Hubbry Logo
MiddlesexMiddlesexMain
Open search
Middlesex
Community hub
Middlesex
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Middlesex
Middlesex
Middlesex
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Middlesex (/ˈmɪdəlsɛks/ ⓘ; abbreviation: Middx) is one of the 39 historic counties of England.[3] Located in the south east of England, it lost the south-eastern part of its territory when the County of London was created in 1889, and was abolished entirely in 1965. The area covered by Middlesex now lies almost entirely in the ceremonial county of Greater London, with smaller parts in the counties of Hertfordshire and Surrey. Middlesex's boundaries largely followed three rivers: the Thames in the south, the Lea to the east and the Colne to the west. A line of hills formed its northern boundary with Hertfordshire. The county was the second smallest of the historic counties of England, after Rutland.

Key Information

The name of the county derives from its origin as a homeland for the Middle Saxons in the early Middle Ages,[4] with the county subsequently part of that territory in the ninth or tenth century. The City of London, formerly part of the county, became a self governing county corporate in the twelfth century; the City was still able to exert influence as the sheriffs of London maintained their jurisdiction in Middlesex, though the county otherwise remained separate.[5] To the east of the City, the Tower Division (or Tower Hamlets) had considerable autonomy under its own Lord Lieutenant. To the west, precincts around Westminster and Charing Cross became built up.

Despite London's expansion into rural Middlesex, the Corporation of London resisted attempts to expand the City of London boundaries into the county, posing problems for the administration of local government, public infrastructure, and justice. In the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, the population density was especially high in the southeast of the county, including the East and West Ends of London. In 1855 the densely populated southeast, together with sections of Kent and Surrey, came under the Metropolitan Board of Works for certain infrastructure purposes, while remaining a part of Middlesex.[6] The Metropolitan Police also developed in the nineteenth century.

When county councils were introduced in 1889, about twenty per cent of the area of the historic county, along with a third of its population, was incorporated into the new administrative County of London. The remainder formed the administrative county of Middlesex, governed by the Middlesex County Council,[7] which met regularly at the Middlesex Guildhall in Westminster. Further suburban growth, stimulated by the improvement and expansion of public transport,[8] as well as the setting up of new industries, led to the creation of Greater London in 1965, an area which included almost all of the historic county of Middlesex, with the rest included in neighbouring ceremonial counties.[9]

Governance

[edit]
Middlesex as part of the Diocese of London in 1714. The diocese was based on the East Saxon kingdom, and was probably originally larger than shown here.
Map of Middlesex, drawn by Thomas Kitchin, geographer, engraver to the Duke of York, 1769
Map of Middlesex, 1824. Note: west is at the top.

Origin and toponymy

[edit]

The county has its roots in the settlement of the Middle Saxons.[4] The extent of the province is not clear, and probably varied over time, but it is clear that it occupied at least the area of the current county and much of Hertfordshire. Although the province appeared to have come under the dominion of, and is only ever recorded as a part of the Kingdom of the East Saxons, charter evidence shows that it was not part of their core territory. However, it is probable the county was independent at some point.[10]

At times, Essex was ruled jointly by co-Kings, and it is thought that the Middle Saxon province is likely to have been the domain of one of these co-kings.[11] This link to Essex endured through the Diocese of London, re-established in 604 as the East Saxon see, and its boundaries continued to be based on the Kingdom of Essex until the nineteenth century.

The name means territory of the middle Saxons. The word is formed from the Old English, 'middel' and 'Seaxe'[12] ('Saxons') (cf. Essex, Sussex and Wessex). In 704, it is recorded as Middleseaxon in an Anglo-Saxon chronicle, written in Latin, about land at Twickenham. The Latin text reads: "in prouincia quæ nuncupatur Middelseaxan Haec".[13]

The Saxons derived their name, Seaxe in their own tongue, from the seax, a kind of knife for which they were known. The seax appears in the heraldry of the English counties of Essex and Middlesex, each of which bears three seaxes in their ceremonial emblem, or rather the Tudor heralds' idea of what a seax looked like, portrayed in each case like a falchion or scimitar. The names 'Middlesex', 'Essex', 'Sussex' and 'Wessex', contain the name 'Seaxe'.

Early county government

[edit]
Further information: List of places in Middlesex
Further information: History of local government districts in Middlesex

It is not known exactly when Middlesex was established as a county, possibly the early tenth century,[14] but it is clear that it did not cover the whole of the former Middle Saxon Province of Essex. It was recorded in the Domesday Book of 1086 as being divided into the six hundreds of Edmonton, Elthorne, Gore, Hounslow (Isleworth in all later records),[15] Ossulstone and Spelthorne. The City of London has been self-governing since the thirteenth century and became a county in its own right, a county corporate.[note 3] Middlesex also included Westminster, which was separate from the City of London. Westminster Abbey dominated the area of Westminster, until the Dissolution of the Monasteries greatly reduced its influence. A Court of Burgesses was established, in 1585, to fill the power vacuum left behind by the Abbey.[16][17]

Of the six hundreds, Ossulstone contained the districts closest to the City of London. During the 17th century it was divided into four divisions, which, along with the Liberty of Westminster, largely took over the administrative functions of the hundred. The divisions were named Finsbury, Holborn, Kensington and Tower.[18] The county had parliamentary representation from the 13th century.

Middlesex outside the metropolitan area remained largely rural until the middle of the 19th century and so the special boards of local government for various metropolitan areas were late in developing. Other than the Cities of London and Westminster, there were no ancient boroughs.[19] The importance of the hundred courts declined, and such local administration as there was divided between "county business" conducted by the justices of the peace meeting in quarter sessions, and the local matters dealt with by parish vestries. As the suburbs of London spread into the area, unplanned development and outbreaks of cholera forced the creation of local boards and poor law unions to help govern most areas; in a few cases parishes appointed improvement commissioners.[20] In rural areas, parishes began to be grouped for different administrative purposes. From 1875 these local bodies were designated as urban or rural sanitary districts.[21]

Tower Division

[edit]

The Tower division, better known as the Tower Hamlets, was an area in the Southeast of the county covering what is now the London Borough of Tower Hamlets as well as most of what is now the London Borough of Hackney. The territory had its origin in the medieval Manor of Stepney.

The area was unusual in combining Hundred and many County responsibilities, to form a "county within a county" comparable to one of the Ridings of Yorkshire. Of particular note was its military autonomy: it had its own Lord-Lieutenant of the Tower Hamlets and was thus independent of the Lord Lieutenant of Middlesex.

Metropolitan challenges

[edit]
County of Middlesex (c. 1891–1895)
Further information: Population of Middlesex (1801–1881)

By the 19th century, the East End of London had expanded to the eastern boundary with Essex, and the Tower division, an area which approximated to the East End, had reached a population of over a million.[1] When the railways were built, the north western suburbs of London steadily spread over large parts of the county.[8] The areas closest to London were served by the Metropolitan Police from 1829, and from 1840 the entire county was included in the Metropolitan Police District.[22]

Local government in the county was unaffected by the Municipal Corporations Act 1835, and civic works continued to be the responsibility of the individual parish vestries or ad hoc improvement commissioners.[23][24] From 1855, the parishes of the densely populated area in the south east, but excluding the City of London, came within the responsibility of the Metropolitan Board of Works for certain infrastructure purposes, though the area remained a part of Middlesex.[6] Despite this innovation, the system was described by commentators at the time as one "in chaos".[7]

1889 - Administrative County of London

[edit]

In 1889, under the Local Government Act 1888, the metropolitan area of approximately 30,000 acres (120 km2) became part of the administrative County of London.[25] The Act also provided that the part of Middlesex in the administrative county of London should be "severed from Middlesex, and form a separate county for all non-administrative purposes".

Map showing boundaries of Middlesex in 1851 and 1911, aside from minor realignments. The small yellow area in the North is Monken Hadley, which was transferred to Hertfordshire; the larger yellow area in the Southeast was transferred to the newly created County of London in 1889.
Map in 1882 shows complete urbanisation of the East End

The part of the County of London that had been transferred from Middlesex was divided in 1900 into 18 metropolitan boroughs:[26]

1889 - Middlesex County Council

[edit]

Following the Local Government Act 1888, the remaining county came under the control of Middlesex County Council except for the parish of Monken Hadley, which became part of Hertfordshire.[27] The area of responsibility of the Lord Lieutenant of Middlesex was reduced accordingly. Middlesex did not contain any county boroughs, so the county and administrative county (the area of county council control) were identical. At this time, Middlesex regained the right to appoint its own sheriff, lost in the 12th century.[5][28]

The Local Government Act 1894 divided the administrative county into four rural districts and thirty-one urban districts, based on existing sanitary districts. One urban district, South Hornsey, was an exclave of Middlesex within the County of London until 1900, when it was transferred to the latter county.[29] The rural districts were Hendon, South Mimms, Staines and Uxbridge. Because of increasing urbanisation these had all been abolished by 1934.[9] Urban districts had been created, merged, and many had gained the status of municipal borough by 1965. The districts as at the 1961 census were:[30]

  1. Potters Bar
  2. Enfield
  3. Southgate
  4. Edmonton
  5. Tottenham
  6. Wood Green
  7. Friern Barnet
  8. Hornsey
  9. Finchley
  10. Hendon
  11. Harrow
  12. Ruislip-Northwood
  13. Uxbridge
Middlesex urban districts in 1961
  1. Ealing
  2. Wembley
  3. Willesden
  4. Acton
  5. Brentford and Chiswick
  6. Heston and Isleworth
  7. Southall
  8. Hayes and Harlington
  9. Yiewsley and West Drayton
  10. Staines
  11. Feltham
  12. Twickenham
  13. Sunbury-on-Thames

After 1889, the growth of London continued, and the county became almost entirely filled by suburbs of London, with a big rise in population density. This process was accelerated by the Metro-land developments, which covered a large part of the county.[31] The expanding urbanisation had, however, been foretold in 1771 by Tobias Smollett in The Expedition of Humphry Clinker, in which it is said:

Pimlico and Knightsbridge are almost joined to Chelsea and Kensington, and, if this infatuation continues for half a century, then, I suppose, the whole county of Middlesex will be covered in brick.[32]

Public transport in the county, including the extensive network of trams,[33] buses and the London Underground came under control of the London Passenger Transport Board in 1933[34] and a New Works Programme was developed to further enhance services during the 1930s.[8] Partly because of its proximity to the capital, the county had a major role during the Second World War. The county was subject to aerial bombardment and contained military establishments, such as RAF Uxbridge and RAF Heston, which were involved in the Battle of Britain.[35]

County town

[edit]
The Middlesex Guildhall at Westminster, which now houses the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom

Middlesex arguably never, and certainly not since 1789, had a single, established county town. The City of London could be regarded as its county town for most purposes[36] and provided different locations for the various, mostly judicial, county purposes. The county assizes for Middlesex were held at the Old Bailey in the City of London.[17] Until 1889, the High Sheriff of Middlesex was chosen by the City of London Corporation. The sessions house for the Middlesex Quarter Sessions was Hicks Hall in Clerkenwell (just outside the City boundary) from 1612 to 1782, and Middlesex Sessions House on Clerkenwell Green from 1782 to 1921. The quarter sessions performed most of the limited administration on a county level prior to the creation of the Middlesex County Council in 1889.

