Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Hill sphere
View on WikipediaThis article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
|

| Part of a series on |
| Astrodynamics |
|---|
The Hill sphere is a common model for the calculation of a gravitational sphere of influence. It is the most commonly used model to calculate the spatial extent of gravitational influence of an astronomical body (m) in which it dominates over the gravitational influence of other bodies, particularly a primary (M).[1] It is sometimes confused with other models of gravitational influence, such as the Laplace sphere[1] or the Roche sphere, the latter of which causes confusion with the Roche limit.[2][3] It was defined by the American astronomer George William Hill, based on the work of the French astronomer Édouard Roche.[not verified in body]
To be retained by a more gravitationally attracting astrophysical object—a planet by a more massive star, a moon by a more massive planet—the less massive body must have an orbit that lies within the gravitational potential represented by the more massive body's Hill sphere.[not verified in body] That moon would, in turn, have a Hill sphere of its own, and any object within that distance would tend to become a satellite of the moon, rather than of the planet itself.[not verified in body]

One simple view of the extent of the Solar System is that it is bounded by the Hill sphere of the Sun (engendered by the Sun's interaction with the galactic nucleus or other more massive stars).[4][verification needed] A more complex example is the one at right, the Earth's Hill sphere, which extends between the Lagrange points L1 and L2,[clarification needed] which lie along the line of centers of the Earth and the more massive Sun.[not verified in body] The gravitational influence of the less massive body is least in that direction, and so it acts as the limiting factor for the size of the Hill sphere;[clarification needed] beyond that distance, a third object in orbit around the Earth would spend at least part of its orbit outside the Hill sphere, and would be progressively perturbed by the tidal forces of the more massive body, the Sun, eventually ending up orbiting the latter.[not verified in body]
For two massive bodies with gravitational potentials and any given energy of a third object of negligible mass interacting with them, one can define a zero-velocity surface in space which cannot be passed, the contour of the Jacobi integral.[not verified in body] When the object's energy is low, the zero-velocity surface completely surrounds the less massive body (of this restricted three-body system), which means the third object cannot escape; at higher energy, there will be one or more gaps or bottlenecks by which the third object may escape the less massive body and go into orbit around the more massive one.[not verified in body] If the energy is at the border between these two cases, then the third object cannot escape, but the zero-velocity surface confining it touches a larger zero-velocity surface around the less massive body[verification needed] at one of the nearby Lagrange points, forming a cone-like point there.[clarification needed][not verified in body] At the opposite side of the less massive body, the zero-velocity surface gets close to the other Lagrange point.[not verified in body]
Definition
[edit]This section needs expansion with: a comprehensive definition of the title subject, drawn from multiple secondary and tertiary sources, that can be summarised in the lead. You can help by adding to it. (July 2023) |
The Hill radius or sphere (the latter defined by the former radius[citation needed]) has been described as "the region around a planetary body where its own gravity (compared to that of the Sun or other nearby bodies) is the dominant force in attracting satellites," both natural and artificial.[5][better source needed]
As described by de Pater and Lissauer, all bodies within a system such as the Sun's Solar System "feel the gravitational force of one another", and while the motions of just two gravitationally interacting bodies—constituting a "two-body problem"—are "completely integrable ([meaning]...there exists one independent integral or constraint per degree of freedom)" and thus an exact, analytic solution, the interactions of three (or more) such bodies "cannot be deduced analytically", requiring instead solutions by numerical integration, when possible.[6]: p.26 This is the case, unless the negligible mass of one of the three bodies allows approximation of the system as a two-body problem, known formally as a "restricted three-body problem".[6]: p.26
For such two- or restricted three-body problems as its simplest examples—e.g., one more massive primary astrophysical body, mass of , and a less massive secondary body, mass of —the concept of a Hill radius or sphere is of the approximate limit to the secondary mass's "gravitational dominance",[6] a limit defined by "the extent" of its Hill sphere, which is represented mathematically as follows:[6]: p.29 [7]
- ,
where, in this representation, semi-major axis "" can be understood as the "instantaneous heliocentric distance" between the two masses (elsewhere abbreviated rp).[6]: p.29 [7]
More generally, if the less massive body, , orbits a more massive body, (e.g., as a planet orbiting around the Sun), and has a semi-major axis , and an eccentricity of , then the Hill radius or sphere, of the less massive body, calculated at the pericenter, is approximately:[8][non-primary source needed][better source needed]
When eccentricity is negligible (the most favourable case for orbital stability), this expression reduces to the one presented above.[citation needed]
Example and derivation
[edit]This section needs additional citations for verification. (December 2023) |

In the Earth-Sun example, the Earth (5.97×1024 kg) orbits the Sun (1.99×1030 kg) at a distance of 149.6 million km, or one astronomical unit (AU). The Hill sphere for Earth thus extends out to about 1.5 million km (0.01 AU). The Moon's orbit, at a distance of 0.384 million km from Earth, is comfortably within the gravitational sphere of influence of Earth and it is therefore not at risk of being pulled into an independent orbit around the Sun.
