Hubbry Logo
Human evolutionary geneticsHuman evolutionary geneticsMain
Open search
Human evolutionary genetics
Community hub
Human evolutionary genetics
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Human evolutionary genetics
Human evolutionary genetics
Human evolutionary genetics
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Human evolutionary genetics studies how one human genome differs from another human genome, the evolutionary past that gave rise to the human genome, and its current effects. Differences between genomes have anthropological, medical, historical and forensic implications and applications. Genetic data can provide important insights into human evolution.

Origin of apes

[edit]
The taxonomic relationships of hominoids
−10 —
–
−9 —
–
−8 —
–
−7 —
–
−6 —
–
−5 —
–
−4 —
–
−3 —
–
−2 —
–
−1 —
–
0 —
Miocene
 
←
←
←
←
←
←
←
←
←
←
←
←
←

Biologists classify humans, along with only a few other species, as great apes (species in the family Hominidae). The living Hominidae include two distinct species of chimpanzee (the bonobo, Pan paniscus, and the chimpanzee, Pan troglodytes), two species of gorilla (the western gorilla, Gorilla gorilla, and the eastern gorilla, Gorilla graueri), and two species of orangutan (the Bornean orangutan, Pongo pygmaeus, and the Sumatran orangutan, Pongo abelii). The great apes with the family Hylobatidae of gibbons form the superfamily Hominoidea of apes.

Apes, in turn, belong to the primate order (>400 species), along with the Old World monkeys, the New World monkeys, and others. Data from both mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and nuclear DNA (nDNA) indicate that primates belong to the group of Euarchontoglires, together with Rodentia, Lagomorpha, Dermoptera, and Scandentia.[1] This is further supported by Alu-like short interspersed nuclear elements (SINEs) which have been found only in members of the Euarchontoglires.[2]

Phylogenetics

[edit]

A phylogenetic tree is usually derived from DNA or protein sequences from populations. Often, mitochondrial DNA or Y chromosome sequences are used to study ancient human demographics. These single-locus sources of DNA do not recombine and are almost always inherited from a single parent, with only one known exception in mtDNA.[3] Individuals from closer geographic regions generally tend to be more similar than individuals from regions farther away. Distance on a phylogenetic tree can be used approximately to indicate:

  1. Genetic distance. The genetic difference between humans and chimpanzees is less than 2%,[4] or three times larger than the variation among modern humans (estimated at 0.6%).[5]
  2. Temporal remoteness of the most recent common ancestor. The mitochondrial most recent common ancestor of modern humans is estimated to have lived roughly 160,000 years ago,[6] the latest common ancestors of humans and chimpanzees roughly 5 to 6 million years ago.[7]

Speciation of humans and the African apes

[edit]

The separation of humans from their closest relatives, the non-human African apes (chimpanzees and gorillas), has been studied extensively for more than a century. Five major questions have been addressed:

  • Which apes are our closest ancestors?
  • When did the separations occur?
  • What was the effective population size of the common ancestor before the split?
  • Are there traces of population structure (subpopulations) preceding the speciation or partial admixture succeeding it?
  • What were the specific events (including fusion of chromosomes 2a and 2b) prior to and subsequent to the separation?

General observations

[edit]

As discussed before, different parts of the genome show different sequence divergence between different hominoids. It has also been shown that the sequence divergence between DNA from humans and chimpanzees varies greatly. For example, the sequence divergence varies between 0% to 2.66% between non-coding, non-repetitive genomic regions of humans and chimpanzees.[8] The percentage of nucleotides in the human genome (hg38) that had one-to-one exact matches in the chimpanzee genome (pantro6) was 84.38%. Additionally gene trees, generated by comparative analysis of DNA segments, do not always fit the species tree. Summing up:

  • The sequence divergence varies significantly between humans, chimpanzees and gorillas.
  • For most DNA sequences, humans and chimpanzees appear to be most closely related, but some point to a human-gorilla or chimpanzee-gorilla clade.
  • The human genome has been sequenced, as well as the chimpanzee genome. Humans have 23 pairs of chromosomes, while chimpanzees, gorillas and orangutans have 24. Human chromosome 2 is a fusion of two chromosomes 2a and 2b that remained separate in the other primates.[9]

Divergence times

[edit]

The divergence time of humans from other apes is of great interest. One of the first molecular studies, published in 1967 measured immunological distances (IDs) between different primates.[10] Basically the study measured the strength of immunological response that an antigen from one species (human albumin) induces in the immune system of another species (human, chimpanzee, gorilla and Old World monkeys). Closely related species should have similar antigens and therefore weaker immunological response to each other's antigens. The immunological response of a species to its own antigens (e.g. human to human) was set to be 1.

The ID between humans and gorillas was determined to be 1.09, that between humans and chimpanzees was determined as 1.14. However the distance to six different Old World monkeys was on average 2.46, indicating that the African apes are more closely related to humans than to monkeys. The authors consider the divergence time between Old World monkeys and hominoids to be 30 million years ago (MYA), based on fossil data, and the immunological distance was considered to grow at a constant rate. They concluded that divergence time of humans and the African apes to be roughly ~5 MYA. That was a surprising result. Most scientists at that time thought that humans and great apes diverged much earlier (>15 MYA).

The gorilla was, in ID terms, closer to human than to chimpanzees; however, the difference was so slight that the trichotomy could not be resolved with certainty. Later studies based on molecular genetics were able to resolve the trichotomy: chimpanzees are phylogenetically closer to humans than to gorillas. However, some divergence times estimated later (using much more sophisticated methods in molecular genetics) do not substantially differ from the very first estimate in 1967, but a recent paper[11] puts it at 11–14 MYA.

Divergence times and ancestral effective population size

[edit]
The sequences of the DNA segments diverge earlier than the species. A large effective population size in the ancestral population (left) preserves different variants of the DNA segments (=alleles) for a longer period of time. Therefore, on average, the gene divergence times (tA for DNA segment A; tB for DNA segment B) will deviate more from the time the species diverge (tS) compared to a small ancestral effective population size (right).

Current methods to determine divergence times use DNA sequence alignments and molecular clocks. Usually the molecular clock is calibrated assuming that the orangutan split from the African apes (including humans) 12-16 MYA. Some studies also include some old world monkeys and set the divergence time of them from hominoids to 25-30 MYA. Both calibration points are based on very little fossil data and have been criticized.[12]

If these dates are revised, the divergence times estimated from molecular data will change as well. However, the relative divergence times are unlikely to change. Even if we cannot tell absolute divergence times exactly, we can be fairly sure that the divergence time between chimpanzees and humans is about sixfold shorter than between chimpanzees (or humans) and monkeys.

One study (Takahata et al., 1995) used 15 DNA sequences from different regions of the genome from human and chimpanzee and 7 DNA sequences from human, chimpanzee and gorilla.[13] They determined that chimpanzees are more closely related to humans than gorillas. Using various statistical methods, they estimated the divergence time human-chimp to be 4.7 MYA and the divergence time between gorillas and humans (and chimps) to be 7.2 MYA.

Additionally they estimated the effective population size of the common ancestor of humans and chimpanzees to be ~100,000. This was somewhat surprising since the present day effective population size of humans is estimated to be only ~10,000. If true that means that the human lineage would have experienced an immense decrease of its effective population size (and thus genetic diversity) in its evolution. (see Toba catastrophe theory)

A and B are two different loci. In the upper figure they fit to the species tree. The DNA that is present in today's gorillas diverged earlier from the DNA that is present in today's humans and chimps. Thus both loci should be more similar between human and chimp than between gorilla and chimp or gorilla and human. In the lower graph, locus A has a more recent common ancestor in human and gorilla compared to the chimp sequence. Whereas chimp and gorilla have a more recent common ancestor for locus B. Here the gene trees are incongruent to the species tree.

Another study (Chen & Li, 2001) sequenced 53 non-repetitive, intergenic DNA segments from human, chimpanzee, gorilla and orangutan.[8] When the DNA sequences were concatenated to a single long sequence, the generated neighbor-joining tree supported the Homo-Pan clade with 100% bootstrap (that is that humans and chimpanzees are the closest related species of the four). When three species are fairly closely related to each other (like human, chimpanzee and gorilla), the trees obtained from DNA sequence data may not be congruent with the tree that represents the speciation (species tree).

The shorter the internodal time span (TIN), the more common are incongruent gene trees. The effective population size (Ne) of the internodal population determines how long genetic lineages are preserved in the population. A higher effective population size causes more incongruent gene trees. Therefore, if the internodal time span is known, the ancestral effective population size of the common ancestor of humans and chimpanzees can be calculated.

When each segment was analyzed individually, 31 supported the Homo-Pan clade, 10 supported the Homo-Gorilla clade, and 12 supported the Pan-Gorilla clade. Using the molecular clock the authors estimated that gorillas split up first 6.2-8.4 MYA and chimpanzees and humans split up 1.6-2.2 million years later (internodal time span) 4.6-6.2 MYA. The internodal time span is useful to estimate the ancestral effective population size of the common ancestor of humans and chimpanzees.

A parsimonious analysis revealed that 24 loci supported the Homo-Pan clade, 7 supported the Homo-Gorilla clade, 2 supported the Pan-Gorilla clade and 20 gave no resolution. Additionally they took 35 protein coding loci from databases. Of these 12 supported the Homo-Pan clade, 3 the Homo-Gorilla clade, 4 the Pan-Gorilla clade and 16 gave no resolution. Therefore, only ~70% of the 52 loci that gave a resolution (33 intergenic, 19 protein coding) support the 'correct' species tree. From the fraction of loci which did not support the species tree and the internodal time span they estimated previously, the effective population of the common ancestor of humans and chimpanzees was estimated to be ~52 000 to 96 000. This value is not as high as that from the first study (Takahata), but still much higher than present day effective population size of humans.

