Hubbry Logo
Water coolingWater coolingMain
Open search
Water cooling
Community hub
Water cooling
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Water cooling
Water cooling
Water cooling
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Cooling tower and water discharge of a nuclear power plant

Water cooling is a method of heat removal from components and industrial equipment. Evaporative cooling using water is often more efficient than air cooling. Water is inexpensive and non-toxic; however, it can contain impurities and cause corrosion.

Water cooling is commonly used for cooling automobile internal combustion engines and power stations. Water coolers utilising convective heat transfer are used inside some high-end personal computers to further lower the temperature of CPUs and other components compared to air cooling.

Other uses include the cooling of lubricant oil in pumps; for cooling purposes in heat exchangers; for cooling buildings in HVAC and in chillers.

Mechanism

[edit]

Advantages

[edit]

Water is inexpensive, non-toxic, and available over most of the earth's surface. Liquid cooling offers higher thermal conductivity than air cooling. Water has unusually high specific heat capacity among commonly available liquids at room temperature and atmospheric pressure allowing efficient heat transfer over distance with low rates of mass transfer. Cooling water may be recycled through a recirculating system or used in a single-pass once-through cooling (OTC) system. Water's high enthalpy of vaporization allows the option of efficient evaporative cooling to remove waste heat in cooling towers or cooling ponds.[1] Recirculating systems are open if they rely upon evaporative cooling or closed if heat removal is accomplished in heat exchangers, thus with negligible evaporative loss. A heat exchanger or condenser may separate non-contact cooling water from a fluid being cooled,[2] or contact cooling water may directly impinge on items like saw blades where phase difference allows easy separation. Environmental regulations emphasize the reduced concentrations of waste products in non-contact cooling water.[3]

Disadvantages

[edit]

Water accelerates the corrosion of metal parts and is a favorable medium for biological growth. Dissolved minerals in natural water supplies are concentrated by evaporation to leave deposits called scale. Cooling water often requires the addition of chemicals to minimize corrosion and insulating deposits of scale and biofouling.[4]

Water contains varying amounts of impurities from contact with the atmosphere, soil, and containers. Being both an electrical conductor and a solvent for metal ions and oxygen, water can accelerate corrosion of machinery being cooled. Corrosion reactions proceed more rapidly as temperature increases.[4] Preservation of machinery in the presence of hot water has been improved by addition of corrosion inhibitors including zinc, chromates and phosphates.[5][6] The first two have toxicity concerns;[7] and the last has been associated with eutrophication.[8] Residual concentrations of biocides and corrosion inhibitors are of potential concern for OTC and blowdown from open recirculating cooling water systems.[9] With the exception of machines with short design life, closed recirculating systems require periodic cooling-water treatment or replacement raising similar concern about ultimate disposal of cooling water containing chemicals used with environmental safety assumptions of a closed system.[10]

Biofouling occurs because water is a favorable environment for many life forms. Flow characteristics of recirculating cooling water systems encourage colonization by sessile organisms using the circulating supply of food, oxygen and nutrients.[11] Temperatures may become high enough to support thermophilic populations of organisms such as types of fungi.[12] Biofouling of heat exchange surfaces can reduce heat transfer rates of the cooling system, and biofouling of cooling towers can alter flow distribution to reduce evaporative cooling rates. Biofouling may also create differential oxygen concentrations increasing corrosion rates. OTC and open recirculating systems are more susceptible to biofouling. Biofouling may be inhibited by temporary habitat modifications. Temperature differences may discourage the establishment of thermophilic populations in intermittently operated facilities, and intentional short-term temperature spikes may periodically kill less tolerant populations. Biocides have been commonly used to control biofouling where sustained facility operation is required.[13]

Chlorine may be added in the form of hypochlorite to decrease biofouling in cooling water systems, but is later reduced to chloride to minimize the toxicity of blowdown or OTC water returned to natural aquatic environments. Hypochlorite is increasingly destructive to wooden cooling towers as pH increases. Chlorinated phenols have been used as biocides or leached from preserved wood in cooling towers. Both hypochlorite and pentachlorophenol have reduced effectiveness at pH values greater than 8.[14] Non-oxidizing biocides may be more difficult to detoxify prior to release of blowdown or OTC water to natural aquatic environments.[15]

Concentrations of polyphosphates or phosphonates with zinc and chromates or similar compounds have been maintained in cooling systems to keep heat exchange surfaces clean enough that a film of gamma iron oxide and zinc phosphate can inhibit corrosion by passivating anodic and cathodic reaction points.[16] These increase salinity and total dissolved solids, and phosphorus compounds may provide the limiting essential nutrient for algal growth contributing to biofouling of the cooling system or to eutrophication of natural aquatic environments receiving blowdown or OTC water. Chromates reduce biofouling in addition to effective corrosion inhibition in the cooling water system, but residual toxicity in blowdown or OTC water has encouraged lower chromate concentrations and the use of less-flexible corrosion inhibitors.[7] Blowdown may also contain chromium leached from cooling towers constructed of wood preserved with chromated copper arsenate.[17]

Total dissolved solids or TDS (sometimes called filterable residue) is reported as the mass of residue remaining when a measured volume of filtered water is evaporated.[18] Salinity indicates water density or conductivity changes caused by dissolved materials.[19] Probability of scale formation increases with increasing total dissolved solids. Solids commonly associated with scale formation are calcium and magnesium both as carbonate and sulfate. Corrosion rates initially increase with salinity in response to increasing electrical conductivity, but then decrease after reaching a peak as higher levels of salinity decrease dissolved oxygen levels.[4]

Some groundwater contains very little oxygen when pumped from wells, but most natural water supplies include dissolved oxygen. Increasing oxygen concentrations accelerate corrosion.[4] Dissolved oxygen approaches saturation levels in cooling towers. It is beneficial in blowdown or OTC water being returned to natural aquatic environments.[20]

Water ionizes into hydronium (H3O+) cations and hydroxide (OH−) anions. The concentration of ionized hydrogen (as protonated water) in a cooling water system is reported as the pH level.[21] Low pH values increase the rate of corrosion; high pH values encourage scale formation. Amphoterism is uncommon among metals used in water cooling systems, but aluminum corrosion rates increase with pH values above 9. Galvanic corrosion may be severe in water systems with copper and aluminum components. Acid can be added to cooling water systems to prevent scale formation if the pH decrease will offset increased salinity and dissolved solids.[22]

Steam power stations

[edit]
The Indian Point Energy Center. Over a billion fish eggs and larvae are killed in its cooling system each year.[23]
Cooling water intake of a nuclear power plant

Few other cooling applications approach the large volumes of water required to condense low-pressure steam at power stations.[24] Many facilities, particularly electric power plants, use millions of gallons of water per day for cooling.[25] Water cooling on this scale may alter natural water environments and create new environments. Thermal pollution of rivers, estuaries and coastal waters is a consideration when siting such plants. Water returned to aquatic environments at temperatures higher than the ambient receiving water modifies aquatic habitat by increasing biochemical reaction rates and decreasing the oxygen saturation capacity of the habitat. Temperature increases initially favor a population shift from species requiring the high-oxygen concentration of cold water to those enjoying the advantages of increased metabolic rates in warm water.[11]

Once-through cooling (OTC) systems may be used on very large rivers or at coastal and estuarine sites. These power stations put the waste heat into the river or coastal water. These OTC systems thus rely upon an ample supply of river water or seawater for their cooling needs. Such facilities are built with intake structures designed for bringing in large volumes of water at a high rate of flow. These structures tend to also pull in large numbers of fish and other aquatic organisms, which are killed or injured on the intake screens.[26] Large flow rates may trap slow-swimming organisms including fish and shrimp on screens protecting the small bore tubes of the heat exchangers from blockage. High temperatures or pump turbulence and shear may kill or disable smaller organisms that pass through the screens entrained with the cooling water.[27]: Ch. A2  More than 1,200 power plants and manufacturing facilities in the U.S. use OTC systems;[28]: 4–4  the intake structures kill billions of fish and other organisms each year.[29] More-agile aquatic predators consume organisms impinged on the screens; and warm water predators and scavengers colonize the cooling water discharge to feed on entrained organisms.

The U.S. Clean Water Act required the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to issue regulations on industrial cooling water intake structures.[30] EPA issued final regulations for new facilities in 2001 (amended 2003),[26][31] and for existing facilities in 2014.[32]

Cooling towers

[edit]
A Marley mechanical induced draft cooling tower
See also: Cooling tower

As an alternative to OTC, industrial cooling towers may use recirculated river water, coastal water (seawater), or well water. Large mechanical induced-draft or forced-draft cooling towers in industrial plants continuously circulate cooling water through heat exchangers and other equipment where the water absorbs heat. That heat is then rejected to the atmosphere by the evaporation of some of the water in cooling towers where upflowing air contacts the downflowing water. The loss of evaporated water into the air exhausted to the atmosphere is replaced by "make-up" fresh river water or fresh cooling water, but the amount of water lost during evaporative cooling may affect the natural habitat for aquatic organisms. Because the evaporated pure water is replaced by make-up water containing carbonates and other dissolved salts, a portion of the circulating water is continuously discarded as "blowdown" water to minimize the excessive build-up of salts in the circulating water; these blowdown wastes may change the receiving water quality.[33]

Internal combustion engines

[edit]
Further information: Internal combustion engine cooling

The heated coolant mixture can be used to warm the air inside the car by means of the heater core. Also, the water jacket around an engine is very effective at deadening mechanical noises, making the engine quieter.