New Brentford was first promulgated as the county town in 1789, on the basis that it was where elections of knights of the shire (or Members of Parliament) were held from 1701.[25][37] Thus a traveller's and historian's London regional summary of 1795 states that (New) Brentford was "considered as the county-town; but there is no town-hall or other public building".[38] Middlesex County Council took over at the Guildhall in Westminster, which became the Middlesex Guildhall. In the same year, this location was placed into the new County of London, and was thus outside the council's area of jurisdiction.

Creation of Greater London

[edit]

The population of inner London (then the County of London) declined after its creation in 1889 as more residents moved into the outer suburbs. In the interwar years, suburban London expanded further, with improvement and expansion of public transport,[8] and the setting up of new industries.

After the Second World War, from 1951 to 1961, the populations of the administrative county of London[39] and of inner Middlesex were in steady decline, with population growth continuing in the outer parts of Middlesex.[30][40] According to the 1961 census, Ealing, Enfield, Harrow, Hendon, Heston & Isleworth, Tottenham, Wembley, Willesden and Twickenham had each reached a population greater than 100,000, which would normally have entitled each of them to seek county borough status. If this status were to be granted to all those boroughs, it would mean that the population of the administrative county of Middlesex would be reduced by over half, to just under one million.

Evidence submitted to the Royal Commission on Local Government in Greater London included a recommendation to divide Middlesex into two administrative counties of North Middlesex and West Middlesex.[36] However, the commission instead proposed abolition of the county and merging of the boroughs and districts. This was enacted by Parliament as the London Government Act 1963, which came into force on 1 April 1965.

The Act abolished the administrative counties of Middlesex and London.[41] The Administration of Justice Act 1964 abolished the Middlesex magistracy and lieutenancy, and altered the jurisdiction of the Central Criminal Court.

New London boroughs from former London CC area

[edit]

Eighteen of London County Council Metropolitan Boroughs were part of the ancient county of Middlesex. In 1965 these merged to form seven of the twelve current boroughs of Inner London:

New London boroughs from former Middlesex CC area

[edit]

In April 1965, nearly all of the area of the historic county of Middlesex became part of Greater London, under the control of the Greater London Council, and formed the new outer London boroughs of Barnet (part only), Brent, Ealing, Enfield, Haringey, Harrow, Hillingdon, Hounslow and Richmond upon Thames (part only).[42]

Areas transferred to Surrey and Hertfordshire County Councils

[edit]

The remaining areas were Potters Bar Urban District, which became part of the administrative county of Hertfordshire, and Sunbury-on-Thames Urban District and Staines Urban District, which became part of the administrative county of Surrey.[9] Following the changes, local acts of Parliament relating to Middlesex were henceforth to apply to the entirety of the nine "North West London Boroughs".[43]

In 1974, the three urban districts that had been transferred to Hertfordshire and Surrey were abolished and became the districts of Hertsmere (part only) and Spelthorne respectively.[44] In 1995 the village of Poyle was transferred from Spelthorne to the Berkshire borough of Slough.[45] Additionally, the Greater London boundary to the west and north has been subject to several small changes since 1965.[46][47]

Judicial areas

[edit]

On its creation in 1965, Greater London was divided into five Commission Areas for justice. The one named "Middlesex" consisted of the boroughs of Barnet, Brent, Ealing, Enfield, Haringey, Harrow, Hillingdon and Hounslow.[48] It was abolished on 1 July 2003.[49]

Earldom

[edit]

The title Earl of Middlesex was created twice, in 1622 and 1677, but became extinct in 1843.[25]

Geography

[edit]

The county lay within the London Basin[50] and the most significant feature was the River Thames, which formed the southern boundary. The River Lea and the River Colne formed natural boundaries to the east and west. The entire south west boundary of Middlesex followed a gently descending meander of the Thames without hills. In many places "Middlesex bank" is more accurate than "north bank" — for instance at Teddington the river flows north-westward, so the left (Middlesex) bank is the south-west bank.[note 4] The largely low-lying county was dominated by clay in its north and alluvium on gravel in its south.

Hand-drawn map of Kent, Sussex, Surrey and Middlesex from 1575

In the north, the boundary ran along a WSW/ENE aligned ridge of hills. From the Colne to Barnet Gate Wood, this boundary is marked by a 20 kilometre hedge of great antiquity. East of the wood the hedge continues but did not forms the county boundary, suggesting that the eastern part of the boundary is younger.

After Barnett Gate Wood the hedge continues east to Arkley where it divides into two branches, one continuing east to Chipping Barnet and Cockfosters, with another heading north to form the parish boundary between Shenley and Ridge, both in Hertfordshire. Neither branch formed part of the county boundary. The change to the county boundary was probably caused in the late 8th century, before Middlesex took the form of a county, when the Liberty of St Albans was created from parts of the Dioceses of London and Lincoln.[51]

The hills are broken by Barnet or 'Dollis' valleys. (South of the boundary, these feed into the Welsh Harp Lake or Brent Reservoir which becomes the River Brent).[note 5] This formed a long protrusion of Hertfordshire into the county.[52] The county was once well wooded,[50] with much of it covered by the ancient Forest of Middlesex; Domesday returns for Middlesex indicate that it was around 30% wooded (much of it wood-pasture) in 1086, about double the English average.[53] The highest point is the High Road by Bushey Heath at 502 feet (153 m).[54]

Bentley Priory Nature Reserve houses Middlesex's oldest tree: The Master Oak.[55]

Economic development

[edit]

There were settlements in the area of Middlesex that can be traced back thousands of years before the creation of a county.[56] The economy of the county was dependent on the City of London from early times and was primarily agricultural.[17] A variety of goods were provided for the City, including crops such as grain and hay, livestock and building materials. Tourism began to develop in the late 16th century and, in 1593, John Norden noted that the county was attracting visitors to its "divers devices, neatly decked with rare inventions, environed with orchards of sundry delicate fruits, gardens with delectable walks, arbours, alleys, and great variety of pleasing dainties."[57] Inns and tea gardens at Isleworth, Tottenham, Edmonton and Hornsey are noted in the 17th and 18th centuries for attracting day-trippers from London. Hampton Court Palace was among the historic buildings opened to the public in the 19th century and 350,000 people visited in 1851.[58]

During the 18th century, the inner parishes of Middlesex became suburbs of the City and were increasingly urbanised.[17] In 1794, Thomas Cox wrote of Middlesex:

We may call it almost all London, being chiefly inhabited by the citizens, who fill the towns in it with their country houses, to which they often resort that they may breathe a little sweet air, free from the fogs and smoke of the City.[59]

In 1803, Sir John Sinclair, president of the Board of Agriculture, spoke of the need to cultivate the substantial Finchley Common and Hounslow Heath (perhaps prophetic of the Dig for Victory campaign of World War II) and fellow Board member Middleton estimated that one tenth of the county, 17,000 acres (6,900 ha), was uncultivated common, capable of improvement.[60] However, William Cobbett, in his Rural Rides first serialised in 1822, said that

"A more ugly country between Egham and Kensington would with great difficulty be found in England. Flat as a pancake, and until you come to Hammersmith, the soil is a nasty, stony dirt upon a bed of gravel. Hounslow Heath which is only a little worse than the general run, is a sample of all that is bad in soil and villainous in look. Yet this is now enclosed, and what they call 'cultivated'. Here is a fresh robbery of villages, hamlets, and farm and labourers' buildings and abodes."[61]

Thomas Babington wrote in 1843, "An acre in Middlesex is worth a principality in Utopia"[62] which contrasts neatly with its agricultural description.

The building of radial railway lines from 1839 caused a fundamental shift away from agricultural supply for London towards large scale house building.[36] Tottenham, Edmonton and Enfield in the north developed first as working-class residential suburbs with easy access to central London. The line to Windsor through Middlesex was completed in 1848, and the railway to Potters Bar in 1850; and the Metropolitan and District Railways started a series of extensions into the county in 1878. Closer to London, the districts of Acton, Willesden, Ealing and Hornsey came within reach of the tram and bus networks, providing cheap transport to central London.[36]

After World War I, the availability of labour and proximity to London made areas such as Hayes and Park Royal ideal locations for the developing new industries.[36] New jobs attracted more people to the county and the population continued to rise, reaching a peak in 1951. Middlesex became the location of facilities for the film industry. Twickenham Studios were established in 1913. There were also studios at Cricklewood Studios, Gainsborough Pictures, Isleworth Studios, Kew Bridge Studios and Southall Studios.

Former postal county

[edit]

Middlesex (abbreviated Middx) is a former postal county.[63] Counties were an element of postal addressing in routine use until 1996, intended to avoid confusion between post towns, and are no longer required for the routing of the mail.[64] The postal county did not match the boundaries of Middlesex because of the presence of the London postal district, which stretched into the county to include Tottenham, Willesden, Hornsey and Chiswick.[65] Addresses in this area included "LONDON" which is the post town but any overlap with the then County of London was coincidental.

