Hubbry Logo
Pope Innocent IPope Innocent IMain
Open search
Pope Innocent I
Community hub
Pope Innocent I
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Pope Innocent I
Pope Innocent I
Pope Innocent I
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Pope Innocent I (Latin: Innocentius I) was the bishop of Rome from 401 to his death on 12 March 417. From the beginning of his papacy, he was seen as the general arbitrator of ecclesiastical disputes in both the East and the West. He confirmed the prerogatives of the Archbishop of Thessalonica, and issued a decretal on disciplinary matters referred to him by the Bishop of Rouen. He defended the exiled John Chrysostom and consulted with the bishops of Africa concerning the Pelagian controversy, confirming the decisions of the African synods.

Key Information

The Catholic priest-scholar Johann Peter Kirsch, 1500 years later, described Innocent as a very energetic and highly gifted individual "...who fulfilled admirably the duties of his office".[2]

Family background

[edit]

According to his biographer in the Liber Pontificalis, Innocent was a native of Albano and the son of a man called Innocentius.[2] On the other hand, in a letter to Demetrias his contemporary Jerome referred to him as the son of the previous pope, Anastasius I. It has, however, been suggested that Jerome was describing a link merely hierarchical rather than biological.[3] According to Urbano Cerri, Pope Innocent was a native of Albania.[4]

Pontificate

[edit]

From his appointment in 401, Innocent lost no opportunity to maintain the authority of the Roman apostolic See, seen as final arbiter for all ecclesiastical disputes. That such opportunities were numerous and varied is evident from his communications with Victricius of Rouen, Exuperius of Toulouse, Alexander of Antioch and others, as well as how he acted when John Chrysostom appealed to him against Theophilus of Alexandria. On the Pelagian controversy he took a decided view. He reinforced the decisions of the synod of the province of proconsular Africa, held in Carthage in 416. He accordingly confirmed the condemnation in 411 against Cælestius, who was of the Pelagian view. In the same year he wrote likewise to the fathers of the Numidian synod of Mileve who had appealed to him. Soon after this, five African bishops, among them St. Augustine, wrote a personal letter to Innocent explaining their own position on Pelagianism.[2] In addition he acted as metropolitan over the bishops of Italia Suburbicaria.[2][5]

The historian Zosimus, in his Historia Nova, suggests that during the sack of Rome in 410 by Alaric I, Innocent I was willing to permit private pagan practices as a temporary measure. However, Zosimus also suggests that this attempt by pagans to restore public worship failed due to lack of public interest, suggesting that Rome in the previous century had been successfully and permanently won over to Christianity.[2]

Among Innocent I's letters is one to Jerome and another to John II, Bishop of Jerusalem, regarding annoyances to which the former had been subjected by the Pelagians at Bethlehem. Innocent's portrayal of the church as an institution "where there is protection for all, ... where there is security, where there is a port that resists the waves, where there is a treasure of infinite goods" was quoted by Pope Gregory XVI in correspondence with the French cleric Félicité de La Mennais in 1833.[6]

He died on 12 March 417. Accordingly, his feast day is now celebrated on 12 March, though from the thirteenth to the twentieth century he was commemorated on 28 July.[7] His successor was Zosimus.

In 405, Pope Innocent sent a list of the sacred books to a Gallic bishop, Exsuperius of Toulouse,[8] identical with that of Trent (which took place more than 1000 years later),[9][10][11] except for some uncertainty in the manuscript tradition about whether the letters ascribed to Paul were 14 or only 13, in the latter case possibly implying omission of the Epistle to the Hebrews.[8] Previously in 367, Athanasius of Alexandria had circulated the 39th Easter Letter mentioning the list of Scripture, both Old and New Testament, which he referred to as "canonized".

