Hubbry Logo
Cardiovascular diseaseCardiovascular diseaseMain
Open search
Cardiovascular disease
Community hub
Cardiovascular disease
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Cardiovascular disease
Cardiovascular disease
Cardiovascular disease
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Cardiovascular disease
Micrograph of a heart with fibrosis (yellow) and amyloidosis (brown). Movat's stain.
SpecialtyCardiology
SymptomsChest pain, shortness of breath, fatigue, loss of consciousness
ComplicationsHeart failure, heart attack, stroke, aneurysm, peripheral artery disease, sudden cardiac arrest.[1]
Usual onsetOlder adults[2]
TypesCoronary artery diseases, stroke, heart failure, hypertensive heart disease, rheumatic heart disease, cardiomyopathy,[3][4] Arrhythmia
Risk factorsDiabetes,[3] high blood lipids, excess weight, Smoking, excessive drug use, excessive alcohol intake, genetic predisposition
PreventionHealthy eating, exercise, avoiding tobacco smoke, limited alcohol intake,[3] Overall lifestyle changes
TreatmentTreating high blood pressure, high blood lipids, diabetes[3]
MedicationAspirin, beta blockers, blood thinners
Deaths17.9 million / 32% (2015)[5]

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is any disease involving the heart or blood vessels.[3] CVDs constitute a class of diseases that includes: coronary artery diseases (e.g. angina, heart attack), heart failure, hypertensive heart disease, rheumatic heart disease, cardiomyopathy, arrhythmia, congenital heart disease, valvular heart disease, carditis, aortic aneurysms, peripheral artery disease, thromboembolic disease, and venous thrombosis.[3][4]

The underlying mechanisms vary depending on the disease.[3] It is estimated that dietary risk factors are associated with 53% of CVD deaths.[6] Coronary artery disease, stroke, and peripheral artery disease involve atherosclerosis.[3] This may be caused by high blood pressure, smoking, diabetes mellitus, lack of exercise, obesity, high blood cholesterol, poor diet, excessive alcohol consumption,[3] and poor sleep,[7][8] among other things. High blood pressure is estimated to account for approximately 13% of CVD deaths, while tobacco accounts for 9%, diabetes 6%, lack of exercise 6%, and obesity 5%.[3] Rheumatic heart disease may follow untreated strep throat.[3]

It is estimated that up to 90% of CVD may be preventable.[9][10] Prevention of CVD involves improving risk factors through: healthy eating, exercise, avoidance of tobacco smoke and limiting alcohol intake.[3] Treating risk factors, such as high blood pressure, blood lipids and diabetes is also beneficial.[3] Treating people who have strep throat with antibiotics can decrease the risk of rheumatic heart disease.[11] The use of aspirin in people who are otherwise healthy is of unclear benefit.[12][13]

Cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of death worldwide except Africa.[3] Together CVD resulted in 17.9 million deaths (32.1%) in 2015, up from 12.3 million (25.8%) in 1990.[5][4] Deaths, at a given age, from CVD are more common and have been increasing in much of the developing world, while rates have declined in most of the developed world since the 1970s.[14][15] Coronary artery disease and stroke account for 80% of CVD deaths in males and 75% of CVD deaths in females.[3] Most cardiovascular disease affects older adults. In high income countries, the mean age at first cardiovascular disease diagnosis lies around 70 years (73 years in women, 68 years in men).[16] In the United States 11% of people between 20 and 40 have CVD, while 37% between 40 and 60, 71% of people between 60 and 80, and 85% of people over 80 have CVD.[2] The average age of death from coronary artery disease in the developed world is around 80, while it is around 68 in the developing world.[14] At same age, men are about 50% more likely to develop CVD and are typically diagnosed seven to ten years earlier in men than in women.[16][3]: 48 

Types

[edit]
Disability-adjusted life year for inflammatory heart diseases per 100,000 inhabitants in 2004[17]
  No data
  Less than 70
  70–140
  140–210
  210–280
  280–350
  350–420
  420–490
  490–560
  560–630
  630–700
  700–770
  More than 770

There are many cardiovascular diseases involving the blood vessels. They are known as vascular diseases.[18]

There are also many cardiovascular diseases that involve the heart.

Risk factors

[edit]

There are many risk factors for heart diseases: age, sex, tobacco use, physical inactivity, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, excessive alcohol consumption, unhealthy diet, obesity, genetic predisposition and family history of cardiovascular disease, raised blood pressure (hypertension), raised blood sugar (diabetes mellitus), raised blood cholesterol (hyperlipidemia), undiagnosed celiac disease, psychosocial factors, poverty and low educational status, air pollution, and poor sleep.[3][19][20][21][22][23] While the individual contribution of each risk factor varies between different communities or ethnic groups the overall contribution of these risk factors is very consistent.[24] Some of these risk factors, such as age, sex or family history/genetic predisposition, are immutable; however, many important cardiovascular risk factors are modifiable by lifestyle change, social change, drug treatment (for example prevention of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes).[25] People with obesity are at increased risk of atherosclerosis of the coronary arteries.[26]

Genetics

[edit]

Cardiovascular disease in a person's parents increases their risk by ~3 fold,[27] and genetics is an important risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. Genetic cardiovascular disease can occur either as a consequence of single variant (Mendelian) or polygenic influences.[28] There are more than 40 inherited cardiovascular disease that can be traced to a single disease-causing DNA variant, although these conditions are rare.[28] Most common cardiovascular diseases are non-Mendelian and are thought to be due to hundreds or thousands of genetic variants (known as single nucleotide polymorphisms), each associated with a small effect.[29][30]

Age

[edit]
Calcified heart of an older woman with cardiomegaly

Age is the most important risk factor in developing cardiovascular or heart diseases, with approximately a tripling of risk with each decade of life.[31] Coronary fatty streaks can begin to form in adolescence.[32] It is estimated that 82 percent of people who die of coronary heart disease are 65 and older.[33] Simultaneously, the risk of stroke doubles every decade after age 55.[34]

Multiple explanations are proposed to explain why age increases the risk of cardiovascular/heart diseases. One of them relates to serum cholesterol level.[35] In most populations, the serum total cholesterol level increases as age increases. In men, this increase levels off around age 45 to 50 years. In women, the increase continues sharply until age 60 to 65 years.[35]

Aging is also associated with changes in the mechanical and structural properties of the vascular wall, which leads to the loss of arterial elasticity and reduced arterial compliance and may subsequently lead to coronary artery disease.[36]

Sex

[edit]
See also: Cardiovascular disease in women

At same age, men are about 50% more likely to develop CVD and are typically diagnosed seven to ten years earlier in men than in women.[16] A notable exception are thromboembolic diseases which are similarly common in men and women.[16] It has been argued that the excess risk of CVD observed in men compared to women only applied to the pre-menopausal period,[31][37] but more recent data from the WHO and UN disputes this.[31] If a female has diabetes, she is more likely to develop heart disease than a male with diabetes.[38] Women who have high blood pressure and had complications in their pregnancy have three times the risk of developing cardiovascular disease compared to women with normal blood pressure who had no complications in pregnancy.[39][40]

Coronary heart diseases are 2 to 5 times more common among middle-aged men than women.[35] In a study done by the World Health Organization, sex contributes to approximately 40% of the variation in sex ratios of coronary heart disease mortality.[41] Another study reports similar results finding that sex differences explains nearly half the risk associated with cardiovascular diseases[35] One of the proposed explanations for sex differences in cardiovascular diseases is hormonal difference.[35] Among women, estrogen is the predominant sex hormone. Estrogen may have protective effects on glucose metabolism and hemostatic system, and may have direct effect in improving endothelial cell function.[35] The production of estrogen decreases after menopause, and this may change the female lipid metabolism toward a more atherogenic form by decreasing the HDL cholesterol level while increasing LDL and total cholesterol levels.[35]

Among men and women, there are differences in body weight, height, body fat distribution, heart rate, stroke volume, and arterial compliance.[36] In the very elderly, age-related large artery pulsatility and stiffness are more pronounced among women than men.[36] This may be caused by the women's smaller body size and arterial dimensions which are independent of menopause.[36]

Tobacco

[edit]

Cigarettes are the major form of smoked tobacco.[3] Risks to health from tobacco use result not only from direct consumption of tobacco, but also from exposure to second-hand smoke.[3] Approximately 10% of cardiovascular disease is attributed to smoking;[3] however, people who quit smoking by age 30 have almost as low a risk of death as never smokers.[42]

Physical inactivity

[edit]
Further information: Sedentary lifestyle

Insufficient physical activity (defined as less than 5 x 30 minutes of moderate activity per week, or less than 3 x 20 minutes of vigorous activity per week) is currently the fourth leading risk factor for mortality worldwide.[3] In 2008, 31.3% of adults aged 15 or older (28.2% men and 34.4% women) were insufficiently physically active.[3] The risk of ischemic heart disease and diabetes mellitus is reduced by almost a third in adults who participate in 150 minutes of moderate physical activity each week (or equivalent).[43] In addition, physical activity assists weight loss and improves blood glucose control, blood pressure, lipid profile and insulin sensitivity. These effects may, at least in part, explain its cardiovascular benefits.[3]

Diet

[edit]
Further information: Saturated fat § Cardiovascular disease, Salt and cardiovascular disease, and Lipid hypothesis

High dietary intakes of saturated fat, trans-fats and salt, and low intake of fruits, vegetables and fish are linked to cardiovascular risk, although whether all these associations indicate causes is disputed. The World Health Organization attributes approximately 1.7 million deaths worldwide to low fruit and vegetable consumption.[3] Frequent consumption of high-energy foods, such as processed foods that are high in fats and sugars, promotes obesity and may increase cardiovascular risk.[3] The amount of dietary salt consumed may also be an important determinant of blood pressure levels and overall cardiovascular risk.[3] There is moderate quality evidence that reducing saturated fat intake for at least two years reduces the risk of cardiovascular disease.[44] High trans-fat intake has adverse effects on blood lipids and circulating inflammatory markers,[45] and elimination of trans-fat from diets has been widely advocated.[46][47] In 2018 the World Health Organization estimated that trans fats were the cause of more than half a million deaths per year.[47] There is evidence that higher consumption of sugar is associated with higher blood pressure and unfavorable blood lipids,[48] and sugar intake also increases the risk of diabetes mellitus.[49] High consumption of processed meats is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease, possibly in part due to increased dietary salt intake.[21]

Alcohol

[edit]
Further information: Alcohol and cardiovascular disease

The relationship between alcohol consumption and cardiovascular disease is complex, and may depend on the amount of alcohol consumed.[50] There is a direct relationship between high levels of drinking alcohol and cardiovascular disease.[3] Drinking at low levels without episodes of heavy drinking may be associated with a reduced risk of cardiovascular disease,[51] but there is evidence that associations between moderate alcohol consumption and protection from stroke are non-causal.[52] Moderate drinking is defined as one drink per day for women or two drinks a day for men. At the population level, the health risks of drinking alcohol exceed any potential benefits.[3][53] Exercising regularly can provide the same benefits as potentially consuming small amounts of alcohol and is a much safer alternative. Consuming too much alcohol can cause a high blood pressure, heart failure, and cardiomyopathy. Drinking alcohol can also cause obesity, which can contribute to cardiovascular issues as well.[54]

Celiac disease

[edit]

Untreated celiac disease can cause the development of many types of cardiovascular diseases, most of which improve or resolve with a gluten-free diet and intestinal healing. However, delays in recognition and diagnosis of celiac disease can cause irreversible heart damage.[22]

Sleep

[edit]

A lack of good sleep, in amount or quality, is documented as increasing cardiovascular risk in both adults and teens. Recommendations suggest that infants typically need 12 or more hours of sleep per day, adolescents at least eight or nine hours, and adults seven or eight. About one-third of adult Americans get less than the recommended seven hours of sleep per night, and in a study of teenagers, just 2.2 percent of those studied got enough sleep, many of whom did not get good quality sleep. Studies have shown that short sleepers getting less than seven hours sleep per night have a 10 percent to 30 percent higher risk of cardiovascular disease.[7][55]

Sleep disorders such as sleep-disordered breathing and insomnia, are also associated with a higher cardiometabolic risk.[56] An estimated 50 to 70 million Americans have insomnia, sleep apnea or other chronic sleep disorders.[citation needed]

In addition, sleep research displays differences in race and class. Short sleep and poor sleep tend to be more frequently reported in ethnic minorities than in whites. African-Americans report experiencing short durations of sleep five times more often than whites, possibly as a result of social and environmental factors. Black children and children living in disadvantaged neighborhoods have much higher rates of sleep apnea.[8]

One study found that of adults who are 45 and older, subjects that fell asleep at different times each night and slept inconsistent numbers of hours each night were more likely to develop atherosclerosis. Poor sleep habits, such as too little sleep, too much sleep, or fragmented sleep, were associated with cardiovascular disease, obesity, and high blood pressure. Another study noted that participants whose sleep duration varied by more than two hours within the course of a week were 1.4 times more likely to have elevated levels of coronary artery calcium, a predictor of cardiovascular events.[57]

Socioeconomic disadvantage

[edit]

Cardiovascular disease has a greater impact on low- and middle-income countries compared to those with higher income.[58] Although data on the social patterns of cardiovascular disease in low- and middle-income countries is limited,[58] reports from high-income countries consistently demonstrate that low education, income, and socioeconomic status are associated with a greater risk of cardiovascular disease.[16][59] Policies that have resulted in increased socio-economic inequalities have been associated with greater subsequent socio-economic differences in cardiovascular disease[58] implying a cause and effect relationship. Psychosocial factors, environmental exposures, health behaviours, and health-care access and quality contribute to socio-economic differentials in cardiovascular disease.[60] The Commission on Social Determinants of Health recommended that more equal distributions of power, wealth, education, housing, environmental factors, nutrition, and health care were needed to address inequalities in cardiovascular disease and non-communicable diseases.[61]

Air pollution

[edit]

Particulate matter has been studied for its short- and long-term exposure effects on cardiovascular disease. Currently, airborne particles under 2.5 micrometers in diameter (PM2.5) are the major focus, in which gradients are used to determine CVD risk. Overall, long-term PM exposure increased rate of atherosclerosis and inflammation. In regards to short-term exposure (2 hours), every 25 μg/m3 of PM2.5 resulted in a 48% increase of CVD mortality risk.[62] In addition, after only 5 days of exposure, a rise in systolic (2.8 mmHg) and diastolic (2.7 mmHg) blood pressure occurred for every 10.5 μg/m3 of PM2.5.[62] Other research has implicated PM2.5 in irregular heart rhythm, reduced heart rate variability (decreased vagal tone), and most notably heart failure.[62][63] PM2.5 is also linked to carotid artery thickening and increased risk of acute myocardial infarction.[62][63]

Cardiovascular risk assessment

[edit]

Existing cardiovascular disease or a previous cardiovascular event, such as a heart attack or stroke, is the strongest predictor of a future cardiovascular event.[64] Age, sex, smoking, blood pressure, blood lipids and diabetes are important predictors of future cardiovascular disease in people who are not known to have cardiovascular disease.[65] These measures, and sometimes others, may be combined into composite risk scores to estimate an individual's future risk of cardiovascular disease.[64] Numerous risk scores exist although their respective merits are debated.[66] Other diagnostic tests and biomarkers remain under evaluation but currently these lack clear-cut evidence to support their routine use. They include family history, coronary artery calcification score, high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), ankle–brachial pressure index, lipoprotein subclasses and particle concentration, lipoprotein(a), apolipoproteins A-I and B, fibrinogen, white blood cell count, homocysteine, N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and markers of kidney function.[67][68] High blood phosphorus is also linked to an increased risk.[69]

Psychological stress

[edit]

There is evidence that mental health problems, in particular depression and traumatic stress, is linked to cardiovascular diseases. Whereas mental health problems are known to be associated with risk factors for cardiovascular diseases such as smoking, poor diet, and a sedentary lifestyle, these factors alone do not explain the increased risk of cardiovascular diseases seen in depression, stress, and anxiety.[70] Moreover, posttraumatic stress disorder is independently associated with increased risk for incident coronary heart disease, even after adjusting for depression and other covariates.[71]

Many studies recognize depression and anxiety as two important disorders that can cause an increase in the risk of developing cardiovascular disease. Only half of the instances of cardiovascular disease are explained by factors such as age and gender that cannot be changed. The other half of instances are due to other sources, including psychological stress. Studies have shown that the prevalence of depression in patients with heart failure is higher than 20%.[72]

Another study assessed the link between men and women who had been divorced and instance of cardiovascular disease. The study found that women who had gone through at least two divorces were just as likely to experience cardiovascular disease as a smoker or diabetic. Men, on the other hand, also had a higher risk of cardiovascular disease, however, their health improved upon remarriage while women did not.[73]

This study also found that during a World Cup soccer event in Germany, heart attacks more than doubled during the days when the nation's team was playing. Researchers assume this link is due to the fact that stress can increase inflammation in the body, which can cause high blood pressure and low HDL cholesterol. Chronic stress can also affect sleep, exercise, and food choices.

