Hubbry Logo
July MonarchyJuly MonarchyMain
Open search
July Monarchy
Community hub
July Monarchy
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
July Monarchy
July Monarchy
from Wikipedia

Key Information

The July Monarchy (French: Monarchie de Juillet), officially the Kingdom of France (French: Royaume de France), was a liberal constitutional monarchy in France under Louis Philippe I, starting on 9 August 1830, with the revolutionary victory in the July Revolution of 1830, and ending on 24 February 1848, with the Revolution of 1848. It marks the end of the Bourbon Restoration (1814–1830). It began with the overthrow of the conservative government of Charles X, the last king of the main line House of Bourbon.

Louis Philippe I, a member of the more liberal Orléans branch of the House of Bourbon, proclaimed himself as Roi des Français ("King of the French") rather than "King of France", emphasizing the popular origins of his reign. The king promised to follow the juste milieu, or the middle-of-the-road, avoiding the extremes of both the conservative supporters of Charles X and radicals on the left.

The July Monarchy was dominated by wealthy bourgeoisie and numerous former Napoleonic officials. It followed conservative policies, especially under the influence of François Guizot. The king promoted friendship with the United Kingdom and sponsored colonial expansion, notably the French conquest of Algeria. By 1848, Louis Philippe I's popularity had collapsed, and he abdicated following the successful February Revolution, part of the larger revolutions of 1848.

Overview

[edit]
After the July Revolution, the French tricolour replaced the white flag of the Bourbons once again. This was an attempt to link the new monarchy with the heritage of the French Revolution.
Coat of arms of France (1830–1831)
Coat of arms of France (1831–1848)
Coat of Arms of Louis Philippe I (Order of the Golden Fleece)

The July Monarchy (1830–1848) is generally seen as a period during which the haute bourgeoisie was dominant, and marked the shift from the counter-revolutionary Legitimists to the Orléanists. The Orléanists were willing to make some compromises with the changes brought by the 1789 Revolution. For instance, Louis-Philippe was crowned "King of the French", instead of "King of France": this marked his acceptance of popular sovereignty.

Louis-Philippe, who had flirted with liberalism in his youth, rejected much of the pomp and circumstance of the Bourbons and surrounded himself with merchants and bankers. The July Monarchy, however, ruled during a time of turmoil. A large group of Legitimists on the right demanded the restoration of the Bourbons to the throne. On the left, republicanism and later socialism remained powerful forces. Late in his reign Louis-Philippe became increasingly rigid and dogmatic and refused to remove his deeply unpopular President of the Council François Guizot. The situation gradually escalated until the Revolutions of 1848 resulted in the fall of the monarchy and the establishment of the Second Republic.

During the first few years of his reign, Louis-Philippe took actions to develop legitimate, broad-based reform. The government found its source of legitimacy within the Charter of 1830, written by reform-minded members of Chamber of Deputies and committed to a platform of religious equality among Catholics and Protestants; the empowerment of the citizenry through the reestablishment of the National Guard, electoral reform, reform of the peerage system, and the lessening of royal authority. Louis-Philippe and his ministers adhered to policies that seemed to promote the central tenets of the constitution. However, the majority of these policies were veiled attempts to shore up the power and influence of the government and the bourgeoisie, rather than legitimate attempts to promote equality and empowerment for a broad constituency of the French population.[citation needed] Thus, though the July Monarchy seemed to move toward reform, this movement was largely illusory.

During the years of the July Monarchy, enfranchisement roughly doubled, from 94,000 under Charles X to more than 200,000 men by 1848.[citation needed] But, this number still represented only roughly one percent of population and a small number of those men of eligible age. The extended franchise tended to favor the wealthy merchant bourgeoisie more than any other group as the right to vote was related to payment of a certain level of taxes. Beyond resulting in the election of more bourgeoisie to the Chamber of Deputies, this electoral expansion meant that the bourgeoisie could politically challenge the nobility on legislative matters. Thus, while appearing to honor his pledge to increase suffrage, Louis-Philippe acted primarily to empower his supporters and increase his hold over the French Parliament. The election of only the wealthiest men tended to undermine any possibility for growth of a radical faction in Parliament, and effectively served socially conservative ends.

The reformed Charter of 1830 limited the power of the king, stripping him of his ability to propose and decree legislation, as well as limiting his executive authority. However, Louis-Philipe believed in a kind of monarchy in which the king was more than a figurehead for an elected Parliament, and as such, he was deeply involved in legislative affairs. One of his first acts in creating his government was to appoint the conservative Casimir Pierre Perier as the premier of his cabinet. Perier, a banker, was instrumental in shutting down many of the republican secret societies and labor unions that had formed during the early years of the regime. In addition, he oversaw the dismemberment of the National Guard after it proved too supportive of radical ideologies. He conducted these actions with royal approval. He was once quoted as saying that the source of French misery was the belief that there had been a revolution. "No Monsieur," he said to another minister, "there has not been a revolution: there is simply a change at the head of state." [citation needed]

Perier and François Guizot, then Minister of the Interior, enforced the conservatism of the July Monarchy. The regime acknowledged early on that radicalism and republicanism threatened it, as they undermined its laissez-faire policies. In 1834 the Monarchy declared the term "republican" illegal. Guizot shut down republican clubs and disbanded republican publications. Republicans within the cabinet, such as the banker Dupont, were all but excluded by Perier and his conservative clique. Distrusting the National Guard, Louis-Philippe increased the size of the army and reformed it in order to ensure its loyalty to the government.

Two factions always persisted in the cabinet, split between liberal conservatives such as Guizot (le parti de la Résistance, the Party of Resistance) and liberal reformers such as the journalist Adolphe Thiers (le parti du Mouvement, the Party of Movement), the latter never gained prominence. Perier was succeeded as premier by Count Molé, another conservative. Thiers, a reformer, succeeded Molé but was later sacked by Louis-Philippe after attempting to pursue an aggressive foreign policy. After Thiers the conservative Guizot was selected as premier.

In particular, the Guizot administration was marked by increasingly authoritarian crackdowns on republicanism and dissent, and an increasingly pro-business policy. This policy included protective tariffs that defended the status quo and enriched French businessmen. Guizot's government granted railway and mining contracts to the bourgeois supporters of the government, and contributed some of the start-up costs of these enterprises. As workers under these policies had no legal right to assemble, unionize, or petition the government for increased pay or decreased hours, the July Monarchy under Perier, Molé, and Guizot generally proved detrimental to the lower classes. Guizot's advice to those who were disenfranchised by the tax-based electoral requirements was "enrichissez-vous" (enrich yourselves).

Louis Phillipe was pushed to the throne by an alliance between the people of Paris; the Republicans, who had set up barricades in the capital; and the liberal bourgeoisie. However, at the end of his reign, the so-called "Citizen King" was overthrown by similar citizen uprisings and use of barricades during the February Revolution of 1848. This resulted in the proclamation of the Second Republic.[3]

After Louis-Philippe's ousting and subsequent exile to Britain, the liberal Orléanist faction (opposed by the counter-revolutionary Legitimists) continued to support a return of the House of Orléans to the throne. But the July Monarchy proved to be the last Bourbon-Orleans monarchy of France (although monarchy was re-established under Napoleon Bonaparte's nephew, who reigned as Napoleon III from 1852 to 1870). The Legitimists withdrew from politics to their castles, leaving the way open for the struggle between the Orléanists and the Republicans.

Background

[edit]
Liberty Leading the People (1830) by Eugène Delacroix commemorates the July Revolution of 1830. The child with two pistols to the right of Liberty (who holds the tricolor flag) would be Victor Hugo's inspiration for Gavroche in Les Misérables.[citation needed]

Following the ouster of Napoleon Bonaparte in 1814, the Coalitions restored the Bourbon Dynasty to the French throne. The ensuing period, the Bourbon Restoration, was characterized by conservative reaction and the re-establishment of the Roman Catholic Church as one of the main powers in French politics. The relatively moderate Comte de Provence, brother of the deposed-and-executed Louis XVI, ruled as Louis XVIII from 1814 to 1824 and was succeeded by his more conservative younger brother, the former Comte d'Artois, ruling as Charles X from 1824. In May 1825 he had an elaborate coronation in Reims Cathedral which harkened back to the pre-revolutionary monarchy.

Despite the return of the House of Bourbon to power, France was much changed from the era of the ancien régime. The egalitarianism and liberalism of the revolutionaries remained an important force and the autocracy and hierarchy of the earlier era could not be fully restored. Economic changes, which had been underway long before the revolution, had progressed further during the years of turmoil and were firmly entrenched by 1815. These changes had seen power shift from the noble landowners to the urban merchants. The administrative reforms of Napoleon, such as the Napoleonic Code and efficient bureaucracy, also remained in place. These changes produced a unified central government that was fiscally sound and had much control over all areas of French life, a sharp difference from the complicated mix of feudal and absolutist traditions and institutions of pre-Revolutionary Bourbons.

Portrait of Louis Philippe I by Franz Xaver Winterhalter, 1841. The Louis Philippe I, King of the French, is depicted at the entrance of the Gallerie des batailles which he had furnished in the Château de Versailles.

Louis XVIII, for the most part, accepted that much had changed. However, he was pushed on his right by the Ultra-royalists, led by the comte de Villèle, who condemned the doctrinaires' attempt to reconcile the Revolution with the monarchy through a constitutional monarchy. Instead, the Chambre introuvable, elected in 1815, first banished all Conventionnels who had voted for Louis XVI's death and then passed similar reactionary laws. Louis XVIII was forced to dissolve this Chamber, dominated by the Ultras, in 1816, fearing a popular uprising. The liberals thus governed until the 1820 assassination of the Duke of Berry, nephew of the king and known supporter of the Ultras, which brought Villèle's Ultras back to power (vote of the Anti-Sacrilege Act in 1825, and of the loi sur le milliard des émigrés, 'Act on the émigrés' billions'). His brother Charles X, however, took a far more conservative approach. He attempted to compensate the aristocrats for what they had lost in the revolution, curbed the freedom of the press, and reasserted the power of the Church. In 1830 the discontent caused by these changes and Charles' authoritarian nomination of the Ultra prince de Polignac as minister culminated in an uprising in the streets of Paris, known as the 1830 July Revolution. Charles was forced to flee and Louis-Philippe d'Orléans, a member of the Orléans branch of the family, and son of Philippe Égalité who had voted the death of his cousin Louis XVI, ascended the throne. Louis-Philippe ruled, not as "King of France" but as "King of the French" (an evocative difference for contemporaries).

Initial period (August 1830 – November 1830)

[edit]

Symbolic establishment of the new regime

[edit]
Silver five-franc coin featuring Louis Philippe

On 7 August 1830, the 1814 Charter was revised. The preamble reviving the Ancien Régime was suppressed, and the King of France became the "King of the French", (also known as the "Citizen King") establishing the principle of national sovereignty over the principle of the divine right. The new Charter was a compromise between the Doctrinaires opposition to Charles X and the Republicans. Laws enforcing Catholicism and censorship were repealed and the revolutionary tricolor flag re-established.

Louis-Philippe pledged his oath to the 1830 Charter on 9 August setting up the beginnings of the July Monarchy. Two days later, the first cabinet was formed, gathering the constitutionalist opposition to Charles X, including Casimir Perier, the banker Jacques Laffitte, Count Molé, the duke of Broglie, François Guizot, etc. The new government's first aim was to restore public order, while at the same time appearing to acclaim the revolutionary forces which had just triumphed. Assisted by the people of Paris in overthrowing the Legitimists, the Orléanist bourgeoisie had to establish its new order.

Louis-Philippe decided on 13 August 1830 to adopt the arms of the House of Orléans as state symbols. Reviewing a parade of the Parisian National Guard on 29 August which acclaimed the adoption, he exclaimed to its leader, Lafayette: "This is worth more to me than coronation at Reims!".[4] The new regime then decided on 11 October that all people injured during the revolution (500 orphans, 500 widows and 3,850 people injured) would be given financial compensation and presented a draft law indemnifying them in the amount of 7 million francs, also creating a commemorative medal for the July Revolutionaries.

Ministers lost their honorifics of Monseigneur and Excellence and became simply Monsieur le ministre. The new king's older son, Ferdinand-Philippe, was given the title of Duke of Orléans and Prince Royal, while his daughters and his sister, Adélaïde d'Orléans, were named princesses of Orléans – and not of France, since there was no longer any "King of France" nor "House of France".

Unpopular laws passed during the Restoration were repealed, including the 1816 amnesty law which had banished the regicides – with the exception of article 4, concerning the Bonaparte family. The Church of Sainte-Geneviève was once again returned to its functions as a secular building, named the Panthéon. Various budget restrictions were imposed on the Catholic Church, while the 1825 Anti-Sacrilege Act which envisioned death penalties for sacrilege was repealed.

Permanent disorder

[edit]

Civil unrest continued for three months, supported by the left-wing press. Louis-Philippe's government was not able to put an end to it, mostly because the National Guard was headed by one of the Republican leaders, the Marquis de La Fayette, who advocated a "popular throne surrounded by Republican institutions". The Republicans then gathered themselves in popular clubs, in the tradition established by the 1789 Revolution. Some of those were fronts for secret societies (for example, the Blanquist Société des Amis du Peuple [fr]), which sought political and social reforms, or the execution of Charles X's ministers (Jules de Polignac, Jean de Chantelauze, the Count de Peyronnet and the Martial de Guernon-Ranville). Strikes and demonstrations were permanent.[5]

In order to stabilize the economy and finally secure public order, in the autumn of 1830 the government had the Assembly vote a credit of 5 million francs to subsidize public works, mostly roads. Then, to prevent bankruptcies and the increase of unemployment, especially in Paris, the government issued a guarantee for firms encountering difficulties, granting them 60 million francs. These subsidies mainly went into the pockets of big entrepreneurs aligned with the new regime, such as the printer Firmin Didot.

The death of the Prince of Condé on 27 August 1830, who was found hanged, caused the first scandal of the July Monarchy. Without proof, the Legitimists quickly accused Louis-Philippe and the Queen Marie-Amélie of having assassinated the ultra-royalist Prince, with the alleged motive of allowing their son, the Duke of Aumale, to get his hands on his fortune. It is however commonly accepted[weasel words] that the Prince died as a result of sex games with his mistress, the Baroness de Feuchères.[citation needed]

Purge of the Legitimists

[edit]
Conference hall of the chamber of deputies at the Palais Bourbon

Meanwhile, the government expelled from the administration all Legitimist supporters who refused to pledge allegiance to the new regime, leading to the return to political affairs of most of the personnel of the First Empire, who had themselves been expelled during the Second Restoration. This renewal of political and administrative staff was humorously illustrated by a vaudeville of Jean-François Bayard.[6] The Minister of the Interior, Guizot, re-appointed the entire prefectoral administration and the mayors of large cities. The Minister of Justice, Dupont de l'Eure, assisted by his secretary general, Mérilhou, dismissed most of the public prosecutors. In the Army, the General de Bourmont, a follower of Charles X who was commanding the invasion of Algeria, was replaced by Bertrand Clauzel. Generals, ambassadors, plenipotentiary ministers and half of the Conseil d'État were replaced. In the Chamber of Deputies, a quarter of the seats (119) were submitted to a new election in October, leading to the defeat of the Legitimists.

In sociological terms, however, this renewal of political figures did not mark any great change of elites. The old land-owners, civil servants and liberal professions continued to dominate the state of affairs, leading the historian David H. Pinkney to deny any claim of a "new regime of a grande bourgeoisie".[7]

"Resistance" and "Movement"

[edit]

Although some voices began to push for the closure of the Republican clubs, which fomented revolutionary agitation, the Minister of Justice, Dupont de l'Eure, and the Parisian public prosecutor, Bernard, both Republicans, refused to prosecute revolutionary associations (the French law prohibited meetings of more than 20 persons).

However, on 25 September 1830, the Minister of Interior Guizot responded to a deputy's question on the subject by stigmatizing the "revolutionary state", which he conflated with chaos, to which he opposed the Glorious Revolution in England in 1688.[8]

Two political currents thereafter made their appearance, and would structure political life under the July Monarchy: the Movement Party and the Resistance Party. The first was reformist and in favor of support to the nationalists who were trying, all over of Europe, to shake the grip of the various Empires in order to create nation-states. Its mouthpiece was Le National. The second was conservative and supported peace with European monarchs, and had as mouthpiece Le Journal des débats.

The trial of Charles X's ministers, arrested in August 1830 while they were fleeing, became the major political issue. The left demanded their heads, but this was opposed by Louis-Philippe, who feared a spiral of violence and the renewal of revolutionary Terror. Thus, on 27 September 1830 the Chamber of Deputies passed a resolution charging the former ministers, but at the same time, in an address to King Louis-Philippe on 8 October, invited him to present a draft law repealing the death penalty, at least for political crimes. This in turn provoked popular discontent on 17 and 18 October, with the masses marching on the Château de Vincennes where the former ministers were detained.