In 1965, Royal Mail retained the postal county because it would have been too costly to amend addresses covering the bulk of Outer London.[66] Exceptionally, the Potters Bar post town was transferred to Hertfordshire. Geographically the postal county consisted of two unconnected areas, 6 miles (10 km) apart. The first was in and around Enfield and the second, larger area was to the west.[67] This led the retention of 25 Post Towns to this day:

Postcode area Post towns
EN (part) ENFIELD; POTTERS BAR (until 1965)
HA EDGWARE, HARROW, NORTHWOOD, PINNER, RUISLIP, STANMORE, WEMBLEY
TW (part) ASHFORD, BRENTFORD, FELTHAM, HAMPTON, HOUNSLOW†, ISLEWORTH, SHEPPERTON, STAINES, SUNBURY-ON-THAMES, TEDDINGTON, TWICKENHAM†
UB GREENFORD, HAYES, NORTHOLT, SOUTHALL, UXBRIDGE, WEST DRAYTON

† = postal county was not required

The postal county had many border inconsistencies where its constituent post towns encroached on neighbouring counties, such as the villages of Denham in Buckinghamshire, Wraysbury in Berkshire and Eastbury in Hertfordshire which were respectively in the post towns of Uxbridge, Staines and Northwood and therefore in the postal county of Middlesex. Egham Hythe, Surrey also had postal addresses of Staines, Middlesex. Conversely, Hampton Wick was conveniently placed in Kingston, Surrey with its sorting offices just across the river.[68] Nearby Hampton Court Palace has a postal address of East Molesey, therefore associating it with Surrey.[69]

Middlesex former postal county

The Enfield post town in the EN postcode area was in the former postal county. All post towns in the HA postcode area and UB postcode area were in the former postal county. Most of the TW postcode area was in the former postal county.

Culture and community

[edit]

Flag and coat of arms

[edit]

The Middlesex Flag is included in the Flag Institute's registry of county and regional flags.[70] The flag is a banner of the arms of the former Middlesex County Council, abolished in 1965. A similar design had been used traditionally as a local badge in Middlesex and neighbouring Essex for centuries.

Coats of arms of Middlesex (left) and Buckinghamshire (right) in stained glass at the exit from Uxbridge tube station
County of Middlesex sign in 2014, on the border between the London Boroughs of Barnet and Enfield

Coats of arms were attributed by the mediaeval heralds to the kingdoms of the Anglo-Saxon Heptarchy. That assigned to the Kingdom of Essex, of which the Middle Saxon Province was part, depicted three "seaxes" or short notched swords on a red background. The seaxe was a weapon carried by Anglo-Saxon warriors, and the term "Saxon" may be derived from the word.[71][72] These arms became associated with the two counties that approximated to the kingdom: Middlesex and Essex. County authorities, militia and volunteer regiments associated with both counties used the attributed arms.

In 1910, it was observed that the county councils of Essex and Middlesex and the Sheriff's Office of the County of London were all using the same arms. Middlesex County Council decided to apply for a formal grant of arms from the College of Arms, with the addition of a heraldic "difference" to the attributed arms. Colonel Otley Parry, a justice of the peace for Middlesex and author of a book on military badges, was asked to devise an addition to the shield. The chosen addition was a "Saxon Crown", derived from the portrait of King Athelstan on a silver penny of his reign, stated to be the earliest form of crown associated with any English sovereign. The grant of arms was made by letters patent dated 7 November 1910.[73][74][75]

Arms of the Middlesex County Council
Arms of the Middlesex County Council
 The arms of the Middlesex County Council were blazoned:
Gules, three seaxes fessewise points to the sinister proper, pomels and hilts and in the centre chief point a Saxon crown or.



The undifferenced arms of the kingdom were eventually granted to Essex County Council in 1932.[76] Seaxes were also used in the insignia of many of the boroughs and urban districts in the county, while the Saxon crown came to be a common heraldic charge in English civic arms.[77][78] On the creation of the Greater London Council in 1965 a Saxon crown was introduced in its coat of arms.[79] Seaxes appear in the arms of several London borough councils and of Spelthorne Borough Council.[80][81]

Military units

[edit]

As well as the ancient county fyrd and militia, Middlesex military units have included the Middlesex Regiment, the Middlesex Yeomanry and their predecessors.

Middlesex Regiment Cap Badge

In the south-east, the Tower Division, effectively a separate county, had its own military arrangements.

County day

[edit]

Middlesex Day is celebrated each year on 16 May. This commemorates the actions of the 57th (West Middlesex) Regiment in 1811, at the Battle of Albuera, during the Peninsular War. During the battle, Lieutenant-Colonel William Inglis, despite his injuries, refused to retire from the battle but remained with the regimental colours, encouraging his men with the words "Die hard 57th, die hard!" as they came under intense pressure from a French attack. The regiment held and the battle was won. The 'Die Hards' subsequently became the West Middlesex's regimental nickname and the phrase Die Hard entered the language. In 2003, an early day motion in the House of Commons noted the celebration of 16 May, the anniversary of Albuhera, as Middlesex Day.[82]

County flower

[edit]

In 2002 Plantlife ran a county flowers campaign to assign flowers to each of the counties of the United Kingdom. The general public was invited to vote for the bloom they felt most represented their county. The wood anemone was chosen as the flower of Middlesex. The flower was a common sight in the Forest of Middlesex.

When the suburbs of London swept over Middlesex, many of its woods were bypassed and preserved. The wood anemone still blooms there to this day.[83][84]

County history societies

[edit]

The London and Middlesex Archaeological Society (LAMAS) was founded in 1855 for the study of the archaeology and local history of the City of London and the county of Middlesex. It works in close association with the London Museum and with the Museum of London Archaeology. It has over 40 affiliated local history societies in Middlesex.[85]

The interests of family historians in Middlesex are supported by two member organisations of the Federation of Family History Societies: The London, Westminster and Middlesex Family History Society and the West Middlesex Family History Society.[86][87] For genealogical research Middlesex is assigned Chapman code MDX, except for the City of London ("square mile") assigned LND.

Literature

[edit]

Sir John Betjeman, Poet Laureate from 1972 until his death in 1984, was born in 1906 in Gospel Oak and grew up in Highgate. He published several poems about Middlesex and suburban life. Many were featured in the televised readings Metroland.[88]

Dear Middlesex, dear vanished country friend,
Your neighbour, London, killed you in the end.

— Contrasts: Marble Arch to Edgware – A Lament, John Betjeman (1968)[89]

Sport

[edit]

Middlesex continues to be used as a geographic frame of reference by a number of sporting associations.

Rugby union

[edit]

Seven rugby union clubs at national league levels 1 to 4 have some or all of their other teams playing in Middlesex leagues (those marked * having grounds in Middlesex). These are Harlequins*, Saracens*, London Scottish, London Irish*, Richmond, Ealing Trailfinders*, and Barnes.

Middlesex Rugby is the governing body for rugby union in Middlesex. The union selects players from its 88 affiliated clubs for the Middlesex team in the County Championship. It runs the Middlesex RFU Senior Cup open to the top 8 Middlesex clubs that play between tiers 6–7 of the English rugby union system. It also runs the Middlesex RFU Senior Bowl and the Middlesex RFU Senior Vase for sides from lower down the pyramid. It helps run the Herts/Middlesex 1 (tier 9) and Herts/Middlesex 2 (tier 10) leagues. Middlesex Rugby is also active in promoting youth rugby and women's rugby in the county.[90]

Football

[edit]

The Middlesex County Football Association regulates and promotes football in the county. The Middlesex F.A. organises many cup competitions, the most prestigious being the Middlesex Senior Cup (founded in 1889) and the Middlesex Senior Charity Cup (founded in 1901).

The Middlesex County Football League was founded in 1984 and currently comprises 5 divisions. The premier divisions sits at level 7 of the National League System.

Cricket

[edit]
Middlesex vs Sussex at Lord's

Middlesex County Cricket Club is one of eighteen first-class county clubs within the domestic cricket structure of England and Wales. The club was founded in 1864 but teams representing the county have played top-class cricket since the early 18th century and the club has always held first-class status. Middlesex have won thirteen County Championship titles (including 2 shared titles), the most recent in 2016.

The Middlesex Cricket Board is the governing body of all recreational cricket in Middlesex.

The Middlesex County Cricket League is the top-level competition for all recreational club cricket in the county. The League now consists of twenty-two divisions in total. The top division has been designated an ECB Premier League.

Other sports

[edit]

Middlesex Bowling Association has over 80 affiliated clubs throughout the county.[91]

Middlesex County Amateur Swimming Association organises training, competitions and representative county teams in swimming, diving, water polo and synchronised swimming.[92]

Middlesex County Athletics Association is the organisation controlling Amateur Athletics in Middlesex under the direction of UK Athletics.[93]

North Middlesex Golf Club

Middlesex Golf represents all aspects of golf within the county. It has 33 affiliated golf clubs.[94]

Middlesex Tennis, affiliated to the LTA, works to create more opportunities for people in Middlesex to play and compete in tennis at all levels of the game.[95] The Middlesex County Championships are the highlight of Middlesex's Competition Calendar.[96]

Middlesex County Badminton Association has over 80 affiliated clubs and organises men's, ladies' and mixed leagues.[97]

Middlesex Squash & Racketball Association is responsible for organising and promoting squash in Middlesex. It was founded in the 1930s and ran the first Middlesex Open Championships in 1937.[98]

Middlesex County Archery Association is the governing body for the sport of archery in the county.[99]

Middlesex Small-Bore Rifle Association brings together small-bore rifle and airgun clubs in the county, and organises teams to represent the County in competitions.[100]

Middlesex County Chess Association aims to foster chess throughout Middlesex. It has 15 affiliated clubs.[101]

Middlesex County Bridge Association runs the Middlesex Cup and the Middlesex League and enters county teams in national and regional competitions.[102]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Middlesex

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia

Middlesex was a historic in southeastern , positioned north of the River Thames and forming a core part of the region's early urban and suburban development. Its name derives from the Middelseaxan, denoting the territory of the Middle Saxons situated between the East Saxons () and West Saxons (). Established toward the end of the , the functioned as an administrative entity for over a millennium, governing areas that included much of London's northern expansion outside the itself. In 1965, the was abolished under the Act 1963, with most of its land—previously the second-smallest historic by area—incorporated into , though small peripheral districts were reassigned to neighboring counties like and . Despite the administrative dissolution, Middlesex persists as a ceremonial and historic , evident in institutions like the , the former , and ongoing campaigns asserting its cultural endurance against perceptions of complete erasure. The county's legacy underscores tensions between modern governance reforms and longstanding geographic identities, with its Thames-side location historically fostering trade, governance, and population growth intertwined with London's ascendancy.

