Hubbry Logo
PessimismPessimismMain
Open search
Pessimism
Community hub
Pessimism
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Pessimism
Pessimism
Pessimism
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
An optimist and a pessimist, Vladimir Makovsky, 1893

Pessimism is a mental attitude in which an undesirable outcome is anticipated from a given situation. Pessimists tend to focus on the negatives of life in general. A common question asked to test for pessimism is "Is the glass half empty or half full?"; in this situation, a pessimist is said to see the glass as half empty, or in extreme cases completely empty, while an optimist is said to see the glass as half full. Throughout history, the pessimistic disposition has had effects on all major areas of thinking.[1]

Etymology

[edit]

The term pessimism derives from the Latin word pessimus, meaning 'the worst'. It was first used by Jesuit critics of Voltaire's 1759 novel Candide, ou l'Optimisme. Voltaire was satirizing the philosophy of Leibniz who maintained that this was the 'best (optimum) of all possible worlds'. In their attacks on Voltaire, the Jesuits of the Revue de Trévoux accused him of pessimisme.[2]: 9 

As a psychological disposition

[edit]

In the ancient world, psychological pessimism was associated with melancholy, and was believed to be caused by an excess of black bile in the body. The study of pessimism has parallels with the study of depression. Psychologists trace pessimistic attitudes to emotional pain or even biology. Aaron Beck argues that depression is due to unrealistic negative views about the world. Beck starts treatment by engaging in conversation with clients about their unhelpful thoughts. Pessimists, however, are often able to provide arguments that suggest that their understanding of reality is justified; as in Depressive realism or (pessimistic realism).[1] Deflection is a common method used by those who are depressed. They let people assume they are revealing everything which proves to be an effective way of hiding.[3] The pessimism item on the Beck Depression Inventory has been judged useful in predicting suicides.[4] The Beck Hopelessness Scale has also been described as a measurement of pessimism.[5]

Wender and Klein point out that pessimism can be useful in some circumstances: "If one is subject to a series of defeats, it pays to adopt a conservative game plan of sitting back and waiting and letting others take the risks. Such waiting would be fostered by a pessimistic outlook. Similarly if one is raking in the chips of life, it pays to adopt an expansive risk-taking approach, and thus maximize access to scarce resources."[6]

The leading causes of pessimism are genetics, past experience, and social and environmental factors. One study of 5,187 teenage twins and their siblings suggests that genetics may account for one-third of the variance in whether someone leans toward pessimism vs. optimism, with the remaining variance due to their environment, and twin studies suggest that, when it comes to personality, about half the differences between us are because of genetic factors. But Spector points out that throughout our lives, in response to environmental factors, our genes are constantly being dialled up and down as with a dimmer switch, a process known as epigenetics.[7][8]

Criticism

[edit]

Pragmatic criticism

[edit]

Through history, some have concluded that a pessimistic attitude, although justified, must be avoided to endure. Optimistic attitudes are favored and of emotional consideration.[9] Al-Ghazali and William James rejected their pessimism after suffering psychological, or even psychosomatic illness. Criticisms of this sort however assume that pessimism leads inevitably to a mood of darkness and utter depression. Many philosophers would disagree, claiming that the term "pessimism" is being abused. The link between pessimism and nihilism is present, but the former does not necessarily lead to the latter, as philosophers such as Albert Camus believed. Happiness is not inextricably linked to optimism, nor is pessimism inextricably linked to unhappiness. One could easily imagine an unhappy optimist, and a happy pessimist. Accusations of pessimism may be used to silence legitimate criticism.

Nouriel Roubini, an economist who introduces himself as Dr. Doom, was largely dismissed as a pessimist in 2006 for his dire but to some extent accurate predictions of a financial crisis, ahead of the 2008 financial crisis. However, financial journalist Justin Fox observed in the Harvard Business Review in 2010 that the crisis Roubini predicted was not at all like the 2008 financial crisis; it involved a currency crisis and run on the dollar and dismissed Roubini's predictions as inaccurate.[10][11][12] Others noted that "The problem is that even though he was spectacularly right on this one, he went on to predict time and time again, as the markets and the economy recovered in the years following the collapse, that there would be a follow-up crisis and that more extreme crashes were inevitable. His calls, after his initial pronouncement, were consistently wrong. Indeed, if you had listened to him, and many investors did, you would have missed the longest bull market run in US market history."[13][14][15][16] Another observed: "For a prophet, he's wrong an awful lot of the time."[17] Tony Robbins wrote: "Roubini warned of a recession in 2004 (wrongly), 2005 (wrongly), 2006 (wrongly), and 2007 (wrongly)" ... and he "predicted (wrongly) that there'd be a 'significant' stock market correction in 2013."[18] Speaking about Roubini, economist Anirvan Banerji told The New York Times: "Even a stopped clock is right twice a day."[19] Economist Nariman Behravesh said: "Nouriel Roubini has been singing the doom-and-gloom story for 10 years. Eventually something was going to be right."[20]

Personality Plus opines that pessimistic temperaments (e.g., melancholy and phlegmatic) can be useful inasmuch as pessimists' focus on the negative helps them spot problems that people with more optimistic temperaments (e.g., choleric and sanguine) miss.[citation needed]

Other forms of pessimism

[edit]

Philosophical pessimism

[edit]
Main article: Philosophical pessimism

Philosophical pessimism is not a state of mind or a psychological disposition, but rather it is a worldview or philosophical position that assigns a negative value to life or existence. Philosophical pessimists commonly argue that the world contains an empirical prevalence of pains over pleasures, that existence is ontologically or metaphysically adverse to living beings, and that life is fundamentally meaningless or without purpose.[21]

Political and cultural

[edit]
Main article: Cultural pessimism

Philosophical pessimism stands opposed to the optimism or even utopianism of Hegelian philosophies. Emil Cioran claimed "Hegel is chiefly responsible for modern optimism. How could he have failed to see that consciousness changes only its forms and modalities, but never progresses?"[22] Philosophical pessimism is differentiated from other political philosophies by having no ideal governmental structure or political project, rather pessimism generally tends to be an anti-systematic philosophy of individual action.[2]: 7  This is because philosophical pessimists tend to be skeptical that any politics of social progress can actually improve the human condition. As Cioran states, "every step forward is followed by a step back: this is the unfruitful oscillation of history".[23] Cioran also attacks political optimism because it creates an "idolatry of tomorrow" which can be used to authorize anything in its name. This does not mean however, that the pessimist cannot be politically involved, as Camus argued in The Rebel (1951). Pessimism about the human condition was also expressed by Hobbes (1588–1679).[24][25]

There is another strain of thought generally associated with a pessimistic worldview, this is the pessimism of cultural criticism and social decline. Anthony Trollope summarised the attitude with gentle mockery in 1880: "Everything is going wrong. [...] Farmers are generally on the verge of ruin. Trade is always bad. The Church is in danger. The House of Lords isn't worth a dozen years' purchase. The throne totters."[26]

Oswald Spengler's The Decline of the West (1918–1922) popularised pessimism. Spengler promoted a cyclic model of history similar to the theories of Giambattista Vico (1668–1744). Spengler believed that modern western civilization was in a "winter" age of decline (German: Untergang). Spenglerian theory was immensely influential in interwar Europe, especially in Weimar Germany. Similarly, traditionalist Julius Evola (1898–1974) thought that the world was in the Kali Yuga, a Dark Age of moral decline.