The earlier eccentricity-ignoring formula can be re-stated as follows:
- , or ,
where M is the sum of the interacting masses.
Derivation
[edit]The expression for the Hill radius can be found by equating gravitational and centrifugal forces acting on a test particle (of mass much smaller than ) orbiting the secondary body. Assume that the distance between masses and is , and that the test particle is orbiting at a distance from the secondary. When the test particle is on the line connecting the primary and the secondary body, the force balance requires that
where is the gravitational constant and is the (Keplerian) angular velocity of the secondary about the primary (assuming that ). The above equation can also be written as
which, through a binomial expansion to leading order in , can be written as
Hence, the relation stated above
If the orbit of the secondary about the primary is elliptical, the Hill radius is maximum at the apocenter, where is largest, and minimum at the pericenter of the orbit. Therefore, for purposes of stability of test particles (for example, of small satellites), the Hill radius at the pericenter distance needs to be considered.
To leading order in , the Hill radius above also represents the distance of the Lagrangian point L1 from the secondary.
Regions of stability
[edit]This section may be in need of reorganization to comply with Wikipedia's layout guidelines. The reason given is: the section lacks sourcing and focus. (July 2023) |
The Hill sphere is only an approximation, and other forces (such as radiation pressure or the Yarkovsky effect) can eventually perturb an object out of the sphere.[citation needed] As stated, the satellite (third mass) should be small enough that its gravity contributes negligibly.[6]: p.26ff
The region of stability for retrograde orbits at a large distance from the primary is larger than the region for prograde orbits at a large distance from the primary. This was thought to explain the preponderance of retrograde moons around Jupiter; however, Saturn has a more even mix of retrograde/prograde moons so the reasons are more complicated.[10] In a two-planet system, the mutual Hill radius of the two planets must exceed to be stable. Multi-planet systems of three or more with semi-major-axis differences of less than ten mutual Hill radii are always unstable. This is due to the loss of angular momentum due to perturbations by a third planet.[11]
Further examples
[edit]This section needs additional citations for verification. (September 2018) |
It is possible for a Hill sphere to be so small that it is impossible to maintain an orbit around a body. For example, an astronaut could not have orbited the 104 ton Space Shuttle at an orbit 300 km above the Earth, because a 104-ton object at that altitude has a Hill sphere of only 120 cm in radius, much smaller than a Space Shuttle. A sphere of this size and mass would be denser than lead, and indeed, in low Earth orbit, a spherical body must be more dense than lead in order to fit inside its own Hill sphere, or else it will be incapable of supporting an orbit. Satellites further out in geostationary orbit, however, would only need to be more than 6% of the density of water to fit inside their own Hill sphere.[citation needed]
Within the Solar System, the planet with the largest Hill radius is Neptune, with 116 million km, or 0.775 au; its great distance from the Sun amply compensates for its small mass relative to Jupiter (whose own Hill radius measures 53 million km). An asteroid from the asteroid belt will have a Hill sphere that can reach 220,000 km (for 1 Ceres), diminishing rapidly with decreasing mass. The Hill sphere of 66391 Moshup, a Mercury-crossing asteroid that has a moon (named Squannit), measures 22 km in radius.[12]
