Hubbry Logo
Mouvement FrancisteMouvement FrancisteMain
Open search
Mouvement Franciste
Community hub
Mouvement Franciste
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Mouvement Franciste
Mouvement Franciste
Mouvement Franciste
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Bucard and members of the Francist Movement, 1934

Key Information

The Francist Movement (French: Mouvement franciste, MF) was a French fascist and anti-semitic league created by Marcel Bucard in September 1933 that edited the newspaper Le Francisme. Mouvement franciste reached a membership of 10,000 and was financed by the Italian dictator, Benito Mussolini. Its members were deemed the francistes or Chemises bleues (Blueshirts) and gave the Roman salute (a paramilitary character that was mirrored in France by François Coty's Solidarité Française).

It took part in the Paris protests of 6 February 1934, during which the entire far right (from Action Française to Croix-de-Feu) protested the implications of the Stavisky Affair and possibly attempted to topple Édouard Daladier's government. It incorporated the Solidarité française after Coty's death later in the same year.

All of the movements that participated in the 6 February riots were outlawed in 1936, when Léon Blum's Popular Front government passed new legislation on the matter. After a failed attempt in 1938, the movement was refounded as a political party (Parti franciste) in 1941, after France had been overrun by Nazi Germany.

Together with Jacques Doriot's Parti Populaire Français and Marcel Déat's Rassemblement National Populaire, the francistes were the main collaborators of the Nazi occupiers and Vichy France. The Parti Franciste did not survive the end of World War II, and was considered treasonous. Bucard was executed as a collaborator after the war.

Creation

[edit]

Francisme was created in August–September 1933 by Marcel Bucard, a former seminarian and war hero, who had already participated in a number of nationalist and proto-fascist movements: French Action, Faisceau, French Solidarity and Croix de Feu. The official creation takes place on 29 September 1933 at 11 pm, during a ceremony organized at the Arc de Triomphe in Paris. Marcel Bucard whilst delivering a speech at the ceremony stated that he wanted: "(...) to found a movement of revolutionary action whose aim is to conquer power" and "to stop the race to the abyss".[3]

The movement was heavily inspired by Mussolini's National Fascist Party and received significant funding and support from the Italian fascist movement; Bucard wrote, "Our Francism is to France what Fascism is to Italy".

Collaboration with the German occupation

[edit]

During the Occupation, the Franciste Movement was relaunched and along with Jacques Doriot's French Popular Party (PPF) and Marcel Déat's National Popular Rally (RNP) is one of the most notable political movement to collaborate with the occupying German authorities.

On May 5, 1941, Marcel Bucard and Paul Guiraud (associate of philosophy, son of Jean Guiraud, editor-in-chief of La Croix ) relaunched Francisme. Paul Guiraud attempted to give the movement a more "socialist" look. Similarly, Bucard defended the General Confederation of Labour (dissolved during the occupation) and criticized the Vichy regime's Labor Charter, which he considered not socialist enough.[4]

Like the other collaboration movements, the movement failed to become a mass movement. At its peak (summer 1943), according to historian duo Lambert-Le Marec it had some 5,500 members (4,000 in the provinces and 1,500 in the Paris region) or, according to other sources, a maximum of 8,000 members.[5] The newspaper Le Franciste reached a maximum circulation during the war of 20,000 copies.

In 1943, it participated in a collaborationist front, dominated by the National Popular Rally, in an attempt to unify with other fascist movements. Like the other parties, the Franciste Movement was heavily collaborationist (creation of the Task Forces to fight against resistance was one such example). Many of its members participated in anti-Semitic and anti-communist operations, and members joined the Milice, which actively targeted the French Resistance.[6] It was particularly well established in the departments of Seine-et-Oise and Morbihan, where local people were involved in incidents of violence.

On July 4, 1944, two policemen were killed by Bucard's bodyguards during an altercation after he robbed a Jewish jewelry store. Bucard was imprisoned, but released on July 29, just in time to flee to Germany on August 12 with the other Francists as the Allies invaded France in Operation Overlord. Bucard was finally arrested, tried, and sentenced to death on February 21, 1946, and shot on March 19 at Fort Chatillon, near Paris. Facing a firing squad, he refused to wear a blindfold and shouted, "Qui vive? La France!" before it fired. His family were denied a request that his body be deposited in the family vault; he was buried in the Parisian cemetery of Thiais, now in the department of Val-de-Marne.

