Hubbry Logo
M134 MinigunM134 MinigunMain
Open search
M134 Minigun
Community hub
M134 Minigun
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
M134 Minigun
M134 Minigun
M134 Minigun
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The M134 Minigun is an American 7.62×51mm NATO six-barrel rotary machine gun with a high rate of fire (2,000 to 6,000 rounds per minute).[2] It features a Gatling-style rotating barrel assembly with an external power source, normally an electric motor. The "Mini" in the name is in comparison to larger-caliber designs that use a rotary barrel design,[citation needed] such as General Electric's earlier 20 mm M61 Vulcan, and "gun" for the use of rifle ammunition as opposed to autocannon shells.

Key Information

"Minigun" refers to a specific model of weapon that General Electric originally produced, but the term "minigun" has popularly come to refer to any externally powered rotary gun of rifle caliber. The term is sometimes used loosely to refer to guns of similar rates of fire and configuration, regardless of power source and caliber.

The Minigun is used by several branches of the U.S. military. Versions are designated M134 and XM196 by the United States Army, and GAU-2/A and GAU-17/A by the U.S. Air Force and U.S. Navy.

History

[edit]

Background: electrically driven Gatling gun

[edit]

The ancestor to the modern minigun was the hand cranked mechanical Gatling gun invented in the 1860s by Richard Jordan Gatling. He later replaced the hand-cranked mechanism with an electric motor, a relatively new invention at the time. Even after Gatling slowed the mechanism, the new electrically powered Gatling gun had a theoretical rate of fire of 3,000 rounds per minute, roughly three times the rate of a typical modern, single-barreled machine gun. Gatling's design received U.S. Patent #502,185 on July 25, 1893.[3] Despite his improvements, the Gatling gun fell into disuse after cheaper, lighter-weight, recoil and gas operated machine guns were invented; Gatling himself went bankrupt for a period.[4]

During World War I, several German companies were working on externally powered guns for use in aircraft. One of these designs was the Fokker-Leimberger, an externally powered 12-barrel rotary gun using the 7.92×57mm Mauser round; it was claimed to be capable of firing over 7,000 rpm, but suffered from frequent cartridge-case ruptures[5] due to its "nutcracker" rotary split-breech design, which is different from that of conventional rotary gun designs.[6] None of these German guns went into production during the war, although a competing Siemens prototype (possibly using a different action), which was tried on the Western Front, scored a victory in aerial combat.[5] The British also experimented with this type of split-breech during the 1950s, but they were also unsuccessful.[7]

Minigun: 1960s–Vietnam

[edit]

In the 1960s, the United States Armed Forces began exploring modern variants of the electrically powered, rotating barrel Gatling-style weapons for use in the Vietnam War. American forces in the Vietnam War, which used helicopters as one of the primary means of transporting soldiers and equipment through the dense jungle, found that their helicopters were vulnerable to small arms fire and rocket-propelled grenade (RPG) attacks when they slowed to land. Although helicopters had mounted single-barrel machine guns, using them to repel attackers hidden in the dense jungle foliage often led to overheated barrels or cartridge jams.[8]

To develop a more reliable weapon with a higher rate of fire, General Electric designers scaled down the rotary-barrel 20 mm M61 Vulcan cannon for 7.62×51mm NATO ammunition.[citation needed] The resulting weapon, designated M134 and known as the "Minigun", could fire up to 6,000 rounds per minute without overheating. The gun has a variable (i.e. selectable) rate of fire, specified to fire at rates of up to 6,000 rpm with most applications set at rates between 3,000 and 4,000 rounds per minute.

View of M134 from inside a UH-1 Huey, Nha Trang AB, 1967

The Minigun was mounted on Hughes OH-6 Cayuse and Bell OH-58 Kiowa side pods; in the turret and on pylon pods of Bell AH-1 Cobra attack helicopters; and on door, pylon and pod mounts on Bell UH-1 Iroquois transport helicopters. Several larger aircraft were outfitted with miniguns specifically for close air support: the Cessna A-37 Dragonfly with an internal gun and with pods on wing hardpoints; and the Douglas A-1 Skyraider, also with pods on wing hardpoints. Other famous gunship airplanes are the Douglas AC-47 Spooky, the Fairchild AC-119, and the Lockheed AC-130.[8]

Dillon Aero minigun

[edit]

The U.S. government had procured some 10,000 Miniguns during the Vietnam War.[9] Around 1990, Dillon Aero acquired a large number of Miniguns and spares from "a foreign user". The guns kept failing to shoot continuously, revealing that they were actually worn-out weapons. The company decided to fix the problems encountered, rather than simply putting the guns into storage. Fixing failure problems ended up improving the Minigun's overall design. Word of Dillon's efforts to improve the Minigun reached the 160th SOAR, and the company was invited to Fort Campbell, Kentucky, to demonstrate its products. A delinker, used to separate cartridges from ammunition belts and feed them into the gun housing, and other parts were tested on Campbell's ranges. The 160th SOAR were impressed by the delinker's performance and began ordering them by 1997. This prompted Dillon to improve other design aspects including the bolt, housing and barrel. From 1997 to 2001, Dillon Aero manufactured 25–30 products per year. In 2001, it was working on a new bolt design that increased performance and service life. By 2002, virtually every component of the minigun had been improved, so Dillon began producing complete weapons with improved components. The guns were purchased quickly by the 160th SOAR as its standardized weapon system. The gun then went through the Army's formal procurement system approval process, and in 2003 the Dillon Aero minigun was certified and designated M134D.[9] Once the Dillon Aero system was approved for general military service, Dillon Aero GAU-17s entered Marine Corps service and were well received in replacing GE's GAU-17s serving on Marine UH-1s.[10]

A U.S. Air Force rotary-wing crewman fires a minigun during the Vietnam War.

The core of the M134D was a steel housing and rotor. To focus on weight reduction, a titanium housing and rotor were introduced, creating the M134D-T which had reduced weight from 62 lb (28 kg) to 41 lb (19 kg). The gun housing had a 500,000-round lifespan before it wore out, which was far higher than a conventional machine gun's 40,000-round lifespan but lower than that of other rotary guns. A hybrid of the two weapons resulted in the M134D-H, which had a steel housing and titanium rotor. It was cheaper with the steel component and only 1 lb (0.45 kg) heavier than the M134D-T, and restored its lifespan to 1.5 million rounds.[9][11] The M134D-H is currently in use on various 160th Regiment platforms.[9]

Dillon also created specialized mounts and ammunition-handling systems. Initially, mounts were made only for aviation systems. Then from 2003 to 2005, the Navy began mounting Dillon miniguns on specialized small boats. In 2005, the Naval Surface Warfare Center Crane Division procured guns to mount on Humvees. In Iraq, US Army Special Forces units on the ground were frequently engaged by opposition forces, so they mounted M134D miniguns on their vehicles for additional firepower. After several engagements the attackers seemed to avoid vehicles with miniguns. Later, the Special Forces units began concealing their weapons so opposition troops would not know they were facing the weapon; the regular Army units did the opposite, creating minigun mock-ups out of painted PVC pipes tied together to resemble barrels to intimidate enemies.[9]