Etymology and Origins

Toponymy and Name Derivation

The name Middlesex originates from the Middelseaxe, translating to "" or "land of the ," denoting a Saxon tribal group positioned geographically and politically between the East Saxons (Eastseaxe) of to the east and the West Saxons (Westseaxe) extending westward along the upper Thames. This reflects the tribal common in early Anglo-Saxon , where names often preserved ethnic identifiers from the settlements. The earliest attestation of Middelseaxe appears in the , a administrative document from the late 7th or early that enumerated tributary peoples and territories by hide assessments for fiscal purposes; the are rated at 600 hides, indicating a mid-tier under Mercian hegemony. The further employs the term in annalistic entries, such as for 653, recording that "Middelseaxe onfengon under Peadan aldormen ryhtne geleafan" (the Middle Saxons received true faith under Peada), evidencing its currency in contemporary records of ecclesiastical and political events. By the , the name had standardized as Middlesex in Latinized forms like Middlesexia, as documented in the of 1086, where the county is surveyed as a distinct entity encompassing hundreds such as Ossulstone and Elthorne, without subsumption into wards. Medieval charters, including those from kings like Offa in the , perpetuate variants such as Middleseaxna, reinforcing the name's derivation from Saxon tribal roots rather than later urban overlays.

Prehistoric and Early Saxon Settlement

Evidence of human activity in the region of Middlesex dates to the Palaeolithic era, with traces of early tools and occupation found in areas such as Harrow Weald, suggesting sporadic presence amid a landscape of woodlands and river valleys. and settlements were concentrated along the Thames foreshore and tributaries, where flint tools—including scrapers, borers, and flakes—indicate riverine exploitation for , , and early tool-making, as evidenced by assemblages recovered from intertidal zones and sites. These artifacts, often dated to circa 8000–4000 BCE, reflect small, mobile groups adapting to post-glacial environments, with pollen analysis from regional cores showing a shift from dense forests to cleared land by the , supporting rudimentary . Bronze and activity remained limited, with scatters of metalwork and enclosures pointing to continued rural patterns rather than dense populations, though barrows and field systems near the and Lea rivers suggest territorial organization by circa 1000 BCE. Roman occupation from the CE introduced infrastructure, including branches of (modern A5) crossing northern Middlesex and the route through , facilitating trade and military movement from . Rural villas, such as those at Stream Farm near South Mimms, featured hypocausts and tessellated pavements, indicating elite agrarian estates, but urban development was confined largely to the periphery of , with Middlesex serving as a for production and grain supply. Following Roman withdrawal around 410 CE, archaeological evidence of continuity is sparse, with post-Roman pottery and sunken-featured buildings signaling gradual Saxon incursion by the 5th–6th centuries. By the early , Anglo-Saxon settlement solidified, as the (Middel Seaxe) established control north of the Thames, initially under Kentish influence before shifting to overlordship. The earliest documentary reference appears in a 704 CE charter as Provincia Middleseaxon, denoting a distinct folkland with hall-based settlements and place names incorporating elements like -ham (homestead, e.g., ) and -ingas (people of, e.g., ), evidencing kin-group organization and agricultural expansion. s from the onward, such as those granting lands at , confirm ecclesiastical ties to bishops and a structured around royal vills and folk estates, laying demographic foundations for later divisions.

Historical Geography

Boundaries and Territorial Extent

Middlesex's boundaries originated in the late Anglo-Saxon period and were formalized in the of 1086, encompassing lands north of the River Thames excluding the . The territory extended eastward to the River Lea, westward to the River Colne, southward along the Thames separating it from , and northward to the boundary with , roughly along a line from modern-day Enfield to . This delimited an area of approximately 200 square miles, divided into five : , Elthorne, Gore, (later ), and Ossulstone. These boundaries remained stable for over eight centuries, with minimal alterations until the . mappings from the mid-1800s, such as the 1:10,560 scale sheets, confirmed the county's extent at around 181,000 acres prior to reforms, reflecting the unchanged perimeter defined by natural features and historic shire lines. Small enclaves and liberties, like the detached parts of in Harrow, were integrated without significant territorial shift. The Local Government Act 1888 introduced the first major contraction, transferring approximately 50 square miles of densely urbanized southeastern portions—including areas now in the modern of Camden, , and Hackney—to the newly formed effective April 1, 1889. This reduced Middlesex's administrative area while preserving the historic boundaries for other purposes. Minor boundary adjustments with neighboring counties followed, such as exchanges with in 1892 involving small parcels near the Thames. The London Government Act 1963, effective 1965, dismantled the administrative county entirely, incorporating the bulk of remaining territory into . Northern extremities, including and , were ceded to ; western areas like Staines and Sunbury to ; and eastern fringes to . Ceremonial remnants persist in the lord-lieutenancy of Middlesex, covering non-metropolitan fragments totaling under 20 square miles, as delineated in records and preserved for lieutenancy and sporting contexts like .

Physical Landscape and Resources

Middlesex's is dominated by the Eocene , a stiff, bluish formation that weathers to brown and underlies much of the county, producing heavy, impermeable soils prone to waterlogging. These clay soils supported pastoral agriculture through strong formation but limited arable farming without artificial drainage due to slow rates. Superimposed on this are alluvial deposits in the , including sands, gravels, and silts that created lighter, more fertile soils in riverine lowlands. The county's topography reflects the synclinal structure of the London Basin, featuring gently undulating plains with minimal relief; elevations rise from near along the Thames to a maximum of 153 meters (502 feet) at Bushey Heath near the northwestern boundary. This subdued landscape, lacking steep gradients or highlands, restricted hydraulic power for mills or heavy manufacturing but facilitated overland transport via flat routes. Key hydrological features include the Thames as the southern arterial waterway, fed by tributaries like the River to the west—forming part of the border—and the River Lea to the east, which demarcate drainage divides and historically promoted radial flow patterns toward the . These rivers, coursing through gravel-filled valleys, mitigated clay-induced flooding in places but sustained marshy conditions in undrained depressions, shaping ecosystems prior to . Exploitable resources centered on the terraces of the Thames and valleys, yielding flint-rich aggregates for and building , with major pits operational from the onward. Abundant supplied raw material for brickmaking and ceramics, with quarries in northern and western sectors providing the bulk of London's brick production by the , leveraging the clay's plasticity and firing properties. These deposits causally underpinned urban material demands, as the impermeable substrate concentrated in aquifers, enabling limited extraction for local supply.

Urbanization and Population Changes

The population of the historic county of , encompassing areas adjacent to , was recorded at 818,629 in the 1801 . This figure more than doubled to 1,735,348 by 1841, driven by inward migration from rural and overseas, as 's economic pull transformed peripheral parishes into densely settled suburbs. By 1901, the count reached 4,896,885, a surge attributable to the county's proximity to 's labor markets and the proliferation of steam railways starting in the , which lowered costs and enabled residential separation from workplaces. Railway lines, including the London and Birmingham Railway (opened 1838) and extensions into northwestern , accelerated this shift by connecting outer villages to central districts, fostering along tracks and stations. Empirical analysis indicates that proximity to new rail infrastructure correlated with 10-20% higher localized rates in mid-19th-century , with Middlesex exemplifying how improvements amplified urban spillovers without proportional agricultural decline in the county's remaining rural enclaves. These dynamics imposed measurable strains, such as overburdened systems and networks in parishes like and , where densities rose from under 100 to over 500 persons per between 1851 and 1901. In the , the of Middlesex—established in and excluding metropolitan police districts transferred to —saw its population climb from 1,112,000 in 1901 to 2,221,397 by 1961. Post-World War II suburbanization, spurred by housing shortages and preferential loans for detached homes under schemes like the Housing Act 1949, fueled this expansion in outer boroughs such as and , where low-density estates absorbed migrants from bombed inner areas. By 1961, over 60% of the county's residents lived in densities exceeding urban thresholds, exacerbating infrastructure deficits like road congestion and school overcrowding, with per capita water demand rising 50% from 1931 levels amid unchecked growth. This pattern underscored causal pressures from 's gravitational pull, independent of formal planning, leading to evident diseconomies in service provision.

Governance and Administration

Early Administrative Structures

Following the of 1066, Middlesex functioned as a distinct shire under the oversight of a appointed by , responsible for enforcing royal writs, collecting revenues, and supervising local . The , deriving from the Anglo-Saxon "shire-reeve," managed these duties through deputies and bailiffs, rendering annual accounts to the that underscored the county's operational independence from neighboring jurisdictions like the . The 's decentralized administration relied on its five hundreds—Elthorne, Gore, Istleworth, Spelthorne, and the expansive Ossulstone—which convened courts every four weeks to adjudicate minor civil disputes, criminal matters below level, and fiscal obligations such as the assessment and collection of county rates and feudal aids. These hundred courts, presided over by the or elected hundredmen, operated on derived from manorial records and shrieval precedents, fostering local in routine governance while deferring major cases to the held biannually at New Brentford. Manorial courts complemented this system, handling tenant disputes and customary services on feudal estates, with records preserved in court rolls evidencing self-reliant tied to . By the mid-16th century, the emerged within Ossulstone Hundred, encompassing precincts like , , and Poplar under direct authority via the of , who exercised military command and limited civil exempt from the Middlesex sheriff's full purview. This division, rooted in medieval military obligations for but formalized post-1550 amid Tudor centralization of strategic frontiers, maintained distinct sessions for musters and levies, insulating urban-adjacent areas from rural hundred mechanisms and highlighting prioritization of security over uniform shrieval control. Empirical records in the , commencing reliably from 1130, illustrate Middlesex's fiscal autonomy through separate sheriff-led tallies of farm rents, pleas fines, and payments—such as the 1156 roll entry for £200 in county farm—distinct from exemptions, affirming causal separation of county revenues despite geographic proximity and shared economic flows. These audits, audited annually, reveal consistent shrieval accountability without subsumption into metropolitan fiscal streams, underpinning the endurance of customary until later reforms.