Open method

[edit]
An antique gasoline engine with an evaporative cooler and mesh screen to improve evaporation. Water is pumped up to the top and flows down the screen to the tank.
Further information: Hopper cooling

An open water cooling system makes use of evaporative cooling, lowering the temperature of the remaining (unevaporated) water. This method was common in early internal combustion engines until scale buildup was observed from dissolved salts and minerals in the water. Modern open cooling systems continuously waste a fraction of recirculating water as blowdown to remove dissolved solids at concentrations low enough to prevent scale formation. Some open systems use inexpensive tap water, but this requires higher blowdown rates than deionized or distilled water. Purified water systems still require blowdown to remove the accumulation of byproducts of chemical treatment to prevent corrosion and biofouling.[34]

Pressurization

[edit]

Water for cooling has a boiling point temperature of around 100 degrees C at atmospheric pressure. Engines operating at higher temperatures may require a pressurized recycle loop to prevent overheating.[35] Modern automotive cooling systems often operate at 15 psi (103 kPa) to raise the boiling-point of the recycling water coolant and reduce evaporative losses.[36]

Antifreeze

[edit]

The use of water cooling carries the risk of damage from freezing. Automotive and many other engine cooling applications require the use of a water and antifreeze mixture to lower the freezing point to a temperature unlikely to be experienced. Antifreeze also inhibits corrosion from dissimilar metals and can increase the boiling point, allowing a wider range of water cooling temperatures.[36] Its distinctive odor also alerts operators to cooling system leaks and problems that would go unnoticed in a water-only cooling system.

Other additives

[edit]

Other less common chemical additives are products to reduce surface tension. These additives are meant to increase the efficiency of automotive cooling systems. Such products are used to enhance the cooling of underperforming or undersized cooling systems or in racing where the weight of a larger cooling system could be a disadvantage.[citation needed]

Power electronics and transmitters

[edit]

Since approximately 1930 it is common to use water cooling for tubes of powerful transmitters. As these devices use high operation voltages (around 10 kV), the use of deionized water is required and it has to be carefully controlled. Modern solid-state transmitters can be built so that even high-power transmitters do not require water cooling. Water cooling is however also sometimes used for thyristors of HVDC valves, for which the use of deionized water is required.[citation needed]

Liquid cooling maintenance

[edit]
CoolIT Rack DCLC AHx Liquid Cooling Solution

Liquid cooling techniques are increasingly being used for the thermal management of electronic components. This type of cooling is a solution to ensure the optimisation of energy efficiency while simultaneously minimising noise and space requirements. Especially useful in supercomputers or Data Centers because maintenance of the racks is quick and easy. After disassembly of the rack, advanced-technology quick-release couplings eliminate spillage for the safety of operators and protect the integrity of fluids (no impurities in the circuits). These couplings are also capable of being locked (Panel mounted?) to allow blind connection in difficult-to-access areas.[citation needed] It is important in electronics technology to analyse the connection systems to ensure:

  • Non-spill sealing (clean break, flush face couplings)
  • Compact and lightweight (materials in special aluminum alloys)
  • Operator safety (disconnection without spillage)
  • Quick-release couplings sized for optimized flow
  • Connection guiding system and compensation of misalignment during connection on rack systems
  • Excellent resistance to vibration and corrosion
  • Designed to withstand a large number of connections even on refrigerant circuits under residual pressure

Computer usage

[edit]
"T-Line" redirects here. For the rail line in San Francisco, see T Third Street. For the rail line in Tacoma, see T Line (Sound Transit). For the planned transit line in Hamilton, Ontario, see BLAST network. For a shorthand system, see Teeline Shorthand.
See also: Computer cooling
GPU waterblock on an Nvidia 1080 Ti
This 60 mm diameter by 10 mm high impingement-type water-cooled copper cold plate (heat sink) animation shows temperature contoured flow trajectories, predicted using a CFD analysis package.

Water cooling often adds complexity and cost in comparison to air cooling design by requiring a pump, tubing or piping to transport the water, and a radiator, often with fans, to reject the heat to the atmosphere. Depending on the application, water cooling may create an additional element of risk where leakage from the water coolant recycle loop can corrode or short-circuit sensitive electronic components.

The primary advantage of water cooling for cooling CPU cores in computing equipment is transporting heat away from the source to a secondary cooling surface to allow for large, more optimally designed radiators rather than small, relatively inefficient fins mounted directly on the heat source. Cooling hot computer components with various fluids has been in use since at least the Cray-2 in 1982, which used Fluorinert. Through the 1990s, water cooling for home PCs slowly gained recognition among enthusiasts, but it became noticeably more prevalent after the introduction of the first Gigahertz-clocked processors in the early 2000s. As of 2018, there are dozens of manufacturers of water cooling components and kits, and many computer manufacturers include preinstalled water cooling solutions for their high-performance systems.

Water cooling can be used for many computer components, but usually it is used for the CPU and GPUs. Water cooling typically uses a water block, a water pump, and a water-to-air heat exchanger. By transferring device heat to a separate larger heat exchanger using larger, lower-speed fans, water cooling can allow quieter operation, improved processor speeds (overclocking), or a balance of both. Less commonly, Northbridges, Southbridges, hard disk drives, memory, voltage regulator modules (VRMs), and even power supplies can be water-cooled.[37]

Internal radiator size may vary: from 40 mm dual fan (80 mm) to 140 quad fan (560 mm) and thickness from 30 mm to 80 mm. Radiator fans may be mounted on one or both sides. External radiators can be much larger than their internal counterparts as they do not need to fit in the confines of a computer case. High-end cases may have two rubber grommeted ports in the back for the inlet and outlet hoses, which allow external radiators to be placed far away from the PC.

Typical 2000s single-waterblock DIY watercooling setup in a PC utilizing a T-Line

A T-Line is used to remove trapped air bubbles from the circulating water. It is made with a t-connector and a capped-off length of tubing. The tube n acts as a mini-reservoir and allows air bubbles to travel into it as they are caught into the "tee" connector, and ultimately removed from the system by bleeding. The capped line may be capped with a fill-port fitting to allow the release of trapped gas and the addition of liquid. [citation needed]

Water coolers for desktop computers were, until the end of the 1990s, homemade. They were made from car radiators (or more commonly, a car's heater core), aquarium pumps and home-made water blocks, laboratory-grade PVC and silicone tubing and various reservoirs (homemade using plastic bottles, or constructed using cylindrical acrylic or sheets of acrylic, usually clear) and or a T-Line. More recently[when?] a growing number of companies are manufacturing water-cooling components compact enough to fit inside a computer case.[38] This, and the trend to CPUs of higher power dissipation, has greatly increased the popularity of water cooling.

Dedicated overclockers have occasionally used vapor-compression refrigeration or thermoelectric coolers in place of more common standard heat exchangers. Water cooling systems in which water is cooled directly by the evaporator coil of a phase change system are able to chill the circulating coolant below the ambient air temperature (impossible with a standard heat exchanger) and, as a result, generally provide superior cooling of the computer's heat-generating components. The downside of phase-change or thermoelectric cooling is that it uses much more electricity, and antifreeze must be added due to the low temperature. Additionally, insulation, usually in the form of lagging around water pipes and neoprene pads around the components to be cooled, must be used in order to prevent damage caused by condensation of water vapour from the air on chilled surfaces. Common places from which to obtain the required phase transition systems are a household dehumidifier or air conditioner.[39]

An alternative cooling scheme, which also enables components to be cooled below the ambient temperature while obviating the requirement for antifreeze and lagged pipes, is to place a thermoelectric device (commonly referred to as a 'Peltier junction' or 'pelt' after Jean Peltier, who documented the effect) between the heat-generating component and the water block. Because the only sub-ambient temperature zone now is at the interface with the heat-generating component itself, insulation is required only in that localized area. The disadvantage of such a system is higher power dissipation.[citation needed]

To avoid damage from condensation around the Peltier junction, a proper installation requires it to be "potted" with silicone epoxy. The epoxy is applied around the edges of the device, preventing air from entering or leaving the interior.[citation needed]

Apple's Power Mac G5 was the first mainstream desktop computer to have water cooling as standard (although only on its fastest models). Dell followed suit by shipping their XPS computers with liquid cooling[citation needed], using thermoelectric cooling to help cool the liquid. Currently, Dell's only computers to offer liquid cooling are their Alienware desktops.[40]

Asus are the first and only mainstream brand to have put water-cooled laptops into mass production. Those laptops have a built-in air/water hybrid cooling system and can be docked to an external liquid cooling radiator for additional cooling and electrical power.[41][42]

Ships and boats

[edit]

Water is an ideal cooling medium for vessels as they are constantly surrounded by water that generally remains at a low temperature throughout the year. Systems operating with seawater need to be manufactured from cupronickel, bronze, titanium or similarly corrosion-resistant materials. Water containing sediment may require velocity restrictions through piping to avoid erosion at high velocity or blockage by settling at low velocity.[43]

Other applications

[edit]

Plant transpiration and animal perspiration use evaporative cooling to prevent high temperatures from causing unsustainable metabolic rates.

Machine guns used in fixed defensive positions sometimes use water cooling to extend barrel life through periods of rapid fire, but the weight of the water and pumping system significantly reduces the portability of water-cooled firearms. Water-cooled machine guns were extensively used by both sides during World War I; however, by the end of the war lighter weapons that rivaled the firepower, effectiveness and reliability of water-cooled models began to appear on the battlefield. Thus water-cooled weapons have played a far lesser role in subsequent conflicts.

