Hubbry Logo
Inuit cuisineInuit cuisineMain
Open search
Inuit cuisine
Community hub
Inuit cuisine
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Inuit cuisine
Inuit cuisine
Inuit cuisine
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Inuit elders eating maktaaq

Historically, Inuit cuisine, which is taken here to include the Greenlandic, the Yupʼik and Aleut cuisines, consisted of a diet of animal source foods that were fished, hunted, and gathered locally.

After hunting, they often honour the animals' spirit by singing songs and performing rituals. Although traditional or country foods still play an important role in the identity of Inuit, much food is purchased from the store, which has led to health problems and food insecurity.[1][2] According to Edmund Searles in his article Food and the Making of Modern Inuit Identities, they consume this type of diet because a mostly meat diet is "effective in keeping the body warm, making the body strong, keeping the body fit, and even making that body healthy".[3]

Food sources

[edit]

Hunting practices

[edit]
Toggling harpoon or unaaq MHNT

There has been a decline of hunting partially due to the fact that most young people lack the skills to survive off the land. They are no longer skilled in hunting like their ancestors and are growing more accustomed to the Qallunaat ("white people") food that they receive from the south. The high costs of hunting equipment—snowmobiles, rifles, sleds, camping gear, gasoline, and oil—is also causing a decline in families who hunt for their meals.[10]

An Inuk hunter skinning a ringed seal
  • Seal: Depending on the season, Inuit hunt for different types of seal: harp seal, harbour seal, and bearded seal. Ringed seals are hunted all year, while harp seals are only available during the summer.[9] Because seals need to break through the ice to reach air, they form breathing holes with their teeth and claws. Through these, Inuit hunters are able to capture seals.[9] When a hunter arrives at these holes, they set up a seal indicator that alerts the hunter when a seal is coming up for a breath of air. When the seal comes up, the hunter notices movement in the indicator and uses their harpoon, especially a toggling harpoon, to capture the seal in the water.[9]
Walrus hunting
  • Walrus: They are often hunted during the winter and spring since hunting them in summer is much more dangerous. A walrus is too large to be controlled by one person, so it cannot be hunted alone.[9] In Uqalurait: An Oral History of Nunavut, an Inuk elder describes the hunt of a walrus in these words: "When a walrus was sighted, the two hunters would run to get close to it and at a short distance it is necessary to stop when the walrus's head was submerged... the walrus would hear you approach. [They] then tried to get in front of the walrus and it was harpooned while its head was submerged. In the meantime, the other person would drive the harpoon into the ice through the harpoon loop to secure it."[9]
  • Bowhead whale: Similar to walrus, they are captured by harpoon. The hunters use active pursuit to harpoon the whale and follow it during attack. At times, Inuit were known for using a more passive approach when hunting whales. According to John Bennett and Susan Rowley, a hunter would harpoon the whale and instead of pursuing it, would "wait patiently for the winds, currents, and spirits to aid him in bringing the whale to shore".[9]
Bowhead whale (Balaena mysticetus), caught in an Inuit subsistence whale hunt in Igloolik, Nunavut in 2002
  • Caribou (reindeer): During the majority of the year, they roam the tundra in small herds, but twice a year large herds of caribou cross the inland regions. Caribou have excellent senses of smell and hearing so that the hunters must be very careful when in pursuit. Often, Inuit hunters set up camp miles away from the caribou crossing and wait until they are in full view to attack.[9] There are many ways in which the caribou can be captured, including spearing, forcing the animals into the river, using blinders, scaring them, and stalking them. When spearing caribou, hunters put the string of the spear in their mouths and the other end they use to gently spear the animal.[9]
  • Fish: They are caught by jigging. The hunter cuts a square hole in the ice on the lake and fishes using a fish lure and spear. Instead of using a hook on a line, Inuit use a fake fish attached to the line. They lower it into the water and move it around as if it is real. When the live fish approach it, they spear the fish before it has a chance to eat the fake fish.[9]

Nutrition

[edit]
Caribou meat from hunt. Greenland

Because the climate of the Arctic is ill-suited for agriculture and lacks forageable plant matter for much of the year, the traditional Inuit diet is lower in carbohydrates and higher in fat and animal protein compared to the global average. When carbohydrate intake is inadequate for total energy requirements, protein is broken down in the liver through gluconeogenesis and utilized as an energy source. Inuit studied in the 1970s were found to have abnormally large livers, presumably to assist in this process. Their urine volumes were also high, a result of additional urea which the body uses to purge waste products from gluconeogenesis.[11] However, in multiple studies the traditional Inuit diet has not been shown to be a ketogenic diet.[12][13][14][15] Not only have multiple researchers been unable to detect any evidence of ketosis resulting from the traditional Inuit diet, but the ratios of fatty-acid to glucose were observed to be well below the generally accepted level of ketogenesis.[12][13][14][15]

Inuit might consume more carbohydrates than most nutritionists have assumed.[16] Because some of the meat the Inuit eat is raw and fresh, or freshly frozen, they can obtain more carbohydrates from their meat, as dietary glycogen, than Westerners can.[16][17] The Inuit practice of preserving a whole seal or bird carcass under an intact whole skin with a thick layer of blubber also permits some proteins to ferment into carbohydrates.[16] Furthermore, the blubber, organs, muscle and skin of the marine mammals that Inuit eat have significant glycogen stores, which assist those animals when oxygen is depleted on prolonged dives.[18][19][20] For instance, when blubber is analyzed by direct carbohydrate measurements, it has been shown to contain as much as 8—30% carbohydrates.[19] While postmortem glycogen levels are often depleted through the onset of rigor mortis, marine mammals have a much delayed onset of rigor mortis, even in warm conditions, presumably due to the high content of oxymyoglobin in the muscle that may permit aerobic metabolism to continue slowly for some time after the death of the animal.[19][21] Additionally, in cold conditions, glycogen's depletion is halted at −18 °C (−0.4 °F) and lower temperatures in comminuted meat.[22][23]

Traditional Inuit diets derive approximately 50% of their calories from fat, 30–35% from protein and 15–20% of their calories from carbohydrates, largely in the form of glycogen from the raw meat they consumed.[24][25] This high fat content provides valuable energy and prevents protein poisoning, which historically was sometimes a problem in late winter when game animals grew lean through winter starvation. It has been suggested that because the fats of the Inuit's wild-caught game are largely monounsaturated and rich in omega-3 fatty acids, the diet does not pose the same health risks as a typical Western high-fat diet.[26] However, actual evidence has shown that Inuit have a similar prevalence of coronary artery disease as non-Inuit populations and they have excessive mortality due to cerebrovascular strokes, with twice the risk to that of the North American population.[27][28] Indeed, the cardiovascular risk of this diet is so severe that the addition of a more standard American diet has reduced the incidence of mortality in the Inuit population.[29] Furthermore, fish oil supplement studies have failed to support claims of preventing heart attacks or strokes.[30][31][32]