Intellectuals such as Oliver James correlate economic progress with economic inequality, the stimulation of artificial needs, and affluenza. Anti-consumerists identify rising trends of conspicuous consumption and self-interested, image-conscious behavior in culture. Post-modernists like Jean Baudrillard (1929–2007) have even argued that culture (and therefore our lives) now has no basis in reality whatsoever.[1]

Conservative thinkers, especially social conservatives, often perceive politics in a generally pessimistic way. William F. Buckley famously remarked that he was "standing athwart history yelling 'stop!'", and Whittaker Chambers (1901-1961) was convinced that capitalism was bound to fall to communism, though he himself became staunchly anti-communist. Social conservatives often see the West as a decadent and nihilistic civilization which has abandoned its roots in Christianity and/or Greek philosophy, leaving it doomed to fall into moral and political decay. Robert Bork's Slouching Toward Gomorrah and Allan Bloom's The Closing of the American Mind are famous expressions of this point of view.

Many economic conservatives and libertarians believe that the expansion of the state and the role of government in society is inevitable, and that they are at best fighting a holding action against it.[citation needed][27] They hold that the natural tendency of people is to be ruled and that freedom is an exceptional state of affairs which is now being abandoned in favor of social and economic security provided by the welfare state.[citation needed] Political pessimism has sometimes found expression in dystopian novels such as George Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four.[28] Political pessimism about one's country often correlates with a desire to emigrate.[29]

During the 2008 financial crisis in the United States, the neologism "pessimism porn" came to describe the alleged eschatological and survivalist thrill some people derive from predicting, reading, and fantasizing about the collapse of civil society through the destruction of the world's economic system.[30][31][32][33]

Puolanka, a municipality located in the Kainuu region in the northern Finland, has been called the "most pessimistic municipality in Finland",[34] and in 2019, the municipality gained worldwide publicity when the BBC published a video about Puolanka, describing it as the "most pessimistic town in the world".[35] Pessimism has a long tradition in the Kainuu region, mostly because Kainuu was a poor region that had often suffered from famines in the late 19th century and early 20th century, which is why the region is also called a "hunger land".[36]

Technological and environmental

[edit]

Technological pessimism is the belief that advances in science and technology do not lead to an improvement in the human condition. Technological pessimism can be said to have originated during the Industrial Revolution with the Luddite movement. Luddites blamed the rise of industrial mills and advanced factory machinery for the loss of their jobs and set out to destroy them. The Romantic movement was also pessimistic towards the rise of technology and longed for simpler and more natural times. Poets like William Wordsworth and William Blake believed that industrialization was polluting the purity of nature.[37]

Some social critics and environmentalists believe that globalization, overpopulation and the economic practices of modern capitalist states over-stress the planet's ecological equilibrium. They warn that unless something is done to slow this, climate change will worsen eventually leading to some form of social and ecological collapse.[38] James Lovelock believes that the ecology of the Earth has already been irretrievably damaged, and even an unrealistic shift in politics would not be enough to save it. According to Lovelock, the Earth's climate regulation system is being overwhelmed by pollution and the Earth will soon jump from its current state into a dramatically hotter climate.[39] Lovelock blames this state of affairs on what he calls "polyanthroponemia", which is when: "humans overpopulate until they do more harm than good." Lovelock states:

The presence of 7 billion people aiming for first-world comforts…is clearly incompatible with the homeostasis of climate but also with chemistry, biological diversity and the economy of the system.[39]

Some radical environmentalists, anti-globalization activists, and Neo-luddites can be said to hold to this type of pessimism about the effects of modern "progress". A more radical form of environmental pessimism is anarcho-primitivism which faults the agricultural revolution with giving rise to social stratification, coercion, and alienation. Some anarcho-primitivists promote deindustrialization, abandonment of modern technology and rewilding.

An infamous anarcho-primitivist is Theodore Kaczynski, also known as the Unabomber, who engaged in a nationwide mail bombing campaign. In his 1995 Unabomber Manifesto, he called attention to the erosion of human freedom by the rise of the modern "industrial-technological system".[40] The manifesto begins thus:

The Industrial Revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race. They have greatly increased the life-expectancy of those of us who live in "advanced" countries, but they have destabilized society, have made life unfulfilling, have subjected human beings to indignities, have led to widespread psychological suffering (in the Third World to physical suffering as well) and have inflicted severe damage on the natural world. The continued development of technology will worsen the situation. It will certainly subject human beings to greater indignities and inflict greater damage on the natural world, it will probably lead to greater social disruption and psychological suffering, and it may lead to increased physical suffering even in "advanced" countries.

One of the most radical pessimist organizations is the voluntary human extinction movement, which argues for the extinction of the human race through antinatalism.

Pope Francis' controversial 2015 encyclical on ecological issues is rife with pessimistic assessments of the role of technology in the modern world.

Entropy pessimism

[edit]
See also: Heat death of the universe, Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen § The relevance of thermodynamics to economics, and Ecological economics § Methodology
Natural resources flow through the economy and end up as waste and pollution.

"Entropy pessimism" represents a special case of technological and environmental pessimism, based on thermodynamic principles.[41]: 116  According to the first law of thermodynamics, matter and energy is neither created nor destroyed in the economy. According to the second law of thermodynamics—also known as the entropy law—what happens in the economy is that all matter and energy is transformed from states available for human purposes (valuable natural resources) to states unavailable for human purposes (valueless waste and pollution). In effect, all of man's technologies and activities are only speeding up the general march against a future planetary "heat death" of degraded energy, exhausted natural resources and a deteriorated environment—a state of maximum entropy locally on earth; "locally" on earth, that is, when compared to the heat death of the universe, taken as a whole.

The term "entropy pessimism" was coined to describe the work of Romanian American economist Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen, a progenitor in economics and the paradigm founder of ecological economics.[41]: 116  Georgescu-Roegen made extensive use of the entropy concept in his magnum opus on The Entropy Law and the Economic Process.[42] Since the 1990s, leading ecological economist and steady-state theorist Herman Daly—a student of Georgescu-Roegen—had been the economic profession's most influential proponent of entropy pessimism prior to his death in 2022.[43][44]: 545 

Among other matters, the entropy pessimism position is concerned with the existential impossibility of allocating Earth's finite stock of mineral resources evenly among an unknown number of present and future generations. This number of generations is likely to remain unknown to us, as there is no way—or only little way—of knowing in advance if or when humankind will ultimately face extinction. In effect, any conceivable intertemporal allocation of the stock will inevitably end up with universal economic decline at some future point.[45]: 369–371  [46]: 253–256  [47]: 165  [48]: 168–171  [49]: 150–153  [50]: 106–109  [44]: 546–549  [51]: 142–145 

Entropy pessimism is a widespread view in ecological economics and in the degrowth movement.