A hospital in Sweden relies on snow-cooling from melt-water to cool its data centers, medical equipment, and maintain a comfortable ambient temperature.[44]

Some nuclear reactors use heavy water as coolant. Heavy water is employed in nuclear reactors because it is a weaker neutron absorber. This allows for the use of less-enriched fuel. For the main cooling system, normal water is preferably employed through the use of a heat exchanger, as heavy water is much more expensive. Reactors that use other materials for moderation (graphite) may also use normal water for cooling.

High-grade industrial water (produced by reverse osmosis or distillation) and potable water are sometimes used in industrial plants requiring high-purity cooling water. Production of these high-purity waters creates waste byproduct brines containing the concentrated impurities from the source water.

In 2018, researchers from the University of Colorado Boulder and University of Wyoming invented a radiative cooling metamaterial known as "RadiCold", which has been developed since 2017. This metamaterial aids in cooling of water and increasing the efficiency of power generation, in which it would cool the underneath objects, by reflecting away the sun's rays while at the same time allowing the surface to discharge its heat as infrared thermal radiation.[45]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Bibliography

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Water cooling

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Water cooling is a heat dissipation technique that employs liquid, typically water, to absorb and transfer thermal energy from equipment or processes, exploiting water's high specific heat capacity and thermal conductivity for efficient cooling. In these systems, coolant circulates through heat exchangers or jackets in contact with hot surfaces, facilitating convective heat transfer to remove excess heat generated by operations such as combustion, electrical resistance, or mechanical friction. Commonly applied in internal combustion engines, industrial machinery, power generation facilities, and high-density computing environments, water cooling enables sustained operation under high thermal loads where air cooling proves inadequate. While offering superior heat removal—often several times more effective than air-based methods due to liquid's enhanced convection—it introduces challenges including potential leaks, corrosion, and substantial water consumption, particularly in evaporative cooling towers used for large-scale applications.

History

Origins in Industrial and Mechanical Systems

The application of water cooling originated in the late 17th and early 18th centuries with atmospheric steam engines designed for pumping water from mines, where direct injection of cold water into the cylinder condensed exhaust steam to create a partial vacuum and drive the piston. Thomas Newcomen's engine, patented in 1712, relied on this method, but it required reheating the cylinder for each cycle, leading to substantial heat losses and low of approximately 0.5 to 1 percent. addressed these limitations in 1769 with his separate condenser, which used a dedicated chamber cooled by circulating cold water to condense steam outside the main cylinder, avoiding repeated heating and cooling of the working parts; this innovation increased efficiency to around 2 to 3 percent and enabled higher power outputs by mitigating overheating and material stress in the cylinder walls. By the late 19th century, water cooling transitioned to internal combustion engines, where combustion temperatures exceeding 2000°C necessitated superior heat dissipation beyond air cooling's capacity to prevent cylinder warping, , and power loss. Early stationary gas engines, such as those developed following Nikolaus Otto's 1876 four-stroke cycle, incorporated water jackets around to absorb and transfer heat to a or , allowing sustained operation at higher loads. This approach proliferated in the 1890s for vehicular applications; for instance, the 1901 featured a flat-mounted, with water cooling via a gravity-fed system and , producing 5 horsepower while managing thermal buildup during extended runs. In early power generation, water cooling via condensers became integral in the late 1800s to recondense exhaust from reciprocating engines and turbines, water and operating under conditions for thermodynamic gains of 20 to 50 percent over non-condensing systems by lowering back-pressure. Surface condensers, using tubes through which cooling flowed without mixing, were employed in stationary plants to enhance cycle , with auxiliary cooling towers emerging in the to handle large volumes and reject to the atmosphere in water-scarce areas. These systems prioritized empirical thermal management, as 's higher —four times that of air—facilitated greater rejection rates, enabling scalable production without prohibitive fuel consumption.

20th Century Expansion and Standardization

In the 1920s and 1930s, pressurized cooling systems gained traction in automobiles, enabling higher coolant boiling points and improved efficiency under load; introduced a pioneering pressurized heating and ventilation system in that influenced broader adoption. By the 1940s, sealed pressurized radiators became standard in many vehicles, drawing from pre-war innovations that reduced evaporation and overheating risks during extended operation. Ethylene glycol-based , first applied in automotive engines in 1926, saw extensive military use during for reliable cold-weather performance, transitioning to civilian markets postwar to prevent freezing and boiling without compromising . Additives such as , including chromates and borates, were integrated into coolants from the mid-20th century onward, forming protective layers on metal surfaces to mitigate in mixed-material systems like radiators and engines. These compounds reduced rates by passivating alloys, extending system longevity; for instance, inhibitors limited aggressive ion interactions, lowering failure incidents from and scaling compared to plain or early alcohol mixes. efforts in the automotive sector emphasized compatible inhibitor packages, ensuring reliability across mass-produced vehicles without over-reliance on frequent maintenance. In power generation, water cooling scaled significantly from the 1950s to 1970s amid commercialization and plant expansions, with light water systems becoming the norm for heat dissipation in pressurized water reactors. Cooling towers, patented in form in 1918 by Dutch engineers Frederik van Iterson and Gerard Kuypers, proliferated post-1950 as utilities shifted from once-through river or lake withdrawal to recirculating setups, driven by needs and emerging regulations. By the , over half of new U.S. plants adopted closed-loop towers to reuse water and comply with environmental limits on discharge temperatures, reducing intake volumes by up to 95% relative to open systems. This standardization enhanced operational reliability in large-scale facilities, where empirical monitoring showed decreased and failures through controlled chemistry and velocity management.

Post-2000 Advancements in High-Density Computing

In the early , liquid cooling saw renewed application in supercomputing, drawing from the legacy of systems that pioneered immersion techniques for handling high heat densities in vector processors. This approach allowed for denser packing of components compared to air-cooled alternatives, though adoption remained niche amid prevailing air-based designs in (HPC). The post-2020 era marked a dramatic resurgence driven by workloads, where graphics processing units (GPUs) like NVIDIA's H100 (introduced 2022, up to 700 W ) and Blackwell series (revealed 2024, up to 1,200 W) generated heat densities surpassing capacities. Average rack power densities reached 8.4 kW by 2020, with some exceeding 30 kW, and AI-optimized racks approaching 132 kW or more by 2025, necessitating liquid methods to maintain operational temperatures. Direct-to-chip liquid cooling, involving cold plates mounted directly on processors, gained widespread adoption between 2022 and 2025, capturing 70-80% of chip-level and alleviating facility-wide cooling loads. , submerging servers in dielectric fluids, further enabled (PUE) values below 1.1 in optimized facilities, as demonstrated in hyperscale deployments. implemented chip-level liquid cooling in new data centers starting August 2024, achieving PUE under 1.2 versus 1.4-1.6 for air-cooled systems. A 2025 life cycle assessment in Nature quantified that advanced liquid cooling technologies, including cold plates and immersion, reduced greenhouse gas emissions by 15-21% and energy use by 15-20% over air cooling baselines across cloud infrastructure. In high-density scenarios, liquid cooling delivered up to 50% lower overall energy consumption than air methods, primarily due to liquids' superior heat transfer—up to 3,000 times more efficient—allowing sustained performance at densities where air fails. This shift reflects the causal limit of air cooling's thermal conductivity, outpaced by exponential rises in compute power per unit volume.

Principles of Operation

Thermodynamic Fundamentals

Water's , approximately 4.184 J/g·°C at 20°C, enables it to absorb substantially more per unit mass for a given change than air, which has a specific heat capacity of about 1.005 J/g·°C at constant pressure under standard conditions. This property, derived from molecular interactions including bonding in , facilitates efficient transfer in cooling loops by minimizing fluid rises during heat absorption. In systems leveraging phase change, water's of —2,260 J/g at 100°C—allows for additional removal without increase during , far exceeding the capacity limits of non-phase-change fluids like air. This , measured empirically through , underpins the thermodynamic advantage in evaporative processes, where input primarily drives the liquid-to-vapor transition rather than raising bulk . Heat transfer in water-based fluid loops primarily occurs via forced convection, where the convective heat transfer coefficient hh is characterized by the (Nu=hL/kNu = hL/k), with LL as and kk as thermal conductivity. For turbulent flow in tubes, design correlations such as the Dittus-Boelter , Nu=0.023Re0.8Pr0.4Nu = 0.023 Re^{0.8} Pr^{0.4}, predict enhanced convection relative to conduction alone, as higher (ReRe) and (PrPr) numbers—water's Pr≈7Pr \approx 7 at versus air's ≈0.7\approx 0.7—yield values typically 10-100 times greater in liquid flows. Laboratory measurements confirm water cooling's lower thermal resistance in steady-state conditions, often achieving effective resistances below 0.1 °C/W for heat sinks versus 0.5-1 °C/W for air-cooled equivalents under comparable loads, due to superior convective efficiency and density-driven heat transport. In transient scenarios, water's higher volumetric heat capacity (≈4.18 MJ/m³·°C versus air's ≈1.2 kJ/m³·°C) delays temperature spikes, as verified in controlled heat flux experiments. This superiority holds empirically across flow regimes, independent of scale, when normalized for pumping power.

