Hubbry Logo
Copperhead (politics)Copperhead (politics)Main
Open search
Copperhead (politics)
Community hub
Copperhead (politics)
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Copperhead (politics)
Copperhead (politics)
Copperhead (politics)
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

In the 1860s, the Copperheads, also known as Peace Democrats,[1] were a faction of the Democratic Party in the Union who opposed the American Civil War and wanted an immediate peace settlement with the Confederates.

Key Information

Republicans started labeling anti-war Democrats "Copperheads" after the eastern copperhead (Agkistrodon contortrix), a species of venomous snake. Those Democrats embraced the moniker, reinterpreting the copper "head" as the likeness of Liberty, which they cut from Liberty Head large cent coins and proudly wore as badges.[2] By contrast, Democratic supporters of the war were called War Democrats. Notable Copperheads included two Democratic Congressmen from Ohio: Reps. Clement L. Vallandigham and Alexander Long. Republican prosecutors accused some prominent Copperheads of treason in a series of trials in 1864.[3]

Copperheadism was a highly contentious grassroots movement. It had its strongest base just north of the Ohio River and in some urban ethnic wards. In the State of Ohio, perhaps in contrast with Indiana and Illinois, the counties that had Peace Democrat majorities tended not to be along the Ohio River, but more in the central and northwestern portions of the state.[4] Historians such as Wood Gray, Jennifer Weber, and Kenneth M. Stampp[citation needed] have argued that it represented a traditionalistic element alarmed at the rapid modernization of society sponsored by the Republican Party and that it looked back to Jacksonian democracy for inspiration. Weber argues that the Copperheads damaged the Union war effort by opposing conscription, encouraging desertion, and forming conspiracies. Still, other historians say that the draft was already in disrepute and that the Republicans greatly exaggerated the conspiracies for partisan reasons.[5][6][page needed]

Historians such as Gray and Weber argue that the Copperheads were inflexibly rooted in the past and were naive about the refusal of the Confederates to return to the Union. Convinced that the Republicans were ruining the traditional world they loved, they were obstructionist partisans.[7] In turn, the Copperheads became a significant target of the National Union Party in the 1864 presidential election, when they were used to discredit the leading Democratic candidates.

Copperhead support increased when Union armies did poorly and decreased when they won great victories. After the fall of Atlanta in September 1864, Union military success seemed assured, and Copperheadism collapsed.

Name

[edit]
The Eastern copperhead snake is venomous and has coloration well-adapted for camouflage

A possible origin of the name came from a New York Times newspaper account in April 1861 that stated that when postal officers in Washington, D.C., opened a mail bag from a state now in the Confederacy:

A day or two since, when one of the mail-bags coming from the South by way of Alexandria, was emptied in the court-yard of the Post-office, a box fell out and was broken open, – from which two copperheads, one four and a half and the other three feet long, crawled out. The larger one was benumbed and easily killed; the other was very lively and venomous and was dispatched with some difficulty and danger. What are we to think of a people who resort to such weapons of warfare.[8][9]

Agenda

[edit]
Copperhead pamphlet from 1864 by Charles Chauncey Burr, a magazine editor from New York City[10]

During the American Civil War (1861–1865), the Copperheads nominally favored the Union and strongly opposed the war, about which they faulted abolitionists. They demanded immediate peace and resisted draft laws. They wanted President Abraham Lincoln and the Republicans ousted from power, seeing the President as a tyrant destroying American republican values with despotic and arbitrary actions.[11]

Some Copperheads tried to persuade Union soldiers to desert. They talked of helping Confederate prisoners of war seize their camps and escape. They sometimes met with Confederate agents and took money. The Confederacy encouraged their activities whenever possible.[12]

Newspapers

[edit]

The Copperheads had numerous important newspapers, but the editors never allied. In Chicago, Wilbur F. Storey made the Chicago Times into Lincoln's most vituperative enemy.[13] The New York Journal of Commerce, originally abolitionist, was sold to owners who became Copperheads, giving them an important voice in the largest city. A typical editor was Edward G. Roddy, owner of the Uniontown, Pennsylvania Genius of Liberty. He was an intensely partisan Democrat who saw African Americans as an inferior race and Lincoln as a despot and dunce. Although he supported the war effort in 1861, he blamed abolitionists for prolonging the war and denounced the government as increasingly despotic. By 1864, he was calling for peace at any price.[citation needed]

John Mullaly's Metropolitan Record was the official Catholic newspaper in New York City. Reflecting Irish American opinion, it supported the war until 1863 before becoming a Copperhead organization. In the spring and summer of 1863, the paper urged its Irish working-class readers to pursue armed resistance to the draft passed by Congress earlier in the year. When the draft began in the city, working-class European Americans, largely Irish, responded with violent riots from July 13 to 16, lynching, beating and hacking to death more than 100 black New Yorkers and burning down black-owned businesses and institutions, including the Colored Orphan Asylum, an orphanage for 233 black children. On August 19, 1864, John Mullaly was arrested for inciting resistance to the draft.

Even in an era of extremely partisan journalism, Copperhead newspapers were remarkable for their angry rhetoric. Wisconsin newspaper editor Marcus M. Pomeroy of the La Crosse Democrat referred to Lincoln as "Fungus from the corrupt womb of bigotry and fanaticism" and a "worse tyrant and more inhuman butcher than has existed since the days of Nero ... The man who votes for Lincoln now is a traitor and murderer ... And if he is elected to misgovern for another four years, we trust some bold hand will pierce his heart with dagger point for the public good".[14]

Copperhead resistance

[edit]
Clement Vallandigham, leader of the Copperheads, coined the slogan: "To maintain the Constitution as it is, and to restore the Union as it was."

The Copperheads sometimes talked of violent resistance and, in some cases, started to organize. However, they never actually made an organized attack. As war opponents, Copperheads were suspected of disloyalty, and their leaders were sometimes arrested and held for months in military prisons without trial. One famous example was General Ambrose Burnside's 1863 General Order Number 38, issued in Ohio, which made it an offense (to be tried in military court) to criticize the war in any way.[15] The order was used to arrest Ohio congressman Clement L. Vallandigham when he criticized the order itself.[16] However, Lincoln commuted his sentence but exiled him to the Confederacy.

Probably the largest Copperhead group was the Knights of the Golden Circle. Formed in Ohio in the 1850s, it became politicized in 1861. It reorganized as the Order of American Knights in 1863 and again in early 1864 as the Order of the Sons of Liberty, with Vallandigham as its commander. One leader, Harrison H. Dodd, advocated the violent overthrow of the governments of Indiana, Illinois, Kentucky, Tennessee, and Missouri in 1864. Democratic Party leaders and a Federal investigation thwarted his "Northwest Conspiracy".

