Hubbry Logo
E-commerceE-commerceMain
Open search
E-commerce
Community hub
E-commerce
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
E-commerce
E-commerce
E-commerce
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

E-commerce
Digital content
Retail goods and services
Online shopping
Mobile commerce
Customer service
E-procurement
Purchase-to-pay
Super-apps

E-commerce (electronic commerce) refers to commercial activities including the electronic buying or selling products and services which are conducted on online platforms or over the Internet.[1] E-commerce draws on technologies such as mobile commerce, electronic funds transfer, supply chain management, Internet marketing, online transaction processing, electronic data interchange (EDI), inventory management systems, and automated data collection systems. E-commerce is a part of the retail, the largest segment of the electronics industry and is in turn driven by the technological advances of the semiconductor industry.

Defining e-commerce

[edit]

The term was coined and first employed by Robert Jacobson, Principal Consultant to the California State Assembly's Utilities & Commerce Committee, in the title and text of California's Electronic Commerce Act, carried by the late Committee Chairwoman Gwen Moore (D-L.A.) and enacted in 1984.

E-commerce typically uses the web for at least a part of a transaction's life cycle although it may also use other technologies such as e-mail. Typical e-commerce transactions include the purchase of products (such as books from Amazon) or services (such as music downloads in the form of digital distribution such as the iTunes Store).[2] There are three areas of e-commerce: online retailing, electronic markets, and online auctions. E-commerce is supported by electronic business.[3] The existence value of e-commerce is to allow consumers to shop online and pay online through the Internet, saving the time and space of customers and enterprises, greatly improving transaction efficiency, especially for busy office workers, and also saving a lot of valuable time.[4]

E-commerce businesses may also employ some or all of the following:

There are five essential categories of E-commerce:[7]

  • Business to Business
  • Business to Consumer
  • Business to Government
  • Consumer to Business
  • Consumer to Consumer
  • Direct to Consumer

Forms

[edit]

Contemporary electronic commerce can be classified into two categories. The first category is business based on types of goods sold (involves everything from ordering "digital" content for immediate online consumption, to ordering conventional goods and services, to "meta" services to facilitate other types of electronic commerce). The second category is based on the nature of the participant (B2B, B2C, C2B and C2C).[8]

On the institutional level, big corporations and financial institutions use the internet to exchange financial data to facilitate domestic and international business. Data integrity and security are pressing issues for electronic commerce.

Aside from traditional e-commerce, the terms m-Commerce (mobile commerce) as well (around 2013) t-Commerce[9] have also been used.

Governmental regulation

[edit]

In the United States, California's Electronic Commerce Act (1984), enacted by the Legislature, the more recent California Privacy Rights Act (2020), enacted through a popular election proposition and to control specifically how electronic commerce may be conducted in California. In the US in its entirety, electronic commerce activities are regulated more broadly by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). These activities include the use of commercial e-mails, online advertising and consumer privacy. The CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 establishes national standards for direct marketing over e-mail. The Federal Trade Commission Act regulates all forms of advertising, including online advertising, and states that advertising must be truthful and non-deceptive.[10] Using its authority under Section 5 of the FTC Act, which prohibits unfair or deceptive practices, the FTC has brought a number of cases to enforce the promises in corporate privacy statements, including promises about the security of consumers' personal information.[11] As a result, any corporate privacy policy related to e-commerce activity may be subject to enforcement by the FTC.

The Ryan Haight Online Pharmacy Consumer Protection Act of 2008, which came into law in 2008, amends the Controlled Substances Act to address online pharmacies.[12]

Conflict of laws in cyberspace is a major hurdle for harmonization of legal framework for e-commerce around the world. In order to give a uniformity to e-commerce law around the world, many countries adopted the UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Commerce (1996).[13]

Internationally there is the International Consumer Protection and Enforcement Network (ICPEN), which was formed in 1991 from an informal network of government customer fair trade organisations. The purpose was stated as being to find ways of co-operating on tackling consumer problems connected with cross-border transactions in both goods and services, and to help ensure exchanges of information among the participants for mutual benefit and understanding. From this came Econsumer.gov, an ICPEN initiative since April 2001. It is a portal to report complaints about online and related transactions with foreign companies.

There is also Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation. APEC was established in 1989 with the vision of achieving stability, security and prosperity for the region through free and open trade and investment. APEC has an Electronic Commerce Steering Group as well as working on common privacy regulations throughout the APEC region.

In Australia, trade is covered under Australian Treasury Guidelines for electronic commerce and the Australian Competition & Consumer Commission[14] regulates and offers advice on how to deal with businesses online,[15] and offers specific advice on what happens if things go wrong.[16]

The European Union undertook an extensive enquiry into e-commerce in 2015–16 which observed significant growth in the development of e-commerce, along with some developments which raised concerns, such as increased use of selective distribution systems, which allow manufacturers to control routes to market, and "increased use of contractual restrictions to better control product distribution". The European Commission felt that some emerging practices might be justified if they could improve the quality of product distribution, but "others may unduly prevent consumers from benefiting from greater product choice and lower prices in e-commerce and therefore warrant Commission action" in order to promote compliance with EU competition rules.[17]

In the United Kingdom, the Financial Services Authority (FSA)[18] was formerly the regulating authority for most aspects of the EU's Payment Services Directive (PSD), until its replacement in 2013 by the Prudential Regulation Authority and the Financial Conduct Authority.[19] The UK implemented the PSD through the Payment Services Regulations 2009 (PSRs), which came into effect on 1 November 2009. The PSR affects firms providing payment services and their customers. These firms include banks, non-bank credit card issuers and non-bank merchant acquirers, e-money issuers, etc. The PSRs created a new class of regulated firms known as payment institutions (PIs), who are subject to prudential requirements. Article 87 of the PSD required the European Commission to report on the implementation and impact of the PSD by 1 November 2012.[20]

In India, the Information Technology Act 2000 governs the basic applicability of e-commerce.

In China, the Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China (promulgated on 25 September 2000), stipulated the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) as the government department regulating all telecommunications related activities, including electronic commerce.[21] On the same day, the Administrative Measures on Internet Information Services were released, the first administrative regulations to address profit-generating activities conducted through the Internet, and lay the foundation for future regulations governing e-commerce in China.[22] On 28 August 2004, the eleventh session of the tenth NPC Standing Committee adopted an Electronic Signature Law, which regulates data message, electronic signature authentication and legal liability issues. It is considered the first law in China's e-commerce legislation. It was a milestone in the course of improving China's electronic commerce legislation, and also marks the entering of China's rapid development stage for electronic commerce legislation.[23]

[edit]

E-commerce has become an important tool for small and large businesses worldwide, not only to sell to customers, but also to engage them.[24][25]

Cross-border e-Commerce is also an essential field for e-Commerce businesses.  It has responded to the trend of globalization. It shows that numerous firms have opened up new businesses, expanded new markets, and overcome trade barriers; more and more enterprises have started exploring the cross-border cooperation field. In addition, compared with traditional cross-border trade, the information on cross-border e-commerce is more concealed. In the era of globalization, cross-border e-commerce for inter-firm companies means the activities, interactions, or social relations of two or more e-commerce enterprises. However, the success of cross-border e-commerce promotes the development of small and medium-sized firms, and it has finally become a new transaction mode. It has helped the companies solve financial problems and realize the reasonable allocation of resources field. SMEs ( small and medium enterprises) can also precisely match the demand and supply in the market, having the industrial chain majorization and creating more revenues for companies.[26]

In 2012, e-commerce sales topped $1 trillion for the first time in history.[27]

Mobile devices are playing an increasing role in the mix of e-commerce, this is also commonly called mobile commerce, or m-commerce. In 2014, one estimate saw purchases made on mobile devices making up 25% of the market by 2017.[28]

For traditional businesses, one research stated that information technology and cross-border e-commerce is a good opportunity for the rapid development and growth of enterprises. Many companies have invested an enormous volume of investment in mobile applications. The DeLone and McLean Model stated that three perspectives contribute to a successful e-business: information system quality, service quality and users' satisfaction.[29] There is no limit of time and space, there are more opportunities to reach out to customers around the world, and to cut down unnecessary intermediate links, thereby reducing the cost price, and can benefit from one on one large customer data analysis, to achieve a high degree of personal customization strategic plan, in order to fully enhance the core competitiveness of the products in the company.[30]

Modern 3D graphics technologies, such as Facebook 3D Posts, are considered by some social media marketers and advertisers as a preferable way to promote consumer goods than static photos, and some brands like Sony are already paving the way for augmented reality commerce. Wayfair now lets you inspect a 3D version of its furniture in a home setting before buying.[31]

China

[edit]
Main article: E-commerce in China

Among emerging economies, China's e-commerce presence continued to expand every year. With 668 million Internet users as of 2014, China's online shopping sales reached $253 billion in the first half of 2015, accounting for 10% of total Chinese consumer retail sales in that period.[32] The Chinese retailers have been able to help consumers feel more comfortable shopping online.[33] e-commerce transactions between China and other countries increased 32% to 2.3 trillion yuan ($375.8 billion) in 2012 and accounted for 9.6% of China's total international trade.[34] In 2013, Alibaba had an e-commerce market share of 80% in China.[35] In 2014, Alibaba still dominated the B2B marketplace in China with a market share of 44.82%, followed by several other companies including Made-in-China.com at 3.21%, and GlobalSources.com at 2.98%, with the total transaction value of China's B2B market exceeding 4.5 billion yuan.[36]

China was also the largest e-commerce market in the world by value of sales, with an estimated US$899 billion in 2016.[37] It accounted for 42.4% of worldwide retail e-commerce in that year, the most of any country.[38]: 110  Research shows that Chinese consumer motivations are different enough from Western audiences to require unique e-commerce app designs instead of simply porting Western apps into the Chinese market.[39]

The expansion of e-commerce in China has resulted in the development of Taobao villages, clusters of e-commerce businesses operating in rural areas.[38]: 112  Because Taobao villages have increased the incomes or rural people and entrepreneurship in rural China, Taobao villages have become a component of rural revitalization strategies.[40]: 278 

In 2015, the State Council promoted the Internet Plus initiative, a five-year plan to integrate traditional manufacturing and service industries with big data, cloud computing, and Internet of things technology.[41]: 44  The State Council provided support for Internet Plus through policy support in area including cross-border e-commerce and rural e-commerce.[41]: 44 

In 2019, the city of Hangzhou established a pilot program artificial intelligence-based Internet Court to adjudicate disputes related to e-commerce and internet-related intellectual property claims.[42]: 124 

Europe

[edit]

In 2010, the United Kingdom had the highest per capita e-commerce spending in the world.[43] As of 2013, the Czech Republic was the European country where e-commerce delivers the biggest contribution to the enterprises' total revenue. Almost a quarter (24%) of the country's total turnover is generated via the online channel.[44]

Arab states

[edit]

The rate of growth of the number of internet users in the Arab countries has been rapid – 13.1% in 2015. A significant portion of the e-commerce market in the Middle East comprises people in the 30–34 year age group. Egypt has the largest number of internet users in the region, followed by Saudi Arabia and Morocco; these constitute 3/4th of the region's share. Yet, internet penetration is low: 35% in Egypt and 65% in Saudi Arabia.[45]

The Gulf Cooperation Council countries have a rapidly growing market and are characterized by a population that becomes wealthier (Yuldashev). As such, retailers have launched Arabic-language websites as a means to target this population. Secondly, there are predictions of increased mobile purchases and an expanding internet audience (Yuldashev). The growth and development of the two aspects make the GCC countries become larger players in the electronic commerce market with time progress. Specifically, research shows that the e-commerce market was expected to grow to over $20 billion by 2020 among these GCC countries (Yuldashev). The e-commerce market has also gained much popularity among western countries, and in particular Europe and the U.S. These countries have been highly characterized by consumer-packaged goods (CPG) (Geisler, 34). However, trends show that there are future signs of a reverse. Similar to the GCC countries, there has been increased purchase of goods and services in online channels rather than offline channels. Activist investors are trying hard to consolidate and slash their overall cost and the governments in western countries continue to impose more regulation on CPG manufacturers (Geisler, 36). In these senses, CPG investors are being forced to adapt to e-commerce as it is effective as well as a means for them to thrive.

The future trends in the GCC countries will be similar to that of the western countries. Despite the forces that push business to adapt e-commerce as a means to sell goods and products, the manner in which customers make purchases is similar in countries from these two regions. For instance, there has been an increased usage of smartphones which comes in conjunction with an increase in the overall internet audience from the regions. Yuldashev writes that consumers are scaling up to more modern technology that allows for mobile marketing. However, the percentage of smartphone and internet users who make online purchases is expected to vary in the first few years. It will be independent on the willingness of the people to adopt this new trend (The Statistics Portal). For example, UAE has the greatest smartphone penetration of 73.8 per cent and has 91.9 per cent of its population has access to the internet. On the other hand, smartphone penetration in Europe has been reported to be at 64.7 per cent (The Statistics Portal). Regardless, the disparity in percentage between these regions is expected to level out in future because e-commerce technology is expected to grow to allow for more users.