Following these riots, Interior Minister Guizot requested the resignation of the Prefect of the Seine, Odilon Barrot, who had criticized the parliamentarians' address to the king. Supported by Victor de Broglie, Guizot considered that an important civil servant could not criticize an act of the Chamber of Deputies, particularly when it had been approved by the King and his government. Dupont de l'Eure took Barrot's side, threatening to resign if the king disavowed him. The banker Laffitte, one of the main figures of the Parti du mouvement, thereupon put himself forward to coordinate the ministers with the title of "President of the Council". This immediately led Broglie and Guizot, of the Parti de l'Ordre, to resign, followed by Casimir Perier, André Dupin, the Count Molé and Joseph-Dominique Louis. Confronted to the Parti de l'Ordre's defeat, Louis-Philippe decided to put Laffitte to trial, hoping that the exercise of power would discredit him. He thus called him to form a new government on 2 November 1830.

Laffitte government (2 November 1830 – 13 March 1831)

[edit]
Donjon of the Château de Vincennes, where Charles X's ministers were detained

Although Louis-Philippe strongly disagreed with the banker Laffitte and secretly pledged to the Duke of Broglie that he would not support him at all, the new President of the Council was tricked into trusting his king.

The trial of Charles X's former ministers took place from 15 to 21 December 1830 before the Chamber of Peers, surrounded by rioters demanding their death. They were finally sentenced to life detention, accompanied by civil death for Polignac. La Fayette's National Guard maintained public order in Paris, affirming itself as the bourgeois watchdog of the new regime, while the new Interior Minister, Camille de Montalivet, kept the former ministers safe by detaining them in the Château de Vincennes.

But by demonstrating the National Guard's importance, La Fayette had made his position delicate, and he was quickly forced to resign. This led to the Minister of Justice Dupont de l'Eure's resignation. In order to avoid exclusive dependence on the National Guard, the "Citizen King" charged Marshal Soult, the new Minister of War, with reorganizing the Army. In February 1831, Soult presented his project, aiming to increase the military's effectiveness. Among other reforms, the project included the 9 March 1831 law creating the Foreign Legion.

In the meantime, the government enacted various reforms demanded by the Parti du Mouvement, which had been set out in the Charter (art. 69). The 21 March 1831 law on municipal councils reestablished the principle of election and enlarged the electorate (founded on census suffrage) which was thus increased tenfold in comparison with the legislative elections (approximately 2 to 3 million electors from a total population of 32,6 million). The 22 March 1831 law re-organized the National Guard; the 19 April 1831 law, voted after two months of debate in Parliament and promulgated after Laffitte's downfall, decreased the electoral income level from 300 to 200 francs and the level for eligibility from 1,000 to 500 francs. The number of voters thereby increased from less than 100,000 to 166,000: one Frenchman in 170 possessed the right to vote, and the number of constituencies rose from 430 to 459.

February 1831 riots

[edit]
François Guizot, a leader of the Parti de l'Ordre

Despite these reforms, which targeted the bourgeoisie rather than the people, Paris was once again rocked by riots on 14 and 15 February 1831, leading to Laffitte's downfall. The immediate cause of the riots was a funeral service organized by the Legitimists at Saint-Germains l'Auxerrois Church in memory of the ultra-royalist Duke of Berry, assassinated in 1820. The commemoration turned into a political demonstration in favor of Henri, Count of Chambord, Legitimist pretender to the throne. Seeing in this celebration an intolerable provocation, the Republican rioters ransacked the church two days in a row, before turning on other churches. The revolutionary movement spread to other cities.

Confronted with renewed unrest, the government abstained from any strong repression. The prefect of the Seine Odilon Barrot, the prefect of police Jean-Jacques Baude, and the new commandant of the National Guard, General Georges Mouton, remained passive, triggering Guizot's indignation, as well as the Republican Armand Carrel's criticisms against the demagogy of the government. Far from suppressing the crowds, the government had the Archbishop of Paris Mgr de Quélen arrested, as well as charging the friar of Saint-Germain-l'Auxerrois and other priests, along with some other monarchists, with having provoked the masses.

In a gesture of appeasement, Laffitte, supported by the Prince Royal Ferdinand-Philippe, Duke of Orléans, proposed to the king that he remove the fleur-de-lys, symbol of the Ancien Régime, from the state seal. With obvious displeasure, Louis-Philippe finally signed the 16 February 1831 ordinance substituting for the arms of the House of Orléans a shield with an open book, on which could be read "Charte de 1830". The fleur-de-lys, was also removed from public buildings, etc. This new defeat of the king sealed Laffitte's fate.

On 19 February 1831, Guizot verbally attacked Laffitte in the Chamber of Deputies, daring him to dissolve the Chamber and present himself before the electors. Laffitte accepted, but the king, who was the only one entitled to dissolve the Chamber, preferred to wait a few days more. In the meanwhile, the Prefect of the Seine Odilon Barrot was replaced by Taillepied de Bondy at Montalivet's request, and the prefect of police Jean-Jacques Baude by Vivien de Goubert. To make matters worse, in this insurrectionary climate, the economic situation was fairly bad.

Louis-Philippe finally tricked Laffitte into resigning by having his Minister of Foreign Affairs, Horace Sébastiani, pass him a note written by the French ambassador to Vienna, Marshal Maison, and which had arrived in Paris on 4 March 1831, which announced an imminent Austrian intervention in Italy. Learning of this note in Le Moniteur of 8 March, Laffitte requested an immediate explanations from Sébastiani, who replied that he had followed royal orders. After a meeting with the king, Laffitte submitted to the Council of Ministers a belligerent program, and was subsequently disavowed, forcing him to resign. Most of his ministers had already negotiated their positions in the forthcoming government.

The Casimir Périer government (13 March 1831 – 16 May 1832)

[edit]

Having succeeded in outdoing the Parti du Mouvement, the "Citizen King" called to power the Parti de la Résistance. However, Louis-Philippe was not really much more comfortable with one side than with the other, being closer to the center. Furthermore, he felt no sympathy for its leader, the banker Casimir Pierre Périer, who replaced Laffitte on 13 March 1831 as head of the government. His aim was more to re-establish order in the country, letting the Parti de la Résistance assume responsibility for unpopular measures.

Périer, however, managed to impose his conditions on the king, including the pre-eminence of the President of the Council over other ministers, and his right to call cabinet councils outside of the actual presence of the king. Furthermore, Casimir Perier secured agreement that the liberal Prince Royal, Ferdinand-Philippe d'Orléans, would cease to participate to the Council of Ministers. Despite this, Perier valued the king's prestige, calling on him, on 21 September 1831, to move from his family residence, the Palais-Royal, to the royal palace, the Tuileries.

The banker Périer established the new government's principles on 18 March 1831: ministerial solidarity and the authority of the government over the administration: "the principle of the July Revolution... is not insurrection... it is resistance to the aggression the power"[9] and, internationally, "a pacific attitude and the respect of the non-intervention principle". The vast majority of the Chamber applauded the new government and granted him a comfortable majority. Périer harnessed the support of the cabinet through oaths of solidarity and strict discipline for dissenters. He excluded reformers from official discourse, and abandoned the regime's unofficial policy of mediating in labor disputes in favor of a strict laissez-faire policy that favored employers.

Civil unrest (Canut Revolt) and repression

[edit]
The Canut Revolt in Lyon, October 1831

On 14 March 1831, on the initiative of a patriotic society created by the mayor of Metz, Jean-Baptiste Bouchotte, the opposition's press launched a campaign to gather funds to create a national association aimed at struggling against any Bourbon Restoration and the risks of foreign invasion. All the major figures of the Republican Left (La Fayette, Dupont de l'Eure, Jean Maximilien Lamarque, Odilon Barrot, etc.) supported it. Local committees were created all over France, leading the new president of the Council, Casimir Périer, to issue a circular prohibiting civil servants from membership of this association, which he accused of challenging the state itself by implicitly accusing it of not fulfilling its proper duties.

In the beginning of April 1831, the government took some unpopular measures, forcing several important personalities to resign: Odilon Barrot was dismissed from the Council of State, General Lamarque's military command suppressed, Bouchotte and the Marquis de Laborde forced to resign. When on 15 April 1831 the Cour d'assises acquitted several young Republicans (Godefroy Cavaignac, Joseph Guinard and Audry de Puyraveau's son), mostly officers of the National Guard who had been arrested during the December 1830 troubles following the trial of Charles X's ministers, new riots acclaimed the news on 15–16 April. But Périer, implementing the 10 April 1831 law outlawing public meetings, used the military as well as the National Guard to dissolve the crowds. In May, the government used fire hoses as crowd control techniques for the first time.

Another riot, started on the Rue Saint-Denis on 14 June 1831, degenerated into an open battle against the National Guard, assisted by the Dragoons and the infantry. The riots continued on 15 and 16 June.

The major unrest, however, took place in Lyon with the Canuts Revolt, started on 21 November 1831, and during which parts of the National Guard took the demonstrators' side. In two days, the Canuts took control of the city and expelled General Roguet and the mayor Victor Prunelle. On 25 November Casimir Périer announced to the Chamber of Deputies that Marshal Soult, assisted by the Prince Royal, would immediately march on Lyon with 20,000 men. They entered the city on 3 December re-establishing order without any bloodshed.

Civil unrest, however, continued, and not only in Paris. On 11 March 1832, sedition exploded in Grenoble during the carnival. The prefect had canceled the festivities after a grotesque mask of Louis-Philippe had been displayed, leading to popular demonstrations. The prefect then tried to have the National Guard disperse the crowd, but the latter refused to go, forcing him to call on the army. The 35th regiment of infantry (infanterie de ligne) obeyed the orders, but this in turn led the population to demand their expulsion from the city. This was done on 15 March and the 35th regiment was replaced by the 6th regiment, from Lyon. When Casimir Perier learnt the news, he dissolved the National Guard of Grenoble and immediately recalled the 35th regiment to the city.

Beside this continuing unrest, in every province, Dauphiné, Picardy, in Carcassonne, Alsace, etc., various Republican conspiracies threatened the government (conspiracy of the Tours de Notre-Dame in January 1832, of the rue des Prouvaires in February 1832, etc.) Even the trials of suspects were seized on by the Republicans as an opportunity to address the people: at the trial of the Blanquist Société des Amis du Peuple [fr] in January 1832, Raspail harshly criticized the king while Auguste Blanqui gave free vein to his socialist ideas. All of the accused denounced the government's tyranny, the incredibly high cost of Louis-Philippe's civil list, police persecutions, etc. The omnipresence of the French police, organized during the French First Empire by Fouché, was depicted by the Legitimist writer Balzac in Splendeurs et misères des courtisanes. The strength of the opposition led the Prince Royal to shift his view somewhat further to the right.

Legislative elections of 1831

[edit]

In the second half of May 1831, Louis-Philippe, accompanied by Marshal Soult, started an official visit to Normandy and Picardy, where he was well received. From 6 June to 1 July 1831, he traveled in the east, where there was stronger Republican and Bonapartist activity, along with his two elder sons, the Prince Royal and the Duke of Nemours, as well as with the comte d'Argout. The king stopped in Meaux, Château-Thierry, Châlons-sur-Marne (renamed Châlons-en-Champagne in 1998), Valmy, Verdun and Metz. There, in the name of the municipal council, the mayor made a very political speech in which he expressed the wish to have peerages abolished, adding that France should intervene in Poland to assist the November Uprising against Russia. Louis-Philippe flatly rejected all of these aspirations, stating that the municipal councils and the National Guard had no standing in such matters. The king continued his visit to Nancy, Lunéville, Strasbourg, Colmar, Mulhouse, Besançon and Troyes, and his visits were, on the whole, occasions to re-affirm his authority.

Louis-Philippe decided in the Château de Saint-Cloud, on 31 May 1831, to dissolve the Chamber of Deputies, fixing legislative elections for 5 July 1831. However, he signed another ordinance on 23 June in Colmar in order to have the elections put back to 23 July 1831, so as to avoid the risk of Republican agitation during the commemorations of the July Revolution. The general election of 1831 took place without incident, according to the new electoral law of 19 April 1831. However, the results disappointed the king and the president of the Council, Périer: more than half of the outgoing deputies were re-elected, and their political positions were unknown. The Legitimists obtained 104 seats, the Orléanist Liberals 282 and the Republicans 73.

On 23 July 1831, the king set out Casimir Périer's program in the speech from the Throne: strict application of the Charter at home and strict defense of the interests of France and its independence abroad.

The deputies in the chamber then voted for their President, electing Baron Girod de l'Ain, the government's candidate, on the second round. He gained 181 votes to the banker Laffitte's 176. But Dupont de l'Eure gained the first vice presidency with 182 voices out of a total of 344, defeating the government's candidate, André Dupin, who had only 153 votes. Casimir Périer, who considered that his parliamentary majority was not strong enough, decided to resign.

Louis-Philippe thereafter turned towards Odilon Barrot, who refused to assume governmental responsibilities, pointing out that he had only a hundred deputies in the Chamber. However, during the 2 and 2 August 1831 elections of questeurs and secretaries, the Chamber elected mostly government candidates such as André Dupin and Benjamin Delessert, who obtained a strong majority against a far-left candidate, Eusèbe de Salverte. Finally, William I of the Netherlands's decision to invade Belgium – the Belgian Revolution had taken place the preceding year – on 2 August 1831, constrained Casimir Perier to remain in power in order to respond to the Belgians' request for help.

During the parliamentary debates concerning France's imminent intervention in Belgium, several deputies, led by Baron Bignon, unsuccessfully requested similar intervention to support Polish independence. However, at the domestic level, Casimir Perier decided to back down before the dominant opposition, and satisfied an old demand of the Left by abolishing hereditary peerages. Finally, the 2 March 1832 law on Louis-Philippe's civil list fixed it at 12 million francs a year, and one million for the Prince Royal, the Duke of Orléans. The 28 April 1832 law, named after the Justice Minister Félix Barthe, reformed the 1810 Penal Code and the Code d'instruction criminelle.

1832 cholera epidemic

[edit]

The cholera pandemic that originated in India in 1815 reached Paris around 20 March 1832 and killed more than 13,000 people in April. The pandemic would last until September 1832, killing in total 100,000 in France, with 20,000 in Paris alone.[10] The disease, the origins of which were unknown at the time, provoked a popular panic. The people of Paris suspected poisoners, while scavengers and beggars revolted against the authoritarian measures of public health.

According to the 20th-century historian and philosopher Michel Foucault, the cholera outbreak was first fought by what he called "social medicine", which focused on flux, circulation of air, location of cemeteries, etc. All of these concerns, born of the miasma theory of disease, were thus concerned with urbanist concerns of the management of populations.

Cholera also struck the royal princess Madame Adélaïde, as well as d'Argout and Guizot. Casimir Périer, who on 1 April 1832 visited the patients at the Hôtel-Dieu with the Prince Royal, contracted the disease. He resigned his ministerial activities before dying of cholera on 16 May 1832.

Consolidation of the regime (1832–1835)

[edit]

King Louis-Philippe did not regret the departure of Casimir Périer from the political scene, as he complained that Périer took all the credit for the government's policy successes, while he himself had to assume all the criticism for its failures.[11] The "Citizen King" was therefore not in any hurry to find a new President of the Council, all the more since the Parliament was in recess and that the troubled situation demanded swift and energetic measures.

Indeed, the regime was being attacked on all sides. The Legitimist Duchess of Berry attempted an uprising in spring 1832 [fr] in Provence and Vendée, a stronghold of the ultra-royalists, while the Republicans headed an insurrection in Paris on 5 June 1832, on the occasion of the funeral of one of their leaders, General Lamarque, also struck dead by the cholera. General Mouton crushed the rebellion. (Victor Hugo later described the scene in his 1862 novel Les Misérables.)

This double victory, over both Legitimists and the Republicans, was a success for the July Monarchy regime.[12] Furthermore, the death of the Duke of Reichstadt (Napoleon II) on 22 July 1832, in Vienna, marked another setback for the Bonapartist opposition.

Finally, Louis-Philippe married his elder daughter, Louise d'Orléans, to the newly-appointed King of the Belgians, Leopold I, on the anniversary of the establishment of the July Monarchy (9 August). Since the Archbishop of Paris, Quélen (a Legitimist), refused to celebrate this mixed marriage between a Catholic and a Lutheran, the wedding took place in the Château de Compiègne. This royal alliance strengthened Louis-Philippe's position abroad.

First Soult government

[edit]
Portrait of Marshal Soult by George Healy, 1840

Louis-Philippe called a trusted man, Marshal Soult, to the Presidency of the Council in October 1832. Soult was supported by a triumvirate composed of the main politicians of that time: Adolphe Thiers, the duc de Broglie and François Guizot. The conservative Journal des débats spoke of a "coalition of all talents",[13] while the King of the French would eventually speak, with obvious disappointment, of a "Casimir Périer in three persons". In a circular addressed to the high civil-servants and military officers, the new President of the Council, Soult, stated that he would explicitly follow the policies of Périer ("order at home", "peace abroad") and denounced both the Legitimist right-wing opposition and the Republican left-wing opposition.

The new Minister of Interior, Adolphe Thiers, had his first success on 7 November 1832 with the arrest in Nantes of the rebellious Duchess of Berry, who was detained in the citadel of Blaye. The duchess was then expelled to Palermo in the Kingdom of the Two Sicilies on 8 June 1833.

The opening of the parliamentary session on 19 November 1832, was a success for the regime. The governmental candidate, André Dupin, was easily elected on the first round as President of the Chamber, with 234 votes against 136 for the candidate of the opposition, Jacques Laffitte.