Vitamins and minerals which are typically derived from plant sources are nonetheless present in most Inuit diets. Vitamins A and D are present in the oils and livers of cold-water fishes and mammals. Vitamin C is obtained through sources such as reindeer liver, kelp, muktuk, and seal brain; because these foods are typically eaten raw or frozen, the vitamin C they contain, which would be destroyed by cooking, is instead preserved.[33]

Eating habits and food preparation

[edit]

Searles defines Inuit food as mostly "eaten frozen, raw, or boiled, with very little mixture of ingredients and with very few spices added".[3] Some preparations include:

One common way to eat the meat hunted is frozen. Many hunters will eat the food that they hunt on location where they found it. This keeps their blood flowing and their bodies warm. One custom of eating meat at the hunting site pertains to fish. In Overland to Starvation Cove: A History, Heinrich Klutschak explains the custom: "...no fish could be eaten in a cooked state on the spot where caught but could only be enjoyed raw; only when one is a day's march away from the fishing site is it permitted to cook the fish over the flame of a blubber lamp."[34]

Inuit eat only two main meals a day, but it is common to eat many snacks every hour.[34] Customs among Inuit when eating and preparing food are very strict and may seem odd for people of different cultures.[34]

When eating a meal, Inuit place large slabs of meat, blubber, and other parts of the animal on a piece of metal, plastic, or cardboard on the floor.[3] From here, anyone in the house is able to cut off a piece of meat. At these meals, no one is obliged to join in the meal; Inuit eat only when hungry.[3] Sometimes, though, meals are announced to the whole camp. A woman does this by the shout of "Ujuk!" which means "cooked meat".[34]

After a hunt, the eating habits differ from normal meals.[35] When a seal is brought home, the hunters quickly gather around it to receive their pieces of meat first. This happens because the hunters are the coldest and hungriest among the camp and need the warm seal blood and meat to warm them.[35] The seal is cut in a specific way directly after a hunt. Borré explains the cutting of the seal in this way: "one of the hunters slits the abdomen laterally, exposing the internal organs. Hunters first eat pieces of liver or they use a tea cup to gather some blood to drink."[35] At this time, hunters may also chop up pieces of fat and the brain to mix together and eat with meat.[35]

Women and children are accustomed to eating different parts of the seal because they wait until the hunters are done eating. Intestines are the first thing to be chosen and then any leftover pieces of the liver are consumed.[35] Finally, ribs and the backbone are eaten and any remaining meat is distributed among the camp.[35]

Food sharing in the community

[edit]

Inuit are known for their practice of food sharing, a form of food distribution where one person catches the food and shares with the entire community. Food sharing was first documented among the Inuit in 1910 when a little girl decided to take a platter around to four neighboring families who had no food of their own.[36]

Sharing of frozen, aged walrus meat among Inuit families

According to Uqalurait: An Oral History of Nunavut, "food sharing was necessary for the physical and social welfare of the entire group."[9] Younger couples would give food from their hunt to the elders, most often their parents, as a sign of respect. Food sharing was not only a tradition, but also a way for families to make bonds with one another. Once you shared food with someone, you were in a "lifelong partnership" with them.[9]

Inuit often are relentless in making known that they are not like Qallunaat in the sense that they do not eat the same food and they are communal with their food. Qallunaat believe that the person who purchases the food is the owner of the food and is free to decide what happens to the food. Searles describes the Inuit perspective on food by saying that "in the Inuit world of goods, foods as well as other objects associated with hunting, fishing, and gathering are more or less communal property, belonging not to individuals but to a larger group, which can include multiple households." Food in an Inuit household is not meant to be saved for the family who has hunted, fished, gathered, or purchased it, but instead for anyone who is in need of it. Searles and his wife were visiting a family in Iqaluit and he asked for permission to have a cup of orange juice. This small gesture of asking was taken as offensive because Inuit do not consider food belonging to one person.[3]

Perceived benefits and beliefs of the diet

[edit]
Arctic char fishing

The Inuit believe that their diet has many benefits over the western Qallunaat food. They believe that their diet will make one stronger, warmer, and full of energy.

One example is the drinking of seal blood. When interviewing an Inuk elder, Searles was told that "Inuit food generates a strong flow of blood, a condition considered to be healthy and indicative of a strong body."[3] After the consumption of seal blood and meat, one could look at their veins in the wrist for proof of the strength that Inuit food provides.[3] Borré states that "seal blood is seen as fortifying human blood by replacing depleted nutrients and rejuvenating the blood supply, it is considered a necessary part of the Inuit diet."[35]

Inuit also believe that eating raw meat keeps them warmer and stronger.[37] They say that raw meat takes effect on one's body when eaten consistently.[37] One Inuk, Oleetoa, who ate a combination of "Qallunaat" and Inuit food, told of a story of his cousin Joanasee who ate a diet consisting of mostly raw Inuit food. The two compared their strengths, warmth, and energy and found that Joanasee benefited most based on his diet.[3]

Inuit choose their diet based on four concepts, according to Borré: "the relationship between animals and humans, the relationship between the body and soul and life and health, the relationship between seal blood and Inuit blood, and diet choice." Inuit are especially spiritual when it comes to the customs of hunting, cooking, and eating. The Inuit belief is that the combination of animal and human blood in one's bloodstream creates a healthy human body and soul.[35]

Hunting beliefs

[edit]

A particularly strong belief held by the Inuit is about the relationship between seal and Inuit. According to Inuit hunters and elders, hunters and seals have an agreement that allows the hunter to capture and feed from the seal if only for the hunger of the hunter's family. Borré explains that through this alliance "both hunter and seal are believed to benefit: the hunter is able to sustain the life of his people by having a reliable source of food, and the seal, through its sacrifice, agrees to become part of the body of the Inuit."[35]

Inuit are under the belief that if they do not follow the alliances that their ancestors have laid out, the animals will disappear because they have been offended and will cease to reproduce.[35]

All saltwater animals, including seals, are considered to be always thirsty and are therefore offered a drink of fresh water as they die. This is shown as a sign of respect and gratitude toward the seal and its sacrifice. This offering is also done to please the spirit Sedna to ensure food supply.[9]

Healing beliefs

[edit]

Borré tells of a time when she saw an Inuk woman fall ill who blamed her sickness on the lack of seal in her diet. Once receiving seal meat, the woman felt better within hours and said that her quick recovery was due to the consumption of seal meat and blood. Borré experienced this many times among many different members of the group and they all attributed their sickness to the lack of Inuit food.[35]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Inuit cuisine

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Inuit cuisine comprises the traditional dietary practices of the peoples across regions including , , , and , centered on "country foods" harvested from the land and sea such as marine mammals (seal, , ), caribou, , birds, and limited seasonal like berries. This largely carnivorous regimen emphasizes high-fat, high-protein animal sources—including , organs, , and muscle—to deliver dense energy and nutrients essential for enduring extreme cold and seasonal scarcities, with raw consumption providing bioavailable vitamins such as C from fresh tissues. Foods are prepared raw, frozen, dried, fermented (as in from seal), or occasionally boiled, reflecting adaptations to fuel shortages and preservation needs in environments lacking timber for extensive cooking. Historically nomadic and underpin these practices, fostering nutritional resilience—evident in lower markers from omega-3-rich marine diets—though modernization and shifts have introduced market foods, altering traditional compositions. Culturally, sharing harvested foods reinforces community bonds, with iconic dishes like maktaq ( ) symbolizing sustenance and heritage tied to sustainable .