Sessions of the Peace and Quarter Sessions

The Sessions of the Peace in Middlesex, comprising assemblies of justices of the peace drawn from the local and , originated in the early as a mechanism for local governance under royal commissions issued via statutes such as the 1361 Justices of the Peace Act. These bodies addressed civil disputes, minor criminal offenses, and administrative tasks, with justices empowered to bind over suspects, suppress riots, and enforce statutes on vagrancy and morality. By the late , these evolved into formalized Quarter Sessions, held four times annually—typically at Epiphany, , Midsummer, and —to process indictments for felonies like and assault that fell short of capital crimes reserved for . In Middlesex, sessions convened at venues such as the sessions house in Westminster from the , reflecting the county's unique burdens from London's expansion. Administrative functions dominated proceedings, with justices issuing orders for under the Elizabethan Poor Laws of 1598 and 1601, including settlement examinations to determine parishioners' legal rights to aid and removal orders to repatriate vagrants to their birthplaces, averting fiscal strain on urban parishes. Records from the onward document thousands of such cases, alongside mandates for repairs—such as presentments against negligent surveyors—and bridge maintenance, funded via county rates levied on landowners. organization fell under their purview post-1660, with sessions rolls detailing enrollments, musters, and provisions for the trained bands, especially during Jacobite threats in the 1710s and , where Middlesex's proximity to the capital necessitated rapid mobilization of up to 4,000 able-bodied men. Surviving sessions books, calendared for periods like 1689–1709, reveal meticulous clerkly notations of these quasi-judicial acts, underscoring the system's role in decentralized authority. While effective in rural enclaves like Enfield and for routine enforcement, the framework strained under 18th-century metropolitan pressures, as population influxes fueled crime rates exceeding 10,000 indictments annually by mid-century. The crisis of 1720–1751 exemplified this overload, with cheap distilled spirits—consumed at rates reaching 14 million gallons yearly in —correlating with surges in petty , infanticide, and disorderly conduct prosecuted at sessions; Middlesex magistrates explicitly blamed for fostering "vice and debauchery" among the laboring poor, leading to evidentiary backlogs and reliance on summary convictions. Empirical tallies from sessions papers show convictions for -related disturbances peaking in the –, though causal attributions varied, with some contemporaries linking intake to nutritional deficits rather than inherent moral decay. This urban-rural disparity highlighted inherent limits in a gentry-led system ill-suited to industrialized vice waves, prompting incremental reliance on and later parliamentary interventions.

19th-Century Reforms and Metropolitan Challenges

The encroachment of 's urbanization into Middlesex during the early intensified pressures on the county's governance, as surged and rudimentary parochial systems proved inadequate for handling sewage, water supply, and . By 1831, the —encompassing much of northern Middlesex—had over 1.3 million residents, fueling in parishes like and , where inadequate drainage contributed to filth accumulation and disease vectors. The 1832 epidemic underscored these vulnerabilities, striking with 6,536 fatalities amid contaminated water sources and poor ventilation, prompting urgent calls for systemic overhaul as local vestries struggled with isolation and notification efforts. Parliamentary inquiries, including Blue Books on , highlighted a parallel crisis of pauper influx from rural and post-1815 economic dislocations, straining Middlesex's workhouses and raising relief expenditures by over 50% in metropolitan parishes between 1800 and 1830. In response, the Metropolis Management Act 1855 marked a pivotal reform, dividing the Metropolis into 23 sanitary districts—including key Middlesex areas like Hackney and —and mandating elected vestries or district boards to manage local sewers, lighting, and cleansing, supplanting ad hoc parish committees. This legislation extended Hobhouse's Lighting and Watching Act of 1833 county-wide while establishing the as a central authority for arterial drainage and street improvements, funded by a precept on local rates, thereby coordinating efforts across Middlesex, , and boundaries. Such measures directly mitigated epidemic risks by standardizing infrastructure, as evidenced by reduced mortality in subsequent outbreaks like 1848–1849, where proactive board interventions limited spread compared to 1832's chaos. Yet these centralizing reforms eroded Middlesex's traditional administrative sovereignty, as the Quarter Sessions—long responsible for county-wide oversight of highways and nuisances—ceded control over metropolitan functions to unelected or indirectly accountable bodies, reflecting Parliament's preference for uniformity over localized discretion. Critics at the time, including rural justices, argued this overreach disregarded the county's heterogeneous landscape, imposing urban-centric mandates that inflated rates without commensurate local input, though empirical gains in efficiency—such as the Board's eventual network—substantiated the necessity amid unchecked growth. This shift exemplified broader tensions between entrenched parochial traditions and Westminster's causal push for scalable governance to avert sanitary collapse.

Formation of Middlesex County Council

The Local Government Act 1888 (51 & 52 Vict. c. 41) provided for the creation of elected county councils to assume administrative duties previously exercised by justices of the peace at quarter sessions, establishing the Middlesex County Council for the of Middlesex effective from 1 April 1889. This encompassed the historic county of Middlesex excluding the and the metropolitan area governed by the newly formed . The council consisted of elected councillors and aldermen, with the first elections for councillors occurring across in January 1889, followed by selection of aldermen by the councillors. Statutory powers transferred to the council included the maintenance and construction of main highways and bridges, management of county buildings such as asylums and halls, levying of rates, and borrowing for , all aimed at addressing local administrative needs detached from judicial functions. Additional responsibilities encompassed oversight of initiatives through coordination with district authorities and opposition to private bills in affecting county interests. The council's operational base was established at the in Westminster, serving as the for meetings and administration. In its initial years from 1889 to 1900, the council adapted to intensifying suburban development pressures by expanding powers for road and bridge improvements, alongside assuming varied duties such as weights and measures enforcement and reformatory management, reflecting empirical demands for infrastructure to support population growth in outlying districts. Annual reports documented these efforts, with financial accounts tracking expenditures on health-related functions and other mandates, though specific budget figures varied with project scales and rateable values.

Abolition in 1965 and Transfer to

The London Government Act 1963 provided for the reorganization of local government in the metropolitan area of London, leading to the abolition of the of Middlesex and its on 31 March 1965. This legislation dissolved the Middlesex , which had been established in 1889, and transferred its functions primarily to the newly created (GLC) for strategic matters and to the London borough councils for local administration. The Act aimed to address the administrative challenges posed by the expanding urban by establishing a unified framework for the area encompassing over 600 square miles and a population exceeding 8 million. The bulk of Middlesex's territory was incorporated into , forming the entirety or substantial portions of seven outer London boroughs: Brent, , Enfield, Harrow, , and , with additional areas contributing to Barnet and Haringey. These boroughs assumed responsibilities for services such as , , and highways previously managed by the . Small peripheral districts were excluded from : Urban District transferred to , while Staines and Urban Districts went to , reflecting minor boundary adjustments to align with existing administrative patterns. Certain judicial functions associated with Middlesex persisted post-abolition, with the in Westminster continuing to serve as a venue for legal proceedings, including those inherited from the former Middlesex Quarter Sessions, now integrated into the framework. The dissolution marked the end of Middlesex as an administrative entity, with its former areas losing separate county status while retaining ceremonial and postal references in some contexts.

Criticisms of Administrative Abolition

The abolition of Middlesex County Council in 1965 and its integration into the (GLC) drew criticism for eroding the county's distinct historical identity, which dated back over 1,300 years as a geographic and cultural entity separate from proper. Campaigners and local historians contended that subsuming Middlesex's outer areas into a metropolitan authority diluted parochial attachments, with residents increasingly identifying as Londoners rather than Middlesex folk, as reflected in the disappearance of county signage and postal references post-reform. This cultural shift prompted the formation of preservation groups, such as the Middlesex Federation of Clubs and Societies, dedicated to affirming the county's enduring geographic reality despite administrative dissolution, underscoring empirical resistance to the perceived erasure. Administratively, detractors highlighted how the GLC's centralized structure fostered and inefficiency compared to the more localized , which had managed suburban needs with fewer layers of oversight. The GLC's top-down planning often prioritized uniform metropolitan policies over tailored local initiatives, leading to delays in infrastructure projects like road improvements in former Middlesex boroughs, where decision-making bottlenecks arose from coordinating across 32 diverse authorities. Audits and ary reviews post-1965 revealed elevated administrative costs under the GLC, attributed to duplicated functions between the council and boroughs, contrasting with the leaner pre-abolition model; these inefficiencies contributed to the GLC's own abolition in 1986 amid fiscal critiques. While advocates of abolition, including the 1962 Herbert Commission, promoted unified to address London's sprawl, reveals over-centralization stifled responsive local , as evidenced by persistent borough-level complaints of vetoed parochial schemes under GLC hegemony. This pattern of metropolitan dominance echoed broader trends where centralized reforms inadvertently hampered sub-regional autonomy, with former Middlesex areas experiencing fragmented service delivery until further experiments.

Political and Constitutional History

Earldom and Noble Associations

The Earldom of Middlesex was first created in the on 17 September 1622 for Lionel Cranfield, a merchant who rose to become Lord Treasurer under James I, having been elevated to Baron Cranfield in 1621 and Viscount Cranfield earlier that year. Cranfield's elevation reflected his financial expertise in reforming customs and crown revenues, though his career ended in by in 1624 for and overreach. The title passed to his son James Cranfield, 2nd (died 1651), and then to another son, Lionel Cranfield, 3rd (1625–1674), who died without male issue on 26 October 1674, causing the earldom's initial extinction. A second creation occurred on 5 October 1675, reviving the earldom alongside the barony of Cranfield for Charles Sackville (1643–1706), grandson of the first earl through his daughter Frances Cranfield's marriage to Lionel Cranfield, Earl of Dorset. Sackville, who succeeded as 6th Earl of Dorset in 1677, held the Middlesex title as a honor within the Sackville family, which controlled extensive estates but maintained limited direct feudal oversight in itself, a increasingly dominated by royal and urban interests rather than traditional shire earldoms. The revived earldom persisted through Sackville heirs, including dukedoms of Dorset, until its final extinction in 1843 upon the death without male heirs of John Frederick Sackville, 3rd and 4th Earl of Middlesex. These peerages, though named for Middlesex, functioned primarily as personal dignities rather than instruments of territorial governance, underscoring the county's anomalous status under direct crown influence since the , with noble ties manifesting more through scattered manor holdings than comprehensive feudal lordship. For instance, family interests intersected with Middlesex manors via and marriage alliances, shaping localized by enforcing customs and practices that prioritized aristocratic revenue over peasant tenures. Empirical records from manorial courts indicate such noble involvement stabilized tenure patterns amid London's expansion, though without evidence of systematic for county-wide like early canals, which relied more on mercantile syndicates.

