Hubbry Logo
PerchloratePerchlorateMain
Open search
Perchlorate
Community hub
Perchlorate
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Perchlorate
Perchlorate
Perchlorate
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Perchlorate
Skeletal model of perchlorate showing various dimensions
Skeletal model of perchlorate showing various dimensions
Ball-and-stick model of the perchlorate ion
Ball-and-stick model of the perchlorate ion
Spacefill model of perchlorate
Spacefill model of perchlorate
Names
Systematic IUPAC name
Perchlorate[1]
Identifiers
3D model (JSmol)
ChEBI
ChEMBL
ChemSpider
DrugBank
ECHA InfoCard 100.152.366 Edit this at Wikidata
2136
MeSH 180053
UNII
  • InChI=1S/ClHO4/c2-1(3,4)5/h(H,2,3,4,5)/p-1 checkY
    Key: VLTRZXGMWDSKGL-UHFFFAOYSA-M checkY
  • [O-][Cl+3]([O-])([O-])[O-]
Properties
ClO−4
Molar mass 99.45 g·mol−1
Conjugate acid Perchloric acid
Except where otherwise noted, data are given for materials in their standard state (at 25 °C [77 °F], 100 kPa).
☒N verify (what is checkY☒N ?)

A perchlorate is a chemical compound containing the perchlorate ion, ClO−4, the conjugate base of perchloric acid (ionic perchlorate). As counterions, there can be metal cations, quaternary ammonium cations or other ions, for example, nitronium cation (NO+2).

The term perchlorate can also describe perchlorate esters or covalent perchlorates.[2] These are organic compounds that are alkyl or aryl esters of perchloric acid. They are characterized by a covalent bond between an oxygen atom of the ClO4 moiety and an organyl group.

In most ionic perchlorates, the cation is non-coordinating. The majority of ionic perchlorates are commercially produced salts commonly used as oxidizers for pyrotechnic devices and for their ability to control static electricity in food packaging.[3] Additionally, they have been used in rocket propellants, fertilizers, and as bleaching agents in the paper and textile industries.

Perchlorate contamination of food and water endangers human health, primarily affecting the thyroid gland.

Ionic perchlorates are typically colorless solids that exhibit good solubility in water. The perchlorate ion forms when they dissolve in water, dissociating into ions.  Many perchlorate salts also exhibit good solubility in non-aqueous solvents.[4] Four perchlorates are of primary commercial interest: ammonium perchlorate (NH4)ClO4, perchloric acid HClO4, potassium perchlorate KClO4 and sodium perchlorate NaClO4.

Production

[edit]

Very few chemical oxidants are strong enough to convert chlorate to perchlorate. Persulfate, ozone, or lead dioxide are all known to do so, but the reactions are too delicate and low-yielding for commercial viability.[5]

Perchlorate salts are typically manufactured through the process of electrolysis, which involves oxidizing aqueous solutions of corresponding chlorates. This technique is commonly employed in the production of sodium perchlorate, which finds widespread use as a key ingredient in rocket fuel.[5] Perchlorate salts are also commonly produced by reacting perchloric acid with bases, such as ammonium hydroxide or sodium hydroxide. Ammonium perchlorate, which is highly valued,[why?] can also be produced via an electrochemical process.[6]

Perchlorate esters are formed in the presence of a nucleophilic catalyst via a perchlorate salt's nucleophilic substitution onto an alkylating agent.[7]

Uses

[edit]

Chemical properties

[edit]

The perchlorate ion is the least redox reactive of the generalized chlorates. Perchlorate contains chlorine in its highest oxidation number (+7). A table of reduction potentials of the four chlorates shows that, contrary to expectation, perchlorate in aqueous solution is the weakest oxidant among the four.[12]

Ion Acidic reaction E° (V) Neutral/basic reaction E° (V)
Hypochlorite 2 H+ + 2 HOCl + 2 e− → Cl2 (g) + 2 H2O 1.63 ClO− + H2O + 2 e− → Cl− + 2 OH− 0.89
Chlorite 6 H+ + 2 HOClO + 6 e− → Cl2 (g) + 4 H2O 1.64 ClO−2 + 2 H2O + 4 e− → Cl− + 4 OH− 0.78
Chlorate 12 H+ + 2 ClO−3 + 10 e− → Cl2 (g) + 6 H2O 1.47 ClO−3 + 3 H2O + 6 e− → Cl− + 6 OH− 0.63
Perchlorate 16 H+ + 2 ClO−4 + 14 e− → Cl2 (g) + 8 H2O 1.42 ClO−4 + 4 H2O + 8 e− → Cl− + 8 OH− 0.56

These data show that the perchlorate and chlorate are stronger oxidizers in acidic conditions than in basic conditions.

Gas phase measurements of heats of reaction (which allow computation of ΔfH°) of various chlorine oxides do follow the expected trend wherein Cl2O7 exhibits the largest endothermic value of ΔfH° (238.1 kJ/mol) while Cl2O exhibits the lowest endothermic value of ΔfH° (80.3 kJ/mol).[13]

Weak base and weak coordinating anion

[edit]

As perchloric acid is one of the strongest mineral acids, perchlorate is a very weak base in the sense of Brønsted–Lowry acid–base theory. As it is also generally a weakly coordinating anion, perchlorate is commonly used as a background, or supporting, electrolyte.

Weak oxidant in aqueous solution due to kinetic limitations

[edit]
Main articles: Inner sphere electron transfer and Outer sphere electron transfer

Perchlorate compounds oxidize organic compounds, especially when the mixture is heated. The explosive decomposition of ammonium perchlorate is catalyzed by metals and heat.[14]

As perchlorate is a weak Lewis base (i.e., a weak electron pair donor) and a weak nucleophilic anion, it is also a very weakly coordinating anion.[14] This is why it is often used as a supporting electrolyte to study the complexation and the chemical speciation of many cations in aqueous solution or in electroanalytical methods (voltammetry, electrophoresis…).[14] Although the perchlorate reduction is thermodynamically favorable (∆G < 0; E° > 0), and that ClO−4 is expected to be a strong oxidant, most often in aqueous solution, it is practically an inert species behaving as an extremely slow oxidant because of severe kinetics limitations.[15][16] The metastable character of perchlorate in the presence of reducing cations such as Fe2+ in solution is due to the difficulty to form an activated complex facilitating the electron transfer and the exchange of oxo groups in the opposite direction. These strongly hydrated cations cannot form a sufficiently stable coordination bridge with one of the four oxo groups of the perchlorate anion. Although thermodynamically a mild reductant, Fe2+ ion exhibits a stronger trend to remain coordinated by water molecules to form the corresponding hexa-aquo complex in solution. The high activation energy of the cation binding with perchlorate to form a transient inner sphere complex more favourable to electron transfer considerably hinders the redox reaction.[17] The redox reaction rate is limited by the formation of a favorable activated complex involving an oxo-bridge between the perchlorate anion and the metallic cation.[18] It depends on the molecular orbital rearrangement (HOMO and LUMO orbitals) necessary for a fast oxygen atom transfer (OAT)[19] and the associated electron transfer as studied experimentally by Henry Taube (1983 Nobel Prize in Chemistry)[20][21] and theoretically by Rudolph A. Marcus (1992 Nobel Prize in Chemistry),[22] both awarded for their respective works on the mechanisms of electron-transfer reactions with metal complexes and in chemical systems.

In contrast to the Fe2+ cations which remain unoxidized in deaerated perchlorate aqueous solutions free of dissolved oxygen, other cations such as Ru(II) and Ti(III) can form a more stable bridge between the metal centre and one of the oxo groups of ClO−4. In the inner sphere electron transfer mechanism to observe the perchlorate reduction, the ClO−4 anion must quickly transfer an oxygen atom to the reducing cation.[23][24] When it is the case, metallic cations can readily reduce perchlorate in solution.[20] Ru(II) can reduce ClO−4 to ClO−3, while V(II), V(III), Mo(III), Cr(II) and Ti(III) can reduce ClO−4 to Cl−.[25]

Some metal complexes, especially those of rhenium, and some metalloenzymes can catalyze the reduction of perchlorate under mild conditions.[26] Perchlorate reductase (see below), a molybdoenzyme, also catalyzes the reduction of perchlorate.[27] Both the Re- and Mo-based catalysts operate via metal-oxo intermediates.

Microbiology

[edit]

Over 40 phylogenetically and metabolically diverse microorganisms capable of growth using perchlorate as an electron acceptor[28] have been isolated since 1996. Most originate from the Pseudomonadota, but others include the Bacillota, Moorella perchloratireducens and Sporomusa sp., and the archaeon Archaeoglobus fulgidus.[29][30] With the exception of A. fulgidus, microbes that grow via perchlorate reduction utilize the enzymes perchlorate reductase and chlorite dismutase, which collectively take perchlorate to chloride.[29] In the process, free oxygen (O2) is generated.[29]

Natural abundance

[edit]

Terrestrial abundance

[edit]

Perchlorate is created by lightning discharges in the presence of chloride. Perchlorate has been detected in rain and snow samples from Florida and Lubbock, Texas.[31] It is also present in Martian soil.

Naturally occurring perchlorate at its most abundant can be found commingled with deposits of sodium nitrate in the Atacama Desert of northern Chile. These deposits have been heavily mined as sources for nitrate-based fertilizers. Chilean nitrate is in fact estimated to be the source of around 81,000 tonnes (89,000 tons) of perchlorate imported to the U.S. (1909–1997). Results from surveys of ground water, ice, and relatively unperturbed deserts have been used to estimate a 100,000 to 3,000,000 tonnes (110,000 to 3,310,000 tons) "global inventory" of natural perchlorate presently on Earth.[32]

On Mars

[edit]

Perchlorate was detected in Martian soil at the level of ~0.6% by weight.[33][34] It was shown that at the Phoenix landing site it was present as a mixture of 60% Ca(ClO4)2 and 40% Mg(ClO4)2.[35] These salts, formed from perchlorates, act as antifreeze and substantially lower the freezing point of water. Based on the temperature and pressure conditions on present-day Mars at the Phoenix lander site, conditions would allow a perchlorate salt solution to be stable in liquid form for a few hours each day during the summer.[36]

The possibility that the perchlorate was a contaminant brought from Earth was eliminated by several lines of evidence. The Phoenix retro-rockets used ultra pure hydrazine and launch propellants consisting of ammonium perchlorate or ammonium nitrate. Sensors on board Phoenix found no traces of ammonium nitrate, and thus the nitrate in the quantities present in all three soil samples is indigenous to the Martian soil. Perchlorate is widespread in Martian soils at concentrations between 0.5 and 1%. At such concentrations, perchlorate could be an important source of oxygen, but it could also become a critical chemical hazard to astronauts.[37]

In 2006, a mechanism was proposed for the formation of perchlorates that is particularly relevant to the discovery of perchlorate at the Phoenix lander site. It was shown that soils with high concentrations of chloride converted to perchlorate in the presence of titanium dioxide and sunlight/ultraviolet light. The conversion was reproduced in the lab using chloride-rich soils from Death Valley.[38] Other experiments have demonstrated that the formation of perchlorate is associated with wide band gap semiconducting oxides.[39] In 2014, it was shown that perchlorate and chlorate can be produced from chloride minerals under Martian conditions via UV using only NaCl and silicate.[40]

Further findings of perchlorate and chlorate in the Martian meteorite EETA79001[41] and by the Mars Curiosity rover in 2012-2013 support the notion that perchlorates are globally distributed throughout the Martian surface.[42][43][44] With concentrations approaching 0.5% and exceeding toxic levels on Martian soil, Martian perchlorates would present a serious challenge to human settlement,[45] as well as microorganisms.[46] On the other hand, the perchlorate would provide a convenient source of oxygen for the settlements.

