g/mol
- ^ a b Derived from molar values using molar mass of 585g/mol
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s Fachwörterbuch Kompakt Medizin E-D/D-E. Author: Fritz-Jürgen Nöhring. Edition 2. Publisher:Elsevier, Urban&FischerVerlag, 2004. ISBN 978-3-437-15120-0. Length: 1288 pages
- ^ a b c d GPnotebook > reference range (AST) Archived 2017-01-07 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved on Dec 7, 2009
- ^ a b "Gamma-GT". Leistungsverzeichnis. Medizinisch-Diagnostische Institute. Archived from the original on 25 April 2012. Retrieved 20 November 2011.
- ^ a b "Creatine kinase". GPnotebook.
- ^ a b c d Page 585 in: Lee, Mary Ann (2009). Basic Skills in Interpreting Laboratory Data. Amer Soc of Health System. ISBN 978-1-58528-180-0.
- ^ a b c d Muscle Information and Courses from MediaLab, Inc. > Cardiac Biomarkers Retrieved on April 22, 2010
- ^ Caselli, C.; Cangemi, G.; Masotti, S.; Ragusa, R.; Gennai, I.; Del Ry, S.; Prontera, C.; Clerico, A. (2016-07-01). "Plasma cardiac troponin I concentrations in healthy neonates, children and adolescents measured with a high sensitive immunoassay method: High sensitive troponin I in pediatric age". Clinica Chimica Acta. 458: 68–71. doi:10.1016/j.cca.2016.04.029. ISSN 0009-8981. PMID 27118089.
- ^ Baum, Hannsjörg; Hinze, Anika; Bartels, Peter; Neumeier, Dieter (2004-12-01). "Reference values for cardiac troponins T and I in healthy neonates". Clinical Biochemistry. 37 (12): 1079–82. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2004.08.003. ISSN 0009-9120. PMID 15589813.
- ^ a b Page 220 in: Lee, Mary Ann (2009). Basic Skills in Interpreting Laboratory Data. Amer Soc of Health System. ISBN 978-1-58528-180-0.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n Adëeva Nutritionals Canada > Optimal blood test values Archived 2009-05-29 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved on July 9, 2009
- ^ a b c d e f Derived from values in mg/dL to mmol/L, by dividing by 89, according to faqs.org: What are mg/dL and mmol/L? How to convert? Glucose? Cholesterol? Last Update July 21, 2009. Retrieved on July 21, 2009
- ^ a b c d Derived from values in mg/dL to mmol/L, using molar mass of 386.65 g/mol
- ^ a b c "Reference range (cholesterol)". GPnotebook.
- ^ a b c d e f g h Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia; Cholesterol (HDL and LDL) – plasma or serum Last Updated: Monday, 6 August 2007
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j Derived from values in mmol/L, using molar mass of 386.65 g/mol
- ^ What Your Cholesterol Levels Mean. American Heart Association. Retrieved on September 12, 2009
- ^ "HDL Cholesterol: The Test". September 3, 2001. Archived from the original on 2001-09-03.
- ^ GP Notebook > range (reference, ca-125) Retrieved on Jan 5, 2009
- ^ ClinLab Navigator > Test Interpretations > CA-125 Archived 2012-06-26 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved on March 8, 2011
- ^ a b Bjerner J, Høgetveit A, Wold Akselberg K, et al. (June 2008). "Reference intervals for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), CA125, MUC1, Alfa-foeto-protein (AFP), neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and CA19.9 from the NORIP study". Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation. 68 (8): 703–13. doi:10.1080/00365510802126836. PMID 18609108. S2CID 12545738.
- ^ Carcinoembryonic Antigen(CEA) at MedicineNet
- ^ a b c Luboldt, Hans-Joachim; Schindler, Joachim F.; Rübben, Herbert (2007). "Age-Specific Reference Ranges for Prostate-Specific Antigen as a Marker for Prostate Cancer". EAU-EBU Update Series. 5 (1): 38–48. doi:10.1016/j.eeus.2006.10.003. ISSN 1871-2592.
- ^ a b c Basuyau JP, Mallet E, Leroy M, Brunelle P (October 2004). "Reference intervals for serum calcitonin in men, women, and children". Clinical Chemistry. 50 (10): 1828–30. doi:10.1373/clinchem.2003.026963. PMID 15388660.
- ^ The TSH Reference Range Wars: What's "Normal?", Who is Wrong, Who is Right... Archived 2016-04-11 at the Wayback Machine By Mary Shomon, About.com. Updated: June 19, 2006. About.com Health's Disease and Condition
- ^ a b 2006 Press releases: Thyroid Imbalance? Target Your Numbers Archived 2008-03-03 at the Wayback Machine Contacts: Bryan Campbell American] Association of Clinical Endocrinologists
- ^ a b The TSH Reference Range Wars: What's "Normal?", Who is Wrong, Who is Right... Archived 2016-04-11 at the Wayback Machine By Mary Shomon, About.com. Updated: June 19, 2006
- ^ a b Demers, Laurence M.; Carole A. Spencer (2002). "LMPG: Laboratory Support for the Diagnosis and Monitoring of Thyroid Disease". National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry (USA). Archived from the original on 2008-11-20. Retrieved 2007-04-13. – see Section 2. Pre-analytic factors
- ^ a b c d e f Free T4; Thyroxine, Free; T4, Free Archived 2010-12-22 at the Wayback Machine UNC Health Care System
- ^ Derived from molar values using molar mass of 776.87 g/mol
- ^ a b c d e f Derived from mass values using molar mass of 776.87 g/mol
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o Table 4: Typical reference ranges for serum assays Archived 2011-07-01 at the Wayback Machine – Thyroid Disease Manager
- ^ a b c d van der Watt G, Haarburger D, Berman P (July 2008). "Euthyroid patient with elevated serum free thyroxine". Clinical Chemistry. 54 (7): 1239–41. doi:10.1373/clinchem.2007.101428. PMID 18593963.
- ^ a b c d Derived from mass values using molar mass of 650.98 g/mol
- ^ a b Cioffi M, Gazzerro P, Vietri MT, et al. (2001). "Serum concentration of free T3, free T4 and TSH in healthy children". Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology & Metabolism. 14 (9): 1635–39. doi:10.1515/jpem.2001.14.9.1635. PMID 11795654. S2CID 34910563. INIST 13391788.
- ^ Häggström, Mikael (2014). "Reference ranges for estradiol, progesterone, luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone during the menstrual cycle". WikiJournal of Medicine. 1 (1). doi:10.15347/wjm/2014.001.
- ^ a b "Andrology Australia: Your Health > Low Testosterone > Diagnosis". Archived from the original on 2012-02-17. Retrieved 2008-11-28.
- ^ a b c d Derived from mass values using molar mass of 288.42g/mol
- ^ a b c d e f g Derived from molar values using molar mass of 288.42g/mol
- ^ a b c d MedlinePlus > Testosterone Update Date: 3/18/2008. Updated by: Elizabeth H. Holt, MD, PhD, Yale University. Review provided by VeriMed Healthcare Network. Also reviewed by David Zieve, MD, MHA, Medical Director
- ^ a b c d Derived from mass values using molar mass of 330.46g/mol
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j reference range (FSH) GPnotebook. Retrieved on September 27, 2009
- ^ a b c d e f Values taken from day 1 after LH surge in: Stricker R, Eberhart R, Chevailler MC, Quinn FA, Bischof P, Stricker R (2006). "Establishment of detailed reference values for luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, estradiol, and progesterone during different phases of the menstrual cycle on the Abbott ARCHITECT analyzer". Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. 44 (7): 883–87. doi:10.1515/CCLM.2006.160. PMID 16776638. S2CID 524952.
- ^ a b c d e f New York Hospital Queens > Services and Facilities > Patient Testing > Pathology > New York Hospital Queens Diagnostic Laboratories > Test Directory > Reference Ranges[permanent dead link] Retrieved on Nov 8, 2009
- ^ a b Mayo Medical Laboratories > Test ID: LH, Luteinizing Hormone (LH), Serum Archived 2016-09-25 at the Wayback Machine, retrieved December 2012
- ^ a b c d e f g GPNotebook – reference range (oestradiol) Archived 2012-06-09 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved on September 27, 2009
- ^ a b c d e f g Derived from molar values using molar mass of 272.38g/mol
- ^ a b c d Total amount multiplied by 0.022 according to 2.2% presented in: Wu CH, Motohashi T, Abdel-Rahman HA, Flickinger GL, Mikhail G (August 1976). "Free and protein-bound plasma estradiol-17 beta during the menstrual cycle". J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 43 (2): 436–45. doi:10.1210/jcem-43-2-436. PMID 950372.
- ^ a b Derived from mass values using molar mass of 314.46 g/mol
- ^ a b Bhattacharya Sudhindra Mohan (July/August 2005) Mid-luteal phase plasma progesterone levels in spontaneous and clomiphene citrate induced conception cycles Archived 2010-06-02 at the Wayback Machine J Obstet Gynecol India Vol. 55, No. 4 : July/August 2005 pp. 350–52
- ^ a b Dehydroepiandrosterone Sulfate (DHEA-S), Serum Archived 2018-03-14 at the Wayback Machine at Mayo Foundation For Medical Education And Research. Retrieved July 2012
- ^ a b c d Unit Code 91215 Archived 2011-07-20 at the Wayback Machine at Mayo Clinic Medical Laboratories. Retrieved April 2011
- ^ a b Antimullerian Hormone (AMH), Serum Archived 2013-07-29 at the Wayback Machine from Mayo Medical Laboratories. Retrieved April 2012.
- ^ a b Derived from mass values using 140,000 g/mol, as given in:
- Hampl R, Šnajderová M, Mardešić T (2011). "Antimüllerian hormone (AMH) not only a marker for prediction of ovarian reserve". Physiological Research. 60 (2): 217–23. doi:10.33549/physiolres.932076. PMID 21114374.
- ^ a b Nieman, Lynnette K (29 September 2019). "Measurement of ACTH, CRH, and other hypothalamic and pituitary peptides". www.uptodate.com. UpToDate. Archived from the original on 25 June 2021. Retrieved 25 June 2021.
- ^ a b c d Biochemistry Reference Ranges at Good Hope Hospital Archived 2010-07-20 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved on Nov 8, 2009
- ^ a b c d Derived from molar values using molar mass of 362 g/mol
- ^ a b c d e f g h Friedrich N, Alte D, Völzke H, et al. (June 2008). "Reference ranges of serum IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 levels in a general adult population: results of the Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP)". Growth Hormone & IGF Research. 18 (3): 228–37. doi:10.1016/j.ghir.2007.09.005. PMID 17997337.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p Taken from the assay method giving the lowest and highest estimate, respectively, from Table 2 in: Beltran L, Fahie-Wilson MN, McKenna TJ, Kavanagh L, Smith TP (October 2008). "Serum total prolactin and monomeric prolactin reference intervals determined by precipitation with polyethylene glycol: evaluation and validation on common immunoassay platforms". Clinical Chemistry. 54 (10): 1673–81. doi:10.1373/clinchem.2008.105312. PMID 18719199.
- ^ a b Derived from molar values using molar mass of 9.4 kDa
- ^ a b Table 2 in: Aloia JF, Feuerman M, Yeh JK (2006). "Reference range for serum parathyroid hormone". Endocr Pract. 12 (2): 137–44. doi:10.4158/ep.12.2.137. PMC 1482827. PMID 16690460.
- ^ a b Derived from mass values using molar mass of 9.4 kDa
- ^ a b c d e f Derived from molar values using molar mass 400.6 g/mol
- ^ a b c d Bender, David A. (2003). "Vitamin D". Nutritional biochemistry of the vitamins. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-80388-5. Retrieved December 10, 2008 through Google Book Search.
- ^ a b c d Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Dietrich T, Orav EJ, et al. (September 2004). "Higher 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations are associated with better lower-extremity function in both active and inactive persons aged > or =60 y". The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 80 (3): 752–58. doi:10.1093/ajcn/80.3.752. PMID 15321818.
- ^ a b c d Reusch J, Ackermann H, Badenhoop K (May 2009). "Cyclic changes of vitamin D and PTH are primarily regulated by solar radiation: 5-year analysis of a German (50 degrees N) population". Horm. Metab. Res. 41 (5): 402–07. doi:10.1055/s-0028-1128131. PMID 19241329. S2CID 260166796.