Anxiety

[edit]

Patients who suffer from generalized anxiety disorder are more likely to develop some form of cardiovascular disease. It is hypothesized that anxiety makes one more likely to develop cardiovascular disease due to the fact that it can change the body's stress response through hormonal and physiological reactions. People with anxiety often experience high blood pressure, arrhythmias, and heart attacks. The stress response caused by anxiety can increase inflammation in the body. It was also discovered that patients with anxiety had lower levels of omega-3-fatty acids which is linked to an increased risk of developing cardiovascular disease.[74]

Occupational exposure

[edit]
Main article: Occupational cardiovascular disease

Little is known about the relationship between work and cardiovascular disease, but links have been established between certain toxins, extreme heat and cold, exposure to tobacco smoke, and mental health concerns such as stress and depression.[75]

Non-chemical risk factors

[edit]

A 2015 SBU-report looking at non-chemical factors found an association for those:[76]

  • with mentally stressful work with a lack of control over their working situation — with an effort-reward imbalance[76]
  • who experience low social support at work; who experience injustice or experience insufficient opportunities for personal development; or those who experience job insecurity[76]
  • those who work night schedules; or have long working weeks[76]
  • those who are exposed to noise[76]

Specifically the risk of stroke was also increased by exposure to ionizing radiation.[76] Hypertension develops more often in those who experience job strain and who have shift-work.[76] Differences between women and men in risk are small, however men risk having and dying of heart attacks or stroke twice as often as women during working life.[76]

Chemical risk factors

[edit]

A 2017 SBU report found evidence that workplace exposure to silica dust, engine exhaust or welding fumes is associated with heart disease.[77] Associations also exist for exposure to arsenic, benzopyrenes, lead, dynamite, carbon disulphide, carbon monoxide, metalworking fluids and occupational exposure to tobacco smoke.[77] Working with the electrolytic production of aluminium or the production of paper when the sulphate pulping process is used is associated with heart disease.[77] An association was also found between heart disease and exposure to compounds which are no longer permitted in certain work environments, such as phenoxy acids containing TCDD(dioxin) or asbestos.[77]

Workplace exposure to silica dust or asbestos is also associated with pulmonary heart disease. There is evidence that workplace exposure to lead, carbon disulphide, phenoxyacids containing TCDD, as well as working in an environment where aluminum is being electrolytically produced, is associated with stroke.[77]

Somatic mutations

[edit]

As of 2017, evidence suggests that certain leukemia-associated mutations in blood cells may also lead to increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Several large-scale research projects looking at human genetic data have found a robust link between the presence of these mutations, a condition known as clonal hematopoiesis, and cardiovascular disease-related incidents and mortality.[78]

Radiation therapy

[edit]

Radiation treatments (RT) for cancer can increase the risk of heart disease and death, as observed in breast cancer therapy.[79] Therapeutic radiation increases the risk of a subsequent heart attack or stroke by 1.5 to 4 times;[80] the increase depends on the dose strength, volume, and location. Use of concomitant chemotherapy, e.g. anthracyclines, is an aggravating risk factor.[81] The occurrence rate of RT induced cardiovascular disease is estimated between 10% and 30%.[81]

Side-effects from radiation therapy for cardiovascular diseases have been termed radiation-induced heart disease or radiation-induced cardiovascular disease.[82][83] Symptoms are dose-dependent and include cardiomyopathy, myocardial fibrosis, valvular heart disease, coronary artery disease, heart arrhythmia and peripheral artery disease. Radiation-induced fibrosis, vascular cell damage and oxidative stress can lead to these and other late side-effect symptoms.[82]

Pathophysiology

[edit]
Density-Dependent Colour Scanning Electron Micrograph SEM (DDC-SEM) of cardiovascular calcification, showing in orange calcium phosphate spherical particles (denser material) and, in green, the extracellular matrix (less dense material)[84]

Population-based studies show that atherosclerosis, the major precursor of cardiovascular disease, begins in childhood. The Pathobiological Determinants of Atherosclerosis in Youth (PDAY) study demonstrated that intimal lesions appear in all the aortas and more than half of the right coronary arteries of youths aged 7–9 years.[85]

Obesity and diabetes mellitus are linked to cardiovascular disease,[86] as are a history of chronic kidney disease and hypercholesterolaemia.[87] In fact, cardiovascular disease is the most life-threatening of the diabetic complications and diabetics are two- to four-fold more likely to die of cardiovascular-related causes than nondiabetics.[88][89][90]

Screening

[edit]

Screening ECGs (either at rest or with exercise) are not recommended in those without symptoms who are at low risk.[91] This includes those who are young without risk factors.[92] In those at higher risk the evidence for screening with ECGs is inconclusive.[93] Additionally echocardiography, myocardial perfusion imaging, and cardiac stress testing is not recommended in those at low risk who do not have symptoms.[94] Some biomarkers may add to conventional cardiovascular risk factors in predicting the risk of future cardiovascular disease; however, the value of some biomarkers is questionable.[95][96] Ankle-brachial index (ABI), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), and coronary artery calcium, are also of unclear benefit in those without symptoms as of 2018.[97]

The NIH recommends lipid testing in children beginning at the age of 2 if there is a family history of heart disease or lipid problems.[98] It is hoped that early testing will improve lifestyle factors in those at risk such as diet and exercise.[99]

Screening and selection for primary prevention interventions has traditionally been done through absolute risk using a variety of scores (ex. Framingham or Reynolds risk scores).[100] This stratification has separated people who receive the lifestyle interventions (generally lower and intermediate risk) from the medication (higher risk). The number and variety of risk scores available for use has multiplied, but their efficacy according to a 2016 review was unclear due to lack of external validation or impact analysis.[101] Risk stratification models often lack sensitivity for population groups and do not account for the large number of negative events among the intermediate and low risk groups.[100] As a result, future preventative screening appears to shift toward applying prevention according to randomized trial results of each intervention rather than large-scale risk assessment.

Prevention

[edit]

Up to 90% of cardiovascular disease may be preventable if established risk factors are avoided.[9][102] Currently practised measures to prevent cardiovascular disease include:

  • Maintaining a healthy diet, such as the Mediterranean diet, a vegetarian, vegan or another plant-based diet.[103][104][105][106]
  • Replacing saturated fat with healthier choices: Clinical trials show that replacing saturated fat with polyunsaturated vegetable oil reduced CVD by 30%. Prospective observational studies show that in many populations lower intake of saturated fat coupled with higher intake of polyunsaturated and monounsaturated fat is associated with lower rates of CVD.[107]
  • Decrease body fat if overweight or obese.[108] The effect of weight loss is often difficult to distinguish from dietary change, and evidence on weight reducing diets is limited.[109] In observational studies of people with severe obesity, weight loss following bariatric surgery is associated with a 46% reduction in cardiovascular risk.[110]
  • Limit alcohol consumption to the recommended daily limits.[103] People who moderately consume alcoholic drinks have a 25–30% lower risk of cardiovascular disease.[111][112] However, people who are genetically predisposed to consume less alcohol have lower rates of cardiovascular disease[113] suggesting that alcohol itself may not be protective. Excessive alcohol intake increases the risk of cardiovascular disease[114][112] and consumption of alcohol is associated with increased risk of a cardiovascular event in the day following consumption.[112]
  • Decrease non-HDL cholesterol.[115][116] Statin treatment reduces cardiovascular mortality by about 31%.[117]
  • Stopping smoking and avoidance of second-hand smoke.[103] Stopping smoking reduces risk by about 35%.[118]
  • At least 150 minutes (2 hours and 30 minutes) of moderate exercise per week.[119][120]
  • Lower blood pressure, if elevated. A 10 mmHg reduction in blood pressure reduces risk by about 20%.[121] Lowering blood pressure appears to be effective even at normal blood pressure ranges.[122][123][124]
  • Not enough sleep also raises the risk of high blood pressure. Adults need about 7–9 hours of sleep. Sleep apnea is also a major risk as it causes breathing to stop briefly, which can put stress on the body which can raise the risk of heart disease.[125][126]

Most guidelines recommend combining preventive strategies. There is some evidence that interventions aiming to reduce more than one cardiovascular risk factor may have beneficial effects on blood pressure, body mass index and waist circumference; however, evidence was limited and the authors were unable to draw firm conclusions on the effects on cardiovascular events and mortality.[127]

There is additional evidence to suggest that providing people with a cardiovascular disease risk score may reduce risk factors by a small amount compared to usual care.[128] However, there was some uncertainty as to whether providing these scores had any effect on cardiovascular disease events. It is unclear whether or not dental care in those with periodontitis affects their risk of cardiovascular disease.[129] According to a 2021 WHO study, working 55+ hours a week raises the risk of stroke by 35% and the risk of dying from heart conditions by 17%, when compared to a 35–40 hours week.[130]

Psychological prevention

[edit]

Decrease psychosocial stress.[131] This measure may be complicated by imprecise definitions of what constitute psychosocial interventions.[132] Mental stress–induced myocardial ischemia is associated with an increased risk of heart problems in those with previous heart disease.[133] Severe emotional and physical stress leads to a form of heart dysfunction known as Takotsubo syndrome in some people.[134] Specific relaxation therapies are of unclear benefit.[135][136] Decreasing psychological stress can be accomplished by receiving access to services and support, recognizing signs and symptoms of mental health disorders, awareness of family history, and understanding which mental health disorders increase the risk of cardiovascular disease.[137] Psychosocial intervention programs have been shown to improve risk of developing cardiovascular disease in the high-risk population.[138]

Diet

[edit]
See also: Lipid hypothesis, Saturated fat and cardiovascular disease, and Salt and cardiovascular disease

A diet high in fruits and vegetables decreases the risk of cardiovascular disease and death.[139]

A 2021 review found that plant-based diets can provide a risk reduction for CVD if a healthy plant-based diet is consumed. Unhealthy plant-based diets do not provide benefits over diets including meat.[104] A similar meta-analysis and systematic review also looked into dietary patterns and found "that diets lower in animal foods and unhealthy plant foods, and higher in healthy plant foods are beneficial for CVD prevention".[105] A 2018 meta-analysis of observational studies concluded that "In most countries, a vegan diet is associated with a more favourable cardio-metabolic profile compared to an omnivorous diet."[106]

Evidence suggests that the Mediterranean diet may improve cardiovascular outcomes.[140] There is also evidence that a Mediterranean diet may be more effective than a low-fat diet in bringing about long-term changes to cardiovascular risk factors (e.g., lower cholesterol level and blood pressure).[141]

The DASH diet (high in nuts, fish, fruits and vegetables, and low in sweets, red meat and fat) has been shown to reduce blood pressure,[142] lower total and low density lipoprotein cholesterol[143] and improve metabolic syndrome;[144] but the long-term benefits have been questioned.[145] A high-fiber diet is associated with lower risks of cardiovascular disease.[146]

Worldwide, dietary guidelines recommend a reduction in saturated fat,[147] and although the role of dietary fat in cardiovascular disease is complex and controversial there is a long-standing consensus that replacing saturated fat with unsaturated fat in the diet is sound medical advice.[148] Total fat intake has not been found to be associated with cardiovascular risk.[149][150] A 2020 systematic review found moderate quality evidence that reducing saturated fat intake for at least 2 years caused a reduction in cardiovascular events.[151] A 2015 meta-analysis of observational studies however did not find a convincing association between saturated fat intake and cardiovascular disease.[152] Variation in what is used as a substitute for saturated fat may explain some differences in findings.[148] The benefit from replacement with polyunsaturated fats appears greatest,[153] while replacement of saturated fats with carbohydrates does not appear to have a beneficial effect.[153] A diet high in trans fatty acids is associated with higher rates of cardiovascular disease,[154] and in 2015 the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) determined that there was 'no longer a consensus among qualified experts that partially hydrogenated oils (PHOs), which are the primary dietary source of industrially produced trans fatty acids (IP-TFA), are generally recognized as safe (GRAS) for any use in human food'.[155] There is conflicting evidence concerning whether dietary supplements of omega-3 fatty acids (a type of polyunsaturated essential fatty acid) added to diet improve cardiovascular risk.[156][157]

The benefits of recommending a low-salt diet in people with high or normal blood pressure are not clear.[158] In those with heart failure, after one study was left out, the rest of the trials show a trend to benefit.[159][160] Another review of dietary salt concluded that there is strong evidence that high dietary salt intake increases blood pressure and worsens hypertension, and that it increases the number of cardiovascular disease events; both as a result of the increased blood pressure and probably through other mechanisms.[161][162] Moderate evidence was found that high salt intake increases cardiovascular mortality; and some evidence was found for an increase in overall mortality, strokes, and left ventricular hypertrophy.[161]

Intermittent fasting

[edit]

Overall, the current body of scientific evidence is uncertain on whether intermittent fasting could prevent cardiovascular disease.[163] Intermittent fasting may help people lose more weight than regular eating patterns, but was not different from energy restriction diets.[163]

Medication

[edit]

Blood pressure medication reduces cardiovascular disease in people at risk,[121] irrespective of age,[164] the baseline level of cardiovascular risk,[165] or baseline blood pressure.[166] The commonly used drug regimens have similar efficacy in reducing the risk of all major cardiovascular events, although there may be differences between drugs in their ability to prevent specific outcomes.[167] Larger reductions in blood pressure produce larger reductions in risk,[167] and most people with high blood pressure require more than one drug to achieve adequate reduction in blood pressure.[168] Adherence to medications is often poor, and while mobile phone text messaging has been tried to improve adherence, there is insufficient evidence that it alters secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease.[169]

Statins are effective in preventing further cardiovascular disease in people with a history of cardiovascular disease.[170] As the event rate is higher in men than in women, the decrease in events is more easily seen in men than women.[170] In those at risk, but without a history of cardiovascular disease (primary prevention), statins decrease the risk of death and combined fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular disease.[171] The benefit, however, is small.[172] A United States guideline recommends statins in those who have a 12% or greater risk of cardiovascular disease over the next ten years.[173] Niacin, fibrates and CETP Inhibitors, while they may increase HDL cholesterol do not affect the risk of cardiovascular disease in those who are already on statins.[174] Fibrates lower the risk of cardiovascular and coronary events, but there is no evidence to suggest that they reduce all-cause mortality.[175]

Anti-diabetic medication may reduce cardiovascular risk in people with Type 2 diabetes, although evidence is not conclusive.[176] A meta-analysis in 2009 including 27,049 participants and 2,370 major vascular events showed a 15% relative risk reduction in cardiovascular disease with more-intensive glucose lowering over an average follow-up period of 4.4 years, but an increased risk of major hypoglycemia.[177]

Aspirin has been found to be of only modest benefit in those at low risk of heart disease, as the risk of serious bleeding is almost equal to the protection against cardiovascular problems.[178] In those at very low risk, including those over the age of 70, it is not recommended.[179][180] The United States Preventive Services Task Force recommends against use of aspirin for prevention in women less than 55 and men less than 45 years old; however, it is recommended for some older people.[181]

The use of vasoactive agents for people with pulmonary hypertension with left heart disease or hypoxemic lung diseases may cause harm and unnecessary expense.[182]

Antibiotics for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease

Antibiotics may help patients with coronary disease to reduce the risk of heart attacks and strokes.[183] However, evidence in 2021 suggests that antibiotics for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease are harmful, with increased mortality and occurrence of stroke;[183] the use of antibiotics is not supported for preventing secondary coronary heart disease.

Physical activity

[edit]

Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation following a heart attack reduces the risk of death from cardiovascular disease and leads to less hospitalizations.[184] There have been few high-quality studies of the benefits of exercise training in people with increased cardiovascular risk but no history of cardiovascular disease.[185]

A systematic review estimated that inactivity is responsible for 6% of the burden of disease from coronary heart disease worldwide.[186] The authors estimated that 121,000 deaths from coronary heart disease could have been averted in Europe in 2008 if people had not been physically inactive. Low-quality evidence from a limited number of studies suggest that yoga has beneficial effects on blood pressure and cholesterol.[187] Tentative evidence suggests that home-based exercise programs may be more efficient at improving exercise adherence.[188]

Dietary supplements

[edit]

While a healthy diet is beneficial, the effect of antioxidant supplementation (vitamin E, vitamin C, etc.) or vitamins has not been shown to protect against cardiovascular disease and in some cases may possibly result in harm.[189][190][191][192] Mineral supplements have also not been found to be useful.[193] Niacin, a type of vitamin B3, may be an exception with a modest decrease in the risk of cardiovascular events in those at high risk.[194][195] Magnesium supplementation lowers high blood pressure in a dose-dependent manner.[196] Magnesium therapy is recommended for people with ventricular arrhythmia associated with torsades de pointes who present with long QT syndrome, and for the treatment of people with digoxin intoxication-induced arrhythmias.[197] There is no evidence that omega-3 fatty acid supplementation is beneficial.[198] A 2022 review found that some dietary supplements, including micronutrients, may reduce risk factors for cardiovascular disease.[199]

Management

[edit]

Cardiovascular disease is treatable with initial treatment primarily focused on diet and lifestyle interventions.[3] Influenza may make heart attacks and strokes more likely and therefore influenza vaccination may decrease the chance of cardiovascular events and death in people with heart disease.[200]

Proper CVD management necessitates a focus on MI and stroke cases due to their combined high mortality rate, keeping in mind the cost-effectiveness of any intervention, especially in developing countries with low or middle-income levels.[100] Regarding MI, strategies using aspirin, atenolol, streptokinase or tissue plasminogen activator have been compared for quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) in regions of low and middle income. The costs for a single QALY for aspirin and atenolol were less than US$25, streptokinase was about $680, and t-PA was $16,000.[201] Aspirin, ACE inhibitors, beta-blockers, and statins used together for secondary CVD prevention in the same regions showed single QALY costs of $350.[201]

There are also surgical or procedural interventions that can save someone's life or prolong it. For heart valve problems, a person could have surgery to replace the valve. For arrhythmias, a pacemaker can be put in place to help reduce abnormal heart rhythms and for a heart attack, there are multiple options two of these are a coronary angioplasty and a coronary artery bypass surgery.[202]

There is probably no additional benefit in terms of mortality and serious adverse events when blood pressure targets were lowered to ≤ 135/85 mmHg from ≤ 140 to 160/90 to 100 mmHg.[203]

Epidemiology

[edit]
cardiovascular-disease-death-rates
Disability-adjusted life year for cardiovascular diseases per 100,000 inhabitants in 2004[17]
  no data
  <900
  900–1650
  1650–2300
  2300–3000
  3000–3700
  3700–4400
  4400–5100
  5100–5800
  5800–6500
  6500–7200
  7200–7900
  >7900

Cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of death worldwide and in all regions except Africa.[3] In 2008, 30% of all global death was attributed to cardiovascular diseases. Death caused by cardiovascular diseases are also higher in low- and middle-income countries as over 80% of all global deaths caused by cardiovascular diseases occurred in those countries. It is also estimated that by 2030, over 23 million people will die from cardiovascular diseases each year.

It is estimated that 60% of the world's cardiovascular disease burden will occur in the South Asian subcontinent despite only accounting for 20% of the world's population. This may be secondary to a combination of genetic predisposition and environmental factors. Organizations such as the Indian Heart Association are working with the World Heart Federation to raise awareness about this issue.[204]

Research

[edit]
See also: Heart-on-a-chip and Vessel-on-a-chip

There is evidence that cardiovascular disease existed in pre-history,[205] and research into cardiovascular disease dates from at least the 18th century.[206] The causes, prevention, and/or treatment of all forms of cardiovascular disease remain active fields of biomedical research, with hundreds of scientific studies being published on a weekly basis.

Recent areas of research include the link between inflammation and atherosclerosis[207][208] the potential for novel therapeutic interventions,[209] and the genetics of coronary heart disease.[210]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Cardiovascular disease

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) refers to a group of disorders affecting the heart and blood vessels, including coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease (such as stroke), peripheral arterial disease, rheumatic heart disease, and congenital heart defects. These conditions often arise from pathological processes like atherosclerosis, where plaque buildup narrows arteries, and thrombosis, which can acutely block blood flow, precipitating events such as myocardial infarction or ischemic stroke. CVD is the leading cause of death globally, responsible for an estimated 19.8 million fatalities in 2022, representing about one-third of all deaths worldwide. The burden of CVD has intensified over recent decades, with 437 million disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) lost in 2023, a 1.4-fold increase from 1990 levels, driven by aging populations and rising prevalence of modifiable risk factors. Key behavioral contributors include tobacco smoking, physical inactivity, excessive alcohol consumption, and diets high in processed foods and sodium, which elevate intermediate risks such as hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, and obesity. Empirical evidence from large cohort studies underscores that these factors causally drive endothelial dysfunction, inflammation, and plaque instability, with smoking alone accounting for up to 20% of attributable CVD burden in some populations. While genetic predispositions exist, population-level data show that over 80% of premature CVD deaths could be averted through primary prevention targeting these modifiable elements, as demonstrated by declines in smoking and cholesterol levels offsetting rises in obesity. Therapeutic advances, including statins for lipid management, antihypertensive agents, and revascularization procedures like angioplasty, have improved survival rates for acute events, yet controversies persist over over-reliance on pharmacological interventions without concurrent lifestyle modifications, as long-term adherence to drugs alone yields suboptimal outcomes compared to integrated approaches. Globally, low- and middle-income countries bear 75% of CVD mortality despite lower historical incidence, highlighting disparities in access to diagnostics and the need for causal interventions over symptomatic treatments. Ongoing research emphasizes precision in risk stratification, incorporating biomarkers like C-reactive protein for inflammation, to better predict and mitigate progression from subclinical atherosclerosis to clinical disease.