A typical extrasolar "hot Jupiter", HD 209458 b,[13] has a Hill sphere radius of 593,000 km, about eight times its physical radius of approx 71,000 km. Even the smallest close-in extrasolar planet, CoRoT-7b,[14] still has a Hill sphere radius (61,000 km), six times its physical radius (approx 10,000 km). Therefore, these planets could have small moons close in, although not within their respective Roche limits.[citation needed]
Hill spheres for the solar system
[edit]The following table and logarithmic plot show the radius of the Hill spheres of some bodies of the Solar System calculated with the first formula stated above (including orbital eccentricity), using values obtained from the JPL DE405 ephemeris and from the NASA Solar System Exploration website.[15]
| Body | Million km | au | Body radii | Arcminutes[note 1] | Farthest moon (au) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury | 0.1753 | 0.0012 | 71.9 | 10.7 | — |
| Venus | 1.0042 | 0.0067 | 165.9 | 31.8 | — |
| Earth | 1.4714 | 0.0098 | 230.7 | 33.7 | 0.00257 |
| Mars | 0.9827 | 0.0066 | 289.3 | 14.9 | 0.00016 |
| Jupiter | 50.5736 | 0.3381 | 707.4 | 223.2 | 0.1662 |
| Saturn | 61.6340 | 0.4120 | 1022.7 | 147.8 | 0.1785 |
| Uranus | 66.7831 | 0.4464 | 2613.1 | 80.0 | 0.1366 |
| Neptune | 115.0307 | 0.7689 | 4644.6 | 87.9 | 0.3360 |
| Ceres | 0.2048 | 0.0014 | 433.0 | 1.7 | — |
| Pluto | 5.9921 | 0.0401 | 5048.1 | 3.5 | 0.00043 |
| Eris | 8.1176 | 0.0543 | 6979.9 | 2.7 | 0.00025 |

See also
[edit]- Laplace sphere – A region in space where a satellite orbit is stable
- Interplanetary Transport Network – Low-energy trajectories in the Solar System
- n-body problem – Problem in physics and celestial mechanics
- Roche lobe – Gravitationally-binding region around a star in a binary system
- Sphere of influence (astrodynamics) – Region of space gravitationally dominated by a given body
- Sphere of influence (black hole) – Region where a supermassive black hole gravitationally dominates its galaxy
Explanatory notes
[edit]- ^ At average distance, as seen from the Sun. The angular size as seen from Earth varies depending on Earth's proximity to the object.
References
[edit]- ^ a b Souami, D.; Cresson, J.; Biernacki, C.; Pierret, F. (2020). "On the local and global properties of gravitational spheres of influence". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 496 (4): 4287–4297. arXiv:2005.13059. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1520.
- ^ Williams, Matt (2015-12-30). "How Many Moons Does Mercury Have?". Universe Today. Retrieved 2023-11-08.
- ^ Hill, Roderick J. (2022). "Gravitational clearing of natural satellite orbits". Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia. 39. Cambridge University Press. Bibcode:2022PASA...39....6H. doi:10.1017/pasa.2021.62. ISSN 1323-3580. S2CID 246637375.
- ^ Chebotarev, G. A. (March 1965). "On the Dynamical Limits of the Solar System". Soviet Astronomy. 8: 787. Bibcode:1965SvA.....8..787C.
- ^ Lauretta, Dante and the Staff of the Osiris-Rex Asteroid Sample Return Mission (2023). "Word of the Week: Hill Sphere". Osiris-Rex Asteroid Sample Return Mission (AsteroidMission.org). Tempe, AZ: University of Arizona. Retrieved July 22, 2023.
- ^ a b c d e f de Pater, Imke & Lissauer, Jack (2015). "Dynamics (The Three-Body Problem, Perturbations and Resonances)". Planetary Sciences (2nd ed.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. pp. 26, 28–30, 34. ISBN 9781316195697. Retrieved 22 July 2023.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ a b Higuchi1, A. & Ida, S. (April 2017). "Temporary Capture of Asteroids by an Eccentric Planet". The Astronomical Journal. 153 (4). Washington, DC: The American Astronomical Society: 155. arXiv:1702.07352. Bibcode:2017AJ....153..155H. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aa5daa. S2CID 119036212.