A third study (Yang, 2002) used the same dataset that Chen and Li used but estimated the ancestral effective population of 'only' ~12,000 to 21,000, using a different statistical method.[14]

Genetic differences between humans and other great apes

[edit]

Humans and chimpanzees are 99.1% identical at the coding level, with 99.4% similarity at the nonsynonymous level and 98.4% at the synonymous level.[15] The alignable sequences within genomes of humans and chimpanzees differ by about 35 million single-nucleotide substitutions. Additionally about 3% of the complete genomes differ by deletions, insertions and duplications.[16]

Since mutation rate is relatively constant, roughly one half of these changes occurred in the human lineage. Only a very tiny fraction of those fixed differences gave rise to the different phenotypes of humans and chimpanzees and finding those is a great challenge. The vast majority of the differences are neutral and do not affect the phenotype.[citation needed]

Molecular evolution may act in different ways, through protein evolution, gene loss, differential gene regulation and RNA evolution. All are thought to have played some part in human evolution.

Gene loss

[edit]
"Gene loss" redirects here. For gene loss in microorganisms, see Reductive evolution.

Many different mutations can inactivate a gene, but few will change its function in a specific way. Inactivation mutations will therefore be readily available for selection to act on. Gene loss could thus be a common mechanism of evolutionary adaptation (the "less-is-more" hypothesis).[17]

80 genes were lost in the human lineage after separation from the last common ancestor with the chimpanzee. 36 of those were for olfactory receptors. Genes involved in chemoreception and immune response are overrepresented.[18] Another study estimated that 86 genes had been lost.[19]

Hair keratin gene KRTHAP1

[edit]

A gene for type I hair keratin was lost in the human lineage. Keratins are a major component of hairs. Humans still have nine functional type I hair keratin genes, but the loss of that particular gene may have caused the thinning of human body hair. Based on the assumption of a constant molecular clock, the study predicts the gene loss occurred relatively recently in human evolution—less than 240 000 years ago, but both the Vindija Neandertal and the high-coverage Denisovan sequence contain the same premature stop codons as modern humans and hence dating should be greater than 750 000 years ago. [20]

Further information: Evolution of hair

Myosin gene MYH16

[edit]

Stedman et al. (2004) stated that the loss of the sarcomeric myosin gene MYH16 in the human lineage led to smaller masticatory muscles. They estimated that the mutation that led to the inactivation (a two base pair deletion) occurred 2.4 million years ago, predating the appearance of Homo ergaster/erectus in Africa. The period that followed was marked by a strong increase in cranial capacity, promoting speculation that the loss of the gene may have removed an evolutionary constraint on brain size in the genus Homo.[21]

Another estimate for the loss of the MYH16 gene is 5.3 million years ago, long before Homo appeared.[22]

Other

[edit]
  • CASPASE12, a cysteinyl aspartate proteinase. The loss of this gene is speculated to have reduced the lethality of bacterial infection in humans.[18]

Gene addition

[edit]

Segmental duplications (SDs or LCRs) have had roles in creating new primate genes and shaping human genetic variation.

Human-specific DNA insertions

[edit]

When the human genome was compared to the genomes of five comparison primate species, including the chimpanzee, gorilla, orangutan, gibbon, and macaque, it was found that there are approximately 20,000 human-specific insertions believed to be regulatory. While most insertions appear to be fitness neutral, a small amount have been identified in positively selected genes showing associations to neural phenotypes and some relating to dental and sensory perception-related phenotypes. These findings hint at the seemingly important role of human-specific insertions in the recent evolution of humans.[23]

Selection pressures

[edit]

Human accelerated regions are areas of the genome that differ between humans and chimpanzees to a greater extent than can be explained by genetic drift over the time since the two species shared a common ancestor. These regions show signs of being subject to natural selection, leading to the evolution of distinctly human traits. Two examples are HAR1F, which is believed to be related to brain development and HAR2 (a.k.a. HACNS1) that may have played a role in the development of the opposable thumb.

It has also been hypothesized that much of the difference between humans and chimpanzees is attributable to the regulation of gene expression rather than differences in the genes themselves. Analyses of conserved non-coding sequences, which often contain functional and thus positively selected regulatory regions, address this possibility.[24]

Sequence divergence between humans and apes

[edit]

When the draft sequence of the common chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) genome was published in the summer 2005, 2400 million bases (of ~3160 million bases) were sequenced and assembled well enough to be compared to the human genome.[16] 1.23% of this sequenced differed by single-base substitutions. Of this, 1.06% or less was thought to represent fixed differences between the species, with the rest being variant sites in humans or chimpanzees. Another type of difference, called indels (insertions/deletions) accounted for many fewer differences (15% as many), but contributed ~1.5% of unique sequence to each genome, since each insertion or deletion can involve anywhere from one base to millions of bases.[16]

A companion paper examined segmental duplications in the two genomes,[25] whose insertion and deletion into the genome account for much of the indel sequence. They found that a total of 2.7% of euchromatic sequence had been differentially duplicated in one or the other lineage.

Percentage sequence divergence between humans and other hominids[8]
Locus Human-Chimp Human-Gorilla Human-Orangutan
Alu elements 2 - -
Non-coding (Chr. Y) 1.68 ± 0.19 2.33 ± 0.2 5.63 ± 0.35
Pseudogenes (autosomal) 1.64 ± 0.10 1.87 ± 0.11 -
Pseudogenes (Chr. X) 1.47 ± 0.17 - -
Noncoding (autosomal) 1.24 ± 0.07 1.62 ± 0.08 3.08 ± 0.11
Genes (Ks) 1.11 1.48 2.98
Introns 0.93 ± 0.08 1.23 ± 0.09 -
Xq13.3 0.92 ± 0.10 1.42 ± 0.12 3.00 ± 0.18
Subtotal for X chromosome 1.16 ± 0.07 1.47 ± 0.08 -
Genes (Ka) 0.8 0.93 1.96

The sequence divergence has generally the following pattern: Human-Chimp < Human-Gorilla << Human-Orangutan, highlighting the close kinship between humans and the African apes. Alu elements diverge quickly due to their high frequency of CpG dinucleotides which mutate roughly 10 times more often than the average nucleotide in the genome. The mutation rate is higher in the male germ line, therefore the divergence in the Y chromosome—which is inherited solely from the father—is higher than in autosomes. The X chromosome is inherited twice as often through the female germ line as through the male germ line and therefore shows slightly lower sequence divergence. The sequence divergence of the Xq13.3 region is surprisingly low between humans and chimpanzees.[26]

Mutations altering the amino acid sequence of proteins (Ka) are the least common. In fact ~29% of all orthologous proteins are identical between human and chimpanzee. The typical protein differs by only two amino acids.[16] The measures of sequence divergence shown in the table only take the substitutional differences, for example from an A (adenine) to a G (guanine), into account. DNA sequences may however also differ by insertions and deletions (indels) of bases. These are usually stripped from the alignments before the calculation of sequence divergence is performed.

Genetic differences between modern humans and Neanderthals

[edit]

An international group of scientists completed a draft sequence of the Neanderthal genome in May 2010. The results indicate some breeding between modern humans (Homo sapiens) and Neanderthals (Homo neanderthalensis), as the genomes of non-African humans have 1–4% more in common with Neanderthals than do the genomes of subsaharan Africans. Neanderthals and most modern humans share a lactose-intolerant variant of the lactase gene that encodes an enzyme that is unable to break down lactose in milk after weaning. Modern humans and Neanderthals also share the FOXP2 gene variant associated with brain development and with speech in modern humans, indicating that Neanderthals may have been able to speak. Chimps have two amino acid differences in FOXP2 compared with human and Neanderthal FOXP2.[27][28][29]

Genetic differences among modern humans

[edit]
Further information: Human genetic variation, Recent human evolution, Archaic humans, Archaic admixture, Race and genetics, and Human variability
Further information: Human genetics, Archaeogenetics, Human mitochondrial DNA haplogroup, Human Y-chromosome DNA haplogroup, and Genetic genealogy

Homo sapiens is thought to have emerged about 300,000 years ago. It dispersed throughout Africa, and after 70,000 years ago throughout Eurasia and Oceania. A 2009 study identified 14 "ancestral population clusters", the most remote being the San people of Southern Africa.[30][31]

With their rapid expansion throughout different climate zones, and especially with the availability of new food sources with the domestication of cattle and the development of agriculture, human populations have been exposed to significant selective pressures since their dispersal. For example, the ancestors of East Asians are thought to have undergone processess of selection for a number of alleles, including variants of the EDAR, ADH1B, ABCC1, and ALDH2 genes.