The e-commerce business within these two regions will result in competition. Government bodies at the country level will enhance their measures and strategies to ensure sustainability and consumer protection (Krings, et al.). These increased measures will raise the environmental and social standards in the countries, factors that will determine the success of the e-commerce market in these countries. For example, an adoption of tough sanctions will make it difficult for companies to enter the e-commerce market while lenient sanctions will allow ease of companies. As such, the future trends between GCC countries and the Western countries will be independent of these sanctions (Krings, et al.). These countries need to make rational conclusions in coming up with effective sanctions.

India

[edit]
Main article: E-commerce in India

India had an Internet user base of about 460 million as of December 2017.[46] Despite being the third largest user base in the world, the penetration of the Internet is low compared to markets like the United States, United Kingdom or France but is growing at a much faster rate, adding around six million new entrants every month.[citation needed] In India, cash on delivery is the most preferred payment method, accumulating 75% of the e-retail activities.[47][citation needed] The India retail market was expected to rise from 2.5% in 2016 to 5% in 2020.[48]

Brazil

[edit]

In 2013, Brazil's e-commerce was growing quickly with retail e-commerce sales expected to grow at a double-digit pace through 2014. By 2016, eMarketer expected retail e-commerce sales in Brazil to reach $17.3 billion.[49]

Logistics

[edit]

Logistics in e-commerce mainly concerns fulfillment. Online markets and retailers have to find the best possible way to fill orders and deliver products. Small companies usually control their own logistic operation because they do not have the ability to hire an outside company. Most large companies hire a fulfillment service that takes care of a company's logistic needs.[50] The optimization of logistics processes that contains long-term investment in an efficient storage infrastructure system and adoption of inventory management strategies is crucial to prioritize customer satisfaction throughout the entire process, from order placement to final delivery.[51]

Impacts

[edit]

Impact on markets and retailers

[edit]
Store closing flags outside a Toys R Us in Deptford, New Jersey. Despite investments, the chain struggled to win market share in the age of digital commerce.

E-commerce markets grew at noticeable rates. The online market was expected to grow by 56% in 2015–2020. In 2017, retail e-commerce sales worldwide amounted to 2.3 trillion US dollars and e-retail revenues were projected to grow to 4.891 trillion US dollars in 2021.[52] Traditional markets are only expected 2% growth during the same time. Brick and mortar retailers are struggling because of online retailer's ability to offer lower prices and higher efficiency. Many larger retailers are able to maintain a presence offline and online by linking physical and online offerings.[53]

E-commerce allows customers to overcome geographical barriers and allows them to purchase products anytime and from anywhere. Online and traditional markets have different strategies for conducting business. Traditional retailers offer fewer assortment of products because of shelf space where, online retailers often hold no inventory but send customer orders directly to the manufacturer. The pricing strategies are also different for traditional and online retailers. Traditional retailers base their prices on store traffic and the cost to keep inventory. Online retailers base prices on the speed of delivery.

There are two ways for marketers to conduct business through e-commerce: fully online or online along with a brick and mortar store. Online marketers can offer lower prices, greater product selection, and high efficiency rates. Many customers prefer online markets if the products can be delivered quickly at relatively low price. However, online retailers cannot offer the physical experience that traditional retailers can. It can be difficult to judge the quality of a product without the physical experience, which may cause customers to experience product or seller uncertainty. Another issue regarding the online market is concerns about the security of online transactions. Many customers remain loyal to well-known retailers because of this issue.[54]

Security is a primary problem for e-commerce in developed and developing countries. E-commerce security is protecting businesses' websites and customers from unauthorized access, use, alteration, or destruction. The type of threats include: malicious codes, unwanted programs (ad ware, spyware), phishing, hacking, and cyber vandalism. E-commerce websites use different tools to avert security threats. These tools include firewalls, encryption software, digital certificates, and passwords.[citation needed]

Impact on supply chain management

[edit]
Main article: Supply chain management

For a long time, companies had been troubled by the gap between the benefits which supply chain technology has and the solutions to deliver those benefits. However, the emergence of e-commerce has provided a more practical and effective way of delivering the benefits of the new supply chain technologies.[55]

E-commerce has the capability to integrate all inter-company and intra-company functions, meaning that the three flows (physical flow, financial flow and information flow) of the supply chain could be also affected by e-commerce. The affections on physical flows improved the way of product and inventory movement level for companies. For the information flows, e-commerce optimized the capacity of information processing than companies used to have, and for the financial flows, e-commerce allows companies to have more efficient payment and settlement solutions.[55]

In addition, e-commerce has a more sophisticated level of impact on supply chains: Firstly, the performance gap will be eliminated since companies can identify gaps between different levels of supply chains by electronic means of solutions; Secondly, as a result of e-commerce emergence, new capabilities such implementing ERP systems, like SAP ERP, Xero, or Megaventory, have helped companies to manage operations with customers and suppliers. Yet these new capabilities are still not fully exploited. Thirdly, technology companies would keep investing on new e-commerce software solutions as they are expecting investment return. Fourthly, e-commerce would help to solve many aspects of issues that companies may feel difficult to cope with, such as political barriers or cross-country changes. Finally, e-commerce provides companies a more efficient and effective way to collaborate with each other within the supply chain.[55]

Impact on employment

[edit]

E-commerce helps create new job opportunities due to information related services, software app and digital products. It also causes job losses. The areas with the greatest predicted job-loss are retail, postal, and travel agencies. The development of e-commerce will create jobs that require highly skilled workers to manage large amounts of information, customer demands, and production processes. In contrast, people with poor technical skills cannot enjoy the wages welfare. On the other hand, because e-commerce requires sufficient stocks that could be delivered to customers in time, the warehouse becomes an important element. Warehouse needs more staff to manage, supervise and organize, thus the condition of warehouse environment will be concerned by employees.[56]

Impact on customers

[edit]

E-commerce brings convenience for customers as they do not have to leave home and only need to browse websites online, especially for buying products which are not sold in nearby shops. It could help customers buy a wider range of products and save customers' time. Consumers also gain power through online shopping. They are able to research products and compare prices among retailers. Thanks to the practice of user-generated ratings and reviews from companies like Bazaarvoice, Trustpilot, and Yelp, customers can also see what other people think of a product, and decide before buying if they want to spend money on it.[57][58] Also, online shopping often provides sales promotion or discounts code, thus it is more price effective for customers. Moreover, e-commerce provides products' detailed information; even the in-store staff cannot offer such detailed explanation. Customers can also review and track the order history online.

E-commerce technologies cut transaction costs by allowing both manufactures and consumers to skip through the intermediaries. This is achieved through by extending the search area best price deals and by group purchase. The success of e-commerce in urban and regional levels depend on how the local firms and consumers have adopted to e-commerce.[59]

However, e-commerce lacks human interaction for customers, especially who prefer face-to-face connection. Customers are also concerned with the security of online transactions and tend to remain loyal to well-known retailers. In recent years, clothing retailers such as Tommy Hilfiger have started adding Virtual Fit platforms to their e-commerce sites to reduce the risk of customers buying the wrong sized clothes, although these vary greatly in their fit for purpose.[60] When the customer regret the purchase of a product, it involves returning goods and refunding process. This process is inconvenient as customers need to pack and post the goods. If the products are expensive, large or fragile, it refers to safety issues.[53]

Impact on the environment

[edit]

In 2018, E-commerce generated 1.3 million short tons (1.2 megatonnes) of container cardboard in North America, an increase from 1.1 million (1.00)) in 2017. Only 35 percent of North American cardboard manufacturing capacity was from recycled content. The recycling rate in Europe was 80 percent and Asia was 93 percent. Amazon, the largest user of boxes, had a strategy to cut back on packing material and reduced packaging material used by 19 percent by weight since 2016. Amazon is requiring retailers to manufacture their product packaging in a way that does not require additional shipping packaging. Amazon also has an 85-person team researching ways to reduce and improve their packaging and shipping materials.[61]

Accelerated movement of packages around the world includes accelerated movement of living things, such as invasive species.[62] Weeds, pests, and diseases all sometimes travel in packages of seeds.[62] Some of these packages are part of brushing manipulation of e-commerce reviews.[62]

Impact on traditional retail

[edit]

E-commerce has been cited as a major force for the failure of major U.S. retailers in a trend frequently referred to as a "retail apocalypse."[63] The rise of e-commerce outlets like Amazon has made it harder for traditional retailers to attract customers to their stores and forced companies to change their sales strategies. Many companies have turned to sales promotions and increased digital efforts to lure shoppers while shutting down brick-and-mortar locations.[64] The trend has forced some traditional retailers to shutter its brick and mortar operations.[65]

E-commerce during COVID-19

[edit]
Further information: Economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic

In March 2020, global retail website traffic hit 14.3 billion visits[66] signifying an unprecedented growth of e-commerce during the lockdown of 2020. Later studies show that online sales increased by 25% and online grocery shopping increased by over 100% during the crisis in the United States.[67] Meanwhile, as many as 29% of surveyed shoppers state that they will never go back to shopping in person again; in the UK, 43% of consumers state that they expect to keep on shopping the same way even after the lockdown is over.[68]

Retail sales of e-commerce shows that COVID-19 has a significant impact on e-commerce and its sales were expected to reach $6.5 trillion by 2023.[69]

Business application

[edit]
An example of an older generation of avatar-style automated online assistant on a merchandising website

Some common applications related to electronic commerce are:

Timeline

[edit]

A timeline for the development of e-commerce:

  • 1971 or 1972: The ARPANET is used to arrange a cannabis sale between students at the Stanford Artificial Intelligence Laboratory and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, later described as "the seminal act of e-commerce" in John Markoff's book What the Dormouse Said.[70]
  • 1979: Michael Aldrich demonstrates the first online shopping system.[71]
  • 1981: Thomson Holidays UK is the first business-to-business (B2B) online shopping system to be installed.[72]
  • 1982: Minitel was introduced nationwide in France by France Télécom and used for online ordering.
  • 1983: California State Assembly holds first hearing on "electronic commerce" in Volcano, California.[73] Testifying are CPUC, MCI Mail, Prodigy, CompuServe, Volcano Telephone, and Pacific Telesis. (Not permitted to testify is Quantum Technology, later to become AOL.) California's Electronic Commerce Act was passed in 1984.
  • 1983: Karen Earle Lile (AKA Karen Bean) and Kendall Ross Bean create e-commerce service in San Francisco Bay Area. Buyers and sellers of pianos connect through a database created by Piano Finders on a Kaypro personal computer. Pianos for sale are listed on a Bulletin board system. Buyers print list of pianos for sale by a dot matrix printer. Customer service happened through a Piano Advice Hotline listed in the San Francisco Chronicle classified ads and money transferred by a bank wire transfer when a sale was completed.[74][75]
  • 1984: Gateshead SIS/Tesco is first B2C online shopping system[76] and Mrs Snowball, 72, is the first online home shopper[77]
  • 1984: In April 1984, CompuServe launches the Electronic Mall in the US and Canada. It is the first comprehensive electronic commerce service.[78]
  • 1989: In May 1989, Sequoia Data Corp. introduced Compumarket, the first internet based system for e-commerce. Sellers and buyers could post items for sale and buyers could search the database and make purchases with a credit card.
  • 1990: Tim Berners-Lee writes the first web browser, WorldWideWeb, using a NeXT computer.[79]
  • 1992: Book Stacks Unlimited in Cleveland opens a commercial sales website (www.books.com) selling books online with credit card processing.
  • 1993: Paget Press releases edition No. 3[80] of the first[81] app store, The Electronic AppWrapper[82]
  • 1994: Netscape releases the Navigator browser in October under the code name Mozilla. Netscape 1.0 is introduced in late 1994 with SSL encryption that made transactions secure.
  • 1994: Ipswitch IMail Server becomes the first software available online for sale and immediate download via a partnership between Ipswitch, Inc. and OpenMarket.
  • 1994: "Ten Summoner's Tales" by Sting becomes the first secure online purchase through NetMarket.[83]
  • 1995: The US National Science Foundation lifts its former strict prohibition of commercial enterprise on the Internet.[84]
  • 1995: Thursday 27 April 1995, the purchase of a book by Paul Stanfield, product manager for CompuServe UK, from W H Smith's shop within CompuServe's UK Shopping Centre is the UK's first national online shopping service secure transaction. The shopping service at launch featured W H Smith, Tesco, Virgin Megastores/Our Price, Great Universal Stores (GUS), Interflora, Dixons Retail, Past Times, PC World (retailer) and Innovations.
  • 1995: Amazon is launched by Jeff Bezos.
  • 1995: eBay is founded by computer programmer Pierre Omidyar as AuctionWeb. It is the first online auction site supporting person-to-person transactions.[85]
  • 1995: The first commercial-free 24-hour, internet-only radio stations, Radio HK and NetRadio start broadcasting.
  • 1996: The use of Excalibur BBS with replicated "storefronts" was an early implementation of electronic commerce started by a group of SysOps in Australia and replicated to global partner sites.
  • 1998: Electronic postal stamps can be purchased and downloaded for printing from the Web.[86]
  • 1999: Alibaba Group is established in China. Business.com sold for US$7.5 million to eCompanies, which was purchased in 1997 for US$149,000. The peer-to-peer filesharing software Napster launches. ATG Stores launches to sell decorative items for the home online.
  • 1999: Global e-commerce reaches $150 billion[56]
  • 2000: The dot-com bust.
  • 2001: eBay has the largest userbase of any e-commerce site.[85]
  • 2001: Alibaba.com achieved profitability in December 2001.
  • 2002: eBay acquires PayPal for $1.5 billion.[87] Niche retail companies Wayfair and NetShops are founded with the concept of selling products through several targeted domains, rather than a central portal.
  • 2003: Amazon posts first yearly profit.
  • 2004: DHgate.com, China's first online B2B transaction platform, is established, forcing other B2B sites to move away from the "yellow pages" model.[88]
  • 2007: Business.com acquired by R.H. Donnelley for $345 million.[89]
  • 2014: US e-commerce and online retail sales projected to reach $294 billion, an increase of 12 percent over 2013 and 9% of all retail sales.[90] Alibaba Group has the largest Initial public offering ever, worth $25 billion.
  • 2015: Amazon accounts for more than half of all e-commerce growth,[91] selling almost 500 Million SKU's in the US.
  • 2016: The Government of India launches the BHIM UPI digital payment interface. In the year 2020 it had 2 billion digital payment transactions.[92][93]
  • 2017: Retail e-commerce sales across the world reaches $2.304 trillion, which was a 24.8 percent increase than previous year.[94]
  • 2017: Global e-commerce transactions generate $29.267 trillion, including $25.516 trillion for business-to-business (B2B) transactions and $3.851 trillion for business-to-consumer (B2C) sales.[95]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