Garwood Industries minigun

[edit]

Garwood Industries created the M134G version with several modifications to the original GE system. The optimum rate of fire was determined by Garwood to be around 3,200 rounds per minute (rpm). The M134G is being produced with this firing rate as well as 4,000 rpm and the previous standard 3,000 rpm rate.[12] Garwood Industries made several other modifications to the 1960s Minigun design in order to meet modern-day military and ISO standards.[12] This includes modifications to the drive motor, feeder and barrel clutch assembly.[13]

From 2015 to 2017 Garwood Industries CEO Tracy Garwood collaborated with firearms dealer Michael Fox and weapons smuggler Tyler Carlson to supply miniguns to Mexican drug cartels. Garwood submitted false paperwork to the ATF claiming that some M134G rotor housings had been destroyed when they were actually sold to the gun-running ring. In 2017 federal agents raided Fox's home and recovered two of the rotor housings that Garwood had reported destroyed. A number of the rotor housings were shipped to Mexico and a completed M134G using a reportedly destroyed rotor housing was recovered from a cartel by Mexican law enforcement.[14] Garwood claimed he did not know that the intended buyers were Mexican cartels although he was aware that they were to be used for illegal activity.[15]

Design and variants

[edit]
A Royal Navy minigun, separated from mounting and ammunition

The basic minigun is a six-barrel, air-cooled, and electrically driven rotary machine gun. The electric drive rotates the weapon within its housing, with a rotating firing pin assembly and rotary chamber.[16] The minigun's multi-barrel design helps prevent overheating, but also serves other functions. Multiple barrels allow for a greater capacity for a high firing rate, since the serial process of firing, extraction, and loading is taking place in all barrels simultaneously. Thus, as one barrel fires, two others are in different stages of shell extraction and another three are being loaded. The minigun is composed of multiple closed-bolt rifle barrels arranged in a circular housing. The barrels are rotated by an external power source, usually electric, pneumatic, or hydraulic. Other rotating-barrel cannons are powered by the gas pressure or recoil energy of fired cartridges. A gas-operated variant, designated XM133, was also developed.[17]

While the weapon can feed from linked ammunition, it requires a delinking feeder to strip the links as the rounds are fed into the chambers. The original feeder unit was designated MAU-56/A, but has since been replaced by an improved MAU-201/A unit.[18]

A U.S. Navy Special Warfare Combatant-craft Crewman (SWCC) on a SOC-R firing a Minigun at Stennis Space Center in Mississippi, August 2009.

The General Electric minigun is used in several branches of the U.S. military, under a number of designations. The basic fixed armament version was given the designation M134 by the United States Army, while the same weapon was designated GAU-2/A (on a fixed mount) and GAU-17/A (flexible mount) by the United States Air Force (USAF) and United States Navy (USN). The USAF minigun variant has three versions, while the US Army weapon appears to have incorporated several improvements without a change in designation. The M134D is an improved version of the M134 designed and manufactured by Dillon Aero,[19] while Garwood Industries manufactures the M134G variant.[20] Available sources show a relation between both M134 and GAU-2/A and M134 and GAU-2B/A.[21][22] A separate variant, designated XM196, with an added ejection sprocket was developed specifically for the XM53 Armament Subsystem on the Lockheed AH-56 Cheyenne helicopter.[23]

Another variant was developed by the USAF specifically for flexible installations, beginning primarily with the Bell UH-1N Twin Huey helicopter, as the GAU-17/A. Produced by General Dynamics, this version has a slotted flash hider. The primary end users of the GAU-17/A have been the USN and the United States Marine Corps (USMC), which mount the gun as defensive armament on a number of helicopters and surface ships. GAU-17/As from helicopters were rushed into service for ships on pintle mountings taken from Mk16 20 mm guns for anti-swarm protection in the Gulf ahead of the 2003 Iraq War - 59 systems were installed in 30 days.[24] The GAU-17/A is designated Mk 44 in the machine gun series[24] and is generally known as the Mk 44 when installed on British warships.

The weapon is part of both the A/A49E-11 armament system on the UH-1N; and of the A/A49E-13 armament subsystem on the USAF Sikorsky HH-60H Pave Hawk helicopter. The weapons on these systems feature a selectable fire rate of either 2,000 or 4,000 rpm. There is mention of a possible GAUSE-17 designation (GAU-Shipboard Equipment-17), in reference to the system when mounted on surface ships, though this would not follow the official ASETDS designation system's format.[25][26]

FAST Marine firing a GAU-17/A minigun
GAU-17/A
US Army designation US Air Force designation US Navy designation Description
XM134/M134 GAU-2/A N/A 7.62×51mm NATO GE "Minigun" 6-barreled machine gun
N/A GAU-2A/A N/A GAU-2/A variant; unknown differences
M134 GAU-2B/A Mk 25 MOD0[citation needed] GAU-2A/A variant; unknown differences
N/A GAU-17/A N/A GAU-2B/A variant; can be mounted to a variety of different craft, uses either an MAU-201/A or MAU-56/A delinking feeder.
N/A N/A Mk 44[27] Unknown differences
XM214 Microgun N/A N/A Scaled-down variant of the XM134 firing the 5.56×45mm NATO round. The U.S. military lost interest in the project, and it never entered mass production.[28]
XM196 N/A N/A M134/GAU-2B/A variant; housing modified by addition of an ejection sprocket; for use in the XM53 armament subsystem on the AH-56 helicopter

Gun pods and other mounting systems

[edit]
Main articles: U.S. aircraft gun pods and U.S. Helicopter Armament Subsystems

One of the first applications of the weapon was in aircraft armament pods. These gun pods were used by a wide variety of fixed- and rotary-wing aircraft mainly during the Vietnam War, remaining in inventory for a period afterward. The standard pod, designated SUU-11/A by the Air Force and M18 by the U.S. Army, was a relatively simple unit, completely self-contained, with a 1,500-round magazine directly feeding delinked ammunition into the weapon. This means the Minigun fitted to the pod does not require the standard MAU-56/A delinking feeder unit.[29] A number of variants of this pod exist.

