Hubbry Logo
In situ resource utilizationIn situ resource utilizationMain
Open search
In situ resource utilization
Community hub
In situ resource utilization
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
In situ resource utilization
In situ resource utilization
In situ resource utilization
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

ISRU reverse water gas shift testbed (NASA KSC)
ISRU Pilot Excavator – A NASA project

In space exploration, in situ resource utilization (ISRU) is the practice of collection, processing, storing and use of materials found or manufactured on other astronomical objects (the Moon, Mars, asteroids, etc.) that replace materials that would otherwise be brought from Earth.[1]

ISRU could provide materials for life support, propellants, construction materials, and energy to a spacecraft payloads or space exploration crews.[2] It is now very common for spacecraft and robotic planetary surface mission to harness the solar radiation found in situ in the form of solar panels. The use of ISRU for material production has not yet been implemented in a space mission, though several field tests in the late 2000s demonstrated various lunar ISRU techniques in a relevant environment.[3]

ISRU has long been considered as a possible avenue for reducing the mass and cost of space exploration architectures, in that it may be a way to drastically reduce the amount of payload that must be launched from Earth in order to explore a given planetary body. According to NASA, "in-situ resource utilization will enable the affordable establishment of extraterrestrial exploration and operations by minimizing the materials carried from Earth."[4]

Uses

[edit]

Water

[edit]

In the context of ISRU, water is most often sought directly as fuel or as feedstock for fuel production. Applications include its use in life support, either directly for drinking, for growing food, producing oxygen, or numerous other industrial processes, all of which require a ready supply of water in the environment and the equipment to extract it. Such extraterrestrial water has been discovered in a variety of forms throughout the Solar System, and a number of potential water extraction technologies have been investigated. For water that is chemically bound to regolith, solid ice, or some manner of permafrost, sufficient heating can recover the water. However this is not as easy as it appears because ice and permafrost can often be harder than plain rock, necessitating laborious mining operations. Where there is some level of atmosphere, such as on Mars, water can be extracted directly from the air using a simple process such as WAVAR. Another possible source of water is deep aquifers kept warm by Mars's latent geological heat, which can be tapped to provide both water and geothermal power.[citation needed]

Rocket propellant

[edit]

Rocket propellant production has been proposed from the Moon's surface by processing water ice detected at the poles. The likely difficulties include working at extremely low temperatures and extraction of water from the regolith. Most schemes electrolyse the water to produce hydrogen and oxygen and cryogenically store them as liquids. This requires large amounts of equipment and power to achieve. Alternatively, it may be possible to heat water in a nuclear or solar thermal rocket,[5] which may be able to deliver a large mass from the Moon to low Earth orbit (LEO) in spite of the much lower specific impulse, for a given amount of equipment.[6]

The monopropellant hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) can be made from water on Mars and the Moon.[7]

Aluminum as well as other metals has been proposed for use as rocket propellant made using lunar resources,[8] and proposals include reacting the aluminum with water.[9]

For Mars, methane propellant can be manufactured via the Sabatier process. SpaceX has suggested building a propellant plant on Mars that would use this process to produce methane (CH
4) and liquid oxygen (O2) from sub-surface water ice and atmospheric CO
2.[10]

Solar cell production

[edit]

It has long been suggested that solar cells could be produced from the materials present in lunar soil. Silicon, aluminium, and glass, three of the primary materials required for solar cell production, are found in high concentrations in lunar soil and can be used to produce solar cells.[11] In fact, the native vacuum on the lunar surface provides an excellent environment for direct vacuum deposition of thin-film materials for solar cells.[12]

Solar arrays produced on the lunar surface can be used to support lunar surface operations as well as satellites off the lunar surface. Solar arrays produced on the lunar surface may prove more cost effective than solar arrays produced and shipped from Earth, but this trade depends heavily on the location of the particular application in question.[citation needed]

Another potential application of lunar-derived solar arrays is providing power to Earth. In its original form, known as the solar power satellite, the proposal was intended as an alternate power source for Earth. Solar cells would be launched into Earth orbit and assembled, with the resultant generated power being transmitted down to Earth via microwave beams.[13] Despite much work on the cost of such a venture, the uncertainty lay in the cost and complexity of fabrication procedures on the lunar surface.

Building materials

[edit]

The colonization of planets or moons will require obtaining local building materials, such as regolith. For example, studies employing artificial Mars soil mixed with epoxy resin and tetraethoxysilane, produce high enough values of strength, resistance, and flexibility parameters.[14]

Asteroid mining could also involve extraction of metals for construction material in space, which may be more cost-effective than bringing such material up out of Earth's deep gravity well, or that of any other large body like the Moon or Mars. Metallic asteroids contain huge amounts of siderophilic metals, including precious metals.[citation needed]

Locations

[edit]

Mars

[edit]
See also: SpaceX Mars transportation infrastructure and Mars Direct

ISRU research for Mars is focused primarily on providing rocket propellant for a return trip to Earth—either for a crewed or a sample return mission—or for use as fuel on Mars. Many of the proposed techniques use the well-characterised atmosphere of Mars as feedstock.[15] Since this can be simulated on Earth, these proposals are relatively simple to implement, though it is by no means certain that NASA or the ESA will favour this approach over a more conventional direct mission.[16]

A typical proposal for ISRU is the use of a Sabatier reaction, CO2 + 4H2 → CH4 + 2H2O, in order to produce methane on the Martian surface, to be used as a propellant. Oxygen is liberated from the water by electrolysis, and the hydrogen recycled back into the Sabatier reaction. The usefulness of this reaction is that—as of 2008, when the availability of water on Mars was less scientifically demonstrated—only the hydrogen (which is light) was thought to need to be brought from Earth.[17]

As of 2018, SpaceX has stated their goal of developing the technology for a Mars propellant plant that could use a variation on what is described in the previous paragraph. Rather than transporting hydrogen from Earth to use in making the methane and oxygen, they have said they plan to mine the requisite water from subsurface water ice, produce and then store the post-Sabatier reactants, and then use it as propellant for return flights of their Starship no earlier than 2023.[18][19] As of 2023 SpaceX has not produced or published any designs, specifications for any ISRU technology.[20]

A similar reaction proposed for Mars is the reverse water gas shift reaction, CO2 + H2 → CO + H2O. This reaction takes place rapidly in the presence of an iron-chrome catalyst at 400 °C,[21] and has been implemented in an Earth-based testbed by NASA.[22] Again, hydrogen is recycled from the water by electrolysis, and the reaction only needs a small amount of hydrogen from Earth. The net result of this reaction is the production of oxygen, to be used as the oxidizer component of rocket fuel.[citation needed]

Another reaction proposed for the production of oxygen and fuel[23] is the electrolysis of the atmospheric carbon dioxide,

[24]

It has also been proposed the in situ production of oxygen, hydrogen and CO from the Martian hematite deposits via a two-step thermochemical CO2/H2O splitting process, and specifically in the magnetite/wüstite redox cycle.[25] Although thermolysis is the most direct, one-step process for splitting molecules, it is neither practical nor efficient in the case of either H2O or CO2. This is because the process requires a very high temperature (> 2,500 °C) to achieve a useful dissociation fraction.[26] This poses problems in finding suitable reactor materials, losses due to vigorous product recombination, and excessive aperture radiation losses when concentrated solar heat is used. The magnetite/wustite redox cycle was first proposed for solar application on earth by Nakamura,[27] and was one of the first used for solar-driven two-step water splitting. In this cycle, water reacts with wustite (FeO) to form magnetite (Fe3O4) and hydrogen. The summarised reactions in this two-step splitting process are as follows:

and the obtained FeO is used for the thermal splitting of water or CO2 :

3FeO + H2O → Fe3O4 + H2
3FeO + CO2 → Fe3O4 + CO

This process is repeated cyclically. The above process results in a substantial reduction in the thermal input of energy if compared with the most direct, one-step process for splitting molecules.[28]

However, the process needs wüstite (FeO) to start the cycle, but on Mars there is no wustite or at least not in significant amounts. Nevertheless, wustite can be easily obtained by reduction of hematite (Fe2O3) which is an abundant material on Mars, being especially conspicuous are the strong hematite deposits located at Terra Meridiani.[29] The use of wustite from the hematite, abundantly available on Mars, is an industrial process well known on Earth, and is performed by the following two main reduction reactions:[citation needed]

3Fe2O3 + H2 → 2Fe3O4 + H2O
3Fe2O3 + CO → 2Fe3O4 + CO2

The proposed 2001 Mars Surveyor lander was to demonstrate manufacture of oxygen from the atmosphere of Mars,[30] and test solar cell technologies and methods of mitigating the effect of Martian dust on the power systems, but the project was cancelled.[31] The Mars 2020 rover mission includes an ISRU technology demonstrator (the Mars Oxygen ISRU Experiment) that will extract CO2 from the atmosphere and produce O2.[32]

It has been suggested that buildings on Mars could be made from basalt as it has good insulating properties. An underground structure of this type would be able to protect life forms against radiation exposure.[33]

All of the resources required to make plastics exist on Mars.[34][35] Many of these complex reactions are able to be completed from the gases harvested from the martian atmosphere. Traces of free oxygen, carbon monoxide, water and methane are all known to exist.[36][37] Hydrogen and oxygen can be made by the electrolysis of water, carbon monoxide and oxygen by the electrolysis of carbon dioxide and methane by the Sabatier reaction of carbon dioxide and hydrogen. These basic reactions provide the building blocks for more complex reaction series which are able to make plastics. Ethylene is used to make plastics such as polyethylene and polypropylene and can be made from carbon monoxide and hydrogen:[38]

2CO + 4H2 → C2H4 + 2H2O.