On September 28, 2015, NASA announced that analyses of spectral data from the Compact Reconnaissance Imaging Spectrometer for Mars instrument (CRISM) on board the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter from four different locations where recurring slope lineae (RSL) are present found evidence for hydrated salts. The hydrated salts most consistent with the spectral absorption features are magnesium perchlorate, magnesium chlorate and sodium perchlorate. The findings strongly support the hypothesis that RSL form as a result of contemporary water activity on Mars.[47][48][49][50][51]

Contamination in environment

[edit]

Perchlorates are of concern because of uncertainties about toxicity and health effects at low levels in drinking water, impact on ecosystems, and indirect exposure pathways for humans due to accumulation in vegetables.[11] They are water-soluble, exceedingly mobile in aqueous systems, and can persist for many decades under typical groundwater and surface water conditions.[52]

Industrial origin

[edit]

Perchlorates are used mostly in rocket propellants but also in disinfectants, bleaching agents, and herbicides. Perchlorate contamination is caused during both the manufacture and ignition of rockets and fireworks.[4] Fireworks are also a source of perchlorate in lakes.[53] Removal and recovery methods of these compounds from explosives and rocket propellants include high-pressure water washout, which generates aqueous ammonium perchlorate.

In U.S. drinking water

[edit]

In 2000, perchlorate contamination beneath the former flare manufacturing plant Olin Corporation Flare Facility, Morgan Hill, California was first discovered several years after the plant had closed. The plant had used potassium perchlorate as one of the ingredients during its 40 years of operation. By late 2003, the State of California and the Santa Clara Valley Water District had confirmed a groundwater plume currently extending over nine miles through residential and agricultural communities.[citation needed] The California Regional Water Quality Control Board and the Santa Clara Valley Water District have engaged[when?] in a major outreach effort, a water well testing program has been underway for about 1,200 residential, municipal, and agricultural wells. Large ion exchange treatment units are operating in three public water supply systems which include seven municipal wells with perchlorate detection. The potentially responsible parties, Olin Corporation and Standard Fuse Incorporated, have been supplying bottled water to nearly 800 households with private wells,[when?] and the Regional Water Quality Control Board has been overseeing cleanup efforts.[54]

The source of perchlorate in California was mainly attributed to two manufacturers in the southeast portion of the Las Vegas Valley in Nevada, where perchlorate has been produced for industrial use.[55] This led to perchlorate release into Lake Mead in Nevada and the Colorado River which affected regions of Nevada, California and Arizona, where water from this reservoir is used for consumption, irrigation and recreation for approximately half the population of these states.[4] Lake Mead has been attributed[when?] as the source of 90% of the perchlorate in Southern Nevada's drinking water. Based on sampling, perchlorate has been affecting 20 million people, with highest detection in Texas, southern California, New Jersey, and Massachusetts, but intensive sampling of the Great Plains and other middle state regions may lead to revised estimates with additional affected regions.[4] An action level of 18 μg/L has been adopted[when?] by several affected states.[52]

In 2001, the chemical was detected at levels as high as 5 μg/L at Joint Base Cape Cod (formerly Massachusetts Military Reservation), over the Massachusetts then state regulation of 2 μg/L.[56][57]

As of 2009, low levels of perchlorate had been detected in both drinking water and groundwater in 26 states in the U.S., according to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).[58]

In food

[edit]

In 2004, the chemical was found in cow's milk in California at an average level of 1.3 parts per billion (ppb, or μg/L), which may have entered the cows through feeding on crops exposed to water containing perchlorates.[59] A 2005 study suggested human breast milk had an average of 10.5 μg/L of perchlorate.[60]

From minerals and other natural occurrences

[edit]

In some places, there is no clear source of perchlorate, and it may be naturally occurring. Natural perchlorate on Earth was first identified in terrestrial nitrate deposits /fertilizers of the Atacama Desert in Chile as early as the 1880s[61] and for a long time considered a unique perchlorate source. The perchlorate released from historic use of Chilean nitrate based fertilizer which the U.S.imported by the hundreds of tons in the early 19th century can still be found in some groundwater sources of the United States, for example Long Island, New York.[62] Recent improvements in analytical sensitivity using ion chromatography based techniques have revealed a more widespread presence of natural perchlorate, particularly in subsoils of Southwest USA,[63] salt evaporites in California and Nevada,[64] Pleistocene groundwater in New Mexico,[65] and even present in extremely remote places such as Antarctica.[66] The data from these studies and others indicate that natural perchlorate is globally deposited on Earth with the subsequent accumulation and transport governed by the local hydrologic conditions.

Despite its importance to environmental contamination, the specific source and processes involved in natural perchlorate production remain poorly understood. Laboratory experiments in conjunction with isotopic studies[67] have implied that perchlorate may be produced on earth by oxidation of chlorine species through pathways involving ozone or its photochemical products.[68][69] Other studies have suggested that perchlorate can also be formed by lightning activated oxidation of chloride aerosols (e.g., chloride in sea salt sprays),[70] and ultraviolet or thermal oxidation of chlorine (e.g., bleach solutions used in swimming pools) in water.[71][72][73]

From nitrate fertilizers

[edit]

Although perchlorate as an environmental contaminant is usually associated with the manufacture, storage, and testing of solid rocket motors,[74] contamination of perchlorate has been focused as a side effect of the use of natural nitrate fertilizer and its release into ground water. The use of naturally contaminated nitrate fertilizer contributes to the infiltration of perchlorate anions into the ground water and threaten the water supplies of many regions in the US.[74]

One of the main sources of perchlorate contamination from natural nitrate fertilizer use was found to come from the fertilizer derived from Chilean caliche (calcium carbonate), because Chile has rich source of naturally occurring perchlorate anion.[75] Perchlorate concentration was the highest in Chilean nitrate, ranging from 3.3 to 3.98%.[52] Perchlorate in the solid fertilizer ranged from 0.7 to 2.0 mg g−1, variation of less than a factor of 3 and it is estimated that sodium nitrate fertilizers derived from Chilean caliche contain approximately 0.5–2 mg g−1 of perchlorate anion.[75] The direct ecological effect of perchlorate is not well known; its impact can be influenced by factors including rainfall and irrigation, dilution, natural attenuation, soil adsorption, and bioavailability.[75] Quantification of perchlorate concentrations in nitrate fertilizer components via ion chromatography revealed that in horticultural fertilizer components contained perchlorate ranging between 0.1 and 0.46%.[52]

Environmental cleanup

[edit]

There have been many attempts to eliminate perchlorate contamination. Current remediation technologies for perchlorate have downsides of high costs and difficulty in operation.[76] Thus, there have been interests in developing systems that would offer economic and green alternatives.[76]

Treatment ex situ and in situ

[edit]

Several technologies can remove perchlorate, via treatments ex situ (away from the location) and in situ (at the location).

Ex situ treatments include ion exchange using perchlorate-selective or nitrite-specific resins, bioremediation using packed-bed or fluidized-bed bioreactors, and membrane technologies via electrodialysis and reverse osmosis.[77] In ex situ treatment via ion exchange, contaminants are attracted and adhere to the ion exchange resin because such resins and ions of contaminants have opposite charge.[78] As the ion of the contaminant adheres to the resin, another charged ion is expelled into the water being treated, in which then ion is exchanged for the contaminant.[78] Ion exchange technology has advantages of being well-suitable for perchlorate treatment and high volume throughput but has a downside that it does not treat chlorinated solvents. In addition, ex situ technology of liquid phase carbon adsorption is employed, where granular activated carbon (GAC) is used to eliminate low levels of perchlorate and pretreatment may be required in arranging GAC for perchlorate elimination.[77]

In situ treatments, such as bioremediation via perchlorate-selective microbes and permeable reactive barrier, are also being used to treat perchlorate.[77] In situ bioremediation has advantages of minimal above-ground infrastructure and its ability to treat chlorinated solvents, perchlorate, nitrate, and RDX simultaneously. However, it has a downside that it may negatively affect secondary water quality. In situ technology of phytoremediation could also be utilized, even though perchlorate phytoremediation mechanism is not fully founded yet.[77]

Bioremediation using perchlorate-reducing bacteria, which reduce perchlorate ions to harmless chloride, has also been proposed.[79]

Health effects

[edit]

Thyroid inhibition

[edit]

Perchlorate is a potent competitive inhibitor of the thyroid sodium-iodide symporter.[80] Thus, it has been used to treat hyperthyroidism since the 1950s.[81] At very high doses (70,000–300,000 ppb) the administration of potassium perchlorate was considered the standard of care in the United States, and remains the approved pharmacologic intervention for many countries.