[edit]

Bibas writes that some criminal defense attorneys prefer to err on the side of pessimism: "Optimistic forecasts risk being proven disastrously wrong at trial, an embarrassing result that makes clients angry. On the other hand, if clients plead based on their lawyers' overly pessimistic advice, the cases do not go to trial and the clients are none the wiser."[52]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Pessimism

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia

Pessimism is the attitude or philosophical stance that anticipates negative outcomes as more probable than positive ones, or holds that and inherently outweigh good and in . In , it often contends that possesses negative value overall, with non-existence preferable to continued being due to inescapable driven by insatiable desires. , a central figure in this tradition, portrayed the world as propelled by a blind, striving "will" that generates perpetual dissatisfaction, rendering illusory and ascetic or aesthetic as partial escapes. Psychologically, pessimism manifests as a toward overestimating threats and underestimating successes, correlating with heightened depression risk yet also enabling adaptive strategies like , where anticipating worst-case scenarios motivates thorough preparation and reduces anxiety through contingency planning. Empirical studies reveal pessimism's dual-edged nature: chronic forms impair and physical via stress pathways, but balanced or strategic variants foster resilience by aligning expectations with realistic constraints, countering undue that can lead to underpreparation or of evident risks. Controversies arise in its cultural reception, where institutional biases in academia and media may undervalue pessimism's grounding in observable —marked by recurrent conflict, , and mortality—favoring narratives of indefinite despite countervailing on persistent global challenges.

Historical Development

Ancient and Pre-Modern Roots

of (c. 535–475 BCE) articulated a emphasizing perpetual flux and strife as fundamental to existence, positing that "war is the father of all" and harmony arises from opposing tensions, implying inherent conflict and instability rather than stable harmony. This perspective, rooted in observations of natural change and opposition, prefigures pessimistic views by underscoring the absence of enduring order or contentment in the . In the , Hegesias of Cyrene (fl. c. 300 BCE), a Cyrenaic philosopher, extended such ideas into explicit advocacy for non-existence, arguing that () is unattainable due to life's preponderance of pains over pleasures, and thus or from birth represents rational escape from inevitable misery. His teachings, drawing from empirical assessments of human experience, reportedly led to restrictions on his lectures by Ptolemy II due to influencing self-killings. Eastern traditions paralleled these motifs through concepts like dukkha in , formalized in the 5th century BCE by Siddhartha Gautama, denoting the inherent unsatisfactoriness of conditioned existence arising from impermanence (anicca) and attachment, as the First Noble Truth asserts suffering's ubiquity in birth, aging, illness, and death. Similarly, the Hebrew Bible's (composed c. 450–200 BCE, traditionally attributed to c. 970–931 BCE) declares "vanity of vanities; all is vanity" regarding human toil and pursuits "under the sun," portraying endeavors as futile cycles yielding no lasting gain amid mortality and divine inscrutability. By the 17th century, (1623–1662) in his elaborated on humanity's wretchedness without divine faith, describing man as a "thinking reed" frail yet aware of vast miseries—, ignorance, and mortality—absent transcendent purpose, with diversions merely masking innate unhappiness. These pre-modern strands distinguish from cynicism: the former centers on metaphysical or existential inevitability of derived from first observations of , , and transience, whereas the latter primarily critiques social hypocrisy and human self-interest without positing suffering's ontological primacy.

Modern Philosophical Foundations

Arthur Schopenhauer's The World as Will and Representation (1818) crystallized pessimism into a systematic metaphysics, identifying the essence of reality as a blind, objectless will that manifests as ceaseless striving, inevitably producing through the perpetual mismatch between desire and satisfaction. Schopenhauer contended that this will underlies all phenomena, observable empirically in the competitive ferocity of —predation, disease, and decay among organisms—rendering a cycle of need and frustration rather than fulfillment. He prescribed aesthetic and ascetic denial of the will as partial escapes, drawing on first-principles analysis of human motivation and biological imperatives to argue that willing perpetuates pain without ultimate resolution. Schopenhauer's framework explicitly repudiated Leibnizian , which posits the as the best possible arrangement under divine reason; instead, he asserted through from observed evils that this must be the worst conceivable , as any greater misery would preclude sustained altogether. This rejection grounded pessimism in realism about empirical causation—predator-prey dynamics, reproductive , and —dismissing metaphysical harmonizations as evasions of evident . Friedrich Nietzsche initially advanced Schopenhauer's pessimism in (1872), portraying it as the tragic wisdom revealed in Dionysian ecstasy, where life's underlying chaos and confront the illusion of Apollonian order, yet finding justification through artistic creation rather than . Nietzsche praised Schopenhauer's insight into will-driven torment as aligning with responses to reality's horrors, though he diverged by emphasizing affirmation over denial, viewing pessimism not as defeat but as a precondition for heroic vitality amid inevitable strife.

20th Century and Contemporary Evolutions

In the , Norwegian philosopher articulated a stark view of human consciousness as an evolutionary maladaptation, positing in his 1933 essay "" that awareness of life's fundamental meaninglessness induces existential dread, which individuals mitigate through psychological defense mechanisms such as isolation (compartmentalizing grim realities), anchoring (clinging to cultural or ideological absolutes), (engaging in transient activities), and sublimation (channeling dread into art or intellect). Zapffe contended that these strategies merely postpone inevitable panic, framing humanity's condition as tragically over-evolved, with no ultimate redemption beyond ascetic renunciation or voluntary extinction. This perspective echoed Schopenhauer's will-to-live as futile striving amid , but emphasized biological origins over metaphysics, influencing later antinatalist thought. Post-World War II disillusionment with industrialized carnage and secular disenchantment spurred existential variants, as seen in Albert Camus's 1942 elaboration of in , where the "absurd" arises from the clash between humanity's craving for inherent purpose and the universe's indifferent silence. Camus rejected or religious "leaps of " as evasions, advocating instead a defiant lucidity—imagining "happy" in perpetual rebellion against futility—yet his framework presupposed a pessimistic baseline of cosmic meaninglessness, diverging from pure resignation by prioritizing experiential revolt over hope. This defiant strain responded to the era's total wars and totalitarian ideologies, highlighting technology's role in amplifying human alienation without resolving underlying existential voids. In the late 20th and early 21st centuries, formalized through , notably David Benatar's 2006 , which deploys an asymmetry argument: the absence of pain in non-existence is preferable (a benefit, as no one is deprived of averting harm), whereas the absence of pleasure is neutral (no one is deprived of joy they never experience). Benatar thus concludes procreation imposes net harm, extending Schopenhauerian suffering-as-default into ethical prohibition without relying on religious , amid secularization's erosion of compensatory narratives. This influenced debates in , including effective altruism's grappling with creating versus preventing lives, where pessimistic intuitions challenge utilitarian optimism about expanding sentient populations. Contemporary evolutions blend literary horror with pessimism, as in Thomas Ligotti's 2010 The Conspiracy Against the Human Race, which synthesizes Zapffe and Schopenhauer to portray consciousness as a "puppet show" of cosmic horror—self-awareness as maladaptive illusion breeding inevitable disillusion, best countered by antinatalist cessation rather than technological or progressive fixes. Ligotti's narrative-driven pessimism critiques anthropocentric delusions amid biotechnological advances, viewing secular humanism's faith in progress as denial. Recent discourse, such as Maarten Boudry's 2024 "The Seven Laws of Pessimism" in Quillette, dissects persistent pessimism despite empirical gains (e.g., declining violence and poverty), attributing it to cognitive biases like negativity dominance and availability heuristics, yet underscoring philosophy's role in questioning unchecked optimism narratives that overlook causal realities of entropy and human frailty.