Relics

[edit]

In 846, Pope Sergius II gave approval for the relics of St. Innocent to be moved by Count Liudolf of Saxony and his wife, Oda, along with those of his father and predecessor Anastasius, to the crypt of the former collegiate church of Gandersheim, now Gandersheim Abbey, where most rest until this day.[12] Relics were also brought to The Church of Our Lady St Mary of Glastonbury upon its consecration.[13]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Pope Innocent I

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia

Pope Innocent I (died 12 417) was of from 401 until his , succeeding Anastasius I amid the declining . Little is known of his origins beyond likely Roman birth and deaconate service, with no recorded birth date. His emphasized Roman primacy through arbitral interventions in regional disputes, including confirmations of church privileges in , , and . Innocent corresponded extensively with bishops across Gaul, Africa, Britain, and the East, asserting appellate jurisdiction to Rome for doctrinal and disciplinary matters, as in his letter to Victricius of Rouen upholding metropolitan election procedures. He initially supported Eastern patriarch John Chrysostom against Alexandrian opposition, dispatching legates to investigate, though later pragmatically accepted his deposition to preserve relations with Emperor Arcadius. During the Visigothic sack of Rome in 410, Innocent was in Ravenna negotiating imperial aid from Honorius, later permitting Alaric's burial rites under church auspices while condemning pagan accusations against Christians. His letters, preserved in collections like those to Decentius of Gubbio on liturgical practices, reflect a focus on canonical uniformity and Roman oversight amid barbarian incursions.

Early Life and Background

Origins and Family

Innocent I was born in Albano Laziale, a town in the Alban Hills near Rome in the Italian region of Latium, to a father named Innocentius. The precise date of his birth remains unknown, with estimates placing it sometime in the mid-4th century, prior to his clerical formation in Rome. Little is documented about his immediate family beyond his father's name, as recorded in the Liber Pontificalis, a primary historical source compiled in the 6th century but drawing on earlier Roman church traditions. No reliable contemporary accounts mention a mother, siblings, or extended kin, and claims of descent from Roman nobility lack substantiation in verifiable texts, appearing instead in later, less rigorous biographies. Some secondary traditions, including references attributed to St. Jerome, propose that Innocentius was identical to Pope Anastasius I (r. 399–401), Innocent's immediate predecessor, suggesting a rare father-son succession in the papacy; however, this identification is speculative and contradicted by the Liber Pontificalis entry for Anastasius, which describes him separately without clerical lineage ties. Innocent grew up immersed in the Roman , receiving formation in the service of the Roman Church from an early age, which positioned him for ecclesiastical roles before his . This background reflects the typical path of late Roman churchmen, often from Italian families with ties to the city's Christian institutions rather than imperial .

Path to the Papacy

Innocent was born in Albano Laziale, in the region of Campania (modern-day Lazio), to a family connected with the Roman Church; historical accounts identify him as the son of his predecessor, (r. 399–401). Little survives regarding his personal background or education, though he evidently advanced within the ecclesiastical hierarchy of , likely serving as a deacon amid the clergy of the city. His upbringing immersed him in the traditions and administration of the Roman see, positioning him as a familiar figure among the local presbytery and laity during a period of relative stability following the pontificate of Siricius. Anastasius I died on December 19, 401, after a brief marked by efforts against Origenist errors in the East. Three days later, on December 22, 401, Innocent was unanimously elected of by the assembled and , reflecting the consensus-driven process typical of early papal successions in the late period, where the Roman selected candidates from its own ranks without imperial interference at that juncture. This rapid transition underscores Innocent's established reputation for orthodoxy and administrative competence within the Roman Church, though no specific campaigns or rival candidates are recorded in contemporary sources.

