Hubbry Logo
DichromacyDichromacyMain
Open search
Dichromacy
Community hub
Dichromacy
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Dichromacy
Dichromacy
Dichromacy
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Typical cone cell spectral sensitivity of organisms with dichromatic color vision

Dichromacy (from Greek di 'two' and chromo 'color'[citation needed]) is the state of having two types of functioning photoreceptors, called cone cells, in the eyes. Organisms with dichromacy are called dichromats. Dichromats require only two primary colors to be able to represent their visible gamut. By comparison, trichromats need three primary colors, and tetrachromats need four. Likewise, every color in a dichromat's gamut can be evoked monochromatic light. By comparison, every color in a trichromat's gamut can be evoked with a combination of monochromatic light and white light.

Dichromacy in humans is a color vision deficiency in which one of the three cone cells is absent or not functioning and color is thereby reduced to two dimensions.[1]

Perception

[edit]

Dichromatic color vision is enabled by two types of cone cells with different spectral sensitivities and the neural framework to compare the excitation of the different cone cells. The resulting color vision is simpler than typical human trichromatic color vision, and much simpler than tetrachromatic color vision, typical of birds and fish.

A dichromatic color space can be defined by only two primary colors. When these primary colors are also the unique hues, then the color space contains the individuals entire gamut. In dichromacy, the unique hues can be evoked by exciting only a single cone at a time, e.g. monochromatic light near the extremes of the visible spectrum. A dichromatic color space can also be defined by non-unique hues, but the color space will not contain the individual's entire gamut. For comparison, a trichromatic color space requires three primary colors to be defined. However, even when choosing three pure spectral colors as the primaries, the resulting color space will never encompass the entire trichromatic individual's gamut.

The color vision of dichromats can be represented in a 2-dimensional plane, where one coordinate represented brightness, and the other coordinate represents hue. However, the perception of hue is not directly analogous to trichromatic hue, but rather a spectrum diverging from white (neutral) in the middle to two unique hues at the extreme, e.g. blue and yellow. Unlike trichromats, white (experienced when both cone cells are equally excited) can be evoked by monochromatic light. This means that dichromats see white in the rainbow.

Humans

[edit]
Main article: Color blindness

Dichromacy in humans is a form of color blindness (color vision deficiency). Normal human color vision is trichromatic, so dichromacy is achieved by losing functionality of one of the three cone cells. It is rarer than anomalous trichromacy. The classification of human dichromacy depends on which cone is missing:

  • Protanopia is a severe form of red-green color blindness, in which the L-cone is absent. It is sex-linked and affects about 1% of males. Colors of confusion include blue/purple and green/yellow.[2]
  • Deuteranopia is a severe form of red-green color blindness, in which the M-cone is absent. It is sex-linked and affects about 1% of males. Color vision is very similar to protanopia.[2]
  • Tritanopia is a severe form of blue-yellow color blindness, in which the S-cone is absent. It is much rarer than the other types, occurring in about 1 in 100,000, but is not sex-linked, so affects females and males at similar rates. They tend to confuse greens and blues, and yellow can appear pink.
  • Normal sight
    Normal sight
  • Deuteranopic sight
    Deuteranopic sight
  • Protanopic sight
    Protanopic sight
  • Tritanopic sight
    Tritanopic sight
  • Monochromatic sight
    Monochromatic sight

Diagnosis

[edit]
Main article: Color blindness § Diagnosis

The three determining elements of a dichromatic opponent-color space are the missing color, the null-luminance plane, and the null-chrominance plane.[3] The description of the phenomena itself does not indicate the color that is impaired to the dichromat, however, it does provide enough information to identify the fundamental color space, the colors that are seen by the dichromat. This is based on testing both the null-chrominance plane and null-luminance plane which intersect on the missing color. The cones excited to a corresponding color in the color space are visible to the dichromat and those that are not excited are the missing colors.[4]

Color detecting abilities of dichromats

[edit]

According to color vision researchers at the Medical College of Wisconsin (including Jay Neitz), each of the three standard color-detecting cones in the retina of trichromats – blue, green and red – can pick up about 100 different gradations of color. If each detector is independent of the others, the total number of colors discernible by an average human is their product (100 × 100 × 100), i.e. about 1 million;[5] Nevertheless, other researchers have put the number at upwards of 2.3 million.[6] The same calculation suggests that a dichromat (such as a human with red-green color blindness) would be able to distinguish about 100 × 100 = 10,000 different colors,[7] but no such calculation has been verified by psychophysical testing.

Furthermore, dichromats have a significantly higher threshold than trichromats for colored stimuli flickering at low (1 Hz) frequencies, meaning they perform worse than trichromats but better than monochromats. At higher (10 or 16 Hz) frequencies, dichromats perform as well as or better than trichromats but worse than monochromats.[8][9] This means such animals would still observe the flicker instead of a temporally fused visual perception as is the case in human movie watching at a high enough frame rate.

