Hubbry Logo
Fox huntingFox huntingMain
Open search
Fox hunting
Community hub
Fox hunting
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Fox hunting
Fox hunting
from Wikipedia

Master of foxhounds leads the field from Powderham Castle in Devon, England.

Fox hunting is an activity involving the tracking, chase and, if caught, the killing of a fox, normally a red fox, by trained foxhounds or other scent hounds. A group of unarmed followers, led by a "master of foxhounds" (or "master of hounds"), follow the hounds on foot or on horseback.[1]

Fox hunting with hounds, as a formalised activity, originated in England in the sixteenth century, in a form very similar to that practised until February 2005, when a law banning the activity in England and Wales came into force.[2] A ban on hunting in Scotland had been passed in 2002, but it continues to be within the law in Northern Ireland and several other jurisdictions, including Australia, Canada, France, Ireland and the United States.[3][4]

The sport is controversial, particularly in the United Kingdom. Proponents of fox hunting view it as an important part of rural culture and useful for reasons of conservation and pest control,[5][6][7][better source needed] while opponents argue it is cruel and unnecessary.[8]

History

[edit]

The use of scenthounds to track prey dates back to Assyrian, Babylonian, and ancient Egyptian times, and was known as venery.[9]

Europe

[edit]
The Fox Hunt, Alexandre-François Desportes, France, 1720

Many Greek- and Roman-influenced countries have long traditions of hunting with hounds. Hunting with Agassaei [d] hounds was popular in Celtic Britain, even before the Romans arrived, introducing the Castorian and Fulpine hound breeds which they used to hunt.[10] Norman hunting traditions were brought to Britain when William the Conqueror arrived, along with the Gascon and Talbot hounds.

Foxes were referred to as beasts of the chase by medieval times, along with the red deer (hart & hind), martens, and roes,[11] but the earliest known attempt to hunt a fox with hounds was in Norfolk, England, in 1534, where farmers began chasing foxes down with their dogs for the purpose of pest control.[10] The last wolf in England was killed in the late 15th century during the reign of Henry VII, leaving the English fox with no threat from larger predators. The first use of packs specifically trained to hunt foxes was in the late 1600s, with the oldest fox hunt being, probably, the Bilsdale in Yorkshire.[12]

By the end of the seventeenth century, deer hunting was in decline. The inclosure acts brought fences to separate formerly open land into many smaller fields, deer forests were being cut down, and arable land was increasing.[13] With the onset of the Industrial Revolution, people began to move out of the country and into towns and cities to find work. Roads, railway lines, and canals all split hunting countries,[14] but at the same time they made hunting accessible to more people. Shotguns were improved during the nineteenth century and the shooting of gamebirds became more popular.[13] Fox hunting developed further in the eighteenth century when Hugo Meynell developed breeds of hound and horse to address the new geography of rural England.[13]

In Germany, hunting with hounds (which tended to be deer or boar hunting) was first banned on the initiative of Hermann Göring on 3 July 1934.[15] In 1939, the ban was extended to cover Austria after Germany's annexation of the country. Bernd Ergert, the director of Germany's hunting museum in Munich, said of the ban, "The aristocrats were understandably furious, but they could do nothing about the ban given the totalitarian nature of the regime."[15]

United States

[edit]

According to the Masters of Foxhounds Association of America, Englishman Robert Brooke was the first man to import hunting hounds to what is now the United States, bringing his pack of foxhounds to Maryland in 1650, along with his horses.[16] Also around this time, numbers of European red foxes were introduced into the Eastern seaboard of North America for hunting.[17][18] The first organised hunt for the benefit of a group (rather than a single patron) was started by Thomas, sixth Lord Fairfax in 1747.[16] In the United States, George Washington and Thomas Jefferson both kept packs of foxhounds before and after the American Revolutionary War.[19][20]

Australia

[edit]

In Australia, the European red fox was introduced solely for the purpose of fox hunting in 1855.[21] Native animal populations have been very badly affected, with the extinction of at least 10 species attributed to the spread of foxes.[21] Fox hunting with hounds is mainly practised in the east of Australia. In the state of Victoria there are thirteen hunts, with more than 1000 members between them.[22] Fox hunting with hounds results in around 650 foxes being killed annually in Victoria,[22] compared with over 90,000 shot over a similar period in response to a State government bounty.[23] The Adelaide Hunt Club traces its origins to 1840, just a few years after the colonization of South Australia.

Current status

[edit]

United Kingdom

[edit]
The Rev. William Heathcote (1772–1802), on horseback (son of the 3rd Baronet); Sir William Heathcote of Hursley, 3rd Baronet (1746–1819), holding his horse and whip; and Major Vincent Hawkins Gilbert, M.F.H., holding a fox's head. The Heathcote's family seat was Hursley House. Daniel Gardner portrayed the three gentlemen on the hunt in 1790.

Fox hunting is prohibited in Great Britain by the Protection of Wild Mammals (Scotland) Act 2002 and the Hunting Act 2004 (England and Wales), passed under the ministry of Tony Blair, but remains legal in Northern Ireland.[24][25] The passing of the Hunting Act was notable in that it was implemented through the use of the Parliament Acts 1911 and 1949, after the House of Lords refused to pass the legislation, despite the Commons passing it by a majority of 356 to 166.[26]

After the ban on fox hunting, hunts in Great Britain switched to legal alternatives, such as drag hunting and trail hunting.[27][28] The Hunting Act 2004 also permits some previously unusual forms of hunting wild mammals with dogs to continue, such as "hunting... for the purpose of enabling a bird of prey to hunt the wild mammal".[29]

Opponents of hunting, such as the League Against Cruel Sports, claim that some of these alternatives are a smokescreen for illegal hunting or a means of circumventing the ban.[30] Hunting support group Countryside Alliance said in 2006 that there was anecdotal evidence that the number of foxes killed by hunts (unintentionally) and farmers had increased since the Hunting Act came into force, both by the hunts (through lawful methods) and landowners, and that more people were hunting with hounds (although killing foxes had become illegal).[31]

Tony Blair wrote in A Journey, his memoirs published in 2010, that the Hunting Act of 2004 is 'one of the domestic legislative measures I most regret'.[32]

United States

[edit]

In America, fox hunting is also called "fox chasing", as it is the practice of many hunts not to actually kill the fox (the red fox is not regarded as a significant pest).[16] Some hunts may go without catching a fox for several seasons, despite chasing two or more foxes in a single day's hunting.[33] Foxes are not pursued once they have "gone to ground" (hidden in a hole). American fox hunters undertake stewardship of the land, and endeavour to maintain fox populations and habitats as much as possible.[33] In many areas of the eastern United States the coyote, a natural predator of the red and grey fox, is becoming more prevalent and threatens fox populations in a hunt's given territory. In some areas, coyote are considered fair game when hunting with foxhounds, even if they are not the intended species being hunted.

In 2013, the Masters of Foxhounds Association of North America listed 163 registered packs in the US and Canada.[34] This number does not include non-registered (also known as "farmer" or "outlaw") packs.[33] Baily's Hunting Directory Lists 163 foxhound or draghound packs in the US and 11 in Canada[35] In some arid parts of the Western United States, where foxes in general are more difficult to locate, coyotes[36] are hunted and, in some cases, bobcats.[37]

Other countries

[edit]
Lithograph. Tourism travel poster issued 1922–1959 (approximate)

The other main countries in which organized fox hunting with hounds is practised are Ireland (which has 41 registered packs),[38] Australia, France (this hunting practice is also used for other animals such as deer, wild boar, fox, hare or rabbit), Canada and Italy. There is one pack of foxhounds in Portugal, and one in India. Although there are 32 packs for the hunting of foxes in France, hunting tends to take place mainly on a small scale and on foot, with mounted hunts tending to hunt red or roe deer, or wild boar.[39]

In Portugal fox hunting is permitted (Decree-Law no. 202/2004) but there have been popular protests[40] and initiatives to abolish it. A petition[41] was handed over to the Assembly of the Republic[42] on 18 May 2017 and the parliamentary hearing held in 2018.[43]

In Canada, the Masters of Foxhounds Association of North America lists seven registered hunt clubs in the province of Ontario, one in Quebec, and one in Nova Scotia.[44] Ontario issues licenses to registered hunt clubs, authorizing its members to pursue, chase or search for fox,[45] although the primary target of the hunts is coyotes.[46]

Quarry animals

[edit]

Red fox

[edit]
The red fox is the main quarry of European and North American fox hunts.