Moon

[edit]
Main article: Lunar resources

The Moon possesses abundant raw materials that are potentially relevant to a hierarchy of future applications, beginning with the use of lunar materials to facilitate human activities on the Moon itself and progressing to the use of lunar resources to underpin a future industrial capability within the Earth-Moon system.[39] Natural resources include solar power, oxygen, water, hydrogen, and metals.[40][41][42]

The lunar highland material anorthite can be used as aluminium ore. Smelters can produce pure aluminium, calcium metal, oxygen and silica glass from anorthite. Raw anorthite is also good for making fiberglass and other glass and ceramic products.[43] One particular processing technique is to use fluorine brought from Earth as potassium fluoride to separate the raw materials from the lunar rocks.[44]

Over twenty different methods have been proposed for oxygen extraction from the lunar regolith.[8] Oxygen is often found in iron-rich lunar minerals and glasses as iron oxide. The oxygen can be extracted by heating the material to temperatures above 900 °C and exposing it to hydrogen gas. The basic equation is: FeO + H2 → Fe + H2O. This process has recently been made much more practical by the discovery of significant amounts of hydrogen-containing regolith near the Moon's poles by the Clementine spacecraft.[45]

Lunar materials may also be used as a general construction material,[46] through processing techniques such as sintering, hot-pressing, liquification, and the cast basalt method. Cast basalt is used on Earth for construction of, for example, pipes where a high resistance to abrasion is required.[47] Glass and glass fiber are straightforward to process on the Moon and Mars.[43] Basalt fibre has also been made from lunar regolith simulators.

Successful tests have been performed on Earth using two lunar regolith simulants MLS-1 and MLS-2.[48] In August 2005, NASA contracted for the production of 16 tonnes of simulated lunar soil, or lunar regolith simulant material for research on how lunar soil could be used in situ.[49][50]

Martian moons, Ceres, asteroids

[edit]

Other proposals[51] are based on Phobos and Deimos. These moons are in reasonably high orbits above Mars, have very low escape velocities, and unlike Mars have return delta-v's from their surfaces to LEO which are less than the return from the Moon.[citation needed]

Ceres is further out than Mars, with a higher delta-v, but launch windows and travel times are better, and the surface gravity is just 0.028 g, with a very low escape velocity of 510 m/s. Researchers have speculated that the interior configuration of Ceres includes a water-ice-rich mantle over a rocky core.[52]

Near Earth Asteroids and bodies in the asteroid belt could also be sources of raw materials for ISRU.[citation needed]

Planetary atmospheres

[edit]

Proposals have been made for "mining" for rocket propulsion, using what is called a Propulsive Fluid Accumulator. Atmospheric gases like oxygen and argon could be extracted from the atmosphere of planets like the Earth, Mars, and the outer giant planets by Propulsive Fluid Accumulator satellites in low orbit.[53]

ISRU capability classification (NASA)

[edit]

In October 2004, NASA's Advanced Planning and Integration Office commissioned an ISRU capability roadmap team. The team's report, along with those of 14 other capability roadmap teams, were published 22 May 2005.[54] The report identifies seven ISRU capabilities:[54]: 278 

  1. resource extraction,
  2. material handling and transport,
  3. resource processing,
  4. surface manufacturing with in situ resources,
  5. surface construction,
  6. surface ISRU product and consumable storage and distribution, and
  7. ISRU unique development and certification capabilities.[54]: 265 

The report focuses on lunar and martian environments. It offers a detailed timeline[54]: 274  and capability roadmap to 2040[54]: 280–281  but it assumes lunar landers in 2010 and 2012.[54]: 280 

ISRU technology demonstrators and prototypes

[edit]

The Mars Surveyor 2001 Lander was intended to carry to Mars a test payload, MIP (Mars ISPP Precursor), that was to demonstrate manufacture of oxygen from the atmosphere of Mars,[55] but the mission was cancelled.[citation needed]

The Mars Oxygen ISRU Experiment (MOXIE) is a 1% scale prototype model aboard the Mars 2020 rover Perseverance that produces oxygen from Martian atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) in a process called solid oxide electrolysis.[56][57][58][59] The experiment produced its first 5.37 grams of oxygen on 20 April 2021.[60]

The lunar Resource Prospector rover was designed to scout for resources on a polar region of the Moon, and it was proposed to be launched in 2022.[61][62] The mission concept was in its pre-formulation stage, and a prototype rover was being tested when it was scrapped in April 2018.[63][61][62] Its science instruments will be flown instead on several commercial lander missions contracted by NASA's new Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLSP) program, that aims to focus on testing various lunar ISRU processes by landing several payloads on multiple commercial landers and rovers. The first formal solicitation was expected in 2019.[64][65] The spiritual successor to the Resource Prospector became VIPER (rover), that was also cancelled in 2024.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

In situ resource utilization

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
In situ resource utilization (ISRU) is the practice of collecting, processing, and utilizing local materials at extraterrestrial sites—such as the , , or asteroids—to produce essential mission consumables like oxygen, , propellants, and construction materials, thereby reducing the mass and cost of supplies transported from . This approach enhances the sustainability and feasibility of long-duration by leveraging in-situ resources to support human and robotic operations, minimizing dependence on resupply missions. The concept of ISRU has roots in decades of research, with lunar applications tracing back to laboratory testing in the 1970s focused on oxygen extraction from , while Mars-focused efforts intensified in the emphasizing atmospheric processing. Key benefits include significant reductions in launch mass—potentially saving 7.5 to 11 kg in orbit for every 1 kg produced on the or Mars—and enabling extended mission durations through on-site production of and needs. Challenges such as handling abrasive lunar , operating in low , and ensuring energy efficiency have driven advancements in autonomous systems and materials processing technologies. On the Moon, ISRU targets polar water ice and regolith to extract oxygen via techniques like hydrogen reduction or molten salt electrolysis, producing water for drinking, fuel components like hydrogen and oxygen for ascent vehicles, and even building materials from sintered regolith; missions like the revived Volatiles Investigating Polar Exploration Rover (VIPER), now scheduled for launch in late 2027 via , will further map and characterize these resources. For Mars, the thin carbon dioxide atmosphere serves as a primary resource, with processes like the combining CO₂ and hydrogen to generate methane fuel and oxygen, supplemented by water mining from subsurface ice. These applications align with 's Artemis program for lunar return and long-term Mars ambitions, where ISRU could supply full propellants for surface-to-orbit launches. Notable demonstrations include the Mars Oxygen In-Situ Resource Utilization Experiment (MOXIE) aboard the Perseverance rover, which successfully produced over 120 grams of oxygen from Martian CO₂ across 16 runs from 2021 to 2023, validating scalability for future human missions. Lunar efforts, such as analog testing in volcanic terrains like Mauna Kea, Hawaii, simulate regolith processing with partners including the Canadian Space Agency, paving the way for technologies in the Lunar Surface Innovation Initiative. More recently, the PRIME-1 experiment, launched in February 2025 aboard Intuitive Machines' IM-2 mission, demonstrated regolith excavation and water ice extraction technologies at the lunar south pole, with operational results under evaluation as of 2025. Ongoing development prioritizes flight-ready systems to achieve technology readiness levels of 6–9 by the 2030s, supporting sustainable exploration architectures.

Introduction

Definition and Principles

In situ resource utilization (ISRU) is the practice of collecting, processing, storing, and using materials encountered or manufactured on other celestial bodies, such as the , Mars, or asteroids, to support space missions and reduce dependence on resources transported from . This approach encompasses the identification and extraction of local resources to produce essential mission commodities, including propellants, water, oxygen, and construction materials, thereby enhancing mission feasibility and longevity. The core principles of ISRU revolve around mass efficiency, , and integration with in-situ . Mass efficiency is achieved by minimizing the payload mass launched from , with studies indicating that producing 1 kg of resources on the lunar or Martian surface can save 7.5 to 11 kg of launch mass from , potentially reducing overall launch requirements by orders of magnitude for long-duration missions. is enabled through self-sufficient systems that support habitats and without continuous resupply, while synergy with in-situ allows for the creation of tools and infrastructure from local materials, fostering a closed-loop economy in space environments. Key benefits of ISRU include substantial cost reductions, risk mitigation, and the enablement of extended human presence beyond . For instance, production via ISRU can yield cost savings in the billions of dollars per by avoiding the need to launch large quantities of fuel. It also mitigates risks by providing local redundancy for critical supplies, reducing vulnerability to launch failures or disruptions. These advantages are realized through basic concepts such as exploiting diverse resource types—volatiles like water ice for and oxygen, for metals and additional oxygen, and planetary atmospheres for gases like —while addressing energy needs via solar or nuclear sources for extraction and processing. Closed-loop systems further enhance efficiency by recycling outputs, such as using produced water and as inputs for processes like the to generate and oxygen. A fundamental aspect of ISRU's value lies in achieving net mass savings for the mission when the mass of resources produced on-site exceeds the mass of the extraction and processing .

