Hubbry Logo
Long March (rocket family)Long March (rocket family)Main
Open search
Long March (rocket family)
Community hub
Long March (rocket family)
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Long March (rocket family)
Long March (rocket family)
Long March (rocket family)
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The Long March rockets are a family of expendable launch system rockets operated by the China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation.[1][2] The rockets are named after the Chinese Red Army's 1934–35 Long March military retreat during the Chinese Civil War.[3]

The Long March series has performed more than 500 launches, including missions to low Earth orbit, Sun-synchronous orbit, geostationary transfer orbit, and Earth-Moon transfer orbit. The new-generation carrier rockets, Long March 5, Long March 6, Long March 7, Long March 11, and Long March 8, have made their maiden flights. Among them, the Long March 5 has a low-Earth orbit carrying capacity of 25,000 kilograms, and a geosynchronous transfer orbit carrying capacity of 14,000 kilograms.[1][2]

History

[edit]
For a more comprehensive list, see List of Long March launches.

China used the Long March 1 rocket to launch its first satellite, Dong Fang Hong 1 (lit. "The East is Red 1"), into low Earth orbit on 24 April 1970, becoming the fifth nation to achieve independent launch capability. Early launches had an inconsistent record, focusing on the launching of Chinese satellites. The Long March 1 was quickly replaced by the Long March 2 family of launchers.

  • Long March 1
    Long March 1
  • Long March 1 engine
    Long March 1 engine

Origins

[edit]

The Long March 1 rocket is derived from earlier Chinese 2-stage Intermediate-range ballistic missile (IRBM) DF-4, or Dong Feng 4 missile, and the Long March 2, Long March 3, Long March 4 rocket families are derivatives of the Chinese 2-stage Intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) DF-5, or Dong Feng 5 missile.

However, like its counterparts in both the United States and in Russia, the differing needs of space rockets and strategic missiles have caused the development of space rockets and missiles to diverge. The main goal of a launch vehicle is to maximize payload, while for strategic missiles increased throw weight is much less important than the ability to launch quickly and to survive a first strike. This divergence has become clear in the next generation of Long March rockets, which use cryogenic propellants in sharp contrast to the next generation of strategic missiles, which are mobile and solid fuelled.

The next generation of Long March rocket, Long March 5 rocket family, is a brand new design, while Long March 6 and Long March 7 can be seen as derivations because they use the liquid rocket booster design of Long March 5 to build small-to-mid capacity launch vehicles.

Entry into commercial launch market

[edit]
Long March 3A launch

After the U.S. Space Shuttle Challenger was destroyed in 1986, a growing commercial backlog gave China the chance to enter the international launch market. In September 1988, U.S. President Ronald Reagan agreed to allow U.S. satellites to be launched on Chinese rockets.[4] Reagan's satellite export policy would continue to 1998, through Bush and Clinton administrations, with 20 or more approvals.[5] AsiaSat 1, which had originally been launched by the Space Shuttle and retrieved by another Space Shuttle after a failure, was launched by a Long March 3 in 1990 as the first foreign payload on a Chinese rocket.

However, major setbacks occurred in 1992–1996. The Long March 2E was designed with a defective payload fairing, which collapsed when faced with the rocket's excessive vibration. After just seven launches, the Long March 2E destroyed the Optus B2 and Apstar 2 satellites and damaged AsiaSat 2.[6][7] The Long March 3B also experienced a catastrophic failure in 1996, veering off course shortly after liftoff and crashing into a nearby village. At least 6 people were killed on the ground, and the Intelsat 708 satellite was also destroyed.[8] A Long March 3 also experienced a partial failure in August 1996 during the launch of Chinasat-7.[9] Six Long March rockets (Chang Zheng 2C/SD) launched 12 Iridium satellites, about a sixth of Iridium satellites in the original fleet.[10]

United States embargo on Chinese launches

[edit]
See also: International Traffic in Arms Regulations § Satellite components

The involvement of United States companies in the Apstar 2 and Intelsat 708 investigations caused great controversy in the United States. In the Cox Report, the United States Congress accused Space Systems/Loral and Hughes Aircraft Company of transferring information that would improve the design of Chinese rockets and ballistic missiles.[11] Although the Long March was allowed to launch its commercial backlog, the United States Department of State has not approved any satellite export licenses to China since 1998. ChinaSat 8, which had been scheduled for launch in April 1999 on a Long March 3B rocket,[12] was placed in storage, sold to the Singapore company ProtoStar, and finally launched on a European rocket Ariane 5 in 2008.[11]

From 2005 to 2012, Long March rockets launched ITAR-free satellites made by the European company Thales Alenia Space.[13] However, Thales Alenia was forced to discontinue its ITAR-free satellite line in 2013 after the United States State Department fined a United States company for selling ITAR components.[14] Thales Alenia Space had long complained that "every satellite nut and bolt" was being ITAR-restricted, and the European Space Agency (ESA) accused the United States of using ITAR to block exports to China instead of protecting technology.[15] In 2016, an official at the United States Bureau of Industry and Security confirmed that "no U.S.-origin content, regardless of significance, regardless of whether it is incorporated into a foreign-made item, can go to China". Since 2016, the European aerospace industry is working on developing replacements for United States satellite components.[16]

Return to success

[edit]
Long March 2F is the only human-rated launch vehicle of the Long March family.
Long March 2F is the only human-rated launch vehicle of the Long March family.

After the failures of 1992–1996, the troublesome Long March 2E was withdrawn from the market. Design changes were made to improve the reliability of Long March rockets. From October 1996 to April 2009, the Long March rocket family delivered 75 consecutive successful launches, including several major milestones in space flight:

The Long March rockets have subsequently maintained an excellent reliability record. Since 2010, Long March launches have made up 15–25% of all space launches globally. Growing domestic demand has maintained a healthy manifest. International deals have been secured through a package deal that bundles the launch with a Chinese satellite, circumventing the United States embargo.[17]

Payloads

[edit]

The Long March is China's primary expendable launch system family. The Shenzhou spacecraft and Chang'e lunar orbiters are also launched on the Long March rocket. The maximum payload for LEO is 25,000 kilograms (CZ-5B), the maximum payload for GTO is 14,000 kg (CZ-5). The next generation rocket Long March 5 variants will offer more payload in the future.

Propellants

[edit]
Three engines using three different combination of propellants. From left to right: YF-20 using N2O4 and UDMH, YF-100 using LOX and kerosene, YF-77 using LOX and LH2

Long March 1's 1st and 2nd stage used nitric acid and unsymmetrical dimethylhydrazine (UDMH) propellants, and its upper stage used a spin-stabilized solid rocket engine.

Long March 2, Long March 3, Long March 4, the main stages and associated liquid rocket boosters use dinitrogen tetroxide (N2O4) as the oxidizing agent and UDMH as the fuel. The upper stages (third stage) of Long March 3 rockets use YF-73 and YF-75 engines, using liquid hydrogen (LH2) as the fuel and liquid oxygen (LOX) as the oxidizer.

The new generation of Long March rocket family, Long March 5 and its derivations Long March 6, Long March 7, Long March 8, and Long March 10 use non-toxic LOX/kerosene and LOX/LH2 liquid propellants (except in some upper stages where UDMH/N2O4 continues to be used).

Long March 9 is being developed as a LOX/[[CH4]], or methalox, rocket.

Long March 11 is a solid-fuel rocket.

Long March 12 uses non-toxic LOX/kerosene liquid propellants for the first 2 stages.

Variants

[edit]

Timeline bars start at first launch (rather than start of development).

Long March 12Long March 11Long March 8Long March 7ALong March 7Long March 6CLong March 6ALong March 6Long March 5BLong March 5Long March 4CLong March 4BLong March 4ALong March 3CLong March 3BLong March 3ALong March 3Long March 2FLong March 2ELong March 2DLong March 2CLong March 2ALong March 1DLong March 1

[needs update]

The Long March rockets are organized into several series:

The Long March 5, 6 and 7 are a newer generation of rockets sharing the new 1200 kN class YF-100 engines, which burns RP-1 / LOX, unlike earlier 2, 3 and 4 series which uses more expensive and dangerous N2O4 / UDMH propellants.[18] The 5 series is a heavy-lift launch vehicle, with a capacity of 25,000 kg to LEO while the 6 series is a small-lift launch vehicle with a capacity of 1,500 kg to LEO, and the 7 series is a medium-lift launch vehicle, with a capacity of 14,000 kg to LEO.