Initially, on fixed-wing gunships such as the Douglas AC-47 Spooky and Fairchild AC-119, the side-firing armament was fitted by combining SUU-11/A aircraft pods, often with their aerodynamic front fairings removed, with a locally fabricated mount. These pods were essentially unmodified, required no external power, and were linked to the aircraft's fire controls. The need for those pods for other missions led to the development and fielding of a purpose-built "Minigun module" for gunship use, designated the MXU-470/A. These units first arrived in January 1967 with features such as an improved 2,000-round drum and an electric feeder allowing simplified reloading in flight. The initial units were unreliable and were withdrawn almost immediately.[30] By the end of the year, the difficulties had been worked out and the units were again being fitted to AC-47s, AC-119s, and AC-130s, with a specific ammunition load that replaced every fifth 'ball' round with a tracer round to enable better accuracy by the gunners, and also earning these airborne gunships the nickname 'Puff the Magic Dragon' by the Viet Cong due to their apparent ability of spitting fire and making everything they hit disappear or die. The AC-47 had three side-mounted MXU-470/As (four were mounted on its replacement, the AC-119) and when all firing at once created a devastating image in the eyes of the enemy. The first AC-130A Gunship IIs did away with the MXU-470/A mounts and instead used GAU-2/As, and not only had four 7.62mm GAU-2/A minigun mounts, but added four 20mm M61 Vulcan 6-barrel rotary cannons; this configuration was upgraded two years later in 1969 by removing two each of the GAU-2/As and M61s and adding two 40mm (1.58 in) L/60 Bofors cannons in the aptly named AC-130A 'Surprise Package'. This configuration lasted two more years until, in late 1971, the AC-130E Pave Aegis arrived, which did away with the miniguns altogether and one of the 40mm Bofors and instead went to the configuration of two 20mm M61 Vulcan, one 40mm L/60 Bofors and one 105 mm (4.13 in) M102 howitzer, a configuration that lasted until the early 2000s when the AC-130Hs (the AC-130Es had had an avionics upgrade and redesignated to H models) underwent a refit and the two M61 Vulcans were removed and replaced with one General Dynamics 25 mm (0.984 in) GAU-12/U Equalizer 5-barrel rotary cannon (while still retaining the H suffix).[citation needed]

The improved MXU-470/As were even being proposed for lighter aircraft such as the Cessna O-2 Skymaster[31] used by Forward Air Controllers but proved too heavy and cumbersome. A fit of two MXU-470/As was also tested on the Fairchild AU-23A Peacemaker, though the Royal Thai Air Force later elected to use another configuration with the M197 20 mm cannon.[32]

In September 2013, Dillon Aero released the DGP2300 gun pod for the M134D-H. It contains 3,000 rounds, enough ammunition to fire the minigun for a full minute. The system is entirely self-contained, so it can be mounted on any aircraft that can handle the weight, rotational torque, and recoil force (190 lbf (850 N)) of the gun. The pod has its own battery, which can be wired into the aircraft's electrical system to maintain a charge.[33]

US Army designation US Air Force designation Description
XM18 SUU-11/A Gun pod fitted with the GAU-2/A/M134 7.62 mm machine gun and fixed rate of fire of 4,000 RPM[34]
XM18E1/M18 SUU-11A/A SUU-11/A/XM18 variant; various improvements including additional auxiliary power and selectable fire-rate capability (2,000 or 4,000 RPM)[35]
M18E1/A1 SUU-11B/A SUU-11A/A/M18 variant; differences modified selectable fire-rate capability (3,000 or 6,000 RPM)[21]
N/A MXU-470/A Emerson Electric module for mounting a GAU-2B/A minigun; used in AC-47, AC-119G/K, and AC-130A/E/H aircraft

Various iterations of the minigun have also been used in a number of armament subsystems for helicopters, with most of these subsystems being created by the United States. The first systems utilized the weapon in a forward firing role for a variety of helicopters, some of the most prominent examples being the M21 armament subsystem for the UH-1 and the M27 for the OH-6. It also formed the primary turret-mounted armament for a number of members of the Bell AH-1 Cobra family. The weapon was also used as a pintle-mounted door gun on a wide variety of transport helicopters, a role it continues to fulfill today.

US Navy designation Description
Mk 77 MOD0[citation needed] Machine gun mount for the GAU-2/Mk 25 MOD0/GAU-17 series of machine guns; deck mount applications
Mk 16 MOD8, MOD9, or MOD11 Mount for medium and heavy machine guns onto naval, ground, or air vehicles[36]
Mk 49 MOD0 and MOD1 Remote weapon station mount[37]
  • SUU-11/A pod in the cargo door of an AC-47
    SUU-11/A pod in the cargo door of an AC-47
  • MXU-470/A modules in an AC-47
    MXU-470/A modules in an AC-47
  • Douglas AC-47 Spooky with SUU-11/A pods
    Douglas AC-47 Spooky with SUU-11/A pods

Users

[edit]
Map with M134 Minigun users in blue

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Sources

[edit]
  • Ballad, Jack S. Development and Employment of Fixed-Wing Gunships, 1962–1972. Washington, D.C.: Office of Air Force History, United States Air Force, 1982.
  • Davis, Larry. Gunships: A Pictorial History of Spooky. TX: Squadron/Signal Publications, 1982. ISBN 0-89747-123-7.
  • Gervasi, Tom. Arsenal of Democracy III: America's War Machine, the Pursuit of Global Dominance. New York: Grove Press, Inc, 1984. ISBN 0-394-54102-2.
  • Gunston, Bill. The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Aircraft Armament. New York: Orion Books, 1988. ISBN 0-517-56607-9.
  • Headquarters, Department of the Army. FM 1-40 Attack Helicopter Gunnery. Washington, D.C.: Headquarters, Department of the Army, 1969.
  • Pretty, Ronald T., ed. Jane's Weapon Systems, 1986–1987. London: Jane's Publishing Company, Ltd, 1986. ISBN 0-7106-0832-2.
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

M134 Minigun

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The M134 Minigun is a six-barreled, electrically powered rotary chambered in , capable of firing between 2,000 and 6,000 rounds per minute. Developed by in the late and early as a scaled-down version of the larger cannon, it employs an external power source to drive its rotating barrels, enabling sustained high-volume fire without overheating. Originally designed for helicopter armament and aircraft gun pods to deliver against ground targets, the weapon entered service during the , where it equipped platforms such as the UH-1 Huey gunships and AC-47 gunships, revolutionizing tactics through its unprecedented . Modern iterations, including the Dillon Aero M134D, feature enhanced durability and are employed by U.S. forces on helicopters, vehicles, and unmanned systems for both offensive and defensive roles. Its defining characteristic remains the ability to project a dense stream of projectiles, making it effective for area denial despite limited individual accuracy at range.