E-commerce

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia

E-commerce, or electronic commerce, is the buying and selling of goods and services, or the transmission of funds or data, over an electronic network, primarily the . This activity occurs through digital platforms and devices, encompassing transactions between businesses and consumers (B2C), businesses and businesses (B2B), consumers and consumers (), and other models. E-commerce traces its origins to the 1970s with the development of (EDI) for business document exchange, but it expanded significantly in the 1990s with the advent of the and secure online payments. Pioneering milestones include the first computerized online sale in 1972 via a system and the invention of electronic shopping by in 1979, followed by the launch of major platforms like Amazon in 1995. These developments enabled scalable digital marketplaces, reducing geographical barriers and transaction costs through automated processes. By 2024, global e-commerce revenue exceeded $4.5 trillion, with projections indicating continued expansion to represent over 20% of worldwide retail sales by 2025. This growth stems from increased internet penetration, mobile device usage, and logistical efficiencies, fostering economic productivity via direct producer-to-consumer channels and data-driven personalization. However, e-commerce has concentrated market power in dominant platforms, prompting antitrust scrutiny over practices that may stifle competition, alongside persistent challenges in consumer data privacy and protection against fraud.

Definition and Fundamentals

Defining E-commerce

E-commerce, or electronic commerce, consists of the buying and selling of goods or services conducted over computer networks by methods specifically designed for the purpose of receiving or placing the order. This definition, adopted by the (OECD) in 1998 and reaffirmed in its 2025 guidelines, focuses on the electronic facilitation of order placement rather than requiring electronic payment or delivery. Such transactions occur primarily via the but can involve other electronic networks like extranets or (EDI) systems. The U.S. Census Bureau similarly defines e-commerce sales as those where the buyer places an order, or the price and terms of the sale are negotiated, over an electronic network, including the , , or other online tools. This scope encompasses physical goods, digital products, and services, spanning interactions between businesses (B2B), consumers (B2C), consumers (), and other models, though the core element remains the digitally mediated commercial exchange. Eurostat aligns with this by describing e-commerce as the sale or purchase of goods or services between businesses, households, or individuals via electronic means. Key to e-commerce is the transmission of , funds, or both to execute transactions, often through websites, mobile applications, or platforms, distinguishing it from non-commercial online activities like information sharing. Unlike traditional brick-and-mortar commerce, e-commerce reduces geographical barriers and enables real-time global transactions, though it relies on underlying infrastructure for , , and fulfillment. Definitions from statistical bodies like the and U.S. Census Bureau prioritize measurability for economic tracking, ensuring consistency in reporting sales volumes that reached $1.03 trillion in U.S. e-commerce retail for 2023 alone.

Classifications and Business Models

E-commerce transactions are classified primarily by the nature of the parties involved, with the most common categories being business-to-consumer (B2C), (B2B), (C2C), (C2B), and (B2G). In B2C models, businesses sell products or services directly to individual consumers, representing the most visible form of e-commerce and driving the majority of retail online sales, such as through platforms like Amazon and stores. B2B e-commerce involves transactions between businesses, often featuring larger order volumes and customized pricing, with examples including Alibaba for wholesale sourcing and Grainger for industrial supplies. C2C platforms facilitate direct exchanges between consumers, typically through auction or listing systems, as seen in where individuals sell used goods to other individuals. C2B models reverse the typical flow, with consumers offering products, services, or data to businesses, such as freelancers bidding on or influencers selling content rights. B2G e-commerce encompasses sales from businesses to government entities, often involving portals for public tenders and compliance with regulatory standards. These classifications can overlap, and emerging variants like (D2C) emphasize brand-owned channels bypassing intermediaries within B2C frameworks. Beyond transactional classifications, e-commerce business models describe operational and revenue strategies, including dropshipping, , subscriptions, and auctions. Dropshipping allows retailers to sell without holding inventory, as third-party suppliers handle fulfillment, reducing upfront costs but introducing dependency on supplier reliability; examples include many Shopify-based stores sourcing from . Marketplace models aggregate multiple sellers on a single platform, earning commissions on transactions, with Amazon commanding 37.6% of U.S. retail e-commerce spending in 2024 through such a structure. Subscription models generate recurring revenue via periodic deliveries or access, suited for consumables like Dollar Shave Club's razors or software services, fostering but requiring consistent value to minimize churn. Auction models, prevalent in C2C but adaptable to B2B, involve bidding processes to determine prices, as pioneered by since 1995, which can maximize seller returns for unique or surplus items. Other models like white-labeling or adapt to specific classifications, with profitability varying by scale; for instance, global e-commerce reached $25.93 trillion in 2023, with B2C retail segments growing to $6.4 trillion in 2024 amid diverse model adoption. These models influence scalability, risk, and market fit, with choices often driven by capital availability and control.

Historical Development

Early Origins and Milestones

(EDI), a system for the automated exchange of standardized business documents such as purchase orders and invoices between organizations, emerged in the as a precursor to modern e-commerce, primarily facilitating (B2B) transactions to streamline supply chains in industries like transportation and . By the , EDI had gained traction among large corporations, reducing paperwork and errors through computer-to-computer communication, though it required proprietary networks and was limited to structured data formats without consumer involvement. In 1979, British entrepreneur developed the first system for consumer , known as "teleshopping," by connecting a modified domestic to a real-time transaction-processing computer via a standard , enabling users to browse catalogs and place orders remotely. This innovation marked an early attempt at business-to-consumer (B2C) electronic transactions, predating the public , and was implemented in the UK with initial trials involving retailers like , where a visually impaired customer placed the first such order in 1984 using a TV . France's network, launched nationwide in by the state-owned postal and telecommunications service, provided an early public platform for electronic services including e-commerce precursors such as catalog browsing, reservations, and purchases via low-cost terminals distributed to telephone subscribers. By the mid-1980s, supported millions of sessions for transactional activities, fostering familiarity with remote buying but remaining confined to a proprietary system rather than open protocols. These developments laid foundational concepts for digital commerce, emphasizing secure data exchange and remote access, though widespread adoption awaited broader network infrastructure.

Expansion and Key Innovations (1990s–2010s)

The commercialization of the internet in the mid-1990s fueled the rapid expansion of e-commerce, with U.S. online retail sales surging from negligible levels in 1995 to approximately $28 billion by 2000, driven by investments exceeding $50 billion in dot-com startups during the boom period from 1995 to 2000. Companies like Amazon, established in July 1994 as an online bookseller and completing its first book sale in July 1995, introduced scalable inventory management and customer-centric features such as user reviews and algorithmic recommendations, which enhanced purchase conversion rates by personalizing shopping experiences based on browsing history. Similarly, eBay's launch in September 1995 pioneered consumer-to-consumer auctions, enabling through bidding mechanisms that accounted for over 10 million auctions by 1997 and facilitated the trading of diverse goods from collectibles to . A pivotal innovation was the development of secure online transactions, exemplified by Netscape's implementation of the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) protocol in 1995, which encrypted data transfers and addressed consumer fears over , thereby enabling the first verifiable secure purchases like the 1994 sale of a Sting album via NetMarket. The dot-com bubble's peak in March 2000, with index valuations inflating tech stocks by over 400% from 1995 levels, spurred infrastructural advancements including faster server technologies and basic search functionalities, though the subsequent bust from 2000 to 2002 wiped out $5 trillion in market value and forced many unprofitable ventures to fold, weeding out unsustainable models reliant on hype rather than revenue generation. Survivors adapted by focusing on operational efficiency; for instance, , founded in December 1998 as and rebranded after merging with X.com, processed its first eBay transaction in 2000 and grew to handle 70% of eBay's payments by 2002, reducing transaction abandonment by offering buyer-seller protection absent in traditional systems. In the 2000s, broadband penetration in the U.S. rose from 5% of households in 2000 to over 50% by 2007, enabling media-rich e-commerce sites with video previews and higher-resolution images that boosted average order values by 20-30% compared to dial-up eras. This period saw international expansion, with Alibaba's founding in 1999 introducing B2B marketplaces in that connected over 1 million suppliers by 2003, capitalizing on lower costs and demand to achieve $1 billion in annual sales by 2008. U.S. e-commerce sales recovered post-bust, climbing from $21.8 billion in 2001 to $165.4 billion in 2010, representing a of about 25%, as retailers integrated hybrid models blending online and physical fulfillment. Key innovations included Amazon's purchasing patented in September 1999, which streamlined checkout to under 30 seconds and increased impulse buys, and the rise of programs like Amazon Associates launched in 1996, which by 2005 generated over $2.5 billion in referred sales through performance-based commissions. The late 2000s introduced precursors, with the iPhone's debut in June 2007 and subsequent app ecosystems enabling optimized shopping interfaces; by 2010, mobile e-commerce transactions in the U.S. exceeded $1 billion annually, laying groundwork for responsive design and location-based promotions despite early limitations in payment processing. These developments underscored causal factors like improved internet infrastructure and trust-building mechanisms—rather than mere speculation—as drivers of sustained growth, with empirical data showing e-commerce's share of total U.S. retail sales rising from 0.9% in 2000 to 4.2% in 2010, reflecting genuine adoption over bubble-era overvaluation.

Recent Growth Phase (2020s Onward)

The catalyzed a sharp acceleration in e-commerce adoption beginning in 2020, as lockdowns and measures prompted consumers worldwide to shift from physical retail to online channels, compressing years of expected into months. In the United States, e-commerce sales rose 43% to $815.4 billion in 2020 from $571.2 billion in 2019, representing a $244.2 billion increase driven by heightened demand for essentials like groceries and . Globally, the pandemic added an estimated 19% to e-commerce revenue growth in 2020 alone, with platforms experiencing surges in traffic and orders as businesses pivoted to digital sales amid store closures. This shift was not merely temporary; post-lockdown data indicates sustained behavioral changes, including increased online grocery purchasing and broader category penetration, though some segments like non-essential apparel saw partial reversion to pre-pandemic patterns by 2022. From 2021 onward, e-commerce continued expanding at robust rates, fueled by infrastructure investments, mobile proliferation, and , though growth moderated from pandemic peaks due to reopening economies and normalization. Worldwide retail e-commerce sales reached approximately $6.01 trillion in 2024, projected to climb to $6.42 trillion in 2025—a 6.86% year-over-year increase—reflecting deceleration from the 2020-2021 surge but steady penetration into new markets and demographics. emerged as a dominant driver, with sales expected to exceed $4 trillion globally in 2025, accounting for over half of total e-commerce transactions as smartphones enabled seamless browsing and payments in regions with limited fixed . adaptations, including enhanced fulfillment centers and last-mile delivery optimizations by firms like Amazon, supported this scale-up, mitigating bottlenecks exposed during the . Key innovations in the mid-2020s further propelled growth, particularly the integration of for personalization and operations, alongside live and formats that blended entertainment with purchasing. AI tools for recommendation engines and inventory forecasting became standard by 2023, boosting conversion rates and reducing cart abandonment, while live commerce—streaming product demonstrations via platforms like and —gained traction in and expanded westward, driving impulse buys through real-time interaction. applications for secure payments and transparency also advanced, addressing fraud concerns amid rising transaction volumes. Despite these advances, challenges persisted, including regulatory scrutiny over data privacy and antitrust actions against dominant platforms, which influenced competitive dynamics without halting overall expansion. By late 2025, e-commerce's share of total retail sales had stabilized at elevated levels, underscoring a structural shift rather than a fleeting response to crisis.