Historical Origins

Pre-European contact era

The pre-European contact era of Inuit cuisine originated with the Thule culture, which emerged in the region around 1000 AD and rapidly expanded eastward across the , supplanting earlier Dorset populations by the 13th century. This expansion facilitated the development of a specialized diet tailored to the 's extreme conditions, emphasizing high-energy yields from local fauna in the absence of or domesticated crops. Archaeological sites from Thule settlements, such as those in the Canadian High Arctic, reveal a subsistence economy centered on exploiting , with evidence of communal operations targeting bowhead whales during spring migrations. Seals formed the dietary staple, hunted via breathing-hole techniques on winter or from kayaks in summer open water, providing consistent access to , for and , and hides for . Walrus and beluga whales supplemented seal harvests in coastal areas, their rendered into oil essential for lamps and caloric intake amid scarce carbohydrates. Inland pursuits focused on caribou migrations in late summer and fall, using bows and arrows, while birds like ptarmigan and eiders, along with fish such as , offered seasonal variety. Tools including toggle-head harpoons, spears, and ulus (semicircular knives) unearthed at sites like Silumiut in demonstrate advanced butchering methods to preserve and process these protein-rich foods, minimizing waste in a resource-limited environment. Isotopic analysis of skeletal remains from confirms a marine-dominated diet, with ringed seals contributing the majority of protein and fat, reflecting adaptations to prey availability rather than diverse foraging. Seasonal encampments tracked animal movements—coastal for marine mammals in winter and spring, inland for caribou in autumn—ensuring caloric surplus from fat-heavy sources to combat and support mobility. Limited plant matter, such as roots or berries gathered in brief summers, played a minor role, underscoring the meat-centric baseline shaped by ecology. This system persisted without significant external inputs until Norse and later European encounters.

Post-contact dietary transitions

Following European contact, particularly from the mid-19th century onward, Inuit communities increasingly incorporated trade goods such as , , , biscuits, and tobacco, obtained through exchanges with the and whalers for furs and labor. These items, distributed via expanding trading posts, shifted from occasional supplements to staples by the early , altering consumption patterns away from near-exclusive reliance on animal-sourced foods. Colonial administrations and missionary activities reinforced this transition by advocating cooked, imported foods over traditional raw or fermented preparations, while government policies in —such as the 1950s High Arctic relocations of Inuit families—disrupted migratory and imposed dependence on rationed Western provisions like and canned goods through state-managed stores. In , Danish colonial governance similarly promoted market-based diets from the early , accelerating the replacement of country foods with processed imports amid urbanization and wage labor incentives. These interventions, intended to integrate into sedentary economies, empirically undermined nutritional self-sufficiency. The resultant dietary Westernization precipitated severe health declines, with tuberculosis incidence peaking in Canadian Inuit communities during the 1940s–1960s at rates up to 250 times the national average, where inadequate intake of nutrient-dense traditional foods heightened susceptibility to infection. Post-1950, caries prevalence escalated from 0–20% in early 19th-century cohorts to over 80% in some groups, directly tied to refined consumption eroding enamel protection afforded by prior low-sugar, high-protein diets. By the late , rates in climbed to 25–40%—comparable to southern —while prevalence surged 2–5-fold, driven by high-sugar processed foods and sedentariness replacing the metabolic resilience of ancestral high-fat regimens; data refute modernization's purported benefits, evidencing instead iatrogenic epidemics from imposed carbohydrate-heavy shifts.

Environmental and Geographical Foundations

Adaptations to Arctic conditions

The environment imposes severe constraints on food availability, characterized by prolonged winters with average temperatures of -30°C and extremes reaching -50°C, that precludes , and a brief of 6–8 weeks where are sparse and low in calories. These conditions necessitate a cuisine centered on mobile, fat-abundant marine and terrestrial animals, which provide reliable, high-density energy sources year-round, unlike sessile vulnerable to and . Traditional Inuit caloric intake ranged from approximately 3,000 to 4,000 kcal per day, with males often exceeding 3,800 kcal to offset heightened basal metabolic rates and physical exertion in cold-induced . Dietary fat, comprising 50% or more of calories, supports by fueling non-shivering heat production and efficient , while the low-carbohydrate profile—derived from incidental plant matter or animal —favors metabolic shifts toward beta-oxidation of fatty acids, aided by genetic adaptations such as CPT1A variants prevalent in populations. These enable sustained activity without reliance on glucose, with dietary-induced thermogenesis from protein and fat estimated at 10% of . Limited , averaging under 1,000 hours annually, restricts cutaneous synthesis, prompting dependence on animal-derived sources like seal blubber and livers, which deliver cholecalciferol in bioavailable forms. Similarly, requirements (minimal 10 mg daily to avert ) are met through raw or fermented meats and organs, where fresh caribou liver yields 24 mg per 100 g and skin provides additional ascorbate preserved by avoiding heat degradation. In a resource-scarce , adaptations emphasize maximal extraction from each harvest: entire carcasses are partitioned for (meat, organs, marrow), (blubber lamps), and materials (hides for igloo covers and clothing, bones and sinews for tools), yielding near-zero waste and compounding caloric efficiency in an ecosystem where failed hunts could prove fatal. This holistic utilization reflects causal imperatives of survival, prioritizing empirical yield over selective consumption, with ethnographic records confirming multi-purpose processing of seals and caribou to sustain communities through lean periods.

Primary Food Sources

Marine mammals and fish

Marine mammals constitute the primary source of protein and fat for coastal Inuit groups, delivering high caloric density and essential nutrients adapted to Arctic conditions. Seals, including ringed (Pusa hispida) and harp (Pagophilus groenlandicus) species, are harvested extensively for their blubber, which provides concentrated energy and omega-3 fatty acids critical for thermoregulation and cardiovascular health. Ringed seals, in particular, form the largest dietary component due to their prevalence near ice edges and breathing holes, yielding blubber with superior polyunsaturated fat profiles compared to terrestrial alternatives. Whales such as beluga (Delphinapterus leucas) and bowhead (Balaena mysticetus) are pursued during communal hunts, offering substantial yields that sustain multiple families; a single beluga can supply hundreds of kilograms of meat and , historically meeting up to two-thirds of caloric needs in some communities. These harvests emphasize fat-rich components, which genetic adaptations enable to metabolize efficiently for prolonged energy in harsh climates. Fish like (Salvelinus alpinus) provide year-round access via and anadromous runs, serving as a lean protein complement to fattier marine mammals and ensuring dietary diversity across seasons. Regional differences influence emphases: in , ice-dependent hunting prioritizes seals and beluga at polynyas, while Greenland's open-water access supports broader pursuits under subsistence quotas.