In large amounts perchlorate interferes with iodine uptake into the thyroid gland. In adults, the thyroid gland helps regulate the metabolism by releasing hormones, while in children, the thyroid helps in proper development. The NAS, in its 2005 report, Health Implications of Perchlorate Ingestion, emphasized that this effect, also known as Iodide Uptake Inhibition (IUI) is not an adverse health effect. However, in January 2008, California's Department of Toxic Substances Control stated that perchlorate is becoming a serious threat to human health and water resources.[82] In 2010, the EPA's Office of the Inspector General determined that the agency's own perchlorate reference dose (RfD) of 24.5 parts per billion protects against all human biological effects from exposure, as the federal government is responsible for all US military base groundwater contamination. This finding was due to a significant shift in policy at the EPA in basing its risk assessment on non-adverse effects such as IUI instead of adverse effects. The Office of the Inspector General also found that because the EPA's perchlorate reference dose is conservative and protective of human health further reducing perchlorate exposure below the reference dose does not effectively lower risk.[83]

Because of ammonium perchlorate's adverse effects upon children, Massachusetts set its maximum allowed limit of ammonium perchlorate in drinking water at 2 parts per billion (2 ppb = 2 micrograms per liter).[84]

Perchlorate affects only thyroid hormone. Because it is neither stored nor metabolized, effects of perchlorate on the thyroid gland are reversible, though effects on brain development from lack of thyroid hormone in fetuses, newborns, and children are not.[85]

Toxic effects of perchlorate have been studied in a survey of industrial plant workers who had been exposed to perchlorate, compared to a control group of other industrial plant workers who had no known exposure to perchlorate. After undergoing multiple tests, workers exposed to perchlorate were found to have a significant systolic blood pressure rise compared to the workers who were not exposed to perchlorate, as well as a significant decreased thyroid function compared to the control workers.[86]

A study involving healthy adult volunteers determined that at levels above 0.007 milligrams per kilogram per day (mg/(kg·d)), perchlorate can temporarily inhibit the thyroid gland's ability to absorb iodine from the bloodstream ("iodide uptake inhibition", thus perchlorate is a known goitrogen).[87] The EPA converted this dose into a reference dose of 0.0007 mg/(kg·d) by dividing this level by the standard intraspecies uncertainty factor of 10. The agency then calculated a "drinking water equivalent level" of 24.5 ppb by assuming a person weighs 70 kg (150 lb) and consumes 2 L (0.44 imp gal; 0.53 US gal) of drinking water per day over a lifetime.[88][needs update]

In 2006, a study reported a statistical association between environmental levels of perchlorate and changes in thyroid hormones of women with low iodine. The study authors were careful to point out that hormone levels in all the study subjects remained within normal ranges. The authors also indicated that they did not originally normalize their findings for creatinine, which would have essentially accounted for fluctuations in the concentrations of one-time urine samples like those used in this study.[89] When the Blount research was re-analyzed with the creatinine adjustment made, the study population limited to women of reproductive age, and results not shown in the original analysis, any remaining association between the results and perchlorate intake disappeared.[90] Soon after the revised Blount Study was released, Robert Utiger, a doctor with the Harvard Institute of Medicine, testified before the US Congress and stated: "I continue to believe that that reference dose, 0.007 milligrams per kilo (24.5 ppb), which includes a factor of 10 to protect those who might be more vulnerable, is quite adequate."[91]

In 2014, a study was published, showing that environmental exposure to perchlorate in pregnant women with hypothyroidism is associated with a significant risk of low IQ in their children.[92]

Lung toxicity

[edit]

Some studies suggest that perchlorate has pulmonary toxic effects as well. Studies have been performed on rabbits where perchlorate has been injected into the trachea. The lung tissue was removed and analyzed, and it was found that perchlorate injected lung tissue showed several adverse effects when compared to the control group that had been intratracheally injected with saline. Adverse effects included inflammatory infiltrates, alveolar collapse, subpleural thickening, and lymphocyte proliferation.[93]

Aplastic anemia

[edit]

In the early 1960s, potassium perchlorate used to treat Graves' disease was implicated in the development of aplastic anemia—a condition where the bone marrow fails to produce new blood cells in sufficient quantity—in thirteen patients, seven of whom died.[94] Subsequent investigations have indicated the connection between administration of potassium perchlorate and development of aplastic anemia to be "equivocable at best", which means that the benefit of treatment, if it is the only known treatment, outweighs the risk, and it appeared a contaminant poisoned the 13.[95]

Regulation in the U.S.

[edit]

Water

[edit]

In 1998, perchlorate was included in the U.S. EPA Contaminant Candidate List, primarily due to its detection in California drinking water.[96][4]

In 2002, the EPA completed its draft toxicological review of perchlorate and proposed an reference dose of 0.00003 milligrams per kilogram per day (mg/kg/day) based primarily on studies that identified neurodevelopmental deficits in rat pups. These deficits were linked to maternal exposure to perchlorate.[97]

In 2003, a federal district court in California found that the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act applied, because perchlorate is ignitable, and therefore was a "characteristic" hazardous waste.[98]

Subsequently, the U.S. National Research Council of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) reviewed the health implications of perchlorate, and in 2005 proposed a much higher reference dose of 0.0007 mg/kg/day based primarily on a 2002 study by Greer et al.[97] During that study, 37 adult human subjects were split into four exposure groups exposed to 0.007 (7 subjects), 0.02 (10 subjects), 0.1 (10 subjects), and 0.5 (10 subjects) mg/kg/day. Significant decreases in iodide uptake were found in the three highest exposure groups. Iodide uptake was not significantly reduced in the lowest exposed group, but four of the seven subjects in this group experienced inhibited iodide uptake. In 2005, the RfD proposed by NAS was accepted by EPA and added to its integrated risk information system (IRIS).

  1. The NAS report described the level of lowest exposure from Greer et al. as a "no-observed-effect level" (NOEL). However, there was actually an effect at that level although not statistically significant largely due to small size of study population (four of seven subjects showed a slight decrease in iodide uptake).
  2. Reduced iodide uptake was not considered to be an adverse effect, even though it is a precursor to an adverse effect, hypothyroidism. Therefore, additional safety factors, would be necessary when extrapolating from the point of departure to the RfD.
  3. Consideration of data uncertainty was insufficient because the Greer, et al. study reflected only a 14-day exposure (=acute) to healthy adults and no additional safety factors were considered to protect sensitive subpopulations like for example, breastfeeding newborns.

Although there has generally been consensus with the Greer et al. study, there has been no consensus with regard to developing a perchlorate RfD. One of the key differences results from how the point of departure is viewed (i.e., NOEL or "lowest-observed-adverse-effect level", LOAEL), or whether a benchmark dose should be used to derive the RfD. Defining the point of departure as a NOEL or LOAEL has implications when it comes to applying appropriate safety factors to the point of departure to derive the RfD.[99]

In early 2006, EPA issued a "Cleanup Guidance" and recommended a Drinking Water Equivalent Level (DWEL) for perchlorate of 24.5 μg/L.[citation needed] Both DWEL and Cleanup Guidance were based on a 2005 review of the existing research by the National Academy of Sciences (NAS).[100]

Lacking a federal drinking water standard, several states subsequently published their own standards for perchlorate including Massachusetts in 2006[citation needed] and California in 2007. Other states, including Arizona, Maryland, Nevada, New Mexico, New York, and Texas have established non-enforceable, advisory levels for perchlorate.[citation needed]

In 2008, EPA issued an interim drinking water health advisory for perchlorate and with it a guidance and analysis concerning the impacts on the environment and drinking water.[101] California also issued guidance[when?] regarding perchlorate use.[102] Both the Department of Defense and some environmental groups voiced questions about the NAS report,[citation needed] but no credible science has emerged to challenge the NAS findings.[citation needed]

In February 2008, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reported that U.S. toddlers on average were being exposed to more than half of EPA's safe dose from food alone.[103] In March 2009, a Centers for Disease Control study found 15 brands of infant formula contaminated with perchlorate and that combined with existing perchlorate drinking water contamination, infants could be at risk for perchlorate exposure above the levels considered safe by EPA.

In 2010, the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection set a 10 fold lower RfD (0.07 μg/kg/day) than the NAS RfD using a much higher uncertainty factor of 100. They also calculated an Infant drinking water value, which neither US EPA nor CalEPA had done.[104]

On February 11, 2011, EPA determined that perchlorate meets the Safe Drinking Water Act criteria for regulation as a contaminant.[101][105] The agency found that perchlorate may have an adverse effect on the health of persons and is known to occur in public water systems with a frequency and at levels that it presents a public health concern. Since then EPA has continued to determine what level of contamination is appropriate. EPA prepared extensive responses to submitted public comments.[106][better source needed]

In 2016, the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) filed a lawsuit to accelerate EPA's regulation of perchlorate.[107]

In 2019, EPA proposed a Maximum Contaminant Level of 0.056 mg/L for public water systems.[108]

On June 18, 2020, EPA announced that it was withdrawing its 2011 regulatory determination and its 2019 proposal, stating that it had taken "proactive steps" with state and local governments to address perchlorate contamination.[109] In September 2020 NRDC filed suit against EPA for its failure to regulate perchlorate, and stated that 26 million people may be affected by perchlorate in their drinking water.[110] On March 31, 2022, the EPA announced that a review confirmed its 2020 decision.[111] Following the NRDC lawsuit, in 2023 the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit ordered EPA to develop a perchlorate standard for public water systems.[112] EPA stated that it will publish a proposed standard for perchlorate in 2025, and issue a final rule in 2027.[113]

Covalent perchlorates

[edit]

Although typically found as a non-coordinating anion, a few metal complexes are known. Hexaperchloratoaluminate and tetraperchloratoaluminate are strong oxidising agents.

Several perchlorate esters are known.[2] For example, methyl perchlorate is a high energy material that is a strong alkylating agent. Chlorine perchlorate is a covalent inorganic analog.

Safety

[edit]

As discussed above, iodide is competitor in the thyroid glands. In the presence of reductants, perchlorate forms potentially explosive mixtures. The PEPCON disaster destroyed a production plant for ammonium perchlorate when a fire caused the ammonium perchlorate stored on site to react with the aluminum that the storage tanks were constructed with and explode.

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Perchlorate

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Perchlorate is the monovalent inorganic anion with the ClO₄⁻, consisting of a central atom in the +7 bonded to four oxygen atoms, which exhibits high aqueous and acts as a stable, strong despite chlorine's highest oxidation state among oxychlorines. First synthesized as in 1816 by Austrian chemist Friedrich von Stadion through of , perchlorate occurs both naturally in arid environments like the via atmospheric oxidation processes and as a synthetic compound produced industrially on a large scale. Its primary applications leverage its oxidative properties in solid rocket propellants, , , airbag inflators, and highway safety flares, with being the most common form used in and munitions. Perchlorate's environmental —due to its resistance to degradation, low volatility, and mobility in aqueous systems—has led to widespread and near and disposal sites, prompting regulatory scrutiny. The anion's toxicity stems from competitive inhibition of the sodium-iodide in the gland, potentially disrupting synthesis and posing risks particularly to fetuses and infants dependent on maternal iodine uptake, though human epidemiological data show mixed results beyond acute high-dose exposures.

Chemical Properties

Molecular Structure and Bonding

The perchlorate ion, ClO₄⁻, consists of a central chlorine atom surrounded by four oxygen atoms in a tetrahedral arrangement, with the chlorine exhibiting an oxidation state of +7. This configuration arises from the valence electrons of chlorine forming four sigma bonds to oxygen, augmented by d-orbital participation enabling expanded octet accommodation, while the overall -1 charge resides delocalized over the oxygens via resonance. The Cl–O bond lengths measure approximately 1.44 Å, shorter than expected for pure single bonds (∼1.7 Å), signifying partial double-bond character from four equivalent hybrids wherein the positive charge on is stabilized by π-backbonding to oxygen p-orbitals. Bond angles approach the ideal tetrahedral value of 109.5°, reflecting minimal lone-pair repulsion due to the absence of non-bonding electrons on . Infrared spectroscopy corroborates this symmetric, resonance-stabilized bonding, displaying degenerate asymmetric stretching (ν₃) at ∼1100 cm⁻¹ and bending (ν₄) at ∼620 cm⁻¹ modes characteristic of equivalent Cl–O linkages with enhanced bond order. Compared to chlorate (ClO₃⁻), where chlorine holds a +5 oxidation state and fewer resonance forms limit delocalization, perchlorate's additional oxygen fosters superior charge dispersion, underpinning its relative thermodynamic stability.