The East Asian types of ADH1B in particular are associated with rice domestication and would thus have arisen after the development of rice cultivation roughly 10,000 years ago.[32] Several phenotypical traits of characteristic of East Asians are due to a single mutation of the EDAR gene, dated to c. 35,000 years ago.[33]

As of 2017, the Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Database (dbSNP), which lists SNP and other variants, listed a total of 324 million variants found in sequenced human genomes.[34] Nucleotide diversity, the average proportion of nucleotides that differ between two individuals, is estimated at between 0.1% and 0.4% for contemporary humans (compared to 2% between humans and chimpanzees).[35][36] This corresponds to genome differences at a few million sites; the 1000 Genomes Project similarly found that "a typical [individual] genome differs from the reference human genome at 4.1 million to 5.0 million sites … affecting 20 million bases of sequence."[37]

In February 2019, scientists discovered evidence, based on genetics studies using artificial intelligence (AI), that suggest the existence of an unknown human ancestor species, not Neanderthal, Denisovan or human hybrid (like Denny (hybrid hominin)), in the genome of modern humans.[38][39]

Research studies

[edit]

In March 2019, Chinese scientists reported inserting the human brain-related MCPH1 gene into laboratory rhesus monkeys, resulting in the transgenic monkeys performing better and answering faster on "short-term memory tests involving matching colors and shapes", compared to control non-transgenic monkeys, according to the researchers.[40][41]

In May 2023, scientists reported, based on genetic studies, a more complicated pathway of human evolution than previously understood. According to the studies, humans evolved from different places and times in Africa, instead of from a single location and period of time.[42][43]

On 31 August 2023, researchers reported, based on genetic studies, that a human ancestor population bottleneck occurred "around 930,000 and 813,000 years ago ... lasted for about 117,000 years and brought human ancestors close to extinction."[44][45]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Human evolutionary genetics

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Human evolutionary genetics is the interdisciplinary field integrating , , and to elucidate the genetic foundations of origins, diversification, migrations, and adaptations from archaic ancestors to modern populations. Emerging prominently with the and accelerated by technologies, the discipline has reconstructed pivotal demographic events, including a severe bottleneck reducing to around 10,000 individuals during the out-of-Africa expansion approximately 50,000–70,000 years ago. Key discoveries encompass interbreeding with Neanderthals and Denisovans, introducing adaptive such as those enhancing immune responses in non-African genomes, where archaic admixture constitutes 1–2% and up to 4–6% in some Oceanian groups, respectively. Notable achievements include identifying signatures of positive selection on loci underlying traits like skin pigmentation, digestion in adults, and hypoxia tolerance, demonstrating recent evolutionary pressures post-agriculture and . Controversies persist regarding the interpretation of genetic differentiation among continental populations, with affirming clinal variation and functional differences in frequencies, often downplayed in institutionally biased syntheses favoring over genetic causality.

Phylogenetic foundations

Hominoid evolutionary tree

The hominoid evolutionary tree reflects the phylogenetic branching among , rooted in molecular sequence data calibrated by evidence to estimate divergence timings. Hominoids diverged from cercopithecoids ( monkeys) approximately 25-30 million years ago, with the lesser apes (family Hylobatidae, including ) splitting first from the great ape () lineage around 18-22 million years ago. This basal position of is supported by multi-locus phylogenomic analyses showing distinct genetic distances. Within , orangutans (subfamily ) diverged next from the African great ape and human common ancestor approximately 12-16 million years ago, as inferred from relaxed models incorporating fossil constraints like and early pongine remains. The subfamily then subdivided, with gorillas (tribe ) branching off from the human-chimpanzee lineage about 8-10 million years ago, based on genomic alignments and calibration points from fossils. The closest relatives to humans are chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and bonobos (Pan paniscus), forming the sister genus Pan within tribe , with their split from the human lineage dated to 6-7 million years ago through pedigree-informed mutation rates and whole-genome comparisons. These estimates arise from Bayesian phylogenomic methods that account for rate heterogeneity across branches, yielding consistent topologies across studies. Sequence divergence between humans and Pan species averages 1.2-1.3%, affirming the recency of this split while highlighting the tree's resolution via large-scale orthologous datasets.

Key divergence events from common ancestors

The divergence of the human lineage from other hominoids represents key events inferred primarily from analyses of genomic sequences, calibrated against dates. The last common ancestor (LCA) of humans and chimpanzees is estimated to have lived approximately 6-7 million years ago (mya), based on rates and divergence metrics from whole-genome alignments, with confidence intervals spanning 5-8 mya depending on assumptions. This timing aligns with early hominin s such as tchadensis, dated to around 7 mya, which exhibits bipedal traits suggestive of post-divergence adaptations in the human lineage. Earlier, the lineage diverged from the human-chimpanzee around 8-10 mya, as determined from sequence divergence in the gorilla genome project, which used orangutan-human splits for calibration and accounted for differences among great apes. The lineage split even further back, approximately 12-16 mya, marking the division between African great apes () and Asian pongines (), supported by non-synonymous substitution patterns and fossil evidence from the epoch. These estimates derive from Bayesian phylogenetic models that incorporate fossil constraints to refine molecular clocks, revealing a branching topology where orangutans form the outgroup to the African apes. Ancestral effective population sizes (Ne) for these pre-divergence populations, reconstructed via coalescent-based methods from polymorphism data across extant , indicate larger groups than modern humans. For the human-chimpanzee LCA, Ne is inferred at 40,000-100,000 individuals, reflecting a panmictic before lineage splits reduced sizes through bottlenecks. Similarly, the deeper hominoid ancestors maintained Ne values 5-10 times higher than the current human estimate of ~10,000, as evidenced by and silent site variability, underscoring demographic stability prior to Pleistocene fluctuations. These inferences highlight how rates inversely scale with Ne, providing a framework for understanding divergence without incomplete lineage sorting.

Genomic divergence from great apes

Sequence-level differences

The divergence between and chimpanzee genomes, primarily due to single-nucleotide substitutions, is approximately 1.23% across alignable sequences. This figure arises from the Chimpanzee Sequencing and Analysis Consortium's comparison of orthologous regions, excluding structural variants. Including small insertions and deletions (indels), which account for an additional ~1.5% divergence through roughly 3 million events totaling about 90 megabases of sequence difference, elevates the overall sequence-level distinction to around 3%. Fixed differences predominate in non-coding regions, with coding sequences exhibiting lower divergence (~0.75-1%) due to purifying selection constraints. Divergence increases with phylogenetic distance: human-gorilla substitution rates average 1.6-1.75%, reflecting the deeper split ~8-10 million years ago, while human-orangutan differences reach ~3.1%. These estimates derive from whole-genome alignments in great ape sequencing projects, emphasizing substitutions over ancestral polymorphisms. contributions scale similarly, with human-gorilla indels comprising ~5-10% more variable sites than human-chimp alignments. In the human lineage post-chimp , substitution rates accelerated disproportionately in non-coding regulatory elements compared to protein-coding exons, where synonymous rates remained near neutral expectations. (HARs), often enhancers, exhibit 2-18-fold excess mutations relative to neutral models, contrasting the constrained evolution (~0.5% ) in exons. This pattern underscores regulatory sequences' role in lineage-specific changes without broad structural impacts. CpG dinucleotides, prone to C-to-T transitions via -induced , contribute disproportionately to -specific sequence differences, with observed mutation rates ~10-12 times higher than non-CpG sites. In the branch, elevated CpG loss rates in contexts, evolving rapidly over recent timescales, amplify divergence from apes, particularly in regulatory contexts where patterns vary. These hypermutable sites account for ~20-25% of human-chimp polymorphisms despite comprising only ~1% of the .

Structural genomic changes

The most prominent structural genomic difference between humans and great apes is the formation of human through the telomeric fusion of two ancestral acrocentric chromosomes that remain separate in chimpanzees (2A and 2B), , and orangutans. This Robertsonian fusion event, dated to approximately 0.74–3.18 million years ago based on analyses of flanking sequences, is supported by the presence of degenerate telomeric repeats (TTAGGG arrays) at the fusion site on human q13–q14.1, an inactivated ancestral , and syntenic correspondence to the ape chromosomes. This fusion accounts for the reduction in diploid chromosome number from 48 in great apes to 46 in humans, with no net loss of genetic material but altered chromosomal architecture potentially influencing meiotic stability and recombination. Beyond the fusion, human and ape karyotypes differ by numerous inversions, primarily pericentric, that rearrange gene order and suppress recombination in heterozygous regions. Comparative analyses identify at least nine such inversions distinguishing from chromosomes, including large ones on human chromosomes 1, 12, and 18, often fixed in one lineage and polymorphic or absent in the other. Whole-genome alignments reveal over 1.5 million base pairs affected by these inversions, with many originating in the chimpanzee lineage post-divergence, as evidenced by breakpoint sequences enriched for segmental duplications that mediate non-allelic . Translocations are rarer, with few interchromosomal exchanges; one notable example involves material between and ape homologs, but overall synteny is conserved, underscoring inversions and the fusion as primary drivers of karyotypic . Copy number variations, particularly expansions of segmental duplications (SDs), represent another key structural divergence, comprising about 5% of the and showing accelerated change in the hominid lineage. from the Great Ape Genome Project and subsequent assemblies indicate that human-specific SDs, often in pericentromeric and subtelomeric regions, exceed those in apes by volume and complexity, fostering expansions via duplication-mediated innovation. These SDs, enriched for paralogous sequences >1 kb with >90% identity, contribute to structural polymorphism and have been linked to adaptive traits, though their role in remains under study due to incomplete lineage sorting in ape ancestors. High-quality ape sequences from 2025 confirm elevated human lineage divergence in SD content relative to unique regions, highlighting their outsized impact on genomic architecture despite covering a minority of the genome.