The Long March 10A is a partially-reusable crewed-rated rocket designed for LEO missions currently under development; the Long March 9 is initially designed to be partially reusable before becoming a fully reusable launcher.

Comparison of Long March rockets
Model Status Stages Length
(m) 		Max. diameter
(m) 		Liftoff mass
(t) 		Liftoff thrust
(kN) 		Payload
(LEO, kg) 		Payload (SSO, kg) Payload
(GTO, kg)
Long March 1 Retired 3 29.86 2.25 81.6 1020 300 – –
Long March 1D Retired 3 28.22 2.25 81.1 1101.2 930 – –
Long March 2A Retired 2 31.17 3.35 190 2,786 1,800 – –
Long March 2C Active 2 43.72 3.35 245 2,961.6 4,000 2,100 1,250
Long March 2D Active 2 41.056 (without shield) 3.35 249.6 2,961.6 3,500 1,300 –
Long March 2E Retired[19] 2 (+ 4 boosters) 49.686 3.35 464 5,923.2 9,500 4,350 3,500
Long March 2F Retired 2 (+ 4 boosters) 58.34 3.35 493 6512 8,800 – –
Long March 2F/G Active 2 (+ 4 boosters) 58.34 3.35 493 6512 8,800 – –
Long March 2F/T Active 2 (+ 4 boosters) 58.34 3.35 493 6512 8,800 – –
Long March 3 Retired[19] 3 44.9 3.35 205 2,961.6 5,000 – 1,600
Long March 3A Retired 3 52.52 3.35 242 2,961.6 6,000 5,100 2,600
Long March 3B Retired[a] 3 (+ 4 boosters) 54.838 7.85 (including boosters) 425.8 5,923.2 11,200 6,850 5,100
Long March 3B/E Active 3 (+ 4 boosters) 56.326 7.85 (including boosters) 458.97 5923.2 11,500 7,100 5,500
Long March 3C Retired 3 (+ 4 boosters) 55.638 7.85 (including boosters) 345 4,442.4 9,100 6,450 3,900
Long March 3C/E Active 3 (+ 4 boosters) 55.638 7.85 (including boosters) 345 4,442.4 9,100 6,450 3,900
Long March 4A Retired 3 41.9 3.35 241.1 2,961.6 3,800 1,600 –
Long March 4B Active 3 48 3.35 249.2 2,961.6 4,200 2,295 –
Long March 4C Active 3 48 3.35 249.2 2,961.6 4,200 2,947 1,500
Long March 5 [20][21] Active 2 (+ 4 boosters, optional upper stage) 57 11.7 (including boosters) 854.5 10620 – – 14,400
Long March 5B Active 1 (+ 4 boosters) 53.7 11.7 (including boosters) 837.5 10620 25,000 15,000 –
Long March 6[22][23] Active 3 29 3.35 103 1200 >1,500 500~1,080 –
Long March 6A Active 2 (+ 4 solid fuel boosters) 50~55 7.35 (including boosters) 530 7230 >8,000 >5,000 –
Long March 6C Active 2 43 3.35 217 2,376 4,500 2,000 1,400
Long March 7 Active 2 (+ 4 boosters) 53 7.85 (including boosters) 597 7,200 14,000 5,500 –
Long March 7A Active 3 (+ 4 boosters) 60.13–60.7 7.85 (including boosters) 573 7,200 – – 7,800
Long March 8 Active 2 (2 boosters, optional) 50.3 3–7.85 (including boosters) 356.6 4,800 8,100[24] 5,000[24] 2,800[24]
Long March 8A Active 2 (+ 2 boosters) 50.5 3.35–7.85 (including boosters) 371 4,800 9,800 7,000 3,500
Long March 9 Planned 3 114 10.6 4,369 60,000 150,000 – –
Long March 10 Planned 3 (+ 2 common core boosters) 88.5–91.6 15 (including boosters) 2,187 26,250 70,000 – 32,000
Long March 10A Planned 3 88.5–91.6 5 ? 8750 >18,000 expened
>14,000 reusable		 – -
Long March 11 Active 4 20.8 ~2 58 1188 700 350 –
Long March 12 Active 2 62 3.8 433 5,000 >10,000 6,000 –
Long March 12A Planned 2 59 3.8 433 5,000 10,000 6,000 –
2A 2C 2D 2E 2F 3 3A 3B 3C 4A 4B 4C

Long March 8

[edit]
Main article: Long March 8

The Long March 8 is a new series of launch vehicles, which is geared towards Sun-synchronous orbit (SSO) launches.[25] In early 2017, it was expected to be based on the Long March 7, and have two solid fuel boosters, and first launch by the end of 2018.[26] By 2019, it was intended to be partially reusable. The first stage will have legs and grid fins (like Falcon 9) and it may land with side boosters still attached.[27] The first Long March 8 was rolled out to for a test launch on or around 20 December 2020 and launched on 22 December 2020.[28] The second flight with no side boosters occurred on 27 February 2022, sending a national record of 22 satellites into SSO.[29][needs update]

Future development

[edit]

Long March 9

[edit]
Main article: Long March 9

The Long March 9 (LM-9, CZ-9, or Changzheng 9, Chinese: 长征九号) is a Chinese super-heavy carrier rocket concept proposed in 2018[30] that is currently in study. It is planned for a maximum payload capacity of 140,000 kg[31] to low Earth orbit (LEO), 50,000 kg to trans-lunar injection or 44,000 kg to Mars.[32][33] Its first flight is expected by 2028 or 2029 in preparation for a lunar landing sometime in the 2030s;[34] a sample return mission from Mars has been proposed as first major mission.[33] It has been stated that around 70% of the hardware and components needed for a test flight are currently undergoing testing, with the first engine test to occur by the end of 2018. The 2011 proposed design would be a three-staged rocket, with the initial core having a diameter of 10 meters and use a cluster of four engines. Multiple variants of the rocket have been proposed, CZ-9 being the largest with four liquid-fuel boosters with the aforementioned LEO payload capacity of 140,000 kg, CZ-9A having just two boosters and a LEO payload capacity of 100,000 kg, and finally CZ-9B having just the core stage and a LEO payload capacity of 50,000 kg.[35]

2021 respecification
[edit]

Approved in 2021, the Long March 9 is classified as a super heavy-lift launch vehicle.[34] A very different design of LM-9 was announced in June 2021, with more engines and no external boosters.[36] Payload capacities are 160 tonnes to LEO and 53 tonnes to TLI.[37][38]

Long March 10

[edit]
Main article: Long March 10

The Long March 10, previously known as the "921 rocket",[39] is under development for crewed lunar missions. The nickname "921" refers to the founding date of China's human spaceflight program. Like the Long March 5, it uses 5-meter (16.4 ft) diameter rocket bodies and YF-100K engines, although with 7 engines on each of 3 cores.[40][41] The launch weight is 2187 tonnes, delivering 25 tonnes into trans-lunar injection.[42] The proposed crewed lunar mission uses two rockets; the crewed spacecraft and lunar landing stack launch separately and rendezvous in lunar orbit.[43] Development was announced at the 2020 China Space Conference.[42] As of 2022, the first flight of this triple-cored rocket is targeted for 2027.[44]

Launch sites

[edit]

There are four launch centers in China. They are:

Most of the commercial satellite launches of Long March vehicles have been from Xichang Satellite Launch Center, located in Xichang, Sichuan province. Wenchang Spacecraft Launch Site in Hainan province is under expansion and will be the main launch center for future commercial satellite launches. Long March launches also take place from the more military oriented Jiuquan Satellite Launch Center in Gansu province from which the crewed Shenzhou spacecraft also launches. Taiyuan Satellite Launch Center is located in Shanxi province and focuses on the launches of Sun-synchronous orbit (SSO) satellites.