Stability and Reactivity

Perchlorate ions demonstrate remarkable kinetic stability in aqueous solutions at ambient temperatures, resisting oxidation or reduction despite the thermodynamic favorability of reduction to lower oxidation states of . This inertness arises from high activation energies that impose substantial kinetic barriers to , rendering perchlorate a weak practical oxidant under standard conditions. Consequently, perchlorate persists in environmental matrices without spontaneous decomposition, requiring specific catalysts or energy inputs to overcome these barriers. Thermal decomposition of perchlorate salts occurs only at elevated temperatures above 300°C, yielding chlorides and molecular oxygen via pathways such as ClO₄⁻ → Cl⁻ + 2O₂. For instance, undergoes incomplete decomposition below 300°C, leaving a porous residue, while completion demands temperatures exceeding 350°C. This high thermal threshold underscores the role of activation energies in limiting reactivity, distinguishing perchlorate from more labile oxychlorine species like . In biological contexts, perchlorate reduction proceeds under anaerobic conditions mediated by dissimilatory perchlorate-reducing bacteria, such as Dechloromonas species, which employ the enzyme perchlorate reductase to catalyze the initial two-electron reduction to (ClO₄⁻ → ClO₂⁻). This enzymatic mechanism bypasses abiotic kinetic limitations, facilitating sequential dismutation of to and oxygen, though the process remains confined to specialized microbial consortia.

Coordination and Solubility Characteristics

The perchlorate anion (ClO₄⁻) exhibits weak coordinating ability toward metal ions, primarily due to its large ionic size and delocalized negative charge over the tetrahedral structure, resulting in low and minimal ligand field stabilization. This contrasts with anions like (SO₄²⁻), which possess higher and stronger donor properties, enabling more robust coordination in metal complexes. Consequently, perchlorate often functions as a or non-coordinating in many complexes, facilitating the study of other s without interference. Most perchlorate salts demonstrate exceptionally high in , attributed to the weak ion-pairing interactions stemming from perchlorate's non-coordinating nature and minimal in hydrated forms. For instance, (NaClO₄) dissolves at 209.6 g per 100 mL of at 25 °C. This solubility exceeds that of many common salts, allowing perchlorate to remain dissociated and mobile in aqueous solutions without forming precipitates with most cations. Exceptions include (KClO₄), with solubility of approximately 1.7 g per 100 mL at 20 °C, which is exploited in for perchlorate quantification via selective precipitation from ethanolic solutions. These characteristics enhance perchlorate's utility in coordination chemistry, where its inertness prevents unwanted complexation, and in solution chemistry, where high solubility ensures it behaves as a stable, non-precipitating anion under typical conditions.

History and Discovery

Early Synthesis and Identification

Potassium perchlorate was first synthesized in 1816 by Austrian chemist Friedrich von Stadion through the electrolysis of potassium chlorate solutions, marking the initial preparation of a perchlorate compound. Stadion observed the formation of white crystals upon cooling the electrolyzed solution, which he identified as a new chlorine-oxygen compound distinct from chlorate based on its solubility and lack of reaction with reducing agents that readily decolorized chlorate solutions. In the same year, Stadion isolated by distilling with concentrated under reduced pressure, yielding a fuming, colorless he termed "oxygenated ." This acid exhibited exceptional oxidizing power, capable of igniting organic materials upon contact and decomposing with explosive violence when heated, properties that highlighted its chemical potency beyond known oxyacids of . Throughout the mid-19th century, chemists confirmed perchlorate's identity through refined analytical methods, including stepwise reduction titrations that revealed its seven-valent state—unlike —and tests showing insolubility differences in specific solvents, enabling separation from chlorate impurities in preparations. These validations, reported in chemical journals of the era, solidified perchlorate as a yet highly reactive , spurring further structural investigations.

Development of Industrial Production

Industrial production of perchlorate originated in in the 1890s, where Stockholms Superfosfat Fabriken AB commenced commercial manufacturing in Masebo using electrolytic methods. Prior to , the depended heavily on imports from to meet limited demand, as domestic output remained minimal despite early efforts by companies like Oldbury Electro-Chemical, which began production in 1910. The exigencies of prompted rapid expansion of U.S. domestic production starting in the early 1940s, driven by military requirements for oxidizers in explosives and early rocket propellants. Western Electrochemical Company initiated large-scale electrolytic oxidation of to at a new facility in , which became operational in January 1944 with an initial capacity of 100 tons per month of , later expanded. This plant, costing approximately $5 million by the early 1950s, was subsequently acquired and operated by American Potash and Chemical Corporation, which scaled output to 40-50 tons per day by 1953 through metathesis reactions involving , , and . Amid the and the intensification of the in the 1950s, production shifted emphasis toward as the preferred oxidizer for composite solid propellants in missiles and rockets, supplanting due to superior stability and performance characteristics. U.S. capacity reached 24,700 tons annually by 1959, reflecting sustained geopolitical pressures for reliable domestic supplies. Engineering advancements in electrolytic cells, including the adoption of anodes and additives, markedly improved current efficiencies in the chlorate-to-perchlorate conversion, elevating yields from as low as 23% in dilute solutions to over 93% at concentrations above 100 g/L , approaching quantitative conversion in optimized batch processes. These refinements reduced anode consumption and dependency on scarce , enabling scalable, high-purity output essential for military applications.

Production

Industrial Processes

The primary industrial method for perchlorate production involves the electrochemical anodic oxidation of aqueous (NaClO₃) solutions, typically at concentrations of 500–600 g/L and temperatures of 50–70°C, using inert anodes such as or lead dioxide-coated . This process proceeds via stepwise oxidation: chlorate is first converted to and intermediates, followed by further anodic oxidation to perchlorate (ClO₄⁻), with the overall reaction NaClO₃ + H₂O → NaClO₄ + H₂ occurring across the cell, where hydrogen evolves at the . Current densities of 0.2–0.5 A/cm² are employed in undivided cells to achieve high conversion efficiencies exceeding 90%, with cell voltages around 4–6 V. The resulting (NaClO₄) solution is purified by and then converted to (NH₄ClO₄), the predominant form for applications, via double decomposition with or by reacting with and , followed by fractional recrystallization to separate the less soluble NH₄ClO₄. This metathesis yields propellant-grade NH₄ClO₄ with purity levels greater than 99.5%, essential for consistent burn rates in solid rocket motors. Byproducts include gas from the and minor at the , with potential trace gas from decomposition if control is inadequate; energy consumption for the oxidation step averages 5–7 kWh per kg of perchlorate produced, driven largely by at the . Global production capacity for is concentrated in the United States and , which together account for over 80% of output, primarily to support and defense sectors. In the U.S., American Pacific Corporation operates the sole domestic facility in , with a June 2025 announcement of a $100 million expansion adding a new production line to increase capacity by more than 50%, motivated by heightened demand for and propulsion systems. Chinese producers have similarly expanded capacities by over 12% in 2024, leveraging lower-cost electrolytic infrastructure to meet export and domestic military needs. These processes emphasize closed-loop from upstream chlorate production to minimize raw material inputs, primarily and .

Laboratory Methods

Laboratory-scale synthesis of perchlorate salts, such as , commonly employs the thermal of via the reaction 4KClO3→3KClO4+KCl4 \mathrm{KClO_3} \rightarrow 3 \mathrm{KClO_4} + \mathrm{KCl}, performed by heating in a at 400–500°C under controlled conditions until ceases, typically requiring 1–2 hours to achieve partial conversion yields of 60–75%. The resulting crude mixture is cooled, dissolved in hot to solubilize the perchlorate while leaving residues, filtered, and the filtrate cooled to crystallize , which is then recrystallized from for purity exceeding 99%. This method prioritizes small-batch precision to minimize side reactions like chlorate decomposition to and , with safety measures including ventilation to handle evolved oxides and avoidance of overheating to prevent decomposition. Perchloric acid (HClO4\mathrm{HClO_4}) is prepared in laboratories by distilling a 70–72% aqueous under vacuum (<1 mmHg) with dehydrating agents such as magnesium perchlorate or fuming sulfuric acid to obtain anhydrous or highly concentrated forms, boiling at approximately 203°C for the , though anhydrous acid remains stable only at low temperatures for days. Alternatively, treating sodium or barium perchlorate with concentrated hydrochloric acid precipitates the corresponding chloride, followed by filtration and distillation of the filtrate to the (71.6% HClO4\mathrm{HClO_4}). Concentrated HClO4\mathrm{HClO_4} (>72%) poses severe hazards, including shock-sensitive explosivity when dry, violent oxidation of organics leading to fires or detonations, and rapid decomposition at 245°C generating high pressure and toxic gases; handling requires adding acid to (never reverse), use of open systems, and exclusion of organics or reducing agents. Purity and identity confirmation of perchlorates employs ion chromatography with conductivity or mass spectrometric detection, achieving detection limits below 1 µg/L for the perchlorate anion via separation on anion-exchange columns and quantification by peak area comparison to standards. Complementary spectroscopic methods, such as Raman spectroscopy, identify the perchlorate ion through characteristic ν₁ symmetric stretch at ~935 cm⁻¹, enabling non-destructive confirmation in solids or solutions, particularly useful for distinguishing from interferents like chlorate or nitrate. These techniques ensure analytical rigor, with mass spectrometry providing isotopic ratio confirmation (e.g., m/z 99/101) for trace-level verification.

Uses and Applications

Propellants and Pyrotechnics

Ammonium (AP) functions as the predominant oxidizer in composite solid rocket propellants, typically accounting for 60-80% of the formulation by weight to provide the oxygen necessary for combusting metallic fuels like aluminum. These propellants offer a high , enabling efficient energy release and specific impulses exceeding 250 seconds, which surpasses many alternative oxidizers due to AP's dense oxygen content and minimal residue production. In the program's solid rocket boosters, the propellant incorporated approximately 69.6% AP alongside 16% aluminum and binders, delivering a vacuum of around 268 seconds and supporting launches from 1981 to 2011. AP's mechanical stability under high vibration and thermal stress further enhances its suitability for applications, reducing risks of premature ignition or structural failure during storage and operation. Beyond propulsion, perchlorate salts, particularly AP and , are integral to pyrotechnic compositions for their clean-burning properties and ability to intensify vivid colors through donation during . In fireworks, AP serves as an oxidizer to sustain rapid while enhancing spectral emissions for reds, greens, and blues, contributing to displays used globally for celebrations and signaling. powers automotive inflators by generating gas through controlled decomposition, ensuring millisecond-scale deployment in collision scenarios since the 1990s. Highway safety flares and military signaling devices also rely on perchlorates for sustained, high-intensity illumination without excessive smoke, prioritizing reliability in emergency and tactical contexts. The demand for perchlorate-based materials in defense, , and has propelled market expansion, with global revenues projected to reach approximately $1.4 billion by 2032, growing at a compound annual rate of about 6.8% from 2023 levels, largely fueled by systems and production. This growth underscores perchlorates' unmatched performance in delivering high thrust-to-weight ratios and visual efficacy compared to substitutes like nitrates, which often yield lower energy densities or inferior stability.

