Hubbry Logo
TarsierTarsierMain
Open search
Tarsier
Community hub
Tarsier
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Tarsier
Tarsier
Tarsier
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Tarsiers[1][2]
Temporal range: 45–0 Ma Middle Eocene to recent
Philippine tarsier (Carlito syrichta)
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Mammalia
Order: Primates
Infraorder: Tarsiiformes
Family: Tarsiidae
Gray, 1825
Type genus
Tarsius
Storr, 1780
Genera
Range of all tarsier species

Tarsiers (/ˈtɑːrsiərz/ TAR-see-ərz) are haplorhine primates of the family Tarsiidae, which is the lone extant family within the infraorder Tarsiiformes. Although the group was prehistorically more globally widespread, all of the existing species are restricted to Maritime Southeast Asia, predominantly in Brunei, Indonesia, Malaysia and the Philippines.[3]

Tarsier image inside Philippine National Museum of Natural History

They are found primarily in forested habitats, especially forests that have liana, since the vine gives tarsiers vertical support when climbing trees.[4]

Evolutionary history

[edit]

Fossil record

[edit]

Fossils of tarsiiform primates have been found in Asia, Europe, and North America (with disputed fossils from Northern Africa), but extant tarsiers are restricted to several Southeast Asian islands. The fossil record indicates that their dentition has not changed much, except in size, over the past 45 million years.

Within the family Tarsiidae, there are two extinct genera—Xanthorhysis and Afrotarsius; however, the placement of Afrotarsius is not certain,[5] and it is sometimes listed in its own family, Afrotarsiidae, within the infraorder Tarsiiformes,[6] or considered a simian (anthropoid) primate.[7]

So far, four fossil species of tarsiers are known from the fossil record:

The genus Tarsius has a longer fossil record than any other primate genus, but the assignment of the Eocene and Miocene fossils to the genus is dubious.[11]

Classification

[edit]
See also: List of tarsiiformes

The phylogenetic position of extant tarsiers within the order Primates has been debated for much of the 20th century, and tarsiers have alternately been classified with strepsirrhine primates in the suborder Prosimii, or as the sister group to the simians (Anthropoidea) in the infraorder Haplorhini. Analysis of SINE insertions, a type of macromutation to the DNA, is argued to offer very persuasive evidence for the monophyly of Haplorhini, where other lines of evidence, such as DNA sequence data, remain ambiguous. Thus, some systematists argue the debate is conclusively settled in favor of a monophyletic Haplorrhini. In common with simians, tarsiers have a mutation in the L-gulonolactone oxidase (GULO) gene, which prevents their bodies from synthesizing vitamin C so they must find it in the diet. Since the strepsirrhines do not have this mutation and have retained the ability to make vitamin C, the genetic trait that confers the need for it in the diet would tend to place tarsiers with haplorhines.[12]

Philippine tarsier (Carlito syrichta), one of the smallest primates

At a lower phylogenetic level, the tarsiers have, until recently, all been placed in the genus Tarsius,[1] while it was debated whether the species should be placed in two (a Sulawesi and a Philippine-western group) or three separate genera (Sulawesi, Philippine and western groups).[13] Species level taxonomy is complex, with morphology often being of limited use compared to vocalizations.[citation needed] Further confusion existed over the validity of certain names. Among others, the widely used T. dianae has been shown to be a junior synonym of T. dentatus, and comparably, T. spectrum is now considered a junior synonym of T. tarsier.[1]

In 2010, Colin Groves and Myron Shekelle suggested splitting the genus Tarsius into three genera, the Philippine tarsiers (genus Carlito), the western tarsiers (genus Cephalopachus), and the eastern tarsiers (genus Tarsius). This was based on differences in dentition, eye size, limb and hand length, tail tufts, tail sitting pads, the number of mammae, chromosome count, socioecology, vocalizations, and distribution. The senior taxon of the species, T. tarsier was restricted to the population of a Selayar island, which then required the resurrection of the defunct taxon T. fuscus.[2]

In 2014, scientists published the results of a genetic study from across the range of the Philippine tarsier, revealing previously unrecognised genetic diversity. Three subspecies are recognised in the established taxonomy: Carlito syrichta syrichta from Leyte and Samar, C. syrichta fraterculus from Bohol, and C. syrichta carbonarius from Mindanao. Their analysis of mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences suggested that ssp. syrichta and fraterculus may represent a single lineage, whereas ssp. carbonarius may represent two lineages – one occupies the majority of Mindanao while the other is in northeastern Mindanao and the nearby Dinagat Island, which the authors termed the 'Dinagat-Caraga tarsier'. More detailed studies that integrate morphological data will be needed to review the taxonomy of tarsiers in the Philippines.[14]

