Hubbry Logo
Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe RailwayAtchison, Topeka and Santa Fe RailwayMain
Open search
Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway
Community hub
Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway
Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway
Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway
Santa Fe system (shown in blue) at the time of the BNSF merger
ATSF #5051, an EMD SD40-2, leads a train through Marceline, Missouri, in August 1983.
Overview
HeadquartersChicago, Illinois
Kansas City, Missouri
Los Angeles, California
Reporting markATSF
Locale
List
FounderCyrus K. Holliday
Dates of operation1859–1996
SuccessorBNSF Railway
Technical
Track gauge4 ft 8+1⁄2 in (1,435 mm) standard gauge
Length13,115 miles (21,107 km)
Buda No. 619 Rail bus used on the route from Harvey to Topeka [1]

The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway (reporting mark ATSF), often referred to as the Santa Fe or AT&SF, was one of the largest Class 1 railroads in the United States between 1859 and 1996.[2]

The Santa Fe was a pioneer in intermodal freight transport; at various times, it operated an airline, the short-lived Santa Fe Skyway, and the Santa Fe Railroad tugboats.[3] Its bus line extended passenger transportation to areas not accessible by rail, and ferryboats on the San Francisco Bay allowed travelers to complete their westward journeys to the Pacific Ocean. The AT&SF was the subject of a popular song, Harry Warren and Johnny Mercer's "On the Atchison, Topeka and the Santa Fe", written for the film The Harvey Girls (1946).

The railroad officially ceased independent operations on December 31, 1996, when it merged with the Burlington Northern Railroad to form the Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway.

History

[edit]

Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway

[edit]

The railroad was chartered in February 1859 to serve the cities of Atchison and Topeka, Kansas, and Santa Fe, New Mexico. The railroad reached the Kansas–Colorado border in 1873 and Pueblo, Colorado, in 1876. To create a demand for its services, the railroad set up real estate offices and sold farmland from the land grants that it was awarded by Congress for laying track.[2]

As the railroad was first being built, many of the tracks were laid directly over the wagon ruts of the Santa Fe Trail. In 1869, the first general office building of the company was built in Topeka. This building also served as a passenger station and freight depot. When the line was extended to Newton, Kansas in 1871, the railroad became a major cattle shipper to ensure a steady revenue stream, at the end of Texas cattle drive trails.

Despite being chartered to serve the city, the railroad chose to bypass Santa Fe, due to the engineering challenges of the mountainous terrain. In 1880,[4] a branch line from Lamy, New Mexico, brought the Santa Fe railroad the 20 miles to its namesake city.[5] It continued to connect with the Southern Pacific at Deming.

The system was eventually expanded with branch lines into California, Arizona, Texas, New Mexico, Colorado, Kansas, Missouri, Oklahoma, Louisiana, and Illinois. It reached Arizona and California by acquiring control of the western portion of the Atlantic and Pacific Railroad in 1880. It reached Chicago by acquiring the Chicago and St. Louis Railway in 1887. By 1887 the mainline had been completed from Chicago to Los Angeles, making it one of the country’s most important railroads and one of the few that directly connected the Midwest with the Gulf of Mexico and the Pacific Ocean under one corporation. The principal lines consisted of:

  • Chicago to Kansas City to La Junta, Colorado, to Los Angeles;
  • Emporia, Kansas, to Oklahoma City to Fort Worth to Houston;
  • Emporia, Kansas, to Dalies, New Mexico;
  • Barstow to Richmond, California (the Valley Division);
  • Temple to Farwell, Texas;
  • Denver to La Junta, Colorado;
  • Albuquerque, New Mexico, to El Paso, Texas;
  • Dallas to Presidio, Texas; and
  • Kansas City to Tulsa.

The primary back shops at Topeka, Kansas, were first established in the 1860s. The original shops were relocated in 1878 to the south side of Seward Avenue and expanded in 1902 to double the repair capacity. The shops at Albuquerque, New Mexico, were built in 1880 and materially expanded in 1925. Another shop site was established at San Bernardino, California, in 1886. To maintain rolling stock in the state of Texas, a fourth major shop facility was built in Cleburne, Texas, in 1899.[6]

An AT&SF trademark in the late 19th century incorporated the British lion out of respect for the country's financial assistance in building the railroad to California.
Gold bond of the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad Company, issued October 1, 1889
A map of "The Santa Fé Route" and subsidiary lines, as published in an 1891 issue of the Grain Dealers and Shippers Gazetteer

Physical confrontations led to two years of armed conflict that became known as the Royal Gorge Railroad War. Federal intervention prompted an out-of-court settlement on February 2, 1880, in the form of the so-called "Treaty of Boston", wherein the Denver & Rio Grande railroad was allowed to complete its line and lease it for use by the Santa Fe railroad.

Building across Kansas and eastern Colorado was simple, with few natural obstacles, but the railroad found it almost economically impossible because of the sparse population. It set up real estate offices in the area and promoted settlement across Kansas on the land granted to it by Congress in 1863.

The Santa Fe entered Texas by starting what became the Panhandle and Santa Fe Railway in 1886 and acquiring the Gulf, Colorado and Santa Fe Railway in 1887. The Santa Fe reached San Francisco by buying the San Francisco & San Joaquin Valley Railway in 1891. They completed a Grand Canyon branch in 1901. The Santa Fe acquired the properties of the Southern California Railway in 1906. They acquired a Phoenix branch with the purchase of the Santa Fe, Prescott and Phoenix Railway in 1911.

Expansion

[edit]
A comparison map prepared by the Santa Fe Railroad in 1921, showing the "Old Santa Fé Trail" (top) and the AT&SF and its connections (bottom)

In 1928, the Santa Fe acquired the Kansas City, Mexico and Orient Railway.

On March 29, 1955, the railway was one of many companies that sponsored attractions in Disneyland with its five-year sponsorship of all Disneyland trains and stations until 1974.[7]

In 1960, AT&SF bought the Toledo, Peoria & Western Railroad (TP&W); then sold a half-interest to the Pennsylvania Railroad (PRR). The TP&W cut straight east across Illinois from near Fort Madison, Iowa (Lomax, IL), to a connection with the PRR at Effner, Indiana (Illinois–Indiana border), forming a bypass around Chicago for traffic moving between the two lines. The TP&W route did not mesh with the traffic patterns Conrail developed after 1976, so AT&SF bought back the other half, merged the TP&W in 1983, then sold it back into independence in 1989.[8]

Attempted Southern Pacific merger

[edit]
Main article: Southern Pacific Santa Fe Railroad
AT&SF and SP freight trains meet at Walong on the Tehachapi Loop in the late 1980s.

AT&SF began merger talks in the 1980s. The Southern Pacific Santa Fe Railroad (SPSF) was a proposed merger between the parent companies of the Southern Pacific and AT&SF announced on December 23, 1983. As part of the joining of the two firms, all rail and non-rail assets owned by Santa Fe Industries and the Southern Pacific Transportation Company were placed under the control of a holding company, the Santa Fe–Southern Pacific Corporation. The merger was subsequently denied by the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) on the basis that it would create too many duplicate routes.[9][10]

The companies were so confident the merger would be approved that they began repainting locomotives and non-revenue rolling stock in a new unified paint scheme. While Southern Pacific (railroad) was sold off to Rio Grande Industries, all of the SP's real estate holdings were consolidated into a new company, Catellus Development Corporation, making it California's largest private landowner, of which Santa Fe remained the owner. In the early 1980s, gold was discovered on several properties west of Battle Mountain, Nevada along I-80, on ground owned by the Santa Fe Railroad (formerly SP). The Santa Fe Pacific Corporation (a name correlation of Santa Fe and Southern Pacific) was to develop the properties. They were sold to Newmont during 1997 in preparation for the merger with Burlington Northern). Sometime later, Catellus would purchase the Union Pacific Railroad's interest in the Los Angeles Union Passenger Terminal (LAUPT).[8]

Burlington Northern merger

[edit]
Main article: BNSF Railway

On September 22, 1995, AT&SF merged with Burlington Northern Railroad to form the Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway (BNSF). Some of the challenges resulting from the joining of the two companies included the establishment of a common dispatching system, the unionization of AT&SF's non-union dispatchers, and incorporating AT&SF's train identification codes throughout. The two lines maintained separate operations until December 31, 1996, when it officially became BNSF.

1870 1945
Gross operating revenue $182,580 $528,080,530
Total track length 62 miles (100 km) 13,115 miles (21,107 km)
Freight carried 98,920 tons 59,565,100 tons
Passengers carried 33,630 11,264,000
Locomotives owned 6 1,759
Unpowered rolling stock owned 141 81,974 freight cars
1,436 passenger cars
Source: Santa Fe Railroad (1945), Along Your Way, Rand McNally, Chicago, Illinois.
Revenue Freight Ton-Miles (Millions)
ATSF/GC&SF/P&SF Oklahoma City-Ada-Atoka FtWorth & Rio Grande KCM&O/KCM&O of Texas Clinton & Oklahoma Western New Mexico Central
1925 13,862 14 42 330 2 1
1933 8,712 12 18 (incl P&SF) (incl P&SF) (incl ATSF)
1944 37,603 45 (incl GC&SF)
1960 36,635 20
1970 48,328 (merged)
Revenue Passenger-Miles (Millions)
ATSF/GC&SF/P&SF Oklahoma City-Ada-Atoka FtWorth & Rio Grande KCM&O/KCM&O of Texas Clinton & Oklahoma Western New Mexico Central
1925 1,410 5 6 8 0.1 0.1
1933 555 0.1 0.8 (incl P&SF) (incl P&SF) (incl ATSF)
1944 6,250 0.2 (incl GC&SF)
1960 1,689 0
1970 727 (merged)

Company officers

[edit]
Cyrus K. Holliday, first president of AT&SF
William Barstow Strong, president 1881–1889

Passenger service

[edit]
A 4-4-0 steam engine leading an AT&SF passenger train in Kansas, c. 1895
A map depicting the "Grand Canyon Route", c. 1901
An AT&SF pass from 1923
A scene from the filming of The Harvey Girls (1946)
The San Francisco Chief crossing the Muir Trestle in the 1950s
The exterior of a Hi-Level lounge on the El Capitan soon the car's completion in 1956
AT&SF EMD F7s in the classic Warbonnet livery, leading the San Diegan, heading south near Miramar, California, in 1973

The AT&SF was widely known for its passenger train service in the first half of the 20th century. AT&SF introduced many innovations in passenger rail travel, among these the "Pleasure Domes" of the Super Chief (billed as the "...only dome car[s] between Chicago and Los Angeles" when they were introduced in 1951) and the "Big Dome" Lounge cars and double-decker Hi-Level cars of the El Capitan, which entered revenue service in 1954. The railroad was among the first to add dining cars to its passenger trains, a move which began in 1891, following the examples of the Northern Pacific and Union Pacific railroads. The AT&SF offered food on board in a dining car or at one of the many Harvey House restaurants that were strategically located throughout the system.[2]

In general, the same train name was used for both directions of a particular train. The exceptions to this rule included the Chicagoan and Kansas Cityan trains (both names referred to the same service, but the Chicagoan was the eastbound version, while the Kansas Cityan was the westbound version), and the Eastern Express and West Texas Express. All AT&SF trains that terminated in Chicago did so at Dearborn Station. Trains terminating in Los Angeles arrived at AT&SF's La Grande Station until May 1939, when Los Angeles Union Passenger Terminal was opened.