Key Elections and Controversies

In the 1768 , was elected as one of two Members of for Middlesex, representing a constituency of influential freeholders proximate to whose votes carried weight in national politics. His prior publication of The North Briton No. 45 in 1763, which critiqued King George III's speech and defended press freedoms against government suppression, had led to his 1764 expulsion from on charges of , establishing him as a symbol of resistance to arbitrary executive and parliamentary power. On 3 February 1769, the again expelled Wilkes, citing seditious and obscene libels, despite his election by Middlesex voters, thereby prioritizing its internal judgment over the electorate's expressed preference. This sparked the Middlesex election crisis, with Wilkes re-elected unopposed in February and March 1769 by-elections. A contested poll on 13 April 1769 saw Wilkes secure 1,143 votes against Henry Lawes Luttrell's 296, yet the , invoking its privilege to determine member eligibility, seated Luttrell on 15 April by a 197-143 vote, disregarding the majority will of Middlesex electors. Further by-elections in June and September 1769 repeated this pattern, with Wilkes winning but Luttrell retained, fueling petitions signed by thousands of Middlesex voters and public unrest that challenged Parliament's authority to override electoral outcomes on non-constitutional grounds. The crisis underscored a core constitutional tension: the electorate's right to select representatives versus Parliament's self-asserted to expel or disqualify based on perceived moral failings or prior publications, a Wilkes defended as essential to and limiting elite control over representation. Rather than mere factional strife, it exposed causal flaws in unchecked , where the body claimed superior judgment over constituents it purported to represent, eroding the foundational logic of elected accountability without judicial or voter recourse. Wilkes's persistence elevated demands for , influencing later reforms by highlighting how such interventions alienated from legislative power. The addressed longstanding franchise restrictions in counties like Middlesex by enfranchising male copyholders, long-term leaseholders, and £10 household occupiers while retaining 40-shilling freeholders, thereby expanding the electorate beyond traditional rural landowners to include emerging urban middle classes amid London's suburban growth. This shifted Middlesex's political influence from predominantly agrarian freeholder dominance to broader representation of industrialized and commercial interests, with the Act standardizing qualifications and registering voters to curb prior abuses like . Though not creating new seats for Middlesex, the changes amplified its voice in parliamentary debates on metropolitan issues, reflecting empirical pressures from rather than abstract equity.

Role in National Politics

Prior to the , Middlesex functioned as a county constituency returning two Members of Parliament, with an estimated electorate of over 8,000 qualified freeholders by the , one of the largest in due to its proximity to and agricultural freehold base. This substantial voter pool compelled MPs to align with metropolitan radical sentiments, including advocacy for retrenchment, anti-slavery measures, and parliamentary reform, thereby exerting pressure on national debates over electoral corruption in smaller, less representative boroughs. Instances of local administrative exposure, such as prosecutions against corrupt county officials in , underscored Middlesex's role in highlighting systemic issues that fueled broader anti-corruption campaigns leading to the 1832 changes. The Reform Act divided Middlesex into Northern and Southern divisions, each electing one MP starting in December 1832, accommodating population growth and enabling more granular representation of its urbanizing districts. Further redistributions under the created additional constituencies, expanding to seven by 1918, which amplified Middlesex's parliamentary footprint and allowed MPs' voting records to reflect diverse local interests in national legislation on , labor, and . Middlesex radicals contributed to Chartism's national push for democratic expansion, with activity in its working-class enclaves near supporting mass petitions in 1839 (1.28 million signatures), 1842 (over 3.3 million), and 1848, where metropolitan districts including Middlesex bolstered signature drives despite parliamentary rejection. This participation, rooted in industrial discontent, helped sustain Chartism's pressure on franchise extension, though causal impact was limited by the movement's ultimate fragmentation. Local involvement extended to women's suffrage, as Middlesex residents endorsed early petitions like the 1866 document presented by , which amassed about 1,500 signatures nationwide, including from London-area addresses in the county, marking an initial organized challenge to gender-based disenfranchisement. After , suburban expansion in Middlesex fostered conservative electoral trends, with middle-class commuters prioritizing stability; interwar constituencies such as , Harrow, and consistently returned Conservative MPs, whose voting aligned with national policies on and fiscal restraint, moderating prewar radical legacies amid economic volatility. This shift, evident in 1920s and 1930s majorities, reflected causal links between demographic growth and tempered progressivism, influencing coalition dynamics in .

Economic Development

Agricultural Foundations

In the medieval period, Middlesex agriculture relied on the prevalent across much of , featuring communal arable strips dedicated to cereals including , , and oats, interspersed with pastures for such as and sheep. This system supported practices suited to the county's clay and soils, with crop rotations maintaining basic fertility through fallowing and manuring. The meadows, rich in alluvial deposits, specialized in hay production and seasonal , providing essential that sustained over winter and contributed to dairy output for local markets. Parliamentary enclosure acts from the mid-18th century onward transformed this landscape by consolidating scattered holdings into compact farms, enabling innovations like hedgerow planting, drainage, and that boosted crop yields and . In Middlesex, such enclosures were initially infrequent but accelerated post-1750, with examples like the 1806 act illustrating how larger farm units displaced smaller copyholders while facilitating market-oriented farming, including intensified wheat cultivation documented in contemporary surveys. maps from the 1840s, such as that of , reveal post-enclosure field patterns emphasizing arable , with apportioned lands reflecting higher output per acre compared to open-field inefficiencies. The county's , derived from glacial clays and riverine sediments, underpinned these developments by enabling surplus production that sustained early population densities and fed London's expansion, as evidenced by consistent yields in pre-industrial records linking arable output to urban provisioning. This natural advantage, rather than solely , provided the causal foundation for agricultural resilience, allowing Middlesex to transition from subsistence to commercial farming without widespread fertility collapse seen elsewhere in medieval .

Industrialization and Suburban Growth

The marked a profound economic transformation in Middlesex, transitioning from rural enclaves to centers of industry and suburban expansion, propelled by private enterprise and infrastructural innovations. Key sectors included , with Fuller's Griffin Brewery in , established in the late , undergoing significant modernization and output growth amid rising demand from London's population boom; by the mid-, it exemplified the shift to larger-scale production using steam power and improved malting techniques. Printing presses proliferated in locales like and , capitalizing on Middlesex's adjacency to London's hub, while works emerged to service emerging needs, including coach-making firms that adapted to rail competition by specializing in lighter vehicles like dog-carts from the early 1800s. These developments reflected causal drivers such as market proximity and , with minimal early regulatory interference enabling rapid scaling. Railway construction accelerated this shift, commencing with the London and Birmingham Railway's authorization in 1833 and partial opening through Middlesex by 1838, linking Euston to and fostering the first commuter patterns into . Subsequent lines, including the Great Western Railway's extension westward, created commuter belts in areas like Harrow and , where private companies invested heavily during the 1840s , spurring residential development and daily wage-earner travel; by 1863, the further integrated northern Middlesex suburbs, directly attributing population surges to enhanced connectivity. This infrastructure, built predominantly by joint-stock enterprises, underscored prosperity through voluntary investment rather than state directive, though later parliamentary oversight introduced delays and costs that critics argued hampered efficiency. Occupational data from censuses illustrate the pivot: while outer parishes retained notable agricultural into the early 1800s, by 1881 agriculture had marginalized as a job source in sampled Middlesex parishes, supplanted by , , and domestic service roles amid ; the 1901 census recorded further diversification, with and communications employing over 10% of males, reflecting rail-enabled and industrial clustering. This evolution, peaking pre-1914, yielded sustained wealth generation via enterprise-led urbanization, unencumbered initially by expansive bureaucracies that later constrained peripheral growth.

Post-Abolition Economic Integration

Following the administrative abolition of in , its territories were largely incorporated into the (GLC) framework, facilitating economic absorption into the broader metropolitan economy dominated by finance, services, and infrastructure. Former Middlesex areas, particularly outer boroughs like (including ), Enfield, and Barnet, benefited from proximity to central London's markets while retaining suburban characteristics that supported , , and emerging . This integration aligned local economic activity with London's overall expansion, where the capital's contribution to GDP rose from approximately 19.6% in 1998 to 23.7% by 2019, reflecting sustained post-war growth trajectories that encompassed outer zones without evidence of a sharp discontinuity at the 1965 boundary change. In , encompassing key former Middlesex locales such as and Hayes, economic continuity manifested through aviation dominance via , which generated substantial —ranking the among London's top job providers by 2021, with airport operations as the primary driver. Post-1965 developments included vinyl record production and brickmaking legacies evolving into and tech-adjacent sectors, bolstered by institutions like Brunel University fostering innovation. has positioned itself as a potential tech hub within , with local strategies emphasizing digital and knowledge-based industries to leverage metropolitan connectivity, including finance-related jobs numbering over 5,000 in the vicinity by 2025. rates in such areas remained robust, with 's 68.2% rate for ages 16-64 in 2023 aligning with London's outer averages, underscoring adaptive integration rather than stagnation. However, the transition to GLC oversight introduced critiques of diluted local autonomy, as strategic metropolitan planning often prioritized inner-city or cross-borough initiatives over tailored outer-suburban s, potentially dampening borough-specific enterprise incentives. Academic analyses highlight tensions in suburbs, where centralized GLC policies from 1965 to 1986 created backlash against overridden local priorities, contributing to perceptions of economic disconnects that favored uniformity over nuanced county-level responsiveness. The GLC's dissolution in 1986 devolved powers to boroughs, yet the prior era's structure arguably constrained localized fiscal tools for stimulating independent growth in former Middlesex enclaves, with some observers noting persistent challenges in attracting non-aviation amid metropolitan competition.

Culture and Community

Heraldry, Flag, and Symbols

The coat of arms of the Middlesex County Council was granted by the College of Arms on 7 November 1910. It features a red (gules) field charged with three silver (argent) seaxes—traditional Saxon short swords—with golden (or) hilts and pommels, arranged horizontally (fessewise) with points to the sinister, and a golden Saxon crown in the center chief. The seaxes derive from ancient emblems associated with the Saxon kingdoms of Middlesex and Essex, while the Saxon crown was added in 1909 to distinguish Middlesex's design from Essex's identical three-seaxes motif. This heraldic achievement symbolized the county's Anglo-Saxon heritage and was used officially until the council's abolition in 1965. The of Middlesex is the of these arms, consisting of the red field with the three white seaxes, gold hilts, and gold Saxon crown replicated across vertical stripes. Registered with the on its traditional adoption date of 7 November 1910, the has persisted in ceremonial and heritage contexts post-1965, including display at civic and historic sites such as the . Despite the administrative dissolution of the county, it continues to represent Middlesex identity in non-official settings, underscoring historical continuity over modern boundaries. In 2002, the conservation charity Plantlife designated the wood anemone () as the county flower of Middlesex through a public survey aimed at highlighting native and threats. This spring-blooming perennial, with white star-shaped flowers, evokes the wooded landscapes that once characterized much of the historic county before suburban expansion. The selection reflects empirical associations with Middlesex's pre-industrial ecology rather than formal civic adoption, and it serves as a symbolic emblem in heritage discussions.