In Belgium, Marshal Gérard assisted the young Belgian monarchy with 70,000 men, taking back the citadel of Antwerp, which capitulated on 23 December 1832.

Strengthened by these recent successes, Louis-Philippe initiated two visits to the provinces, first into the north to meet with the victorious Marshal Gérard and his men, and then into Normandy, where Legitimist troubles continued, from August to September 1833. In order to conciliate public opinion, the members of the new government took some popular measures, such as a program of public works, leading to the completion of the Arc de Triomphe in Paris, and the re-establishment, on 21 June 1833, of Napoleon's statue on the Colonne Vendôme. The Minister of Public Instruction and Cults, François Guizot, had the famous law on primary education passed in June 1833, leading to the creation of an elementary school in each commune.

Finally, a ministerial change was enacted after the Duke de Broglie's resignation on 1 April 1834. Broglie had found himself in a minority in the Chamber concerning the ratification of a treaty signed with the United States in 1831. This was a source of satisfaction for the king, as it removed from the triumvirate the individual he disliked the most.

April 1834 insurrections

[edit]

The ministerial change coincided with the return of violent unrest in various cities of France. At the end of February 1834, a new law that subjected the activities of town criers to public authorization led to several days of confrontations with the police. Furthermore, the 10 April 1834 law, primarily aimed against the Republican Society of the Rights of Man (Société des Droits de l'Homme), envisioned a crack-down on non-authorized associations. On 9 April 1834, when the Chamber of Peers was to vote on the law, the Second Canut Revolt exploded in Lyon. The Minister of the Interior, Adolphe Thiers, decided to abandon the city to the insurgents, taking it back on 13 April with casualties of 100 to 200 dead on both sides.

The massacre of the rue Transnonain, Paris, on 14 April 1834, depicted by the caricaturist Honoré Daumier

The Republicans attempted to spread the insurrection to other cities, but failed in Marseille, Vienne, Poitiers and Châlons-sur-Marne. More serious Republican threats developed in Grenoble and especially in Saint-Étienne on 11 April, but finally public order was restored. The greater danger to the regime was, as often, in Paris. Expecting trouble, Thiers had concentrated 40,000 men there, who were visited by the king on 10 April. Furthermore, Thiers had made "preventive arrests" of 150 principal leaders of the Society of the Rights of Man and outlawed its mouthpiece, La Tribune des départements. Despite these measures, barricades were set up in the evening of 13 April 1834, leading to harsh repression, including a massacre of all the inhabitants (men, women, children and old people) of a house from where a shot had been fired. This incident was immortalized in a lithograph by Honoré Daumier.

To express their support for the monarchy, both Chambers gathered in the Palace of the Tuileries on 14 April. In a gesture of appeasement, Louis-Philippe canceled his feast-day celebration on 1 May, and publicly announced that the sums that were to have been used for these festivities would be dedicated to the orphans, widows and injured. In the same time, he ordered Marshal Soult to publicize these events widely across France (the provinces being more conservative than Paris), to convince them of the "necessary increase in the Army".[14]

More than 2,000 arrests were made following the riots, in particular in Paris and Lyon. The cases were referred to the Chamber of Peers, which, in accordance with art. 28 of the Charter of 1830, dealt with cases of conspiracy against state security (French: attentat contre la sûreté de l'État). The Republican movement was decapitated, so much that even the funeral of La Fayette (died 20 May 1834), passed with little incident. As early as 13 May the Chamber of Deputies voted a credit of 14 million in order to increase the army to 360,000 men. Two days later, they also adopted a very repressive law on detention and use of military weapons.

Legislative elections of 1834

[edit]

Louis-Philippe decided to seize the opportunity of dissolving the Chamber and organizing new elections, which were held on 21 June 1834. However, the results were not as favorable to him as expected: although the Republicans were almost eliminated, the Opposition retained around 150 seats (approximately 30 Legitimists, the rest being followers of Odilon Barrot, who was an Orléanist supporter of the regime, but headed the Parti du mouvement). Furthermore, in the ranks of the majority itself, composed of about 300 deputies, a new faction, the Tiers-Parti, led by André Dupin, could on some occasions defect from the majority and give its votes to the Left. On 31 July the new Chamber re-elected Dupin as President of the Chamber with 247 votes against 33 for Jacques Laffitte and 24 for Pierre-Paul Royer-Collard. Furthermore, a large majority (256 against 39) voted an ambiguous address to the king which, although polite, did not abstain from criticizing him. The latter immediately decided, on 16 August 1834, to prorogue Parliament until the end of the year.

Short-lived governments (July 1834 – February 1835)

[edit]

Thiers and Guizot, who dominated the triumvirate, decided to get rid of Marshal Soult, who was appreciated by the king for his compliant attitude. Seizing the opportunity of an incident concerning the French possessions in Algeria, they pushed Soult to resign on 18 July 1834. He was replaced by Marshal Gérard, with the other ministers remaining in place. Gérard however, was forced to resign in turn, on 29 October 1834, over the question of an amnesty for the 2,000 prisoners detained in April. Louis-Philippe, the Doctrinaires (including Guizot and Thiers) and the core of the government opposed the amnesty, but the Tiers-Parti managed to convince Gérard to announce it, underscoring the logistical difficulties in organizing such a large trial before the Chamber of Peers.

Gérard's resignation opened up a four-month ministerial crisis, until Louis-Philippe finally assembled a government entirely from the Tiers-Parti. However, after André Dupin's refusal to assume its presidency, the king made the mistake of calling, on 10 November 1834, a figure from the First Empire, the duc de Bassano, to head his government. The latter, crippled with debts, became the object of public ridicule after his creditors decided to seize his ministerial salary. Alarmed, all the ministers decided to resign, three days later, without even advising Bassano, whose government became known as the "Three Days Ministry". On 18 November 1834, Louis-Philippe called Marshal Mortier, Duke of Trévise, to the Presidency, and the latter formed exactly the same government as Bassano. This crisis made the Tiers-Parti ridiculous while the Doctrinaires triumphed.

On 1 December 1834, Mortier's government decided to submit a motion of confidence to the Parliament, obtaining a clear majority (184 votes to 117). Despite this, Mortier had to resign two months later, on 20 February 1835, officially for health reasons. The opposition had denounced a government without a leader, accusing Mortier of being Louis-Philippe's puppet. The same phrase that Thiers had spoken in opposition to Charles X, "the king reigns but does not rule" (le roi règne mais ne gouverne pas), was now addressed to the "Citizen King".

Evolution towards parliamentarianism (1835–1840)

[edit]

The polemics which led to Marshal Mortier's resignation, fueled by monarchists such as Baron Massias and the Count of Roederer, all turned around the question of parliamentary prerogative. On the one hand, Louis-Philippe wanted to be able to follow his own policy, in particular in "reserved domains" such as military affairs or diplomacy. As the head of state, he also wanted to be able to lead the government, if need be by bypassing the President of the Council. On the other hand, a number of the deputies stated that the ministers needed a leader commanding a parliamentary majority, and thus wanted to continue the evolution towards parliamentarism which had only been sketched out in the Charter of 1830. The Charter did not include any mechanism for the political accountability of ministers towards the Chamber (confidence motions or for censorship motions). Furthermore, the function of the President of the Council itself was not even set out in the Charter.

Broglie ministry (March 1835 – February 1836)

[edit]

In this context, the deputies decided to support Victor de Broglie as head of the government, mainly because he was the king's least preferred choice, as Louis-Philippe disliked both his anglophilia and his independence. After a three-week ministerial crisis, during which the "Citizen King" successively called on Count Molé, André Dupin, Marshal Soult, General Sébastiani and Gérard, he was finally forced to rely on the duc de Broglie and to accept his conditions, which were close to those imposed before by Casimir Périer.

As in the first Soult government, the new cabinet rested on the triumvirate of Broglie (Foreign affairs), Guizot (Public instruction), and Thiers (Interior). Broglie's first act was to take a personal revenge on the Chamber by having it ratify (by 289 votes against 137) the 4 July 1831 treaty with the United States, something which the deputies had refused him in 1834. He also obtained a large majority on the debate over the secret funds, which worked as an unofficial motion of confidence (256 voices against 129).

Trial of the April insurgents

[edit]

Broglie's most important task was the trial of the April insurgents, which began on 5 May 1835 before the Chamber of Peers. The Peers finally convicted only 164 detainees on the 2,000 prisoners, of whom 43 were judged in absentia. Those defendants who were present for their trial introduced a great many procedural delays, and attempted by all means to transform the trial into a platform for Republicanism. On 12 July 1835, some of them, including the main leaders of the Parisian insurrection, escaped from the Prison of Sainte-Pélagie through a tunnel. The Court of Peers delivered its sentence on the insurgents of Lyon on 13 August 1835, and on the other defendants in December 1835 and January 1836. The sentences were rather mild: a few condemnations to deportation, many short prison sentences and some acquittals.

Fieschi attentat (28 July 1835)

[edit]
Attentat de Fieschi, on 28 July 1835. By Eugène Lami, 1845. Château de Versailles.
The weapon built and used by Fieschi, Musée des Archives Nationales (2012)

Against their hopes, the trial finally turned to the Republicans' disadvantage, by giving them a radical image which reminded the public opinion of the excesses of Jacobinism and frightened the bourgeois. The Fieschi attentat of July 1835, which took place on Paris during a review of the National Guard by Louis-Philippe for the commemorations of the July Revolution, further scared the notables.

On the Boulevard du Temple, near the Place de la République, a volley gun composed of 25 gun barrels mounted on a wooden frame was fired on the king from the upstairs window of a house. The King was only slightly injured, while his sons, Ferdinand Philippe, Duke of Orléans, Prince Louis, Duke of Nemours and François d'Orléans, prince de Joinville, escaped unharmed. However, Marshal Mortier and ten other persons were killed, while tens were injured (among which seven died in the following days).

The conspirators, the adventurer Giuseppe Fieschi and two Republicans (Pierre Morey and Théodore Pépin) members of the Society of Human Rights, were arrested in September 1835. Judged before the Court of Peers, they were sentenced to death and guillotined on 19 February 1836.

September laws

[edit]

The Fieschi assassination attempt shocked the bourgeoisie and most of France, which was generally more conservative than the people of Paris. The Republicans were discredited in the country, and public opinion was ready for strong measures against them.

The first law reinforced the powers of the president of the Cour d'assises and of the public prosecutor against those accused of rebellion, possession of prohibited weapons or attempted insurrection. It was adopted on 13 August 1835, by 212 votes to 72.

The second law reformed the procedure before the juries of the Assizes. The existing 4 March 1831 law confined the determination of guilt or innocence to the juries, excluding the professional magistrates belonging to the Cour d'assises, and required a 2/3 majority (8 votes to 4) for a guilty verdict. The new law changed that to a simple majority (7 against 5), and was adopted on 20 August 1835 by 224 votes to 149.

The third law restricted freedom of press, and provoked passionate debates. It aimed at outlawing discussions concerning the king, the dynasty and constitutional monarchy, as it was alleged that these had prepared the ground for Fieschi's attempt. Despite a strong opposition to the draft, the law was approved on 29 August 1835 by 226 votes to 153.

Final consolidation of the regime

[edit]

These three laws were simultaneously promulgated on 9 September 1835, and marked the final success of the policy of Résistance pursued against the Republicans since Casimir Périer. The July Monarchy was thereafter sure of its ground, with discussions concerning its legitimacy being completely outlawed. The Opposition could now only discuss the interpretation of the Charter and advocate an evolution towards parliamentarianism. Demands for the enlargement of the electoral base became more frequent, however, in 1840, leading to the re-appearance of Republican Opposition through the claim to universal suffrage.

The Broglie ministry, however, finally fell on a question concerning the public debt. The Minister of Finance, Georges Humann, announced on 14 January 1836 his intention to reduce the interest on government bonds in order to lighten the public debt, a very unpopular measure among the supporters of the regime, since bond interest was a fundamental component of the bourgeoisie's wealth. Therefore, the Council of Ministers immediately disavowed Humann, while the Duke de Broglie explained to the Chamber that his proposal was not supported by the government. However, his tone was judged insulting by the deputies, and one of them, the banker Alexandre Goüin, immediately proposed a draft law concerning bonds himself. On 5 February 1836, a narrow majority of deputies (194 against 192) decided to continue the examination of the draft, thus disavowing Broglie's cabinet. The government immediately resigned: for the first time, a cabinet had fallen after having been put in a minority before the Chamber of Deputies, a sure victory of parliamentarianism.

First Thiers government (February – September 1836)

[edit]

Louis-Philippe then decided to pretend to play the parliamentary card, with the secret intention of neutralizing it. He took advantage of the ministerial crisis to get rid of the Doctrinaires (Broglie and Guizot), invited some Tiers-Parti politicians to give an illusion of an opening to the Left, and finally called on Adolphe Thiers on 22 February 1836, in an attempt to convince him to distance himself from the liberal Doctrinaires, and also to use up his legitimacy in government, until the time came to call on Count Molé, whom the king had decided a long time before to make his President of the Council. Louis-Philippe thus separated the center-right from the center-left, strategically attempting to dissolve the Tiers-Parti, a dangerous game since this could also lead to the dissolving of the parliamentary majority itself and create endless ministerial crises. Furthermore, as the duc de Broglie himself warned him, when Thiers was eventually pushed out, he would shift decisively to the Left and transform himself in a particularly dangerous opponent.

In the Chamber, the debate on the secret funds, marked by a notable speech by Guizot and an evasive response by the Justice Minister, Sauzet, was concluded with a favorable vote for the government (251 votes to 99). On the other hand, the draft proposal on government bonds was easily postponed by the deputies on 22 March 1836, another sign that it had been only a pretext.

Thiers' motivations for accepting the position of head of the government and taking the Ministry of Foreign Affairs as well were to enable him to negotiate the Duke of Orléans's wedding with an Austrian archduchess. Since the Fieschi attempt, Ferdinand-Philippe's wedding (he had just reached 25) had become an obsession of the king, and Thiers wanted to effect a spectacular reversion of alliances in Europe, as Choiseul had done before him. But Metternich and the archduchess Sophie of Bavaria, who dominated the court in Vienna, rejected an alliance with the House of Orléans, which they deemed too unstable.

Another assassination attempt against Louis-Philippe, by Louis Alibaud on 25 June 1836, justified their fears. These two setbacks upset Thiers. On 29 July 1836, the inauguration of the Arc de Triomphe, intended to be the scene of a ceremony of national concord, during which the July Monarchy would harness the glory of the Revolution and of the Empire, finally took place, quietly and unceremoniously, at seven in the morning and without the king being present.

To re-establish his popularity and in order to take his revenge on Austria, Thiers was considering a military intervention in Spain, requested by the Queen Regent Marie Christine de Bourbon who was confronted by the Carlist rebellion. But Louis-Philippe, advised by Talleyrand and Soult, strongly opposed the intervention, which led to Thiers's resignation. This new event, in which the government had fallen not because of parliament but because of a disagreement with the king on foreign policy, demonstrated that the evolution towards parliamentarianism was far from being assured.

Two Molé governments (September 1836 – March 1839)

[edit]
First mass in Kabylie during the French conquest of Algeria, 1837

Count Molé formed a new government on 6 September 1836, including the Doctrinaires Guizot, Tanneguy Duchâtel and Adrien de Gasparin. This new cabinet did not include any veterans of the July Revolution, something the press immediately highlighted. Molé immediately took some humane measures in order to assure his popularity: the general adoption of small prison cells to avoid "mutual teaching of crime", abolition of chain gangs exposed to the public, and a royal pardon for 52 political prisoners (Legitimists and Republicans), in particular for Charles X' former ministers. On 25 October 1836, the inauguration of the Obelisk of Luxor (a gift from the Wali of Egypt, Muhammad Ali Pasha) on the Place de la Concorde was the scene of a public ovation for the King.

1836 Bonapartist uprising

[edit]

On 30 October 1836, Louis-Napoléon Bonaparte attempted an uprising in Strasbourg, which was quickly put down and the Bonapartist prince and his accomplices were arrested on the same day. The king, wanting to avoid a public trial, and without legal proceedings, ordered that Louis-Napoléon be taken to Lorient where he was put on board the frigate L'Andromède, which sailed for the United States on 21 November. The other conspirators were brought before the Cour d'assises of Strasbourg, which acquitted them on 18 January 1837.

Loi de disjonction

[edit]

Thereafter, on 24 January 1837, the Minister of War, General Simon Bernard, proposed a draft law – loi de disjonction – aimed, in case of insurrection, at separating civilians, who would be judged by the Cour d'assises, and non-civilians, who would be judged by a war council. The opposition adamantly rejected the proposal, and surprisingly managed to have the whole Chamber reject it, on 7 March 1837, by a very slim majority of 211 votes to 209.

However, Louis-Philippe decided to go against public expectation, and the logic of parliamentarianism, by maintaining the Molé government in place. But the government was deprived of any solid parliamentary majority, and thus paralyzed. For a month and a half, the king tried various ministerial combinations before forming a new government which included Camille de Montalivet, who was close to him, but which excluded Guizot, who had more and more difficulty working with Molé, who was once again confirmed as head of the government.

This new government was almost a provocation for the Chamber: not only was Molé retained, but de Salvandy, who had been in charge of the loi de disjonction, and Lacave-Laplagne, in charge of a draft law concerning the Belgian Queen's dowry – both having been rejected by the deputies – were also members of the new cabinet. The press spoke of a "Cabinet of the castle" or "Cabinet of lackeys", and all expected it to be short-lived.

