Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Lagrange point
View on Wikipedia



WMAP Earth
| Part of a series on |
| Astrodynamics |
|---|
In celestial mechanics, the Lagrange points (/lə.ˈɡrɑːndʒ/; also Lagrangian points or libration points) are points of equilibrium for small-mass objects under the gravitational influence of two massive orbiting bodies. Mathematically, this involves the solution of the restricted three-body problem.[1]
Normally, the two massive bodies exert an unbalanced gravitational force at a point, altering the orbit of whatever is at that point. At the Lagrange points, the gravitational forces of the two large bodies and the centrifugal force balance each other.[2] This can make Lagrange points an excellent location for satellites, as orbit corrections, and hence fuel requirements, needed to maintain the desired orbit are kept at a minimum.
For any combination of two orbital bodies, there are five Lagrange points, L1 to L5, all in the orbital plane of the two large bodies. There are five Lagrange points for the Sun–Earth system, and five different Lagrange points for the Earth–Moon system. L1, L2, and L3 are on the line through the centers of the two large bodies, while L4 and L5 each act as the third vertex of an equilateral triangle formed with the centers of the two large bodies.
When the mass ratio of the two bodies is large enough, the L4 and L5 points are stable points, meaning that objects can orbit them and that they have a tendency to pull objects into them. Several planets have trojan asteroids near their L4 and L5 points with respect to the Sun; Jupiter has more than one million of these trojans.
Some Lagrange points are being used for space exploration. Two important Lagrange points in the Sun-Earth system are L1, between the Sun and Earth, and L2, on the same line at the opposite side of the Earth; both are well outside the Moon's orbit. Currently, an artificial satellite called the Deep Space Climate Observatory (DSCOVR) is located at L1 to study solar wind coming toward Earth from the Sun and to monitor Earth's climate, by taking images and sending them back.[3] The James Webb Space Telescope, a powerful infrared space observatory, is located at L2.[4] This allows the satellite's sunshield to protect the telescope from the light and heat of the Sun, Earth and Moon simultaneously with no need to rotate the sunshield. The L1 and L2 Lagrange points are located about 1,500,000 km (930,000 mi) from Earth.
The European Space Agency's earlier Gaia telescope, and its newly launched Euclid, also occupy orbits around L2. Gaia keeps a tighter Lissajous orbit around L2, while Euclid follows a halo orbit similar to JWST. Each of the space observatories benefit from being far enough from Earth's shadow to utilize solar panels for power, from not needing much power or propellant for station-keeping, from not being subjected to the Earth's magnetospheric effects, and from having direct line-of-sight to Earth for data transfer.
History
[edit]The three collinear Lagrange points (L1, L2, L3) were discovered by the Swiss mathematician Leonhard Euler around 1750, a decade before the Italian-born Joseph-Louis Lagrange discovered the remaining two.[5][6]
In 1772, Lagrange published an "Essay on the three-body problem". In the first chapter he considered the general three-body problem. From that, in the second chapter, he demonstrated two special constant-pattern solutions, the collinear and the equilateral, for any three masses, with circular orbits.[7]
Lagrange points
[edit]The five Lagrange points are labeled and defined as follows:
L1 point
[edit]The L1 point lies on the line defined between the two large masses M1 and M2. It is the point where the gravitational attraction of M2 and that of M1 combine to produce an equilibrium. An object that orbits the Sun more closely than Earth would typically have a shorter orbital period than Earth, but that ignores the effect of Earth's gravitational pull. If the object is directly between Earth and the Sun, then Earth's gravity counteracts some of the Sun's pull on the object, increasing the object's orbital period. The closer to Earth the object is, the greater this effect is. At the L1 point, the object's orbital period becomes exactly equal to Earth's orbital period. L1 is about 1.5 million kilometers, or 0.01 au, from Earth in the direction of the Sun.[1]
L2 point
[edit]The L2 point lies on the line through the two large masses beyond the smaller of the two. Here, the combined gravitational forces of the two large masses balance the centrifugal force on a body at L2. On the opposite side of Earth from the Sun, the orbital period of an object would normally be greater than Earth's. The extra pull of Earth's gravity decreases the object's orbital period, and at the L2 point, that orbital period becomes equal to Earth's. Like L1, L2 is about 1.5 million kilometers or 0.01 au from Earth (away from the sun). An example of a spacecraft designed to operate near the Earth–Sun L2 is the James Webb Space Telescope.[8] Earlier examples include the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe and its successor, Planck.
L3 point
[edit]The L3 point lies on the line defined by the two large masses, beyond the larger of the two. Within the Sun–Earth system, the L3 point exists on the opposite side of the Sun, a little outside Earth's orbit and slightly farther from the center of the Sun than Earth is. This placement occurs because the Sun is also affected by Earth's gravity and so orbits around the two bodies' barycenter, which is well inside the body of the Sun. An object at Earth's distance from the Sun would have an orbital period of one year if only the Sun's gravity is considered. But an object on the opposite side of the Sun from Earth and directly in line with both "feels" Earth's gravity adding slightly to the Sun's and therefore must orbit a little farther from the barycenter of Earth and Sun in order to have the same 1-year period. It is at the L3 point that the combined pull of Earth and Sun causes the object to orbit with the same period as Earth, in effect orbiting an Earth+Sun mass with the Earth-Sun barycenter at one focus of its orbit.
L4 and L5 points
[edit]
The L4 and L5 points lie at the third vertices of the two equilateral triangles in the plane of orbit whose common base is the line between the centers of the two masses, such that the point lies 60° ahead of (L4) or behind (L5) the smaller mass with regard to its orbit around the larger mass.
Stability
[edit]The triangular points (L4 and L5) are stable equilibria, provided that the ratio of M1/M2 is greater than 24.96.[note 1] This is the case for the Sun–Earth system, the Sun–Jupiter system, and, by a smaller margin, the Earth–Moon system. When a body at these points is perturbed, it moves away from the point, but the factor opposite of that which is increased or decreased by the perturbation (either gravity or angular momentum-induced speed) will also increase or decrease, bending the object's path into a stable, kidney bean-shaped orbit around the point (as seen in the corotating frame of reference).[9]
The points L1, L2, and L3 are positions of unstable equilibrium. Any object orbiting at L1, L2, or L3 will tend to fall out of orbit; it is therefore rare to find natural objects there, and spacecraft inhabiting these areas must employ a small but critical amount of station keeping in order to maintain their position.
Natural objects at Lagrange points
[edit]Due to the natural stability of L4 and L5, it is common for natural objects to be found orbiting in those Lagrange points of planetary systems. Objects that inhabit those points are generically referred to as 'trojans' or 'trojan asteroids'. The name derives from the names that were given to asteroids discovered orbiting at the Sun–Jupiter L4 and L5 points, which were taken from mythological characters appearing in Homer's Iliad, an epic poem set during the Trojan War. Asteroids at the L4 point, ahead of Jupiter, are named after Greek characters in the Iliad and referred to as the "Greek camp". Those at the L5 point are named after Trojan characters and referred to as the "Trojan camp". Both camps are considered to be types of trojan bodies.
As the Sun and Jupiter are the two most massive objects in the Solar System, there are more known Sun–Jupiter trojans than for any other pair of bodies. However, smaller numbers of objects are known at the Lagrange points of other orbital systems:
- The Sun–Earth L4 and L5 points contain interplanetary dust and at least two asteroids, 2010 TK7 and 2020 XL5.[10][11][12]
- The Earth–Moon L4 and L5 points contain concentrations of interplanetary dust, known as Kordylewski clouds.[13][14] Stability at these specific points is greatly complicated by solar gravitational influence.[15]
- The Sun–Neptune L4 and L5 points contain several dozen known objects, the Neptune trojans.[16]
- Mars has four accepted Mars trojans: 5261 Eureka, 1999 UJ7, 1998 VF31, and 2007 NS2.
- Saturn's moon Tethys has two smaller moons of Saturn in its L4 and L5 points, Telesto and Calypso. Another Saturn moon, Dione also has two Lagrange co-orbitals, Helene at its L4 point and Polydeuces at L5. The moons wander azimuthally about the Lagrange points, with Polydeuces describing the largest deviations, moving up to 32° away from the Saturn–Dione L5 point.