Overview

Definition and Classification

Cardiovascular disease (CVD), also known as heart and circulatory disease, encompasses a group of disorders affecting the heart and blood vessels, including coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease (such as stroke), peripheral arterial disease, rheumatic heart disease, congenital heart disease, and conditions like deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. These disorders primarily involve structural or functional abnormalities leading to impaired blood flow or cardiac function, often culminating in acute events like myocardial infarction or stroke. The term CVD is used interchangeably with circulatory system diseases in epidemiological contexts, emphasizing their collective impact on morbidity and mortality worldwide. Standard classification of CVD follows the International Classification of Diseases, 11th Revision (ICD-11), under Chapter 11: Diseases of the circulatory system, which organizes conditions into hierarchical codes for diagnostic and statistical purposes. Key categories include hypertensive diseases (BA00-BA04), ischaemic heart diseases (BA40-BA6Z), pulmonary heart disease and diseases of pulmonary circulation (BA80-BA8Z), and other forms such as cardiomyopathies (BC40-BC4Z) and cerebrovascular diseases (8B00-8B9Z). This framework standardizes reporting across healthcare systems, facilitating global comparisons of prevalence and outcomes, though it excludes isolated hypertension unless complicated by organ damage. Alternative categorizations, such as those from the Framingham Heart Study, focus on risk stratification rather than taxonomic grouping, estimating 10-year probabilities of CVD events based on factors like age, cholesterol levels, and blood pressure for primary prevention. The scope of CVD is projected to expand significantly, with global prevalence expected to increase by 90% from 2025 to 2050 due to population aging, rising obesity, and socioeconomic shifts, despite potential declines in age-standardized rates in some regions. In the United States, clinical CVD (excluding uncomplicated hypertension) is forecasted to affect 45 million adults by 2050, up from current levels, representing about 15% of the adult population and driven by demographic changes and persistent risk factors. These projections underscore the need for precise classification to track epidemiological trends and allocate resources effectively.

Signs and Symptoms

Cardiovascular diseases often manifest asymptomatically in early stages, with symptoms emerging due to myocardial ischemia, reduced cardiac output, or vascular occlusion disrupting tissue perfusion. Common nonspecific indicators include chest pain or discomfort, shortness of breath (dyspnea) during exertion or at rest, persistent fatigue, and palpitations, which reflect inadequate oxygen delivery to the heart muscle or systemic hypoperfusion. In coronary artery disease, angina pectoris presents as substernal pressure, tightness, or aching exacerbated by physical activity and alleviated by rest, stemming from transient myocardial ischemia; acute myocardial infarction intensifies this with prolonged severe pain radiating to the arm, jaw, or back, often accompanied by nausea, diaphoresis, and dyspnea. Heart failure symptoms arise from ventricular dysfunction causing pulmonary congestion or systemic venous backup, manifesting as orthopnea, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea, peripheral edema, and exertional fatigue due to impaired forward flow and elevated filling pressures. Peripheral artery disease typically features intermittent claudication, a cramping leg pain in calves, thighs, or buttocks triggered by walking and relieved within minutes of rest, resulting from lower limb ischemia during increased metabolic demand; advanced cases may include rest pain, nonhealing ulcers, or tissue loss. Cerebrovascular disease, particularly ischemic stroke, produces acute focal deficits from cerebral hypoperfusion, such as unilateral weakness or numbness, aphasia, visual field loss, ataxia, or sudden severe headache, often without preceding warning. Arrhythmias may cause irregular heartbeats, syncope, or presyncope from erratic electrical conduction impairing hemodynamics, while valvular disorders contribute symptoms like exertional dyspnea or angina from pressure or volume overload. Symptoms vary by subtype but universally signal underlying pathophysiological disruptions in blood flow or cardiac function rather than extrinsic factors.

Global Burden and Mortality

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of mortality worldwide, responsible for 19.2 million deaths in 2023, equivalent to one in three global deaths. This figure reflects a rise from 13.1 million CVD deaths in 1990, driven by population growth, aging demographics, and persistent modifiable risk factors including hypertension, high body mass index, tobacco use, and dyslipidemia. In 2023, the global age-adjusted CVD death rate stood at 235.18 per 100,000 population, with a prevalence of 612.06 million cases. The burden extends beyond mortality to disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), a metric combining years of life lost (YLLs) due to premature death and years lived with disability (YLDs). CVD accounted for 437 million DALYs in 2023, marking a 1.4-fold increase from 320 million in 1990, with ischemic heart disease and stroke comprising the largest shares. YLLs dominate DALYs for CVD, reflecting its acute lethality, while YLDs highlight chronic impacts like heart failure. Projections from 2025 to 2050 forecast a 73.4% rise in crude mortality and a 54.7% increase in crude DALYs globally, attributable to demographic shifts rather than worsening age-specific risks, as effective interventions against modifiable factors could mitigate age-standardized declines. Regional variations underscore the influence of lifestyle-driven risks over structural barriers alone. Low- and middle-income countries bear a disproportionate load, with CVD deaths rising sharply in regions like Southeast Asia and sub-Saharan Africa due to surging obesity, diabetes, and urbanization-linked sedentary behavior, despite lower historical exposure compared to high-income nations. In contrast, high-income areas exhibit stabilizing or declining age-adjusted rates through risk factor control, illustrating that behavioral modifications—such as reduced smoking and improved diet—can substantially alleviate burden irrespective of economic context. Economic costs amplify this impact; in the United States, CVD-related expenditures are projected to triple to $1.8 trillion by 2050, reflecting untreated modifiable risks amid population changes.

Types

Coronary Artery Disease

Coronary artery disease (CAD), also known as coronary heart disease, involves the progressive accumulation of atherosclerotic plaques in the coronary arteries, which supply oxygenated blood to the myocardium. This buildup narrows the arterial lumen, impairs blood flow, and can lead to myocardial ischemia when oxygen demand exceeds supply. Plaques consist primarily of lipids, cholesterol, inflammatory cells, and fibrous tissue, with empirical studies showing that significant stenosis (≥50% narrowing) often correlates with clinical symptoms, though subclinical atherosclerosis affects up to 42% of middle-aged adults in population-based imaging cohorts. CAD manifests clinically along a spectrum from chronic stable ischemia to acute events. Stable angina pectoris presents as predictable, exertional chest discomfort relieved by rest or nitroglycerin, resulting from fixed obstructions typically exceeding 70% stenosis that limit flow reserve during increased demand. In contrast, acute coronary syndrome (ACS) encompasses unstable angina, non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), and ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), driven by plaque rupture or erosion triggering thrombus formation and abrupt occlusion. Unstable angina differs from stable by occurring at rest or with minimal provocation, signaling imminent risk of infarction. As the leading cause of death in the United States, CAD accounted for 371,506 fatalities in 2022, representing the most common form of heart disease and contributing substantially to overall cardiovascular mortality. Approximately 1 in 20 adults aged 20 and older have diagnosed CAD, with prevalence rising sharply with age and risk factors. Globally, CAD drives the majority of ischemic heart disease burdens, underscoring its role as the primary killer within cardiovascular pathologies.

Cerebrovascular Disease

Cerebrovascular disease refers to pathological conditions affecting the blood vessels that supply the brain, primarily manifesting as stroke, which involves sudden interruption of blood flow leading to brain tissue damage. Strokes are classified into ischemic, accounting for approximately 65-87% of cases globally through arterial occlusion by thrombus or embolus, and hemorrhagic, comprising about 15-30% via vessel rupture causing intracerebral or subarachnoid bleeding. Ischemic subtypes include thrombotic strokes from local plaque buildup and embolic from distant clots, often originating from atrial fibrillation or cardiac sources. Hemorrhagic events typically stem from hypertension-induced vessel fragility or aneurysms. Transient ischemic attack (TIA), or "mini-stroke," involves temporary focal ischemia without permanent infarction, resolving within 24 hours but signaling high risk for subsequent full stroke. Epidemiologically, cerebrovascular disease imposes a substantial global burden, with stroke incidence reaching over 7.8 million ischemic cases in 2021 alone, alongside rising trends in both ischemic and hemorrhagic subtypes due to aging populations and persistent risk factors. In 2021, ischemic stroke constituted 65.3% of total stroke burden, intracerebral hemorrhage 28.8%, and subarachnoid hemorrhage the remainder, with overall prevalence exceeding 100 million cases worldwide. Unlike coronary artery disease, which primarily affects myocardial function, cerebrovascular events yield focal brain deficits, contributing to stroke as the second-leading cause of death and primary cause of long-term disability, with projections indicating a 50% increase in cases by 2050 absent interventions. Risk factors for cerebrovascular disease substantially overlap with those for coronary artery disease, including hypertension, smoking, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and atrial fibrillation, though hypertension exerts a particularly dominant causal role in both ischemic and hemorrhagic subtypes via endothelial damage and vessel wall stress. Modifying hypertension in midlife yields the greatest gains in life-years free of cardiovascular events, with a 2025 analysis estimating up to a decade of extended healthy lifespan when combined with smoking cessation, surpassing benefits from other factors like obesity control. These shared risks underscore systemic atherosclerosis and thrombosis as common pathways, yet cerebrovascular outcomes diverge in emphasizing brain-specific vulnerabilities, such as collateral circulation limitations exacerbating ischemic penumbra. Clinically, cerebrovascular disease produces distinct neurological sequelae, including hemiparesis, aphasia, visual field defects, and cognitive impairments, contrasting with the chest pain and heart failure predominant in coronary events; up to one-third of survivors develop dementia, and most retain partial deficits hindering workforce participation. TIA, while not causing infarction, correlates with 10-15% stroke risk within 90 days, necessitating urgent secondary prevention focused on antiplatelet therapy and risk factor optimization to avert progression to permanent deficits.

Peripheral Artery Disease

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) refers to the narrowing or occlusion of arteries supplying blood to the limbs, most commonly the lower extremities, resulting from atherosclerotic plaque buildup that impairs perfusion. This condition manifests as a peripheral extension of systemic atherosclerosis, serving as an indicator of widespread vascular pathology that elevates risks for coronary and cerebrovascular events. The primary symptom is intermittent claudication, characterized by exertional muscle pain, cramping, or fatigue in the calves, thighs, or buttocks that resolves with rest due to inadequate oxygen delivery during activity. In severe cases, critical limb ischemia develops, featuring rest pain, non-healing ulcers, or gangrene, which can necessitate amputation if untreated. Up to 50-90% of cases remain asymptomatic, contributing to delayed recognition. Globally, PAD affected approximately 236 million adults as of 2019, with prevalence rising 72% from 65.8 million in 1990 to 113.4 million, driven by aging populations and rising comorbidities. Age-standardized prevalence reached about 5.6% by 2015, with projections estimating 360 million cases by 2050, particularly in low- and middle-income regions where rates exceed 20% in some areas. In the United States, 7-12 million individuals are impacted. Despite this burden, PAD is frequently underdiagnosed, with 2024-2025 analyses attributing this to the predominance of silent disease, symptom variability, and disparities in screening, notably among women and those with limited healthcare access. PAD patients face a 2-3 times higher mortality risk from cardiovascular causes compared to those without, underscoring its role as a sentinel for multisite atherosclerosis.

Heart Failure and Cardiomyopathies

Heart failure manifests as a pathophysiological state in which the heart cannot generate sufficient cardiac output to satisfy tissue perfusion needs at rest or during exertion, stemming from impaired systolic or diastolic function. Systolic heart failure, also termed heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), involves diminished myocardial contractility, typically with left ventricular ejection fraction below 40%, leading to ventricular dilation and inadequate forward flow. In contrast, diastolic heart failure, or heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), arises from stiff ventricular walls that hinder relaxation and filling during diastole, preserving ejection fraction above 50% but compromising stroke volume through elevated end-diastolic pressures. These distinctions arise from underlying myocardial remodeling and extracellular matrix alterations, with HFrEF more often linked to myocyte loss and HFpEF to fibrosis and hypertrophy. Epidemiological data indicate heart failure prevalence escalates sharply with age, reflecting cumulative insults from comorbidities and demographic shifts toward older populations. In the United States, an estimated 6.7 million adults over age 20 had heart failure in recent assessments, with projections reaching 8.7 million by 2030 due to extended lifespans and improved acute cardiovascular survival. Globally, heart failure burdens approximately 64 million individuals, with incidence rates climbing in aging societies as diastolic variants predominate in the elderly, driven by factors like hypertension-induced stiffness rather than overt ischemia. Lifetime risk stands at about 24% in developed nations, underscoring the condition's progression from subclinical ventricular dysfunction to overt pump failure. Cardiomyopathies encompass primary disorders of the myocardium that directly precipitate heart failure through structural and functional derangements, distinct from secondary failures due to coronary or valvular pathology. Classified by etiology, genetic forms predominate in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), where mutations in sarcomeric genes like MYH7 or MYBPC3 disrupt contractile proteins, yielding asymmetric septal hypertrophy and diastolic impairment in up to 1 in 500 individuals worldwide. Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) often blends genetic (e.g., titin variants) and acquired elements, manifesting as eccentric remodeling with systolic dysfunction and chamber enlargement. Acquired cardiomyopathies, such as those from viral myocarditis or cardiotoxic chemotherapies, induce inflammatory or infiltrative damage, while restrictive variants like amyloidosis feature rigid ventricles from protein deposition, severely limiting preload. Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy involves fibrofatty replacement, genetically tied to desmosomal genes, but primarily affects systolic performance over electrical instability in isolation. These entities collectively amplify heart failure risk, with genetic screening revealing familial patterns in 20-50% of cases depending on subtype, enabling early intervention absent in purely acquired processes.

Arrhythmias and Valvular Disease

Arrhythmias encompass disorders of the heart's electrical conduction system, resulting in abnormal heart rates or rhythms that can originate from the atria, ventricles, or conduction pathways. These conditions are classified broadly as bradyarrhythmias (heart rates below 60 beats per minute) or tachyarrhythmias (rates exceeding 100 beats per minute), with further subdivision based on site of origin and mechanism. Atrial fibrillation (AFib), the most common sustained arrhythmia, affects approximately 44 million individuals worldwide and becomes increasingly prevalent with age, reaching up to 9% in those aged 80 to 89 years. AFib predisposes to thromboembolism via stasis in the left atrial appendage, elevating ischemic stroke risk fivefold and accounting for 15 to 20% of such events. Lifetime risk of developing AFib is about 1 in 4 for individuals aged 40 or older. Ventricular arrhythmias, including tachycardia and fibrillation, contribute to 75 to 80% of sudden cardiac deaths, estimated at 184,000 to 450,000 annually in the United States. Non-atherosclerotic etiologies include structural abnormalities in the conduction system, such as disruptions in Purkinje fibers, which propagate electrical impulses. A 2025 Mayo Clinic study identified previously unrecognized intramyocardial Purkinje tissue comprising over 60% of human myocardial Purkinje fiber content, visualized via the biomarker myosin light chain 4 (MYL4), offering new insights into rhythm management and potential pacing targets. Valvular heart disease involves structural or functional impairment of one or more cardiac valves, leading to stenosis (narrowing) or regurgitation (leakage). Primary forms arise from intrinsic valve pathology rather than secondary effects like ischemia. Aortic stenosis, predominantly calcific and degenerative, affects about 9 million people globally and is the most common valvular lesion in developed nations, often manifesting in the elderly due to progressive leaflet calcification independent of coronary atherosclerosis. Mitral regurgitation frequently stems from myxomatous degeneration or prolapse, a genetic predisposition causing leaflet redundancy and annular dilation. Rheumatic heart disease, resulting from autoimmune damage post-group A streptococcal infection, remains a leading cause of valvular pathology in low-income regions, primarily affecting mitral and aortic valves with fibrosis and fusion leading to stenosis. In contrast, degenerative causes predominate in high-income settings, driven by age-related wear, calcification, or congenital anomalies like bicuspid aortic valves, which accelerate stenosis through mechanical stress and lipid-mediated inflammation distinct from plaque buildup in arteries. Overall, valvular disease impacts 5 to 10% of the population, with aortic stenosis as the predominant fatal type in epidemiological surveys. These pathologies impair hemodynamics, promoting atrial enlargement and arrhythmias like AFib through volume overload or pressure gradients.

Pathophysiology

Atherosclerosis Mechanisms

Atherosclerosis involves the progressive buildup of plaques in arterial walls, primarily driven by the retention and modification of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particles in the intima layer. Endothelial dysfunction, often triggered by hemodynamic shear stress or risk factors such as hypertension and smoking, increases vascular permeability, allowing LDL to infiltrate the subendothelial space. Once retained by proteoglycans, LDL undergoes oxidative modification by reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated from sources like NADPH oxidase in endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells. This oxidation transforms native LDL into oxidized LDL (oxLDL), which is more atherogenic than unmodified LDL due to its ability to promote inflammation and cellular uptake independent of regulatory feedback. Oxidative stress, rather than mere lipid accumulation, serves as a critical initiator, as evidenced by the heightened ROS production in early lesion formation preceding significant plaque development. Macrophages recruited to the intima via chemokines bind and internalize oxLDL through scavenger receptors such as CD36 and LOX-1, bypassing the homeostatic LDL receptor pathway. This unregulated uptake leads to cholesterol ester accumulation within lysosomes, forming lipid-laden foam cells that characterize the initial fatty streak lesions. Foam cells secrete pro-inflammatory cytokines like interleukin-1β and tumor necrosis factor-α, amplifying local oxidative stress and attracting additional monocytes while impairing cholesterol efflux through downregulation of transporters such as ABCA1. Empirical data from animal models demonstrate that inhibiting foam cell formation reduces early plaque size, underscoring its causal role in lesion progression. As plaques advance, foam cells and dying macrophages contribute to a necrotic core, prompting vascular smooth muscle cells (SMCs) to migrate from the media, proliferate, and deposit extracellular matrix components like collagen and elastin to form a fibrous cap. Continued ROS-mediated signaling sustains SMC phenotypic switching toward a pro-inflammatory, synthetic state, further promoting plaque instability through matrix metalloproteinase activity. Human histopathological studies confirm that oxidative modifications correlate more strongly with advanced plaque features than total lipid content alone. Among LDL subclasses, small dense LDL (sdLDL) particles exhibit greater atherogenicity than larger, buoyant ones, independent of total LDL cholesterol levels. SdLDL penetrates arterial walls more readily due to reduced size (diameter ≤257 Ångstroms) and binds more avidly to proteoglycans, enhancing retention. These particles are also more susceptible to oxidation owing to lower antioxidant content and polyunsaturated fatty acid enrichment, yielding highly pro-inflammatory oxLDL. Prospective cohort studies, such as those analyzing NMR spectroscopy data, show sdLDL strongly predicts cardiovascular events, with odds ratios exceeding those for total LDL-C; for instance, elevated sdLDL associates with a 1.5- to 3-fold increased risk after adjusting for standard lipids. This evidence challenges overreliance on total cholesterol metrics, as particle size and density better reflect causal oxidation propensity in causal realism frameworks.