Wedding of the Duke of Orléans

[edit]

However, in his first speech, on 18 April 1837, Molé cut short his critics with the announcement of the future wedding of Ferdinand Philippe, Duke of Orléans (styled as the Prince Royal) with the Duchess Helene of Mecklenburg-Schwerin. Taken by surprise, the deputies voted for the increase of the dowry of both the Duke of Orléans, which had been previously rejected, and the Queen of the Belgians.

After this promising beginning, in May Molé's government managed to secure Parliament's confidence during the debate on the secret funds, despite Odilon Barrot's attacks (250 votes to 112). An 8 May 1837 ordinance granted general amnesty to all political prisoners, while crucifixes were re-established in the courts, and the Church of Saint-Germain l'Auxerrois, closed since 1831, was authorized to renew religious activities. To demonstrate that public order had been restored, the king passed reviewed the National Guard on the Place de la Concorde. On 30 May 1837, the Duke of Orléans' wedding was celebrated at the château de Fontainebleau.

A few days later, on 10 June Louis-Philippe inaugurated the Château de Versailles, the restoration of which, begun in 1833, was intended to establish a Museum of the History of France, dedicated to "all the glories of France". The king had closely followed and personally financed the project entrusted to the architect Pierre-François-Léonard Fontaine. In a symbol of national reconciliation, the military glories of the Revolution and of the Empire, even those of the Restoration, were to sit side by side with those of the Ancien Régime.

Legislative elections of 4 November 1837

[edit]

Molé's government seemed stable, helped by the return of economic prosperity. Therefore, the king and Molé decided, against the Duke of Orléans's advice, that the moment was auspicious for the dissolving of the Chamber, which was done on 3 October 1837. In order to influence the forthcoming elections, Louis-Philippe decided on the Constantine expedition in Algeria, a military success of General Sylvain Charles Valée and the Duke of Nemours, second son of Louis-Philippe, who took Constantine on 13 October.

However, the 4 November 1837 elections did not deliver Louis-Philippe's hopes. Of a total of 459 deputies, only a plurality of 220 were supporters of the regime. About 20 Legitimists had been elected, and 30 Republicans. The center-right Doctrinaires had approximately 30 deputies, the center-left about twice that many, and the dynastic opposition (Odilon Barrot) 65. The Tiers-Parti had only about 15 deputies, and 30 more were undecided. Such a Chamber carried the risk of the formation of a heterogeneous coalition against the government.

As early as January 1838, the government was under great pressure, in particular from Charles Gauguier, over deputies who were also civil servants. On 9 January he accused the government of electoral manipulation in order to have loyal civil servants elected. Where there had been 178 in the preceding Chamber, there were now 191. Adolphe Thiers and his allies also defied the government, concerning Spanish affairs. However, with the help of the Doctrinaires, Molé obtained a favorable vote for the address to the king on 13 January 1838, with 216 votes to 116.

Molé's cabinet appeared to be taken hostage by the Doctrinaires, at the exact moment when Guizot was distancing himself from the President of the Council. All of Thiers's efforts would be thereafter focused on pushing the Doctrinaires away from the ministerial majority. During the vote on the secret funds, both Guizot, in the Chamber of Deputies, and the Duke of Broglie, in the Chamber of Peers, criticized the cabinet, although both ultimately voted with the government.

On 10 May 1838, the deputies rejected the government's plan for railway development, after having finally agreed, a week earlier, the proposals on government bonds opposed by Molé. The Peers, however, supported Molé and rejected the initiative. On 20 June 1838, Molé succeeded in having the Assembly pass the 1839 budget before the parliamentary recess.

On the opening of the parliamentary session in December 1838, André Dupin was elected by a very slim majority (183 votes for 178 for Hippolyte Passy, the center-left candidate and adamant opponent of the "Castle cabinet") as President of the Chamber. A coalition, including Guizot, Thiers, Prosper Duvergier de Hauranne and Hippolyte Passy, had formed during summer, but it did not prevent the vote of a favorable address to the King (221 votes against 208).

Legislative elections of 2 March 1839

[edit]

Confronted to such a slight and uncertain majority, Molé presented his resignation to the king on 22 January 1839. Louis-Philippe first attempted to refuse it, and then, approaching Marshal Soult, who was not initially persuaded, offered him the lead. Soult finally accepted after the funeral of the king's daughter, the duchesse de Württemberg, on the condition of moving promptly to new elections. During the electoral campaign, the left-wing opposition denounced what they termed a constitutional coup, comparing the 1837 and 1839 dissolutions to the consecutive dissolutions of Charles X in 1830. Thiers compared Molé to Polignac, one of Charles X's ministers.

The 2 March 1839 elections were a disappointment for the king, who lost two loyal deputies, while the coalition mustered 240 members, against only 199 for the government. Molé presented his resignation to the king on 8 March, which Louis-Philippe was forced to accept.

Second Soult government (May 1839 – February 1840)

[edit]
Armand Barbès, one of the leaders of the Republican insurrection of 12 May 1839

After Molé's fall, Louis-Philippe immediately called upon Marshal Soult, who attempted, without success, to form a government including the three leaders of the coalition who had brought down Molé: Guizot, Thiers and Odilon Barrot. Confronted with the Doctrinaires' refusal, he then tried to form a center-left cabinet, which also foundered upon Thiers's intransigence concerning Spanish affairs. These successive setbacks forced the king to postpone to 4 April 1839 the opening of the parliamentary session. Thiers also refused to be associated with the duc de Broglie and Guizot. The king then attempted to keep him at bay by offering him an embassy, which provoked the outcries of Thiers's friends. Finally, Louis-Philippe resigned himself to composing, on 31 March 1839, a transitional and neutral government.

The parliamentary session opened on 4 April in a quasi-insurrectionary atmosphere. A large mob had gathered around the Palais-Bourbon, seat of the Assembly, singing La Marseillaise and rioting. The left-wing press accused the government of provocations. Thiers supported Odilon Barrot as President of the Chamber, but his attitude during the negotiations for the formation of a new cabinet had disappointed some of his friends. A part of the center-left thus decided to present Hippolyte Passy against Barrot. The latter won with 227 votes against 193, supported by the ministerial deputies and the Doctrinaires. This vote demonstrated that the coalition had imploded, and that a right-wing majority could be formed to oppose any left-wing initiative.

Despite this, the negotiations for the formation of a new cabinet still were unsuccessful, with Thiers making his friends promise to request his authorization before accepting any governmental function. The situation seemed at an impasse, when on 12 May 1839, the Société des saisons, a secret Republican society, headed by Martin Bernard, Armand Barbès and Auguste Blanqui, organized an insurrection in the Rue Saint-Denis and the Rue Saint-Martin in Paris. The League of the Just, founded in 1836, participated in this uprising.[15] However, not only was it a failure, and the conspirators arrested, but this allowed Louis-Philippe to form a new government on the same day, presided over by Marshal Soult who had assured him of his loyal support.

At the end of May, the vote on the secret funds gave a large majority to the new government, which also had the budget passed without any problems. The parliamentary recess was decreed on 6 August 1838, and the new session opened on 23 December, during which the Chamber voted a rather favorable address to the government by 212 votes to 43. Soult's cabinet, however, fell on 20 February 1839, 226 deputies having voted against proposed dowry of the Duke of Nemours (only 200 votes for), who was to marry Victoire de Saxe-Cobourg-Kohary.

Second Thiers cabinet (March – October 1840)

[edit]
Adolphe Thiers, by Honoré Daumier

Soult's fall compelled the king to call on the main left-wing figure, Adolphe Thiers. Guizot, one of the only remaining right-wing alternatives, had just been named ambassador to London and left France. Thiers's aim was to definitively establish parliamentary government, with a "king who reigns but does not rule", and a cabinet drawn from the parliamentary majority and answerable to it. Henceforth, he clearly opposed Louis-Philippe's concept of government.

Thiers formed his government on 1 March 1840. He first pretended to offer the presidency of the Council to the duc de Broglie, and then Soult, before accepting it and taking Foreign Affairs at the same time. His cabinet was composed of fairly young politicians (47 years old on average), Thiers himself being only 42.

Relations with the king were immediately difficult. Louis-Philippe embarrassed Thiers by suggesting that he nominate his friend Horace Sébastiani as Marshal, which would expose him to the same criticisms he had previously suffered over political favoritism and the abuse of governmental power. Thiers thus decided to postpone Sébastiani's advancement.

Thiers obtained an easy majority during the debate on the secret funds in March 1840 (246 votes to 160). Although he was classified as center-left, Thiers's second government was highly conservative, and dedicated to the protection of the interests of the bourgeoisie. Although he had the deputies pass the vote on government bond conversion, which was a left-wing proposal, he was sure that it would be rejected by the Peers, which is what happened. On 16 May 1840, Thiers harshly rejected universal suffrage and social reforms after a speech by the Radical François Arago, who had linked the ideas of electoral reform and social reform. Arago was attempting to unite the left-wing by tying together universal suffrage claims and socialist claims, which had appeared in the 1840s, concerning the "right of work" (droit au travail). He believed that electoral reform to establish universal suffrage should precede the social reform, which he considered very urgent.[16]

On 15 June 1838, Thiers obtained the postponement of a proposal made by the conservative deputy Ovide de Rémilly who, equipping himself with an old demand of the Left, sought to outlaw the nomination of deputies to salaried public offices during their elective mandate. As Thiers had previously supported this proposition, he was acutely criticized by the Left.

Since the end of August 1838, social problems related to the economic crisis which started in 1839 caused strikes and riots in the textile, clothing and construction sectors. On 7 September 1839, the cabinet-makers of the faubourg Saint-Antoine started to put up barricades. Thiers responded by sending out the National Guard and invoking the laws prohibiting public meetings.

Thiers also renewed the Banque de France's privilege until 1867 on such advantageous terms that the Bank had a commemorative gold medal cast. Several laws also established steamship lines, operated by companies operating state-subsidised concessions. Other laws granted credits or guarantees to railway companies in difficulties.

Return of Napoleon's ashes

[edit]
The transfer of Napoleon's ashes on board of La Belle Poule on 15 October 1840. Painting by Eugène Isabey.

While Thiers favored the conservative bourgeoisie, he also made sure to satisfy the Left's thirst for glory. On 12 May 1840, the Minister of the Interior, Charles de Rémusat, announced to the deputies that the king had decided that the remains of Napoleon would be transferred to the Invalides. With the British government's agreement, the Prince de Joinville sailed to Saint Helena on the frigate Belle Poule to retrieve them.

This announcement immediately struck a chord with public opinion, which was swept along with patriotic fervor. Thiers saw in this act the successful completion of the rehabilitation of the Revolution and of the Empire, which he had attempted in his Histoire de la Révolution française and his Histoire du Consulat et de l'Empire, while Louis-Philippe, who was reluctant, aimed at capturing for himself a touch of the imperial glory, just as he had appropriated the legitimist monarchy's glory in the Château de Versailles. The Prince Louis-Napoleon decided to seize the opportunity to land in Boulogne-sur-Mer on 6 August 1840, with the aim of rallying the 42nd infantry regiment (42e régiment de ligne) along with some accomplices including one of Napoleon's comrades in Saint Helena, the General de Montholon. Although Montholon was in reality a double agent used by the French government to spy, in London, on Louis-Napoleon, Montholon deceived Thiers by letting him think that the operation would take place in Metz. However, Bonaparte's operation was a complete failure, and he was detained with his men in the Fort of Ham, Picardy.

Their trial took place before the Chamber of Peers from 28 September 1840 to 6 October 1840, to general indifference. The public's attention was concentrated on the trial of Marie Lafarge, before the Cour d'assises of Tulle, the defendant being accused of having poisoned her husband. Defended by the famous Legitimist lawyer Pierre-Antoine Berryer, Bonaparte was sentenced to life detention, by 152 votes (against 160 abstentions, out of a total of 312 Peers). "We do not kill insane people, all right! but we do confine them,[17] declared the Journal des débats, in this period of intense discussions concerning parricides, mental disease and reform of the penal code.[18]

Colonization of Algeria

[edit]
Siege of Constantine in 1837

The conquest of Algeria, initiated in the last days of the Bourbon Restoration, was now confronted by Abd-el-Kader's raids, punishing Marshal Valée and the duc d'Orléans's expedition to the Portes de Fer in autumn 1839, which had violated the terms of the 1837 Treaty of Tafna between General Bugeaud and Abd-el-Kader. Thiers pushed in favor of colonizing of the interior of the country, up to the edges of the desert. He convinced the king, who saw in Algeria an ideal theater for his son to cover the House of Orléans with glory, and persuaded him to send General Bugeaud as first governor general of Algeria. Bugeaud, who would lead harsh repression against the natives, was officially nominated on 29 December 1840, a few days after Thiers's fall.

Middle Eastern affairs and Thiers's fall

[edit]

Thiers supported Muhammad Ali Pasha, the Wali of Egypt, in his ambition to constitute a vast Arabian Empire from Egypt to Syria. He tried to intercede in order to have him sign an agreement with the Ottoman Empire, unbeknownst to the four other European powers (Britain, Austria, Prussia and Russia). However, informed of these negotiations, the British Minister of Foreign Affairs, Lord Palmerston, quickly negotiated a treaty between the four powers to sort out the "Eastern Question". When revealed, the London Convention of 15 July 1840 provoked an explosion of patriotic fury: France had been ousted from a zone where it traditionally exercised its influence (or attempted to), while Prussia, which had no interest in it, was associated with the treaty. Although Louis-Philippe pretended to join the general protestations, he knew that he could take advantage of the situation to get rid of Thiers.

The latter pandered to patriotic feelings by decreeing, on 29 July 1840, a partial mobilization, and by starting, on 13 September 1840, the works on the fortifications of Paris. But France remained passive when, on 2 October 1840, the Royal Navy mobilized along the Lebanese coastline. Mehemet Ali was then immediately dismissed as wali by the Ottoman Sultan Abdulmejid I.

Following long negotiations between the king and Thiers, a compromise was found on 7 October 1840: France would renounce its support for Muhammad Ali's pretensions in Syria but would declare to the European powers that Egypt should remain at all costs autonomous. Britain thereafter recognized Muhammad Ali's hereditary rule in Egypt: France had obtained a return to the situation of 1832. Despite this, the rupture between Thiers and Louis-Philippe was now definitive. On 29 October 1840, when Charles de Rémusat presented to the Council of Ministers the draft of the speech of the throne, prepared by Hippolyte Passy, Louis-Philippe found it too aggressive. After a short discussion, Thiers and his associates collectively presented their resignations to the king, who accepted them. On the following day, Louis-Philippe sent for Marshal Soult and Guizot so they could return to Paris as soon as possible.

Guizot government (1840–1848)

[edit]
Council of Ministers in the Palais des Tuileries: Marshal Soult presents to Louis-Philippe a draft law on 15 August 1842. Guizot stands on the left. Painting by Claudius Jacquand (1844)

When Louis-Philippe called to power Guizot and the Doctrinaires, representatives of the center-right, after the center-left Thiers, he surely imagined that this would be only temporary, and that he would soon be able to call back Molé. But the new cabinet formed by Guizot would remain closely knit, and finally win the king's trust, with Guizot becoming his favorite president of the Council.

On 26 October 1840, Guizot arrived to Paris from London. He took for himself the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and let Soult assume the nominal presidency. This satisfied the king and the royal family, while Guizot himself was sure of his ability to manipulate the old Marshal Soult as he wished. As the center-left had refused to remain in the government, Guizot's cabinet included only conservatives, ranging from the ministerial center to the center-right Doctrinaires.

The July Column was erected in honor of the 1830 Revolution. The Middle East Question was settled by the London Straits Convention of 1841, which permitted the first reconciliation between France and Britain. This in turn increased public favor towards the colonization of Algeria.

Both the government and the Chamber were Orléanists. They were divided into Odilon Barrot's Dynastic Left (Gauche dynastique), which demanded the extension of the franchise to the petty bourgeoisie and had as its mouthpiece Le Siècle; the center-left, headed by Adolphe Thiers, which aimed at restricting royal prerogatives and influence, and which had as its mouthpiece Le Constitutionnel; the conservatives, headed by Guizot and Count Molé, who wanted to preserve the regime and defended their ideas in Le Journal des débats and La Presse.

Louis Philippe in 1842

Guizot refused any reforms, rejecting a broader franchise. According to him, the monarchy should favor the "middle classes", defined by land ownership, a "moral" tied to money, work and savings. « Enrichissez-vous par le travail et par l'épargne et ainsi vous serez électeur ! » ("Get rich through work and savings and then you will be electors!") was his famous statement. Guizot was helped in his aims by a comfortable rate of economic growth, averaging about 3.5% a year from 1840 to 1846. The transport network was quickly enlarged. An 1842 law organized the national railway network, which grew from 600 to 1,850 km, a sure sign that the Industrial Revolution had fully reached France.