Philosophical Pessimism

Core Tenets and Arguments

Philosophical pessimism posits that human existence entails a net preponderance of over , grounded in the empirical observation that pains—physical, emotional, and existential—outweigh transient satisfactions in . This asymmetry arises because functions primarily as the temporary cessation of rather than a positive state, with desires perpetually regenerating dissatisfaction upon fulfillment. Empirical support draws from hedonic adaptation research, which demonstrates that individuals rapidly return to a baseline level of after positive events, rendering gains in illusory and sustained only through escalating stimuli that prove unsustainable. From a biological standpoint, pessimism highlights an wherein heightened amplifies without proportional adaptive benefits, as introduces foresight of inevitable decline, mortality, and unresolvable conflicts inherent to drives. Organisms, including humans, are propelled by mechanisms prioritizing pain avoidance—such as , , and loss—over pursuit, reflecting selection pressures where negative stimuli elicit stronger responses to ensure amid constant threats. This causal chain underscores life's entropic trajectory: biological systems expend energy against universal disorder, culminating in decay and without compensatory uplift, as striving merely perpetuates the cycle of need and frustration. Pessimism rejects teleological narratives of inherent or redemption, arguing instead for recurrent cycles of birth, aspiration, and dissolution devoid of overarching purpose or . Causal realism reveals no empirical mechanism elevating toward fulfillment; historical and patterns exhibit equilibrium through conflict and depletion rather than ascent, with apparent advancements offset by novel forms of deprivation or entropy's inexorable advance. Variants distinguish speculative pessimism, which invokes unfalsifiable cosmic indifference or to deem valueless in an indifferent void, from empirical forms verifiable through data on suffering's prevalence and adaptation's limits, prioritizing observable realities over metaphysical .

Major Thinkers and Texts

(1788–1860) is widely regarded as the primary architect of modern , positing that existence is dominated by an insatiable, blind "will to live" that perpetuates endless suffering, with temporary relief only through aesthetic , , or of the will. Influenced by Immanuel Kant's distinction between and , as well as Indian philosophies like encountered in the , Schopenhauer argued in (first edition 1818; expanded 1844) that the phenomenal world is mere representation, while the underlying reality is this willful force driving all striving, rendering life a cycle of desire, frustration, and pain without ultimate purpose or redemption outside transcendence. In contrast to Schopenhauer's atheistic framework, Blaise Pascal (1623–1662) articulated a theistic pessimism emphasizing humanity's inherent wretchedness and fragility absent divine grace, viewing the human condition as a "thinking reed" capable of profound misery due to self-awareness amid insignificance in the cosmos. In Pensées (published posthumously 1670), Pascal contended that diversion from boredom and contemplation of mortality reveals the futility of earthly pursuits, urging faith in God as the sole bulwark against despair, though reason alone cannot compel belief—famously encapsulated in his pragmatic "wager" on Christianity's infinite stakes. Friedrich Nietzsche (1844–1900), initially an admirer of Schopenhauer, diverged by rejecting resignation to suffering as a symptom of weakness, instead advocating a "pessimism of strength" that affirms life's tragic totality through Dionysian creativity and eternal recurrence. In (1872), Nietzsche praised Schopenhauer's diagnosis of existence as inherently painful yet critiqued his solution of will-denial as life-denying , proposing instead the who embraces chaos and suffering to forge meaning, transforming pessimism into a vital force rather than escapist metaphysics. Philipp (1841–1876) radicalized Schopenhauer's will into a "will-to-death," theorizing in Philosophy of Redemption (1876) that the divine unitary being fragmented into multiplicity through a primordial act of self-negation, with all existence driven toward and dissolution as the ultimate redemption from suffering. Building on Schopenhauer but inverting his perpetual will, Mainländer viewed as a decelerating descent toward universal , where human accelerates this cosmic , rendering procreation an ethical horror and voluntary the path to . Emil Cioran (1911–1995), a 20th-century exponent of aphoristic despair, extended pessimism into existential without Schopenhauer's metaphysical scaffolding, portraying consciousness as a amplifying life's inherent torment in works like (1934) and The Trouble with Being Born (1973). Cioran rejected systematic philosophy for fragmented reflections on , , and the futility of birth, arguing that awareness of mortality renders all action vain, yet finding a perverse lucidity in unrelenting negation rather than redemption or affirmation. David Benatar (b. 1962) advanced antinatalist pessimism through an axiological asymmetry, contending in (2006) that the absence of pain is good (even unexperienced) while the absence of pleasure is neutral, but experienced pain is bad and pleasure merely mitigates harm—thus, non-existence spares potential beings net harm, making procreation morally wrong irrespective of contingent happiness. This deontological argument diverges from Schopenhauer's experiential focus by prioritizing impartial over subjective , challenging optimistic biases in . Thomas Ligotti (b. 1953), blending with , propounds cosmic pessimism in The Conspiracy Against the Human Race (2010), positing human consciousness as an evolutionary malfunction foisting illusory purpose onto a indifferent, entropic , where anti-natalism follows from life's intrinsic horror akin to Lovecraftian voids. Influenced by Schopenhauer and Zapffe, Ligotti diverges toward metaphors—humans as marionettes in a malign —rejecting Nietzschean affirmation as and advocating extinctionism grounded in empirical revealing selfhood's fragility.