The Santa Fe was the only railroad to run trains from Chicago to California on its own tracks. The railway's extensive network was also home to a number of regional services. These generally couldn't boast of the size or panache of the transcontinental trains, but built up enviable reputations of their own nonetheless. Of these, the Chicago-Texas trains were the most famous and impressive. The San Diegans, which ran from Los Angeles to San Diego, were the most popular and durable, becoming to the Santa Fe what New York City-Philadelphia trains were to the Pennsylvania Railroad. But Santa Fe flyers also served Tulsa, Oklahoma, El Paso, Texas, Phoenix, Arizona (the Hassayampa Flyer), and Denver, Colorado, among other cities not on their main line.

To reach smaller communities, the railroad operated mixed (passenger and freight) trains or gas-electric doodlebug rail cars. The latter were later converted to diesel power, and one pair of Budd Rail Diesel Cars was eventually added. After World War II, Santa Fe Trailways buses replaced most of these lesser trains. These smaller trains generally were not named; only the train numbers were used to differentiate services.

The ubiquitous passenger service inspired the title of the 1946 Academy-Award-winning Harry Warren tune "On the Atchison, Topeka and the Santa Fe." The song was written in 1945 for the film The Harvey Girls, a story about the waitresses of the Fred Harvey Company's restaurants.[2] It was sung in the film by Judy Garland and recorded by many other singers, including Bing Crosby. In the 1970s, the railroad used Crosby's version in a commercial.

AT&SF ceased operating passenger trains on May 1, 1971, when it conveyed its remaining trains to Amtrak. These included the Super Chief / El Capitan, the Texas Chief and the San Diegan (though Amtrak reduced the San Diegan from three daily round trips to two). Discontinued were the San Francisco Chief, the ex-Grand Canyon, the Tulsan, and a Denver–La Junta local.[14] ATSF had been more than willing to retain the San Diegan and its famed Chiefs. However, any railroad that opted out of Amtrak would have been required to operate all of its passenger routes until at least 1976. The prospect of having to keep operating its less-successful routes, especially the money-bleeding 23/24 (the former Grand Canyon) led ATSF to get out of passenger service altogether.[15]

Amtrak still runs the Super Chief and San Diegan today as the Southwest Chief and Pacific Surfliner, respectively, although the original routes and equipment have been modified by Amtrak.

Named trains

[edit]

AT&SF operated the following named trains on regular schedules:

Special trains

[edit]
A promotional brochure for the Scott Special passenger train

Occasionally, a special train was chartered to make a high-profile run over the Santa Fe's track. These specials were not included in the railroad's regular revenue service lineup, but were intended as one-time (and usually one-way) traversals of the railroad. Some of the more notable specials include:

Signals

[edit]

The Santa Fe employed several distinctive wayside and crossing signal styles. In an effort to reduce grade crossing accidents, the Santa Fe was an early user of wigwag signals from the Magnetic Signal Company, beginning in the 1920s. They had several distinct styles that were not commonly seen elsewhere. Model 10's, which had the wigwag motor and banner coming from halfway up the mast with the crossbucks on top, were almost unique to the Santa Fe–the Southern Pacific had a few as well. Upper quadrant Magnetic Flagmen were used extensively on the Santa Fe as well–virtually every small town main street and a number of city streets had their crossings protected by these unique wigwags. Virtually all the wigwags were replaced with modern signals by the turn of the 21st century.

The railroad was also known for its tall "T-2 style" upper quadrant semaphores which provided traffic control on its lines. Again, the vast majority of these had been replaced by the beginning of the 21st century, with fewer than 10 still remaining in use in New Mexico as of 2023.

Paint schemes

[edit]

Steam locomotives

[edit]
AT&SF#1129, a 1902 Baldwin 2-6-2 Prairie locomotive, preserved at Las Vegas, New Mexico, since 1956

The Santa Fe operated a large and varied fleet of steam locomotives. In 1899, the company owned 1,036 locomotives.[17] Among them was the 2-10-2 "Santa Fe", originally built for the railroad by Baldwin Locomotive Works in 1903.[18][19] The railroad would ultimately end up with the largest fleet of them, at over 300.[citation needed] Other types included 4-4-2 Atlantics, 2-6-0 Moguls, 2-8-0 Consolidations, 2-8-2 Mikados, 2-10-0 Decapods, 2-6-2 Prairies, 4-8-4 Heavy-Mountains, 4-6-4 Heavy-Pacifics, 4-6-2 Pacifics, 4-8-2 Mountains, 2-8-4 Berkshires, and 2-10-4 Texas. The railroad also operated a fleet of heavy articulated Mallet locomotives, including 1158 class 2-6-6-2s, 2-8-8-0s, 2-10-10-2s, 2-8-8-2s, and the rare 4-4-6-2. The railroad retired its last steam locomotive in 1959.

During the twentieth century, all but one of these was painted black, with white unit numbers on the sand domes and three sides of the tender. Cab sides were lettered "AT&SF", also in white. The subsidiary Gulf, Colorado and Santa Fe often painted all or part of the smokebox (between the boiler and the headlight) white or silver. In 1940, the circle and cross emblem was applied to the tenders of a few passenger locomotives, but these were all later painted over. After World War II, "Santa Fe" appeared on tender sides of mainline road locomotives in white, above the unit number. Locomotives were delivered from Baldwin with white paint on the wheel rims, but the road did not repaint these "whitewalls" after shopping the locomotives. After World War II, side rods and valve gear were painted chrome yellow. For a short time, Pacific types 1369 and 1376 were semi-streamlined for "Valley Flyer" service, with a unique paint scheme in colors similar to those used on the new passenger diesels. Unique was the two-tone light blue over royal blue scheme of streamlined Hudson type 3460.

Diesel locomotives

[edit]

Passenger

[edit]
An EMC 1800 hp B-B in the original Golden Olive scheme in 1935

Santa Fe's first set of diesel-electric passenger locomotives was placed in service on the Super Chief in 1936 and consisted of a pair of blunt-nosed units (EMC 1800 hp B-B) designated as Nos. 1 and 1A. The upper portion of the sides and ends of the units were painted gold, while the lower section was a dark olive-green color; an olive stripe also ran along the sides and widened as it crossed the front of the locomotive.

Riveted to the sides of the units were metal plaques bearing a large "Indian Head" logo, which owed its origin to the 1926 Chief "drumhead" logo. "Super Chief" was emblazoned on a plaque located on the front. The rooftop was light slate gray, rimmed by a red pinstripe. This unique combination of colors was called the Golden Olive paint scheme.[20][21] Before entering service, Sterling McDonald's General Motors Styling Department augmented the look with the addition of red and blue striping along both the sides and ends of the units in order to enhance their appearance.

An EMC E1 in the Warbonnet scheme in 1938

In a little over a year, the EMC E1 (a new and improved streamlined locomotive) would be pulling the Super Chief and other passenger consists, resplendent in the now-famous Warbonnet paint scheme devised by Leland Knickerbocker of the GM Art and Color Section. Its design was protected under a U.S. design patent,[22] granted on November 9, 1937. It is reminiscent of a Native American ceremonial head-dress. The scheme consisted of a red "bonnet" that wrapped around the front of the unit and was bordered by a yellow stripe and black pinstripe. The extent of the bonnet varied according to the locomotive model and was largely determined by the shape and length of the car body. The remainder of the unit was either painted silver or was composed of stainless-steel panels.

All units wore a nose emblem consisting of an elongated yellow "Circle and Cross" emblem with integral "tabs" on the nose and the sides, outlined and accented with black pinstripes, with variances according to the locomotive model. "SANTA FE" was displayed on the horizontal limb of the cross in black, Art Deco-style lettering. This emblem has come to be known as the "cigar band" due to its uncanny resemblance to the same. On all but the "Erie-built" units (which were essentially run as a demonstrator set), GE U28CG, GE U30CG, and FP45 units, a three-part yellow and black stripe ran up the nose behind the band.

A "Circle and Cross" motif (consisting of a yellow field, with red quadrants, outlined in black) was painted around the side windows on "as-delivered" E1 units. Similar designs were added to E3s, E6s, the DL109/110 locomotive set, and ATSF 1A after it was rebuilt and repainted. The sides of the units typically bore the words "SANTA FE" in black, 5"– or 9"–high extra extended Railroad Roman letters, as well as the "Indian Head" logo,[23][24] with a few notable exceptions.

Railway identity on diesel locomotives in passenger service:

Locomotive Type "Indian Head" "Circle and Cross" "Santa Fe" Logotype Starting Year Comments
ATSF 1 Yes Yes* Yes No 1937 "Circle and Cross" added to No. 1 after rebuild in May 1938
EMC E1, E3, & E6 Yes* Yes Yes No 1937 "Indian Head" added to B units at a later date
ALCO DL109/110 Yes* Yes Yes No 1941 No "Indian Head" on B unit
EMD FT Yes* No Yes No 1945 "Indian Head" added to B units at a later date
ALCO PA / PB Yes* No Yes No 1946 "Indian Head" added to B units at a later date
EMD F3 Yes* No Yes No 1946 "Indian Head" on B units only
FM Erie-built Yes* No Yes* No 1947 "Indian Head" and "SANTA FE" on A units only
EMD F7 Yes* No Yes* No 1949 "Indian Head" on B units only; "SANTA FE" added in 1954
EMD E8 Yes* No Yes No 1952 "Indian Head" on B units only
GE U28CG No No No Yes 1966 "Santa Fe" logotype in large, red "billboard"-style letters
GE U30CG No No Yes* No 1967 5"–high non-extended "SANTA FE" letters
EMD FP45 No No Yes* No 1967 9"–high "SANTA FE" letters

Source: Pelouze, Richard W. (1997). Trademarks of the Santa Fe Railway. The Santa Fe Railway Historical and Modeling Society, Inc., Highlands Ranch, Colorado, pp. 47–50.