- ^ a b c d e f g h Vasquez A, Cannell J (July 2005). "Calcium and vitamin D in preventing fractures: data are not sufficient to show inefficacy". BMJ. 331 (7508): 108–09, author reply 109. doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7508.108-b. PMC 558659. PMID 16002891.
- ^ a b Converted from values in mcU/mL by dividing with a factor of 11.2 mcU/mL per ng/(mL*hour), as given in:
- New Assays for Aldosterone, Renin and Parathyroid Hormone Archived 2011-10-27 at the Wayback Machine University of
- ^ a b Pratt RE, Flynn JA, Hobart PM, Paul M, Dzau VJ (March 1988). "Different secretory pathways of renin from mouse cells transfected with the human renin gene". The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 263 (7): 3137–41. doi:10.1016/S0021-9258(18)69046-5. PMID 2893797.
- ^ a b c d New Assays for Aldosterone, Renin and Parathyroid Hormone Archived 2011-10-27 at the Wayback Machine University of Washington, Department of Laboratory Medicine. Retrieved Mars 2011
- ^ a b Converted from values in ng/(mL*hour) by multiplying with a factor of 11.2 mcU/mL per ng/(mL*hour), as given in:
- New Assays for Aldosterone, Renin and Parathyroid Hormone Archived 2011-10-27 at the Wayback Machine University of
- ^ a b Converted from mass values using molar mass of 360.44 g/mol
- ^ a b c d Tiu SC, Choi CH, Shek CC, et al. (January 2005). "The use of aldosterone-renin ratio as a diagnostic test for primary hyperaldosteronism and its test characteristics under different conditions of blood sampling". The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 90 (1): 72–78. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.117.5182. doi:10.1210/jc.2004-1149. PMID 15483077.
- ^ a b c d e f Central Manchester University Hospitals / Reference ranges Archived 2012-11-30 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved on July 9, 2009
- ^ University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center > Clinical Lab Reference Range Guide Retrieved on April 28, 2009
- ^ a b c d e Derived from mass values using molar mass of 441 mol−1
- ^ a b GPnotebook > B12 Retrieved on April 28, 2009
- ^ a b Derived form molar values using molar mass of 1355g/mol
- ^ a b Derived from mass values using molar mass of 1355g/mol
- ^ a b c d "Homocysteine". www.thedoctorsdoctor.com.
- ^ a b c d Derived from molar values using molar massof 135 g/mol
- ^ a b Derived from mass values using molar mass of 176 grams per mol
- ^ a b c For Driving under the influence by country, see Drunk driving law by country
- ^ Derived from mass values using molar mass of 46g/mol
- ^ a b c d e Derived from mass values using 64,500 g/mol. This molar mass was taken from: Van Beekvelt MC, Colier WN, Wevers RA, Van Engelen BG (2001). "Performance of near-infrared spectroscopy in measuring local O2 consumption and blood flow in skeletal muscle". J Appl Physiol. 90 (2): 511–19. doi:10.1152/jappl.2001.90.2.511. PMID 11160049. S2CID 15468862.
- ^ a b c d Normal Lab Values Archived 2014-12-16 at the Wayback Machine at Marshall University Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine. Retrieved July 2013
- ^ a b c d e f g h molar concentration as given for hemoglobin above, but multiplied by 4, according to: Lodemann P, Schorer G, Frey BM (February 2010). "Wrong molar hemoglobin reference values-a longstanding error that should be corrected". Annals of Hematology. 89 (2): 209. doi:10.1007/s00277-009-0791-x. PMID 19609525. S2CID 3091357.
- ^ a b c d Derived from mass concentration, using molar mass of 64,458 g/mol. This molar mass was taken from: Van Beekvelt MC, Colier WN, Wevers RA, Van Engelen BG (2001). "Performance of near-infrared spectroscopy in measuring local O2 consumption and blood flow in skeletal muscle". J Appl Physiol. 90 (2): 511–19. doi:10.1152/jappl.2001.90.2.511. PMID 11160049. S2CID 15468862.. Subsequently, 1 g/dL = 0.1551 mmol/L
- ^ a b c d e f Morkis IV, Farias MG, Scotti L (2016). "Determination of reference ranges for immature platelet and reticulocyte fractions and reticulocyte hemoglobin equivalent". Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter. 38 (4): 310–313. doi:10.1016/j.bjhh.2016.07.001. PMC 5119661. PMID 27863758.
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ a b Brugnara C, Schiller B, Moran J (2006). "Reticulocyte hemoglobin equivalent (Ret He) and assessment of iron-deficient states". Clinical and Laboratory Haematology. 28 (5): 303–8. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2257.2006.00812.x. PMC 1618805. PMID 16999719.
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ a b c d e f g h lymphomation.org > Tests & Imaging > Labs > Complete Blood Count Retrieved on May 14, 2009
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u McClatchey, Kenneth D. (November 28, 2002). Clinical Laboratory Medicine. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN 978-0-683-30751-1 – via Google Books.
- ^ "Determination of monocyte count by hematological analyzers, manual method and flow cytometry in Polish population" Central European Journal of Immunology (Centr Eur J Immunol 2006; 31 (1–2): 1–5) authors: Elżbieta Górska, Urszula Demkow, Roman Pińkowski, Barbara Jakubczak, Dorota Matuszewicz, Jolanta Gawęda, Wioletta Rzeszotarska, Maria Wąsik,
- ^ a b c d e gpnotebook.co.uk > blood constituents (reference range) Retrieved on May 14, 2009
- ^ a b Demirin H, Ozhan H, Ucgun T, Celer A, Bulur S, Cil H, Gunes C, Yildirim HA (2011). "Normal range of mean platelet volume in healthy subjects: Insight from a large epidemiologic study". Thromb. Res. 128 (4): 358–60. doi:10.1016/j.thromres.2011.05.007. hdl:20.500.12684/3830. PMID 21620440.
- ^ a b Normal Values: RBC, Hgb, Hct, Indices, RDW, Platelets, and MPV (Conventional Units) Archived 2011-07-27 at the Wayback Machine From labcareplus. Retrieved 4 nov, 2010
- ^ a b Lozano M, Narváez J, Faúndez A, Mazzara R, Cid J, Jou JM, Marín JL, Ordinas A (1998). "[Platelet count and mean platelet volume in the Spanish population]". Med Clin (Barc) (in Spanish). 110 (20): 774–77. PMID 9666418.
- ^ a b MedlinePlus Encyclopedia: 003652
- ^ a b Antithrombin III at eMedicine
- ^ a b Antithrombin CO000300 Archived 2017-09-09 at the Wayback Machine in Coagulation Test Handbook at Massachusetts General Hospital. In turn citing:
- Elizabeth M. Van Cott, M.D., and Michael Laposata, M.D., Ph.D., "Coagulation." In: Jacobs DS et al, ed. The Laboratory Test Handbook, 5th Edition. Lexi-Comp, Cleveland, 2001; 327–58.
- ^ a b "Home". pathology.bsuh.nhs.uk. Retrieved November 20, 2009.
- ^ a b Miller A, Green M, Robinson D (January 1983). "Simple rule for calculating normal erythrocyte sedimentation rate". British Medical Journal. 286 (6361): 266. doi:10.1136/bmj.286.6361.266. PMC 1546487. PMID 6402065.
- ^ Böttiger LE, Svedberg CA (1967). "Normal erythrocyte sedimentation rate and age". Br Med J. 2 (5544): 85–87. doi:10.1136/bmj.2.5544.85. PMC 1841240. PMID 6020854.
- ^ "C-reactive protein". GPnotebook.
- ^ 2730 Serum C-Reactive Protein values in Diabetics with Periodontal Disease Archived 2008-12-20 at the Wayback Machine A.R. Choudhury, and S. Rahman, Birdem, Diabetic Association of Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh. (the diabetics were not used to determine the reference ranges)
- ^ a b c d Derived from mass using molar mass of 25,106 g/mol
- ^ a b Sipahi T, Kara C, Tavil B, Inci A, Oksal A (March 2003). "Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency: an overlooked cause of late hemorrhagic disease of the newborn". Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology. 25 (3): 274–75. doi:10.1097/00043426-200303000-00019. PMID 12621252.
- ^ a b Derived from mass values using molar mass of 44324.5 g/mol
- ^ a b Derived from molar values using molar mass of 44324.5 g/mol
- ^ "Procalcitonin, Serum". Mayo Clinic. Retrieved 2015-03-01.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j The Society for American Clinical Laboratory Science > Chemistry Tests > Immunoglobulins Archived 2009-10-15 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved on Nov 26, 2009
- ^ a b "SSA – Clinical: SS-A/Ro Antibodies, IgG, Serum". www.mayocliniclabs.com. Mayo Clinic Laboratories. Retrieved 2 July 2020.
- ^ a b "SSB – Clinical: SS-B/La Antibodies, IgG, Serum". www.mayocliniclabs.com. Mayo Clinic Laboratories. Retrieved 2 July 2020.
- ^ a b c "ADNA – Clinical: DNA Double-Stranded Antibodies, IgG, Serum". www.mayocliniclabs.com. Mayo Clinic Laboratories. Retrieved 2 July 2020.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab ac ad ae chronolab.com > Autoantibodies associated with rheumatic diseases > Reference ranges Archived 2013-07-30 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved on April 29, 2010
- ^ a b c "AMA – Clinical: Mitochondrial Antibodies (M2), Serum". www.mayocliniclabs.com. Mayo Clinic Laboratories. Retrieved 2 July 2020.
- ^ a b Rajkumar SV, Kyle RA, Therneau TM, et al. (August 2005). "Serum free light chain ratio is an independent risk factor for progression in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance". Blood. 106 (3): 812–17. doi:10.1182/blood-2005-03-1038. PMC 1895159. PMID 15855274.
- ^ "Reference range (amylase)". GPnotebook.
- ^ Ageno W, Finazzi S, Steidl L, et al. (2002). "Plasma measurement of D-dimer levels for the early diagnosis of ischemic stroke subtypes". Archives of Internal Medicine. 162 (22): 2589–93. doi:10.1001/archinte.162.22.2589. hdl:2434/51239. PMID 12456231.
- ^ Kline JA, Williams GW, Hernandez-Nino J (May 2005). "D-dimer concentrations in normal pregnancy: new diagnostic thresholds are needed". Clinical Chemistry. 51 (5): 825–29. doi:10.1373/clinchem.2004.044883. PMID 15764641.
- ^ a b Gardner MD, Scott R (April 1980). "Age- and sex-related reference ranges for eight plasma constituents derived from randomly selected adults in a Scottish new town". Journal of Clinical Pathology. 33 (4): 380–85. doi:10.1136/jcp.33.4.380. PMC 1146084. PMID 7400337.
- ^ a b c d Finney H, Newman DJ, Price CP (January 2000). "Adult reference ranges for serum cystatin C, creatinine and predicted creatinine clearance". Annals of Clinical Biochemistry. 37 (1): 49–59. doi:10.1258/0004563001901524. PMID 10672373. S2CID 35866310.
- ^ a b c d e f g h Derived from molar values by multiplying with the molar mass of 113.118 g/mol, and divided by 10.000 to adapt from μg/L to mg/dL
- ^ a b MedlinePlus Encyclopedia: Glucose tolerance test
- ^ a b c Derived from molar values using molar mass of 180g/mol
- ^ a b Derived from mass values using molar mass of 180g/mol
- ^ a b "Diabetes – Prevention". Cleveland Clinic. Retrieved 2016-06-23. Last revised 1/15/2013
- ^ a b c d Derived from mass values using molar mass of 90.08 g/mol
- ^ a b Derived from mass values using molar mass of 88.06 g/mol
- ^ a b Ketones at eMedicine
- ^ a b c d Page 700 in:
Richard C. Dart (2004). Medical Toxicology. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins=year=2004. ISBN 978-0-7817-2845-4. - ^ The UK Electronic Medical Compendium recommends 0.4–0.8 mmol/L plasma lithium level in adults for prophylaxis of recurrent affective bipolar manic-depressive illness Camcolit 250 mg Lithium Carbonate Archived 2016-03-04 at the Wayback Machine Revision 2 December 2010, Retrieved 5 May 2011
- ^ a b Amdisen A. (1978). "Clinical and serum level monitoring in lithium therapy and lithium intoxication". J. Anal. Toxicol. 2 (5): 193–202. doi:10.1093/jat/2.5.193.