The red fox (Vulpes vulpes) is the normal prey animal of a fox hunt in the US and Europe. A small omnivorous predator,[47] the fox lives in burrows called earths,[48] and is predominantly active around twilight (making it a crepuscular animal).[49] Adult foxes tend to range around an area of between 5 and 15 km2 (2 and 6 square miles) in good terrain, although in poor terrain, their range can be as much as 20 km2 (7+34 square miles).[49] The red fox can run at up to 48 km/h (30 mph).[49] The fox is also variously known as a Tod (old English word for fox),[50] Reynard (the name of an anthropomorphic character in European literature from the twelfth century),[51] or Charlie (named for the Whig politician Charles James Fox).[52] American red foxes tend to be larger than European forms, but according to foxhunters' accounts, they have less cunning, vigour and endurance in the chase than European foxes.[53]

Coyote, grey fox, and other quarry

[edit]
Hunting Jackals by Samuel Howitt, illustrating a group of golden jackals rushing to the defence of a fallen pack-mate

Other species than the red fox may be the quarry for hounds in some areas. The choice of quarry depends on the region and numbers available.[16] The coyote (Canis latrans) is a significant quarry for many Hunts in North America, particularly in the west and southwest, where there are large open spaces.[16] The coyote is an indigenous predator that did not range east of the Mississippi River until the latter half of the twentieth century.[54] The coyote is faster than a fox, running at 65 km/h (40 mph) and also wider ranging, with a territory of up to 283 km2 (109 square miles),[55] so a much larger hunt territory is required to chase it. However, coyotes tend to be less challenging intellectually, as they offer a straight line hunt instead of the convoluted fox line. Coyotes can be challenging opponents for the dogs in physical confrontations, despite the size advantage of a large dog. Coyotes have larger canine teeth and are generally more practised in hostile encounters.[56]

The grey fox (Urocyon cinereoargenteus), a distant relative of the European red fox, is also hunted in North America.[16] It is an adept climber of trees, making it harder to hunt with hounds.[57] The scent of the gray fox is not as strong as that of the red, therefore more time is needed for the hounds to take the scent. Unlike the red fox which, during the chase, will run far ahead from the pack, the gray fox will speed toward heavy brush, thus making it more difficult to pursue. Also unlike the red fox, which occurs more prominently in the northern United States, the more southern gray fox is rarely hunted on horseback, due to its densely covered habitat preferences.

Hunts in the southern United States sometimes pursue the bobcat (Lynx rufus).[16] In countries such as India, and in other areas formerly under British influence, such as Iraq, the golden jackal (Canis aureus) is often the quarry.[58][59] During the British Raj, British sportsmen in India would hunt jackals on horseback with hounds as a substitute for the fox hunting of their native England. Unlike foxes, golden jackals were documented to be ferociously protective of their pack mates, and could seriously injure hounds.[60][61] Jackals were not hunted often in this manner, as they were slower than foxes and could scarcely outrun greyhounds after 200 yards or 180 m.[62]

Alternatives to hunting live prey

[edit]

Following the ban on fox hunting in Great Britain, hunts switched to legal alternatives in order to preserve their traditional practices, although some hunt supporters had previously claimed this would be impossible and that hound packs would have to be destroyed.[63]

Most hunts turned, primarily, to trail hunting,[27][28] which anti-hunt organisations claim is just a smokescreen for illegal hunting.[64] Some anti-hunting campaigners have urged hunts to switch to the established sport of drag hunting instead, as this involves significantly less risk of wild animals being accidentally caught and killed.[65][66][67]

Trail hunting

[edit]

A controversial[68] alternative to hunting animals with hounds. A trail of animal urine (most commonly fox) is laid in advance of the 'hunt', and then tracked by the hound pack and a group of followers; on foot, horseback, or both. Because the trail is laid using animal urine, and in areas where such animals naturally occur, hounds often pick up the scent of live animals; sometimes resulting in them being caught and killed.[69]

Drag hunting

[edit]

An established sport which dates back to the 19th century. Hounds follow an artificial scent, usually aniseed, laid along a set route which is already known to the huntsmen.[70] A drag hunt course is set in a similar manner to a cross country course, following a route over jumps and obstacles. Because it is predetermined, the route can be tailored to keep hounds away from sensitive areas known to be populated by animals which could be confused for prey.[71]

Hound trailing

[edit]

Similar to drag hunting, but in the form of a race; usually of around 15 km (10 miles) in length.[70] Unlike other forms of hunting, the hounds are not followed by humans.

Clean boot hunting

[edit]

Clean boot hunting uses packs of bloodhounds to follow the natural trail of a human's scent.[70]

Animals of the hunt

[edit]

Hounds and other dogs

[edit]
An English foxhound

Fox hunting is usually undertaken with a pack of scent hounds,[1] and, in most cases, these are specially bred foxhounds.[72] These dogs are trained to pursue the fox based on its scent. The two main types of foxhound are the English Foxhound[73] and the American Foxhound.[74] It is possible to use a sight hound such as a Greyhound or lurcher to pursue foxes,[75] though this practice is not common in organised hunting, and these dogs are more often used for coursing animals such as hares.[76] There is also one pack of beagles in Virginia that hunt foxes. They are unique in that they are the only hunting beagle pack in the US to be followed on horseback. English Foxhounds are also used for hunting mink.

Hunts may also use terriers to flush or kill foxes that are hiding underground,[1] as they are small enough to pursue the fox through narrow earth passages. This is not practised in the United States, as once the fox has gone to ground and is accounted for by the hounds, it is left alone.

Horses

[edit]
A mixed field of horses at a hunt, including children on ponies

The horses, called "field hunters" or hunters, ridden by members of the field, are a prominent feature of many hunts, although others are conducted on foot (and those hunts with a field of mounted riders will also have foot followers). Horses on hunts can range from specially bred and trained field hunters to casual hunt attendees riding a wide variety of horse and pony types. Draft and Thoroughbred crosses are commonly used as hunters, although purebred Thoroughbreds and horses of many different breeds are also used.

Some hunts with unique territories favour certain traits in field hunters; for example, when hunting coyote in the western US, a faster horse with more stamina is required to keep up, as coyotes are faster than foxes and inhabit larger territories. Hunters must be well-mannered, have the athletic ability to clear large obstacles such as wide ditches, tall fences, and rock walls, and have the stamina to keep up with the hounds. In English foxhunting, the horses are often a cross of half or a quarter Irish Draught and the remainder English thoroughbred.[77]

Dependent on terrain, and to accommodate different levels of ability, hunts generally have alternative routes that do not involve jumping. The field may be divided into two groups, with one group, the First Field, that takes a more direct but demanding route that involves jumps over obstacles[78] while another group, the Second Field (also called Hilltoppers or Gaters), takes longer but less challenging routes that utilise gates or other types of access on the flat.[78][79]

Birds of prey

[edit]

In Great Britain, since the introduction of the hunting ban, a number of hunts have employed falconers to bring birds of prey to the hunt, due to the exemption in the Hunting Act for falconry.[80] Many experts, such as the Hawk Board, deny that any bird of prey can reasonably be used in the British countryside to kill a fox which has been flushed by (and is being chased by) a pack of hounds.[81]

Procedure

[edit]
The Bedale Hunt, Yorkshire, drawing a wood in February 2005

Main hunting season

[edit]
A French staghound pack: moving off

The main hunting season usually begins in early November, in the northern hemisphere,[14] and in May in the southern hemisphere.

A hunt begins when the hounds are put, or cast, into a patch of woods or brush where foxes are known to lay up during daylight hours; known as a covert (pronounced "cover"). If the pack manages to pick up the scent of a fox, they will track it for as long as they are able. Scenting can be affected by temperature, humidity, and other factors. If the hounds lose the scent, a check occurs. [82]

The hounds pursue the trail of the fox and the riders follow, by the most direct route possible. This may involve very athletic skill on the part of horse and rider, and fox hunting has given birth to some traditional equestrian sports including steeplechase[83] and point-to-point racing.[84]

The hunt continues until either the fox goes to ground (evades the hounds and takes refuge in a burrow or den) or is overtaken and usually killed by the hounds.

Social rituals are important to hunts, although many have fallen into disuse. One of the most notable was the act of blooding. In this ceremony, the master or huntsman would smear the blood of the fox onto the cheeks or forehead of a newly initiated hunt-follower, often a young child.[85] Another practice of some hunts was to cut off the fox's tail (brush), the feet (pads) and the head (mask) as trophies, with the carcass then thrown to the hounds.[85] Both of these practices were widely abandoned during the nineteenth century, although isolated cases may still have occurred to the modern day.[85]

Cubbing

[edit]

In the autumn of each year, hunts accustom the young hounds, which by now are full-size, but not yet sexually mature, to hunt and kill foxes through the practice of cubbing (also called cub hunting, autumn hunting and entering).[14][86][49] Cubbing also aims to teach hounds to restrict their hunting to foxes, so that they do not hunt other species such as deer or hares.[1][87]

The activity sometimes incorporates the practice of holding up; where hunt supporters, riders and foot followers surround a covert and drive back foxes attempting to escape, before then drawing the covert with the young hounds and some more experienced hounds, allowing them to find and kill foxes within the surrounded covert.[1] A young hound is considered to be entered into the pack once they have successfully joined in a hunt of this fashion. Young hounds which do not show sufficient aptitude may be killed by their owners or drafted to other packs, including minkhound packs.[88]

The Burns Inquiry, established in 1999, reported that an estimated 10,000 fox cubs were killed annually during the cub-hunting season in Great Britain.[89] Cub hunting is now illegal in Great Britain,[90] although anti-hunt associations maintain that the practice continues.[91][need quotation to verify]

People

[edit]

Hunt staff and officials

[edit]
Caricature of Edgar Lubbock (1847–1907): "The Master of the Blankney".
Published in Vanity Fair (1906)

As a social ritual, participants in a fox hunt fill specific roles, the most prominent of which is the master, who often number more than one and then are called masters or joint masters. These individuals typically take much of the financial responsibility for the overall management of the sporting activities of the hunt, along with the care and breeding of the hunt's foxhounds as well as control and direction of its paid staff.