System Components and Configurations

Water cooling systems rely on core hardware to circulate coolant and manage transfer efficiently. The circulation pump drives fluid movement, providing the required to overcome hydraulic resistance in the loop, typically delivering flow rates of 1-4 liters per minute in compact setups to ensure adequate convective removal without excessive use. Pump selection must account for the system's , as insufficient flow reduces the , leading to elevated component temperatures via diminished Reynolds numbers in laminar regimes. Heat exchangers form the primary interfaces for transfer: water blocks contact heat-generating surfaces to absorb energy into the via , often incorporating or nickel-plated bases with internal microchannels that increase surface area by factors of 10-20 compared to plain surfaces. Radiators then dissipate this heat to ambient air through finned structures ventilated by fans, where effectiveness scales with airflow velocity and fin density, achieving thermal resistances as low as 0.1 °C/W in high-performance units. Reservoirs store excess volume, mitigate air entrapment that could cause in pumps, and enable visual monitoring of fluid condition to preempt degradation from particulates or biological growth. System configurations influence flow dynamics and thermal uniformity: in series arrangements, coolant traverses components sequentially, yielding a temperature rise proportional to each exchanger's heat load divided by mass flow rate (ΔT = Q / (ṁ c_p)), which can result in downstream components experiencing 2-5 °C higher inlet temperatures under balanced loads. Parallel configurations bifurcate flow to independent paths, minimizing cumulative temperature gradients but introducing splitter losses that demand pumps with 20-50% higher capacity to sustain equivalent velocities and Nusselt numbers for heat transfer. Empirical comparisons show series loops often suffice for simplicity and lower restriction in low-heat-density applications, while parallel setups enhance equity in multi-component systems without exceeding 1-2 °C inter-component deltas when flow exceeds 1 GPM total. Reliability hinges on monitoring and failure mitigation, as causal chains from undetected issues like flow starvation can propagate to overheating or material fatigue. Sensors for flow, , and differential temperature detect deviations; for instance, drops exceeding 10-20% of nominal signal restrictions from clogs or tubing kinks, while flow meters ensure rates above cavitation thresholds around 0.5 L/min. frequently utilizes conductivity probes that register abrupt conductance spikes upon coolant escape, as water-based fluids exhibit conductivities of 1-10 µS/cm contrasting dry baselines, enabling sub-minute response times in industrial exchangers. Experimental analyses of direct liquid cooling reveal that facility-side failures, including leaks, can elevate equipment temperatures by 20-50 °C within seconds absent , with empirical data underscoring seizures and seal breaches as prevalent modes from vibration-induced or dry-running. Periodic , such as fluid exchanges every 12-24 months, counters and , which empirical studies link to 30-50% declines in efficacy over time in untreated loops.

Types of Water Cooling Systems

Open-Loop Systems

Open-loop water cooling systems, also known as once-through cooling, draw directly from a natural source such as a , lake, or , route it through heat exchangers to absorb from the process or machinery, and discharge the heated back into the source without recirculation. This configuration enables direct while minimizing equipment complexity, as the cooling serves as a single-pass medium. Such systems were prevalent in 19th- and early 20th-century industrial applications, including stationary engines equipped with surface condensers that utilized or coastal for condensing exhaust , thereby improving over atmospheric exhaust methods. The primary advantages of open-loop systems include operational simplicity, reduced risk of scaling or compared to recirculating setups—since minerals and contaminants are not concentrated through —and higher overall , as there is no auxiliary energy penalty from pumping recirculated volumes or evaporative losses. For instance, once-through cooling avoids the 2-5% efficiency drop associated with cooling towers in closed systems. These benefits made open-loop designs cost-effective for high-volume heat rejection in early power and , where proximity to large water bodies allowed unlimited withdrawal without storage needs. However, open-loop systems require substantial water volumes, with typical withdrawals ranging from 20,000 to 50,000 gallons per megawatt-hour (MWh) for fossil fuel-fired and up to 60,000 gallons per MWh for nuclear facilities using this method. This high demand, coupled with thermal discharge elevating source water temperatures by 5-10°F and risks of aquatic organism impingement or entrainment at structures, prompted environmental regulations starting in the early . In the United States, Section 316(b) of the Clean Act (1972) and subsequent EPA rules restricted once-through cooling to mitigate ecological impacts, leading many pre-1970s to retrofit to closed-loop alternatives. Similar bans emerged in , such as Switzerland's 1971 prohibition on River discharges, followed by in 1972. Today, open-loop systems persist mainly in grandfathered facilities or regions with abundant coastal access, but their deployment has declined sharply due to these constraints.

Closed-Loop Systems

Closed-loop water cooling systems recirculate a within a sealed circuit, preventing direct contact with the external environment to minimize , , and oxygen ingress. This design relies on heat exchangers—such as shell-and-tube or plate configurations—to transfer from the process to a secondary medium, like ambient air or an evaporative spray, without exposing the primary loop to atmospheric impurities or biological growth. By maintaining isolation, these systems achieve higher operational reliability in applications requiring consistent fluid purity, such as and engine cooling, where open exposure would accelerate degradation. Pressurization within the loop, often to 15 psi gauge above , suppresses the coolant's , allowing water-based fluids to operate at temperatures up to approximately 120°C without . This is achieved through sealed reservoirs and pressure caps that contain the , raising the saturation temperature by roughly 3°F per psi increment via thermodynamic principles governing . Such pressurization not only prevents in pumps and -induced inefficiencies but also supports compact designs by enabling higher heat fluxes without fluid loss. Empirical testing in pressurized loops confirms stable operation at these conditions, with suppressed until pressures exceed design limits. The adoption of sealed, closed-loop configurations gained prominence in automotive radiators by the mid-20th century, supplanting earlier open or semi-open systems that suffered from frequent replenishment due to evaporation and leaks. By the 1950s, pressurized sealed radiators had become standard in mass-produced vehicles, reducing coolant consumption by orders of magnitude and simplifying maintenance compared to pre-war designs reliant on overflow vents. This shift was driven by empirical observations of water loss rates dropping from gallons per year in open systems to near-zero in sealed ones, alongside improved engine efficiency from sustained high-temperature operation. Contamination control in closed loops directly enhances longevity through reduced , as limited oxygen —typically below 0.1 ppm in deaerated fluids—yields empirical rates of 0.1-0.5 mils per year (mpy) on coupons, versus 1-10 mpy in oxygenated open circuits. Monitoring data from electrical resistance probes and weight-loss coupons in industrial installations corroborate this, showing pitting and uniform minimized when initial deaeration and periodic maintain low dissolved solids. Failures, when they occur, often trace to ingress during breaches rather than inherent design flaws, underscoring the causal role of sealing integrity in sustaining low kinetics over decades.

Evaporative and Hybrid Systems

Evaporative water cooling systems reject heat primarily through the phase change of water from liquid to vapor, leveraging the latent heat of vaporization, which is approximately 2260 kJ/kg at typical operating temperatures, far exceeding the sensible heat capacity of water at 4.18 kJ/kg·°C. This process occurs in cooling towers where warm water is distributed over fill material, contacting counterflowing air that induces evaporation, cooling the remaining water via mass and heat transfer. The efficiency stems from the high enthalpy change during evaporation, enabling water temperatures to approach the ambient wet-bulb temperature, the theoretical limit dictated by air's moisture-holding capacity. Hyperbolic cooling towers, characterized by their natural draft-inducing shape, were first patented in 1918 by Dutch engineers Frederik van Iterson and Gerard Kuypers, with initial constructions near , . These designs facilitate countercurrent flow, enhancing rates and achieving outlet water temperatures typically 3–6°C (5–10°F) above the , known as the approach. Performance depends on factors like fill type, air velocity, and water loading, with modern induced-draft variants optimizing this via structured packing to maximize surface area. Evaporative systems' effectiveness diminishes in high-humidity environments, as relative humidity above 60–70% reduces the gradient driving , limiting cooling to within a few degrees of wet-bulb but increasing fan power needs. Wet-bulb , defined as the of actual depression to the wet-bulb depression potential, ranges from 70–95%, constrained by air saturation limits. Hybrid systems integrate evaporative elements with dry air cooling to mitigate water consumption, using adiabatic pre-cooling pads that intermittently wet air inlet to boost coil efficiency without direct water circulation. Post-2020 advancements, such as mist-precooled hybrids, achieve up to 95% water use reduction compared to full evaporative towers by operating dry most of the time and evaporating minimal water during peak loads. Some 2025 designs approach near net-zero water through smart controls and high-efficiency pads, cutting consumption by 90% while maintaining thermal performance in variable climates. These hybrids balance benefits with sensible , though they require careful management of risks from wet media.

Applications in Power Generation

Steam Power Stations

In steam power stations, water cooling is critical for condensing exhaust in the turbine condenser, which maintains low and maximizes the Rankine cycle's thermodynamic . By cooling to near-saturated conditions at temperatures around 25–40°C, the condenser creates a (typically 0.03–0.08 bar absolute), allowing greater expansion of through the turbine and increasing net work output by 50–100% compared to non-condensing atmospheric exhaust systems. This enables thermal efficiencies of 30–40% in supercritical coal-fired plants and 31–35% in nuclear plants, where the rejection—often exceeding 60% of the fuel's energy input—demands precise to avoid degradation from temperature rises. Once-through cooling systems, prevalent in plants sited near large water bodies before the , direct ambient through condenser tubes in a single pass, absorbing via sensible warming ( of 5–15°C) before discharge, which supports high with minimal evaporative losses but withdraws vast quantities—up to 50,000–100,000 gallons per megawatt-hour. Recirculating systems, in contrast, employ pumps to cycle a closed of through the condenser multiple times, rejecting primarily via downstream , which reduces by 80–95% relative to once-through but increases pumping (1–2% of plant output) and requires chemical treatment to prevent scaling and . Both configurations in and nuclear steam plants prevent losses from non-condensable gas accumulation or tube , but recirculating demands ongoing makeup to offset drift and blowdown losses. Environmental regulations, notably Section 316(b) of the U.S. of 1972 and subsequent state-level thermal discharge limits, drove a post-1970s transition from once-through to recirculating systems in over 70% of retrofitted U.S. by 2000, prioritizing reductions in impingement, entrainment, and effluent warming over raw intake volume. This shift mitigated ecological disruptions but elevated operational costs by 5–10% due to tower infrastructure, while thermoelectric cooling still accounted for 7.6 billion gallons per day of U.S. freshwater consumption in 2015, equivalent to 41% of total offstream withdrawals, highlighting the causal trade-off between cycle efficiency and resource intensity. Globally, similar trends appear in directives post-2000, though once-through persists in water-abundant regions like for its lower capital expense.