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) - ^ Hamilton, D.P. & Burns, J.A. (March 1992). "Orbital Stability Zones About Asteroids: II. The Destabilizing Effects of Eccentric Orbits and of Solar Radiation". Icarus. 96 (1). New York, NY: Academic Press: 43–64. Bibcode:1992Icar...96...43H. doi:10.1016/0019-1035(92)90005-R.
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) See also Hamilton, D.P. & Burns, J.A. (March 1991). "Orbital Stability Zones About Asteroids" (PDF). Icarus. 92 (1). New York, NY: Academic Press: 118–131. Bibcode:1991Icar...92..118H. doi:10.1016/0019-1035(91)90039-V. Retrieved 22 July 2023.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) cited therein. - ^ Follows, Mike (4 October 2017). "Ever Decreasing Circles". NewScientist.com. Retrieved 23 July 2023.
The moon's Hill sphere has a radius of 60,000 kilometres, about one-sixth of the distance between it and Earth.
- ^ Astakhov, Sergey A.; Burbanks, Andrew D.; Wiggins, Stephen & Farrelly, David (2003). "Chaos-assisted capture of irregular moons". Nature. 423 (6937): 264–267. Bibcode:2003Natur.423..264A. doi:10.1038/nature01622. PMID 12748635. S2CID 16382419.
- ^ Chambers, J. E., Wetherill, G. W., & Boss, A. P. (1996). The stability of multi-planet systems. Icarus, 119(2), 261-268.
- ^ Johnston, Robert (20 October 2019). "(66391) Moshup and Squannit". Johnston's Archive. Retrieved 30 March 2017.
- ^ "HD 209458 b". Extrasolar Planets Encyclopaedia. Archived from the original on 2010-01-16. Retrieved 2010-02-16.
- ^ "Planet CoRoT-7 b". Extrasolar Planets Encyclopaedia. 2024.
- ^ "NASA Solar System Exploration". NASA. Retrieved 2020-12-22.
Further reading
[edit]- de Pater, Imke & Lissauer, Jack (2015). "Dynamics (The Three-Body Problem, Perturbations and Resonances)". Planetary Sciences (2nd ed.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. pp. 28–30, 34. ISBN 9781316195697. Retrieved 22 July 2023.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - de Pater, Imke & Lissauer, Jack (2015). "Planet Formation (Formation of the Giant Planets, Satellites of Planets and Minor Planets)". Planetary Sciences (2nd ed.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. pp. 539, 544. ISBN 9781316195697. Retrieved 22 July 2023.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - Gurzadyan, Grigor A. (2020). "The Sphere of Attraction, the Sphere of Action and Hill's Sphere". Theory of Interplanetary Flights. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. pp. 258–263. ISBN 9781000116717. Retrieved 22 July 2023.
- Gurzadyan, Grigor A. (2020). "The Roche Limit". Theory of Interplanetary Flights. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. pp. 263f. ISBN 9781000116717. Retrieved 22 July 2023.
- Ida, S.; Kokubo, E. & Takeda, T. (2012). "N-Body Simulations of Moon Accretion". In Marov, Mikhail Ya. & Rickman, Hans (ed.). Collisional Processes in the Solar System. Astrophysics and Space Science Library. Vol. 261. Berlin, Germany: Springer Science & Business Media. pp. 206, 209f. ISBN 9789401007122. Retrieved 22 July 2023.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - Ip, W.-H. & Fernandez, J.A. (2012). "Accretional Origin of the Giant Planers and its Consequences". In Marov, Mikhail Ya. & Rickman, Hans (ed.). Collisional Processes in the Solar System. Astrophysics and Space Science Library. Vol. 261. Berlin, Germany: Springer Science & Business Media. pp. 173f. ISBN 9789401007122. Retrieved 22 July 2023.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - Asher, D.J.; Bailey, M.E. & Steel (2012). "The Role of Non-Gravitational Forces in Decoupling Orbits from Jupiter". In Marov, Mikhail Ya. & Rickman, Hans (ed.). Collisional Processes in the Solar System. Astrophysics and Space Science Library. Vol. 261. Berlin, Germany: Springer Science & Business Media. p. 122. ISBN 9789401007122. Retrieved 22 July 2023.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
External links
[edit]Hill sphere
View on GrokipediaConceptual Foundations
Definition
The Hill sphere, also known as the gravitational sphere of influence, represents the region surrounding a secondary celestial body, such as a planet, within which its gravitational attraction on a test particle dominates over that of the primary body, typically a much more massive central star. This boundary delineates the approximate extent to which the secondary body can stably retain satellites or debris, beyond which perturbations from the primary's gravity become significant enough to disrupt orbits. In the context of a two-body system where the secondary orbits the primary, the Hill sphere defines the effective zone of control for the secondary's gravitational field.