Anatomy and physiology

[edit]
Tarsiers tree-climbing

Tarsiers are small animals with enormous eyes; each eyeball is approximately 16 millimetres (0.63 in) in diameter and is as large as, or in some cases larger than, its entire brain.[16][17] The unique cranial anatomy of the tarsier results from the need to balance their large eyes and heavy head so they are able to wait silently for nutritious prey.[18] Tarsiers have a strong auditory sense, and their auditory cortex is distinct.[18] Tarsiers also have long hind limbs, owing mostly to the elongated tarsus bones of the feet, from which the animals get their name.[page needed] The combination of their elongated tarsi and fused tibiofibulae makes them morphologically specialized for vertical clinging and leaping.[19] The head and body range from 10 to 15 cm in length, but the hind limbs are about twice this long (including the feet), and they also have a slender tail from 20 to 25 cm long. Their fingers are also elongated, with the third finger being about the same length as the upper arm. Most of the digits have nails, but the second and third toes of the hind feet bear claws instead, which are used for grooming. Tarsiers have soft, velvety fur, which is generally buff, beige, or ochre in color.[20]

Tarsier morphology allows for them to move their heads 180 degrees in either direction, allowing for them to see 360 degrees around them.[21] Their dental formula is also unique: 2.1.3.31.1.3.3[22] Unlike many nocturnal vertebrates, tarsiers lack a light-reflecting layer (tapetum lucidum) of the retina and have a fovea.

The tarsier's brain is different from that of other primates in terms of the arrangement of the connections between the two eyes and the lateral geniculate nucleus, which is the main region of the thalamus that receives visual information. The sequence of cellular layers receiving information from the ipsilateral (same side of the head) and contralateral (opposite side of the head) eyes in the lateral geniculate nucleus distinguishes tarsiers from lemurs, lorises, and monkeys, which are all similar in this respect.[23] Some neuroscientists suggested that "this apparent difference distinguishes tarsiers from all other primates, reinforcing the view that they arose in an early, independent line of primate evolution."[24]

Philippine tarsiers are capable of hearing frequencies as high as 91 kHz. They are also capable of vocalizations with a dominant frequency of 70 kHz.[25]

Unlike most primates, male tarsiers do not have bacula.[26]

Behavior

[edit]

Pygmy tarsiers differ from other species in terms of their morphology, communication, and behavior.[27] The differences in morphology that distinguish pygmy tarsiers from other species are likely based on their high altitude environment.[28]

All tarsier species are nocturnal in their habits, but like many nocturnal organisms, some individuals may show more or less activity during the daytime. Based on the anatomy of all tarsiers, they are all adapted for leaping even though they all vary based on their species.[29][30][31][32]

Ecological variation is responsible for differences in morphology and behavior in tarsiers because different species become adapted to local conditions based on the level of altitude.[33] For example, the colder climate at higher elevations can influence cranial morphology.[34]

Tarsiers tend to be extremely shy animals and are sensitive to bright lights, loud noises, and physical contact. They have been reported to behave suicidally when stressed or kept in captivity.[35][36]

Predators

[edit]

Due to their small size, tarsiers are prey to various other animals. Tarsiers primarily inhabit the lower vegetation layers as they face threats from both terrestrial predators such as cats, lizards, and snakes, and aerial predators such as owls and birds. By residing in these lower layers, they can minimize their chances of being preyed upon by staying off the ground and yet still low enough to avoid birds of prey.

Tarsiers, though known as being shy and reclusive, are known to mob predators. In nature, mobbing is the act of harassing predators to reduce the chance of being attacked. When predators are near, tarsiers will make a warning vocalization. Other tarsiers will respond to the call, and within a short period of time, 2-10 tarsiers will show up to mob the predator. The majority of the group consists of adult males, but there will occasionally be a female or two. While tarsier groups only contain one adult male, males from other territories will join in the mob event, meaning there are multiple alpha male tarsiers attacking the predator.[37][21][38]

Diet

[edit]