Historical Development

Origins in Electrically Driven Gatling Guns

The , invented by and patented in , originally relied on a hand-crank mechanism to rotate multiple barrels around a central axis, achieving firing rates up to 200 rounds per minute. In 1893, Gatling patented an electrically driven variant that substituted the crank with an external electric motor, theoretically capable of sustaining 3,000 rounds per minute by eliminating human-powered limitations. Despite this advancement, the design saw no practical military adoption due to inadequate battery technology, inconsistent power delivery, and the superiority of emerging recoil-operated machine guns like the Maxim, which required no external drive. The U.S. Army formally declared the hand-cranked Gatling obsolete in , shifting focus to self-powered automatic weapons. Post-World War II advancements in aviation and firepower demands revived interest in electrically driven multi-barrel designs, as jet aircraft required weapons with extreme rates of fire to engage fast-moving targets while minimizing recoil-induced structural stress and barrel overheating inherent in reciprocating-bolt systems. In June 1946, the U.S. Army Ordnance Department awarded General Electric a contract under Project Vulcan to develop a lightweight, high-rate aerial Gatling gun, initially exploring calibers like .60 and later standardizing on 20mm. Early experiments involved retrofitting a museum-piece 1903 Gatling with an electric motor, briefly achieving 5,000 rounds per minute and validating the external-power concept for sustained fire without mechanical fatigue on the operator or airframe. General Electric's iterative prototypes progressed rapidly: a 1949 five-barrel model fired at 2,500 rounds per minute, escalating to 6,000 by September 1950 through refined electric timing and sequencing mechanisms that synchronized barrel rotation, chambering, firing, and extraction. By 1952, the T-45C (redesignated T-171C) incorporated delinking feeders and electric priming, addressing handling and ignition reliability. These efforts culminated in the cannon, standardized in 1956 with a practical rate of 6,000 rounds per minute and enhanced service life exceeding 100,000 rounds between failures, establishing electrically driven Gatling guns as viable for high-volume in dynamic combat environments. The Vulcan's success in managing heat dispersion via rotating barrels and external power—independent of or gas operation—laid the foundational principles for subsequent adaptations, including compact 7.62mm systems.

1960s Development and Initial Testing

Development of the M134 Minigun commenced in 1960 at General Electric's Armament Division, driven by the escalating U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War and the requirement for a lightweight, high-rate-of-fire weapon to provide suppressive fire for helicopters vulnerable to ground attack. Building upon the proven external-power Gatling gun concept of the 20mm M61 Vulcan cannon, engineers adapted the multi-barrel design to the 7.62×51mm NATO cartridge, enabling sustained fire without excessive overheating. The first 7.62mm prototypes were constructed and subjected to initial testing in under the XM134 designation, evaluating the electrically driven rotary mechanism's reliability and performance. These tests demonstrated a maximum of 6,000 rounds per minute, though early configurations revealed challenges with feed consistency and barrel , prompting refinements to reduce the rate to approximately 4,000 rounds per minute for enhanced controllability. Further evaluation in 1963-1964 included mounting prototypes on such as the AC-47 for live-fire trials, where the weapon's ability to deliver dense, accurate barrages at high speeds was validated against simulated ground targets. Successful outcomes from these tests, including integration into door-mounted pods like the SUU-11/A, led to formal adoption as the Army's M134 and Air Force's GAU-2/A by mid-decade, paving the way for production and deployment.

Deployment During the Vietnam War

The M134 Minigun saw its initial combat deployment during the Vietnam War on fixed-wing gunships, particularly the Douglas AC-47 Spooky, where it was integrated into SUU-11/A pods. These pods, each housing one M134 capable of firing up to 6,000 rounds per minute, were mounted on the AC-47 starting in late 1964 following successful testing on similar platforms like the Convair C-131. The AC-47's three miniguns provided suppressive fire for ground troops, with the first notable defensive mission occurring on March 9, 1966, when an AC-47 repelled a North Vietnamese Army assault on the A Shau Special Forces camp. Subsequently, the M134 was adapted for rotary-wing aircraft, enhancing helicopter self-defense against jungle ambushes. Mounted as door guns on UH-1 Huey helicopters, the minigun addressed limitations of single-barrel machine guns by delivering sustained high-volume fire without overheating. Deployment on Hueys became more widespread late in the war, with armorers retrofitting them to counter the vulnerabilities exposed during early air operations. Each SUU-11/A or similar pod typically carried 1,500 rounds of 7.62×51mm ammunition, equating to about 15 seconds at maximum rate, though operational rates were often set lower for control and barrel life. While effective for area suppression, early field use revealed reliability challenges, including ammunition drum jams and mechanical damage under combat stress, particularly in the humid Vietnamese environment. The minigun's electrically driven mechanism, powered by generators, nonetheless proved superior for rapid engagement of concealed enemy positions, contributing to its proliferation across U.S. forces by 1968.

Post-Vietnam Refinements and Licensing

Following the , the M134 Minigun faced persistent reliability challenges, including excessive wear on internal components and short barrel lifespans, often limited to around 10,000 rounds due to the stresses of sustained high-rate fire in harsh operational environments. These issues stemmed from the original design's limitations in handling prolonged bursts without frequent maintenance or part replacements. In the late 1980s, Dillon Aero, initially focused on civilian applications, acquired surplus M134 units and began a multi-year reverse-engineering and redesign process, starting around 1989-1990. By systematically improving every component—such as upgrading rotor bearings, delinking systems, and material durability—the company addressed core deficiencies, resulting in the lighter and more robust M134D variant introduced in 2002. This refinement reduced weight, enhanced sustained fire capability, and significantly extended component life, making it suitable for modern military demands. Dillon Aero transitioned into primary production by developing new M134D units and offering modernization kits to upgrade legacy GAU-2B/A models, effectively supplanting earlier . Other entities, including Garwood Industries, produced compatible variants with their own enhancements under production agreements derived from the original design. These efforts ensured the Minigun's continued relevance, with Dillon's version certified for U.S. as the GAU-17/A.

Modern Manufacturing by Dillon Aero and Others

Dillon Aero, Inc., based in Scottsdale, Arizona, emerged as the primary modern producer of the M134 Minigun in the late 1980s after identifying reliability issues in legacy General Electric models and initiating a comprehensive redesign effort around 1989–1990. By 2002, the company had reengineered every component, resulting in the M134D, an upgraded variant featuring enhanced durability, simplified loading mechanisms, and reduced maintenance requirements compared to earlier iterations. Dillon Aero delivers newly manufactured M134D units chambered in 7.62×51mm NATO and provides retrofit kits to convert older GAU-2B/A systems to the D configuration, ensuring compatibility with existing military inventories. The M134D has since become the for U.S. and allied forces, with Dillon Aero reporting deployment of over 6,500 systems across more than 50 countries as of recent production tallies. These weapons emphasize high-volume fire capability—up to 6,000 rounds per minute—while incorporating material upgrades like lightweight alloys and improved delinking feeders to mitigate jamming risks observed in Vietnam-era designs. Dillon's integrates precision and controls tailored for aerial and vehicular mounts, supporting integrations on platforms such as MH-60 helicopters and remote stations. In addition to Dillon Aero, other U.S.-based firms contribute to the M134 ecosystem through variant production and alternatives. Garwood Industries manufactures the M134G, a specialized adaptation focused on ground and naval applications with modular enhancements for sustained fire. Defense offers competitive M134-compatible systems, including belt-fed alternatives derived from Minigun principles, while STS Minigun produces next-generation components and full assemblies for government-approved users, emphasizing modular upgrades over original designs. These entities primarily operate under ITAR restrictions, limiting exports and focusing on domestic sustainment rather than mass civilian markets.