  • The Master of Foxhounds (who use the post-nominal (and may also be called) MFH[92][93][94]) or Joint Master of Foxhounds operates the sporting activities of the hunt, maintains the kennels, works with (and sometimes is) the huntsman, and spends the money raised by the hunt club. (Often the master or joint masters are the largest of financial contributors to the hunt.) The master will have the final say over all matters in the field.[95]
  • Honorary secretaries are volunteers (usually one or two) who look after the administration of the hunt.[95]
  • The Treasurer collects the cap (money) from guest riders and manages the hunt's finances.[95]
  • A kennelman looks after hounds in kennels, assuring that all tasks are completed when pack and staff return from hunting.[96]
  • The huntsman, who may be a professional, is responsible for directing the hounds. The Huntsman usually carries a horn to communicate to the hounds, followers and whippers in.[95] Some huntsmen also fill the role of kennelman (and are therefore known as the kennel huntsman). In some hunts the master is also the huntsman.
  • Whippers-in (or "Whips") are assistants to the huntsman. Their main job is to keep the pack all together, especially to prevent the hounds from straying or 'riotting', which term refers to the hunting of animals other than the hunted fox or trail line. To help them to control the pack, they carry hunting whips (and in the United States they sometimes also carry .22 revolvers loaded with snake shot or blanks.)[95] The role of whipper-in in hunts has inspired parliamentary systems (including the Westminster System and the US Congress) to use whip for a member who enforces party discipline and ensures the attendance of other members at important votes.[97]
  • Terrier man— Carries out fox control. Most hunts where the object is to kill the fox will employ a terrier man, whose job it is to control the terriers which may be used underground to corner or flush the fox. Often voluntary terrier men will follow the hunt as well. In the UK and Ireland, they often ride quadbikes with their terriers in boxes on their bikes.[98]

In addition to members of the hunt staff, a committee may run the Hunt Supporters Club to organise fundraising and social events and in the United States many hunts are incorporated and have parallel lines of leadership.

The United Kingdom, Ireland, and the United States each have a Masters of Foxhounds Association (MFHA) which consists of current and past masters of foxhounds. This is the governing body for all foxhound packs and deals with disputes about boundaries between hunts, as well as regulating the activity.

Attire

[edit]
Members of the field following a Danish drag hunt

Mounted hunt followers typically wear traditional hunting attire. A prominent feature of hunts operating during the formal hunt season (usually November to March in the northern hemisphere) is hunt members wearing 'colours'. This attire usually consists of the traditional red coats worn by huntsmen, masters, former masters, whippers-in (regardless of sex), other hunt staff members and male members who have been invited by masters to wear colours and hunt buttons as a mark of appreciation for their involvement in the organization and running of the hunt.

Since the Hunting Act in England and Wales, only Masters and Hunt Servants tend to wear red coats or the hunt livery whilst out hunting. Gentleman subscribers tend to wear black coats, with or without hunt buttons. In some countries, women generally wear coloured collars on their black or navy coats. These help them stand out from the rest of the field.

Red fox hunting coat with 4 gold buttons and square skirt, as worn in England by Masters of Foxhounds and hunt staff. Masters who serve as their own huntsman ("hunt their own hounds"), known as "Amateur Masters", and professional huntsmen, wear five buttons with square corners on the skirt. Members of the field who have been "awarded colours" (permitted to wear a red coat and hunt buttons) wear three buttons (and in old tradition with rounded corners on the coat skirt).[99]

The traditional red coats are often misleadingly called "pinks". Various theories about the derivation of this term have been given, ranging from the colour of a weathered scarlet coat to the name of a purportedly famous tailor.[100][101]

Some hunts, including most harrier and beagle packs, wear green rather than red jackets, and some hunts wear other colours such as mustard. The colour of breeches vary from hunt to hunt and are generally of one colour, though two or three colours throughout the year may be permitted.[102] Riding boots are generally English dress boots (no laces). For the men they are black with brown leather tops (called tan tops), and for the women, black with a patent black leather top of similar proportion to the men.[102] Additionally, the number of buttons is significant. The Master wears a scarlet coat with four brass buttons while the huntsman and other professional staff wear five. Amateur whippers-in also wear four buttons.

Another differentiation in dress between the amateur and professional staff is found in the ribbons at the back of the hunt cap. The professional staff wear their hat ribbons down, while amateur staff and members of the field wear their ribbons up.[103]

Those members not entitled to wear colours, dress in a black hunt coat and unadorned black buttons for both men and women, generally with pale breeches. Boots are all English dress boots and have no other distinctive look.[102] Some hunts also further restrict the wear of formal attire to weekends and holidays and wear ratcatcher (tweed jacket and tan breeches), at all other times.

Other members of the mounted field follow strict rules of clothing etiquette. For example, for some hunts, those under eighteen (or sixteen in some cases) will wear ratcatcher all season. Those over eighteen (or in the case of some hunts, all followers regardless of age) will wear ratcatcher during autumn hunting from late August until the Opening Meet, normally around 1 November. From the Opening Meet they will switch to formal hunting attire where entitled members will wear scarlet and the rest black or navy.

The highest honour is to be awarded the hunt button by the Hunt Master. This sometimes means one can then wear scarlet if male, or the hunt collar if female (colour varies from hunt to hunt) and buttons with the hunt crest on them. For non-mounted packs or non-mounted members where formal hunt uniform is not worn, the buttons are sometimes worn on a waistcoat. All members of the mounted field should carry a hunting whip (it should not be called a crop). These have a horn handle at the top and a long leather lash (2–3 yards or 2–2.5 m) ending in a piece of coloured cord. Generally all hunting whips are brown, except those of Hunt Servants, whose whips are white.

Controversy

[edit]

The nature of fox hunting, including the killing of the quarry animal, the pursuit's strong associations with tradition and social class, and its practice for sport have made it a source of great controversy within the United Kingdom. In December 1999, the then Home Secretary, Jack Straw MP, announced the establishment of a Government inquiry (the Burns Inquiry) into hunting with dogs, to be chaired by the retired senior civil servant Lord Burns. The inquiry was to examine the practical aspects of different types of hunting with dogs and its impact, how any ban might be implemented and the consequences of any such ban.[104]

Amongst its findings, the Burns Inquiry committee analysed opposition to hunting in the UK and reported that:

There are those who have a moral objection to hunting and who are fundamentally opposed to the idea of people gaining pleasure from what they regard as the causing of unnecessary suffering. There are also those who perceive hunting as representing a divisive social class system. Others, as we note below, resent the hunt trespassing on their land, especially when they have been told they are not welcome. They worry about the welfare of the pets and animals and the difficulty of moving around the roads where they live on hunt days. Finally there are those who are concerned about damage to the countryside and other animals, particularly badgers and otters.[105]

In a later debate in the House of Lords, the inquiry chairman, Lord Burns, also stated that "Naturally, people ask whether we were implying that hunting is cruel... The short answer to that question is no. There was not sufficient verifiable evidence or data safely to reach views about cruelty. It is a complex area."[106]

Anti-hunting activists who choose to take action in opposing fox hunting can do so through lawful means, such as campaigning for fox hunting legislation and monitoring hunts for cruelty. Some use unlawful means.[107] Main anti-hunting campaign organisations include the RSPCA and the League Against Cruel Sports. In 2001, the RSPCA took high court action to prevent pro-hunt activists joining in large numbers to change the society's policy in opposing hunting.[108]

Outside of campaigning, some activists choose to engage in direct intervention such as sabotage of the hunt.[109] Hunt sabotage is unlawful in a majority of the United States, and some tactics used in it (such as trespass and criminal damage) are offences there and in other countries.[110]

Fox hunting with hounds has been happening in Europe since at least the sixteenth century, and strong traditions have built up around the activity, as have related businesses, rural activities, and hierarchies. For this reason, there are large numbers of people who support fox hunting and this can be for a variety of reasons.[5]

Pest control

[edit]

The fox is referred to as vermin in some countries. Some farmers fear the loss of their smaller livestock,[66] while others consider them an ally in controlling rabbits, voles, and other rodents, which eat crops.[111] A key reason for dislike of the fox by pastoral farmers is their tendency to commit acts of surplus killing toward animals such as chickens, since having killed many they eat only one.[112][113] Some anti-hunt campaigners maintain that provided it is not disturbed, the fox will remove all of the chickens it kills and conceal them in a safer place.[114]

Opponents of fox hunting claim that the activity is not necessary for fox control, arguing that the fox is not a pest species despite its classification and that hunting does not and cannot make a real difference to fox populations.[115] They compare the number of foxes killed in the hunt to the many more killed on the roads. They also argue that wildlife management goals of the hunt can be met more effectively by other methods such as lamping (dazzling a fox with a bright light, then shooting by a competent shooter using an appropriate weapon and load).[116]

There is scientific evidence that fox hunting has no effect on fox populations, at least in Britain, thereby calling into question the idea it is a successful method of culling. In 2001 there was a 1-year nationwide ban on fox-hunting because of an outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease. It was found this ban on hunting had no measurable impact on fox numbers in randomly selected areas.[117] Prior to the fox hunting ban in the UK, hounds contributed to the deaths of 6.3% of the 400,000 foxes killed annually.[118]

The hunts claim to provide and maintain a good habitat for foxes and other game,[66] and, in the US, have fostered conservation legislation and put land into conservation easements. Anti-hunting campaigners cite the widespread existence of artificial earths and the historic practice by hunts of introducing foxes, as indicating that hunts do not believe foxes to be pests.[119]