Gene family expansions, losses, and novel genes

In humans, the MYH16 gene, encoding a heavy chain isoform expressed in masticatory muscles, underwent inactivating mutations approximately 2.4 million years ago, resulting in reduced fiber size and overall muscle mass in the jaw. This loss correlates with diminished observed in the lineage, facilitating cranial reorganization. Similarly, the KRTHAP1 keratin-associated protein gene became a in humans, distinct from its functional role in non-human , contributing to alterations in hair shaft structure and potentially the of reduced body hair coverage or finer hair texture. Comparative analyses indicate that pseudogenization in hair follicle-specific keratin genes, including KRTHAP1-related loci, aligns with the relative hairlessness in humans compared to other . Gene family expansions in the lineage include the NOTCH2NL paralogs, which arose through segmental duplications unique to humans and expand the pool of cortical neural progenitors by modulating Notch signaling.30399-4) These genes, absent or non-functional in other great apes, correlate with increased neuronal output during neocortical development, linking to the expansion of size. Ongoing structural variants in NOTCH2NL suggest continued evolutionary refinement in modern humans. Human-specific duplications have also occurred in loci influencing immune function, such as certain and families, though precise expansions vary; for instance, genes with human-specific features enriched in immune pathways reflect adaptations post-divergence from apes. De novo genes originating via retroduplication, such as processed transcripts integrated into the , have emerged recently in , with examples influencing reproductive traits and disease susceptibility. Evolutionarily young protein-coding genes, including those from retrogene formation, exhibit human-specific expression and contribute to phenotypic innovations like neural or gonadal development, as documented in curated databases up to 2023. Aberrant activation of such novel open reading frames can promote pathological states, underscoring their dual role in adaptation and risk.

Evidence of positive selection in the human lineage

Genomic signatures of positive selection in the human lineage since divergence from chimpanzees approximately 6-7 million years ago are primarily detected through comparative analyses of substitution rates. The of nonsynonymous to synonymous substitutions (dN/dS > 1) in protein-coding genes indicates adaptive changes driven by , while branch-site models test for lineage-specific acceleration. Similarly, excess non-synonymous polymorphisms relative to divergence (McDonald-Kreitman tests) or distorted site frequency spectra signal selective sweeps. These methods reveal positive selection acting on functional categories including , sensory perception, metabolism, and neural development, contrasting with neutral expectations under alone, where dN/dS ≈ 1 or purifying selection dominates (dN/dS < 1). In protein-coding regions, positive selection is enriched in genes related to immunity and sensory processing. For instance, primate-wide analyses identify accelerated evolution in immune pathways, such as those involving cytokine signaling and pathogen recognition, where human-branch dN/dS elevations exceed neutral models, conferring fitness advantages against novel pathogens post-divergence. Sensory genes, including some olfactory receptors, show signatures of positive selection on intact functional copies in humans, despite overall pseudogenization and relaxed constraint compared to chimpanzees, potentially adapting to ecological shifts like reduced reliance on smell for foraging. Neural genes exhibit similar patterns, with accelerated substitutions in transcription factors and synaptic proteins, supporting causal links to expanded cognitive capacities via enhanced neural connectivity and plasticity. Human accelerated regions (HARs), numbering over 3,000 non-coding sequences conserved across vertebrates but rapidly evolving in the human lineage (up to 18-fold faster than expected), provide evidence of regulatory adaptation. These short (~100-500 bp) elements function as enhancers, driving increased gene expression in brain tissues during fetal development, with targets enriched for neurodevelopmental genes like ASPM and MCPH1. Experimental perturbations in model organisms confirm HARs' roles in corticogenesis and neuronal proliferation, implying selection for larger, more complex brains via cis-regulatory changes rather than coding mutations. Specific loci illustrate these dynamics. The FOXP2 gene, implicated in oromotor control, bears two fixed amino acid substitutions unique to the human lineage (shared with Neanderthals), with branch-site dN/dS analyses indicating positive selection for refined vocalization circuits, though population-level sweeps in modern humans remain contested and likely predate recent admixture. Complementarily, expansions in the AMY1 amylase gene family (average 6-7 copies in humans versus 2 in chimpanzees) arose via duplications over 800,000 years ago, enhancing salivary starch hydrolysis efficiency—a fitness benefit in Paleolithic diets incorporating tubers and seeds, as evidenced by copy-number correlations with amylase protein levels and adaptive simulations. These cases underscore selection's role in physiological adaptations, grounded in empirical divergence data exceeding neutral drift predictions.

Archaic admixture and its genetic legacy

Neanderthal introgression patterns

Non-African modern human populations derive approximately 1–2% of their autosomal genomes from Neanderthals, stemming primarily from one or more interbreeding events between 47,000 and 65,000 years ago during the initial out-of-Africa dispersal of anatomically modern humans. This introgression is absent or negligible in sub-Saharan African populations, which lack direct Neanderthal admixture, though trace Neanderthal-derived alleles (0.3–0.5%) appear in some African genomes due to subsequent back-migrations of Eurasians carrying such sequences.30059-3) Geographic variation exists among non-Africans, with East Asians retaining slightly higher Neanderthal ancestry (about 1.8–2.1%) compared to Europeans (1.15–1.5%), potentially reflecting additional admixture pulses or varying selective retention. Recent analyses of ancient DNA from Eurasian sites confirm these patterns, cataloging Neanderthal haplotypes and revealing that introgressed segments average 50–100 kb in length, with longer tracts indicating older admixture events. Neanderthal-derived sequences show non-random distribution across the genome, exhibiting depletion in evolutionarily conserved regions, including protein-coding exons, due to purifying selection against Neanderthal alleles burdened by higher genetic load from small effective population sizes. Conversely, these sequences are enriched in non-coding regulatory elements and specific functional categories, such as keratinocyte differentiation, sensory perception, and particularly innate immunity loci (e.g., Toll-like receptors and HLA genes), where Neanderthal variants may have conferred adaptive advantages in novel Eurasian environments. Skin pigmentation genes also display elevated Neanderthal introgression, correlating with lighter pigmentation alleles fixed in some Eurasian lineages. These patterns suggest initial hybrid viability, as evidenced by 2020s ancient DNA studies identifying fertile Neanderthal-modern human offspring in Eurasian fossil records, though negative selection reduced overall retention to current levels. Refined mapping using telomere-to-telomere genome assemblies has identified additional ~51 Mb of Neanderthal sequences previously missed in fragmented references, predominantly in pericentromeric and acrocentric regions, further quantifying the mosaic nature of introgression. Back-migration effects are modeled as contributing recurrent low-level gene flow, with Neanderthal haplotypes in Africans clustering with those from Western Eurasian sources rather than independent archaic admixture.30059-3) Overall, these patterns underscore a selective filter post-introgression, preserving beneficial alleles while purging deleterious ones, as confirmed by linkage disequilibrium decay analyses across diverse modern and ancient samples.

Denisovan and other archaic contributions

Modern human populations in Oceania, particularly Melanesians and Papuans, exhibit the highest levels of Denisovan genetic admixture, with estimates ranging from 4% to 6% of their genomes derived from this archaic hominin group. Whole-genome sequencing of diverse Oceanian samples has revealed that this ancestry stems from interbreeding events between early modern humans dispersing into Southeast Asia and Denisovan populations persisting in the region. Phylogeographic patterns indicate a gradient of Denisovan introgression, with elevated proportions in Near Oceanians such as Papuans and Aboriginal Australians, decreasing eastward into Polynesians and Fijians, consistent with serial admixture during coastal migrations out of Asia. Analyses of high-coverage genomic data from Papuan individuals have identified contributions from multiple, deeply divergent Denisovan lineages that split over 350,000 years ago, suggesting at least two distinct admixture pulses with archaic groups related to the Altai Denisovan. Studies published between 2018 and 2021, incorporating sequence data from East Asian and Oceanian cohorts, support this model of recurrent gene flow, with one pulse contributing broadly to East Eurasian ancestry and a second, more divergent component enriched in Papuans. These events likely occurred after the initial out-of-Africa expansion but prior to the peopling of Remote Oceania, as evidenced by haplotype sharing patterns that predate Polynesian expansions. In East Asian populations, Denisovan ancestry is present at lower frequencies, approximately 0.1% to 0.2%, but includes functional variants under positive selection, such as the EPAS1 haplotype associated with high-altitude hypoxia tolerance in Tibetans. This allele, from Denisovans around 40,000 to 50,000 years ago, modulates hemoglobin levels and oxygen transport efficiency, enabling adaptation to the Tibetan Plateau's extreme conditions without the maladaptive polycythemia seen in other highlanders. Whole-genome comparisons confirm that this Denisovan-derived EPAS1 variant swept to high frequency (>80%) in Tibetans through incomplete lineage sorting or direct , distinct from de novo mutations. Beyond Denisovans, evidence from 2020 genomic surveys of West African populations reveals from unknown "" archaic hominins, contributing approximately 2% to 4% of ancestry in groups like the Yoruba and Mende. These archaic sources, inferred via divergence-based statistics on whole-genome data, represent deeply diverged lineages within that admixed with modern human ancestors between 43,000 and 124,000 years ago, independent of Eurasian or inputs. Such findings underscore multiple instances of archaic admixture across human dispersals, with African ghost contributions potentially influencing immune-related loci, though functional impacts remain under investigation.