Technical Design

Operating Mechanism and Principles

The M134 Minigun employs the principle, featuring six barrels arranged in a radial cluster around a central rotor assembly, powered by an external 24-28 volt DC that drives continuous rotation within a stationary housing. This electric drive rotates the barrels and their associated bolts at speeds yielding 2,000 to 6,000 rounds per minute, with the rate adjustable via motor voltage or gearing. Unlike - or gas-operated machine guns, the external power source ensures consistent cycling independent of cartridge energy, enabling sustained high-volume fire while minimizing vibration through balanced sequential barrel discharge—one round per barrel per revolution. Ammunition, typically 7.62×51mm NATO linked belts, feeds externally into a delinker mechanism powered by the 's rotation, stripping rounds from M13 disintegrating links and delivering them into the receding bolts. Each bolt, riding in tracks on the , reciprocates linearly via cam followers engaging helical grooves machined into the housing; these cams—often coated with low-friction Delrin plastic or similar—dictate the bolt's motion: initial rearward travel to receive the cartridge, forward ramming to chamber and lock the round, and subsequent extraction. Firing occurs at the 12 o'clock position, where the cam drives the bolt fully forward, forcing the cartridge primer against a fixed protruding from the , which ignites the without additional moving striker components. Post-ignition, the barrel continues rotating while the cam unlocks the bolt, withdraws it to extract the spent case via an extractor claw, and ejects the downward at the 6 o'clock position through ports in the housing. Teflon-infused semi-fluid applied to bolts, cams, and tracks reduces and , supporting barrel life exceeding 100,000 rounds under typical firing schedules. This mechanism's reliance on mechanical camming for timing and fixed-pin ignition yields high reliability in adverse conditions, though it demands robust electrical supply—drawing up to 2 kW—to maintain against inertial and frictional loads. The distributed thermal dissipation across barrels prevents rapid overheating, allowing bursts far longer than single-barrel equivalents, limited primarily by feed and power availability.

Core Specifications and Components

The M134 Minigun employs a six-barrel Gatling-style rotary mechanism driven by an external electric motor, chambered for the 7.62×51mm NATO cartridge, which enables sustained high-volume fire without overheating individual barrels. The design incorporates a belt-fed delinking system that strips rounds from M13 disintegrating links, feeding them into the rotor for sequential chambering and firing across the rotating barrels. Core components include a steel or titanium rotor housing that contains the six bolt assemblies and tracks, a barrel clamp assembly securing the interchangeable barrels, and a feeder-delinker unit for ammunition handling, all mounted within a modular gun housing that supports integration with various power supplies and mounts. Key specifications for the modern Dillon Aero M134D variant, which represents the primary production model, are summarized below:
SpecificationDetails
Caliber7.62×51mm NATO
ActionElectrically driven rotary breech
Rate of FireSelectable 3,000 or 4,000 rounds per minute
Weight (steel housing)62 lb (28 kg) gun unit only
Weight (titanium variant)41 lb (19 kg) gun unit only
Length801 mm (31.6 in)
Barrel Length559 mm (22 in)
Effective RangeUp to 1,200 m
Feed SystemBelt-fed with delinker
These parameters reflect configurations optimized for aerial and vehicular applications, with the variants reducing weight for improved platform compatibility while maintaining structural integrity under high cyclic rates. The rotor assembly, central to operation, rotates under motor power to index bolts into firing positions, with each bolt driven forward by a cam track to chamber, fire, and extract rounds in sequence. Safing mechanisms, including a sector , prevent unintended discharge during powered rotation, while the top cover facilitates bolt removal for . Barrels are individually removable for replacement after approximately rounds, mitigating wear from sustained fire. External components such as the drive motor and —typically 24-28 VDC at high amperage—are not integral to the gun body but essential for function, often sourced from vehicle or aircraft systems.

Rate of Fire and Ammunition Handling

The M134 Minigun achieves its high volume of fire through an electrically powered rotary mechanism that spins six barrels at rates typically ranging from 2,000 to 6,000 rounds per minute, with the exact output controlled by the drive motor's voltage and gearing. Early military configurations often operated at 3,000 to 4,000 rounds per minute for balanced performance in sustained fire, as higher speeds risked rapid barrel wear and overheating without adequate cooling. Modern iterations, such as the Dillon Aero M134D, standardize at a fixed 3,000 rounds per minute (50 rounds per second) to enhance reliability, reduce maintenance demands, and extend barrel life during prolonged engagements. Ammunition is supplied via disintegrating M13 link belts of 7.62×51mm NATO cartridges, drawn from flexible chutes or rigid containers with capacities up to 4,000 rounds to support extended firing sequences. A feeder-delinker assembly, positioned ahead of the gun's rotor, strips individual rounds from the belt links—preventing jams from linked feed—and sequentially delivers them into the rotating chambers, enabling uninterrupted operation even under high cyclic rates. This delinking process requires precise synchronization with the gun's electric drive, as misalignment can cause misfeeds; supplemental boosters or powered feed systems are often integrated in vehicle or aircraft mounts to assist belt pull against inertial forces. Belt tension and ammunition condition critically influence handling, with degraded links or improper storage leading to failures that halt fire after mere seconds at full rate.

Variants and Mounting Systems

Primary Military Variants

The primary military variants of the M134 Minigun consist of service-specific designations for the core six-barrel, electrically powered rotary , with adaptations primarily in mounting systems and housings rather than fundamental mechanical changes. The U.S. Army adopted the weapon as the M134 for fixed installations and the XM196 for experimental or early configurations, emphasizing ground and vehicle integrations. In parallel, the U.S. Air Force designated aircraft-mounted versions as the GAU-2/A for initial fixed mounts and later GAU-2B/A for door and pedestal applications, while the U.S. Navy standardized on the GAU-17/A for naval and rotary-wing platforms, incorporating features like enhanced flash suppression. These variants share identical operating principles, including external electric drive for barrel rotation at rates up to 6,000 rounds per minute, but differ in accessory integrations such as delinkers, receivers, and management tailored to platform demands. Post-Vietnam, General Electric's production gave way to licensed , culminating in Dillon Aero's M134D family as the dominant modern variant for U.S. Forces since the 1990s, featuring upgraded stators, bearings, and seals for enhanced durability in diverse environments. The standard M134D employs a steel housing and rotor assembly weighing approximately 62 pounds (28 kg), prioritizing robustness for sustained fire. A lightweight iteration, the M134D-T or M134T, reduces weight to 41 pounds (19 kg) through components in the housing and rotor, enabling easier portability for ground troops or reduced aircraft loads without compromising the 2,000–6,000 rounds per minute firing rate. These Dillon variants have become the across U.S. branches for Minigun deployments, supplanting earlier models due to superior reliability and parts commonality. No significant caliber or barrel count deviations exist among primary variants, maintaining focus on high-volume with linked 7.62mm .

