Hubbry Logo
Gray foxGray foxMain
Open search
Gray fox
Community hub
Gray fox
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Gray fox
Gray fox
Gray fox
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Gray fox
Gray fox, southern Nevada.
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Mammalia
Order: Carnivora
Family: Canidae
Genus: Urocyon
Species:
U. cinereoargenteus
Binomial name
Urocyon cinereoargenteus
(Schreber, 1775)
Gray fox range

The gray fox (Urocyon cinereoargenteus), or grey fox, is an omnivorous mammal of the family Canidae, widespread throughout North America and Central America. This species and its only congener, the diminutive island fox (Urocyon littoralis) of the California Channel Islands, are the only living members of the genus Urocyon, which is considered to be genetically sister to all other living canids. Its species name cinereoargenteus means "ashen silver".

It was once the most common fox in the eastern United States, and though still found there, human advancement and deforestation allowed the red fox to become the predominant fox-like canid. Despite this post-colonial competition, the gray fox has been able to thrive in urban and suburban environments, one of the best examples being southern Florida.[2][3] The Pacific States and Great Lakes region still have the gray fox as their prevalent fox.[4][5][6]

Etymology

[edit]

The genus Urocyon comes from Ancient Greek οὐρά (ourá, "tail") + κύων (kúōn, "dog"). The species epithet cinereoargenteus is a combination of 'cinereo' (from 'cinereus') meaning ashen, and 'argenteus' (from argentum), meaning 'silver', referencing the color of the tail.

Description

[edit]

The gray fox is mainly distinguished from most other canids by its grizzled upper parts, black stripe down its tail and strong neck, ending in a black-tipped tail, while the skull can be easily distinguished from all other North American canids by its widely separated temporal ridges that form a 'U'-shape. Like other canids, the fox's ears and muzzle are angular and pointed. Its claws tend to be lengthier and curved.

There is little sexual dimorphism, save for the females being slightly smaller than males. The gray fox ranges from 76 to 112.5 cm (29.9 to 44.3 in) in total length. The tail measures 27.5 to 44.3 cm (10.8 to 17.4 in) of that length and its hind feet measure 100 to 150 mm (3.9 to 5.9 in). The gray fox typically weighs 3.6 to 7 kg (7.9 to 15.4 lb), though exceptionally large individuals can weigh as much as 9 kg (20 lb).[7][8][9][10] The gray fox is readily distinguished from the red fox by its obvious lack of the "black stockings" that stand out on the red fox. The grey fox has a stripe of black hair that runs along the middle of its tail, and individual guard hairs that are banded with white, gray, and black.[11] The gray fox displays white on the ears, throat, chest, belly, and hind legs.[11] Gray foxes also have black around their eyes, on the lips, and on their noses.[12]

Gray fox, showing black tail stripe, Sierra Nevada

In contrast to the species in genus Vulpes, such as the red fox, the gray fox has oval (instead of slit-like) pupils.[13](p122) The gray fox also has reddish coloration on parts of its body, including the legs, sides, feet, chest, and back and sides of the head and neck.[10] The stripe on the fox's tail ends in a black tip as well.[14] Its weight can be similar to that of a red fox, but the gray fox appears smaller because its fur is not as long and it has shorter limbs.[15]

The dental formula of U. cinereoargenteus is 3.1.4.23.1.4.3 = 42.[11]

Origin and genetics

[edit]
Gray fox kit at the Palo Alto Baylands in California

The gray fox appeared in North America during the mid-Pliocene (Hemphillian land animal age) epoch 3.6 million years ago (AEO) with the first fossil evidence found at the lower 111 Ranch site, Graham County, Arizona with contemporary mammals like the giant sloth, the elephant-like Cuvieronius, the large-headed llama, and the early small horses of Nannippus and Equus.[16] Faunal remains at two northern California cave sites confirm the presence of the gray fox during the late Pleistocene.[17] Genetic analysis has shown that the gray fox migrated into the northeastern United States post-Pleistocene in association with the Medieval Climate Anomaly warming trend.[18]

Genetic analyses of the fox-like canids confirmed that the gray fox is a distinct genus from the red foxes (Vulpes spp.). The genus Urocyon is considered to be sister to the other living canid taxa.[19] Genetically, the gray fox often clusters with two other ancient lineages: The east Asian raccoon dog (Nyctereutes procyonoides) and the African bat-eared fox (Otocyon megalotis).[20]

The chromosome number is 66 (diploid) with a fundamental number of 70. The autosomes include 31 pairs of sub-graded subacrocentrics, but one only pair of metacentrics.[21]

Recent mitochondrial genetic studies suggests divergence of North American eastern and western gray foxes in the Irvingtonian mid-Pleistocene into separate sister taxa.[22] The gray fox's dwarf relative, the island fox, is likely descended from mainland gray foxes.[23] These foxes apparently were transported by humans to the islands and from island to island, and are descended from a minimum of 3–4 matrilineal founders.[22]

Distribution and habitat

[edit]
A yawning gray fox, northern Florida

The species occurs throughout most rocky, wooded, brushy regions of the southern half of North America from southern Canada (Manitoba through southeastern Quebec)[24] to the northern part of South America (Venezuela and Colombia), excluding the mountains of northwestern United States.[25] The species prefers a mix of wooded and agricultural land in the Midwest, juniper forests as well as ponderosa pine in the west, and deciduous forests in the east.[26] It is the only canid whose natural range spans both North and South America.[27] In some areas, high population densities exist near brush-covered bluffs.[11] The species prefers a mix of forest and agricultural land towards the southern part of their range (Belize ).[28] In southeastern Mexico, the species prefers areas with a human presence such as near roads.[29]

Behavior

[edit]

The gray fox is specifically adapted to climb trees. Its strong, hooked claws allow it to scramble up trees to escape many predators, such as the domestic dog or the coyote,[30] or to reach tree-bound or arboreal food sources. It can climb branchless, vertical trunks to heights of 18 metres (59 ft) and jump from branch to branch.[31] It descends primarily by jumping from branch to branch, or by descending slowly backwards like a domestic cat. The gray fox is primarily nocturnal or crepuscular and makes its den in hollow trees, stumps or appropriated burrows during the day. Such gray fox tree dens may be located 30 ft (9 m) above the ground.[13](p122) For the most part, they rest on the ground rather than higher up in trees.