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Mouvement Franciste

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Mouvement Franciste (MF), founded on 29 September 1933 by —a decorated veteran disillusioned with parliamentary politics—was a small French political league that explicitly modeled itself after Benito Mussolini's Fascist , promoting francisme as a nationalist, corporatist ideology emphasizing authoritarian leadership, , anti-Semitism, and the abolition of democratic institutions in favor of a totalitarian state organized along syndical lines. With membership peaking at a few thousand, the group published the newspaper Le Francisme and engaged in activities, including participation in the anti-government riots of 6 February 1934 alongside other right-wing leagues, though it remained marginal compared to larger formations like the . During , Bucard aligned the MF with the Vichy and later supported the Légion des Volontaires Français contre le Bolchévisme, leading to its dissolution in 1944 and Bucard's execution for collaboration in 1946, which underscored the movement's ultimate failure to achieve mass appeal or lasting influence amid France's fragmented far-right landscape.

Ideology and Principles

Core Tenets and Influences

The Mouvement Franciste adopted the Italian Fascist model under as its primary ideological influence, explicitly positioning itself as the representative of in and receiving financial support from Mussolini's regime, including a personal meeting between founder and Mussolini in 1935. This framework entailed a wholesale rejection of both liberal parliamentary democracy, viewed as decadent and ineffective, and , perceived as a Bolshevik threat to national sovereignty and order. Central to its doctrine was an ultra-nationalist vision of French regeneration, emphasizing hierarchical , traditional values, and the expulsion of perceived internal enemies to restore national vitality. Anti-Semitism formed a core element, portraying as racially incompatible and a danger warranting their removal from French society, while served as a bulwark against leftist subversion and class warfare. The movement advocated replacing the republican system with an authoritarian structured as a single-party state, incorporating corporatist economic organization to integrate labor and capital under state oversight, thereby transcending partisan divisions and ensuring national unity. This totalitarian orientation prioritized a strong, centralized authority to enforce order and mobilize against decay.

Economic and Social Views

The Mouvement Franciste promoted a corporatist inspired by , organizing economic activity into state-supervised corporations that integrated workers, employers, and technicians to eliminate class conflict and prioritize national production over individual profit. This system was positioned as a "third way" alternative to liberal , criticized for fostering selfish and financial that exacerbated crises like the , and to Marxist , rejected for its internationalist and promotion of proletarian . , the movement's founder, emphasized state-directed planning to achieve and , subordinating private enterprise to collective national goals while preserving under hierarchical oversight. Socially, the Francistes envisioned a rigidly hierarchical order grounded in organic national unity, where social roles were determined by , aptitude, and loyalty to the state, rejecting egalitarian doctrines as disruptive to natural structures. Family was upheld as the foundational unit of , warranting state protection through policies encouraging large families, moral , and paternal to counter perceived demographic decline and moral decay from urban . Exclusionary measures targeted , viewed as economic parasites undermining national cohesion through and , and communists, seen as agents of Bolshevik intent on destroying and ; Bucard explicitly advocated their removal from public life to restore a pure French ethnic community. The movement's anti-parliamentary stance framed the Third Republic's democratic institutions as inherently corrupt and impotent, enabling factional intrigue and special interests that failed to mitigate the Great Depression's effects in , where rose sharply after 1931 amid deflationary policies and social unrest. Instead, Francisme called for a strong authoritarian state to impose decisive economic reforms and social discipline, bypassing parliamentary debate as a mechanism for national paralysis.

Founding and Early Years

Establishment by Marcel Bucard

Marcel Bucard, born on 7 December 1895 in Saint-Clair-sur-Epte, served as a decorated officer during , attaining the rank of captain and earning praise from for his valor at . Disillusioned with the perceived failures of the , including economic instability and , Bucard had previously engaged in right-wing nationalist circles, including participation in Georges Valois's Faisceau, an early fascist-inspired group dissolved in 1928. His experiences fueled a rejection of parliamentary democracy, leading him to seek a revolutionary alternative modeled on Benito Mussolini's 1922 , which Bucard viewed as a blueprint for national regeneration through and authoritarian seizure of power. On 29 September 1933, at 11 p.m., Bucard publicly established the Mouvement Franciste during a ceremony at the in , attended by approximately 25 supporters. In his founding declaration, he proclaimed the creation of a "movement of " aimed at overthrowing the existing order, emphasizing national unity under a totalitarian state inspired by . The event symbolized a ritualistic break from republican traditions, with participants adopting fascist-style salutes and uniforms—specifically blue shirts—to evoke discipline and readiness from the outset. The initial manifesto, articulated in Bucard's speech and early publications like Le Francisme, positioned francisme as a "third way" transcending both liberal capitalism and Marxist communism, advocating corporatism, anti-parliamentarism, and a strong leader to restore French greatness amid the Great Depression's crises. This doctrine rejected class conflict in favor of national solidarity, drawing direct ideological and financial support from Mussolini's regime, which provided subsidies to propagate fascist principles adapted to French soil. Bucard's vision prioritized empirical renewal through state control of production and elimination of partisan divisions, reflecting his firsthand disillusionment with republican inefficiency rather than abstract theorizing.