Technological Infrastructure

Core Technologies Enabling E-commerce

The foundational networking layer of e-commerce depends on the TCP/IP protocol suite, which standardized communication when transitioned to it on January 1, 1983, allowing fragmented data packets to be reliably routed across disparate networks for . This packet-switching mechanism ensures efficient, error-corrected delivery of product catalogs, user queries, and order confirmations over the . At the , the Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP), initiated by at in 1989 and first implemented in version 0.9 by 1991, enables clients to request and servers to respond with hypermedia documents, powering the navigation of e-commerce websites through hyperlinks and forms for adding items to virtual carts. Its stateless request-response model supports scalable, server-agnostic interactions critical for handling millions of concurrent shoppers. Security protocols address the vulnerability of transmitted financial data; introduced the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) in in 1995, providing encryption via to protect sensitive exchanges like details from on public networks. SSL evolved into Transport Layer Security (TLS), with —HTTP over SSL/TLS—becoming standard for e-commerce by the late 1990s to verify server authenticity and maintain during checkout processes. Client-side technologies including for page structure, Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) for visual presentation, and for dynamic behaviors form the front-end stack, allowing interactive elements such as product zoom, search autocomplete, and real-time pricing updates without full page reloads. Server-side scripting languages like , processing over 75% of web servers as of 2023, manage dynamic content generation, while relational databases such as store and query vast inventories, user profiles, and transaction logs with SQL for ACID-compliant operations ensuring data consistency amid high-volume sales. Scalable hosting via web servers like (released 1995) or handles request routing and load balancing, with cloud infrastructure—exemplified by ' public launch in 2006—enabling elastic computing resources to absorb peak loads, such as Black Friday surges exceeding 10x normal traffic. Application Programming Interfaces (APIs), standardized through RESTful designs since the early , integrate disparate systems for seamless data flow between storefronts, payment processors, and logistics providers, underpinning omnichannel experiences.

Payment Systems, Security, and Data Management

E-commerce relies on diverse payment systems to facilitate transactions, with and debit cards accounting for 20% and 12% of global e-commerce payments in 2024, respectively. Digital wallets have surged in adoption, comprising 39% of e-commerce payments in 2024, more than double the 15% share from 2014, driven by convenience and integration with mobile devices. In the United States, leads as the most recognized e-commerce payment brand, while platforms like and contribute to the overall dominance, which reached 53% of e-commerce spending volume in 2024. These systems process trillions in value annually, with digital wallets alone handling $41 trillion globally in 2024, underscoring their role in reducing friction compared to traditional cards. Security in e-commerce payments centers on standards like the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS), a set of requirements established by major card brands to protect cardholder data during storage, processing, and transmission. PCI DSS mandates practices such as , of sensitive data, and regular vulnerability assessments, with non-compliance risking fines or loss of payment processing privileges. Fraud prevention employs techniques including protocols for added authentication, tokenization to replace card details with unique identifiers, and real-time risk scoring to flag anomalies like unusual transaction patterns. Despite these measures, e-commerce fraud inflicted $48 billion in global losses in 2023, highlighting persistent vulnerabilities from methods like account takeover and card-not-present schemes. Data management in e-commerce involves collecting and safeguarding personal information such as addresses, payment details, and purchase histories, often governed by regulations like the EU's (GDPR), effective since May 25, 2018, which requires explicit for and imposes fines up to 4% of annual global turnover for violations. GDPR has compelled e-commerce firms to audit data flows, minimize collection to essentials, and enable user rights like , reducing average tracker usage on sites by about 14.79% post-implementation. Breaches remain a risk, with the retail sector facing elevated cyber threats; for instance, global costs averaged $4.88 million per incident in recent years, exacerbated by factors like misconfigurations and credential abuse. Effective strategies include at rest and in transit, alongside compliance with PCI DSS for payment data, to mitigate exposures that could erode consumer trust and invite regulatory penalties.

Operational Aspects

Platforms, Marketplaces, and Fulfillment

E-commerce platforms provide the software infrastructure for businesses to create and manage online stores, enabling features such as product listings, inventory tracking, and . Shopify, as of September 2025, holds the largest among U.S. e-commerce platforms at approximately 28%, powering over 2.69 million sites with tools for customizable storefronts and integrated payment gateways. , an open-source plugin for , commands around 20-39% global usage depending on metrics, supporting over 3.5 million sites due to its flexibility and low entry barriers for small merchants. However, e-commerce startups frequently cite challenges in technical setup, such as platform configuration and system integration, as well as inventory management difficulties including tracking and fulfillment coordination, as barriers to effective entry and growth. Other notable platforms include , with 19% U.S. share and emphasis on design templates, and , favored for enterprise scalability. Modern e-commerce platforms also incorporate features designed to enhance user experience and boost conversion rates, including newsletter signups for personalized alerts and promotions, wishlists for saving desired items, recommendations of related products and upsells to increase average order value, guest checkout to reduce purchase abandonment, clear and multiple payment options to foster trust, robust About pages and contact information to establish credibility, and social media integration to build community engagement. Marketplaces differ from standalone platforms by aggregating multiple third-party sellers on a centralized site, facilitating buyer discovery across diverse inventories while often handling payments and . Amazon leads globally with $790.3 billion in gross merchandise value in 2024, capturing 37.6% U.S. and processing 16.16 million daily orders through its vast seller ecosystem. Alibaba and its consumer-facing AliExpress dominate in and emerging markets, emphasizing B2B and cross-border sales, while maintains 134 million active buyers focused on auctions and fixed-price listings. Walmart Marketplace and regional players like Mercado Libre in follow, with marketplaces collectively driving over 50% of global e-commerce sales by enabling network effects that reduce customer acquisition costs for sellers. Fulfillment encompasses the post-purchase processes of order picking, packing, shipping, and returns, critical for and retention in e-commerce. Common methods include in-house fulfillment for full control, dropshipping where suppliers ship directly to minimize inventory risks, and (3PL) providers like Amazon's Fulfillment by Amazon (FBA), which stores goods in warehouses, handles packing, and integrates with Prime's two-day delivery network. FBA contrasts with platforms like , which offer fulfillment networks or apps for 3PL integration but require sellers to manage branding and independently, often resulting in higher fees for Amazon's scale (up to 35% of sales) versus Shopify's lower platform costs. Trends in 2025 emphasize in warehousing for efficiency, hyperlocal micro-fulfillment centers to cut delivery times, and sustainable practices like optimized packaging to meet consumer demands, with multi-node networks enabling support across online and physical retail.

Logistics and Supply Chain Dynamics

E-commerce encompasses the warehousing, inventory management, transportation, and delivery processes that enable timely fulfillment of online orders, with last-mile delivery accounting for approximately 53% of total costs. The global e-commerce market reached an estimated $535 billion in 2025, driven by surging parcel volumes and reliance on (3PL) providers by most merchants. Efficient are essential for meeting consumer demands, as 66% of buyers expect same-day delivery in urban areas, amplifying pressures on and cost control. Fulfillment centers form the backbone of e-commerce operations, with Amazon operating over 200 such facilities worldwide as of 2025, many averaging 800,000 square feet and employing for sorting and picking. These centers integrate automation to handle peak demands, such as those following the , which boosted global e-commerce sales by 63% year-over-year in Q3 2020 through accelerated online shifts amid lockdowns. Inventory management relies on and AI to optimize stock levels, reducing overstock risks while minimizing stockouts, though disruptions like those in 2024 caused average revenue losses of 8% for affected companies. Transportation networks involve multi-modal shipping, but bottlenecks in global supply chains—exacerbated by events like the —have led to delays, with 57% of firms reporting serious interruptions. Last-mile delivery presents the greatest operational hurdles, including urban congestion, failed attempts costing up to $20 per incident, and rising expenses reported by 84% of e-commerce businesses in the past year. High return rates, ranging from 8-88% by product category, further strain , necessitating robust tracking systems. Micro-fulfillment centers near urban hubs aim to shorten these distances, while 3PL partnerships help smaller retailers scale without owning . Innovations are addressing these dynamics through AI-driven forecasting for delivery accuracy, robotic systems in warehouses—such as Amazon's centers with over 7,000 robots—and emerging drone and autonomous vehicle pilots for bypassing traffic. These technologies promise cost reductions and faster processing, with AI enabling 10-fold increases in deployment in advanced facilities as of 2024. efforts, including electric fleets and optimized routing, respond to environmental pressures, though implementation varies by region due to regulatory differences. Overall, hinges on integrating data analytics with physical infrastructure to counter vulnerabilities exposed by global events.

Worldwide Statistics and Growth Drivers

Global retail e-commerce sales reached approximately $6.01 in 2024, with projections estimating $6.42 in 2025, reflecting a year-over-year growth of 6.86%. This expansion follows a (CAGR) of around 8.4% in 2024, though forecasts indicate a deceleration to 6.8% in 2025 amid maturing markets in developed regions. Broader e-commerce , including B2B transactions, is anticipated to hit $3.66 in 2025, with a projected CAGR of 6.29% through 2030, driven by sustained digital . E-commerce penetration in global retail sales stood at 20.1% in 2024, surpassing physical retail for the first time in many metrics, while user penetration among internet users is expected to reach 54.3% in 2025. Over 2.71 billion people shopped online worldwide in recent years, with average revenue per user projected at $1.13 thousand in 2025, highlighting the scale of consumer engagement despite varying regional disparities. These figures underscore e-commerce's transition from niche to dominant channel, particularly in categories like electronics and apparel, where online shares exceed 30% in advanced economies. Projections for 2026 indicate top e-commerce categories by revenue will include consumer electronics, leading with sustained demand for gadgets; fashion, at US$957 billion; food, growing rapidly with a CAGR of around 9.42%; DIY/hardware; furniture; beauty/personal care; and beverages. Emerging profitable niches encompass sustainable/eco-friendly products, pet supplies, home fitness/athleisure, consumer electronics accessories, and health/wellness items like sleep aids. Primary growth drivers include widespread adoption, enabling m-commerce which accounts for over half of e-commerce traffic in many markets, and improved penetration in emerging economies. Convenience factors, such as 24/7 accessibility and price transparency, compel shifts from traditional retail, amplified by post-pandemic behavioral changes favoring contactless purchasing. Advancements in , digital payments, and AI-driven further reduce barriers, with and buy-now-pay-later options accelerating uptake among younger demographics in regions like . Economic pressures, including , have bolstered e-commerce's appeal through competitive pricing and variety, though saturation in mature markets tempers overall velocity. E-commerce growth also signals middle-class expansion through increased internet access, digital adoption among middle-income households, and greater spending power for discretionary online purchases, particularly in emerging markets.

Regional Variations and Case Studies

E-commerce adoption varies significantly by region, driven by factors such as internet penetration, payment infrastructure, logistics capabilities, and regulatory environments. In Asia-Pacific, which accounts for over 55% of global e-commerce transactions, rapid urbanization and mobile internet access have propelled growth rates exceeding those in mature markets. North America exhibits high penetration rates, with the United States leading at approximately 15.8% of retail sales online in 2025. Europe emphasizes data privacy regulations like GDPR, tempering expansion compared to less regulated emerging markets. Latin America demonstrates the fastest compound annual growth rates, fueled by increasing smartphone usage and fintech innovations, projecting market expansion from USD 1.45 trillion in 2024 to USD 3.26 trillion by 2033. In Africa, adoption hinges on mobile money systems, with divergent impacts between urban centers benefiting from e-commerce and rural areas facing infrastructural barriers. A prominent case study is China's e-commerce ecosystem, dominated by , which pioneered platforms like and since 2003, leveraging events to generate record sales exceeding USD 84 billion in 2021 alone. Alibaba's success stems from integrating digital payments via , addressing trust issues in a market where over 1 billion consumers now participate, contributing to Asia's outsized share of global volumes. This model contrasts with Western approaches by emphasizing super-apps and ecosystem lock-in rather than standalone marketplaces. In , e-commerce growth reflects competition between local players like and global entrants like Amazon, with foreign investments from Alibaba and totaling billions to capture a burgeoning . , acquired by in 2018 for USD 16 billion, adapted to cash-on-delivery preferences and regional languages, achieving significant amid regulatory scrutiny on . By 2025, India's penetration lags at around 5-7% but surges via affordable data plans, highlighting adaptations to low-credit environments unlike credit-reliant U.S. models. The exemplifies mature-market dynamics through Amazon's evolution from bookseller to logistics powerhouse, commanding over 37% of U.S. e-commerce in 2024 with innovations in same-day delivery and AI recommendations. This contrasts with Europe's fragmented landscape, where platforms like navigate cross-border duties and strict consumer protections, resulting in slower penetration growth at 10-12% regionally. In , MercadoLibre's integrated payments and financing have mirrored Alibaba's strategy, driving adoption in and despite challenges in remote areas. African cases, such as in , underscore mobile-first models, yet persistent issues like poor last-mile delivery limit scalability compared to Asia's infrastructure investments.