Literature, Arts, and Folklore

documented Middlesex extensively in his A Tour Thro' the Whole Island of (1724–1726), with Letters V and VI focusing on London's suburbs and the county's environs, highlighting rapid urbanization and agricultural transitions near the metropolis. He critiqued the landscape's uniformity, describing much of Middlesex as visually unappealing amid and building sprawl. Virginia Woolf, residing in historical Middlesex locales such as 22 (1882–1904) and 46 (1905–1907), drew from the county's urban fabric in works like (1925), which evokes Westminster and adjacent areas' rhythms and social strata. Her essays, including those in The London Scene (1975 compilation), reflect on the Thames-side suburbs' evolving character, blending observation with stream-of-consciousness prose. In the performing arts, Middlesex hosted music halls emblematic of Victorian entertainment, such as the Middlesex Music Hall on (opened 1836 as the Mogul Saloon), which featured variety acts, comedy, and songs until its 1930s decline amid cinema competition. Suburban venues like the Compass Theatre in (capacity 158 seats) continue amateur and community productions, rooted in the county's post-war cultural persistence. Middlesex encompasses rural legends and spectral tales, as cataloged in compilations like Tales of Old Middlesex (2007), which draws on oral traditions of haunted heaths (e.g., ) and ancient earthworks such as , attributed to pre-Roman or spectral origins in local lore. These narratives, often tied to boundary markers and sightings, reflect the county's transition from agrarian isolation to metropolitan absorption, preserved through ballads and antiquarian records rather than widespread literary canonization.

Sports and Recreation

Middlesex's sports landscape emphasized cricket and other pastimes that reinforced community ties during the county's urbanization from the 19th century onward, as population growth in areas like Enfield and Wembley spurred local clubs and events to channel recreational energies. These activities provided structured outlets amid industrial expansion, with county-affiliated organizations drawing participants from suburban districts. Middlesex County Cricket Club, founded on 2 February 1864 at the London Tavern by local gentlemen, stands as the county's flagship sporting body. The club secured —located in , historically within Middlesex—as its permanent home starting in June 1877 via an arrangement with the , enabling consistent fixtures and development. Over its tenure, the club has garnered recognition for competitive prowess, including County Championship titles in years such as 1947 and 1976, reflecting sustained excellence in . Rugby union featured prominently through clubs like , established in 1867 with its inaugural formal assembly at the Eton and Middlesex Tavern in . The team historically engaged in county competitions, securing the Middlesex Sevens trophy multiple times, including in 1948, which highlighted its role in regional tournaments. In , non-league outfits such as , formed in August 1893 as Enfield Spartans in the North Middlesex area, embodied grassroots traditions with participation in leagues like the post-World War I. Greyhound racing at commenced in 1927, hosting thrice-weekly meetings that sustained the venue financially and attracted crowds for events like the Wembley Spring Stakes, continuing until the track's removal in 1998.

Military Units and Contributions

The , designated the Duke of Cambridge's Own, served as a primary unit associated with the historic county from its formal establishment in 1881 until amalgamation in 1966. It participated in the Second Boer War (1899–1902), with elements sustaining minimal recorded losses of approximately one killed and nine wounded, as noted in General Buller's despatches of November 1900. During the First World War, the regiment endured severe attrition, including over 650 casualties in the 16th Battalion's assault at Mash Valley near Ovillers on 1 July 1916 during the ; overall, it recorded 12,270 fatalities across its battalions. In the Second , Middlesex's proximity to and key infrastructure positioned it as a focal point for home defense, leading to the formation of multiple battalions affiliated with the , such as the 12th (headquartered in ) and 30th (in Enfield). These units, numbering in the thousands locally, trained at sites like —the first training school—and focused on anti-invasion roles, leveraging the county's strategic vulnerability to airborne and coastal threats. Following the county's administrative abolition in 1965, the regiment's lineage persisted through amalgamation on 31 December 1966 into the , incorporating traditions and battle honors from Middlesex units. Territorial elements, including the 5th Battalion, contributed to volunteer formations like the 5th (Volunteer) Battalion of the , maintaining regional ties despite structural changes.

Legacy and Modern Recognition

Ceremonial and Postal Persistence

Despite the administrative abolition of Middlesex in 1965 under the London Government Act, the county persisted as a recognized postal subdivision for Royal Mail operations. Royal Mail maintained Middlesex on its official list of postal counties for mail sorting and addressing long after 1965, dividing delivery areas geographically even as administrative boundaries shifted. This system supported the inclusion of "Middlesex" (often abbreviated as "Middx") in postal addresses for former county locations, such as Teddington and Greenford, facilitating efficient routing until the full implementation of postcode-based sorting diminished the need for county identifiers. The postal county designation endured into the 1990s, with voluntary use in addresses reported into the early 2000s, countering claims of complete erasure by preserving practical utility. Ceremonial roles tied to Middlesex, such as the Lord-Lieutenancy and , were formally discontinued in 1965 with the establishment of , transferring responsibilities to the new entity. However, the county's historical framework influenced ongoing honors within , where the performs functions like presenting awards and representing the Crown in former Middlesex territories, maintaining indirect ceremonial continuity. Similarly, elements of sheriff duties persist under the of , who upholds traditions originating from Middlesex's . These non-administrative vestiges, alongside postal remnants, demonstrate that while structures dissolved, Middlesex's identity retained functional and symbolic roles, challenging narratives of total obsolescence.

Revival Campaigns and Heritage Efforts

Following the abolition of the Middlesex in , various groups have advocated for renewed official recognition of the historic , emphasizing its enduring cultural and ceremonial identity rather than full administrative restoration. Middlesex Heritage, a campaign group, in May 2023 urged King Charles III to endorse the county's revival by supporting the appointment of a dedicated lord-lieutenant, arguing that such a step would affirm Middlesex's 1,300-year history and counter its effective erasure from official maps. The Campaign for Historic Counties has similarly promoted Middlesex's retention as a geographic and identity entity, contending that the reforms targeted only the short-lived (established 1889) and not the ancient itself, which predates modern and persists in local loyalties. Proponents of these efforts highlight benefits such as restoring community cohesion and decentralizing identity from the unitary , aligning with principles of local governance over centralized uniformity; critics, however, dismiss revival as administratively unfeasible given integrated infrastructure and population shifts post-1965. Achievements include the establishment of Middlesex Day on 16 May, commemorating the 1811 where the Middlesex Regiment's stand earned it the "Die-Hards" nickname, with annual observances promoting county pride through events, flags, and ary motions since at least the early . The Association of British Counties and Middlesex have supported archival preservation and heritage , maintaining of pre-1965 institutions to sustain historical continuity amid urban expansion. These initiatives reflect a broader push for historic counties' ceremonial status, as evidenced by persistent postal and sporting usages, though empirical data on public support remains limited to anecdotal surveys and petition signatories rather than comprehensive polling.

County Identity in Contemporary Society

In areas formerly comprising Middlesex, such as parts of Hillingdon, Enfield, and Barnet, residual attachments to the county's identity persist through informal preferences for historic nomenclature over modern London borough designations. For instance, residents in towns like Uxbridge and Ruislip often refer to their locations as being in Middlesex rather than Greater London, reflecting a cultural resistance to complete assimilation into the metropolitan identity. This preference underscores a lingering sense of local distinctiveness, evidenced by the maintenance of "Middlesex" in some postal addresses and signage, including a 2014 sign in Barnet explicitly marking the "County of Middlesex." Heritage sites like , located in historic Middlesex territory within the London Borough of , continue to draw tourists interested in the county's pre-1965 legacy, with annual visitors engaging with its gardens and interiors that evoke the area's rural and aristocratic past. Such sustains awareness of Middlesex's boundaries and history, countering the erosion of sub-regional identities within London's expansive urban fabric. Broader societal analyses suggest that the dilution of historical identities, including Middlesex, contributes to social fragmentation in megacities by weakening communal ties rooted in shared geographic heritage. Reports indicate that locally rooted populations express concern over disappearing traditional identities, correlating with increased disconnection and tensions in urban settings. This resistance to full London-centric assimilation may foster pockets of cultural continuity, potentially mitigating some aspects of and alienation prevalent in densely populated conurbations.