Prior to European colonization of North America, the red fox was found primarily in boreal forest and the gray fox in deciduous forest. With the increase in human populations in North America, their habitat selection has adapted: Gray foxes that live near human populations tend to choose areas near hardwood trees, locations used primarily by humans, or roads to utilize as their habitat.

The increase of coyote populations around North America has reduced certain fox populations, so gray foxes choose habitats that will allow escape from coyotes, therefore the foxes's tendency to live nearer to areas where humans are active. The larger predators of the gray fox, like coyotes and bobcats, tend to avoid human-use areas and paved roads. They heavily utilize the edges of forests as a travel corridor, which is used for primary movement from place to place. Their choices do not change based on sex, the season, or the time of day. They also do the majority of their hunting in edges, and use them to escape from predators as well. Gray foxes are thus known as an "edge species."[32]

Interspecies competition

[edit]
A red fox (Vulpes vulpes) confronting a gray fox, San Joaquin Wildlife Refuge

Gray foxes often hunt for the same prey as bobcats and coyotes who occupy the same region. To avoid interspecific competition, the gray fox has developed certain behaviors and habits to increase their survival chances. In regions where gray foxes and coyotes hunt for the same food, the gray fox has been observed to give space to the coyote, staying within its own established range for hunting.[33][34] Gray foxes may also avoid competitors by occupying different habitats from them. In California, gray foxes do this by living in chaparral where their competitors are fewer and the low shrubbery provides them a greater chance to escape from a dangerous encounter.[34] It also has been suggested that gray foxes could be more active at night than during the day to avoid larger, diurnal competitors.[34]

Still, gray foxes frequently fall victim to bobcats and coyotes. When killed, the carcasses are often unconsumed, suggesting they are victims of intraguild predation.[33] These gray foxes are often killed on or near the boundary of their established range, when they begin to interfere with their competitors.[33] Gray foxes are known as mesopredators because they are mid-tier predators and their prey consists mostly of smaller mammals, while coyotes are known as de facto apex predators due to the removal of other apex predators, like wolves, in North America.[35][36] This explains the gray fox's tendency to change behavior in response to the coyote threat, as they are essentially lower on the food chain.

Reproduction

[edit]

The gray fox is assumed to be monogamous, like other foxes. The breeding season of the gray fox varies geographically; in Michigan, the gray fox mates in early March, in Alabama, breeding peaks occur in February. The gestation period lasts approximately 53 days. Litter size ranges from 1–7, with a mean of 3.8 young per female.

Gray fox kits at Zion Canyon

The sexual maturity of females is around 10 months of age. Kits begin to hunt with their parents at the age of 3 months. By the time that they are 4 months old, the kits will have developed their permanent dentition and can now easily forage on their own. The family group remains together until the autumn, when the young males reach sexual maturity, then they disperse.[21] In a study of 9 juvenile gray foxes, only the males dispersed, moving up to 84 km (52 mi). The juvenile females stayed within proximity of the den within 3 km (1.9 mi) and always returned.[37] Adult gray foxes showed no signs of dispersion for either sex.[38] The gray fox will typically live between six and ten years.[39]

The annual reproductive cycle of males has been described through epididymal smears. They become fertile earlier and remain fertile longer than females.[21]

Logs, trees, rocks, burrows, or abandoned dwellings serve as suitable den sites. Dens are used at any time during the year but mostly during whelping season. Dens are built in brushy or wooded regions and are better concealed than the dens of the red fox.[11]

Diet

[edit]
A gray fox at night
Adult male and female gray fox

The gray fox is an omnivorous, solitary hunter. It frequently preys on the eastern cottontail (Sylvilagus floridanus) in the eastern U.S., though it will readily catch voles, shrews, and birds. In California, the gray fox primarily eats rodents (such as deer mice, woodrats, and cotton rats),[40] followed by lagomorphs, e.g. jackrabbit, brush rabbit, etc.[30] When it is available, gray foxes may also feed on carrion.[40] In some parts of the Western United States (such as in the Zion National Park in Utah), the gray fox is primarily insectivorous and herbivorous.[13](p124) Fruit is an important component of the diet of the gray fox, and they seek whatever fruits are readily available, generally eating more vegetable matter than does the red fox (Vulpes vulpes).[7] Generally, there is an increase in fruits and invertebrates (such as grasshoppers, beetles, butterflies, and moths)[40] within the gray fox's diet in the transition from winter to spring. As nuts, grains, and fruits become more numerous, they are cached by foxes. Typically, they attempt to cover the area with their scent either through their scent glands or urine. This marking serves the dual purpose of allowing them to find the food again later and preventing other animals from taking it.[41]

Ecosystem role

[edit]

Since woodrats, cotton rats, and mice make up a large part of the gray fox's diet, they serve as important regulators of small rodent populations.

In addition to their beneficial predation on rodents, gray foxes are also less welcome hosts to some external and internal parasites, which include fleas, lice, nematodes, and tapeworms.[41] In the United States, the most common parasite of the gray fox is a flea (Pulex simulans); however, several previously undocumented parasitic arthropods were found in populations in central Mexico, and a warming climate may encourage them to migrate north.[42]

Hunting

[edit]

Gray foxes are hunted in the U.S. The intensity of the hunting has correlated with the value of their pelts. Between the 1970–1971 and 1975–1976 hunting seasons, the price of gray fox pelts greatly increased and the number of individuals hunted jumped over six-fold from 26,109 to 163,458.[21] It has been recently reported that over 500,000 gray foxes are killed every year for their fur.[43]

Subspecies

[edit]
U. c. fraterculus
Tikal, Guatemala

There are 16 subspecies recognized for the gray fox.[21]