It is also argued that hunting with dogs has the advantage of weeding out old, sick, and weak animals because the strongest and healthiest foxes are those most likely to escape. Therefore, unlike other methods of controlling the fox population, it is argued that hunting with dogs resembles natural selection.[66] The counter-argument is given that hunting cannot kill old foxes because foxes have a natural death rate of 65% per annum.[119]

In Australia, where foxes have played a major role in the decline in the number of species of wild animals, the Government's Department of the Environment and Heritage concluded that "hunting does not seem to have had a significant or lasting impact on fox numbers." Instead, control of foxes relies heavily on shooting, poisoning and fencing.[120]

Economics

[edit]

As well as the economic defence of fox hunting that it is necessary to control the population of foxes, lest they cause economic cost to the farmers, it is also argued that fox hunting is a significant economic activity in its own right, providing recreation and jobs for those involved in the hunt and supporting it. The Burns Inquiry identified that between 6,000 and 8,000 full-time jobs depend on hunting in the UK, of which about 700 result from direct hunt employment and 1,500 to 3,000 result from direct employment on hunting-related activities.[1]

Since the ban in the UK, there has been no evidence of significant job losses, and hunts have continued to operate along limited lines, either trail hunting, or claiming to use exemptions in the legislation.[121]

Animal welfare and animal rights

[edit]

Many animal welfare groups, campaigners and activists believe that fox hunting is unfair and cruel to animals.[122] They argue that the chase itself causes fear and distress and that the fox is not always killed instantly as is claimed. Animal rights campaigners also object to hunting (including fox hunting), on the grounds that animals should enjoy some basic rights (such as the right to freedom from exploitation and the right to life).[123][124]

In the United States and Canada, pursuing quarry for the purpose of killing is strictly forbidden by the Masters of Foxhounds Association.[16] According to article 2 of the organisation's code:

The sport of fox hunting as it is practised in North America places emphasis on the chase and not the kill. It is inevitable, however, that hounds will at times catch their game. Death is instantaneous. A pack of hounds will account for their quarry by running it to ground, treeing it, or bringing it to bay in some fashion. The Masters of Foxhounds Association has laid down detailed rules to govern the behaviour of Masters of Foxhounds and their packs of hounds.[125]

There are times when a fox that is injured or sick is caught by the pursuing hounds, but hunts say that the occurrence of an actual kill of this is exceptionally rare.[16]

Supporters of hunting maintain that when foxes or other prey (such as coyotes in the western USA) are hunted, the quarry are either killed relatively quickly (instantly or in a matter of seconds) or escapes uninjured. Similarly, they say that the animal rarely endures hours of torment and pursuit by hounds, and research by Oxford University shows that the fox is normally killed after an average of 17 minutes of chase.[122] They further argue that, while hunting with hounds may cause suffering, controlling fox numbers by other means is even more cruel. Depending on the skill of the shooter, the type of firearm used, the availability of good shooting positions and luck, shooting foxes can cause either an instant kill, or lengthy periods of agony for wounded animals which can die of the trauma within hours, or of secondary infection over a period of days or weeks. Research from wildlife hospitals, however, indicates that it is not uncommon for foxes with minor shot wounds to survive. [126] Hunt supporters further say that it is a matter of humanity to kill foxes rather than allow them to suffer malnourishment and mange.[127]

Other methods include the use of snares, trapping and poisoning, all of which also cause considerable distress to the animals concerned, and may affect other species. This was considered in the Burns Inquiry (paras 6.60–11), whose tentative conclusion was that lamping using rifles fitted with telescopic sights, if carried out properly and in appropriate circumstances, had fewer adverse welfare implications than hunting.[1] The committee believed that lamping was not possible without vehicular access, and hence said that the welfare of foxes in upland areas could be affected adversely by a ban on hunting with hounds, unless dogs could be used to flush foxes from cover (as is permitted in the Hunting Act 2004).

Some opponents of hunting criticise the fact that the animal suffering in fox hunting takes place for sport, citing either that this makes such suffering unnecessary and therefore cruel, or else that killing or causing suffering for sport is immoral.[128] The Court of Appeal, in considering the British Hunting Act, determined that the legislative aim of the Hunting Act was "a composite one of preventing or reducing unnecessary suffering to wild mammals, overlaid by a moral viewpoint that causing suffering to animals for sport is unethical."[129]

Anti-hunting campaigners also criticised UK hunts of which the Burns Inquiry estimated that foxhound packs put down around 3,000 hounds, and the hare hunts killed around 900 hounds per year, in each case after the hounds' working life had come to an end.[1][130][131]

In June 2016, three people associated with the South Herefordshire Hunt (UK) were arrested on suspicion of causing suffering to animals in response to claims that live fox cubs were used to train hounds to hunt and kill. The organisation Hunt Investigation Team supported by the League Against Cruel Sports, gained video footage of an individual carrying a fox cub into a large kennel where the hounds can clearly be heard baying. A dead fox was later found in a rubbish bin. The individuals arrested were suspended from Hunt membership.[132] In August, two more people were arrested in connection with the investigation.[133]

Civil liberties

[edit]

It is argued by some hunt supporters that no law should curtail the right of a person to do as they wish, so long as it does not harm others.[66] Philosopher Roger Scruton has said, "To criminalise this activity would be to introduce legislation as illiberal as the laws which once deprived Jews and Catholics of political rights, or the laws which outlawed homosexuality".[134] In contrast, liberal philosopher, John Stuart Mill wrote, "The reasons for legal intervention in favour of children apply not less strongly to the case of those unfortunate slaves and victims of the most brutal parts of mankind—the lower animals."[135] The UK's most senior court, the House of Lords, has decided that a ban on hunting, in the form of the Hunting Act 2004, does not contravene the European Convention on Human Rights,[136] as did the European Court of Human Rights.[137]

Trespass

[edit]

In its submission to the Burns Inquiry, the League Against Cruel Sports presented evidence of over 1,000 cases of trespass by hunts. These included trespass on railway lines and into private gardens.[1] Trespass can occur as the hounds cannot recognise human-created boundaries they are not allowed to cross, and may therefore follow their quarry wherever it goes unless successfully called off. However, in the United Kingdom, trespass is a largely civil matter when performed accidentally.

Nonetheless, in the UK, the criminal offence of 'aggravated trespass' was introduced in 1994 specifically to address the problems caused to fox hunts and other field sports by hunt saboteurs.[138][139] Hunt saboteurs trespass on private land to monitor or disrupt the hunt, as this is where the hunting activity takes place.[139] For this reason, the hunt saboteur tactics manual presents detailed information on legal issues affecting this activity, especially the Criminal Justice Act.[140] Some hunt monitors also choose to trespass whilst they observe the hunts in progress.[139]

The construction of the law means that hunt saboteurs' behaviour may result in charges of criminal aggravated trespass,[141] rather than the less severe offence of civil trespass.[142] Since the introduction of legislation to restrict hunting with hounds, there has been a level of confusion over the legal status of hunt monitors or saboteurs when trespassing, as if they disrupt the hunt whilst it is not committing an illegal act (as all the hunts claim to be hunting within the law) then they commit an offence; however, if the hunt was conducting an illegal act then the criminal offence of trespass may not have been committed.[139]

Social life and class issues in Britain

[edit]
Punch magazine's "Mr. Briggs" cartoons illustrated issues over fox hunting during the 1850s.

In Britain, and especially in England and Wales, supporters of fox hunting regard it as a distinctive part of British culture generally, the basis of traditional crafts and a key part of social life in rural areas, an activity and spectacle enjoyed not only by the riders but also by others such as the unmounted pack which may follow along on foot, bicycle or 4×4 vehicles.[5] They see the social aspects of hunting as reflecting the demographics of the area; the Home Counties packs, for example, are very different from those in North Wales and Cumbria, where the hunts are very much the activity of farmers and the working class. The Banwen Miners Hunt is such a working class club, founded in a small Welsh mining village, although its membership now is by no means limited to miners, with a more cosmopolitan make-up.[143]

Oscar Wilde, in his play A Woman of No Importance (1893), once famously described "the English country gentleman galloping after a fox" as "the unspeakable in full pursuit of the uneatable."[144] Even before the time of Wilde, much of the criticism of fox hunting was couched in terms of social class. The argument was that while more "working class" blood sports such as cock fighting and badger baiting were long ago outlawed,[145][146] fox hunting persists, although this argument can be countered with the fact that hare coursing, a more "working-class" sport, was outlawed at the same time as fox hunting with hounds in England and Wales. The philosopher Roger Scruton has said that the analogy with cockfighting and badger baiting is unfair, because these sports were more cruel and did not involve any element of pest control.[134]

A series of "Mr. Briggs" cartoons by John Leech appeared in the magazine Punch during the 1850s which illustrated class issues.[147] More recently the British anarchist group Class War has argued explicitly for disruption of fox hunts on class warfare grounds and even published a book The Rich at Play examining the subject.[148] Other groups with similar aims, such as "Revolutions per minute" have also published papers which disparage fox hunting on the basis of the social class of its participants.[149]

Opinion polls in the United Kingdom have shown that the population is equally divided as to whether or not the views of hunt objectors are based primarily on class grounds.[150] Some people have pointed to evidence of class bias in the voting patterns in the House of Commons during the voting on the hunting bill between 2000 and 2001, with traditionally working-class Labour members voting the legislation through against the votes of normally middle- and upper-class Conservative members.[151]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia

Fox hunting is a traditional field sport originating in England during the 16th century, involving the tracking and pursuit of a wild fox by a pack of scent hounds led by a huntsman, with human participants following on horseback or on foot. The hounds detect the fox's scent and give chase across rural terrain, often resulting in an extended pursuit that may end with the fox being overtaken and killed by the pack. Emerging from earlier pest control practices and a shift from deer hunting due to declining populations, the sport gained its modern form in the 18th century through innovations like Hugo Meynell's breeding of swifter hounds at the Quorn Hunt, fostering organized packs and formalized events that emphasized speed and endurance. By the 19th century, expanded rail networks enabled broader participation, embedding fox hunting as a cornerstone of rural equestrian culture linked to land management and social traditions among the landed classes. Long-standing debates over its ethics, particularly the suffering inflicted on the quarry and hounds, culminated in prohibitions: Scotland's Protection of Wild Mammals Act in 2002 and the UK's Hunting Act 2004, which banned hunting wild mammals with dogs in England and Wales effective February 2005, though exemptions exist for limited pest control scenarios. Proponents historically justified it for regulating fox numbers as predators of livestock and game, while critics highlighted cruelty absent empirical proof of superior efficacy over alternatives like shooting. Today, traditional hunting persists legally in Northern Ireland, the Republic of Ireland, and parts of the United States—where it often prioritizes the chase over dispatch—alongside drag or trail hunting in banned regions as substitutes using artificial scents.