Psychological Dimensions

Pessimism as Personality Trait

Pessimism as a personality trait constitutes a stable cognitive disposition involving a generalized expectancy of unfavorable future outcomes and a tendency to attribute negative events to internal, stable, and global causes. This trait is empirically measured by instruments such as the Life Orientation Test-Revised (LOT-R), a 10-item self-report scale developed by Scheier, Carver, and Bridges in 1994, which assesses dispositional optimism versus pessimism through items gauging expectancies like "I rarely count on good things happening to me" (reversed for optimism scoring). Scores on the pessimism subscale range from 0 to 12, with higher values indicating stronger trait pessimism, and the measure demonstrates good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha ≈ 0.74) and test-retest reliability over periods up to 6 years. In contrast, optimism bias—a pervasive cognitive error—leads individuals to systematically overestimate positive probabilities and underestimate threats, fostering illusory superiority and planning fallacies that can impair risk assessment in real-world decisions. Trait pessimism correlates positively with in the Big Five model (r ≈ 0.40–0.60 across studies), a dimension marked by proneness to negative affect, emotional instability, and heightened reactivity to stressors, whereas it shows weaker or negative associations with extraversion and . This linkage underscores pessimism's role within broader emotional volatility, distinct from transient states, as evidenced by its stability across adulthood despite life events. Underpinning this trait is , an evolved cognitive mechanism that amplifies attention to and memory for adverse stimuli, prioritizing threat detection to minimize survival costs in ancestral environments where false negatives (overlooking dangers) outweighed false positives. supports this, showing stronger activation to negative versus positive inputs, enhancing vigilance but potentially at the expense of balanced forecasting. Unlike , which involves clinically significant distress, , and functional impairment per criteria persisting for at least two weeks, trait pessimism functions as a non-pathological that predicts vulnerability to negative moods without necessarily constituting a disorder. Longitudinal data indicate that while pessimism prospectively associates with elevated depressive symptoms (odds ratio ≈ 1.5–2.0), it manifests independently in non-clinical populations.

Defensive Pessimism and Adaptive Strategies

Defensive pessimism constitutes a cognitive wherein individuals preemptively anticipate negative outcomes to channel anxiety into preparatory actions, thereby enhancing performance in uncertain or high-stakes scenarios. Introduced by psychologists Julie K. Norem and in 1986, this approach involves setting deliberately low expectations and mentally rehearsing potential failures, which serves to motivate effort and mitigate the paralyzing effects of unaddressed . Unlike dispositional pessimism, which correlates with passive , defensive pessimism functions adaptively by transforming anticipatory dread into actionable planning, particularly among those prone to anxiety. Empirical evidence supports its efficacy in boosting outcomes for vulnerable populations. In controlled studies, defensive pessimists—who vividly imagine worst-case scenarios prior to tasks such as academic exams—demonstrated superior performance compared to strategic optimists, who suppress negative thoughts to maintain positive expectations. For instance, when defensive pessimists were experimentally induced to adopt optimistic mindsets, their results deteriorated, underscoring the strategy's role in leveraging anxiety for focus and rehearsal rather than evasion. This pattern held across reflective tasks, where negative mood induction further amplified defensive pessimists' advantages over optimists, indicating that the strategy aligns mood with preparatory cognition to avoid complacency. Defensive pessimism counters cognitive biases like the , wherein over-optimism systematically underestimates task timelines and risks, as documented by and in their foundational work on biases. By methodically tracing causal pathways to —such as overlooked dependencies or resource shortfalls—it fosters realistic contingencies, akin to a mental that preempts errors in domains requiring precision. In professional , this translates to structured worst-case modeling, which empirical reviews affirm outperforms naive positivity by prompting contingency measures without inducing chronic negativity. Thus, it exemplifies pessimism as a for adaptive resilience, prioritizing empirical foresight over motivational platitudes.

Empirical Outcomes and Health Correlates

High levels of dispositional pessimism have been associated with greater emotional maladjustment in early adolescents, particularly during stressors like the , with longitudinal data indicating that pessimism contributes more strongly to this outcome than low does. In populations, lower pessimism correlates with reduced substance use and lower cardiometabolic risk factors, as evidenced by scoping reviews of multiple studies linking higher and reduced pessimism to improved physical health markers over time. These findings suggest bidirectional relationships, where stable pessimistic outlooks prospectively elevate risks for depressive disorders and symptom severity, while also potentially reflecting underlying health declines. Defensive pessimism, a strategic form involving anticipatory and low expectations to motivate preparation, demonstrates adaptive outcomes in performance contexts. from experimental and correlational studies shows that defensive pessimists perform better when experiencing naturally occurring negative moods, as positive moods disrupt their anxiety-driven focus, whereas strategic optimists benefit from positive affect. This strategy harnesses anxiety for enhanced motivation and goal attainment, particularly in academic settings, though long-term emotional costs may arise if over-relied upon. Neuroimaging studies reveal a neural basis for pessimism involving heightened to negative cues, often lateralized to right-hemisphere structures, which may confer evolutionary advantages for threat detection but increase to depression. Functional MRI data in depressive contexts, linked to pessimistic attitudes, indicate biased toward negative stimuli, amplifying rumination and emotional imbalances. Such mechanisms underscore pessimism's potential adaptiveness for vigilance, contrasted with risks of chronic . Empirical rebuttals to pervasive positivity biases in psychological narratives highlight 's pitfalls, including underpreparation and unrealistic expectations that hinder adaptive responding. Excessive correlates with of risks, leading to poorer outcomes in uncertain environments, as critiqued in analyses of positive interventions where over- exacerbates problems like financial misjudgment or health . Longitudinal data thus portray pessimism's correlates as context-dependent, with unmitigated forms predicting adverse health trajectories but moderated variants offering preparatory benefits absent in unchecked .

Specialized Forms and Applications

Cultural and Political Pessimism

Cultural pessimism posits cyclical patterns of societal decay, as articulated by in , whose first volume appeared in 1918 and outlined the inevitable of civilizations akin to biological organisms. Spengler's framework influenced later diagnoses of Western decline, emphasizing cultural exhaustion over linear progress. Modern iterations, often from right-leaning analysts, attribute erosion to factors like mass and , which correlate with measurable institutional strains; for instance, total fertility rates in Western nations have plummeted from around 2.5 births per woman in the to below 1.5 in many European countries and 1.6 in the U.S. by 2023, undermining demographic sustainability without replacement-level reproduction. Similarly, U.S. rates quadrupled from 160 per 100,000 in 1960 to over 750 by 1991, coinciding with post- shifts including expanded welfare, relaxed enforcement, and the 1965 Immigration and Nationality Act, though causal links remain debated amid confounding variables like lead exposure and family structure changes. Political pessimism highlights failures of centralized , vindicated by Friedrich Hayek's 1945 essay "The Use of Knowledge in Society," which argued that socialist planning cannot aggregate dispersed, , leading to inefficiencies—as empirically demonstrated by the Soviet Union's 1991 collapse after decades of misallocation and stagnation, despite initial industrial gains. In the contemporary U.S., cross-partisan economic pessimism has intensified, with Pew Research finding 74% of Americans rating conditions as fair or poor in 2025 amid persistent above 3% since 2021 and widening inequality, while Semafor focus groups in June 2025 revealed widespread despair over job insecurity and cultural division, even among diverse demographics. These views test predictions against data, such as overload from immigration surges straining public services, where European cities post-2015 migrant waves saw localized crime upticks in certain categories per official statistics, though aggregate effects vary. Counterexamples illustrate limits to pessimism, as Thomas Malthus's 1798 forecast of outstripping food supply—due to arithmetic growth in versus geometric expansion—proved overstated, thwarted by 19th- and 20th-century innovations like the Haber-Bosch process and mechanized farming that multiplied yields severalfold. Left-leaning critiques often frame such decline narratives as culturally relativistic biases, dismissing empirical correlations (e.g., secularization's link to drops via eroded family incentives) as moral panics, yet these overlook causal mechanisms like value shifts reducing birth rates independently of economic factors. Mainstream academic sources, prone to systemic progressive tilts, underemphasize data-driven validations of pessimist warnings, such as institutional trust erosion from policy-induced divisions, prioritizing equity narratives over first-principles scrutiny of incentives and outcomes.