Mammals

[edit]

Until the 1960s, popular belief held that most mammals outside of primates were monochromats. In the last half-century, however, a focus on behavioral and genetic testing of mammals has accumulated extensive evidence of dichromatic color vision in a number of mammalian orders. Mammals are now usually assumed to be dichromats (possessing S- and L-cones), with monochromats viewed as the exceptions.

The common vertebrate ancestor, extant during the Cambrian, was tetrachromatic, possessing 4 distinct opsins classes.[6] Early mammalian evolution would see the loss of two of these four opsins, due to the nocturnal bottleneck, as dichromacy may improve an animal's ability to distinguish colors in dim light.[10] Placental mammals are therefore–as a rule–dichromatic.[11]

The exceptions to this rule of dichromatic vision in placental mammals are old world monkeys and apes, which re-evolved trichromacy, and marine mammals (both pinnipeds and cetaceans) which are cone monochromats.[12] New World Monkeys are a partial exception: in most species, males are dichromats, and about 60% of females are trichromats, but the owl monkeys are cone monochromats,[13] and both sexes of howler monkeys are trichromats.[14][15][16]

Trichromacy has been retained or re-evolved in marsupials, where trichromatic vision is widespread.[17] Recent genetic and behavioral evidence suggests the South American marsupial Didelphis albiventris is dichromatic, with only two classes of cone opsins having been found within the genus Didelphis.[18]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Sources

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Dichromacy

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Dichromacy is a form of color vision deficiency characterized by the complete absence or non-functionality of one of the three types of cone photoreceptors in the human retina—responsible for detecting long-wavelength (L or red), medium-wavelength (M or green), or short-wavelength (S or blue) light—resulting in color perception based on only two primary channels rather than the typical three. Dichromacy represents the more severe end of color vision deficiencies, distinct from the milder anomalous trichromacy, which affects a larger portion of the population. This condition impairs the ability to differentiate hues within the missing cone's spectrum, such as confusing reds and greens in protanopia or deuteranopia, or blues and yellows in tritanopia. Dichromacy is primarily genetic in origin, with red-green forms (protanopia and deuteranopia) inherited in an X-linked recessive manner, affecting approximately 2% of males and less than 0.1% of females globally, while the rarer blue-yellow form (tritanopia) follows autosomal dominant inheritance and impacts less than 0.01% of the population. The three main subtypes of dichromacy correspond to the absent cone type: protanopia, where L-cones are missing, leading to insensitivity to red light and a tendency to perceive reds as darker greens or blacks; deuteranopia, involving the loss of M-cones, which causes confusion between greens and reds but without the brightness shift seen in protanopia; and tritanopia, the absence of S-cones, resulting in difficulty distinguishing blues from yellows, often with a preference for purples appearing as pinks. These deficiencies arise from mutations in genes—OPN1LW and OPN1MW on the for red-green types, and OPN1SW on for tritanopia—leading to either no pigment production or a non-functional protein. Prevalence varies by ethnicity, with higher rates of red-green color vision deficiency in populations of Northern European descent (up to 8% in males) compared to lower incidences in Asian and African groups (around 4-5% in males). Dichromacy typically manifests from birth and is often undiagnosed until childhood or later, as affected individuals may adapt using and cues, though it can impact daily tasks like identifying traffic signals, selecting ripe fruits, or performing color-dependent professions such as piloting or electrical work. involves standardized tests like the Ishihara pseudoisochromatic plates for red-green defects or the Farnsworth-Munsell 100 Hue test for broader assessment, with available for confirmation. While there is no cure, accommodations such as color-correcting lenses or software filters can aid perception, and ongoing research explores potential based on gene targeting.

Fundamentals

Definition

Dichromacy is a form of in which an individual relies on only two functional types of photoreceptors in the , resulting in a two-dimensional where any perceived color can be matched by adjusting the relative intensities of two primary hues. This condition arises from the absence or dysfunction of one of the three typical pigments, limiting the ability to discriminate hues that require the missing receptor. Examples of dichromacy include protanopia (lacking long-wavelength-sensitive ), deuteranopia (lacking medium-wavelength-sensitive ), and tritanopia (lacking short-wavelength-sensitive ). In contrast to normal trichromacy, which employs three cone types with peak sensitivities in the long (red), medium (green), and short (blue) wavelengths to create a three-dimensional color space, dichromacy reduces color perception to mixtures of two primaries, leading to a narrower gamut of distinguishable colors. Monochromacy, the most severe deficiency, involves only one functional cone type or rod-based vision, eliminating color perception entirely and rendering the world in grayscale. The key perceptual outcome of dichromacy is the existence of confusion lines in chromaticity space, along which certain color pairs appear identical due to the overlapping spectral sensitivities of the two remaining cones, which respond proportionally to those stimuli. These lines define the boundaries of color confusions, such as reds and greens for some dichromats, fundamentally altering hue discrimination. The concept of dichromacy emerged in the through the work of physiologists studying , building on the trichromatic theory proposed by Thomas Young and elaborated by , who linked it to the absence of one retinal pigment.