Despite this Copperhead setback, tensions remained high. These tensions would contribute to physical altercations between Copperheads, Republicans, and Union soldiers in Illinois towns such as Paris, Mattoon, and ultimately in Charleston. The Charleston Riot would take place in Charleston on March 28th, 1864 and would end with six Union soldiers and two Copperheads dead. This event would draw the attention of President Lincoln, and would become national news.[17] Indiana Republicans then used the sensational revelation of an antiwar Copperhead conspiracy by elements of the Sons of Liberty to discredit Democrats in the 1864 House elections. The military trial of Lambdin P. Milligan and other Sons of Liberty revealed plans to set free the Confederate prisoners held in the state. The culprits were sentenced to hang, but the Supreme Court intervened in Ex parte Milligan, saying they should have received civilian trials.[18]

Most Copperheads actively participated in politics. On May 1, 1863, former Congressman Vallandigham declared that the war was being fought not to save the Union but to free the blacks and enslave Southern whites. The U.S. Army then arrested him for declaring sympathy for the enemy. He was court-martialed by the Army and sentenced to imprisonment, but Lincoln commuted the sentence to banishment behind Confederate lines.[19] The Democrats nevertheless nominated him for governor of Ohio in 1863. He left the Confederacy and went to Canada, where he campaigned for governor but lost after an intense battle. He operated behind the scenes at the 1864 Democratic convention in Chicago. This convention adopted a largely Copperhead platform and selected Ohio Representative George Pendleton, a Peace Democrat, as the vice-presidential candidate. However, it chose a pro-war presidential candidate, General George B. McClellan. The contradiction severely weakened the party's chances to defeat Lincoln.[citation needed]

Characteristics

[edit]

The values of the Copperheads reflected the Jacksonian democracy of an earlier agrarian society. The Copperhead movement attracted Southerners who had settled north of the Ohio River, and the poor and merchants who had lost profitable Southern trade.[20][21] They were most numerous in border areas, including southern parts of Ohio, Illinois, and Indiana (in Missouri, comparable groups were avowed Confederates).[22]

The movement had scattered bases of support outside the lower Midwest. A Copperhead element in Connecticut dominated the Democratic Party there.[23] The Copperhead coalition included many Irish American Catholics in eastern cities, mill towns and mining camps (especially in the Pennsylvania coal fields). They were also numerous in German Catholic areas of the Midwest, especially Wisconsin.[24]

Historian Kenneth Stampp has captured the Copperhead spirit in his depiction of Congressman Daniel W. Voorhees of Indiana:

There was an earthy quality in Voorhees, "the tall sycamore of the Wabash." On the stump his hot temper, passionate partisanship, and stirring eloquence made an irresistible appeal to the western Democracy [i.e. the Democratic Party]. His bitter cries against protective tariffs and national banks, his intense race prejudice, his suspicion of the eastern Yankee, his devotion to personal liberty, his defense of the Constitution and State's rights faithfully reflected the views of his constituents. Like other Jacksonian agrarians, he resented the political and economic revolution then in progress. Voorhees idealized a way of life that he thought was being destroyed by the current rulers of his country. His bold protests against these dangerous trends made him the idol of the Democracy of the Wabash Valley.[25]

Historiography

[edit]
"The Copperhead Party—in Favor of a Vigorous Prosecution of Peace!", cartoon by Thomas Nast, in the Harper's Weekly, February 28, 1863

Two central questions have run through the historiography of the Copperheads: "How serious a threat did they pose to the Union war effort and hence to the nation's survival?" and "To what extent and with what justification did the Lincoln administration and other Republican officials violate civil liberties to contain the perceived menace?"[26]

The first book-length scholarly treatment of the Copperheads was The Hidden Civil War: The Story of the Copperheads (1942) by Wood Gray. In it, Gray decried the "defeatism" of the Copperheads and argued that they deliberately served the Confederacy's war aims.[27] Also in 1942, George Fort Milton published Abraham Lincoln and the Fifth Column, which likewise condemned the traitorous Copperheads and praised Lincoln as a model defender of democracy.[28][26]

Gilbert R. Tredway, a professor of history, in his 1973 study Democratic Opposition to the Lincoln Administration in Indiana found most Indiana Democrats were loyal to the Union and desired national reunification. He documented Democratic counties in Indiana having outperformed Republican counties in recruiting soldiers. Tredway found that Copperhead sentiment was uncommon among the rank-and-file Democrats in Indiana.[29]

The chief historians who look more favorably on the Copperheads are Richard O. Curry and Frank L. Klement. Klement devoted most of his career to debunking the idea that the Copperheads represented a danger to the Union. Klement and Curry have downplayed the treasonable activities of the Copperheads, arguing the Copperheads were traditionalists who fiercely resisted modernization and wanted to return to the old ways. Klement argued in the 1950s that the Copperheads' activities, especially their supposed participation in treasonous anti-Union secret societies, were mostly false inventions by Republican propaganda machines designed to discredit the Democrats at election time.[26] Curry sees Copperheads as poor traditionalists battling against the railroads, banks, and modernization.[30] In his standard history Battle Cry of Freedom (1988), James M. McPherson asserted Klement had taken "revision a bit too far. There was some real fire under that smokescreen of Republican propaganda".[26][31][page needed]

Jennifer Weber's Copperheads: The Rise and Fall of Lincoln's Opponents in the North (2006) agrees more with Gray and Milton than with Klement. She argues that first, Northern antiwar sentiment was strong, so strong that Peace Democrats came close to seizing control of their party in mid-1864. Second, she shows the peace sentiment led to deep divisions and occasional violence across the North. Third, Weber concluded that the peace movement deliberately weakened the Union military effort by undermining both enlistment and the operation of the draft. Indeed, Lincoln had to divert combat troops to retake control of New York City from the anti-draft rioters in 1863. Fourth, Weber shows how the attitudes of Union soldiers affected partisan battles back home. The soldiers' rejection of Copperheadism and overwhelming support for Lincoln's reelection in 1864 was decisive in securing the Northern victory and the preservation of the Union. The Copperheads' appeal, she argues, waxed and waned with Union failures and successes in the field.[6][page needed]

Flags

[edit]

There was no official flag for Copperheads: they differed from area to area. Most contemporary accounts indicate some flags had a white field with the inscription "peace" and "nation."[32] Others were the standard national flag with 13 to 22 stars and 11-7 stripes known as "exclusionary flags". They mostly removed the stars of rebel states or Union states. The flags were also popular with the opposition[33] Some retained their 34 stars but put political slogans in their stripes.