  • Urocyon cinereoargenteus borealis (New England)
  • Urocyon cinereoargenteus californicus (southern California)
  • Urocyon cinereoargenteus cinereoargenteus (eastern United States)
  • Urocyon cinereoargenteus costaricensis (Costa Rica)
  • Urocyon cinereoargenteus floridanus (Gulf states)
  • Urocyon cinereoargenteus fraterculus (Yucatán)
  • Urocyon cinereoargenteus furvus (Panama)
  • Urocyon cinereoargenteus guatemalae (southernmost Mexico south to Nicaragua)
  • Urocyon cinereoargenteus madrensis (southern Sonora, south-west Chihuahua, and north-west Durango)
  • Urocyon cinereoargenteus nigrirostris (south-west Mexico)
  • Urocyon cinereoargenteus ocythous (Central Plains states)
  • Urocyon cinereoargenteus orinomus (southern Mexico, Isthmus of Tehuantepec)
  • Urocyon cinereoargenteus peninsularis (Baja California)
  • Urocyon cinereoargenteus scottii (south-western United States and northern Mexico)
  • Urocyon cinereoargenteus townsendi (northern California and Oregon)
  • Urocyon cinereoargenteus venezuelae (Colombia and Venezuela)

Parasites

[edit]

Parasites of gray fox include trematode Metorchis conjunctus.[44] Other common parasites that were collected on gray foxes in Texas were a variety of tapeworms (Mesocestoides litteratus, Taenia pisiformis, Taenia serialis) and roundworms (Ancylostoma caninum, Ancylostoma braziliense, Haemonchus similis, Spirocerca lupi, Physaloptera rara, Eucoleus aerophilus). T. pisiformis was the most common parasite species and was associated with frequent impacts on health.[45]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Gray fox

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The gray fox (Urocyon cinereoargenteus) is a small to medium-sized canid distinguished by its unique arboreal adaptations among fox species, enabling it to climb trees with sharp, recurved claws on its forepaws. Native to a broad range across North and , from southern through the to northern , it features grizzled gray fur accented with reddish tones on the sides, white underparts, and a distinctive black stripe running from the neck along the back to the tip of its bushy tail. Adults typically measure 32 to 45 cm in body length with a 30 to 44 cm tail, weighing 3 to 7 kg, though individuals up to 9 kg have been recorded. This adaptable species inhabits diverse environments but thrives in woodland-brush ecotones, mixed forests, shrublands, and areas with dense cover such as thickets or rocky outcrops, avoiding open grasslands and deserts. Gray foxes are primarily nocturnal and solitary hunters outside the breeding season, utilizing their climbing ability to escape predators, hunt arboreal prey, or rest in tree cavities. Their diet is omnivorous, consisting mainly of small mammals like rabbits and rodents, supplemented by birds, insects, fruits, and vegetation, with foraging patterns varying seasonally. Reproduction occurs once annually, with monogamous pairs forming; females give birth to 3 to 5 in a den—often a , rock crevice, or abandoned —after a 63-day , and both parents care for the young until dispersal at 4 to 6 months. Home ranges average 3 to 12 square kilometers for males and smaller for females, marked by scent and vocalizations including barks and screams. Despite widespread distribution, populations face threats from , vehicle collisions, and disease, though the species is generally considered of least concern globally, with regional declines noted in some areas due to limited ecological data.

Taxonomy and Etymology

Etymology

The scientific name of the gray fox is Urocyon cinereoargenteus, first described as Canis cinereoargenteus by in 1775. The genus name derives from the terms oura (οὐρά), meaning "tail," and kyōn (κύων), meaning "," alluding to the animal's prominent bushy tail that resembles that of a dog. The specific epithet cinereoargenteus is a compound New Latin word formed from cinereus (ashen or gray) and argenteus (silvery), reflecting the species' grizzled, ashy-silver fur coloration on the upper body and back. The common English name "gray fox" arose in the 18th and 19th centuries to describe the animal's predominant salt-and-pepper gray coat, serving to differentiate it from the (Vulpes vulpes), which features a distinctive reddish-orange pelage and was more familiar to European settlers. Early naturalists contributed to the species' nomenclature through regional and descriptive terms; for instance, depicted and named it the "Grey Fox" using the binomial Canis (Vulpes) virginianus in his 1845 publication The Viviparous Quadrupeds of , emphasizing its commonality in the . Historical synonyms such as "Virginian fox" similarly highlighted its prevalence in and surrounding areas during colonial-era observations.

Taxonomy and Evolution

The gray fox (Urocyon cinereoargenteus) belongs to the genus in the family and the order , making it one of the most basal living members of the dog family. This classification reflects its distinct evolutionary position, separate from more derived canid groups like the true foxes of the genus . The lineage diverged from the lineage and other canids during the epoch, approximately 8–12 million years ago, marking an early split in canid radiation that originated in . Evolutionary adaptations in the gray fox, such as its unique arboreal climbing ability among canids—enabled by rotatable wrists and semi-retractable claws—likely arose from its prolonged isolation in North American habitats, where forested environments favored tree-scaling for predation, escape, and denning. This trait distinguishes from Old World canids and underscores its ancient continental origins, as the genus never participated in the great faunal interchange across the Bering land bridge. Genetic studies, particularly those analyzing , confirm Urocyon's basal position within , revealing deep phylogenetic divergence and genetic isolation from Old World canid lineages due to geographic barriers. These analyses show that the gray fox represents an early-branching , with mitochondrial sequences indicating no intermixing with Eurasian canids post-divergence. The fossil record supports this ancient history, with early Urocyon remains, such as cf. Urocyon sp., dating to the (approximately 9 million years ago) in , from sites like the Love Bone Bed in . These fossils document the genus's persistence and in North American ecosystems long before the Pleistocene diversification of modern subspecies.