Technological, Environmental, and Scientific Variants

Technological pessimism critiques the trajectory of innovation as eroding human agency and leading to systemic dependencies. In The Technological Society (1954), Jacques Ellul argued that "technique"—the rationalized efficiency of tools and systems—gains autonomy, subordinating human values and choices to its self-perpetuating logic, resulting in a loss of individual freedom and moral deliberation. This perspective posits that technological progress, while solving immediate problems, entrenches determinism, as evidenced by increasing reliance on algorithms and automation that prioritize optimization over ethical contingencies. In the 2020s, AI-focused pessimism has intensified, with figures like Eliezer Yudkowsky warning of existential risks from superintelligent systems misaligned with human goals, estimating probabilities of catastrophe (p(doom)) as high as 99%. However, aggregated expert assessments reveal wide disagreement, with AI domain specialists median-estimating a 3% chance of human extinction by 2100 from AI, contrasted against superforecasters' 0.38%, highlighting overestimation risks in unproven domains. Historical precedents underscore such caution: 1970s predictions of irreversible energy scarcity post-oil shocks anticipated chronic shortages, yet outcomes were mitigated by efficiency gains, conservation, and supply expansions like North Sea oil, averting collapse through adaptive innovation rather than depletion. Environmental pessimism emphasizes material constraints on growth, often invoking resource finitude and ecological tipping points. The 1972 Limits to Growth report, using modeling, forecasted industrial collapse by the mid-21st century from resource exhaustion, pollution, and population pressures, with scenarios projecting stagnation or decline before 2100. Yet, 50-year empirical tracking shows divergence: global GDP has expanded fivefold since 1972 without the predicted halt, attributable to technological substitutions (e.g., hydraulic fracturing for fossil fuels) and yield improvements defying depletion curves. Climate-specific variants highlight emissions-driven risks, but data reveal absolute decoupling in advanced economies—e.g., U.S. GDP rose 300% from 1990-2020 while CO2 emissions fell 15%—via shifts to services, renewables, and efficiency, even accounting for offshored production. IPCC scenarios from AR6 (2023) encompass pathways from low-emissions (SSP1) to high (SSP5), but observed global CO2 emissions through 2023 have tracked below the most pessimistic baselines, with post-2010 trends aligning closer to intermediate cases due to faster renewable deployment than modeled. Cosmologically, thermodynamic inevitability reinforces long-term pessimism: the second law entails increasing in an expanding , culminating in heat death—a uniform, inert equilibrium devoid of usable energy gradients—absent speculative reversals. While motivating conservation (e.g., averting near-term ), such views risk stifling solutions, as public fears post-1979 Three Mile Island (zero direct deaths) and 1986 Chernobyl (under 50 acute fatalities) halted nuclear expansion in the West, forgoing low-carbon capacity equivalent to billions of tons of averted CO2. Scientific pessimism draws from , positing as constrained by ancestral adaptations ill-suited to modern scales. contends that traits like kin favoritism, status-seeking, and in-group aggression—shaped by Pleistocene selection pressures—persist as fixed cognitive modules, fostering recurrent flaws such as irrational biases and zero-sum conflicts that undermine large-scale . These underpin pessimism about reformability, as genetic underpinnings resist rapid cultural overrides, evidenced by cross-cultural universals in violence rates and inequality persistence. Pros include incentivizing realism in policy, like resource husbandry to counter overexploitation instincts; cons manifest in innovation paralysis, where —amplified by evolved loss sensitivities—delays technologies like or advanced nuclear designs, prolonging vulnerabilities to or energy insecurity. Empirical validation tempers extremes: while flaws endure, has curbed baseline brutality, with homicide rates dropping 90%+ since medieval eras, suggesting adaptive plasticity within biological bounds.

Critiques, Defenses, and Realism

Primary Criticisms

Critics contend that pessimism pragmatically undermines human motivation and fosters passivity, as it portrays efforts to improve conditions as futile in the face of inevitable suffering or decline. This view echoes historical literary , such as Voltaire's Candide (1759), which, while targeting Leibnizian , illustrates how overly deterministic outlooks—whether optimistic or pessimistic—can discourage proactive engagement with reality by emphasizing predestined outcomes over agency. Empirical analyses support this by showing that pessimistic dispositions correlate with reduced initiative, contrasting with evidence that adaptive outlooks sustain goal-directed behavior. A key empirical challenge arises from psychological data linking pessimism to diminished , including lower compared to . A 2022 study using German Socio-Economic found that positively predicts , while pessimism exerts a negative effect, even after controlling for , , and demographics; specifically, a one-standard-deviation increase in raised satisfaction scores by 0.15 points on a 0-10 scale. This aligns with broader findings that chronic pessimism correlates with passivity and avoidance, potentially exacerbating personal and societal stagnation rather than prompting reform. Pessimism is further critiqued as a akin to or mental filtering, where negative events receive disproportionate attention while positive trends are overlooked, leading to . For instance, in pessimistic frameworks amplifies focus on downturns, ignoring verifiable progress such as the long-term decline in documented by , who analyzed historical data showing European homicide rates dropping from 10-100 per 100,000 in the to under 2 per 100,000 by the , driven by state monopolies on force and expanding moral circles. Such biases may reflect or reinforce institutional tendencies in academia and media to emphasize crises over advancements, as evidenced by underreporting of technology-enabled poverty reductions—global fell from 42% in 1980 to 8.6% in 2018 per World Bank metrics—potentially due to ideological preferences for narratives of systemic failure. This selective negativity not only distorts causal assessments of human progress but also self-perpetuates through reinforced expectancies of doom.