References

  1. https://www.etymonline.com/word/Middlesex
  2. https://middlesexheritage.org/middlesex-history/
  3. https://www.londonlives.org/static/MiddlesexLocalGovernment.jsp
  4. https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-27140505
  5. https://libraryblog.lbrut.org.uk/2017/02/middlesex/
  6. https://kingfishervisitorguides.com/features/history-and-heritage-of-middlesex/
  7. https://www.historyfiles.co.uk/KingListsBritain/EnglandMiddlesex.htm
  8. https://www.historyfiles.co.uk/FeaturesBritain/EnglandMerciaHidage01.htm
  9. https://asc.jebbo.co.uk/a/a-L.html
  10. http://www.domesdaybook.co.uk/middlesex.html
  11. https://ia600203.us.archive.org/4/items/middlesexinbriti00shar/middlesexinbriti00shar.pdf
  12. https://www.harrow.gov.uk/planning-developments/archaeological-priority-areas-scheduled-ancient-monuments
  13. https://www.prehistoricsociety.org/sites/prehistoricsociety.org/files/resources/ps-signpost_river-thames.pdf
  14. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-23609994
  15. https://www.british-history.ac.uk/vch/middx/vol1/pp64-74
  16. https://opendomesday.org/county/middlesex/
  17. https://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/place/17431
  18. https://maps.nls.uk/os/25inch-england-and-wales/middlesex.html
  19. https://www.britannica.com/place/Middlesex-historical-county
  20. https://www.victorianweb.org/science/geology/smith3.html
  21. http://www.hhgs.org.uk/Local_clay_sand_gravel.pdf
  22. https://www.walkingenglishman.com/lists/countytopsengland/middlesex.html
  23. https://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/unit/10073790/theme/POP
  24. https://www.princeton.edu/~reddings/pubpapers/MMM-QJE-2020.pdf
  25. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0094119021000723
  26. https://www.ons.gov.uk/census/2011census/2011censusdata/censusdata18011991
  27. https://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/unit/10061441/theme/POP
  28. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/20040301_gateways.pdf
  29. https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/help-with-your-research/research-guides/medieval-financial-records-pipe-rolls-1130-1300/
  30. https://www.highsheriffofgreaterlondon.com/the-role/
  31. https://wikishire.co.uk/wiki/History_of_Middlesex
  32. https://kids.kiddle.co/Tower_division
  33. http://www.medievalgenealogy.org.uk/guide/pip.shtml
  34. https://www.genguide.co.uk/source/quarter-session-records-crime-criminals-courts/
  35. https://www.londonlives.org/static/Pretrial.jsp
  36. https://bristoluniversitypressdigital.com/display/book/9781447325888/ch016.pdf
  37. https://www.thelondonarchives.org/your-research/research-guides/criminal-court-cases-middlesex-sessions-up-to-1889
  38. https://www.familysearch.org/en/wiki/England_Quarter_Session_Records
  39. https://manyheadedmonster.com/2022/09/05/englands-quarter-sessions-records-online-and-in-print/
  40. https://archive.org/details/middlesexcountyr00grea
  41. https://evanevanstours.com/blog/london-gin-craze-history/
  42. https://www.londonlives.org/static/PS.jsp
  43. http://ndl.ethernet.edu.et/bitstream/123456789/23076/1/240.pdf.pdf
  44. https://www.historyofparliamentonline.org/volume/1790-1820/constituencies/middlesex
  45. https://www.facebook.com/groups/446783695525873/posts/1638010519736512/
  46. https://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/chadwick-poor-law-commissioners-report-of-1834
  47. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Vict/18-19/120
  48. https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1855/mar/16/metropolitan-local-management
  49. https://www.sciencemuseum.org.uk/objects-and-stories/medicine/cholera-victorian-london
  50. https://atom.aim25.com/index.php/mcc-middlesex-county-council-x-middlesex-county-council-31
  51. https://supremecourt.uk/about-the-building/history
  52. https://www.wilcuma.org.uk/middlesex-after-1066/the-establishment-of-county-council-administration/
  53. https://atom.aim25.com/index.php/informationobject/browse?view=table&subjects=120852&sortDir=desc&sort=lastUpdated&sf_culture=en&topLod=0
  54. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1963/33
  55. https://www.education-uk.org/documents/acts/1963-london-government-act.html
  56. https://www.familysearch.org/en/wiki/Middlesex_Archives_and_Libraries
  57. https://www.ons.gov.uk/file?uri=/aboutus/transparencyandgovernance/freedomofinformationfoi/populationdataforthehomecountiesmiddlesexandthecountyoflondon1889to1965/middlesexlondongovernmentact1963.doc
  58. https://monarchies.fandom.com/wiki/Middlesex
  59. https://londonist.com/london/history/does-middlesex-still-exist
  60. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/royal-family/2023/05/16/middlesex-historic-county-king-charles-lord-lieutenant/
  61. https://middlesexheritage.org/
  62. https://hansard.parliament.uk/Commons/1962-02-19/debates/703b0cad-d4c6-436f-bdb2-dab895494594/LondonGovernment
  63. https://www.london.gov.uk/media/8844/download
  64. https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/63374/1/Kockan_London_Government_50_Years_of_Debate.pdf
  65. https://www.jstor.org/stable/587817
  66. https://lgiu.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/LGIU%4040-For-the-Future-of-Local-Government.pdf
  67. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Lionel-Cranfield-1st-earl-of-Middlesex
  68. https://www.historyofparliamentonline.org/volume/1604-1629/member/cranfield-sir-lionel-1575-1645
  69. https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803095645898
  70. https://www.westminster-abbey.org/abbey-commemorations/commemorations/lionel-cranfield-earl-of-middlesex/
  71. https://www.thepeerage.com/p22901.htm
  72. https://www.parliament.uk/about/living-heritage/evolutionofparliament/houseofcommons/reformacts/overview/wilkeslib1/
  73. https://historyofparliament.com/2019/04/04/the-will-of-the-people-the-middlesex-elections-of-1769/
  74. https://www.parliament.uk/about/living-heritage/evolutionofparliament/houseofcommons/reformacts/from-the-parliamentary-collections/wilkes1/wilkes5/
  75. https://www.parliament.uk/about/living-heritage/evolutionofparliament/houseofcommons/reformacts/overview/reformact1832/
  76. https://www.historyofparliamentonline.org/volume/1820-1832/survey/ix-english-reform-legislation
  77. https://www.historyofparliamentonline.org/volume/1820-1832/constituencies/middlesex
  78. https://membersafter1832.historyofparliamentonline.org/constituencies/907
  79. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/social-science-history/article/what-did-chartism-petition-for-mass-petitions-in-the-british-movement-for-democracy/6F808F114F20844C22B16B6AAD955F49
  80. https://www.parliament.uk/globalassets/documents/parliamentary-archives/1866SuffragePetitionNamesWebJune16.pdf
  81. https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-7529/
  82. https://www.tha-engliscan-gesithas.org.uk/the-open-fields-of-england/
  83. https://bahs.org.uk/AGHR/ARTICLES/36n1a6.pdf
  84. https://www.bahs.org.uk/AGHR/ARTICLES/28n2a3.pdf
  85. https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/download/f3a4d313b47b3eeb49e93439c7faf2b5ceb0aa5342f8cb7c57c9ef2716f61033/18686851/Carter-Enclosure_resistance_mdx.phd..pdf
  86. https://chiswicktimeline.org/1847-tithe-map-chiswick/
  87. https://www.bahs.org.uk/AGHR/ARTICLES/45n2a1.pdf
  88. https://www.fullersbrewery.co.uk/pages/our-story
  89. https://www.british-history.ac.uk/vch/middx/vol2/pp193-195
  90. https://www.campop.geog.cam.ac.uk/research/occupations/outputs/preliminary/dissertationmodha.pdf
  91. https://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/census/EW1901GEN/7
  92. https://data.london.gov.uk/blog/londons-economic-activity-1998-2019/
  93. https://www.londonchamber.co.uk/LCCI_Media/LCCI/Media/Reports/London-s-Economy-Summary.pdf
  94. https://www.ons.gov.uk/visualisations/labourmarketlocal/E09000017/
  95. https://www.futureoflondon.org.uk/news/uxbridge-metropolitan-centre/
  96. https://www.glassdoor.co.uk/Job/uxbridge-finance-jobs-SRCH_IL.0%2C8_IC3283577_KO9%2C16.htm
  97. https://www.hillingdon.gov.uk/article/12759/Invest-in-Hillingdon
  98. https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/61549/1/Holman_backlash_in_the_london_suburbs.pdf
  99. https://www.lse.ac.uk/geography-and-environment/research/lse-london/documents/Archive/HEIF-2/Jerry-W.pdf
  100. https://www.flaginstitute.org/wp/flags/middlesex-flag/
  101. https://www.crwflags.com/fotw/flags/gb-e-msx.html
  102. https://britishcountyflags.com/2013/06/30/middlesex-flag/
  103. http://blog.appletonstudios.com/2025/10/middlesex-coat-of-arms-inside-supreme.html
  104. https://flowercolouruk.wordpress.com/county-flowers/
  105. https://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/travellers/Defoe/18
  106. https://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/travellers/Defoe/21
  107. https://engelsbergideas.com/essays/daniel-defoes-journeys-of-the-mind/
  108. https://virginiawoolfsociety.org.uk/resources/where-virginia-woolf-lived-in-london/
  109. https://www.britishlibrary.cn/en/articles/virginia-woolfs-london/
  110. https://londonist.com/2014/08/virginia-woolfs-london
  111. https://www.londonmuseum.org.uk/collections/v/object-731104/middlesex-music-hall/
  112. https://www.epilonian.com/product/6323/Tales-of-Old-Middlesex
  113. https://britishfolklore.com/grims-ditch/
  114. https://countrysidebooks.co.uk/products/tales-of-old-middlesex
  115. https://www.middlesexccc.com/page/history
  116. https://www.lords.org/lords/our-history/father-time-wall/1877-middlesex-county-cricket-club-make-lord-s-the
  117. https://www.middlesexccc.com/page/about-middlesex
  118. http://www.rugbyfootballhistory.com/wasps.html
  119. https://www.wasps.co.uk/your-club/club-history/
  120. https://www.bbc.co.uk/london/content/articles/2008/09/05/nl_enfield1893_feature.shtml
  121. https://stories.wembleystadium.com/100-history-making-moments-part-one/index.html
  122. https://greyhoundracinghistory.co.uk/tracks/english-licensed-greyhound-tracks/london-wembley/
  123. https://www.nam.ac.uk/explore/middlesex-regiment-duke-cambridges-own
  124. https://www.angloboerwar.com/unit-information/imperial-units/573-middlesex-regiment
  125. https://somme1916.wordpress.com/2015/12/16/middlesex-regiment-on-the-somme/
  126. https://4thmiddlesex.wordpress.com/
  127. https://www.wartimememoriesproject.com/ww2/allied/battalion.php?pid=7553
  128. https://www.wartimememoriesproject.com/ww2/allied/battalion.php?pid=7571
  129. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z5nGNKhhmDA
  130. https://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item/object/30070281
  131. https://www.queensregimentalassociation.org/media/the-middlesex-regiment.pdf
  132. https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-10853705
  133. https://teddington.nub.news/news/local-news/why-is-middlesex-still-in-teddington-addresses
  134. https://www.reddit.com/r/london/comments/1jjlxff/why_did_we_write_middlesex_on_letters_if_it_hasnt/
  135. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-10825499
  136. https://greaterlondonlieutenancy.com/about-us/our-history/
  137. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2008/may/30/1
  138. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12092129/King-Charles-urged-return-historic-county-Middlesex-wiped-maps-1965.html
  139. https://realcounties.com/
  140. https://www.facebook.com/RealCounties/posts/why-middlesexday-when-middlesex-was-abolished-in-1965middlesex-was-not-abolished/1011761564440744/
  141. https://realcounties.com/official-statements/
  142. https://edm.parliament.uk/early-day-motion/22809/middlesex-day
  143. https://abcounties.com/news/middlesex-day-16th-may-2025/
  144. https://middlesexheritage.org/middlesex-day-16th-may/
  145. https://thelondonweekly.net/culture/4231-campaign-to-restore-middlesex-county-council-urges-king-charles-ii-s-support
  146. https://www.mylondon.news/news/west-london-news/huge-list-london-towns-lots-18656189
  147. https://secretldn.com/syon-house-and-park-guide/
  148. https://moreincommon.org.uk/media/x2pb3ypk/shattered-britain-executive-summary.pdf
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.