Historical Development

Origins in Europe

The earliest documented pursuit of foxes with in dates to 1534 in , , where a deployed farm dogs to chase a that had been raiding , marking an initial effort at vermin control rather than organized sport. Prior to the , European hunting traditions emphasized larger quarry like deer, boar, and using packs of , as codified in medieval laws that restricted such activities to and while classifying foxes as pests to be eliminated opportunistically via , , or digging out with terriers. Foxes' elusive nature and increasing prevalence amid landscape changes—such as reducing deer habitats—prompted the of scent for their pursuit, though packs remained irregular and secondary to stag until fox numbers warranted dedicated efforts. By the mid-17th century, formalized fox hunting packs emerged in , with the Bilsdale Hunt in founded in 1668 by George Villiers, 2nd Duke of Buckingham, as one of the earliest continuous operations, reflecting a shift toward systematic management across rural estates. This development coincided with improvements in hound breeding, drawing on Norman and Celtic strains introduced centuries earlier for tracking, which enhanced endurance and scenting ability suited to foxes' terrain-covering runs. In broader , analogous practices appeared sporadically; for instance, German hunts incorporated foxes alongside hares until prohibitions in 1934, but lacked the centralized packs of Britain, often merging with broader traditions under aristocratic oversight. saw early adoption by the 18th century, influenced by English settlers, though continental variants like French chasse au renard prioritized deer until the 19th century. These origins underscore fox hunting's pragmatic roots in agricultural necessity, evolving from ad hoc responses to predation on livestock—foxes annually killing thousands of poultry and lambs in 16th-century records—into a structured pursuit enabled by England's open fields and improving equine capabilities, distinct from the ritualized game hunts of medieval .

Expansion to the Americas and Australia

Fox hunting practices were introduced to by English settlers during the colonial period, with the earliest documented importation of foxhounds occurring in 1650 when Robert Brooke brought a pack to alongside his family and horses. This marked the transfer of the European tradition, adapted to local quarry including native red foxes ( vulpes) and gray foxes ( cinereoargenteus), which differed from the solely red fox pursuits in Britain. By the mid-18th century, organized hunts emerged, such as those involving , who maintained a personal pack of hounds and participated in hunts as early as 1768, often on horseback across plantations. The sport gained traction among colonial elites in , , and , where terrain and fox populations supported mounted chases, though early efforts focused more on deer and before shifting emphasis to foxes. The formal organization of fox hunts expanded post-independence, with the Piedmont Foxhounds in established by the late 18th century as one of the earliest subscription-based packs , predating widespread clubs. Canada's Montreal Hunt, founded in 1826, represents the continent's first documented hunt club, while in the U.S., proliferation accelerated after the Civil War, yielding 76 registered packs by 1904 across regions from the Northeast to the Midwest and Southwest. This growth reflected socioeconomic patterns akin to Britain, attracting landowners and , but incorporated American variations like trail hunting on varied landscapes and occasional pursuits in open prairies. By the early , the Masters of Foxhounds Association formalized standards, overseeing over 145 registered packs today, primarily east of the where fox densities and private land access align with traditional methods. In Australia, fox hunting arrived with British colonial expansion, though initial hound imports in 1810 under Governor Lachlan Macquarie targeted both foxes and stags for sport, predating viable fox populations. European red foxes, absent natively, were deliberately introduced starting in the mid-1850s—specifically around 1855 in Victoria—for recreational hunting to replicate English pastimes among settlers. Releases centered near , with feral populations establishing by the early 1870s and spreading rapidly; genetic studies confirm multiple Victorian introductions circa 1870 fueled this colonization, reaching continental coverage within 70 years. Organized hunts, such as those by the Sydney Hunt Club from its 1810s origins, persisted into the but faced decline due to foxes' invasive status, which shifted perceptions from sport to , limiting mounted traditions to select clubs in and Victoria amid regulatory scrutiny. Unlike , Australia's arid interior constrained fox densities and hunt viability, confining expansion to temperate southeastern regions.

Evolution of Organized Hunts

Organized fox hunting emerged in during the late , transitioning from pursuits by farmers and landowners to structured packs maintained for systematic quarry control and sport. Early packs, such as those in the Quorn country hunted by Thomas Boothby around the 1740s, represented the first dedicated subscriptions, where hounds were kenneled collectively and hunts coordinated across defined territories rather than relying on individual landowners' dogs. This shift coincided with agricultural enclosures, which created expansive open fields suitable for prolonged chases, replacing fragmented woodlands previously used for . Hugo Meynell, master of the from 1753 to 1800, pioneered the modern form by selectively breeding foxhounds for enhanced speed, endurance, and scenting prowess, adapting them to cross-country pursuits over varied terrain. His innovations included prioritizing hounds' stamina for extended runs—often exceeding 20 miles—and integrating faster horse breeds to keep pace, transforming hunts from short, opportunistic kills into strategic, all-day events emphasizing the chase. Meynell's methods, detailed in contemporary hunting diaries, emphasized scientific kennel management, including controlled breeding lines from bloodhounds and staghounds, which standardized pack performance and influenced subsequent hunts nationwide. By the early 19th century, organized hunts proliferated, with over 100 registered packs by 1830, supported by subscription models where subscribers funded masters, huntsmen, and kennels. Formalization included designated hunt countries, annual meets, and codified etiquette, as seen in the establishment of the Masters of Foxhounds Association precursors. This era saw hunts evolve into social institutions among the , with terriers introduced for earth-stopping and whips for hound control, enhancing efficiency in locating and pursuing foxes across expanding rural landscapes altered by the . Data from hunt records indicate average pack sizes grew to 40-60 hounds, enabling consistent coverage of 200-300 square miles per season.

Core Practices and Elements

Quarry Species

The primary quarry species in fox hunting is the red fox (Vulpes vulpes), a small omnivorous canid weighing 4 to 7 kilograms (8 to 15 pounds) in adults, characterized by its reddish fur, white underbelly, and bushy tail with a black tip. Native to Eurasia and North America, the red fox is prized for its cunning evasion tactics, including using dense cover, doubling back on trails, and denning in underground earths, which provide hounds with a challenging scent trail typically lasting 20 to 60 minutes per hunt. Its adaptability to varied terrains—from open fields to woodlands—has made it the traditional target since fox hunting's formalization in the 18th century, when packs were selectively bred to pursue its distinctive odor over long distances. In regions outside Europe, such as , fox hunts may also pursue the (Urocyon cinereoargenteus), a smaller species (3 to 5 kilograms) with grayish fur and arboreal climbing ability, or the (Canis latrans), a larger canid (8 to 20 kilograms) known for straight-line running and pack behavior, particularly in areas where red fox populations are sparse. These alternatives reflect local ecology; for instance, coyotes often replace foxes in western U.S. hunts due to their prevalence as adaptable predators in open prairies. Occasionally, bobcats (Lynx rufus) are chased in southern states, though hunts emphasize non-lethal pursuit to preserve quarry populations for sustained sport. In the , prior to the 2004 ban on live quarry hunting, the red fox remained the exclusive target, with no native gray fox and coyotes absent from the ecosystem.

Hounds, Horses, and Supporting Animals

The primary hounds employed in fox hunting are , a breed selectively developed in during the late 16th century specifically for pursuing foxes in packs through varied terrain. These hounds exhibit substantial builds with long, straight legs suited for galloping, broad chests for endurance, and an acute derived from crosses with stag-hunting hounds known for scenting and stamina. Packs typically consist of 20 to 40 hounds, counted in couples (pairs), enabling coordinated tracking via vocalization and collective scenting to follow the fox's trail over distances that can span several miles. Horses used in fox hunting, known as field hunters, prioritize functional traits over specific breeds, requiring stamina to sustain several hours of pursuit across rough countryside, a calm to handle the excitement of and crowds, bravery for navigating natural obstacles, and reliable jumping ability to clear hedges, walls, and ditches without refusal. Common types include Thoroughbreds, draft-Thoroughbred crosses, and other athletic equines like Warmbloods or ponies, selected for soundness, fitness, and rather than pedigree exclusivity. Riders accustom these mounts to hunt conditions through progressive , ensuring they remain responsive amid unpredictable chases. Supporting animals include working terriers deployed by terriermen to assist in locating and flushing foxes from underground dens or earths, preventing evasion and aiding the hounds' pursuit. Breeds such as Jack Russell Terriers, Patterdale Terriers, Border Terriers, Lakeland Terriers, and Fell Terriers are favored for their , agility in confined spaces, and vermin-hunting instincts, often entering burrows to bay or extract the quarry. These terriers, typically small and tenacious, complement the pack by addressing scenarios where foxes seek refuge below ground, though their use varies by hunt protocol and regional regulations.