Subspecies

The gray fox (Urocyon cinereoargenteus) is divided into 16 recognized , primarily differentiated by geographic range, body size, and variations in pelage coloration and pattern. These reflect adaptations to diverse environments across North and , from southern to northern , with distinctions often clinal rather than discrete. Body size increases northward, with northern exhibiting larger overall dimensions, including longer skulls and limbs, compared to smaller southern forms; for instance, adults in northern populations can weigh up to 7 kg, while tropical ones average 3-4 kg. Pelage variations include grayer, more grizzled coats in temperate zones and darker, richer reddish-brown tones in tropical , aiding in dense forests or arid scrub. Notable subspecies include U. c. cinereoargenteus (Schreber, 1775), found from southern Massachusetts to Illinois and south to central South Carolina and the Mississippi River, characterized by a classic grizzled gray coat with prominent rusty-reddish sides; and U. c. scottii (Mearns, 1890), occurring in the southwestern United States (western Texas to southern Nevada) and northern Mexico (Chihuahua), featuring paler, more arid-adapted fur with reduced reddish tones. Other examples are U. c. borealis (Merriam, 1898) in New England and southern Ontario, the largest subspecies with robust builds suited to cooler climates; U. c. floridanus (Rhoads, 1895) along the southeastern U.S. Gulf Coast, showing denser underfur; and U. c. costaricensis (Allen, 1914) in Central America (Costa Rica to Nicaragua), with darker tropical pelage. Southern subspecies like U. c. guatemalae (Merriam, 1900) in Guatemala and U. c. madrensis (Goldman, 1915) in western Mexico exhibit smaller sizes and intensified black markings on the back and tail. Recent genetic analyses have revealed deep between eastern and western North American lineages dating to approximately 1 million years ago, with evidence of historical hybridization, prompting debates on whether some should be merged or elevated to status based on molecular data rather than morphology alone. These findings, from 2023 studies, highlight the need for updated taxonomic revisions to better reflect phylogeographic history.

Physical Characteristics

Description

The gray fox (Urocyon cinereoargenteus) is a medium-sized canid characterized by an elongated body and relatively short legs, with a height ranging from 32 to 45 cm. Total body length, including the tail, measures 75 to 115 cm, while adults typically weigh 3 to 7 kg. is minimal, with males only slightly larger than females on average. The fur of the gray fox is grizzled gray on the upper parts, interspersed with white on the , inner ears, and undersides, accented by reddish tones on the and rust-colored patches on the sides. A distinctive black stripe runs along the back and extends to the tip, complemented by a mane of stiff black hairs. The is bushy, aiding in balance, and the ears are rounded. Gray foxes undergo a seasonal molt, shedding their thicker winter in spring for a sleeker summer pelage. Unique anatomical adaptations include strong, semi-retractable claws on all feet and flexible, rotating ankles, enabling the gray fox to climb trees effectively by grasping trunks and descending headfirst. The is adapted for an omnivorous diet, featuring a dental formula of 3.1.4.2 / 3.1.4.3 = 42 teeth, with prominent teeth for shearing meat and vegetation.

Genetics

The gray fox (Urocyon cinereoargenteus) possesses a diploid number of 2n = 66, a that distinguishes it from other canids, such as the (Canis latrans) with 2n = 78. This chromosomal configuration, characterized by numerous acrocentric and metacentric , reflects the basal position of the genus within and contributes to from more derived canid lineages. Genetic diversity in gray fox populations varies regionally, with North American groups exhibiting heterozygosity typically around 0.50–0.65 based on loci analyses, indicative of broad across forested and woodland habitats. These patterns underscore the ' adaptability in expansive ranges. Hybridization between gray foxes and sympatric canids like red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) or coyotes is exceedingly rare, primarily due to substantial genetic barriers including divergent karyotypes and mitochondrial incompatibilities that prevent viable offspring. Anecdotal reports of interspecific crosses exist but lack genetic confirmation, reinforcing the role of chromosomal and molecular divergence in maintaining integrity across overlapping distributions. Population genetics research on gray foxes frequently employs molecular markers such as microsatellites for assessing , , and in North American populations, with sets of 6–10 loci yielding robust estimates of diversity and admixture. More recently, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) derived from whole-genome sequencing have enabled finer-scale analyses of phylogeographic breaks and adaptive variation, surpassing microsatellites in resolution for detecting subtle population differentiation. These tools have been instrumental in elucidating lineage divergences estimated at 1 million years ago between eastern and western clades.

Distribution and Habitat

Geographic Range

The gray fox (Urocyon cinereoargenteus) is native to a broad expanse across North and Central America, extending from southern Canada southward through the United States and Mexico into Central America and reaching northern South America as far as northern Colombia and Venezuela. This distribution excludes extreme northern latitudes, much of the Great Plains, the Great Basin, and high-elevation regions such as the Rocky Mountains. No introduced populations of the species have been established outside this native range. Historically, gray foxes recolonized much of following the Pleistocene epoch, with fossil evidence indicating their presence at over 40 sites during that period, primarily in the southwest, and subsequent expansion northward during post-glacial warming phases. More recently, the species has exhibited northward range shifts, potentially driven by , with confirmed records extending into southern as of the mid-2010s. In optimal habitats within their range, gray fox densities typically range from 1 to 5 individuals per square kilometer, though estimates vary by and local conditions. Recent studies as of 2025 have documented the species' expansion into suburban environments, where they adapt to human-modified landscapes alongside rural and forested areas, though regional declines have been noted in areas like . Subspecies distributions correspond to geographic divisions within this overall range, with variations such as U. c. cinereoargenteus predominant in the .

Habitat Preferences

The gray fox ( cinereoargenteus) favors a range of wooded habitats, including and mixed forests, brushy fields, and edges, where it thrives in areas with interspersed cover rather than expansive open landscapes. It generally avoids open prairies and grasslands, such as those in the central and northern , due to the lack of suitable vegetative structure for concealment and denning. These preferences extend across elevations from up to approximately 3,000 m, particularly in rugged, forested terrains of North and . A key aspect of the gray fox's use involves arboreal and rocky features for security, with individuals frequently climbing trees or utilizing rocky outcrops as dens, escape routes, and resting sites; this behavior leverages their specialized structure for vertical ascent. In fragmented landscapes, including urban-adjacent areas, gray foxes demonstrate adaptability by establishing territories in preserved wetlands and using restored corridors to navigate human-modified environments, as observed in ongoing monitoring at the Palo Alto Baylands Nature Preserve. At the microhabitat scale, gray foxes select sites with dense vegetation for protective cover during foraging and resting, often positioning dens near water sources such as or riparian zones to facilitate hydration and prey availability.