Analytical and Other Industrial Roles

Perchloric acid is widely used in wet digestion methods for preparing organic samples, such as biological tissues and sera, prior to analysis, often in combination with to ensure complete and minimize residue interference. In modified Kjeldahl procedures, the addition of 60% perchloric acid reduces digestion time by facilitating rapid oxidation of organic matter while maintaining accurate quantification, as demonstrated in early 20th-century optimizations. These applications leverage perchloric acid's potent oxidizing and dehydrating capabilities to break down complex matrices without introducing significant contamination for subsequent atomic absorption or spectrometry. Anhydrous perchloric acid demonstrates exceptional solvating properties for organic compounds, forming modified molecular adducts upon mixing with solvents, which enables its use in dissolving recalcitrant organics for analytical or synthetic purposes. Industrially, perchloric acid functions as a dehydrating agent in determinations and metal dissolutions, where it accelerates evaporation and prevents hydration artifacts. Its strong oxidizing nature supports of metals like aluminum and in processes, as well as of platinum-group metals such as and onto substrates. Potassium perchlorate has served as a historical therapeutic agent for , with clinical evidence from 1952 showing its efficacy in blocking thyroidal uptake to suppress overproduction in conditions like . In organometallic synthesis, perchlorate acts as a weakly coordinating anion to stabilize highly reactive cations in complexes, enabling isolation of low-coordinate otherwise prone to aggregation. Covalent perchlorates, including trimethylsilyl perchlorate, provide discrete covalent bonding motifs for generating silylium-like ions and facilitating nucleophilic substitutions in weakly nucleophilic media.

Natural Occurrence

Terrestrial Deposits and Formation Mechanisms

Perchlorate occurs naturally in terrestrial environments primarily through abiotic atmospheric oxidation processes, where ions react with and transient oxidants like hydroxyl radicals or ClO radicals, often initiated by discharges or photolysis. These reactions produce (HClO₄), which is deposited globally via wet or dry processes and concentrates in hyper-arid regions due to minimal leaching and high rates. Empirical measurements indicate that this mechanism yields detectable perchlorate in remote, uncontaminated sites, with isotopic signatures (e.g., oxygen ) distinguishing natural from synthetic sources. In the Antarctic Dry Valleys, perchlorate was discovered in 2010 in soils and ice samples at concentrations up to 1100 μg/kg, far exceeding levels in less arid Antarctic regions and confirming accumulation over millennia in ice-free zones with negligible biological or anthropogenic influence. These findings imply a continuous global atmospheric of perchlorate, estimated at 10⁴–10⁵ metric tons annually based on deposition models and data, comparable to pre-1980s industrial emissions. Terrestrial deposits are prominently associated with formations rich in nitrates, such as those in Chile's , where perchlorate co-precipitates as soluble salts alongside (Chile saltpeter) at average concentrations of approximately 0.03 wt% (300 mg/kg) in nitrate ores. Formation here involves analogous atmospheric oxidation followed by capillary evaporation in hyper-arid basins over geological timescales ( to present), with correlated abundances of and indicating shared photochemical origins. While these natural deposits were extensively mined from the late 19th to mid-20th centuries for , leading to distributed legacy contamination, the perchlorate itself predates industrial extraction. Biotic contributions to perchlorate formation remain minor and debated, potentially involving microbial oxidation of lower chloroxyanions (e.g., or ) in oxic soils by specialized using oxygenase enzymes, though laboratory yields are low (<1% conversion) and field evidence is sparse compared to abiotic rates. Global inventories suggest that such processes contribute negligibly to bulk deposits, with abiotic atmospheric inputs dominating pre-industrial levels across arid inventories.

Extraterrestrial Presence

Perchlorate salts were detected in Martian regolith by the Phoenix lander in 2008, with the Wet Chemistry Laboratory measuring concentrations of 0.4 to 0.6 wt% in soil samples from the northern polar plains. These findings indicated perchlorate as a dominant soluble anion, distributed evenly across the landing site and contributing to the soil's high salinity. Subsequent missions, including the Curiosity rover in Gale Crater, corroborated oxychlorine species consistent with perchlorate at varying levels, though direct quantification varied due to instrumental differences. Abiotic formation mechanisms on Mars involve ultraviolet photochemistry oxidizing chloride-bearing minerals in the regolith, facilitated by the planet's thin CO2 atmosphere and intense solar UV radiation. Surface radiolysis and plasma chemistry during dust storms or electrostatic discharges further promote stepwise chlorine oxidation to perchlorate, yielding concentrations orders of magnitude higher than terrestrial analogs without invoking biologic processes. This oxidant's reactivity under UV exposure generates free radicals that degrade simple organics, informing regolith chemistry models and underscoring its role as a persistent environmental factor rather than a transient contaminant. Perchlorate presence extends to other solar system bodies, including detections in lunar samples and chondritic meteorites at trace levels, suggesting mechanochemical or radiolytic production in regolith exposed to cosmic rays and solar wind. Chlorine isotopic ratios in Martian perchlorate, such as a lighter 37Cl/35Cl ratio compared to Earth's crustal average, align with abiotic fractionation from photochemical or radiolytic pathways, excluding biologic enrichment. While speculative for cometary ices, analogous oxychlorine formation could occur in volatile-rich environments under irradiation, highlighting perchlorate's ubiquity as a chemical tracer of oxidative surface processes across airless or thin-atmosphere worlds.

Environmental Distribution

Sources of Environmental Perchlorate

Perchlorate enters ecosystems through industrial releases linked to its role as an oxidizer in solid rocket propellants, explosives, munitions, and pyrotechnics, with detections reported at 284 U.S. Department of Defense installations from manufacturing, testing, and disposal activities. Groundwater at such sites, including rocket fuel facilities, has shown concentrations from 4 µg/L to over 630,000 µg/L, as at the PEPCON plant in Henderson, Nevada, following a 1988 explosion. Fireworks production and displays add to localized inputs, elevating perchlorate in nearby surface waters and soils post-use. Agricultural application of nitrate fertilizers sourced from Chilean caliche introduces perchlorate as an impurity inherent to the nitrate salts, leading to soil enrichment and subsequent leaching into groundwater or runoff. In U.S. drinking water supplies, perchlorate averages below 10 µg/L across sampled systems, though positive detections show medians around 6.4 µg/L and spikes near industrial sites can exceed 500,000 µg/L in plumes extending miles from sources. Plant uptake from contaminated irrigation or soils transfers perchlorate into the food chain, with FDA surveys detecting levels in produce ranging from nondetect to 927 µg/kg in spinach (mean 115 µg/kg), up to 286 µg/kg in tomatoes (mean 13.6 µg/kg), and up to 111 µg/kg in carrots (mean 15.9 µg/kg). Global perchlorate use, including pyrotechnics and propellants, contributes via atmospheric deposition, estimated at 1.3 × 10⁵ to 6.4 × 10⁵ kg annually in the U.S., dispersing low levels into remote soils and waters.

Distinguishing Natural from Anthropogenic Inputs

Stable isotope ratio analysis, particularly of chlorine (δ37Cl) and oxygen (δ18O, Δ17O), provides a primary method for differentiating natural from anthropogenic perchlorate sources. Natural perchlorate, formed via atmospheric photochemical oxidation involving ozone, typically exhibits elevated δ18O values (often >+45‰) and distinct mass-independent fractionation in Δ17O due to stratospheric oxygen incorporation, contrasting with synthetic perchlorate from electrolytic industrial processes, which shows lower δ18O (generally -25‰ to +25‰) and δ37Cl values clustered around 0‰. These signatures arise from differing formation mechanisms: natural processes favor oxygen exchange with atmospheric oxidants, while anthropogenic production relies on aqueous electrolysis without such isotopic enrichment. Radiogenic 36Cl/Cl ratios further aid distinction, as natural perchlorate in ancient deposits reflects cosmogenic or historical nuclear inputs absent in modern synthetics. Historical anthropogenic inputs complicate attribution, as natural perchlorate from Chilean deposits—mined since the mid-19th century and exported as fertilizers until the 1920s—introduced significant quantities to global agricultural soils before synthetic production dominated. These fertilizers, containing up to 0.1-0.6% perchlorate by weight from natural evaporative concentration in hyper-arid Atacama conditions, contaminated sites in the U.S. and predating 1900, with isotopic profiles matching indigenous natural sources rather than electrolytic synthetics. In arid and semi-arid soils, perchlorate accumulates naturally through repeated evaporation cycles that concentrate precursors, coupled with photochemical oxidation under high UV exposure and low leaching rates, yielding deposits independent of human activity. Empirical investigations in regions like the southwestern U.S. and dry valleys reveal high perchlorate concentrations (up to mg/kg in soils) with no documented industrial history, confirmed via isotopic forensics attributing them to indigenous natural formation rather than leakage from manufacturing. For instance, studies in non-industrial arid basins show predominant natural signatures, challenging assumptions that elevated levels imply solely anthropogenic origins and highlighting how regulatory frameworks may overlook baseline natural variability. Such findings underscore the need for site-specific tracing to avoid conflating historical fertilizer legacies or evaporative accumulation with contemporary industrial releases.

Global Monitoring and Levels

Perchlorate monitoring employs advanced analytical methods, predominantly liquid chromatography-tandem (LC-MS/MS), capable of detection limits below 0.1 μg/L (ppb) in and similar matrices. These techniques enable quantification at trace levels, with method detection limits as low as 0.021 μg/L reported in validated protocols. In the United States, U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) assessments of public water supply wells in the High Plains detected perchlorate above 0.1 μg/L in 56% of samples across nearly all counties studied, though concentrations exceeding 4 μg/L were less prevalent and regionally variable. For example, in the Southern High Plains , 35% of private wells showed levels at or above 4 μg/L, with a maximum of 58.8 μg/L. National evaluations of public systems indicate that approximately 4.1% had detections above 4 μg/L in at least one sample, reflecting baseline prevalence in groundwater-dependent supplies. European Union monitoring of perchlorate in food, intensified after Commission Regulation (EU) 2023/915 set maximum levels (e.g., 0.05 mg/kg for most fruits and vegetables), has demonstrated broad compliance, with (EFSA) evaluations confirming dietary exposures below the tolerable daily intake of 1.4 μg/kg body weight in the majority of assessed populations. Observed trends in regulated regions show stable or decreasing perchlorate levels in treated water supplies, attributable to remediation and source controls, while U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) food surveys from 2008 to 2012 revealed no significant changes in overall concentrations across sampled commodities. Natural arid environments, such as Chile's , exhibit persistently elevated baselines—with concentrations from 290 to 2,565 μg/kg and surface waters up to 1,480 μg/L—independent of industrial restrictions or bans elsewhere.