Types

Dichromacy is categorized into three primary types—protanopia, deuteranopia, and tritanopia—each characterized by the absence of one specific photoreceptor class, leading to distinct confusions in color perception. These types are classified according to the peak sensitivity of the missing : short-wavelength-sensitive (S) cones at approximately 420 nm, medium-wavelength-sensitive () cones at approximately 530 nm, and long-wavelength-sensitive () cones at approximately 560 nm. Protanopia results from the complete absence of L-cones, which are sensitive to long wavelengths around 560 nm and primarily detect , causing individuals to confuse reds with greens or blacks while perceiving other colors relatively normally. In this condition, the remaining S- and M-cones provide dichromatic vision with a reduced for longer wavelengths, as L-cones contribute significantly to perception. Deuteranopia involves the absence of M-cones, sensitive to medium wavelengths around 530 nm and primarily responsible for detection, leading to confusions between reds and greens that are spectrally shifted compared to protanopia, with yellows appearing more desaturated. Affected individuals rely on S- and L-cones, maintaining similar overall sensitivity to normal vision but with impaired discrimination in the red-green axis. Tritanopia arises from the lack of S-cones, which peak at approximately 420 nm and are tuned to short () wavelengths, resulting in confusions between and yellows or greens, while red-green distinctions remain intact. This type preserves the contributions of M- and L-cones to both color and brightness, but short-wavelength signals are absent, leading to a blue-yellow perceptual deficiency. Protanopia and deuteranopia follow patterns, whereas tritanopia is typically autosomal dominant. Rare variants of dichromacy exist, though such forms are not well-documented in human vision.

Physiology and Genetics

Cone Cells and Mechanisms

Cone cells are specialized photoreceptors in the responsible for under photopic conditions, containing photopigments known as opsins that bind to the 11-cis-retinal. These opsins are heptahelical transmembrane proteins embedded in the outer segment discs of the cones, where light absorption triggers a conformational change, initiating the phototransduction cascade through G-protein activation. In typical trichromatic vision, three types of cones exist: short-wavelength-sensitive (S) cones with peak sensitivity around 420-440 nm, medium-wavelength-sensitive () cones peaking at 530-545 nm, and long-wavelength-sensitive () cones peaking at 558-565 nm, enabling discrimination across the . In dichromacy, only two of these cone types remain functional due to the absence or non-functionality of one photopigment class, reducing to a two-dimensional perceptual space. For instance, in protanopia (L-cone absence) or deuteranopia (-cone absence), the S and remaining or L cones provide input, while in tritanopia (S-cone absence), the and L cones dominate. This limitation stems from the genetic or developmental failure of one , resulting in cones that either lack or express a non-functional variant, thereby restricting the spectral sampling to two overlapping sensitivity bands. Neural processing of color in dichromats adapts the , where signals from the two functional cones are compared via antagonistic pathways in ganglion cells and beyond, projecting to the and . Originally proposed for with three opponent channels—red-green (L-M), blue-yellow (S-(L+M)), and achromatic (L+M)—dichromacy eliminates one channel; for example, tritanopia lacks the blue-yellow opponent axis, confining color comparisons to a 2D space of red-green opponency and . This adaptation occurs through single-opponent cells that respond preferentially to broad color increments or decrements and double-opponent cells in V1 that sharpen color boundaries, but with reduced chromatic dimensionality due to the missing cone input. The curves of the two active cones in dichromats exhibit significant overlap, particularly between M and L types in tritanopia, leading to metamerism where distinct spectral stimuli elicit identical responses and appear indistinguishable. This overlap causes confusion loci—straight lines in the CIE 1931 chromaticity diagram radiating from the —along which dichromats perceive no hue difference; for protanopia, the primary locus spans from a neutral point at approximately 493 nm to a confusion point at 639 nm, while for tritanopia, it extends from 568 nm to 447 nm. These loci represent iso-perceived colors in the reduced cone space, visualized as heavy lines in CIE diagrams overlaying the spectral locus, highlighting the linear confusion boundaries absent in trichromats. Reliance on fewer inputs in dichromacy alters and flicker sensitivity, as the achromatic channel (sum of the two ) carries more weight but with potential imbalances. At low temporal frequencies (e.g., 1 Hz), dichromats show elevated detection thresholds—about twofold higher than trichromats—for chromatic stimuli due to the loss of opponent mechanisms, impairing fine modulation via the missing channel. Conversely, at high frequencies (e.g., 16 Hz), dichromats exhibit comparable or superior flicker sensitivity, attributed to compensatory increases in the of surviving types, enhancing in the luminance pathway.