Terrestrial game and birds

Caribou, known locally as tuktu, served as a cornerstone of the terrestrial protein supply for inland Inuit communities, providing lean meat rich in iron—approximately 5 milligrams per palm-sized portion—and essential for sustaining energy during migrations and winter scarcities. This game animal's flesh was often consumed fresh or in stews flavored with available berries, contributing high-protein, low-fat that complemented fattier marine imports through trade networks. Birds supplemented the diet with seasonal abundance, particularly ptarmigan, a ground-dwelling species yielding iron-dense meat at about 10 milligrams per similar serving, and migratory geese offering bursts of protein during spring and fall influxes. These fowl provided variety in an otherwise mammal-dominated inland regimen, with their eggs and meat valued for portability and rapid procurement in open terrains. Polar bear meat represented a sporadic, high-reward option in northern ranges, prized for its caloric density despite the dangers posed by its liver, which Inuit traditionally avoided due to acute toxicity from excessive accumulation—capable of causing liver damage, hemorrhage, and death even in small quantities. Consumption focused on muscle tissue to mitigate risks while harnessing the bear's role as an apex terrestrial predator. Inland reliance on these resources necessitated exchange systems with coastal groups, where caribou meat and hides were bartered for marine fats during herd absences, ensuring nutritional balance across ecosystems. Such networks underscored the adaptive interdependence in Inuit procurement, preventing deficiencies from terrestrial leanness alone.

Plant and incidental foods

In traditional Inuit diets, plant foods played a supplemental role, gathered primarily during the short Arctic summer to provide vitamins and minor carbohydrates amid otherwise scarce vegetation. Berries such as crowberries (Empetrum nigrum), noted for their nutritional addition to subarctic diets, were collected fresh or preserved through fermentation or drying for winter use. Roots, tubers, and herbaceous stems from tundra species like sweet vetch were foraged opportunistically, often yielding small yields due to permafrost and harsh conditions. A distinctive incidental source of starch came from "mousefood," consisting of roots and bulbs cached by such as voles and lemmings in burrows; excavated these stores, sometimes replenishing them with to sustain the rodents for future harvests. Lichens, including (Umbilicaria spp.) and reindeer lichens (Cladina spp.), supplemented diets in lean periods, valued for their availability year-round despite limited digestibility. and , such as Arctic kelp (qiqquat), were occasionally harvested from coastal areas as a fallback, though consumption was restrained due to potential digestive discomfort from their richness. Empirical analyses of pre-contact and early post-contact Inuit subsistence confirm that carbohydrates from these plants contributed less than 10% of total caloric intake, underscoring their marginal energetic role relative to animal sources while countering notions of balanced plant reliance in Arctic adaptations.

Harvesting Practices

Traditional techniques and tools

Inuit hunters employed harpoons (unaq) with detachable heads and floats to pursue marine mammals such as seals and whales from kayaks (qajaq), lightweight skin-covered boats optimized for stealth and maneuverability in open water. These tools allowed precise strikes to retrieve animals that might otherwise escape, leveraging hydrodynamic designs tested over generations in Arctic conditions. For winter seal hunts, hunters constructed houses (igloos) near breathing holes in the , waiting in ambush to harpoon seals as they surfaced for air, a method reliant on intimate knowledge of ice formation and animal respiration patterns. Dog sleds facilitated transport to hunting grounds and hauling of carcasses across and , with teams of hardy Inuit dogs pulling loads efficiently in subzero temperatures. For fish and birds, techniques included ice fishing through hand-chiseled holes using bone or antler hooks baited with smaller fish or meat, often conducted in groups to share labor and vigilance against cracking ice. Bird procurement involved elevated sealskin nets on poles made from narwhal tusk or driftwood to capture migratory species like dovekies during nesting seasons, minimizing energy expenditure while maximizing yield. Traplines, consisting of snares or deadfalls set along migration routes, targeted ptarmigan and other ground birds, positioned based on observed trails and seasonal movements. Empirical forecasting integrated observations of animal behavior—such as seal surfacing frequency or flock directions—to anticipate storms or ice shifts, enabling safer expeditions and reducing risks from sudden weather changes. Following a kill, maximized resource efficiency by utilizing nearly every part: meat and for sustenance, hides for clothing and boats, bones and sinew for tools, and intestines for waterproof linings, a practice that ensured survival in resource-scarce environments without the waste implied in external ethical critiques. This comprehensive exploitation reflected causal adaptations to caloric demands and material needs, derived from direct environmental interactions rather than imposed ideals.

Seasonal cycles and modern adjustments

Inuit harvesting practices have historically synchronized with seasonal rhythms, particularly the spring pupping of ringed seals (Pusa hispida), which occurs from late March to May and provides accessible fat-rich prey on thinning , enabling communities to stockpile for the lean summer period. Fall caribou (Rangifer tarandus) migrations, typically peaking in to , concentrate herds for communal hunts yielding hundreds of animals per group in pre-contact eras, averting risks during the subsequent long winter when mobility was limited by snow and darkness. These cycles enforced alternating feasts of marine and terrestrial bounty against periods of scarcity, with ethnographic records from the early documenting harvest peaks aligning with animal availability to sustain nutritional needs amid variable and weather. Post-1950s technological shifts, including widespread adoption by the 1960s and proliferation in the 1970s, enhanced harvest efficiency by extending travel ranges up to 100-200 km daily compared to dog-team limits of 20-50 km, allowing pursuit of migrating herds over greater distances and reducing energy expenditure on hunts. However, these changes disrupted intergenerational transmission, as reliance on mechanical reliability supplanted nuanced tracking and ice expertise passed via apprenticeships, with oral histories noting fewer youth mastering traditional cues amid centralized settlements post-1950s. Contemporary quotas, formalized under Nunavut's Total Allowable Harvest (TAH) framework since 1999, have curtailed yields—for instance, George River caribou harvests dropped to zero under a 2018 ban amid a 75% from 1993 peaks, yet monitoring data through 2023 indicates ongoing herd contraction without reversal, suggesting limited benefits from restrictions alone. Similar patterns appear in beluga quotas, capped at 58-62 animals annually in certain regions for population stability, correlating with reported household harvest reductions and heightened food insecurity rates sixfold above Canadian averages as of 2011 surveys. These measures, while aimed at conservation, have not uniformly stemmed declines attributed to multifaceted pressures, prompting critiques in Indigenous-led reports of overly rigid enforcement impeding adaptive harvesting without commensurate ecological gains.

Culinary Preparation and Preservation

Raw consumption and fermentation

Inuit cuisine features extensive raw consumption of marine and terrestrial animal tissues, including seal, , (maktaaq), fish, and organ meats such as liver and , which are eaten frozen or thawed minimally to retain heat-labile nutrients. This practice leverages the Arctic's subzero temperatures for natural preservation, minimizing oxidation and enzymatic degradation while enabling immediate bioavailability of vitamins sensitive to cooking, such as in raw caribou liver (24 mg per 100 g) and seal (15 mg per 100 g). Fermentation serves as a key uncooked preservation method, transforming raw meats and into durable staples through anaerobic microbial activity in controlled environments. , typically prepared from seal flippers, , or , involves cutting the raw tissue into pieces, sealing it in animal skins or burying it in caches during summer, where it ferments over weeks to months under partial freezing, yielding a soft, pungent product rich in . Similarly, ujuk or preparations, such as qaqquq from heads, follow anaerobic in sealed pokes or ground pits, extending shelf life beyond fresh freezing by inhibiting spoilage through acidification. These methods rely on empirical cues from environmental conditions—rapid burial post-harvest, reliance on consistent cold for initial freezing to curb initial proliferation, and timely retrieval for consumption—to mitigate risks inherent in raw handling, distinct from uncontrolled decay. Traditional protocols emphasize small-batch processing and community oversight to ensure halts at edibility, prioritizing nutrient retention over pathogen-free sterility achievable only through modern .