Health Effects

Biochemical Mechanism

Perchlorate exerts its primary biochemical effect through of the sodium- symporter (NIS), a plasma membrane responsible for actively transporting into follicular cells using the sodium gradient. This inhibition occurs because perchlorate, a monovalent anion structurally similar to , binds to the same substrate site on NIS with high affinity, reducing the transporter's capacity to accumulate necessary for hormone synthesis. The inhibition constant (Ki) for perchlorate at NIS is estimated in the range of 1-10 µM, reflecting its potency relative to , though exact values vary by species and assay conditions. As a competitive process, the inhibition is reversible upon removal of perchlorate or increased availability, allowing NIS function to recover without permanent structural damage to the transporter. Beyond NIS inhibition, perchlorate does not demonstrate direct , such as formation or mutagenicity, in standard assays; its effects are confined to disrupting kinetics rather than causing or covalent binding to cellular macromolecules. For disruptions in uptake to manifest as downstream perturbations, perchlorate concentrations must sustain exposure levels that competitively exceed typical dietary fluxes, typically requiring micromolar ranges or higher systemic doses to outcompete physiological (around 0.1-1 µM in plasma). This threshold dependence underscores the mechanism's reliance on relative anion concentrations rather than intrinsic at the molecular level. In animal models, such as rats exposed to perchlorate via , thyroid hypertrophy or goiter-like histological changes (e.g., follicular cell ) emerge only at elevated doses exceeding 10 mg/kg/day, often accompanied by elevated (TSH) levels that drive compensatory glandular activity. These changes are adaptive responses to reduced intrathyroidal rather than cytotoxic damage, with reversibility observed upon cessation of exposure in studies up to 8.5 mg/kg/day, where alterations remained minimal to mild. No evidence of NIS downregulation or permanent impairment appears at lower doses, consistent with the competitive nature of the interaction.

Empirical Toxicity Data

In controlled human volunteer studies conducted in the mid-20th century, oral doses of up to 0.14 mg/kg/day administered for several weeks did not produce detectable changes in function, as measured by radioiodine uptake and levels. Subsequent short-term exposure studies in healthy adults, involving perchlorate in at doses around 0.1-0.4 mg/kg/day for 14 days, confirmed inhibition of uptake but no significant alterations in serum concentrations (T4, T3, TSH) in iodine-sufficient individuals. Occupational exposure assessments among perchlorate workers, with estimated intakes up to 0.5 mg/kg/day over years, revealed no consistent adverse effects, suggesting physiological adaptation via increased transport or compensatory mechanisms in chronic low-level scenarios. Acute oral toxicity in rodents is low, with LD50 values exceeding 2000 mg/kg body weight for ammonium and potassium perchlorate salts in rats and mice; for example, dietary LD50 in mice reached approximately 3621 mg/kg/day for potassium perchlorate over 30 days. Long-term rodent studies, including two-year exposures up to 100 mg/kg/day, showed no evidence of carcinogenicity beyond species-specific thyroid follicular cell hypertrophy and hyperplasia, which were not observed at lower doses and lacked progression to malignancy in multiple assays. Developmental toxicity studies in rats exposed gestationally to perchlorate doses exceeding 10 mg/kg/day demonstrated delayed pup growth, reduced hormone levels, and subtle neurobehavioral changes, effects that were markedly exacerbated under iodine-deficient conditions but attenuated with adequate iodine supplementation. These findings involve dose-response thresholds far above typical environmental exposures, and extrapolation to humans remains uncertain due to differences in homeostasis, metabolic scaling, and the absence of comparable effects in iodine-replete adult trials.

Dose-Response and Vulnerable Populations

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) established a reference dose (RfD) for perchlorate of 0.7 μg/kg body weight per day, based on clinical studies demonstrating no significant inhibition of thyroidal uptake at doses below this level, with an uncertainty factor applied for sensitive subpopulations. This RfD incorporates a point of departure from controlled exposure data in healthy adults, where perchlorate doses up to 0.7 μg/kg/day did not alter levels or stimulate (TSH) secretion, though higher doses induced reversible uptake inhibition competitive with . In contrast, the (EFSA) derived a tolerable daily intake (TDI) of 1.4 μg/kg body weight per day in its May 2025 scientific opinion, utilizing benchmark dose modeling from rat studies on iodide uptake inhibition, adjusted by an overall uncertainty factor of 25 to account for interspecies and intraspecies variability. The higher TDI reflects updated modeling that identifies a lower bound of the benchmark dose (BMDL05) at 35 μg/kg per day in animals, emphasizing rapid reversibility of effects upon cessation of exposure and the absence of histopathological changes at doses near human-relevant levels. Fetuses and infants represent potentially vulnerable populations due to elevated sodium-iodide symporter (NIS) activity in the developing and dependence on maternal for neurodevelopment, which could amplify perchlorate's under iodine limitation. However, large-scale epidemiological data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), including cycles from 2001–2002 and 2013–2014, reveal no consistent evidence of widespread or altered thyroid function across general populations at measured urinary perchlorate levels (geometric means ~2–3 μg/L), with associations limited to subgroups exhibiting urinary iodine concentrations below 100 μg/L. Iodine intake serves as a primary confounder, as sufficient dietary outcompetes perchlorate at the NIS, mitigating uptake inhibition; studies in iodine-replete individuals show negligible thyroid perturbations even at elevated exposures. Co-exposures to other NIS inhibitors, such as from fertilizers or from tobacco smoke, may theoretically exacerbate perchlorate's effects by further reducing transport, particularly in iodine-deficient contexts, but human empirical data remain limited to observational correlations without establishing causation or dose-additive thresholds. Population-level modeling incorporating these confounders indicates that realistic risks are confined to scenarios of chronic low-iodine status combined with high perchlorate intake exceeding the RfD or TDI, underscoring the need for iodine sufficiency in rather than perchlorate isolation.

Controversies and Debates

Risk Overestimation Claims

Critics of perchlorate risk assessments argue that methodologies often overrely on data from sensitive strains, such as those exhibiting pronounced inhibition at low doses, while disregarding interspecies pharmacokinetic differences that result in faster perchlorate clearance in humans—typically with half-lives of 8-12 hours compared to longer retention in rats. This discrepancy has prompted physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models demonstrating that human al uptake inhibition requires higher exposures than predicted from rodent linear extrapolations, contributing to initial U.S. EPA draft reference doses (RfDs) as low as 0.03 µg/kg/day in 2002 that were later revised upward following National Academies of Sciences () recommendations of 0.7 µg/kg/day in 2005, reflecting a 20-fold adjustment to account for human-specific kinetics. Such revisions underscore claims of overestimation through uncertain (NOAEL) selections and excessive uncertainty factors applied without sufficient human data validation, as evidenced by the EPA's interim RfD adoption aligning with findings that rodent hypersensitivity does not translate directly to human risk under typical exposure scenarios. Epidemiological critiques further highlight that associations between perchlorate exposure and neurodevelopmental outcomes like IQ deficits diminish or vanish in cohorts with adequate iodine status, where perchlorate's of sodium-iodide is mitigated, suggesting that risk models fail to incorporate nutritional confounders prevalent in real-world populations. Amplification of trace detections in media and regulatory narratives often overlooks naturally occurring baselines, inflating perceived urgency despite limited causal links to population-level health harms; for instance, projected U.S. compliance costs for stringent limits (e.g., 4-6 µg/L) exceed $2 billion annually in treatment alone, with no commensurate evidence of averted adverse outcomes in monitored communities. These economic burdens, derived from ion-exchange and biological remediation mandates, are contrasted against empirical voids in verifying thyroid disruptions or developmental effects at environmental levels, prompting assertions that precautionary linear dose-response assumptions prioritize hypothetical risks over causal evidence from human biomonitoring.

Natural Sources vs. Regulatory Focus on Industry

Regulatory frameworks for perchlorate have historically prioritized anthropogenic sources, such as and industrial discharges, even as demonstrates substantial natural contributions in various environments. Natural perchlorate arises from atmospheric oxidation processes and mineral deposits, including ores from the used in Chilean fertilizers, which introduce perchlorate into agricultural soils and waters without industrial intent. In arid regions like the , indigenous atmospheric deposition and soil accumulation yield baseline levels of 10-20 grams per hectare in shallow soils, contributing to detectable concentrations in independent of human activity. This natural baseline complicates blanket regulatory approaches, as isotopic analysis reveals mixed origins in many samples, yet policies often default to attributing exceedances to industry without forensic differentiation. Such emphasis on industrial sources carries economic repercussions, particularly for defense sectors reliant on as an oxidizer in solid rocket fuels, where restrictions or phase-outs could elevate costs and compromise readiness. Historical incidents, like the 1988 PEPCON explosion involving perchlorate production, underscore vulnerabilities, but proposed curbs on its use in propellants—driven by concerns—risk shifting cleanup burdens to taxpayers for Department of Defense sites without proportionally addressing diffuse natural inputs. Industry advocates, including propellant manufacturers, contend that source-specific tracing via isotopes is essential to avoid inefficient regulations that penalize synthetic while overlooking inevitable natural ubiquity. In the , Commission Regulation (EU) 2023/915 imposed maximum perchlorate levels in food categories like fruits and (e.g., 0.05 mg/kg for certain items), focusing on mitigation through good agricultural practices despite perchlorate's natural precipitation from the atmosphere into the . Critics, including some agricultural stakeholders, argue these limits undervalue background exposures from non-anthropogenic pathways, potentially leading to unwarranted trade disruptions or compliance costs without causal attribution to controllable sources. Environmental organizations, conversely, prioritize precautionary reductions irrespective of origin, citing perchlorate's persistence and thyroid-disrupting potential, while empirical researchers advocate integrated monitoring to apportion natural versus added contributions accurately. This tension reflects broader debates on causal realism in policy, where undifferentiated regulation may amplify economic strain on sectors like defense and without commensurate reduction.