Genetic Basis

Dichromacy in humans is primarily a congenital condition resulting from genetic that impair the function of one of the three cone genes, leading to the loss of one cone type. Protanopia (absence of red-sensitive cones) and deuteranopia (absence of green-sensitive cones) follow an pattern due to in the OPN1LW and OPN1MW genes, respectively, both located on the at Xq28. Red-green dichromacy affects approximately 2% of males due to hemizygosity on their single , whereas females require on both to express the condition, affecting about 0.03% of them. In contrast, tritanopia (absence of blue-sensitive cones) is inherited in an autosomal dominant manner through in the OPN1SW gene on 7q32, resulting in equal among sexes but overall rarity compared to red-green forms. At the molecular level, dichromacy arises from various genetic alterations in the genes that produce non-functional photopigments. For red-green dichromacy, the OPN1LW and OPN1MW genes are arranged in a tandem array on the , with the L-cone (OPN1LW) gene typically upstream of multiple M-cone (OPN1MW) copies; disruptions such as gene deletions, chimeric or hybrid genes formed by unequal recombination, and point mutations (e.g., missense variants altering critical for spectral tuning) prevent proper expression or function of the respective opsins. These mechanisms often lead to complete loss of one cone type, with hybrid genes particularly common in anomalous but extending to dichromatic phenotypes when combined with deletions. For tritanopia, mutations in OPN1SW are predominantly point mutations or small insertions/deletions that disrupt the opsin's binding to 11-cis-retinal or its membrane integration, rendering blue-sensitive cones non-functional. While most cases of dichromacy are congenital and genetic in origin, acquired forms can develop later in life due to diseases or environmental factors that damage cone cells or their pathways, distinct from inherited mutations. Conditions such as diabetes mellitus can induce tritan-like dichromacy through retinal vascular changes and opsin dysfunction without altering the underlying DNA sequence, contrasting with the permanent genetic defects in congenital cases. Other causes include macular degeneration or toxic exposures, but these typically result in partial or progressive color loss rather than complete dichromacy unless severe.

In Humans

Prevalence

Dichromacy, the severe form of color vision deficiency characterized by the absence of one pigment type, exhibits distinct patterns globally, with -green variants being far more common than blue-yellow types. Protanopia, the lack of long-wavelength () sensitivity, affects approximately 1% of males and 0.01% of females, while deuteranopia, lacking medium-wavelength () sensitivity, impacts about 1.5% of males and 0.01% of females. Tritanopia, involving the absence of short-wavelength () sensitivity, is much rarer, occurring in roughly 0.008% of both males and females. Prevalence of red-green dichromacy shows ethnic variations, with higher rates observed in Caucasian populations—where total red-green deficiency can reach 8% in males of Northern European descent—compared to lower incidences in some Asian and African groups, ranging from 4% to 6.5% in males. These differences are largely attributed to the X-linked genetic of red-green types, which primarily affects males due to their single . Risk factors for congenital dichromacy center on family history, given its X-linked recessive pattern for protanopia and deuteranopia, whereas tritanopia follows autosomal dominant inheritance. Acquired forms of dichromacy or severe color deficiency, often resulting from aging, disease, or medication, affect approximately 3.7% of the elderly population aged 60 years and older, with prevalence of red-green deficiencies rising to around 5.8% in those aged 80 and older.

Diagnosis

Diagnosis of dichromacy in humans primarily relies on psychophysical tests that assess color discrimination and matching abilities, supplemented by electrophysiological and genetic methods for confirmation and classification. The Ishihara pseudoisochromatic plates serve as a standard screening tool for detecting red-green color deficiencies, such as protanopia and deuteranopia, by presenting plates where numbers or paths are discernible only to those with normal or specific defective vision; it identifies approximately 96% of confirmed cases but may miss mild anomalous trichromacy. For evaluating the severity of the deficiency, the Farnsworth-Munsell 100 Hue test requires arranging colored caps in spectral order, revealing error scores that quantify discrimination deficits, with higher scores indicating greater impairment in dichromats. Anomaloscopy provides a more precise diagnostic method through direct comparison of spectral lights, particularly via the Rayleigh match, where subjects adjust mixtures of and primaries to match a reference; dichromats exhibit a match anomaly with zero tolerance for variation (matching only at a single point due to absent function), enabling distinction from anomalous , which shows a broader matching range. This test targets protan and deutan types effectively, while tritanopia requires adapted blue-yellow matching protocols. Advanced techniques include (ERG), which measures retinal responses to specific wavelengths; in dichromats, ERG reveals absent signals from the deficient class, such as lacking L-cone responses in protanopes, confirming the physiological basis of the defect. analyzes gene mutations on the for red-green dichromacy or autosomal genes for tritanopia, identifying specific variants like deletions or hybrids in OPN1LW/OPN1MW that cause absence, serving as a definitive diagnostic standard when psychophysical results are ambiguous.