In later years, Santa Fe adapted the scheme to its gas-electric "doodlebug" units.[25] The standard for all of Santa Fe's passenger locomotives, the Warbonnet is considered by many to be the most-recognized corporate logo in the railroad industry. Early after Amtrak's inception in 1971, Santa Fe embarked on a program to repaint the red bonnet on its F units that were still engaged in hauling passenger consists with yellow (also called Yellowbonnets) or dark blue (nicknamed Bluebonnets), as it no longer wanted to project the image of a passenger carrier.

Freight

[edit]
AT&SF #103, an EMD FT, decorated in the "Cat Whiskers" scheme, enters service during World War II.

Diesels used as switchers between 1935 and 1960 were painted black, with just a thin white or silver horizontal accent stripe (the sills were painted similarly). The letters "A.T.& S.F." were applied in a small font centered on the sides of the unit, as was the standard blue and white "Santa Fe" box logo. After World War II, diagonal white or silver stripes were added to the ends and cab sides to increase the visibility at grade crossings (typically referred to as the Zebra Stripe scheme). "A.T.& S.F." was now placed along the sides of the unit just above the accent stripe, with the blue and white "Santa Fe" box logo below.

Due to the lack of abundant water sources in the American desert, the Santa Fe Railway was among the first railroads to receive large numbers of streamlined diesel locomotives for use in freight service, in the form of the EMD FT. For the first group of FTs, delivered between December 1940 and March 1943 (#100–#119), the railroad selected a color scheme consisting of dark blue accented by a pale yellow stripe up the nose, and pale yellow highlights around the cab and along the mesh and framing of openings in the sides of the engine compartment; a thin red stripe separated the blue areas from the yellow.

A museum restoration of Kennecott Copper Corporation #103 (an Alco model RS-2) now bears #2098 and the Zebra Stripe scheme.

The words "SANTA FE" were applied in yellow in a 5"–high extended font, and centered on the nose was the "Santa Fe" box logo (initially consisting of a blue cross, circle, and square painted on a solid bronze sheet, but subsequently changed to baked steel sheets painted bronze with the blue identifying elements applied on top). Three thin, pale-yellow stripes (known as Cat Whiskers) extended from the nose logo around the cab sides. In January 1951, Santa Fe revised the scheme to consist of three yellow stripes running up the nose, with the addition of a blue and yellow Cigar Band (similar in size and shape to that applied to passenger units); the blue background and elongated yellow "SANTA FE" lettering were retained.

The years 1960 to 1972 saw non-streamlined freight locomotives sporting the "Billboard" color scheme (sometimes referred to as the "Bookends" or "Pinstripe" scheme), where the units were predominantly dark blue with yellow ends and trim, with a single yellow accent pinstripe. The words "Santa Fe" were applied in yellow in large bold serif letters (logotype) to the sides of the locomotive below the accent stripe (save for yard switchers which displayed the "SANTA FE" in small yellow letters above the accent stripe, somewhat akin to the Zebra Stripe arrangement).

In late 1975 and early 1976, on the occasion of the American Independence Bicentennial, Santa Fe repainted five SD45-2s with a special Bicentennial scheme at its San Bernardino Shops. These locomotives, numbered #5700 to #5704 they were placed at the front of the Super C high priority freight trains operating between Chicago and Los Angeles, although they were also seen leading the American Freedom Train's national tour on the Santa Fe lines and also participated in special events such as the grand opening, that same year 1976, of the new Railroad's Barstow Classification Yard. In the early 1980s these units were repainted in the company's standard blue and yellow scheme.[26][27][28][29]

From 1972 to 1996, and even on into the BNSF era, the company adopted a new paint scheme often known among railfans as the "Freightbonnet" or "Yellowbonnet", which placed more yellow on the locomotives (reminiscent of the company's retired Warbonnet scheme); the goal again was to ensure higher visibility at grade crossings. The truck assemblies, previously colored black, now received silver paint.

Santa Fe #2378, an Alco S-2 switcher in the Billboard scheme in 1966

In 1965, the road took delivery of ten GE U28CG dual service road switcher locomotives equally suited to passenger or fast freight service. These wore a variation of the "Warbonnet" scheme in which the black and yellow separating stripes disappeared. The "Santa Fe" name was emblazoned on the sides in large black letters, using the same stencils used on freight engines; these were soon repainted in red. In 1989, Santa Fe resurrected this version of the "Warbonnet" scheme and applied it to two SDFP45 units, #5992 and #5998. The units were re-designated as #101 and #102 and reentered service on July 4, 1989, as part of the new "Super Fleet" campaign (the first Santa Fe units to be so decorated for freight service). The six remaining FP45 units were thereafter similarly repainted and renumbered. From that point forward, most new locomotives wore red and silver, and many retained this scheme after the Burlington Northern Santa Fe merger, some with "BNSF" displayed across their sides.

For the initial deliveries of factory-new "Super Fleet" equipment, Santa Fe took delivery of the EMD GP60M and General Electric B40-8W which made the Santa Fe the only US Class I railroad to operate new 4-axle (B-B) freight locomotives equipped with the North American Safety Cab intended for high-speed intermodal service.

Several experimental and commemorative paint schemes emerged during the Santa Fe's diesel era. One combination was developed and partially implemented in anticipation of a merger between the parent companies of the Santa Fe and Southern Pacific (SP) railroads in 1984. The red, yellow, and black paint scheme with large yellow block letters on the sides and ends of the units of the proposed Southern Pacific Santa Fe Railroad (SPSF) has come to be somewhat derisively known among railfans as the Kodachrome livery, due to the similarity in colors to the boxes containing slide film sold by the Eastman Kodak Company under the same name. Santa Fe units repainted in this scheme were labeled "SF", Southern Pacific units "SP", and some (presumably new) units wore the letters "SPSF". After the ICC's denial of the merger, railfans joked that SPSF really stood for "Shouldn't Paint So Fast."[30]

  • Paint schemes of the AT&SF locomotives
  • Warbonnet roof details on top of an EMD F7
    Warbonnet roof details on top of an EMD F7
  • ATSF EMD F7 in 1968, displaying the "SANTA FE" in black Railroad Roman letters along each side
    ATSF EMD F7 in 1968, displaying the "SANTA FE" in black Railroad Roman letters along each side
  • Santa Fe #98 (originally #108), an EMD FP45 decked out in Warbonnet colors, including the traditional "cigar band" nose emblem
    Santa Fe #98 (originally #108), an EMD FP45 decked out in Warbonnet colors, including the traditional "cigar band" nose emblem
  • ATSF 108 at Southern California Railway Museum, repainted into its original colors
    ATSF 108 at Southern California Railway Museum, repainted into its original colors
  • Santa Fe #681 in Sealy Texas in June 2001
    Santa Fe #681 in Sealy Texas in June 2001
  • The L.A.-bound Super Chief gets its 5-minute pit-stop service in Albuquerque in 1943
    The L.A.-bound Super Chief gets its 5-minute pit-stop service in Albuquerque in 1943
  • ATSF 9542 in Kodachrome leads other locomotives in the Freightbonnet livery in 1990
    ATSF 9542 in Kodachrome leads other locomotives in the Freightbonnet livery in 1990

Preserved locomotives

[edit]
AT&SF No. 870, a 1906-built 2-8-0 from Burnham, Williams & Co. on static display at a park in Santa Fe Springs

While most of the Santa Fe's steam locomotives were retired and sold for scrap, over fifty were saved and donated to various parks and museums, a handful of which have either been restored to operating condition or are pending future restoration.

Some of the more notable locomotives include:

  • 5 (0-4-0), located in the CTRC trolley barn at the San Jose Historical Museum.[31]
  • 132 (2-8-0), Built by Baldwin in 1880 and located at the Kansas Museum of History in Topeka. Named for Cyrus K. Holliday. Was used often by the Santa Fe for promotions and special events until it was donated to the Kansas State Historical Society in 1977. It is the second oldest locomotive from the Santa Fe that is preserved close to its original appearance.
  • 643 (2-8-0), Originally built by Hinkley Locomotive Works in 1879 as #73 with a 4-4-0 arrangement. The oldest preserved locomotive of the Santa Fe, although not as originally configured. It was converted by the railroad to a 2-8-0 configuration following an accident in 1897. It had several upgrades over the years while working on the Gulf Division. It was formerly located at the then-new Oklahoma State Fairgrounds, following its donation from the Santa Fe to the people of Oklahoma in 1953. The locomotive was relocated again in 2015 to the Oklahoma Railway Museum in Oklahoma City, where it received a badly needed cleaning and thorough cosmetic restoration, and is currently on display.[32]
  • 769 (2-8-0), located at the Old Coal Mine Museum in Madrid, New Mexico. It is waiting to be moved to the Santa Fe Southern Railway in Santa Fe for future restoration to operating condition.[33]
  • 870 (2-8-0), located at Heritage Park in Santa Fe Springs, California.
  • 940 (2-10-2), located at the Union depot in Bartlesville, Oklahoma. It is the only surviving steam locomotive from the Santa Fe with a 2-10-2 wheel arrangement.
  • 1010 (2-6-2), located at the California State Railroad Museum in Sacramento, California. It is planned to go under restoration to operating condition.[34]
  • 1129 (2-6-2), located at Las Vegas, New Mexico.
  • 1316 (4-6-2), formerly located at Fort Concho, Texas: the sole survivor of the 1309 class was restored to operating condition by the Texas State Railroad in the early 1980s as its No. 500. It is currently displayed at Palestine for another restoration for future excursion service.[35]
  • 2913 (4-8-4), located in Riverview Park at Fort Madison, Iowa.
  • 2926 (4-8-4), formerly located in Coronado Park in Albuquerque, New Mexico. This locomotive had been undergoing restoration for operational purposes by New Mexico Heritage Rail, which has expended 114,000 man-hours and $1,700,000 in donated funds on its restoration since 2002. It was restored in July 2021. Performed her first mainline travel on September 30, 2023.[36]
  • 3415 (4-6-2), formerly located at Eisenhower Park in Abilene, Kansas, until it was acquired by the Abilene and Smoky Valley Railroad and has been restored for excursion service since 2009. The locomotive is expected to be taken out of service for a 15-year boiler inspection later in 2023.[37]
  • 3416 (4-6-2), currently preserved at Great Bend, Kansas.
  • 3417 (4-6-2), formerly preserved at Hulen Park, in Cleburne, Texas.
  • 3423 (4-6-2), located at the Railroad & Heritage Museum in Temple Texas, it is currently preserved.
  • 3424 (4-6-2), Preserved in Kinsley, Kansas.
  • 3450 (4-6-4), the sole survivor of the 3450 class, this locomotive is the gateway of the RailGiants Train Museum in Pomona, California.[38]
  • 3463 (4-6-4), the sole survivor of the 3460 class, this locomotive is located at the Kansas Expocentre in Topeka, Kansas, awaiting a cosmetic restoration.[39]
  • 3751 (4-8-4), the Santa Fe's and Baldwin's very first 4-8-4, was once on display at Viaduct Park near the AT&SF depot in San Bernardino, California. The locomotive was moved out of the park in 1986 to be restored and, after almost 5 years later, No. 3751 made its first run on a 4-day trip from Los Angeles to Bakersfield and return in December 1991. This trip marked the beginning of No. 3751's career in excursion service.[40] Beginning in 2017, 3751 underwent a federally required 15-year overhaul until September 2022. On the same month, it's federally required 15-year overhaul was complete, and after that, it attended the Amtrak Track Safety Event in Fullerton, California, on September 24, 2022, and September 25, 2022.
  • 3759 (4-8-4): This locomotive is known for pulling the "Farewell to Steam Excursion" for the Santa Fe in 1955 before it was donated to the city of Kingman, Arizona, where it is currently on static display. It was almost acquired by the Grand Canyon Railway in the early 1990s.[41]
  • 3768 (4-8-4), after retiring in 1958, it was donated to the city of Wichita, Kansas, where it is currently preserved at the Great Plains Museum of Transportation.
  • 5000 Madame Queen (2-10-4), the second-oldest preserved steam locomotive with a 2-10-4 wheel arrangement, Madame Queen is located in Amarillo, Texas, awaiting possible relocation elsewhere.[42]
  • 5011 (2-10-4), the first of the 5011 class, is on static display at the National Museum of Transportation in St. Louis, Missouri.[43]
  • 5017 (2-10-4), located at the National Railroad Museum in Green Bay, Wisconsin.[44]
  • 9005 (0-6-0), located in the historic train depot in Clovis, New Mexico
Santa Fe #5704, on display at Los Angeles Union Station on September 10, 2023. After being retired from active service by BNSF, it was donated to the SoCal Railroad Museum in Perris.
  • 5704 (EMD SD45-2): After being removed from active service by BNSF, it was saved from being scrapped thanks to the efforts of Stephen Priest, a Kansas City railroad historian, and Eric Goodman, a member of BNSF management, who got the company to donate the locomotive to the SoCal Railroad Museum in Perris. After being repainted in the Bicentennial scheme at the Mid-America Car and Locomotive shops in Kansas City, and a public presentation at the Union Station located in the same City, the locomotive was taken to Los Angeles.[26][27][28] After remaining in storage at the BNSF yard in Commerce for more than two years, waiting for Metrolink to rebuild the connector track to the Museum in Perris, on May 5, 2025 #5704 was finally taken to the SoCal Railway Museum, along with EMD F40PHM-2C #2105, donated to the Museum by Coaster.[45]

Ferry service

[edit]

Santa Fe maintained and operated a fleet of three passenger ferry boats (the San Pablo, the San Pedro, and the Ocean Wave) that connected Richmond, California, with San Francisco by water. The ships traveled the eight miles between the San Francisco Ferry Terminal and the railroad's Point Richmond terminal across San Francisco Bay. The service was originally established as a continuation of the company's named passenger train runs such as the Angel and the Saint. The larger two ships (the San Pablo and the San Pedro) carried Fred Harvey Company dining facilities.

Rival SP owned the world's largest ferry fleet (which was subsidized by other railroad activities), at its peak carrying 40 million passengers and 60 million vehicles annually aboard 43 vessels. Santa Fe discontinued ferry service in 1933 due to the effects of the Great Depression and routed their trains to Southern Pacific's ferry terminal in Oakland. The San Francisco–Oakland Bay Bridge opened in 1936, initiating a slow decline in demand for SP's ferry service, which was eventually discontinued c. 1958; starting in 1938, SF-bound passengers could board buses across the bridge at the Santa Fe Oakland depot (located in Emeryville).[citation needed]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway was a major Class I railroad in the United States, chartered on February 11, 1859, by the territorial legislature to connect Atchison and Topeka with . Founded by Cyrus K. Holliday, who served as its first president, the line began construction in 1868 and expanded rapidly through shrewd management and farsighted investment into a vast network spanning the Midwest to the Pacific Coast. Renowned for its luxurious passenger trains, including the streamlined that epitomized speed and comfort between and , the railway transported millions of passengers and freight, significantly contributing to the settlement and of the American Southwest. It pioneered innovations in intermodal freight, such as land-bridge container services linking and , and maintained high standards of efficiency until passenger operations ceased in 1971 with the advent of . The company operated independently until September 22, 1995, when it merged with the to form the Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway, later rebranded as BNSF.

Origins and Early Development

Chartering and Initial Construction (1859-1869)

The Atchison and Topeka Railroad was chartered on February 11, 1859, by the Kansas Territorial Legislature to connect the Missouri River port of Atchison with the inland town of Topeka, with long-term ambitions to extend southwestward along the Santa Fe Trail to access lucrative trade routes to New Mexico. Cyrus K. Holliday, a Topeka founder and entrepreneur, drafted the charter amid the absence of general incorporation laws in the territory and spearheaded the effort to promote rail development in Kansas as a means to stimulate economic growth in the region. The initiative reflected entrepreneurial vision for integrating eastern markets with emerging western territories, capitalizing on the established wagon trade paths. Formal organization occurred in , with Holliday elected as the first president, supported by initial private investments from local stakeholders and anticipated state aid including land grants and municipal bonds from counties and townships along the proposed route. However, progress stalled due to a severe in and the outbreak of the Civil War in 1861, which diverted resources and labor, preventing surveys and grading until postwar recovery. On November 23, 1863, stockholders approved renaming the company to the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, explicitly signaling intent to pursue the Santa Fe extension. commenced with the ceremonial turning of the first spade on October 30, 1868, in Topeka, focusing on preliminary grading across the prairies where relatively level terrain facilitated earthwork but required overcoming tough sod and variable soil conditions using basic horse-drawn scrapers and plows. By May 30, 1869, the inaugural , named Cyrus K. Holliday, arrived, enabling completion of the initial 27-mile segment westward from Topeka amid ongoing financial and logistical hurdles.

Completion of Kansas Lines and Organizational Changes (1870s)

The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway completed key extensions within Kansas during the early 1870s, solidifying its core infrastructure. Construction reached Emporia in July 1870, followed by Newton in July 1871. By May 1872, the line extended from Topeka to both Wichita and Atchison, spanning approximately 50 miles eastward. Further progress westward led to Hutchinson in 1872 and the Kansas-Colorado border on December 28, 1872, ahead of the March 3, 1873, deadline stipulated in its charter. These completions, totaling over 400 miles of track within the state by 1873, enabled the railway to operate as a connected regional network. These Kansas lines facilitated initial freight traffic, primarily in grain from wheat-producing areas and cattle shipments from emerging stockyards. Wichita's arrival of the railway in 1872 spurred rapid economic activity, with cattle drives converging there for northward. Emporia's position similarly supported cattle forwarding, linking local ranching to eastern markets and demonstrating how rail connectivity directly increased shipment volumes in these commodities. Early operations handled wheat from central fields, providing revenue streams that stabilized the carrier amid construction costs. Organizationally, the railway underwent restructuring in , adopting its full name more formally after initial chartering as the Atchison and Topeka Railroad in 1859. This reorganization aimed to broaden its scope and governance for sustained expansion. Leadership transitions, including the appointment of figures like Henry Keyes as president until , emphasized operational efficiency. By 1878, William B. Strong assumed the presidency, implementing administrative reforms to streamline management and capitalize on completed lines. These changes positioned the company as a viable intra-state hauler, with board oversight focused on fiscal prudence and .

Major Expansion and Transcontinental Reach

Extension to the Southwest and California (1880s)

In the late 1870s, the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway (ATSF) pushed southward from its lines into , beginning construction through the challenging in February 1878. This 7,834-foot-high barrier required steep grades and extensive grading work to navigate its rugged terrain, with tracks reaching the Colorado-New Mexico border at Raton by November 1878 and extending the full 248 miles to Albuquerque by April 1880. The extension opened access to southwestern markets and connected with the ATSF's subsidiary, the Atlantic and Pacific Railroad (A&P), facilitating further westward progress. From Albuquerque, the ATSF extended lines southward to San Marcial by October 1880 and further to Deming and El Paso by March 1881, achieving an initial transcontinental link via a connection with the Southern Pacific (SP) at Deming. Simultaneously, the A&P subsidiary advanced westward from , covering approximately 400 miles across arid deserts and plateaus to reach , on the by August 1883, where it met SP tracks. This segment, built under federal incentives along the 35th parallel, positioned the ATSF for competition but initially relied on SP routing to ports. To secure an independent path to the Pacific and counter SP's monopolistic control over access, the ATSF backed the California Southern Railroad, chartered in October 1880 to link National City (near ) northward through . Construction tackled 's 3,829-foot elevation with sharp curves and heavy earthwork, using teams of skilled Mexican laborers; grading to Cajon Summit began in January 1885, reaching San Bernardino by September 1883 and Barstow by November 1885. SP opposed the project through legal and physical blockades, such as at Colton in 1882, but court interventions enabled completion, finalizing a direct Chicago-to-Los Angeles route by 1885 and enabling competitive transcontinental freight hauling. These efforts expanded the ATSF system to approximately 7,500 miles by 1890.