- One version of the giant impact hypothesis postulates that an object named Theia formed at the Sun–Earth L4 or L5 point and crashed into Earth after its orbit destabilized, forming the Moon.[17]
- In binary stars, the Roche lobe has its apex located at L1; if one of the stars expands past its Roche lobe, then it will lose matter to its companion star, known as Roche lobe overflow.[18]
Objects which are on horseshoe orbits are sometimes erroneously described as trojans, but do not occupy Lagrange points. Known objects on horseshoe orbits include 3753 Cruithne with Earth, and Saturn's moons Epimetheus and Janus.
Physical and mathematical details
[edit]
Click for animation.
Lagrange points are the constant-pattern solutions of the restricted three-body problem. For example, given two massive bodies in orbits around their common barycenter, there are five positions in space where a third body, of comparatively negligible mass, could be placed so as to maintain its position relative to the two massive bodies. This occurs because the combined gravitational forces of the two massive bodies provide the exact centripetal force required to maintain the circular motion that matches their orbital motion.
Alternatively, when seen in a rotating reference frame that matches the angular velocity of the two co-orbiting bodies, at the Lagrange points the combined gravitational fields of two massive bodies balance the centrifugal pseudo-force, allowing the smaller third body to remain stationary (in this frame) with respect to the first two.
L1
[edit]The location of L1 is the solution to the following equation, gravitation providing the centripetal force: where r is the distance of the L1 point from the smaller object, R is the distance between the two main objects, and M1 and M2 are the masses of the large and small object, respectively. The quantity in parentheses on the right is the distance of L1 from the center of mass. The solution for r is the only real root of the following quintic function
where is the mass fraction of M2 and is the normalized distance. If the mass of the smaller object (M2) is much smaller than the mass of the larger object (M1) then L1 and L2 are at approximately equal distances r from the smaller object, equal to the radius of the Hill sphere, given by:
We may also write this as: Since the tidal effect of a body is proportional to its mass divided by the distance cubed, this means that the tidal effect of the smaller body at the L1 or at the L2 point is about three times of that body. We may also write: where ρ1 and ρ2 are the average densities of the two bodies and d1 and d2 are their diameters. The ratio of diameter to distance gives the angle subtended by the body, showing that viewed from these two Lagrange points, the apparent sizes of the two bodies will be similar, especially if the density of the smaller one is about thrice that of the larger, as in the case of the Earth and the Sun.
This distance can be described as being such that the orbital period, corresponding to a circular orbit with this distance as radius around M2 in the absence of M1, is that of M2 around M1, divided by √3 ≈ 1.73:
L2
[edit]
The location of L2 is the solution to the following equation, gravitation providing the centripetal force: with parameters defined as for the L1 case. The corresponding quintic equation is
Again, if the mass of the smaller object (M2) is much smaller than the mass of the larger object (M1) then L2 is at approximately the radius of the Hill sphere, given by:
The same remarks about tidal influence and apparent size apply as for the L1 point. For example, the angular radius of the Sun as viewed from L2 is arcsin(695.5×103/151.1×106) ≈ 0.264°, whereas that of the Earth is arcsin(6371/1.5×106) ≈ 0.242°. Looking toward the Sun from L2 one sees an annular eclipse. It is necessary for a spacecraft, like Gaia, to follow a Lissajous orbit or a halo orbit around L2 in order for its solar panels to get full sun.
L3
[edit]The location of L3 is the solution to the following equation, gravitation providing the centripetal force: with parameters M1, M2, and R defined as for the L1 and L2 cases, and r being defined such that the distance of L3 from the center of the larger object is R − r. If the mass of the smaller object (M2) is much smaller than the mass of the larger object (M1), then:[20]
Thus the distance from L3 to the larger object is less than the separation of the two objects (although the distance between L3 and the barycentre is greater than the distance between the smaller object and the barycentre).
L4 and L5
[edit]The reason these points are in balance is that at L4 and L5 the distances to the two masses are equal. Accordingly, the gravitational forces from the two massive bodies are in the same ratio as the masses of the two bodies, and so the resultant force acts through the barycenter of the system. Additionally, the geometry of the triangle ensures that the resultant acceleration is to the distance from the barycenter in the same ratio as for the two massive bodies. The barycenter being both the center of mass and center of rotation of the three-body system, this resultant force is exactly that required to keep the smaller body at the Lagrange point in orbital equilibrium with the other two larger bodies of the system (indeed, the third body needs to have negligible mass). The general triangular configuration was discovered by Lagrange working on the three-body problem.
Radial acceleration
[edit]
The radial acceleration a of an object in orbit at a point along the line passing through both bodies is given by: where r is the distance from the large body M1, R is the distance between the two main objects, and sgn(x) is the sign function of x. The terms in this function represent respectively: force from M1; force from M2; and centripetal force. The points L3, L1, L2 occur where the acceleration is zero — see chart at right. Positive acceleration is acceleration towards the right of the chart and negative acceleration is towards the left; that is why acceleration has opposite signs on opposite sides of the gravity wells.
Stability
[edit]
Although the L1, L2, and L3 points are nominally unstable, there are quasi-stable periodic orbits called halo orbits around these points in a three-body system. A full n-body dynamical system such as the Solar System does not contain these periodic orbits, but does contain quasi-periodic (i.e. bounded but not precisely repeating) orbits following Lissajous-curve trajectories. These quasi-periodic Lissajous orbits are what most of Lagrangian-point space missions have used until now. Although they are not perfectly stable, a modest effort of station keeping keeps a spacecraft in a desired Lissajous orbit for a long time.
For Sun–Earth-L1 missions, it is preferable for the spacecraft to be in a large-amplitude (100,000–200,000 km or 62,000–124,000 mi) Lissajous orbit around L1 than to stay at L1, because the line between Sun and Earth has increased solar interference on Earth–spacecraft communications. Similarly, a large-amplitude Lissajous orbit around L2 keeps a probe out of Earth's shadow and therefore ensures continuous illumination of its solar panels.
The L4 and L5 points are stable provided that the mass of the primary body (e.g. the Earth) is at least 25[note 1] times the mass of the secondary body (e.g. the Moon),[21][22] The Earth is over 81 times the mass of the Moon (the Moon is 1.23% of the mass of the Earth[23]). Although the L4 and L5 points are found at the top of a "hill", as in the effective potential contour plot above, they are nonetheless stable. The reason for the stability is a second-order effect: as a body moves away from the exact Lagrange position, Coriolis acceleration (which depends on the velocity of an orbiting object and cannot be modeled as a contour map)[22] curves the trajectory into a path around (rather than away from) the point.[22][24] Because the source of stability is the Coriolis force, the resulting orbits can be stable, but generally are not planar, but "three-dimensional": they lie on a warped surface intersecting the ecliptic plane. The kidney-shaped orbits typically shown nested around L4 and L5 are the projections of the orbits on a plane (e.g. the ecliptic) and not the full 3-D orbits.