Perceptual Abilities

Dichromatic humans possess a reduced compared to trichromats, enabling them to distinguish roughly 10,000 hues rather than the approximately 1–2 million perceivable by those with normal trichromatic vision. This limitation arises from the absence of one , resulting in a two-dimensional where certain hues are confusable along the missing chromatic axis. For instance, protanopes, lacking functional long-wavelength-sensitive (L-) cones, perceive reds as dark grays or blacks and confuse them with darker greens or browns, while deuteranopes, lacking medium-wavelength-sensitive (M-) cones, blend reds and greens into similar yellowish tones. Tritanopes, though rarer, confuse blues and yellows, seeing them as neutral grays. These confusions follow the dichromatic confusion lines in color spaces like CIE 1931, where colors of equal appearance to dichromats lie along straight lines passing through the missing cone's neutral point. Despite color discrimination deficits, dichromats exhibit strengths in other visual domains, particularly those involving and temporal processing. They often demonstrate enhanced detection at high frequencies (e.g., 16 Hz), attributed to an increased of the remaining types replacing the absent ones and stronger rod- interactions that amplify sensitivity to rapid changes. This can provide an advantage in detecting motion or temporally modulated stimuli under certain conditions. Additionally, dichromats show superior low-light (scotopic) compared to trichromats, allowing better performance in dim environments due to less interference from the missing cone pathway during rod-dominated vision. In everyday scenarios, these perceptual traits manifest as reliance on luminance cues for tasks typically requiring hue distinction; for example, protanopes may identify colors primarily by vertical position and brightness differences rather than hue, as the signal appears dimmer and could be mistaken for an unlit bulb in low-illumination conditions. Similarly, sorting colored objects like fruits or often depends on brightness gradients instead of chromatic differences, enabling functional performance despite reduced hue variety. To visualize these abilities, simulations of dichromatic vision employ algorithms that project trichromatic images onto the dichromat's reduced , such as by applying color filters that enforce confusion lines; tools based on these methods, like those derived from linear transformation models, accurately depict how a vibrant trichromatic scene compresses into a more monochromatic palette for protanopes or deuteranopes.

In Non-Human Animals

Mammals

Most placental mammals exhibit dichromacy, possessing only two types of photoreceptors: short-wavelength-sensitive (SWS1) cones tuned to blue-violet light and middle-to-long-wavelength-sensitive (M/LWS) cones sensitive to green-yellow light. This configuration allows them to distinguish colors along a axis but limits discrimination in the red-green spectrum, a trait shared across diverse orders like and Rodentia. In carnivores such as cats and dogs, dichromacy is well-characterized, with S-cones peaking around 450 nm and M/LWS cones around 550 nm, enabling detection of blues and yellows while rendering reds indistinguishable from greens. Domestic cats (Felis catus) and dogs (Canis familiaris) rely on this system for environmental cues, though their vision is augmented by high rod density for low-light conditions. An exception among placental mammals occurs in primates (catarrhines), where evolved through X-chromosome duplication of the gene, producing separate middle-wavelength (MWS) and long-wavelength (LWS) pigments alongside SWS cones, allowing full red-green-blue color perception in all individuals. Marsupials display greater variability in color vision, with some species dichromatic and others achieving through allelic polymorphism in their single LWS , similar to . For instance, the quokka (Setonix brachyurus) possesses three cone types with peaks at approximately 430 nm (SWS), 540 nm, and 560 nm, enabling trichromatic discrimination, while many wallabies, such as the tammar wallaby (Macropus eugenii), are dichromatic with SWS and a single LWS cone. This polymorphism often results in males being dichromatic and females potentially trichromatic if heterozygous. Dichromatic mammals often compensate through functional adaptations, including UV sensitivity in S-cones for foraging tasks like detecting UV-reflective food sources or trails, and enhanced rod-mediated scotopic vision for crepuscular activity. Ground squirrels (Xerus spp.), for example, leverage their dichromatic system—peaking at 450 nm and 530 nm—to differentiate green foliage from brown earth, aiding in vegetation assessment and predator avoidance during diurnal foraging. Marine mammals represent a notable exception, frequently exhibiting monochromacy with only LWS cones (peaking around 560 nm), as seen in seals and cetaceans, which prioritizes achromatic contrast in the blue-dominated underwater environment over color discrimination.