Financial Reorganizations Amid Economic Panics (1890s)

The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway's aggressive expansion in the preceding decade, financed through extensive bond issuances, left it with substantial fixed obligations that proved unsustainable amid contracting economic conditions. By the early , the company's debt burden, accumulated from constructing over 9,000 miles of track, exposed it to vulnerability when commodity prices fell and credit tightened. This overextension—rooted in capital-intensive growth outpacing revenue generation—directly contributed to its default, rather than exogenous shocks alone. The , marked by widespread bank runs and failures starting in May, precipitated the railway's collapse, as rail securities tumbled and liquidity evaporated. The company entered on December 23, 1893, following the death of its board chairman and amid default on interest payments, joining over one-fourth of U.S. railroads in similar distress by early 1894. On January 1, 1894, the original entity defaulted outright, with courts appointing receivers to manage operations while loomed on underlying mortgages. Reorganization efforts culminated in a comprehensive plan approved in 1895, which slashed capital stock, restructured debt through new consolidated bonds, and divested unprofitable subsidiaries like the St. Louis and San Francisco Railway to refocus on core lines. Edward P. Ripley assumed leadership post-receivership, streamlining operations and emphasizing efficient traffic handling over further speculative builds. The reorganized entity emerged by 1896 as the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, with reduced leverage enabling survival. Post-1895 recovery manifested in empirical gains: freight tonnage rebounded as agricultural shipments stabilized, and net earnings improved through cost controls, averting and positioning the railway for renewed viability without reliance on external bailouts. This outcome underscored the causal efficacy of debt reduction and operational pruning in restoring solvency, distinct from mere cyclical recovery.

Twentieth-Century Growth and World War Contributions (1900-1940s)

In the early 1900s, the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway pursued network enhancements to accommodate rising freight and passenger demands, including the completion of the Coleman Cutoff in 1914, which shortened the route from to by routing through Brownwood, Lubbock, and Texico. This infrastructure upgrade facilitated more efficient transcontinental operations amid growing industrial traffic. By the , the railway continued expansion through track construction in regions like the and , alongside the acquisition of the Kansas City, Mexico and Orient Railway in 1928, which extended lines southward from Wichita to and bolstered connections to . System mileage grew substantially, reaching approximately 13,000 miles by the late 1920s through these sustained investments, enabling the handling of increased agricultural and mineral shipments across the Southwest. During the , operations adapted to regulations, which emphasized cost controls and capacity rationalization, allowing the railway to maintain core route viability despite economic contraction; by 1935, enhancements like improved signaling supported steady freight output. The railway played a critical logistics role in both world wars. In World War I, under federal control via the United States Railroad Administration from 1917 to 1920, it managed surges in munitions and troop movements, contributing to national freight ton-miles that peaked amid wartime priorities. During World War II, the Santa Fe hauled millions of troops, tanks, and military supplies to installations and ports, operating at capacity with dedicated facilities for loading war materials; its efforts included supporting key Southwest bases and achieving record freight volumes, with 1945 totals exceeding 59 million tons annually.

Operational Infrastructure and Innovations

Freight and Passenger Networks

The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway's freight operations constituted the primary economic driver, focusing on agricultural and resource commodities such as wheat from , , , , , and timber originating in the Midwest and Southwest regions. These shipments leveraged extensive track networks, including key integrations like the Gulf, Colorado and Santa Fe Railway subsidiary connecting to Gulf ports and the Panhandle lines for efficient commodity flow. By 1972, the system supported this traffic with 74,008 freight cars, reflecting substantial volumes amid post-war agricultural and energy demands. Core freight corridors emphasized transcontinental efficiency, notably the principal line from via Kansas City and , to , which facilitated bulk movement of , , and later products to coastal markets. This route, extended progressively from the , integrated feeder lines such as the 1914 Coleman Cutoff shortening paths to , enhancing causal linkages between production centers and consumption hubs without reliance on competing carriers. Passenger services complemented freight by promoting settlement and tourism along parallel routes, evolving from local Kansas connections in the 1860s to long-haul offerings linking Kansas City to by 1887 and by 1888. Post-World War II, however, ridership eroded due to automobile proliferation and bus competition, diminishing passenger contributions relative to freight; by the late , freight revenues overwhelmingly dominated as passenger viability waned. The railway maintained 1,235 passenger cars as of 1963 amid declining demand, ultimately transferring remaining services to in 1971.

Locomotives, Rolling Stock, and Paint Schemes

The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway relied on for most of its early operations, with the 4-8-4 "Northern" type emerging as a key heavy and freight hauler in the and . The first such locomotives, from the 3751 class built by in , represented an advancement in power for transcontinental runs, featuring large fireboxes and superheaters for sustained high-speed performance over grades like those in the . Subsequent classes, such as the 2900 series constructed by Baldwin and Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe shops between 1943 and 1944, incorporated wartime steel allocations and weighed approximately 492,000 pounds, enabling them to pull up to 15-car consists at speeds exceeding 80 mph while achieving tractive efforts of 66,000 pounds starting. Earlier freight-oriented designs included the "Santa Fe" type, with over 300 units built starting in 1913 by Baldwin and others, optimized for heavy and trains with ten coupled drivers for adhesion on uneven southwestern tracks. By the late , the railway accelerated dieselization to capitalize on lower operating costs and reliability, retiring most power by 1955. Early passenger diesels included Electro-Motive Division (EMD) E1 sets introduced in 1937, followed by F-series units like the FT prototypes in 1940 and production F3s and F7s through the , which offered 1,500 horsepower per unit and modular configurations for multi-unit lashups hauling premium trains such as the . Freight dieselization emphasized six-axle road-switchers, with EMD models—delivering 3,000 horsepower and high adhesion for unit trains of , , and intermodal containers—becoming prevalent in the 1970s, contributing to a reported 20-30% improvement in per ton-mile over equivalents due to electric transmission and reduced downtime. The shift enabled handling of post-World War II traffic surges, with diesel fleets expanding to over 1,700 units by the 1970s. Paint schemes evolved from utilitarian black for in the pre-1930s era, emphasizing durability over aesthetics, to the iconic "Warbonnet" livery designed by Leland Knickerbocker in 1937 for EMD E1 units on the . This scheme featured silver or aluminum bodies accented by red and yellow stripes evoking a Plains Indian warbonnet headdress, applied initially to power for branding high-speed luxury service but extended to freight F-units by 1940 with "cat-whisker" yellow nose stripes for visibility. Later variations included full Warbonnet on SD40-series locomotives in the 1980s for , while freight variants often used simplified blue-and-yellow "Yellowbonnet" schemes from onward to denote second-line service, prioritizing corrosion resistance in desert environments over elaborate motifs. Rolling stock emphasized standardized, heavy-duty freight cars suited to bulk commodities like agricultural products and minerals, peaking at approximately 84,000 cars owned in the late operational years before the Burlington Northern merger. This fleet included specialized types such as 40-foot boxcars for perishables via Santa Fe Refrigerator Despatch affiliates and hopper cars for , with designs incorporating riveted construction for longevity under high-mileage southwestern routes, averaging over 200,000 miles annually per car in the 1970s. Passenger , though smaller at around 1,200 cars, featured streamlined stainless-steel coaches and sleepers from , optimized for speed with roller bearings reducing drag.

Signaling Systems and Safety Advancements

The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway adopted in the early to enforce train spacing and mitigate rear-end collisions on single- and double-track lines. By the 1920s, the railroad deployed overlap-type on single-track sections, which used track circuits to detect occupancy and automatically adjust signals for opposing movements. Complementary "flat pair" configurations on paired trackage integrated siding protections with automatic functions for meets and passes, enhancing capacity while prioritizing collision prevention over manual oversight. Pioneering cab signaling with followed, with the first permanent wayside-free installation operational between Chillicothe, , and other points by the mid-1920s. This system displayed aspects directly in the locomotive cab and enforced restrictive speeds via onboard fail-safes, abolishing manual blocks and distant signals on equipped territory to curb signal misinterpretation. The integration of continuous cab signals and train stops demonstrably addressed human factors in overruns and excessive speeds, as evidenced by operational rules mandating immediate speed reductions upon cab indications. Centralized Traffic Control (CTC) marked a further evolution, with initial implementations on mainlines by enabling dispatchers to remotely govern signals and switches over extended districts. A notable 110-mile freight corridor between Waynoka, , and Canadian, Texas, received CTC by 1947, incorporating signaled sidings for bidirectional routing that minimized spacing violations and derailment risks from misaligned turnouts. These upgrades correlated with operational efficiencies that indirectly validated safety gains through sustained traffic volumes absent proportional accident escalations. Post-incident responses in the 1950s underscored engineering prioritization, as seen after the September 1956 collision near Grants, New Mexico, involving westbound passenger trains where signaling lapses contributed to the impact. The railroad accelerated crossing signal upgrades and wayside enhancements amid frequent grade-crossing derailments, favoring infrastructural redundancies like advanced wigwags and gates over isolated operator accountability to achieve systemic risk abatement.

Ferry and Auxiliary Services

The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway initiated ferry operations across on July 6, 1900, immediately following the start of through passenger service on July 1, enabling seamless connections from its Point Richmond terminal to San Francisco piers. The first freight trains had arrived at Point Richmond on May 1, 1900, establishing the as a key endpoint for the railway's transcontinental lines. These services utilized passenger ferry boats for travelers and, prior to the 1936 opening of the , accommodated automobiles alongside passengers to bridge the gap between railheads and urban centers. Freight transfers relied on carfloat barges pushed by tugs, allowing rail cars to cross the bay without unloading ; the railway deployed a fleet comprising eight tugs (including the Paul P. Hastings, acquired in 1948 and diesel-converted in 1964), nine barges, and three passenger ferries over the operations' duration. Connections operated from Richmond's Ferry Point to San Francisco's Pier 36 at Powell Street and China Basin, with auxiliary slips at Tiburon (closed 1967) and Oakland's Alameda Belt Line (closed 1970). Passenger volumes shifted post-bridge as motorists and rail passengers increasingly used the fixed crossing for its reliability and reduced transit times, diminishing the need for dedicated ferries by the late . Carfloat freight persisted longer for efficiency in handling bulk commodities immune to bridge weight limits, but urban redevelopment and declining volumes led to pier closures, culminating in a May 4, 1984, at Richmond's Point dock that prompted an embargo and full abandonment of tug-and-barge service. This phase-out reflected broader modal efficiencies, with bridges enabling direct truck-to-rail interchanges and obviating water crossings, thereby streamlining logistics and cutting operational costs tied to vessel maintenance and scheduling. In parallel, the railway developed auxiliary truck lines to complement rail networks, pioneering intermodal freight by integrating motor carriers for short-haul pickups and last-mile delivery; by 1976, centralized operations and traffic coordination for these truck activities were housed in . Pipeline ties emerged through affiliates like Santa Fe Pacific Pipelines, which transported refined products such as and diesel from Bay Area refineries, supporting fuel distribution aligned with rail-served industrial corridors. These extensions facilitated modal shifts from pure rail to hybrid systems, enhancing throughput as truck and pipeline capacities absorbed traffic displaced by infrastructure upgrades like causeways and bridges.