A threatened system

[edit]

This period of Industrial Revolution was characterized by the appearance of a new social phenomenon, known as pauperism. Related to industrialization and the rural exodus, the working poor became an increasingly large segment of the population. Furthermore, the former network of workings men's associations of the Ancien Régime had disappeared. Workers had a 14-hour working day, daily wages of 20 centimes, and no possibility of organizing themselves in trade unions. 250,000 beggars were registered, and 3 million citizens registered with charity offices. State assistance was nonexistent. The only social law of the July Monarchy was to outlaw, in 1841, labor of children under eight years of age, and night labor for those of less than 13 years. The law, however, was almost never implemented.

Christians imagined a "charitable economy", while the ideas of socialism, in particular utopian socialism (Saint-Simon, Charles Fourier, etc.) continued to spread. Blanqui theorized about socialist coups d'état, while the socialist and anarchist thinker Proudhon theorized about mutualism. On the other hand, Liberals, inspired by Adam Smith, imagined a laissez-faire solution and the end of tariffs, which the United Kingdom, the dominant European power, had started in 1846 with the repeal of the Corn Laws.

Final years (1846–1848)

[edit]

The 1846 harvest was poor, in France as elsewhere (especially Ireland, but also Galicia and Bohemia). A rise in the price of wheat, the dietary staple of the common people, provoked a food shortage, while purchasing power decreased. The resulting fall in domestic consumption led to a crisis of industrial overproduction. This in turn immediately led to massive lay-offs, and thus to a large withdrawal of savings, leading to a banking crisis. Bankruptcies multiplied, and stock prices on the stock exchanges collapsed. The government reacted by importing Russian wheat, which created a negative balance of trade. The program of public works therefore stopped, including attempts to improve France's coastal defenses.

Robert Peel's government in Britain collapsed in 1846 after disputes over the Corn Laws, bringing the Whigs back into government led by Lord John Russell and Lord Palmerston. The appointment of Lord Palmerston was regarded as a threat to France. Guizot's effort to bring about rapprochement with Britain in the early 1840s was virtually undone by the Affair of the Spanish Marriages, which broke out that year after Palmerston attempted to wed the Spanish queen to a member of the House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha rather than to a member of the House of Orléans, as Guizot and his British counterparts had agreed to earlier in the 1840s.

Henceforth, there was an increase in workers' demonstrations, with riots in the Buzançais in 1847. In Roubaix, a city in the industrial north, 60% of the workers were unemployed. At the same time, the regime was marred by several political scandals (TesteCubières corruption scandal, revealed in May 1847, or Charles de Choiseul-Praslin's suicide after having murdered his wife, daughter of Horace Sébastiani).

Since the right of association was strictly restricted, and public meetings prohibited after 1835, the Opposition was paralyzed. In order to sidestep this law, political dissidents used civil funerals of their comrades as occasions of public demonstrations. Family celebrations and banquets also served as pretexts for gatherings. At the end of the regime, the campagne des banquets took place in all of the big cities of France. Louis-Philippe firmly reacted to this threat, and prohibited the final banquet, which was to be held on 14 January 1848. Postponed to 22 February, this banquet would provoke the February 1848 Revolution.

End of the monarchy

[edit]

After some unrest, the king replaced Guizot by Thiers who advocated repression. Greeted with hostility by the troops in the Place du Carrousel, in front of the Tuileries Palace, the king finally decided to abdicate in favor of his grandson, Philippe d'Orléans, entrusting the regency to his daughter-in-law, Hélène de Mecklembourg-Schwerin. His gesture was in vain as the Second Republic was proclaimed on 26 February 1848, on the Place de la Bastille, before the July Column.

Louis-Philippe, who claimed to be the "Citizen King" linked to the country by a popular sovereignty contract on which he founded his legitimacy, did not see that the French people were advocating an enlargement of the electorate, either by a decrease of the electoral tax threshold, or by the establishment of universal suffrage [citation needed].

Although the end of the July Monarchy brought France to the brink of civil war, the period was also characterized by an effervescence of artistic and intellectual creation.

Timeline of French constitutions

[edit]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
The July Monarchy was a liberal constitutional monarchy in France under King Louis Philippe I of the House of Orléans, lasting from 1830 to 1848. It originated in the July Revolution of 1830, which overthrew Charles X after his issuance of authoritarian ordinances that dissolved the legislature, censored the press, and restricted suffrage, sparking uprisings in Paris led by liberals, republicans, and workers. Louis Philippe was installed as "King of the French" rather than "of France," symbolizing a contract between the monarch and the people, with a revised Charter of 1814 expanding some civil liberties while maintaining a narrow electorate of about 250,000 wealthy property owners out of a population exceeding 30 million. Known as the Bourgeois Monarchy, the regime prioritized the interests of the industrial and financial elite, fostering economic expansion through industrialization, railway development, and banking reforms, alongside colonial ventures like the conquest of Algeria beginning in 1830. However, it faced persistent unrest from disenfranchised workers, as seen in the Canut revolts in Lyon (1831 and 1834), republican conspiracies, and assassination attempts such as Giuseppe Fieschi's 1835 infernal machine attack on Louis Philippe; these tensions, compounded by economic crises in the 1840s and ministerial corruption under figures like François Guizot, culminated in the Revolution of 1848 that forced the king's abdication and ended the monarchy.

Establishment (1830)

Background to the Bourbon Restoration's Collapse

The Bourbon Restoration (1814–1830) initially balanced monarchical legitimacy with constitutional constraints under , who adhered to the granting limited parliamentary powers and press freedoms to appease post-Napoleonic liberals and the . However, upon X's accession in 1824, ultra-royalist influences—advocating a return to pre-revolutionary absolutism and clerical authority—dominated policy, eroding this equilibrium and alienating moderate supporters who favored pragmatic governance over ideological restorationism. , hardened by revolutionary , prioritized compensating noble émigrés displaced during the , enacting the Law of Indemnity on April 16, 1825, which allocated one billion francs (equivalent to roughly 3% of annual national revenue) in government bonds to reimburse seized properties, a measure critics dubbed "le milliard des émigrés" for its fiscal strain and perceived favoritism toward reactionary elites. This policy, alongside the 1826 Sacrilege Law imposing death penalties for profaning churches and indemnifying families of Revolution-era victims, amplified perceptions of clerical overreach and fiscal irresponsibility, fostering resentment among liberal deputies and the commercial classes who viewed it as regressive compensation at public expense. Economic pressures compounded these political fissures, as entered a severe downturn from 1827 onward, marked by successive poor harvests, industrial slowdowns, and rising that echoed pre-1789 agrarian crises but within an urbanizing . Grain shortages drove bread prices up by over 50% in by 1829, exacerbating urban and merchant bankruptcies amid sluggish growth in textiles and , sectors vital to bourgeois wealth. Government adherence to protectionist tariffs and resistance to infrastructural reforms under ultra ministers like Villèle stifled recovery, contrasting with liberal demands for freer markets and administrative efficiency, thus undermining the regime's claim to post-revolutionary stability. Opposition coalesced through clandestine networks, notably the Charbonnerie—a French adaptation of Italian secret societies active from 1820–1822—which recruited journalists, officers, and deputies disillusioned by ultra dominance, organizing cells to propagate constitutionalist agitation and evade censorship. By the late 1820s, liberal parliamentarians, leveraging electoral gains in to challenge Villèle's majority, framed ultra policies as violations of the Charter's spirit, building public momentum against perceived absolutist encroachments. These structural tensions—rooted in ultra-royalism's causal misalignment with France's evolved socio-economic realities—culminated in Charles X's of 1830, which dissolved the fractious , curtailed press liberties by requiring state approval for publications, and rigged suffrage via new electoral lists, directly precipitating crisis by overriding liberal safeguards.

The July Revolution and Overthrow of Charles X

The July Revolution erupted in Paris on 27 July 1830, as crowds erected barricades in response to Charles X's July Ordinances, which had dissolved the Chamber of Deputies and censored the press. By evening, approximately 4,000 barricades blocked key streets, and clashes with royal troops resulted in initial casualties among protesters. Fighting intensified on 28 July, with revolutionaries assaulting symbols of royal authority, including assaults near the Tuileries Palace where Swiss Guards defended positions before partial retreats. On 29 July, known as the culmination of the Three Glorious Days, insurgents captured the Hôtel de Ville, establishing a amid widespread military defections; several army units fraternized with the rebels, undermining Charles X's control. The king withdrew his forces from and fled to Rambouillet, effectively marking the regime's collapse, though formal abdication followed later. Total casualties numbered around 800 civilians and 200 soldiers killed, with the violence remaining localized compared to more protracted upheavals. Initially driven by republican elements seeking to abolish the monarchy, the uprising was redirected by Orléanist liberals—journalists and politicians favoring a constitutional alternative under Louis-Philippe—who opportunistically positioned their candidate as a compromise to avert full republican triumph. This maneuver, leveraging networks in the press like Le National, shifted momentum from radical aims toward a bourgeois , sidelining calls for a despite the popular base's preferences.

Installation of Louis-Philippe as King

Following the abdication of Charles X on August 2, 1830, amid the upheaval of the , Paris faced mounting pressure from republican elements, including the under Marquis de Lafayette, who initially favored a leading toward a . To forestall this outcome and consolidate bourgeois interests, the , dominated by liberal monarchists, convened jointly with the Chamber of Peers on August 7 to amend the Constitutional Charter of 1814. These revisions transformed the document into the Charter of 1830, suppressing the preamble invoking divine right and , redefining the sovereign as "King of the French" by the nation's will rather than by , and lowering the direct tax qualification for from 300 to 200 francs to enfranchise a broader stratum of the commercial and industrial —approximately doubling the electorate to around 200,000 voters. The amended Charter further expanded eligibility for the beyond to include property-owning citizens nationwide, empowering the urban middle classes as a to royalist forces, while stipulating that peers would be nominated by the king from a list of eligible candidates, with their number unlimited and dignities variable to dilute aristocratic dominance. These changes represented a pragmatic Orléanist compromise, aligning the monarchy with liberal constitutionalism and averting radical republicanism by vesting in the nation while preserving monarchical form. On August 9, 1830, Louis-Philippe, Duke of Orléans, who had been appointed Lieutenant-General of the Kingdom on July 31, formally accepted the throne in the , swearing an oath before the assembled chambers to faithfully observe the revised Charter, thereby inaugurating the July Monarchy as a "bourgeois kingship" oriented toward parliamentary oversight and property rights. To secure administrative loyalty and neutralize legitimist holdovers sympathetic to the Bourbon line, the provisional authorities initiated purges of officials immediately after Louis-Philippe's accession, replacing dozens of prefects, mayors, and magistrates appointed under Charles X with Orléanist adherents. This targeted replacement, affecting over 70 prefects by late August, ensured control over local governance and the , prioritizing regime stability over ideological purity and quelling potential intrigue without resorting to mass executions.

Early Stabilization and Challenges (1830-1832)

Laffitte Government and Initial Reforms

The Laffitte ministry, led by the liberal banker and former governor of the , assumed power on 2 November 1830 as the first stable cabinet of the July Monarchy, embodying the triumphant optimism of the Parisian bourgeoisie that had driven the revolution against Charles X. This government prioritized symbolic gestures of liberal renewal, including the repeal of Restoration-era laws and the reaffirmation of press freedoms, which aligned with the Charter of 1830's emphasis on constitutional limits over royal prerogative. Laffitte's administration also extended amnesties and modest pensions to participants in the , fostering initial enthusiasm among radicals and republicans while expanding the regime's base beyond strict loyalists. Financial management under Laffitte, however, reflected a lax approach amid post-revolutionary disorder, with public expenditure rising to support formations and revolutionary indemnities, contributing to budgetary strains and a decline in (rentes) values by early 1831. As a banker with ties to speculative , Laffitte advocated credit expansion to stabilize the , but this indulgent —prioritizing short-term over fiscal restraint—exacerbated uncertainty, as the revolution had already weakened commercial confidence and increased state borrowing needs. Such measures, while symbolically affirming the regime's popular roots, established early precedents for that undermined long-term stability without addressing underlying fiscal vulnerabilities. Urban volatility erupted prominently in the anticlerical riots of 14–15 February 1831 in , sparked by a legitimist commemoration of the of the Duke de Berry at the Saint-Germain-l'Auxerrois church, which opponents viewed as a provocative display of Bourbon loyalty. Crowds of liberals and republicans, inflamed by the event's perceived challenge to the new order, ransacked the church and the adjacent archbishop's palace, destroying religious artifacts and exposing the fragility of public order under Laffitte's relatively permissive stance toward street-level agitation. The government's delayed response highlighted its initial hesitation to impose rigorous authority, allowing the violence to symbolize broader tensions between revolutionary fervor and the need for governance. These disorders, compounded by financial volatility, prompted Laffitte's resignation in late February 1831, paving the way for Périer's more doctrinaire conservative ministry on 13 March, which prioritized suppression of unrest over liberal experimentation. Périer, an industrial banker unsympathetic to radical excesses, represented a pivot toward order, critiquing Laffitte's tenure for fostering through insufficient restraint.

Périer Government and Suppression of Unrest

Casimir Périer, a banker and industrialist, formed the government on March 13, 1831, as president of the Council of Ministers and interior minister, emphasizing strict order and ministerial solidarity to stabilize the fragile July Monarchy amid ongoing republican and legitimist threats. Périer's approach prioritized decisive action over concessions, deploying military resources to enforce authority and prevent the spread of revolutionary fervor from to provincial centers. In November 1831, silk workers known as canuts in revolted against wage cuts and poor conditions exacerbated by market oversupply, seizing control of parts of the city and raising in a bid for fixed minimum pay. Périer responded by dispatching 20,000 troops under Marshal Soult, who crushed the uprising after four days of fighting on November 21–25, resulting in over 200 rebel deaths and demonstrating the regime's unwillingness to tolerate proletarian challenges to bourgeois order. The suppression solidified Périer's reputation for authoritarian efficiency, though it fueled long-term worker resentment without addressing underlying economic pressures. The July 1831 legislative elections produced a doctrinaire majority in the , aligning with Périer's conservative policies and providing parliamentary backing for his security measures. As spread from into in early 1832, reaching by March and claiming around 18,000 lives there by summer, Périer oversaw quarantines, cordons sanitaires, and decrees to contain panic and unrest, personally visiting affected areas despite the risks. These efforts mitigated widespread disorder, though the epidemic sparked riots in June 1832 exploiting republican grievances. Périer contracted and died of on May 16, 1832, paving the way for Marshal Soult's interim leadership and marking the end of his pivotal stabilizing role.

Electoral and Administrative Purges

Following the , the regime pursued aggressive administrative purges to replace Restoration loyalists with supporters of the new constitutional order. The and early ministries targeted the prefectural corps, dismissing 82 of 86 prefects and 244 of 277 sub-prefects, primarily for their perceived legitimist sympathies. These replacements, drawn from liberal and Napoleonic-era officials amenable to bourgeois interests, centralized control over local governance, enabling the enforcement of loyalty oaths and the monitoring of opposition networks. By late , similar dismissals extended to thousands of lower civil servants, including mayors and justices of the peace, with over 3,600 municipal officials removed in initial waves. This épuration, the most extensive of the , minimized legitimist while avoiding total institutional collapse, as evidenced by the swift stabilization of provincial administration under prefects. Electoral consolidation complemented these reforms by leveraging the censitary system to favor regime adherents. The 1830 Charter retained high property qualifications, requiring 200 francs in annual direct taxes for eligibility, which confined the electorate to roughly 200,000-250,000 affluent voters—mainly landowners and professionals—effectively excluding lower-class revolutionaries from the uprisings who lacked sufficient fiscal standing. Newly appointed prefects, responsible for compiling voter rolls and overseeing polls, applied discretionary scrutiny to disqualify suspected radicals, such as those implicated in fighting or republican clubs, thereby preventing their infiltration into the pays légal. The July 1831 legislative elections yielded a compliant , with over 70% of seats held by doctrinaire conservatives and moderate liberals aligned with Louis-Philippe's ministry, underscoring the purges' efficacy in engineering a loyal majority without resorting to outright on a national scale. The reorganized National Guard further buttressed bourgeois dominance, functioning as an elite militia restricted to tax-paying citizens who could afford uniforms and arms. Limited to about 250,000 members nationwide by 1831, it drew overwhelmingly from the urban middle classes of the pays légal, excluding artisans and workers prone to radicalism. Deployed to quell legitimist revolts in the and maintain vigilance against Parisian republicans, the Guard's actions—such as disarming unauthorized assemblies—entrenched regime control by aligning coercive power with economic stakeholders, whose interests causal realism tied to property defense over egalitarian upheaval. This structure empirically proved resilient, averting widespread disorder through and affirming the monarchy's consolidation among its narrow social base.