On 5 June 2019, China launched a Long March 11 rocket from a mobile launch platform in the Yellow Sea.[45]

Commercial launch services

[edit]

China markets launch services under the China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation (China Great Wall Industry Corporation).[46] Its efforts to launch communications satellites were dealt a blow in the mid-1990s after the United States stopped issuing export licenses to companies to allow them to launch on Chinese launch vehicles out of fear that this would help China's military. In the face of this, Thales Alenia Space built the Chinasat-6B satellite with no components from the United States whatsoever. This allowed it to be launched on a Chinese launch vehicle without violating United States International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) restrictions.[47] The launch, on a Long March 3B rocket, was successfully conducted on 5 July 2007.

A Chinese Long March 2D launched VRSS-1 (Venezuelan Remote Sensing Satellite-1) of Venezuela, "Francisco de Miranda" on 29 September 2012.

Notes

[edit]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Long March (rocket family)

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Long March (Chinese: 长征; pinyin: ), abbreviated CZ, is a family of expendable orbital developed by the China Academy of Launch Vehicle Technology (CALT) under the Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation (CASC) for the and civil space missions. First flown in 1970 with the CZ-1, which placed among the five nations capable of independent satellite launches, the family has evolved from derivatives into a diverse lineup supporting low-Earth orbit (LEO), geostationary transfer orbit (GTO), and interplanetary trajectories. Subsequent generations, including the CZ-2 through CZ-4 series derived from Dongfeng medium-range missiles, enabled routine deployments and achieved over 400 successful missions by the early , with variants like the CZ-2F exclusively human-rated for Shenzhou crewed flights to China's . Newer clean-sheet designs such as the CZ-5 heavy-lift rocket, capable of 25 metric tons to LEO, have powered lunar sample returns via missions and supported ambitious goals like crewed lunar landings, demonstrating China's progression toward self-reliant heavy-lift capabilities without foreign propulsion dependencies. Early development faced technical hurdles, including launch failures in the due to residual missile-era design constraints, but iterative improvements—such as storable hypergolic propellants in legacy models and kerolox in modern ones—have yielded success rates exceeding 95% in recent years, underscoring empirical engineering advancements over initial geopolitical isolation. The family's defining role lies in enabling China's in , from military reconnaissance satellites to commercial constellations, with ongoing expansions like the CZ-8 for medium-lift reusability experiments and CZ-9 super-heavy prototypes targeting Mars ambitions, though proliferation concerns arise from dual-use applications in anti-satellite tests. As of 2025, over 500 launches have occurred, positioning the as the backbone of the world's second-most active program, reliant on state-directed innovation rather than international .

Origins and Early Development

Initial Design and First Launches

The Long March rocket family originated from China's Dongfeng ballistic missile development programs in the mid-20th century, with the initial designs leveraging technology for capabilities during the late 1960s. The first variant, (CZ-1), adapted the first two stages of the , which used storable hypergolic propellants— (UDMH) and nitrogen tetroxide (N2O4)—for reliable ignition without complex turbopumps suited to applications. A new solid-propellant third stage was added to achieve orbital insertion, though the vehicle's limited payload capacity, approximately 300 kg to , reflected its origins in military hardware not optimized for deployment. China's inaugural orbital launch occurred on April 24, 1970, when a successfully placed the —China's first independent spacecraft, weighing 173 kg—into a 441 km by 2,384 km elliptical from Launch Site. This mission demonstrated basic transmission capabilities, including broadcasting the Chinese national anthem, marking China as the fifth nation to achieve independent orbital access. A follow-up launch on March 3, 1971, deployed the Shi Jian 1 scientific , further validating the vehicle's reliability despite early constraints like rudimentary guidance and separation systems derived from missile reentry technology. These initial efforts highlighted challenges such as the and handling risks of hypergolic fuels, which prioritized storability over , and the absence of cryogenic alternatives that could offer higher . To address limitations in supporting recoverable payloads, development shifted to the (CZ-2), derived from the larger , enabling greater lift for reentry vehicles. The CZ-2's on November 26, 1975, successfully recovered a 473 kg Fanhui Shi Weixing (FSW-0) prototype satellite after two days in , proving suborbital reusability and paving the way for operational missions in the early .

Influences from Foreign Technology

The development of the Long March rocket family drew significantly from Soviet technological transfers during the , which provided foundational expertise in liquid-propellant rocketry and systems. Under bilateral agreements, the supplied with technical documentation, equipment, and training for ballistic s, including samples of the R-1 (a copy of the German V-2) and R-2 short-range ballistic missiles. reverse-engineered these designs to produce its Dong Feng-1 (DF-1) by 1960, incorporating Soviet staging principles and hypergolic propellants that later informed orbital launch capabilities. This assistance accelerated 's progression from rudimentary solid-fuel experiments to reliable liquid-fueled boosters, as domestic and guidance systems were initially insufficient for independent replication. The 1960 Sino-Soviet split abruptly terminated this collaboration, with all Soviet advisors withdrawing by August 1960 and denying further blueprints or materials, compelling China to indigenize adaptations under resource constraints. Despite the rupture, the pre-split inflows established critical baselines: Soviet-derived inertial guidance and clustered engine configurations enabled the Long March 1's debut in 1970, derived from the intermediate-range ballistic missile, which itself evolved from earlier R-2 influences. Without these inputs, China's rocketry would likely have lagged by a decade, as evidenced by the program's reliance on imported precision components until domestic substitutes matured post-1960; the split forced innovations like simplified staging to mitigate guidance inaccuracies inherent in purely indigenous efforts. In the , foreign influences shifted to sporadic, non-Soviet acquisitions amid China's economic opening, including purchases of guidance gyroscopes and materials from European suppliers before tightened export controls. These were reverse-engineered to enhance later variants, such as improved in the , but remained marginal compared to the Soviet foundation, with verifiable transfers limited to dual-use components rather than complete systems. Empirical outcomes show these inflows causally boosted payload reliability—e.g., from the Long March 1's 173 kg to orbit to subsequent models' capacities—by integrating foreign precision elements with adapted Soviet architectures, underscoring how targeted technology absorption outpaced isolated domestic R&D in achieving operational maturity.

Technical Specifications

Propellants and Propulsion Systems

The Long March rocket family predominantly employs hypergolic propellants, specifically (UDMH) as fuel and (N2O4) as oxidizer, in the liquid stages of early variants for their storability and spontaneous ignition upon contact, which enhances reliability in upper stages and reduces pre-launch preparation time compared to cryogenic systems. These propellants, while enabling immediate restart capability essential for orbital insertion maneuvers, exhibit lower values—typically around 287 seconds in vacuum for associated engines—due to their chemical properties, and pose handling challenges from high and corrosiveness, as evidenced by documented ground infrastructure requirements and protocols in Chinese launch operations. Newer developments within the family incorporate cryogenic propellants for improved efficiency, including (LOX) with (RP-1) in first and booster stages of variants like 6 and 7, achieving specific impulses up to 335 seconds in vacuum, which supports higher payload fractions through denser energy content and cleaner combustion relative to hypergolics. LOX/ (LH2) combinations appear in core stages of heavy-lift configurations, delivering specific impulses exceeding 430 seconds in vacuum owing to hydrogen's high exhaust velocity, though this necessitates insulated tanks and venting to mitigate boil-off losses during countdowns. Central to these systems are the YF-series engines developed by the Academy of Aerospace Technology, with the YF-20 and YF-21 families powering early hypergolic stages through clustered gimbaled configurations for thrust vector control, evolving into higher-thrust kerosene- variants like the YF-100 (300 seconds sea-level ) that employ gas-generator cycles for scalability in booster applications. The YF-77, utilizing for LH2/ , exemplifies advancements in upper-stage with vacuum thrusts around 700 kN and burn times over 500 seconds, reflecting iterative improvements in reliability derived from empirical testing data. Hypergolics maintain an edge in operational simplicity and storability for missions requiring multiple ignitions, whereas cryogenic shifts prioritize performance metrics validated by launch success rates exceeding 95% in recent campaigns, albeit with added complexity in cryogenic handling.