Solar System values
[edit]
This table lists sample values of L1, L2, and L3 within the Solar System. Calculations assume the two bodies orbit in a perfect circle with separation equal to the semimajor axis and no other bodies are nearby. Distances are measured from the larger body's center of mass (but see barycenter especially in the case of Earth-Moon and Sun-Jupiter) with L3 showing a negative direction. The percentage columns show the distance from the orbit compared to the semimajor axis. E.g. for the Moon, L1 is 326400 km from Earth's center, which is 84.9% of the Earth–Moon distance or 15.1% "in front of" (Earthwards from) the Moon; L2 is located 448900 km from Earth's center, which is 116.8% of the Earth–Moon distance or 16.8% beyond the Moon; and L3 is located −381700 km from Earth's center, which is 99.3% of the Earth–Moon distance or 0.7084% inside (Earthward) of the Moon's 'negative' position.
| Body pair | Semimajor axis, SMA (×109 m) | L1 (×109 m) | 1 − L1/SMA (%) | L2 (×109 m) | L2/SMA − 1 (%) | L3 (×109 m) | 1 + L3/SMA (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earth–Moon | 0.3844 | 0.32639 | 15.09 | 0.4489 | 16.78 | −0.38168 | 0.7084 |
| Sun–Mercury | 57.909 | 57.689 | 0.3806 | 58.13 | 0.3815 | −57.909 | 0.000009683 |
| Sun–Venus | 108.21 | 107.2 | 0.9315 | 109.22 | 0.9373 | −108.21 | 0.0001428 |
| Sun–Earth | 149.598 | 148.11 | 0.997 | 151.1 | 1.004 | −149.6 | 0.0001752 |
| Sun–Mars | 227.94 | 226.86 | 0.4748 | 229.03 | 0.4763 | −227.94 | 0.00001882 |
| Sun–Jupiter | 778.34 | 726.45 | 6.667 | 832.65 | 6.978 | −777.91 | 0.05563 |
| Sun–Saturn | 1426.7 | 1362.5 | 4.496 | 1492.8 | 4.635 | −1426.4 | 0.01667 |
| Sun–Uranus | 2870.7 | 2801.1 | 2.421 | 2941.3 | 2.461 | −2870.6 | 0.002546 |
| Sun–Neptune | 4498.4 | 4383.4 | 2.557 | 4615.4 | 2.602 | −4498.3 | 0.003004 |
Spaceflight applications
[edit]
Sun–Earth
[edit]

Sun–Earth L1 is suited for making observations of the Sun–Earth system. Objects here are never shadowed by Earth or the Moon and, if observing Earth, always view the sunlit hemisphere. The first mission of this type was the 1978 International Sun Earth Explorer 3 (ISEE-3) mission used as an interplanetary early warning storm monitor for solar disturbances.[25] Since June 2015, DSCOVR has orbited the L1 point. Conversely, it is also useful for space-based solar telescopes, because it provides an uninterrupted view of the Sun and any space weather (including the solar wind and coronal mass ejections) reaches L1 up to an hour before Earth. Solar and heliospheric missions currently located around L1 include the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory, Wind, Aditya-L1 Mission and the Advanced Composition Explorer. Planned missions include the Interstellar Mapping and Acceleration Probe(IMAP) and the NEO Surveyor.
Sun–Earth L2 is a good spot for space-based observatories. Because an object around L2 will maintain the same relative position with respect to the Sun and Earth, shielding and calibration are much simpler. It is, however, slightly beyond the reach of Earth's umbra,[26] so solar radiation is not completely blocked at L2. Spacecraft generally orbit around L2, avoiding partial eclipses of the Sun to maintain a constant temperature. From locations near L2, the Sun, Earth and Moon are relatively close together in the sky; this means that a large sunshade with the telescope on the dark-side can allow the telescope to cool passively to around 50 K – this is especially helpful for infrared astronomy and observations of the cosmic microwave background. The James Webb Space Telescope was positioned in a halo orbit about L2 on 24 January 2022.
Sun–Earth L1 and L2 are saddle points and exponentially unstable with time constant of roughly 23 days. Satellites at these points will wander off in a few months unless course corrections are made.[9]
Sun–Earth L3 was a popular place to put a "Counter-Earth" in pulp science fiction and comic books, despite the fact that the existence of a planetary body in this location had been understood as an impossibility once orbital mechanics and the perturbations of planets upon each other's orbits came to be understood, long before the Space Age; the influence of an Earth-sized body on other planets would not have gone undetected, nor would the fact that the foci of Earth's orbital ellipse would not have been in their expected places, due to the mass of the counter-Earth. The Sun–Earth L3, however, is a weak saddle point and exponentially unstable with time constant of roughly 150 years.[9] Moreover, it could not contain a natural object, large or small, for very long because the gravitational forces of the other planets are stronger than that of Earth (for example, Venus comes within 0.3 AU of this L3 every 20 months).[27]
A spacecraft orbiting near Sun–Earth L3 would be able to closely monitor the evolution of active sunspot regions before they rotate into a geoeffective position, so that a seven-day early warning could be issued by the NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center. Moreover, a satellite near Sun–Earth L3 would provide very important observations not only for Earth forecasts, but also for deep space support (Mars predictions and for crewed missions to near-Earth asteroids). In 2010, spacecraft transfer trajectories to Sun–Earth L3 were studied and several designs were considered.[28]
Earth–Moon
[edit]Earth–Moon L1 allows comparatively easy access to lunar and Earth orbits with minimal change in velocity and this has as an advantage to position a habitable space station intended to help transport cargo and personnel to the Moon and back. The SMART-1 mission [29] passed through the L1 Lagrangian Point on 11 November 2004 and passed into the area dominated by the Moon's gravitational influence.
Earth–Moon L2 has been used for a communications satellite covering the Moon's far side, for example, Queqiao, launched in 2018,[30] and would be "an ideal location" for a propellant depot as part of the proposed depot-based space transportation architecture.[31]
Earth–Moon L4 and L5 are the locations for the Kordylewski dust clouds.[32] The L5 Society's name comes from the L4 and L5 Lagrangian points in the Earth–Moon system proposed as locations for their huge rotating space habitats. Both positions are also proposed for communication satellites covering the Moon alike communication satellites in geosynchronous orbit cover the Earth.[33][34]
Sun–Venus
[edit]Scientists at the B612 Foundation were[35] planning to use Venus's L3 point to position their planned Sentinel telescope, which aimed to look back towards Earth's orbit and compile a catalog of near-Earth asteroids.[36]
Sun–Mars
[edit]In 2017, the idea of positioning a magnetic dipole shield at the Sun–Mars L1 point for use as an artificial magnetosphere for Mars was discussed at a NASA conference.[37] The idea is that this would protect the planet's atmosphere from the Sun's radiation and solar winds.
See also
[edit]- Co-orbital configuration – Configuration of two or more astronomical objects
- Euler's three-body problem – Problem in physics and astronomy
- Gegenschein – Optical effect of interplanetary dust reflections
- Interplanetary Transport Network – Low-energy trajectories in the Solar System
- Klemperer rosette – Type of gravitational system
- L5 Society – Society promoting space colonization
- Lagrange point colonization – Colonization of five equilibrium points in the orbit of planets or moons
- Lagrangian mechanics – Formulation of classical mechanics
- List of objects at Lagrange points
- Lunar space elevator – Proposed transportation system
- Oberth effect – Type of spacecraft maneuver
Explanatory notes
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ a b Cornish, Neil J. (1998). "The Lagrange Points" (PDF). WMAP Education and Outreach. Archived from the original (PDF) on 7 September 2015. Retrieved 15 December 2015.
- ^ Weisstein, Eric W. "Lagrange Points". Eric Weisstein's World of Physics.
- ^ "DSCOVR: In-Depth". NASA Solar System Exploration. NASA. Retrieved 27 October 2021.
- ^ "About Orbit". NASA. Retrieved 1 January 2022.
- ^ Koon, Wang Sang; Lo, Martin W.; Marsden, Jerrold E.; Ross, Shane D. (2006). Dynamical Systems, the Three-Body Problem, and Space Mission Design. p. 9. Archived from the original on 27 May 2008. Retrieved 9 June 2008. (16MB)
- ^ Euler, Leonhard (1765). De motu rectilineo trium corporum se mutuo attrahentium (PDF).
- ^ Lagrange, Joseph-Louis (1867–1892). "Tome 6, Chapitre II: Essai sur le problème des trois corps". Œuvres de Lagrange (in French). Gauthier-Villars. pp. 229–334.
- ^ "L2 Orbit". Space Telescope Science Institute. Archived from the original on 3 February 2014. Retrieved 28 August 2016.
- ^ a b c "The Lagrange Points" (PDF). NASA. 1998., Neil J. Cornish, with input from Jeremy Goodman
- ^ Choi, Charles Q. (27 July 2011). "First Asteroid Companion of Earth Discovered at Last". Space.com.
- ^ "NASA - NASA's Wise Mission Finds First Trojan Asteroid Sharing Earth's Orbit". www.nasa.gov. Archived from the original on 22 March 2019. Retrieved 25 January 2020.