Historical Development

The of in situ resource utilization (ISRU) originated in the mid-20th century amid early visions for , with foundational ideas emerging in NASA's lunar studies during the that explored the potential of using to support missions and reduce reliance on -supplied resources. These early efforts were influenced by broader concepts, such as O'Neill's 1976 proposal for self-sustaining habitats in and beyond, which emphasized harvesting lunar and asteroidal resources for and energy production to enable large-scale . In the 1970s, 's Viking missions to Mars in provided critical on the planet's atmosphere, revealing it to be 95.9% , which laid the groundwork for ISRU applications by highlighting abundant local volatiles for potential fuel production. This was followed in 1978 by the seminal paper "Feasibility of Rocket Propellant Production on Mars" by Robert Ash, William Dowler, and Giulio Varsi, which formally analyzed the extraction of oxygen and from Martian CO2 and water ice using processes like the , marking the first detailed technical proposal for planetary ISRU. During the 1980s, the Lunar Base Working Group report of 1984 emphasized the use of lunar for oxygen extraction via reduction processes and for construction materials like radiation shielding, positioning ISRU as essential for establishing permanent lunar outposts. The 1990s saw expanded ISRU integration into mission planning, with NASA's First Lunar Outpost concept under the 1989 Space Exploration Initiative incorporating processing for and habitat construction to enable sustained human presence on the by the early . Concurrently, studies from 1998 to 2000, including NASA's Mars ISRU Precursor efforts, focused on atmospheric production using CO2 to support sample return and human missions, demonstrating mass savings of up to 50% in launch requirements. Influential private-sector contributions included Robert Zubrin's plan, detailed in a 1990 paper and expanded in his 1996 book, which advocated ISRU via the Sabatier process to produce and oxygen from Martian resources, drastically simplifying architecture for crewed Mars landings. Entering the 2000s, NASA's , announced in 2005, prioritized ISRU for extracting water ice from lunar poles to produce and consumables, aiming to reduce mission costs and enable return trips. The 2010s shifted toward commercial involvement, with NASA's 2015 Journey to Mars plan elevating ISRU as a cornerstone for sustainable , targeting production on Mars to support round-trip missions and long-term habitation. In the 2020s, the , signed in 2020 by multiple nations, endorsed ISRU principles for responsible resource use on the Moon, fostering international for extraction and utilization activities while adhering to . As of 2025, ISRU development continues with integration into the Artemis campaign, including technology demonstrations and system advancements for lunar resource utilization.

Core Technologies

Resource Prospecting and Extraction

Resource prospecting in in situ resource utilization (ISRU) involves identifying and mapping accessible materials such as water ice, metals, and volatiles on planetary surfaces using a combination of remote and in-situ techniques. Remote sensing methods, including spectrometers and neutron detectors, have been pivotal in detecting water ice, particularly in lunar polar regions. For instance, NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO), launched in 2009, employed the Lunar Exploration Neutron Detector (LEND) to measure neutron flux and infer hydrogen concentrations indicative of water ice in permanently shadowed craters, revealing elevated levels in the south polar region. Similarly, infrared spectrometers on missions like the Moon Mineralogy Mapper aboard Chandrayaan-1 have identified hydroxyl and water signatures on the lunar surface, aiding initial site selection for ISRU operations. In-situ prospecting extends these capabilities through mobile platforms equipped with drills, spectrometers, and sensors for direct sampling. Rovers and drones facilitate subsurface analysis; the Volatiles Investigating Polar Exploration Rover (VIPER), developed by in the early 2020s and selected for delivery to the in , was designed to traverse craters, using neutron spectrometers, near-infrared spectrometers, and a drill to map water ice distribution up to 1 meter deep. Neutron spectrometers, which detect by measuring moderated neutrons from interactions, have been tested on analogs and are integral to rovers for real-time volatile assessment, as demonstrated in missions. Drilling systems, such as the Sensing, Measurement, Analysis, and Reconnaissance Tool (SMART), integrate sensors for analysis during penetration, enabling precise volatile detection without extensive excavation. Recent demonstrations, such as 's PRIME-1 mission launched in February 2025, have tested and extraction of water ice in lunar polar regions. Extraction methods focus on harvesting these resources efficiently, tailored to the regolith's physical and environmental constraints. Mechanical extraction employs excavators and scoops to gather loose regolith, suitable for surface layers rich in volatiles, with systems like bucket-wheel excavators tested for lunar analogs to achieve rates of several tons per hour. Thermal mining heats regolith to sublimate or volatilize trapped ices, often using solar concentrators or resistive heaters, as in NASA's thermal extraction prototypes that release water vapor from polar simulants. Electromagnetic techniques, such as microwave heating, penetrate regolith to selectively volatilize water without bulk excavation, with laboratory tests on icy simulants yielding up to 90% extraction efficiency by inducing . For gaseous resources in atmospheres like Mars', pumps and compressors capture CO2 or water vapor directly, though on airless bodies, vacuum-compatible traps are used. Key technologies supporting these processes include simulants for pre-mission validation and volatile collection systems. JSC-1A, a widely used simulant derived from , replicates 's , , and mechanical behavior for testing extraction hardware, with over 12 tons produced for ISRU experiments in the 1990s and 2000s. Volatile trapping employs cryogenic systems to condense into ice; cold traps cooled to below 100 K capture sublimated volatiles from heated , as validated in tests achieving near-complete recovery of from simulants. These systems often integrate with extraction to minimize losses, using Peltier coolers or for efficiency in low-pressure environments. Challenges in and extraction are pronounced in extraterrestrial settings, particularly dust management and power constraints. Lunar , electrostatically charged and , adheres to equipment in low , necessitating strategies like electrostatic repulsion or brushless seals to prevent rover mobility loss or clogging during operations. Energy efficiency is critical, as solar-powered s face limitations from the 14-day lunar night, requiring battery storage or nuclear alternatives; prototypes have demonstrated only 20-30% duty cycles without supplemental power, impacting overall yield. Extraction yields from polar vary, with water content estimated at 0.1-2 wt.% in shadowed craters based on recent and data, as of 2025. These hurdles underscore the need for robust, autonomous systems to enable scalable ISRU.

Processing and Conversion

In situ resource utilization (ISRU) processing and conversion involve transforming raw , such as water , atmospheric gases, and , into usable products through chemical and physical methods tailored to the constraints of environments, including limited power and . These processes typically occur after resource extraction and focus on efficient, scalable reactions that minimize energy input while maximizing yield, often leveraging , , or electrochemical means. Key techniques emphasize to integrate with mission architectures, enabling production of propellants, oxygen, and structural materials directly from local resources. Electrolysis stands as a foundational processing technique in ISRU, particularly for splitting obtained from polar or hydrated minerals into and oxygen, which serve as propellants or gases. The reaction proceeds as follows: 2H2O→2H2+O2(E=1.23 V)2H_2O \rightarrow 2H_2 + O_2 \quad (E = 1.23 \, \text{V}) This electrochemical process requires a voltage slightly above the theoretical minimum, with practical systems achieving efficiencies of 60-80% in laboratory settings under ISRU conditions. developments have demonstrated compact electrolyzers capable of processing impure sources, such as those contaminated with particulates, without preprocessing, enhancing reliability for lunar or Martian applications. The represents another critical method for converting from planetary atmospheres and from into and , recycling the for further processing. The is: CO2+4H2→CH4+2H2O(ΔH=−165 kJ/mol)CO_2 + 4H_2 \rightarrow CH_4 + 2H_2O \quad (\Delta H = -165 \, \text{kJ/mol}) Operated at temperatures of 300-400°C with nickel-based catalysts, it achieves conversion efficiencies up to 90% in lab-scale tests, producing suitable for . Compact Sabatier reactors, weighing under 100 kg, have been prototyped for ISRU, integrating exchangers to recover exothermic and reduce overall system mass. Carbothermal reduction processes to extract metals and oxygen by heating it with carbon at high temperatures, typically 1000-1600°C, in a to form metal oxides and , from which oxygen is subsequently liberated. This technique targets the silicates and oxides in lunar or Martian soils, yielding up to 40% oxygen by weight from feedstock in experimental runs. or inert environments prevent reoxidation, with solar reactors providing the necessary heat to sustain the endothermic reaction. Conversion systems complement these techniques by purifying and shaping outputs for end-use. Gas separation via selective membranes isolates oxygen from streams, employing or materials that exploit differences in molecular size or , achieving purities exceeding 95% at low pressure drops suitable for ISRU power budgets. For structural applications, or processing fuses regolith particles into durable bricks; methods selectively heat iron-bearing minerals, forming bonds at 1000-1200°C with inputs 50% lower than conventional heating, as shown in 2022 ESA experiments using simulants. Plasma pyrolysis converts organic waste into and oxygen through high-temperature dissociation (up to 2000°C) in a non-thermal plasma field, recovering over 90% of available oxygen while minimizing solid residues. Hybrid systems enhance efficiency by pairing with solar concentrators, where parabolic mirrors focus sunlight to provide boosting, reducing electrical demands by 30-40% during peak insolation on airless bodies. These integrated setups, prototyped in ISRU pilots, demonstrate closed-loop operation, recycling byproducts like water from the Sabatier process back into electrolyzers for sustained production. Overall, such advancements prioritize low-mass, radiation-hardened equipment to support long-duration missions.