Seasonal Procedures and Cubbing

In traditional fox hunting, the season begins with cubbing, also known as autumn hunting, which serves to introduce young hounds—termed "entry" hounds—into the pack and acclimate them to the pursuit of . This phase typically occurs from August through October in the and similar periods in , preceding the formal winter season that runs from to or , depending on regional and quarry availability. During cubbing, hunts emphasize shorter, early-morning outings lasting 1-2 hours, conducted in wooded coverts or areas known for fox dens, where young foxes (cubs born in spring) are more accessible and provide suitable for novice . The primary purpose of cubbing is to train young in pack cohesion, scent recognition, and the full cycle of the hunt, including , under controlled conditions that minimize risks like "rioting" (chasing non-target such as deer or rabbits). Veteran lead the entry , teaching them to follow the huntsman's horn signals and whips' directions while restricting pursuit to foxes; this fosters and efficiency in the pack, as young foxes' predictable behaviors allow for deliberate skill-building without the endurance demands of adult . Procedures include summer preparatory "hound walks" on foot or horseback to build fitness, followed by cubbing hunts where the field—limited to smaller groups of riders in informal "" attire ( jackets, no formal hunt coats)—observes from a distance to avoid disrupting hound . Upon a kill, traditional practice involves "blooding," where fox is applied to the young ' muzzles and to imprint and reinforce the hunt's culmination, though this has been phased out in some modern contexts to align with changing perceptions. Cubbing also conditions and riders for the , with emphasis on navigating dense at slower paces suited to the cubs' limited range, typically 5-10 miles per hunt. Hunts select cubbing territories strategically, often private woodlands, to target litters before dispersal in late autumn, thereby integrating development with quarry management. This preparatory phase ensures the pack's readiness for formal hunts, where longer chases demand honed instincts; data from hunt records indicate entry achieve proficiency after 20-30 cubbing outings, reducing errors in subsequent seasons. In regions like the , where the Masters of Foxhounds Association oversees practices, cubbing retains its name and focus despite terminological shifts elsewhere to "autumn hunting" amid sensitivities over targeting juveniles.

Hunt Organization and Participant Roles

Fox hunts operate under a structured hierarchy led by one or more Masters of Foxhounds (MFH), who hold ultimate responsibility for the hunt's conduct, including securing landowner permissions, overseeing hound breeding and management, hiring staff, and ensuring compliance with territorial protocols. The MFH represent the hunt in dealings with external parties and make key decisions on fixtures, such as meet locations and schedules, often in consultation with a hunt committee comprising subscribers or members who contribute financially through cap fees or subscriptions to fund operations like staff wages and hound maintenance. The huntsman, typically a employee, directs the in the field, controlling their movement, voice recognition, and pursuit during the hunt while also managing kennel welfare, breeding selection, and daily training to maintain pack efficacy. Assisting the huntsman are one or two whippers-in, fellow hunt servants who position themselves on the flanks to prevent hounds from straying, retrieve stragglers, and enforce pack discipline without direct interference in the quarry's trail. Field masters, appointed by the MFH, lead divisions of mounted participants known as the field, positioning riders to observe the hunt without disrupting or huntsman, thereby prioritizing the pack's work over spectator proximity. The field consists of subscribers, guests, and visitors who follow such as maintaining gaps between divisions and yielding to hunt staff, with junior or less experienced riders often in a separate hill division farther back. Administrative roles, including a hunt secretary for scheduling and correspondence or a for finances, support but defer to the MFH in operational matters. In larger hunts, a huntsman may handle routine hound care distinct from field duties. Many hunts affiliate with governing bodies like the Masters of Foxhounds Association (MFHA) in , which standardizes practices, promotes ethical standards, and assists in formation or management, requiring subscribing hunts to adhere to codes on hound welfare and field conduct. This organization ensures continuity, with masters often serving voluntarily alongside paid staff, reflecting a blend of amateur tradition and professional execution dating to formalized hunts in the .

Practical and Ecological Roles

Pest Control Efficacy and Data

Red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in the inflict measurable economic damage on through predation on , particularly and . Annual losses from fox predation on chickens, geese, and turkeys are estimated at £1.3 million, while predation affects 1–2% of newborn nationally. In free-range flocks, losses average 2 ± 17% across surveyed farms, with foxes responsible for a significant portion of carcasses showing predation signs, such as in where DNA evidence linked foxes to 87% of examined lamb kills. Overall agricultural damage from foxes totals around £12 million yearly, compared to £120 million from rabbits, underscoring foxes as a secondary but notable pest. Hunting with hounds contributes minimally to fox mortality rates. A case study in found that such hunting accounted for only 5% of total control-related deaths county-wide, with most foxes killed via or other means. Pre-2004 estimates indicated hunts culled approximately 15,000–20,000 foxes annually across the , yet this represented a small fraction of the estimated 200,000–300,000 total , insufficient to alter density-dependent by factors like and territorial . Scientific reviews highlight a lack of robust that hound hunting effectively suppresses populations or reduces predation damage, as foxes exhibit high reproductive rates (up to 5–10 cubs per vixen) enabling rapid recovery. Post-2004 Hunting Act data refute claims of population explosions from the ban. A study of temporary bans predicted no marked increase, corroborated by subsequent trends: rural fox numbers stabilized or declined due to sarcoptic mange outbreaks, road traffic (killing ~50,000 annually), and . Urban populations, estimated at 33,000 in 1995, fell sharply by 2018–2024, with sightings dropping 70–90% in areas like and . National estimates suggest a 50% decline since the mid-1990s, predating the ban and linked to mange prevalence rather than cessation. Localized fox control via has proven more effective at reducing lamb losses than broad , with thrice-yearly removals cutting carcass percentages on monitored farms.
FactorEstimated Annual Impact on Fox Mortality (Pre-2004)Primary Evidence
Hunting with hounds~15,000–20,000 foxes (5% of control total)Wiltshire case study; national hunt records
Road traffic~50,000 foxesPopulation modeling and surveys
Disease (e.g., mange)Variable, but drove 1990s–2000s declinesRegional trend analyses
Shooting/other cullingMajority of ~300,000 total deathsControl effort breakdowns
These data indicate that while foxes pose a verifiable pest threat, fox hunting's role in mitigation is marginal compared to alternative methods, with populations primarily self-regulating through non-hunting factors.

Comparisons with Alternative Control Methods

Alternative methods for controlling ( ) populations include , snaring, cage , and den fumigation, with largely prohibited in the UK since the 1963 ban on substances like Cymag gassing. , particularly night-time lamping with or spotlights, emerged as the dominant post-2004 Hunting Act method, accounting for the majority of legal culls estimated at hundreds of thousands annually across roadkill, predation, and deliberate control combined. Pre-ban fox hunts typically killed 20,000 to 50,000 foxes per season, representing roughly 10% of total culls, while snaring deploys 60,000 to 188,000 devices monthly in alone, targeting foxes on game estates and farms. Empirical studies indicate limited overall population-level efficacy for fox hunting compared to alternatives, as foxes exhibit high reproductive rates (litters of 4-6 cubs) and rapid into vacated territories, leading to density-dependent regulation rather than sustained reductions from any single method. A 2001 temporary nationwide ban in the UK caused no detectable change in fox densities, mirroring post-2004 trends where populations remained stable or regionally declined due to intensified and rather than cessation. Local culls via or temporarily depress numbers by 20-50% in treated areas, but compensation occurs within months through breeding and dispersal, with packs of flushing foxes to guns proving more efficient than solo dogs (56% fewer flushes with pairs). Snaring achieves similar local suppression on estates but risks non-target captures, including badgers and pets, reducing selectivity. Animal welfare outcomes vary, with hunting involving prolonged pursuit (average 25 minutes) followed by dispatch via hounds' bite to the neck, often causing rapid death from spinal severance, though exhaustion contributes to stress. Shooting offers potential for instantaneous kills with head shots but incurs wounding rates of 10-44% depending on range and , leading to prolonged suffering from hemorrhage or in escapes. Snares induce strangulation over hours or days, with high non-lethal injury rates (lacerations, ), while cage traps allow relocation or but are labor-intensive and less scalable for large areas. Peer-reviewed assessments, including those from veterinary sources, highlight that no method achieves perfect welfare, but alternatives like and snaring often exceed in unintended cruelty due to escapes and . Ecologically, hunting disrupts fox behavior across wider landscapes via hound scenting, potentially reducing predation pressure on birds more than localized , though evidence for superior benefits remains contested. Cost comparisons favor participant-funded hunts over taxpayer or farmer-borne expenses for patrols, but sustained control requires integrated approaches, as standalone methods fail against foxes' adaptability. Post-ban shifts to alternatives have maintained levels without booms, underscoring that hunting's role was supplementary rather than essential.