Initial Organization and Membership Growth

The Mouvement Franciste adopted a structure modeled on , with members uniformed in blue shirts and organized into hierarchical ranks to emphasize and action-oriented activism. Its efforts centered on the Le Francisme, launched shortly after founding to disseminate core tenets of , , and . Recruitment targeted Great War veterans disillusioned by economic stagnation and unemployed youth seeking purpose amid the , leveraging appeals to restore French grandeur through means. Membership expanded rapidly following the group's September 1933 establishment, reaching an estimated 8,000 to 10,000 adherents by year's end, fueled by widespread discontent over financial scandals like the and fears of communist infiltration in French institutions. Local sections proliferated in urban centers such as and provincial areas, facilitating grassroots mobilization while maintaining centralized control under founder . Though the movement coordinated informally with larger right-wing leagues like the in anti-parliamentary agitation, it insisted on its unique franciste identity, rejecting broader mergers to preserve ideological purity and . This distinct positioning, supported by Italian subsidies, enabled peak growth into the mid-1930s before internal divisions and external suppressions curtailed expansion.

Activities During the Third Republic

Political Campaigns and Protests

The Mouvement Franciste actively participated in the anti-parliamentary demonstrations of February 6, 1934, alongside other , protesting the government's handling of the financial scandal, which activists depicted as symptomatic of republican corruption enabling communist subversion of French institutions. , the movement's founder, personally joined the riots at the , where clashes with security forces left 15 dead and over 1,500 injured, framing the unrest as a patriotic stand against perceived Bolshevik infiltration in state affairs. In the months preceding the legislative elections, the Francistes intensified street rallies and public agitation against the emerging alliance of socialists, communists, and radicals, portraying it as a Moscow-orchestrated assault on national independence, Christian traditions, and private property. These efforts included uniformed gatherings to project disciplined opposition to parliamentary democracy, often escalating into confrontations with leftist counter-demonstrators to assert fascist claims of superior vitality over the enfeebled Third Republic. The movement's newspaper, Le Francisme, amplified these campaigns with inflammatory articles denouncing Jewish influence in finance and politics as allied with communist threats, thereby justifying violent to restore order and . Such , drawn from Bucard's own writings, sought to erode public faith in electoral processes by linking republican governance to existential perils, though the Francistes garnered negligible votes in municipal contests, relying instead on extralegal to challenge leftist ascendancy. The election of the coalition in May 1936, led by , prompted swift legislative action against perceived threats to republican order, including a enabling the dissolution of paramilitary leagues associated with right-wing agitation. The Mouvement Franciste, classified among these groups due to its uniformed elements and anti-parliamentary , faced formal dissolution of its public operations that summer, curtailing open meetings, uniformed marches, and official publications. This measure aligned with the government's broader response to the 1934 riots and ongoing street violence, targeting organizations viewed as undermining democratic institutions. Marcel Bucard, interpreting the ban as symptomatic of the Popular Front's intolerance toward opposition, intensified critiques framing the government's actions as hypocritical authoritarianism that exposed the inherent weaknesses of . He publicly attributed the suppression to undue influences within the left-wing alliance, using it to bolster arguments for a corporatist alternative immune to such factional excesses. In response, Bucard shifted toward less visible organizational forms, maintaining ideological continuity through informal cadre networks that propagated franciste principles amid restricted legal avenues. The suppression yielded a marked decline in the movement's public footprint, with membership activities confined to private circles and sporadic legal challenges, yet it reinforced among committed activists who regarded as empirical proof of parliamentary system's vulnerability to radical left governance. This core group preserved doctrinal cohesion, viewing enforced marginalization not as defeat but as ideological vindication against what they perceived as the Front's erosion of for political rivals.