Structural and Staging Design

The rocket family utilizes serial multi-stage architectures, where each stage provides incremental velocity increases toward orbital insertion, with expended stages separated to minimize mass during subsequent burns. The inaugural featured a simple two-stage all-solid configuration, with a gross lift-off weight of 81,310 kg. Subsequent developments introduced liquid-fueled stages for greater control and efficiency, evolving into three- or four-stage vehicles in medium- and heavy-lift variants. Medium-lift models like the 3 and 4 series incorporate optional strap-on boosters to augment first-stage , enabling higher payloads. The , for example, consists of a three-stage core augmented by four parallel liquid boosters attached to the base of the first stage, forming a clustered configuration for enhanced initial . Heavy-lift variants such as the employ a larger core stage with four strap-on boosters, scaling gross lift-off weights to 869 tons while maintaining modular staging for geostationary or trans-lunar trajectories. Structural designs initially relied on metallic alloys for tanks and airframes, but newer generations integrate composite materials to achieve reductions of up to 30% in components like interstage sections and fairings. Experimental composite tanks, including a 3.35-meter-diameter prototype for environments, demonstrate lighter alternatives to traditional aluminum or structures. diameters have correspondingly expanded from 2.25–3.35 meters in early small- and medium-lift rockets to 5 meters or more in heavy variants, accommodating larger volumes without compromising aerodynamic stability. This evolution optimizes structural integrity under dynamic launch loads while prioritizing payload capacity.

Major Variants

First-Generation Variants (Long March 1–4)

The first-generation Long March variants, encompassing the Long March 1 (LM-1) through Long March 4 (LM-4), were derived from China's Dong Feng ballistic missile series and marked the nation's entry into orbital spaceflight. These liquid-fueled rockets, primarily using unsymmetrical dimethylhydrazine (UDMH) and nitrogen tetroxide (NTO) propellants, featured staged designs optimized for low Earth orbit (LEO) insertions and, in later models, geostationary transfer orbit (GTO) capabilities. Early development emphasized reliability through iterative testing, with the LM-1 serving as a proof-of-concept for satellite deployment. The LM-1, a two-stage with a length of approximately 19 meters and liftoff mass of 18,000 kg, achieved China's inaugural orbital success on April 24, 1970, deploying the 173 kg Dong Fang Hong I satellite into a 441 km × 2,384 km . Capable of delivering up to 300 kg to LEO, the LM-1 conducted limited missions, including suborbital tests and two confirmed orbital attempts, before being phased out by the mid-1970s due to its modest performance and the advent of more capable successors. Its success rate was modest, reflecting the nascent state of Chinese rocketry. The LM-2 series expanded on this foundation, introducing variants tailored for diverse . The baseline LM-2, a two-stage standing 33 meters tall with a 250-tonne liftoff mass, offered about 2,000–3,100 kg to LEO at 200 km altitude. Subvariants included the LM-2C ( 2,500 kg to LEO), LM-2D (enhanced for 3,500 kg LEO), and LM-2E (with four strap-on boosters boosting LEO capacity to 9,500 kg). The LM-2F, introduced in 2003, was the first human-rated version, measuring 58.3 meters long with a 498-tonne mass and 600-tonne thrust, enabling Shenzhou crewed missions to LEO with reinforced structures for safety. Over dozens of launches from and sites, the LM-2 family demonstrated improving reliability, though early flights encountered failures like the 1996 explosion. The LM-3 addressed GTO requirements with a three-stage configuration, incorporating a for perigee velocity augmentation. Measuring 44.6 meters in length and weighing 201 tonnes at liftoff, the baseline LM-3 delivered 1,500 kg to GTO. Enhanced models like the LM-3A increased this to 2,600 kg through refined propulsion and guidance, while the LM-3B, with boosters, reached 5,000 kg to GTO. Launched exclusively from , the series supported domestic and commercial geostationary satellites, achieving over 100 missions by the with a success rate exceeding 95% in mature phases, despite initial setbacks such as the 1984 . The LM-4 series, optimized for sun-synchronous orbits from the site, featured polar launch capabilities for payloads. The three-stage LM-4 had a 41.9-meter , 3.35-meter , 240-tonne , and 2,942 kN , with variants like the LM-4B and LM-4C providing 2,000–4,000 kg to sun-synchronous LEO at 700 km. The LM-4A, limited to two launches in 1988 and 1990, was retired early, but successors continued operations into the 2020s, logging over 100 flights for missions with high reliability post-2000. Earlier first-generation models like the LM-1 and basic LM-2/3 saw retirement by the as upgraded variants and newer families assumed primary roles, contributing to a cumulative success rate near 97% across the Long March lineage.

Second-Generation Variants (Long March 5–8)

The second-generation Long March variants, designated Long March 5 through 8, were developed starting in the early 2000s by the China Academy of Launch Vehicle Technology to provide enhanced lift capacities for ambitious programs including the Tiangong space station and Chang'e lunar missions, utilizing modular designs with kerosene/liquid oxygen (kerolox) and liquid hydrogen/liquid oxygen (hydrolox) engines rather than hypergolic propellants tied to intercontinental ballistic missile origins. These rockets feature larger diameters—up to 5 meters for the Long March 5—and higher thrust levels, with the Long March 5's core stage delivering over 20 MN through twin YF-77 hydrolox engines, enabling payload masses exceeding 70 metric tons to low Earth orbit (LEO) in expendable configuration, though official capacities are often conservatively stated at around 25 tons to LEO. The , a heavy-lift vehicle standing 57 meters tall with a launch mass of approximately 867 tons, debuted on November 3, 2016, from Launch Site, successfully placing a test into despite minor deviations; its second flight in July 2017 failed due to second-stage anomalies, but subsequent missions achieved high reliability, with 15 successes out of 16 attempts by October 2025, supporting key insertions like the for Tiangong and lunar sample return vehicles. The design incorporates four strap-on boosters each powered by two YF-100 kerolox engines producing about 1.2 MN each, alongside a core stage with YF-77 engines for upper-stage efficiency, prioritizing non-toxic propellants for reduced ground hazards. Long March 6 serves as a small-to-medium lift option, optimized for s with a debut flight in September 2015 from , employing a single YF-100 first-stage engine and YF-115 upper stage for payloads up to 20 tons to LEO or 12 tons to (SSO), with variants like Long March 6A adding solid boosters for increased capacity to about 4.5 tons SSO. This kerosene-fueled rocket, roughly 29 meters in length, facilitates frequent launches of constellations, as evidenced by missions deploying multiple commercial payloads. The Long March 7, a medium-lift rocket with 13.5-ton LEO capacity, first flew in June 2016 from Wenchang and primarily supports cargo resupply to the Tiangong station via Tianzhou spacecraft, using a kerolox first stage with four YF-100 engines and hydrolox upper stages; the Long March 7A variant enhances flexibility with a restartable third stage for geostationary transfer orbits. While primarily land-based, adaptations for maritime launch platforms have been considered to expand operational flexibility, aligning with China's broader sea-launch initiatives. Long March 8, introduced in 2020, targets medium-lift needs for satellite constellations with up to 7 tons to SSO, deriving from 7 architecture but incorporating two YF-100 engines on the first stage and optional liquid boosters; early designs envisioned reusable first-stage recovery via powered descent, though operational flights remain expendable, with ongoing developments toward reusability to compete in commercial markets by 2025. The 8A variant, debuting in 2022, boosts payload through enlarged fairings and adaptability for megaconstellation deployments like Guowang.