  • Digital reconstruction of a 22 star "exclusionary" American flag raised by Peace Democrats in San Francisco, California in 1864[34]
    Digital reconstruction of a 22 star "exclusionary" American flag raised by Peace Democrats in San Francisco, California in 1864[34]
  • Digital remake of flag flown in Brookfield, Connecticut by local copperheads[32]
    Digital remake of flag flown in Brookfield, Connecticut by local copperheads[32]
  • Digital remake of a flag flown by a Copperhead. The 11 stripes for the 9 states + 2 border states that were loyal to the Confederacy. The 19 stars for Indiana where it was made[35]
    Digital remake of a flag flown by a Copperhead. The 11 stripes for the 9 states + 2 border states that were loyal to the Confederacy. The 19 stars for Indiana where it was made[35]
  • Digital remake of a flag with Clement Vallandigham's slogan
    Digital remake of a flag with Clement Vallandigham's slogan
  • Digital remake of the flag given to the Democratic Party of Westport, Wisconsin[36]
    Digital remake of the flag given to the Democratic Party of Westport, Wisconsin[36]
  • Digital Reconstruction of 24 star flag flown by Copperheads in Los Angeles, California on June 1, 1861[37]
    Digital Reconstruction of 24 star flag flown by Copperheads in Los Angeles, California on June 1, 1861[37]
  • Digital Reconstruction of a flag flown 1862 with a popular copperhead slogan[38]
    Digital Reconstruction of a flag flown 1862 with a popular copperhead slogan[38]

Notable Copperhead Democrats

[edit]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Copperhead (politics)

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
![Clement Vallandigham portrait][float-right] Copperheads, formally known as Peace Democrats, constituted a dissenting faction of the Democratic Party in the during the (1861–1865), characterized by their vehement opposition to the war's prosecution, advocacy for immediate armistice and negotiated peace with the to restore the Union without territorial loss or emancipation, and criticism of President Abraham Lincoln's administration for policies such as military conscription, suspension of , and the . The label "Copperhead" originated as a Republican pejorative, evoking the venomous copperhead snake to symbolize perceived disloyalty and akin to striking from concealment, though adherents rejected the term and emphasized constitutional fidelity against what they viewed as executive overreach and abolitionist radicalism precipitating unnecessary conflict. Concentrated in Midwestern states like , , and —regions with strong Southern economic and cultural ties—Copperheads drew support from farmers, laborers, and immigrants wary of war's burdens and skeptical of federal centralization, often framing the conflict as a Republican-orchestrated on rather than a defense against . Prominent leaders included Ohio Congressman Clement L. Vallandigham, whose inflammatory speeches denouncing the war as a "wicked, cruel, and unnecessary" endeavor led to his arrest under military authority for discouraging enlistments and aiding the enemy, resulting in exile to the Confederacy before his return via . While some Copperheads engaged in alleged conspiracies like the to foment draft resistance and , their broader platform achieved limited electoral success, such as Democratic gains in 1862 midterms, but faltered amid Union battlefield triumphs and accusations of Confederate sympathy that eroded . The faction's influence dissipated post-1864, as military victory vindicated Republican persistence and discredited peace-at-any-cost advocacy, though their critique highlighted genuine wartime tensions over and federal power that persisted in American political discourse.

Origins and Terminology

Etymology and Adoption of the Term

The term "Copperhead" derives from the venomous copperhead snake (Agkistrodon contortrix), native to eastern , whose brownish camouflage enables it to ambush prey or threats without warning, symbolizing the perceived stealthy disloyalty of certain Northern Democrats toward the Union war effort. Republicans and Union supporters coined the early in the Civil War to denounce Peace Democrats—those opposing military , policies, and prolonged conflict—as covert sympathizers with the Confederacy, akin to a snake lurking in familiar surroundings. By 1862, the label had achieved widespread currency in partisan rhetoric, appearing frequently in newspapers and speeches to discredit opponents of President Lincoln's administration. Initially a smear propagated by Republicans against Democrats rejecting and advocating negotiations, the term was later partially reclaimed by its targets, who interpreted the copperhead as a native, non-aggressive that only struck when provoked, contrasting the aggressive "black snake" imagery Republicans applied to themselves. Peace Democrats adopted copper symbols, such as piercing U.S. one-cent coins—featuring Liberty's profile in copper—as badges or watch fobs to signal affiliation, transforming the into a badge of defiance against perceived federal overreach. This reclamation highlighted internal Democratic divisions, with War Democrats rejecting the label while the anti-war faction embraced it amid electoral campaigns, such as the midterm contests where Copperhead intensified debates over and constitutional limits on wartime powers.

Emergence in the Early Civil War Context

The Copperhead movement emerged amid the initial fervor and subsequent disillusionment following the outbreak of the . After Confederate forces fired on on April 12, 1861, President called for 75,000 volunteers on April 15, eliciting broad Northern support, including from many Democrats who echoed Stephen A. Douglas's June 1861 assertion of unity under the banner "no party now but the country." However, early Union military reverses, notably the defeat at the on July 21, 1861—which resulted in approximately 2,900 Union casualties—fueled skepticism among conservative Democrats in the Midwest states of , , and , who questioned the war's constitutionality and advocated for restoring the Union through negotiation rather than conquest. Republicans coined the term "Copperhead" as a slur for these Peace Democrats, first employing it in the on July 20, 1861, to evoke the image of a that strikes covertly, reflecting perceptions of the faction's alleged disloyalty and obstructionism. The label gained traction by mid-1862 amid escalating grievances over Lincoln's suspension of on April 27, 1861—which enabled the arrest of thousands without trial—and policies perceived as infringing on , such as preliminary emancipation proposals. Figures like Ohio Congressman Clement L. Vallandigham began articulating opposition, decrying the administration's shift from preserving the Union "as it was" to coercive measures that risked prolonging conflict without clear victory. This early coalescence distinguished Copperheads from War Democrats, who backed the Union effort, and positioned the faction to capitalize on war weariness during the 1862 midterm elections, where they secured gains in several state legislatures and congressional seats in the Old Northwest. Their emphasized strict constitutional limits on federal power, arguing that the war's expansion beyond initial aims of reunion threatened republican government itself. ![Clement Vallandigham portrait][float-right]

Core Ideology and Principles

Positions on War Aims and Negotiation

Copperheads contended that the Civil War's sole legitimate aim was the restoration of the Union through reunion on pre-secession terms, rejecting any expansion to include the abolition of as an unconstitutional overreach that would alienate Southern civilians and prolong the conflict unnecessarily. They viewed the preliminary , issued by President on September 22, 1862, as a radical shift that recast the war from a defense of federal authority into a crusade for racial upheaval, potentially creating a "new nation" incompatible with Northern white labor interests and traditional constitutional limits. This stance aligned with their broader critique that military conquest alone could not achieve lasting reunion, given the South's defensive advantages and the war's mounting casualties, which by mid-1863 exceeded 300,000 combined deaths. Prominent Copperhead leader Clement L. Vallandigham, in speeches such as his May 1, 1863, address in , to an estimated 10,000 listeners, urged an immediate to facilitate negotiations, arguing that continued prosecution under Lincoln's policies amounted to and futility. Copperheads differentiated between outright sympathizers and those favoring conditional peace—"Purists" who rejected war in principle and "Legitimists" open to limited force if negotiation failed—but unified in demanding cessation of hostilities to avert further economic ruin, with Northern draft resistance and inflation rates surpassing 80% by 1863 cited as evidence of unsustainable costs. They proposed truce terms centered on mutual and conventions to restore federal authority without federal interference in state institutions, though some, like Democrat Charles Ingersoll, conceded potential acceptance of Southern independence if reunion proved unattainable. This position culminated in the August in , where Copperhead influence secured the party platform's "peace plank," declaring the war a after four years and four million dollars daily in expenditures, and calling for "immediate efforts... for a cessation of hostilities, with a view to an ultimate convention of the States or other peaceable means" to secure peace on equitable terms. The plank, drafted amid Vallandigham's active despite his , prioritized over , reflecting calculations that Confederate persistence rendered total subjugation improbable without risking Northern societal collapse. Critics within the party, including nominee , later disavowed the plank's implication of negotiated independence, but it encapsulated Copperhead insistence on as the only viable path to Union preservation.