Applications in Space Exploration

Propellant and Fuel Production

In situ resource utilization (ISRU) for and production primarily focuses on generating oxidizers and fuels from local extraterrestrial resources to enable return and in-situ refueling, thereby reducing the need for massive Earth-launched payloads. On Mars, a common approach involves producing (LOX) and liquid (LCH4) through the Sabatier process, where (CO2) from the atmosphere reacts with to form and , followed by of the to yield additional oxygen and recycle . This method leverages the Martian atmosphere, which is over 95% CO2, and sourced from or ice deposits. alone can produce and oxygen directly from ice, providing a component compatible with high-performance engines. For asteroid environments, storable hypergolic , such as nitrogen tetroxide and derivatives, may be derived from extracted metals and volatiles, offering stable, non-cryogenic options for in resource-scarce settings. These ISRU methods enable critical mission capabilities, such as powering Mars ascent vehicles (MAVs) for crew return, by producing propellants on-site rather than transporting them from . According to analyses, incorporating ISRU for MAV fuels can reduce Earth launch mass by approximately 75%, minimizing the initial mass in and allowing for more efficient mission architectures with fewer heavy-lift launches. Orbital refueling using ISRU-produced propellants further supports Earth return trajectories, extending mission range and enabling sustainable exploration campaigns. For instance, SpaceX's vehicle plans incorporate Mars ISRU to generate and oxygen propellants, targeting uncrewed demonstrations as early as 2026 to validate production scalability for crewed returns. The commercial production and sale of ISRU-derived propellants, such as LOX and methalox, for cislunar and Mars missions demonstrate economic viability, potentially lowering costs for broader space activities. Specific systems under development include adaptations of cryogenic upper stages, such as Centaur-derived designs, which utilize their existing LOX/LH2 infrastructure for ISRU propellant storage and transfer in vacuum environments. Power requirements for these systems typically range from 10 to 100 kW to achieve production rates of 1 ton of propellant per day, depending on the scale and efficiency of electrolysis and liquefaction processes. A key demonstration is NASA's Mars Oxygen In-Situ Resource Utilization Experiment (MOXIE) on the Perseverance rover, which successfully produced oxygen at 6 grams per hour from atmospheric CO2 via solid oxide electrolysis between 2021 and 2023, validating the technology at technology readiness level 6-7. Challenges in ISRU propellant production include managing cryogenic storage in vacuum conditions, where boil-off rates must be minimized through advanced insulation and active cooling to maintain liquid states for and LCH4 over extended periods. Additionally, propellant purity must exceed 99% to ensure reliable engine performance, requiring robust and separation techniques to remove contaminants like dust or unreacted gases from Martian resources.

Water and Life Support

In situ resource utilization (ISRU) plays a critical role in producing and for systems in space habitats, enabling sustainable human presence beyond by leveraging local resources to supplement or replace imported supplies. On the , ice deposits in permanently shadowed regions (PSRs) at the poles are estimated to contain up to 600 million metric tons, providing a for extraction and to generate oxygen and . of this polar involves heating and purifying the , followed by electrolytic splitting into O₂ for and H₂ for further reactions, with systems designed to operate at low temperatures to minimize energy use. On Mars, can be obtained from hydrated minerals in the or trace atmospheric , which constitutes about 0.03% by volume, through processes like adsorption and desorption before . Additionally, moisture extraction from simulants demonstrates feasibility by heating soils to 100-200°C, releasing bound for capture and purification, achieving yields sufficient for crew needs in hybrid setups. Integration of ISRU with environmental control and systems (ECLSS) enhances closed-loop efficiency, where extracted augments processes to recover up to 90% of , sweat, and humidity from crew waste, reducing resupply demands. Hybrid ISRU-ECLSS systems can produce approximately 0.8-1 kg of oxygen per day per crew member for respiration and needs by combining local resource processing with onboard recyclers, ensuring reliable supply while minimizing mass from . Key systems include the Sabatier process, which reacts atmospheric CO₂ with (from ) to produce and , enabling further oxygen generation via and closing the loop for both and potential byproduct use in . Conceptual biological ISRU approaches, such as bioreactors, utilize to generate oxygen from CO₂ and , offering a regenerative alternative that also sequesters carbon and produces , though still in early development stages. Challenges in ISRU for and include contamination control, as lunar or Martian dust can introduce toxic metals or volatiles into extracted water, necessitating robust to meet potable standards. in extraterrestrial environments can degrade recycling components, such as membranes in electrolyzers or reactors, reducing efficiency over time and requiring radiation-hardened materials or redundant systems for long-duration missions. These issues underscore the need for integrated testing to ensure system reliability in harsh conditions.

Construction and Habitat Materials

In situ resource utilization (ISRU) for construction and habitat materials primarily involves processing local to create structural elements such as bricks, panels, and shielding layers, reducing the need to transport building materials from . Key methods include additive techniques like with sintered regolith, where or heating fuses particles into solid forms without binders. Regolith processors enable sintering of bricks or 3D printing of structures, while metal extraction from ilmenite provides iron and titanium for alloys and components. Dedicated 3D printers facilitate production of parts and spares, and assembly lines for solar panels and structures leverage vacuum and low-gravity environments to enhance efficiency. These capabilities support lunar base self-sufficiency by enabling on-site fabrication of essential hardware. Another approach is casting analogs using regolith mixed with or metal additives extracted from the same material, enabling rapid solidification in vacuum environments. habitats can be reinforced with ISRU-derived or regolith-based shells, where processed regolith particles are combined with minimal imported polymers to form rigidizing layers around the structure. These materials exhibit compressive strengths suitable for load-bearing applications, with sintered lunar bricks achieving 20-50 MPa, comparable to terrestrial for non-critical structures. For shielding, layers of loose or sintered exceeding 2 meters in thickness provide effective protection against galactic cosmic rays and solar particle events, leveraging the regolith's content and density. On asteroids, metallic elements like iron and can be refined into alloys for high-strength components, enhancing durability in microgravity . These ISRU capabilities enable construction services for habitats and orbital components, supporting economic potential through partnerships with private industry. Notable demonstrations include the European Space Agency's (ESA) 2019 Space Robotics Technologies initiative, which developed modular robotic building blocks for autonomous processing and assembly. In 2025, collaborated with on testing regolith behavior in lunar gravity conditions via suborbital flight to advance technologies for construction. Production systems often incorporate in-situ mixers that blend with small amounts of extracted water—typically 5% by mass for hydration in concrete-like mixes—prior to or , drawing from extraction processes as input. Scalability targets aim for 100 m² per day of surface area using robotic swarms, enabling rapid deployment of roads, landing pads, and enclosures. Challenges include managing thermal expansion in materials exposed to extreme temperature swings (-173°C to 127°C on the ), which can cause cracking in sintered structures, and accounting for seismic activity from moonquakes or marsquakes that may compromise structural integrity over time.

Power Generation Components

In situ resource utilization (ISRU) enables the production of power generation components such as solar cells, batteries, and wiring directly from , reducing the need to launch heavy equipment from . This approach leverages local and metals to fabricate photovoltaic panels, systems, and conductive elements essential for sustained space operations. By extracting and metals from lunar or resources, ISRU power components can support scalable energy infrastructure, with potential mass reductions in launched payloads through on-site manufacturing. A primary method for producing solar cells involves extraction from lunar via carbothermal reduction, where carbon reduces silicon oxides in the regolith at high temperatures to yield purified for photovoltaic fabrication. This process heats regolith with a carbon source, such as , to produce and byproducts like , enabling the creation of -based cells suitable for lunar deployment. For instance, laboratory demonstrations have shown that carbothermal reduction can yield from simulants, supporting the development of thin-film solar cells through techniques that deposit layers onto substrates derived from the same material. Additionally, asteroid resources offer metals like and for advanced thin-film , such as those incorporating InGaAs structures, which can be extracted via processes like or to enhance cell performance in space environments. Regolith-derived materials also enable the fabrication of battery electrodes, particularly for iron-air systems, where iron extracted from serves as the in metal-air configurations that react with atmospheric oxygen for . Molten (MRE) processes melt and apply an to separate iron alloys, which can then be formed into electrodes capable of supporting rechargeable batteries for lunar power cycles. These iron-based electrodes benefit from the abundance of iron oxides in , providing a low-mass alternative to Earth-sourced lithium-ion components. For wiring, and other conductive metals can be extracted from basaltic lunar rocks through reduction techniques, forming cables essential for interconnecting power systems without relying on imported materials. Key demonstrations include 2023 laboratory efforts by , which produced prototype solar cells and transmission wiring from regolith simulants, achieving initial efficiencies around 10-12%, with a major milestone announced in September 2025 advancing the Blue Alchemist system for scalable lunar production. NASA's fission reactor integrates with ISRU-derived oxygen and fuels by providing reliable baseload power for plants, enabling efficient propellant and oxygen generation from regolith while utilizing to drive reduction reactions. These efforts aim for efficiencies approaching terrestrial standards of 20% or higher for silicon-based cells. Challenges in ISRU power component production include achieving high purity during of thin films, where regolith impurities can degrade layer quality and reduce cell performance. Furthermore, exposure poses risks of material degradation, causing atomic displacement in photovoltaic semiconductors that lowers long-term efficiency by up to several percent annually without adequate shielding. Addressing these requires advanced purification steps and radiation-hardened designs to ensure reliability in extraterrestrial conditions.