Specialized and Solid-Fuel Variants

The (LM-11) represents the primary all-solid-propellant member of the family, engineered as a four-stage for responsive launches of small satellites. Measuring 21 in length with a liftoff of 57.7 tonnes, it supports payloads of up to approximately 1 tonne to sun-synchronous orbits at 500-700 km altitude. Its solid motors enable road-mobile transport and erection, with launches possible from inland sites like or , or maritime platforms in the , facilitating operations without fixed infrastructure. Debuting in January 2015, the LM-11 has achieved at least 16 consecutive successes by March 2023, underscoring its reliability for quick-turnaround missions. Solid propellants in the LM-11 eliminate the need for cryogenic fueling and complex ground support, allowing preparation and launch within hours—contrasting with days required for variants—thus prioritizing rapid replenishment of constellations in contested environments. This mobility and simplicity yield failure rates under 5%, aligning with the broader series' global-leading success metrics exceeding 95%. The design's cold-launch capability, using gas generators for initial liftoff, further minimizes site dependencies and enhances operational flexibility. Hybrid configurations integrate solid boosters into liquid architectures for specialized performance, as seen in the Long March 6A, which pairs four solid strap-ons with a kerosene-liquid oxygen core stage. This 50-meter, 530-tonne vehicle delivers up to 4 tonnes to 700 km sun-synchronous orbits, leveraging solids for high-thrust ascent augmentation while retaining liquid efficiency for precision orbital insertion. in March 2022 confirmed the viability of this approach, with subsequent missions demonstrating enhanced capacity for medium-lift responsive payloads without full reliance on all-liquid staging. Variants like the LM-2C and LM-2D, while primarily liquid-fueled, adapt for small-payload niches through modular fairings and upper stages, occasionally incorporating solid kick motors for fine orbital adjustments, though they lack the full solid-propellant rapidity of the LM-11. These specialized evolutions prioritize deployment speed and reduced infrastructure over maximal payload, addressing tactical needs where liquid preparation delays pose risks.

Launch Infrastructure

Primary Launch Sites

The , situated in the of at approximately 40.96°N latitude, primarily supports launches into (LEO) and mid-inclination trajectories, including crewed missions via Launch Site 2 (SLS-2) for variants like the Long March 2F and Launch Site 4 (SLS-4) for polar orbits with the Long March 4 series. Its inland location and extensive facilities, established in 1958, enable compatibility with hypergolic-fueled rockets through mobile service towers and rail transport adaptations for rapid turnaround. The in Sichuan Province, at about 28°N latitude, is optimized for geostationary transfer orbits (GTO) due to its southerly position allowing eastward launches over the , minimizing ground hazards and maximizing delta-v efficiency for Long March 2E, 3, and 4 variants. Infrastructure includes dedicated pads like SLS-3 for high-energy missions, with post-2010 enhancements such as upgraded fueling systems and environmental controls to handle the corrosive propellants used in these rockets. Taiyuan Satellite Launch Center in Province, located at roughly 37.5°N, specializes in sun-synchronous orbits (SSO) for and meteorological satellites, primarily using 4B/C and newer 6/6A from sites like SLS-1, leveraging its northern latitude for near-polar inclinations. The Wenchang Spacecraft Launch Site on Hainan Island, China's southernmost facility at 19.6°N, accommodates heavy-lift series for LEO, GTO, and lunar transfers, as well as medium-lift and 8 from Launch Complex 201 (LC-201), benefiting from equatorial proximity to reduce Earth's rotational penalties and enable sea-based payload delivery via adjacent ports. Operational since 2016, it features cryogenic handling upgrades and mobile launchers installed post-2010 to support larger diameters and higher cadences for kerosene-liquid oxygen stages. These sites have undergone coordinated modernizations since , including automated assembly buildings, expanded rail networks, and reusable transporter-erector-launchers, facilitating China's escalation to over 60 annual launches by 2025 through parallel processing and reduced setup times.

Facilities and Support Systems

The Long March rocket family employs cryogenic propellant storage and handling facilities designed for (LOX) and (LH2) in heavy-lift variants such as the , which requires precise temperature control and insulated tanks to maintain propellant integrity during pre-launch operations. These systems incorporate automated fueling arms and safety interlocks to mitigate risks associated with boil-off and . Solid-fueled variants, including the , utilize mobile transporter erector launchers (TELs) that integrate storage, transportation, and elevation functions into a single trailer system, allowing for rapid setup and launch from unprepared sites without fixed infrastructure. This mobility supports tactical deployment, as demonstrated in sea-based launches from barges in the . Maritime support for downrange tracking relies on the Yuanwang-class vessels operated by the People's Liberation Army Navy, equipped with large parabolic antennas, radar systems, and telemetry receivers to monitor rocket ascent trajectories and satellite insertions in real-time. These ships have conducted measurements for numerous Long March missions, such as the 2019 Long March 5 launch where Yuanwang-3 and Yuanwang-7 provided orbital data acquisition. The overarching telemetry, tracking, and command (TT&C) network comprises ground stations linked with Yuanwang ships to form an integrated space-ground system, enabling continuous data relay and command uplink during flights. Integration with the Beidou satellite navigation constellation provides precise positioning and timing signals, enhancing tracking accuracy and supporting autonomous navigation corrections for launch vehicles. The reliability of these facilities contributed to the series reaching its 600th launch on October 16, 2025, via a 8A mission, with from TT&C assets facilitating detailed post-flight reviews that attribute anomalies to specific subsystems, such as stage separation or propulsion failures, for iterative improvements.

Operational History and Performance

Launch Statistics and Reliability

As of October 16, 2025, the Long March rocket family has achieved its 600th launch, encompassing a wide array of orbital missions that account for approximately 86 percent of China's total missions. This milestone reflects a cumulative payload deployment of nearly 1,400 , with the series demonstrating a sustained overall success rate exceeding 96 percent when accounting for both full and partial successes up to the 500th launch in December 2023, extended by subsequent reliable operations. Launch cadence has evolved markedly, beginning with 1–2 attempts annually in the during initial development and testing phases, progressing to dozens per year by the , and accelerating to over 60 launches in recent years amid expanded infrastructure and mission demands. Variant-specific reliability varies but remains high for mature models; for instance, the 3 series records a 97.1 percent success rate across 170 attempts, with only two full failures and six partials, while the Long March 4 family exceeds 95 percent. These rates stem from empirical refinements, including ground-based iterative testing to mitigate recurrence of identified issues. Early reliability challenges, such as anomalies and control software errors in the , contributed to a handful of full failures, but subsequent improvements—driven by fault-tree analysis and enhanced quality controls in and staging—have reduced partial failures, particularly those involving stage separation or . By the third century of launches around , the family-wide success rate stabilized at 96 percent, underscoring causal progress through systematic failure investigations rather than radical redesigns.
VariantLaunches (approx.)Success RateNotable Factors
Long March 317097.1%High GEO precision; few recent issues
Long March 480+>95%Reliable for polar/SSO; minimal failures post-2000s
200+~95%Versatile; early guidance fixes key

Notable Missions and Achievements

The Long March 2F rocket enabled China's crewed Shenzhou missions to the Tiangong space station, including Shenzhou 13 launched on October 16, 2021, which carried three astronauts for a six-month stay, demonstrating sustained human presence in orbit. This human-rated variant has supported multiple crewed flights since the program's inception, establishing independent human spaceflight capabilities without reliance on foreign systems. The Long March 3B variant played a key role in deploying the Beidou-3 navigation satellites, with the final geostationary satellite launched on June 23, 2020, completing a global constellation offering positioning, navigation, and timing services comparable to GPS. Subsequent launches, such as the pair of backup satellites on September 19, 2024, have enhanced system redundancy. The heavy-lift rocket achieved the Chang'e-5 lunar sample return mission, launched on November 23, 2020, from , which collected 1,731 grams of lunar and returned it to Earth on December 17, 2020, marking the first such retrieval since 1976. This mission validated the rocket's capability for high-mass lunar transfers. The same rocket launched the of Tiangong on April 29, 2021, initiating assembly of China's independent space station. The Long March series reached its 500th launch on December 10, 2023, with a deploying a satellite from . The 600th launch occurred on October 16, 2025, via Long March 8A from , deploying internet satellites and underscoring the family's high launch cadence.