Remediation Technologies

Ex Situ and In Situ Methods

Ex situ remediation of perchlorate-contaminated water typically employs resins to selectively remove perchlorate ions from or extracted plumes, achieving removal efficiencies of 98–99.8% in full-scale applications, such as at the site where influent concentrations of 10–350,000 μg/L were reduced to below 4 μg/L. These resins, often nitrate-selective or bifunctional strong-base anion exchangers, operate at flow rates up to 1,500 gpm, demonstrating scalability across 15 documented full-scale projects. However, concentrates perchlorate into regenerants, necessitating subsequent biological reduction in ex situ bioreactors using perchlorate-reducing microbes and electron donors like or to achieve destruction to , with overall system efficiencies exceeding 99% when integrated. disposal or treatment remains a persistent challenge, as high salinity can inhibit microbial activity without dilution or adaptation. In situ methods target perchlorate plumes directly in aquifers, with permeable reactive barriers (PRBs) utilizing organic carbon substrates like mulch, compost, or soybean oil-saturated materials to foster microbial reduction, often achieving >99% destruction in field trials, as seen at NWIRP McGregor where concentrations dropped from 13,000–27,000 μg/L to <4 μg/L within weeks. These barriers intercept plumes passively, with scalability evidenced by installations up to 9,000 ft long, such as Area S, where perchlorate was reduced to below detection limits shortly after deployment. Phytoremediation leverages plants like poplars or constructed wetlands for rhizodegradation and uptake, with field demonstrations at Longhorn Army Ammunition Plant showing plume reductions of 80–95% over 18 months, processing up to 3.5 million liters of groundwater to <4 μg/L. Chemical reduction via zero-valent iron (ZVI) offers abiotic destruction potential but is constrained by slow kinetics, with standard ZVI rates limited despite thermodynamic favorability, though enhancements like nanoparticles or acidic conditions can improve feasibility for targeted applications. Overall, in situ approaches excel in plume containment for low-to-moderate concentrations, with field trials consistently reporting 80–95% mass reduction in monitoring wells over months.

Efficacy and Economic Analysis

In field demonstrations, perchlorate remediation technologies including and bioreactors have routinely achieved effluent concentrations below 4 µg/L from influent levels ranging from 14 µg/L to over 600,000 µg/L. At the site near , , an system coupled with granular treated 1,000 gallons per minute of , reducing perchlorate from 14 µg/L to under 0.35 µg/L. Fluidized-bed bioreactors have similarly delivered non-detect levels (<4 µg/L) at scales up to 4,000 gpm, as seen in and Longhorn Army Ammunition Plant applications. Efficacy declines in low-permeability formations, where substrate or delivery is restricted to radii of 3–4 feet, resulting in untreated pockets and extended plume persistence despite overall concentration declines. In such cases, supplementary techniques like recirculation or fixed biobarriers are needed, though they increase operational complexity without guaranteeing uniform treatment. Treatment costs vary by method but cluster at $90–$95 per acre-foot for weak base anion resin ion exchange processes, factoring in a 20-year net present value at 6% interest; capital outlays for regenerable systems range $70–$150 per acre-foot. Benefit-cost assessments indicate marginal returns for aggressive interventions, with upper-bound estimates of nationwide health benefits from perchlorate reductions in drinking water falling below $2.9 million annually, underscoring low economic justification absent elevated risk thresholds. Monitored natural attenuation emerges as a lower-cost option in low-velocity aquifers (<0.1 ft/day), where dilution and indigenous microbial reduction—enhanced by occasional amendments—yield half-lives of 1.2–1.8 days in pilots, avoiding active treatment expenses while requiring vigilant monitoring to confirm plume stability.

Regulation and Standards

United States Policies

In the , federal regulation of perchlorate in has evolved through the Agency's (EPA) efforts under the . The EPA proposed a National Primary Drinking Water Regulation (NPDWR) with a maximum contaminant level (MCL) of 56 μg/L in June 2019 but finalized a in July 2020 not to regulate perchlorate nationally at that time, citing insufficient evidence of widespread occurrence posing unacceptable risk. A 2023 federal court ruling vacated this , requiring the EPA to regulate perchlorate, leading to a commitment for a proposed NPDWR by November 2025 and a final rule by May 2027. Several states have established enforceable MCLs for perchlorate in drinking water ahead of federal action, with variations reflecting differing risk assessments. California set an MCL of 6 μg/L in October 2007, requiring monitoring and treatment where exceeded. Massachusetts promulgated a stricter MCL of 2 μg/L in 2006, based on a state-specific reference dose emphasizing thyroid protection in vulnerable populations. Other states, such as Arizona, New Jersey, New York, and Texas, have adopted MCLs or guidelines ranging from 1 to 15 μg/L, while many others issue advisory levels or require site-specific evaluations without enforceable limits. For food contamination, the (FDA) issued guidance in 2017 emphasizing monitoring and voluntary industry reductions rather than enforceable bans, following exploratory surveys detecting perchlorate in and from affected sources. The FDA revoked approval for perchlorate as a in sealing gaskets that year due to abandoned use but permits trace amounts (up to 1.2% by weight) in certain dry polymers as an , without setting residue limits. At Department of Defense (DoD) sites, perchlorate contamination from historical rocket fuel and munitions use is addressed under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), or Superfund, with cleanups targeting site-specific risks rather than uniform standards. DoD policy mandates testing where releases are expected and compliance with applicable state or federal cleanup goals, contributing to remediation at numerous installations.

European Union and International Frameworks

Commission Regulation (EU) 2023/915, adopted on 25 April 2023, sets maximum levels for perchlorate as a contaminant in specific food categories to mitigate dietary exposure risks. For example, the regulation specifies a limit of 50 µg/kg in fruit and vegetables, with lower thresholds such as 10 µg/kg in infant formulae and baby foods prepared from fruit or vegetables. These levels, informed by European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) risk assessments, apply uniformly across EU member states and extend to imported goods, superseding prior transitional measures by 31 December 2023 for certain products. EFSA supports EU implementation through ongoing monitoring recommendations, initially outlined in Commission Recommendation (EU) 2015/682, which called for surveillance of perchlorate in food (including , , and ) and from 2015 to 2016, with extensions for targeted sampling. In its updated 2025 scientific opinion, EFSA raised the tolerable daily intake to 1.4 µg/kg body weight per day based on revised toxicological data, emphasizing neurodevelopmental concerns from prenatal exposure while noting no acute risks from typical food levels. This informs potential future adjustments to maximum levels but maintains current regulatory stringency pending further data. Internationally, the (WHO) established a guideline value of 70 µg/L (0.07 mg/L) for perchlorate in in 2017, derived from a tolerable daily intake of 0.7 µg/kg body weight and assuming 2 L daily consumption by a 60 kg adult, though classified as provisional due to uncertainties in long-term effects and natural occurrence variability. National implementations differ, with some countries like those in arid regions accounting for elevated natural perchlorate from atmospheric or geological sources in setting less restrictive thresholds compared to anthropogenic-focused limits. EU perchlorate standards in food have trade ramifications for non-EU exporters, particularly from regions using contaminated fertilizers or irrigation water, necessitating compliance testing and potential supply chain adjustments to avoid market rejection. For instance, higher natural background levels in certain export origins may require remediation technologies or sourcing alternatives to meet the 50 µg/kg fruit threshold, influencing global agricultural practices without differentiated exemptions for origin.

Recent Regulatory Updates

In May 2025, the (EFSA) updated its tolerable daily intake (TDI) for perchlorate to 1.4 µg/kg body weight per day, an increase from the previous 0.3 µg/kg bw/day established in , based on re-evaluation of toxicological data including human studies on effects and exposure assessments showing dietary levels below the new threshold for all age groups. This revision reflects from recent and mode-of-action analyses indicating lower potency for adverse effects than previously assumed, applicable to both chronic and short-term exposures. In April 2024, the issued (EU) 2024/1002, amending maximum residue levels (MRLs) for perchlorate in specific foods such as beans () under (EU) 2023/915, adjusting limits to align with updated occurrence data and EFSA's risk assessments while maintaining protections against exceedances from contamination. In the United States, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) committed in January 2024 via a to propose a National Primary (NPDWR) for perchlorate by November 21, 2025, with finalization by May 21, 2027, following federal court rulings vacating prior determinations that deferred regulation despite acknowledged health risks to function in vulnerable populations. This timeline addresses ongoing litigation emphasizing statutory obligations under the , though debates persist over distinguishing regulatory burdens for anthropogenic versus naturally occurring perchlorate sources, such as atmospheric deposition or mineral deposits, which contribute to baseline exposures not fully exempted in current frameworks.

Safety and Handling

Acute Hazards

Perchlorate salts, such as used in propellants and explosives, act as powerful oxidizers capable of accelerating or detonating when contaminated with fuels, organic materials, or reducing agents, posing acute and risks. Fine dust forms are particularly hazardous, igniting from low-energy sources like or sparks, which can propagate rapid or in confined spaces. A prominent example is the May 4, 1988, PEPCON disaster in Henderson, Nevada, where a small fire in a batch mixing area spread to ammonium perchlorate storage, triggering a series of seven explosions equivalent to 1-2 kilotons of TNT, killing two workers and injuring over 300 others while damaging structures up to 10 miles away. Concentrated perchloric acid (typically 70-72% HClO₄) presents acute corrosivity hazards, inflicting severe chemical burns, tissue destruction, and potential blindness upon contact with skin, eyes, or mucous membranes due to its strong oxidizing and dehydrating action. In fire scenarios involving perchlorates, spray or flooding is the primary strategy to dilute concentrations, dissolve solids, and prevent escalation, as dry chemical or foam extinguishers may fail against the oxidizing nature of the material. Direct acute exposures to perchlorate salts primarily cause local to , eyes, and without systemic at irritant thresholds; the estimated oral LD₅₀ exceeds 200 mg/kg, indicating low acute lethality compared to irritant effects.

Long-Term Storage and Disposal

Perchlorate salts, prized for their chemical inertness at ambient temperatures, are suitable for long-term dry storage in tightly closed, non-reactive containers such as or glass-lined drums to avoid contact with reducing agents, organics, or moisture. Storage facilities must maintain cool conditions below 25°C, good ventilation to control , and separation from heat sources or shock-prone areas, enabling shelf lives extending decades without significant decomposition. handling necessitates respiratory protection and local exhaust ventilation, as no specific OSHA exists for , though it is regulated under for quantities exceeding 7,500 pounds due to its oxidizing properties. Disposal of perchlorate wastes prioritizes to prevent environmental migration, given their high water solubility and . materials are directed to landfills or composite-lined facilities, with ongoing monitoring for to detect perchlorate mobilization. Chemical treatment options, including reduction to via iron or zero-valent iron processes, offer alternatives for smaller volumes before final landfilling, though large-scale is avoided due to risks from the strong oxidizing nature. EPA classifies discarded perchlorate as a potential waste subject to RCRA Subtitle C regulations if characteristic hazards like ignitability or reactivity are exhibited.