Functional impacts of archaic alleles

Archaic alleles introgressed into modern human genomes from s and s have demonstrable functional effects on and disease susceptibility, as identified through genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and functional validations. These variants, comprising roughly 1-2% Neanderthal ancestry in non-African populations and variable Denisovan contributions in Oceanians and Asians, often cluster in genes influencing , , and environmental . While some archaic alleles confer adaptive advantages by enhancing resistance or metabolic efficiency, others elevate risks for neuropsychiatric and metabolic disorders, reflecting a balance of beneficial and deleterious shaped by . Neanderthal-derived alleles in the (HLA) region provide immunity benefits by diversifying immune recognition of pathogens encountered outside . Specific HLA haplotypes of Neanderthal origin, such as those in , -B, and -C loci, enable stronger binding to viral peptides and broader T-cell repertoire diversity, conferring against infections like or . Functional assays confirm these archaic variants activate natural killer cells and cytotoxic T-lymphocytes more effectively against Eurasian pathogens, explaining their positive selection in admixed populations despite overall purifying selection against Neanderthal ancestry. Neanderthal alleles also influence , with variants near genes like SLC16A11 modulating fat storage and levels to favor energy efficiency in colder climates. GWAS implicate these in reduced accumulation, potentially aiding survival in low-calorie environments, though long-term retention may contribute to metabolic imbalances in modern diets. For , the EPAS1 —comprising multiple variants regulating hypoxia-inducible factor 2-alpha—enables Tibetans to suppress excessive at high altitudes, maintaining oxygen delivery without risks; CRISPR-edited models and population studies validate its causality by demonstrating blunted overproduction under hypoxia. Conversely, archaic segments increase disease risks, with Neanderthal alleles near DRD2 and CHRNA3 loci associating with higher vulnerability via altered signaling and receptor sensitivity in brain reward pathways. GWAS in European cohorts link these variants to a 1.5-2-fold elevated odds of dependence, corroborated by (eQTL) data showing upregulated nicotinic receptors in neural tissues. Similarly, introgression in the MHC region and metabolic genes correlates with 10-20% increased risk through impaired insulin secretion and beta-cell function, as evidenced by fine-mapping to causal variants disrupting in admixed populations. Archaic alleles also contribute to depression susceptibility, explaining up to 5% of via polygenic effects on serotonin transport and circadian regulation, with S-LINKAGE disequilibrium analyses prioritizing functional SNPs over linkage. These impacts underscore archaic alleles' dual role: adaptive in ancestral contexts but maladaptive amid contemporary lifestyles, with ongoing research emphasizing causal validation through to distinguish from confounding.

Population genetics of modern humans

Out-of-Africa migration and serial founder effects

The Out-of-Africa (OOA) migration of anatomically modern Homo sapiens, estimated to have occurred around 60,000–70,000 years ago, involved a founding population that experienced a severe genetic bottleneck, drastically reducing outside . This event is evidenced by lower diversity and heterozygosity in non-African genomes, with effective population sizes during the migration inferred to be as low as 1,000–2,300 individuals based on and site frequency spectrum analyses. The bottleneck's signature persists in modern non-African populations, which retain approximately 80–85% of the found in sub-Saharan African populations, reflecting an initial loss attributable to drift in the small migrant group. Subsequent stepwise expansions into and beyond imposed serial founder effects, where each new population was established by a subset of individuals from the previous one, leading to cumulative reductions in neutral . These effects manifest as a cline in heterozygosity decreasing with geographic distance from , with simulations indicating losses of 1–2% per generation in low-density frontier populations due to amplified drift. Coalescent-based models of prolonged migration with serial founding replicate observed patterns, such as elevated and shallower spectra in distant populations, without invoking large-scale admixture until later waves. Empirical data from genome-wide SNPs confirm this gradient, with heterozygosity in East Asians and Native Americans falling to ~70–75% of African levels after multiple inferred founder events. Uniparental markers provide phylogenetic traces of these routes. (mtDNA) haplogroup L3, originating in Africa ~70,000 years ago, spawned non-African macrohaplogroups M and N through the OOA bottleneck; haplogroup M, for instance, dominates in South and East Asian lineages, reflecting early coastal dispersals. Y-chromosome haplogroups, such as those under CT (e.g., DE and CF clades), similarly show star-like expansions post-OOA, with reduced diversity aligning with serial bottlenecks during eastward migrations via . These markers' shallow times (~40,000–60,000 years) and geographic structuring support models of successive small-group foundings rather than panmictic diffusion. Forward and simulations under serial founder scenarios match empirical heterozygosity gradients and site frequency distributions better than isolation-by-distance models alone, predicting ~15–20% diversity loss per major founder event in expanding fronts. Such dynamics explain the persistence of long-range blocks in non-Africans and underscore how drift-dominated expansions shaped neutral genomic variation prior to regional adaptations.

Continental-scale genetic clustering

Genome-wide genotyping and sequencing data consistently demonstrate that human populations exhibit genetic clustering at the continental scale, as revealed by (PCA) of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). In PCA, the first principal component typically separates sub-Saharan African populations from all non-African groups, accounting for the greatest proportion of genetic variance due to the out-of-Africa bottleneck, while the second principal component distinguishes Europeans from East Asians and other Eurasians. These patterns emerge from analyses of hundreds of thousands of SNPs across thousands of individuals, with continental groups occupying non-overlapping regions in low-dimensional PC space. Supervised and unsupervised clustering methods, such as ADMIXTURE, further resolve individuals into ancestry components that align with geographic continents when assuming K=4 to K=6 ancestral populations. For instance, ADMIXTURE assigns over 99% of variance in European-descent samples to a single "European" component, with minimal admixture from African or East Asian sources in unadmixed groups, reflecting historical isolation. Pairwise Wright's FST fixation indices quantify this differentiation, with values between continental superpopulations ranging from 0.07 (e.g., European-East Asian) to 0.15 (e.g., European-African), substantially higher than within-continent averages of ~0.01-0.03. Specifically, FST between the CEU ( residents of Northern and Western European ancestry) and CHB ( in ) populations is 0.106, and between CEU and YRI (Yoruba in , ) is approximately 0.15, based on genome-wide SNP data adjusted for rare variant ascertainment biases. These metrics indicate that 7-15% of occurs between continents, a level comparable to differentiation in other vertebrates. While clinal gradients exist within continents—such as allele frequency changes across or due to isolation-by-distance—inter-continental transitions are abrupt, with FST gradients exceeding 10-fold those within regions, limiting across oceans and geographic barriers until recent millennia. This structure refutes models positing humans as a single panmictic population without discrete ancestry groups, as empirical SNP data from diverse cohorts show that continental assignments predict ancestry with >95% accuracy using as few as 50-100 ancestry-informative markers. Updates from large-scale genomic resources in the 2020s, including the Phase 3 (2,504 individuals across 26 populations, released 2015 but reanalyzed with high-coverage sequencing in 2022) and gnomAD v4 (over 800,000 exomes/genomes), confirm these clusters persist amid expanded sampling. In gnomAD, local ancestry inference partitions variants by continental components (African, European, East Asian, etc.) in admixed samples, revealing that ancestry-specific allele frequencies differ by over twofold for ~80% of variants in groups like Admixed Americans, enabling precise tracing of inherited segments. Pedigree and trio data from these resources demonstrate high heritability of local ancestry tracts, with offspring inheriting chromosomal segments of specific continental origin from parents at rates matching Mendelian expectations, underscoring the stable genetic basis of these clusters across generations.

Regional adaptations and allele frequency clines

Human populations exhibit regional genetic adaptations shaped by local selective pressures, such as ultraviolet radiation gradients, dietary shifts, and prevalence, resulting in clines—smooth geographic variations in variant frequencies that reflect ongoing or recent . These clines often align with environmental factors, including for pigmentation-related loci, where frequencies correlate with solar exposure to balance synthesis and UV protection. Empirical evidence from population genomics supports strong positive selection on specific variants, with estimated selection coefficients derived from decay and allele age modeling indicating heritable fitness advantages through differential survival and reproduction. A prominent example is the SLC24A5 Ala111Thr variant (rs1426654), which contributes substantially to lighter skin pigmentation in Europeans by reducing production in melanocytes. This derived allele reached near fixation (>95% frequency) in European populations via a selective sweep approximately 10,000 years ago, with estimated selection coefficients of 0.08 under additive models and up to 0.16 under dominant models, reflecting to lower UV environments for enhanced absorption. confirms its introduction and rapid rise post-Neolithic, absent in earlier hunter-gatherers, underscoring a targeted response to northern latitudes rather than drift. Frequency clines for SLC24A5 and related loci like SLC45A2 show latitudinal gradients across , decreasing from high European frequencies toward equatorial regions. In East Asian populations, the EDAR 370A variant (rs3827760) exemplifies to ectodermal traits, influencing thicker, straighter , increased density, and altered morphology via enhanced signaling in developing tissues. Under strong positive selection, this swept to high frequencies (>80%) around 30,000–35,000 years ago, likely conferring thermoregulatory or structural advantages in ancestral Siberian or Northeast Asian environments. Transgenic mouse models validate its causal role in producing East Asian-specific and gland phenotypes, with selection estimates indicating fitness benefits from heritable trait modifications. Lactase persistence, enabling adult digestion of milk , arose independently in pastoralist groups through regulatory variants upstream of the LCT gene, such as the -13910*T (rs4988235) prevalent in Europeans (>70% in northern groups). This variant underwent intense selection post-Neolithic dairying, around 7,500–10,000 years ago, with evidence of sweeps tied to nutritional advantages in herding societies facing famine or pathogen loads. Analogous alleles in African and Middle Eastern pastoralists show parallel clines correlating with historical , where heterozygote carriers exhibited higher via caloric access. Pathogen-driven adaptations include the HBB Glu6Val variant (rs334) causing sickle-cell trait, which maintains intermediate frequencies (5–20%) in malaria-endemic equatorial Africa due to heterozygote advantage: carriers resist severe Plasmodium falciparum infection by impairing parasite growth in red blood cells, while homozygotes suffer anemia. Allele frequencies form clines tracking historical malaria prevalence, with balancing selection stabilizing polymorphisms where the fitness cost of homozygosity offsets malaria mortality risks, estimated at selection coefficients favoring heterozygotes by 10–20% in high-transmission zones. Similar gradients appear in other resistance loci, like G6PD variants, emphasizing causal links between heritable erythrocyte modifications and survival differentials under infectious pressure.