Behavior and Ecology

Daily and Seasonal Behavior

The gray fox (Urocyon cinereoargenteus) exhibits primarily nocturnal and crepuscular activity patterns, with peak movements occurring at dawn and dusk as it forages and patrols its territory. During the day, individuals typically rest in dens or elevated sites such as hollows, emerging as fades to minimize encounters with diurnal predators and competitors. Studies indicate that gray foxes travel greater distances per hour at night compared to daytime, reflecting adaptations to low- navigation through dense . Home ranges average 2-12 km², with males maintaining larger territories—often 1.5 to 2 times the size of females—to encompass sufficient resources for paired mates and . Daily movements typically cover 5-10 km as foxes traverse their home ranges, using a combination of trotting and bounding gaits to investigate cover and potential food sources. These travels are guided by keen sensory adaptations, including an acute sense of olfaction for detecting prey scents up to several hundred meters away and sensitive hearing that allows localization of small mammals or through rustling sounds. Vocalizations play a key role in territorial maintenance, with barks serving as alarm or contact calls and screams used during confrontations to assert dominance over intruders. Seasonally, behavior shifts in response to environmental demands. In winter, activity becomes more diurnal to capitalize on warmer midday temperatures for , as shorter days and colder nights limit nocturnal efficiency, leading to increased daytime travel for calorically dense prey. Spring marks the denning period, when pregnant females and pairs select elevated or ground dens for whelping, reducing overall mobility to protect newborns while males provision from nearby ranges. Gray foxes also employ arboreal —facilitated by rotatable wrists and semi-retractable claws—to evade ground threats.

Social Structure and Communication

The gray fox (Urocyon cinereoargenteus) exhibits a predominantly solitary social structure, with individuals maintaining independence outside of breeding and pup-rearing periods. Adults form socially monogamous pair bonds during the breeding season, which typically last for the duration of the reproductive cycle, though genetic studies indicate occasional multiple paternity within litters, suggesting that social monogamy does not always align with genetic fidelity. Following birth, pairs transition into temporary family groups that include the breeding adults and their pups, lasting until the young disperse at around 4-6 months of age; these groups facilitate pup care and protection but dissolve as juveniles become independent. Territoriality plays a central role in gray fox , with mated pairs defending shared home ranges that exhibit high spatial overlap between partners—often 92–95%—while showing minimal intrusion from neighboring pairs or unrelated individuals. These ranges, averaging 2-12 km² depending on quality, are primarily maintained through indirect means rather than frequent aggressive encounters, allowing pairs to coordinate and denning without constant proximity. Overlap increases slightly during pup-rearing to support family cohesion, but dispersal of subadults typically occurs outside established pair territories to minimize conflict. Communication among gray foxes relies on a multimodal system involving chemical, visual, and acoustic signals to convey territory boundaries, , and alarms. Scent marking is the primary method, achieved through , feces, and secretions from supra-caudal and other glands deposited on prominent features like rocks, trees, and community scrapes; these marks reinforce pair territories and signal individual identity, with over-marking of conspecific or heterospecific scats common to assert dominance. Visual cues include postures—such as erect tails during confident or aggressive displays and tucked tails in submission—along with positions and body orientations that facilitate non-vocal interactions during encounters. The vocal repertoire consists mainly of barks, yaps, , growls, and screams, used for alarm, contact, and territorial warnings, though gray foxes are generally quieter than other canids and do not howl.

Interspecies Interactions

The gray fox (Urocyon cinereoargenteus) engages in competitive interactions with sympatric mesopredators, particularly coyotes (Canis latrans) and bobcats (Lynx rufus), over shared resources such as dens and prey. Studies in urban and fragmented landscapes have documented asymmetrical intraguild , where coyotes exhibit behavioral dominance, displacing gray foxes from optimal areas and occasionally predating upon them, though the focus here is on resource overlap. In spring breeding seasons, dietary analyses reveal low to moderate overlap in vertebrate prey consumption with these species, potentially leading to exploitative that influences gray fox efficiency. Recent studies as of 2025 indicate gray fox populations are declining in the Midwest and Southeast U.S., partly due to increased from coyotes and changes. In urban environments, red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) contribute to , which may exacerbate gray fox declines in some areas. Symbiotic relationships involving gray foxes contribute to ecosystem dynamics through endozoochory, where their frugivorous diet facilitates via scat. Gray foxes consume fruits from like (Arctostaphylos pungens) and Mexican fan palm (), depositing viable seeds at distances that promote plant regeneration in fragmented habitats. This mutualism benefits dispersed plants by enhancing rates post-passage through the fox's digestive system. Additionally, gray foxes occasionally participate in commensal scavenging with turkey vultures (Cathartes aura) at carrion sites, where both exploit the same resources without direct conflict, allowing vultures to access aerial vantage while foxes forage on the ground. To mitigate encounters with larger carnivores, gray foxes employ arboreal avoidance strategies, leveraging their unique climbing ability to evade pursuit. Equipped with hooked claws and rotatable wrists, they ascend tree trunks rapidly, reaching heights beyond the reach of ground-based predators like mountain lions (Puma concolor). This behavior not only reduces direct confrontations but also allows temporary refuge during territorial disputes, maintaining spatial separation from competitors.

Reproduction and Life History

Mating and Reproduction

The gray fox ( cinereoargenteus) breeds seasonally, with the timing influenced by and . In northern portions of its range, such as the and , mating typically occurs from to March, peaking in late February to early March. In southern regions, including and , breeding begins earlier, often in , while in tropical areas, it may take place year-round to align with resource availability. Gray foxes are socially monogamous, forming pair bonds that often persist across multiple breeding seasons and support cooperative reproductive efforts. During , which coincides with the breeding period from January through March, males accompany and trail receptive females to establish and reinforce these bonds; mutual grooming between potential mates further strengthens pair cohesion. Pairs collaborate on den preparation, selecting and readying sheltered sites such as rock crevices, hollow logs, or tree hollows in advance of parturition. Following successful , lasts 53 to 63 days. Litters average 4 but range from 2 to 7, depending on factors like maternal condition and quality.