Economic and Regional Impact

Role in Westward Expansion and Land Grants

The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway benefited from a federal land grant of approximately 3 million acres in , authorized by legislation signed on , 1863, which provided alternate sections within a 10-mile strip along the projected route to incentivize construction and settlement. The company sold these lands through dedicated offices, generating revenue while attracting farmers to cultivate and other crops, thereby boosting agricultural output in and later , where additional grants of up to 20 sections per mile supported arid-land farming experiments. This system created economic multipliers by linking remote homesteads to eastern markets, with acreage expanding significantly after as rail access reduced transportation costs from prohibitive levels. The railway directly facilitated migration and town development during westward expansion, reaching Dodge City in September 1872 and establishing it as a pivotal railhead that assured the town's survival and rapid growth from a outpost. Kansas's surged from 364,399 in 1870 to 996,096 in 1880, with railroads like the ATSF serving as primary conduits for homesteaders under the Homestead Act, enabling settlement of former lands. As a key endpoint for drives, the ATSF integrated herds into national supply chains, with Dodge City handling shipments from the Western Trail that funneled an estimated 3 to 5 million head northward between 1870 and 1890, fostering economies but straining local resources. This expansion, however, relied on federal acquisition of territories through treaties that displaced Native American groups, including the sale of lands to the railway in the , contributing to broader patterns of indigenous land loss amid resource extraction priorities. Empirical settlement data underscores the pro-development effects, as rail-induced population influxes correlated with agricultural yields rising from sparse pre-rail levels to producing over 100 million bushels of annually by the 1890s.

Promotion of Settlement, Agriculture, and Industry

The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway actively promoted settlement through its real estate department, which sold federally granted lands to encourage agricultural development in Kansas and adjacent territories. To attract buyers, the company offered free or reduced-rate passenger transportation to prospective settlers purchasing land along its lines. Between 1871 and 1879, these sales encompassed over 1.1 million acres, generating $5.55 million in revenue and enabling the establishment of family farms on previously undeveloped prairie. In the Southwest, the railway extended its promotional efforts by acquiring the Pecos Valley and Northeast Railway in December 1900, integrating infrastructure that transformed arid lands into productive farmland. This acquisition supported extensive private projects in the Pecos Valley, where over $2 million was invested in waterworks by the early 1900s, excluding land acquisitions and rail construction costs, fostering crops such as and corn on approximately 9,000 irrigable acres near . These initiatives, driven by the railway's strategic transport links, boosted agricultural output and local employment without reliance on federal subsidies, highlighting market-oriented development. The railway's freight operations further stimulated industry by hauling minerals, oil, and agricultural goods from and , with total tonnage exceeding 25 million tons annually by the early in connected networks, facilitating that integrated regional economies into national markets. This transportation infrastructure created jobs in farming, , and sectors, as evidenced by rapid land utilization and output growth in served areas, underscoring the company's role in private enterprise-led expansion.

Labor Relations and Internal Challenges

Strikes, Unionization, and Management Responses

The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway experienced early labor unrest, with its first major strike occurring in when employees joined a nationwide walkout demanding higher wages, marking Kansas's initial recorded rail labor action. Prior to , railroad brotherhoods and unions engaged in at least 30 strikes against the company, achieving victories in only a minority of cases, often during periods of corporate financial vulnerability when management conceded on wages or hours to resume operations. These conflicts typically arose from demands for better pay amid fluctuating economic conditions, but frequent disruptions to maintenance and freight schedules imposed operational costs, as evidenced by the company's reliance on replacement workers and occasional violence to sustain service continuity. The 1922 shopmen's strike, a nationwide action by 400,000 skilled railroad workers protesting a 12% reduction imposed by the U.S. Railroad Labor Board, severely impacted Santa Fe operations, including at facilities and halted repairs that delayed freight movements. At Santa Fe's Topeka shops, the company increased its workforce from striking employees by recruiting 234 additional men within days, enabling partial resumption of duties and underscoring management's strategy of hiring non-union labor to mitigate shutdowns. The strike's failure, culminating in court injunctions and federal intervention, resulted in permanent union losses, as thousands of strikers were not rehired, highlighting how such actions eroded worker leverage while exposing railroads to from idled equipment and lost revenue. Unionization formalized under the Railway Labor Act of 1926, which mandated mediation and arbitration for disputes, effectively curbing wildcat strikes and requiring exhaustion of procedures before interruptions, a framework that stabilized relations but limited militant tactics across carriers including Santa Fe. For Santa Fe, this era saw accommodationist policies, with management tolerating over two dozen labor organizations and engaging in paternalistic welfare programs to foster loyalty, yet resisting excessive demands through negotiated concessions tied to productivity metrics. The Act's emphasis on avoiding disruptions aligned with empirical realities of rail economics, where prolonged halts compounded fixed costs like track maintenance without proportional output gains. Post-World War II tensions peaked in the 1946 nationwide railroad strike, where Santa Fe engineers and trainmen halted operations, delaying iconic trains like the Chief for up to 20 hours before partial restarts via limited crews handling mail and essentials. responded by prioritizing critical freight under federal pressure, averting total but incurring hikes averaging $10 million annually industry-wide, which strained budgets amid demands for ending wartime controls. Santa Fe's approach emphasized operational resilience, using on idle assets to negotiate settlements that preserved over blanket concessions. Throughout these periods, Santa Fe management countered union practices like —requiring redundant crew for tasks mechanized post-steam era—through grievances and , citing data on inflated labor expenses that hindered competitive freight hauling against emerging trucking. While unions secured gains in safety protocols and base pay, failed strikes demonstrably dragged efficiency, as evidenced by 1922's repair backlogs and 1946's shipment delays, reinforcing causal links between uninterrupted service and the company's expansion in transcontinental tonnage. This pattern reflected broader rail realities, where productivity demands outweighed restrictive work rules, prompting selective accommodations rather than unqualified capitulation.

Operational Controversies and Regulatory Interactions

The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway faced numerous challenges from the (ICC) over rate structures, particularly in the early , where allegations of unreasonable or discriminatory pricing for commodities like and prompted investigations. In , the ICC ruled that a yardage charge imposed by the Santa Fe and affiliated carriers for stockyards facilities was unlawful, as it exceeded reasonable costs and discriminated against shippers, leading to an order for refunds and rate adjustments upheld by the . Similarly, disputes over inspection charges in transit were contested, with the ICC approving separate fees in some instances to cover costs but rejecting others deemed excessive, reflecting broader tensions between carrier recovery of operational expenses and shipper demands for lower rates in less competitive corridors. Antitrust scrutiny of the Santa Fe's practices often intersected with ICC oversight, as collective rate agreements among railroads, including the Santa Fe, required regulatory approval to qualify for immunity from Sherman Act violations. Courts consistently dismissed private antitrust suits against such ICC-sanctioned arrangements, emphasizing that the agency's expertise preempted judicial intervention unless clear illegality was shown, thereby shielding the Santa Fe from liability in cases involving joint traffic divisions or routing pacts. For instance, in challenges to interdivisional rate splits with lines like the & North Western, the ICC's determinations on reasonableness overrode antitrust claims, prioritizing systemic efficiency over isolated market power concerns in monopoly-like segments such as coal haulage. Environmental incidents involving the Santa Fe prior to the 1970s were infrequent and typically linked to high traffic volumes rather than systemic negligence, with federal records documenting few major hazardous materials releases attributable to the carrier. Train derailments, such as one near Robinson, New Mexico, resulted in minor spills but lacked evidence of regulatory violations under the era's lax standards, contrasting with post-1970 narratives amplified by expanded oversight. ICC rate regulation imposed compliance costs on the Santa Fe, estimated in later analyses to hinder capital investment and service innovation, though competitive routes yielded efficiency gains like reduced per-unit transport expenses for bulk goods. Deregulatory shifts in the late , building on prior case outcomes, enabled market-driven that lowered overall industry costs by up to 50% in contested markets while addressing prior overregulation's stifling effects, without verifiable increases in Santa Fe-specific abuses of dominance.

Leadership and Corporate Governance

Key Executives and Strategic Decision-Makers

Cyrus K. Holliday, a Topeka capitalist and promoter, chartered the Atchison and Topeka Railroad Company on February 14, 1859, serving as its first president and director until 1900, with the initial goal of constructing a line from Atchison to Topeka along the route to facilitate trade and settlement. Under his early leadership, construction began in 1863, reaching Topeka by 1869, laying the foundation for the railway's expansion despite financial and territorial challenges. William Barstow Strong assumed the presidency in 1881 and directed rapid westward extension, growing the system to roughly 7,000 miles of track by 1889 through acquisitions and mainline builds connecting to , which boosted freight volumes in grain, cattle, and minerals but fueled overextension and debt accumulation culminating in the 1893 . Strong's aggressive strategy empirically enhanced market reach, as evidenced by doubled traffic revenues from 1880 to 1890, yet causal overbuilding without proportional demand stabilization exposed vulnerabilities to economic downturns. Edward P. Ripley took over as president in 1895 amid post-bankruptcy reorganization, stabilizing finances through and cost controls while expanding to over 9,000 miles of track by 1910, with freight ton-miles rising 150% from 1900 to 1915 under improved efficiency measures like standardized equipment and route optimizations. Ripley's tenure emphasized operational , averting further despite prior excesses, and laid groundwork for diversification into ancillary holdings such as via controlling stakes in firms like Kirby Lumber Company, which supplemented rail revenues amid fluctuating transport demand. In the mid-20th century, executives pursued non-rail diversification, including energy and from land grants, with subsidiaries generating up to 20% of consolidated revenues by the 1970s through oil leases and resource extraction, providing buffers against rail-specific cyclicality as total system income reached $80.9 million in 1972. This shift, initiated under post-Ripley leaders, empirically sustained longevity by reducing reliance on core freight, which comprised 80% of earnings in earlier eras, though it reflected adaptive responses to regulatory pressures and trucking competition rather than unmitigated innovation.