Implementation in Specific Environments

Lunar Resources

The Moon's unique , characterized by anorthositic highlands, basaltic maria, and polar permanently shadowed regions (PSRs), provides key resources for in situ resource utilization (ISRU). Water ice, primarily deposited in PSRs at the lunar poles, represents a critical volatile for and production; concentrations in the reach up to 150 parts per million (ppm) in some samples, with deposits estimated at least 5 liters per square meter in the top meter of surface material near the coldest areas. China's Chang'e-6 mission, which returned samples from the lunar far side in June 2024, with key findings published in 2025, has provided insights into volcanic activity, mantle composition, and water distribution in far-side regolith, revealing high concentrations of OH/H₂O (up to several hundred ppm) derived from solar wind implantation and ancient meteorite impacts, enhancing the potential for water and oxygen extraction in non-polar regions through regolith processing techniques. (FeTiO₃), prevalent in mare basalts at concentrations up to 10 weight percent in regolith, serves as a prime source for oxygen extraction due to its 45% oxygen content by weight, enabling high-yield processing for breathable air and oxidizers. Mare basalts further supply extractable metals like iron (14–17 wt%) and aluminum, essential for fabricating structural components and tools, with applications in 3D printing habitats for sustainable lunar bases. ISRU strategies on the Moon are adapted to its airless environment, low gravity, and extreme lighting conditions. Polar sites, such as those near Shackleton Crater, enable near-constant solar illumination on crater rims for powering water ice mining operations, while the 1/6 g gravity reduces the mass requirements for excavation equipment, allowing lighter, more efficient systems to handle regolith transport. The 2009 Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite (LCROSS) mission confirmed water ice in the Cabeus PSR by impacting the surface and analyzing the ejecta plume, revealing approximately 5.6 ± 2.9% water by mass—far higher than in sunlit areas. More recently, the VIPER (Volatiles Investigating Polar Exploration Rover) mission, revived in 2025, is planned to launch in 2027 to map water ice distributions in PSRs, supporting future ISRU operations. These efforts, including China's contributions from Chang'e-6, which inform regolith processing and ice mining techniques, play a role in international programs like NASA's Artemis by advancing global understanding of lunar resources for sustainable exploration, though challenges such as radiation exposure and energy efficiency for extraction processes persist. NASA's Artemis Base Camp, planned for operations in the late 2020s, incorporates ISRU to produce oxygen from regolith at initial rates of tens of kilograms per day, scaling toward 10 metric tons annually to support crewed missions and propellant depots. Hydrogen reduction of regolith, a mature technique, extracts oxygen with yields of 1–2% of the input regolith mass, achieving near-complete conversion (up to 96% efficiency) for ilmenite components through reactions like FeTiO₃ + H₂ → Fe + TiO₂ + H₂O followed by electrolysis. Additional strategies target solar wind-implanted volatiles in anorthositic highland , where concentrations of (~50 ppm), carbon, and enable minor extraction for chemical feedstocks, though yields remain low compared to polar . Concepts for , embedded in at parts-per-billion levels from , propose heating and separation for use as fusion fuel, potentially supplying grams per ton of processed material to power future reactors—though this remains speculative pending viable fusion . Lunar ISRU faces environmental challenges, including 14-day nights that demand nuclear or battery backups for uninterrupted processing, as ceases in shadowed areas; the 's abrasive, electrostatic further complicates operations by eroding seals, clogging mechanisms, and adhering to surfaces, necessitating robust mitigation like electrostatic repulsion or coatings.

Martian Resources

Mars' thin atmosphere, dominated by at approximately 95% by volume, presents a primary resource for in situ resource utilization (ISRU), enabling the production of oxygen and propellants through and the . The low atmospheric density necessitates specialized adaptations, such as high-efficiency compressors for intake systems to gather sufficient CO2 volumes despite the pressure being only about 0.6% of Earth's sea-level value. Additionally, processors must be designed to withstand pervasive dust, including during global dust storms that can reduce solar insolation by up to 50% and require robust to prevent abrasion and clogging. Equatorial landing sites are preferred for ISRU operations to maximize reliable availability, as higher latitudes experience greater seasonal variations in sunlight. The Martian regolith offers further resources, including perchlorates in the soil, which can be reduced (ClO4- to O2) to yield oxygen for and , though their toxicity poses handling challenges and requires mitigation to avoid health risks to crews. Subsurface ice, detected by the Phoenix Lander in 2008 at high northern latitudes and inferred to extend to mid-latitudes with concentrations up to 30% by volume in some deposits, supports extraction for habitats and . Hydrated minerals such as in the regolith provide an alternative source through or chemical processing, complementing ice mining in accessible near-surface layers. Key demonstrations underscore these resources' viability: the Mars Oxygen In-Situ Resource Utilization Experiment (MOXIE) on the Perseverance rover successfully produced a total of 122 grams of oxygen from atmospheric CO2 over 16 runs from 2021 to 2023, validating solid oxide electrolysis at Martian conditions. NASA's MAVEN mission has revealed ongoing atmospheric water loss, with hydrogen escape rates varying by factors of 10 during dust storms, informing the historical context of available volatiles for current ISRU strategies. The low pressure environment complicates chemical reactions by reducing reaction rates and requiring elevated temperatures or catalysts, while perchlorate toxicity demands integrated safety protocols for extraction and processing. These factors emphasize the need for dust-resilient, low-power systems tailored to Mars' harsh surface dynamics.

Asteroid and Airless Body Resources

Asteroids and other airless bodies, such as comets and moons like Phobos, present unique opportunities for in situ resource utilization (ISRU) due to their abundance of volatiles and metals in microgravity environments. These resources can support by providing materials for , , and manufacturing without reliance on resupply. C-type asteroids, which comprise a significant portion of near-Earth objects, are rich in hydrated minerals and organics; they contain up to 20% bound water and 6% organic material, primarily in the form of carbonaceous chondrites. M-type asteroids, on the other hand, are predominantly metallic, consisting of nickel-iron alloys that can reach 80% purity, offering high-value metals for structural applications in space. Carbonaceous chondrites within these bodies also yield complex organics, essential for potential or . Key missions have validated the presence of these resources. NASA's mission, which returned samples from the in 2023, revealed high carbon content and water-bearing clay minerals in the 4.5-billion-year-old material, confirming the asteroid's primitive composition with evidence of organics and hydrated silicates. The Psyche mission, launched in 2023 and scheduled to arrive at the Psyche in 2029, aims to map its iron-nickel surface and analyze its metallic core-like structure to assess resource potential for metals. On the Ceres, an airless body with asteroid-like features, the Dawn mission identified bright spots composed of salts and ammoniated clays, indicating subsurface volatiles including ammonia-rich phyllosilicates that could be extracted for ISRU. Extracting resources from these bodies requires adaptations to microgravity and low gravity, differing from planetary surface operations but sharing some principles with lunar ISRU, such as regolith handling in vacuum. Zero-gravity mining techniques include the use of nets to capture loose regolith or harpoons to anchor and extract material from rubble piles, enabling collection without traditional drilling. Optical mining, developed by TransAstra Corporation and supported by NASA, employs focused sunlight or lasers to vaporize surface material, releasing volatiles like water into collection bags for processing. For slowly rotating asteroids, anchoring systems such as penetration anchors or force-closure mechanisms are critical to stabilize operations against spin-induced motion. ISRU strategies focus on converting these resources into usable products. Water from hydrated silicates in C-type asteroids can be extracted via thermal processing to produce , such as and oxygen through , reducing mission mass by enabling in-situ refueling. Metals from M-type asteroids, including potential rare earth elements in chondritic materials, support and structural components for habitats or . Significant challenges persist, including the variable composition of asteroids, which complicates and extraction due to heterogeneous distributions of volatiles and metals observed in analogs. High delta-v costs for accessing and returning from these bodies further increase mission complexity, necessitating efficient ISRU to offset demands.