World War II Era

Relaunch as Parti Franciste

Following the French defeat in and the establishment of the regime, sought to revive the Mouvement Franciste amid the political vacuum and occupation. On 5 May 1941, the group was officially relaunched as the Parti Franciste with approval from authorities, including tacit endorsement from Marshal , marking its transformation from a pre-war league into a structured aligned initially with the National Revolution's emphasis on authoritarian renewal, anti-parliamentarism, and corporatist economics. This relaunch occurred with German acquiescence, reflecting Bucard's pragmatic adaptation to the Axis-dominated order while maintaining pledges of loyalty to Pétain as , though the party's fascist core—rooted in , , and anti-Semitism—remained intact. Membership recovered from pre-war lows, reaching approximately 10,000 adherents by late 1941, concentrated in regions like , , and , driven by recruitment among disaffected youth and anti-communist elements seeking a bulwark against perceived Bolshevik threats. By 1943, active participants numbered several thousand, evidenced by a parade of 5,000 in that July, bolstered by the party's efforts and Vichy's tolerance as a to rival collaborationist groups like the Parti Populaire Français. The German invasion of the via on 22 June 1941 prompted a sharper ideological pivot, with the Parti Franciste embracing an explicit pro-German stance and framing francisme as the vanguard of a European crusade against . This shift, articulated in party publications and Bucard's rhetoric, positioned the group within a broader fascist vision of Axis solidarity, moving beyond initial Vichy-centric loyalty toward advocacy for deeper integration with Nazi aims, including recruitment for anti-Soviet legions.

Collaboration with Vichy and German Authorities

Following the German occupation of the unoccupied zone in November 1942, the Parti Franciste intensified its alignment with France's authoritarian policies, publicly endorsing the Statut des Juifs enacted on October 3, 1940, which excluded Jews from public office, professions, and education, as consistent with the party's longstanding anti-Semitic ideology articulated in its newspaper Le Franciste. This support extended to Vichy's anti-communist initiatives, including the dissolution of the in September 1940 and subsequent purges of suspected communists from state institutions, which francistes framed as essential to national regeneration against Bolshevik threats. To secure operational legitimacy amid competition from larger collaborationist groups like the Parti Populaire Français, Parti Franciste cadres pursued integration into Vichy's propaganda apparatus and administrative roles, leveraging Bucard's personal appeals to regime figures for official recognition and resource allocation. Direct collaboration with German authorities manifested in propaganda efforts and military recruitment, with the party publishing materials urging "total collaboration" to counter Anglo-American influence and promote a Europe-wide anti-Bolshevik front under German leadership. In July 1941, Marcel Bucard co-founded the Légion des Volontaires Français contre le Bolchevisme (LVF), a unit under Wehrmacht command, to recruit French volunteers for the Eastern Front; initial enlistments drew from franciste ranks, with the first contingent of approximately 1,800 departing Paris on April 18, 1942, to bolster Operation Barbarossa amid high casualties that later strained recruitment. These activities provided the party tactical survival by accessing German funding and protection, enabling expansion from pre-war obscurity to an estimated several thousand adherents by 1943, though subordinate to Vichy's oversight. Internally, Bucard navigated tensions between ideological fidelity to a distinctly French corporatist fascism—rooted in pre-war influences like Mussolini's —and pressures for deeper Nazification, criticizing rival collaborationists such as for subordinating national autonomy to German models in favor of a "neo-socialist" framework overly aligned with Berlin's directives. This stance prioritized doctrinal purity, emphasizing franciste tenets of anti-parliamentarism and economic over opportunistic alignment, which Bucard argued preserved France's regenerative potential within a German-dominated order rather than mere subservience. Such debates underscored the party's marginal position, as German authorities favored more compliant groups, limiting franciste influence to niche and recruitment roles.