- ^ a b R. Baselt, Disposition of Toxic Drugs and Chemicals in Man, 8th edition, Biomedical Publications, Foster City, CA, 2008, pp. 851–54.
- ^ One study (Solomon, D.; Ristow, W.; Keller, M.; Kane, J.; Gelenberg, A.; Rosenbaum, J.; Warshaw, M. (1996). "Serum lithium levels and psychosocial function in patients with bipolar I disorder". The American Journal of Psychiatry. 153 (10): 1301–07. doi:10.1176/ajp.153.10.1301. PMID 8831438.) concluded a "low" dose of 0.4–0.6 mmol/L serum lithium treatment for patients with bipolar 1 disorder had less side effects, but a higher rate of relapse, than a "standard" dose of 0.8–1.0 mmol/L. However, a reanalysis of the same experimental data (Perlis, R.; Sachs, G.; Lafer, B.; Otto, M.; Faraone, S.; Kane, J.; Rosenbaum, J. (2002). "Effect of abrupt change from standard to low serum levels of lithium: A reanalysis of double-blind lithium maintenance data". The American Journal of Psychiatry. 159 (7): 1155–59. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.159.7.1155. PMID 12091193. S2CID 12103424.) concluded the higher rate of relapse for the "low" dose was due to abrupt changes in the lithium serum levels[improper synthesis?]
- ^ a b John Marx; Ron Walls; Robert Hockberger (2013). Rosen's Emergency Medicine – Concepts and Clinical Practice. Elsevier Health Sciences. ISBN 978-1-4557-4987-4.
External links
[edit]Further reading
[edit]- Rappoport, n.; Paik, P.; Oskotsky, B.; Tor, R.; Ziv, E.; Zaitlen, N.; Butte, A. (4 November 2017). "Creating ethnicity-specific reference intervals for lab tests from EHR data". bioRxiv 10.1101/213892.
Reference ranges for blood tests
View on GrokipediaCommon Reference Ranges for Selected Blood Tests
The following provides approximate reference ranges for selected common blood tests. These values are illustrative only and may vary depending on the laboratory, age, sex, ethnicity, and other individual factors. Laboratories use their own validated ranges, and results must always be interpreted by a qualified physician in the context of the patient's clinical presentation and history.[7][3]- Fasting blood glucose (FBS): 70-99 mg/dL
- Hemoglobin (Hb): Men 13.5-17.5 g/dL, Women 12-15.5 g/dL
- White blood cells (WBC): 4000-11000 per microliter
- Red blood cells (RBC): Men 4.5-5.9 million per microliter, Women 4.1-5.1 million per microliter
- Hematocrit (Hct): Men 41-50%, Women 36-44%
- Platelets (PLT): 150000-450000 per microliter
- Blood urea nitrogen (BUN): 7-20 mg/dL
- Creatinine (Cr): 0.6-1.2 mg/dL (men slightly higher)
- Total cholesterol: less than 200 mg/dL
- Triglycerides: less than 150 mg/dL
- Thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH): 0.4-4.0 mIU/L
General Principles
Definition and Purpose
Reference ranges, also known as reference intervals, represent the central 95% of laboratory test values obtained from a defined healthy reference population, typically encompassing the interval between the 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles of the distribution.[9] This interval is often approximated as the mean plus or minus two standard deviations for analytes that follow a Gaussian distribution, providing a statistical benchmark for what constitutes "normal" results in clinical laboratory medicine.[10] The selection of the reference population is critical, involving the exclusion of outliers and individuals with conditions that could skew the data, ensuring the range reflects physiological norms rather than pathological states. The primary purpose of reference ranges is to facilitate the interpretation of blood test results by identifying deviations that may indicate disease, thereby supporting clinical diagnosis, patient monitoring, and screening programs.[1] In practice, these ranges help clinicians determine whether a patient's analyte levels fall within expected physiological bounds, guiding decisions on further testing, treatment initiation, or therapeutic adjustments.[11] For instance, values outside the reference range prompt evaluation for underlying conditions, while those within it provide reassurance, though clinical context remains essential due to inherent biological variability.[12] Historically, reference ranges for blood tests were standardized in the late 1960s through large-scale population studies, with significant contributions from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) in the United States beginning in the 1970s.[13] NHANES I (1971–1975) and subsequent cycles provided extensive data on healthy populations, enabling the establishment of robust, nationally representative intervals that have been updated periodically to account for demographic shifts and analytical advancements.[14] These efforts underscored the need for ongoing refinement, as modern ranges incorporate larger, more diverse datasets to enhance applicability across populations.[15] Key statistical concepts underpinning reference ranges include measures of central tendency, such as the mean or median, which indicate the typical value in the reference population, and dispersion metrics like standard deviation or percentiles that define the interval's width.[9] Outlier exclusion protocols, often based on statistical tests or predefined criteria, ensure the integrity of the distribution by removing extreme values that do not represent the healthy cohort. While factors like age, sex, and ethnicity influence these ranges, the core methodology prioritizes a parametric or non-parametric approach to derive reliable intervals for clinical use.[10]Sample Collection and Processing
Blood samples for laboratory testing are categorized into three primary types: whole blood, serum, and plasma, each suited to specific analytes to ensure accurate measurement and maintain reference range validity. Whole blood consists of cellular components such as red blood cells, white blood cells, and platelets suspended in plasma, and it is used without separation for tests like complete blood counts or blood gas analysis.[16] Serum is the liquid portion obtained after allowing whole blood to clot and then centrifuging to remove the clot and cells; it lacks fibrinogen and other clotting factors, making it appropriate for assays such as electrolyte panels, liver enzymes, and hormone levels like thyroid-stimulating hormone.[16] Plasma, in contrast, is derived from anticoagulated whole blood that is centrifuged immediately to separate cells, retaining fibrinogen and clotting factors; it is essential for tests including coagulation studies (using citrate anticoagulant) and certain cardiac markers like troponin (using heparin).[16] The choice of sample type directly influences analyte stability and test performance, as interchanging them can lead to erroneous results due to differences in matrix composition.[16] Collection methods vary by site and purpose, with venous sampling being the most common for routine blood tests due to its reliability in obtaining sufficient volume. Venous blood is typically drawn via venipuncture from arm veins using evacuated tubes or syringes, with a tourniquet applied proximal to the site for no longer than 1 minute to minimize hemoconcentration and ensure patient comfort.[17] Arterial sampling, performed for blood gas analysis to assess oxygen and carbon dioxide levels, involves direct puncture of an artery (e.g., radial) and requires specialized handling to avoid air bubbles that could alter pH and gas measurements.[17] Capillary sampling, obtained by skin puncture (e.g., heel or fingertip lancet), is preferred for pediatric or point-of-care testing where small volumes suffice, such as glucose monitoring, but it mixes arterial, venous, and interstitial fluids, potentially introducing variability.[17] Fasting for 8-12 hours is often required prior to collection for tests sensitive to dietary influences, like lipid profiles or glucose, to prevent lipemia that obscures spectrophotometric readings.[17] Post-collection processing is critical to isolate serum or plasma while preserving analyte integrity, beginning with allowing serum samples to clot at room temperature (20-25°C) for 30-60 minutes to form a stable fibrin clot.[18] Both serum and plasma samples are then centrifuged to separate the liquid phase from cellular elements, typically at 1,000-2,000 × g for 10 minutes at 18-25°C using a refrigerated centrifuge if temperature-sensitive analytes are involved.[19] Whole blood samples bypass centrifugation for immediate analysis, such as in hematology analyzers. To prevent hemolysis—rupture of red blood cells—tubes must be handled gently, kept upright during transport, and processed promptly without excessive shaking or temperature extremes.[18] Following separation, samples are transferred to secondary containers to avoid contamination. Storage conditions must align with analyte stability to uphold reference range applicability, with separated serum or plasma stable at room temperature (20-25°C) for up to 8 hours, refrigerated (2-8°C) for 24-48 hours, and frozen (≤ -20°C) for longer periods, though repeated freeze-thaw cycles should be avoided.[18] Whole blood is generally not refrigerated unless specified, as chilling can induce metabolic changes in certain tests. Improper handling can introduce interferences like hemolysis (releasing intracellular contents such as potassium), lipemia (turbidity from lipids masking absorbance), or icterus (bilirubin absorption interfering with wavelengths), which compromise result accuracy.[20] Laboratories often reject samples exceeding interference thresholds, such as a hemolysis index greater than 50 (indicating free hemoglobin >50 mg/dL), to prevent reporting biased values that deviate from established reference ranges.[20]Units of Measurement
In clinical chemistry, blood test results are reported using either the International System of Units (SI), which expresses concentrations in molar terms such as millimoles per liter (mmol/L) for analytes like electrolytes and glucose, or conventional units, which often use mass concentrations such as milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) for glucose and lipids.[21] The SI system was developed to provide a coherent framework for scientific measurements, emphasizing chemical relationships and molar quantities to facilitate international comparability, while conventional units stem from historical practices in clinical reporting that prioritize familiarity in certain regions.[22] Europe widely adopted SI units for laboratory reporting starting in the 1980s, following recommendations from the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC), to enhance standardization and reduce errors in data interpretation across borders.[21][23] Conversion between these unit systems is essential for harmonizing results, particularly when comparing data from diverse laboratories or guidelines. For instance, to convert glucose from mg/dL to mmol/L, multiply the value by 0.0555 (or equivalently, divide by 18, as the molecular weight of glucose is approximately 180 g/mol).[24] Similar multipliers apply to other key analytes, as shown in the table below for common blood tests. These factors are derived from molecular weights and ensure accurate translation without altering the clinical meaning.| Analyte | Conventional Unit | Conversion Factor to SI (mmol/L) | Example SI Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Glucose | mg/dL | × 0.0555 | mmol/L |
| Cholesterol | mg/dL | × 0.0259 | mmol/L |
| BUN (to urea) | mg/dL | × 0.357 | mmol/L |
| Creatinine | mg/dL | × 88.4 | µmol/L |
| Calcium | mg/dL | × 0.25 | mmol/L |
| Sodium | mEq/L | × 1 (already equivalent) | mmol/L |
Conventional vs Optimal Ranges
Conventional reference ranges for blood tests are statistically derived from the central 95% of values (2.5th to 97.5th percentiles) observed in a presumably healthy reference population, providing a benchmark for identifying potential abnormalities in clinical settings. These ranges do not guarantee that values within them reflect optimal health, nor do values outside them always indicate disease, as the distributions of healthy and diseased states often overlap. A key limitation is their potential to overlook subclinical issues, where an individual's result may fall within the range but deviate from their personal baseline, signaling early dysfunction that trend monitoring could detect more effectively.[10][31] In preventive medicine, optimal ranges represent narrower intervals linked to peak physiological function and minimized disease risk, often informed by longitudinal studies assessing health outcomes rather than mere population norms. For instance, lipid profiles derived from the Framingham Heart Study and supporting trials indicate that low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels of 50-70 mg/dL correlate with reduced atherosclerosis and coronary heart disease events, in contrast to broader conventional targets below 100 mg/dL. While the Endocrine Society previously recommended optimal serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels of 30-50 ng/mL (2011) for broader benefits like immune function and fracture prevention, their 2024 guideline for disease prevention aligns with the Institute of Medicine (IOM), defining sufficiency at ≥20 ng/mL for healthy adults under 75 without routine higher targets.[32][33] These optimal targets are applied in wellness contexts to guide interventions aimed at longevity and performance, rather than solely diagnosing overt pathology. As of 2025, updates like the ESC/EAS lipid guidelines maintain aggressive LDL-C goals below 70 mg/dL (or <55 mg/dL) for high-risk groups, emphasizing risk-based personalization.[34] Despite their utility, optimal ranges face controversies due to a lack of universal standardization, as recommendations vary by organization and outcome measured, complicating clinical adoption. Evidence from meta-analyses, such as those on vitamin D supplementation, suggests that achieving levels above conventional thresholds may yield benefits in deficient populations, though optimal 25(OH)D remains debated. For lipids, trials aggregated in reviews show superior cardiovascular event reduction with levels below conventional thresholds, underscoring the value of functional approaches while highlighting the need for personalized adjustments.[35][32]Factors Influencing Ranges