Cooling Towers and Large-Scale Thermal Management

Cooling towers in power generation enable hyper-scale heat rejection from steam condensers through evaporative processes, cooling large volumes of recirculated water to maintain turbine efficiency. Counterflow configurations, where water flows downward against upward air movement, achieve higher thermal efficiency than crossflow designs by maximizing contact time and temperature gradients across fill media. In these systems, evaporation accounts for 70-80% of heat transfer, typically consuming 1-2% of the recirculated water as vapor to achieve cooling ranges of 10-20°F (5.6-11.1°C). Makeup water replenishes this loss plus blowdown and drift, with cycles of concentration maintained at 3-5 to control scaling and corrosion. Material advancements have enhanced tower durability against chemical and biological degradation. Wooden towers, dominant until the mid-20th century, suffered rot and maintenance demands in wet environments, prompting a shift to fiberglass-reinforced (FRP) post-1960s for its corrosion resistance, lightweight structure, and 25-30 year without frequent replacements. FRP components, including casing and supports, reduce structural failures observed in wood, as evidenced by industry conversions extending operational reliability. In the United States, closed-cycle systems incorporating cooling towers support about 53% of thermoelectric generating capacity, enabling higher power output per unit of water withdrawn compared to once-through cooling, though with greater consumptive use due to evaporation. This configuration balances thermal efficiency against resource demands, with towers rejecting up to 2% of national thermal output in vapor form. Empirical studies inform plume dispersion modeling, predicting visible steam plumes from saturated exhaust air via advection-diffusion equations validated against field measurements. Drift eliminators, often cellular or blade-type, capture 99.5-99.9% of entrained droplets, limiting losses to 0.0005-0.002% of circulation and minimizing deposition; and data confirm these rates under varying wind speeds up to 10 m/s. Such devices ensure compliance with regulatory drift limits while supporting accurate environmental modeling.

Applications in Internal Combustion Engines

Atmospheric and Pressurized Methods

In early internal combustion engines employing atmospheric cooling, the —typically pure —boiled at approximately 100°C (212°F) under standard sea-level , leading to frequent during prolonged high-load or high-RPM operation. This boiling created steam pockets in cooling passages, disrupting flow, causing hot spots, and limiting engine output to avoid overheating or . Pressurized cooling systems mitigate these issues by sealing the radiator and using pressure caps rated at 13–17 psi (0.9–1.2 bar) above , elevating the of to 120–130°C depending on the exact and composition. This elevation follows thermodynamic principles where increased suppresses vapor formation, allowing higher average temperatures for improved heat rejection without . Pressurization became feasible with the development of reliable seals and became widespread in production automobiles starting in the late 1920s and 1930s, enabling sustained higher RPMs and power densities. Dyno testing confirms that pressurized systems reduce vapor-induced flow interruptions—analogous to vapor lock in coolant circuits—by maintaining liquid phase integrity, resulting in more consistent heat transfer coefficients and up to 10–15% higher sustainable power before thermal limits are reached compared to unpressurized setups.

Coolants and Additives

In internal combustion engines, water cooling systems primarily employ aqueous solutions of glycols as base coolants to enhance freeze protection, elevate boiling points, and improve over pure water, while additives mitigate and risks. A standard 50/50 mixture of and water achieves a freezing point of approximately -37°C, enabling reliable operation in subzero conditions without solidification, alongside a boiling point elevation to around 108°C under . -based formulations dominate due to their superior thermal conductivity and lower compared to alternatives, facilitating efficient heat dissipation from engine components. However, exhibits high acute toxicity; ingestion of as little as one tablespoon can induce , renal failure, and death within 24-72 hours via toxic metabolites like . Propylene glycol serves as a less toxic substitute in scenarios prioritizing environmental or safety concerns, such as applications with potential human or animal exposure, though it compromises performance with reduced efficiency—approximately 15-20% lower thermal conductivity than —and higher , which can impede flow and pump efficiency in engine circuits. mixtures still provide freeze protection similar to ethylene glycol at equivalent concentrations but require careful formulation to avoid excessive drag on cooling system dynamics. Corrosion inhibitors, integral to coolant compositions, form protective films on metal surfaces to counteract electrochemical degradation from glycol degradation products and dissolved oxygen; traditional inorganic additives like silicates and phosphates, prevalent in early formulations, rapidly deposit barrier layers on iron, aluminum, and components, reducing pitting and galvanic attack. These inhibitors also address erosion, a where vapor bubbles collapsing near liners generate micro-jets exceeding 100 MPa , eroding surfaces over time; depleted additives exacerbate this, leading to liner wall penetration and coolant-oil contamination. Advanced hybrid organic acid technology (HOAT) and organic acid technology (OAT) formulations, employing carboxylates alongside minimal inorganics or purely organic inhibitors, extend service intervals to 5 years or 150,000 miles by providing sustained passivation without silicate dropout, which can clog narrow passages in modern aluminum engines. HOAT variants maintain pH stability above 7.5 to neutralize acids, while OAT emphasizes long-term film formation, verified in fleet tests to halve corrosion rates relative to legacy inorganic types under ASTM D1384 simulated service. These chemistries prioritize verified durability metrics over unsubstantiated sustainability claims, with lab data confirming reduced cavitation pitting depths by up to 70% in vibratory tests.

Applications in Electronics and Computing

Power Electronics and Transmitters

Liquid cooling via cold plates is widely applied to insulated-gate bipolar transistors (IGBTs) and other high-voltage power semiconductors to manage heat fluxes typically ranging from 100 to 150 W/cm² in applications like hybrid electric vehicles, with capabilities extending to higher densities in advanced designs. These systems attach metal plates with internal flow channels directly to the device base, circulating coolants to absorb and reject heat, often achieving thermal resistances significantly lower than air-cooled alternatives. Dielectric fluids, such as engineered synthetic coolants, are preferred for their electrical insulating properties, preventing short circuits in proximity to live components while providing effective convective heat transfer. In converters, direct or indirect cooling reduces thermal resistance by up to 30% relative to conventional methods, lowering junction temperatures under load and enhancing reliability for switching frequencies above 10 kHz. This enables higher power densities and compact module designs, as systems dissipate more efficiently than heatsinks, supporting applications in traction inverters and . Maintenance protocols include regular dielectric strength testing of the coolant, conducted per ASTM D-1816 standards over a 2 mm gap to ensure breakdown voltages exceed 30 kV, mitigating risks of insulation failure. For high-power (RF) transmitters, liquid cooling manages thermal outputs in solid-state amplifiers exceeding 10 kW, as seen in FM broadcast systems where coolant circulation minimizes room heat loads and sustains 75% efficiency. Dielectric-compatible fluids or isolated water loops prevent arcing in RF gear, with systems designed for outputs up to 40 kW incorporating sealed loops to isolate high-voltage paths. Such cooling supports reliable operation in naval and broadcast environments, where proves inadequate for sustained high-duty cycles.

Data Centers and High-Performance Computing

In personal computing, all-in-one (AIO) liquid coolers serve as pre-assembled closed-loop systems for CPU thermal management, comprising a pump-integrated water block, flexible tubing, and a finned radiator paired with fans. Larger radiator sizes enhance heat dissipation surface area, permitting fans to run at reduced speeds while achieving comparable cooling temperatures to smaller configurations. These systems excel in scenarios demanding high sustained power or overclocking, providing greater thermal headroom than air coolers for prolonged intensive workloads. For high-performance CPUs in streaming PCs, which generate significant heat from encoding and multitasking, 360 mm class AIO water cooling is recommended for superior cooling performance and quieter operation compared to smaller AIOs or air cooling. In data centers and high-performance computing (HPC) environments, the rapid scaling of AI workloads post-2020 has driven rack power densities beyond the practical limits of air cooling, typically constrained to 20-30 kW per rack due to thermodynamic inefficiencies and airflow bottlenecks. Liquid water-based cooling systems address this by enabling densities exceeding 100 kW per rack in hyperscale facilities, facilitating denser GPU deployments essential for AI training and inference. This shift is causal: higher thermal conductivity of water (versus air) allows direct heat extraction at the chip level, preventing hotspots and supporting sustained performance in clusters like those powered by NVIDIA's GB200 superchips. Direct-to-chip liquid cooling, integrated in and accelerated computing platforms since 2023, circulates chilled water through cold plates attached to high-power GPUs and CPUs, achieving rates far superior to air. Complementing this, two-phase —where servers are submerged in fluids that boil upon heat absorption—has evolved from pilot trials in the 2010s, including tests in high-humidity regions like , to commercial deployments handling 50-100 kW racks. These methods predominate in new hyperscale builds, with providers like CoreWeave citing liquid cooling's role in stacking more GPUs per rack for AI . Studies indicate liquid cooling yields 15-82% reductions in compared to air systems, primarily through lower use for cooling (often 30-40% of total power) and optimized facility infrastructure, though life-cycle assessments emphasize gains are maximized in greenfield designs over retrofits. Retrofit challenges persist, including modifications and leak risks in existing air-cooled facilities, necessitating hybrid transitions or modular upgrades to avoid in operational HPC clusters.