Internal Operations and Paramilitary Involvement

The Parti Franciste maintained a hierarchical internal structure during the occupation, with local cells in major cities like and handling day-to-day functions such as distribution through its Le Franciste and drives targeting disillusioned veterans and youth. These cells coordinated anti-communist intelligence gathering, often sharing informant networks with authorities to monitor suspected Resistance sympathizers, though records indicate operations were hampered by internal factionalism and resource shortages. To propagate its ideology, the party expanded its youth sections, known as the Jeunesse Franciste, which organized paramilitary-style drills, ideological seminars, and physical training for adolescents, aiming to build a cadre of loyal militants; by 1942, these groups numbered several hundred members across regional branches, focusing on anti-Bolshevik rather than combat readiness. Women's auxiliaries played a subordinate role, primarily in auxiliary tasks like organizing social events and disseminating pamphlets, with no evidence of formalized combat units comparable to those in larger collaborationist groups. Franciste paramilitary involvement intensified through individual and cell-level integration into the Française after its formation on January 30, 1943, with prominent members like André Rainsart transitioning directly from party leadership to milicien roles for enforcement operations. These units conducted targeted arrests of alleged Resistance fighters and , often in joint raids with German forces, including operations to justify roundups as anti-communist measures; for instance, Franciste cells in assisted in detentions during 1943-1944 sweeps, contributing to the funneling of detainees toward convoys, though specific tallies attributable solely to Francistes remain undocumented due to merged records with Milice activities. Despite these efforts, the party's overall impact on suppression and deportations was marginal, constrained by its modest membership of approximately 2,000-3,000 active adherents by 1943—far smaller than the 's 30,000-strong force—resulting in localized rather than nationwide enforcement and frequent reliance on larger collaborators for logistical support. Internal purges and defections further diluted operational efficacy, as some cadres prioritized ideological purity over practical violence, limiting the group's role to auxiliary status in Vichy's repressive apparatus.

Post-War Fate and Legacy

Following the rapid Allied advance into during the summer of 1944, the Parti Franciste faced immediate collapse amid the liberation of occupied territories. The movement was formally dissolved on 9 , as provisional authorities banned collaborationist organizations in the wake of German retreats. Leader fled to shortly thereafter, continuing his alignment with Axis forces by enlisting in the and pledging loyalty to before the war's end. In the post-liberation period, France's épuration process—encompassing both extrajudicial purges and formal trials—targeted Franciste figures for aiding the enemy through , activities, and direct with and German authorities. The ideology and operations of francisme were deemed treasonous under ordinances classifying such support as national betrayal, leading to widespread prosecutions of party elites. Bucard was arrested after Germany's surrender, tried by a military tribunal, convicted of intelligence with the enemy and endangering state security, sentenced to death on 21 February 1946, and executed by firing squad on 19 March 1946 at Fort de Châtillon near . Surviving members dispersed rapidly, with many seeking exile in , , or , while others went underground or submitted to and lesser trials. Legal bans on fascist and collaborationist groups, reinforced by the 1945 constitution and ongoing purges, extinguished any prospect of structured reformation, relegating francisme to fragmented, individual holdouts without institutional continuity.

Historiographical Perspectives and Debates

The dominant historiographical narrative frames the Mouvement Franciste as a peripheral fascist entity whose wartime activities aided the Axis occupation, foregrounding its , , and collaborationist while largely eliding the era's geopolitical perils, such as Soviet and domestic communist agitation. French scholars, following René Rémond's tripartite classification of the right (légitimiste, orléaniste, bonapartiste), have often subsumed such groups under conservative rather than distinct , perpetuating an "immunity thesis" that portrays interwar leagues as imitative anomalies lacking mass appeal or revolutionary rupture. This perspective, influential in reckoning, prioritizes moral condemnation over causal analysis of anti-communist drivers, potentially influenced by academia's prevailing left-leaning orientations that downplay Bolshevik threats amid the Third Republic's polarization. Challenging this, transnational historians like and Robert Soucy posit native fascist antecedents in , interpreting Francisme's militant and corporatist rejection of parliamentary decay as ideologically prescient responses to elite and statist overreach, with its vehement anti-Bolshevism anticipating the Soviet Union's post-1945 aggressions that underscored the validity of interwar alarms against communist infiltration. These views emphasize empirical transnational ties—such as Mussolini's subsidies to Marcel Bucard's group—as evidence of fascism's adaptability beyond rigid models, rather than mere marginality. Debates on French fascism's singularity hinge on Francisme's documented organizational frailty—numerically among the smallest leagues, with limited reach—versus assertions of conceptual acuity in safeguarding sovereignty against multicultural dilutions and centralized bureaucracies, though its doctrinal and pro-Axis alignment complicate claims of divorced from expansionist complicity. Empirical metrics of influence, including subdued electoral inroads and reliance on foreign patronage, underscore its non-hegemonic status, yet revisionist analyses probe whether republican historiography's classificatory rigidities obscure causal links between interwar critiques of and enduring nationalist imperatives validated by subsequent ideological contests.