[3][4] Although the Hill sphere is often approximated as spherical for analytical and practical purposes in celestial mechanics, its actual shape in the circular restricted three-body problem is more complex, resembling a teardrop or slightly oblate form due to the tidal influences and the positions of the collinear Lagrange points L1 and L2, which mark the inner and outer boundaries along the line connecting the two bodies. This approximation as a sphere simplifies calculations while capturing the essential dynamics of gravitational dominance. The key parameters influencing the Hill sphere include the semi-major axis of the secondary's orbit around the primary, the mass of the secondary, and the mass of the primary, with the assumption that to ensure the primary's overwhelming influence.[3][5] The Hill sphere was developed by American astronomer George William Hill in his 1878 paper "Researches in the Lunar Theory," where he analyzed the stability of the Moon's orbit under solar perturbations, building on earlier ideas by French astronomer Édouard Roche, who in 1847–1850 explored similar gravitational limits in the context of satellite disruption.[1]Physical Significance
The Hill sphere delineates the region around a secondary body, such as a planet or moon, where its gravitational attraction dominates over that of a more massive primary body, enabling the retention of smaller objects like satellites, moons, or debris in stable orbits relative to the secondary. Objects within this sphere experience perturbations from the primary that are weaker than the secondary's pull, allowing for long-term orbital stability without immediate capture by the primary; for instance, the major satellites of Jupiter and Saturn occupy prograde, low-inclination orbits deeply embedded within their host planets' Hill spheres, preventing ejection during planetary migrations. In extrasolar systems, dust grains or irregular satellites that remain confined to the Hill sphere form circumplanetary debris disks, while those escaping contribute to broader circumstellar material, highlighting the sphere's role in material retention and loss dynamics.[6][7] In space mission design, the Hill sphere, often equated with the sphere of influence, simplifies the analysis of spacecraft trajectories in multi-body environments by approximating motion as a series of Keplerian orbits patched at the boundaries where one body's dominance transitions to another. This patched conic method divides interplanetary paths into heliocentric segments outside a planet's Hill sphere and planetocentric segments inside, providing an efficient initial approximation for numerical integration in missions like Voyager, where low-thrust or high-velocity encounters require accounting for gravitational switches at these radii. For lunar or interplanetary transfers, such as Earth-to-Moon trajectories, the Hill sphere defines safe parking orbits and transfer zones, ensuring spacecraft avoid unintended captures by the primary while optimizing fuel for insertions or escapes through energy manifolds near libration points.[8][9] Beyond mission planning, the Hill sphere plays a pivotal role in astrophysical processes like planetary formation, where protoplanets accrete planetesimals and gas primarily from within their Hill spheres, limiting growth to material gravitationally bound despite disk-wide dispersal. During the oligarchic phase of protoplanet assembly, the Hill sphere's size determines accretion efficiency, as planetesimals entering this region via gas drag or gravitational capture contribute to core buildup, with enhanced rates for atmospheres that dissipate kinetic energy and promote retention. In binary star systems, the Hill radius around circumbinary planets expands for wide orbits, facilitating exomoon stability by providing larger zones shielded from stellar perturbations, potentially extending planetary lifetimes through tidal synchronization. For exomoons, orbits must lie within a reduced Hill radius—scaled by stability factors like 0.49 for prograde cases—to resist stellar torques, influencing detectability in systems with strong perturbers.[10][11][12] Despite its utility, the Hill sphere serves as an approximation that overlooks higher-order effects, such as relativistic corrections in strong gravitational fields or perturbations from non-spherical primary bodies, which can induce secular variations in orbital elements like precession rates. For oblate planets like Earth, the equatorial bulge introduces J₂ zonal harmonics in the gravitational potential, causing deviations from spherical symmetry that the basic Hill model does not capture, leading to inaccuracies in close-in orbits or long-term predictions. These limitations necessitate refined models incorporating multipole expansions or full n-body simulations for precise applications in dense or asymmetric systems.[13]Mathematical Derivation
Derivation Process