Marine and Specialized Applications

Ships and Naval Systems

In naval and commercial ships, water cooling systems for propulsion primarily utilize as the , either through direct open-circuit intake or indirect closed-loop configurations to mitigate and risks inherent to saline environments. Direct cooling draws ambient water via strainers and pumps to circulate through engine jackets and heat exchangers before discharge, but this exposes components to high (typically 3.5% in water), dissolved oxygen, and biological growth, accelerating and reducing efficiency by up to 50% from layers. Closed-loop systems, employing freshwater or glycol mixtures internally, transfer heat to seawater via hull-mounted keel or box coolers—bundles of tubes welded externally to the hull plating for passive exchange without seawater ingress into machinery spaces. These designs originated during for U.S. Navy , addressing the need for compact, reliable cooling in amphibious operations amid limited freshwater availability and pump capacity constraints. coolers, positioned along the or for optimal flow exposure, eliminate the power demands of large raw-water pumps (often 5-10% of load in open systems) and intake strainers prone to debris clogging from marine particulates, while avoiding risks in internals. Biofouling poses a persistent challenge, with sessile organisms like and colonizing exchanger surfaces, tubes, and hull interfaces, impeding convective and fostering under-deposit via oxygen concentration cells. In propulsion cooling, unchecked can elevate engine temperatures by 10-20°C, risking on components, while promoting localized pitting in copper-nickel alloys common to naval heat exchangers. Mitigation integrates sacrificial anodes, specified under U.S. MIL-DTL-24443 standards with controlled iron content (below 0.006%) to prevent passivation in saline conditions, preferentially corroding to protect hulls and fittings. These anodes, inspected and replaced per operational schedules (e.g., every 6-12 months in high-salinity zones), extend system life by 2-3 times compared to untreated setups, though periodic hull cleaning or electrolytic systems address external without additives that could leach into ecosystems.

Industrial and Emerging Uses

High-power fiber lasers, such as 10 kW models used in industrial cutting and cladding, rely on water-cooled systems to manage thermal loads exceeding several kilowatts, often employing closed-loop configurations with deionized water to prevent and mineral buildup in optical components. These systems maintain temperatures around 20-25°C, enabling continuous operation at rated power without thermal . In medical applications, water cooling is integral to devices for dermatological and surgical procedures, where compact chillers circulate chilled water through heat exchangers to stabilize or temperatures, reducing risks of overheating that could degrade beam quality or cause tissue damage. For instance, integrated systems in aesthetic lasers provide precise , extending equipment lifespan and ensuring consistent energy delivery during treatments. Emerging uses include custom fluids in packs, where post-2020 designs incorporate water-glycol mixtures or synthetic for direct immersion or cold-plate cooling to achieve uniform temperature distribution under high discharge rates up to 500 kW. These fluids, engineered for low electrical conductivity and high capacity, mitigate hotspots in lithium-ion cells, supporting faster charging and extended cycle life compared to . Microsoft's Project Natick trials from 2018 to 2024 explored underwater data pods sealed against ingress, using the as a natural via air-to-liquid heat exchangers that piped ambient for , achieving up to eight times lower failure rates than terrestrial servers without consuming freshwater resources. By 2025, water-based liquid cooling trends in emphasize modular direct-to-chip systems for distributed AI inference nodes, addressing power densities over 100 kW/rack in space-constrained environments like retail or telecom sites, where traditional proves inadequate. These deployments prioritize closed-loop water-glycol circuits for efficiency, reducing energy overhead by 30-40% relative to air methods while enabling for hyperscale edge networks.

Performance Characteristics

Advantages Over Alternative Cooling Methods

Water exhibits a thermal conductivity of approximately 0.6 W/m·K at 20°C, over 20 times higher than dry air's 0.026 W/m·K under similar conditions, facilitating more effective conduction of heat from surfaces to the coolant. Combined with water's specific heat capacity of 4.18 kJ/kg·K—roughly four times that of air at 1.005 kJ/kg·K—this enables substantially greater volumetric heat removal, with practical heat transfer efficiencies up to 23 times superior to air in forced convection scenarios. These properties yield higher sustainable capacities, often exceeding by factors of 10 or more in engineered systems, which supports more compact designs without sacrificing performance. Water cooling also demonstrates greater energy efficiency, with wet systems consuming less auxiliary power than dry equivalents—dry methods incurring penalties from elevated fan requirements and reduced thermodynamic effectiveness. By maintaining more isothermal conditions across components, water cooling minimizes thermal gradients and cycling stresses, thereby extending component lifespan through reduced fatigue and material degradation relative to air-cooled alternatives prone to hotter hotspots.

Disadvantages and Mitigation Strategies

Water cooling systems carry an inherent risk of leaks from components such as pumps, fittings, or tubing, which can lead to fluid contact with electrical components and cause short circuits or permanent damage. In all-in-one (AIO) liquid coolers for personal computers, manufacturer-reported leak failure rates are low, with Corsair citing 0.016% for their units as of 2025. Custom loops, however, exhibit higher failure risks due to user assembly variability, with anecdotal reports from hardware communities indicating occasional catastrophic failures despite modern improvements in seals and materials. To mitigate leaks, engineers recommend pressure-testing assemblies prior to operation, using barbed fittings with clamps or compression connectors, and incorporating leak detection sensors that trigger system shutdowns upon fluid escape. The electrical conductivity of typical coolants poses a secondary , as tap or can ionize over time through interaction with metals or contaminants, potentially conducting and exacerbating damage from leaks. Pure water has low conductivity (approximately 0.055 μS/cm at 25°C), but additives or impurities raise it significantly, risking arcing in . Mitigation involves employing fluids, such as propylene glycol-based mixtures or fluorinated non-conductive liquids engineered for stability and electrical insulation, which maintain resistivity above 10^12 ohm-cm even under prolonged use. These fluids, common in and applications, prevent shorts by design while providing adequate comparable to water-glycol blends. Corrosion arises from galvanic reactions between dissimilar metals in the loop (e.g., blocks and aluminum radiators) or oxygen ingress promoting oxidation, reducing system lifespan and efficiency. In cooling towers and industrial loops, rates can exceed 0.1 mm/year without controls, per analyses. and scaling from mineral deposits or biological growth further impede , with scaling potentially reducing exchanger efficiency by 20-30% over time in untreated systems. Strategies include selecting compatible materials like all- or nickel-plated components to minimize galvanic couples, maintaining pH between 7.5-9.0 with inhibitors such as phosphates or azoles that form protective films on metal surfaces, and deploying inline (e.g., 10-50 micron filters) alongside periodic flushing to remove particulates and prevent . Physical water conditioners, which induce crystal modification to inhibit scale adhesion, offer non-chemical alternatives in closed loops. Initial capital costs for water cooling setups are typically 2-3 times higher than air cooling equivalents due to pumps, reservoirs, and custom components; for instance, a basic PC AIO starts at $150 versus $50 for high-end air coolers. Lifecycle analyses in data centers reveal operational savings from 20-40% lower energy use in high-density environments, potentially yielding positive ROI within 3-5 years through reduced fan power and sustained performance. Maintenance demands, including fluid monitoring and top-offs every 6-12 months, add ongoing labor not required for air systems, though automated monitoring in enterprise setups minimizes this; for AIO systems, this extends to periodic radiator dust cleaning every 6-12 months using compressed air or soft brushes to prevent airflow obstruction and temperature rises, as well as ensuring proper mounting orientation—such as positioning the pump head below the radiator or fluid level—to avoid cavitation, air locks, and accelerated wear. Pump failures, occurring at rates higher than leaks (e.g., 1-2% annually in some AIOs), are addressed via redundant pumps or fail-safes that revert to air cooling backups; these failures often precede detectable pump noise, such as humming or whining, which can indicate bearing wear or air ingestion. AIO coolers also face long-term degradation from coolant permeation through radiator fins and tubing materials, leading to gradual fluid loss and air accumulation over 5-7 years, which may necessitate replacement to maintain efficacy.

Environmental Impacts and Debates

Resource Consumption and Efficiency Trade-offs

Water cooling systems, particularly in high-density data centers, involve trade-offs between direct water consumption for evaporative or closed-loop cooling and substantial reductions in electricity demand compared to air-based alternatives. In evaporative cooling setups common to many water-cooled facilities, data centers may withdraw approximately 7 cubic meters of water per megawatt-hour (MWh) of energy used, with consumption varying based on climate and recycling efficiency. This equates to roughly 1,850 gallons per MWh, though closed-loop systems that recirculate water can reduce net consumption by up to 90% by minimizing evaporation losses. In contrast, air cooling relies more heavily on fans and chillers, consuming up to 40% of a data center's total electricity for cooling alone, which indirectly increases water use through higher power generation demands—estimated at 60% of total data center water footprint originating from thermoelectric plants. These efficiency gains manifest in lower (PUE) metrics for water-cooled systems, often achieving values around 1.03 to 1.10 in optimized liquid-cooled data centers, versus 1.2 or higher for traditional air-cooled ones, enabling denser operations with net energy savings of 10-18%. In water-abundant regions, as mapped by U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) data on renewable freshwater availability, this translates to favorable trade-offs where reduced electricity needs offset direct water inputs, especially considering the full lifecycle water embedded in grid power. (EIA) analyses further highlight that water cooling's lower on-site power draw mitigates broader resource strains in scenarios prioritizing computational density over arid-zone deployment. Critics labeling water cooling as inherently wasteful overlook innovations like hybrid air-liquid systems and advanced closed-loop designs, which have demonstrated water use reductions of over 95% in recent deployments—for instance, Microsoft's 2024 zero-water evaporative cooling for AI-optimized facilities. These approaches balance with resource minimization, yielding net positives in high-performance environments where air cooling's electricity penalties would exacerbate grid and indirect water demands.