Recent evolutionary dynamics

Holocene selective sweeps and local adaptations

The epoch, beginning approximately 11,700 years ago following the , witnessed profound environmental and societal shifts that drove positive selection in human populations, including the advent of agriculture around 10,000–12,000 years ago in regions like the and River valley. These changes introduced high-starch diets from domesticated crops and increased population densities through , fostering novel selective pressures from dietary components and elevated loads via zoonotic transmissions from and crowded settlements. Genome-wide scans using statistics such as the integrated haplotype score (iHS) and cross-population extended haplotype homozygosity (XP-EHH) have identified signals of recent selective sweeps—regions of reduced indicative of rapid allele frequency increases—at hundreds of loci in diverse populations, with (LD) decay patterns dating many to the mid-to-late (roughly 5,000–10,000 years ago). Dietary adaptations exemplify these sweeps, particularly in genes involved in starch digestion. The salivary amylase gene AMY1 exhibits , with populations reliant on showing significantly higher average copies (6–8 or more) compared to hunter-gatherers (typically 4–6), correlating with enhanced production and breakdown efficiency. This pattern reflects positive selection post-, as evidenced by comparative genomic analyses across global populations, where structural variants in the amylase locus cluster display elevated homozygosity consistent with sweeps favoring starch-tolerant alleles amid cereal-heavy diets. Pathogen-driven selection intensified with agricultural lifestyles, selecting for variants modulating immune responses to endemic diseases in dense communities. Ancient DNA studies of Eurasian Holocene samples (spanning ~8,000 years) reveal strong positive selection at immune-related loci, including those in signaling and pathways, likely countering heightened infectious burdens from sanitation challenges and animal proximity. While (MHC) regions predominantly show balancing selection preserving diversity against diverse pathogens, nearby sweeps in innate immunity genes underscore adaptation to Holocene-specific microbial pressures, with XP-EHH signals differentiating agricultural from pre-agricultural ancestries. Recent urban expansions may extend these dynamics, though for sweeps remains preliminary and tied to polygenic immune modulation rather than isolated hard sweeps.

Gene-culture interactions and rapid evolution

Gene-culture interactions occur when cultural innovations, such as the of animals and plants, impose novel selective pressures that favor specific genetic variants, leading to accelerated on millennial timescales. In humans, this feedback loop is evident in adaptations to post-Neolithic diets, where practices like and created environments that rewarded alleles enhancing or processing. Ancient DNA analyses reveal these changes were not gradual but involved strong, recent selection, with allele frequencies shifting dramatically within the last 10,000 years. A canonical example is (LP), the continued production of enzyme into adulthood, enabling digestion of in milk. This trait arose independently in multiple populations following cattle domestication around 10,000 years ago, with the European -13910C>T allele (LCT gene) undergoing intense positive selection in pastoralist societies of and the . from (circa 3000 years ago) shows LP frequencies below 10% in many groups, yet by AD 1200, they exceeded 70% in central , indicating ongoing selection with estimated coefficients up to 0.1–0.2 per generation. This rapid rise correlates directly with the cultural spread of dairy herding, providing a caloric advantage during famines or in calcium-poor soils, thus illustrating how dairying culture drove genetic adaptation. Similarly, variants in genes, particularly ADH1B*47His (rs1229984), show signatures of selection tied to practices. In East Asian populations, this allele, which accelerates ethanol conversion to (causing aversion and reducing risk), increased following rice domestication and around 7,000–10,000 years ago. Genetic modeling and analyses confirm positive selection, with the variant's frequency correlating with the expansion of wet-rice agriculture and associated alcohol production, suggesting cultural reliance on fermented beverages selected for protective metabolism. Convergent patterns appear in other regions, underscoring 's role in shaping metabolic genes. Ancient DNA evidence counters notions of evolutionary stasis post-agriculture, demonstrating millennia-scale sweeps in response to cultural niches. For instance, LP allele trajectories from to medieval samples quantify selection intensities incompatible with neutral drift, while ADH1B data align with archaeological records of . These interactions highlight causal chains where alters , favoring heritable variants that, in turn, reinforce cultural practices, driving into historical times.

Genetic basis of complex traits under selection

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified thousands of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with , enabling the construction of polygenic scores (PGS) that quantify genetic predisposition. Analyses of clines and patterns reveal signatures of recent positive selection on PGS for (EA), a proxy for cognitive , particularly in European-ancestry populations. For instance, SNPs from large-scale EA GWAS show enrichment in regions under selection pressure over the past few thousand years, with higher PGS frequencies in northern versus southern Europeans, consistent with adaptive responses to environmental or social demands. Similar patterns emerge for , where PGS derived from GWAS explain north-south gradients across . Ancestry-specific PGS calculations in ancient and modern samples indicate that genetic variants favoring increased stature have risen in frequency in northern latitudes, correlating with latitude-dependent selection possibly linked to nutritional or climatic factors, even after accounting for population stratification biases. This genetic signal persists despite debates over uncorrected stratification inflating earlier estimates, as refined models confirm a heritable basis for observed height differences. Selection on immune-related traits illustrates evolutionary trade-offs, where alleles enhancing resistance often elevate risks for . For example, variants in immune genes like those in the HLA region, under balancing or for infectious disease defense, confer heightened susceptibility to conditions such as and in post-pathogen environments. Recent genomic scans (2023) highlight how such trade-offs shaped frequencies, with immunity-boosting variants fixed or increased despite pleiotropic costs, reflecting net fitness benefits in ancestral settings. Empirical PGS data from 2023–2025 underscore that heritable genetic variance, captured by these scores, systematically differs across populations and explains substantial portions of phenotypic disparities in traits like and , beyond environmental confounders. For instance, EA and PGS exhibit between-population gradients aligning with observed mean differences, with twin and studies partitioning variance to at 50–80% levels, prioritizing polygenic contributions over nurture-only models where data conflict. This approach reveals causal genetic realism in group-level outcomes, as PGS portability tests and integrations affirm evolutionary divergence in spectra.

Methodological and empirical advances

Ancient DNA recovery and analysis

The recovery of () from remains faces inherent challenges due to post-mortem degradation, including fragmentation into short strands typically under 100 base pairs, chemical modifications such as leading to C-to-T transitions, and low endogenous DNA yields often below 1% in extracts. Early studies prior to 2010 were largely restricted to or low-coverage nuclear snippets, but post-2010 methodological innovations enabled genome-wide sequencing from archaic hominins and early sapiens.00714-0) A pivotal advance was the development of single-stranded library preparation protocols, first detailed in 2012, which facilitate adapter ligation directly to denatured, single-stranded DNA fragments, bypassing the need for double-stranded repair and thereby doubling or tripling library yields from highly degraded samples compared to double-stranded methods. Refinements like the ssDNA2.0 protocol in 2017 further optimized ligation efficiency using T4 DNA ligase, enhancing recovery from sub-nanogram quantities of input DNA. Concurrently, uracil-DNA glycosylase (UDG) treatments were refined to excise uracils resulting from deamination, minimizing sequencing errors from miscoded cytosines; partial UDG protocols, introduced around 2013-2015, apply incomplete enzymatic digestion to remove most damage while preserving diagnostic C-to-T patterns at fragment ends for authentication. These techniques yielded high-coverage archaic genomes, such as the Altai female sequenced at approximately 50-fold effective coverage in 2013, enabling detailed heterozygosity estimates and detection. Similarly, a genome from a finger bone achieved 30-fold coverage using single-stranded methods in 2012, with recent 2025 sequencing of a 200,000-year-old molar attaining high-coverage nuclear data for refined phylogenetic placement. For early Homo sapiens, applications by 2024-2025 produced genomes from 42,000-49,000-year-old European individuals at sufficient coverage (often >1x endogenous) to resolve admixture timing, leveraging UDG-treated libraries from petrous bone extracts. Authentication relies on verifying post-mortem damage (PMD) signatures, including elevated C-to-T substitutions at read ends and purine overrepresentation near breaks from depurination, quantified via tools like mapDamage. Contamination controls encompass dedicated cleanrooms, UV irradiation of extracts, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) duplicate removal, and computational estimation of modern human DNA intrusion using sex-specific markers or PMD-discordant reads; for instance, AuthentiCT models predict contamination rates in single-stranded libraries by contrasting damage profiles. These safeguards ensure sequences reflect endogenous ancient molecules, with damage patterns distinguishing authentic aDNA from laboratory contaminants lacking PMD.