Limited cooking methods and storage

Due to the scarcity of combustible materials like wood in the Arctic tundra, Inuit cooking methods emphasized fuel efficiency, often utilizing open flames sparingly for or stewing meats and broths in vessels or animal-skin containers. 's high heat retention made it particularly suitable for these environments, allowing sustained cooking with minimal fuel input compared to open-fire . Heated stones were frequently added to water in non-heat-resistant containers to facilitate without direct flame contact, a technique that reduced fuel consumption and risk of container damage. Starchy or liquid-based preparations, such as blood-thickened stews from caribou or seal, were simmered over small fires when fuel permitted, incorporating organ meats and fats for nourishment and cohesion. These methods prioritized over complexity, reflecting the causal demands of a where or animal fats served as primary, irregularly available fuels. Preservation techniques complemented these constraints by extending food usability without reliance on heat. meats and in airy caches or over low smokes dehydrated them to curb spoilage, with smoking adding compounds from sparse fuels like seal blubber. For long-term winter storage, foods were buried in -dug cellars or pits, leveraging the ground's consistent subzero temperatures—often around -10°C to -20°C—to freeze provisions like seal pokes and without artificial . These caches, lined with skins or stones, prevented thaw-induced rot and supported seasonal food security amid extended darkness and immobility. Flavors derived primarily from animal fats' inherent richness, with scarce plant-based seasonings limited by botanical sparsity.

Nutritional Profile

Macronutrients and energy sources

The traditional Inuit diet is characterized by a high-fat macronutrient profile, with fats typically providing 40-50% of total caloric intake, sourced predominantly from the blubber of marine mammals like seals and whales. This reliance on animal fats, including monounsaturated and polyunsaturated varieties from sea mammals, serves as the primary energy source, enabling efficient utilization through beta-oxidation and ketone production to meet metabolic demands in a carbohydrate-scarce environment. Historical analyses of East Greenland Inuit diets, excluding imported foods, indicate fat contributions around 49% of energy, underscoring the diet's adaptation to Arctic conditions where fat-dense foods ensure caloric density and insulation against cold. Protein constitutes a moderate 30-45% of calories, derived from lean meats of , birds, and terrestrial game, but is carefully balanced with fats to prevent metabolic overload. Excessive lean protein intake without sufficient fat or carbohydrates can lead to protein poisoning, or "rabbit starvation," a condition where the liver's capacity to process from is overwhelmed, resulting in , , and potentially fatal hyperaminoacidemia. practices mitigate this by prioritizing fat-rich portions, such as and organ fats, maintaining protein energy below thresholds that exceed hepatic gluconeogenic limits, typically around 35-50% of total energy. Dietary carbohydrates remain minimal, often under 10% of calories or less than 50 grams per day in traditional contexts, primarily from incidental sources like animal , limited berries, and intestinal contents of herbivores. Studies from the mid-20th century, including reanalyses of data, confirm carbohydrate intakes as low as 8-10% in pre-contact-like diets, contrasting sharply with modern Western norms exceeding 200 grams daily from refined sources. This low-carb framework shifts energy toward fat and protein oxidation, supporting sustained in extreme cold without reliance on glucose-dependent pathways.

Micronutrients from animal tissues

Traditional Inuit diets derive vitamin C primarily from raw or minimally processed animal organs, such as seal liver, which contains approximately 35 mg per 100 g fresh weight, providing daily intakes around 21 mg from and organs alone. This bioavailable form, preserved through avoidance of cooking—which destroys heat-labile —enabled populations to maintain adequate levels without plant sources, averting historically observed among European explorers reliant on cooked meats. Similarly, caribou liver supplies about 24 mg per 100 g, contributing to overall sufficiency in terrestrial components of the diet. Adrenal glands from seals and other marine mammals further concentrate , supporting metabolic needs in environments devoid of fresh produce. Vitamin D, essential for calcium absorption and rickets prevention, abounds in the oils and livers of fish and marine mammals consumed by , with traditional foods ensuring near-100% adequacy in surveyed populations. Fish liver oils, in particular, deliver high concentrations of cholecalciferol, compensating for limited exposure in polar regions and maintaining skeletal health through dietary provision rather than endogenous synthesis. Heme iron and from animal blood, meat, and organs exhibit superior compared to non-heme forms in , where phytates inhibit absorption by up to several-fold. In diets, these micronutrients from sources like seal and caribou provide 28-54% of iron needs via highly absorbable , unencumbered by plant anti-nutritional factors. Omega-3 fatty acids, including EPA and DHA, concentrate in fats at 15-45% of total fatty acids, offering essential precursors directly from dietary .

Health and Physiological Impacts

Genetic adaptations to high-fat diet

The exhibit genetic variants that facilitate efficient of a diet dominated by animal fats, primarily from marine mammals, which can comprise up to 50% or more of caloric intake as saturated and polyunsaturated fats. These adaptations, shaped by over millennia in environments with limited sources, prioritize fatty acid oxidation and over glucose dependence, enabling sustained energy production during periods of food scarcity or extreme cold. Empirical genomic studies confirm positive selection signals in genes, distinguishing Inuit ancestry from non- populations. A prominent example is the variant (rs11558492, encoding the P479L substitution), which occurs at frequencies exceeding 70% in many groups, such as approximately 77% in and 68% in Alaskan Inuit. This enhances carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1A enzyme activity, promoting mitochondrial transport and β-oxidation of long-chain s, thereby supporting body production as an source. On a traditional high-fat, , carriers display modified circulating profiles, including elevated omega-3 levels and reduced glucose reliance, which correlate with lower incidence compared to non-carriers or Western-diet contexts. This variant's selective sweep is attributed to its role in conserving glucose for function amid chronic and risks, rather than direct alone. Additional variants, such as those in the TBX15 locus (potentially involving archaic hominin with Denisovan-like ancestry), influence differentiation and thermogenic capacity, optimizing fat storage and mobilization for heat generation in cold climates. A 2015 University of Oxford-led study of genomes identified TBX15 mutations that improve fat efficiency, enabling tolerance of diets high in saturated fats without equivalent increases in deleterious accumulation, thus contributing to historically low rates despite fat intakes often surpassing 40% of energy from saturated sources. However, these same variants are causally linked to reduced stature, averaging 5-10 cm shorter than in non-adapted populations, reflecting a metabolic favoring energy efficiency over linear growth.