Development and Lifespan

Gray fox are born altricial, blind, and deaf, weighing approximately 85 grams, with dark skin and sparse fur that transitions to a grayish coat within the first two weeks. Their eyes open around 10 days of age, and by four weeks, they begin venturing from , developing coordination and exploratory behaviors. occurs between 8 and 10 weeks, when shift from milk to solid foods regurgitated or brought by parents, marking the transition to more active . By three months, accompany adults on hunting trips, honing skills in and capturing prey, and achieve full independence around six months, though they often remain with the family unit until dispersal. Parental care is biparental, with both foxes sharing responsibilities for denning, grooming, and of , which typically consists of 1-7 . play a key role in provisioning, delivering food to the female and during early development and continuing to supply the family after , which supports kit growth and survival. Dispersal generally occurs in the fall, when subadults, now sexually mature at about 10 months, leave to establish territories, reducing competition within the natal group. In the wild, gray foxes have an average lifespan of 6-10 years, though first-year mortality is high due to factors such as predation, , and juvenile from inadequate skills or resource . In captivity, individuals can live up to 15 years, benefiting from protection against environmental hazards and consistent nutrition.

Diet and Foraging

Dietary Composition

The gray fox (Urocyon cinereoargenteus) exhibits an omnivorous diet, with small mammals forming a major component in many studies, particularly in northern populations and during winter, where they can comprise up to ~70% of diet volume based on scat analyses. Primary prey includes such as mice and voles, as well as lagomorphs like cottontail rabbits, which provide essential high-protein resources. Birds and , including and crustaceans, account for variable portions of the diet, serving as supplementary sources of protein and fats, though their occurrence varies with local abundance. Fruits and vegetation contribute substantially to the diet, showing pronounced seasonal shifts; for instance, in autumn, persimmons, grapes, berries, and mast such as acorns can constitute up to 70% of intake in some regions, supplementing animal matter during periods of prey scarcity. Large prey is rarely consumed, reflecting the gray fox's preference for smaller, more accessible items. Scat studies highlight the species' dietary breadth, with animal matter often exceeding 60% volume in winter (e.g., 67% from rabbits, , and birds in northern populations), dropping in summer as plant foods increase. Regional differences influence composition; in southern habitats like those in , insects and arthropods occur in up to 53% of scats. Nutritionally, the high protein content from mammalian prey supports reproductive demands. Overall, scat analyses across studies confirm opportunistic feeding, with diet diversity indexed by Shannon's evenness (H' ≈ 1.8 annually), underscoring adaptability to local resources.

Foraging Strategies

Gray foxes employ a variety of opportunistic strategies adapted to their habitats, relying on stealth and versatility to capture prey. They frequently stalk small mammals using dense cover for concealment, approaching targets with low, deliberate movements before pouncing to subdue them. This technique is particularly effective against and rabbits, where the fox's keen senses of smell, sight, and hearing detect potential prey from a distance. Unique among canids, gray foxes utilize their ability to access arboreal resources, scaling trees with rotatable wrists and hooked claws to pursue birds or gather fruits directly from branches. This expands their range beyond ground-level pursuits, allowing them to exploit elevated sources that competitors cannot reach. When excess is obtained, gray foxes cache surplus items by digging shallow holes with their forepaws and covering them for later consumption, a that helps manage variable food availability. Foraging activity is primarily nocturnal or crepuscular, with gray foxes emerging at or dawn to hunt and reduce encounters with diurnal predators or human activity. This timing enhances their efficiency in low-light conditions, where their aids in ambush tactics, though they may opportunistically forage during daylight if prey is abundant.

Role in Ecosystem

Ecological Contributions

The gray fox (Urocyon cinereoargenteus) serves as a key predator in its native ecosystems, helping to regulate populations of small mammals such as and rabbits. This predation pressure prevents excessive herbivory that could lead to and vegetation degradation in forests, woodlands, and edge habitats. By controlling these prey species, gray foxes indirectly support stability and reduce the spread of agricultural pests, benefiting both natural and human-modified landscapes. In addition to its carnivorous role, the gray fox aids forest regeneration through seed dispersal via endozoochory. It consumes a variety of fruits, with seeds often passing intact through its gut and being deposited in scat at distant sites, promoting the establishment of new and enhancing in temperate and tropical dry forests. Research indicates that gray foxes disperse an average of 66.8 seeds per scat, positioning them as one of the most effective carnivorous dispersers in these environments, which supports natural succession and resilience against disturbance. The gray fox also functions as an indicator species, reflecting broader due to its sensitivity to and loss. Preferring dense wooded areas with cover, its populations decline in fragmented landscapes signals disruptions in habitat connectivity and potential threats to other woodland-dependent species. This vulnerability underscores the need for conserving intact corridors to maintain ecological integrity. Furthermore, by occasionally excavating dens in loose , gray foxes contribute to minor aeration, which can enhance local cycling and microbial activity in den sites.

Predators and Parasites

Adult gray foxes (Urocyon cinereoargenteus) face few natural predators owing to their agility and unique ability among canids to climb trees, which enables them to evade threats effectively. Primary predators include coyotes (Canis latrans), bobcats (Lynx rufus), and great horned owls (Bubo virginianus), which occasionally prey on adults. Juveniles are more vulnerable, particularly to large raptors such as red-tailed hawks (Buteo jamaicensis) and other hawks. Gray foxes host a range of ectoparasites, notably fleas such as Pulex irritans and various including those from genera , , and . In a study of populations, ectoparasite infestation reached nearly 97%, with five and four flea species identified across examined individuals. Endoparasites are also common, encompassing heartworms () with reported prevalence of 1-4% in surveyed groups and tapeworms like and Mesocestoides spp. Endoparasite prevalence can approach 40% or higher in some populations, though rates vary by region and parasite type. Diseases affecting gray foxes include , which is relatively rare in this species compared to other wild canids. , induced by the Sarcoptes scabiei, occurs infrequently, as gray foxes exhibit notable resistance to sarcoptic mange. , a highly contagious paramyxovirus , represents an emerging threat with potential for substantial mortality in affected populations, particularly during outbreaks.