Board and Ownership Evolutions

The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway's early ownership structure featured dominance by founding promoters and local subscribers, who raised initial capital through limited issuances in to support the line's inception between Atchison and Topeka by 1863. This promoter-led control facilitated rapid incorporation and state-backed land grants but exposed the company to regional economic volatility, with shareholders exerting direct influence over basic financing decisions amid sparse institutional involvement. As westward extensions accelerated in the , ownership broadened to include Eastern financiers providing bonds for transcontinental ambitions, gradually diluting promoter sway in favor of creditor oversight that emphasized debt servicing during expansions. Financial panics tested this evolving structure, underscoring investor-driven market discipline; the strained many railroads through halted construction and credit contraction, yet the Santa Fe's board prioritized operational continuity over aggressive growth, averting immediate insolvency via conservative cash management and reliance on freight revenues from established lines. The more severe , triggered by overextension and silver market collapse, culminated in on December 23, 1893, but board coordination with bondholder committees enabled a court-supervised reorganization by 1895, involving debt reductions, asset sales, and new equity infusions that restored solvency and imposed stricter fiscal controls reflective of shareholder demands for viability. By the mid-20th century, institutional investors had supplanted early individual holdings, with diversified portfolios holding significant stakes amid regulatory scrutiny and non-rail asset accumulation from land grants. This shift manifested in the creation of Santa Fe Industries, Inc., as a overseeing the railway alongside pipelines, , and other ventures, which buffered against rail-specific downturns and aligned with broader investor priorities for asset optimization. Such structural evolutions, compelled by market pressures, reinforced resilience by decentralizing risk and enforcing pragmatic board decisions over speculative pursuits.

Mergers, Dissolution, and Transition

Failed Merger Attempts (1980s)

In September 1983, Santa Fe Industries, parent of the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway (ATSF), announced a $5 billion agreement to acquire the Southern Pacific Company (SP), forming the holding company Santa Fe Southern Pacific Corporation (SFSPC) to consolidate the two railroads under the proposed Southern Pacific Santa Fe Railway (SPSF). The deal, approved by shareholders and structured to operate the railroads separately pending regulatory review, sought to create the nation's third-largest rail carrier with approximately 25,000 miles of track, emphasizing synergies in transcontinental freight and Southwestern routes. However, the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) application filed in March 1984 faced opposition from the U.S. Department of Justice and competitors like Union Pacific, citing antitrust risks. The ICC denied the merger on July 24, 1986, in a 4-1 decision, determining that the anti-competitive harms—particularly the elimination of direct rivalry between ATSF and SP in Southwestern markets—outweighed potential efficiencies such as cost savings and improved service. In key corridors like California-to-Texas freight lanes, the combined entity would have controlled over 80% of rail traffic in some segments, reducing options for shippers reliant on these parallel routes and potentially enabling pricing power absent sufficient alternatives like trucking. While the ICC acknowledged public interest benefits under the 4-R Act's relaxed merger standards, it prioritized preserving , critiqued by proponents as overlooking real-world efficiencies amid rising truck competition; empirical data from prior mergers showed consolidation often lowered rates without monopoly outcomes elsewhere. An appeal was rejected on June 30, 1987, with the ICC mandating divestiture within 90 days. Strategic missteps included SFSPC's structure, which, despite blind trusts, raised control concerns, and insufficient preemptive concessions to rivals, such as trackage rights, failing to mitigate ICC fears of regional dominance. Post-denial, SFSPC divested SP's rail operations to Industries in September 1987 for $1 billion, retaining non-rail assets like real estate under , which bolstered ATSF's financial position but left it independent amid industry pressures. ATSF responded by selling non-core assets, including segments of its San Diego-area lines such as trackage to the San Diego & Arizona Eastern Railway, to refocus on high-density corridors and extend operational until the 1995 Burlington Northern merger. This outcome delayed ATSF's scale advantages, contributing to short-term inefficiencies like duplicated , though it arguably sustained competitive pricing in the interim.

Burlington Northern Merger and Cessation of Operations (1995-1996)

The Surface Transportation Board approved the merger of the Burlington Northern Railroad and the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe on August 16, 1995, subject to conditions aimed at preserving competition. This approval occurred in the context of under the of 1980, which facilitated railroad consolidations by reducing regulatory barriers to mergers and enabling carriers to achieve operational efficiencies through network integration. The merger created a new , Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation, consummated on September 22, 1995, via a $3.8 billion stock-for-stock exchange where each share of common stock was converted into approximately 0.411 shares of the new entity's stock. Following the merger's formation, the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway maintained separate operations to allow for orderly integration of systems, including routing and employee transitions. Independent operations ceased on December 31, 1996, when the Santa Fe was fully merged into the , which was subsequently renamed the Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway. This wind-down enabled initial synergies, such as the rationalization of overlapping routes in the and , where parallel lines were streamlined to concentrate on higher-capacity mainlines, reducing maintenance costs and improving transit times. Post-merger traffic integrations focused on consolidating intermodal and bulk freight movements, leveraging complementary networks—Burlington Northern's northern corridors and Santa Fe's southern transcontinental routes—to capture additional volume without immediate service disruptions. These efforts yielded verifiable cost savings through the elimination of redundant facilities and bases, with early reports indicating annual efficiency gains in the hundreds of millions from duplicated decommissioning. The combined entity operated over 33,000 miles of track, prioritizing factual operational consolidation to enhance competitiveness in a deregulated market.

Legacy and Modern Preservation

Cultural and Historical Significance

The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway (AT&SF) achieved enduring prominence in American popular culture through its premier passenger services, particularly the , which operated from 1936 to 1971 and earned the moniker "Train of the Stars" for transporting celebrities such as , , and between and . This symbolized post-World War II luxury rail travel, featuring streamlined stainless-steel cars and dining experiences evoking Native American motifs, which influenced depictions in media and reinforced the railway's image as a conduit for cross-country mobility. The 1946 MGM musical , set along AT&SF routes and featuring the Oscar-winning song "On the Atchison, Topeka and the Santa Fe," further embedded the railway in cinematic lore, portraying its Harvey House restaurants as hubs of frontier hospitality and westward expansion. These representations, while romanticized, underscored the AT&SF's causal role in enabling rapid transcontinental passenger transport that facilitated and personal migration, with peak ridership on flagship trains exceeding 1 million passengers annually in the 1940s before declining sharply post-1950 due to automobile competition. The railway actively shaped artistic and touristic perceptions of the American Southwest by sponsoring expeditions for painters and promoting indigenous-inspired aesthetics, thereby fostering cultural colonies like . Beginning in 1892, AT&SF provided free passage to artists such as , whose Grand Canyon landscapes were reproduced in promotional materials to attract tourists, linking rail access to the romanticization of regional landscapes and cultures. In collaboration with the , the railway publicized and Santa Fe art colonies, where painters like Ernest Blumenschein drew inspiration from local scenery, generating passenger traffic and embedding Southwestern motifs in national consciousness through posters and Harvey-curated exhibits. This strategy not only boosted tourism—contributing to New Mexico's emergence as an arts destination by the early —but also tied rail infrastructure to intangible cultural exports, with AT&SF advertisements featuring artistic renderings that sold the "Enchanted Land" to Eastern audiences. Economically, the AT&SF's developmental legacy manifested in substantial contributions to regional growth, including settlement patterns and commerce in the Southwest, where it spurred agricultural exports and urban expansion from to . By 1900, the railway's network facilitated the of millions of tons of freight annually, underpinning GDP gains through lowered shipping costs that integrated remote areas into national markets, with studies attributing railroads broadly to 1-2% annual productivity increases in affected regions during the late . Critiques of displacement, particularly among Native American communities along routes, highlight localized social costs, yet empirical assessments affirm net positives: the AT&SF's operations correlated with booms (e.g., New Mexico's from 20,000 in 1880 to over 190,000 by 1910) and sustained economic multipliers via and , outweighing disruptions when measured against pre-rail subsistence baselines. This legacy persists in American identity as a symbol of industrial ambition, distinct from mere operational feats, by embodying the innovations that compressed distances and amplified opportunity.

Preserved Equipment and Recent Restoration Efforts

The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway's preserved equipment includes several operational and static locomotives maintained by museums and historical societies, with steam locomotive No. 3751 standing out as a fully restored 4-8-4 Northern type built by Baldwin Locomotive Works in May 1927, the first of its class for the railroad. Donated to the city of San Bernardino in 1958 and restored to operation by the San Bernardino Railroad Historical Society starting in 1986, it returned to service on December 27, 1991, after a five-year effort involving volunteer labor and fundraising, and has since conducted occasional excursion runs despite ongoing maintenance demands that exceed $100,000 annually for inspections and parts. Similarly, No. 2926, another 4-8-4 Northern built in 1944, underwent restoration for operational use and demonstrated under steam on September 27-28, 2025, at the New Mexico Steam Locomotive and Railroad Historical Society, supported by expanded mainline access approved in June 2025 for 40 miles of trackage around Albuquerque, highlighting the tension between high operational costs—often in the millions for full overhauls—and public educational benefits through heritage runs. Diesel preservation efforts focus on EMD FP45 units, such as No. 93 at the Great Plains Transportation Museum in , which began cosmetic restoration in August 2025 after transport to Mid-America Car Inc. in , to address peeling paint and corrosion, funded by community donations including support from actor Michael Gross in 2023. No. 92, donated to the Illinois Railway Museum, entered indoor storage in 2017 as a preliminary step toward long-term preservation, underscoring the priority of environmental protection over immediate operation given deterioration risks from outdoor exposure. The museum also maintains static No. 3768, a 4-8-4, as part of its Santa Fe collection. Recent corporate involvement includes BNSF Railway's July 2025 donation of SD70MAC No. 9400, the first production U.S. with AC traction motors built in 1993, to the , where plans call for restoration to operating condition and repainting in original scheme, reflecting successor-line commitments to preserving technological milestones amid costs estimated in the hundreds of thousands for reactivation. These efforts, driven by nonprofits and occasional industry support, balance artifact against fiscal realities, as full restorations can require years and divert resources from other exhibits, yet provide tangible links to the railway's engineering legacy.