Failures and Lessons Learned

The Long March rocket family experienced several high-profile failures in the mid-1990s, primarily involving attitude control and overload issues in second- and third-stage systems of the LM-2 and LM-3 variants. On January 26, 1995, a Long March 2E launch failed shortly after liftoff due to a structural overload exacerbated by attitude control malfunctions, resulting in an that scattered debris and caused casualties among nearby villagers. Similarly, the of the Long March 3B on February 15, 1996, carrying the satellite, ended in catastrophe when a broken wire in the attitude control system's wiring harness led to erroneous vector commands, causing engine overload and the rocket veering off course to crash into a nearby mountain, destroying the payload and launch infrastructure. Post-accident investigations by the China Academy of Technology emphasized root-cause analysis of component-level defects, such as wiring integrity and servo system oscillations, prompting engineering fixes including enhanced in guidance and fault-tolerant guidance algorithms to prevent single-point failures from propagating. These measures, combined with rigorous pre-flight testing protocols, markedly improved the Long March 3B's performance trajectory, transitioning from early unreliability to sustained operational maturity through refinements focused on causal failure modes rather than superficial adjustments. More recent anomalies highlight ongoing challenges in upper-stage reliability and orbital debris management. The inaugural Long March 5B mission on July 23, 2020, successfully deployed China's Mars probe but left its massive core stage in an uncontrolled reentry trajectory due to the absence of dedicated deorbit , resulting in widespread debris dispersal over the Atlantic Ocean near . This design oversight, rooted in prioritizing payload capacity over end-of-life disposal for low-Earth orbit insertions, underscored the need for integrated systems in expendable stages; subsequent responses included development of attitude control enhancements and controlled reentry capabilities for future heavy-lift variants to mitigate risks. In 2024, a launch on March 13 carrying DRO-A and DRO-B satellites for testing suffered an upper-stage anomaly with the Yuanzheng-1S kick motor, preventing the payloads from achieving their intended and stranding them in a lower . Lessons from this event, as with prior incidents, drove incorporation of advanced diagnostics, including real-time AI-assisted monitoring for anomalies and redundant ignition sequences, enabling data-driven to isolate and compensate for in-flight deviations before mission loss. Overall, these failures have catalyzed a shift toward probabilistic modeling and modular across the family, prioritizing empirical validation of fixes to enhance causal resilience in complex ascent profiles.

Commercial and International Activities

Entry into Global Launch Market

China's entry into the international commercial launch market occurred on April 7, 1990, when a Long March 3 rocket successfully deployed the AsiaSat 1 —manufactured by Hughes Aircraft for the Hong Kong-based AsiaSat consortium—into from . This launch represented the first foreign payload on a Chinese rocket and positioned as the third country, after the and , capable of providing such services to international clients. Negotiations for this deal began in the late , reflecting early efforts by China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation (CASC) to monetize its launch capabilities amid growing global demand for satellite deployments. Commercial Long March launches are facilitated by China Great Wall Industry Corporation (CGWIC), a CASC subsidiary established to manage international contracts, insurance, and customer integration. CGWIC's pricing strategy emphasized competitiveness against incumbents like Europe's Ariane rockets and Russia's Proton, offering rates as low as $30–40 million per launch for geostationary transfer orbit missions in the 1990s and early 2000s—translating to roughly $4,000–5,000 per kilogram for typical payloads—undercutting Ariane 4/5 equivalents by 20–30% while accounting for higher initial insurance premiums due to perceived reliability risks. This approach secured follow-on contracts, including additional AsiaSat missions and payloads for clients in Asia and beyond, prior to heightened geopolitical constraints. Post-2000, commercial activities pivoted toward bolstering domestic satellite constellations, with Long March variants prioritizing Chinese payloads amid rising national priorities like navigation and remote sensing networks. Nonetheless, CGWIC sustained international engagement, launching over 70 foreign satellites by April 2025—many via dedicated missions or rideshares for non-Western partners such as , , and —demonstrating the family's adaptability and cost advantages in niche markets despite limited access to advanced economies. These efforts yielded 101 total commercial launches, blending foreign and domestic s to refine operational economics and payload integration processes.

Responses to Export Controls and Embargoes

Following revelations in the 1999 Cox Committee Report of unauthorized transfers of sensitive U.S. missile-related technologies to during commercial launches on rockets in the mid-1990s, the enacted strict controls to mitigate proliferation risks associated with dual-use space technologies. These measures, formalized under the (ITAR), effectively barred the export of U.S.-origin or components to for integration and launch unless granted rare presidential waivers, with the policy justified as a safeguard against enhancements to 's capabilities. Complementary multilateral efforts under the further restricted transfers of dual-use items like propulsion and guidance systems, influencing European partners to limit cooperation despite initial divergences in policy. In direct response, pivoted toward technological , investing heavily in domestic , , and materials to circumvent reliance on restricted foreign inputs, which accelerated upgrades across the family, including cryogenic engines for the CZ-3B and strap-on boosters for the CZ-2F. This self-reliance drive yielded tangible progress, as evidenced by the successful maiden flight of the CZ-5 heavy-lift variant on November 3, 2016, capable of 70 metric tons to without foreign-derived components critical to prior models. Commercial launch opportunities narrowed, with foreign revenue from Western payloads plummeting post-1999, but secured limited contracts with non-ITAR-restricted partners in , such as the 2018 launch of Pakistan's Pakistan Remote Sensing Satellite-1 (PRSS-1) on a CZ-2C from and Indonesia's 2012 deployment of the IndoStar-2 via CZ-3B. These successes, totaling fewer than a dozen non-domestic payloads annually in the compared to peaks of 5-7 Western satellites pre-embargo, underscored constrained but demonstrated viability for allied or developing-nation collaborations. Empirically, the controls reduced China's short-term commercial income—dropping from approximately $100 million in foreign launch fees to under $50 million by the mid-2000s—but fostered long-term autonomy, with annual launches surging from 11 in 2000 to 67 in 2023, unhindered by dependency on embargoed technologies. No verifiable data indicates the restrictions impeded overall program advancement; instead, they catalyzed efficiency gains, such as reusable upper-stage experiments on CZ-2F by , aligning with causal incentives for internal innovation over external acquisition.

Controversies and Criticisms

Allegations of Technology Acquisition

In the late 1990s, the U.S. House Select Committee on U.S. National Security and Military/Commercial Concerns with the People's Republic of China, known as the Cox Committee, documented unauthorized technology transfers from American satellite manufacturers to China that aided improvements in the Long March rocket family. Following the February 8, 1996, failure of a Long March 3B rocket carrying the Intelsat 708 satellite, Loral Space & Communications conducted an independent failure review and shared detailed analyses of the guidance system's strapdown inertial measurement unit with Chinese engineers, without obtaining necessary export licenses from the U.S. government. The Cox Report concluded that this information directly contributed to enhancements in the Long March 3B's fairing separation and attitude control systems, boosting overall launch reliability for subsequent missions. A similar incident occurred after the January 25, 1997, explosion of a 3 rocket during the B3 launch, where provided with engineering data on vibration and issues, again bypassing U.S. regulatory approvals. According to the , these transfers—framed by the companies as insurance-related cooperation—effectively conveyed U.S. expertise in rocket failure diagnostics and corrective measures, accelerating 's ability to achieve consistent orbital insertions with variants like the 2E and 3B, which had previously suffered multiple high-profile failures. The report emphasized the dual-use nature of these advancements, noting their applicability to PRC ballistic missile programs, though Chinese officials denied any military benefits. Beyond commercial transfers, U.S. congressional investigations in 1999 highlighted systematic PRC efforts targeting American , reentry, and guidance technologies relevant to development. Declassified assessments from the Cox Committee revealed that Chinese intelligence operations in the 1990s focused on U.S. national laboratories such as Sandia and Lawrence Livermore, seeking classified data on and ablative materials for reentry vehicles, which paralleled challenges in upper stages. hearings in May 1999 corroborated these findings, citing evidence of PRC agents and front companies approaching U.S. experts to acquire designs for high-performance liquid-fuel engines and inertial navigation systems, technologies that integrated into iterative upgrades to reduce development timelines and costs compared to indigenous trial-and-error methods. These acquisitions, per the reports, enabled to bypass decades of foundational research, achieving technical parity in key areas by the early , despite official PRC claims of self-reliant innovation.