Pontificate

Assertion of Papal Authority

During his pontificate from 401 to 417, Pope Innocent I systematically advanced the jurisdictional primacy of the Roman see by intervening in regional church disputes and issuing decretals that required consultation with or appeals to for resolution of significant ecclesiastical matters. In a letter dated , 404, to Victricius, bishop of , Innocent addressed queries on disciplinary issues such as clerical celibacy, ordinations, and the reception of heretics, decreeing that such cases be referred to the Apostolic See for authoritative , thereby establishing as the ultimate arbiter over Western churches. This correspondence emphasized traditions derived from the apostles and early fathers, underscoring 's role in preserving doctrinal and disciplinary unity without introducing novel rules. Innocent extended this to and through similar interventions. His of , 416, to Decentius, of , prescribed the proper conferral of the —a of metropolitan —only upon papal approval, and detailed Roman liturgical for the kiss of peace, fraction of the host, and practices, asserting that deviations required correction from the Roman church to maintain apostolic . Likewise, in letters to Exsuperius of and s in Macedonia, , and , Innocent resolved disputes on episcopal elections, scriptural canons, and heresy condemnations, insisting that Rome's decisions bound subordinate sees based on Petrine succession. A pivotal assertion occurred in the context of African appeals during the Donatist schism and Pelagian controversy. Responding to synods in , Innocent affirmed 's appellate jurisdiction, praising the African bishops for appealing to the " of Peter" and rejecting Pelagius's doctrines after review, while obtaining imperial rescripts to enforce Roman rulings against sectarians. He decreed that final appeals in major cases rested with , viewing the papal see as divinely instituted for the church's , a principle he applied consistently to reinforce unity amid barbarian invasions and doctrinal threats. These actions, preserved in his 38 extant letters, marked a deliberate expansion of Roman oversight, influencing later canonical developments without reliance on coercive force.

Domestic Ecclesiastical Affairs

Innocent I exercised metropolitan oversight over the suburbicarian dioceses surrounding , intervening in their to maintain uniformity and . In a letter to Florentinus, of Tivoli, he addressed episcopal elections and administrative disputes, affirming 's supervisory in these proximate sees. This extended to regular synods where he presided, ensuring alignment with Roman practices amid the administrative challenges of early fifth-century . A key decretal came in his 416 letter to Decentius, bishop of Gubbio (Eugubium), which detailed Roman liturgical and sacramental norms for broader application in the West. Innocent prescribed immersion baptism for adults and affusion for infants, confirmation by imposition of hands with chrism blessed by the bishop (or delegated presbyters), and the pallium's restriction to metropolitan bishops as a sign of delegated authority from Rome. He further outlined extreme unction using blessed oil for the sick, emphasizing its apostolic origins, and clarified the diaconate's subordination to presbyters in liturgical roles. These instructions served as a normative framework, promoting standardization across Italian and provincial churches while underscoring Rome's doctrinal leadership. Extending influence to , Innocent responded to Victricius, of , in a 404/405 ("Etsi tibi") that regulated episcopal ordinations. He mandated participation by at least three provincial bishops alongside the metropolitan, or Roman intervention if metropolitan oversight was absent, to prevent irregularities in elections. This addressed appeals from , reinforcing procedural canons derived from earlier councils like and Sardica, and positioned the Roman see as the arbiter for Western disputes. Similar guidance was provided to other Gallic bishops, such as Exsuperius of Toulouse, including a 405 enumeration of canonical scriptures to combat emerging textual variances. Innocent also enforced clerical continence, reiterating prohibitions on for bishops, , and deacons, with ongoing obligations for those ordained post-marriage. These measures aimed to elevate standards amid social upheavals, on precedents from prior pontiffs and councils to foster rigor in domestic church administration.