Population genomic inference techniques

Population genomic inference techniques employ statistical models to reconstruct demographic histories, detect admixture and , and identify signatures of using (SNP) data from modern human genomes. These methods leverage patterns of , spectra, and to estimate parameters such as effective population sizes (Ne), divergence times, proportions, and locus-specific selection coefficients, often applied to whole-genome or array-based SNP datasets from diverse populations. Advances in computational efficiency have enabled their application to large-scale resources, enhancing power for fine-scale inferences while accounting for confounding factors like recombination and heterogeneity. For demographic inference, the pairwise sequentially Markovian (PSMC) model estimates historical Ne trajectories from heterozygosity decay along individual diploid genomes, modeling times via a hidden Markov process that infers population bottlenecks and expansions over thousands to millions of years. Introduced in , PSMC has been widely used to chart Ne fluctuations, such as the inferred bottleneck around 70,000 years ago, though it assumes no population structure and can bias estimates under admixture. Complementarily, approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) facilitates inference of complex scenarios, including times between populations, by simulating SNP data under candidate models and accepting parameter sets that closely match observed like frequencies or Fst. ABC's flexibility suits non-tractable likelihoods in , as in estimates of Out-of-Africa around 50,000–100,000 years ago, but requires careful prior specification and sufficient simulations to approximate posteriors accurately. Admixture and introgression are detected via tree-based statistics that quantify deviations from strict bifurcating phylogenies. Patterson's D-statistic (ABBA-BABA test), formalized in 2011, assesses by comparing derived allele sharing in a four-population configuration (e.g., ((H1,H2),P3),O), where significant imbalance (D ≠ 0) signals , as evidenced in Neanderthal-human admixture with D ≈ 0.1–0.2 for Eurasian lineages. The fd statistic extends this locally, scanning windows for excess divergence relative to neutral expectations to pinpoint introgressed segments, with elevated fd indicating donor proportions up to 5–10% in specific human archaic admixture tracts. Signatures of selection, particularly recent sweeps, are identified using branch-specific metrics like the branch statistic (), which normalizes Fst outliers along a phylogenetic branch (e.g., PBS > 0.05 for a -specific sweep) by comparing frequencies in a focal against two outgroups, isolating locus-specific drift or selection from genome-wide . has detected adaptations, such as in EDAR for East Asian traits, with scores exceeding thresholds under models of hard sweeps reducing diversity by 50–90%.00245-0) These techniques have gained power through integration with expansive SNP datasets from s; the released whole-genome sequences for 500,000 participants in 2023, enabling population-level estimates with unprecedented sample sizes for rare variant inference. Similarly, the program expanded its genomic data in 2025 to over 414,000 whole genomes from diverse U.S. ancestries, facilitating robust ABC and sweep scans across underrepresented groups while mitigating ascertainment biases in SNP arrays.

Integration with fossil and archaeological data

Genetic inferences from population genomics, estimating the primary out-of-Africa dispersal of anatomically modern humans at approximately 50,000–70,000 years ago, align with archaeological evidence of early Homo sapiens remains in the , such as those from Skhul and Qafzeh caves dated to 90,000–120,000 years ago, indicating initial forays followed by a successful expansion. This correlation validates genetic models of serial founder effects, where reduced diversity in non-African populations matches the timing of sustained migrations evidenced by Levantine tool assemblages and skeletal morphology consistent with modern humans. Admixture signals in modern genomes, particularly Denisovan introgression detected at 3–6% in some Oceanian populations, correspond directly to fossil evidence from in southern , where a juvenile finger bone and molar yielded DNA dated to 30,000–50,000 years ago, confirming the genetic distinctiveness of this archaic group from s. Similarly, Neanderthal admixture traces (1–2% in non-Africans) integrate with fossils from sites like , , dated ~40,000 years ago, where genomic data from extracted DNA elucidates interbreeding timing around 47,000–65,000 years ago during Eurasian dispersals. Discrepancies between estimates and fossil chronologies, such as potential ghost admixture events not initially tied to known remains, have been addressed through multi-omics integration, including ancient and stable from fossils, revealing hidden mixing between distinct archaic lineages. For instance, 2025 analyses of Denisovan-related dental from Siberian contexts identified mitochondrial lineages linking to early southern Siberian individuals, refining admixture models and causally explaining adaptive alleles in modern high-altitude populations via evidenced in both genomic and isotopic proxies for mobility. This approach prioritizes genetic data to reinterpret fossil morphologies, such as hybrid specimens like the ~90,000-year-old "Denny" from , as outcomes of rather than independent evolution.

Controversies and interpretive challenges

Debates on divergence timing and speciation models

Estimates of the human-chimpanzee divergence time have varied widely, with analyses yielding a broad range of 4 to 8 million years ago (mya), often calibrated using constraints such as the oldest putative hominin Sahelanthropus tchadensis dated to approximately 7 mya. evidence, including ape remains, suggests a later split closer to 5-6 mya, as earlier dates from clocks sometimes conflict with the absence of clear hominin s beyond 6-7 mya and imply improbably rapid morphological evolution post-divergence. Variations in clock rates across genomic regions, influenced by generation times (e.g., longer in great apes than previously assumed, exceeding 20 years), contribute to this discrepancy, with some models adjusting for relaxed clocks producing estimates up to 12 mya but lacking robust anchoring. Speciation models debate a clean vicariant split versus protracted divergence with ancient population structure or . Empirical genomic data, including discordant across loci where human-orangutan branches are shorter than expected, favor incomplete lineage sorting (ILS)—ancestral polymorphisms persisting through the split—over strict bifurcation, explaining up to 1-2% of the genome's topology mismatches without invoking hybridization. ILS patterns, pervasive across 29 nodes and comprising up to 64% of some branches, align with a rapid post-gorilla divergence around 8-10 mya, allowing times to lag divergence by millions of years. Early proposals for hybridization, based on variable divergence times and X-chromosome anomalies suggesting interbreeding over 4-7 mya, have faced scrutiny, as ILS alone recapitulates observed heterogeneity without requiring admixture, which would predict excess shared derived alleles not consistently detected. Critics argue hybridization models overcomplicate the signal, given that neutral processes under ILS suffice for most discordance, though low-divergence regions like megabase-scale sweeps on the may reflect selection amplifying ancient structure rather than . Refinements in the 2020s, leveraging high-quality assemblies from multiple individuals (including trio-phased data for accurate reconstruction), have narrowed the to 5.5-6.3 mya, reconciling clocks with fossils by accounting for structural variants and incomplete assemblies in prior references that underestimated by masking heterozygous sites. These advances reduce uncertainty from calibration biases and ILS confounding, supporting a model of isolation following a structured ancestral rather than prolonged admixture, though residual debates persist on the exact role of selection in sorting polymorphisms.

Genetic determinism vs. environmental influences

Twin and family studies consistently estimate the heritability of adult height at approximately 80%, indicating that genetic factors account for the majority of variation in this trait within populations. Similarly, meta-analyses of twin data reveal that the of intelligence, as measured by IQ tests, rises from around 20% in infancy to 50-80% in adulthood, with asymptotes near 80% by age 18-20. These figures derive from comparisons of monozygotic and dizygotic twins, which partition variance into additive genetic, shared environmental, and unique environmental components, demonstrating that shared family environments explain little beyond for such traits. Adoption studies further substantiate genetic predominance by showing minimal influence from rearing environments on outcomes like IQ. For instance, analyses of adoptees reared apart from biological parents yield IQ correlations with biological kin that exceed those with adoptive parents, with one study of 486 families estimating at 42% (95% CI: 21-64%) while finding negligible shared environmental effects in adulthood. Height follows a parallel pattern, where adoptees' stature aligns more closely with biological origins than adoptive family averages, rebutting environmentalist claims of near-complete malleability akin to Lockean doctrines. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) initially captured less variance than twin estimates—termed "missing "—but this gap reflects polygenicity, with thousands of common variants each contributing small effects, rather than negligible genetic influence. For , large-scale GWAS now explain up to 40-50% of heritability through identified loci, with the remainder attributable to rare variants and interactions not yet fully resolved. For IQ, SNP-based heritability hovers at 20-25%, increasing with sample size, underscoring that low initial hit rates stem from methodological limits in detecting diffuse polygenic signals, not absence of genetic causation. Gene-environment interactions (GxE) modulate trait expression but contribute modestly to overall variance, typically comprising 5-7% relative to . Empirical GxE heritability estimates from variance components models average around 6.8% across , suggesting environments amplify or suppress genetic potentials without supplanting them as primary drivers. In evolutionary terms, operates principally on additive genetic variance—the heritable component responsive to differential reproduction—enabling directional changes in traits like or cognitive despite environmental fluctuations. This framework counters blank-slate perspectives, which overemphasize nurture and underweight data from controlled designs, as evidenced by the persistence of genetic correlations across diverse rearing conditions in and twin cohorts.