Economic Impacts

Market Disruptions and Price Effects

The rise of e-commerce has profoundly disrupted traditional brick-and-mortar retail by enabling lower-cost competition, reducing consumer search costs, and shifting sales volumes online, resulting in accelerated store closures and bankruptcies among physical retailers. In the United States, e-commerce accounted for approximately 16.2% of total retail sales in the first quarter of 2025, up from lower shares pre-2020, while physical retail faced ongoing pressures despite temporary pandemic boosts. Globally, e-commerce captured 20.1% of retail sales in 2024, marking the first time it exceeded 20%, contributing to an estimated 15,000 U.S. store shutdowns in 2025 alone. High-profile examples include Forever 21's bankruptcy filing in March 2025, attributed directly to competition from low-cost online platforms like Temu and Shein, which undercut pricing through efficient supply chains and minimal overhead. Similarly, Party City announced the closure of all 850 U.S. stores in 2025, citing erosion of market share by online discount retailers. These disruptions stem from e-commerce's structural advantages, including the elimination of and staffing costs associated with physical stores, allowing platforms to offer broader assortments and faster fulfillment without equivalent fixed expenses. Traditional chains like and Toys "R" Us, which filed for in 2018, exemplified early casualties, as online giants like Amazon captured categories such as toys and appliances through superior inventory visibility and pricing transparency. While some analyses suggest the acute "" phase may be stabilizing with in-store sales recovering post-2020, filings persist, with over 30 major U.S. retailers entering proceedings in 2017 alone due to e-commerce encroachment, and recent cases underscoring that pure-play physical models remain vulnerable. E-commerce firms themselves face risks, with bankruptcies in the sector surging 80% in the year leading to March 2025, though this reflects scaling challenges rather than inherent model flaws. On price effects, e-commerce has exerted a disinflationary influence by fostering intense competition and enabling real-time price comparisons, leading to empirically measurable reductions in consumer costs. A study analyzing U.S. data from 1996 to 2014 found that e-commerce lowered variety-adjusted prices by an average of 0.9%, with greater impacts in cities with higher education levels where online adoption is stronger. More broadly, a 1% increase in the share of online retail transactions correlates with reduced in affected goods categories, as platforms leverage and algorithmic pricing to undercut offline margins. Online prices have historically risen more slowly than in-store equivalents, contributing to overall lower rates; for instance, the tripling of e-commerce's share of U.S. retail spending over the past decade has amplified this effect across durable goods. However, recent macroeconomic pressures, including tariffs and inflation as of 2025, have partially offset these deflationary tendencies in some sectors.

Employment Shifts and Entrepreneurial Opportunities

The rise of e-commerce has accelerated job displacement in traditional brick-and-mortar retail, with the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics projecting a 1.2% decline in retail trade employment from 2024 to 2034, resulting in the sector losing the most jobs among major industries due to e-commerce competition, automation, and consolidation. A National Bureau of Economic Research study found that each new e-commerce fulfillment center reduces local retail employment growth by approximately 1,000 jobs per quarter. In 2024, the U.S. retail sector experienced nearly 170,000 job losses amid inflation, rising costs, and shifts to online shopping. While traditional sales roles have diminished, e-commerce has generated in , warehousing, and sectors. The e-commerce industry employed over 371,000 workers as of 2024, adding more than 26,000 new positions in the prior year. Sectors like e-commerce startups, , and related tech reported net growth rates of 11.3%, 10.8%, and 8.1% respectively in recent assessments. A 2025 survey indicated that 62% of e-commerce firms planned to expand hiring within six months, driven by demand for roles in , , and fulfillment operations. However, these gains have not fully offset retail losses, necessitating worker reskilling for higher-skilled and digital positions. E-commerce platforms have democratized entrepreneurial entry by lowering barriers to , enabling small businesses and individuals to launch operations with minimal upfront capital. As of 2024, Amazon hosted 9.7 million active sellers worldwide, with independent U.S. sellers averaging over $290,000 in annual sales and more than 55,000 surpassing $1 million. powered approximately 4.82 million online stores, facilitating nearly $300 billion in merchant sales that year. These marketplaces provide tools for global reach, inventory management, and customer analytics, allowing entrepreneurs to compete beyond local constraints and scale rapidly, though success demands adaptation to platform algorithms and . While barriers to entry remain low—with minimal startup costs, no need for physical locations, and accessible platforms like Shopify—sustained success proves difficult due to high competition, marketing challenges, and the need for ongoing effort. Small businesses, including those online, exhibit survival rates of about 50% after five years and 30% after ten years, per U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics data analyzed by the Small Business Administration. For e-commerce startups specifically, industry estimates indicate that only 10-20% achieve long-term profitability, with 80-90% failing in the early years due to factors like poor marketing, lack of product-market fit, and intense competition.

Productivity and Trade Enhancements

E-commerce enhances by reducing information asymmetries and search costs between buyers and sellers, allowing for more efficient and operational streamlining. Empirical studies demonstrate that firms adopting e-commerce technologies experience measurable gains in (TFP); for example, Japanese firms introducing e-commerce show higher baseline productivity and accelerated TFP growth compared to non-adopters. In , firm-level analysis confirms a positive and significant impact of e-commerce on productivity, robust across different measurement approaches. Similarly, Taiwanese firms benefit from e-commerce's productivity-boosting effects, particularly when combined with investments, where e-commerce contributes independently to output per unit of input. These gains stem from mechanisms such as automated inventory management and data-driven , which minimize and optimize supply chains without proportional increases in labor or capital inputs. In the retail sector, e-commerce resolves paradoxes observed in traditional models by improving labor through online transactional capabilities; Hungarian retail firms, for instance, exhibit significant positive effects on labor from such . Broader economic models quantify consumer-side benefits, such as reduced physical search costs—equivalent to savings of over $1,000 annually per U.S. household from accessing online merchants—which amplify aggregate by freeing time and resources for higher-value activities. Electronic marketplaces further mitigate inefficiencies from high buyer search costs, enhancing and seller competition without requiring physical infrastructure expansions. E-commerce facilitates international trade by digitizing cross-border transactions, lowering logistical and informational barriers that traditionally disadvantage smaller exporters. This enables small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to participate in global markets; digitalization significantly increases SME involvement in both exports and imports, with platforms providing scalable access to international buyers. The volume of international trade rises as e-commerce promotes knowledge spillovers from high-income to developing economies, particularly through imports of digitally enabled goods and services. OECD analysis shows that digital connectivity and supportive trade policies reduce overall trade costs, boosting bilateral flows by improving connectivity and easing non-tariff hurdles like documentation. For SMEs, internet-enabled platforms allow exports without extensive physical distribution networks, as seen in U.S. small businesses maintaining local operations while gaining global reach, thereby diversifying revenue and enhancing economic resilience. These effects compound productivity gains domestically while expanding trade volumes, with digital tools addressing barriers like customs delays that a 1% reduction in export time can translate to 0.4% higher exports.

Societal and Consumer Dimensions

Consumer Advantages and Behavioral Changes

E-commerce offers consumers substantial through 24/7 and the ability to shop from any internet-connected location, reducing the time and costs associated with physical travel to stores. Empirical analyses estimate that convenience benefits, including lower transportation expenses, account for approximately one-quarter of the total value derived from . This shift has enabled households to acquire more efficiently, with studies demonstrating positive correlations between e-commerce and overall consumption patterns unburdened by store hours or geographic constraints. Key advantages include expanded product variety and price transparency, as platforms aggregate offerings from global suppliers and equip users with tools for rapid comparisons. Intensified among online sellers has driven down prices, contributing another quarter of e-commerce's economic value through reduced markups and promotional efficiencies. Consumers benefit from detailed product reviews and data-driven recommendations, which mitigate information asymmetries prevalent in traditional retail and support more deliberate purchase decisions. Behavioral transformations have accelerated since the early 2020s, with 70% of consumers reporting sustained increases in online buying post-COVID-19 due to habituated digital interfaces and delivery reliability. Mobile commerce, comprising 43% of e-commerce transactions by 2024, has normalized impulse and on-the-go purchases, blurring distinctions between browsing and buying while elevating expectations for seamless, speedy fulfillment. Reliance on algorithmic personalization has fostered subscription models and frequent micro-transactions, though it also prompts scrutiny of overconsumption enabled by frictionless checkout processes.

Challenges for Traditional Retail and Local Economies

The rise of e-commerce has imposed substantial competitive pressures on traditional brick-and-mortar retailers, primarily through lower operational costs that enable reduced prices, wider product assortments, and delivery convenience, eroding the market share of physical stores. In 2024, e-commerce accounted for 16.2% of total U.S. retail sales, up from approximately 6.5% a decade earlier, reflecting a structural shift that disadvantages retailers reliant on high-rent locations and in-person traffic. This transition has contributed to accelerated store closures, with an estimated 7,325 brick-and-mortar outlets shuttered in 2024 and projections for over 15,000 in 2025, more than doubling the prior year's figure amid ongoing digital encroachment. Local economies face compounded challenges as e-commerce diverts away from community-embedded businesses, diminishing the local economic multiplier effect where dollars spent at independent retailers recirculate through wages, suppliers, and services within the area. Between and , the number of small U.S. retailers declined by 65,000, a trend exacerbated by platforms like Amazon that capture sales without sustaining nearby economic activity. Vacant storefronts resulting from these closures—such as the 123.7 million square feet of retail space emptied in the first half of 2025 alone—reduce property values, tax revenues, and ancillary business viability in downtowns and shopping districts, fostering urban blight in affected regions. Furthermore, the "Amazon effect" intensifies these pressures by prioritizing scale and efficiency over localized commerce, leading to job displacements in retail sectors without equivalent reinvestment in community-level . Traditional retailers struggle with foot traffic declines as alternatives fulfill impulse and shopping, prompting closures that ripple into reduced and service sector demand; for instance, post-closure analyses indicate localized drops for surviving retailers, underscoring the interdependent fragility of physical retail ecosystems. While some communities adapt via hybrid models, the net causal outcome remains a contraction in local retail density, with empirical showing persistent challenges in reversing spending leakage to remote e-commerce giants.

Privacy, Fraud, and Ethical Controversies

E-commerce platforms extensively employ tracking technologies, such as third-party , to monitor consumer behavior across multiple websites, compiling detailed profiles for and . These , set by entities other than the primary site, facilitate with advertisers and firms, often without explicit user , enabling the aggregation of , purchase patterns, and preferences into comprehensive dossiers. This practice underpins what critics term "surveillance capitalism," wherein personal data becomes a extracted for predictive behavioral modification, as articulated by scholar , who argues it commodifies human experience for corporate gain. While proponents highlight efficiency in matching supply with demand, detractors contend it erodes individual autonomy, with empirical evidence from regulatory scrutiny showing widespread non-compliance with requirements under laws like GDPR. Data breaches compound these privacy risks, with e-commerce users particularly vulnerable due to the storage of sensitive like payment details and addresses. In 2025, the global average cost of a data breach fell to $4.44 million, yet incidents continue to expose millions of records; for instance, the second quarter alone saw nearly 94 million records leaked worldwide, many tied to retail and transaction platforms. High-profile cases, such as those affecting major retailers, have revealed lapses in and access controls, leading to and financial losses for consumers, underscoring causal links between inadequate cybersecurity investments and heightened vulnerability in digital marketplaces. Fraud in e-commerce manifests primarily through payment scams, account takeovers, and return abuse, inflicting substantial economic damage. Global losses from e-commerce reached an estimated $44 billion in 2024, with projections exceeding $100 billion by 2029, driven by sophisticated tactics like stolen card data and bot-driven fake transactions. In the U.S., merchants incur average fraud costs of $207 per $100 in fraudulent orders, exacerbated by the of online channels and the scale of cross-border sales. alone accounted for 38% of cases in 2024, with e-commerce sites facing elevated risks from proliferation of 269 million compromised card records. Mitigation efforts, including AI-driven detection, have curbed some losses, but persistent underreporting and evolving threats like synthetic identities highlight systemic challenges. Ethical controversies extend to deceptive practices, such as fake reviews, which distort market signals and mislead buyers. Platforms like Amazon have faced accusations of tolerating incentivized or fabricated endorsements, with studies indicating that up to 30-40% of reviews on some sites may be inauthentic, influencing purchasing decisions and enabling subpar products to thrive. This undermines trust, as consumers rely on peer feedback for informed choices, yet algorithmic amplification of manipulated content creates feedback loops favoring unscrupulous sellers. Ethically, such tactics prioritize short-term profits over transparency, echoing broader critiques of platform where liability often shifts to users rather than curators. Labor-related ethics, including grueling warehouse conditions reported in fulfillment centers, further fuel debates, though attributes these to high-volume demands rather than inherent malice, with showing injury rates elevated due to repetitive tasks but mitigated by investments. Overall, these issues reflect tensions between innovation-driven efficiencies and the moral imperatives of stewardship and fair , with source biases in academic critiques often amplifying alarmism while industry reports downplay externalities.