Biological Variability
Biological variability refers to the inherent fluctuations in blood analyte concentrations due to physiological processes within individuals and across populations, distinct from external influences like sample handling. This variability arises from homeostatic mechanisms that maintain analyte levels around a set point, but it can affect the interpretation of reference ranges by introducing natural oscillations that must be accounted for in clinical decision-making. Understanding these variations is crucial for establishing individualized reference intervals and detecting true pathological changes.[36] Within-subject variability encompasses short-term and long-term physiological changes in an individual, such as circadian rhythms, where cortisol levels peak in the early morning due to activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and decline throughout the day. Hormonal fluctuations during the menstrual cycle also contribute, with estrogen levels rising significantly by cycle day seven to promote follicular development, while progesterone increases post-ovulation, potentially influencing related analytes like iron or inflammatory markers. Age-related changes further exemplify this, as serum creatinine concentrations rise steadily after age 40 in females and 60 in males, reflecting declines in muscle mass and renal function that alter analyte homeostasis over time.[37][38][39] Between-subject variability stems from differences in genetic and environmental factors among individuals, leading to diverse homeostatic set points for blood analytes. Genetic polymorphisms, such as those in the G6PD gene, result in variable enzyme activity levels, with affected individuals showing reduced glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase concentrations that can predispose to hemolytic responses under stress, thereby widening population-level analyte distributions. Lifestyle elements, including diet, similarly impact variability; high intake of saturated fatty acids elevates low-density lipoprotein cholesterol by up to 10-15% in susceptible individuals, highlighting how nutritional patterns contribute to inter-individual differences in lipid profiles.[40][41][42] Key indices quantify this variability: the within-subject coefficient of variation (CV_I or CV_w) measures intra-individual fluctuations, while the between-subject coefficient of variation (CV_G or CV_b) captures inter-individual differences, and analytical variation (CV_A) represents laboratory imprecision. For sodium, a tightly regulated analyte, CV_G is approximately 1.8% and CV_w 1.0%, indicating low biological fluctuation around homeostatic set points compared to more variable analytes like lipids, where CV_G can exceed 10%. Longitudinal studies, such as analyses from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), demonstrate that reference ranges for many analytes shift by 20-50% across age groups, underscoring the need to incorporate age-specific biological variation data for accurate clinical application. Pre-analytical factors, like timing of collection, can interact with these inherent variations but are addressed separately.[43][43][43]Pre-Analytical Factors
Pre-analytical factors encompass the variables occurring prior to laboratory analysis that can significantly influence blood test results, primarily related to patient preparation and external conditions. These factors are modifiable and must be standardized to ensure accurate reference ranges and reliable clinical interpretations. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) provides protocols, such as those in GP41-Ed7, emphasizing patient comfort during venipuncture to minimize stress-induced alterations in analytes like cortisol and prolactin, which can transiently elevate due to procedural anxiety.[44] Patient-related preparation plays a critical role in mitigating artifacts. Fasting for 8-12 hours is recommended for tests measuring glucose and lipid profiles to avoid postprandial elevations; for instance, blood glucose can increase by nearly 12% within one hour after a meal, while triglycerides may rise substantially, peaking 2-4 hours post-meal. Hydration status directly impacts hematological parameters, with dehydration causing hemoconcentration that elevates hematocrit levels by reducing plasma volume, potentially leading to falsely high readings. Recent exercise, particularly strenuous activity, can elevate creatine kinase (CK) enzymes due to muscle tissue breakdown, with levels rising up to 30 times the upper limit of normal in untrained individuals shortly after intense sessions.[45][46][47] Timing of sample collection relative to daily or seasonal patterns also affects results. Postprandial states alter lipid profiles, as non-fasting triglycerides better reflect cardiovascular risk but require specific interpretation compared to fasting baselines. Seasonal variations influence certain analytes, such as 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels, which are typically 13-14% higher in summer due to increased sunlight exposure compared to winter.[48][49] Medication use introduces interference that necessitates timing adjustments or disclosure to clinicians. Statins, commonly prescribed for hypercholesterolemia, lower total and LDL cholesterol levels, potentially masking baseline values if not accounted for during testing. Diuretics, such as thiazides, can disrupt electrolyte balance by increasing sodium excretion and altering potassium levels, with recommendations to assess timing relative to the last dose for accurate results. CLSI guidelines advocate informing patients to report all medications and adhere to withholding periods where applicable to standardize pre-analytical conditions.[50][51]Analytical Variability
Analytical variability in blood testing refers to the inconsistencies introduced by laboratory methods, instruments, and procedures that can affect the reliability of reference ranges. These variations arise from differences in analytical techniques, calibration standards, and quality assurance processes, potentially leading to discrepancies in measured analyte concentrations across laboratories. Ensuring minimal analytical variability is crucial for establishing standardized reference ranges that support consistent clinical decision-making.[52] Different analytical methods can introduce significant bias in results, particularly for complex analytes like hormones and cardiac biomarkers. For instance, immunoassays, commonly used for hormone measurements such as estradiol and testosterone, often exhibit higher variability compared to more specific methods like liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, with coefficients of variation ranging from 4% to 49% and biases exceeding 100% at low concentrations.[53] Similarly, troponin assays, which rely on immunoassay platforms, demonstrate inter-assay variances of 10-20% due to differences in antibody specificity and calibration, complicating the harmonization of reference ranges for myocardial infarction diagnosis.[54] While spectrophotometric methods are employed for certain biochemical tests, such as enzyme activity assays, their precision can vary based on reagent stability and wavelength selection, though they generally offer lower bias than immunoassays for non-protein analytes.[55] Instrument calibration plays a pivotal role in mitigating analytical variability by ensuring traceability to certified reference materials. Laboratories calibrate analyzers using standards from authoritative bodies like the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), such as Standard Reference Material (SRM) 3152a for sodium, which provides metrological traceability for accurate ion-selective electrode measurements.[56] Total allowable error (TEa) limits define acceptable performance; for sodium, the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) specify a TEa of ±4 mmol/L, guiding calibration adjustments to keep systematic bias and imprecision within bounds that preserve reference range integrity.[57] Quality control measures are essential to monitor and control analytical variability on an ongoing basis. Internal quality control involves daily runs of control materials at multiple concentration levels to detect shifts in precision and accuracy, with results plotted on Levey-Jennings charts to identify outliers exceeding predefined limits.[58] External proficiency testing, such as surveys conducted by the College of American Pathologists (CAP), evaluates inter-laboratory comparability by comparing participant results against peer groups, helping to identify method-specific biases.[59] Sigma metrics quantify method performance by integrating bias, imprecision, and TEa; a sigma value greater than 4 indicates excellent quality, allowing fewer control rules and reduced false rejections, while values below 3 signal the need for method improvements.[60] Efforts to harmonize analytical practices have advanced through international collaborations, reducing variability in reference ranges. Since 2010, the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) Committee on Reference Intervals and Decision Limits (C-RIDL) has led initiatives, including global multicenter studies to standardize reference value derivation and promote traceable measurements across laboratories.[9] These efforts emphasize method-independent protocols and shared reference materials, fostering consistency in blood test results worldwide.[61]Population and Demographic Differences
Reference ranges for blood tests vary significantly across populations due to demographic factors such as age, sex, ethnicity, and geography, necessitating tailored intervals to accurately interpret results and avoid misdiagnosis.[62] Age profoundly influences reference ranges, with distinct patterns observed between pediatric, adult, and elderly populations. In children, white blood cell (WBC) counts are typically higher than in adults; for instance, medians reach 8.55 × 10³/µL in ages 0.5–4 years compared to 5.91 × 10³/µL in ages 15–82 years.[62] Hemoglobin levels are also lower in pediatric groups, averaging 10.78 g/dL in young children versus 13.14 g/dL in adults.[62] In the elderly, declines become evident; hemoglobin concentrations drop below WHO anemia thresholds (<13.0 g/dL for men and <12.0 g/dL for women) after age 70 and 80, respectively, with averages as low as 9.7 g/dL in men aged ≥90.[63] Serum albumin levels similarly decrease with advancing age, estimated at 42 g/L (95% interval: 36–48 g/L) in older persons compared to higher values in younger adults.[64] Sex-based differences arise primarily from hormonal influences and physiological states like pregnancy. Men generally exhibit higher hemoglobin levels than women due to androgen effects on erythropoiesis, with adult medians of 13.91 g/dL in males versus 12.40 g/dL in females.[62] Pregnancy induces specific alterations through expanded plasma volume, which increases by 40–60% and exceeds red blood cell mass expansion (20–50%), resulting in physiologic anemia and lowered hematocrit from 38–45% pre-pregnancy to about 34% late in gestation.[65] Accordingly, trimester-specific ranges adjust downward for hemoglobin, with minimum normals of 11 g/dL in the first and third trimesters and 10.5 g/dL in the second.[66] Ethnic variations in reference ranges stem from genetic and environmental factors, including higher prevalence of conditions like thalassemia. Southeast Asian populations often show lower mean corpuscular volume (MCV) due to alpha-thalassemia carriers, which affect up to 1 in 20 individuals and reduce MCV below standard intervals (e.g., <81 fL in carriers versus 81–98 fL typical).[67] Broader surveys reveal differences such as lower hemoglobin and MCV in Black individuals compared to White or Asian groups, with non-Hispanic African-Americans averaging 0.5–1.0 g/dL less in hemoglobin.[68] Global data from WHO indicate these patterns contribute to regionally adjusted ranges for accurate anemia assessment across ethnicities.[69] Geographic factors, including altitude and nutrition, further modify ranges to reflect environmental adaptations. At altitudes above 2000 m, reduced oxygen partial pressure stimulates erythropoiesis, elevating hemoglobin by approximately 3% or more; for example, means rise from 155 g/L at sea level to 160 g/L at >1800 m.[70] A specific example occurs in Ecuador, where significant altitude differences between cities influence hematological parameters. In Quito (altitude ~2,850 m), reference ranges for hemoglobin are elevated due to physiological adaptation to hypoxia: 14.9–18.3 g/dL for men (average 16.7 g/dL) and 12.7–16.2 g/dL for women (average 14.5 g/dL). In contrast, Guayaquil (at sea level) uses standard sea-level ranges (e.g., ~13–17 g/dL for men and ~12–15 g/dL for women). Other parameters such as leukocytes and platelets may show slight variations, but the primary difference is in red blood cell parameters due to altitude. Many clinical laboratories in Ecuador apply standardized sea-level ranges without local adjustment, despite recommendations from studies to establish altitude-specific reference ranges for accurate interpretation. In developing regions, nutritional deficiencies like iron scarcity—prevalent in areas with inadequate dietary intake—lower hemoglobin and contribute to higher anemia rates, affecting up to 40% of populations in low socioeconomic zones per WHO estimates.[69]Hematology
Red Blood Cell Parameters