Other Vertebrates

Dichromacy in non-mammalian vertebrates varies widely across taxa, often reflecting adaptations to specific ecological niches such as nocturnal activity or aquatic environments, in contrast to the more uniform dichromacy prevalent in mammals. While many such species possess trichromatic or tetrachromatic vision, dichromacy occurs in select groups, particularly those with simplified cone systems. In birds, vision is predominantly tetrachromatic, incorporating ultraviolet-sensitive cones alongside short-, medium-, and long-wavelength cones, enabling detection of UV crucial for and . However, some raptors, such as certain eagles and hawks, exhibit reduced ultraviolet sensitivity due to violet-tuned rather than true UV-sensitive cones and ocular media limitations, compared to UV-sensitive songbirds, though they remain tetrachromatic overall. Among fish, dichromacy is common in many species, especially in marine and freshwater environments where light spectra are constrained. For instance, the ( salmoides) possesses only two cone types sensitive to green and red wavelengths, allowing color discrimination based on these channels for prey detection and habitat navigation. often adapt to dim blue light with dichromatic systems or even , prioritizing rod-dominated vision over expanded cone diversity. Reptiles and amphibians display variable dichromacy, particularly in nocturnal or crepuscular species with dual cone configurations. Snakes, for example, typically feature two cone types—a UV-sensitive cone (peaking around 360 nm) and a long-wavelength-sensitive (LWS) cone (around 550 nm)—enabling dichromatic suited to low-light and detection integration. In amphibians, nocturnal frogs and salamanders utilize a dual rod system (- and green-sensitive rods) for scotopic color discrimination, effectively providing dichromatic at threshold light levels without relying on cones.

Evolutionary Aspects

Origins in Mammals

Early mammals inherited a visual system from their amniote ancestors that featured tetrachromacy, with four distinct cone opsin classes: short-wavelength sensitive 1 (SWS1, ultraviolet-sensitive), short-wavelength sensitive 2 (SWS2, blue-sensitive), rhodopsin-like 2 (Rh2, green-sensitive), and long-wavelength sensitive (LWS, red-sensitive). This ancestral configuration, dating back to approximately 300 million years ago in early tetrapods, enabled broad-spectrum color discrimination under diurnal conditions. However, during the Mesozoic era around 200 to 100 million years ago, early mammals underwent a "nocturnal bottleneck," a period of evolutionary constraint where they adopted a primarily nocturnal lifestyle to evade competition from diurnal reptiles, including dinosaurs. This shift imposed strong selective pressures favoring enhanced low-light sensitivity over color vision, leading to the loss of the SWS2 and Rh2 opsin genes, reducing the cone complement to two functional types: SWS1 and LWS. The retention of dichromacy in most mammals stems from this bottleneck, with genetic phylogenies of sequences revealing that the SWS1 gene (short-wavelength sensitive, peaking around 360-420 nm) was conserved across all major mammalian lineages, including monotremes, marsupials, and placentals. These phylogenies, reconstructed from comparative DNA analyses of diverse species, indicate that the ancestral mammalian LWS opsin was tuned to mid-wavelength green light (around 550 nm), providing complementary sensitivity to the blue-violet SWS1 for basic dichromatic discrimination in dim environments. Fossil and evidence supports this loss occurring before the divergence of marsupials and placentals around 148 million years ago, with no recovery of the lost opsins in non-primate mammals. In , a key evolutionary modification occurred through the duplication of the ancestral LWS opsin gene on the , approximately 40 million years ago in the lineage leading to . This event produced separate long-wavelength sensitive (LWS, peaking at ~560 nm) and middle-wavelength sensitive (MWS, ~530 nm) opsins, diverging from the single green-sensitive ancestral form via sequence divergence and gene conversion. While this laid the foundation for in catarrhine , the broader mammalian retention of a single LWS/MWS class underscores the enduring impact of nocturnal adaptation, where selective pressures prioritized proliferation and enlarged retinal areas for over expanded cone diversity.

Comparative Evolution

The ancestral s possessed a diverse array of s, enabling tetrachromatic with sensitivity spanning (UV) to longer wavelengths, including UV-violet sensitive SWS1 opsins peaking around 358–370 nm. This multiplicity arose from early duplications of an ancestral approximately 500–530 million years ago, predating the of major vertebrate lineages, and provided broad spectral coverage through four classes (SWS1, SWS2, Rh2, LWS) alongside rod opsins. Dichromacy emerged as a reduction in this ancestral repertoire, particularly in lineages adapting to nocturnal or low-light environments, where selective pressures favored fewer types for enhanced sensitivity over chromatic discrimination; diurnal lineages, by contrast, often retained more opsins. Convergent evolution of dichromacy has occurred independently across groups, reflecting parallel adaptations to similar ecological niches such as or aquatic habitats. In fish, deep-sea species have lost multiple cone opsins (e.g., SWS1 and Rh2), resulting in dichromatic or monochromatic vision akin to that in nocturnal reptiles like snakes, which independently shed SWS1 and other cones while retaining LWS and Rh1 for dim-light detection. Reptilian dichromacy mirrors mammalian patterns, with losses in nocturnal squamates paralleling the early mammalian reduction during a that eliminated SWS2 and Rh2 opsins. These independent gene losses highlight shared selective pressures for simplified in light-limited settings, distinct from the preserved in diurnal and birds. In , dichromacy was partially reversed through the of in females, achieved via X-chromosome polymorphism around 30–40 million years ago in lineages and in ancestors. This polymorphism allows heterozygous females to express both medium-wavelength-sensitive (MWS) and long-wavelength-sensitive (LWS) in separate cones due to random , restoring red-green discrimination lost in the mammalian lineage. Genomic studies since 2010 have illuminated the mechanisms of these evolutionary shifts, identifying key duplications and tuning sites that drove spectral adaptations across s. For instance, analyses of over 100 genomes revealed repeated LWS duplications enabling in diurnal species, while comparative sequencing in reptiles and mammals pinpointed convergent substitutions (e.g., at sites 83 and 292 in Rh1) underlying dichromatic sensitivities. These insights, drawn from high-throughput sequencing, underscore how expansions and losses shaped diversity.