Thrombosis and Plaque Rupture

Thrombosis in cardiovascular disease often culminates from the acute rupture of atherosclerotic plaques, where disruption of the fibrous cap exposes thrombogenic substrates such as collagen, tissue factor, and lipid-rich necrotic core to circulating blood elements, triggering platelet adhesion, activation, and the coagulation cascade. This exposure leads to rapid thrombus formation, which can partially or completely occlude the vessel lumen, resulting in ischemia and events like myocardial infarction or stroke. Plaque rupture accounts for the majority of acute coronary syndromes, with pathological analyses indicating it as the underlying mechanism in 60-70% of fatal cases. The process aligns with an adaptation of Virchow's triad—endothelial (or plaque surface) injury, local hemodynamic disturbances, and hypercoagulability—to arterial contexts. Rupture equates to vessel wall damage by breaching the endothelial barrier and revealing procoagulant surfaces; stenotic plaques induce flow stasis or turbulence proximally, promoting thrombus propagation; and systemic factors like elevated fibrinogen or platelet reactivity exacerbate clot stability. In non-ruptured scenarios, such as plaque erosion, thrombosis arises from denudation without cap fracture, but rupture predominates in thrombotic occlusions, comprising about 44-73% of culprit lesions in acute syndromes per intravascular imaging. Intravascular optical coherence tomography (OCT) and ultrasound (IVUS) provide empirical visualization of rupture features, including cap discontinuities, cavity formation, and thrombus apposition, with OCT detecting these at resolutions up to 10-20 micrometers. Studies using combined OCT-IVUS in ST-elevation myocardial infarction cohorts report plaque rupture in 64.8% of culprit sites, often with underlying large necrotic cores and minimal calcification, underscoring the acute destabilization's role over chronic progression. These imaging modalities confirm that ruptured plaques exhibit thinner caps (<65 micrometers) pre-event in prospective data, though in vivo rupture incidence remains event-driven rather than routinely quantifiable in stable disease. Thrombus composition post-rupture typically includes platelet-rich aggregates initially, transitioning to fibrin-dominant structures, influenced by shear stress and local geometry.

Inflammatory Processes

Chronic low-grade inflammation drives CVD progression alongside dyslipidemia, supporting integrated approaches targeting both lipids and inflammation. Inflammatory processes in cardiovascular disease involve the recruitment of immune cells, such as monocytes and T lymphocytes, to the arterial wall, where they differentiate into macrophages that engulf oxidized lipids and release pro-inflammatory cytokines including interleukin-1β (IL-1β), IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α). These cytokines amplify local inflammation, promote smooth muscle cell proliferation, and destabilize atherosclerotic plaques by inducing matrix metalloproteinases that degrade fibrous caps. Adaptive immune responses, including T-cell activation, further sustain chronic inflammation, contributing to plaque progression independent of lipid accumulation alone. C-reactive protein (CRP), an acute-phase reactant produced by hepatocytes in response to IL-6, serves as a biomarker of systemic inflammation and predicts cardiovascular events, with high-sensitivity CRP (hsCRP) levels above 2 mg/L associated with increased risk of myocardial infarction and stroke. While mainstream paradigms prioritize lipid-driven atherogenesis, evidence indicates CRP may exert causal effects by impairing endothelial function, facilitating monocyte adhesion, and promoting plaque instability, as supported by observational data and animal models where CRP binding to oxidized LDL exacerbates lesion formation. Mendelian randomization studies estimating genetically elevated CRP levels yield risk ratios for coronary heart disease comparable to observational associations, suggesting a direct pathogenic role beyond mere correlation. Clinical trials targeting inflammatory pathways provide empirical support for inflammation as a primary driver, challenging lipid-centric models. In the CANTOS trial, canakinumab—an IL-1β inhibitor—reduced major adverse cardiovascular events by 15% in post-myocardial infarction patients with elevated hsCRP, without altering lipid profiles, demonstrating that cytokine blockade mitigates risk through anti-inflammatory mechanisms. Similarly, low-dose colchicine (0.5 mg daily), which inhibits inflammasome activation and cytokine release, lowered cardiovascular event rates by 25-30% in patients with coronary artery disease, further evidenced by reduced hsCRP and IL-6 levels. These findings underscore systemic cytokine-mediated inflammation as a modifiable causal factor, with benefits accruing irrespective of cholesterol reduction. Upstream triggers of these processes include chronic infections, which induce persistent immune activation and cytokine storms contributing to atherogenesis; for instance, pathogens like periodontal bacteria or Chlamydia pneumoniae correlate with accelerated plaque formation via endothelial activation and systemic inflammatory markers. Chronic psychosocial stress similarly drives inflammation by activating the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, elevating cortisol and pro-inflammatory cytokines like IL-6, which foster a hypercoagulable state and lipid oxidation, accounting for elevated cardiovascular risk in stressed cohorts independent of traditional factors. This causal chain—from stressors to immune dysregulation—highlights inflammation's role as an integrator of environmental insults into vascular pathology.

Endothelial Dysfunction

Endothelial dysfunction refers to the impaired functioning of the vascular endothelium, the monolayer of cells lining blood vessels, which serves as a critical barrier regulating vascular tone, permeability, inflammation, and thrombosis. This dysfunction manifests as a reduction in endothelium-dependent vasodilation, primarily due to decreased bioavailability of nitric oxide (NO), a key vasoprotective molecule produced by endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS). Empirical evidence from human studies demonstrates that endothelial dysfunction precedes and contributes to cardiovascular disease progression by promoting vasoconstriction, leukocyte adhesion, and platelet aggregation, thereby increasing vascular resistance and thrombotic risk. The core mechanism involves impaired NO production and increased oxidative stress, where reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as superoxide inactivate NO, forming peroxynitrite and exacerbating barrier failure. In conditions like hypertension and hypercholesterolemia, eNOS uncoupling—wherein the enzyme produces superoxide instead of NO—further diminishes NO levels, leading to endothelial barrier disruption and heightened permeability. Studies in endothelial cell models confirm that inhibiting NO synthesis directly induces dysfunction, mimicking vascular failure observed in vivo. This foundational impairment contrasts with downstream effects like plaque formation, as it initiates the loss of the endothelium's anti-atherogenic and anti-thrombotic properties. Endothelial dysfunction exhibits a bidirectional relationship with insulin resistance, a hallmark of metabolic disorders preceding cardiovascular events. Insulin resistance selectively impairs insulin signaling in endothelium via disrupted phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt pathways, which normally activate eNOS, while preserving mitogenic pathways that promote inflammation. Clinical data from insulin-resistant individuals show reduced flow-mediated dilation—a marker of endothelial function—correlating with hyperinsulinemia levels as low as those post-overnight fasting, independent of hyperglycemia. This linkage underscores causal realism in metabolic-vascular interplay, where endothelial NO deficiency worsens insulin-mediated glucose uptake, perpetuating resistance and vascular barrier failure.

Risk Factors

Non-Modifiable Risk Factors

Age is the most potent non-modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD), with incidence and mortality rates rising exponentially after approximately age 40, driven by cumulative vascular wear, reduced regenerative capacity, and progressive stiffening of arteries. In adults over 80 years, CVD prevalence reaches 89.3% in males and 91.8% in females, reflecting the dominance of chronological aging in disease manifestation. The percentage of adults with at least one CVD risk factor also escalates with age, from 27.0% in those aged 20-39 to 42.6% in those 65 and older, underscoring age's independent contribution beyond modifiable factors. Sex influences CVD risk profiles, with males exhibiting higher susceptibility prior to female menopause, attributable to protective effects of estrogen on endothelial function and lipid metabolism in premenopausal women. Premenopausal women experience lower age-adjusted CVD rates compared to men, but this gap narrows post-menopause, where women's risk accelerates and often surpasses men's when adjusted for age, leading to later but equally severe presentations. Women typically manifest CVD about 10 years later than men, yet postmenopausal prognosis for events like acute coronary syndrome worsens relative to age-matched males. Genetic predisposition, including family history, confers verifiable heritability for CVD outcomes, as evidenced by twin studies showing genetic contributions of 57% in males and 38% in females to coronary heart disease mortality. Conditions like familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), a monogenic disorder affecting LDL receptor function, illustrate causal genetic impact, with prevalence around 1 in 311 individuals and a twofold elevation in coronary heart disease risk even at moderate LDL-C levels. FH-affected individuals face markedly higher premature atherosclerotic CVD incidence, such as 14.9 per 1000 person-years for atherosclerotic CVD in primary prevention cohorts, emphasizing polygenic and monogenic pathways without implying determinism, as environmental interactions modulate expression.

Modifiable Lifestyle Risk Factors

Tobacco smoking exhibits a robust dose-response relationship with cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, where even low levels of consumption substantially elevate incidence of coronary heart disease and stroke. A meta-analysis of prospective studies found that smoking approximately one cigarette per day confers about half the excess risk of smoking 20 cigarettes per day for these outcomes, underscoring the absence of a safe threshold. Current smoking at least doubles the risk for major CVD subtypes, including acute myocardial infarction and heart failure, with benefits from cessation accruing rapidly—heavy smokers quitting experience significant risk reduction within five years. Physical inactivity independently heightens CVD risk, with sedentary behavior linked to increased all-cause and cardiovascular mortality through mechanisms like impaired endothelial function and metabolic dysregulation. Prospective cohort data indicate that prolonged sitting, such as in occupational settings, associates with a 34% higher CVD mortality risk compared to more active patterns. Regular moderate-to-vigorous physical activity mitigates this, reducing nonfatal cardiac events by 18% and total cardiac events by 29%, highlighting the causal protective role of habitual movement over mere avoidance of sedentariness. Dietary patterns emphasizing refined sugars and processed carbohydrates drive inflammation and metabolic disturbances more directly than saturated fats, contrary to earlier emphases in some guidelines. High added sugar intake triples CVD mortality risk via elevated blood pressure and chronic low-grade inflammation, while replacing saturated fats with sugars exacerbates obesity and related complications. Meta-analyses challenge the saturated fat-CVD link, showing no consistent harm when contextualized against carbohydrate quality, with evidence favoring whole-food sources of fats over isolated nutrient fears. Alcohol consumption follows a J-shaped curve for CVD outcomes, where light-to-moderate intake (up to one drink daily) correlates with 22% lower cardiovascular mortality compared to abstinence, likely due to effects on HDL cholesterol and hemostasis, while heavy use (>3 drinks daily) sharply elevates risks via hypertension and cardiomyopathy. This pattern holds in meta-analyses of cohort studies, though causality remains debated amid confounding by former drinkers in abstainer groups; excess consumption nullifies benefits and amplifies harm. Chronic sleep deprivation, defined as ≤5-6 hours nightly, elevates CVD incidence by 20-48% in prospective cohorts, through pathways including sympathetic overactivation and insulin resistance. Short sleep duration specifically heightens coronary heart disease risk, with irregularity compounding effects independent of duration. Chronic stress, proxied by elevated cortisol levels, associates with up to fivefold higher myocardial infarction risk in cohort analyses, mediating via endothelial damage and plaque instability. Hair cortisol measurements confirm this link, with higher chronic exposure correlating to prevalent hypertension and prior CVD events, emphasizing behavioral management of psychosocial stressors.

Environmental and Occupational Risk Factors

Air pollution, particularly fine particulate matter (PM2.5), has been empirically linked to increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) incidence and mortality through mechanisms including endothelial dysfunction, inflammation, and oxidative stress. A meta-analysis of 35 studies reported that a short-term increase of 10 μg/m³ in PM2.5 concentrations is associated with a 2.12% elevated risk of CVD-related hospitalization. Long-term exposure to PM2.5 at moderate levels (e.g., 5-15 μg/m³) correlates with higher risks of acute myocardial infarction, ischemic heart disease mortality, and overall CVD mortality, with hazard ratios indicating approximately 10-20% increased risk per 10 μg/m³ increment in cohort studies. These associations persist after adjusting for confounders like smoking and socioeconomic status, underscoring direct causal pathways from particulate inhalation to vascular damage rather than indirect effects via inequality, as particulate-induced systemic inflammation drives outcomes independently of neighborhood deprivation metrics. Occupational exposures contribute to CVD risk via chronic stressors and toxicants. Shift work, especially night shifts, disrupts circadian rhythms, elevating CVD event risk by 17% overall and 26% for coronary heart disease morbidity compared to day work, based on systematic reviews of prospective studies. This risk arises from prolonged sympathetic activation, sleep disruption, and metabolic dysregulation, with meta-analyses confirming higher odds for hypertension and arrhythmias among shift workers. Chemical exposures, such as solvents, metals, and pesticides, further compound hazards; occupational solvent exposure is linked to electrocardiographic abnormalities and increased myocardial infarction incidence, while high pesticide exposure raises 10-year CVD event rates by up to 40% in exposed cohorts. Metals like cadmium show probable but not definitive atherosclerotic effects, with prevalence rates of 8.5% for metal exposures in CVD cases. Ionizing radiation exposure, often occupational in medical or nuclear workers, induces CVD through DNA damage, fibrosis, and accelerated atherosclerosis. In atomic bomb survivors, doses of 0-4 Gy (primarily 0-2 Gy) exhibit a dose-response relationship with heart disease and stroke risks, with excess relative risks of 14% per Gy for circulatory mortality. Systematic reviews of low-dose exposures (<0.5 Gy) confirm elevated circulatory disease incidence, including in cohorts with cumulative doses from repeated medical imaging or occupational sources. These findings highlight radiation's role in endothelial injury and plaque instability, distinct from acute high-dose effects like burns.

Emerging Risk Factors

Elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and mildly elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) are established independent risk factors for cardiovascular disease, contributing to atherosclerosis and thrombosis, but are not typically classified as diagnosed cardiometabolic diseases themselves. Lp(a), primarily genetically determined, confers risk through proatherogenic and prothrombotic properties. Emerging risk factors for cardiovascular disease encompass understudied contributors supported by recent empirical evidence, including post-infectious sequelae, microbial dysbiosis, novel dietary exposures, and stress-mediated autonomic perturbations. These factors highlight causal pathways beyond traditional risks, such as persistent inflammation or metabolic disruptions, with studies from 2024 onward quantifying their independent contributions through longitudinal cohorts and mechanistic analyses. Post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection, often termed long COVID, elevate cardiovascular risk through mechanisms like endothelial injury and chronic inflammation. A 2025 analysis found long COVID associated with significantly higher odds of subsequent cardiovascular diagnoses, including arrhythmias and heart failure, persisting beyond four weeks post-recovery. Large-scale epidemiological data from September 2025 confirmed increased incidences of pericarditis, cardiomyopathy, and dysrhythmias, attributing these to viral-induced microvascular damage rather than mere correlation with acute severity. Vaccination mitigates these risks by reducing infection-related cardiac events, underscoring a causal link via viral persistence. Gut microbiome composition influences cardiovascular outcomes via metabolite production, such as trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO), which promotes atherosclerosis. April 2024 research identified specific cholesterol-consuming bacteria that lower serum lipids and heart disease risk, with abundance correlating inversely to event rates in cohort studies. A June 2024 study on microbial age showed that a "younger" gut profile—rich in diverse, anti-inflammatory taxa—counteracts elevated cardiovascular risk in metabolically unhealthy individuals, independent of chronological age. Dysbiosis, often from antibiotic use or poor fiber intake, drives progression through short-chain fatty acid imbalances, as evidenced by multi-omics analyses linking taxa shifts to plaque instability. Ultra-processed foods (UPFs), characterized by high additive content and low nutrient density, contribute via glycemic spikes, oxidative stress, and gut permeability alterations. A March 2025 NIH-linked study reported high UPF intake associated with elevated heart disease and stroke incidence in U.S. adults, with each 100 grams daily increase raising hypertension and event risks by measurable increments. February 2024 meta-analyses across millions confirmed UPF exposure heightens cardiometabolic mortality by 19%, mechanistically tied to systemic inflammation rather than caloric excess alone. Subgroup data from 2024 trials differentiated harmful UPF subtypes, like emulsified snacks, from neutral ones, emphasizing formulation over processing category. Chronic psychological stress and anxiety exert causal effects on cardiovascular disease through autonomic nervous system imbalance, reducing heart rate variability and favoring sympathetic dominance. June 2024 NHLBI findings linked lower variability—indicative of vagal withdrawal—to stress-induced myocardial vulnerability, with prospective data showing doubled event rates in high-stress cohorts. Anxiety triggers this via hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal activation, leading to endothelial dysfunction and plaque rupture, as quantified in 2024 reviews of sympathetic overdrive. Unlike bidirectional associations, intervention trials demonstrate that autonomic modulation (e.g., via biofeedback) attenuates risk, supporting causality over confound.

Prevention

Primary Prevention Strategies

Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease targets individuals without established disease through population-level lifestyle modifications that address modifiable risk factors, including a balanced diet rich in fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and fatty fish; regular exercise; maintaining a healthy weight; not smoking; and managing blood pressure and cholesterol, reducing incidence by up to 80% in adherent groups according to cohort data. Empirical evidence from randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses prioritizes smoking avoidance, physical activity, nutrient-dense dietary patterns, and weight maintenance over pharmaceutical approaches in low-to-moderate risk populations. Avoidance or cessation of tobacco use constitutes the most impactful single intervention, with risk of coronary heart disease declining by approximately 50% within one year of quitting and normalizing to never-smoker levels after 15 years. Prospective studies indicate that even brief cessation yields measurable reductions in endothelial dysfunction and atherogenesis, underscoring causal links via oxidative stress and platelet activation mechanisms. Regular physical activity, specifically 150 minutes per week of moderate-intensity aerobic exercise, correlates with a 14% lower risk of coronary heart disease events in large prospective cohorts. Dose-response meta-analyses affirm that this threshold—equivalent to 8.75 metabolic equivalent task-hours weekly—optimally balances CVD prevention with feasibility, yielding 20-30% reductions in all-cause mortality when sustained. Resistance training adjuncts further enhance vascular compliance, though aerobic modalities predominate in risk attenuation. Dietary strategies emphasizing whole, unprocessed foods rich in fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and fatty fish outperform restrictive low-fat paradigms, which meta-analyses show yield inferior improvements in lipid profiles and inflammation markers. The PREDIMED trial demonstrated that a Mediterranean-style diet supplemented with extra-virgin olive oil or nuts reduced major cardiovascular events by 30% relative to a advised low-fat diet in high-risk primary prevention participants, driven by polyphenols' anti-atherogenic effects rather than mere caloric restriction. Low-carbohydrate variants similarly match or exceed low-fat outcomes for weight and triglyceride control without adverse cardiovascular shifts. Maintaining healthy body weight via consistent caloric deficits of 500-750 kcal daily facilitates 5-10% loss, directly lowering visceral adiposity and associated proinflammatory cytokines that propel atherosclerosis. Randomized interventions confirm this approach ameliorates insulin resistance and hypertension precursors independently of exercise volume, though long-term adherence challenges persist absent behavioral reinforcement. Pharmacologic prophylaxis, such as statins or antihypertensives, is contraindicated for primary prevention in normotensive or low-cholesterol individuals due to net harm from side effects outweighing benefits in meta-analyses of low-risk cohorts; lifestyle primacy holds except in documented high-risk subsets like familial hypercholesterolemia.