Constitutional Objections to Federal Policies

Copperheads contended that President Abraham Lincoln's suspension of the writ of , initiated on April 27, 1861, and expanded through subsequent orders, violated Article I, Section 9 of the U.S. Constitution, which permits suspension only "when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it," and argued that such authority resided exclusively with Congress rather than the executive branch. They criticized the administration's use of this suspension to justify arbitrary arrests of civilians without trial, including political opponents, as exemplified by the military arrest of Congressman on May 5, 1863, for a speech denouncing federal policies, which Copperheads viewed as an assault on free speech and under the First and Fifth Amendments. In Vallandigham's case, the U.S. in Ex parte Vallandigham (1864) declined to issue a writ but affirmed that military commissions lacked jurisdiction over civilians where civil courts were operational, underscoring Copperhead claims of unconstitutional overreach into civilian affairs. Regarding the issued on January 1, 1863, Copperheads, including Vallandigham, argued it exceeded presidential war powers under Article II, transforming a conflict aimed at restoring the Union into one for abolition and thereby infringing on property protected by the Fifth Amendment without or compensation, while applying only to Confederate-held territories beyond federal enforcement. They maintained that emancipation required congressional action or , not unilateral executive decree, and accused the policy of inciting servile insurrection and prolonging the war contrary to its original constitutional purpose of suppressing rebellion under Article I, Section 8. Vallandigham described the proclamation as "a confession of military and political failure" that undermined the by shifting war aims without legislative consent. Copperheads further objected to the Enrollment Act of March 3, 1863, which authorized a federal draft, asserting it lacked constitutional basis since Article I empowers Congress to "raise and support Armies" but traditionally through state militias or voluntary enlistments, not direct national conscription that bypassed state sovereignty and equal protection by allowing commutation fees favoring the wealthy. Leaders like Vallandigham declared the act "unconstitutional and revolutionary," arguing it violated the Tenth Amendment by usurping states' reserved powers over their citizens and militias, and contributed to unrest such as the New York Draft Riots in July 1863, where protesters echoed these grievances. They also decried related measures like confiscation acts and the Legal Tender Act of 1862 as encroachments on property rights and federalism, insisting that wartime exigencies did not justify abandoning strict construction of enumerated powers.

Views on Slavery, Emancipation, and Racial Issues

Copperheads maintained that was a constitutionally protected in the states where it existed, advocating non-interference by the federal government as per the original compact of the Union. They opposed abolitionist agitation, viewing it as a disruptive force that had precipitated rather than a , and argued that the war's initial aim—to preserve the Union—should not extend to dismantling . This stance aligned with their broader commitment to and limited federal authority, rejecting any expansion of war powers to address domestic social structures. The , issued on January 1, 1863, drew sharp condemnation from Copperheads, who decried it as an unconstitutional executive overreach that transformed the conflict into a crusade against rather than a defense of federal authority. Prominent leader explicitly criticized the proclamation, declaring that "war for the Union was abandoned; war for the Negro openly begun," and warned it would prolong the conflict without achieving restoration of the seceded states. They contended that emancipation violated property rights enshrined in the Fifth Amendment and lacked congressional sanction, predicting it would incite further Southern resistance and undermine voluntary reunion. Copperhead newspapers, such as the , echoed this by labeling the measure a "diabolical scheme" designed to incite servile insurrection and burden the North with racial consequences. On racial issues, Copperheads expressed deep reservations about policies implying equality between whites and blacks, fearing would lead to widespread miscegenation, economic competition from freed slaves, and social disorder in Northern states. They opposed arming Black troops, as authorized under the Second Confiscation Act of July 17, 1862, viewing it as degrading to white soldiers and a violation of traditional military hierarchies. Figures like Vallandigham argued against extending or voting rights to , insisting such changes threatened white labor and cultural norms; in , Copperhead platforms in 1863 elections demanded repeal of state laws permitting Black testimony in courts against whites. This racial conservatism stemmed from a in inherent differences and a desire to maintain pre-war social boundaries, with many Copperheads supporting schemes to relocate freed slaves abroad rather than integrating them domestically. ![Clement Vallandigham portrait][float-right] , a leading Copperhead voice, exemplified opposition to through public speeches and writings that framed it as a radical departure from constitutional norms. While not uniformly advocating 's expansion into new territories—as some did—Copperheads prioritized peace negotiations that would likely preserve the institution in the Confederacy to expedite Union restoration, rejecting abolition as a precondition for settlement. Their resistance extended to the Thirteenth Amendment, proposed in 1864, which they portrayed as punitive and irreversible, potentially dooming prospects for reconciliation. This position reflected a pragmatic calculus: tolerating in the to avert prolonged bloodshed, rather than endorsing it ideologically, though individual rhetoric often invoked defenses of the "peculiar institution" against perceived Northern fanaticism.

Activities and Organizational Efforts

Propaganda Through Newspapers and Publications

![Copperhead pamphlet "Abraham Africanus I," 1864][float-right] Copperhead sympathizers utilized newspapers to propagate anti-war sentiments, portraying the Civil War as an unconstitutional aggression against and criticizing Abraham Lincoln's policies as tyrannical. The Crisis, founded by Samuel Medary in , in 1860, emerged as a primary vehicle for Peace Democrats, consistently opposing military , , and federal overreach while advocating with the Confederacy. The paper's editorials, such as those decrying the war's economic burdens on Northern farmers and laborers, reached wide audiences in the Midwest, where Copperhead support was strongest. In urban centers like New York, outlets including the Journal of Commerce and amplified similar rhetoric, labeling the conflict an "abolition war" that prioritized over Union preservation. These dailies published accounts exaggerating Union defeats and Confederate strengths to foster disillusionment, with circulations exceeding 50,000 copies daily by 1863. Regional papers, such as the La Crosse Democrat under editor Marcus "" Pomeroy in , further disseminated vitriolic attacks on Lincoln, referring to him as a "monster" and calling for his on grounds of violating . Magazines provided a platform for more sustained ideological defense, exemplified by The Old Guard, a New York-based monthly launched in 1862 by Charles Chauncey Burr. Devoted to "principles of 1776 and 1787," it defended as constitutionally protected, denounced as inciting servile insurrection, and portrayed Republican rule as despotic, with issues like the November 1864 edition satirizing Lincoln's reelection. Circulation reached approximately 25,000 subscribers, influencing intellectual circles opposed to the war's prolongation. Pamphlets and leaflets supplemented periodical efforts, offering concise, distributable . The 1864 booklet Abraham Africanus I., His Life and Its Lessons, authored by Burr, depicted Lincoln as a biblical imposing African equality on white America, warning of societal upheaval from policies. Such tracts, often anonymous or pseudonymous, circulated in the thousands during seasons, emphasizing platforms that promised restored trade and averted draft riots, though their inflammatory tone sometimes alienated moderate Democrats. These materials collectively framed the war as a Republican-orchestrated , prioritizing empirical critiques of casualty figures—over 200,000 Union dead by mid-1863—and fiscal costs exceeding $1 billion annually to argue for over .