- ^ Hui, Man-To; Wiegert, Paul A.; Tholen, David J.; Föhring, Dora (November 2021). "The Second Earth Trojan 2020 XL5". The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 922 (2): L25. arXiv:2111.05058. Bibcode:2021ApJ...922L..25H. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac37bf. S2CID 243860678.
- ^ Slíz-Balogh, Judit; Barta, András; Horváth, Gábor (2018). "Celestial mechanics and polarization optics of the Kordylewski dust cloud in the Earth-Moon Lagrange point L5 - Part I. Three-dimensional celestial mechanical modelling of dust cloud formation". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 480 (4): 5550–5559. arXiv:1910.07466. Bibcode:2018MNRAS.480.5550S. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2049.
- ^ Slíz-Balogh, Judit; Barta, András; Horváth, Gábor (2019). "Celestial mechanics and polarization optics of the Kordylewski dust cloud in the Earth-Moon Lagrange point L5. Part II. Imaging polarimetric observation: new evidence for the existence of Kordylewski dust cloud". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 482 (1): 762–770. arXiv:1910.07471. Bibcode:2019MNRAS.482..762S. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2630.
- ^ Freitas, Robert; Valdes, Francisco (1980). "A Search for Natural or Artificial Objects Located at the Earth–Moon Libration Points". Icarus. 42 (3): 442–447. Bibcode:1980Icar...42..442F. doi:10.1016/0019-1035(80)90106-2.
- ^ "List Of Neptune Trojans". Minor Planet Center. Archived from the original on 25 July 2011. Retrieved 27 October 2010.
- ^ Belbruno, Edward; Gott III, J. Richard (2005). "Where Did The Moon Come From?". The Astronomical Journal. 129 (3): 1724–1745. arXiv:astro-ph/0405372. Bibcode:2005AJ....129.1724B. doi:10.1086/427539. S2CID 12983980.
- ^ Sepinsky, Jeremy F.; Willems, Bart; Kalogera, Vicky (May 2007). "Equipotential Surfaces and Lagrangian Points in Nonsynchronous, Eccentric Binary and Planetary Systems". The Astrophysical Journal. 660 (2): 1624–1635. arXiv:astro-ph/0612508. Bibcode:2007ApJ...660.1624S. doi:10.1086/513736. S2CID 15519581.
- ^ Seidov, Zakir F. (1 March 2004). "The Roche Problem: Some Analytics". The Astrophysical Journal. 603 (1): 283–284. arXiv:astro-ph/0311272. Bibcode:2004ApJ...603..283S. doi:10.1086/381315. S2CID 16724058.
- ^ "Lecture Notes | Dynamics | Aeronautics and Astronautics". MIT OpenCourseWare.
- ^ Fitzpatrick, Richard. "Stability of Lagrange Points". Newtonian Dynamics. University of Texas.
- ^ a b c Greenspan, Thomas (7 January 2014). "Stability of the Lagrange Points, L4 and L5" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 18 April 2018. Retrieved 28 February 2018.
- ^ Pitjeva, Elena V.; Standish, E. Myles (1 April 2009). "Proposals for the masses of the three largest asteroids, the Moon-Earth mass ratio and the Astronomical Unit". Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy. 103 (4): 365–372. Bibcode:2009CeMDA.103..365P. doi:10.1007/s10569-009-9203-8. S2CID 121374703.
- ^ Cacolici, Gianna Nicole, et al., "Stability of Lagrange Points: James Webb Space Telescope", University of Arizona. Retrieved 17 Sept. 2018.
- ^ "ISEE-3/ICE". Solar System Exploration. NASA. Archived from the original on 20 July 2015. Retrieved 8 August 2015.
- ^ Angular size of the Sun at 1 AU + 1.5 million kilometres: 31.6′, angular size of Earth at 1.5 million kilometres: 29.3′
- ^ Duncombe, R. L. "Appendix E. Report on Numerical Experiment on the Possible Existence of an "Anti-Earth"". 1968. U.S. NAVAL OBSERVATORY. Retrieved 24 October 2013.
The separation of [a Counter-Earth] from the line joining the Earth and the Sun shows a variation with increasing amplitude in time, the effect being most pronounced for the largest assumed mass. During the 112 years covered by the integration the separation becomes large enough in all cases that Clarion should have been directly observed, particularly at times of morning or evening twilight and during total solar eclipses.
- ^ Tantardini, Marco; Fantino, Elena; Ren, Yuan; Pergola, Pierpaolo; Gómez, Gerard; Masdemont, Josep J. (2010). "Spacecraft trajectories to the L3 point of the Sun–Earth three-body problem" (PDF). Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy. 108 (3): 215–232. Bibcode:2010CeMDA.108..215T. doi:10.1007/s10569-010-9299-x. S2CID 121179935.
- ^ "SMART-1: On Course for Lunar Capture | Moon Today - Your Daily Source of Moon News". www.moontoday.net. Archived from the original on 2 November 2005.
- ^ Jones, Andrew (14 June 2018). "Chang'e-4 relay satellite enters halo orbit around Earth-Moon L2, microsatellite in lunar orbit". SpaceNews.
- ^ Zegler, Frank; Kutter, Bernard (2 September 2010). "Evolving to a Depot-Based Space Transportation Architecture" (PDF). AIAA SPACE 2010 Conference & Exposition. AIAA. p. 4. Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 June 2014. Retrieved 25 January 2011.
L2 is in deep space far away from any planetary surface and hence the thermal, micrometeoroid, and atomic oxygen environments are vastly superior to those in LEO. Thermodynamic stasis and extended hardware life are far easier to obtain without these punishing conditions seen in LEO. L2 is not just a great gateway—it is a great place to store propellants. ... L2 is an ideal location to store propellants and cargos: it is close, high energy, and cold. More importantly, it allows the continuous onward movement of propellants from LEO depots, thus suppressing their size and effectively minimizing the near-Earth boiloff penalties.
- ^ Kordylewski, Kazimierz (1961). "Photographische Untersuchungen des Librationspunktes L5 im System Erde-Mond". Acta Astronomica, Vol. 11, p.165. Vol. 11. p. 165. Bibcode:1961AcA....11..165K.
- ^ Hornig, Andreas (1 May 2022). "TYCHO: Supporting Permanently Crewed Lunar Exploration with High-Speed Optical Communication from Everywhere". ESA.
- ^ Hornig, Andreas (6 October 2013). "TYCHO mission to Earth-Moon libration point EML-4 @ IAC 2013". IAC2013.
- ^ Foust, Jeff (20 June 2017). "B612 studying smallsat missions to search for near Earth objects". SpaceNews.com. Retrieved 6 May 2025.
- ^ "The Sentinel Mission". B612 Foundation. Archived from the original on 30 June 2012. Retrieved 1 February 2014.
- ^ "NASA proposes a magnetic shield to protect Mars' atmosphere". phys.org.
Further reading
[edit]- Joseph-Louis, Comte Lagrange, from Œuvres, Tome 6, « Essai sur le Problème des Trois Corps »—Essai (PDF); source Tome 6 (Viewer)
- "Essay on the Three-Body Problem" by J.-L. Lagrange, translated from the above, in merlyn.demon.co.uk Archived 23 June 2019 at the Wayback Machine.
- Considerationes de motu corporum coelestium—Leonhard Euler—transcription and translation at merlyn.demon.co.uk Archived 3 August 2020 at the Wayback Machine.