Secondary Prevention Approaches

Secondary prevention strategies for cardiovascular disease (CVD) aim to reduce the incidence of recurrent events in individuals who have already experienced a major vascular occurrence, such as myocardial infarction, stroke, or peripheral artery disease revascularization. These interventions, grounded in clinical trial evidence and guidelines, emphasize multifactorial risk reduction through pharmacological therapies, structured rehabilitation, and targeted control of modifiable factors like hypertension and dyslipidemia. Implementation post-event has been associated with up to 75% relative risk reduction in recurrent events when comprehensive programs are adhered to, though global underutilization persists, with only about 20-30% of eligible patients participating in core components like cardiac rehabilitation. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programs form a foundational element, delivering supervised exercise, behavioral counseling, and education on medication adherence and lifestyle factors. Meta-analyses of randomized trials demonstrate that CR reduces cardiovascular mortality by 20-30% and all-cause mortality by 13-26% in patients with coronary heart disease, with additional benefits including improved exercise capacity (mean increase of 1-2 METs) and reduced hospital readmissions by 20-30%. Core components, updated in 2024 guidelines, include initial risk stratification, medically supervised exercise (typically 36 sessions over 12 weeks), nutritional counseling, and smoking cessation support, with hybrid virtual options expanding access amid low referral rates (often <50% in eligible populations). Blood pressure (BP) control yields among the highest gains in life-years saved post-event, with modeling from global risk factor analyses estimating that achieving systolic BP <130 mm Hg averts 10-15% of recurrent CVD events compared to higher thresholds. The 2025 AHA/ACC hypertension guideline recommends targeting <130/80 mm Hg in most post-CVD patients using combinations of ACE inhibitors, ARBs, or beta-blockers, supported by trials showing 20-25% relative risk reductions in stroke and heart failure recurrence; intensive targets (<120 mm Hg systolic) further lower major adverse cardiovascular events by 10-15% in high-risk subgroups like those with diabetes, though with increased risks of hypotension and renal impairment requiring individualized monitoring. Pharmacological prophylaxis targets thrombosis and atherosclerosis progression. High-intensity statin therapy (e.g., atorvastatin 40-80 mg or rosuvastatin 20-40 mg daily) is recommended to reduce LDL cholesterol <70 mg/dL or by ≥50%, achieving 20-30% relative reductions in major vascular events based on trials like IMPROVE-IT and ODYSSEY OUTCOMES. Antiplatelet agents, including lifelong low-dose aspirin (75-100 mg) and initial dual therapy with P2Y12 inhibitors (e.g., clopidogrel or ticagrelor for 6-12 months post-acute coronary syndrome), prevent stent thrombosis and recurrent infarction, with meta-analyses confirming 20-25% risk reductions. Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (ACEIs or ARBs) and beta-blockers are indicated for patients with left ventricular dysfunction or persistent angina, reducing mortality by 15-20% in heart failure subsets. Adherence to these regimens via polypill formulations has shown 10-15% improvements in persistence rates, addressing the gap where only 40-60% of patients maintain full secondary prevention pharmacotherapy long-term. Vaccination against infectious diseases complements these strategies, as infections can trigger acute cardiovascular events in patients with established CVD. Recommended alongside COVID-19 vaccination, these include annual influenza vaccination for all adults with CVD to reduce cardiovascular morbidity, mortality, and events such as myocardial infarction; pneumococcal vaccination (e.g., PCV20 or sequential PCV15/PPSV23) for adults with CVD to prevent invasive disease associated with heightened cardiac risks; a single dose of RSV vaccine for adults aged 75 years or older, or aged 50–74 years with CVD; and recombinant zoster vaccine (Shingrix, two doses) for adults aged 50 years or older to mitigate herpes zoster and its linked increases in stroke and heart failure risks.

Dietary Interventions

Dietary interventions for preventing cardiovascular disease emphasize modifications to macronutrient composition and eating patterns to address causal factors such as insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, and inflammation, rather than solely targeting isolated nutrients like cholesterol. Randomized controlled trials, including the Women's Health Initiative Dietary Modification Trial involving 48,835 postmenopausal women followed for 8.1 years, demonstrated that a low-fat dietary pattern reducing total fat intake by 11.0% and saturated fat by 4.2% yielded no significant reduction in coronary heart disease (hazard ratio 0.97; 95% CI, 0.88-1.07), stroke (HR 0.98; 95% CI, 0.83-1.15), or total cardiovascular events. This outcome critiques longstanding guidelines prioritizing low-fat intake, as the intervention failed to alter CVD incidence despite promoting fruits, vegetables, and grains over fats. Low-carbohydrate diets, restricting carbohydrates to under 130 g/day while allowing higher fat and protein intake, have shown superior effects on cardiometabolic risk factors in meta-analyses of randomized trials. A 2020 systematic review of 23 studies found low-carbohydrate diets significantly lowered triglycerides by 0.31 mmol/L, increased HDL cholesterol by 0.06 mmol/L, and reduced body weight by 1.30 kg compared to low-fat diets, though LDL cholesterol rose modestly by 0.12 mmol/L; these shifts align with improved insulin sensitivity and reduced atherogenic dyslipidemia. Long-term observational data from the Nurses' Health Study, tracking 82,802 women over 20 years, indicated that lower-carbohydrate scores (emphasizing plant-based sources) correlated with no increased coronary heart disease risk (relative risk 0.94 for lowest vs. highest quintile). Such diets address root causes like hyperglycemia, outperforming low-fat approaches in reversing type 2 diabetes—a key CVD driver—in programs like Virta Health's continuous care intervention, where 60% of participants achieved diabetes remission at one year alongside improved lipid profiles. Regarding specific fats, saturated fatty acids exhibit neutrality or context-dependent effects on CVD risk, challenging demonization in dietary guidelines. A 2020 JACC review reassessed evidence, concluding that saturated fats from whole foods like dairy and meat do not independently elevate CVD when carbohydrate intake is controlled, as replacement with refined carbs exacerbates harm via glycation and inflammation; prospective cohorts like PURE (135,335 participants across 18 countries) linked higher saturated fat intake to lower stroke risk (HR 0.79 per 5% energy increase). In contrast, industrial trans fats unequivocally promote endothelial dysfunction and plaque formation; jurisdictions banning partially hydrogenated oils, such as New York counties from 2007, saw cardiovascular mortality decline by 4.5% (p=0.02) two years post-ban, attributing reductions to lowered LDL oxidation. Polyunsaturated fats from seed oils (e.g., soybean, corn), rich in omega-6 linoleic acid, show mixed outcomes: while short-term RCTs suggest LDL-lowering when substituting saturated fats, long-term data raise concerns over oxidative stress and inflammation from high n-6:n-3 ratios, with no clear CVD mortality benefit in population studies. Intermittent fasting, such as time-restricted eating (e.g., 16:8 protocol), modulates circadian metabolism and caloric intake to mitigate obesity-related CVD risks. A 2025 meta-analysis of pairwise comparisons reported reductions in systolic blood pressure (mean difference -4.43 mmHg), fasting glucose (-3.72 mg/dL), and triglycerides (-10.86 mg/dL) across 11 randomized trials, supporting cardiometabolic improvements without adverse cardiac events. The INTERFAST-MI trial (n=112 post-myocardial infarction patients) found 16:8 fasting safe, enhancing left ventricular ejection fraction by 3% at 3 months versus controls. However, a 2024 observational analysis of NHANES data (20,078 adults) associated 8-hour eating windows with 91% higher CVD mortality risk (HR 1.91; 95% CI, 1.20-3.03), potentially confounded by self-selection or reverse causation in unhealthy individuals. Causal inference favors fasting's benefits in controlled settings, prioritizing empirical trial data over associative epidemiology.

Pharmacological Prevention

Low-dose aspirin (75-100 mg daily) is recommended selectively for primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in adults aged 40-59 years with a 10-year ASCVD risk of 10% or greater and low bleeding risk, as it reduces nonfatal myocardial infarction by approximately 26% relative risk but increases major bleeding by 58%. However, initiation is not advised for adults aged 60 years or older, where bleeding risks outweigh cardiovascular benefits, with no net reduction in all-cause mortality observed across trials. This approach targets the causal pathway of platelet aggregation and thrombosis but requires individualized assessment, as absolute risk reductions are modest (e.g., 0.38% over 10 years for coronary events in high-risk groups). Statins, such as atorvastatin or rosuvastatin, are indicated for primary prevention in adults with elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) or a 10-year ASCVD risk of 7.5% or higher, achieving relative reductions of 20-25% in major cardiovascular events through LDL-C lowering of 30-50%. Meta-analyses of randomized trials confirm efficacy in reducing nonfatal myocardial infarction and stroke, with one study reporting a 25% relative risk reduction for major vascular events per 1 mmol/L LDL-C decrease, though absolute benefits in primary prevention are small (e.g., 1.6% reduction in heart attacks over 5 years, number needed to treat of 62). No significant all-cause mortality benefit emerges in low-risk populations (<5% 10-year risk), and debates persist over overprescription driven by relative risk emphasis, with critics noting high numbers needed to treat (e.g., 140 for stroke prevention) and underreporting of adverse effects like myopathy (1-5% incidence) or diabetes risk increase (9% relative). While statins address dyslipidemia—a proxy for atherogenic pathways—their pleiotropic effects (e.g., anti-inflammatory) contribute, but evidence quality varies, with some analyses questioning net benefit in those under 7.5% risk due to pharma-funded trial biases. Antihypertensive agents, including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), calcium channel blockers, and thiazide diuretics, are recommended for primary prevention in adults with hypertension (systolic blood pressure ≥130 mm Hg or diastolic ≥80 mm Hg) and elevated cardiovascular risk per tools like the 2025 PREVENT equations (≥7.5% 10-year risk). Blood pressure reduction of 5 mm Hg systolic lowers major cardiovascular event risk by 10% regardless of baseline levels, with trials showing 20-25% relative reductions in stroke and 10-15% in myocardial infarction. Causal targeting of hemodynamic stress on endothelium and vessels yields benefits even in stage 1 hypertension with risk factors, though absolute reductions depend on baseline (e.g., 2-3% over 5 years in moderate cases), and combination therapy may be needed for goal attainment (<130/80 mm Hg). Side effects like orthostasis or electrolyte shifts necessitate monitoring, but overall, therapy prevents organ damage more effectively than risk proxies alone.

Diagnosis and Screening

Diagnostic Tests and Imaging

Electrocardiography (ECG or EKG) is a primary noninvasive test that records the electrical activity of the heart to detect arrhythmias, ischemia, or infarction, typically performed within minutes using surface electrodes. It identifies abnormalities such as ST-segment elevation in acute coronary syndromes with high sensitivity for certain patterns, though specificity varies by clinical context. Echocardiography employs ultrasound waves to visualize cardiac structures, assess ventricular function, valvular integrity, and ejection fraction, often as a transthoracic or transesophageal variant for enhanced resolution. This modality detects wall motion abnormalities indicative of ischemia or cardiomyopathy, with Doppler techniques quantifying blood flow velocities and pressures noninvasively. Coronary angiography, an invasive procedure via catheter insertion, delivers contrast dye to opacify coronary arteries, confirming stenosis severity and guiding interventions like stenting. It remains the gold standard for anatomical assessment of obstructive disease, achieving near-100% accuracy in lesion detection when combined with fractional flow reserve measurements. Advanced imaging includes cardiac computed tomography (CT) angiography for noninvasive coronary lumen evaluation and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for myocardial viability and perfusion without ionizing radiation. Stress echocardiography or nuclear perfusion imaging complements these by revealing inducible ischemia under pharmacological or exercise provocation. By 2025, artificial intelligence (AI) integration has enhanced diagnostic precision across modalities, automating segmentation in echocardiography to reduce variability and improve ejection fraction quantification by up to 20% in multicenter trials. AI algorithms in CT and MRI accelerate reconstruction, minimizing artifacts and enabling rapid plaque characterization, with applications in real-time guidance for angiography showing reduced procedural times. These tools, validated in prospective studies, prioritize empirical outcomes like sensitivity for stenosis detection exceeding 90% while addressing overfitting through diverse datasets.

Risk Assessment Tools

Risk assessment tools for cardiovascular disease (CVD) utilize multivariable statistical models to estimate an individual's short- or long-term probability of experiencing events such as myocardial infarction, stroke, or CVD-related death, aiding in the prioritization of preventive measures like statin therapy or lifestyle changes. These models typically integrate factors including age, sex, blood pressure, lipid profiles, smoking status, and diabetes, derived from large cohort studies with Cox proportional hazards regression or similar methods. Validation involves metrics like C-statistic for discrimination and calibration plots for accuracy, though performance varies across populations due to differences in baseline risk and comorbidities. The Framingham Risk Score, developed from the Framingham Heart Study's prospective data collected since 1948, predicts 10-year risk of hard coronary heart disease (myocardial infarction or coronary death) in adults aged 30-79 without prior coronary disease or diabetes. It incorporates age, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, systolic blood pressure (untreated or treated), current smoking, and diabetes status, categorizing risk as low (<10%), intermediate (10-20%), or high (>20%). Validated in U.S. cohorts, it demonstrates a C-statistic of approximately 0.76 for coronary events but tends to overestimate risk in lower-prevalence European populations and underperforms in non-White groups due to cohort homogeneity. For European populations, the SCORE2 algorithm, released by the European Society of Cardiology in 2021, estimates 10-year risk of first-onset fatal and non-fatal major CVD events (atherosclerotic and heart failure-related) in individuals aged 40-69 free of prior CVD. It uses age, sex, smoking, systolic blood pressure, and non-HDL cholesterol, recalibrated with data from 45 cohorts encompassing over 250,000 participants and contemporary event rates from 13 million person-years. SCORE2 improves calibration over its predecessor SCORE, with a pooled C-statistic of 0.72-0.74, and a variant SCORE2-OP extends predictions to ages 70-79 using adjusted baselines. It recommends thresholds of ≥5% for low-moderate risk and ≥10% for high-very high risk to initiate intensified prevention. Emerging polygenic risk scores (PRS) complement traditional models by quantifying genetic liability through weighted sums of thousands of common variants identified via genome-wide association studies. For coronary artery disease, PRS derived from European-ancestry meta-analyses (e.g., CARDIoGRAMplusC4D) can identify 8% of individuals with 2-3 times the average genetic risk, independent of clinical factors, with net reclassification improvements up to 10-20% when integrated into scores like Framingham or ASCVD. A 2022 American Heart Association scientific statement endorses PRS for coronary artery disease and atrial fibrillation risk stratification, noting enhanced prediction in early adulthood where traditional scores are less informative due to low absolute risk. Recent 2024-2025 advances include AI-optimized PRS and multi-ancestry adaptations, demonstrating clinical utility in reclassifying 5-10% of intermediate-risk patients toward statin eligibility, though implementation lags due to genotyping costs and equity concerns in non-European populations. Critiques of these tools highlight over-reliance on LDL cholesterol (often proxied via non-HDL or derived from total/HDL), which, while causally linked to atherosclerosis per Mendelian randomization evidence, fails as a standalone predictor due to overlapping distributions between cases and controls, yielding false positives/negatives in up to 50% of assessments. Small dense LDL subfractions, rather than total LDL concentration, correlate more strongly with plaque progression and events (hazard ratios 1.5-2.0 per standard deviation increase), yet standard models omit particle size or count via advanced assays like NMR spectroscopy. Variability in LDL levels over time independently doubles CVD risk beyond mean exposure, and cumulative "cholesterol-years" better capture lifetime atherogenic burden than snapshot measures. These limitations underscore the need for multimodal integration, including inflammation markers (e.g., hsCRP) or apolipoprotein B, to refine predictions without discounting LDL's centrality.

Early Detection Challenges

Cardiovascular disease frequently advances asymptomatically for years, complicating early identification as individuals may lack overt symptoms until advanced stages, such as myocardial infarction or heart failure. Studies indicate that subclinical coronary plaque is present in approximately 49% of asymptomatic middle-aged adults, with prevalence rising with age and risk factors like hypertension. Pre-heart failure stages affect 11% to 42.7% of populations, particularly the elderly and those with comorbidities, underscoring how silent progression evades routine clinical detection without proactive measures. Current risk assessment tools, including the 2024 American Heart Association PREVENT equations, aim to predict cardiovascular events earlier by incorporating variables like age, blood pressure, cholesterol, and kidney function, enabling identification of high-risk individuals before symptoms emerge. However, challenges persist in model generalizability, interpretability, and external validation, limiting their applicability across diverse populations. Routine screening modalities like electrocardiography yield inadequate evidence of net benefit in asymptomatic adults, with potential harms from false positives outweighing advantages per U.S. Preventive Services Task Force assessments. Access disparities exacerbate detection barriers, with rural and socioeconomically disadvantaged areas facing shortages of cardiologists and lower screening rates for risk factors like hypertension. Racial and income-based inequities result in fewer preventive screenings among Black, Hispanic, and low-income groups, contributing to delayed diagnoses despite evidence that targeted, proactive strategies can double early CVD identification rates. While such screenings demonstrate cost-effectiveness and improved outcomes when implemented, systemic gaps in healthcare infrastructure hinder equitable application.

Management and Treatment

Acute Interventions

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) represents the preferred reperfusion strategy for patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), demonstrating superior outcomes compared to thrombolytic therapy in reducing short-term mortality when performed promptly. Guidelines recommend achieving a door-to-balloon time of 90 minutes or less from hospital arrival, as delays beyond this threshold correlate with increased in-hospital and long-term mortality risks. For instance, symptom onset-to-balloon times exceeding 2 hours or door-to-balloon times over 60 minutes independently predict higher 90-day mortality rates, with each 30-minute delay elevating risk by approximately 7-10% in observational cohorts. Thrombolytic therapy, involving agents such as alteplase or tenecteplase, serves as an alternative when primary PCI cannot be executed within 120 minutes of first medical contact, particularly in rural or resource-limited settings. This approach achieves myocardial reperfusion in about 50-60% of cases but carries higher rates of hemorrhagic complications and reinfarction compared to PCI, resulting in 20-30% greater 30-day mortality in direct comparisons from randomized trials. Prehospital fibrinolysis followed by routine angiography within 3-24 hours can mitigate some deficits in high-risk patients unable to access timely PCI, though overall survival benefits diminish with treatment delays beyond 3 hours from symptom onset. Adjunctive pharmacotherapies during acute reperfusion include immediate aspirin administration (162-325 mg chewed) to inhibit platelet aggregation, reducing early mortality by 23% in meta-analyses of STEMI trials, alongside P2Y12 inhibitors like ticagrelor or prasugrel for dual antiplatelet effects. Anticoagulation with heparin or bivalirudin supports procedural success in PCI, while beta-blockers and statins are initiated concurrently to limit infarct expansion, though their acute mortality impact is secondary to timely revascularization. In non-STEMI acute coronary syndromes, urgent angiography and revascularization within 2 hours for high-risk features (e.g., refractory angina or hemodynamic instability) further underscore the time-sensitive nature of interventions to avert progression to full infarction.