Theological Controversies

During the pontificate of Innocent I (401–417), the most significant theological was , a advanced by the British ascetic that emphasized free will's sufficiency for and , while minimizing or denying the inherited guilt of and the absolute necessity of for overcoming . argued that infants are born without , that baptism serves primarily for remission of actual sins rather than , and that individuals could achieve sinlessness through effort aided by natural faculties and divine law, rather than transformative grace. This position, propagated by and his disciple Celestius in Rome and North Africa, clashed with the Augustinian emphasis on human depravity post-Fall and grace's primacy, prompting widespread debate on anthropology, soteriology, and ecclesial discipline. In response to Pelagius's teachings, two North African synods convened in 416: one at on and another at Milevis (modern Mila, ) shortly thereafter, both condemning Pelagius and Celestius for and appealing to Innocent I for , citing the apostolic see's authoritative in doctrinal . , a key opponent, endorsed these synods and facilitated the transmission of their acts to alongside his own writings against . Pelagius, facing local condemnations, appealed directly to Innocent around 417, submitting a letter and a confession of faith professing adherence to Nicene orthodoxy, free will in harmony with grace, and rejection of presuming salvation without divine aid, though critics like Augustine later deemed this ambiguous and insufficiently addressing original sin's transmission. On January 27, 417, Innocent issued two decretal letters: one to the Carthaginian bishops affirming the synods' validity and the other addressing the controversy more broadly, thereby endorsing the excommunication of Pelagius, Celestius, and their adherents pending repentance and explicit renunciation of erroneous views on grace and sin. In these responses, Innocent invoked the authority derived from Saints Peter and Paul to enforce unity, declaring the Pelagians "cut off from the communion of the Church" until they acknowledged the Africans' judgment and submitted to orthodox teaching on grace's indispensability. This papal intervention marked an early assertion of Rome's appellate and confirmatory role in Western doctrinal disputes, though Innocent's death later that year in March allowed successor Zosimus to briefly waver before reaffirming the condemnation. No other major theological heresies, such as Origenism, prominently engaged Innocent's direct adjudication during his tenure, with Pelagianism remaining the focal point of his doctrinal engagements.

Relations with the Eastern Church

Pope Innocent I's most notable interactions with the Eastern Church centered on the deposition of , of , by the of the Oak in 403. This , convened under the influence of , , and amid political pressures from Empress , condemned Chrysostom on charges including mismanagement and doctrinal irregularities, leading to his . Chrysostom appealed directly to Innocent, as well as to bishops Venerius of and Chromatius of Aquileia, highlighting the synod's procedural irregularities and requesting validation of his or a fair retrial. In response, Innocent refused to recognize the Synod of the Oak's verdict, deeming it unconstitutional due to its lack of due process and failure to involve Western sees. He dispatched letters circa 404 to the clergy and laity of Constantinople, protesting the deposition and urging resistance to the successor bishop Arsacius; to Arsacius himself, challenging his legitimacy; and to Emperors Honorius in the West and Arcadius in the East, demanding a general ecumenical council to review the case. Innocent also summoned Theophilus to a synod in Rome and proposed a joint assembly at Thessalonica with Eastern and Western bishops to adjudicate the matter impartially. These actions underscored Innocent's assertion of Roman primacy in adjudicating major ecclesiastical disputes, positioning the Apostolic See as the ultimate appellate authority. The Eastern under rebuffed these overtures, preventing the proposed from convening, and Innocent maintained non-communion with Arsacius (installed 404) and his successor Atticus (installed 406) by withholding recognition until Chrysostom's name was restored to the liturgical diptychs. This restoration occurred around 415, after Theophilus's in 412, when Atticus complied to mend relations. Innocent continued corresponding with the exiled Chrysostom, sending consolatory letters (Epistles XI and XII, circa 407) until the latter's in 407 during a second . Through these efforts, Innocent reinforced the jurisdictional oversight of over Eastern churches, particularly in cases of episcopal deposition, though political divisions limited immediate ecclesiastical .