- Explanation of Lagrange points—Neil J. Cornish
- The Five Points of Lagrange by Neil deGrasse Tyson
External links
[edit]- ZIP file—J R Stockton - Includes translations of Lagrange's Essai and of two related papers by Euler
- What are Lagrange points?—European Space Agency page, with good animations
- A NASA explanation—also attributed to Neil J. Cornish
- Explanation of Lagrange points—John Baez
- Locations of Lagrange points, with approximations—David Peter Stern
- An online calculator to compute the precise positions of the 5 Lagrange points for any 2-body system—Tony Dunn
- Astronomy Cast—Ep. 76: "Lagrange Points" by Fraser Cain and Pamela L. Gay
- Earth, a lone Trojan discovered Archived 2 May 2017 at the Wayback Machine
- See the Lagrange Points and Halo Orbits subsection under the section on Geosynchronous Transfer Orbit in NASA: Basics of Space Flight, Chapter 5
Lagrange point
View on GrokipediaHistory
Discovery by Euler and Lagrange
The three-body problem emerged as a key challenge in 18th-century celestial mechanics, motivated by the need to account for gravitational perturbations in systems like the Earth-Moon-Sun configuration and the stability of planetary orbits, including Jupiter's satellites, which deviated from idealized Keplerian two-body assumptions.[5] Mathematicians sought equilibrium solutions where a third body could maintain a fixed position relative to two orbiting primaries, providing insights into long-term dynamical stability without requiring continuous adjustments to elliptical paths.[6] Leonhard Euler first identified three collinear equilibrium points in the circular restricted three-body problem in his 1760 analysis, where a test particle of negligible mass balances the gravitational pulls of two larger bodies in circular orbits around their common center of mass.[7] These points lie along the line joining the primaries: one between them (L1), one beyond the smaller primary (L2), and one beyond the larger primary on the opposite side (L3). Euler detailed this in memoirs such as De motu rectilineo trium corporum se mutuo attrahentium (published 1767), deriving the positions through a quintic equation governing relative distances in collinear configurations, motivated by broader efforts to refine lunar and planetary theories.[7] Building independently on similar ideas, Joseph-Louis Lagrange expanded the theory in 1772 by deriving all five equilibrium points, including two off-axis triangular points (L4 and L5) forming equilateral triangles with the primaries.[8] In his Essai sur le problème des trois corps, Lagrange analyzed these configurations within the context of planetary perturbations, showing that the triangular points could support stable orbits for appropriate mass ratios, as seen in potential applications to Jupiter's system.[8] This work, later integrated into Mécanique Analytique (1788), provided a foundational framework for understanding non-Keplerian stability in multi-body systems.[6]19th- and 20th-century developments
In the late 19th century, significant theoretical advancements clarified the structure and limitations of solutions in the three-body problem. Heinrich Bruns demonstrated in 1887 that no additional algebraic first integrals exist beyond the classical conserved quantities of energy, center of mass motion, and angular momentum, limiting the possibility of closed-form solutions for general configurations.[9] Building on this, Henri Poincaré's qualitative investigations during the 1890s, particularly in his 1889 prize memoir and the three-volume Les Méthodes nouvelles de la mécanique céleste (1892–1899), analyzed the stability of periodic orbits and equilibrium points, revealing the inherent chaotic dynamics possible in perturbed three-body systems through concepts like homoclinic tangles and the non-integrability of the equations.[10] These works confirmed that the only equilibrium configurations are the five Lagrange points—three collinear and two triangular—with no further equilibria possible, as the algebraic conditions for balance yield precisely these solutions under the Newtonian potential.[5] Poincaré's analysis also underscored the conditional stability of the triangular points (L4 and L5) under small perturbations for mass ratios typical in the Solar System, where deviations remain bounded despite sensitivity to initial conditions. Early 20th-century progress shifted toward numerical verification and application to real celestial systems. Forest Ray Moulton, in his influential textbook An Introduction to Celestial Mechanics (1914), derived the particular solutions for relative equilibria in the restricted three-body problem and provided numerical evaluations of the Lagrange point positions for specific Solar System pairs, such as the Sun-Jupiter and Sun-Earth systems, using the era's mass ratios and orbital parameters to illustrate their locations relative to planetary distances.[11] These computations, based on iterative solutions to the positioning equations, confirmed the theoretical predictions and highlighted practical implications, such as potential gathering points for dust or minor bodies near L4 and L5 in the Jupiter Trojans region. By the mid-20th century, attention turned to dynamical behaviors around the points for practical uses, particularly in emerging space exploration. Eckhard Rabe conducted detailed orbital analyses in the 1950s and early 1960s, including computations of periodic and quasi-periodic trajectories near Earth-Moon libration points, demonstrating feasible low-energy paths for spacecraft insertion and maintenance using numerical integration techniques. Concurrently, initial proposals for leveraging these points in rocketry and space travel appeared; for instance, in his 1961 novel A Fall of Moondust, Arthur C. Clarke described a space station at the Earth-Moon L1 point, highlighting its equilibrium properties for stable observation and communication beyond low Earth orbit.[12] These ideas, echoed in NACA technical reports on interplanetary navigation from the late 1950s, laid groundwork for viewing libration points as gateways for extended missions, influencing early NASA trajectory planning post-1958.Overview of the five points
Collinear points (L1, L2, L3)
The collinear Lagrange points, denoted as L1, L2, and L3, are equilibrium locations in the circular restricted three-body problem where a negligible-mass test particle remains stationary relative to two orbiting primary bodies, such as a star and a planet, due to the balance of gravitational and centrifugal forces in the co-rotating reference frame. These points lie along the straight line joining the two primaries, with the gravitational attractions from both bodies exactly countering the centrifugal force arising from the frame's rotation, resulting in zero net acceleration for the test particle. This configuration arises in systems where the primaries move in circular orbits around their common center of mass, providing positions of potential equilibrium for third bodies like spacecraft or asteroids.[3][13] L1 is situated between the two primary bodies, closer to the less massive secondary, where the stronger gravitational pull of the primary is partially offset by the secondary's attraction, allowing the centrifugal force to maintain equilibrium. This positioning makes L1 act as a natural gateway for transferring objects between the vicinity of the secondary body and the broader orbital environment, as small perturbations can facilitate efficient trajectories with minimal energy expenditure. In contrast, L2 lies beyond the secondary body, on the side away from the primary, where the secondary's weaker gravity assists the primary's pull against the outward centrifugal force, enabling the test particle to co-orbit without additional propulsion in the ideal case.[1][14][13] L3 is positioned beyond the primary body, on the opposite side from the secondary, nearly coinciding with the primary's orbital path but slightly displaced inward to balance the distant secondary's gravitational influence with the centrifugal effect. Physically, these collinear points correspond to saddle-shaped features in the effective potential landscape of the co-rotating frame, where the potential forms shallow wells along the line of the primaries but rises in perpendicular directions, leading to unstable equilibria akin to a ball balanced precariously on a saddle—any minor deviation causes drift away from the point. While inherently unstable and requiring periodic corrections for practical use, such as in satellite missions, this saddle nature underscores their role as dynamic gateways rather than permanent parking spots.[3][14][13]Triangular points (L4, L5)