Governmental Transitions and Consolidation (1832-1835)

First Soult Ministry and Insurrection Responses

Marshal formed his first ministry on 11 October 1832, assuming the roles of President of the Council of Ministers and Minister of War following the death of Casimir Périer. Soult's extensive military experience, including command during the , positioned him to prioritize internal security amid ongoing threats to the regime. His government focused on military reorganization, enacting the Army Law of 1832 to expand and modernize forces, which enhanced capacity for quelling domestic disturbances. Insurrections erupted across in 1834, beginning in on 9 April where silk workers (canuts) seized parts of the city amid grievances over wages and conditions, but quickly spreading to and provincial centers like and . The government under Soult interpreted these events not as isolated economic protests but as orchestrated conspiracies involving republican secret societies, such as the Society of Human Rights, potentially allied with legitimist elements seeking to destabilize the monarchy. In response, Soult deployed units and forces, leveraging his authority to coordinate rapid suppression; in , he personally led 10,000-20,000 troops to retake strongholds with minimal bloodshed by early May. In , the response was more violent, culminating in the 14 April massacre on Rue Transnonain, where troops stormed a building after sniper fire, killing at least 12-15 civilians, including non-combatants, in . Overall, the crackdown resulted in over 1,000 arrests nationwide, with insurgents facing summary trials emphasizing the conspiratorial nature of the unrest to justify harsh measures. These actions deterred immediate recurrence, contributing to regime stability; subsequent June 1834 legislative elections yielded a still dominated by conservative Orléanists and , despite republican gains in urban seats. Soult's ministry ended in July 1834 amid disputes over Algerian policy, but his suppression tactics solidified the July Monarchy's reliance on military force against perceived subversive networks.

Short-Lived Cabinets and Political Maneuvering

The Gérard ministry, formed on 18 July 1834 under Marshal Étienne Maurice Gérard as president of the Council, emerged as a transitional administration following the resignation of Nicolas Soult amid parliamentary discontent over incidents and domestic pressures. Gérard's retained most prior ministers but struggled with fragmented support in the , where doctrinaire conservatives and moderate liberals vied for influence, leading to its resignation on 29 October 1834 after failing to secure stable majorities for budgetary measures. This was followed by the brief Cabinet of Hugues-Bernard Maret from 29 October to 18 November 1834, which served primarily as an interim arrangement lacking broad legitimacy and quickly yielded to the Mortier ministry on 18 November 1834, with Marshal Adolphe Mortier appointed prime minister and war minister to leverage military prestige for regime stability. Mortier's tenure, ending on 12 March 1835 due to escalating opposition from both legitimist right-wingers and republican leftists, emphasized continuity in repressive policing tactics against insurrections without introducing substantive reforms, reflecting King Louis-Philippe's direct intervention to avert deeper crises. These rapid cabinet shifts illustrated tactical parliamentary maneuvering by the Orléanist leadership, including figures like and , who prioritized factional balancing over bold initiatives to entrench the monarchy's authority amid ongoing legitimist plots and worker unrest. Internally, debated the merits of France's inherited administrative centralization—rooted in Napoleonic prefectural systems—against proposals for enhanced localism to foster civic participation and counter Jacobin excesses, though such discussions yielded no policy ruptures, underscoring a commitment to evolutionary consolidation rather than ideological overhauls. By avoiding major fiscal or electoral shifts, these ministries bridged to more durable dominance, preserving the regime's bourgeois core while navigating the 1834-1835 legislative sessions with minimal disruption.

Legislative Elections and Regime Entrenchment

The legislative elections held on 5 July 1831, following the dissolution of the initial post-revolutionary Chamber of Deputies on 31 May, yielded a substantial majority for candidates aligned with the Orléanist regime, with ministerial supporters securing approximately 280 of the 434 seats. The electorate remained restricted under the Charter of 1830 to males aged 25 and older paying at least 200 francs in direct taxes annually, encompassing roughly 165,000 qualified voters nationwide—a figure equivalent to about 0.5 percent of the total population and reflecting a stable, propertied base predisposed to the regime's liberal-conservative orientation. This outcome demonstrated early consolidation of support among the bourgeoisie and landowners, who viewed the July Monarchy as a safeguard against both absolutist restoration and radical republicanism, countering assertions of pervasive illegitimacy by evidencing acquiescence within the voting class. Subsequent polls, such as the 21 June 1834 election amid unrest like the silk workers' revolt, further entrenched the regime, with "Résistants"—those opposed to the Bourbon restoration—gaining reinforced majorities in the Chamber, often exceeding 300 seats for government-endorsed lists. Turnout hovered in the range of 40-50 percent among the eligible, indicative of a consistent though limited participation that prioritized property interests over broader mobilization, as the narrow franchise excluded the working classes and much of the peasantry. Claims of manipulation, including government influence via prefects to favor compliant civil servants—rising from 178 such officials in prior assemblies to higher numbers—were leveled by legitimist critics like Antoine Berryer in early 1836 debates, yet these must be weighed against legitimist strategies of abstention or non-recognition of the "usurper" regime, which suppressed opposition tallies in rural strongholds. Such boycotts, rooted in loyalty to X's line, effectively ceded ground to candidates without necessitating widespread fraud, as evidenced by the voluntary withdrawal of legitimist contenders in key districts. By the mid-1830s, these electoral patterns solidified as a defining trait, with chambers approving budgets emphasizing balanced accounts, debt reduction, and resistance to inflationary measures or expansive —policies championed from Casimir Périer's ministry onward to appeal to the taxpayer electorate's aversion to fiscal adventurism. This prudence, prioritizing "enrichment through order," aligned with the property owners' causal incentives for stability, fostering a feedback loop where electoral success reinforced policies that sustained bourgeois allegiance, rather than narratives of coerced or illusory consent.

Evolution to Parliamentary Conservatism (1835-1840)

Broglie Ministry and Security Measures

The Broglie ministry assumed power on 12 March 1835, with Victor de Broglie serving as president of the , tasked with bolstering the regime's defenses against ongoing subversive threats from republican and legitimist factions in the wake of the 1834 insurrections. Following the April 1834 silk workers' uprising, which involved clashes between canuts and troops resulting in over 200 deaths, authorities prosecuted hundreds of participants; more than 500 were arrested, with many receiving sentences of or to penal colonies, exemplifying the government's commitment to exemplary punishment to deter future unrest. A pivotal crisis erupted on 28 1835, when , a Corsican radical, orchestrated an attempt on King Louis-Philippe using a makeshift "infernal machine"—a row of 25 rifle barrels fused together and detonated from a window on the during the king's review of the . The explosion claimed 18 lives and wounded dozens, yet Louis-Philippe and his entourage sustained only minor injuries; Fieschi and two accomplices were subsequently convicted by the Court of Peers and guillotined on 19 February 1836. In direct response, the ministry pushed through the September Laws, promulgated on 9 September 1835, comprising three statutes that intensified repression: enhanced penalties for press offenses against the monarchy (including fines up to 10,000 francs and imprisonment up to five years), prohibitions on unauthorized political associations and gatherings, and procedural reforms easing convictions in political trials by allowing majority jury verdicts rather than unanimity for certain offenses. These measures proved effective in the short term by stifling seditious publications, dismantling republican networks, and reducing plots—none succeeded until the regime's collapse in 1848—through a combination of judicial intimidation and expanded police surveillance, though they eroded liberal support and failed to resolve socioeconomic grievances fueling opposition.

Molé Governments and Domestic Stability

The Comte Louis-Mathieu Molé formed his first ministry on 15 September 1836, succeeding amid parliamentary deadlock, with a mandate emphasizing administrative prudence and internal order over expansive reforms. Molé's approach prioritized continuity in and avoidance of partisan polarization, fostering a period of relative calm in the mid-1830s by deferring contentious issues like electoral expansion or clerical influence, which allowed the regime to consolidate without provoking widespread unrest. A key test came with the Bonapartist putsch in on 30 October 1836, when Louis-Napoléon Bonaparte, exiled nephew of I, attempted to seize the garrison with a small group of adherents, proclaiming the Napoleonic eagle. Local troops under General Vaudrey quickly suppressed the uprising, arresting Bonaparte and his followers within hours, demonstrating the regime's effective control over military loyalty and preventing escalation into broader legitimist or republican agitation. In response, the government advanced the loi de disjonction on 28 April 1837, which separated political offenses from common crimes in trials to mitigate acquittals influenced by Bonapartist sympathy in mixed cases, thereby enhancing judicial reliability for security without resorting to . Dynastic affirmation bolstered this stability through the marriage of Ferdinand Philippe, Duc d'Orléans—the king's eldest son and heir— to Princess Hélène of Mecklenburg-Schwerin on 30 May 1837 at , a union arranged to secure Protestant ties and symbolize Orleanist continuity amid lingering revolutionary skepticism. The event, marked by public processions and parliamentary addresses, reinforced monarchical legitimacy without fiscal extravagance, contrasting prior instability and aiding Molé's efforts to portray the regime as enduring. Legislative elections in November 1837, following dissolution, yielded a ministerial majority of approximately 200 seats in the 459-member , sustaining the doctrinaire center against opposition gains. Subsequent polls on 2 and 6 1839 preserved this equilibrium, with conservative alignments holding firm despite abstention campaigns, underscoring voter acquiescence to Molé's steady and the restricted franchise's toward property owners. These outcomes reflected diminished republican and legitimist , contributing to the era's domestic tranquility until external pressures mounted later.

Thiers Cabinets: Foreign Policy Initiatives

Adolphe assumed the positions of and foreign minister on 1 March 1840, initiating a marked by assertive nationalism aimed at reviving French prestige through Napoleonic symbolism and colonial expansion. A key symbolic gesture was Thiers' advocacy for the return of Napoleon Bonaparte's remains from , authorized by decree on 25 November 1840 after negotiations he had championed, intended to legitimize the July Monarchy by associating it with imperial glory amid domestic challenges. In , Thiers intensified colonization efforts following the inconclusive advances of prior years, dispatching reinforcements and endorsing aggressive campaigns against Abd al-Qadir's resistance; military operations in 1840, including expeditions into the interior, expanded French control over coastal and central regions, though full pacification remained elusive due to logistical strains and tribal guerrilla tactics. These initiatives reflected Thiers' view of as a vital outlet for French military ambition, yielding territorial gains—such as the occupation of in June 1840—but at high cost in lives and resources, with empirical data indicating over 20,000 French troops engaged by mid-year amid persistent revolts. The epitomized Thiers' bellicose orientation, as he supported Pasha of 's bid for Syrian territories against the , framing it as an opportunity to counter British dominance and secure French influence in the through potential alliance with . This policy clashed with the Quadruple Alliance's Convention of 15 July 1840, which the other great powers—Britain, , , and —imposed to curb Egyptian expansion, leading to Anglo-Austrian naval actions like the bombardment of Acre on 3 November. 's isolation, exacerbated by Thiers' threats of war and mobilization orders, prompted King Louis-Philippe's intervention; Thiers resigned on 29 October 1840, averting broader conflict but underscoring the limits of his aggressive against monarchical caution and European consensus. Empirically, the episode demonstrated restrained outcomes, with no territorial acquisitions for and a reinforcement of the post-Napoleonic balance, despite Thiers' rhetoric of revanche.

Guizot Era: Apex of Bourgeois Rule (1840-1847)

Economic Liberalism and Industrial Expansion

The Guizot ministry emphasized economic policies that encouraged private enterprise, investment, and industrial development, aligning with doctrinaire principles of intervention to foster bourgeois prosperity. These measures included maintaining protective tariffs to shield emerging industries while promoting internal market and capital mobilization. The approach reflected a pragmatic focused on stability and growth rather than unrestricted , contributing to 's shift from agrarian dominance toward mechanized production. France achieved sustained economic expansion during this period, with industrial output rising steadily amid favorable conditions for and commerce. Coal production, for instance, doubled from approximately 1.5 million metric tons in 1840 to over 3 million by 1847, while output grew from 400,000 to nearly 700,000 tons in the same timeframe, signaling accelerated adoption of steam power and machinery. This growth underpinned broader prosperity until the mid-1840s downturn, with policies under Guizot prioritizing and enterprise over expansive welfare or redistribution. A pivotal development was the railway sector's rapid modernization, initiated by the May 1842 law on railway concessions. This established a framework for private companies to receive fixed-term grants for constructing and operating lines, with the state subsidizing and guaranteeing bond interest to attract investors, thereby channeling capital into networks. Track length expanded from about 600 kilometers in 1842 to 1,850 kilometers by , forming the core of a radial system linking to major provinces and facilitating goods distribution. National industrial expositions further exemplified the regime's promotion of technological advancement and . The 1839 event, held on the , and especially the 1844 exposition—the tenth in the series—displayed innovations in textiles, machine tools, and , drawing over 1 million visitors in 1844 and highlighting French prowess amid growing factory-based production. These fairs, supported by ministerial patronage, served as platforms for inventors and firms to secure contracts and recognition, reinforcing industrial momentum. Financial liberalization complemented these efforts, with eased regulations on stock exchanges and joint-stock formations enabling financing and industrial ventures. The Paris Bourse expanded its role in trading securities for infrastructure projects, reflecting increased liquidity and investor confidence in the decade's stable monetary environment under the Banque de France. Such reforms mobilized domestic savings into productive assets, though they remained constrained by conservative fiscal prudence to avoid speculative excesses.

Doctrinaire Policies on Enrichment and Order

, as prime minister from 1840 to 1848, promoted the doctrinaire principle that social stability depended on the moral and material advancement of the middle classes through individual effort rather than political reform. He articulated this in speeches urging citizens to "Éclairez-vous, enrichissez-vous, améliorez la condition morale et matérielle de notre ," emphasizing enlightenment, enrichment, and improvement of France's moral and material condition as genuine innovations over radical changes. This approach, often summarized as encouraging self-enrichment via work and savings, aimed to expand the propertied base of society, thereby reinforcing property rights as the foundation for representative government and averting the upheavals seen in 1789 and 1830. Central to these policies was the prioritization of to foster moral order and capable citizens among the . As earlier minister of public instruction from , Guizot had enacted laws establishing primary schools in every commune, requiring moral and civic instruction to instill discipline and respect for authority, which continued to underpin his later . By , this system had created over 25,000 primary schools, educating millions and promoting a merit-based elite grounded in Protestant-influenced values of thrift, labor, and , which viewed as essential for sustaining order without aristocratic privilege or democratic excess. Such enrichment was pragmatic, as it tied political capacity to economic stake, arguing that only those contributing through could responsibly govern, thus stabilizing the against proletarian unrest. Guizot resisted expanding the , which remained limited to about 250,000 voters paying at least 200 francs in direct taxes, justifying this by the inherent risks of empowering the unqualified masses, whom he believed lacked the capacities for self-government and would invite . Doctrinaire theory posited that true resided in reason and , not numerical ; lowering the cens would dilute this, as evidenced by prior revolutions where broadened participation led to rather than . Bills to include middle paying 100 francs were repeatedly blocked, with Guizot arguing that organic social through enrichment would naturally qualify more for voting without legislative fiat, preserving the constitutional balance established in 1830. To enforce this order, Guizot's government suppressed the 1847 reform banquet campaign, a series of over 70 gatherings organized by opposition figures to demand expansion outside parliamentary channels. Authorities banned a major banquet scheduled for February 22, 1848, viewing it as a subversive ploy to mobilize public pressure and erode the regime's authority. This crackdown, rooted in doctrinaire commitment to legal processes over extraparliamentary agitation, aimed to prevent the chaos of street politics, prioritizing the stability of property-holding interests that had sustained under the monarchy.

Foreign Policy: Peace, Algeria, and European Balance


François Guizot's foreign policy from 1840 emphasized diplomatic restraint to preserve European peace and the post-Napoleonic balance of power, prioritizing cooperation with Britain over unilateral adventures that risked isolating France. This stance involved adherence to existing alliances and treaties, avoiding continental wars that could destabilize the bourgeois monarchy domestically.
France reinforced its commitment to liberal constitutional regimes through participation in the Quadruple Alliance of April 22, 1834, alongside Britain, Spain, and Portugal, dispatching an expeditionary force of 45,000 troops under General Étienne Gérard to the Basque region in July 1836 to aid Queen Isabella II against Carlist insurgents, thereby containing absolutist threats without broader escalation. The consolidation of Belgian independence followed, with France endorsing the Treaty of London signed April 19, 1839, which guaranteed Belgium's neutrality and territorial integrity against Dutch claims, backed by collective great power assurance including 60,000 Prussian troops mobilized to enforce compliance.
The 1840 Oriental Crisis tested this equilibrium, as Egyptian forces under Muhammad Ali threatened Ottoman Syria; Guizot, succeeding the bellicose Adolphe Thiers, steered France toward acceptance of the London Convention of July 15, 1840—wherein Britain, Austria, Prussia, Russia, and the Ottomans compelled Egyptian withdrawal—opting for abstention and naval mediation rather than war, thus safeguarding Anglo-French commercial ties and averting a general European conflict.
Algerian operations provided a controlled imperial vent, with Thomas Robert Bugeaud's appointment as governor-general on December 28, 1840, introducing "total war" tactics: razzias by mobile columns razed over 800 villages and seized livestock from 1841 onward, complemented by scorched-earth policies that fragmented resistance. By January 6, 1844, these efforts subdued vast swathes of Abd al-Qadir's domain, extending French control southward to the Chélif and Saharan fringes; Abd al-Qadir's surrender on December 23, 1847, after fleeing to Morocco, secured northern Algeria's pacification, incorporating approximately 200,000 square kilometers without provoking European intervention, as the focus remained extrcontinental. This duality—continental caution paired with overseas assertiveness—sustained regime stability amid internal bourgeois consolidation.