Chronic Disease Management

Chronic management of cardiovascular disease emphasizes sustained pharmacological control of risk factors and symptoms to mitigate progression and recurrent events. Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) typically includes combinations of antihypertensives, lipid-lowering agents, antiplatelet drugs, and disease-specific therapies such as beta-blockers or mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists for heart failure. The 2023 AHA/ACC guideline for chronic coronary disease recommends lifelong therapy with high-intensity statins for most patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, alongside blood pressure targets below 130/80 mmHg using ACE inhibitors or ARBs as first-line agents in those with comorbidities like diabetes or chronic kidney disease. Similarly, the 2024 ESC guidelines for chronic coronary syndromes advocate for combination therapy including aspirin indefinitely and P2Y12 inhibitors for at least 12 months post-event, with proton pump inhibitors to reduce gastrointestinal bleeding risk. Polypharmacy, defined as concurrent use of five or more medications, is inherent to GDMT in chronic CVD, particularly in heart failure where patients often require diuretics, ACE inhibitors, beta-blockers, and aldosterone antagonists simultaneously. While this multimodal approach yields net benefits—such as a 20-30% relative risk reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events through optimized risk factor control—polypharmacy elevates risks of drug-drug interactions, adverse effects like hypotension or renal impairment, and hospitalization rates by up to 1.5-fold in older adults. Deprescribing strategies, informed by periodic reassessment of net benefit, are recommended to minimize burden without compromising efficacy, as evidenced by trials showing safe discontinuation of certain agents in stable patients. Medication adherence directly influences outcomes, with meta-analyses demonstrating that high adherence (>80%) to preventive pharmacotherapy correlates with 15-25% lower all-cause mortality and reduced hospitalizations compared to low adherence (<50%). Poor adherence, affecting 30-50% of CVD patients due to factors like pill burden or side effects, causally exacerbates disease progression, as non-adherent individuals exhibit 1.5-2-fold higher risks of cardiovascular death independent of baseline severity. Interventions such as simplified regimens, patient education, and electronic reminders improve adherence rates by 10-20%, underscoring the need for routine monitoring via refill data or self-reports during follow-up visits every 3-6 months. Long-term success hinges on balancing therapeutic intensity with tolerability, prioritizing evidence from randomized trials over observational associations.

Surgical and Interventional Procedures

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) involves surgically creating new pathways for blood flow around blocked coronary arteries using grafts from the saphenous vein or internal mammary artery, typically performed via median sternotomy on cardiopulmonary bypass. In randomized controlled trials such as the SYNTAX trial, CABG demonstrated lower rates of major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (12.4% vs. 17.8% at 1 year) compared to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with complex multivessel disease, primarily due to reduced need for repeat revascularization. Long-term data from meta-analyses indicate CABG provides superior 10-year survival in multivessel coronary artery disease, with hazard ratios favoring CABG over PCI (e.g., HR 0.79 for mortality at 4 years in adjusted analyses). However, CABG carries higher perioperative risks, including stroke (1-2% incidence), particularly in trials like EXCEL for left main disease where excess cerebrovascular events occurred post-CABG. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), including balloon angioplasty and drug-eluting stent placement, offers a less invasive alternative for revascularization, achieving procedural success rates exceeding 95% in contemporary practice. RCTs such as those pooled for left main disease show PCI noninferior to CABG for short-term safety in select patients without diabetes or complex anatomy, with lower early stroke risk but higher rates of target vessel revascularization (e.g., 12.9% vs. 7.6% at 5 years in EXCEL). In multivessel disease meta-analyses of over 4,000 patients, PCI matched CABG for 1-2 year composite outcomes but diverged at longer follow-up, with CABG reducing myocardial infarction and mortality in higher SYNTAX scores (>22). PCI remains preferred for acute settings like ST-elevation myocardial infarction, where door-to-balloon times under 90 minutes correlate with improved survival. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) deploys a prosthetic valve via catheter access, primarily for severe aortic stenosis in patients at intermediate or high surgical risk, with procedural success rates around 96-98%. Landmark trials like PARTNER 1 showed TAVR noninferior to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) at 5 years for all-cause mortality in high-risk cohorts (67.8% vs. 62.4%), though with higher rates of vascular complications and paravalvular leak. In low-risk patients, the Evolut Low Risk trial reported TAVR noninferior for 2-year composite death or disabling stroke (7.7% vs. 9.2%), expanding indications since FDA approval for broader use in 2019. Meta-analyses confirm comparable short-term (up to 2 years) mortality between TAVR and SAVR, but longer-term data (>5 years) suggest potential TAVR disadvantages in durability and reintervention needs. For combined coronary and valvular disease, hybrid approaches like PCI plus TAVR versus CABG plus SAVR yield similar periprocedural mortality (0.7-0.8%) but differ in long-term outcomes, with surgical strategies showing lower 5-year death or stroke in some registries (16.2% vs. 27.8%). Patient selection via heart team evaluation, incorporating anatomic complexity and comorbidities, guides procedure choice, as evidenced by guideline-directed algorithms prioritizing CABG for diabetes with multivessel involvement. Ongoing trials continue to refine these interventions' roles amid evolving stent and valve technologies.

Lifestyle and Rehabilitation

Lifestyle modifications following a cardiovascular event or diagnosis emphasize sustained behavioral changes to mitigate recurrent risk, including smoking cessation, which halves the excess cardiovascular mortality risk within one year of quitting among former smokers with established disease. Combining smoking cessation with initiation of regular exercise post-event yields a 46% reduction in subsequent cardiovascular disease incidence compared to continued smoking without exercise. Adoption of diets rich in whole grains, fruits, and vegetables, such as the Mediterranean pattern, supports weight control and endothelial function, with adherence linked to lower composite cardiovascular endpoints in secondary prevention cohorts. Regular physical activity, targeting 150 minutes weekly of moderate aerobic exercise, improves cardiorespiratory fitness and reduces all-cause mortality by approximately 15% per 1000-step daily increment in rehabilitated patients. Cardiac rehabilitation programs, typically spanning 8-12 weeks, integrate supervised exercise training with education on risk factor management, yielding dose-dependent improvements in prognosis; participation correlates with lower five-year mortality rates, with each additional session attended reducing all-cause death risk incrementally. Core components encompass physician-prescribed aerobic and resistance exercises, nutritional counseling, psychosocial evaluations for depression and anxiety, and monitoring of modifiable risks like hypertension and dyslipidemia. Meta-analyses of randomized trials demonstrate that exercise-based rehabilitation reduces cardiovascular mortality by 20-30% and hospital readmissions in coronary heart disease patients, independent of contemporary pharmacotherapy. Outcomes hinge on patient adherence and individual accountability, as non-completion rates exceed 50% in many programs due to barriers like transportation or motivation, underscoring the need for personalized strategies to foster long-term compliance. Programs incorporating psychosocial support address mental health factors that impede lifestyle persistence, with completers showing sustained gains in quality of life and reduced major adverse cardiovascular events. Evidence from large cohorts affirms that rehabilitation's benefits—such as enhanced exercise capacity and risk factor control—partially mediate mortality reductions, emphasizing causal links via improved vascular function and metabolic health rather than mere correlation.

Epidemiology

In high-income countries, age-adjusted mortality rates from cardiovascular disease (CVD) began declining in the mid-20th century, reversing earlier increases observed from the 1930s to 1950s. In the United States, age-adjusted heart disease mortality per 100,000 population fell by 56% from 307.4 in 1950 to 134.6 in 1996, using the 1940 population as reference; this trend continued, with an overall 66% reduction in age-adjusted heart disease mortality from 761 per 100,000 in 1970 to 258 in 2022. Similar patterns emerged across Western Europe and other high-income nations by the 1960s, where CVD mortality peaked before substantial declines, contributing to gains in life expectancy of approximately 0.15 years annually since the 1950s through reduced all-cause mortality. Key drivers included reductions in modifiable risk factors, particularly smoking prevalence, alongside improvements in medical interventions. Declines in tobacco use accounted for a significant portion of the drop in coronary heart disease deaths, with population-level smoking reductions correlating to thousands of averted fatalities and extended life-years; for instance, post-1960s anti-smoking efforts in the US and Europe halved adult smoking rates by the 2000s, directly lowering CVD incidence. Smoking bans in public spaces, implemented widely from the 1990s onward (e.g., in California in 1995 and EU directives by 2000s), produced rapid effects, reducing hospital admissions for heart attacks by up to 20-40% within months to a year in affected regions, as secondhand smoke exposure fell sharply. Therapeutic advances amplified these prevention gains, with blood pressure control, lipid-lowering therapies, and acute care (e.g., thrombolysis and revascularization post-1980s) preventing secondary events and contributing roughly 40-50% of the mortality reduction in modeling studies from the US and Europe. Dietary shifts toward lower saturated fat intake and increased awareness of hypertension also played roles, though causal attributions vary; empirical data link these to parallel drops in serum cholesterol levels (e.g., 10-15% reductions in US adults from 1960-1990). Despite these trends, disparities persisted, with slower declines among lower socioeconomic groups due to uneven risk factor control.

Current Global Patterns

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) accounted for 19.2 million deaths globally in 2023, comprising about 32% of all deaths and marking an increase from 13.1 million in 1990, driven by population growth and aging alongside persistent risk factors such as hypertension and poor diet. Ischemic heart disease and stroke represented the primary causes, responsible for roughly 85% of these fatalities, with disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) totaling 437 million, a 1.4-fold rise since 1990. The global prevalence of CVD reached approximately 612 million cases, with an age-standardized rate of 7,179 per 100,000 population. Over 80% of CVD deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries, where limited access to preventive care and treatment exacerbates outcomes compared to high-income regions. Age-standardized mortality rates remain highest in Central and Eastern Europe, Central Asia, and parts of sub-Saharan Africa, often exceeding 400 deaths per 100,000 due to elevated prevalence of smoking, alcohol use, and uncontrolled hypertension. In contrast, Western Europe and North America exhibit lower age-adjusted rates—around 150-200 per 100,000—reflecting better management of risk factors through screening and pharmacotherapy, though absolute numbers persist due to aging populations. Asia bears a disproportionate absolute burden, with South and East Asia contributing the largest shares of deaths and DALYs owing to massive population sizes and accelerating urbanization, which has fueled rises in obesity, diabetes, and processed food consumption since the early 2000s. For instance, high blood pressure underlies a significant portion of CVD events in these regions, with prevalence rates often surpassing 30% in adults. Latin America and the Middle East also show elevated rates linked to similar socioeconomic transitions, while sub-Saharan Africa faces growing ischemic heart disease alongside longstanding rheumatic conditions, though underreporting may inflate disparities. These patterns underscore causal links to modifiable risks like tobacco use (active in 15-20% of global CVD deaths) and air pollution, which disproportionately affect densely populated developing areas.

Projections to 2050

Projections from the Global Burden of Disease study indicate that between 2025 and 2050, global cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevalence will increase by 90.0%, crude mortality by 73.4%, and crude disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) by 54.7%. These estimates account for current trends in demographics, epidemiology, and healthcare access, with population growth and aging identified as primary drivers adding substantial absolute burden despite potential declines in age-standardized rates. Aging populations, particularly in low- and middle-income countries where 80% of older individuals are expected to reside by 2050, will amplify CVD incidence as age remains the strongest non-modifiable risk factor. Demographic shifts, including rising life expectancy (projected to increase globally by 4.6 years from 2022 to 2050), will extend exposure to cumulative risks, outweighing gains from improved survival post-diagnosis. Population expansion in regions with high fertility rates and urbanization will further elevate crude metrics, even as metabolic risks like obesity and diabetes contribute to non-communicable disease transitions. Modifiable risk factors offer mitigation potential; age-standardized DALYs attributable to behavioral and metabolic risks, such as , high body-mass index, and , are forecasted to decline through targeted interventions, reflecting historical successes in and management. However, rising prevalences of and in aging cohorts could offset these gains, necessitating sustained efforts in prevention to curb absolute increases. Regional variations persist, with anticipating a 91.2% rise in crude CVD mortality despite a 23.0% drop in age-standardized rates, underscoring the dominance of demographic forces over factor improvements. In the United States, the American Heart Association projects that by 2050, more than 61% of adults—exceeding 184 million individuals—will have some form of cardiovascular disease, including hypertension.

History

Early Descriptions and Theories

The Ebers Papyrus, dating to approximately 1550 BCE, contains some of the earliest recorded descriptions of cardiovascular symptoms, including chest pain and conditions suggestive of heart involvement, such as references to the heart as the center of bodily functions, emotions, and vitality. Ancient Egyptian texts portrayed the heart as a key organ connected to vessels throughout the body, with treatments involving herbal remedies and incantations aimed at restoring balance, though these lacked empirical validation for vascular pathologies later identified in mummified remains showing atherosclerosis. In ancient Greece, Hippocrates (c. 460–370 BCE) advanced humoral theory, positing that diseases, including those affecting the heart, arose from imbalances among four bodily fluids—blood, phlegm, yellow bile, and black bile—without recognizing the heart's role as a pump or the circulatory system's mechanics. This framework influenced Galen (c. 129–216 CE), who described the heart as a furnace processing vital spirits from inhaled air, attributing cardiac disorders to humoral excesses or deficiencies rather than structural or obstructive causes, a view perpetuated for centuries but ultimately contradicted by anatomical evidence of coronary narrowing. By the , observational descriptions shifted toward symptom-based recognition without reliance on humoral explanations. William Heberden presented the first detailed account of pectoris in before of Physicians, characterizing it as a "disorder of the breast" with violent exacerbated by motion and relieved by , affecting about cases he documented, distinct from or . Published in , Heberden's work highlighted the condition's prognostic , linking it empirically to and older age, though causal mechanisms remained elusive until later vascular discoveries disproved purely humoral origins.

20th-Century Breakthroughs

In 1913, Russian pathologist Nikolai Anitschkow conducted experiments feeding rabbits pure dissolved in , resulting in the development of atherosclerotic plaques in their aortas and , providing early experimental for a causal link between elevated and . These findings, published in St. Petersburg, marked a pivotal shift toward recognizing dietary as a potential driver of vascular pathology, though the induced hypercholesterolemia in rabbits far exceeded typical human levels. Anitschkow's work laid foundational support for the lipid hypothesis, influencing subsequent research despite initial skepticism regarding its applicability to humans. The Framingham Heart Study, launched in 1948 by the U.S. Public Health Service, enrolled 5,209 residents of Framingham, Massachusetts, for long-term prospective observation, yielding landmark identifications of modifiable risk factors for coronary heart disease. By the early 1960s, analyses revealed hypertension, elevated serum cholesterol, and cigarette smoking as independent predictors of cardiovascular events, with high blood pressure linked to a 2-3 fold increased risk of heart disease. The study further quantified obesity's role in exacerbating these factors and established the multifactorial nature of atherosclerosis progression, enabling population-level risk stratification models that reduced U.S. cardiovascular mortality by informing public health interventions. Diagnostic innovations transformed cardiovascular assessment in the early 20th century, beginning with Willem Einthoven's 1903 invention of the string galvanometer electrocardiograph, which enabled non-invasive detection of arrhythmias and ischemic changes, earning him the 1924 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. In 1929, Werner Forssmann pioneered cardiac catheterization by self-inserting a ureteral catheter into his own right ventricle under fluoroscopy, proving safe access to the heart for pressure measurements and contrast imaging, a technique refined in the 1940s-1950s for coronary angiography to visualize blockages. Therapeutic advances accelerated mid-century, with John Gibbon's 1953 development of the heart-lung machine enabling the first successful open-heart surgery for atrial septal defect closure in 1954, facilitating repairs of congenital defects and valvular diseases. Coronary artery bypass grafting emerged in 1967 when René Favaloro used the saphenous vein to bypass occlusions, improving survival in severe angina patients. Pharmacologically, Akira Endo's 1970s isolation of microbial inhibitors of HMG-CoA reductase culminated in lovastatin's FDA approval in 1987 as the first statin, reducing LDL cholesterol by up to 30% and demonstrating efficacy in slowing atherosclerosis progression in clinical trials. These interventions collectively halved age-adjusted cardiovascular death rates in developed nations by century's end through combined diagnostic precision, surgical repair, and lipid-lowering therapy.

Post-2000 Developments

The completion of the in catalyzed genomic advancements in cardiovascular disease, facilitating genome-wide association studies that identified over genetic loci linked to by . These efforts expanded to polygenic scores by the , integrating thousands of to quantify inherited susceptibility to atherosclerotic events with improved predictive accuracy beyond traditional factors like LDL . Clinical guidelines began incorporating for conditions such as and cardiomyopathies around , enabling earlier interventions based on monogenic causes. In the 2010s and 2020s, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), such as liraglutide and semaglutide, transitioned from diabetes therapies to established cardiovascular protectants following cardiovascular outcome trials. The LEADER trial in 2016 demonstrated liraglutide reduced major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) by 13% in patients with type 2 diabetes and high CVD risk, prompting regulatory approvals for cardioprotective indications. Semaglutide's SELECT trial, reported in 2023, extended these benefits to non-diabetic individuals with obesity and preexisting CVD, showing a 20% MACE reduction driven by fewer myocardial infarctions and strokes, with effects linked to weight loss, reduced inflammation, and hemodynamic improvements rather than solely glucose control.01375-3/fulltext) Multiple meta-analyses confirmed class-wide MACE reductions of 12-15% across GLP-1 RAs in diverse high-risk populations. Advancements in understanding the cardiac conduction system emerged in the 2020s, with innovations in physiological mapping and pacing techniques. Conduction system pacing, introduced clinically around 2017, targeted the His-Purkinje network to restore synchronized ventricular activation, outperforming traditional right ventricular pacing in preserving ejection fraction and reducing heart failure hospitalizations in randomized trials by 2020. In October 2025, Mayo Clinic researchers identified a novel biomarker exclusive to the human Purkinje network using advanced imaging, revealing previously unrecognized anatomical features that enhance targeting for arrhythmias and regenerative therapies. These discoveries built on single-cell sequencing from the early 2020s, which delineated conduction cell heterogeneity and glial interactions, informing potential gene-editing strategies for conduction defects.