Socioeconomic Dimensions

Economic Impacts on Rural Communities

Fox hunting contributed to the rural economy primarily through direct employment in hunt operations and indirect support for ancillary services such as horse breeding, veterinary care, farriery, and local hospitality. The Burns Inquiry, a government-commissioned report published in 2000, estimated that hunting with dogs in England and Wales supported 6,000 to 8,000 jobs in total, with approximately 700 directly tied to hunt staff like huntsmen and kennel hands, generating around £15.6 million in associated economic value. These figures encompassed spending by participants on subscriptions, horse maintenance, and event-day expenditures at rural pubs and accommodations, though such activities represented a minor fraction of the broader rural economy dominated by agriculture and tourism. The 2004 Hunting Act, which prohibited hunting wild mammals with dogs in , prompted predictions of substantial job losses and economic disruption in affected communities. However, empirical assessments post-ban indicate minimal net decline, as most hunts adapted by transitioning to trail or , preserving operational structures and participant engagement. By , 184 hunts remained active, with 34% reporting increased subscriber numbers and no hunts ceasing operations entirely, alongside recruitment of 25 young workers into hunt-related roles via vocational training. The equine sector, intertwined with , demonstrated resilience, sustaining 1.35 million horses and 4.3 million riders nationwide by 2006, mitigating potential shortfalls through diversified equestrian activities. Local economic benefits persisted through these adaptations, including continued demand for rural like kennels and stables, though some services such as free fallen stock disposal by hunts for farmers diminished, partially offset by national schemes. The Burns anticipated that any localized impacts would be short- to medium-term and absorbable via reallocation to other countryside pursuits, a projection borne out by the absence of widespread closures or unemployment spikes in hunting-dependent areas. Critics of exaggerated pre-ban claims, including academic analyses, have noted that hunting's overall contribution was insignificant relative to rural GDP—often less than 0.1%—and potentially offset by unquantified costs like crop damage from hunt disruptions, underscoring that the activity's economic role, while supportive of community networks, was not foundational to rural viability.

Cultural and Social Traditions

Fox hunting emerged as a formalized pursuit in England during the 16th century, initially as a method of vermin control by farmers using dogs to track foxes, with the first recorded instance occurring in Norfolk in 1534. By the 18th century, it had evolved into a structured equestrian sport embraced by the gentry and aristocracy, particularly after the decline of deer populations prompted a shift from stag hunting. This transition reflected broader social dynamics, where the activity symbolized rural heritage, horsemanship, and communal participation among landowners and local farmers, reinforcing hierarchies and fostering interpersonal networks in agrarian communities. Central to its social fabric were codified customs and etiquette that emphasized discipline, safety, and tradition. Participants adhered to strict protocols, such as yielding right-of-way to and the huntsman, maintaining during the chase to avoid disturbing the pack, and using specialized terminology like "" to signal a sighting. Attire evolved into distinctive uniforms, including the scarlet "hunting " coats—derived from wool-dyed for and —worn by masters and senior staff to denote authority, while other riders donned black or jackets. Social rituals extended beyond the field, encompassing opening meets with ceremonial horn calls, hunt breakfasts hosted by landowners, and annual balls that served as venues for matchmaking, business dealings, and community cohesion in rural . The practice permeated British cultural expressions, appearing in literature as emblematic of countryside vigor and class identity, notably in R.S. Surtees' 19th-century novels featuring the aspirational fox hunter Mr. Jorrocks, who extolled the sport's exhilaration and egalitarian rural appeal. similarly immortalized hunts, with illustrations and paintings capturing the spectacle's drama and social pageantry, reinforcing its status as a marker of traditional English identity tied to land stewardship and outdoor pursuits. These representations underscore fox hunting's role not merely as recreation but as a affirming social bonds and continuity in rural society, even as its practices adapted post-2004 legal restrictions.

United Kingdom Post-2004 Ban Developments

The Hunting Act 2004, which prohibited hunting wild mammals with dogs in England and Wales effective 18 February 2005, prompted most registered hunts to adopt trail hunting as a legal substitute, involving the laying and pursuit of artificial scents rather than live quarry. This adaptation allowed hunts to maintain traditional activities, with packs of hounds and followers continuing operations across rural areas, though critics alleged it served as a pretext for illegal hunting. Enforcement proved challenging, with only 341 convictions for illegal hunting recorded between 2005 and 2013, reflecting difficulties in proving intent under the Act's provisions. Political efforts to the Act emerged prominently in under the Conservative government, when a proposed to enable a free vote on relaxing the ban failed due to opposition from MPs, who refused to abstain as anticipated. Subsequent and campaigns, such as one in calling for outright citing encroachment on traditions, garnered support but did not lead to legislative change. The Act withstood legal challenges, including validity tests by pro-hunt groups, without successful overturn. By 2025, marking 20 years since the ban, illegal hunting persisted through loopholes like exemptions for "research and observation," with hunts conducting cubbing and main-season activities despite prohibitions. The Labour government's 2024 manifesto pledged to ban trail hunting, reiterated in statements through December 2024 and April 2025, aiming to close perceived evasions, though no enabling legislation had been introduced by September 2025. Police reported ongoing law-breaking during hunts but highlighted enforcement limitations, underscoring the Act's under-criminalization relative to observed violations.

Status in the United States

Fox hunting with remains legal across the , with no federal , though it is subject to state-level regulations governing furbearer seasons, licensing, and methods of take. States classify red and gray foxes as game or furbearer , permitting their pursuit during designated open seasons, typically from fall through winter, with requirements for licenses and, in some cases, restrictions on using dogs during overlapping big game seasons like deer firearms hunts. For instance, prohibits fox with dogs during the statewide deer firearms season except for unarmed "riding to the hounds" activities, emphasizing participant safety and non-lethal pursuit. The Masters of Foxhounds Association of (MFHA), established in , serves as the governing body for organized mounted hunts in the and , registering approximately 170 hunts as of 2023, with the majority in the eastern states. MFHA-member hunts adhere to a Code of Hunting Practices that prioritizes ethical conduct, hound welfare, and cooperation with landowners, while emphasizing the sport's focus on the chase rather than intentional killing of . In North American practice, hunts typically aim to "put the to ground"—observing the animal evade and return to its den—rather than pursuing it to a lethal conclusion, a distinction rooted in abundant populations often serving as primary and conservation-oriented management to sustain local numbers. Regional strongholds include , , and , where historical traditions dating to colonial times support active hunt clubs on private lands with permission. In , for example, foxes may be chased with hounds year-round on with landowner consent, though harvest is limited to firearms seasons and requires appropriate permits; allows fox hunting statewide with no bag limit during open periods, including Sundays. While state laws permit lethal take of foxes as pests or , MFHA hunts rarely result in kills—estimated at less than 1% of runs—viewing such outcomes as incidental and counterproductive to maintaining healthy populations for sustained . No states impose outright bans on hound-based fox pursuit, reflecting a regulatory framework that balances recreational with ecological management rather than the welfare-driven restrictions seen elsewhere.

International Variations

In Ireland, traditional fox hunting with packs of hounds is legal in both Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland, where it is conducted seasonally across rural landscapes to manage fox populations that prey on livestock and game birds. This practice supports numerous hunts, with participants following hounds on horseback or foot, differing from the UK's post-2004 restrictions by allowing full pursuit and kill by the pack without mandatory shooting. A legislative effort to ban it in the Republic advanced to first stage in May 2025, but as of October 2025, hunts continue under existing wildlife laws. In , fox hunting incorporates both mounted hunts with hounds (chasse à courre or vènerie) and shooting, legally permitted as foxes are classified as game huntable during open seasons from to . Hounds are used to flush foxes from cover, with kills often by gunshot rather than the pack, emphasizing amid high rural densities; animal welfare groups have advocated for bans since at least 2017 without success. Australia treats foxes as invasive pests responsible for significant agricultural damage, leading to varied control methods including mounted hunts with hounds primarily in Victoria, where around a dozen low-profile clubs operate weekly during winter months. These hunts focus on rather than , with landowners authorized to shoot foxes year-round under licensing, contrasting European ceremonial aspects. In , hunting with packs of hounds has been prohibited since July 3, 1934, under laws initiated by , restricting fox management to individual shooting, trapping, or den observation without pursuit by dogs. Similar bans apply in and , where fox hunting with hounds was outlawed to curb perceived cruelty, shifting to regulated shooting for .