Aircraft and Gun Pod Integrations

The M134 Minigun has been extensively integrated into rotary-wing aircraft, particularly helicopters, using designations such as GAU-17/A for flexible mounts employed by the U.S. Navy and Marine Corps, and GAU-2/A for fixed mounts by the U.S. Air Force. These systems provide high-volume suppressive fire, with the GAU-17/A featuring a six-barrel rotating cluster driven by an external power source from the aircraft. In the Bell UH-1 Huey helicopter, the Minigun was mounted in door gunner positions during the Vietnam War, often using external mounts like the General Electric A/A49E-3 for the UH-1N variant, enabling crew-served operation with ammunition feeds from internal tanks. Fixed-wing aircraft integrations include the gunship, which employed three 7.62mm GAU-2/M134 Miniguns firing through modified side windows for , delivering up to 6,000 rounds per minute per gun in nocturnal operations. Later configurations on the AC-47D incorporated SUU-11/A pods, each housing a Minigun with 1,500 rounds of 7.62x51mm ammunition, sufficient for 15 seconds at maximum rate or 45 seconds at reduced rates. These pods were also adapted for other platforms like the A-1 Skyraider, A-37 , and B-26K Counter-Invader, featuring self-contained power and ammo systems for underwing or pylon mounting. Modern Dillon Aero M134D-H variants support podded configurations like the DAP-6 Gun Pod System, a self-contained unit mountable on both fixed-wing and rotary-wing aircraft, including unmanned systems such as the General Atomics Mojave UAS tested in 2024. Helicopter integrations extend to platforms like the HH-60G Pave Hawk and MH-60 for , with or ramp mounts allowing 360-degree traversal in some V-22 Osprey setups.

Ground and Naval Adaptations

The M134 Minigun has been adapted for ground vehicle mounting primarily by forces to provide high-volume during escorts and rapid response scenarios. Dillon Aero's M134D systems are employed in such ground applications, often integrated into concealable mounts on trucks like the Convoy Escort Vehicle (CEV), which deploys the weapon in under three seconds for threat engagement and retracts in less than eight seconds to maintain stealth. These adaptations leverage the Minigun's 3,000-6,000 rounds per minute rate to overwhelm or light threats, though conventional forces prefer belt-fed s like the M240 due to and sustained fire needs. In Iraq and Afghanistan, U.S. special forces mounted M134s on Humvees and technical vehicles for perimeter defense and ambush suppression, capitalizing on the weapon's compact size—85 pounds for the gun alone—allowing integration without excessive vehicle modifications. Recent developments include U.S. Army tests in 2025 mounting the M134 on M1 Abrams tanks to counter low-flying drones, replacing the coaxial M240 to deliver rapid bursts against small, agile targets where precision is secondary to volume of fire. Naval adaptations focus on close-in defense for small craft and ships, where the GAU-17/A variant supplements .50 caliber M2s and 25 mm chain guns against speedboats and personnel threats. The U.S. Navy deploys it on riverine patrol boats and special warfare combatant-craft for operations in littoral environments, providing 7.62 mm suppression at ranges up to 1,000 meters. Following the 2000 , the Royal Navy installed Miniguns on frigates and destroyers for harbor and at-sea , though by 2023 evaluations favored replacing them with .50 caliber weapons for better reliability in maritime conditions and reduced maintenance demands. Similar integrations occur on U.S. Navy vessels, emphasizing the Minigun's role in asymmetric threats over anti-ship roles dominated by larger calibers.

Operational Use

Major Military Users

The primary military user of the M134 Minigun is the , where it serves across multiple branches in various designations and roles. The employs the M134 and XM196 variants, particularly in special operations aviation, with the 160th Special Operations Aviation Regiment (SOAR), known as the "Night Stalkers," relying on it for helicopter-mounted since the 1990s. The designates it as the GAU-2/A for integration, while the and Marine Corps use the GAU-17/A, mounted on helicopters, patrol boats, and by special warfare combatant-craft crewmen (SWCC) for defensive armament. (USSOCOM) incorporates it on platforms like the MH-47G Chinook helicopter, equipping two 7.62 mm M134 miniguns for . Beyond the United States, the M134 Minigun has been adopted by the militaries of over 40 countries, often through direct procurement or transfers, for similar aerial, vehicular, and naval applications. Notable international users include , , , , , , , and , with deployments on helicopters and ground vehicles. integrated the M134D variant on CH-146 Griffon helicopters during combat operations in , enhancing close-range fire support capabilities. Other operators, such as the and , have fielded it in and border security roles, reflecting its versatility in modern .

Combat Roles and Tactical Applications

The M134 Minigun primarily functions in aerial combat roles as a defensive armament on helicopters, where door gunners employ it to deliver during troop insertions, extractions, and low-level transits over hostile terrain. This high-volume output, capable of 2,000 to 6,000 rounds per minute, saturates enemy positions with projectiles, pinning and disrupting ambushes in dense environments like those encountered in starting in 1967. The weapon's electric drive enables sustained bursts from vibrating platforms without manual cranking, prioritizing immediate firepower over precision to protect vulnerable and embarked forces. In fixed-wing gunship applications, such as on the AC-47 Spooky during the from 1965 onward, multiple M134 units mounted in firing pods provided orbiting , circling targets at low altitudes to hose down enemy concentrations with interlocking fields of fire. Tactically, this setup allowed for prolonged engagement of night defenses and troop movements, with the miniguns' rapid rate overwhelming soft targets and light fortifications through sheer projectile density rather than individual accuracy. The configuration emphasized area denial and interdiction, expending thousands of rounds to suppress or destroy positions supporting ground operations. On ground vehicles and naval craft, particularly in contexts since the 1980s, the M134 mounts for perimeter defense, convoy escort, and rapid reaction to infantry assaults, as seen in U.S. forces' adaptations for Humvees and MRAPs in . Remote or crew-served turrets enable quick traversal to engage fleeting threats, leveraging the gun's suppressive capability to cover advances or hold chokepoints against numerically superior foes. This role exploits the minigun's ability to generate immediate psychological and physical dominance via bullet hose effects, though it demands robust power supplies and logistics to mitigate short engagement windows limited by dispersion beyond 1,000 meters.