Population differences and their evolutionary implications

Genetic differentiation among human populations is evident in distributions, with (FST) values averaging 0.10-0.15 between continental-scale groups such as Europeans, East Asians, and West Africans, reflecting historical isolation and local selection pressures. Although approximately 85% of total occurs within populations, the remaining structured component enables accurate clustering of individuals into continental ancestry groups with over 99% precision using multilocus genotypes, countering interpretations that dismiss between-group differences as negligible—a critique known as Lewontin's fallacy, which overlooks how correlated allele frequencies across many loci produce distinct population signals despite low average pairwise FST. These divergences contribute to (PRS) differences that predict mean trait disparities between s for complex phenotypes, such as , pigmentation, and metabolic traits, where continental-scale shifts in effect sizes explain portions of observed group variances alongside within-group (h2) estimates of 0.4-0.8. For instance, PRS derived from genome-wide association studies capture 5-15% of phenotypic variance within ancestries for traits like or , with between-population mean differences aligning with adaptive histories, such as lighter skin alleles enriched in northern latitudes due to synthesis needs. Such patterns reject purely social constructivist views of categories, as genetic clusters independently predict outcomes beyond environmental confounders, with FST effects manifesting causally in trait distributions. Evolutionary implications arise from accelerated divergence in isolated populations, where and localized selection amplify allele frequency shifts, fostering adaptations like hypoxia tolerance in high-altitude groups (e.g., EPAS1 variants in Tibetans fixed near 90% frequency via recent sweeps) or resistance alleles (e.g., Duffy negativity in Africans). These dynamics contribute to contemporary health disparities, including elevated risk in admixed or isolated lineages via thrifty gene hypotheses, where historical famine adaptations mismatch modern diets, underscoring causal roles of ancestry-specific over solely socioeconomic factors. In smaller, bottlenecked populations, reduced effective sizes heighten drift's influence, enabling rapid fixation of beneficial variants but also elevating recessive disease loads, as seen in founder effects among or . Overall, these findings highlight ongoing shaped by geography, with implications for precision medicine requiring ancestry-informed models to avoid underpredicting risks in non-European cohorts.

References

  1. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41576-022-00568-4
  2. https://www.nature.com/articles/nature01495.pdf
  3. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5182416/
  4. https://humanorigins.si.edu/evidence/genetics/ancient-dna-and-neanderthals
  5. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41576-020-00305-9
  6. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06705-1
  7. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41588-025-02117-1
  8. https://genomebiology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13059-015-0866-z
  9. https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1001342
  10. https://www.nature.com/articles/nature10842
  11. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.0509585102
  12. https://academic.oup.com/mbe/article/20/3/424/1035768
  13. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1235277/
  14. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8995062/
  15. https://academic.oup.com/mbe/article/25/9/1979/1303030
  16. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.10.17.618932v2.full-text
  17. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1449138/
  18. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC430260/
  19. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC166229/
  20. https://humanorigins.si.edu/evidence/genetics
  21. https://www.calacademy.org/explore-science/the-gorilla-genome
  22. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-08816-3
  23. https://bmcbiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12915-017-0428-9
  24. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7191052/
  25. https://academic.oup.com/mbe/article/22/3/650/1075932
  26. https://elifesciences.org/articles/24284
  27. https://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12864-020-6674-1
  28. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC187548/
  29. https://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12864-022-08828-7
  30. https://academic.oup.com/mbe/article/34/7/1669/3072060
  31. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC52649/
  32. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002929707604820
  33. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5991517/
  34. https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.0010056
  35. https://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12864-020-06962-8
  36. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5161654/
  37. https://newsroom.uw.edu/news-releases/improved-ape-genome-assemblies-give-human-evolution-insights
  38. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2751663/
  39. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15042088/
  40. https://www.uniprot.org/uniprotkb/Q9H6N6/entry
  41. https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.0040052
  42. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2754481/
  43. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5540548/
  44. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092867418303830
  45. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7475042/
  46. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.03.14.643395.full
  47. https://bmcbioinformatics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12859-019-2886-2
  48. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36928843/
  49. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11960464/
  50. https://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2164-15-599
  51. https://academic.oup.com/mbe/article/34/6/1391/3053366
  52. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1180675/
  53. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-08622-x
  54. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9712246/
  55. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3644635/
  56. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adn0609
  57. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3632468/
  58. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adq3010
  59. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9741939/
  60. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1567134823001260
  61. https://genomebiology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13059-025-03502-z
  62. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6165692/
  63. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3188841/
  64. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2405889121
  65. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092867419302181
  66. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5866234/
  67. https://www.cell.com/current-biology/pdf/S0960-9822%2825%2901117-0.pdf
  68. https://www.quora.com/How-much-Denisovan-ancestry-do-modern-humans-have-How-many-percent-of-Denisovan-DNA-do-modern-humans-have-and-what-can-it-tell-us-about-human-history-physiology-etc
  69. https://www.nature.com/articles/nature13408
  70. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2020803118
  71. https://www.sci.news/genetics/west-africans-dna-archaic-hominin-08123.html
  72. https://academic.oup.com/gbe/article/15/4/evad054/7092825
  73. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10208968/
  74. https://genomebiology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13059-017-1181-7
  75. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4134395/
  76. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4849557/
  77. https://elifesciences.org/articles/80757
  78. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abq7487
  79. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2953791/
  80. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1212380109
  81. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2674957/
  82. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.0507611102
  83. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2752555/
  84. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rstb.2011.0306
  85. https://investigativegenetics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/2041-2223-4-11
  86. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1988848/
  87. https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/~mmahoney/pubs/snps2.pdf
  88. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rstb.2020.0410
  89. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3759727/
  90. https://www.nature.com/articles/nature15393
  91. https://academic.oup.com/g3journal/article/3/5/891/6025675
  92. https://bmcgenomdata.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2156-10-39
  93. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092867422009916
  94. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-63340-2
  95. https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/news/2024-10-local-ancestry-inference-for-african-african-american-samples-in-gnomad/
  96. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266624772500082X
  97. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4856077/
  98. https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1001375
  99. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3525146/
  100. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2009227118
  101. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12383888/
  102. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2374902/
  103. https://www.nature.com/articles/jhg201260
  104. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18561327/
  105. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1182074/
  106. https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev.genet.37.110801.143820
  107. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8117455/
  108. https://www.nature.com/articles/hdy201116
  109. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3060623/
  110. https://academic.oup.com/mbe/article/33/5/1188/2579618
  111. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-66289-2
  112. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2675971/
  113. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1470945/
  114. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07911-1
  115. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2377015/
  116. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8452260/
  117. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9932995/
  118. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3024025/
  119. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S006526602400004X
  120. https://www.cell.com/current-biology/fulltext/S0960-9822%2820%2931277-X
  121. https://www.ucl.ac.uk/news/2022/jul/famine-and-disease-drove-evolution-lactose-tolerance-europe
  122. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982220311878
  123. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3900515/
  124. https://academic.oup.com/mbe/article/31/4/975/1108992
  125. https://bmcecolevol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2148-10-15
  126. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9547508/
  127. https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3000742
  128. https://www.mdpi.com/2624-8611/1/1/5
  129. https://europepmc.org/article/ppr/ppr333153
  130. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6428571/
  131. https://www.evolbio.mpg.de/3653020/evolutionary-trade-offs-balancing-genetic-disease-risks-and-pathogen-protection
  132. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0896841117304791
  133. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/twin-research-and-human-genetics/article/evolutionary-trends-of-polygenic-scores-in-european-populations-from-the-paleolithic-to-modern-times/E76E2C78FFC3DA9BDEB0BC8E37D9273D
  134. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06079-4
  135. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.0704665104
  136. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236047535_Single-stranded_DNA_library_preparation_for_the_sequencing_of_ancient_or_damaged_DNA
  137. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5449542/
  138. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4275898
  139. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0003269721000944
  140. https://www.nature.com/articles/nature12886
  141. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22936568/
  142. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.10.20.683404v1
  143. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-08420-x
  144. https://www.mpg.de/23820703/1204-evan-oldest-modern-human-genomes-sequenced-150495-x
  145. https://genomebiology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13059-020-02123-y
  146. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/20548923.2016.1258824
  147. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5867843/
  148. https://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-genom-111422-025117
  149. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3154645/
  150. https://academic.oup.com/bioinformatics/article/24/23/2713/180202
  151. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4271521/
  152. https://biobank.ndph.ox.ac.uk/ukb/label.cgi?id=180
  153. https://allofus.nih.gov/article/announcement-all-of-us-adds-data-from-50-more-participants-in-largest-data-expansion-to-date
  154. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3119552/
  155. https://australian.museum/learn/science/human-evolution/the-first-migrations-out-of-africa/
  156. https://www.nature.com/articles/nature09710
  157. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7612221/
  158. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2025/03/250318141412.htm
  159. https://www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674%2825%2900627-0
  160. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2025/08/250814090949.htm
  161. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227992906_Molecular_Clocks_Determining_the_Age_of_the_Human-Chimpanzee_Divergence
  162. https://science.psu.edu/news/scientists-narrow-time-limits-human-and-chimpanzee-split
  163. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3465393/
  164. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1600374113
  165. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3044849/
  166. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abn4409
  167. https://reich.hms.harvard.edu/sites/reich.hms.harvard.edu/files/inline-files/Patterson%2520et%2520al.2.pdf
  168. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2743777/
  169. https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1005451
  170. https://www.science.org/content/article/landmark-study-resolves-major-mystery-how-genes-govern-human-height
  171. https://www.nature.com/articles/mp2014105
  172. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/twin-research-and-human-genetics/article/wilson-effect-the-increase-in-heritability-of-iq-with-age/FF406CC4CF286D78AF72C9E7EF9B5E3F
  173. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8513766/
  174. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5985927/
  175. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-05275-y
  176. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002929724001782
  177. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3241417/
  178. https://reich.hms.harvard.edu/sites/reich.hms.harvard.edu/files/inline-files/guarav_fst_0.pdf
  179. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0049837
  180. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12879450/
  181. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9014184/
  182. https://academic.oup.com/emph/article/2019/1/26/5262222
  183. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8960389/
  184. https://genomemedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13073-024-01304-9
  185. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7787134/
  186. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4904122/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.