References

  1. https://www.jstor.org/stable/260635
  2. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40399232
  3. https://repositorio.ulisboa.pt/bitstream/10451/55506/1/ulsd732863_td_Carlos_Martins.pdf
  4. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24474189
  5. https://www.jstor.org/stable/259685
  6. https://iris.uniroma1.it/retrieve/22bd2a39-d324-411f-9aba-d42e0b8720a4/Mammone_French-Historiographical_20253.pdf
  7. https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00992324/document
  8. https://www.britannica.com/topic/fascism/Conservative-economic-programs
  9. https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/133506/mdesan_1.pdf?sequence
  10. https://www.britannica.com/place/France/The-Great-Depression-and-political-crises
  11. https://hal-sciencespo.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03389171v1/file/2020-cage-dagorret-grosjean-and-jha-heroes-and-villains.pdf
  12. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/contemporary-european-history/article/fascism-as-a-transnational-movement-the-case-of-interwar-alsace/AC8B472B62511CC03A346A5AED2C344E
  13. https://shs.cairn.info/revue-vingt-et-vingt-et-un-revue-d-histoire-2022-3-page-3?lang=fr
  14. https://www.cases-rebelles.org/des-forces-reactionnaires-n15-marcel-bucard-et-le-parti-franciste/
  15. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/25728657.pdf
  16. https://dokumen.pub/french-fascism-the-second-wave-1933-1939-0300059965-9780300059960.html
  17. https://books.openedition.org/purh/5860
  18. https://shs.cairn.info/la-france-de-1914-a-1945--9782200252694-page-155?lang=fr
  19. https://shs.cairn.info/article/VIN_155_0003/pdf?lang=fr
  20. http://simon-previous-issues.vwi.ac.at/images/Documents/Articles/2018-2/2018-2_ART_D-Elia/ART_D-Elia01.pdf
  21. https://shs.cairn.info/le-vestiaire-des-totalitarismes--9782271129116-page-145?lang=fr
  22. https://jewsandjudaism.files.wordpress.com/2018/09/copy-of-william-i-brustein-roots-of-hate_-anti-semitism-in-europe-before-the-holocaust-cambridge-university-press-2003.pdf
  23. https://dokumen.pub/france-since-the-popular-front-government-and-people-1936-1996-2nbsped-0198731515-9780198731511.html
  24. https://www.radiofrance.fr/franceinter/podcasts/affaires-sensibles/fiction-marcel-bucard-proces-d-un-collabo-9296602
  25. https://www.erudit.org/fr/revues/sp/2014-sp03456/1052391ar/
  26. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/joining-hitlers-crusade/volunteers/F98E5E1F832FEAA283C44E48F0DE6EA4
  27. http://reparti.free.fr/taguieff1999.pdf
  28. https://utoronto.scholaris.ca/server/api/core/bitstreams/563d461f-81cd-4d0b-89ac-0d4d605c3dcd/content
  29. https://shs.cairn.info/histoire-de-la-propagande-en-france-de-1940-a-1944--9782130434740-page-203?lang=fr
  30. https://www.cheminsdememoire.gouv.fr/sites/default/files/editeur/presse%2520collabo.pdf
  31. https://spectrum.library.concordia.ca/982160/3/Mallet_PhD_S2017.pdf
  32. https://www.aeaweb.org/articles/materials/19066
  33. https://utoronto.scholaris.ca/bitstreams/563d461f-81cd-4d0b-89ac-0d4d605c3dcd/download
  34. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1057/9780230373273.pdf
  35. https://france-politique.fr/wiki/Parti_Franciste_%28PF%29
  36. https://shs.cairn.info/polices-des-temps-noirs--9782262035617-page-373?lang=fr
  37. https://theses.hal.science/tel-05241379v1/file/159614_LIMARE_2025_archivage.pdf
  38. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=8866692
  39. https://portal.ehri-project.eu/authorities/ehri_cb-004323
  40. https://www.france-politique.fr/wiki/Parti_Franciste_%28PF%29
  41. https://www.bezenperrot.bzh/parti-franciste
  42. https://sciencespo.hal.science/hal-03389171v1/file/2020-cage-dagorret-grosjean-and-jha-heroes-and-villains.pdf
  43. https://www.tracesofwar.com/persons/72266/Bucard-Marcel.htm
  44. https://iris.uniroma1.it/bitstream/11573/1701309/1/Mammone_French-Historiographical_20253.pdf
  45. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283633146_The_historiography_of_fascism_in_France
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.