Response to the Sack of Rome

In 408, as Alaric I and his Visigothic forces besieged Rome for the first time, demanding subsidies and a military command from Emperor Honorius, the Roman Senate dispatched an embassy to the imperial court at Ravenna, including Pope Innocent I, to urge concessions and avert catastrophe. The negotiations failed, as Honorius refused Alaric's terms, prompting the Visigoths to temporarily withdraw after extracting payments from the city. Alaric returned in late 409, renewing the siege and blockading the Tiber River, which intensified famine and desperation within Rome. A second senatorial delegation, again involving Innocent, was sent under Gothic escort to Ravenna in early 410 to plead for peace terms, including potential Gothic alliance against other barbarians. Honorius rejected the proposals, viewing them as capitulation, and dispatched a dismissive reply. On August 24, 410, Alaric's forces entered Rome via the Salarian Gate after slaves opened it, sacking the city for three days while largely sparing Christian basilicas and avoiding widespread slaughter, consistent with their Arian Christian beliefs. Innocent, absent in Ravenna during the event, could not return immediately due to ongoing Gothic presence and instability, remaining away for approximately two years. His diplomatic efforts, though unsuccessful in preventing the sack, underscored papal involvement in secular crises amid the empire's weakening defenses. Amid the pre-sack siege's hardships, some Roman senators proposed reviving pagan sacrifices to Jupiter to appease the gods, with pagan priests insisting on public rites in the Forum or Capitolium. Innocent consented only to private sacrifices, arguing public ones required intact temples and lacked efficacy without them, but the proposal collapsed as private rites were deemed insufficient. This stance reflected his rejection of state pagan revival while navigating civic panic, prioritizing Christian doctrine over desperate irreligion.

Death and Immediate Aftermath

Final Years and Succession

Innocent I remained active in ecclesiastical governance during the closing phase of his pontificate, notably addressing the Pelagian heresy through correspondence with African bishops. On January 27, 417, he dispatched letters affirming the decisions of councils against Pelagius and Coelestius, emphasizing Rome's appellate authority and urging their excommunication if unrepentant. These actions underscored his ongoing commitment to doctrinal orthodoxy amid regional disputes. No records indicate a period of incapacity prior to his death. Innocent I died on , 417, in , after a pontificate spanning over fifteen years. The is not specified in surviving accounts, though his correspondence suggests he maintained vigor until the end. Following his death, Zosimus, described in the Liber Pontificalis as of Greek origin from Mesoraca in , was elected on , 417. The transition appears to have occurred without recorded factional strife, reflecting the relatively stable electoral processes of the early fifth-century Roman church, though Zosimus's brief soon encountered its own controversies.

Relics and Burial

Pope Innocent I died on 12 March 417 and was initially interred in the Catacomb of Pontian (also known as Catacombe di Ponziano) on the Via Portuensis in Rome, near the basilica associated with the site. This location housed the tombs of several early popes, including his father, Anastasius I. In 846, during a period of instability in Rome amid Saracen raids, Pope Sergius II authorized the translation of Innocent's relics, along with those of Anastasius I and Saint Aurea, to the Abbey of Gandersheim in Saxony (modern-day Germany). The transfer was carried out by Liudolf, Duke of Saxony (sometimes referred to as Count Liudolf), and his wife Oda, who conveyed the remains northward for safekeeping. Upon arrival, the relics were enshrined in the crypt of the abbey church at Gandersheim. The relics have remained at Gandersheim Abbey since the ninth century, preserving the primary bodily remains of Innocent I outside Rome. Portions of bone relics (ex ossibus) have been documented in later reliquaries distributed by the Vatican, attesting to the veneration of his remains in Catholic tradition. No major subsequent translations or authenticated rediscoveries of the full tomb have been recorded, distinguishing Innocent's burial from those of many contemporaries whose sites were lost or relocated during later renovations of Roman catacombs.