Environmental Realities

Efficiency Gains and Emission Reductions

E-commerce platforms facilitate gains through data-driven inventory management and , minimizing overstock and enabling just-in-time fulfillment that reduces holding costs and waste. For instance, algorithmic routing and in have been shown to enhance transportation by consolidating deliveries, thereby lowering fuel consumption per unit shipped. These mechanisms stem from real-time , which contrasts with traditional retail's reliance on static store-based stocking, often leading to excess inventory and spoilage. Comparisons of carbon footprints reveal that e-commerce typically generates lower than brick-and-mortar retail, primarily by obviating consumer vehicle trips to physical stores and curtailing use in maintaining vast retail spaces for , heating, and cooling. A base-case indicates e-commerce emissions are 17% lower overall, factoring in delivery logistics against multi-stop excursions. Similarly, from the Politecnico di Milano estimates shopping's environmental impact at 75% less than in-store equivalents, attributing savings to reduced needs and optimized parcel aggregation. An MIT study further quantifies traditional shopping's footprint as roughly double that of online orders, assuming average delivery efficiencies. In operations, applications have demonstrated tangible reductions, such as a 10% cut in emissions via optimized routing and load planning in tested scenarios. Experimental models for e-commerce platforms report up to 19.7% improvements in overall energy efficiency, alongside proportional carbon emission drops, through integrated AI-driven strategies. These gains are amplified by shifting to denser urban fulfillment centers, which shorten delivery distances and leverage in electric or efficient fleets, though outcomes hinge on consolidation rates exceeding fragmented last-mile trips. Empirical reviews across studies affirm that such efficiencies hold when online orders replace multiple physical visits, yielding net emission savings without assuming idealized behaviors.

Waste Generation and Sustainability Critiques

E-commerce generates substantially more per purchase than traditional retail due to the necessity of protective shipping materials for individual items transported over distances. A study found that produces 4.8 times the packaging waste volume compared to in-store purchases, primarily from boxes, fillers, and wraps designed to prevent damage during transit. In 2019, the global e-commerce sector utilized approximately 1 million tonnes of packaging, with projections indicating this figure would exceed 2 million tonnes by 2025 absent efforts. For context, China's e-commerce operations generated 221.5 million kilograms of packaging waste in a recent year, closely followed by the at 212.7 million kilograms. High return rates amplify this waste, as returned items often require repackaging and generate additional discarded materials. Online purchases see return rates averaging 30%, compared to 8-10% for brick-and-mortar stores, with apparel reaching 40-50% in some cases. Fewer than 50% of returned goods are resold; many are landfilled or incinerated due to restocking costs or condition issues, contributing to overconsumption cycles. This process not only doubles packaging use for returns but also exacerbates textile and product waste, as critiqued in analyses highlighting e-commerce's role in fostering disposable purchasing habits. Sustainability critiques emphasize e-commerce's contribution to broader and landfill burdens, driven by fragmented last-mile deliveries and incentivized overordering. Without intervention, plastic from e-commerce in regions like could reach 800,000 tonnes annually by 2030. Environmental reports argue that the model's emphasis on speed and convenience generates avoidable through excess materials that low rates—often below 15% globally for plastics—fail to offset. Critics, including those from organizations like Oceana, point to dominant platforms' plastic reliance, such as Amazon's shipment of hundreds of millions of kilograms yearly, as systemic failures prioritizing efficiency over minimization. These concerns are grounded in empirical generation data rather than balanced by unverified efficiency claims, underscoring causal links between e-commerce scale and .

Domestic and International Regulations

In the United States, the Federal Trade Commission enforces regulations against unfair or deceptive practices in e-commerce under Section 5 of the FTC Act, requiring clear disclosures on pricing, shipping, and product claims to prevent consumer harm. Following the 2018 Supreme Court decision in South Dakota v. Wayfair, states can mandate sales tax collection from remote sellers meeting economic nexus thresholds, such as exceeding $100,000 in annual sales or 200 transactions, leading to widespread compliance by platforms like Amazon. Data privacy falls under state-specific laws, with California's Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), effective January 1, 2020, empowering consumers to access, delete, and opt out of the sale of their personal information, while by 2025, 20 states have implemented comprehensive privacy statutes imposing similar obligations on online retailers handling consumer data. U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) regulates e-commerce imports through the threshold of $800 per shipment, exempting low-value packages from duties and formal entry, though enhanced scrutiny applies to high-volume imports to combat goods and ensure compliance with product standards. Executive actions, such as the 2020 memorandum on safe and lawful e-commerce, direct agencies to address risks from foreign platforms like those originating in , prioritizing protection and security. Internationally, the applies the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) since May 25, 2018, mandating e-commerce operators to obtain explicit consent for processing, conduct privacy impact assessments, and report breaches within 72 hours, with fines up to 4% of global turnover for non-compliance. The EU's (DSA), fully applicable from February 17, 2024, imposes transparency and accountability on online platforms, requiring risk assessments for systemic issues like illegal content dissemination. In July 2024, over 80 (WTO) members finalized a plurilateral Joint Statement Initiative on E-commerce, establishing rules for cross-border flows, protections, and on cybersecurity and AI, excluding the which opted out amid concerns over policy space. This agreement builds on the 1998 WTO Work Programme on Electronic Commerce, maintaining a moratorium on customs duties for digital transmissions extended indefinitely in 2024. Enforcement challenges persist due to jurisdictional variances, prompting calls for greater harmonization to facilitate legitimate trade while curbing illicit activities.

Antitrust Concerns and Barriers to Innovation

Dominant e-commerce platforms, particularly Amazon, have faced antitrust scrutiny for allegedly maintaining market power through practices that exclude competitors and harm consumers. In September 2023, the U.S. (FTC), joined by attorneys general from 17 states, filed a against Amazon, accusing it of monopolizing online superstores and marketplaces by deploying algorithms like Project Nessie to prevent rivals from offering lower prices, imposing loyalty metrics that penalized sellers for using other platforms, and self-preferencing its own products in search results. The case advanced in October 2024 after a federal judge denied Amazon's motion to dismiss, highlighting claims of predatory tactics enabled by Amazon's estimated 40% share of U.S. online retail sales as of 2023. In the , the (DMA), enforced from March 2024, designates Amazon as a "gatekeeper" due to its systemic importance in e-commerce, requiring it to refrain from self-preferencing, allow third-party app sideloading, and share with competitors to promote contestability. Violations could incur fines up to 10% of global turnover, with the DMA aiming to curb advantages like bundling services that lock in sellers and buyers. Critics, including some economists, contend that such dominance stems from superior efficiency and scale rather than exclusionary conduct, noting Amazon's mere 4-6% share of total U.S. retail when including offline sales, which challenges monopoly definitions focused solely on online metrics. These antitrust issues intersect with barriers to , as high in e-commerce—driven by network effects, accumulation, and capital-intensive —deters new entrants and reduces incentives for incumbents to innovate aggressively. Empirical analyses indicate that concentrated digital markets correlate with lower outputs, such as fewer patents and R&D investments per firm, because dominant players can acquire nascent competitors (e.g., Amazon's purchases of Whole Foods in 2017 and in 2009) instead of out-innovating them, a pattern termed "killer acquisitions." UNCTAD reports highlight how moats and power requirements exacerbate these barriers, limiting smaller firms' ability to develop alternatives in personalized recommendations or . Proponents of stricter enforcement argue that without intervention, platforms like Amazon stifle third-party seller by algorithmically suppressing non-compliant listings, as alleged in ongoing class-action suits over price-fixing tools that enforce artificial floors. Conversely, evidence from platform economies suggests that scale enables innovations like one-click purchasing and drone delivery, which smaller rivals struggle to replicate due to fixed costs, implying antitrust remedies risk slowing overall sector progress absent clear consumer harm. In concentrated markets, Herfindahl-Hirschman Index measures above 2,500 for U.S. online retail signal potential anticompetitive effects, yet causal links to reduced remain debated, with some studies attributing stagnation to regulatory rather than dominance alone.

Crisis Resilience and Adaptations

Acceleration During COVID-19

The , beginning in early 2020, catalyzed a rapid expansion of e-commerce through widespread lockdowns, store closures, and public aversion to in-person interactions, which directly constrained traditional retail access and shifted toward online channels. In the United States, e-commerce surged by 43%, rising from $571.2 billion in 2019 to $815.4 billion in 2020, representing an absolute increase of $244.2 billion. This acceleration was particularly acute following initial lockdowns in March 2020, with quarterly e-commerce revenue jumping 54.3% in Q2 2020 amid stay-at-home orders. Globally, e-commerce grew 17.8% to $3.9 trillion in 2020, with the share of online in total retail climbing from 16% in 2019 to 19% in 2020, driven by necessity rather than mere preference shifts. Certain categories experienced outsized gains due to pandemic-specific demands: online grocery sales, for instance, increased fivefold compared to pre-2020 levels by 2023, reflecting sustained adaptations in essential procurement initiated during peak restrictions. Sporting and home fitness equipment also saw sharp rises, as consumers turned to e-commerce for and alternatives amid and store shutdowns. This period marked a structural acceleration, with many non-digital-native retailers hastily building online capabilities; however, the surge was causally tied to exogenous policy measures like mandates, rather than endogenous market efficiencies alone, as evidenced by the correlation between stringency and e-commerce traffic spikes. The momentum carried into 2021, with U.S. e-commerce reaching $870 billion, a 50.5% increase over 2019 levels, though growth rates began moderating as restrictions eased, indicating the acceleration's partial dependence on crisis conditions. UNCTAD data confirms this boost persisted modestly into 2021 for consumer e-commerce, underscoring how enforced digital pivots expanded platform usage but also highlighted vulnerabilities in supply chains strained by the same disruptions. Overall, the pandemic compressed years of projected e-commerce adoption into months, empirically validating that regulatory and health-induced barriers to physical retail were primary accelerators, independent of prior trends.

Responses to Other Disruptions (e.g., Geopolitical and Supply Chain Crises)

E-commerce firms encountered significant supply chain interruptions from the March 2021 Suez Canal blockage, when the container ship Ever Given halted traffic for six days, delaying 432 vessels and approximately $92.7 billion in cargo, which exacerbated delays for European consumer orders reliant on Asian imports. In response, platforms like Amazon and Alibaba accelerated investments in multi-modal logistics and alternative shipping routes, such as rerouting via the Cape of Good Hope, though this increased transit times by up to two weeks and fuel costs by 40%. These adaptations highlighted the vulnerability of just-in-time inventory models, prompting e-commerce operators to build buffer stocks averaging 20-30% higher to mitigate future chokepoint risks. Geopolitical tensions, including the U.S.-China trade war initiated in 2018 with tariffs on $360 billion of Chinese goods by 2019, compelled e-commerce sellers to diversify sourcing away from China, shifting production to Vietnam, India, and Mexico, where manufacturing costs rose modestly but tariff exposure dropped by up to 25%. By 2025, renewed tariff threats under potential U.S. policy shifts led platforms to implement dynamic pricing algorithms that absorbed 10-15% cost increases internally or passed them selectively to consumers, while enhancing traceability software to mask origins and comply with de minimis import rules. This diversification reduced dependency on single-country suppliers from 60% to under 40% for many U.S.-based e-tailers, though it initially inflated operational expenses by 5-10%. The 2022 Russia-Ukraine conflict disrupted e-commerce supply chains by constricting access to 25% of global wheat and barley exports, alongside energy price surges that elevated shipping costs by 20-30%, forcing brands like Nike and to suspend Russian operations and seek Eastern European alternatives. E-commerce entities responded by adopting nearshoring strategies, relocating fulfillment centers closer to markets—such as expanding U.S. warehouses for European goods—and integrating AI-driven to forecast disruptions, achieving up to 15% improvements in amid sanctions-induced payment blocks. Overall, these crises accelerated a shift toward resilient, networked supply chains, with e-commerce giants investing $50-100 billion annually in and supplier vetting to counter ongoing geopolitical volatilities through 2025.