Political Mobilization and Electoral Challenges

Copperheads mobilized politically primarily through established Democratic Party mechanisms, including state legislatures, congressional campaigns, and national conventions, emphasizing opposition to prolonged war, , and as threats to constitutional liberties and white labor. In the 1862 midterm elections, amid Union military setbacks like the Seven Days Battles and Second Bull Run, Peace Democrats capitalized on voter frustration with casualties exceeding 100,000 and economic strains from blockades, securing Democratic gains of approximately 28 seats in the , shifting control to a narrower Republican majority. Key figures like , despite losing his congressional reelection by 1,250 votes to Union general Robert Schenck, rallied supporters through speeches decrying federal overreach, fostering localized mobilization in Midwestern strongholds such as , , and where antiwar sentiment ran high among farmers and laborers fearing competition from freed slaves. State-level efforts intensified in 1863, with Peace Democrats holding rallies such as the May 1 gathering in Mount Vernon, Ohio, to protest military arrests and demand armistice negotiations, drawing thousands despite risks of federal intervention. Vallandigham, exiled to the Confederacy after his May 5, 1863 arrest and military trial, was nominated in absentia for Ohio governor by Democratic convention delegates on June 11, 1863, framing the campaign around restoration of civil liberties and immediate peace talks; he garnered 187,000 votes (39%) against Republican John Brough's 288,000 (61%), reflecting strong but insufficient rural and urban working-class turnout undermined by war enthusiasm post-Chancellorsville. At the in on August 29-31, 1864, Copperheads asserted dominance over War Democrats, drafting a platform on August 30 declaring the war a "failure" and calling for an immediate armistice, convention for peace, and reunion without abolishing slavery, which alienated moderates and handicapped nominee George McClellan. McClellan publicly repudiated the peace plank on September 8, 1864, but Copperhead orators like Vallandigham campaigned vigorously in swing states, securing 45% of the popular vote (2.2 million) yet only 21 electoral votes against Lincoln's 212, as Union victories at (September 2) and (August 5) boosted Republican turnout and soldier ballots favored Lincoln by over 70% in key regiments. Electoral challenges compounded from Republican portrayals of Copperheads as Confederate sympathizers, evidenced by propaganda linking them to draft resistance and secret societies, which eroded credibility among patriotic voters; internal Democratic divisions, with War Democrats defecting to Lincoln's National Union ticket, further fragmented mobilization, as seen in Pennsylvania where Peace Democrat gubernatorial candidate George Woodward lost narrowly in October 1863 amid similar platform tensions. Conscription riots in July 1863, while drawing some Copperhead support, alienated moderates by associating the faction with violence rather than principled constitutionalism, limiting broader appeal and contributing to marginalization by 1864 as battlefield successes reframed the war's viability.

Public Resistance, Protests, and Secret Societies

![Clement Vallandigham - Brady-Handy.jpg][float-right] Copperheads engaged in public resistance through rallies and speeches denouncing the Lincoln administration's war policies, including and . In May 1863, a Copperhead indignation meeting in New York City's Union Square protested perceived tyrannical actions, such as the arrest of dissenters, drawing crowds to voice opposition to federal overreach. Prominent leader delivered fiery anti-war orations in , arguing that the conflict violated constitutional liberties and advocating immediate peace negotiations with the Confederacy, which galvanized supporters but led to his 1863 arrest for treasonous rhetoric. These public demonstrations often linked resistance to the draft with broader critiques of the war's expansion beyond preserving the Union, as seen in where Copperhead agitation contributed to and unrest in 1862-1863. Protests escalated amid events like the , with Copperheads decrying it as a racial incitement that prolonged the war and threatened Northern social order. In , the 1864 Charleston Riot exemplified violent resistance, where anti-war Democrats clashed with Union supporters over election-day violence and opposition to military interference, resulting in deaths and arrests that highlighted Copperhead willingness to confront federal authority physically. Such actions, while rooted in constitutional objections, faced accusations of disloyalty, with participants sometimes wearing copper badges as symbols of defiance against Republican policies. Complementing overt protests, Copperheads formed secret societies to coordinate covert resistance, evolving from the Knights of the Golden Circle—a pro-Southern group advocating and —to the Order of American Knights and ultimately the by 1863-1864. The , with an estimated 100,000 members across Midwestern states like and , aimed to undermine the war effort through subversion, including plots to liberate Confederate prisoners, seize federal arsenals, and support potential invasions by Confederate forces in 1864. Vallandigham, after his exile to the Confederacy, assumed leadership of the , directing operations from to foster armed uprisings against Lincoln's government if peace negotiations failed. These organizations distributed oaths pledging resistance to and , though their plans often dissolved amid internal divisions and federal infiltration, reflecting a shift from public advocacy to clandestine networks amid intensifying suppression.