Atmospheric and Gas Giant Resources

In situ resource utilization (ISRU) in planetary atmospheres and gas giant envelopes focuses on extracting and processing volatile gases to support exploration, propulsion, and habitat construction, leveraging the dense atmospheric compositions of bodies like , Titan, and the outer s. These environments provide abundant (CO₂), (N₂), (CH₄), (H₂), and (He) that can be harvested without surface landing, enabling strategies such as production and material synthesis in fluid media. Unlike thinner atmospheres like Mars', these thicker layers allow for aerodynamic platforms and in-flight collection, though they introduce unique engineering demands due to extreme conditions. On , the atmosphere—predominantly 96% CO₂ with traces of (SO₂) and (H₂SO₄) aerosols—offers resources for acids, oxygen, and carbon-based materials. Proposed floating habitats at 50 km altitude, where pressures approximate 1 bar and temperatures range from 0–50°C, could utilize breathable air mixtures of oxygen and N₂ as while processing CO₂ into plastics and fuels via catalytic reactions. from cloud layers (47–70 km altitude) can be decomposed thermally above 100°C into (H₂O) and (SO₃), followed by further breakdown to SO₂ and O₂ at ~400°C, or electrolyzed to yield H₂ and O₂ for propulsion and . These processes support platforms for long-term atmospheric research, drawing on 1960s concepts for cloud-based colonies adapted from early space habitat studies. Titan's atmosphere, composed of ~95% N₂ and 5% CH₄ with organic aerosols, enables ISRU for fuels like liquid methane (LCH₄) and supports hybrid systems combining atmospheric gases with surface ice-derived oxidizers. CH₄ can be compressed to 8.8 bar and liquefied at Titan's ambient 94 K temperature for use as propellant in ascent vehicles, achieving specific impulses around 325 s when paired with (LOX). The Huygens probe's 2005 descent revealed complex in the haze, including tholin-like particles from N₂-CH₄ interactions, confirming the potential for in-situ synthesis. or balloon platforms could facilitate gas scooping during entry or host units in floating factories to generate breathable air and propellants from N₂ and CH₄. For gas giants like , Saturn, , and , ISRU targets H₂ (86–92% abundance) and He (8–19%), with He serving as lift gas for buoyant vehicles or fuel for nuclear thermal propulsion. 's atmosphere contains ~15% He⁴ and trace He³ (1.52 × 10⁻⁵ fraction), suitable for via robotic scoopers during aerocapture maneuvers, where atmospheric drag aids orbital insertion while collecting gases for cryogenic storage. Saturn aerocapture concepts propose using the planet's H₂-He envelope to decelerate probes, potentially integrating scoop systems for in-flight resource harvesting to enable extended missions or sample returns. of harvested H₂ could produce and oxygen in aerostat habitats, while Fischer-Tropsch synthesis from CO/CO₂ traces (augmented by imported catalysts) might yield hydrocarbons for plastics or fuels in deeper atmospheric layers. Key adaptations include balloon and platforms for stable operations in and Titan's clouds, atmospheric scoops for dynamic entry harvesting on gas giants, and floating factories with solar or radioisotope power for and synthesis. These enable depots without massive imports, as demonstrated in Titan sample return architectures producing ~3,000 kg of LCH₄/ over 2.7–3 years using 1 kWe power. Challenges encompass high winds (up to 114 m/s on Titan, supersonic on gas giants), extreme temperatures (94 K on Titan to 735 K near 's surface), and corrosive gases like H₂SO₄, necessitating acid-resistant materials and robust thermal management.

Capability Assessment

NASA's ISRU Capability Levels

NASA's In Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU) capability levels provide a framework for assessing the maturity and self-sufficiency of ISRU systems in supporting human missions. The framework, outlined in early development roadmaps, progresses through nine levels from initial feasibility demonstrations to full operational independence. Level 1 involves subscale technologies proven feasible for , excavation, and consumable production. Subsequent levels advance to lab/pilot scale development (Level 2), environmental testing (Level 3), long-duration testing (Level 4), autonomy integration (Level 5), (Level 6), infrastructure deployment (Level 7), operational capability for indefinite stays (Level 8), and full Earth-independent operations (Level 9). The criteria for advancing through these levels are defined by key metrics tailored to mission needs, including production rates measured in kilograms per day (e.g., targeting 1-10 kg/day for oxygen in early levels, scaling to tons for propellants in advanced ones), reliability quantified by (MTBF) exceeding 1,000 hours, and scalability from prototype units handling 1 kg to industrial systems processing tons of or atmosphere. Energy efficiency, in operations (e.g., robotic control without human intervention), and integration with power and transportation systems are also evaluated to ensure compatibility with exploration architectures. These metrics guide maturation, with demonstrations required in relevant environments like chambers or analog sites to validate under lunar or Martian conditions. Key milestones in this framework include targeting Level 3 capabilities for basic life support in the Artemis III mission, scheduled for mid-2027, where initial water extraction and oxygen production from lunar regolith could reduce resupply needs during short surface stays. A notable example is the Mars Oxygen In-Situ Resource Utilization Experiment (MOXIE), which achieved Level 4 by successfully demonstrating oxygen production from Martian atmospheric CO₂ at rates of up to 10 g/hour during the Perseverance rover mission from 2021 to 2023, validating electrolysis technology in situ. This progression draws from heritage technologies, such as the Viking landers' water vapor detectors in the 1970s, which provided early insights into polar resource detection, evolving to advanced concepts like oxygen extraction from regolith via molten salt electrolysis at Levels 6 and above. This classification system informs NASA's funding priorities, with programs like the NASA Innovative Advanced Concepts (NIAC) supporting grants for Level 7 and higher innovations, such as autonomous mining swarms or closed-loop manufacturing, to accelerate development toward sustainable off-Earth presence. By benchmarking ISRU against these levels, NASA ensures technologies align with overarching goals of risk reduction and mission extensibility.

Technological Readiness and Challenges

In situ resource utilization (ISRU) technologies generally range from Technology Readiness Level (TRL) 3 to 6, spanning analytical and experimental proof-of-concept in laboratory environments to prototype demonstrations in relevant operational settings, though select processes like the Sabatier reaction for methane production have reached TRL 7 through flight-qualified testing analogs. For instance, excavation systems such as the ISRU Pilot Excavator have advanced to TRL 6 following 2025 analog testing with detailed mechanical designs and full fabrication as of mid-2025, while water extraction from icy regolith prototypes operate at TRL 5. Overall, ISRU maturation lags behind traditional spacecraft subsystems due to the need for integrated testing in extraterrestrial analogs, with many components still requiring subscale demonstrations to bridge gaps to TRL 6. Key challenges in ISRU development include high energy demands, typically 10-50 kWh per kg of output for processes like beneficiation and oxygen extraction from , which strain limited power sources on planetary surfaces. poses further hurdles, as multi-process chains—such as excavation followed by thermal or chemical extraction—demand robust interfaces to manage physical interactions and minimize mass penalties from redundant hardware. Economic viability remains a barrier, with ISRU systems needing to deliver returns on exceeding 10 times the cost of Earth-launched equivalents to justify deployment, particularly for production where scalability affects mission . Additionally, lunar abrasion can degrade equipment efficiency by up to 20% through wear on seals and moving parts, while is essential for electronics in unshielded environments to prevent single-event upsets during prolonged operations. Mitigation strategies emphasize AI-driven optimization to dynamically adjust process parameters, such as regolith reduction rates or electrolysis efficiency, reducing energy use through predictive modeling and reinforcement learning for autonomous operation. Modular designs enhance scalability by allowing interchangeable subsystems—like standardized excavators or reactors—that can be replicated or reconfigured for varying production scales without full redesigns. These approaches address integration complexities by enabling plug-and-play architectures tested in terrestrial analogs. Post-MOXIE analysis as of 2025 has confirmed scalability potential for oxygen production systems, with efficiencies up to 98% in Martian conditions. The ISRU market is projected to expand from approximately $2.5 billion in 2024 to $12 billion by 2035, fueled by commercial investments from entities like and since 2020, which have allocated resources toward production and habitat materials to support sustainable . This outlook signals a shift toward commercially viable systems, with ongoing prototypes poised to elevate TRLs through private-public collaborations by the early 2030s.