Future Trajectories

Emerging Technologies (AI, AR, Blockchain)

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into e-commerce platforms for , recommendation engines, and automation. AI algorithms analyze user behavior and purchase history to deliver tailored product suggestions, with platforms like Amazon employing models that reportedly drive 35% of its sales through recommendations. In 2025, AI-enabled e-commerce is projected to reach a of $8.65 billion, with 89% of companies either using or testing AI tools that enhance conversion rates by up to 47% on AI-optimized sites. powered by AI forecast demand using historical data and real-time signals, enabling inventory optimization and adjustments to respond to market fluctuations. Augmented reality (AR) enhances online shopping by allowing virtual product visualization, reducing return rates through better purchase decisions. Retailers such as IKEA utilize AR applications like IKEA Place, enabling customers to project furniture into their living spaces via mobile devices, which has contributed to increased user engagement and sales conversion. By 2025, 80% of retail brands are expected to adopt AR for customer engagement, including 3D product visualization on websites, with the AR e-commerce sector projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 37.9% from 2025 to 2030. A 2023 Gartner survey indicated that 56% of retailers planned new AR/VR investments by 2025, reflecting broader industry momentum toward immersive experiences that bridge physical and digital retail gaps. Blockchain technology addresses e-commerce challenges in transparency and secure payments by providing immutable ledgers for transaction verification and tracking. In , enables end-to-end visibility, from sourcing to delivery, helping to combat counterfeiting and ensure product authenticity, as demonstrated in pilots by companies like for food . For payments, facilitates faster cross-border transactions with reduced costs—up to 80% lower remittance fees—and minimizes fraud through decentralized validation, though widespread adoption remains limited by scalability issues and regulatory hurdles. reports that implementations can lower administrative costs while improving , positioning it as a foundational technology for future e-commerce ecosystems focused on trust and .

Potential Challenges and Policy Implications

E-commerce platforms face escalating cybersecurity threats, with identified as the leading concern for organizations in 2025 surveys of IT professionals. Global losses are projected to reach $10.5 trillion annually by 2025, driven by attacks on retail supply chains and payment systems that exploit vulnerabilities in online transactions. These incidents, including targeting e-commerce operators, have increased due to the sector's reliance on vast consumer data repositories, amplifying risks of breaches that compromise payment information and erode trust. Market concentration among dominant platforms like Amazon raises antitrust concerns, as platforms control significant shares of online retail and leverage data advantages to erect barriers to entry for smaller competitors. However, analyses indicate that e-commerce rarely fosters outright monopolies, with competition from offline retail and emerging players mitigating claims of reduced innovation; for instance, Amazon's market share in online retail is substantial but does not preclude dynamic entry in niche segments. Predatory pricing and below-cost sales by large platforms disadvantage independent businesses, with over half of surveyed U.S. independents citing this as a major threat to viability. The exacerbates access inequities, particularly in developing economies where limited connectivity hinders e-commerce participation, affecting an estimated billions without reliable . Rural and low-income populations in advanced economies also face barriers, as inadequate restricts and seller opportunities, perpetuating economic disparities. Taxation complexities compound these issues, with e-commerce often exempt from sales taxes—comprising about 80% of transactions—leading to revenue shortfalls for governments and uneven competitive footing. Policy responses must prioritize economically grounded antitrust enforcement to address platform power without stifling innovation, adhering to established that evaluates effects on consumer welfare rather than size alone. Privacy regulations intersecting with competition policy offer a framework for curbing monopolies, though antitrust alone may insufficiently mitigate harms without complementary sector-specific rules. International harmonization of e-commerce taxation, such as through guidelines, is essential to close loopholes and ensure fair revenue collection across borders. Investments in digital infrastructure, including expansion in underserved areas, represent a critical policy lever to bridge the divide and unlock , as evidenced by WTO initiatives targeting least-developed countries. Failure to balance these measures risks entrenching inefficiencies, while overregulation could deter the sector's efficiency gains.