Government Suppression and Internal Challenges

Lincoln Administration's Countermeasures

The Lincoln administration's primary countermeasures against Copperheads centered on the suspension of habeas corpus, which permitted military arrests of civilians deemed threats to the Union war effort. President Lincoln authorized the initial suspension on April 27, 1861, along key rail lines to prevent sabotage amid fears of rebellion in Maryland, and progressively broadened its application as Copperhead agitation intensified. This measure, justified by Lincoln as essential to suppress insurrection under Article I, Section 9 of the Constitution, enabled the detention of over 13,000 individuals by war's end, including suspected Peace Democrats discouraging enlistments or aiding Confederate sympathizers. In the Midwest, where Copperhead influence peaked, Union generals enforced orders targeting anti-war speech. General Ambrose Burnside's General Order No. 38, issued April 13, 1863, from , declared that "the habit of declaring sympathies for the enemy" would not be tolerated, subjecting violators to by military commission. This directly precipitated the arrest of Ohio Congressman on May 5, 1863, at his Dayton residence, following a speech on May 1 condemning as a "poor man's fight" and the administration's policies as tyrannical. Vallandigham's swift military trial resulted in conviction for treasonous utterances, with a sentence of close confinement; Lincoln commuted this to banishment beyond Union lines on May 19, 1863, viewing exile as a deterrent without martyrdom. The U.S. , in Vallandigham on February 17, 1864, ruled it lacked jurisdiction over military commissions during active rebellion, effectively endorsing the administration's authority. formalized these powers via the Suspension Act of 1863, passed September 24, indemnifying prior actions and extending suspensions for disloyalty cases. Additional tactics included selective newspaper shutdowns and surveillance of groups like the , a Copperhead-linked secret society, though the administration avoided mass repression to preserve Northern unity. Lincoln defended these steps in his 1863 message to , arguing that "must a of necessity be too strong for the liberties of its own , or too weak to maintain its own existence?" Such measures curtailed overt Copperhead organizing but fueled accusations of , galvanizing some Democratic opposition through the 1864 election. The Lincoln administration's suspension of enabled widespread arrests of individuals suspected of disloyalty, including prominent Copperheads, without immediate . This measure, expanded through proclamations and military orders, targeted those perceived as undermining the Union war effort, such as through public speeches or alleged ties to Confederate sympathizers. In regions with strong Copperhead sentiment like and , federal authorities arrested dozens to hundreds for activities ranging from draft resistance to suspected involvement in secret societies like the . The most notable case involved Clement Vallandigham, a leading Copperhead and former Ohio congressman, arrested on May 5, 1863, in , by Union troops under General Ambrose Burnside's General Order No. 38. Vallandigham had delivered a speech on May 1 criticizing Lincoln's policies, , and as tyrannical and sympathetic to the Confederacy, prompting charges of violating military prohibitions on expressing disloyal sentiments. Tried by military commission, he was convicted on May 16 and sentenced to indefinite imprisonment, but President Lincoln commuted this to banishment beyond Union lines on May 19. Vallandigham was transported to the Confederacy on May 25, 1863, where Confederate authorities received him reluctantly amid internal debates over his utility. He soon evaded blockade to reach , continuing Copperhead agitation from exile, including an unsuccessful 1863 bid for Ohio governor while absent. The U.S. , in Ex parte Vallandigham (1864), declined jurisdiction, affirming military commissions' authority during wartime rebellion without endorsing the arrest's legality. Other Copperheads faced similar fates, including imprisonment for alleged plotting, such as or arms smuggling linked to peace organizations. In , military arrests targeted suspected members in 1864, disrupting planned uprisings but yielding few convictions post-war via habeas challenges like Ex parte Milligan (1866), which later limited against civilians where courts functioned. These actions, while curbing overt resistance, fueled Copperhead narratives of executive overreach, though documented ties to Confederate agents in some cases justified federal scrutiny.

Factors Leading to Decline and Marginalization

The Copperhead movement's influence waned significantly after mid-1863, coinciding with decisive Union military triumphs at Gettysburg (July 1–3) and Vicksburg (July 4), which shattered Confederate momentum and restored Northern resolve against peace advocacy perceived as capitulation. These victories, resulting in over 50,000 Confederate casualties at Gettysburg and the surrender of 29,000 troops at Vicksburg, shifted public sentiment by demonstrating the war's winnability, thereby undermining Copperhead arguments that prolonged conflict was futile and unconstitutional. Electoral dynamics exacerbated the faction's marginalization during the 1864 presidential campaign, where Democrats nominated —a War Democrat—over more radical peace advocates, and McClellan explicitly disavowed the party's platform calling for an armistice with the Confederacy. Lincoln's reelection by a margin of 55% to 45% in the popular vote, with 212 electoral votes to McClellan's 21, reflected eroding Copperhead support, as even in strongholds like and , their candidates underperformed amid wartime patriotism. The platform's rejection by McClellan alienated purist Copperheads while failing to consolidate antiwar voters, fracturing the movement's political cohesion. The Confederacy's surrender at Appomattox on April 9, 1865, rendered Copperhead demands for negotiation moot, as the Union's preservation obviated their central critique of the war's necessity. Postwar Reconstruction policies, including the 13th Amendment's ratification on December 6, 1865, abolishing slavery, further isolated remaining sympathizers by aligning mainstream Democrats with national unity over sectional appeasement. Internal divisions, evident in the Knights of the Golden Circle's diminished activities after 1864 arrests and the evaporation of draft resistance following commutation adjustments, compounded this erosion, leaving Copperheads without organizational vitality. By 1866 midterm elections, their rhetoric had subsided into broader Democratic opposition, marking the faction's effective dissolution.

Notable Individuals

Key Leaders and Their Contributions

Clement L. Vallandigham (1820–1871) served as the preeminent leader of the Copperhead faction, galvanizing opposition to the Civil War through fiery oratory and political organizing in the Midwest. As a Democratic U.S. Representative from Ohio's 7th district from 1859 to 1863, Vallandigham consistently denounced the Republican administration's war policies, arguing that the conflict infringed on constitutional liberties and prolonged unnecessary bloodshed. His leadership crystallized the Copperhead identity, positioning the group as defenders of and critics of , which he viewed as exacerbating sectional divisions rather than resolving them. Vallandigham's key contributions included mobilizing public sentiment via speeches and publications that called for negotiations with the Confederacy, emphasizing that victory was unattainable and that peace required compromise on to restore the Union. In a notable January 14, 1863, address in , he declared the war a failure and urged immediate cessation of hostilities, that resonated with war-weary Democrats but provoked federal scrutiny. His arrest on May 5, 1863, by Union authorities for allegedly expressing treasonous sympathies—stemming from a speech labeling the conflict a "wicked, cruel, and unnecessary war"—elevated him to martyr status among Copperheads, spurring rallies and petitions demanding his release. Exiled to the Confederate lines before being transported to , Vallandigham continued influencing the movement by clandestinely returning to to campaign for governor in 1863, where he received 39.6% of the vote despite his banishment, demonstrating Copperhead electoral viability. Other notable figures included , an senator and vice-presidential nominee in 1864 alongside , who amplified Copperhead platforms by advocating armistice in congressional debates and linking anti-war stances to against war debts. Pendleton's efforts helped sustain Democratic opposition in the Midwest, though he distanced himself from more radical elements post-war. Samuel S. Cox, a New York representative who later moved to , contributed through editorials and speeches echoing Vallandigham's themes of constitutional overreach, fostering networks between urban Democratic machines and rural peace advocates. These leaders collectively shaped Copperhead ideology, prioritizing negotiation over coercion, but their influence waned as Union victories undermined their peace arguments by 1864.