Reliability and Safety Concerns

The Long March 5B core stages have undergone multiple uncontrolled reentries, including in May 2020 when debris impacted , in May over the , and in July 2022 with fragments scattering unpredictably across a broad footprint. These events involved stages weighing approximately 20 tonnes, too massive to fully burn up in the atmosphere, contrasting with practices by the and , which typically employ controlled deorbits targeting remote ocean areas to minimize ground risks. International experts have highlighted these as unnecessary hazards, given available technologies for passivation and targeted disposal, with the incident prompting calls for adherence to global norms under frameworks like the Committee on the Peaceful Uses of . Orbital debris generation from Long March launches has empirically exceeded norms in several cases, exacerbating collision risks in . For instance, the August 2024 Long March 6A mission produced over 700 tracked fragments from an upper stage , endangering more than 1,000 satellites and other objects according to conjunction analyses. U.S. Space Command reported initial tracking of more than pieces, with estimates suggesting thousands of smaller untrackable particles, contributing to a cloud that persists longer than typical due to the stage's mass and altitude. Such incidents underscore a pattern where Chinese launches have added disproportionately to the cataloged population compared to controlled disposal rates by other operators. The dual-use architecture of rockets, which shares propulsion and guidance systems with China's Dongfeng-series ballistic missiles, amplifies safety concerns through potential proliferation pathways. Commercial launch services using these vehicles have raised alarms under the , as technology transfers could enable foreign entities to adapt civilian rocket components for missile applications, justifying stringent export controls despite economic pressures. This overlap tempers reliability claims, as opaque reporting on failure modes—often limited to announcements without independent verification—hampers global assessments of systemic risks, including unintended escalations from militarized derivatives.

Future Developments

Planned Upgrades and New Variants

The Long March 8A, an upgraded variant of the Long March 8, debuted successfully on February 11, 2025, featuring a larger 3.35-meter-diameter / second stage powered by two upgraded YF-75D engines, along with enhanced first-stage and booster YF-100 engines for increased payload capacity to , targeting large-scale satellite constellations. This upgrade optimizes for cost efficiency and rapid production, with plans for 5-6 launches in 2025 alone. Further enhancements to the Long March 8 series include development of a reusable first stage integrating a core booster with side boosters, aimed at enabling vertical landings to reduce operational costs. The Long March 10 series, designed primarily for China's manned lunar exploration, completed multiple static fire tests in 2025, including a second full-duration test on September 12 at , validating its 990-ton thrust capability for configurations supporting the Mengzhou crewed spacecraft and lander. The standard Long March 10 can lift 70 tonnes to and 27 tonnes to , with partial reusability in variants like the Long March 10A, which is slated for initial flights to support lunar landings by 2030. Two Long March 10 launches are planned per mission to rendezvous in . Development of the super-heavy continues, with a planned first flight around 2030, featuring a 10-meter-diameter core stage, liftoff mass exceeding 4,000 tonnes, and thrust near 6,000 tonnes, powered by methane-liquid oxygen engines in a fully reusable first stage configuration using up to 30 YF-215 engines. It targets over 130 tonnes to , enabling crewed lunar missions and beyond. By October 2025, the family encompassed 24 variants, including 11 from a new generation emphasizing advanced engines and reusability for cost reductions through recoverable stages.

Strategic Implications for China's Space Program

The Long March rocket family has been instrumental in achieving China's strategic autonomy in space by enabling the deployment of the BeiDou Navigation Satellite System, providing an independent alternative to the U.S.-controlled Global Positioning System for military and civilian applications. The Long March 3A series alone successfully launched 58 BeiDou satellites across 43 missions with a 100% success rate as of 2020, contributing to the constellation's global coverage and reducing dependence on foreign navigation infrastructure amid U.S. export controls. By October 2025, the family had achieved its 600th launch, demonstrating cumulative reliability that supports national goals of self-reliance in satellite deployment without external partnerships. This reliability underpins China's lunar exploration ambitions, including the and potential crewed missions, where variants like the have lofted heavy payloads for probes, and the forthcoming is designed for manned lunar transfers targeted before 2030. Such capabilities counter U.S. dominance in deep by fostering indigenous heavy-lift infrastructure, allowing to pursue resource utilization and scientific outposts independently. Economically, the Long March series has facilitated the growth of China's commercial sector, with over 600 launches providing a stable platform for deploying private satellites despite critiques of limiting competition. Annual investments in commercial reached $2.86 billion in 2024, driven by state-owned launches that prioritize national payloads but increasingly accommodate emerging firms, bolstering a sector projected to exceed $900 billion by 2029. While China's progress stems from high-volume iteration—evidenced by accelerating launch rates—the family lags in disruptive innovations like full reusability, where SpaceX's has reduced costs by up to 95% through repeated recoveries, compared to China's nascent efforts in rockets like Tianlong-3. This volume-driven approach yields reliability for autonomy but trails in patent-intensive advancements and rapid cost reductions seen in U.S. private-sector models.