Red blood cell parameters are essential components of a complete blood count (CBC) that assess the oxygen-carrying capacity and morphological characteristics of erythrocytes. These include the red blood cell count, hemoglobin concentration, and hematocrit, which provide foundational data for diagnosing anemias, polycythemias, and related disorders. Derived indices such as mean corpuscular volume (MCV), mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH), mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC), and red cell distribution width (RDW) offer insights into red blood cell size, hemoglobin content, and variability, aiding in the classification of hematologic abnormalities.[71] The red blood cell count measures the number of erythrocytes per unit volume of blood, typically reported in units of ×10¹²/L. In adult males, the reference range is 4.5–5.9 ×10¹²/L, while in adult females, it is 4.2–5.4 ×10¹²/L.[72][73] Hemoglobin, the protein responsible for oxygen transport, has a reference range of 13.5–17.5 g/dL for males and 12.0–16.0 g/dL for females.[74] Hematocrit, representing the percentage of blood volume occupied by red blood cells, ranges from 41–50% in males and 36–44% in females.[75]| Parameter | Male Reference Range | Female Reference Range | Units |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Blood Cell Count | 4.5–5.9 ×10¹²/L | 4.2–5.4 ×10¹²/L | ×10¹²/L |
| Hemoglobin | 13.5–17.5 g/dL | 12.0–16.0 g/dL | g/dL |
| Hematocrit | 41–50% | 36–44% | % |
White Blood Cell Parameters
White blood cell (WBC) parameters, also known as leukocytes, are essential components of the complete blood count (CBC) used to assess immune function and detect infections, inflammation, or hematologic disorders. The total WBC count measures the overall number of leukocytes in circulation, while the differential count provides the relative and absolute proportions of specific subtypes: neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils, and basophils. These parameters help identify patterns such as neutrophilia in bacterial infections or lymphocytosis in viral conditions.[71] The reference range for total WBC count in healthy adults is typically 4.0 to 11.0 × 10^9/L (or 4,000 to 11,000 cells/µL). This range can vary slightly by laboratory and population, but deviations outside it may indicate leukopenia (below 4.0 × 10^9/L) or leukocytosis (above 11.0 × 10^9/L). Neonates exhibit higher counts, often 9.0 to 30.0 × 10^9/L in the first two weeks of life, reflecting immature immune system dynamics, with levels gradually declining to adult ranges by age 4–6 years. Sex differences are minimal in adults, though some studies note slightly higher counts in males.[84][85][74] The WBC differential categorizes leukocytes by subtype, reported as percentages of the total count and absolute numbers for clinical accuracy, as percentages alone can mislead if total WBC is abnormal. Neutrophils, the most abundant, range from 40% to 70% (absolute: 1.8 to 7.7 × 10^9/L), serving as primary responders to bacterial infections. Lymphocytes follow at 20% to 40% (absolute: 1.0 to 4.8 × 10^9/L), crucial for adaptive immunity. Monocytes constitute 2% to 8% (absolute: 0.2 to 0.8 × 10^9/L), differentiating into macrophages. Eosinophils are 1% to 4% (absolute: 0.0 to 0.4 × 10^9/L), elevated in parasitic or allergic conditions, while basophils are 0% to 1% (absolute: 0.0 to 0.1 × 10^9/L), involved in hypersensitivity reactions.[71][86] WBC counting and differentiation occur via manual or automated methods, with automation preferred for efficiency and precision in routine testing. Manual counting involves microscopic examination of a stained blood smear, where a technologist classifies at least 100 cells based on morphology, but it is labor-intensive and subject to inter-observer variability. Automated hematology analyzers, such as those using flow cytometry, hydrodynamically focus cells through a narrow stream and employ laser light scatter, impedance, and fluorescent dyes to distinguish subtypes by size, granularity, and nucleic acid content—enabling rapid 5-part differentials. These systems flag abnormalities, such as a "left shift" indicating increased immature neutrophils (bands >5–10%) during acute infections, prompting manual review for confirmation.[87][88][89] Several factors influence WBC parameters, introducing variability that must be considered for accurate interpretation. Physiological stress, including emotional or physical exertion, can transiently elevate neutrophil counts through demargination from vascular walls, mimicking infection. Ethnic differences also play a role; for instance, individuals of African descent often have lower total WBC and lymphocyte counts but higher neutrophil percentages compared to those of European descent. These variations underscore the need for population-specific reference ranges to avoid misdiagnosis.[90][90]| WBC Parameter | Adult Reference Range (Percentage) | Adult Reference Range (Absolute, ×10^9/L) |
|---|---|---|
| Neutrophils | 40–70% | 1.8–7.7 |
| Lymphocytes | 20–40% | 1.0–4.8 |
| Monocytes | 2–8% | 0.2–0.8 |
| Eosinophils | 1–4% | 0.0–0.4 |
| Basophils | 0–1% | 0.0–0.1 |
Platelet and Coagulation Factors
Platelets, also known as thrombocytes, are small cell fragments essential for primary hemostasis, where they adhere to damaged vessel walls, aggregate, and initiate clot formation to prevent bleeding.[91] The reference range for platelet count in healthy adults is typically 150-450 × 10^9/L, though values may vary slightly by laboratory and population demographics.[92] Mean platelet volume (MPV), which reflects platelet size and activation potential, normally ranges from 7 to 11 fL, with deviations indicating possible bone marrow disorders or increased platelet turnover.[93] Coagulation factors contribute to secondary hemostasis by forming a stable fibrin clot through enzymatic cascades. Prothrombin time (PT) measures the extrinsic pathway and is normally 11-13.5 seconds, assessing factors VII, X, V, II, and fibrinogen.[94] Activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) evaluates the intrinsic pathway, with a reference range of 25-35 seconds, involving factors XII, XI, IX, VIII, X, V, II, and fibrinogen.[95] The international normalized ratio (INR), derived from PT, standardizes results across reagents and is 0.8-1.2 in healthy individuals not on anticoagulants; it is calculated as: where ISI (international sensitivity index) is calibrated against a World Health Organization reference thromboplastin to ensure consistency, typically ranging from 0.9 to 2.0 depending on the reagent.[96][97] Fibrinogen, a key coagulation factor (factor I), converts to fibrin during clotting and has a reference range of 200-400 mg/dL; levels below 100 mg/dL increase bleeding risk.[98] D-dimer, a fibrinolysis marker reflecting breakdown of cross-linked fibrin, is normally 0-0.5 μg/mL (or <500 ng/mL fibrinogen equivalent units), with elevated values suggesting thrombosis or disseminated intravascular coagulation.[99] Anticoagulant therapies like warfarin prolong PT and aPTT by inhibiting vitamin K-dependent factors (II, VII, IX, X), requiring INR monitoring to maintain therapeutic levels of 2.0-3.0 for conditions such as atrial fibrillation.[100]Biochemical Markers
Electrolytes and Trace Elements
Electrolytes are essential ions that maintain fluid balance, nerve function, muscle contraction, and acid-base homeostasis in the body. Reference ranges for serum electrolytes reflect concentrations typically found in healthy adults, derived from large population studies using standardized laboratory methods such as ion-selective electrodes. These ranges can vary slightly by laboratory due to methodological differences, but standard values provide a benchmark for clinical interpretation. Deviations may indicate disorders like dehydration, renal dysfunction, or endocrine imbalances, though clinical context is crucial for diagnosis. The primary electrolytes measured in routine blood tests include sodium, potassium, chloride, and bicarbonate. Sodium, the most abundant extracellular cation, supports osmotic pressure and cellular function, with a typical serum reference range of 135-145 mmol/L in adults. Potassium, vital for cardiac and muscular activity, has a narrow range of 3.6-5.2 mmol/L, as even small shifts can lead to arrhythmias. Chloride, the major extracellular anion, aids in acid-base balance and is referenced at 98-107 mmol/L. Bicarbonate, reflecting the buffering capacity against acidosis, normally spans 22-29 mmol/L. Calcium and magnesium are divalent cations critical for bone health, enzymatic reactions, and neuromuscular excitability. Total serum calcium, including both protein-bound and ionized forms, is typically 2.1-2.6 mmol/L (or 8.6-10.2 mg/dL), while ionized calcium—the physiologically active fraction—ranges from 1.1-1.3 mmol/L. Magnesium, involved in over 300 enzymatic processes, maintains a serum concentration of 0.7-1.0 mmol/L (1.7-2.4 mg/dL). Abnormalities in these levels often relate to parathyroid function or nutritional status. Trace elements like iron, zinc, and copper are measured to assess nutritional adequacy and metabolic disorders. Serum iron, which fluctuates diurnally, is referenced at 10-30 μmol/L (50-170 μg/L), but ferritin—a storage protein—better indicates iron reserves at 30-300 ng/mL for adult males and 15-150 ng/mL for females. Zinc, essential for immune function and DNA synthesis, has a reference range of 11-18 μmol/L (70-120 μg/L). Copper, a cofactor in superoxide dismutase, is typically 12-20 μmol/L (75-125 μg/L), often bound to ceruloplasmin. The anion gap, calculated as [Na⁺] - ([Cl⁻] + [HCO₃⁻]), helps evaluate metabolic acidosis by estimating unmeasured anions, with a normal range of 8-16 mmol/L in serum. This metric is particularly useful in emergency settings to differentiate causes of acid-base disturbances, such as lactic acidosis or renal failure.| Electrolyte/Element | Reference Range (Adults) | Units | Clinical Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sodium | 135-145 | mmol/L | Primary extracellular cation; hyponatremia common in SIADH. |
| Potassium | 3.6-5.2 | mmol/L | Narrow range; hyperkalemia risks cardiac arrest. |
| Chloride | 98-107 | mmol/L | Parallels sodium; altered in vomiting or diarrhea. |
| Bicarbonate | 22-29 | mmol/L | Indicates renal compensation in acid-base disorders. |
| Total Calcium | 2.1-2.6 | mmol/L | 50% ionized; hypocalcemia linked to tetany. |
| Ionized Calcium | 1.1-1.3 | mmol/L | Free form; measured in critical care. |
| Magnesium | 0.7-1.0 | mmol/L | Hypomagnesemia associated with arrhythmias. |
| Iron (Serum) | 10-30 | μmol/L | Diurnal variation; low in deficiency anemia. |
| Ferritin | 30-300 (males); 15-150 (females) | ng/mL | Iron stores; elevated in inflammation. |
| Zinc | 11-18 | μmol/L | Deficiency impairs wound healing. |
| Copper | 12-20 | μmol/L | Wilson's disease shows low ceruloplasmin-bound levels. |
| Anion Gap | 8-16 | mmol/L | Elevated in ketoacidosis; formula excludes potassium in some labs. |
Acid-Base Balance and Blood Gases
Acid-base balance in the blood is maintained through the interplay of respiratory and metabolic processes, primarily involving the bicarbonate buffer system, carbon dioxide (CO2) as a volatile acid, and oxygen (O2) levels. Blood gas analysis measures key parameters such as pH, partial pressure of CO2 (pCO2), partial pressure of O2 (pO2), bicarbonate (HCO3-), base excess, and lactate to assess homeostasis. Deviations indicate acidosis (pH < 7.35) or alkalosis (pH > 7.45), which can be respiratory (driven by pCO2 changes) or metabolic (driven by HCO3- or base excess alterations). These measurements are crucial for diagnosing conditions like respiratory failure, shock, or metabolic disorders. Reference ranges for arterial blood gases reflect normal physiological states in healthy adults at sea level. The following table summarizes standard values:| Parameter | Reference Range | Units |
|---|---|---|
| pH | 7.35–7.45 | - |
| pCO2 (PaCO2) | 35–45 | mmHg |
| pO2 (PaO2) | 75–100 | mmHg |
| HCO3- | 22–26 | mmol/L |
| Base excess | -2 to +2 | mmol/L |
| Lactate | 0.5–2.2 | mmol/L |
Liver Enzymes and Function