The triangular Lagrange points, designated L4 and L5, are equilibrium locations in the circular restricted three-body problem where a negligible-mass test particle can remain stationary relative to two more massive bodies orbiting their common center of mass. These points occupy the third vertices of equilateral triangles formed with the two primary masses within their orbital plane, distinguishing them from the collinear configurations of L1, L2, and L3. This geometry arises from the symmetric balance required for equilibrium in the rotating reference frame of the system.[1][15] L4 is positioned 60 degrees ahead of the secondary (less massive) body along its orbital path around the primary body, while L5 lies 60 degrees behind the secondary. In this arrangement, both points maintain a fixed separation equal to the distance between the two primaries, enabling the test particle to share the same orbital period as the pair. This co-orbital positioning allows the particle to effectively "escort" the secondary body in its journey, a feature unique to the triangular points.[1][15] Physically, equilibrium at L4 and L5 results from the precise cancellation of forces in the co-rotating frame: the gravitational pulls of the primary and secondary bodies on the test particle are equal in magnitude but opposite in direction relative to the centrifugal force arising from the system's rotation. This balance permits the particle to orbit the primary with the identical angular velocity as the secondary, without requiring additional propulsion. For systems where the ratio of the larger mass to the smaller mass exceeds approximately 25:1—such as the Sun–Earth or Earth–Moon pairs—these points exhibit stability under small perturbations, primarily due to the Coriolis effect providing a restoring influence.[1][15][16] Although exact positioning at L4 or L5 represents neutral equilibrium, minor deviations typically result in bounded librations rather than escape. Tadpole orbits describe small-amplitude oscillations where the test particle circulates around one triangular point (either L4 or L5) while remaining on the same side of the secondary body, forming a narrow, tadpole-like path in the rotating frame. In contrast, horseshoe orbits involve wider excursions, with the particle looping around both L4 and L5, passing alternately ahead and behind the secondary in a U-shaped trajectory that encircles the primary without crossing it. These co-orbital variations highlight the dynamic resilience of the triangular points, allowing sustained proximity over extended periods.[1][15]Mathematical derivation
Restricted three-body problem setup
The circular restricted three-body problem (CR3BP) models the motion of a third body with negligible mass under the gravitational influence of two primary bodies that orbit each other circularly around their common center of mass. This framework assumes that the two primaries, with masses , maintain fixed circular orbits with angular velocity , and the third body does not perturb their motion due to its infinitesimal mass; furthermore, the third body's trajectory is confined to the orbital plane of the primaries.[17][18] To analyze the dynamics, a synodic coordinate system is employed, which rotates with angular velocity about the barycenter of the primaries. In this frame, the origin is at the barycenter, the x-axis aligns with the line connecting the primaries (with at and at , where ), the y-axis is perpendicular in the orbital plane, and the z-axis is normal to that plane. The equations of motion in this rotating frame incorporate gravitational forces from both primaries and fictitious centrifugal and Coriolis terms.[17][18] The effective potential in the CR3BP combines the gravitational potential of the primaries with the centrifugal potential arising from the frame's rotation: where and are the distances from the third body to and , respectively, and is the distance from the rotation axis (the z-axis through the barycenter). Equilibrium points, such as the Lagrange points, occur where the gradient of vanishes, , balancing gravitational and centrifugal forces.[17][19] For computational convenience, the CR3BP is often formulated in dimensionless normalized units: the distance between the primaries is set to 1, the total mass (implying ), and the orbital period yields , with time scaled such that the primaries' angular velocity is unity. In this system, positions are expressed relative to , simplifying the effective potential to where the sign convention reflects the negative gravitational terms.[17][18] A key conserved quantity in the rotating frame is the Jacobi integral, an energy-like constant that constrains the third body's motion: where is the square of the velocity relative to the synodic frame. This integral arises from the system's autonomy in the rotating coordinates and defines accessible regions (Hill's regions) bounded by zero-velocity surfaces where .[17][19][20]Positioning equations for L1, L2, L3
In the circular restricted three-body problem (CR3BP), the collinear Lagrange points L1, L2, and L3 are located along the line connecting the two primary masses, where the gradient of the effective potential vanishes in the synodic frame, satisfying .[21] This equilibrium condition equates the gravitational accelerations from the primaries (masses at and at ) with the centrifugal acceleration, assuming unit separation and for systems like Sun-Earth.[22] For points on this line (), the balance yields a quintic equation in the normalized distance from the secondary (smaller) primary. For L1 (between primaries) and L2 (beyond the secondary), the equation is with the upper sign for L1 and lower for L2; the positions are then and .[21] For small , ; for L1, , yielding a normalized distance from the more massive primary, with a refined series expansion derived via perturbation methods.[22] A similar expansion applies to L2, replacing the leading term with .[21] The quintic for L3 (beyond the primary) is where is the distance from the primary, yielding .[21] For small , the position approximates , or equivalently , with higher-order terms .[21] For arbitrary , the quintics lack closed-form solutions and require numerical methods such as Newton-Raphson iteration, starting from the small- approximations as initial guesses to converge rapidly.[22]Positioning and stability of L4, L5
In the circular restricted three-body problem (CR3BP), the positions of the L4 and L5 Lagrange points are determined by solving the equilibrium conditions ∂Ω/∂x = 0 and ∂Ω/∂y = 0, where the effective potential is given by with the distance to the primary of mass located at , and the distance to the primary of mass at , in normalized units where the primaries' separation is 1 and the orbital angular velocity is 1.[23] For off-axis solutions (), substituting into the partial derivatives yields the exact locations , for any mass ratio , corresponding to L4 (positive y) and L5 (negative y).[24] These coordinates place the third body such that its distances to both primaries are exactly 1, forming the apex of equilateral triangles with base along the line joining the primaries.[25] Geometrically, this configuration satisfies force balance due to symmetry: the gravitational accelerations from the primaries, of magnitudes and , point toward each primary at a 60° angle relative to the line connecting L4 or L5 to the barycenter. Their vector sum aligns toward the barycenter with magnitude sufficient to counter the centrifugal acceleration , where is the distance from the rotation axis (barycenter); the x- and y-components cancel appropriately in the rotating frame.[23] For small (e.g., a negligible secondary mass), the primary's pull dominates but is augmented by the secondary's, with the 60° geometry ensuring the net gravitational force points inward, balanced precisely by the outward centrifugal term at this shifted position.[25] Linear stability is assessed by linearizing the equations of motion around L4 or L5, yielding a characteristic equation from the state matrix involving the Hessian components , , , and . At these points, the correct values are , , (positive for L4, negative for L5), and .[14] The vertical (z-direction) motion decouples and is always stable, with eigenvalues , corresponding to simple harmonic oscillations at the orbital frequency. For in-plane (x-y) motion, the characteristic equation is the biquadratic . Substituting the values gives coefficients that ensure all eigenvalues are pure imaginary (stable) when , the critical value from Gascheau's criterion where , beyond which a pair of eigenvalues acquires a positive real part, causing instability. For small , the in-plane frequencies are approximately (short-period) and (long-period), leading to bounded tadpole or horseshoe orbits.[25][26]Stability and dynamics
Linear stability analysis
The linear stability of the Lagrange points in the circular restricted three-body problem (CR3BP) is assessed by linearizing the equations of motion around each equilibrium point, yielding a system of the form , where represents small perturbations in position and velocity, and is the Jacobian matrix derived from the dynamics , , , with the effective potential.[17] The eigenvalues of determine local stability: purely imaginary eigenvalues indicate linear stability (bounded oscillatory motion), while any eigenvalue with nonzero real part implies instability.[17] In the planar case, the in-plane motion (4×4 Jacobian) decouples from the vertical (z-direction) motion, which always yields a pair of purely imaginary eigenvalues , as at all points.[17] For the collinear points L1, L2, and L3, the off-diagonal potential derivatives vanish (), and the in-plane characteristic equation is the biquadratic .[17] Substituting , the roots are , where one root is positive and one negative due to the saddle-like curvature (, or vice versa, with ).[17] This yields one pair of real eigenvalues () for the unstable in-plane direction and one pair of purely imaginary eigenvalues for the stable oscillatory mode, resulting in saddle-center×center dynamics overall.[17] Thus, all collinear points are linearly unstable for any mass parameter .[17] For small , near L1 the unstable eigenvalue approximates in the leading order, establishing the exponential divergence timescale.[27] For the triangular points L4 and L5, the characteristic equation simplifies to , derived from and in dimensionless units.[17] Letting , the quadratic has discriminant ; the roots are .[17] Linear stability requires (both ), so , yielding four purely imaginary eigenvalues and center×center dynamics.[17] This critical value, first derived by Gascheau, ensures all eigenvalues are imaginary for typical systems like Sun-Jupiter ().[28] For , produces complex eigenvalues with positive real parts, rendering the points unstable.[17] When stable, perturbations around L4 and L5 exhibit two distinct frequencies from the negative roots: a short-period epicyclic frequency (corresponding to small radial and vertical oscillations near the orbital period ) and a long-period secular frequency (corresponding to tadpole libration around the point, with period ).[17] These motions are captured by Hill's variational equations, the linearized form \begin{align*} \ddot{\xi} - 2 \dot{\eta} - \frac{1}{2} \xi &= 0, \ \ddot{\eta} + 2 \dot{\xi} + \frac{1}{2} \eta &= 0, \end{align*} in a coordinate system rotated and translated to the point (with as deviations along and perpendicular to the line joining the primaries, adjusted for ); solutions involve elliptic functions describing bounded epicyclic and secular librations.[17]Perturbations and long-term behavior