Tarsiers are the only entirely carnivorous extant primates, albeit mainly insectivorous, catching invertebrates by jumping at them. The tarsiers also opportunistically prey on a variety of arboreal and small forest animals, including orthopterans, scarab beetles, small flying frogs, lizards and, occasionally, amphibious crabs that climb into the lower sections of trees.[39][40][41] However, it has been found that their favorite prey are arthropods, beetles, arachnids, cockroaches, grasshoppers, katydids, cicadas, and walking sticks.[21] Tarsiers are, rarely, also known to prey on baby birds, small tree snakes and even baby bats.[20]

Reproduction

[edit]

Gestation takes about six months,[42] and tarsiers give birth to single offspring. Young tarsiers are born furred, and with open eyes, and are able to climb within a day of birth. They reach sexual maturity by the end of their second year. Sociality and mating system varies, with tarsiers from Sulawesi living in small family groups, while Philippine and western tarsiers are reported to sleep and forage alone.

Conservation

[edit]

Tarsiers have never formed successful breeding colonies in captivity; this may be due in part to their special feeding requirements.[43][44][45][46][47]

A sanctuary near the town of Corella, on the Philippine island of Bohol, has had some success restoring tarsier populations.[48] The Philippines Tarsier Foundation has developed a large, semi-wild enclosure known as the Tarsier Research and Development Center. Carlito Pizarras, also known as the "Tarsier man", founded the sanctuary, where visitors can observe tarsiers in the wild. The trees in the sanctuary are populated with nocturnal insects that make up the tarsier's diet.[49]

The first quantitative study on the activity patterns of captive Philippine tarsiers (Tarsius syrichta) was conducted at the Subayon Conservation Centre for the Philippine Tarsier in Bilar, Bohol. From December 2014 to January 2016, female and male T. syrichta were observed based on their time apportioned to normal activities during non-mating versus mating seasons. During the non-mating season, a significant amount of their waking hours were spent scanning prior to resting, foraging, and traveling. Feeding, scent-marking, self-grooming, social activities, and other activities were minimal. Scanning was still a common activity among the paired sexes during mating season. However, resting markedly decreased, while increases in travel and foraging were evident.[50]

The 2008-described Siau Island tarsier in Indonesia is regarded as critically endangered and was listed among The World's 25 Most Endangered Primates by Conservation International and the IUCN/SCC Primate Specialist Group in 2008.[51] The Malaysian government protects tarsiers by listing them in the Totally Protected Animals of Sarawak, on the island of Borneo, where they are commonly found.[52]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Tarsier

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Tarsiers are small, nocturnal belonging to the family Tarsiidae, which includes three genera—Carlito, Cephalopachus, and —endemic to the islands of , renowned for their disproportionately large eyes, elongated tarsal bones in the hind limbs, and the ability to rotate their heads nearly 360 degrees due to a unique spinal morphology. These haplorhine , weighing between 80 and 150 grams and measuring 9 to 13 centimeters in body length with a up to 25 centimeters, inhabit diverse environments from sea level to elevations of 2,200 meters, including primary, secondary, and even human-modified habitats like plantations. Primarily arboreal and specialized for vertical clinging and leaping, tarsiers can jump distances up to five meters or more than 45 times their body length, aided by their powerful hind legs and adhesive pads on their digits. Their diet is exclusively carnivorous, consisting mainly of arthropods such as and spiders, though some also consume small vertebrates like birds, bats, , and frogs; they lack a , relying instead on acute vision and hearing for nocturnal hunting. Socially, they are typically solitary or live in small family groups, communicating via ultrasonic vocalizations and scent marking within home ranges of 0.005 to 0.1125 square kilometers, and they exhibit cooperative behaviors like predators. Reproductively, tarsiers have a period of 157 to 193 days, producing a single that weighs 25 to 30 percent of the mother's body mass and clings to her fur immediately after birth; breeding is seasonal, often from to , with individuals reaching in about a year and potentially living up to 17 years in captivity, though wild lifespans average around 10 years. Evolutionarily, tarsiers represent a basal lineage of haplorhine , with fossils dating back 34 to 56 million years to the Eocene epoch, bridging strepsirrhines and anthropoids through shared traits like forward-facing eyes and dry noses, yet retaining primitive features such as grooming claws. Conservation challenges are significant, with about 14 recognized species distributed across three main genera (western, Philippine, and eastern/Sulawesi), many of which are threatened, including some classified as Critically Endangered, Endangered, or Vulnerable by the IUCN, and others , as of 2025; primary threats include from logging, , and , compounded by their low densities and specialized ecological needs. Efforts to protect tarsiers involve habitat preservation in protected areas like national parks and ecotourism initiatives, which also highlight their role in controlling insect pests, underscoring their ecological and cultural importance in regions like , the , and .