References

  1. https://online.nmartmuseum.org/nmhistory/opening-the-west/atchison-topeka-and-santa-fe-railroad/history-atsf.html
  2. https://archives.library.uta.edu/repositories/2/resources/650
  3. https://www.nebraskapress.unl.edu/bison-books/9781496238856/history-of-the-atchison-topeka-and-santa-fe-railway/
  4. https://archives.lib.ku.edu/repositories/3/resources/5147
  5. https://socalrailway.org/collections/santa-fe-railway/
  6. https://www.bnsf.com/bnsf-resources/pdf/about-bnsf/History_and_Legacy.pdf
  7. https://www.bnsf.com/news-media/railtalk/heritage/175th-anniversary.html
  8. https://www.railswest.com/history/atsftranscontinental.html
  9. https://tscpl.org/articles/remembering-santa-fe-railway
  10. https://www.bnsf.com/news-media/railtalk/heritage/cyrus-holliday.html
  11. https://www.kancoll.org/khq/1968/68_2_snell%2Bwilson.htm
  12. https://legendsofkansas.com/kansas-railroad-timeline/
  13. https://johnmarvigbridges.org/ATSF.html
  14. https://denversrailroads.com/ATSF.htm
  15. https://www.american-rails.com/atsf.html
  16. https://www.okhistory.org/publications/enc/entry?entry=AT001
  17. https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Journals/PacHR/8/1/The_Entrance_of_the_Santa_Fe_Railroad_into_California*.html
  18. https://www.american-rails.com/cajon.html
  19. https://www.ancestry.com/historical-insights/business-industry/business/atchison-topeka-santa-fe
  20. https://time.com/archive/6826285/railroads-clear-track-for-the-santa-fe/
  21. https://groups.io/g/toytrains/topic/december_23_in_railroad/53970170
  22. https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/443/147/245979/
  23. https://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/entries/atchison-topeka-and-santa-fe-railway-system
  24. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3116038
  25. https://archive.org/details/md-31180-loaded-for-war-vwr
  26. https://sfrhms.org/product/santa-fe-in-world-war-ii-contributing-to-victory/
  27. https://www.steamlocomotive.com/locobase.php?id=236
  28. https://www.steamlocomotive.com/locobase.php?id=463
  29. https://www.thedieselshop.us/ATSF.HTML
  30. https://www.american-rails.com/warbonnet.html
  31. http://www.lundsten.dk/us_signaling/abs_atsf_oppovl_1920s/
  32. http://www.lundsten.dk/us_signaling/abs_atsf_flatpair/
  33. https://www.jonroma.net/media/signaling/railway-signaling/1950/Automatic%2520Block%2520Increases%2520Safety%2520on%2520Paired%2520Trackage.pdf
  34. https://www.princeton.edu/~ota/disk3/1976/7614/761414.PDF
  35. https://jonroma.net/media/signaling/railway-signaling/1927/Santa%2520Fe%2520Is%2520Operating%2520Trains%2520by%2520Cab%2520Signaling%2520With%2520Train%2520Control.pdf
  36. https://www.jonroma.net/media/signaling/railway-signaling/1932/Centralized%2520Traffic%2520Control%2520Saves%2520Time%2520on%2520the%2520Santa%2520Fe.pdf
  37. https://www.jonroma.net/media/signaling/railway-signaling/1947/CTC%2520Has%2520Long%2520Sidings%2520With%2520Signals%2520on%2520the%2520Santa%2520Fe.pdf
  38. https://www.armballast.com/train-wreck-nightmare-on-the-chief/
  39. https://www.lafire.com/famous_fires/1956-0122_SantaFeTrainWreck/1956-0122_SantaFeTrainWreck.htm
  40. http://atsfirc.qstation.org/atsfhist.html
  41. https://railfan.com/santa-fe-on-the-bay/
  42. https://www.gem.wiki/Santa_Fe_Pacific_Pipeline_%28SFPP%29_System
  43. http://apcrp.org/BLOCK_KATHY/SANTA_FE_CALENDARS/Santa_Fe_Cal_Mast_INT.htm
  44. https://www.catskillarchive.com/rrextra/statsf.Html
  45. https://www.facebook.com/groups/friendsoftheflinthills/posts/10163144851241007/
  46. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/703464
  47. https://www.dodgecityhasjobs.com/dodge-city-history
  48. https://www.legendsofamerica.com/ks-dodgecitybeginnings/
  49. https://ksdata.ku.edu/ksdata/ksah/population/2pop1.pdf
  50. https://umbc.edu/che/tahlessons/pdf/historylabs/Transforming_the_West:_Did_the_Reality_Match_the_Expectations_for_Kansas_Homesteaders.PrinterFriendly.pdf
  51. https://www.travelks.com/kansas-magazine/articles/post/dodge-citys-western-cattle-trail/
  52. https://www.potawatomi.org/blog/2018/09/04/beginning-of-the-end-of-citizen-potawatomi-displacement/
  53. https://www.ksre.k-state.edu/historicpublications/pubs/sb392.pdf
  54. https://repository.arizona.edu/bitstream/handle/10150/285053/azu_td_6905412_sip1_m.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  55. https://ttu-ir.tdl.org/bitstreams/f8f1de9b-b530-45db-abf4-fee302152d06/download
  56. https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1876&context=nmhr
  57. https://nmwrri.nmsu.edu/footer_pages/nm-wrri-library-database-files/wrri-library-pdfs/wrrilibrary1/001255.pdf
  58. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/commercial-financial-chronicle-1339/april-30-1904-536414/fulltext
  59. https://www.kspatriot.org/index.php/articles/34-kansas-commerce/236-history-of-industry-commerce-and-labor-in-kansas.html?start=1
  60. https://online.ucpress.edu/phr/article-pdf/53/2/233/599125/3639201.pdf
  61. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2804&context=greatplainsquarterly
  62. https://thebhc.org/sites/default/files/beh/BEHprint/v019/p0271-p0278.pdf
  63. https://www.sbsun.com/2022/12/12/a-detailed-look-at-the-great-railroad-strike-of-1922/
  64. https://boilermakers.org/news/history/greedy-owners-killed-union-members-in-the-1922-shopmans-strike
  65. https://railroads.dot.gov/sites/fra.dot.gov/files/fra_net/1647/Railway%2520Labor%2520Act%2520Overview.pdf
  66. https://thebhc.org/sites/default/files/beh/BEHprint/v010/p0117-p0123.pdf
  67. https://calisphere.org/item/de74a711e9020417cef1a8b437490b01/
  68. https://www.nationalww2museum.org/war/articles/1946-railroad-strike
  69. https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/768/914/407901/
  70. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/295/193/
  71. https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/412/800
  72. https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/597/593/125958/
  73. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-387/pdf/USREPORTS-387-326.pdf
  74. https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-7th-circuit/117615295.html
  75. https://americanhistory.si.edu/it/collections/archival-item/sova-nmah-ac-0241-ref1071
  76. https://railroads.dot.gov/sites/fra.dot.gov/files/fra_net/18852/dot_9675_DS1.pdf
  77. https://www.gao.gov/assets/rced-90-80.pdf
  78. https://www.ugpti.org/resources/reports/downloads/mpc03-145.pdf
  79. https://www.american-rails.com/holliday.html
  80. https://www.ksgenweb.org/archives/1918ks/bioh/hollidck.html
  81. https://www.infoplease.com/biographies/society-culture/william-barstow-strong
  82. https://www.legendsofamerica.com/rr-santafetrail/
  83. https://wheelsmuseum.org/?page_id=613
  84. https://tfaoi.org/aa/4aa/4aa58.htm
  85. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4469087
  86. https://www.encyclopedia.com/books/politics-and-business-magazines/santa-fe-pacific-corporation
  87. https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/grant-panic/
  88. https://everything-everywhere.com/the-panic-of-1893/
  89. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1986-07-25-mn-245-story.html
  90. https://time.com/archive/6706724/antitrust-derailing-a-merger/
  91. https://www.nytimes.com/1985/11/11/business/why-justice-department-opposes-railroad-merger-in-west.html
  92. https://www.stb.gov/wp-content/uploads/FD-30400_D_V6.pdf
  93. https://www.nytimes.com/1986/08/20/opinion/l-a-giant-railroad-merger-properly-derailed-236786.html
  94. https://utahrails.net/sp/sp-atsf-merger.php
  95. https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/atr/legacy/2015/05/04/0056.pdf
  96. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1986-11-09-fi-24403-story.html
  97. https://www.stb.gov/wp-content/uploads/FD-32549-BN-SF-August-16-1995-Decision.pdf
  98. https://www.bnsf.com/news-media/railtalk/heritage/25th-anniversary.html
  99. https://www.nytimes.com/1995/02/08/business/company-news-2-railroads-shareholders-approve-merger.html
  100. https://www.upi.com/Archives/1995/09/22/Burlington-Northern-Santa-Fe-deal-official/3041811742400/
  101. https://www.trains.com/trn/railroads/history/bnsf-railway-merger-family-tree/
  102. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259707775_Long-Run_Effects_of_Mergers_The_Case_of_US_Western_Railroads
  103. https://www.bnsf.com/news-media/railtalk/heritage/celebrities-on-the-rail.html
  104. https://www.newyorksocialdiary.com/the-super-chief-the-train-of-the-stars/
  105. https://www.pbssocal.org/shows/lost-la/promoting-the-golden-west-advertising-and-the-railroad
  106. http://www.csun.edu/~sg4002/courses/417/readings/rail.pdf
  107. https://online.nmartmuseum.org/nmhistory/opening-the-west/atchison-topeka-and-santa-fe-railroad.html
  108. https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/econ_etds/65/
  109. https://www.sbrhs.org/equipment/santa-fe-3751/history.html
  110. https://www.american-rails.com/3751.html
  111. https://railfan.com/new-mexico-heritage-rail-secures-main-line-access-for-santa-fe-2926/
  112. https://www.trains.com/trn/railroads/heritage-rail/preservation/great-plains-museums-santa-fe-fp45-heads-for-cosmetic-restoration/
  113. https://www.gptm.us/santafe93
  114. https://www.irm.org/atsf92/
  115. https://www.irm.org/in-the-news/sd70mac-acquired-by-irm/
  116. https://railfan.com/bnsf-donates-historic-sd70mac-to-irm/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.