Symbols and Cultural Representations

Flags, Emblems, and Visual Propaganda

Copperheads adopted emblems that played on their name, originating from Republican comparisons to the venomous copperhead snake, to signify their anti-war stance. A key symbol was the copperhead badge, fashioned by cutting the Liberty Head portrait from an 1857–1864 copper one-cent coin and mounting it on a pin or chain for wear as a ornament or fob. This practice, documented in period accounts, allowed adherents to openly display affiliation despite the term's intent. Flags associated with Copperheads often incorporated Union motifs adapted for peace advocacy, such as banners bearing slogans like "The as it is, the Union as it was," championed by leader . Homemade flags, including one stitched by women in , around 1863, served as visual protests against the war, blending patriotic imagery with calls for negotiation over military escalation. Visual propaganda extended to pocket tokens and satirical prints, with some tokens featuring snake motifs or shared among sympathizers for discreet identification. These items reinforced Copperhead narratives of constitutional fidelity against perceived Republican overreach, though such symbols invited backlash and were sometimes confiscated as evidence of disloyalty.

Historiography and Enduring Legacy

19th-Century Interpretations and Republican Narratives

![The Copperhead Party—in Favor of a Vigorous Prosecution of Peace! (Thomas Nast, Harper's Weekly, February 28, 1863)][float-right] Republicans during the Civil War era interpreted Copperheads as treacherous elements within the North, likening them to the venomous copperhead snake that strikes without warning, to emphasize their perceived disloyalty and covert opposition to the Union war effort. The term "Copperhead" emerged as a Republican-coined by 1862, applied broadly to anti-war Democrats who criticized , , and military policies, portraying them not merely as political dissenters but as active threats abetting the Confederacy. This narrative framed Copperhead rhetoric and activities, such as opposition to the and calls for , as tantamount to , with figures like accused of encouraging desertion and resistance to federal authority. The Lincoln administration and Republican propagandists amplified this view through speeches, editorials, and visual media, depicting Copperheads as part of a "fifth column" undermining Northern resolve. President Lincoln himself, in private correspondence and public addresses, expressed concerns over their influence, viewing organizations like the Knights of the Golden Circle—sometimes linked to Copperheads—as seditious networks plotting against the government, though of widespread remained contested even among contemporaries. Political cartoons by in , such as the February 28, 1863, illustration showing Copperheads advocating peace at the expense of Union victory, reinforced the image of them as serpentine agitators favoring Southern independence over national preservation. Post-war Republican narratives, particularly from in Congress, solidified Copperheads as symbols of wartime betrayal, justifying suspensions of and arrests as necessary defenses against internal enemies. Historians aligned with Unionist perspectives, like those writing in the immediate , echoed this by chronicling Copperhead peace movements as demoralizing forces that prolonged the conflict, citing specific incidents such as draft riots in 1863 where Copperhead sympathy allegedly exacerbated violence. These interpretations prioritized loyalty to the Republican-led war aims, often downplaying constitutional arguments raised by Copperheads in favor of a causal link between their and Confederate resilience, though primary accounts from Republican soldiers and officials frequently blended factual resistance with hyperbolic accusations of outright .

20th- and 21st-Century Scholarly Reassessments

In the early decades of the , historians such as James Ford Rhodes and members of the , including William A. Dunning, largely perpetuated a of Copperheads as a disruptive but containable threat to Union unity, justifying Lincoln's suspensions of and other measures as necessary to counter potential subversion without deeming the movement inherently treasonous. This perspective emphasized the efficiency of suppression over deep analysis of Copperhead motivations, often framing dissent within a broader patriotic imperative for national preservation. A significant reassessment emerged in the mid-20th century with Frank L. Klement's 1960 monograph The Copperheads in the Middle West, which portrayed Copperheads not as disloyal Confederate sympathizers but as principled conservative Democrats rooted in Jacksonian traditions, opposing the war's escalation, , and centralization of power as violations of constitutional limits and . Klement systematically debunked Republican-era claims of widespread and treason—such as alleged plots—through exhaustive examination of primary sources like newspapers, correspondence, and election data, arguing that Copperhead rhetoric reflected legitimate partisan critique rather than sabotage, and that their influence was regionally confined to the Midwest without posing an existential risk to the Union war effort. This revisionist framework, echoed by Richard O. Curry in 1967, shifted focus from mythic subversion to structural party dynamics, rehabilitating Copperheads as a voice of restraint amid wartime radicalism. In the late 20th and early 21st centuries, scholars built on yet critiqued Klement's exoneration, with Jennifer L. Weber's 2006 study Copperheads: The Rise and Fall of Lincoln's Opponents in the North acknowledging their constitutionalist dissent while emphasizing how their antiwar agitation, draft resistance, and racial opposition eroded Northern morale and recruitment, nearly derailing Lincoln's reelection in before Union victories restored momentum. Weber's analysis, drawing on enlistment records and political correspondence, portrayed Copperheads as a potent "fire in the rear" that materially hindered —such as discouraging volunteers and fueling desertions—without substantiating outright but highlighting their strategic alignment with Confederate interests through peace advocacy. Contemporary consensus, as reflected in syntheses like the Essential Civil War Curriculum, views Copperheads primarily as the antiwar faction of the Democratic Party, loyal in intent but pragmatically defeatist in effect, with their legacy informing debates on wartime rather than disloyalty. This nuanced underscores empirical evidence of limited organizational cohesion and electoral marginalization post-1864, countering earlier hyperbolic portrayals while recognizing the movement's role in amplifying sectional tensions.

Comparisons to Subsequent Anti-War Movements

The Copperhead faction's opposition to the Union war effort during the (1861–1865) shares superficial parallels with later anti-war movements, particularly in the realm of political dissent amid ongoing conflict and accusations of undermining national resolve. Like the protests of the 1960s and 1970s, which mobilized mass demonstrations and draft resistance against U.S. involvement in , Copperheads advocated for immediate armistice negotiations, criticizing the Lincoln administration's prolongation of hostilities as unconstitutional and economically ruinous. Both faced charges of disloyalty: Copperheads were branded traitors by Republicans for alleged Confederate sympathies, evidenced by their circulation of peace resolutions at the 1863 calling for cessation of fighting, while Vietnam-era activists endured FBI surveillance and labels of aiding communism through groups like . However, substantive differences in ideology and context set the Copperheads apart. Their dissent stemmed from partisan Democratic grievances, including opposition to as a war aim—which they viewed as exacerbating sectional division—and a desire to restore the pre-war Union with intact, rather than broader anti-imperialist or humanitarian critiques prevalent in Vietnam opposition. Copperhead leaders like emphasized constitutional limits on federal power, such as habeas corpus suspensions affecting over 13,000 arrests by 1863, but lacked the decentralized, youth-led radicalism of later movements that incorporated civil rights intersections and global . In contrast, Vietnam protests escalated to violent clashes, like the 1970 killing four students, whereas Copperhead activity remained largely electoral and rhetorical, peaking with 40% of the Northern popular vote for George McClellan in the 1864 presidential election before declining amid Union victories. Comparisons to the post-2003 opposition highlight partisan obstructionism but reveal Copperhead exceptionalism in wartime scale. Conservative analysts, such as Mackubin Thomas Owens, have likened critics within the Democratic Party—evident in congressional resolutions like the 2006 non-binding vote to redeploy troops—to Copperheads for prioritizing electoral defeat over success, echoing Vallandigham's 1863 exile to Confederate lines after tribunal conviction for discouraging enlistments. Yet dissent operated in peacetime congressional debates without the Copperheads' existential threat to Union preservation; the latter's secret societies, like the Knights of the Golden Circle with estimated 200,000 members by 1864, plotted armed resistance in states like , actions unmatched by -era rhetoric. Scholarly treats Copperheads as a uniquely intense anti-war surge, publicized through newspapers reaching millions, but cautions against equating them to movements lacking their ethnic-Irish Catholic base or pro-Southern undertones.