The derivation of the Hill sphere begins with the setup of the circular restricted three-body problem (CRTBP), which models the motion of a test particle of negligible mass in the gravitational field of two more massive bodies, referred to as the primary (mass ) and secondary (mass ), assuming . In this framework, the primary is positioned at the origin, while the secondary orbits the primary in a circular path at a fixed distance , with the test particle's mass being insignificant enough not to perturb the orbits of the two primaries.[14] The system is analyzed in a co-rotating reference frame that rotates with the angular velocity of the secondary's orbit, where , ensuring the primaries remain fixed relative to the frame. This setup, originally developed in the context of lunar motion, allows for the examination of the test particle's dynamics under combined gravitational and centrifugal influences.[15] In the co-rotating frame, the equations of motion for the test particle incorporate fictitious forces due to the frame's rotation. The effective potential governing the motion is given by where is the distance from the primary to the test particle, is the distance from the secondary to the test particle, is the position vector of the secondary (with ), and is the cylindrical radius from the rotation axis (origin). This potential combines the gravitational contributions from both primaries with the centrifugal term . The Jacobi integral, a conserved quantity analogous to energy in the rotating frame, is where is the speed relative to the rotating frame. The surfaces where (zero-velocity surfaces) delineate regions of forbidden motion for the test particle, as kinetic energy cannot be negative, thus defining boundaries around the secondary where motion is possible.[16] The boundary of the Hill sphere approximates the region where the secondary's gravitational influence dominates, corresponding to the collinear Lagrange point L1 (or L2 for the outer boundary), a saddle point in the effective potential. At this point, the gravitational accelerations from the primary and secondary balance, including the centrifugal force. To find this, consider the test particle along the line joining the primaries (y=0 plane, assuming planar motion), with the secondary at and the point at (for L1, where is small). The condition for equilibrium requires the gradient of to vanish: . For the x-component, Substituting and assuming (mass ratio ), the equation simplifies under the approximation . Expanding for small , the balance yields the location where the secondary's pull counters the primary's tide and centrifugal effects, marking the Hill sphere's boundary. This saddle point connects the zero-velocity surfaces, enclosing the stable region around the secondary.[14] The derivation relies on several key assumptions: circular orbits for the primaries (no eccentricity), a small mass ratio to justify linear approximations near the secondary, planar motion (z=0), and negligible mass for the test particle to maintain the restricted problem. These conditions ensure the validity of the Hill sphere as an approximation for the secondary's sphere of influence, particularly effective for hierarchical systems like planet-satellite pairs. The approach, rooted in analyses of lunar stability, extends to broader celestial mechanics applications under these constraints.[15][16]Resulting Formula
The Hill radius , which defines the approximate extent of a secondary body's gravitational influence, is given by the formula where is the semi-major axis of the secondary body's orbit around the primary, is the mass of the secondary body, and is the mass of the primary body.[17] This expression assumes a circular orbit and that the secondary mass is much smaller than the primary mass. For orbits with nonzero eccentricity , an alternative approximation incorporates a correction factor, yielding [18] This form accounts for the reduced effective orbital distance due to eccentricity. For very small mass ratios , the formula can be expressed in logarithmic form as , which facilitates computations and visualizations on logarithmic scales.[19] The exponent of emerges from equating the secondary body's gravitational acceleration to the differential tidal acceleration induced by the primary at the boundary of the sphere. The numerical factor of 3 in the denominator traces to the approximate position of the L1 Lagrange point, located at a distance of roughly from the secondary along the line connecting the two bodies.[20] This approximation holds to within about 1% accuracy when , as the underlying assumptions of weak perturbations break down for larger mass ratios; in such cases, more complete treatments like the Roche lobe geometry are required instead.[5] The formula neglects effects from planetary oblateness, higher-order perturbations, and general relativity. The Hill radius is expressed in the same units as the semi-major axis , such as kilometers for inner solar system scales or astronomical units for exoplanetary contexts. To compute , one substitutes the known values of , , and directly into the formula, often using astronomical databases for mass and orbital parameters.[21]Stability and Regions