Recent Deployments in the 21st Century

The M134 Minigun, including its variants like the GAU-17/A, has been employed by U.S. special operations forces in ground, air, and naval roles throughout the Global War on Terror following the September 11, 2001 attacks. These deployments emphasized its role in providing high-volume suppressive fire against insurgent forces in asymmetric warfare environments. In , the weapon was mounted on UH-1 Huey helicopters operated by units, where it delivered rapid fire during troop extractions and firefights with fighters. Footage from operations shows miniguns engaging enemy positions from helicopters in support of ground troops, contributing to immediate suppressive effects on concealed adversaries. Australian forces also integrated M134 miniguns on CH-47 Chinooks for self-protection during missions, requiring aircrew qualification for operation. During the , special operations units mounted M134 miniguns on Humvees and MRAP vehicles for convoy protection and raids, often in automated configurations for night operations. U.S. Navy SEAL teams utilized the system in combat scenarios, including engagements documented in declassified footage. Additionally, surplus GAU-17/A units were adapted by the U.S. Navy as the Mk 44 on mountings originally for 20mm cannons, deployed ahead of the 2003 invasion for maritime interdiction in the Arabian Gulf. The GAU-17/A variant continues in service with U.S. conventional and as of 2015, mounted on helicopters, vehicles, and boats for suppression tasks in ongoing operations. Its electrically driven design ensures reliability in sustained fire roles against grouped or hidden threats.

Evaluation

Combat Effectiveness and Achievements

The M134 Minigun exhibited high combat effectiveness in the Vietnam War, primarily through its integration into platforms like the AC-47 Spooky gunship, which mounted three units for side-firing suppressive fire and close air support. These gunships defended isolated outposts and convoys against Viet Cong and North Vietnamese Army assaults, leveraging the weapon's sustained rate of fire up to 6,000 rounds per minute to deliver devastating volumes of 7.62mm ammunition over targeted areas. In 1966 alone, AC-47s conducted 5,584 sorties, expending 13.6 million rounds and 81,700 illumination flares, with operational records confirming that no friendly outpost or village under their protection fell to enemy attack. A standout achievement came on October 11, 1966, when a single AC-47, dubbed Spooky, unleashed 43,500 rounds from its miniguns alongside 96 aerial rockets during an intense engagement, exemplifying the system's capacity for prolonged, high-intensity without barrel overheating. Mounted on UH-1 Huey helicopters, the M134 enabled door gunners to neutralize ground threats effectively during troop insertions and extractions, transforming vulnerable transport aircraft into formidable fire platforms that countered ambushes with rapid, area-denial barrages. This reliability under stress contributed to the Minigun's reputation for unprecedented delivery in aerial roles. In subsequent conflicts, the M134D variant sustained its effectiveness in , with U.S. forces mounting it on ground vehicles and helicopters in and to suppress insurgent positions during firefights. teams employed it for immediate overwhelming fire in ambushes, as seen in documented engagements where minigun bursts neutralized fighters and disrupted attacks on convoys. Its ability to generate suppressive effects rapidly—often halting enemy advances through sheer bullet density—underscored persistent tactical value in , despite logistical demands.

Technical Limitations and Criticisms

The M134 Minigun's dependence on an external electric power source represents a primary operational constraint, as the weapon's rotary mechanism requires 24-28 volts DC at up to 100 amps to achieve its rated fire rates of 2,000 to 6,000 rounds per minute, necessitating dedicated generators or vehicle-mounted batteries that limit mobility in dismounted scenarios. This power demand precludes practical handheld use without substantial support infrastructure, confining the system primarily to fixed or vehicle integrations where electrical supply can be assured. Ammunition logistics pose another significant drawback, with the high cyclic rate consuming rounds at rates exceeding 100 per second in full burst, rapidly depleting standard 1,000-round belts and imposing severe weight burdens—approximately 25-30 pounds per belt—on transport and sustainment. Military evaluations have noted that this voracious appetite for ammunition renders the M134 impractical for prolonged engagements without dedicated resupply chains, exacerbating logistical strains in resource-constrained environments. Accuracy limitations stem from the weapon's inherent dispersion, producing a wide of that diminishes precision beyond 500-1,000 meters, particularly in initial bursts before tracer rounds calibrate the stream, as the externally powered barrels spin independently of forces but still exhibit ballistic spread due to high variations. U.S. Army trials in the rejected ground-based applications partly because this dispersion risked to friendly forces, deeming it unsuitable for close support roles where tighter patterns from conventional machine guns like the M60 were preferred. Reliability concerns, while mitigated by the design's separation of firing from recoil cycles, include occasional delinking failures or jams from degraded ammunition belts or power fluctuations, with field reports attributing interruptions to inconsistent battery charging in high-duty cycles. The system's , involving six synchronized barrels and electrical drives, also elevates demands compared to simpler recoil-operated guns, requiring specialized technicians for disassembly and fault isolation after sustained use. Despite these issues, the M134's overall in vehicle-mounted configurations has been affirmed in prolonged testing, though critics argue its niche overlooks broader vulnerabilities in power-dependent operations.

Maintenance Requirements and Reliability Improvements

The original M134 Minigun, produced by , required operator and organizational maintenance focused on regular , inspection of rotating components, and clearing jams caused by faulty , , or insufficient . Jams were addressed by maintaining muzzle control downrange while using tools like or screwdrivers to extract obstructions, emphasizing procedural discipline to avoid mishandling under fire. Barrels demanded periodic cleaning and inspection every 9,000 to 15,000 rounds due to cumulative heat and residue buildup, though the rotary distributed across six barrels, limiting per-barrel firing rates to approximately 500 rounds per minute at standard 3,000 rounds-per-minute system rates. Spare parts shortages after 1975, with inventories depleted by 1985, severely hampered sustained maintenance, rendering many units inoperable by the 1990s. Early reliability was compromised by design flaws leading to rapid internal wear, frequent failures in high-stress environments like Vietnam-era operations, and component degradation that caused stoppages. These issues stemmed from inadequate material durability in bolts, delinkers, and rotors under sustained high-rate fire, exacerbating downtime in field conditions. Dillon Aero, acquiring production rights and beginning refurbishments in 1989–1990, introduced the M134D variant with targeted upgrades, achieving by 2002 following U.S. Army contracts in 1997–1998. Key enhancements included a redesigned bolt with dual locking/unlocking tangs and a spherical to prevent primer punctures and breakage, alongside reduced extractor height to 0.080 inches for better cartridge handling. The feeder/delinker featured seven redesigned pushers following a SLAP path for stability and retained lubrication, minimizing drag and failures in feed. A titanium rotor assembly with replaceable locking lugs, one-piece titanium barrel clamp/flash hider, and simplified top cover with safing sector facilitated quicker inspections and part swaps, extending system life to 1.5 million rounds and barrel life to 250,000 rounds while achieving a mean rounds between of 500,000. The GAU-2B/M134 modernization kit addressed obsolescence by replacing critical assemblies—such as the feeder/delinker, clutch, six bolts and tracks, gun control unit, and one-piece barrel clamp—with Dillon components, restoring reliability and alleviating parts shortages for legacy guns. Elimination of the variable fire-rate selector, fixing output at 3,000 rounds per minute, further boosted dependability by reducing mechanical complexity. Variants like the M134D-T (all-titanium, 41 pounds) and M134D-H (hybrid steel-titanium, 1.5 million-round lifespan) prioritized reduction and , enabling prolonged operational use without frequent overhauls, as validated in extensive testing exceeding millions of rounds. These changes collectively transformed the Minigun into a noted for simplicity in loading, ease of field maintenance, and high uptime in demanding scenarios.