Decline and Collapse (1847-1848)

Economic Downturn and Harvest Failures

The agricultural crisis of 1846–1847 originated from exogenous shocks, primarily inclement weather and (potato blight), which devastated potato crops across northern and , including . While potatoes formed a smaller dietary staple in compared to , the blight destroyed significant portions of the crop, exacerbating vulnerabilities in rural diets reliant on tubers for the poor. Concurrently, excessive rainfall and fungal diseases ruined yields, with production falling by approximately 20–30% below average in key regions like and the . These failures triggered acute grain shortages, driving wheat prices upward by over 100% in markets from mid-1846 to early , with bread costs surging to levels unaffordable for urban laborers. Imports of foreign increased dramatically—reaching 7.5 million quintals in alone—but speculative by merchants amplified , preventing effective distribution to consumers. The prior decade's industrial boom, fueled by railway investments and banking expansion, had boosted prosperity, yet the sudden drop in agricultural output eroded worker , leading to factory slowdowns and spikes exceeding 10% in centers like and . Prime Minister François Guizot's administration responded with emergency measures, including export bans on grains and subsidized imports via state credits, yet these proved inadequate against market distortions from and inadequate rural infrastructure. Relief funds disbursed through departmental commissions totaled around 50 million francs, but distribution delays and allegations undermined efficacy, as funds often favored larger landowners over subsistence farmers. The crisis thus exposed limitations in policies amid acute supply shocks, though it stemmed fundamentally from climatic anomalies rather than structural economic defects.

Mounting Opposition from Multiple Factions

Despite retaining a parliamentary in the August 1846 legislative elections, the Guizot ministry faced intensifying extra-parliamentary opposition, as restricted limited the regime's ability to channel broader discontent through electoral means. This electoral consolidation, rather than stabilizing the government, highlighted the disconnect between the narrow bourgeois electorate and wider societal pressures, prompting opponents to seek alternative mobilization strategies. The reform banquet campaign, launched in July 1847, exemplified this shift, with opponents circumventing bans on public political assemblies by organizing dinners that initially focused on expanding the tax-based from roughly 250,000 voters. Led by moderate liberals like Odilon Barrot of the Dynastic Opposition, the banquets drew participants from diverse factions, including republicans and proto-socialists, fostering a temporary against the regime's stasis. Over the subsequent months, approximately 70 such events occurred nationwide, attracting tens of thousands and evolving under radical influence—particularly from figures like Alexandre Ledru-Rollin—into explicit demands for republican governance and social reforms, overshadowing moderate calls for incremental change. This coalition bridged ideological divides, uniting dynastic liberals seeking to supplant Louis-Philippe with a more reformist monarchy, advocating , and socialists emphasizing workers' rights, while peripheral legitimist elements exploited the unrest to press restoration claims. Radicals' insistence on , including plans for mass demonstrations at banquets, accelerated the movement's militancy, prioritizing systemic overthrow over negotiation and exposing the regime's vulnerability to unified anti-bourgeois pressures.

February Revolution and Abdication

The commenced on 22 February 1848 in , triggered by demonstrations protesting the government's prohibition of political banquets intended to circumvent laws. Crowds clashed with troops and police as barricades proliferated across the city, escalating into sporadic violence over the following days. On 23 February, the crisis intensified when units of the —predominantly middle-class volunteers tasked with maintaining order—defected en masse, refusing to fire on demonstrators and instead aligning with the protesters, which precipitated widespread panic among government elites and ministers. This abrupt loss of bourgeois support, rather than overwhelming popular mobilization, accelerated the regime's collapse, as key officials fled and loyalty eroded within hours. By 24 February, with barricades numbering over 1,500 and elite cohesion shattered, Louis-Philippe abdicated the throne in favor of his nine-year-old grandson, the Comte de Paris, though the designation was disregarded amid the chaos. The king and his family escaped to in disguise, marking the effective end of the July Monarchy. Republicans promptly proclaimed the Second that afternoon, establishing a led by figures like , which abolished the monarchy without significant resistance. Total casualties remained limited to several hundred deaths among demonstrators, troops, and civilians, reflecting the upheaval's brevity and reliance on institutional defection over mass combat. The inherited the monarchy's robust fiscal framework, including balanced budgets and minimal public debt accumulated under Guizot's policies, enabling a transitional period unmarred by immediate insolvency.

Social and Economic Foundations

Bourgeois Ascendancy and Class Realignment

The of the July Monarchy, established by the of 1830, restricted voting rights to men aged 25 and older who paid at least 200 francs annually in direct taxes, yielding an electorate of roughly ,000 individuals amid a exceeding 32 million. This property-based qualification aligned closely with the bourgeois class—merchants, manufacturers, and landowners—whose economic interests prioritized stability to safeguard investments and commerce, thereby fostering a insulated from mass pressures that might disrupt order. The traditional nobility, diminished since the Revolution, saw its dominance further erode as bourgeois elements ascended into key institutions. In the Chamber of Peers, hereditary noble seats persisted, but King Louis-Philippe's appointments increasingly elevated financiers and industrial entrepreneurs, reflecting a merit-based integration of new wealth into the upper house and diluting aristocratic exclusivity. This realignment underscored the monarchy's reliance on propertied stakeholders, whose governance emphasized fiscal prudence over feudal privileges, contributing to the regime's longevity until exogenous shocks. Urban-rural cleavages reinforced bourgeois consolidation, with the peasantry—owning about 40% of arable land post-Revolutionary sales—exhibiting through quiescence, sustained by low direct taxes (averaging under 100 francs per ) and of smallholdings against redistribution threats. In contrast to urban workers' agitations, rural proprietors viewed the as a bulwark for their gains, their exclusion from notwithstanding, as policies avoided heavy fiscal burdens that could incite revolt. This , by empowering net contributors to the economy, causally underpinned the era's relative domestic tranquility.

Industrialization, Railways, and Growth Metrics

The July Monarchy witnessed notable advances in key industrial sectors, particularly in and , which laid foundations for broader . production from French mines stood at 1.5 million tonnes in 1830, supporting expanding energy needs amid rising demand that reached 2.5 million tonnes overall by that year. Iron output, essential for machinery and , grew to approximately 400,000 tons by , reflecting investments in foundries and technological adoption despite limited domestic ore resources. , centered in regions like , Nord, and , advanced through mechanized spinning and weaving, with cotton production expanding via steam-powered mills that increased output efficiency. Railway construction emerged as a transformative project, integrating markets and accelerating commodity flows. The network expanded from initial lines in the 1830s—such as Saint-Étienne–Lyon opened in 1832—to about 1,900 kilometers by , connecting major industrial basins to ports and urban centers. This development lowered costs, boosted and iron distribution, and stimulated ancillary industries like , with lines like Paris–Saint-Germain (1837) exemplifying early adoption of technology. These shifts contributed to measurable , evidenced by rising industrial indicators that refuted perceptions of . Foreign values grew by 26 percent between 1827 and 1847, driven by manufactured exports including textiles and metals. Overall, such metrics underscored a period of structural modernization, with railways alone enhancing velocities and per-unit efficiencies across sectors.

Labor Conditions and Proto-Socialist Agitations

![Revolte_des_Canuts_-Lyon_1831-_1.jpg][float-right] During the July Monarchy, labor conditions in reflected the early stages of industrialization, characterized by long working hours, rudimentary factory safety, and reliance on family labor including children, particularly in and sectors. Real wages for male construction workers and agricultural laborers remained relatively stable from 1830 to 1848, with nominal increases offset by price fluctuations, maintaining comparable to pre-industrial levels in before 1750. The regime adhered to a non-interventionist policy, eschewing labor regulations to preserve market incentives, which proponents argued fostered gradual gains over mandated reforms that could stifle . Proto-socialist agitations manifested primarily in localized revolts among skilled artisans rather than widespread proletarian movements. The 1831 Lyon silk workers' uprising (Canuts revolt) stemmed from a craft-specific dispute over fixed tariffs amid falling silk prices due to , leading to wage reductions; workers briefly seized control of before military suppression restored order. A second revolt in 1834 arose from employers' attempts to lower piece-rate payments after prior concessions, highlighting tensions in the decentralized where independent weavers confronted merchant-negociants, not factory owners. These events, confined to Lyon's silk industry, did not escalate into systemic challenges, as participants invoked revolutionary rhetoric like "Vivre en travaillant ou mourir en combattant" but lacked broader coordination. The government suppressed early union formations and strikes, continuing the 1791 Le Chapelier Law's prohibition on worker associations to avert the political disruptions seen in English Chartism, prioritizing social order over collective bargaining. Mutual aid societies emerged as tolerated alternatives, providing limited self-help without strike capabilities. Pauperism, evidenced by rising urban beggary and poor relief demands, correlated more with rural-to-urban migration and slow demographic expansion—from 30 million in 1800 to about 35 million by 1840—exacerbating transitional unemployment rather than direct policy failures or industrial exploitation. Alexis de Tocqueville critiqued expanding public charity as fostering dependency, aligning with the regime's realism that market-driven growth, not state aid, addressed root causes like skill mismatches.

Political Structure and Ideological Contests

Constitutional Framework and Limited Suffrage

The Charter of 1830, promulgated by Louis-Philippe on August 14, 1830, established the constitutional basis of the July Monarchy by revising the 1814 charter while affirming national sovereignty over any notion of royal concession or divine right. Legislative authority was vested jointly in the king, the appointed Chamber of Peers, and the elected , creating a bicameral system designed to balance popular input with elite restraint. The , numbering around 280 members, was elected for five-year terms by departmental colleges, while the Chamber of Peers—whose size the king could expand at will—included royal appointees serving for life or hereditarily, often drawn from , high , and magistrates to provide institutional continuity and temper impulsive majorities. Suffrage remained sharply restricted under a system, requiring male citizens aged 25 or older to pay at least 200 francs in direct taxes annually—a threshold lowered from 300 francs under the Restoration, which doubled the electorate to approximately 200,000 individuals out of a population exceeding 35 million. This property-based qualification prioritized those with economic stakes in orderly governance, empirically reducing the volatility associated with broader enfranchisement, as seen in the French Revolution's experiments with near-universal male that precipitated factional paralysis, the , and executive overreach by 1793–1799. The system's focus on tangible contributors to public revenue aligned incentives toward fiscal prudence and long-term stability, avoiding the demagogic pressures that undermined prior republican assemblies. The king's role shifted to that of executive pivot, titled "King of the French" to emphasize derivation from national will rather than hereditary absolutism or divine sanction, with powers to command armed forces, negotiate treaties, appoint ministers and peers, and dissolve the —subject to electoral renewal within three months. No longer a mere , Louis-Philippe exercised active coordination among branches, initiating legislation and selecting ministers aligned with his hereditary authority, yet constrained by the charter's framework. Ministerial responsibility, codified in provisions allowing by deputies and trial by peers, evolved from Restoration precedents toward greater parliamentary oversight, as governments increasingly required Chamber confidence to sustain budgets and policies, though the king retained nomination prerogative. Budgetary authority further exemplified the hybrid's checks: the Chambers approved all taxes, with direct levies requiring annual renewal and indirect ones limited to multi-year durations upon , preventing unchecked executive spending while averting legislative gridlock through the king's mediating —exercised sparingly to maintain equilibrium. This calibrated distribution of powers sustained 18 years of relative internal order, outperforming the instability of universalist models that fragmented and invited radicalism, as the limited franchise and bicameral buffers filtered transient passions in favor of propertied .

Doctrinaires vs. Resistance Party Dynamics

Following the of 1830, the liberals who had united against Charles X's ordinances fragmented into rival factions within the , reflecting intra-bourgeois tensions over the pace of reform under the constitutional charter. The , rooted in Restoration-era and led by , evolved into the Parti de la Résistance, prioritizing stability and resistance to further revolutionary impulses to consolidate the bourgeois monarchy. This approach aligned with causal principles of gradual capacity-building in governance, avoiding the disruptions of expanded or adventurism that could undermine order. In contrast, Adolphe Thiers headed the Parti du Mouvement, advocating activist policies including electoral adjustments to broaden participation slightly and a more assertive foreign stance, as seen in his 1840 premiership push for confrontation with Britain over the Oriental Crisis involving Muhammad Ali in Egypt. Thiers' faction, emerging from the opportunistic 1830 coalition that elevated Louis-Philippe via the Address of 221 deputies on May 18, 1830, later critiqued the regime's stasis, demanding "movement" to preempt radical pressures. However, this dynamism often manifested as parliamentary maneuvering, with Thiers resigning twice (1836 and 1840) amid royal vetoes on expansionist aims, highlighting the king's preference for Guizot's restraint. The rivalry dominated legislative sessions from the mid-1830s, exemplified by Guizot's tenure as premier from September 1840 to February 1848, during which he enforced the 200-franc tax threshold and promoted moral order via policies like the 1833 mandating local schooling. Thiers' opposition, while vocal on issues like debates in , failed to dislodge the Resistance due to Louis-Philippe's alignment with doctrinaire , which empirically sustained 18 years of relative domestic peace by co-opting moderate reformers and suppressing extremes through administrative control rather than concessions. This intra-liberal contest, absent simplistic left-right framing, underscored causal trade-offs: Movement agitation risked legitimizing socialist demands, whereas Resistance consolidation deferred instability until exogenous economic shocks in 1846-1847.

Challenges from Legitimists, Republicans, and Bonapartists

The , adherents to the senior Bourbon line displaced by the , pursued restoration through sporadic insurrections in western , where royalist sentiment lingered from the wars. A prominent effort occurred in 1832, when Marie Caroline de Bourbon-Sicile, Duchesse de Berry and mother of the legitimist claimant , comte de Chambord, launched a clandestine expedition from , landing in and inciting revolts in the Vendée and regions with promises of tax relief and Catholic privileges. Involving around 1,000-2,000 irregular fighters at peak, the rising faltered due to poor coordination, betrayal by informants, and minimal rural mobilization beyond isolated hotspots, culminating in the duchess's arrest in on October 7, 1832, after she was recognized by a collaborator. Government troops, numbering over 30,000 mobilized, restored order within weeks, highlighting the Legitimists' isolation from broader societal currents. Republican opposition coalesced around secret societies advocating and , chief among them the Société des Droits de l'Homme, formed in July 1830 with initial membership exceeding 10,000 across 50 branches by 1833, drawing urban artisans, students, and intellectuals critical of the regime's restricted electorate of approximately 200,000 wealthy males. The society orchestrated disturbances, including riots in following the June 1832 funeral of General Lamarque, a liberal figurehead, where rose but were dismantled by 10,000 and troops, resulting in over 800 arrests and 100 deaths. Further unrest in April 1834, protesting the acquittal of ministers implicated in repressive laws, saw silk workers (canuts) and Parisian radicals erect , yet these fragmented actions—limited to 5,000-6,000 participants nationally—succumbed to and the September 1835 press and association restrictions, which dissolved unauthorized groups and confined to marginal parliamentary voices. Bonapartists, fueled by nostalgia for Napoleon's military glory and administrative centralism, sought revival through appeals to veterans and imperial symbols, though their organized efforts remained nascent and elite-driven under the regime's censorship of Napoleonic imagery until the 1840 return of Napoleon's ashes from . Key manifestations included Louis-Napoléon's abortive 1836 coup attempt at the garrison, where he and 60 followers, invoking the 1815 Waterloo centennial spirit, seized a but were repelled by loyalist officers, leading to his ; a similar 1840 landing at with 56 men and a tame eagle symbol ended in capture after scattered skirmishes. These quixotic ventures, attracting fewer than 200 active participants combined, underscored Bonapartist dependence on charismatic pretenders rather than mass mobilization, as electoral inroads stayed negligible with no dedicated candidates securing seats before 1848. These factions' challenges proved self-defeating owing to profound ideological fissures—Legitimists' ultramontane absolutism clashed with Republicans' anticlerical , while Bonapartists' plebiscitary alienated both—precluding coalitions that might have exploited economic grievances. Electoral data from 1831-1846 chamber elections reveal their containment: Legitimists held 20-40 seats sporadically via regional strongholds but boycotted or refrained from oaths, Republicans mustered under 10 deputies amid barriers, and Bonapartists none, against a ruling bloc commanding + of 459 seats, affirming resilience through divided opposition unable to transcend parochial bases.

Cultural and Intellectual Climate

Romanticism, Arts, and National Exhibitions

The July Monarchy fostered a vibrant Romantic movement in the arts, reflecting the regime's patronage of cultural expression as a means to affirm national vitality following the 1830 revolution. Eugène Delacroix's Liberty Leading the People (1830), depicting the allegory of liberty amid the barricades of the July Revolution, exemplified Romanticism's emphasis on emotion, individualism, and historical drama, gaining acclaim for its dynamic composition and patriotic fervor. Victor Hugo, a key literary figure, advanced Romantic ideals through works like Hernani (premiered February 25, 1830), which sparked the "battle of Hernani" with its defiance of classical unities, signaling a shift toward expressive freedom in drama. Theater censorship, stricter under the Bourbon Restoration, eased under Louis-Philippe, enabling Romantic playwrights such as Hugo and to stage innovative works that prioritized passion over neoclassical restraint, thereby invigorating Parisian stages with historical and exotic themes. This liberalization contributed to a cultural , as the subsidized theaters while tolerating bolder content to align with bourgeois tastes for and sentiment. National art exhibitions, notably the Paris Salons held annually at the from 1831 onward, showcased Romantic innovations alongside academic traditions, with juries under Louis-Philippe's influence promoting historical painting and landscape genres that celebrated French heritage. Complementing these were industrial expositions in 1834, 1839, and 1844, organized to display manufacturing advances and boost public morale through spectacles of progress, such as machinery and luxury goods, underscoring the monarchy's fusion of artistic with economic prestige. Louis-Philippe's restoration of Versailles, transforming it into the Musée d'Histoire de France by 1837, exemplified state-sponsored cultural projects; over 1,000 artworks were commissioned or acquired to narrate French from Clovis to the , with the historic galleries inaugurated on June 30, 1837, to educate and unify the populace under a narrative of continuity and achievement. This initiative, involving extensive renovations from 1833, highlighted the regime's investment in monumental art as a tool for national identity, distinct from mere royal pomp.