Liver enzymes and function tests assess hepatocellular integrity, biliary excretion, and synthetic capacity, providing key insights into liver health. These tests measure enzymes released from damaged hepatocytes or biliary epithelium, as well as proteins synthesized by the liver and coagulation parameters reflecting its role in clotting factor production. Abnormalities in these markers can indicate acute or chronic liver injury, cholestasis, or impaired synthetic function, with reference ranges varying slightly by laboratory, age, sex, and methodology.[101] Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) is primarily localized in hepatocytes and serves as a sensitive marker of liver cell injury, with a typical reference range of 7-56 U/L in adults. Aspartate aminotransferase (AST), found in liver, heart, muscle, and other tissues, has a reference range of 10-40 U/L; elevations often parallel ALT but can reflect extrahepatic sources. An AST/ALT ratio greater than 2:1 is characteristic of alcoholic liver disease, attributed to pyridoxine deficiency impairing ALT synthesis and greater AST release from mitochondria in alcoholic hepatitis. Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) originates from liver, bone, intestine, and placenta, with a reference range of 44-147 U/L; isolated elevations suggest cholestasis or bone disorders. Gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), highly concentrated in biliary epithelium, ranges from 9-48 U/L and is particularly useful for confirming hepatic origin of ALP elevations or detecting alcohol-related damage when exceeding twice the upper limit alongside an elevated AST/ALT ratio.[101][101][101][101] Bilirubin, a byproduct of heme metabolism, reflects hepatic conjugation and excretion; total bilirubin typically ranges from 5-21 μmol/L (0.3-1.2 mg/dL), while direct (conjugated) bilirubin is less than 5 μmol/L (<0.3 mg/dL). Hyperbilirubinemia patterns—predominantly unconjugated in hemolysis or Gilbert syndrome, conjugated in cholestasis—aid in differential diagnosis. Albumin, the liver's principal synthetic protein, maintains oncotic pressure and transports substances, with a reference range of 35-50 g/L (3.5-5.0 g/dL); hypoalbuminemia indicates chronic liver disease or malnutrition. Total protein, encompassing albumin and globulins, ranges from 60-80 g/L (6.0-8.0 g/dL) and supports assessment of overall synthetic function.[101][102] Prothrombin time (PT), measuring the extrinsic coagulation pathway, prolongs in liver failure due to reduced synthesis of factors II, V, VII, IX, and X, with a normal range of 11-13.5 seconds. The Child-Pugh score integrates PT (or INR), bilirubin, albumin, ascites, and encephalopathy to classify cirrhosis severity: Class A (5-6 points) indicates compensated disease with good prognosis, Class B (7-9 points) moderate decompensation, and Class C (10-15 points) advanced failure with high mortality risk. This system, originally developed for surgical risk assessment, remains widely used for prognostic stratification in chronic liver disease.[103][104][105] For ALP elevations, isoenzyme fractionation distinguishes hepatic from bone origins; liver ALP is heat-stable and accounts for about 50% of total serum activity in healthy adults, while bone ALP predominates in growing children or Paget disease. Techniques such as electrophoresis or immunoassays enable this separation, guiding whether further biliary or skeletal evaluation is needed. Note that AST elevations can overlap with cardiac injury, as detailed in cardiac biomarker assessments.[106][107]| Marker | Reference Range (Adults) | Clinical Significance |
|---|---|---|
| ALT | 7-56 U/L | Hepatocellular injury |
| AST | 10-40 U/L | Liver or extrahepatic damage; AST/ALT >2 in alcoholic disease |
| ALP | 44-147 U/L | Cholestasis or bone disease |
| GGT | 9-48 U/L | Biliary obstruction, alcohol use |
| Total Bilirubin | 5-21 μmol/L | Conjugation/excretion impairment |
| Direct Bilirubin | <5 μmol/L | Cholestatic jaundice |
| Albumin | 35-50 g/L | Synthetic function |
| Total Protein | 60-80 g/L | Overall protein status |
| PT | 11-13.5 s | Coagulation factor synthesis |
Cardiac Biomarkers
Cardiac biomarkers are proteins and enzymes released into the bloodstream in response to myocardial injury, stress, or dysfunction, aiding in the diagnosis and management of conditions such as acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and heart failure. These markers provide insights into the timing and extent of cardiac damage, with reference ranges established based on the 99th percentile upper reference limits (URLs) in healthy populations to minimize false positives. The primary biomarkers include cardiac troponins, creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB), myoglobin, and B-type natriuretic peptides (BNP and NT-proBNP), each with distinct release kinetics and clinical utility.[108] Troponins I and T are the most specific and sensitive indicators of myocardial injury, forming part of the contractile apparatus in cardiac muscle cells and released upon cell membrane disruption. In high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) assays, the reference range is typically 0 to 0.04 ng/mL (or 0-40 ng/L), corresponding to the sex-specific 99th percentile URL, such as 17 ng/L for females and 35 ng/L for males using the Abbott assay. Conventional troponin assays (third and fourth generations) had higher detection limits (around 0.01-0.1 ng/mL) and lower sensitivity for early or minor injuries, while high-sensitivity assays (fifth generation), introduced around 2007 and widely adopted by 2017, detect troponin in over 50% of healthy individuals, enabling earlier diagnosis within 1-3 hours of symptom onset. Troponin levels rise 2-3 hours after injury, peak at approximately 24 hours post-AMI, and remain elevated for 5-14 days, with a characteristic rise-and-fall pattern required for AMI diagnosis per the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction.[109][110][111][112] CK-MB, the cardiac isoform of creatine kinase, is released from damaged myocardial cells and serves as an early marker of AMI, though less specific than troponins due to presence in skeletal muscle. The reference range for CK-MB is 0-5 ng/mL, with levels above this indicating potential cardiac damage when the CK-MB fraction exceeds 5-6% of total CK. It rises 4-6 hours after injury, peaks at 12-24 hours, and returns to normal within 48-72 hours, making it useful for confirming reinfarction in the subacute phase.[108][113][114] Myoglobin, a heme protein in cardiac and skeletal muscle, is an early but nonspecific biomarker of muscle injury, rapidly released due to its small size. The reference range is 28-72 ng/mL, with elevations above 85 ng/mL suggesting acute damage. It increases within 1-4 hours of AMI, peaks at 6-12 hours, and normalizes by 24 hours, offering value in ruling out AMI in low-risk patients presenting early but limited by lack of cardiac specificity.[115][116][117] BNP and its inactive precursor NT-proBNP are secreted by ventricular cardiomyocytes in response to wall stress, primarily used to diagnose and assess heart failure severity. For BNP, levels below 100 pg/mL effectively rule out acute heart failure in symptomatic patients. NT-proBNP reference ranges are age-adjusted: less than 300 pg/mL for individuals under 75 years, and less than 450 pg/mL for those 75 years and older, reflecting physiological increases with age and renal function. These peptides do not exhibit acute rise-and-fall patterns like injury markers but provide prognostic value, with elevations correlating to worse outcomes in heart failure.[118][119][120]| Biomarker | Reference Range | Units | Key Clinical Context |
|---|---|---|---|
| High-sensitivity Troponin I/T | 0-0.04 (sex-specific 99th percentile) | ng/mL | AMI diagnosis; peaks ~24 hours post-injury |
| CK-MB | 0-5 | ng/mL | Early AMI confirmation; normalizes in 48-72 hours |
| Myoglobin | 28-72 | ng/mL | Early rule-out of AMI; normalizes in 24 hours |
| BNP | <100 | pg/mL | Rules out heart failure |
| NT-proBNP | <300 (<75 years); <450 (≥75 years) | pg/mL | Age-adjusted heart failure assessment |
Lipid Profile
The lipid profile is a panel of blood tests that measures various lipids and lipoproteins to assess cardiovascular risk, including total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and triglycerides (TG). Desirable reference ranges for adults, based on guidelines from major cardiovascular organizations, are as follows: TC below 5.2 mmol/L (200 mg/dL), LDL-C below 3.4 mmol/L (131 mg/dL) for those at low risk, HDL-C above 1.0 mmol/L (39 mg/dL) for men and above 1.3 mmol/L (50 mg/dL) for women, and fasting TG below 1.7 mmol/L (150 mg/dL).[121][122] These ranges help identify dyslipidemia, a key modifiable risk factor for atherosclerosis and coronary heart disease, with elevated LDL-C and TG promoting plaque formation while low HDL-C reduces protective effects against arterial buildup.[123] LDL-C is often estimated indirectly using the Friedewald equation when direct measurement is unavailable, calculated as in mmol/L (or divided by 5 in mg/dL).[124] This formula assumes very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol is approximately TG divided by 2.2 mmol/L, but it has limitations, including inaccuracy when TG exceeds 4.5 mmol/L (400 mg/dL), in patients with type III hyperlipoproteinemia, or at low LDL-C levels below 1.8 mmol/L (70 mg/dL), where overestimation can occur.[125][126] Alternative methods, such as direct assays or newer equations like Martin-Hopkins, may be preferred in these scenarios to improve precision for risk stratification.[127] Traditionally, lipid profiles required fasting for 8-12 hours to minimize postprandial effects on TG and calculated LDL-C, but the 2016 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) guidelines recommend non-fasting samples for initial screening and general cardiovascular risk assessment, as non-fasting levels provide similar predictive value for events like myocardial infarction.[128] Fasting remains advised if TG is elevated above 5.0 mmol/L (443 mg/dL) non-fasting or for confirming hypertriglyceridemia, as food intake can transiently raise TG by 0.5-1.0 mmol/L without significantly altering TC or HDL-C.[129] This shift enhances practicality and patient adherence in primary care settings. As an advanced marker, apolipoprotein B (ApoB) quantifies the number of atherogenic lipoprotein particles (including LDL and VLDL), with reference ranges typically 0.6-1.1 g/L (60-110 mg/dL) in healthy adults, though desirable levels below 0.9 g/L (90 mg/dL) are often targeted for risk reduction.[130][131] ApoB outperforms LDL-C in some populations for predicting cardiovascular events, particularly when discordance exists between the two, as it better reflects particle concentration.[132] Debates on optimal versus conventional ranges continue, with some evidence suggesting stricter targets below population medians for maximal prevention.[133]Tumor and Inflammatory Markers
Tumor Markers
Tumor markers are serum proteins or antigens whose levels in the blood can become elevated in the presence of certain malignancies, aiding in diagnosis, staging, prognosis, and monitoring of treatment response for specific cancers. These biomarkers are not diagnostic on their own due to their limited specificity, as elevations can occur in benign conditions or other diseases, but they are valuable when used in conjunction with imaging, clinical findings, and serial measurements. Common tumor markers include prostate-specific antigen (PSA) for prostate cancer, cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) for ovarian cancer, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) for colorectal and other gastrointestinal cancers, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) for hepatocellular carcinoma and germ cell tumors, and beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (beta-hCG) for germ cell tumors and trophoblastic diseases. Reference ranges vary by laboratory, patient demographics, and assay method, but established upper limits help guide clinical interpretation. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is a serine protease produced by prostate epithelial cells, with normal serum levels typically below 4 ng/mL in men without prostate cancer. Levels above this threshold may prompt further evaluation, though PSA can be elevated in benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), prostatitis, or recent prostate manipulation, reducing its specificity for malignancy. For instance, BPH can cause PSA elevations due to increased prostate volume and glandular disruption, often necessitating differentiation via digital rectal exam, imaging, or biopsy. Serial PSA monitoring is preferred over single measurements to detect trends, such as a rise greater than 0.75 ng/mL per year, which may indicate progression. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend age- and risk-adjusted PSA cutoffs for early detection; for example, men aged 40-49 at average risk may use a threshold of 2.5-3.0 ng/mL, while higher-risk individuals (e.g., family history or African ancestry) should start screening earlier with lower cutoffs like 1.0 ng/mL to balance sensitivity and overdiagnosis. Cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) is a glycoprotein expressed on ovarian epithelial cells, with reference levels generally less than 35 U/mL in healthy individuals. Elevated CA-125 is observed in about 80% of advanced epithelial ovarian cancers but has low specificity, as it can rise in endometriosis, pelvic inflammatory disease, or menstruation. It is primarily used for monitoring response to therapy and detecting recurrence rather than screening, with serial declines post-treatment indicating favorable outcomes. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) serves as a marker for colorectal cancer, with normal values under 5 ng/mL in non-smokers and up to 5 ng/mL in smokers due to tobacco-induced inflammation.[134] Post-resection CEA normalization (to <5 ng/mL) predicts better prognosis, while persistent elevation signals residual disease; however, it overlaps with inflammatory conditions like inflammatory bowel disease. Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) is a fetal glycoprotein produced by yolk sac and liver cells, with adult reference ranges below 10 ng/mL. Elevations exceeding this level are associated with hepatocellular carcinoma (especially in cirrhosis) or nonseminomatous germ cell tumors, correlating with tumor burden and guiding treatment decisions. Beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (beta-hCG), a placental hormone subunit, has reference levels below 5 IU/L in non-pregnant adults. It is markedly elevated in choriocarcinoma and some germ cell tumors, aiding in diagnosis and surveillance, though transient rises can occur in hypogonadism or marijuana use. Overall, these markers' utility lies in longitudinal tracking rather than absolute values, with NCCN emphasizing risk-stratified approaches to minimize false positives. Brief overlaps with acute phase reactants, such as CEA elevations in general inflammation, underscore the need for integrated clinical assessment.| Tumor Marker | Associated Cancers | Reference Range (Adults) | Key Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| PSA | Prostate | <4 ng/mL | Age/risk-adjusted cutoffs; elevated in BPH |
| CA-125 | Ovarian | <35 U/mL | Monitoring post-treatment; low specificity |
| CEA | Colorectal | <5 ng/mL (non-smokers) | Higher in smokers; serial for recurrence |
| AFP | Liver, germ cell | <10 ng/mL | Correlates with tumor burden |