In the circular restricted three-body problem (CR3BP), nonlinear effects beyond linear stability analysis give rise to 1:1 mean-motion resonances around the triangular Lagrange points L4 and L5, manifesting as tadpole and horseshoe librations for co-orbital objects like Trojan asteroids. Tadpole orbits, with smaller libration amplitudes enclosing one Lagrange point, exhibit gradual amplitude reduction under planetary mass growth or perturbations, while horseshoe orbits, which encircle both L4 and L5, can transition into tadpole configurations over long timescales, preserving enclosed area in dimensionless units. These resonant structures enable long-term confinement, with some orbits remaining stable for over 10^8 to 10^9 years in the Jupiter-Sun system despite nonlinear diffusion. For the collinear points L1, L2, and L3, which are inherently unstable saddles, nonlinear dynamics lead to escape on timescales of approximately 10 to 100 years in typical Solar System configurations, driven by the hyperbolic growth of perturbations along unstable manifolds.[29] External perturbations exacerbate this instability; for instance, solar radiation pressure induces a drift in orbits near Sun-Earth L1 and L2, necessitating corrective maneuvers for spacecraft and contributing to rapid ejection of natural objects. Similarly, planetary oblateness and non-circular orbits introduce additional forcing, while the Yarkovsky effect—arising from asymmetric thermal re-emission—causes semi-major axis drift in small asteroids, reducing Trojan populations at L4 and L5 over 10^8 to 10^9 years by pushing objects into chaotic regions.[30] Kolmogorov-Arnold-Moser (KAM) theory elucidates the persistence of stable islands around L4 and L5 in the perturbed CR3BP, where quasi-periodic invariant tori survive for small perturbations, confining orbits within "banana-shaped" regions of effective stability spanning radii up to about 0.03 in normalized units, sufficient to encompass observed Jupiter Trojans over the age of the Solar System.[31] These KAM tori form robust barriers against large-scale diffusion, though Arnold diffusion in three dimensions slightly narrows the stable domains by 12-19% compared to planar cases.[31] Observationally, the collinear points show near-total depletion of natural objects due to their short dynamical lifetimes, with no confirmed asteroids persisting there, as perturbations quickly transport material through chaotic layers surrounding the saddle points into unbound or crossing orbits.[32] In contrast, L4 and L5 host stable Trojan swarms, but external effects like Yarkovsky gradually erode small-body populations (<1 km), leading to observable size-frequency distributions skewed toward larger survivors, while chaotic layers near the tadpole-horseshoe boundary facilitate intermittent escapes.[30]Natural objects and phenomena
Trojan asteroids in the Solar System
Trojan asteroids, also known as Trojan bodies, are small Solar System objects that share the orbital paths of planets while librating around the L4 or L5 Lagrange points, maintaining stable configurations over long timescales. In the case of Jupiter, these asteroids form the largest known population, with approximately 15,000 confirmed objects as of 2025, distributed between the L4 (Greek camp) and L5 (Trojan camp) swarms ahead of and behind the planet, respectively.[33] The first Jupiter Trojan, (588) Achilles, was discovered in 1906 by astronomer Max Wolf using photographic plates at Heidelberg Observatory, marking the initial recognition of these co-orbital companions; subsequent discoveries, including (624) Hektor by Seth Barnes Nicholson in 1907, expanded the catalog and confirmed their association with Jupiter's orbit.[34] These bodies range in size from meters to hundreds of kilometers, with the largest, (624) Hektor, possessing a mass on the order of kg and exhibiting a bilobed structure suggestive of a contact binary.[35] Neptune hosts a smaller but dynamically significant population of Trojans, with around 30 confirmed objects as of 2025, all but a few residing at the L4 point ahead of the planet.[36] The first Neptune Trojan, 2001 QR322, was identified in 2001 through observations at the Palomar Observatory, revealing a body approximately 100 km in diameter librating stably with an amplitude of about 25 degrees.[37] Unlike Jupiter's more balanced swarms, Neptune's Trojans show a strong asymmetry, with only a handful at L5, attributed to observational biases and dynamical effects during planetary evolution; their reddish colors indicate origins in the outer Solar System, distinct from inner-belt asteroids.[37] For Mars, the Trojan population is sparse and predominantly at the L5 point, with 18 known objects as of 2025, including the family around (5261) Eureka.[38] A notable exception is (121514) 1999 UJ7, discovered in 1999 but confirmed as a stable L4 Trojan in dynamical studies around 2020, with an orbit showing minimal libration amplitude over gigayear timescales despite Mars' smaller mass ratio (), which generally reduces stability compared to gas giants.[39] This object's primitive C-type spectrum suggests an origin in the outer asteroid belt, and its long-term residence highlights the viability of Trojan orbits even for terrestrial planets, though perturbations from Jupiter introduce greater variability.[40] No long-term Trojans have been confirmed for Venus as of 2025, though temporary captures occur due to their proximity to the main asteroid belt and resonant dynamics.[41] For Earth, two quasi-Trojans have been confirmed as of 2025: (7066) 2010 TK7, discovered in 2010 by NASA's Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE), librates at L4 with a diameter of about 300 meters but is marginally stable, potentially escaping in less than 2,000 years due to evection resonance with Venus; and (614689) 2020 XL5, discovered in 2020 and confirmed as a stable L4 Trojan in 2022, with an estimated stability of at least 4,000 years and a diameter of about 1.2 km.[42][43] The prevailing formation model for Trojan asteroids posits capture from the primordial planetesimal disk during the giant planets' outward migration in the early Solar System, as simulated in the Nice model.[44] Planetesimals scattered by growing planetary cores were trapped at Lagrange points when Jupiter and other giants underwent radial excursions driven by interactions with the gaseous disk and scattered bodies, preserving a subset in stable librations while others were ejected or collided. This mechanism explains the compositional diversity—ranging from carbonaceous to icy types—and the observed asymmetries, with high-fidelity N-body integrations showing capture efficiencies of 1-10% for Jupiter's Trojans during a migration phase lasting 10-100 million years.[44]Dust and other transient objects
The Kordylewski clouds are concentrations of interplanetary dust located at the Earth-Moon L4 and L5 Lagrange points, first reported in 1961 by Polish astronomer Kazimierz Kordylewski through photographic observations of faint brightness patches near these points.[45] These clouds consist of small dust particles, primarily micrometeoroids, that scatter sunlight via polarization, forming diffuse structures with low optical density.[46] Their existence was long debated due to their extreme faintness—estimated at about 10^{-7} of the Moon's brightness—and potential disruption by solar radiation, wind, and planetary perturbations, which could prevent stable accumulation; however, ground-based imaging polarimetry in 2018 provided confirmatory evidence by detecting polarized light patterns consistent with dust scattering at L5, ruling out artifacts like atmospheric clouds or contrails.[47] At the Sun-Earth L1 and L2 Lagrange points, transient dust populations arise from interplanetary sources such as comet tails and asteroid impacts, forming temporary accumulations influenced by gravitational balance and non-gravitational forces. Observations from the SOHO spacecraft's LASCO coronagraph have detected streams of small dust particles, known as beta-meteoroids (grains smaller than 1.4 × 10^{-12} g), which are accelerated outward by solar radiation pressure after release from parent bodies, occasionally concentrating near these collinear points during their hyperbolic trajectories.[48] These beta-meteoroids exhibit unbound orbits, escaping the inner solar system, and contribute to faint zodiacal light enhancements observable in the vicinity of L1 and L2.