Human Interactions

Hunting and Management

The gray fox (Urocyon cinereoargenteus) has been hunted for its pelts since the , when it was included among furbearers traded in regional markets across the , such as in the Midwest where gray fox skins were valued alongside and other for the fur industry. Commercial harvest peaked in the late , with mean pelt values reaching $42.50 in 1979 before declining sharply. Hunting methods for gray foxes primarily involve , which has historically been the dominant approach for commercial take, often using foothold or conibear traps, as well as calling with distress sounds to attract them during hunts and setups that leverage their nocturnal activity patterns. Hunting regulations for gray foxes vary widely by , reflecting local population management needs, with season lengths ranging from several months to year-round in certain areas. For instance, in , the 2025-2026 season runs from September 1 to February 28 (day hunting only), with a daily bag limit of two. In , gray foxes may be hunted year-round during daylight hours and at night from November 24, 2025, to May 31, 2026, with no bag limit. permits daylight hunting from November 10, 2025, through February 28, 2026, with no bag limit but restrictions on methods. Bag limits typically range from 1 to 5 per season or day across states, aimed at sustainable harvest. Management of gray fox populations has shifted since the 1990s, when trapping for the fur trade declined due to falling pelt prices—from over $40 in the late to $10–12 by the decade's end—reducing commercial incentives and overall harvest levels. This decline has led to greater emphasis on non-commercial roles, including wildlife control where gray foxes are targeted to mitigate conflicts, though such efforts are limited. Gray foxes also play a key role in monitoring, as they are susceptible to the virus and are trapped or tested as part of national surveillance programs, such as the U.S. National Plan for Wildlife Management, which uses oral vaccination to control variants in gray fox populations in the Southwest.

Conservation Status

The gray fox (Urocyon cinereoargenteus) is classified as Least Concern on the , with a global population considered stable and estimated in the millions across its extensive range in North and . This status reflects no immediate risk of , as the species maintains viable densities in suitable habitats, ranging from 1 to 27 individuals per square mile in various regions. Despite overall stability, regional population declines have been documented, particularly in the , where habitat loss from urbanization and agriculture has contributed to dramatic reductions over the past few decades. In response to these declines, closed gray fox hunting and trapping seasons indefinitely effective July 2025. represents a notable mortality factor in some areas, with studies indicating it accounts for a significant portion of observed deaths, though exact rates vary by location. is facilitating northward range shifts, as evidenced by recent expansions into northeastern areas like and , potentially improving habitat suitability in warming conditions. However, urban adaptation has been observed in resilient subpopulations, such as those persisting in the Palo Alto Baylands since 2019, demonstrating tolerance to semi-urban environments amid ongoing expansion. Conservation efforts focus on state-level monitoring rather than federal protections, given the ' secure status. In the U.S., initiatives include mapping in to establish baselines for potential declines and multi-year in assessing distribution and trends. Ongoing studies, such as those in the Midwest from 2020–2024, confirm heterozygosity and effective sizes within normal ranges, informing strategies to mitigate fragmentation from habitat loss. Recent from 2023–2025 highlights urban pressures and climate-driven migrations, emphasizing the need for localized management to sustain subpopulations.