| Beta-hCG | Germ cell, trophoblastic | <5 IU/L (non-pregnant) | Useful in staging and prognosis |
Acute Phase Reactants
Acute phase reactants are a group of plasma proteins whose concentrations change significantly—typically by at least 25%—during inflammation, infection, or tissue injury, serving as non-specific indicators of the body's systemic response.[135] These proteins are synthesized primarily by hepatocytes under the influence of cytokines such as interleukin-6, helping to modulate immune and inflammatory processes.[136] They are classified as positive acute phase reactants, which increase in concentration, or negative acute phase reactants, which decrease to prioritize resources for the inflammatory response.[136] Positive acute phase reactants include C-reactive protein (CRP), ferritin, and procalcitonin, which rise rapidly to combat pathogens and limit tissue damage.[137] CRP, for instance, binds to phosphocholine on damaged cells and bacteria, activating complement and promoting phagocytosis.[138] Its reference range in healthy adults is typically less than 10 mg/L, with high-sensitivity CRP (hs-CRP) used for cardiovascular risk assessment: less than 1 mg/L indicates low risk, 1–3 mg/L average risk, and greater than 3 mg/L high risk.[138][139] In acute inflammation, CRP levels can increase dramatically, doubling approximately every 8 hours and peaking within 36–50 hours after onset.[140] Ferritin, an iron-storage protein, also acts as a positive acute phase reactant, with levels elevating during inflammation to sequester iron and deprive pathogens of this essential nutrient, potentially masking underlying iron deficiency anemia.[136] Procalcitonin, a precursor to calcitonin, surges in bacterial infections and sepsis; concentrations below 0.5 ng/mL generally rule out severe systemic infection, while levels above 0.5 ng/mL suggest a high likelihood of bacterial sepsis requiring antibiotics.[141] Negative acute phase reactants, such as albumin, decrease during inflammation to conserve amino acids for synthesizing positive reactants and acute phase proteins like fibrinogen.[142] Albumin levels typically fall below the normal range of 3.5–5.7 g/dL in such states, contributing to hypoalbuminemia observed in chronic inflammation or infection.[143] The erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), while not a protein, is a related non-specific marker of inflammation influenced by acute phase proteins like fibrinogen; normal values are less than 15 mm/h for men and less than 20 mm/h for women under 50 years, though these increase with age.[136]| Marker | Reference Range (Normal/Non-Inflammatory) | Clinical Notes |
|---|---|---|
| CRP | <10 mg/L | hs-CRP <1 mg/L low CV risk; rises rapidly in infection. |
| ESR (Men <50) | <15 mm/h | Influenced by fibrinogen; higher in women and elderly. |
| ESR (Women <50) | <20 mm/h | Non-specific; complements CRP. |
| Ferritin | Varies by age/sex (e.g., 30–300 ng/mL men) | Elevates in inflammation; interpret with iron studies. |
| Procalcitonin | <0.5 ng/mL | Rules out sepsis; >0.5 ng/mL prompts antibiotic use. |
| Albumin (Negative) | 3.5–5.7 g/dL | Decreases in acute response; signals catabolism. |
Autoantibodies and Immune Markers
Autoantibodies and immune markers in blood tests are essential for evaluating autoimmune diseases, immunodeficiencies, and certain malignancies, providing reference ranges that help clinicians assess immune system dysregulation. These tests measure specific antibodies produced against self-antigens or components of the immune response, such as immunoglobulins and complement proteins, which can indicate active disease processes when levels deviate from normal. Reference ranges vary slightly by laboratory and population demographics, but standardized values guide interpretation, with elevations or reductions signaling potential pathology like rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) are autoantibodies targeting nuclear components and serve as a screening tool for connective tissue diseases. The reference range for ANA titer is typically less than 1:40, considered negative, while titers of 1:40 or higher may warrant further investigation, though low-positive results (1:40 to 1:80) can occur in healthy individuals.[144] Rheumatoid factor (RF), an autoantibody against the Fc portion of IgG, is associated with RA and other autoimmune conditions; normal levels are below 14 IU/mL, with elevations above this threshold increasing diagnostic specificity when combined with clinical findings.[145] Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) antibodies offer higher specificity for RA than RF; the reference range is less than 20 U/mL for negative results, with values at or above this level supporting early diagnosis and prognosis.[146] Complement proteins C3 and C4 are key components of the classical and alternative pathways, consumed during immune complex-mediated inflammation. Normal serum levels for C3 range from 0.9 to 1.8 g/L, and for C4 from 0.1 to 0.4 g/L in adults, with reductions often reflecting active disease consumption.[147] In SLE, low C3 levels (below 0.9 g/L) during flares correlate with increased disease activity, particularly renal involvement, serving as a biomarker for monitoring therapeutic response.[148] Immunoglobulins represent the humoral arm of immunity, with quantitative assays establishing baseline immune competence. Serum IgG levels in healthy adults typically range from 7 to 16 g/L, providing long-term protection against pathogens.[149] IgA concentrations are 0.7 to 4 g/L, crucial for mucosal immunity, while IgM levels of 0.4 to 2.3 g/L indicate acute responses to new antigens.[149] Deviations, such as hypogammaglobulinemia (e.g., IgG below 7 g/L), may signal primary immunodeficiencies, whereas polyclonal hypergammaglobulinemia can occur in chronic infections or autoimmunity. Serum protein immunofixation electrophoresis is used to detect monoclonal proteins in multiple myeloma, identifying abnormal immunoglobulin bands that indicate clonal plasma cell proliferation. In healthy individuals, no monoclonal bands are present; detection of a discrete M-protein spike, often IgG or IgA type, confirms monoclonality when serum protein electrophoresis shows an abnormality.[150]| Marker | Reference Range (Adults) | Clinical Context |
|---|---|---|
| ANA Titer | <1:40 (negative) | Screening for autoimmune diseases like SLE |
| RF | <14 IU/mL | Diagnosis of RA; elevated in 70-80% of cases |
| Anti-CCP | <20 U/mL (negative) | Specific for RA; predicts erosive disease |
| Complement C3 | 0.9-1.8 g/L | Low in active SLE flares |
| Complement C4 | 0.1-0.4 g/L | Reduced in immune complex diseases |
| IgG | 7-16 g/L | Hypogammaglobulinemia if low |
| IgA | 0.7-4 g/L | Mucosal immunity assessment |
| IgM | 0.4-2.3 g/L | Acute infection response |
Hormones and Vitamins
Thyroid Hormones
Thyroid hormones play a crucial role in regulating metabolism, growth, and development through the hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid axis. Blood tests for thyroid function primarily measure thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) from the pituitary gland, which stimulates the thyroid to produce thyroxine (T4) and triiodothyronine (T3). These tests help diagnose conditions like hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism by comparing levels to established reference ranges, which can vary slightly by laboratory but are generally standardized for adults. The reference range for TSH in adults is typically 0.4-4.0 mU/L, serving as the initial screening test due to its sensitivity in detecting thyroid dysfunction. Free T4, the unbound form of thyroxine available for cellular use, has a reference range of 9-23 pmol/L in adults.[151] Free T3, the active form influencing metabolic rate, ranges from 3.1-6.8 pmol/L.[152] Total T4, which includes both bound and unbound thyroxine, is measured at 58-140 nmol/L, though free T4 is preferred for accuracy as it is less affected by binding proteins.[153]| Test | Reference Range (Adults) | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| TSH | 0.4-4.0 | mU/L |
| Free T4 | 9-23 | pmol/L |
| Free T3 | 3.1-6.8 | pmol/L |
| Total T4 | 58-140 | nmol/L |
Sex and Adrenal Hormones
Sex and adrenal hormones encompass key regulators of reproduction, stress response, and secondary sexual characteristics, with reference ranges varying significantly by sex, age, menstrual cycle phase, and time of day due to diurnal rhythms and physiological fluctuations. These hormones include gonadal steroids like testosterone, estradiol, and progesterone, which fluctuate across the menstrual cycle in females, and adrenal products such as cortisol, adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S), which are influenced by the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. Accurate interpretation requires consideration of timing, as levels can indicate conditions like hypogonadism, polycystic ovary syndrome, or Cushing's syndrome when outside normal ranges. Reference ranges are established through population studies and may differ slightly between laboratories, but standardized values provide clinical benchmarks. Testosterone, the primary male androgen but present in both sexes, supports muscle mass, bone density, and libido. In adult males, total testosterone levels typically range from 8.6 to 29 nmol/L, measured in morning samples to account for diurnal variation.[160] In adult females, levels are lower, ranging from 0.3 to 1.9 nmol/L, with minimal cycle-related changes.[161] Elevated or low levels can signal disorders like androgen excess or deficiency, often assessed alongside free testosterone for bioavailability. Estradiol, the predominant estrogen, drives female reproductive cycles and bone health. In females during the follicular phase (early menstrual cycle), serum estradiol ranges from 45 to 854 pmol/L, rising toward ovulation.[162] Postmenopausal levels drop below 100 pmol/L, reflecting ovarian decline. In males, levels are consistently low, around 40-160 pmol/L, contributing to estrogen balance. Progesterone, which prepares the uterus for pregnancy, remains low in the follicular phase at less than 5 nmol/L, surging to over 20 nmol/L post-ovulation in the luteal phase.[163] Anovulation is suggested if follicular progesterone exceeds this threshold unexpectedly. Adrenal hormones like cortisol and ACTH regulate stress and metabolism via the HPA axis. Morning cortisol (8-9 AM) normally ranges from 140 to 690 nmol/L, decreasing throughout the day; evening levels below 50% of morning indicate healthy rhythm.[164] ACTH, which stimulates cortisol production, has a reference range of 2 to 11 pmol/L, also peaking in the morning. The dexamethasone suppression test assesses HPA feedback, with post-test cortisol below 50 nmol/L confirming normal suppression. DHEA-S, an adrenal androgen precursor to testosterone, in adult males ranges from 2.7 to 13.5 μmol/L, declining with age after peaking in the 20s.[165] Gonadotropins follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH) from the pituitary orchestrate gonadal function. In the follicular phase of premenopausal females, FSH ranges from 3 to 10 IU/L, with LH slightly lower at 2 to 10 IU/L. Postmenopause, FSH elevates above 30 IU/L due to lack of ovarian feedback, often exceeding 40 IU/L as a diagnostic marker.[166] These phase-specific ranges highlight the need for timed sampling to evaluate fertility, menopause, or pituitary disorders.| Hormone | Sex/Phase | Reference Range | Units | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Testosterone (total) | Adult males | 8.6–29 | nmol/L | Morning sample preferred |
| Testosterone (total) | Adult females | 0.3–1.9 | nmol/L | Stable across cycle |
| Estradiol | Females, follicular | 45–854 | pmol/L | Early cycle (days 1–14) |
| Progesterone | Females, follicular | <5 | nmol/L | Indicates low pre-ovulatory levels |
| Cortisol | Adults, AM (8–9 AM) | 140–690 | nmol/L | Diurnal peak |
| ACTH | Adults, morning | 2–11 | pmol/L | Stimulates adrenal cortisol |
| DHEA-S | Adult males (20–30 years) | 2.7–13.5 | μmol/L | Declines with age |
| FSH | Females, follicular | 3–10 | IU/L | Rises postmenopause >30 |
| LH | Females, follicular | 2–10 | IU/L | Surges at midcycle |
Vitamins and Nutritional Markers
Vitamins and nutritional markers in blood tests assess the status of essential micronutrients and proteins involved in metabolic processes, immune function, and overall health. These tests measure circulating levels of fat-soluble and water-soluble vitamins, as well as carrier proteins like prealbumin, to identify deficiencies, excesses, or functional impairments that may contribute to conditions such as anemia, neuropathy, or malnutrition. Reference ranges vary by laboratory method, age, and population, but established guidelines provide benchmarks for interpretation, emphasizing the importance of clinical context alongside results. Vitamin D, primarily evaluated through 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OH D), is crucial for calcium homeostasis and bone health. Sufficient serum levels are generally considered 50-125 nmol/L (20-50 ng/mL), as recommended by the Institute of Medicine, with values below 50 nmol/L indicating potential deficiency and levels above 125 nmol/L risking toxicity in some cases.[168] Vitamin B12 (cobalamin) supports red blood cell formation and neurological function, with serum reference ranges typically spanning 148-675 pmol/L (200-914 pg/mL) in adults. Levels below 148 pmol/L suggest deficiency, while functional assessment via methylmalonic acid (MMA) is useful when B12 is borderline; normal serum MMA is less than 0.40 μmol/L, with elevations above this threshold confirming impaired B12 utilization even if direct B12 measurement is normal.[169] Folate (vitamin B9) is essential for DNA synthesis and prevents megaloblastic anemia, with serum reference ranges commonly 6.8-45 nmol/L (3-20 ng/mL); values below 6.8 nmol/L indicate deficiency, though red blood cell folate provides a longer-term status indicator.[170] Retinol (vitamin A) maintains vision, skin integrity, and immune response, with normal serum concentrations ranging from 1.05-2.45 μmol/L (30-70 mcg/dL). Deficiency is defined as below 0.70 μmol/L, while toxic levels exceeding 3.5 μmol/L (>100 mcg/dL) can lead to hypervitaminosis A, characterized by liver damage and elevated intracranial pressure.[171][172] Thiamine (vitamin B1) is vital for energy metabolism, particularly in nerve and muscle cells, with whole blood reference ranges of 70-180 nmol/L indicating adequate status; levels below 70 nmol/L signal deficiency, often seen in alcoholism or malnutrition.[173] Prealbumin, also known as transthyretin, serves as a marker of protein nutritional status due to its short half-life and liver synthesis, with adult serum reference ranges typically 20-40 mg/dL (200-400 mg/L). Low levels below 15 mg/dL correlate with acute malnutrition or inflammation, though interpretation requires adjustment for non-nutritional factors like renal disease.[174] These markers highlight the balance between deficiency and toxicity, where optimal ranges support health without excess risk; for instance, while vitamin D sufficiency aligns with conventional ranges, some guidelines advocate higher targets for specific benefits like fracture prevention.[168]| Marker | Specimen | Reference Range (Adults) | Key Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25-OH Vitamin D | Serum | 50-125 nmol/L | Sufficient; <50 nmol/L: deficiency risk |