Implications

Daily Life Impacts

Dichromacy, particularly the common red-green forms such as protanopia and deuteranopia, presents significant challenges in human society by impairing the ability to distinguish certain colors, leading to practical difficulties in color-reliant tasks. These perceptual confusions, where reds and greens appear similar, extend beyond abstract vision science into tangible barriers in professional and personal spheres. Occupational restrictions are among the most pronounced impacts, as many visually demanding fields enforce color vision standards to ensure safety and accuracy. In , regulatory bodies like the U.S. (FAA) and various services require normal for pilots and air traffic controllers due to reliance on color-coded instruments and signals, resulting in disqualification for dichromats. Similarly, electrical work often bars individuals with dichromacy because of the need to identify color-coded wires and components, with at least 25% of individuals with CVD having been denied jobs in sectors such as the and police due to their condition. Design fields, including graphic and , impose limitations through color-matching requirements, contributing to altered career trajectories for affected individuals. Overall, approximately 43% of dichromats report that their condition has influenced their career choices, with restrictions in roles like and rail operations exacerbating barriers. In everyday activities, dichromacy complicates routine decisions dependent on color cues, increasing the for those affected. Traffic signals pose a frequent challenge, with 50% of dichromats struggling to differentiate and lights, though many adapt by relying on positional cues without of elevated rates. selection often leads to mismatches, as individuals may confuse similar hues, while judging ripeness—such as distinguishing ripe bananas from unripe ones—relies on unreliable color . These issues extend to identification and household tasks, where 90% of dichromats encounter difficulties in color-based sorting. Social and psychological effects further compound the challenges, fostering isolation or in color-centric interactions. In appreciation, dichromats may misinterpret palettes, leading to diminished enjoyment or misunderstandings in discussions. Sports activities, such as following team colors in soccer or navigating color-coded maps in , can result in disadvantages or exclusion, with children often facing ridicule in school settings that prompts social withdrawal. Psychologically, this manifests as emotional distress from repeated curiosities or embarrassments, though only a minority of studies quantify such impacts. Gender disparities amplify these effects, as dichromacy predominantly affects males due to its X-linked , with rates of about 8% in males compared to 0.4% in females. This skew influences career choices more severely for men, who comprise nearly all (99%) of job applicants screened for CVD in high-stakes fields, potentially limiting opportunities in male-dominated sectors like and transportation.

Compensation Strategies

Assistive tools have been developed to help individuals with dichromacy distinguish colors more effectively by altering light wavelengths or providing digital enhancements. Color-correcting glasses, such as EnChroma lenses, employ notch filters to reduce spectral overlap between medium- and long-wavelength cones, thereby enhancing contrast for red-green dichromats. These glasses are designed primarily for anomalous trichromats (protanomaly and deuteranomaly), with limited or no benefit for dichromats like protanopes and deuteranopes; clinical studies indicate limited improvements in some tasks, though overall effectiveness varies and may not enable perception of entirely new colors. Mobile applications also serve as practical aids; for instance, Color Blind Pal uses camera-based color detection to identify and label hues in real-time, allowing users to point at objects and receive verbal or visual feedback on colors they cannot differentiate. Design accommodations in everyday environments and digital interfaces prioritize accessibility beyond color reliance to mitigate dichromacy's limitations. Universal design principles, such as , recommend using patterns, textures, or labels alongside colors in visual aids like maps and charts to ensure interpretability for all users, including those with dichromatic vision. Operating systems incorporate built-in software filters; Windows Color Filters, for example, apply , inverted, or deuteranopia/protanopia-specific adjustments to screen content, enabling real-time color adaptation that aids tasks like reading graphs or identifying icons. Training methods focus on behavioral adaptations to compensate for perceptual gaps without altering vision itself. Occupational therapy programs teach strategies like sorting items by or saturation levels rather than hue, or using verbal descriptions and tactile cues to navigate color-dependent activities such as clothing selection or food preparation. services tailor these skills to professional contexts, providing task-specific training and assistive devices to support employment in fields like or where color cues are prevalent. As of 2025, emerging advances offer potential for more direct interventions. trials targeting cone opsin genes have shown promise in restoring partial in patients, with phase 1/2 studies demonstrating safety and subtle improvements in color perception when administered early; similar approaches are advancing for related monochromatic conditions, such as . As of July 2025, the Vision Center at initiated a phase 1 for the first targeting in boys. AI-enhanced vision aids, including smart glasses, use computational algorithms to reconstruct trichromatic views in real-time by remapping colors based on the user's deficiency profile, as explored in recent prototypes that integrate camera feeds with neural networks for on-the-fly correction.