References

  1. https://animaldiversity.org/accounts/Urocyon_cinereoargenteus/
  2. https://www.fs.usda.gov/database/feis/animals/mammal/urci/all.html
  3. http://mars.unh.edu/natureworks/grayfox.htm
  4. https://cales.arizona.edu/pubs/adjunct/snr0704/snr07042u.pdf
  5. https://maxallen.inhs.illinois.edu/files/2021/08/Allen-2021-Gray-Fox-Review.pdf
  6. https://animaldiversity.org/accounts/Urocyon/
  7. https://digital.cincinnatilibrary.org/digital/collection/p16998coll34
  8. https://www.science.smith.edu/departments/Biology/VHAYSSEN/msi/pdf/i0076-3519-189-01-0001.pdf
  9. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4546004/
  10. https://www.nwf.org/Magazines/National-Wildlife/2013/AugSept/PhotoZone/Gray-Fox
  11. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0136329
  12. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36326769/
  13. https://flmnhbulletin.com/index.php/flmnh/article/download/flmnh-vol45-no4-pp413-434/vol45-no4/1185
  14. https://bioone.org/journals/bulletin-of-the-american-museum-of-natural-history/volume-2009/issue-325/574.1/Phylogenetic-Systematics-of-the-North-American-Fossil-Caninae-Carnivora/10.1206/574.1.full
  15. https://academic.oup.com/jmammal/article/92/2/283/863160
  16. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/ecology-and-evolution/articles/10.3389/fevo.2021.666800/full
  17. https://www.fws.gov/taxonomic-tree/32157
  18. https://www.itis.gov/servlet/SingleRpt/SingleRpt?search_topic=TSN&search_value=726894
  19. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/mec.17105
  20. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/context/icwdm_usdanwrc/article/3644/viewcontent/Kierepka_JH_2023_Genomic_analyses_of_gray_fox_lineages.pdf
  21. https://dec.ny.gov/nature/animals-fish-plants/gray-fox
  22. https://www.desertmuseum.org/kids/facts/?animal=Gray%20Fox
  23. https://www.nps.gov/brca/learn/nature/other-mammals.htm
  24. https://wildlifeillinois.org/identify-wildlife/gray-fox/
  25. https://forfoxsakewildlife.com/2018/12/31/mange-vs-shedding-in-foxes/
  26. https://a-z-animals.com/animals/comparison/grey-fox-vs-red-fox/
  27. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10989890/
  28. https://karger.com/cgr/article/137/2-4/174/62338/Comparative-Chromosome-Painting-in-Carnivora-and
  29. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9602142/
  30. http://messybeast.com/genetics/hybrid-canines.htm
  31. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7828831/
  32. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01830.x
  33. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/mec.17105
  34. https://explorer.natureserve.org/Taxon/ELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.104188/Urocyon_cinereoargenteus
  35. https://www.ontario.ca/page/gray-fox-recovery-strategy
  36. https://urbanwildliferesearchproject.org/gray-fox-report-august-2025/
  37. https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.3993
  38. https://www.fs.usda.gov/pnw/pubs/journals/pnw_2025_larreur001.pdf
  39. https://wildadirondacks.org/adirondack-mammals-gray-fox-urocyon-cinereoargenteus.html
  40. https://urbanwildliferesearchproject.org/gray-fox-report-march-2025/
  41. https://nsojournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2981/11-093
  42. http://vtfishandwildlife.com/learn-more/vermont-critters/mammals/gray-fox
  43. https://seafwa.org/sites/default/files/journal-articles/SAWYER-162-172.pdf
  44. https://www.sandiegocounty.gov/content/dam/sdc/common_components/images/awm/Docs/ipm_fox.pdf
  45. https://nsojournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2981/wlb.00326
  46. https://threatenedtaxa.org/index.php/JoTT/article/view/8435/9477
  47. https://www.ncwildlife.gov/media/2183/open
  48. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236595453_Multiple_paternity_and_kinship_in_the_gray_fox_Urocyon_cinereoargenteus
  49. https://bioone.org/journals/wildlife-biology/volume-2017/issue-1/wlb.00326/Gray-fox-home-range-spatial-overlap-mated-pair-interactions-and/10.2981/wlb.00326.full
  50. http://wildlife.ucsc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Allen-et-al.-Small-Carnivore-Scent-Acquisiton-2016.pdf
  51. https://projectcoyote.org/act/learning-hub/fox-profile/
  52. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9251843/
  53. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0293270
  54. https://research.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/download/69020.pdf
  55. https://news.vt.edu/articles/2025/10/cnre-research-gray-fox.html
  56. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32211171/
  57. https://www.redalyc.org/journal/425/42571632026/html/
  58. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3196&context=icwdm_usdanwrc
  59. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5645120/
  60. https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/mammals/grayfox.html
  61. https://www.wildliferescueleague.org/animals/foxes-red-and-gray/
  62. https://www.wildlifesciencecenter.org/gray-fox
  63. https://downloads.regulations.gov/APHIS-2012-0107-21320/attachment_112.pdf
  64. https://nhmu.utah.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/Urocyon%20cinereoargenteus.pdf
  65. https://www.depts.ttu.edu/nsrl/mammals-of-texas-online-edition/Accounts_Carnivora/Urocyon_cinereoargenteus.php
  66. https://curiodyssey.org/animals/our-animals/mammals/gray-fox/
  67. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1383&context=wnan
  68. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5325/jpennacadscie.92.1.0036
  69. https://tennacadsci.org/~tasc/docs/JTAS66-2-79.pdf
  70. https://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?pid=S2007-33642014000100019&script=sci_abstract&tlng=en
  71. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0260325
  72. https://www.nationaltrappers.com/grayfox.html
  73. https://nhnature.org/visit/animal_info_sheets/gray_fox.php
  74. https://skyislandalliance.org/2020/11/friday-creature-feature-gray-fox/
  75. https://wildlife.ca.gov/HWC/Foxes
  76. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ece3.7201
  77. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7083659/
  78. https://defenders.org/blog/2024/09/fabulous-foxes-of-californias-san-joaquin-valley
  79. https://www.wildlifeecology.org/grayfox_indiana.html
  80. https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=2567
  81. https://www.in.gov/dnr/fish-and-wildlife/files/wmr/fw-grayfox-report-2020-2024.pdf
  82. https://bioone.org/journals/journal-of-wildlife-diseases/volume-16/issue-2/0090-3558-16.2.225/OCCURRENCE-OF-Dirofilaria-immitis-IN-GRAY-FOX-Urocyon-cinereoargenteus-IN/10.7589/0090-3558-16.2.225.pdf
  83. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&context=manter
  84. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1474656/
  85. https://www.mass.gov/info-details/canine-distemper
  86. https://www.encyclopediadubuque.org/index.php/FUR_TRADE
  87. https://scholarworks.uark.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1749&context=jaas
  88. https://www.dnr.sc.gov/wildlife/publications/pdf/furbearers.pdf
  89. https://mdc.mo.gov/hunting-trapping/seasons/fox-red-or-gray-hunting-trapping
  90. https://allpredatorcalls.com/grey-fox-hunting-tips/
  91. https://www.agfc.com/hunting/more-game/furbearers/hunting-season-dates-and-bag-limits/
  92. https://gf.nd.gov/regulations/small-game
  93. https://fw.ky.gov/Hunt/Pages/Furbearer-Hunting-and-Trapping.aspx
  94. https://www.wvencyclopedia.org/entries/725
  95. https://www.wildlifedepartment.com/outdoorok/ooj/trapping-and-oklahoma-fur-trade-then-and-now
  96. https://www.aphis.usda.gov/sites/default/files/us-national-plan-for-wildlife-rabies-mgmt.pdf
  97. https://www.aphis.usda.gov/national-wildlife-programs/rabies
  98. https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/23062/46190249
  99. https://www.mammaldiversity.org/taxon/1005965/
  100. https://dnr.illinois.gov/hunting/furbearers.html
  101. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989425000423
  102. https://www.kcur.org/news/2024-03-25/a-unique-tree-climbing-fox-is-on-the-decline-in-the-midwest-researchers-want-to-know-why
  103. https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/species-risk-public-registry/recovery-strategies/grey-fox-2018.html
  104. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277990643_First_Occurrence_of_the_Grey_Fox_Urocyon_cinereoargenteus_in_New_Brunswick_a_Climate-change_Mediated_Range_Expansion
  105. https://mainenaturalhistory.org/3-9-25-the-tree-fox/
  106. https://urbanwildliferesearchproject.org/gray-fox-report-february-2025/
  107. https://research.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/69020
  108. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/388240949_The_Precipitous_Decline_of_a_Gray_Fox_Population
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.