Rebuttals and Justifications for Rational Pessimism

Rational pessimism rebuts charges of undue negativity by grounding expectations in causal mechanisms and empirical patterns, fostering epistemic rigor through anticipation of foreseeable risks rather than reliance on hopeful assumptions. Critics often portray pessimism as paralyzing, yet evidence indicates that strategically low expectations—coupled with proactive contingency planning—enhance outcomes by mitigating downside surprises, outperforming naive that underprepares for tail risks. For instance, in the lead-up to the , optimists dismissed housing market vulnerabilities as contained, attributing stability to perpetual growth, while those emphasizing overleveraged and speculative bubbles accurately foresaw the downturn, enabling better-positioned responses. This approach aligns with causal realism, where ignoring leverage cycles and incentive misalignments invites collapse, as unchecked optimism did in fueling the bubble. Contemporary global risks further justify rational pessimism against normalized optimism in media and policy discourse, which frequently understates threats to sustain narratives of inevitable progress. Public debt trajectories exemplify this: global public debt surpassed $100 trillion in 2024 and is projected to exceed 100% of GDP by , per IMF assessments, amid stagnant growth and rising interest burdens that constrain fiscal maneuverability—yet such warnings are often diluted in coverage favoring short-term stimulus over structural reforms. Similarly, escalating , accelerating faster in the U.S. than in peer democracies during the , heightens instability risks through eroded compromise norms, warranting foresight over dismissal as mere rhetoric. Mainstream outlets, prone to institutional biases favoring equilibrium assumptions, have historically downplayed these dynamics, attributing them to transient factors rather than entrenched ideological divergences. In cultural spheres, data on and institutional underpin a realist pessimism that counters progressive denials of decline. U.S. rates fell to a record low of 1.60 births per woman in , well below replacement levels, signaling demographic pressures from economic disincentives and shifting priorities that threaten long-term societal vitality. Concurrently, trust in federal government plummeted to 22% in , reflecting perceived failures in amid polarization and policy inefficacy. Such metrics validate toward optimistic framings that attribute breakdowns to external shocks alone, ignoring endogenous causal factors like policy-induced family disincentives; this realism, often aligned with conservative analyses, prioritizes data-driven foresight over ideologically insulated .

Empirical Vindicaton and Falsification of Predictions

Paul Ehrlich's 1968 book predicted that "hundreds of millions" of people would starve in the and due to outstripping food supplies, irrespective of technological interventions. These famines failed to occur, as global cereal production rose from 1.2 billion metric tons in 1968 to over 2.5 billion by 1985, driven by the Green Revolution's adoption of high-yield wheat and rice varieties, synthetic fertilizers, and expanded , which boosted yields by 200-300% in key regions like and . Conversely, pessimistic forecasts of fertility collapse have found empirical support in 2020s data. The global stood at 2.24 children per woman in 2023, down from 4.98 in 1960, with projections indicating a drop below the 2.1 replacement level by approximately 2050. By 2050, fertility rates in over 75% of countries will fall short of sustaining stability without , inverting classical Malthusian resource pressures into challenges from aging workforces, shrinking labor pools, and heightened dependency ratios—evident in Europe's rate of 1.46 in 2023 and East Asia's sub-1.0 levels in nations like (0.72). This validates warnings of demographic implosion, as seen in projections of global peaking at 10.4 billion by 2080s before declining. V-Dem Institute's Democracy Report 2025 documents persistent autocratization over 25 years, with 42 countries—home to 37% of the global population—experiencing democratic erosion since 2000, including declines in electoral fairness and freedom of expression amid rising and polarization. Although a 2025 V-Dem working paper critiques potential "pessimism bias" in expert codings, inflating global estimates through correlated perceptions of democratic trends, the underlying data affirm substantive declines in institutional quality, such as a 15-point drop in the Liberal Democracy Index for affected regimes since 2010. The exposed costs of optimistic biases in preparedness, where unrealistic optimism led to systematic underestimation of infection risks and behavioral non-compliance, contributing to over 7 million excess deaths globally by 2023 despite prior simulations like Event 201 highlighting vulnerabilities. Inadequate stockpiling of PPE and ventilators in many nations, traceable to downplayed tail risks, amplified economic losses exceeding $12 by 2021. Evaluating such forecasts demands data-driven Bayesian updating, wherein prior probabilities of outcomes are revised against observations—evident in projections where models have captured core warming trends (e.g., 1.1°C since pre-industrial) but diverged on extremes, with measures like resilient mitigating projected yield losses by 10-20% in vulnerable regions. This approach privileges empirical discrepancies over ideological priors, as in falsified Ehrlich-style doomsaying versus validated long-term thermodynamic , which guarantees eventual cosmic heat death absent violating physical laws.