Thermal Pollution and Regulatory Considerations

Thermal pollution from water cooling systems primarily arises from the discharge of heated effluent into receiving water bodies, elevating local temperatures and potentially affecting aquatic organisms. Under the U.S. of 1972, thermal discharges are regulated through National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits, which impose site-specific limits on temperature increases, often restricting delta-T (change in temperature) to less than 3°C to protect standards. These limits ensure that heated plumes dissipate rapidly, typically within meters to kilometers downstream, minimizing broad ecological disruption. Empirical studies on compliant discharges indicate negligible impacts on fish populations and ecosystems. For instance, field assessments at power plants adhering to delta-T limits below 3°C show no significant alterations in species diversity, reproduction rates, or migration patterns, as the thermal stress thresholds for most temperate aquatic species exceed such increments. Entrainment and impingement at cooling intakes, addressed under Clean Water Act Section 316(b), have been reduced to mortality rates below 1% for and in modern facilities equipped with fine-mesh screens, low-velocity designs, and variable-speed pumps, according to EPA evaluations of . While localized warming can influence dynamics or predator-prey interactions in discharge zones, these effects are confined and reversible upon cessation, contrasting sharply with global forcings. The heat added equates to a trivial of natural diurnal or seasonal variations and solar input, rendering it irrelevant to planetary balance. Alternatives like dry cooling avoid discharge but impose efficiency penalties of 5-10% in power generation due to inferior , necessitating higher fuel consumption and associated emissions to maintain output. Regulatory frameworks thus balance these trade-offs by prioritizing wet cooling where water availability permits, informed by causal evidence over unsubstantiated broader environmental claims.