References

  1. https://hsp.org/education/unit-plans/civil-liberties-and-the-civil-war-in-pennsylvania-0/copperheads-or-confederates-political-opposition-in-civil-war-pennsylvania
  2. https://www.americanhistorycentral.com/entries/peace-democrats-aka-copperheads/
  3. https://www.essentialcivilwarcurriculum.com/copperheads.html
  4. https://www.wisconsinhistory.org/Records/Article/CS3066
  5. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1012&context=wvuhistoricalreview
  6. https://history.house.gov/Historical-Highlights/1800-1850/Representative-Clement-Vallandigham-of-Ohio/
  7. https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1012&context=masters202029
  8. https://quod.lib.umich.edu/j/jala/2629860.0032.105/--lincoln-s-critics-the-copperheads?rgn=main%3Bview=fulltext
  9. https://academic.oup.com/jah/article-pdf/25/2/263/2024435/25-2-263.pdf
  10. https://politicaldictionary.com/words/copperheads/
  11. https://creativecockades.blogspot.com/2014/08/copperheads-peace-and-constitutionalism.html
  12. https://quod.lib.umich.edu/j/jala/2629860.0032.105/--lincoln-s-critics-the-copperheads?rgn=main;view=fulltext
  13. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Copperhead-American-political-faction
  14. https://www.knoxhistory.org/index.php/local-history/historic-markers/vallandighams-speech
  15. https://www.sethkaller.com/item/1655-23005-%25E2%2580%259CCopperheads-Vigorously-Prosecuting-Peace:-Is-it-the-Peace-YOU-Want-%25E2%2580%259D&from=7
  16. https://teachingamericanhistory.org/document/to-erastus-corning-et-al/
  17. https://www.oyez.org/cases/1850-1900/68us243
  18. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/68/243/
  19. https://teachingamericanhistory.org/document/on-the-war-and-its-conduct/
  20. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/419770/summary
  21. https://egrove.olemiss.edu/etd/1572/
  22. https://www.americanhistorycentral.com/entries/vallandigham-clement/
  23. https://www.bklynlibrary.org/blog/2014/02/25/emancipation-proclamation
  24. https://digital-collections.columbuslibrary.org/digital/collection/memory/id/139297/
  25. https://www.legacyamericana.com/Lincoln-and-Civil-War-THE-CRISIS-Copperhead-newspaper_p_2632.html
  26. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/wvuhistoricalreview/vol2/iss1/7/
  27. https://www.lincolnandthecivilwar.com/SubLevelPages/OldGuard.asp
  28. https://grolierclub.omeka.net/exhibits/show/american-magazines/item/1142
  29. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/418454/summary
  30. https://www.gilderlehrman.org/sites/default/files/inline-pdfs/Hannah%2520Teller_Snakes%2520Lurking%2520in%2520the%2520Grass_0.pdf
  31. https://pubs.lib.uiowa.edu/annals-of-iowa/article/6775/galley/115544/view/
  32. https://www.ohiocivilwarcentral.com/clement-vallandigham/
  33. https://www.ohiocivilwarcentral.com/peace-democrats/
  34. https://www.nps.gov/people/clement-l-vallandigham.htm
  35. https://www.williamreesecompany.com/the-real-chicago-platform-as-expounded-by-the-democratic-orators-at-chicago-caption-title-65929.html
  36. https://elections.harpweek.com/1864/bio-1864-Full.asp?UniqueID=27
  37. https://dsc.duq.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1991&context=etd
  38. https://www.nytimes.com/1863/05/20/archives/the-copperhead-indignation-meeting.html
  39. https://www.journalofthecivilwarera.org/2021/12/deceive-and-inflame-the-masses-placing-blame-for-new-hampshire-civil-war-draft-resistance/
  40. https://publish.illinois.edu/ihlc-blog/2020/03/31/the-charleston-riot-of-1864/
  41. https://patriotshistoryusa.com/teaching-materials/bonus-materials/the-copperheads/
  42. https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/bitstreams/c1b6731c-05ea-4be9-9af2-5581c3f4e144/download
  43. https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/four-cases-when-the-writ-of-habeas-corpus-was-suspended
  44. https://www.law.berkeley.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Chapter-7.pdf
  45. https://www.clevelandcivilwarroundtable.com/lincolns-suspension-of-habeas-corpus/
  46. https://hd.housedivided.dickinson.edu/node/39414
  47. https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/68/243
  48. https://civilwaronthewesternborder.org/timeline/habeas-corpus-suspension-act
  49. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/proclamation-94-suspending-the-writ-habeas-corpus
  50. https://indyencyclopedia.org/copperheads/
  51. https://www.americanheritage.com/most-unpopular-man-north
  52. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Clement-L-Vallandigham
  53. https://study.com/academy/lesson/copperheads-overview-history.html
  54. https://www.historynet.com/the-fire-in-the-rear-clement-vallandigham-and-the-copperheads/
  55. http://www.thelatinlibrary.com/chron/civilwarnotes/vallandigham.html
  56. https://www.coinbooks.org/v22/esylum_v22n39a13.html
  57. https://www.treasurenet.com/threads/copperhead-badge.154503/
  58. https://www.newstimes.com/local/article/historic-brookfield-flag-symbolizes-intricacies-442329.php
  59. https://archive.nytimes.com/opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/01/28/lincoln-and-the-copperheads/
  60. https://elections.harpweek.com/1864/cartoon-1864-Medium.asp?UniqueID=55&Year=1864
  61. https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/imh/article/download/9470/12652/24897
  62. https://academic.oup.com/jah/article-pdf/47/3/516/1992973/47-3-516.pdf
  63. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/458333/summary
  64. https://repository.lsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2631&context=cwbr
  65. https://www.nationalreview.com/2007/03/copperheads-then-and-now-mackubin-thomas-owens/
  66. https://www.history.com/articles/anti-war-movements-throughout-american-history
  67. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02773945.2019.1686533
  68. https://www.csmonitor.com/2007/0330/p09s01-coop.html
  69. https://ashbrook.org/viewpoint/oped-owens-07-copperheads/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.