Taxonomy and phylogeny

Classification

Tarsiers belong to the family Tarsiidae within the order , classified as haplorhine primates distinguished by their dry noses and other derived features. The family encompasses three extant genera: Carlito, which includes Philippine tarsiers endemic to the southern ; Cephalopachus, comprising western tarsiers from and ; and Tarsius, representing eastern tarsiers primarily from and nearby islands. This tripartite division was established in a 2010 taxonomic revision that separated these groups based on geographic isolation and morphological distinctions, elevating Carlito from its prior inclusion in Tarsius. Current taxonomy recognizes at least 14 species and 7 subspecies across these genera, reflecting ongoing discoveries of cryptic diversity in isolated island populations. Representative species include Carlito syrichta (), confined to , , , and ; Tarsius tumpara (Siau Island tarsier), a critically endangered form from ; and Cephalopachus bancanus (), distributed across western and . The 2010 revision by Groves and Shekelle initially identified 10 species but anticipated further splits, a borne out by subsequent descriptions emphasizing allopatric distributions. Historical has evolved significantly, with early classifications lumping all tarsiers under a single species, Tarsius tarsier (spectral tarsier), until mid-20th-century revisions recognized broader diversity. Key changes include the 2010 proposal of Carlito for Philippine forms, honoring conservationist Carlito Pizarras, which resolved long-standing debates over their distinctiveness from tarsiers. relies on morphological traits such as dental variations (e.g., differences in and molar structure), pelage patterns (including color and texture gradients), and vocalizations (distinct songs for territorial signaling), which help delineate species boundaries in the absence of extensive genetic data. These traits, combined with cranial and postcranial metrics, underpin the current framework, though genetic studies have since corroborated many divisions.

Genetic studies

Genetic studies on tarsiers have utilized mitochondrial and nuclear DNA to delineate species boundaries and population structures, particularly in the Philippines. A 2014 study by Brown et al. analyzed mitochondrial cytochrome b sequences and nuclear intron data from populations across Bohol, Samar, Leyte, Dinagat, and Mindanao, revealing three distinct evolutionary lineages with uncorrected sequence divergences of 2.1–4.7% among them, confirming cryptic genetic variation that supports revised taxonomic boundaries for Philippine tarsiers (now classified under Carlito syrichta with potential subspecies distinctions). This work highlighted non-congruence with prior biogeographical expectations, emphasizing the role of island isolation in shaping genetic partitioning. Molecular analyses of island populations have further elucidated recent divergence events potentially influenced by natural or anthropogenic processes. A 2020 study by Nurdin et al. examined nuclear gene sequences from tarsier populations on the islands of , Manado Tua, and Muka in , finding that these island groups diverged from mainland tarsiers approximately 2,000–150,000 years ago, likely due to natural rafting or human-mediated translocation. Such findings underscore the vulnerability of insular populations to historical connectivity disruptions, with the island clades forming a monophyletic group distinct from continental ones. Phylogenetic reconstructions using nuclear markers have clarified intra-regional relationships within . In a 2022 analysis by Nurdin et al., on sequences from five nuclear genes positioned , the pygmy tarsier, as the most basal lineage among Sulawesi tarsiers, diverging earlier than other species like T. dentatus and T. wallacei, based on robust posterior probabilities in the resulting trees. This placement highlights T. pumilus's ancient divergence within the tarsier radiation on the island. Key genetic features have reinforced tarsiers' classification within Haplorhini. The presence of a pseudogenized L-gulonolactone oxidase (GULO) gene, rendering tarsiers unable to synthesize vitamin C endogenously, aligns them molecularly with simians and confirms their haplorhine status, as this mutation arose once in the common ancestor of tarsiers and anthropoids. Isolated populations exhibit notably low genetic diversity, exemplified by the Siau Island tarsier (Tarsius tumpara), where small population sizes (estimated at fewer than 2,000 individuals) and historical bottlenecks have led to reduced variability, increasing extinction risk.