Legacy and Historical Assessment

Contributions to Doctrine and Governance

Pope Innocent I significantly advanced Catholic doctrine by condemning Pelagianism, a heresy denying original sin and the necessity of divine grace for salvation. In response to appeals from the synods of Carthage and Mileve in 416, along with a letter from five bishops including Augustine of Hippo, Innocent issued three epistles on January 27, 417, upholding the synods' decisions, excommunicating Pelagius and Caelestius until repentance, and affirming that their teachings contradicted apostolic tradition. This intervention reinforced the Church's teaching on human fallenness and dependence on grace, aligning with emerging Augustinian views and marking an early papal role in doctrinal adjudication. In sacramental theology, Innocent clarified practices through correspondence, such as his letter to Decentius of Gubbio, which addressed confirmation, stating that the sealing of infants was not permissible before baptism and emphasizing the role of chrism in the rite administered by bishops or priests. He also enumerated and rejected apocryphal writings in a 405 letter, contributing to the discernment of the biblical canon by deeming certain texts not only repudiable but damnable. Regarding governance, Innocent asserted papal primacy by intervening in distant churches and establishing Rome's appellate jurisdiction. In his February 15, 404, epistle to Victricius of Rouen, he ruled that no ecclesiastical case could be definitively settled without Roman cognizance, applying Roman disciplinary norms on consecrations, clerical admissions, and heretic reception universally. Similar directives extended to Gaul, Spain, Africa, and Britain, including regulations on clerical celibacy, monastic discipline, and Priscillianist remnants, while entrusting Illyria's vicariate to the Bishop of Thessalonica in 412. These actions promoted centralized authority, influencing early canon law and the Church's administrative structure.

Influence on Roman Primacy

Innocent I advanced the authority of the Roman see by intervening in ecclesiastical disputes beyond Italy, positioning Rome as the appellate authority for major cases. In a decretal dated February 15, 404, addressed to Victricius, bishop of Rouen, he provided rulings on disciplinary issues raised by the Gallic bishop and stipulated that controversies of significant import must be escalated to the Apostolic See for adjudication, thereby establishing a precedent for Rome's supervisory role over distant provinces. This assertion aligned with Innocent's broader practice of reserving judgment in appeals, as seen in his correspondence with bishops in Gaul, Macedonia, Dacia, and Spain, where he directed adherence to Roman precedents derived from apostolic tradition. A pivotal demonstration of this primacy occurred during the Pelagian controversy, where North African synods at Carthage and Milevis in 416 appealed to Innocent for confirmation of their condemnation of Pelagius and Caelestius. In January 417, Innocent endorsed the African decisions while excommunicating the heretics, underscoring Rome's function as the final arbiter in doctrinal matters and reinforcing the principle that provincial councils required papal ratification to bind the universal Church. This episode highlighted Innocent's causal influence on ecclesiastical governance, as his ratification not only validated local actions but also integrated them into a framework centered on Petrine authority, countering tendencies toward regional autonomy. In domestic Italian affairs, Innocent's letter to Decentius, bishop of Gubbio (Eugubium), circa 416, further elaborated Roman primacy by mandating conformity to the Roman rite in sacraments like confirmation and chrismation, declaring the Roman Church's practices—traced to the apostles—as the normative standard from which others should not deviate. He described Rome as the caput (head) and principium (source) of ecclesiastical tradition, compelling Decentius to align local customs accordingly and thereby extending Rome's liturgical and jurisdictional influence as a model for uniformity. These interventions collectively fortified the doctrinal and administrative preeminence of the Roman see, laying groundwork for later developments in papal supremacy amid the Empire's fragmentation.

Modern Scholarly Views

Scholars such as Geoffrey D. Dunn have examined Innocent I's correspondence to argue that he actively promoted the Roman see as an appellate authority in ecclesiastical disputes, particularly in regions like Illyricum, where he instructed bishops to forward cases to Rome for review under the Sardica canons (canons 3–7, ca. 343), though this role was confined to judicial oversight rather than direct governance or enforcement. Dunn emphasizes that Innocent's interventions, such as in the Bubalius affair involving Thessalonica's metropolitan, relied on vicarial structures and were contested, with evidence of forged synodal acts complicating appeals; this reflects pragmatic assertions of influence amid Eastern resistance rather than an established universal primacy. In theological controversies, modern assessments credit Innocent with early opposition to Pelagianism through letters supporting African bishops like Augustine of Hippo, yet note the fragility of these positions, as his successor Zosimus briefly rehabilitated Pelagius in 417 before reversing course. Dunn's analysis of Innocent's exchanges with John Chrysostom during the latter's exile (404–407) portrays Rome's advocacy for Eastern orthodoxy as an extension of appellate claims, but without yielding clear Eastern acknowledgment of jurisdictional supremacy, suggesting Innocent's primacy rhetoric was aspirational and contextually limited by imperial politics and regional autonomy. Historians like Charles Pietri interpret Innocent's administrative letters as efforts to consolidate Rome's organizational and ideological preeminence during the empire's decline, including directives on clerical discipline and canon law application in suburbicarian Italy, though these were not uniformly implemented beyond immediate spheres of influence. Overall, contemporary scholarship views Innocent's papacy (401–417) as a pivotal but transitional phase in Roman authority's evolution, marked by opportunistic interventions rather than doctrinal innovations or unchallenged hegemony, with his 36 extant letters providing primary evidence for debating the causal links between local crises and emerging centralization.