Empirical outcomes of traditional vs. modern diets

Prior to widespread adoption of imported Western foods in the mid-20th century, populations exhibited exceptionally low rates of (CVD) and , with assessments from the 1950s to 1970s documenting near absence of these conditions among those adhering to traditional high-fat, low-carbohydrate diets primarily from marine mammals, , and land animals. and clinical data from Alaskan on such diets revealed minimal and , contrasting sharply with contemporaneous Western populations where refined carbohydrates and sugars dominated. The dietary transition, accelerating post-1950s with increased availability of store-bought carbohydrates, sugars, and processed foods, correlated with marked health deteriorations, including elevated and metabolic disorders. In communities, surveys indicate 72% of adults were or obese by the early , a surge linked to reduced country food intake and higher consumption of nutrient-poor, high-glycemic imports. Historical analyses of from the 1970s highlight declining nutritional status and emerging chronic conditions as traditional foods were supplanted by refined carbs, undermining the metabolic resilience afforded by ancestral diets. This shift parallels broader patterns where increased and intake precipitated rises in coronary heart disease and , challenging low-fat paradigms that overlooked carbohydrate-driven insulin dysregulation. Contemporary efforts to revive traditional diets demonstrate restorative effects on biomarkers, with Inuit following higher country food patterns showing reduced CVD risk factors such as lower triglycerides and improved glycemic control compared to Westernized eaters. Controlled interventions in Inuit found traditional high-fat, low-carb marine-based diets marginally superior for daily glucose and profiles versus Western alternatives, supporting causal links between reintroducing animal-sourced nutrients and metabolic recovery. These outcomes underscore how modern dietary imports, often promoted without regard for ancestral adaptations, have fueled epidemics of and , while empirical reversals via country foods affirm the physiological benefits of reverting to pre-transition patterns.

Cultural and Social Roles

Community sharing and social bonds

Inuit societies maintain egalitarian resource distribution through obligatory food sharing, which mitigates the risks of variable in the Arctic's harsh conditions by pooling harvests across households via and networks. Anthropological studies in communities, such as , demonstrate that sharing country foods like seal and caribou not only equalizes access but also builds , with households deriving influence and reciprocal benefits from generous distribution. Post-hunt meat allocation exemplifies this reciprocity: successful hunters divide catches on-site or upon return, apportioning portions to , extended relatives, and non-hunting neighbors to prevent waste and starvation during lean periods, as documented in Akulivik where game is systematically redistributed among villagers. This practice fosters alliances, as recipients acknowledge obligations through future aid or shares, contrasting with market economies where surpluses accrue individually. Communal eating further strengthens bonds, with groups passing long cuts of raw or clockwise during meals in shared spaces like igloos or tents, emphasizing consumption over personal portions and reinforcing interdependence for . Norms against , enforced by social scrutiny and prestige tied to —as seen in where withholding invites exclusion—empirically curb accumulation, promoting household-level equalization absent in individualistic systems.

Rituals, beliefs, and taboos

In traditional Inuit cosmology, animals were believed to possess souls or spirits (anirniit) that required respectful treatment to ensure the success of future hunts, as offended spirits could withhold themselves from hunters. This belief manifested in rituals such as offering to the mouths of freshly killed seals or before butchering, symbolizing gratitude and appeasement to prevent scarcity. Similarly, hunts among communities in northern held profound spiritual significance, viewed as communal prayers and quests where the whale's voluntary offering sustained both physical and metaphysical life, with captains performing preparatory charms and post-harvest ceremonies to honor the animal's essence. Certain food taboos reinforced these beliefs, often aligning with empirical risks; for instance, liver was strictly avoided due to its lethal content, which could induce , a passed down orally and resulting in its designation as , typically reserved for dogs rather than consumption. Such prohibitions extended to other practices, like refraining from wasteful , deemed sinful as it offended animal souls and jeopardized communal survival. Following European contact in the 18th and 19th centuries, Christian influences, particularly Moravian and Anglican, led to where many integrated biblical tenets with indigenous spirituality, diminishing some animistic rituals while retaining core respect for game. For example, shaman-mediated taboos related to menstrual or death impurities affecting food handling waned, replaced or blended with Christian prohibitions, though traditional avoidance of certain organs persisted as practical safeguards rather than purely spiritual mandates.

Contemporary Developments

Climate change effects on food security

Thinning sea ice has disrupted traditional Inuit seal hunting by reducing ice stability and duration, making access to breathing holes and haul-out sites more hazardous and unpredictable. In regions like the , communities report hampered seal harvests due to shorter ice seasons and thinner coverage, as documented in assessments of rapid environmental changes. Similarly, unreliable ice conditions have increased risks of equipment loss, injuries, and fatalities during hunts, further limiting reliable access to ringed seals, a staple protein source. Shifts in caribou migrations and population declines since the early 2000s have reduced harvest predictability for communities dependent on these herds. Migratory caribou numbers peaked in the but fell by approximately 65% across monitored herds by the , with specific populations like the Bathurst herd dropping from peaks to critically low levels amid changing vegetation and weather patterns. In , the George River caribou herd declined by 99% from over 800,000 in 2001, altering traditional harvesting ranges and contributing to broader access challenges. These changes, linked to empirical observations of warmer conditions affecting calving grounds and forage, have prompted shifts in locations, though overall yields remain diminished. Such disruptions have led to estimated declines in country food harvests, with studies modeling 2010s data indicating potential 20-30% reductions in key species availability under observed climate variability, heightening dependence on expensive southern imports that strain household budgets in remote areas. A 2016 analysis of Canadian communities highlighted how reduced harvests from climate-driven factors like thaw and ice loss lower nutrient intake from traditional sources, exacerbating nutritional vulnerabilities without immediate substitutes. However, empirical reveals that local emits far less than equivalent imported foods; a 2024 Bayesian model of harvests found that replacing them with market meats would generate over 1,000 metric tons more CO2 equivalents annually per community, underscoring the inefficiency of import-focused strategies. This data challenges for curtailing traditional practices in favor of global supply chains, which overlook local emissions advantages and supply vulnerabilities.

Revival initiatives and hybrid diets

In recent years, initiatives in have sought to revive traditional practices through education and subsidies, aiming to bolster access to country foods amid economic pressures. The Nunavut Food Security Coalition has implemented community-based programs that teach harvesting skills, contributing to sustained activities and correlating with localized reductions in household food insecurity rates, as evidenced by participant reports of increased reliance on nutrient-dense wild game and marine mammals. Similarly, government-backed hunter support programs, expanded post-2010, provide equipment subsidies and fair compensation for furs and sealskins, enabling broader distribution of country foods and mitigating dependency on costly imported staples. In Greenland, parallel efforts emphasize the integration of traditional foods into daily diets, with research programs post-2010 investigating the microbial benefits of fermented Inuit staples like raw fish and game to promote their cultural and nutritional reclamation. These revival strategies often manifest in hybrid diets that blend country foods—such as seal, , and caribou—with store-bought items, prioritizing the former for their superior provision of bioavailable proteins, fats, and micronutrients like and omega-3 fatty acids, which are scarce in processed imports. This approach addresses nutritional gaps in transitional diets, where over-reliance on market foods has historically elevated risks of deficiencies and chronic conditions. Empirical studies from 2022 to 2024 underscore improvements from heightened intake. A randomized crossover trial in participants demonstrated that a four-week traditional diet—rich in raw marine mammals and fish—enhanced daily glycemic control and lipid profiles compared to a Western diet, potentially slowing progression to , particularly in carriers of risk variants like TBC1D4. Metagenomic analyses of youth microbiomes revealed greater diversity and distinct profiles linked to frequent consumption of raw and fermented country foods, suggesting protective effects against metabolic disorders through modulated gut flora. These findings indicate that hybrid diets emphasizing traditional elements can restore resilience and metabolic stability eroded by modernization.