References

  1. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/chemistry/cooling-water
  2. https://www.mitacoolingtechnologies.com/en/sources/glossary/water-cooling-system/
  3. https://www.watertechnologies.com/handbook/chapter-23-cooling-water-systems-heat-transfer
  4. https://www.alfalaval.com/globalassets/documents/microsites/heating-and-cooling-hub/alfa_laval_heating_and_cooling_hub_the_theory_behind_heat_transfer.pdf
  5. https://www.supermicro.com/en/glossary/liquid-cooling
  6. https://www.flexential.com/resources/blog/data-centers-liquid-cooling
  7. https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/gaming/resources/cpu-cooler-liquid-cooling-vs-air-cooling.html
  8. https://www.energy.gov/energysaver/principles-heating-and-cooling
  9. https://www.eesi.org/articles/view/data-centers-and-water-consumption
  10. https://engines.egr.uh.edu/episode/678
  11. https://science.howstuffworks.com/innovation/inventions/watt-steam-engine.htm
  12. https://www.egr.msu.edu/~lira/supp/steam/
  13. https://technicshistory.com/2024/03/21/twilight-of-the-steam-age-part-1-internal-combustion/
  14. https://studebakermuseum.org/the-curved-dash-oldsmobile-putting-america-on-wheels/
  15. https://www.tianjinlatino.com/news/the-history-of-the-cooling-tower
  16. https://www.ashrae.org/file%2520library/about/mission%2520and%2520vision/ashrae%2520and%2520industry%2520history/evolution-of-automotive-heating-riding-in-comfort-part-i.pdf
  17. https://moparconnectionmagazine.com/gallery-tracing-the-evolution-of-the-modern-radiator/
  18. http://www.crankshift.com/history-of-antifreeze/
  19. https://automotivetechinfo.com/2018/12/antifreeze-the-chemistry-behind-the-genuine-article/
  20. https://content.ampp.org/themeredirect/corrosion/article-pdf/13/11/72/1515134/0010-9312-13_11_72.pdf
  21. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7075887/
  22. http://large.stanford.edu/courses/2015/ph240/morgan1/docs/R2180.pdf
  23. https://www.coolingtowerproducts.com/history-of-cooling-towers/
  24. https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=14971
  25. https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/P1569_web.pdf
  26. https://enabledenergy.net/insights/the-saga-of-liquid-cooling/
  27. https://cray-history.net/cray-history-front/fom-home/
  28. https://spectrum.ieee.org/data-center-liquid-cooling
  29. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221313882500342X
  30. https://www.coresite.com/blog/liquid-cooling-steps-up-for-high-density-racks-and-ai-workloads
  31. https://www.datacenters.com/news/why-liquid-cooling-is-becoming-the-data-center-standard
  32. https://submer.com/blog/impact-of-immersion-on-data-center-sustainability/
  33. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-cloud/blog/2024/12/09/sustainable-by-design-next-generation-datacenters-consume-zero-water-for-cooling/
  34. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-08832-3
  35. https://news.microsoft.com/source/features/sustainability/microsoft-quantifies-environmental-impacts-of-datacenter-cooling-from-cradle-to-grave-in-new-nature-study/
  36. https://energyinformatics.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s42162-023-00269-0
  37. https://blog.enconnex.com/data-center-liquid-cooling-vs-air-cooling
  38. https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/air-specific-heat-capacity-d_705.html
  39. https://webbook.nist.gov/cgi/cbook.cgi?ID=C7732185&Mask=1F
  40. https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/water-properties-d_1573.html
  41. https://webbook.nist.gov/cgi/cbook.cgi?ID=C7732185&Type=JANAFL&Plot=on
  42. https://www.delltechnologies.com/asset/en-us/products/servers/industry-market/deep-dive-into-direct-liquid-cooling.pdf
  43. https://www.energy.gov/femp/articles/liquid-cooling-v-air-cooling-evaluation-maui-high-performance-computing-center
  44. https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/thermalscienceapplication/article/11/6/061002/727731/Comparative-Analysis-Between-Water-Cooled-and-Air
  45. https://www.ekwb.com/guides/how-liquid-cooling-works/
  46. https://www.microcenter.com/tech_center/article/9734/liquid-cooling-coolants%2C-reservoirs%2C-and-pumps
  47. https://koolance.com/how-to-build-a-water-cooled-pc
  48. https://www.titanrig.com/blog/post/water-cooling-components-reservoirs
  49. https://www.ekwb.com/blog/parallel-vs-serial-loop-why-choose-one-over-the-other/
  50. https://www.titanrig.com/blog/post/pc-guides-serial-vs-parallel-flow
  51. https://www.lenovo.com/us/en/knowledgebase/water-cooling-for-pcs-a-comprehensive-guide/
  52. https://www.emerson.com/documents/automation/application-note-heat-exchanger-leak-detection-using-conductivity-ph-en-68446.pdf
  53. https://par.nsf.gov/servlets/purl/10058025
  54. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0735193325008255
  55. https://www.ucs.org/resources/water-power-plant-cooling
  56. https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/current-and-future-generation/cooling-power-plants
  57. https://science.howstuffworks.com/transport/engines-equipment/steam.htm
  58. http://large.stanford.edu/courses/2013/ph241/abdul-khabir2/
  59. https://www.nrdc.org/resources/power-plant-cooling-and-associated-impacts
  60. https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/DOE-Cooling%2520Water%2520Issues%2520&%2520Opportunities.pdf
  61. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-04/documents/cooling-water_phase-1_tdd_2001.pdf
  62. https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol18/v18issue1/771-a18-1-5/file
  63. https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=50698
  64. https://www.accessengineeringlibrary.com/content/book/9780071803472/back-matter/appendix1
  65. https://www.watertechnologies.com/handbook/chapter-32-closed-recirculating-cooling-systems
  66. https://baltimoreaircoil.com/what-is-a-closed-circuit-cooling-tower
  67. https://durathermfluids.com/pdf/techpapers/pressure-boiling-point.pdf
  68. https://www.rotax-owner.com/en/912-914-technical-questions/8364-rotax-914-coolant-pressure
  69. https://patents.google.com/patent/US4167159A/en
  70. https://usradiator.com/everything-you-need-to-know-about-automotive-cooling-systems
  71. https://www.autoradiators.com/radiating-history-a-look-at-vintage-car-radiators-and-their-evolution.html
  72. https://www.watertechnologies.com/handbook/chapter-24-corrosion-control-cooling-systems
  73. https://jpt.spe.org/assessing-and-mitigating-corrosion-closed-loop-cooling-water-systems
  74. https://www.trane.com/content/dam/Trane/Commercial/global/learning-center/ashrae-articles/Schwedler-012014--02262015feature.pdf
  75. https://deltacooling.com/resources/news/understanding-wet-bulb-temperatures-and-how-it-affects-cooling-tower-performance
  76. https://www.hmcoolingtower.com/blog/how-to-calculate-cooling-tower-capacity-requirements/
  77. https://airsysnorthamerica.com/evaporative-cooling-for-data-centers-pros-and-cons/
  78. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259012302300186X
  79. https://www.evapco.com/news/adiabatic-cooling-new-happy-medium
  80. https://nimbus.cool/products/virga-hybrid-adiabatic-cooling-systems/
  81. https://h2ocooling.com/blog/industrial-cooling-towers/
  82. https://baltimoreaircoil.com/air-cooled-water-cooled-adiabatic-hybrid-fluid-cooling-solutions
  83. https://www.epa.gov/laws-regulations/summary-clean-water-act
  84. https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=14431
  85. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19770077433/downloads/19770077433.pdf
  86. https://www.advantageengineering.com/fyi/262/advantageFYI262.php
  87. https://spxcooling.com/wp-content/uploads/AE-AS-24-1.pdf
  88. https://constructandcommission.com/makeup-blow-down-cycles-of-concentration/
  89. https://mwcooling.com/cooling-tower-fundamentals-the-evolution-of-wooden-cooling-towers/
  90. https://h2ocooling.com/blog/why-are-cooling-towers-made-of-wood/
  91. https://internationalcoolingtower.com/2016/11/cooling-tower-company-completing-wood-to-frp-conversions/
  92. https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=3950
  93. https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=36773
  94. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/6663552
  95. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378778816303425
  96. https://www.engr.colostate.edu/~meroney/PapersPDF/CEP04-05-1.pdf
  97. https://www.epri.com/research/products/CS-1683-V1
  98. https://centuryperformance.com/tech-zone/automotive-cooling-system-basics/
  99. https://help.summitracing.com/knowledgebase/article/SR-05280/en-us
  100. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/276809585_INTERNAL_COMBUSTION_ENGINE_COOLING_SYSTEM_WITH_ELEVATED_COOLANT_TEMPERATURE_RESEARCH_ON_THE_MODEL_TEST_STAND
  101. https://www.waterousco.com/media/pdfs/KORD3_22-224_Cooling_system_for_CI_engine.pdf
  102. https://garage.grumpysperformance.com/index.php?threads/auto-cooling-system-flow-rates-and-heat-transfer.9880/
  103. https://www.hpacademy.com/previous-webinars/322-ideal-engine-coolant-temperature/
  104. https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/ethylene-glycol-d_146.html
  105. https://www.excelcalcs.com/calcs/repository/Fluids/50-50-Ethylene-glycol-water--and--air-properties/
  106. https://www.superradiatorcoils.com/blog/how-are-ethylene-and-propylene-glycol-different-which-should-i-use
  107. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK537009/
  108. https://medlineplus.gov/ency/article/002751.htm
  109. https://health.uconn.edu/poison-control/about-poisons/garage-items/antifreeze-and-windshield-wiper-fluid/
  110. https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/ethylene-propylene-glycol-d_904.html
  111. https://www.dober.com/history-of-coolants
  112. https://www.hagerty.com/media/opinion/the-hack-mechanic/just-chill-making-sense-of-the-coolant-conundrum/
  113. https://www.techshopmag.com/tech-tip-cavitation-your-cooling-system-s-worst-nightmare/
  114. https://blog.amsoil.com/protect-against-cylinder-liner-cavitation/
  115. https://www.jeepforum.com/threads/whats-the-deal-with-hoat-and-oat.2970417/
  116. https://www.quora.com/Why-did-FCA-move-from-HOAT-to-OAT-spec-on-the-required-coolant
  117. https://www.valvolineglobal.com/en-ksa/all-you-need-to-know-about-coolants/
  118. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0043164824000036
  119. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9028534/
  120. https://www.qats.com/cms/2017/08/30/industry-developments-thermal-management-solutions-igbt-modules/
  121. https://soltexinc.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Choosing-the-Right-Fluid-for-Dielectric-Cooling1.pdf
  122. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0017931019344552
  123. https://faq.engineeredfluids.com/2990207/Which-Dielectric-Voltage-measurement-standard-does-Engineered-Fluid-use-for-its-products
  124. https://www.rohde-schwarz.com/products/broadcast-and-media/radio-transmitters/rs-thr9-liquid-cooled-fm-transmitter-family_63493-45698.html
  125. https://www.radioworld.com/tech-and-gear/tech-tips/maintaining-liquid-cooled-transmitters
  126. https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/cooling/liquid-vs-air-cooling-do-you-need-an-aio-cooler
  127. https://www.tomshardware.com/best-picks/best-aio-coolers
  128. https://www.energystar.gov/products/data_center_equipment/16-more-ways-cut-energy-waste-data-center/install-rack-or-row
  129. https://www.datacenterfrontier.com/special-reports/article/11427279/pushing-the-boundaries-of-air-cooling-in-high-density-environments
  130. https://www.ramboll.com/en-us/insights/decarbonise-for-net-zero/100-kw-per-rack-data-centers-evolution-power-density
  131. https://www.fibermall.com/blog/nvidia-gb200-superchip.htm
  132. https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/opinions/unlocking-the-potential-of-direct-to-chip-liquid-cooling/
  133. https://jetcool.com/post/what-is-direct-liquid-cooling-for-ai-data-centers/
  134. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110016822001557
  135. https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/liquid-cooling/immersion-cooling-for-data-centers-an-exotic-inevitability
  136. https://www.coreweave.com/blog/why-you-need-liquid-cooling-for-ai-performance-at-scale
  137. https://www.networkworld.com/article/3979105/liquid-cooling-technologies-reducing-data-center-environmental-impact.html
  138. https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstreams/17cb464c-407a-4bf7-81fb-04b5e9d924eb/download
  139. https://www.vertiv.com/en-us/solutions/learn-about/liquid-cooling-options-for-data-centers/
  140. https://www.parkplacetechnologies.com/blog/data-center-liquid-cooling-vs-air-cooling/
  141. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/marine-science/articles/10.3389/fmars.2021.761531/full
  142. https://www.goodway.com/resources/tips-tricks/calcium-fouling-seawater-cooling-systems
  143. https://www.rivieramm.com/opinion/opinion/keel-coolers-eliminate-silt-sand-and-seawater-24321
  144. https://www.nationalfisherman.com/boats-gear/how-r-w-fernstrum-s-keel-coolers-powers-commercial-fishing-vessels
  145. https://siebertyachtmanagement.com/marine-cooling-systems-and-heat-exchangers/
  146. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08927014.2024.2326067
  147. https://boatzincs.com/pages/use-mil-spec-zinc-anodes.html
  148. https://www.marineinsight.com/tech/understanding-sacrificial-anodes-on-ships/
  149. https://www.belmontmetals.com/keeping-vessels-seaworthy-common-marine-anode-capabilities/
  150. https://www.teyuchiller.com/fiber-laser-chiller-applied-to-shipbuilding.html
  151. https://www.alibaba.com/showroom/laser-chiller-cooling-system.html
  152. https://rigidchill.com/medical-aesthetic-laser-devices-cooling/
  153. https://moircooling.com/the-integrated-compact-cooling-system-for-medical-laser-equipment/
  154. https://www.boydcorp.com/blog/benefits-of-battery-immersion-cooling.html
  155. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2023/ma/d3ma00299c
  156. https://news.microsoft.com/source/features/sustainability/project-natick-underwater-datacenter/
  157. https://dgtlinfra.com/underwater-data-centers-servers/
  158. https://www.nlyte.com/blog/why-liquid-cooling-for-edge-is-now-essential/
  159. https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/analysis/liquid-cooling-the-edge-of-reason/
  160. https://thermtest.com/heat-conductivity-of-water
  161. https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/air-properties-viscosity-conductivity-heat-capacity-d_1509.html
  162. https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/specific-heat-capacity-water-d_660.html
  163. https://ctherm.com/resources/newsroom/blog/understanding-specific-heat-capacity/
  164. https://ctmmagnetics.com/general/air-cooled-vs-liquid-cooled-differences/
  165. https://www.boydcorp.com/about-boyd/resources/technical-papers-and-guides/air-vs-liquid-cooling-advancements-in-thermal-management.html
  166. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0306261921008977
  167. https://www.cycleworld.com/is-air-cooling-better-than-liquid-cooling/
  168. https://caferacerguide.com/air-cooled-vs-liquid-cooled-cafe-racers/
  169. https://www.corsair.com/us/en/explorer/diy-builder/cpu-coolers/what-are-the-chances-of-an-aio-leaking/
  170. https://tark-solutions.com/thermal-technical-library/application-notes/common-coolant-types-and-their-uses-liquid-cooling-systems
  171. https://www.qats.com/cms/2017/11/13/fluids-can-used-liquid-cold-plates-electronics-cooling/
  172. https://www.boydcorp.com/blog/avoiding-galvanic-corrosion.html
  173. https://www.chemtreat.com/solutions/water-essentials-handbook-chapter-corrosion-scale-and-biofouling-control-in-cooling-systems/
  174. https://www.esgamingpc.com/blog-liquid-cooling-vs-air-cooling-whats-the-best-option.html
  175. https://www.profileits.com/understanding-the-total-cost-of-ownership-tco-for-a-10-mw-ai-data-center-air-cooling-vs-immersion-cooling/
  176. https://www.corsair.com/us/en/explorer/diy-builder/cpu-coolers/how-to-clean-an-aio-liquid-cpu-cooler/
  177. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BbGomv195sk
  178. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R48646
  179. https://cologix.com/resources/blogs/liquid-cooling-for-data-centers-meeting-the-growing-demand-of-ai/
  180. https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/industry/technology/technology-media-and-telecom-predictions/2025/genai-power-consumption-creates-need-for-more-sustainable-data-centers.html
  181. https://airsysnorthamerica.com/how-does-your-cooling-system-affect-data-center-pue/
  182. https://www.vertiv.com/en-in/about/news-and-insights/articles/educational-articles/optimizing-water-usage-effectiveness-for-data-centers/
  183. https://www.circleofblue.org/2025/water-energy/data-center-energy-demand-is-putting-pressure-on-u-s-water-supplies/
  184. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/33/1326
  185. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9291154/
  186. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-04/documents/final-regulations-cooling-water-intake-structures-at-existing-facilities_fact-sheet_may-2014.pdf
  187. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-04/documents/cooling-water_phase-4_tdd_2014.pdf
  188. http://large.stanford.edu/courses/2021/ph240/conklin2/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.