Demonstrations and Future Missions

Past and Current Experiments

One of the earliest in-space demonstrations of ISRU potential was NASA's Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite (LCROSS) mission in 2009, which impacted a at the to eject and analyze material, confirming the presence of water ice and vapor in the plume. The mission's spectrometers detected water molecules amounting to at least 5.6% by weight in the samples, providing direct evidence for volatile resources exploitable for oxygen production or . In 2010, conducted field tests of the Regolith Environment Science and Oxygen Lunar Volatile EXtraction (RESOLVE) rover prototype on , , using lunar simulants to demonstrate in-situ oxygen extraction from ilmenite-rich soils via thermal processing. The prototype successfully acquired core samples up to one meter deep, heated them to release volatiles, and quantified oxygen yields, validating the system's mobility and resource mapping capabilities in an analog lunar environment. From 2013 to 2018, the Space Exploration Analog and (HI-SEAS) program ran multiple NASA-funded Mars analog missions at an isolated site on , simulating crewed operations including ISRU tasks such as processing for habitat construction and water extraction from hydrated minerals. These four- to twelve-month simulations involved crew teams testing resource utilization protocols, emphasizing psychological and operational challenges in closed-loop systems mimicking Martian conditions. A landmark current experiment is the Mars Oxygen In-Situ Resource Utilization Experiment (MOXIE) aboard NASA's Perseverance rover, which operated from 2021 to 2023, successfully producing oxygen from Martian atmospheric CO2 via solid oxide electrolysis in 16 runs. At peak performance, MOXIE generated 12 grams of oxygen per hour with 98% purity, exceeding its design goals and totaling over 120 grams across operations, while operating at efficiencies up to 94% current density under varying environmental conditions. In February 2024, ' IM-1 mission ( lander) achieved a soft lunar landing near the , conducting partial interaction experiments despite the lander tipping over, which limited functionality but still transmitted over 350 megabytes of surface relevant to resource prospecting. NASA's payloads on IM-1, including navigation aids and spectrometers, gathered composition insights, confirming mission success in despite operational constraints. Under NASA's (CLPS) program, the IM-2 mission launched on February 26, 2025, aboard a , targeting the Mons Mouton region near the . The lander, , carried the PRIME-1 (Polar Resources Ice Mining Experiment-1) , consisting of a (TRIDENT) and mass spectrometer (NIM), to detect and quantify water ice in subsurface . Despite the lander tipping over upon landing on March 6, 2025, preventing full operation, PRIME-1 partially functioned and contributed to approximately 6.6 gigabytes of data collected, advancing validation of resources for ISRU as of ongoing analysis in 2025. China's Chang'e-6 mission, launched in May 2024 by the China National Space Administration (CNSA), achieved the first-ever sample return from the far side of the Moon, landing in the Apollo basin and collecting about 1.935 kilograms of regolith and rocks, which were returned to Earth in June 2024. Analyses of these samples, published in 2025, provided key insights into lunar resource utilization, revealing variations in water content within the regolith correlated with glass abundance, particle sizes, and depths, as well as high concentrations of hydroxyl (OH) and water (H2O) that suggest potential for in-situ extraction of water and oxygen essential for sustainable lunar bases. These findings, including evidence of solar wind-derived water and impact-formed minerals, advance ISRU technologies such as regolith processing for volatiles, supporting future missions like precursors to Mars exploration. Since 2000, over 50 ground-based ISRU demonstrations have been conducted globally, focusing on processing and volatile extraction in simulated environments. International efforts include JAXA's 2022 tests on lunar simulants for oxygen production via carbothermal reduction, achieving yields from concentrates in setups. Key lessons from these experiments highlight scalability challenges, such as gaps between prototypes and flight-qualified systems requiring without loss, and power consumption overruns of 20-30% due to thermal management in conditions. These issues underscore the need for iterative analog testing to bridge environmental discrepancies before full-scale deployment.

Planned and Proposed ISRU Activities

NASA's Artemis program includes planned demonstrations of in situ resource utilization (ISRU) technologies, with Artemis IV targeted for 2028 featuring a crewed mission that incorporates oxygen extraction from lunar regolith as a key payload under the Lunar Infrastructure Foundational Technologies (LIFT-1) initiative. This demonstration aims to validate scalable oxygen production systems on the lunar surface, building toward sustainable habitation by processing regolith to yield breathable air and propulsion oxidizer. The (ESA) plans to deploy its Prospect package, consisting of a robotic drill and miniaturized laboratory, to the region to prospect for volatiles including water ice, with integration into lunar lander under ’s CLPS program targeted for 2027. This effort supports water resource mapping essential for ISRU, enabling extraction and processing for and fuel production in future European lunar activities. Under NASA's (CLPS) program, several deliveries include ISRU-focused payloads such as drills and excavation systems for volatile detection and sampling, with Task Order 20A featuring a rover-borne system to locate, excavate, and analyze near-subsurface water-bearing . Mark 1 lander, selected for NASA's V human landing system in 2029, is designed for integration with ISRU technologies to support resource extraction during crewed surface operations, emphasizing cargo delivery and production capabilities. This integration aims to demonstrate end-to-end ISRU chains, from processing to usable commodities, aligning with sustained lunar presence goals. For Mars exploration, the Mars Sample Return (MSR) campaign, jointly led by and ESA with launches planned in the early 2030s, incorporates precursor ISRU elements to test resource utilization for sample retrieval and ascent vehicle propulsion, though the program faces ongoing reviews for cost and architecture adjustments as of late 2025. These precursors focus on validating in-situ propellant production to reduce mission mass and enable return capabilities. Proposed concepts include SpaceX's uncrewed Starship missions to Mars in 2026, which will gather entry, descent, and landing data while paving the way for subsequent ISRU propellant plants to produce methane and oxygen from atmospheric CO2 and water ice for return flights. Revival efforts for NASA's Resource Prospector-like missions are under consideration for the 2030 timeframe, aiming to deploy full ISRU chains including rover-based prospecting, extraction, and processing of lunar volatiles to achieve integrated resource utilization at technology readiness level 6 or higher. In the commercial sector, AstroForge's Vestri mission, scheduled for launch in , proposes to demonstrate through optical mining techniques to extract platinum-group metals and other resources from metallic asteroids, marking the first private attempt at in-situ in deep space. This initiative targets scalable extraction for propulsion fuels and construction materials, supporting broader economy development. ISRU goals emphasize achieving capability levels 5 and above, as defined by NASA's ISRU Technology Roadmap, with targets for lunar water production exceeding 100 kg per day to enable sustainable outposts, including for oxygen and . International cooperation under the , signed by over 40 nations since 2020, promotes shared ISRU development among signatories to standardize resource utilization protocols and infrastructure. Emerging innovations in planned and proposed activities include robotic swarms for distributed extraction across resource-rich terrains, enhancing efficiency in handling and volatile mining on the and asteroids. AI-driven processing systems are also proposed to optimize real-time decision-making in ISRU operations, such as adaptive and resource assaying, to improve yield and reduce operational risks in autonomous missions.