Controversies and Debates

Lipid Hypothesis Critiques

Critics contend that the lipid hypothesis, which posits elevated serum cholesterol—particularly low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)—as a primary causal factor in atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease (CVD), rests on flawed observational associations rather than robust causal evidence. Numerous reviews highlight that contradictory studies outnumber supportive ones, with correlations often failing to establish causation due to confounding factors like reverse causality, where early disease elevates cholesterol as a response rather than a driver. This perspective is echoed in analyses questioning the hypothesis's foundational postulates, including the assumption that saturated fat intake directly raises blood cholesterol to pathogenic levels. A key empirical challenge arises from findings in older populations, where higher total (TC) and LDL-C levels correlate inversely with all-cause mortality. A 2016 systematic in BMJ Open, analyzing 19 cohort studies involving over 68,000 participants aged 60 and older, reported that high LDL-C was associated with reduced mortality in most cohorts, with no studies showing increased risk from elevated levels. This inverse relationship persists after adjustments for confounders, suggesting low cholesterol may signal frailty, malnutrition, or terminal illness rather than confer protection, thus undermining the hypothesis's universality. Similar patterns appear in subsequent analyses, such as a 2023 study linking optimal long-term survival to LDL-C ranges of 100–189 mg/dL, far above aggressive lowering targets. Nuances in LDL composition further complicate the hypothesis's reliance on aggregate LDL-C measures. Small, dense LDL particles exhibit greater atherogenicity—due to easier arterial penetration, oxidative susceptibility, and prolonged circulation—compared to large, buoyant subtypes, yet standard assays capture only cholesterol mass, not particle size or number. Prospective data indicate that adjusting for particle characteristics attenuates or eliminates LDL-C's apparent risk association, with metrics like LDL particle number (LDL-P) or (reflecting particle count) providing superior CVD prediction. Critics argue this heterogeneity implies that uniform LDL-C targeting overlooks metabolic contexts, such as promoting dense particles independently of total . Even proponents acknowledge evidential shifts; the American Heart Association's 2019 science advisory concluded that dietary cholesterol minimally influences blood levels in most individuals, decoupling intake from serum causality and highlighting genetic variability in absorption. Specifically, daily intakes of 800-1000 mg (e.g., from 4 whole eggs, liver, red meat, fatty fish) have minimal impact for most, but approximately 15-25% of individuals are genetic hyper-responders who experience sharp LDL-C increases, elevating CVD and stroke risk; regular lipid blood tests are recommended to monitor those consuming high amounts. Reappraisals of randomized trials further note that while LDL-C reduction via statins yields CVD event benefits, all-cause mortality gains remain modest (e.g., 1% absolute risk reduction over 5 years in primary prevention), raising questions about broad causal attribution amid potential pleiotropic effects or harms like muscle toxicity. These critiques, often from researchers outside dominant pharmaceutical-aligned consensus, emphasize the need for causal validation beyond correlations, including Mendelian randomization studies showing familial hypercholesterolemia's risks tied more to lifelong exposure than acute levels.

Dietary Fat and Carbohydrate Roles

Multiple meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies have concluded that dietary saturated fat intake is not significantly associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) events or mortality, challenging long-standing dietary guidelines that recommended strict limitation of saturated fats. For instance, a 2020 reassessment in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology found no beneficial effects on CVD outcomes from reducing saturated fat consumption, particularly when replaced by refined carbohydrates rather than polyunsaturated fats. This evidence has prompted critiques of nutritional guidelines, such as those from the American Heart Association, for overemphasizing saturated fat restriction based on early observational data that conflated saturated fats with trans fats and processed foods. In contrast, replacement of saturated fats with polyunsaturated fatty acids in controlled trials has shown modest reductions in CVD risk, estimated at 19-21% in some analyses, but benefits diminish or reverse when substituted with carbohydrates, highlighting the importance of what replaces saturated fats rather than saturated fats themselves. A 2018 BMJ review on dietary fats and cardiometabolic health underscored these nuances, noting that guidelines often fail to distinguish between food matrices—such as whole-fat dairy or unprocessed meats, which show neutral or protective effects—and isolated saturated fatty acids, while ignoring potential harms from carbohydrate-driven metabolic shifts. High intake of refined and processed carbohydrates, including added sugars like sucrose and high-fructose corn syrup, promotes insulin resistance, a key causal pathway in atherosclerosis and CVD progression, independent of total fat consumption. Epidemiological and mechanistic studies link excessive refined carbohydrate consumption to elevated triglycerides, small dense LDL particles, and endothelial dysfunction via chronic hyperinsulinemia and hepatic de novo lipogenesis. For example, prospective data indicate that diets high in glycemic load from processed carbs increase coronary heart disease risk by fostering visceral adiposity and inflammation, effects exacerbated in insulin-resistant individuals. Randomized trials comparing low-carbohydrate, higher-fat diets to low-fat, higher-carbohydrate regimens demonstrate superior improvements in CVD risk markers—such as HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, and insulin sensitivity—with the former, alongside greater weight loss, suggesting that carbohydrate restriction may mitigate CVD risk more effectively than fat restriction in metabolically vulnerable populations. These findings align with causal evidence from metabolic ward studies, where high-carb intake induces postprandial hyperglycemia and oxidative stress, contrasting with the metabolic stability of fats from whole foods. However, long-term adherence and individual variability, including genetic factors influencing fat metabolism, remain areas of ongoing debate, with some observational showing elevated LDL in strict low-carb contexts warranting personalized approaches over blanket guidelines.

Statin Overuse and Pharmaceutical Influence

Critics have argued that the widespread prescription of statins for cardiovascular disease prevention reflects commercial distortion by pharmaceutical interests, leading to overuse particularly in primary prevention among low-risk populations. Cardiologist Aseem Malhotra, in analyses published in 2025, contended that industry-funded trials and guidelines exaggerate benefits while minimizing harms, influencing clinical practice to prioritize lipid-lowering drugs over lifestyle measures. This perspective aligns with broader evidence of drug company practices that overplay relative risk reductions in marketing while downplaying absolute benefits and adverse events. In primary prevention, the absolute risk reduction (ARR) from statins is typically low, often less than 1% over five years for major cardiovascular events, translating to a number needed to treat (NNT) exceeding 50 to prevent one heart attack. For instance, meta-analyses of trials in individuals without prior heart disease show a 1.6% ARR for avoiding myocardial infarction after five years of therapy, with even smaller gains for stroke (0.37%) or mortality. These modest effects contrast with relative risk reductions of 20-30% often highlighted in promotional materials, potentially misleading prescribers and patients about net benefits in low-risk groups. Statin side effects, including muscle , , elevated , and hepatic dysfunction, appear underreported in clinical trials and post-marketing , with U.S. indicating that only 0.01% to 44% of adverse for statins are captured. Observational studies report muscle symptoms in 10-20% of users, higher than the 5% or less in randomized controlled trials, which may exclude susceptible individuals or rely on subjective reporting biased toward . This discrepancy contributes to overuse, as evidenced by analyses showing potential statin excess in 60% of older community-dwelling patients without clear indications. For primary prevention, lifestyle interventions—such as adopting a Mediterranean-style diet, regular physical activity, and smoking cessation—demonstrate superior risk reduction compared to statins alone, with healthy behaviors linked to up to 50% lower coronary artery disease incidence in population studies. Modeling suggests that comprehensive lifestyle strategies outperform moderate statin regimens in averting events among those without established disease, emphasizing their role as first-line options before pharmacological escalation. Pharmaceutical influence on guidelines has been critiqued for sidelining such non-drug approaches, potentially driven by revenue incentives from blockbuster statin sales exceeding billions annually.

Inflammation as Primary Driver

Proponents of as the primary causal of cardiovascular disease argue that inflammatory processes initiate and propagate , with accumulation serving as a secondary response rather than the . Experimental and histopathological demonstrates that , triggered by inflammatory cytokines and immune , precedes plaque formation, independent of levels. This view challenges lipid-centric models by emphasizing innate immunity's in oxidizing trapped lipoproteins and recruiting monocytes, which amplify progression. C-reactive protein (CRP), an acute-phase reactant and of , shown to predict cardiovascular more robustly than low-density lipoprotein (LDL) in multiple cohorts. In a prospective of 27,939 apparently healthy women followed for up to eight years, CRP levels stratified risk across LDL categories, with each standard deviation increase in CRP conferring a 1.5-fold higher of first cardiovascular , surpassing LDL's . Similarly, among statin-treated patients post-acute coronary syndrome, residual inflammatory risk indexed by high-sensitivity CRP outperformed LDL in forecasting recurrent , suggesting inflammation sustains atherothrombosis even when lipids are controlled. These findings support causal inference from trials like JUPITER, where rosuvastatin's benefits correlated more closely with CRP reduction than LDL lowering. Infectious and immune mechanisms further bolster inflammation's primacy, as detailed in a 2018 review synthesizing human, experimental, and biomarker data. Pathogens such as Chlamydia pneumoniae and periodontal bacteria provoke chronic vascular inflammation, linking infection to plaque instability and thrombosis via Toll-like receptor activation and cytokine storms. This refutes pure atherothrombosis models by highlighting how immune dysregulation integrates traditional risks—smoking, hypertension—into inflammatory cascades, with clinical trials like CANTOS demonstrating interleukin-1β inhibition reduces events by 15-20% irrespective of lipid profiles. Gut-derived endotoxemia exemplifies an upstream inflammatory trigger, where dysbiosis-induced (LPS) translocation from permeable barriers elevates circulating endotoxins, fostering metabolic and endothelial . In patients with , LPS levels correlate with plaque burden and adverse outcomes, independent of , as LPS activates NLRP3 to promote formation. Observational from high-risk cohorts show metabolic endotoxemia amplifies in and , with interventions like prebiotics modulating to lower CVD markers. Critiques of the lipid hypothesis underscore these shifts, positing that elevated LDL reflects oxidative stress and inflammation rather than causing it de novo. Epidemiological reanalyses reveal weak causal links between saturated fats and heart disease when confounders like trans fats or refined carbs are isolated, with inflammation metrics like CRP explaining variance better in familial hypercholesterolemia cases lacking early events. This perspective, advanced by researchers questioning statin universality, urges mechanistic reframing toward anti-inflammatory strategies, though mainstream consensus retains lipids' contributory role amid ongoing debates over trial designs favoring pharmaceutical endpoints.

Research Directions

Genetic and Molecular Advances

Recent advances in genomics have enabled the development of polygenic risk scores (PRS) that integrate thousands of common genetic variants to estimate an individual's susceptibility to coronary artery disease and other cardiovascular conditions. These scores capture the cumulative effect of low-penetrance alleles, providing incremental prognostic value beyond traditional clinical risk factors such as age, hypertension, and cholesterol levels. A 2024 study in the European Heart Journal demonstrated that incorporating a CVD-PRS into standard risk models reclassified 10-15% of intermediate-risk individuals into higher or lower categories, enhancing net reclassification improvement by up to 5%. Similarly, analyses from the American College of Cardiology in 2024 confirmed that PRS refines subclinical atherosclerosis prediction when combined with coronary artery calcium scoring, with high PRS individuals showing elevated event rates independent of lifestyle factors. For monogenic disorders like familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), which affects approximately 1 in 250 individuals and elevates LDL cholesterol due to mutations in genes such as LDLR, , or APOB, CRISPR-Cas9-based gene editing has emerged as a transformative . In phase 1 trials reported in 2023, a single intravenous dose of VERVE-101, targeting the in heterozygous FH patients, achieved durable LDL reductions of 55% at 180 days post-infusion, with no serious adverse events linked to off-target editing. Ongoing trials as of June 2025, including CTX310 and CTX320 from CRISPR Therapeutics, extend this approach to both heterozygous and homozygous FH, demonstrating sustained suppression and LDL lowering without the need for lifelong lipid-lowering drugs. Preclinical studies using AAV-delivered CRISPR to correct LDLR mutations in FH mouse models reduced atherosclerosis burden by restoring receptor function, supporting translation to human applications. These interventions address causal genetic defects directly, potentially preventing premature cardiovascular events in high-risk pedigrees. At the molecular level, novel biomarkers reflecting endothelial dysfunction, inflammation, and fibrosis are advancing early detection and risk stratification. Growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15), a stress-responsive , independently predicts in population cohorts, with levels elevated prior to clinical manifestation in up to 20% of at-risk individuals. MicroRNAs (miRNAs), such as miR-208a and miR-499, serve as circulating indicators of myocardial , offering higher sensitivity than troponins for subclinical detection in recent 2024-2025 validations. Extracellular vesicles carrying proteomic have also shown in profiling plaque , with lipidomic signatures correlating to progression. These biomarkers, when integrated with genetic , facilitate precision phenotyping, though challenges like and population-specific validation persist. An advisory in November 2024 emphasized gene therapy's role in targeting molecular pathways, including AAV-vectors for angiogenic factors in ischemic disease, underscoring the shift toward causal, genotype-guided interventions.

Technological Innovations

Wearable devices equipped with photoplethysmography (PPG) and electrocardiogram (ECG) capabilities have advanced (AFib) detection, enabling real-time monitoring outside clinical settings. For instance, smartwatches like the incorporate ECG signals for AFib identification, with algorithms achieving high in populations. A 2025 systematic review confirmed the of these wearables in detecting arrhythmias, including paroxysmal AFib, through AI-enhanced of , supporting interventions in cases. Comparative studies of consumer wearables, such as ECG smart chest patches versus PPG smartwatches, reported diagnostic accuracies exceeding 90% for distinguishing from AFib, though chest patches demonstrated marginally superior in prolonged monitoring. Artificial intelligence applications in cardiovascular imaging have progressed toward automated analysis and predictive modeling, particularly in cardiac computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In 2025, AI tools facilitate image segmentation, noise reduction, and tissue characterization in MRI, evolving from basic tasks to prognostic assessments of myocardial viability and fibrosis. Scientific statements highlight AI's role in streamlining workflows, including patient selection and automated reporting in cardiac CT/MRI, with emerging models predicting adverse events by integrating imaging data with clinical variables. Trends include AI-driven image enhancement and generation techniques, which improve diagnostic precision in interventional cardiology, such as real-time guidance during procedures, though challenges persist in validation across diverse populations. Conduction mapping technologies have refined the visualization of the heart's electrical pathways, aiding arrhythmia management and surgical planning. Intraoperative techniques employing multielectrode catheters and fiberoptic confocal microscopy localize the His bundle and conduction tissues during congenital heart surgery, using clockface schematics to generate predictive models and minimize injury risk. A Mayo Clinic study in October 2025 revealed novel anatomical details of the conduction system via advanced mapping, providing a bioanatomical framework to enhance understanding of myocardial synchrony and arrhythmogenesis. Three-dimensional electroanatomical mapping systems, modified for pediatric use, reduce radiation exposure while enabling precise velocity assessments near regions of interest, improving accuracy in complex cases.

Public Health Policy Implications

![Cardiovascular_diseases_world_map-Deaths_per_million_persons-WHO2012.svg.png][float-right] Cardiovascular diseases accounted for 19.2 million deaths worldwide in 2023, representing approximately one in three global deaths, with projections indicating a 90% increase in prevalence from 2025 to 2050 driven primarily by aging populations and rising rates of modifiable risk factors such as hypertension, obesity, and smoking. Public health policies must target these factors through evidence-supported strategies, including widespread screening and management of hypertension, which can be implemented cost-effectively at primary care levels, potentially averting millions of deaths if treatment coverage reaches 70%. Community-based educational interventions have demonstrated effectiveness in enhancing knowledge of CVD risks, promoting physical activity, and improving dietary practices, thereby reducing incidence without relying on coercive measures. While regulatory policies such as tobacco taxes and sodium reduction initiatives show population-level benefits in lowering CVD , skepticism persists regarding broad mandates due to their potential to overlook variability in and compliance, with favoring voluntary of healthy behaviors like and weight management for sustained reduction. Policies emphasizing personal tools, such as Framingham or ASCVD calculators, enable targeted on modifiable factors, empowering informed over uniform interventions that may not account for causal heterogeneity in onset. Limited health literacy exacerbates CVD morbidity, underscoring the value of accessible, non-mandated educational campaigns to improve outcomes across populations. To address escalating projections, policies should prioritize modifiable behavioral risks—evidenced by the of physical inactivity, poor , and use in driving the global burden—rather than narratives centered on socioeconomic equity, which often conflate with causation and divert resources from interventions like promotion. Empirical indicate that scaling evidence-based behavioral changes, including regular exercise and avoidance, yields significant CVD prevention independent of structural reforms. Such approaches align with causal mechanisms linking personal habits to arterial , promoting and in resource allocation.