References

  1. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Perchlorate
  2. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/chemistry/perchlorate
  3. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA406294.pdf
  4. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/es048612x
  5. https://www.fda.gov/food/environmental-contaminants-food/perchlorate-questions-and-answers
  6. https://wwwn.cdc.gov/TSP/PHS/PHS.aspx?phsid=892&toxid=181
  7. https://www.thermofisher.com/us/en/home/industrial/environmental/environmental-learning-center/contaminant-analysis-information/anion-analysis/perchlorate-analysis.html
  8. https://19january2017snapshot.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2014-03/documents/ffrrofactsheet_contaminant_perchlorate_january2014_final.pdf
  9. https://dtsc.ca.gov/perchlorate/
  10. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4834222/
  11. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30184474/
  12. https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9393
  13. https://www.vedantu.com/question-answer/oxidation-state-cl-of-a-perchlorate-ion-class-11-chemistry-cbse-61229a600e4bf80dde9c3f37
  14. https://brainly.com/question/33741535
  15. https://udspace.udel.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/93edf1f1-678a-4144-a451-345181619068/content
  16. https://topblogtenz.com/clo4-lewis-structure-molecular-geometry-bond-angle-hybridization/
  17. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7008933/
  18. https://www.differencebetween.com/difference-between-chlorate-and-perchlorate/
  19. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2681191/
  20. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001191641200255X
  21. https://www.tera.org/ART/Perchlorate/BioremJClO4.pdf
  22. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/2002400
  23. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19700029187/downloads/19700029187.pdf
  24. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/i560144a004
  25. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1196028/
  26. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0010854500820226
  27. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5c02514
  28. https://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/v68-342
  29. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/522606
  30. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsreagents.4299.20190201
  31. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321383020_A_simple_gravimetric_method_for_the_determination_of_perchlorate
  32. https://www.publish.csiro.au/en/EN09001
  33. https://library.sciencemadness.org/library/books/perchloric_acid_and_perchlorates.pdf
  34. https://periodical.knowde.com/industrial-applications-of-perchloric-acid/
  35. http://tetrazolelover.at.ua/Unsorted/OLD/burton1955.pdf
  36. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1024&context=usnavyresearch
  37. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/AD0242192.pdf
  38. https://openchemicalengineeringjournal.com/VOLUME/13/PAGE/23/PDF/
  39. https://pure.tue.nl/ws/files/1607624/617569.pdf
  40. https://www.globallcadataaccess.org/sodium-perchlorate-production-upr-ecoinvent-36-consequential
  41. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0045653518324883
  42. https://patents.google.com/patent/US2739873A/en
  43. https://taylorandfrancis.com/knowledge/Engineering_and_technology/Chemical_engineering/Ammonium_perchlorate/
  44. https://www.openpr.com/news/4101404/ammonium-perchlorate-market-is-going-to-booming-growth-2025-with
  45. https://spacenews.com/american-pacific-corporation-finalizes-100-million-capacity-expansion-with-parent-company-approval/
  46. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/AD0003174.pdf
  47. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666647223000040
  48. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/chemistry/perchloric-acid
  49. https://ehrs.upenn.edu/health-safety/lab-safety/chemical-hygiene-plan/fact-sheets/fact-sheet-perchloric-acid
  50. https://www.fda.gov/food/environmental-contaminants-food/rapid-determination-perchlorate-anion-foods-ion-chromatography-tandem-mass-spectrometry
  51. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0043135422014555
  52. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5044968/
  53. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878535215000106
  54. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-92707-0
  55. https://vc.airvectors.net/tarokt_2.html
  56. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19920000825/downloads/19920000825.pdf
  57. https://calibrechem.com/blog/ammonium-perchlorate-a-key-ingredient-in-solid-rocket-fuel/
  58. https://www.ammoniumperchlorate.org/blog/how_do_fireworks_work.html
  59. https://pyrodata.com/chemicals/Ammonium-perchlorate
  60. https://www.monarchchemicals.co.uk/Information/News-Events/1014-/10-chemicals-used-in-fireworks-and-pyrotechnics
  61. https://www.coherentmarketinsights.com/industry-reports/ammonium-perchlorate-market
  62. https://www.inorganicventures.com/trace-analysis-guide/acid-digestions-of-organic-samples
  63. https://zenodo.org/record/2246502/files/article.pdf?download=1
  64. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/231301640_Rapid_Kjeldahl_Digestion_Method_Using_Perchloric_Acid
  65. https://umdearborn.edu/sites/default/files/unmanaged/pdf/ehs/perchloric-acid.pdf
  66. https://www.microchemicals.com/dokumente/application_notes/wet_etching_metals_al_au_cu_cr_ni_ti_ag.pdf
  67. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3640367/
  68. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ja00172a012
  69. https://russchemrev.org/RCR3410pdf
  70. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/es9033606
  71. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13762-024-06004-w
  72. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20155929/
  73. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2009JE003425
  74. https://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/1188/report.pdf
  75. https://ttu-ir.tdl.org/bitstreams/519a215b-a18e-47b7-b789-db21f79aad7e/download
  76. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2010GL045269
  77. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2019JE006156
  78. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2016JE005078
  79. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0012821X18305065
  80. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5054826/
  81. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019103522003013
  82. https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp162-c6.pdf
  83. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2019-03/documents/interim-dw-perchlorate.pdf
  84. https://www.fda.gov/food/environmental-contaminants-food/exploratory-survey-data-perchlorate-food-2004-2005
  85. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ac051360d
  86. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0883292718302361
  87. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2021/9978489
  88. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA589977.pdf
  89. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0269749100001329
  90. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/es902042p
  91. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0013935118301026
  92. https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2134/jeq2013.11.0453
  93. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045653525004771
  94. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0883292722000361
  95. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1209&context=nasapub
  96. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1879959
  97. https://www.waters.com/content/dam/waters/en/app-notes/2007/720000941/720000941-it.pdf
  98. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16047796/
  99. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1054&context=usgsstaffpub
  100. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229572501_Perchlorate_occurrence_in_the_Texas_Southern_High_Plains_Aquifer_System
  101. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/EN/legal-content/summary/maximum-levels-for-certain-contaminants-in-food.html
  102. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24165784/
  103. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258116182_Perchlorate_Levels_in_Soil_and_Waters_from_the_Atacama_Desert
  104. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2685834/
  105. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7337408/
  106. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK600943/
  107. https://nap.nationalacademies.org/read/11202/chapter/8
  108. https://academic.oup.com/jcem/article/91/7/2721/2656603
  109. https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp162-c3.pdf
  110. https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp162.pdf
  111. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11679215/
  112. https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp162-c2.pdf
  113. https://www.epa.gov/sdwa/perchlorate-drinking-water
  114. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/07/21/2020-13462/drinking-water-final-action-on-perchlorate
  115. https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/pub/9393
  116. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1764147/
  117. https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/3886
  118. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7352877/
  119. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412022006407
  120. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8725411/
  121. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17454566/
  122. https://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/doi/10.1289/ehp.8254
  123. https://www.epa.gov/archive/epapages/newsroom_archive/newsreleases/c1a57d2077c4bfda85256fac005b8b32.html
  124. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4223440/
  125. https://www.nytimes.com/2004/03/02/science/second-thoughts-on-a-chemical-in-water-how-much-is-too-much.html
  126. https://www.alston.com/en/insights/publications/2020/07/epa-pass-on-perchlorate-regulation-reduces-lawsuit
  127. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1024&context=usnavyresearch
  128. https://www.usgs.gov/news/state-news-release/natural-perchlorate-levels-desert-ecosystem
  129. https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/70230854
  130. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GOVPUB-D5_400-PURL-LPS31626/pdf/GOVPUB-D5_400-PURL-LPS31626.pdf
  131. https://www.alston.com/en/insights/publications/2023/06/perchlorate-ruling-means-regulatory-restart
  132. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249050972_Forensic_Identification_of_Anthropogenic_and_Naturally_Occurring_Sources_of_Perchlorate
  133. https://food.ec.europa.eu/food-safety/chemical-safety/contaminants/catalogue/perchlorate_en
  134. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4707997/
  135. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-04/documents/perchlorate_542-r-05-015.pdf
  136. https://itrcweb.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/PERC-2.pdf
  137. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA421555.pdf
  138. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11051-005-4412-x
  139. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0043135407003545
  140. https://serdp-estcp.mil/projects/details/3d0bca05-02a0-41ab-b5b3-f5a58512361c
  141. https://frtr.gov/costperformance/pdf/rem_perchlorate_ESTCP_2008.pdf
  142. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/risa.12261
  143. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/06/26/2019-12773/national-primary-drinking-water-regulations-perchlorate
  144. https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/epa-seeks-input-national-primary-drinking-water-regulation-perchlorate
  145. https://www.hklaw.com/en/insights/publications/2023/05/the-dc-circuit-overrules-epa-on-regulating-perchlorate
  146. https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/drinking_water/certlic/drinkingwater/Perchlorate.html
  147. https://www.mass.gov/guides/perchlorate-frequently-asked-questions
  148. https://www.ewg.org/tapwater/reviewed-perchlorate.php
  149. https://www.fda.gov/food/environmental-contaminants-food/perchlorate
  150. https://www.fda.gov/food/hfp-constituent-updates/fda-revoking-food-additive-approval-use-perchlorate-sealing-gaskets-food-containers-because-its-use
  151. https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2022-03/epa-plan-to-address-perchlorate.final_.pdf
  152. https://exwc.navfac.navy.mil/Portals/88/Documents/EXWC/Restoration/er_pdfs/gpr/dod-ev-pol-perchlorate-20100303.pdf?ver=5oRJ1SkdsRhIYMUhJCAf0g%253D%253D
  153. https://www.gao.gov/assets/a308656.html
  154. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32023R0915
  155. https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/wash-documents/wash-chemicals/perchlorate-background-jan17.pdf
  156. https://19january2021snapshot.epa.gov/sites/static/files/2017-10/documents/perchlorate_factsheet_9-15-17_508.pdf
  157. https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/pub/3869
  158. https://www.food-safety.com/articles/9986-efsa-increases-tolerable-daily-intake-for-chemical-contaminant-perchlorate-in-food
  159. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1002/oj/eng
  160. https://global.foodmate.net/news/show-11964.html
  161. https://www.nrdc.org/court-battles/nrdc-v-us-epa-perchlorate
  162. https://www.ampac.us/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/AMMONIUM_PERCHLORATE_SAFETY_DATA_SHEET.pdf
  163. https://www.nj.gov/health/eoh/rtkweb/documents/fs/0109.pdf
  164. https://www.clarkcountynv.gov/government/departments/fire/the-pepcon-explosion
  165. https://safety.fsu.edu/safety_manual/supporting_docs/Perchloric%2520Acid%2520Safety.pdf
  166. https://oehha.ca.gov/sites/default/files/media/downloads/water/chemicals/phg/perchloratephgfeb2015.pdf
  167. https://www.osha.gov/publications/hib19910925
  168. https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.119AppA
  169. https://dtsc.ca.gov/perchlorate-fact-sheet/
  170. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK600955/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.