References

  1. https://www.military.com/equipment/m134-gau-17-gatling-gun
  2. https://modernfirearms.net/en/machineguns/u-s-a-machineguns/m134-minigun-eng/
  3. http://www.navweaps.com/Weapons/WNUS_30-cal_GAU17.php
  4. https://www.militaryfactory.com/smallarms/detail.php?smallarms_id=243
  5. https://www.coffeeordie.com/article/m134-minigun
  6. https://www.defensemedianetwork.com/stories/the-evolution-of-the-m134d-minigun/
  7. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA179871.pdf
  8. https://www.historicalfirearms.info/post/86249885754/electrically-powered-gatling-gun-since-the-late
  9. https://www.americanheritage.com/doctor-gatling-and-his-gun
  10. https://www.quora.com/Why-did-it-take-the-military-so-long-to-motorize-a-Gatling-gun-Seems-like-a-no-brainer-to-me
  11. https://smallarmsreview.com/project-vulcan/
  12. https://www.key.aero/article/vulcan-rotary-cannon
  13. https://www.[military.com](/page/Military.com)/equipment/m134-gau-17-gatling-gun
  14. https://www.centaursinvietnam.org/History/ihistoryEqOrdMiniGun.html
  15. https://www.guns.com/news/2012/02/08/brought-to-you-by-ge-the-m134-minigun
  16. https://www.key.aero/article/us-air-force-ac-47s-vietnam-first-gunships
  17. https://warfarehistorynetwork.com/article/vietnam-war-weapons-the-ac-47-gunship/
  18. https://www.warhistoryonline.com/guns/m134-minigun.html
  19. https://thegunclub.quora.com/I-thought-I-d-do-a-post-on-the-GE-M134-7-62-NATO-Minigun-Armorers-started-mounting-them-on-Huey-s-late-in-the-Vietnam-W
  20. https://www.ac119gunships.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/7.62mm-SUU-11B-A-Minigun-Pod.pdf
  21. https://www.thearmorylife.com/douglas-ac-47-spooky/
  22. https://verticalmag.com/features/prideandcommitment/
  23. https://www.vanhornaviation.com/2017/12/14/spotlight-on-dillon-aero
  24. https://www.guns.com/news/2017/04/17/a-brief-history-of-the-minigun-video
  25. https://dillonaero.com/m134d-standard-7-62-x-51mm/
  26. http://kuba-t1000.com/minigun/index.php?akcja=history_modern
  27. https://dillonaero.com/
  28. https://dillonaero.com/guns-2/
  29. https://highgrounddefense.com/
  30. https://sts-minigun.com/
  31. https://forums.kitmaker.net/t/m134-minigun-questions/34759
  32. https://www.forgottenweapons.com/m134-minigun-the-modern-gatling-gun-video/
  33. https://www.reddit.com/r/mechanical_gifs/comments/8lcxs0/delinking_and_bolt_mechanism_from_m134_minigun/
  34. https://dillonaero.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/M134D-Standard-7.62x51mm-Data-Sheet.pdf
  35. https://www.dtvarms.com/m134/m134-components
  36. https://www.seaforces.org/wpnsys/SURFACE/M134-minigun.htm
  37. https://www.eliteukforces.info/weapons/minigun/
  38. https://guns.fandom.com/wiki/M134_Minigun
  39. https://www.militaryfactory.com/smallarms/detail.php?smallarms_id=155
  40. https://www.facebook.com/groups/257042038774284/posts/927182705093544/
  41. https://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/Visit/Museum-Exhibits/Fact-Sheets/Display/Article/195865/gunship-i-spooky/
  42. https://www.super-hobby.com/products/SUU-11A-A-gun-container.html
  43. https://theaviationist.com/2024/04/27/mojave-tested-with-minugun-pods/
  44. https://dillonaero.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/DA-complete-catalog.pdf
  45. https://www.reddit.com/r/Helicopters/comments/1nbt1ft/v22_osprey_gau17_m134_360_mini_gun/
  46. https://dillonaero.com/convoy-escort-vehicle-cev/
  47. https://www.americanspecialops.com/special-ops-weapons/minigun.php
  48. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DgrXc4wGLZs
  49. https://chuckhillscgblog.net/2023/05/28/in-focus-the-50-cal-heavy-machine-gun-in-royal-navy-service/
  50. https://www.socom.mil/FactBook/2022%2520Fact%2520Book.pdf
  51. https://www.ghostsofthebattlefield.org/articles/douglas-ac-47-spooky-the-birth-of-the-modern-gunship
  52. https://sofrep.com/gear/m134-minigun-old-painless-lives-and-fires/
  53. https://sofrep.com/news/m134-minigun-old-painless-lives-and-fires/
  54. https://www.military.com/video/guns/machine-guns/special-forces-m134-minigun-nightfire/1000296083001
  55. https://www.awm.gov.au/collection/C2686034
  56. https://www.imfdb.org/wiki/M134_Minigun
  57. https://www.ac47-gunships.com/ac47_history.htm
  58. https://canvas4everyone.com/blogs/news/the-mini-gun-a-detailed-profile-of-a-rapid-fire-powerhouse
  59. https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-advantages-and-disadvantages-between-the-minigun-and-a-machine-gun
  60. https://www.quora.com/How-unrealistic-are-handheld-miniguns-What-are-the-reasons-why-they%25E2%2580%2599re-unrealistic-to-be-used-and-serve-in-armed-forces
  61. https://www.reddit.com/r/explainlikeimfive/comments/u0z7vt/eli5_how_do_gatling_gunsminiguns_have_such/
  62. https://www.facebook.com/kommandostore/posts/accuracy-by-volume-%25EF%25B8%258Fthe-m134-minigun-was-invented-by-the-uss-very-own-top-applia/882337297244150/
  63. https://diysolarforum.com/threads/question-about-lithium-batteries-for-m134-mini-gun-military-application.99624/
  64. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ct_P_KaJX5c
  65. https://old-wiki.warthunder.com/M134_Minigun_%287.62_mm%29
  66. https://www.quora.com/How-do-I-clear-a-jam-in-a-minigun
  67. https://www.ar15.com/forums/General/Do-they-clean-the-barrels-on-the-M134-minigun-/5-2476220/?page=1
  68. https://smallarmsreview.com/m134-d-the-dillon-aero-minigun-package/
  69. https://dillonaero.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/4L-DADS0003-GAU-2B_M134-MINIGUN-MODERNIZATION-KIT-10-29-15.pdf
  70. https://dillonaero.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/M134D-MINIGUN-hybrid.pdf
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.