References

  1. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cardiovascular-diseases-%28cvds%29
  2. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2022.11.005
  3. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40990886/
  4. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9644238/
  5. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2206916
  6. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31553287/
  7. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanam/article/PIIS2667-193X%2824%2900287-4/fulltext
  8. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK535419/
  9. https://icd.who.int/
  10. https://www.findacode.com/icd-11/chapter-11.html
  11. https://icd.who.int/dev11/l-m/en
  12. https://www.framinghamheartstudy.org/fhs-risk-functions/cardiovascular-disease-10-year-risk/
  13. https://academic.oup.com/eurjpc/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/eurjpc/zwae281/7756567
  14. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001256
  15. https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/heart-disease/symptoms-causes/syc-20353118
  16. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/21493-cardiovascular-disease
  17. https://www.cdc.gov/heart-disease/about/index.html
  18. https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/coronary-artery-disease/symptoms-causes/syc-20350613
  19. https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/coronary-heart-disease/symptoms
  20. https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/heart-failure/symptoms-causes/syc-20373142
  21. https://www.heart.org/en/health-topics/heart-failure/warning-signs-of-heart-failure
  22. https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/peripheral-artery-disease/symptoms-causes/syc-20350557
  23. https://www.cdc.gov/heart-disease/about/peripheral-arterial-disease.html
  24. https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/stroke/symptoms-causes/syc-20350113
  25. https://www.cdc.gov/stroke/signs-symptoms/index.html
  26. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2025.08.015
  27. https://professional.heart.org/-/media/phd-files-2/science-news/2/2025-heart-and-stroke-stat-update/factsheets/2025-stats-update-fact-sheet-global-burden-of-disease.pdf
  28. https://www.healthdata.org/news-events/newsroom/news-releases/report-cardiovascular-diseases-caused-1-3-global-deaths-2023
  29. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39270739/
  30. https://newsroom.heart.org/news/population-shifts-risk-factors-may-triple-u-s-cardiovascular-disease-costs-by-2050
  31. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK564304/
  32. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK507799/
  33. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.055340
  34. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/22910-acute-coronary-syndrome
  35. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.028991
  36. https://www.cdc.gov/heart-disease/data-research/facts-stats/index.html
  37. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001209
  38. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.048033
  39. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/eclinm/article/PIIS2589-5370%2824%2900337-7/fulltext
  40. https://www.stroke.org/en/about-stroke/types-of-stroke
  41. https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/conditions-and-diseases/stroke/types-of-stroke
  42. https://www.healthdata.org/research-analysis/library/global-regional-and-national-burden-stroke-and-its-risk-factors-1990-2021
  43. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.124.036142
  44. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8588679/
  45. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2415879
  46. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12132760/
  47. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK430927/
  48. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/STR.0000000000000430
  49. https://www.cdc.gov/stroke/about/index.html
  50. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK430745/
  51. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.318258
  52. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40590724/
  53. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.318535
  54. https://www.aafp.org/pubs/afp/issues/2019/0315/p362.html
  55. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circresaha.116.303849
  56. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36565779/
  57. https://spj.science.org/doi/10.34133/research.0702
  58. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001153
  59. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/ATVBAHA.125.323193
  60. https://www.acc.org/Latest-in-Cardiology/Articles/2024/10/22/17/25/PAD-Implications-For-Health-and-Quality-of-Life
  61. https://newsroom.heart.org/news/women-with-pvd-often-underdiagnosed-undertreated-highlighting-need-for-more-research
  62. https://www.heart.org/en/health-topics/heart-failure/what-is-heart-failure/types-of-heart-failure
  63. https://www.healthline.com/health/heart-failure/systolic-vs-diastolic
  64. https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/systolic-vs-diastolic-heart-failure
  65. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3891535/
  66. https://hfsa.org/hf-stats-2024-heart-failure-epidemiology-and-outcomes-statistics
  67. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10398425/
  68. https://escholarship.org/content/qt0pr7s2zr/qt0pr7s2zr.pdf
  69. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circresaha.117.309711
  70. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8484993/
  71. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11976403/
  72. https://www.heart.org/en/health-topics/cardiomyopathy/what-is-cardiomyopathy-in-adults
  73. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525157812003042
  74. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK558923/
  75. https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-024-20703-6
  76. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/01.str.0000166053.83476.4a
  77. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamacardiology/fullarticle/2503080
  78. https://www.mercy.net/service/atrial-fibrillation/prevent-stroke-while-living-with-afib/
  79. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0146280623005984
  80. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circep.118.006273
  81. https://www.mayoclinic.org/medical-professionals/cardiovascular-diseases/news/new-anatomy-for-the-cardiac-conduction-system-discovered-by-mayo-clinic-cardiology-researchers/mac-20590651
  82. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacep.2025.03.039
  83. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35736352/
  84. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9228968/
  85. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/cardiovascular-medicine/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2020.612716/full
  86. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001254
  87. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0140673623027551
  88. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.123.030895
  89. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8885812/
  90. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circresaha.114.302721
  91. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12645638/
  92. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/cardiovascular-medicine/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2022.925923/full
  93. https://journals.physiology.org/doi/abs/10.1152/physrev.00047.2003
  94. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9043520/
  95. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/cardiovascular-medicine/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2024.1381520/full
  96. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010865018300560
  97. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/atvbaha.114.303887
  98. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/physiology/articles/10.3389/fphys.2017.00600/full
  99. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9735601/
  100. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9197986/
  101. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8877621/
  102. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.120.019140
  103. https://academic.oup.com/jcem/article/88/10/4525/2845681
  104. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/01.cir.0000131511.50734.44
  105. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK534259/
  106. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735109705013963
  107. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK539697/
  108. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/34/10/719/496744
  109. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2021.06.050
  110. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9851427/
  111. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1936879815006950
  112. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/ATVBAHA.120.315754
  113. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9658900/
  114. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36361701/
  115. https://bmccardiovascdisord.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12872-023-03185-z
  116. https://www.uscjournal.com/articles/high-sensitivity-c-reactive-protein-atherosclerotic-cardiovascular-disease-measure-or-not?language_content_entity=en
  117. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16624260/
  118. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3364506/
  119. https://www.atherosclerosis-journal.com/article/S0021-9150%2810%2900663-5/abstract
  120. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1707914
  121. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2023.05.055
  122. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8108024/
  123. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.015
  124. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7729114/
  125. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11801260/
  126. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022399901003026
  127. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8151263/
  128. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9015729/
  129. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/01.res.87.10.840
  130. https://cmbl.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s11658-023-00423-2
  131. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/physiology/articles/10.3389/fphys.2022.978378/full
  132. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16618833/
  133. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3594115/
  134. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/hc0502.103333
  135. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2016/3634948
  136. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6616540/
  137. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db540.htm
  138. https://www.archivesofmedicalscience.com/Menopause-and-women-s-cardiovascular-health-is-it-really-an-obvious-relationship%2C157308%2C0%2C2.html
  139. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590093519300256
  140. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanpub/article/PIIS2468-2667%2819%2930184-7/fulltext
  141. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12270005/
  142. https://www.cdc.gov/heart-disease-family-history/about/about-familial-hypercholesterolemia.html
  143. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamacardiology/fullarticle/2814372
  144. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6678686/
  145. https://www.bmj.com/content/360/bmj.j5855
  146. https://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12916-019-1351-4
  147. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7399440/
  148. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2814094
  149. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0828282X24012303
  150. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0033062015300256
  151. https://www.health.harvard.edu/heart-health/the-sweet-danger-of-sugar
  152. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2020.05.077
  153. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2010.01.006
  154. https://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12916-023-02911-w
  155. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10565718/
  156. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.122.025252
  157. https://observatoireprevention.org/en/2021/04/07/association-between-chronic-stress-and-heart-attacks/
  158. https://bmccardiovascdisord.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12872-024-04221-2
  159. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacadv.2023.100805
  160. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2801820
  161. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5132637/
  162. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29247501/
  163. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40164421/
  164. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/joa3.12014
  165. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.119.012569
  166. https://heart.bmj.com/content/105/6/439
  167. https://www.sjweh.fi/article/1854
  168. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2806940/
  169. https://www.bmj.com/content/380/bmj-2022-072924
  170. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3159113/
  171. https://www.heart.org/en/health-topics/cholesterol/genetic-conditions/lipoprotein-a
  172. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5471681/
  173. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-024-03058-8
  174. https://www.bmj.com/content/384/bmj-2023-077310
  175. https://www.thecardiologyadvisor.com/news/long-covid-linked-to-development-of-cardiovascular-disease/
  176. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/cardiovascular-medicine/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2025.1450470/full
  177. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022282825001786
  178. https://www.escardio.org/The-ESC/Press-Office/Press-releases/Major-new-report-sets-out-how-to-tackle-the-profound-and-lasting-impact-of-Covid-19-on-cardiovascular-health
  179. https://www.nih.gov/news-events/nih-research-matters/gut-bacteria-may-reduce-cholesterol-lower-heart-disease-risk
  180. https://www.broadinstitute.org/news/scientists-link-certain-gut-bacteria-lower-heart-disease-risk
  181. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0914508725001261
  182. https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/news/2025/spotlight-upfs-nih-explores-link-between-ultra-processed-foods-and-heart-disease
  183. https://www.acc.org/About-ACC/Press-Releases/2025/05/08/14/10/Eating-Ultra-Processed-Foods-May-Harm-Your-Health
  184. https://academic.oup.com/eurjpc/advance-article/8173892
  185. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanam/article/PIIS2667-193X%2824%2900186-8/fulltext
  186. https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/news/2024/why-mental-stress-can-take-toll-heart
  187. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101208
  188. https://journals.lww.com/hhmi/fulltext/2024/08040/impact_of_chronic_psychological_stress_on.3.aspx
  189. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11872152/
  190. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/cir.0000000000000678
  191. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40611785/
  192. https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/hcp/patient-care-settings/cardiovascular.html
  193. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0828282X25000091
  194. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3158733/
  195. https://bjsm.bmj.com/content/57/15/979
  196. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2022.07.004
  197. https://www.amjmed.com/article/S0002-9343%2811%2900410-4/fulltext
  198. https://www.heart.org/en/healthy-living/healthy-eating/eat-smart/nutrition-basics/aha-diet-and-lifestyle-recommendations
  199. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1800389
  200. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4351995/
  201. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8017325/
  202. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002916522045798
  203. https://journals.physiology.org/doi/abs/10.1152/ajpendo.00102.2007
  204. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/cardiovascular-medicine/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2022.880054/full
  205. https://www.uscjournal.com/articles/strategies-secondary-prevention-atherosclerotic-cardiovascular-disease?language_content_entity=en
  206. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10809857/
  207. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001289
  208. https://www.nature.com/articles/s44325-024-00017-7
  209. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/HYP.0000000000000249
  210. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7499366/
  211. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/prevention-of-cardiovascular-disease-events-in-those-with-established-disease-secondary-prevention
  212. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001309
  213. https://www.acc.org/About-ACC/Press-Releases/2025/08/26/13/46/American-College-of-Cardiology-Issues-Vaccine-Guidance-for-Adults-with-Heart-Disease
  214. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12099243/
  215. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/202339
  216. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8296783/
  217. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31935216/
  218. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa055317
  219. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6959586/
  220. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26620830/
  221. https://publichealth.jhu.edu/2025/the-evidence-behind-seed-oils-health-effects
  222. https://www.heart.org/en/news/2024/08/20/theres-no-reason-to-avoid-seed-oils-and-plenty-of-reasons-to-eat-them
  223. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12289860/
  224. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.123.010936
  225. https://newsroom.heart.org/news/8-hour-time-restricted-eating-linked-to-a-91-higher-risk-of-cardiovascular-death
  226. https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/aspirin-to-prevent-cardiovascular-disease-preventive-medication
  227. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/ATVBAHA.122.318020
  228. https://www.acc.org/Latest-in-Cardiology/Articles/2022/04/27/20/41/New-USPSTF-Recommendation-on-Aspirin-in-CVD
  229. https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/statin-use-in-adults-preventive-medication
  230. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2795522
  231. https://www.thennt.com/nnt/statins-for-heart-disease-prevention-without-prior-heart-disease/
  232. https://www.thennt.com/cms/nnt/statins-persons-low-risk-cardiovascular-disease/
  233. https://bjsm.bmj.com/cgi/rapidpdf/bjsports-2017-098497?ijkey=Rsap0XafljfcOCR&keytype=ref
  234. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002191502101474X
  235. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2821%2900590-0/fulltext
  236. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4313888/
  237. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2025.08.001
  238. https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/coronary-artery-disease/diagnosis-treatment/drc-20350619
  239. https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/heart-attack/diagnosis/
  240. https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/heart-tests
  241. https://www.michiganmedicine.org/health-lab/10-heart-tests-your-doctor-might-order-and-what-they-mean
  242. https://www.houstonmethodist.org/blog/articles/2023/apr/5-commonly-ordered-heart-tests-what-they-show/
  243. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK448128/
  244. https://www.urmc.rochester.edu/encyclopedia/content?contenttypeid=85&contentid=p00208
  245. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11772728/
  246. https://pubs.rsna.org/doi/10.1148/radiol.240516
  247. https://www.acc.org/Latest-in-Cardiology/Articles/2025/08/01/01/For-the-FITs-Navigating-the-Integration-of-AI
  248. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8248998/
  249. https://www.mdcalc.com/calc/38/framingham-risk-score-hard-coronary-heart-disease
  250. https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/14/21/7570
  251. https://www.escardio.org/Education/Practice-Tools/CVD-prevention-toolbox/SCORE-Risk-Charts
  252. https://www.mdcalc.com/calc/10499/systematic-coronary-risk-evaluation-score2
  253. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001077
  254. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11837432/
  255. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101803
  256. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article-abstract/46/15/1372/8001983
  257. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6097909/
  258. https://bmccardiovascdisord.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12872-023-03578-0
  259. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.122.027639
  260. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2020.08.004
  261. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1936878X22001735
  262. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9177493/
  263. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12059770/
  264. https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/cardiovascular-disease-risk-screening-with-electrocardiography
  265. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2024.04.054
  266. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.123.032919
  267. https://www.acc.org/Latest-in-Cardiology/Articles/2023/10/01/01/42/prioritizing-health-proactive-screening-doubles-early-cvd-diagnosis-in-community
  268. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10492754/
  269. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/226907
  270. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1208200
  271. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circoutcomes.110.945311
  272. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30778668/
  273. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1301092
  274. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2095752/
  275. https://www.aafp.org/pubs/afp/issues/2017/0215/p232.html
  276. https://www.acc.org/Latest-in-Cardiology/Articles/2025/04/01/01/New-in-Clinical-Guidance
  277. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001168
  278. https://www.escardio.org/Guidelines/Clinical-Practice-Guidelines/Chronic-Coronary-Syndromes
  279. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.120.006977
  280. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2019.03.467
  281. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2016.06.005
  282. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36116032/
  283. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/hypertensionaha.115.06731
  284. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5473156/
  285. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa0804626
  286. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9893531/
  287. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1909406
  288. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6082779/
  289. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.065571
  290. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4234175/
  291. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10233454/
  292. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1936879824011701
  293. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2815%2960308-7/abstract
  294. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2021.11.062
  295. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39806748/
  296. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12410434/
  297. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6082775/
  298. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2825743
  299. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-14603-1
  300. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10460604/
  301. https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/14/15/5573
  302. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36746187/
  303. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article-abstract/44/6/452/7028725
  304. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167527323007209
  305. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39337063/
  306. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.123.033568
  307. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5268076/
  308. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.124.038644
  309. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4945698/
  310. https://opencardiovascularmedicinejournal.com/VOLUME/12/PAGE/71/
  311. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2446467/
  312. https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/consequences-smoking-exec-summary.pdf
  313. https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2012/10/29/163889012/after-smoking-is-banned-heart-attacks-drop
  314. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.032302?doi=10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.032302
  315. https://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/16/science/16smoke.html
  316. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10809869/
  317. https://www.acc.org/Latest-in-Cardiology/Articles/2024/01/01/01/42/feature-new-study-reveals-latest-data-on-global-burden-of-cardiovascular-disease
  318. https://world-heart-federation.org/resource/world-heart-report-2024/
  319. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ageing-and-health
  320. https://www.healthdata.org/sites/default/files/2024-05/GBD_2021_Forecasting_infographic_FINAL_2024.05.16.pdf
  321. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2824%2900685-8/fulltext
  322. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2025.04.061
  323. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11296249/
  324. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16911907/
  325. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0741521414008659
  326. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249102706_The_Cardiovascular_System_in_Ancient_Egyptian_Thought
  327. https://thoracickey.com/a-historical-overview-of-cardiovascular-medicine-and-heart-failure/
  328. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8939383/
  329. https://oyc.yale.edu/history/hist-234/lecture-2
  330. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2989494/
  331. https://www.nejm.org/doi/abs/10.1056/NEJM197003262821311
  332. http://www.epi.umn.edu/cvdepi/essay/william-heberden-on-angina-pectoris-1772/
  333. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/1845130
  334. https://europepmc.org/article/pmc/1764970
  335. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3793599/
  336. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9395267/
  337. https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/science/framingham-heart-study-fhs
  338. https://www.revespcardiol.org/en-cardiovascular-risk-factors-insights-from-articulo-13117552
  339. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4159698/
  340. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC124754/
  341. https://www.news-medical.net/health/Statin-History.aspx
  342. https://ourworldindata.org/cardiovascular-deaths-decline
  343. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3683584/
  344. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.123.321999
  345. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.124.035987
  346. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.059595
  347. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40539787/
  348. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacep.2023.06.005
  349. https://www.news-medical.net/news/20201117/Scientists-reveal-new-evidence-of-electrical-pathway-in-the-heart.aspx
  350. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18615352/
  351. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14017430801983082
  352. https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/6/6/e010401
  353. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27292972/
  354. https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/14/3/e077949
  355. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28460374/
  356. https://www.jwatch.org/jw199610010000006/1996/10/01/ldl-particle-size-risk-factor-how-important
  357. https://precisionhealthreports.com/ldl-p-vs-apob
  358. https://www.healthcentral.com/condition/high-cholesterol/cholesterol-particle-size
  359. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000743
  360. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK570127/
  361. https://www.acc.org/latest-in-cardiology/ten-points-to-remember/2019/12/30/15/23/dietary-cholesterol-and-cardiovascular-risk
  362. https://www.amjmed.com/article/S0002-9343%2818%2930404-2/fulltext
  363. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17512433.2018.1519391
  364. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735109720356874
  365. https://ajcn.nutrition.org/article/S0002-9165%2823%2901672-6/fulltext
  366. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/cir.0000000000000510
  367. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12095710/
  368. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/public-health/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1396576/full
  369. https://www.bmj.com/content/361/bmj.k2139
  370. https://openheart.bmj.com/content/4/2/e000729
  371. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6139832/
  372. https://ajcn.nutrition.org/article/S0002-9165%2822%2903918-1/fulltext
  373. https://nutritionsource.hsph.harvard.edu/carbohydrates/carbohydrates-and-blood-sugar/
  374. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4428290/
  375. https://answers.childrenshospital.org/low-carb-diet/
  376. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.100924
  377. https://www.nad.com/news/self-proclaimed-activist-and-cardiologist-says-commercial-interests-are-distorting-evidence-behind-statins
  378. https://singjupost.com/transcript-what-big-pharma-doesnt-want-you-to-know-about-statins-dr-aseem-malhotra/
  379. https://theconversation.com/time-to-end-drug-company-distortion-of-medical-evidence-127495
  380. https://www.aafp.org/pubs/afp/issues/2010/1001/p741.html
  381. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28447485/
  382. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/atv.0000000000000073
  383. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334547485_Potential_Statin_Overuse_in_Older_Patients_A_Retrospective_Cross-Sectional_Study_Using_French_Health_Insurance_Databases
  384. https://advances.massgeneral.org/cardiovascular/article.aspx?id=1022
  385. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8836845/
  386. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/hc0902.104353
  387. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9682196/
  388. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa021993
  389. https://www.tctmd.com/news/crp-more-predictive-future-events-ldl-statin-treated-patients
  390. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12432042/
  391. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.08.1043
  392. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01594333
  393. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41569-022-00737-2
  394. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31894861/
  395. https://kevinmd.com/2025/10/re-examining-the-lipid-hypothesis-and-statin-use.html
  396. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/5236032_The_fallacies_of_the_lipid_hypothesis
  397. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/45/34/3152/7689554
  398. https://www.acc.org/Latest-in-Cardiology/Journal-Scans/2024/09/16/14/28/polygenic-risk-score-adds
  399. https://www.acc.org/Latest-in-Cardiology/Articles/2023/11/08/20/14/sun-445pm-heart1-aha-2023
  400. https://ir.crisprtx.com/news-releases/news-release-details/crispr-therapeutics-reports-positive-additional-phase-1-data
  401. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.042476
  402. https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/26/7/3218
  403. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001296
  404. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/bpr/article/6/1/011301/3331507/Recent-advances-in-the-tools-and-techniques-for-AI
  405. https://healthcare-bulletin.co.uk/article/the-efficacy-of-wearable-cardiovascular-monitoring-devices-in-real-time-arrhythmia-detection-systematic-review-3415/
  406. https://bmccardiovascdisord.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12872-025-04582-2
  407. https://cardiovascularbusiness.com/topics/artificial-intelligence/revolution-here-ais-growing-role-cardiovascular-imaging-interventional-cardiology
  408. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022522322013277
  409. https://www.innovationsincrm.com/cardiac-rhythm-management/2013/february/395-three-dimensional-mapping-system-modification
  410. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacep.2024.12.026
  411. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038160
  412. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8386815/
  413. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0033350622001044
  414. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6378495/
  415. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000579
  416. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S003306202100133X
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.