Regions of Stability
In the context of the restricted three-body problem, George William Hill's analysis of lunar motion in 1878 introduced regions of possible motion to evaluate the perturbing influence of the Earth on the Moon's orbit around it, defining boundaries where the third body's motion is confined based on its energy.[15] These regions, often termed Hill's regions, divide the configuration space into three distinct zones determined by the Jacobi constant, which governs the effective potential and kinetic energy availability.[9] Region I encompasses the interior vicinity of the secondary body, analogous to its Roche lobe, where orbits remain stable and bound primarily to the secondary due to its gravitational dominance.[22] Region II lies between the L1 and L2 Lagrange points, representing a transitional zone where motion can circulate around the secondary but is susceptible to perturbations.[9] Region III extends outward, dominated by the primary body's influence, where the secondary's control is negligible and escape becomes feasible.[22] The boundaries of these regions are delineated by zero-velocity curves, where the Jacobi constant equals the effective potential , rendering kinetic energy zero and prohibiting further motion across the surface.[9] In the planar case, these curves enclose the secondary up to the L1 and L2 points; though for mass ratios where the secondary is much smaller (), it approximates the Hill radius itself.[22] Stability within these regions varies: orbits confined inside approximately 0.7 times the Hill radius resist tidal perturbations from the primary, maintaining long-term bounded motion around the secondary.[23] Beyond this threshold but still within Region I, orbits may persist temporarily, yet they prove unstable over extended timescales due to chaotic interactions and energy diffusion.[9] Orbital eccentricity of the secondary around the primary slightly increases the effective stability radius by altering the time-averaged perturbation strength, though the modification is minor for low eccentricities.[24] Non-zero orbital inclinations introduce additional complexity, as vertical perturbations can destabilize planar approximations and expand or contract accessible regions through three-dimensional zero-velocity surfaces.[25]Relation to Lagrange Points
The collinear Lagrange points L1, L2, and L3 in the restricted three-body problem mark key boundaries of the secondary body's gravitational influence, closely aligning with the Hill sphere's extent for small mass ratios , where is the secondary mass and the primary. The L1 point lies between the primary and secondary bodies, at a distance of approximately from the secondary, with L2 beyond the secondary away from the primary at a similar distance along the line of centers, effectively forming the inner and outer "tips" of the Hill sphere in those directions. These positions arise as unstable equilibria where the gravitational attractions of the primary and secondary, combined with centrifugal and Coriolis forces in the rotating frame, balance. For small , the Hill sphere radius provides a close approximation to the distances from the secondary to L1 and L2, capturing the region where the secondary's gravity dominates over the primary's perturbed influence. This equivalence stems from the dynamical conditions at these points, where test particles experience zero net force in the co-rotating frame, delineating the onset of instability for orbits around the secondary. However, the Hill sphere represents a spherical simplification suited to hierarchical systems with , differing from the more precise Roche lobe, which is an irregular equipotential surface passing through L1; for equal masses (), the Roche lobe extends along the line of centers to roughly 0.5 at L1, whereas the Hill radius yields about 0.69. Dynamically, particles near L1 face low-energy pathways to escape the secondary's Hill sphere and fall toward the primary, highlighting the point's role as a gateway for mass transfer or ejection in three-body systems. In contrast, the triangular Lagrange points L4 and L5, located 60 degrees ahead and behind the secondary along its orbit, lie well outside the Hill sphere but support stable Trojan configurations due to their inherent linear stability in the circular restricted problem.[26] In systems with eccentricity or inclination, the Lagrange points shift relative to the circular case, modifying the effective boundaries of the Hill sphere and introducing time-varying stability regions around the secondary.[27]Applications and Examples