References

  1. https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/08011a.htm
  2. https://www.catholic.com/encyclopedia/pope-innocent-i
  3. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Saint-Innocent-I
  4. https://www.presbytersproject.ihuw.pl/index.php?id=6&SourceID=1541
  5. https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/hcc5/hcc5.ii.vii.iii.html
  6. https://www.ccel.org/ccel/wace/biodict.html?term=Innocentius%2C%2520bp.%2520of%2520Rome
  7. https://eternalchristendom.com/becoming-catholic/quote-archive/st-pope-innocent-i-church-father/
  8. https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:b1acecdb-a105-4507-8dd0-fe3e267bc9fa
  9. https://www.academia.edu/6387535/Innocent_I_and_the_Suburbicarian_Churches_The_Letter_to_Florentinus_of_Tivoli
  10. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-ecclesiastical-history/article/church-of-rome-as-a-court-of-appeal-in-the-early-fifth-century-the-evidence-of-innocent-i-and-the-illyrian-churches/18E62B6C8F69DA2268143F91D5577A7B
  11. https://czasopisma.kul.pl/index.php/vp/article/view/3420
  12. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110268607.145/html
  13. https://presbytersproject.ihuw.pl/index.php?id=6&SourceID=1541
  14. https://www.roger-pearse.com/weblog/2021/05/24/the-decretal-consulenti-tibi-jk-293-and-the-canon-of-the-bible/
  15. https://ccel.org/ccel/schaff/hcc3/hcc3.iii.xii.xxxiii.html
  16. https://earlychurchtexts.com/public/pelagius_letter_and_confession_to_innocent.htm
  17. https://www.christianity.com/church/church-history/timeline/301-600/pope-innocent-i-condemned-pelagius-11629693.html
  18. https://earlychurchtexts.com/public/palladius_john_chrysostom_letter_to_innocent_i.htm
  19. https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/1918.htm
  20. https://www.ccel.org/ccel/herbermann/cathen08.html
  21. https://popehistory.com/popes/pope-st-innocent-i/
  22. https://www.facebook.com/groups/196783340920609/posts/1495057891093141/
  23. https://quillette.com/2023/11/01/a-roman-trauma/
  24. https://www.catholicity.com/encyclopedia/z/zosimus%2Cpope_saint.html
  25. https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/6926297/innocent
  26. https://www.facebook.com/groups/RomanLegacy/posts/1353325818827016/
  27. https://anastpaul.com/2021/07/28/saint-of-the-day-28-july-saint-pope-innocent-i-died-417/
  28. https://www.russianstore.com/en/online-store/catholic-reliquaries/item/3115-1993-vatican-documented-reliquary-theca-with-relics-of-2-popes-st-pope-innocent-i-blessed-pope-innocent-xi
  29. https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/11604a.htm
  30. https://www.catholic.com/magazine/print-edition/pelagius-and-the-pope
  31. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23961670
  32. https://paulturner.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Worship-Amen-Corner-Innocent-to-Decentius.pdf
  33. https://dokumen.pub/church-and-worship-in-fifth-century-rome-the-letter-of-innocent-1-to-decentius-of-gubbio-50-1607244012-9781607244011.html
  34. https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/853y0/roman-primacy-in-the-correspondence-between-innocent-i-and-john-chrysostom
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.