References

  1. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12385717/
  2. https://eyewiki.org/Color_Vision
  3. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/neuroscience/dichromacy
  4. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK217823/
  5. https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/57575
  6. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3095437/
  7. https://micro.magnet.fsu.edu/primer/java/humanvision/colorblindness/index.html
  8. https://www.admesy.com/articles/colorimetry-in-perspective-of-the-human-eye/
  9. https://www.cs.rochester.edu/courses/572/colorvis/colorblind.html
  10. https://medlineplus.gov/genetics/condition/color-vision-deficiency/
  11. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3121536/
  12. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0107035
  13. https://jov.arvojournals.org/article.aspx?articleid=2122133
  14. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3075382/
  15. https://disorders.eyes.arizona.edu/category/genes/opn1lw
  16. https://www.colour-blindness.com/general/prevalence/
  17. https://omim.org/entry/190900
  18. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4285181/
  19. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41525-022-00334-9
  20. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9271157/
  21. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7254067/
  22. https://avehjournal.org/index.php/aveh/article/view/365/648
  23. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK544355/
  24. https://www.colourblindawareness.org/colour-blindness/causes-of-colour-blindness/acquired-colour-vision-defects/
  25. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK11538/table/ch28kallcolor.T1/
  26. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/13/16/2031
  27. https://opg.optica.org/oe/abstract.cfm?uri=josaa-29-3-313
  28. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10475627/
  29. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK217826/
  30. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2622650/
  31. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30844384/
  32. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5017313/
  33. https://opg.optica.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?uri=josaa-27-10-2106
  34. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9316278/
  35. https://jov.arvojournals.org/article.aspx?articleid=2192839
  36. https://pure.rug.nl/ws/files/10741639/1998VisionResVerhulst.pdf
  37. https://www.nei.nih.gov/learn-about-eye-health/eye-conditions-and-diseases/color-blindness/types-color-vision-deficiency
  38. https://opg.optica.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?uri=josaa-14-10-2647
  39. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4987397/
  40. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2781854/
  41. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5717654/
  42. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/ecology-and-evolution/articles/10.3389/fevo.2017.00034/full
  43. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0014231
  44. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2004.3009
  45. https://www.cell.com/current-biology/pdf/S0960-9822%2806%2901186-9.pdf
  46. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.0813201106
  47. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7486276/
  48. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11328346/
  49. https://corvidresearch.blog/tag/ultra-violet/
  50. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/240306724_Ultraviolet_sensitivity_and_colour_vision_in_raptor_foraging
  51. https://academic.oup.com/cz/article/65/1/43/4924236
  52. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25725325/
  53. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/ecology-and-evolution/articles/10.3389/fevo.2019.00352/full
  54. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rstb.2016.0066
  55. https://doi.org/10.1159/000314278
  56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1350-9462(00)00002-1
  57. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2017.00034
  58. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012160622002111
  59. https://www.cell.com/current-biology/pdf/S0960-9822%2806%2901697-6.pdf
  60. https://academic.oup.com/mbe/article/33/10/2483/2925599
  61. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_1100_21
  62. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12930-014-0010-3
  63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-2030-1
  64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lansea.2023.100171
  65. https://enchroma.com/pages/how-enchroma-glasses-work
  66. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33055508/
  67. https://colorblindpal.com/
  68. https://jfly.uni-koeln.de/color/
  69. https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/use-color-filters-in-windows-43893e44-b8b3-2e27-1a29-b0c15ef0e5ce
  70. https://foxrehab.org/color-vision-deficits-treatment-occupational-therapy/
  71. https://www.ncoa.org/article/how-vocational-rehabilitation-can-translate-vision-loss-into-career-success/
  72. https://www.drugdiscoverynews.com/restoring-color-vision-with-gene-therapy-16001
  73. https://www.managedhealthcareexecutive.com/view/gene-therapy-for-rare-eye-disease-to-advance-to-human-trial
  74. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3654777.3676415
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.