Press Regulations and Intellectual Debates

Following the of 1830, the initial liberalization of press laws under the July Monarchy permitted a rapid expansion of periodicals, fostering vigorous public discourse but also enabling the dissemination of radical and incendiary content that threatened . This environment saw newspapers like Le National and Le Globe propagate republican and proto-socialist ideas, contributing to unrest exemplified by events such as the 1834 silk workers' revolt. In response to escalating threats, including Giuseppe Fieschi's failed assassination attempt on King Louis-Philippe on 28 July 1835 using a "machine infernale" , the government enacted the September Laws on 9 September 1835. These laws imposed stricter regulations, including doubled penalties for press offenses inciting attacks on the king's life or fomenting class hatred, mandatory caution money deposits for publications, and enhanced libel prosecutions to curb seditious journalism without reverting to pre-1830 . Such measures proved necessary to restrain inflammatory rhetoric that had directly fueled assassination plots and insurrections, as evidenced by prior laxity allowing unchecked calls for violence. Libel suits under the September Laws effectively targeted , with over 200 press trials in the early escalating to systematic enforcement by 1840, reducing the most extreme republican and legitimist outlets while preserving moderate debate. This judicial approach prioritized causal accountability for destabilizing over blanket suppression, aligning with the regime's bourgeois emphasis on ordered . Intellectual debates intensified around Saint-Simonian and Fourierist doctrines, which gained traction through press organs advocating industrial reorganization and associative economies as antidotes to . Saint-Simonians, via publications like Le Globe until its 1832 shift, promoted a technocratic led by scientists and bankers, influencing projects but critiqued for hierarchical . Fourierists countered with communities emphasizing passionate labor attraction, debated in journals for their utopian impracticality amid empirical industrial growth. Regulations tempered these discussions by prosecuting advocacy veering into class warfare, preventing ideological escalation into the 1848 upheavals seen elsewhere. As Minister of Public Instruction from 1832 to 1837, advanced university reforms prioritizing practical, moral education to foster national unity and merit-based elites compatible with . He expanded secondary instruction, established departmental teacher-training schools (écoles normales), and appointed inspectors to ensure curricula emphasized , , and applied knowledge over speculative , countering radical intellectual currents. These initiatives, building on reinstated liberal provisions, aimed to cultivate responsible citizenship, with enrollment in higher education rising modestly to support administrative efficiency. Guizot's framework reflected causal realism in linking educated middling classes to political stability, eschewing egalitarian excesses that biased sources later romanticized.

Religious Toleration and Protestant Integration

The Charter of 1830 explicitly recognized Catholicism as the religion of the majority of French citizens rather than imposing it as a state-enforced creed, marking a departure from the Restoration's more confessional policies that had emphasized Catholic primacy and occasionally persecuted non-Catholics. This pragmatic stance on religious equality facilitated social stability by integrating Protestant elites into the bourgeois political class without reviving revolutionary or clerical dominance. Unlike the Bourbon Restoration's alignment with ultramontane Catholicism, the July Monarchy maintained the Napoleonic-era Organic Articles, which provided state salaries for Protestant pastors and ensured civil equality for non-Catholics, thereby avoiding sectarian conflicts that could undermine the regime's focus on order and property rights. A key indicator of Protestant integration was the prominence of figures like , a Calvinist who served as from 1840 to 1848 and shaped conservative policies emphasizing moral order and administrative efficiency. Guizot's ascent reflected the regime's merit-based inclusion of capable Protestants in governance, countering any residual biases from the era's dechristianization campaigns while prioritizing empirical governance over ideological purity. Protestants, numbering around 500,000 by the (primarily in the south and east), benefited from this framework, with their consistories receiving state funding for ministers and synagogues/temples maintained under civil oversight, fostering loyalty to the constitutional order. Symbolic of this toleration was Louis-Philippe's approval of interfaith royal marriages, notably the 1837 union of his son, Ferdinand Philippe, Duke of Orléans, to Princess Hélène of Mecklenburg-Schwerin, a Lutheran who became the first Protestant consort in the French royal family since the Revolution. The wedding, held at the Château de Compiègne, proceeded without requiring Hélène's conversion, underscoring the regime's avoidance of confessional absolutism in favor of dynastic pragmatism. Such alliances integrated Protestant nobility and reinforced the monarchy's appeal to liberal elites, including Swiss and German Protestant communities, without alienating the Catholic majority. State support extended to ecclesiastical institutions across denominations, with government funding allocated to Catholic seminaries—such as efforts in 1835 to secure resources for the Oblates of Mary Immaculate's major seminary—while Protestant theological training operated under subsidized consistorial structures established in 1802. This balanced approach avoided the Restoration's favoritism toward tied to legitimist agendas, instead channeling resources toward domestic stability. The period also saw expanded missionary activities, with French Protestant societies like the Société des Missions Évangéliques de Paris dispatching evangelists to , the Pacific, and , often in competition with but tolerated alongside Catholic orders active in after 1830. These efforts, peaking in enthusiasm by the , projected French civilizational influence abroad without domestic religious coercion, aligning with the regime's emphasis on peaceful expansion and countering perceptions of Catholic . Overall, this policy of pragmatic contributed to the July Monarchy's durability by neutralizing religious divisions as a vector for opposition, prioritizing causal factors like elite cohesion over egalitarian ideals that might invite instability.

Controversies and Critiques

Assassination Attempts and Security Threats

King Louis-Philippe I faced several assassination attempts from fringe republican and anarchist conspirators during the July Monarchy, primarily between 1835 and 1840, but all failed to harm him directly, resulting in minimal casualties to the monarch and demonstrating the regime's security efficacy. The most prominent incident occurred on July 28, 1835, when , a Corsican exile, former soldier, thief, and forger driven by republican resentment and personal vendettas against society, orchestrated an attack during the king's review of the on the in . Fieschi constructed an "infernal machine"—a improvised linking 25 rifle barrels loaded with over 400 projectiles—and fired it from a third-story window, killing 18 bystanders including Marshal Mortier and wounding 22 others, among them the king's eldest son, the Duke of Orléans. Louis-Philippe himself sustained only minor injuries from flying debris, while Fieschi was gravely wounded by the device's partial explosion, leading to his immediate capture along with accomplices Pierre Morey and Gabriel Pépin; all three were guillotined in February 1836. Subsequent plots remained isolated and ineffective, involving small groups of marginal radicals unable to mobilize broader support, such as efforts linked to figures like Louis-Napoléon Bonaparte in his 1836 and 1840 coup attempts, which were swiftly foiled without significant violence or regime disruption. These incidents underscored the fringe nature of the threats, limited to a handful of conspirators rather than mass movements. The Sûreté Nationale, established in 1812 under —a who pioneered modern by employing undercover agents, reformed criminals, and forensic techniques like and document analysis—played a key role in preempting and resolving these threats through proactive intelligence networks. Public responses to the attempts affirmed underlying loyalty to Louis-Philippe, as the failures elicited no widespread unrest or sympathy for the perpetrators, instead highlighting the stability of the bourgeois order amid isolated acts of desperation by societal outcasts.

Corruption Allegations vs. Administrative Efficiency

Despite persistent allegations of systemic corruption leveled by regime critics, including republicans and legitimists who portrayed the July Monarchy as a haven for bourgeois speculation and ministerial self-enrichment, verifiable instances of graft remained sporadic and were met with legal repercussions. The Teste-Cubières affair, erupting in May 1847 amid a lawsuit over mining rights, exemplified such claims: Public Works Minister Jean-Baptiste Teste, while out of office, had accepted approximately 160,000 francs from General Amédée Despans-Cubières in 1843 to influence a concession for the Gouhenans iron mines; Teste was convicted by the Court of Peers in August 1847, fined 10,000 francs, and stripped of office, while Cubières received a lighter sentence, underscoring accountability mechanisms rather than entrenched impunity. No comparable scandals permeated the bureaucracy at scale, with opposition narratives often relying on caricature and literary exaggeration to amplify perceptions of moral decay, as evidenced by contemporary prints and pamphlets that targeted figures like Finance Minister Alexandre Goüin without substantiating widespread malfeasance. Counterbalancing these accusations, the regime's administrative structure prioritized meritocratic selection and centralized coordination, particularly through the prefectural system inherited from but refined for greater efficacy. Prefects, directly appointed by the Minister of the Interior and removable at will, served as extensions of central authority in each department, overseeing policy enforcement, public order, and local elections with standardized reporting that minimized regional variances and enhanced national cohesion. This setup, which employed over 300 prefects and sub-prefects by the 1840s, facilitated efficient resource allocation and crisis response—such as during the 1832 outbreak—by channeling directives from while incorporating local intelligence, thereby outperforming the Restoration's more aristocratic and fragmented provincial governance. Many appointees rose through competitive administrative tracks, including the , reinforcing a professional ethos over . Fiscal administration further highlighted this efficiency, as the government sustained balanced budgets and periodic surpluses through disciplined revenue collection and expenditure restraint until the 1846–1847 economic downturn. Public rose modestly from 4.0 billion francs in to 4.9 billion by , reflecting prudent management amid investments like railways, with non-military spending held stable at around 4% of GDP and no reliance on unsustainable borrowing. Such outcomes stemmed from centralized budgetary oversight, where the Chamber of Peers and Deputies annually scrutinized finances, averting deficits through measures like indirect taxes on consumer goods, which generated reliable surpluses in prosperous years—contrasting sharply with the spirals of and Napoleonic eras. This record, while critiqued by radicals as favoring creditors over the masses, empirically validated the regime's capacity for solvent governance absent endemic .

Exclusionary Politics: Achievements in Order vs. Inequality Claims

The July Monarchy maintained political stability for eighteen years, a marked contrast to the frequent regime changes from to , which included the overthrow of the in , the rise and fall of the Directory and , Napoleon's ending in 1815, and the Bourbon Restoration culminating in the revolution. This period saw no successful domestic revolutions until the economic downturn of 1847-1848, with the government effectively suppressing localized uprisings such as the Lyon silk workers' revolts in 1831 and 1834 through military intervention and legal measures, thereby preserving order without descending into the widespread chaos of prior eras. The restricted , limited to approximately 250,000 male owners paying at least 200 francs in direct taxes out of a exceeding 35 million, functioned as a mechanism to prioritize electors with a tangible stake in societal stability, filtering out those prone to radical demands that had fueled earlier upheavals. Proponents like argued this system ensured governance by "capable" individuals invested in long-term order, as ownership correlated with incentives for economic prudence and aversion to confiscatory policies, rather than mere ; empirical outcomes included consistent parliamentary majorities supporting conservative reforms that sustained peace and fiscal balance. Critics, often from socialist circles, contended that this exclusion exacerbated inequality by entrenching bourgeois dominance and sidelining working-class interests, pointing to stagnant for urban laborers amid industrial growth and a top wealth concentration where the wealthiest 1% held significant shares of national assets. However, the regime's emphasis on over expansive state relief—eschewing broad welfare provisions that could foster dependency—aligned with causal incentives for personal industry, as evidenced by the absence of systemic crises comparable to those in Britain under more generous poor laws, and contributed to overall without the fiscal burdens that might have provoked fiscal collapse or social unrest. This approach, rooted in limiting public functions to those demonstrating fiscal responsibility, empirically prioritized order over egalitarian redistribution, averting the cycles seen when broader enfranchisement amplified unpropertied grievances without corresponding stakes.

Legacy and Assessments

Contributions to Modernization and Stability

The July Monarchy (1830–1848) provided France with an unprecedented 18 years of European peace following the , allowing resources to be redirected toward internal consolidation rather than military expenditures. This stability fostered , particularly from to , during which industrial output grew and France transitioned from a predominantly agrarian to one incorporating proto-industrial elements, such as mechanized production reaching mass scale by 1840. Infrastructure development marked a key modernization effort, with the government granting concessions for railways and contributing to construction costs, exemplified by early lines like to Andrézieux (opened 1832) and the pivotal Law of 11 June 1842, which outlined a comprehensive national network plan connecting major cities. By , these initiatives had laid over 1,000 kilometers of track, facilitating trade and resource transport essential for industrial growth. Educational reforms under Interior Minister advanced formation; the 1833 Guizot Law mandated s in communes with over 500 inhabitants and required , resulting in a near-doubling of enrollments to approximately 1.5 million pupils by the mid-1840s and contributing to rising rates from around 40% in 1830 to over 50% by 1848 among military conscripts. This emphasis on basic instruction supported administrative efficiency and a skilled for emerging industries. The regime's constitutional framework, blending monarchical authority with parliamentary oversight and expanded bourgeois electoral participation (via the 1830 Charter), set a for without absolutism or upheaval, prioritizing and legal predictability to underpin economic confidence and .

Causal Factors in 1848 Failure: Empirical Realities

The collapse of the July Monarchy in February 1848 arose from exogenous economic disruptions compounded by elite irresolution, rather than systemic policy inadequacies or pervasive starvation. Harvest shortfalls in 1846, including potato blight and deficient grain yields, elevated wheat prices by 50 to 150 percent in northern, western, and central by mid-1847, precipitating commercial failures, industrial slowdowns, and spikes in urban centers like , where luxury goods sectors contracted sharply. Imports of grain from and the , alongside municipal relief distributions, averted mass mortality, with national wheat prices peaking at 38 francs per hectoliter in March 1847 before stabilizing; unlike Ireland's potato-dependent catastrophe, France recorded no famine-induced excess deaths, as caloric deficits were mitigated by diversified and state interventions. Radical agitators exploited this backdrop to intensify a reformist banquet campaign into violent upheaval, transforming a banned demonstration—intended for electoral expansion—into warfare confined largely to Paris's eastern districts, involving several thousand insurgents against regime forces. Regular troops under commanders like Marshal Thomas Bugeaud remained loyal and numerically superior, capable of quelling the unrest, but King Louis Philippe's on February 24 and subsequent disguised flight to engendered governmental paralysis, eroding command cohesion before decisive engagement could occur. The monarchy's restricted franchise, encompassing only about 200,000 to 250,000 electors by amid a male adult population exceeding nine million, exposed it to localized Parisian volatility, yet nationwide acquiescence endured, evidenced by absent revolts and provincial inertia until the capital's events dictated outcomes. Claims of economy-wide driving inevitable overthrow lack empirical substantiation, as data reveal contained scarcity without rural mobilization or institutional breakdown prior to leadership forfeiture.

Historiographical Debates: Beyond Leftist Narratives

Traditional framed the July Monarchy as a "bourgeois monarchy" that consolidated power for financial elites at the expense of broader republican ideals, portraying its narrow electoral base—limited to about 250,000 voters paying over 200 francs in direct taxes—and exclusion of working classes as sowing the seeds of inevitable proletarian revolt. This interpretation, echoed in Karl Marx's Class Struggles in France, 1848-1850, depicted the regime as a mere "" exploiting national resources, with its downfall in seen as the logical outcome of unresolved class antagonisms rather than contingent events. Empirical reappraisals, drawing on quantitative , challenge this deterministic narrative by highlighting sustained growth and administrative competence that underpinned two decades of relative stability. Industrial output expanded significantly, with production rising from 1.5 million tons in 1830 to over 4 million by 1846, and railway mileage increasing from zero to 1,100 kilometers by 1848, reflecting effective infrastructure policies under ministers like . The regime's collapse stemmed not from inherent structural flaws but from acute exogenous shocks, including the potato blight and poor harvests of 1846-1847, which spiked grain prices by 80-100% and in urban centers, compounded by Guizot's resistance to amid banquet campaign pressures. Such analyses, grounded in archival records of fiscal management—where public debt was stabilized at around 40% of GDP—underscore policy choices and weather-dependent vulnerabilities over teleological class inevitability. Comparisons with contemporary Britain further undermine claims of predestined failure, as the navigated analogous economic pressures—textile slumps and Chartist agitation—without systemic overthrow, maintaining through incremental reforms like the 1832 Reform Act that broadened to one in five adult males. France's upheaval, by contrast, arose from rigid insistence on the 1830 charter's tax qualifications, excluding similar adaptive measures, suggesting causal realism favors institutional rigidity and short-term crises over abstract Marxist dialectics. Right-leaning interpretations prioritize the monarchy's restoration of order post-1830, valuing its suppression of legitimist and republican insurrections—such as the 1832 Paris uprising quelled with minimal casualties—as causal bulwarks against the Jacobin excesses of prior eras, fostering a that doubled from 1830 levels. These views, often sidelined in academia's prevailing left-leaning frameworks that amplify inequality narratives, argue that the regime's emphasis on enrichissez-vous (enrich yourselves) pragmatically channeled bourgeois energies into national modernization, averting the chronic plaguing experiments. While sources like mainstream periodicals exhibit biases toward portraying elite consolidation as moral failing, primary fiscal ledgers and trade statistics affirm the period's net contributions to long-term stability, reframing as aberration rather than apotheosis.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.