Controversies and Critiques

Sustainability debates

Debates on the sustainability of hunting practices center on contrasting narratives: environmental NGOs often portray traditional harvests of marine mammals like seals as contributing to , while empirical assessments indicate that subsistence-level by low-density populations maintains ecological balance through renewable yields. With approximately 65,000 in and similar numbers across regions, annual harvests remain modest—typically numbering in the low thousands for species like s—far below commercial scales and calibrated to observed population recoveries. from biodiversity reports show marine mammal populations, including seals, exhibiting overall increases or stability in harvest areas, driven by factors like reduced historical rather than depletion from Indigenous practices. Critics of international hunting restrictions, such as the 2009 seal products ban, argue that such measures overlook the superior efficacy of Inuit (TEK) in monitoring and regulating local populations compared to remote regulatory bodies. Inuit hunters employ on-the-ground observations of animal , migration patterns, and conditions to adjust harvests dynamically, a system honed over millennia that has sustained species without the need for external quotas in many cases. Bans imposed by distant entities, often influenced by urban-based campaigns, have been critiqued for disregarding this localized expertise, leading to economic hardships without verifiable conservation benefits, as seal populations in regulated Inuit territories have not shown declines attributable to harvesting. Empirical studies attribute primary pressures on Arctic marine mammals to climate-induced changes, such as loss altering migration and access, rather than Inuit hunting as the dominant causal factor. For instance, ringed and foraging patterns have shifted due to thinner and warmer waters, reducing predictable availability for hunters without evidence of crashes from levels. NGO narratives emphasizing hunting-driven declines have been challenged by co-produced Inuit-scientist research, which highlights degradation from anthropogenic warming—evidenced by a 13% per decade Arctic loss since —as the overriding influence, contrasting with stable or recovering mammal stocks under traditional management. This underscores a causal realism where localized, adaptive subsistence practices align with long-term viability, countering unsubstantiated overharvesting claims.

Ethical and regulatory conflicts

The European Union's 2009 regulation banning the import of seal products, effective from 2010, included exemptions for and other Indigenous communities but proved largely ineffective in practice, as commercial markets for exempted products remained inaccessible due to ethical stigma and labeling requirements. This led to significant economic losses for hunters, exacerbating rates and contributing to a documented rise in in northern Canadian communities reliant on sealing income. Animal rights organizations, such as the (IFAW), campaigned against the hunt on grounds of cruelty, yet veterinary assessments in peer-reviewed studies have concluded that Canadian seal harvests employ methods resulting in rapid unconsciousness, comparable to or exceeding the humaneness of slaughter in commercial . traditional practices emphasize quick kills using tools like hakapiks, minimizing suffering in ways that contrast with the prolonged stress in factory farming, though such comparisons are often dismissed by activists prioritizing sentiment over empirical kill-speed data. Regulatory frameworks, including (IWC) quotas for aboriginal subsistence whaling, permit limited harvests—such as 67 bowhead whale strikes annually for Alaskan communities, plus carry-forward allowances—while imposing international oversight that some leaders view as eroding cultural . These quotas, renewed periodically (e.g., through 2025 for certain stocks), stem from negotiations but have faced challenges from nations, creating tensions where subsistence needs clash with global conservation norms perceived as detached from realities. Critics from advocacy groups argue that such regulations, influenced by urban-based NGOs, overlook the nutritional indispensability of marine mammals; for instance, provides up to 35% of iron intake in some regions, filling voids in store-bought alternatives prone to spoilage and high costs in remote areas. Defenses of Inuit practices emphasize cultural against external moral impositions, with data indicating no collapse in seal populations attributable to Indigenous harvests, countering claims from biased advocacy sources that prioritize animal rights over human nutritional imperatives. Canadian reports highlight how bans ignore verifiable poverty spikes—Nunavut's rate exceeds 50%, linked partly to diminished country food access—favoring ideological vegan advocacy from organizations like PETA, which generate funding through emotive campaigns while disregarding Inuit food insecurity metrics showing reliance on high-fat traditional diets for metabolic . These conflicts underscore a pattern where regulatory actions, often driven by European public opinion polls rather than Arctic-specific evidence, undermine without addressing causal links between sealing/ prohibitions and heightened dependency on imported, nutrient-poor foods.