References

  1. https://chinapower.csis.org/china-space-launch/
  2. http://www.andrewerickson.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/China-Rocket-Satellite-Development_Acta-Astronautica_201410-11.pdf
  3. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA233419.pdf
  4. https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2021/08/zhongxing-2e-long-march-3b/
  5. https://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=42066.0
  6. https://jamestown.org/program/chinas-long-march-rocket-program-sees-both-dramatic-successes-and-failures-in-spring-2020/
  7. https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2020/11/long-march-6-lofts-ten-argentinian-satellites/
  8. https://spacenews.com/first-launch-of-long-march-8a-sends-second-group-of-guowang-megaconstellation-satellites-into-orbit/
  9. https://spacenews.com/china-to-debut-new-long-march-and-commercial-rockets-in-2025/
  10. https://missilethreat.csis.org/missile/df-4/
  11. http://www.braeunig.us/space/specs/lgmarch.htm
  12. https://www.space.com/space-exploration/launches-spacecraft/china-launches-internet-satellites-on-600th-mission-of-long-march-rocket-video
  13. https://www.reuters.com/graphics/SPACE-EXPLORATION-MOON/0100B0BH0NZ/index.html
  14. https://www.cnsa.gov.cn/english/n6465652/n6465653/c6480475/content.html
  15. https://www.unoosa.org/documents/pdf/psa/activities/2019/UNChinaSymSDGs/Presentations/Yuanying_Zhou.pdf
  16. https://nuclearweaponsedproj.mit.edu/1954-1959-soviet-union-aids-china-development-its-nuclear-weapons-program/
  17. https://irp.fas.org/dia/product/prc_ch-11.htm
  18. https://mwi.westpoint.edu/houston-we-might-have-a-problem-russias-asat-test-and-the-limits-of-china-russia-space-cooperation/
  19. https://ciaotest.cc.columbia.edu/olj/sa/sa_oct00zum01.html
  20. https://tagconfucius.com/article/view/Chinese-space-program
  21. https://www.ifc.usafa.edu/articles/seller-beware
  22. https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/DOC_0001408631.pdf
  23. https://orcasia.org/article/153/analyzing-the-chinese-space-programme-and-its-relevance-in-geopolitics
  24. https://www.braeunig.us/space/specs/lgmarch.htm
  25. https://www.space.com/china-long-march-rockets-family
  26. https://chinaspacereport.wordpress.com/launch-vehicles/cz6/
  27. https://everydayastronaut.com/change-5-long-march-5-2/
  28. https://spaceflightnow.com/2021/03/12/chinas-long-march-7a-rocket-successful-on-second-flight/
  29. http://www.astronautix.com/c/changzheng1.html
  30. https://www.cgwic.com/Launchservice/LM3B.html
  31. https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2020/05/china-next-generation-crew-capsule/
  32. https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202101/1214000.shtml
  33. https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2011/09/china-major-human-space-flight-milestone-tiangong-1s-launch/
  34. http://www.astronautix.com/c/changzheng2c.html
  35. https://chinaspacereport.wordpress.com/launch-vehicles/cz2/
  36. https://www.globalsecurity.org/space/world/china/cz-2e.htm
  37. https://en.cmse.gov.cn/constitutes/longmarch2f/
  38. https://www.globalsecurity.org/space/world/china/cz-3b.htm
  39. https://chinaspacereport.wordpress.com/launch-vehicles/cz3/
  40. http://www.astronautix.com/c/changzheng4.html
  41. http://english.scio.gov.cn/m/chinavoices/2023-12/11/content_116871262.htm
  42. https://www.globalsecurity.org/space/world/china/cz-5.htm
  43. https://www.cnsa.gov.cn/english/n6465715/n6465718/c6476925/content.html
  44. https://spaceflightnow.com/2016/11/03/china-launches-long-march-5-one-of-the-worlds-most-powerful-rockets/
  45. https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2017/07/long-march-5-lofts-shijian-18/
  46. https://spacenews.com/long-march-6a-launches-third-batch-of-thousand-sails-constellation-satellites/
  47. https://spaceflightnow.com/2016/06/25/chinas-new-long-march-7-rocket-successful-on-first-flight/
  48. https://www.china-in-space.com/p/chinas-launch-sites-and-rockets
  49. https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2020/12/long-march-8-debuts-nine-satellites/
  50. https://spaceflightnow.com/2022/03/07/china-launches-new-variant-of-long-march-8-rocket/
  51. http://english.news.cn/20230316/7cfaec12f90f4d16b0882e84aed45cb8/c.html
  52. https://www.spacedaily.com/reports/Chinas_Long_March_11_rocket_conducts_16_consecutive_successful_launches_999.html
  53. https://breakingdefense.com/2023/08/chinas-rapid-space-launch-advantage-and-how-the-us-can-try-to-counter-it/
  54. https://www.spacedaily.com/reports/Chinas_Long_March_rocket_has_worlds_highest_success_rate_expert_999.html
  55. https://spacenews.com/china-gains-new-flexible-launch-capabilities-with-first-sea-launch/
  56. https://spacenews.com/china-launches-first-long-march-rocket-with-solid-boosters/
  57. https://spacenews.com/long-march-6a-launches-second-yunhai-3-satellite/
  58. https://cgwic.com/Launchservice/LaunchSite.html
  59. http://www.astronautix.com/c/china.html
  60. https://newspaceeconomy.ca/2025/09/08/a-comprehensive-review-of-chinas-land-and-sea-launch-infrastructure/
  61. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1000936120302958
  62. https://www.globalsecurity.org/space/world/china/cz-11-mobile.htm
  63. https://spaceflightnow.com/2019/06/05/chinas-first-sea-launch-declared-a-success/
  64. https://odin.tradoc.army.mil/WEG/Asset/Type_718_Class_%28Yuan_Wang_Class%29_Chinese_Satellite_and_Missile_Tracking_Ship
  65. http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2019-12/28/c_138663785.htm
  66. http://eng.mod.gov.cn/xb/News_213114/TopStories/4913974.html
  67. https://www.cnsa.gov.cn/english/n6465645/n6465648/c6813088/content.html
  68. https://global.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202510/16/WS68f0bb43a310f735438b565f.html
  69. https://www.spacedaily.com/reports/China_marks_milestone_600th_Long_March_rocket_launch_999.html
  70. https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202510/1345836.shtml
  71. https://spacenews.com/china-launches-12th-group-of-guowang-broadband-satellites-as-rocket-milestone-highlights-accelerating-launch-rate/
  72. https://nextspaceflight.com/rockets/115/
  73. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GPO-CRPT-105hrpt851/html/ch6bod.html
  74. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354977993_Reviews_and_Challenges_in_Reliability_Design_of_Long_March_Launcher_Control_Systems
  75. https://english.spacechina.com/n17212/c2516621/content.html
  76. http://eng.mod.gov.cn/xb/News_213114/TopStories/16219633.html
  77. https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2020/06/china-complete-beidou-constellation-long-march-3b/
  78. https://spacenews.com/china-launches-final-pair-of-backup-beidou-satellites/
  79. https://spacenews.com/china-launches-change-5-moon-sample-return-mission/
  80. https://en.gmw.cn/2023-01/31/content_36335010.htm
  81. https://www.spacedaily.com/reports/Long_March_rockets_mark_their_500th_spaceflight_999.html
  82. https://www.upi.com/Archives/1996/02/15/Chinese-rocket-crashes/6146824360400/
  83. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/air-space-magazine/disaster-at-xichang-2873673/
  84. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/3050-2454/ae0b71
  85. https://spaceflightnow.com/2022/07/30/long-march-5b-re-entry/
  86. https://aerospace.org/article/aerospace-experts-tracking-massive-uncontrolled-reentry
  87. https://spacenews.com/surprise-chinese-lunar-mission-hit-by-launch-anomaly/
  88. https://english.news.cn/20240314/bec5de65a5b042a48d88776048560491/c.html
  89. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1000936121000157
  90. http://en.sasac.gov.cn/2020/04/07/c_1174.htm
  91. http://www.china.org.cn/english/funv/77427.htm
  92. https://www.cgwic.com/Launchservice/index.html
  93. https://www.china-in-space.com/p/what-is-the-cost-of-a-long-march
  94. https://spacenews.com/lower-cost-options-enter-launch-market/
  95. https://www.cgwic.com/Launchservice/piggyback.html
  96. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GPO-CRPT-105hrpt851/pdf/GPO-CRPT-105hrpt851.pdf
  97. https://aerospace.csis.org/itar-satellite-regulation/
  98. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0265964611000750
  99. https://www.csis.org/analysis/rethinking-technology-transfer-policy-toward-china
  100. https://www.gao.gov/assets/a234374.html
  101. https://www.armscontrol.org/act/1999-04/cox-report-overview
  102. https://www.csis.org/analysis/limits-chip-export-controls-meeting-china-challenge
  103. https://irp.fas.org/congress/1999_hr/990526-prc.htm
  104. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/11/04/science/china-rocket-debris.html
  105. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41550-022-01718-8
  106. https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-62333546
  107. https://www.reuters.com/technology/space/chinese-rockets-breakup-puts-over-1000-satellites-other-objects-risk-2024-08-09/
  108. https://www.airandspaceforces.com/chinese-rocket-breaks-apart-orbital-debris/
  109. https://arstechnica.com/space/2024/08/us-military-tracks-more-than-300-pieces-of-debris-from-chinese-launch/
  110. https://www.cnn.com/2024/08/09/science/china-rocket-stage-orbital-debris
  111. https://saisreview.sais.jhu.edu/the-dual-use-nature-of-space-launch-vehicles-and-ballistic-missiles-and-the-complexities/
  112. https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2004-10/features/does-china-belong-missile-technology-control-regime
  113. https://www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/2022-12/2212_mtcr_final_report.pdf
  114. https://www.heritage.org/defense/report/commercial-space-cooperation-should-not-harm-national-security-0
  115. https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202502/1328263.shtml
  116. https://www.cnsa.gov.cn/english/n6465652/n6465653/c6810962/content.html
  117. https://news.cgtn.com/news/2025-09-13/China-s-Long-March-10-carrier-rocket-succeeds-in-2nd-static-fire-test-1GCQl4NS4xi/p.html
  118. https://www.scmp.com/news/china/science/article/3322082/chinas-lunar-rocket-test-marks-milestone-bringing-astronauts-moon
  119. https://spacenews.com/china-to-debut-large-reusable-rockets-in-2025-and-2026/
  120. https://spacenews.com/china-reveals-details-for-super-heavy-lift-long-march-9-and-reusable-long-march-8-rockets/
  121. https://www.chinadailyhk.com/hk/article/311038
  122. https://www.aerospaceguide.net/spacerocket/longmarch9.html
  123. http://eng.mod.gov.cn/xb/News_213114/TopStories/4862084.html
  124. https://thediplomat.com/2024/08/china-advances-its-space-capabilities-enlarging-its-strategic-advantage/
  125. https://arstechnica.com/space/2025/09/a-new-report-finds-chinas-space-program-will-soon-equal-that-of-the-us/
  126. https://www.china-briefing.com/news/chinas-opportunities-in-aerospace-and-commercial-space-industries/
  127. https://jamestown.org/program/moonshot-vs-long-march-contrasting-the-united-statess-and-chinas-space-programs/
  128. https://interestingengineering.com/space/china-tianlong-3-reusable-rocket
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.