References

  1. https://www.techtarget.com/searchcio/definition/e-commerce
  2. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/e/ecommerce.asp
  3. https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/ecommerce
  4. https://www.thefulfillmentlab.com/blog/history-of-ecommerce
  5. https://www.mayple.com/resources/ecommerce/history-of-ecommerce
  6. https://www.hughes.com/resources/insights/technology/5-major-turning-points-history-e-commerce
  7. https://ecdb.com/resources/sample-data/market/ww/all
  8. https://www.emarketer.com/content/ecommerce-account-more-than-20--of-worldwide-retail-sales-despite-slowdown
  9. https://www.shopify.com/blog/global-ecommerce-sales
  10. https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/speeches/emerging-antitrust-issues-electronic-commerce
  11. https://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article/reframing-the-e-commerce-antitrust-debate/
  12. https://unctad.org/meetings/en/presentation/dtl_eweek2017p25_torbjornfredriksson_en.pdf
  13. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/the-2025-oecd-definition-of-e-commerce-and-guidelines-for-interpretation_2254f1de-en.html
  14. https://www.census.gov/topics/business-economy/production/e-commerce/about/glossary.html
  15. https://www.census.gov/library/publications/time-series/e-commerce.html
  16. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Glossary:E-commerce
  17. https://www.bigcommerce.com/articles/ecommerce/types-of-business-models/
  18. https://www.elasticpath.com/blog/6-ecommerce-business-models-b2b-b2c
  19. https://www.shopify.com/blog/types-of-ecommerce
  20. https://virtocommerce.com/blog/types-of-ecommerce-business-models
  21. https://business.adobe.com/blog/basics/top-b2b-ecommerce-website-examples
  22. https://kibocommerce.com/blog/commerce-landscape-b2g-b2b-b2b2c-d2c-b2c/
  23. https://www.hostinger.com/tutorials/types-of-ecommerce
  24. https://www.shopify.com/blog/business-model
  25. https://redstagfulfillment.com/what-share-of-us-ecommerce-spending-goes-to-amazon/
  26. https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/e-commerce-market
  27. https://influencermarketinghub.com/ecommerce-market-share-statistics/
  28. https://www.feinternational.com/blog/a-guide-to-e-commerce-business-models-and-revenue-models
  29. https://www.clarity-ventures.com/blog/history-of-edi-development
  30. https://blog.miva.com/the-history-of-ecommerce-how-did-it-all-begin
  31. https://www.historyofinformation.com/detail.php?entryid=4528
  32. https://www.smartosc.com/michael-aldrich-godfather-online-shopping/
  33. https://cloudflare.tv/this-week-in-net/how-minitel-put-france-online-40-years-ago-and-a-glimpse-into-threads/evRRqRvY
  34. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01972240309473
  35. https://www.statista.com/statistics/183750/us-retail-e-commerce-sales-figures/
  36. https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/career-map/sell-side/capital-markets/dotcom-bubble/
  37. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/computer-science/amazoncom-sells-its-first-book-online
  38. https://www.k6agency.com/evolution-of-e-commerce/
  39. https://www.42signals.com/blog/the-evolution-of-e-commerce-analysis-from-its-origins-to-today/
  40. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/d/dotcom-bubble.asp
  41. https://about.pypl.com/who-we-are/history-and-facts/default.aspx
  42. https://quartr.com/insights/company-research/the-paypal-story-online-payment-pioneers
  43. https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/industries/a-short-history-of-digital-commerce-and-five-trends-to-watch-in-the-next-decade/
  44. https://www.plytix.com/blog/evolution-of-ecommerce-timeline
  45. https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/ECOMSA
  46. https://www.morphnetworks.com/ecommerce/amazon-e-commerce/
  47. https://www.visualcapitalist.com/sp/history-of-online-shopping/
  48. https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/ECOMPCTSA
  49. https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2022/04/ecommerce-sales-surged-during-pandemic.html
  50. https://www.trade.gov/impact-covid-pandemic-ecommerce
  51. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/growth-marketing-and-sales/our-insights/emerging-consumer-trends-in-a-post-covid-19-world
  52. https://capitaloneshopping.com/research/ecommerce-statistics/
  53. https://theretailexec.com/platform-management/mobile-ecommerce-trends/
  54. https://www.ibm.com/think/insights/ecommerce-trends
  55. https://www.salesforce.com/commerce/ecommerce-trends/
  56. https://explodingtopics.com/blog/ecommerce-trends
  57. https://www.usg.edu/galileo/skills/unit07/internet07_02.phtml
  58. https://tcpip.training/history-of-tcp-ip/
  59. https://hpbn.co/brief-history-of-http/
  60. https://www.thesslstore.com/blog/ssl-and-tls-versions-celebrating-30-years-of-history/
  61. https://www.exabeam.com/blog/infosec-trends/the-origins-of-web-security-and-the-birth-of-security-socket-layer-ssl-protocol/
  62. https://www.wiredincommerce.co.uk/ecommerce-development/ecommerce-website-technologies
  63. https://www.softtrix.com/blog/what-technologies-are-used-in-e-commerce-website/
  64. https://fleximize.com/articles/006970/history-of-ecommerce
  65. https://www.salesforce.com/commerce/ecommerce-tech-stack/
  66. https://paymentscmi.com/insights/top-global-payment-methods/
  67. https://thefinancialbrand.com/news/payments-trends/digital-payments-dominate-globally-says-worldpay-study-187823
  68. https://www.statista.com/forecasts/997132/biggest-e-commerce-payment-brands-in-the-us?srsltid=AfmBOorlvQrB-Y0pICbqWgkVnHcQge2Yo3R_GIZdT0X5PSzc2f666A5l
  69. https://corporate.worldpay.com/news-releases/news-release-details/10-years-cash-cards-and-crypto-worldpays-global-payments-report
  70. https://datos-insights.com/blog/digital-wallet-revolution-strategic-implications-financial-services/
  71. https://www.pcisecuritystandards.org/standards/
  72. https://www.bigcommerce.com/articles/ecommerce/pci-compliance/
  73. https://www.airwallex.com/blog/online-payment-fraud-detection
  74. https://www.fortinet.com/resources/cyberglossary/cybersecurity-statistics
  75. https://www.cookieyes.com/blog/gdpr-for-ecommerce/
  76. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167811625000229
  77. https://deepstrike.io/blog/data-breach-statistics-2025
  78. https://www.isms.online/pci-dss/compliance-for-e-commerce/
  79. https://www.netsuite.com/portal/resource/articles/ecommerce/ecommerce-challenges.shtml
  80. https://baymard.com/learn/ecommerce-ux-best-practices
  81. https://www.wedowebapps.com/ux-best-practices-for-ecommerce/
  82. https://www.clickpost.ai/blog/last-mile-delivery-statistics
  83. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/101-must-know-e-commerce-facts-2025-logistics-transport-online-bdaue
  84. https://www.linkedin.com/posts/broganlambert_supplychainhistory-supplychaininnovation-activity-7366010357913391105-eUTz
  85. https://www.packagingstrategies.com/articles/96892-how-big-are-amazons-warehouses
  86. https://websell.io/covid19-ecommerce
  87. https://procurementtactics.com/supply-chain-statistics/
  88. https://www.ey.com/en_us/insights/supply-chain/how-covid-19-impacted-supply-chains-and-what-comes-next
  89. https://blog.locus.sh/last-mile-delivery-costs-bringing-order-to-chaos/
  90. https://www.sdcexec.com/transportation/last-mile/news/22936078/ds-smith-lastmile-delivery-costs-continue-to-rise-research
  91. https://explodingtopics.com/blog/supply-chain-trends
  92. https://www.aboutamazon.com/news/operations/amazon-ai-innovations-delivery-forecasting-robotics
  93. https://www.damotech.com/blog/largest-warehouses-in-north-america
  94. https://www.netguru.com/blog/robots-and-drones-delivery
  95. https://www.aboutamazon.com/news/operations/amazon-fulfillment-center-robotics-ai
  96. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/ecommerce-logistics-strategic-business-report-105600078.html
  97. https://www.oberlo.com/statistics/global-ecommerce-sales-growth
  98. https://www.statista.com/outlook/emo/ecommerce/worldwide
  99. https://redstagfulfillment.com/what-share-of-global-retail-sales-is-ecommerce/
  100. https://www.emarketer.com/content/worldwide-retail-ecommerce-forecast-2024-midyear-update
  101. https://www.statista.com/outlook/emo/fashion/worldwide
  102. https://www.shopify.com/ae/blog/top-online-shopping-categories
  103. https://www.statista.com/topics/871/online-shopping/
  104. https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/mckinsey-explainers/what-is-e-commerce
  105. https://www.businessgo.hsbc.com/en/article/global-ecommerce-key-trends-in-2024
  106. https://www.lyzer.tech/blog/rise-e-commerce-emerging-markets-opportunities-challenges
  107. https://shipdepot.com/clicks-and-countries-exploring-the-e-commerce-boom-in-emerging-markets/
  108. https://natlawreview.com/press-releases/retail-e-commerce-market-hits-usd-667-trillion-2024-growth-trends-forecast
  109. https://www.mobiloud.com/blog/ecommerce-market-size-by-country
  110. https://www.imarcgroup.com/insight/global-e-commerce-industry-analysis
  111. https://www.marketdataforecast.com/market-reports/latin-america-e-commerce-market
  112. https://www.digitalcommerce360.com/2023/09/18/latin-america-ecommerce-growth-cagr/
  113. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/386464849_E-Commerce_in_Africa_Divergent_Impacts_on_Rural_and_Urban_Economies
  114. https://inspirepreneurmagazine.com/alibaba-case-study-rise-to-e-commerce-dominance/
  115. https://business.columbia.edu/chazen-institute/jerome-chazen-case-study-series
  116. https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/united-states-ecommerce-market
  117. https://www.jpmorgan.com/payments/global-ecommerce-trends-report
  118. https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/ecopro.pdf
  119. https://www.cnbc.com/2024/12/24/how-e-commerce-is-disrupting-traditional-seasonal-work-in-retail.html
  120. https://www.cxnetwork.com/cx-experience/news/retail-sector-faces-turmoil-as-nearly-170000-jobs-lost-in-2024
  121. https://www.startus-insights.com/innovators-guide/e-commerce-report/
  122. https://www.storyboard18.com/how-it-works/e-commerce-tech-start-ups-logistics-lead-employment-surge-with-highest-net-job-gains-report-82614.htm
  123. https://www.linkedin.com/posts/iancichocki_as-a-recruiter-closely-watching-e-commerce-activity-7368627527520665601-p2pF
  124. https://www.urbanismnext.org/resources/how-the-growth-of-e-commerce-is-shifting-retail-jobs
  125. https://www.edesk.com/blog/amazon-statistics/
  126. https://redstagfulfillment.com/shopify-statistics/
  127. https://www.linkedin.com/posts/juozas_in-2024-sellers-on-amazon-exceeded-500-activity-7295057330675605508-7yZO
  128. https://advocacy.sba.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Frequently-Asked-Questions-Small-Business-2019-REV2.pdf
  129. https://www.forbes.com/sites/allbusiness/2023/02/15/10-reasons-why-90-of-ecommerce-businesses-fail/
  130. https://www.rieti.go.jp/en/publications/summary/21030013.html
  131. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/366289123_The_impact_of_E-commerce_on_productivity_Firm-level_evidence_from_Colombia
  132. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0167624513000309
  133. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/384159862_THE_IMPACT_OF_E-COMMERCE_ON_OPERATIONAL_COST_EFFICIENCY_IN_MODERN_BUSINESSES
  134. https://eujournal.org/index.php/esj/article/view/1640/1631
  135. http://www.klenow.com/assessing-gains-ecommerce.pdf
  136. https://people.stern.nyu.edu/bakos/emkts.pdf
  137. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11187-023-00799-7
  138. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042811015382
  139. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2023/05/of-bytes-and-trade-quantifying-the-impact-of-digitalisation-on-trade_17cd5677/11889f2a-en.pdf
  140. https://ustr.gov/about-us/policy-offices/press-office/blog/2014/january/Benefits-of-internet-enabled-trade-to-small-business
  141. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/645791578285992456/pdf/Facilitating-Trade-and-Logistics-for-E-Commerce-Building-Blocks-Challenges-and-Ways-Forward.pdf
  142. https://siepr.stanford.edu/publications/policy-brief/how-valuable-e-commerce
  143. https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/15707.html
  144. https://www.meteorspace.com/2025/01/28/e-commerce-consumer-buying-behaviour-trends-and-statistics/
  145. https://www.invespcro.com/blog/online-retail-statistics-and-trends/
  146. https://www.emarketer.com/content/us-ecommerce-forecast-2024
  147. https://www.peakspancapital.com/insights/why-e-commerce-will-kill-retail-sooner-than-you-think
  148. https://www.getvms.com/navigating-the-15000-store-closures-of-2025/
  149. https://ilsr.org/article/independent-business/fact-sheet-how-breaking-up-amazon-can-empower-small-business/
  150. https://www.emarketer.com/content/store-closures-surge-as-tariffs-and-value-trends-redefine-retail-footprint
  151. https://www.liquidweb.com/white-papers/fall-of-traditional-commerce/
  152. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022435924000381
  153. https://www.coveo.com/blog/first-party-cookies-vs-third-party-cookies/
  154. https://chargebacks911.com/third-party-cookies/
  155. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/18/books/review/shoshana-zuboff-age-of-surveillance-capitalism.html
  156. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-024-03941-2
  157. https://www.ibm.com/reports/data-breach
  158. https://www.statista.com/topics/11610/data-breaches-worldwide/
  159. https://secureframe.com/blog/data-breach-statistics
  160. https://www.statista.com/topics/9240/e-commerce-fraud/
  161. https://www.clickpost.ai/blog/ecommerce-fraud-statistics
  162. https://chargebacks911.com/payment-fraud-statistics/
  163. https://www.recordedfuture.com/research/annual-payment-fraud-intelligence-report-2024
  164. https://www.demandsage.com/ecommerce-fraud-statistics/
  165. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8294234/
  166. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/372679697_From_leisure_to_labour_-_Digital_Labour_Surveillance_Capitalism_and_the_dangers_of_social_media_hegemony
  167. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2023/06/21/themes-the-most-harmful-or-menacing-changes-in-digital-life-that-are-likely-by-2035/
  168. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056025002345
  169. https://www.generationim.com/our-thinking/insights/the-carbon-footprint-of-retail-ecommerce-vs-bricks-mortar/
  170. https://www.renewablematter.eu/en/is-e-commerce-really-more-sustainable-than-stores
  171. https://earth.org/online-shopping-and-its-environmental-impact/
  172. https://www.omdena.com/blog/ai-powered-solution-to-reduce-carbon-footprint-in-supply-chains
  173. https://sustainenergyres.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40807-025-00203-w
  174. https://www.prologis.com/insights-news/research/logistics-real-estate-and-e-commerce-lower-carbon-footprint-retail
  175. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7081612/
  176. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0165176522000684
  177. https://www.woola.io/blog/online-shopping-packaging-waste-statistics
  178. https://www.mailmodo.com/guides/ecommerce-packaging-statistics/
  179. https://www.falconfulfillment.com/blog/the-environmental-impact-of-returns-an-ecommerce-reality/
  180. https://www.theinterline.com/2024/11/20/the-spiraling-environmental-cost-of-e-commerce-returns/
  181. https://www.openwardrobe.co/blog/the-environmental-cost-of-online-clothing-returns
  182. https://e.vnexpress.net/news/news/environment/e-commerce-boom-raises-concerns-about-waste-and-emissions-4928224.html
  183. https://earth5r.org/convenience-comes-at-a-cost-the-environmental-impact-of-ecommerce-packaging/
  184. https://oceana.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/18/2024/04/Amazons-United-States-of-Plastic-Oceana-Report-April-2024_reducedsize-1.pdf
  185. https://www.beyondplastics.org/news-stories/online-retail-amazon-plastic-packaging-problem
  186. https://research-archive.org/index.php/rars/preprint/view/2802
  187. https://www.kliken.com/blog/e-commerce-laws-you-should-know
  188. https://www.shopify.com/blog/ecommerce-laws
  189. https://oag.ca.gov/privacy/ccpa
  190. https://www.framelegal.com/2025-state-data-privacy-laws-what-ecommerce-businesses-need-to-know/
  191. https://www.cbp.gov/trade/basic-import-export/e-commerce
  192. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/02/05/2020-02439/ensuring-safe-and-lawful-e-commerce-for-united-states-consumers-businesses-government-supply-chains
  193. https://iclg.com/practice-areas/digital-business-laws-and-regulations/usa
  194. https://connectontech.bakermckenzie.com/european-union-tightens-rules-on-e-commerce-and-non-eu-product-safety/
  195. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/ecom_e/ecom_work_programme_e.htm
  196. https://www.cigionline.org/articles/is-the-wtos-new-e-commerce-agreement-really-a-game-changer/
  197. https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2023/09/ftc-sues-amazon-illegally-maintaining-monopoly-power
  198. https://www.reuters.com/technology/us-antitrust-case-against-amazon-move-forward-2024-10-07/
  199. https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/europe-fit-digital-age/digital-markets-act-ensuring-fair-and-open-digital-markets_en
  200. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/e-commerce-rules-eu
  201. https://law.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/36-Stan.-L.-Poly-Rev.-147-2025-Hovenkamp-Antitrust-and-eMarkets.pdf
  202. https://www.law.upenn.edu/live/files/11133-gai2020pdf
  203. https://www.fondapol.org/en/study/big-tech-dominance-2-a-barrier-to-technological-innovation/
  204. https://unctad.org/news/highly-concentrated-digital-markets-put-consumers-risk-heres-how-change-course
  205. https://www.forensisgroup.com/resources/expert-legal-witness-blog/amazon-antitrust-lawsuit-2025-de-coster-et-al-v-amazon
  206. https://hbr.org/2024/01/understanding-the-tradeoffs-of-the-amazon-antitrust-case
  207. https://insights.som.yale.edu/insights/would-stricter-antitrust-rules-have-stopped-the-rise-of-amazon
  208. https://www.mdpi.com/2079-8954/13/4/295
  209. https://capitaloneshopping.com/research/covid-online-shopping-statistics/
  210. https://bluegiftdigital.com/how-much-did-ecommerce-grow-during-covid/
  211. https://unctad.org/es/isar/news/covid-19-boost-e-commerce-sustained-2021-new-unctad-figures-show
  212. https://www.grocerydive.com/news/charting-online-grocery-sales-pandemic/743256/
  213. https://www.cnbc.com/2021/02/19/e-commerce-surged-during-covid-groceries-sporting-goods-top-gainers-.html
  214. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/2020/10/e-commerce-in-the-time-of-covid-19_bb699f3a.html
  215. https://www.forbes.com/sites/jasongoldberg/2022/02/18/e-commerce-sales-grew-50-to-870-billion-during-the-pandemic/
  216. https://www.weforum.org/stories/2020/12/covid19-trends-rapid-acceleration-digital-ecommerce/
  217. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0964569123003939
  218. https://ecommercenews.eu/the-impact-of-the-suez-canal-blockage-on-ecommerce/
  219. https://www.maersk.com/news/articles/2021/03/24/vessel-blockage-in-the-suez-canal
  220. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w29315/w29315.pdf
  221. https://www.pinalloy.com/blogs/news/the-2025-u-s-china-trade-war-impacts-on-e-commerce-and-e-traders?srsltid=AfmBOorKxl9dMZCpD4hyNMKpOSfSZCQNGqsm3iOb0dSzGe0fugeG0D3U
  222. https://www.42signals.com/blog/impact-of-trump-tariffs-2025-on-ecommerce/
  223. https://www.signifyd.com/blog/5-trade-war-ecommerce-impacts/
  224. https://5ms.co.uk/the-impact-of-geopolitical-shifts-on-global-ecommerce-supply-chains/
  225. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/sustainable-food-systems/articles/10.3389/fsufs.2025.1648918/full
  226. https://www.fatbit.com/fab/impact-of-russia-ukraine-conflict-on-ecommerce-industry/
  227. https://techcloudltd.com/blog/how-russia-ukraine-war-impacts-ecommerce/
  228. https://www.nogin.com/blog/from-supply-chains-to-sales-how-the-war-in-ukraine-is-reshaping-ecommerce/
  229. https://hbr.org/2020/09/global-supply-chains-in-a-post-pandemic-world
  230. https://research.aimultiple.com/ai-e-commerce/
  231. https://www.hellorep.ai/blog/the-future-of-ai-in-ecommerce-40-statistics-on-conversational-ai-agents-for-2025
  232. https://www.bigcommerce.com/articles/ecommerce/ecommerce-ai/
  233. https://www.shopify.com/retail/how-retailers-are-using-ar-technology-to-build-buzz-and-brand-awareness
  234. https://www.reydar.com/augmented-reality-ecommerce/
  235. https://www.vividworks.com/blog/augmented-reality-ecommerce-examples
  236. https://www.brandxr.io/2025-augmented-reality-in-retail-e-commerce-research-report
  237. https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/services/consulting/articles/blockchain-supply-chain-innovation.html
  238. https://www.scnsoft.com/blockchain/payments
  239. https://www.debutinfotech.com/blog/blockchain-in-ecommerce
  240. https://www.statista.com/statistics/500946/worldwide-leading-it-security-threats/?srsltid=AfmBOopVkbiQTC2ye1UpdP1PkOnNsyzUfvSHw23EPxLXIwe8wNOjSPzf
  241. https://deepstrike.io/blog/cybercrime-statistics-2025
  242. https://armorpoint.com/2025/08/29/top-7-cyber-threats-facing-retailers-in-2025/
  243. https://reason.org/commentary/the-ftc-claims-amazon-is-a-monopolist-but-misunderstands-online-retail/
  244. https://ilsr.org/article/independent-business/new-survey-americas-independent-businesses-see-monopoly-power-as-biggest-threat/
  245. https://www.wto.org/english/news_e/news25_e/ecom_28jan25_e.htm
  246. https://www.wilsoncenter.org/article/closing-digital-divide
  247. https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/speeches/taxation-e-commerce
  248. https://one.oecd.org/document/DAF/COMP/WD%282018%292/en/pdf
  249. https://calawyers.org/privacy-law/data-privacy-and-antitrust-competing-frameworks-for-mitigating-privacy-harms/
  250. https://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1195&context=jtlp
  251. https://unctad.org/news/making-e-commerce-and-digital-economy-work-all
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.