[49] Temporary satellites, or mini-moons, include small near-Earth asteroids briefly captured into geocentric orbits, some of which librate near the Earth-Moon L1 and L2 points during their transient residence in the Hill sphere.[50] A notable example is the asteroid 2006 RH120, approximately 2–4 meters in diameter, which orbited Earth from September 2006 to July 2007, following a trajectory that involved approach and escape paths aligned with the unstable manifolds of L1 and L2 halo orbits, completing about four revolutions around the geocenter before ejection.[51] Such objects, often discovered via surveys like Catalina Sky Survey, remain bound for months to years due to low relative velocities but are perturbed out by lunar influences or solar gravity, distinguishing them from longer-term populations like Trojan asteroids.[52] In extrasolar systems, dust clouds at Lagrange points remain theoretical but offer potential for detection through advanced methods, particularly in protoplanetary disks where gas giants can trap dust via vortices at L4 and L5.[53] For instance, Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) observations of the disk around the young star MWC 758 revealed asymmetric dust features interpreted as trapping at Lagrangian points of an embedded planet, with enhanced millimeter emission indicating concentration of larger grains.[53] In mature exoplanet systems, such dust could manifest as transit timing variations or infrared excesses in direct imaging surveys, though no confirmed detections exist as of 2025; future missions like the James Webb Space Telescope may enable identification via high-contrast polarimetry or spectroscopy.[54]Spacecraft applications
Missions at Sun-Earth L1 and L2
The Sun-Earth L1 Lagrange point offers spacecraft an unobstructed view of the Sun, enabling continuous monitoring of solar activity and the incoming solar wind without interference from Earth's shadow or magnetosphere.[55] This positioning provides early warnings of solar events, such as coronal mass ejections, up to an hour before they impact Earth.[56] A prominent example is the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO), a joint NASA-ESA mission launched in December 1995, which operates in a halo orbit around L1 to study the Sun's interior, atmosphere, and solar wind dynamics and remains operational as of 2025.[56] Similarly, NASA's Advanced Composition Explorer (ACE), launched in August 1997, occupies a Lissajous orbit near L1 to measure energetic particles from the Sun, interplanetary medium, and heliosphere, contributing decades of data on space weather forecasting and still operational as of 2025.[57] In contrast, the Sun-Earth L2 point, located approximately 1.5 million kilometers from Earth on the side opposite the Sun, provides a stable thermal environment by keeping the Sun, Earth, and Moon aligned in the direction toward the Sun from the spacecraft, minimizing heat fluctuations and stray light for sensitive instruments.[1] This configuration is particularly advantageous for infrared and deep-space observations, as the spacecraft's sunshield can effectively block solar radiation while maintaining a cold operating temperature.[58] The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), launched in December 2021 by NASA with ESA and CSA partners, exemplifies this use, operating in a halo orbit around L2 to conduct infrared astronomy and peer into the early universe and remains operational as of 2025.[58] Likewise, ESA's Euclid mission, launched in July 2023, follows a halo orbit at L2 to map the sky and investigate dark energy and dark matter through wide-field imaging and spectroscopy and began science operations in 2024.[59] Spacecraft at these points require periodic station-keeping maneuvers to counteract gravitational perturbations and maintain their orbits, typically using chemical thrusters for delta-v budgets of approximately 2-4 m/s per year.[60] Halo and Lissajous orbits are preferred for these missions, as they ensure continuous line-of-sight visibility to Earth ground stations while avoiding direct alignment with the Sun or Earth that could cause signal loss or thermal issues.[61] Key challenges include light-time delays in communications, averaging about 5 seconds one-way due to the 1.5 million kilometer distance, which necessitates autonomous operations for real-time decisions.[62] Additionally, Lissajous orbits must be carefully designed to avoid seasonal eclipses by Earth at L2, where the spacecraft could enter Earth's shadow for up to several hours, potentially disrupting power and thermal control; larger amplitude halo orbits help mitigate this by phasing the trajectory out of the umbra.[63]Utilization in Earth-Moon and other systems
The Lunar Gateway, a key element of NASA's Artemis program in the 2020s, is designed as a multinational space station positioned in a near-rectilinear halo orbit around the Earth-Moon L2 Lagrange point to function as a cislunar outpost. This location enables sustained human presence for scientific research, lunar surface operations, and preparation for deeper space exploration, with initial habitation targeted for Artemis IV in the late 2020s; as of November 2025, the project remains in development with a FY2025 budget of $817.7 million. Historical concepts from the 1970s, such as those outlined in NASA technical reports, proposed libration-point satellites at Earth-Moon L1 and L2 for communication relays and navigation support, laying groundwork for modern outpost ideas.[64][21] In the Sun-Mars system, the L1 point has been proposed for communication relay satellites to maintain Earth-Mars links during solar conjunction periods when direct signals are blocked by the Sun, with concepts dating to early 2000s simulations and revisited in 2020 NASA studies for future Mars missions in the 2030s. At Sun-Mars L5, emerging ideas focus on using the stable triangular point for spacecraft assembly and servicing hubs to support resource prospecting and mission logistics toward Mars, as explored in recent orbital architecture analyses.[65][66][67] For the Sun-Venus system, L1 has been studied as a vantage for early space weather warnings through closer solar monitoring and as a platform for solar observatories, offering uninterrupted views of the Sun's corona without active missions to date but highlighted in planetary relay proposals. Future prospects include leveraging L2 points across systems for gravitational slingshots in interstellar probe trajectories, enhancing escape velocities for deep-space missions.[68][69]Specific orbital parameters
Sun-Earth and Sun-Jupiter values
In the Sun-Earth system, the mass parameter μ, defined as the ratio of Earth's mass to the total mass of the Sun and Earth, is approximately 3.004 × 10^{-6}.[70] The collinear Lagrange points L1, L2, and L3 lie along the Sun-Earth line, with L1 positioned between the Sun and Earth at a distance of about 1.496 × 10^6 km (0.01 AU) from Earth toward the Sun, and L2 located 1.5 × 10^6 km (0.01 AU) from Earth away from the Sun.[71][72] L3 resides nearly opposite Earth from the Sun, at approximately 1 AU from the Sun. The triangular points L4 and L5 form equilateral configurations with the Sun and Earth, located 60° ahead and behind Earth in its orbit, respectively. Spacecraft in halo orbits around the Sun-Earth L1 or L2 points experience libration periods of approximately 6 months (about 180 days), enabling periodic looping motions relative to the equilibrium points.[73] The orbital speed near these L1 and L2 points is roughly 30 km/s, closely matching Earth's heliocentric velocity due to their proximity to Earth's orbit. For the Sun-Jupiter system, μ is larger at approximately 9.54 × 10^{-4}, reflecting Jupiter's greater mass relative to the Sun.[70] Jupiter orbits at a mean distance of 5.2 AU from the Sun. The L4 and L5 points, which host the Trojan asteroids, are situated at 5.2 AU from the Sun, forming equilateral triangles with the Sun and Jupiter, and thus 5.2 AU from Jupiter as well.[1] These points remain stable because μ is well below the critical value of approximately 0.0385 for linear stability of L4 and L5, corresponding to a primary-to-secondary mass ratio exceeding 24.96.[74] The collinear L1 point, solved via the quintic equation for the distance parameter γ from Jupiter, lies approximately 0.36 AU (about 54 million km) from Jupiter toward the Sun.[75] L2 and L3 follow similarly along the Sun-Jupiter line, with L2 beyond Jupiter and L3 nearly opposite. The following table summarizes key distances for the Lagrange points in these systems, expressed in both AU and km for context, along with approximate angular separations as viewed from Earth (for Sun-Earth) or the secondary body (for Sun-Jupiter), relevant to observability of nearby orbits or objects.| System | Point | Distance from Secondary (AU / km) | Distance from Primary (AU / km) | Approx. Angular Separation from Sun (as seen from Secondary) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun-Earth | L1 | 0.01 / 1.5 × 10^6 | 0.99 / 1.48 × 10^8 | ~0° (along line; halo orbits span ~5–10° in some projections)[73] |
| Sun-Earth | L2 | 0.01 / 1.5 × 10^6 | 1.01 / 1.51 × 10^8 | ~0° (along line; similar halo span) |
| Sun-Earth | L3 | ~2.00 / 2.99 × 10^8 | ~1.00 / 1.50 × 10^8 | ~180° |
| Sun-Earth | L4/L5 | ~1.00 / 1.50 × 10^8 | ~1.00 / 1.50 × 10^8 | ~60° |
| Sun-Jupiter | L1 | 0.36 / 5.4 × 10^7 | 4.84 / 7.25 × 10^8 | ~0° (along line) |
| Sun-Jupiter | L2 | ~0.38 / 5.7 × 10^7 | 5.58 / 8.35 × 10^8 | ~0° (along line) |
| Sun-Jupiter | L3 | ~10.00 / 1.50 × 10^9 | ~5.20 / 7.78 × 10^8 | ~180° |
| Sun-Jupiter | L4/L5 | 5.20 / 7.78 × 10^8 | 5.20 / 7.78 × 10^8 | ~60° (Trojans observable at ~20–30° from Jupiter in sky)[14] |