References

  1. https://www.berkeleywellbeing.com/pessimism.html
  2. https://www.southampton.ac.uk/courses/modules/phil6082-0
  3. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/10732/10732-h/10732-h.htm
  4. https://positivepsychology.com/pessimism-vs-optimism/
  5. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/confessions-of-a-psychological-first-responder/202308/in-defense-of-pessimism
  6. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3807005/
  7. https://ourworldindata.org/optimism-and-pessimism
  8. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/heraclitus/
  9. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2176067
  10. https://www.lionsroar.com/buddhism/suffering-dukkha/
  11. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Ecclesiastes+1&version=NIV
  12. https://www.ccel.org/ccel/pascal/pensees.iii.html
  13. https://danielmiessler.com/blog/the-difference-between-nihilism-pessimism-cynicism-and-skepticism
  14. https://iep.utm.edu/schopenh/
  15. https://quantumfrontiers.com/2016/05/29/schopenhauer-and-the-geometry-of-evil/
  16. https://phaenex.uwindsor.ca/index.php/phaenex/article/view/224
  17. http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:170685/FULLTEXT01.pdf
  18. https://philosophynow.org/issues/45/The_Last_Messiah
  19. https://themodernmoralist.com/too-smart-for-our-own-good-f548cd4ecc60
  20. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/camus/
  21. https://philosophybreak.com/articles/absurdity-with-camus/
  22. https://philosophybreak.com/articles/antinatalism-david-benatar-asymmetry-argument-for-why-its-wrong-to-have-children/
  23. https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/Z4otXYNjWWFHerwdw/against-population-ethics
  24. https://theobelisk.substack.com/p/negativity-in-black-the-pessimistic
  25. https://quillette.com/2024/01/26/the-seven-laws-of-pessimism/
  26. https://handwiki.org/wiki/Philosophy:Philosophical_pessimism
  27. https://scispace.com/pdf/philosophical-pessimism-a-study-in-the-philosophy-of-arthur-3i6bc0crh2.pdf
  28. https://www.cmu.edu/dietrich/sds/docs/loewenstein/HedonicAdaptation.pdf
  29. https://sonjalyubomirsky.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Lyubomirsky-2011.pdf
  30. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11098-022-01893-4
  31. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6790386/
  32. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rstb.2019.0288
  33. https://philarchive.org/archive/PREWPI/1000
  34. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233522193_Pessimism_and_the_Evolution_of_Negativity
  35. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/schopenhauer/
  36. https://www.theschooloflife.com/article/blaise-pascal/
  37. https://academyofideas.com/2014/09/pessimism-of-strength/
  38. https://academic.oup.com/book/9821/chapter/157063731
  39. https://reasonandmeaning.com/2024/12/29/emil-cioran-a-philosophical-pessimist/
  40. https://iep.utm.edu/anti-natalism/
  41. https://socialecologies.wordpress.com/2022/06/14/thomas-ligottis-rhetorical-strategies-as-a-weird-pessimist/
  42. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6220919/
  43. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1379651/full
  44. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886911004405
  45. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339415972_Optimism_Pessimism_and_the_Big_Five_Personality_Model_among_Egyptian_College_Students
  46. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0023969021000254
  47. https://works.swarthmore.edu/context/fac-psychology/article/2156/viewcontent/ACCEPTED_MANUSCRIPT___Norris___The_Negativity_Bias_Revisited_Evidence_from_Neuroscience_Measures_and_an_Individual_Differences_Approach.pdf
  48. https://www.verywellmind.com/is-it-safer-to-be-a-pessimist-3144874
  49. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165032724011029
  50. https://www.nature.com/articles/npp2013116
  51. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/19356294_Defensive_Pessimism_Harnessing_Anxiety_as_Motivation
  52. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2000-16270-004
  53. https://anthonyongphd.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/norem-2008.pdf
  54. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0092656603000825
  55. https://thedecisionlab.com/biases/planning-fallacy
  56. https://www.inc.com/wanda-thibodeaux/how-defensive-pessimism-can-help-you-do-better-at-work-in-life-according-to-science.html
  57. https://sites.psu.edu/aspsy/2024/11/16/in-defense-of-defensive-pessimism/
  58. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38879445/
  59. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1987-13154-001
  60. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/psychological-medicine/article/neural-correlates-of-pessimistic-attitude-in-depression/645C24F5DF0C990F777F8A301EA1F399
  61. https://www.papelesdelpsicologo.es/English/2820.pdf
  62. https://scispace.com/pdf/unrealistic-optimism-still-a-neglected-trait-z5wnxsn11i.pdf
  63. https://www.biblio.com/the-decline-of-the-west-by-oswald-spengler/work/51888
  64. https://ourworldindata.org/fertility-rate
  65. https://www.disastercenter.com/crime/uscrime.htm
  66. https://fee.org/articles/hayek-the-knowledge-problem/
  67. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2025/10/03/most-americans-continue-to-rate-the-us-economy-negatively-as-partisan-gap-widens/
  68. https://www.semafor.com/article/06/24/2025/diverse-focus-groups-surface-pervasive-economic-pessimism
  69. https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2018/05/29/nationalism-immigration-and-minorities/
  70. https://streetfins.com/malthusian-trap-how-humans-escaped-the-cycle-of-misery-for-now/
  71. https://andreasscherman.com/posts/notes-on-the-technological-society-by-jacques-ellul/
  72. https://www.philosopheasy.com/p/jacques-elluls-the-technological
  73. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/12/technology/ai-eliezer-yudkowsky-book.html
  74. https://arxiv.org/html/2502.14870v1
  75. https://80000hours.org/2024/09/why-experts-and-forecasters-disagree-about-ai-risk/
  76. https://www.resources.org/archives/twenty-years-after-the-energy-crisis-what-lessons-were-learned/
  77. https://dornsife.usc.edu/news/stories/what-limits-to-growth-report-got-right/
  78. https://www.clubofrome.org/blog-post/herrington-world-model/
  79. https://ourworldindata.org/co2-gdp-decoupling
  80. https://www.theclimatebrink.com/p/emissions-are-no-longer-following
  81. https://newsletter.danielmiessler.com/p/heat-death-explained
  82. https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/774507/is-heat-death-absolutely-and-really-inevitable
  83. https://thebulletin.org/premium/2021-11/nuclear-fear-the-irrational-obstacle-to-real-climate-action/
  84. https://blog.rootsofprogress.org/devanney-on-the-nuclear-flop
  85. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/evolutionary-psychology/
  86. https://www.aporiamagazine.com/p/the-left-must-take-human-evolution
  87. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1571765/full
  88. https://daily-philosophy.com/kidd-taking-pessimism-seriously/
  89. https://www.philosophyoflife.org/jpl202205.pdf
  90. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BcbCoYITuoA
  91. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12232-022-00390-8
  92. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10902-022-00507-4
  93. https://positivepsychology.com/cognitive-distortions/
  94. https://www.verywellmind.com/negative-bias-4589618
  95. https://stevenpinker.com/files/pinker/files/better_angels_shermer_scientific_american_column_skeptic2p_with_art.pdf
  96. https://www.bostonfed.org/publications/public-policy-discussion-paper/2010/reasonable-people-did-disagree-optimism-and-pessimism-about-the-us-housing-market-before-the-crash.aspx
  97. https://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/17/magazine/17pessimist-t.html
  98. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/ar/2025/in-focus/rising-debt-levels-and-fiscal-adjustments/
  99. https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/imf-sounds-alarm-about-high-global-public-debt-urges-countries-build-buffers-2025-10-15/
  100. https://www.brown.edu/news/2020-01-21/polarization
  101. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/vsrr/vsrr038.pdf
  102. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/the-u-s-fertility-rate-reached-a-new-low-in-2024-cdc-data-shows
  103. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2024/06/24/public-trust-in-government-1958-2024/
  104. https://www.pew.org/en/trend/archive/fall-2024/americans-deepening-mistrust-of-institutions
  105. http://pinguet.free.fr/ehrlich68.pdf
  106. https://theconversation.com/the-green-revolution-is-a-warning-not-a-blueprint-for-feeding-a-hungry-planet-182269
  107. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/fandd/issues/2025/06/the-debate-over-falling-fertility-david-bloom
  108. https://www.healthdata.org/news-events/newsroom/news-releases/lancet-dramatic-declines-global-fertility-rates-set-transform
  109. https://www.mckinsey.com/mgi/our-research/dependency-and-depopulation-confronting-the-consequences-of-a-new-demographic-reality
  110. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/06/29/opinion/population-climate-progress.html
  111. https://www.v-dem.net/documents/60/V-dem-dr__2025_lowres.pdf
  112. https://www.v-dem.net/media/publications/WP_154_NJsg5UN.pdf
  113. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8212979/
  114. https://bmcglobalpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s44263-025-00143-z
  115. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-95488-8
  116. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41612-025-00955-8
  117. https://weather.missouri.edu/gcc/_09-09-13_%2520Chapter%25201%2520Models.pdf
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.