Adaptations and Alternatives

Trail Hunting and Drag Hunting

Trail hunting emerged in the United Kingdom following the enactment of the Hunting Act 2004, which prohibited hunting wild mammals with dogs, as a method intended to replicate the experience of traditional fox hunting while adhering to legal requirements. In this practice, a human lays an artificial scent trail—typically using fox urine, urine from other mammals, or animal-based substances—across varied terrain mimicking potential quarry paths, with hounds trained to follow the scent rather than pursue live animals intentionally. The activity involves riders on horseback observing the hounds, but the law specifies that no fox or other wild mammal may be hunted as quarry, with any kills attributed to accidental encounters rather than deliberate pursuit. Proponents, including hunt associations, argue it preserves the social, equestrian, and hound-training elements of historic hunts, maintaining infrastructure for over 200 registered packs as of 2020. Critics, including organizations, contend that trail hunting functions as a pretext for continued illegal hunting, with trails often laid in habitats using scents that attract wild animals, leading to frequent instances of hounds chasing and killing foxes—over 400 convictions for offenses recorded between 2019 and 2023 despite the practice's supposed compliance. Independent monitors and cases have documented hunts failing to lay verifiable trails or directing hounds toward live , undermining claims of it as a genuine alternative. As of October 2025, trail hunting remains legal under exemptions in the Hunting Act for , though the Labour government has committed to a consultation on banning it in autumn 2025, citing persistent evasion of the ban's intent. Drag hunting, distinct from trail hunting, predates the 2004 legislation as an established equestrian sport emphasizing speed and obstacle navigation over simulation. It employs hounds or bloodhounds to follow a synthetic scent, such as aniseed or , dragged along a predetermined course—often 2-3 miles long with timed segments and artificial fences—laid by vehicle shortly before the event. Unlike trail hunting's unpredictable paths in natural countryside, drag hunts follow fixed routes designed for competitive , avoiding animal-derived scents and live entirely, which positions it as a non-lethal pursuit focused on rider skill and performance. The two differ fundamentally in intent and execution: drag hunting prioritizes structured athleticism without replicating hunt unpredictability, while trail hunting seeks to emulate traditional fox 's exploratory nature, including scenting in coverts, but invites scrutiny for enabling incidental harm. Drag hunting has sustained independent packs, particularly in enclosed venues, as a viable alternative preserving equestrian traditions without legal controversies tied to laws. Both practices have supported the welfare of hunting breeds post-ban by providing exercise and purpose, though trail hunting's reliance on quasi-natural scents has drawn more enforcement challenges, with data indicating it sustains far more packs than pure drag methods alone.

Non-Lethal and Simulated Hunts

Drag hunting entails hounds following an artificial scent trail, typically laid by a or dragging a sack containing aniseed or another strong-smelling substance over a predetermined course of up to three hours with multiple lines. This practice, which originated in the as a training method for hounds and riders, emphasizes speed, , and pack work without pursuing or killing live animals, allowing for controlled routes and guaranteed rest periods after predictable runs. Drag hunts operate in the and the , where they serve as a standalone equestrian distinct from traditional field hunting, often on private land with fewer participants due to the fixed nature of the trails. Trail hunting, introduced in the United Kingdom following the 2004 Hunting Act that prohibited hunting wild mammals with dogs, involves laying a scent trail using fox urine or similar animal-based fluids approximately 20-30 minutes before the hunt to replicate the unpredictability of a live fox's path. Proponents, including the , argue it preserves the full-day format, terrain variability, and communal traditions of fox hunting while complying with the law by lacking intent to pursue wild quarry, with hunts required to document trail-laying evidence during investigations. As of February 2025, however, the government has reaffirmed its commitment to banning trail hunting, citing persistent non-compliance; police data from 2005-2021 recorded over 1,000 incidents of suspected illegal hunting, many linked to trail events where hounds were observed pursuing and killing foxes despite official claims. Independent monitoring by groups like the League Against Cruel Sports has documented cases, such as a 2021 conviction of a huntsman for encouraging illegal hunting during a trail event, highlighting enforcement challenges where proving intent remains difficult under the Act's exemptions. In the United States, the Masters of Foxhounds Association promotes "chase-only" protocols in many registered hunts, where the emphasis is on the pursuit and evasion rather than killing the , with often called off before a dispatch; this non-lethal approach, ratified by the MFHA, avoids the outright of artificial trails but aligns with broader adaptations to reduce lethality while maintaining hound and horse exercise. variants also exist independently in for similar recreational purposes. These simulated methods collectively sustain rural equestrian skills and pack management, though critics contend they fail to fully replicate the biological dynamics of live hunts, potentially leading to welfare issues for overworked in prolonged artificial pursuits.

Debates and Empirical Assessments

Animal Welfare Claims Versus Biological Realities

Opponents of fox hunting frequently assert that the pursuit inflicts severe psychological stress on the fox due to prolonged fear and exertion, followed by a painful death from being torn apart by hounds. These claims often draw from veterinary opinions emphasizing tissue damage and potential prolonged agony in kills involving multiple hounds. However, such assessments typically overlook comparative biological contexts, where red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) routinely experience analogous stressors in the wild as prey species adapted to evasion and burst activity. Biologically, wild red foxes face annual mortality rates of approximately 50-60% in adults and up to 75% in juveniles, with causes including predation, , , and vehicular collisions rather than . , a parasitic infestation causing intense itching, , and secondary infections, accounts for a significant portion of non-human-induced deaths, often leading to weeks of debilitation before fatality—far exceeding typical hunt durations of 15-30 minutes. Road traffic, another prevalent killer, results in or internal injuries that can prolong suffering if not immediately lethal, contrasting with hound kills that frequently achieve rapid via shaking. In natural predation scenarios, foxes encounter similar chase-and-capture dynamics from larger carnivores or , for which their — including high-speed evasion capabilities up to 48 km/h—has evolutionarily adapted without evidence of disproportionate welfare detriment beyond survival selection pressures. Empirical data from the 2004 hunting ban further contextualize welfare debates, showing no substantial surge in foxes, which would indicate unchecked proliferation absent as a mortality factor; instead, regional declines of up to 41% since the mid-1990s have been observed, attributed to intensified , changes, and regulatory mechanisms like density-dependent factors. Pre-ban modeling and temporary moratoriums, such as the 2001 foot-and-mouth suspension, similarly revealed minimal impacts from halted , suggesting it constitutes a minor fraction of overall fox mortality compared to intrinsic biological limits. Lethal control methods, including with hounds, align with predation's role in ecosystems by targeting surplus individuals, potentially reducing and disease transmission without elevating net suffering beyond baseline wild conditions. While anti-hunting sources may amplify acute kill-phase distress, broader causal analysis prioritizes foxes' resilience to pursuit—evident in their ecological success—and the protracted, untreated agonies of alternative deaths, underscoring that replicates rather than deviates from biological norms.

Civil Liberties and Enforcement Challenges

The Hunting Act 2004, which prohibits wild mammals with dogs in , has proven difficult to enforce due to evidentiary challenges in proving intent to hunt rather than pursue legal alternatives like trail hunting. Prosecutions require demonstrating that hounds were deliberately used to chase a live animal, often amid rural terrain where distinguishing between scented trails and accidental fox pursuits is contentious, leading to low rates—only 26.7% of cases against organized hunts have resulted in at least one since the Act's implementation. Official figures indicate 438 convictions under the Act from 2010 onward, including just 42 in 2022, despite reports of hundreds of hunts occurring weekly, underscoring systemic under-enforcement. Senior police officers have described the as "not fit for purpose," citing loopholes such as trail hunting—where hounds follow artificial scents but may inadvertently encounter foxes—that serve as covers for illegal activity, complicating investigations and deterring prosecutions due to resource constraints and legal ambiguities. England's most senior foxhunting noted in 2023 that the law permits practices indistinguishable from banned , rendering it unworkable without clearer definitions of offenses like "searching" for . These enforcement hurdles have persisted, with rural policing priorities often deprioritizing hunts amid competing demands, resulting in fewer than expected interventions despite public complaints and video evidence of apparent violations. Opponents of the ban have framed its imposition as an infringement on , arguing it represents undue state interference in consensual, traditional rural pursuits conducted on private land with participant agreement, akin to restrictions on other heritage sports. Such claims invoke to use and from arbitrary of non-harmful-to-humans activities, positing the Act as emblematic of urban legislative overreach on countryside customs. However, these arguments were rejected by the in 2009, which unanimously ruled that the ban does not violate Article 8 (right to private life) or other protections, affirming Parliament's democratic authority to prioritize over sporting traditions without eroding fundamental . Legal scholars counter that no extends to inflicting unnecessary on sentient animals for recreation, positioning the Act as a valid limit on conduct rather than a liberty erosion.

Political and Class-Based Critiques

Critiques of fox hunting have frequently invoked political dimensions, particularly in the , where the Hunting Act 2004 prohibited the practice amid debates over urban-rural divides and party politics. The Labour government's legislation, passed on 18 November 2004, was driven by commitments to but also served to consolidate support among urban voters less familiar with rural traditions. later indicated regret over the ban, citing undue pressure from a £1 million donation by animal rights supporter Paul Mallon and its role in alienating rural constituencies for a generation. Conservative leaders, such as in 2019, faced internal party backlash for pledging a free vote on repeal, highlighting hunting's persistence as a litmus test for rural loyalty within ranks. Class-based arguments against fox hunting portray it as an emblem of aristocratic privilege and , with detractors claiming it perpetuates hierarchies by concentrating influence among landowners and the . Such views frame the sport as a relic of elite excess, disconnected from modern egalitarian norms, and have been amplified by left-leaning activists who equate opposition to with broader anti-elitism. However, empirical assessments reveal broader participation: hunts historically included working-class elements like terriermen and rural laborers who managed hounds and terrain, alongside farmers reliant on for and community cohesion. polls underscore limited class exclusivity in sentiment, with a 2024 survey finding 79% overall support for maintaining the ban, including a two-to-one majority in rural areas favoring . Proponents counter that class critiques mask urban disdain for rural customs, framing the ban as inverted class warfare that disregards hunting's role in sustaining countryside economies and traditions without verifiable elitist monopoly. This perspective aligns with observations that hunts foster cross-class rural networks, from subscription-paying middle-class riders to professional staff, rather than purely aristocratic pursuits. Politically, the issue exacerbates partisan rifts, with Labour's urban base viewing repeal attempts as regressive, while Conservatives risk alienating core voters by upholding the amid ongoing debates. Despite these critiques, no peer-reviewed substantiates hunting as predominantly upper-class in composition, suggesting class narratives often serve rhetorical purposes over demographic reality.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.