Illustrative Examples
To illustrate the scale of the Hill sphere, consider a hypothetical binary star system where the primary star has a mass and the secondary has a mass , separated by a distance AU. Using the approximate formula for the Hill radius when , the secondary's Hill sphere extends to AU, or roughly 10 million km. This radius indicates that planets orbiting the secondary within about 0.07 AU would remain gravitationally bound to it despite perturbations from the primary, demonstrating how even a low-mass companion can retain close-in material in a wide binary configuration. Another example involves a hypothetical gas giant planet with mass (comparable to Jupiter's mass) orbiting a solar-mass star at AU. Applying the same formula yields AU, or about 52 million km. This sphere encompasses the orbits of close-in moons, explaining why such satellites remain bound to the planet rather than being stripped away by the star's tidal forces, as the planet's gravity dominates within this volume. The Hill radius scales as for fixed primary mass and separation, meaning higher-mass secondaries have proportionally larger spheres of influence; for instance, doubling the secondary mass increases by a factor of about 1.26. It also scales linearly with separation , so wider orbits allow larger Hill spheres. Comparing low-mass secondaries (e.g., , yielding ) to higher-mass ones (e.g., , yielding ) highlights how mass ratio determines the extent of stable retention zones. In the corotating frame of the binary system, the Hill sphere adopts a teardrop shape, elongated away from the primary star, with the L1 Lagrange point (the inner boundary toward the primary) located closer to the secondary than the L2 point (the outer boundary). This asymmetry arises from the balance of gravitational and centrifugal forces, confining stable orbits to a comet-like tail trailing the secondary. As an edge case, when the mass ratio approaches equality (), the approximate formula overestimates the radius at , since it assumes ; instead, the geometry transitions to the full Roche lobe configuration, where the effective volume-equivalent radius for each star is approximately . This reflects the increasing influence of mutual tidal distortions in near-equal-mass binaries.Solar System Bodies
The Hill sphere of Earth extends approximately 1.5 × 10⁶ km from its center, encompassing the Moon's orbit at an average distance of 384,000 km and geostationary orbits around 42,000 km from Earth's surface.[28] This radius falls short of the Earth-Sun L₂ Lagrange point, situated about 1.5 million km sunward from Earth. Jupiter's Hill sphere reaches roughly 0.36 AU, or 53 million km, sufficient to gravitationally bind its four largest moons—the Galilean satellites—with Callisto orbiting at 1.88 million km, the farthest.[29] This sphere also accounts for the stability of smaller irregular satellites but excludes the Trojan asteroids at the Sun-Jupiter L₄ and L₅ points, which orbit at distances exceeding 5 AU from Jupiter itself.[30] Among other planets, Venus possesses a modest Hill sphere of about 0.007 AU (1 million km), too constrained to retain moons against solar perturbations, consistent with its moonless status. Saturn's Hill sphere, extending to 0.44 AU (65 million km), securely holds its ring system—spanning up to 140,000 km from the planet—and major moons like Titan at 1.22 million km.[31] Pluto's Hill sphere measures approximately 0.04 AU (6 million km), enabling retention of Charon at 19,600 km despite the binary-like nature of the system, though its smaller moons orbit near stability limits.[32] For dwarf planets and asteroids, Ceres has a Hill sphere radius of 220,000 km, yet the crowded main asteroid belt dynamics prevent retention of moons; Hubble Space Telescope surveys detected none down to 48 m diameter within this volume.[33] Similarly, isolated Kuiper Belt objects often exhibit small Hill spheres relative to inter-object spacing, limiting stable satellite formation and contributing to their general lack of companions beyond rare cases like Pluto's system. Classical Hill sphere calculations for Solar System bodies remain unchanged, but recent missions apply the concept operationally; for instance, NASA's OSIRIS-REx spacecraft entered Bennu's Hill sphere at 35 km on December 1, 2018, marking the transition to Bennu-dominated gravity for safe surveying and sampling.[34]| Planet | Semi-major axis (AU) | Mass ratio (m/M_⊙) | Hill radius (×10⁶ km) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Venus | 0.723 | 2.45 × 10⁻⁶ | 1.0 |
| Earth | 1.000 | 3.00 × 10⁻⁶ | 1.5 |
| Mars | 1.524 | 3.21 × 10⁻⁷ | 1.0 |
| Jupiter | 5.204 | 9.54 × 10⁻⁴ | 53.2 |
| Saturn | 9.582 | 2.86 × 10⁻⁴ | 65.3 |
| Uranus | 19.201 | 4.36 × 10⁻⁵ | 70.0 |
| Neptune | 30.069 | 5.15 × 10⁻⁵ | 116 |
| Pluto | 39.482 | 6.53 × 10⁻⁹ | 5.9 |