References

  1. https://www.nasa.gov/mission/in-situ-resource-utilization-isru/
  2. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20220006072/downloads/LIVE-ISRU%2520-Overview-RevB.pdf
  3. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20050205045/downloads/20050205045.pdf
  4. https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/nasa-selects-blue-origin-to-deliver-viper-rover-to-moons-south-pole/
  5. https://www.nasa.gov/overview-in-situ-resource-utilization/
  6. https://www.nasa.gov/missions/mars-2020-perseverance/perseverance-rover/nasas-oxygen-generating-experiment-moxie-completes-mars-mission/
  7. https://www.nasa.gov/space-technology-mission-directorate/lunar-surface-innovation-initiative/
  8. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20220008799/downloads/NASA%2520ISRU%2520Plans_Sanders_COSPAR-Final.pdf
  9. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20190025283/downloads/20190025283.pdf
  10. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20170001421/downloads/20170001421.pdf
  11. https://www.[nasa](/page/NASA).gov/overview-in-situ-resource-utilization/
  12. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20010020400/downloads/20010020400_Update.pdf
  13. https://archive.org/details/highfrontierhuma0000onei_p0p1
  14. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20150016009
  15. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/24381782_Report_of_the_Lunar_Base_Working_Group
  16. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19930013865/downloads/19930013865.pdf
  17. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19990025829/downloads/19990025829.pdf
  18. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/4702054_Mars_Direct_A_Simple_Robust_and_Cost_Effective_Architecture_for_the_Space_Exploration_Initiative
  19. https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/journey-to-mars-next-steps-20151008_508.pdf
  20. https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Artemis-Accords-signed-13Oct2020.pdf
  21. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20240013906
  22. https://www.nasa.gov/mission/prime-1/
  23. https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/jsanders_lunar_isru_tagged_0.pdf
  24. https://spj.science.org/doi/10.34133/research.0800
  25. https://www.globalspaceexploration.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/ISECG-ISRU-Technology-Gap-Assessment-Report-Apr-2021.pdf
  26. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20240011783/downloads/Lunar_Regolith_Simulant_Users_Guide_Rev_A_28OCT.pdf
  27. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0094576523004939
  28. https://geoscienceletters.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40562-025-00406-5
  29. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20230003630/downloads/TM-20230003630.pdf
  30. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20170007818/downloads/20170007818.pdf
  31. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20120016419/downloads/20120016419.pdf
  32. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20150006744/downloads/20150006744.pdf?attachment=true
  33. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20110002954/downloads/20110002954.pdf
  34. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20205011724/downloads/Barta%2520COSPAR%2520F0.1-0007-21%2520Full%2520Presesentation%2520V10.pdf
  35. https://nebula.esa.int/sites/default/files/2024-06/C4000136530ESR.pdf
  36. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451929422004910
  37. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1910.04265
  38. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20190001035/downloads/20190001035.pdf
  39. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20120001775/downloads/20120001775.pdf
  40. https://techport.nasa.gov/projects/116390
  41. https://www.kiss.caltech.edu/final_reports/Asteroid_final_report.pdf
  42. https://techport.nasa.gov/projects/93847
  43. https://spacenews.com/how-carrying-enough-water-to-make-return-trip-propellant-simplifies-a-starship-mission-to-mars/
  44. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2303.09011
  45. https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/nasas-perseverance-mars-rover-extracts-first-oxygen-from-red-planet/
  46. https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4434/13/5/103
  47. https://www.technologyreview.com/2020/10/26/1011228/water-moon-more-accessible-nasa-sofia-lro-glass-micro-cold-trap/
  48. https://www.lpi.usra.edu/publications/reports/CB-955/washington.pdf
  49. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20190002020/downloads/20190002020.pdf
  50. https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/eclss-technical-brief-ochmo.pdf
  51. https://www.kiss.caltech.edu/final_reports/ISRU_final_report.pdf
  52. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20180004697/downloads/20180004697.pdf
  53. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20100008463/downloads/20100008463.pdf
  54. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/space-technologies/articles/10.3389/frspt.2024.1366591/full
  55. https://www.utrgv.edu/stssi/research-areas/hubs/in-situ-resource-utilazation/index.htm
  56. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037604212400071X
  57. https://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/9780784485736.042
  58. https://patents.google.com/patent/US11091929B2/en
  59. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0273117724006227
  60. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1350448720300111
  61. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032063322001945
  62. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20170008836/downloads/20170008836.pdf
  63. https://www.esa.int/Science_Exploration/Human_and_Robotic_Exploration/Exploration/In-Situ_Resource_Utilisation
  64. https://3dprint.com/318130/icon-and-nasa-move-lunar-construction-forward/
  65. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11174982/
  66. https://www.lpi.usra.edu/publications/reports/TR98-01/98-01.full.pdf
  67. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0926580525002912
  68. https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/nac_tie_december_2018_gsanders_isru.pdf
  69. https://spj.science.org/doi/10.34133/space.0037
  70. https://ttu-ir.tdl.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/11c6ddf9-b539-47b8-8b36-0bd618320ea9/content
  71. http://www.psrd.hawaii.edu/Nov19/lunar-isru.html
  72. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S009457652100254X
  73. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20240012420
  74. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20240013999
  75. https://carleton.ca/ceser/wp-content/uploads/Lunar-base-construction-from-in-situ-resources.pdf
  76. https://www.blueorigin.com/news/blue-alchemist-powers-our-lunar-future
  77. https://news.satnews.com/2025/09/10/blue-origins-major-milestone-toward-permanent-sustainable-lunar-infrastructure/
  78. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20170002010/downloads/20170002010.pdf
  79. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20200001622/downloads/20200001622.pdf
  80. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20040112017/downloads/20040112017.pdf
  81. https://www.cell.com/device/fulltext/S2666-9986%2825%2900060-2
  82. https://science.nasa.gov/solar-system/moon/nasas-lro-lunar-ice-deposits-are-widespread/
  83. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/space-technologies/articles/10.3389/frspt.2023.1328341/full
  84. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/msa/rimg/article/89/1/829/629994/Lunar-Resources
  85. https://english.cas.cn/newsroom/cas_media/202509/t20250925_1055344.shtml
  86. https://www.cnsa.gov.cn/english/n6465652/n6465653/c10687632/content.html
  87. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adt1093
  88. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20190032062/downloads/20190032062.pdf
  89. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2024GL110355
  90. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032063321001264
  91. https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/pdf/10.2514/6.IAC-06-A5.1.04
  92. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20210022801/downloads/AIAA%2520ASCEND%25202021%2520Paper_211018.pdf
  93. https://www.nasa.gov/missions/with-mars-methane-mystery-unsolved-curiosity-serves-scientists-a-new-one-oxygen/
  94. https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/maveninfographicdigital.pdf
  95. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20020015684/downloads/20020015684.pdf
  96. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19980037039/downloads/19980037039_Update.pdf
  97. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20190028297/downloads/20190028297.pdf
  98. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20180006321/downloads/20180006321.pdf
  99. https://www.nasa.gov/history/25-years-of-continuous-robotic-mars-exploration-from-pathfinder-to-perseverance/
  100. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19880010853/downloads/19880010853.pdf
  101. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20250000969/downloads/ADHarrington_Mars%2520Health%2520Manuscript%2520-%2520GeoHealth.pdf?attachment=true
  102. https://www.nasa.gov/centers-and-facilities/goddard/nasas-maven-mission-observes-ups-and-downs-of-water-escape-from-mars/
  103. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20150011681/downloads/20150011681.pdf
  104. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20150003498/downloads/20150003498.pdf
  105. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20190001162/downloads/20190001162.pdf
  106. https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/nasas-bennu-asteroid-sample-contains-carbon-water/
  107. https://science.nasa.gov/mission/psyche/
  108. https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/new-clues-to-ceres-bright-spots-and-origins/
  109. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19930007695
  110. https://www.nasa.gov/general/optical-mining-of-asteroids-moons-and-planets-to-enable-sustainable-human-exploration-and-space-industrialization/
  111. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286398547_Asteroids_Anchoring_and_Sample_Acquisition_Approaches_in_Support_of_Science_Exploration_and_In_situ_Resource_Utilization
  112. https://asteroid.arizona.edu/isru.html
  113. https://arxiv.org/html/2510.27373v1
  114. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20030022668/downloads/20030022668.pdf
  115. https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/vexag2018/pdf/8049.pdf
  116. https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/niac_2016_phasei_bugga_vipinspr_tagged.pdf
  117. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20220016292/downloads/TM-20220016292.pdf
  118. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20140006386/downloads/20140006386.pdf
  119. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20230005179
  120. https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/scp07-sanders_isru.pdf
  121. https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/nasa-shares-progress-toward-early-artemis-moon-missions-with-crew/
  122. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20240008162/downloads/ASCEND24_IPEx%2520TRL%25205%2520Design%2520Overview.pdf
  123. https://elib.dlr.de/215982/1/ICES_SMU%2520Research_2025_v5_final.pdf
  124. https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/10.2514/6.2024-4890
  125. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20240012392
  126. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2306146122
  127. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355910240_Changing_the_ISRU_Paradigm_from_Sustainability_to_Economic_Tool
  128. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20250000687/downloads/ICACC2025_WearResistance_Stein_v3.pdf
  129. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20240013342/downloads/STMD%2520Power%2520Needs%2520and%2520Challenges%2520M2M%2520for%2520TE.pdf
  130. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0094576522005057
  131. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/364998111_Modular_ISRU_Systems_as_a_Building_Block_for_Sustainable_Space_Exploration
  132. https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250521534303/en/In-Situ-Resource-Utilization-ISRU-Market-Report-2025-2035-NASA-ESA-Drive-In-Situ-Resource-Utilization-Developments-for-Lunar-Expeditions---ResearchAndMarkets.com
  133. https://www.cnbc.com/2021/01/25/investing-in-space-companies-hits-record-8point9-billion-in-2020-report.html
  134. https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2025/05/20/3084611/28124/en/In-Situ-Resource-Utilization-ISRU-Market-Forecast-Report-2025-2035-Competitive-Analysis-of-Paragon-Space-Development-Blue-Origin-Airbus-SpaceX-Astronika-and-Hanwha-Systems.html
  135. https://science.nasa.gov/mission/lcross/
  136. https://www.nasa.gov/general/what-is-lcross-the-lunar-crater-observation-and-sensing-satellite/
  137. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20100033667/downloads/20100033667.pdf
  138. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20100033667
  139. https://www.hi-seas.org/
  140. https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/analogs2013/pdf/4044.pdf
  141. https://news.mit.edu/2022/moxie-oxygen-mars-0831
  142. https://investors.intuitivemachines.com/news-releases/news-release-details/intuitive-machines-historic-im-1-mission-success-american
  143. https://www.nasa.gov/stmd-flight-opportunities/transitions-of-flight-tested-technologies/
  144. https://www.nasa.gov/missions/artemis/nasas-lunar-drill-technology-passes-tests-on-the-moon/
  145. https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/nasa-receives-some-data-before-intuitive-machines-ends-lunar-mission/
  146. https://www.universetoday.com/165000/change-6-samples-indicate-water-was-delivered-to-the-earth-and-moon-by-ancient-meteorites/
  147. https://phys.org/news/2025-11-side-lunar-samples-strongly-cohesive.html
  148. https://isruinfo.com/public/index.php?page=srr_22
  149. https://www.nasa.gov/stmd-flight-opportunities/fo-resources/community-of-practice-webinars/april-2025/
  150. https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/nasa-fiscal-year-2025-mission-fact-sheets.pdf
  151. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20240012396/downloads/IAC-24-A5-x82120-ISRU%2520Final.pdf?attachment=true
  152. https://www.esa.int/Science_Exploration/Human_and_Robotic_Exploration/Prospect_searching_for_water_at_the_lunar_poles
  153. https://www.esa.int/ESA_Multimedia/Images/2024/08/Lunar_drill_close-up
  154. https://science.nasa.gov/lunar-science/clps-deliveries/to20a-astrobotic/
  155. https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/nasa-selects-blue-origin-as-second-artemis-lunar-lander-provider/
  156. https://www.blueorigin.com/blue-moon
  157. https://science.nasa.gov/mission/mars-sample-return/
  158. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2404253121
  159. https://www.spacex.com/humanspaceflight/mars
  160. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20250003730/downloads/Progress%2520Review%2520NASA%2520Lunar%2520ISRU_Sanders.pdf
  161. https://www.astroforge.com/our-missions
  162. https://spacenews.com/astroforge-announces-asteroid-target-for-upcoming-mission/
  163. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20240005576/downloads/ICES_2024_ISRU_final.pdf
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.