References

  1. https://www.thefirstsupperbooks.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Inuit-Foodways.pdf
  2. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2944111/
  3. https://journalofethnicfoods.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s42779-024-00255-1
  4. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4709837/
  5. https://nammco.no/food-resource/
  6. https://thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/thule-culture
  7. https://www.heritage.nf.ca/articles/indigenous/inuit-land-use.php
  8. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352409X25002664
  9. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254560541_A_First_Isotopic_Dietary_Study_of_the_Greenlandic_Thule_Culture
  10. https://canadaehx.com/2020/12/26/the-indigenous-and-the-hudsons-bay-company/
  11. https://collections.dartmouth.edu/arctica-beta/html/EA08-08.html
  12. https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2017/aanc-inac/R5-460-1979-1-eng.pdf
  13. https://www.nunavutfoodsecurity.ca/sites/default/files/documents/CommercializationOfCountryFoodAndFoodSecurity_EN_0.pdf
  14. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26099015/
  15. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/24745332.2022.2033062
  16. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10467516/
  17. https://openheart.bmj.com/content/5/2/e000776
  18. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10195443/
  19. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1096719220300329
  20. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8172218/
  21. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5729304/
  22. https://academic.oup.com/mbe/article/34/4/1021/3065792
  23. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8266228/
  24. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0889157502910537
  25. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7806178/
  26. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5526837/
  27. https://www.inspq.qc.ca/sites/default/files/publications/762_esi_nutrition_report_ma.pdf
  28. https://www.biodiversitygateway.it/en/biodiversity-stories/canada-traditional-hunting-is-sustainable/
  29. https://www.itk.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Arctic-Wildlife.pdf
  30. https://news.berkeley.edu/2015/09/17/what-the-inuit-can-tell-us-about-omega-3-fats-and-paleo-diets/
  31. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3674896/
  32. https://www.qia.ca/marine-hunting/
  33. https://trap.gl/en/kultur/inuit-hunting-culture/
  34. https://iwc.int/management-and-conservation/whaling/aboriginal/greenland
  35. https://livehealthy.gov.nu.ca/sites/default/files/resource_attachments/EN_WEB_itf--nutrition-fact-sheet-series.pdf
  36. https://www.isuma.tv/sites/default/files/attachments/Foods_of_the_Inuit.pdf
  37. https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/nutrition-you-asked/it-true-you-cannot-eat-polar-bear-liver
  38. http://traditionalanimalfoods.org/mammals/hoofed/page.aspx
  39. https://microbiomejournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40168-017-0370-7
  40. https://www.alaskalink.us/index.php/alaskalink-nutri/black-crowberry-empetrum-nigrum
  41. https://www.forksoverknives.com/wellness/extreme-nutrition-the-diet-of-eskimos/
  42. https://ojs.ethnobiology.org/index.php/ebl/article/view/1605/830
  43. https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/6b87a644-19ec-461b-90d1-b4e955f8d8c4/content/AI215E06.htm
  44. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34058960/
  45. https://www.npr.org/2009/08/19/111980557/inuit-hunters-help-scientists-track-narwhals
  46. http://traditionalanimalfoods.org/mammals/seals-sealions-walrus/page.aspx?id=6392
  47. https://www.smithsonianeducation.org/educators/lesson_plans/eskimo/page08.html
  48. https://uh.app/news/inuit-hunting-history-and-the-role-of-their-dogs-the-inuit-indigenous_-3nlIH7cEfC1oj9pXkCVCw
  49. https://travelnunavut.ca/nunavut-fishing-traditions
  50. https://www.anthropology-news.org/articles/catching-birds-in-the-high-arctic/
  51. https://digital.scaa.sk.ca/ourlegacy/exhibit_trapping
  52. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12458905/
  53. https://feheleyfinearts.com/the-inuit-seal-hunt/
  54. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/kujataa-greenland-norse-and-inuit-farming-edge-ice-cap
  55. https://education.arcticeider.com/edu_uploads/seasonal-resources-teacher-web.pdf
  56. https://www.culturalsurvival.org/publications/cultural-survival-quarterly/subsistence-hunting-activities-and-inupiat-eskimo
  57. https://www.erudit.org/en/journals/etudinuit/2017-v41-n1-2-etudinuit04714/1061436ar/
  58. https://indigenouspeoplesatlasofcanada.ca/article/wildlife/
  59. https://www.liverpooluniversitypress.co.uk/journals/article/44976
  60. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24368122
  61. https://canadiangeographic.ca/articles/with-old-traditions-and-new-tech-young-inuit-chart-their-changing-landscapeutm_campaignreprintutm_sourcecanadiangeographic/
  62. https://www.gov.nu.ca/sites/default/files/publications/2022-01/recommendations_on_total_allowable_harvest_tah_rates_for_the_terrestrial_wildlife_populations_in_nunavut._final_wildlife_report_no.4_2007.pdf
  63. https://www.northerncaribou.ca/management/hunting/
  64. https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2021/mpo-dfo/fs70-5/Fs70-5-2021-003-eng.pdf
  65. https://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/10.1139/as-2024-0007
  66. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7050786/
  67. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10714302/
  68. https://openheart.bmj.com/content/4/2/e000673
  69. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10261351/
  70. https://hekint.org/2022/01/26/rabbit-starvation-protein-poisoning/
  71. https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/25268/0000711.pdf?sequence=1
  72. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/22423982.2021.1932184
  73. https://pubs.aina.ucalgary.ca/arctic/Arctic32-2-135.pdf
  74. https://www.quora.com/Why-do-Inuits-not-suffer-from-scurvy-when-their-diet-has-hardly-any-green
  75. https://www.discovermagazine.com/the-inuit-paradox-2576
  76. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S088915750500044X
  77. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10260879/
  78. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12936958/
  79. https://www.north-slope.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Reynolds-Arctic59-2-155-omega3.pdf
  80. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7576585/
  81. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.116.001618
  82. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0128255
  83. https://www.ox.ac.uk/research/high-fat-diet-made-inuits-healthier-shorter-thanks-gene-mutations-study-finds
  84. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5430617/
  85. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/09/150917160034.htm
  86. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/article/25/10/1766/25555/Diabetes-and-Impaired-Glucose-Tolerance-Among-the
  87. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6045743/
  88. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3225107/
  89. https://rosemarycottageclinic.co.uk/blog/2018/10/06/what-we-can-learn-from-the-20th-century-history-of-the-inuit/
  90. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29685826/
  91. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10632723/
  92. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451865421000363
  93. https://mghjournal.com/2020/08/25/dietary-structure-and-relative-health-in-inuit-communities/
  94. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/696018
  95. https://ecologyandsociety.org/vol27/iss3/art31/
  96. https://minpaku.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/649/files/KN_JIN_75_15-21.pdf
  97. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283879440_A_New_Typology_of_Food-Sharing_Practices_among_Hunter-Gatherers_with_a_Special_Focus_on_Inuit_Examples
  98. https://www.ronperrier.net/2013/05/02/inuit-understanding-cultural-context/
  99. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdfplus/10.1086/jar.60.3.3630754
  100. https://www.encyclopedia.com/environment/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/inuit-religious-traditions
  101. https://hakaimagazine.com/features/when-whales-and-humans-talk/
  102. https://churchillpolarbears.org/churchill/inuit-culture/
  103. https://canadiangeographic.ca/articles/shamans-spirits-and-faith-in-the-inuit-north/
  104. https://arctic.noaa.gov/report-card/report-card-2022/consequences-of-rapid-environmental-arctic-change-for-people/
  105. https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2022/cnrc-nrc/NR16-377-2022-eng.pdf
  106. https://arctic.noaa.gov/report-card/report-card-2024/migratory-tundra-caribou-in-a-warmer-climate/
  107. https://ecologyandsociety.org/vol27/iss4/art11/
  108. https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/arctic/article/download/73826/55354/224029
  109. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4937722/
  110. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2317686121
  111. https://thesolutionsjournal.com/continued-importance-hunting-future-inuit-food-security/
  112. https://nunatsiaq.com/stories/article/65674greenlandic_researcher_explores_the_power_of_inuit_food/
  113. https://www.itk.ca/inuit-nunangat-food-security-strategy-announcement/
  114. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3402/ijch.v75.31127
  115. https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-022-04372-y
  116. https://www.ualberta.ca/en/folio/2025/03/traditional-diet-shows-promise-for-modern-gut-health.html
  117. https://nunatsiaq.com/stories/article/65674arctic_fish_and_marine_mammals_populations_up_birds_down_report/
  118. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5008214/
  119. https://arcticreview.no/index.php/arctic/article/view/77/91
  120. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2506779122
  121. https://www.theguardian.com/inequality/2017/nov/01/animal-rights-activists-inuit-clash-canada-indigenous-food-traditions
  122. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/marine-science/articles/10.3389/fmars.2017.00319/full
  123. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ac1a36/pdf
  124. https://oaarchive.arctic-council.org/bitstreams/a7be9b28-107f-4d67-b664-da866ff07d5f/download
  125. https://landscapesandletters.com/2016/03/19/seal-hunt-ecological-social-basis-to-reconsider-perceptions/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.