| Vitamin B12 | Serum | 148-675 pmol/L | Normal; <148 pmol/L: deficiency |
| Folate | Serum | 6.8-45 nmol/L | Normal; <6.8 nmol/L: deficiency |
| Retinol (Vitamin A) | Serum | 1.05-2.45 μmol/L | Normal; >3.5 μmol/L: toxicity |
| Thiamine | Whole Blood | 70-180 nmol/L | Adequate; <70 nmol/L: deficiency |
| Prealbumin | Serum | 20-40 mg/dL | Normal nutrition; <15 mg/dL: malnutrition risk |
| MMA (for B12 status) | Serum | <0.40 μmol/L | Normal; >0.40 μmol/L: functional B12 deficiency |
Other Metabolites and Toxins
Renal Function Markers
Renal function markers are blood and urine tests used to assess the kidneys' ability to filter waste products from the blood, maintain fluid and electrolyte balance, and excrete toxins, providing essential insights into kidney health and detecting conditions like chronic kidney disease (CKD). These markers primarily evaluate glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and waste clearance, with reference ranges varying by age, sex, and laboratory methods. Abnormal levels can indicate impaired renal function, often prompting further evaluation for underlying causes such as diabetes or hypertension. Serum creatinine, a byproduct of muscle metabolism filtered by the glomeruli, serves as a key indicator of renal filtration, with normal reference ranges of 62-106 μmol/L for adult males and 44-80 μmol/L for adult females, influenced by factors like muscle mass, diet, and age. Higher levels suggest reduced GFR, though creatinine levels can be misleading in individuals with low muscle mass, such as the elderly or malnourished, where they may appear normal despite kidney impairment. Urea, or blood urea nitrogen (BUN), measures another waste product from protein breakdown, with a typical range of 2.5-7.8 mmol/L in adults; elevated urea often correlates with dehydration or reduced renal perfusion, but it is less specific than creatinine due to influences from gastrointestinal bleeding or high-protein intake. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), calculated from serum creatinine using equations like the CKD-EPI formula, provides a more accurate assessment of kidney function than creatinine alone, with normal values exceeding 90 mL/min/1.73 m² for adults under 60 years, declining gradually with age. The 2021 CKD-EPI equation incorporates age and sex (race-free since 2021 to address inequities) to estimate GFR, offering improved precision over older formulas like MDRD, particularly for values above 60 mL/min/1.73 m².[175] As an alternative to creatinine, cystatin C—a protease inhibitor produced at a constant rate by all nucleated cells—has a reference range of 0.6–1.2 mg/L in adults and is less affected by muscle mass, making it valuable for confirming eGFR in cases where creatinine may be unreliable.[176] In urine tests, the albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) assesses early kidney damage by detecting microalbuminuria, with normal values below 3 mg/mmol indicating intact glomerular barrier function; ratios between 3-30 mg/mmol suggest microalbuminuria, a risk factor for CKD progression. These markers collectively guide staging of CKD according to guidelines from organizations like KDIGO, where eGFR below 60 mL/min/1.73 m² for over three months defines stage 3 disease. Adjustments for muscle mass are crucial, as overestimation of GFR can occur in muscular individuals using creatinine-based estimates. Electrolyte imbalances, such as hyperkalemia, may accompany advanced renal dysfunction but are evaluated separately.Glucose and Metabolic Panels
Glucose and metabolic panels are essential laboratory assessments used to evaluate carbohydrate metabolism, insulin secretion, and resistance, aiding in the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, prediabetes, and related metabolic disturbances. These panels typically include measurements of blood glucose under various conditions, glycated hemoglobin for long-term glycemic control, and markers of pancreatic beta-cell function such as insulin and C-peptide. They provide critical data on energy homeostasis and help identify risks for conditions like metabolic syndrome, where impaired glucose regulation contributes to broader cardiovascular and endocrine dysfunction. Fasting plasma glucose serves as a primary screening tool, with normal levels in healthy adults ranging from 3.9 to 5.6 mmol/L (70 to 100 mg/dL); values between 5.6 and 6.9 mmol/L indicate impaired fasting glucose, a prediabetes state.[177][178] For non-symptomatic individuals, random plasma glucose below 11.1 mmol/L (200 mg/dL) is considered within normal limits, though levels at or above this threshold with symptoms suggest diabetes.[179] Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) reflects average blood glucose over 2-3 months, with normal values below 5.7% (typically 4% to 5.6% in non-diabetic populations).[180][181] Insulin and C-peptide measurements assess endogenous insulin production, particularly in distinguishing type 1 from type 2 diabetes or evaluating insulinomas. Fasting serum insulin levels in healthy adults normally range from 2.6 to 24.9 μU/mL (or mIU/L).[182] Fasting C-peptide, a byproduct of proinsulin cleavage that correlates with insulin secretion, typically measures 0.3 to 0.6 nmol/L in healthy individuals, rising postprandially to 1 to 3 nmol/L.[183] The metabolic syndrome panel often incorporates indices like the Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) to quantify insulin sensitivity, calculated using the formula: Values below 2 generally indicate normal insulin sensitivity, while higher levels suggest resistance, a key feature of metabolic syndrome; for example, scores above 2.5 are associated with increased cardiometabolic risk.[184][185] The oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) dynamically evaluates glucose handling after a 75-g glucose load, with a normal 2-hour plasma glucose level below 7.8 mmol/L (140 mg/dL); impaired glucose tolerance is defined as 7.8 to 11.0 mmol/L, and levels at or above 11.1 mmol/L indicate diabetes.[177][186] These panels may briefly reference lipid components, such as triglycerides and HDL cholesterol, to contextualize overall metabolic risk without detailed lipid analysis.[178]| Test | Normal Reference Range | Units | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fasting Plasma Glucose | 3.9–5.6 | mmol/L (70–100 mg/dL) | After 8-hour fast; prediabetes: 5.6–6.9 mmol/L.[177] |
| Random Plasma Glucose (non-symptomatic) | <11.1 | mmol/L (<200 mg/dL) | Diabetes threshold ≥11.1 mmol/L with symptoms.[179] |
| HbA1c | <5.7% (4–5.6%) | % | Reflects 2–3 month average; prediabetes: 5.7–6.4%.[180] |
| Fasting Insulin | 2.6–24.9 | μU/mL | Measures beta-cell output; lab-specific variations apply.[182] |
| Fasting C-Peptide | 0.3–0.6 | nmol/L | Indicates endogenous insulin production; rises post-meal.[183] |
| OGTT (2-hour) | <7.8 | mmol/L (<140 mg/dL) | After 75-g load; impaired: 7.8–11.0 mmol/L.[177] |
| HOMA-IR | <2 | Index | Normal sensitivity; >2.5 suggests resistance.[184] |
Toxic Substances and Drug Levels
Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) involves measuring blood concentrations of medications with narrow therapeutic indices to ensure efficacy while minimizing toxicity risks, guiding dose adjustments based on pharmacokinetic principles such as absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination.[187] This approach is essential for drugs like digoxin, lithium, and vancomycin, where individual variability in clearance—due to factors like age, renal function, and drug interactions—can lead to subtherapeutic or supratherapeutic levels. TDM typically targets steady-state concentrations, often assessed via trough levels drawn just before the next dose, to correlate plasma levels with clinical outcomes.[187] For digoxin, used in heart failure and atrial fibrillation, the therapeutic range is generally 0.5-2.0 ng/mL, though lower targets (0.5-0.9 ng/mL) may suffice for heart failure to reduce toxicity risks without losing efficacy.[188] Lithium, employed for bipolar disorder maintenance, has a therapeutic range of 0.6-1.2 mmol/L, with levels above 1.2 mmol/L increasing risks of neurotoxicity such as tremor or confusion.[189] Vancomycin, an antibiotic for serious infections, requires trough levels of 10-20 mg/L to achieve adequate tissue penetration, particularly for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, while avoiding nephrotoxicity at higher concentrations.[190] Monitoring for these drugs incorporates half-life considerations to time sampling appropriately; for instance, theophylline's half-life in young adults is 4-8 hours, necessitating levels checked after steady state (about 5 half-lives) to adjust dosing for asthma or COPD management.[191] Environmental toxins like lead require surveillance, with the CDC blood lead reference value (BLRV) at 3.5 μg/dL (0.17 μmol/L) as of 2021 to identify elevated exposure in adults (no safe threshold exists, as higher concentrations impair neurocognitive function and hematopoiesis).[192] Acetaminophen overdose assessment uses a 4-hour post-ingestion level below 150 μg/mL to rule out hepatotoxicity risk, per the Rumack-Matthew nomogram, prompting N-acetylcysteine therapy if exceeded.[193] Overdose thresholds for salicylates, such as aspirin, indicate toxicity above 3 mmol/L (approximately 40 mg/dL), manifesting as metabolic acidosis, tinnitus, and hyperventilation, with severe cases exceeding 7 mmol/L requiring urgent intervention like hemodialysis.[194] These ranges underscore TDM's role in balancing benefits against adverse effects, with serial measurements essential during acute intoxication or chronic exposure to prevent organ damage.[187]| Substance | Therapeutic/Toxic Range | Units | Key Monitoring Note | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Digoxin | Therapeutic: 0.5-2.0 ng/mL | ng/mL | Trough at steady state; lower for heart failure | [188] |
| Lithium | Therapeutic: 0.6-1.2 mmol/L | mmol/L | 12-hour trough; avoid >1.2 | [189] |
| Vancomycin | Therapeutic trough: 10-20 mg/L | mg/L | Before 4th dose; adjust for renal function | [190] |
| Lead | Reference value: <3.5 μg/dL (<0.17 μmol/L) | μg/dL (μmol/L) | Whole blood; no safe threshold (CDC BLRV, 2021) | [192] |
| Acetaminophen | Toxic if ≥150 μg/mL at 4h post-ingestion | μg/mL | Nomogram-based; treat if above line | [193] |
| Salicylate | Toxic: >3 mmol/L | mmol/L | Serial levels; hemodialysis for severe | [194] |
| Theophylline | Half-life: 4-8 hours (young adults) | hours | Steady-state level post-20 hours | [191] |
Urinalysis Reference Ranges
A complete urinalysis (also known as urine analysis or UA) is a routine laboratory test that examines the physical, chemical, and microscopic properties of urine to screen for urinary tract infections, kidney disorders, metabolic conditions such as diabetes, and other abnormalities. The parameters below provide approximate normal reference ranges for a standard urinalysis. These values are approximate and may vary depending on the laboratory methods, patient age, sex, hydration status, diet, and other individual factors. Results should always be interpreted by a physician in the context of the patient's clinical presentation.| Parameter | Normal Range | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Color | Pale yellow to yellow | Influenced by hydration, diet, and medications. |
| Clarity | Clear | Cloudiness may suggest infection, crystals, or other abnormalities. |
| pH | 4.5-8 | Average around 6; varies with diet and certain conditions. |
| Specific gravity | 1.005-1.030 | Reflects kidney concentrating ability and hydration status. |
| Glucose | Negative | Positive may indicate diabetes or renal threshold issues. |
| Protein | Negative or trace | Higher levels may suggest kidney damage. |
| Ketones | Negative | Positive in diabetic ketoacidosis, starvation, or prolonged fasting. |
| Blood | Negative | Positive may indicate hematuria from infection, stones, or other causes. |
| Leukocytes (WBC) | 0-5 per high-power field | Higher counts suggest urinary tract infection or inflammation. |
| Red blood cells (RBC) | 0-3 per high-power field | Higher indicates microscopic hematuria; further evaluation needed. |
| Bacteria | Negative or few | Significant presence may indicate urinary tract infection. |