Evolutionary history

Fossil record

The fossil record of tarsiiform , the group encompassing tarsiers and their extinct relatives, extends back to the early Eocene epoch, approximately 55 million years ago, with remains documented across , , and , indicating a historically broader geographic distribution than the modern Southeast Asian range of extant tarsiers. In , middle Eocene fossils from include cranial fragments of Tarsius eocaenus from the Shanghuang locality in Province, featuring enlarged orbits and a bell-shaped dental arcade nearly identical to those of living tarsiers. Another Asian example is Xanthorhysis tabrumi from the middle Eocene Yuanqu Basin in Province, represented by a lower jaw fragment preserving a stable pattern. European Eocene sites, such as the Quercy phosphorites in , have yielded Necrolemur antiquus, a tarsier-like omomyid with moderately enlarged orbits suggestive of nocturnal habits similar to modern tarsiers. In , early Eocene localities in produced skulls of Shoshonius cooperi, exhibiting hypertrophic eyes and dental features linking it to the tarsier lineage. More recently, in 2023, two new omomyid species, Stockia lockwoodi and Ourayia uintensis, were described from the Eocene Uinta Formation () and Tornillo Formation (), providing additional insights into early tarsiiform postcranial anatomy and diversity in . The earliest African record comes from the Jebel Qatrani Formation in Egypt's Fayum Province, where Afrotarsius chatrathi is known from a mandibular fragment with molar morphology closely resembling that of , including broad paraconids and posteriorly placed entoconids. , characterized by the 2.1.3.3/1.1.3.3, has remained largely conserved over the past 45 million years, with minimal changes in tooth morphology from Eocene forms like T. eocaenus to . Following the Eocene, the fossil record shows no major diversification events until the Miocene, when multiple Tarsius species, such as T. thailandicus and T. sirindhornae from Thailand's Li and Na Khaem basins, indicate a temporary increase in taxonomic diversity before a decline to modern levels.

Phylogenetic position

Tarsiers occupy a pivotal position within the order as members of the suborder , serving as the to Anthropoidea (simians, including monkeys, apes, and humans), which collectively distinguishes them from the (wet-nosed like lemurs and lorises). This placement positions tarsiers as a morphological and evolutionary bridge between strepsirrhines and simians, retaining several primitive traits that have fueled longstanding debates about their status as a "." Such traits include an unfused and grooming claws, which echo Eocene , though molecular evidence firmly supports their haplorhine affiliation rather than a basal position outside this . Molecular clock analyses estimate that tarsiers diverged from other haplorhines approximately 55–63 million years ago during the early Eocene, aligning with the of modern following the Cretaceous-Paleogene . This timeline is bolstered by genomic studies, including analyses of orthologous genes that highlight shared evolutionary adaptations, such as those involved in immune recognition of microbial pathogens, reinforcing tarsiers' deep divergence within . These estimates contrast with earlier morphological hypotheses that variably allied tarsiers with strepsirrhines or as a separate , but convergent genomic data from retroposons and whole-genome sequencing have resolved tarsiers as unequivocally haplorhine. Key synapomorphies defining the tarsier-anthropoid include forward-facing eyes for enhanced stereoscopic vision, a reduced without a moist (unlike the wet noses of strepsirrhines), and specialized retinal structures like the fovea, which support their nocturnal predatory lifestyle. These features underscore tarsiers' transitional role, blending primitive sensory modalities with derived shared with simians, while their lack of a functional further aligns them with dry-nosed haplorhines. Recent phylogenetic analyses have refined intra-tarsier relationships, with a 2022 study confirming the basal position of the mountain tarsier (Tarsius pumilus) within eastern (Sulawesi) tarsiers, based on multi-locus genetic data showing its divergence from other Sulawesi lineages around 9.88 million years ago. This deep split highlights T. pumilus as a relict lineage, potentially predating major island formation events and underscoring the ancient diversification within Tarsiidae.

Physical description

External anatomy

Tarsiers are small primates with a head-body length typically ranging from 10 to 15 cm and weights between 80 and 165 g, making them among the smallest of the order Primates. Their hindlimbs are markedly elongated, approximately twice the length of the head and body, primarily due to the greatly extended tarsal bones that facilitate powerful leaps in arboreal environments. The overall body form is slender and adapted for vertical clinging and leaping, with a rounded head featuring a reduced snout that emphasizes the prominent facial features. The most striking external feature of tarsiers is their enormous eyes, each with a of 15 to 18 mm, which are fixed in their sockets and larger than the animal's . Their fur is soft and velvety, generally in , brown, or buff, providing in forested habitats. The dental formula is 2.1.3.3/1.1.3.3, unique among , with specialized teeth adapted for shearing prey. Elongated fingers and toes end in expanded adhesive pads that enhance grip on vertical surfaces. Sexual dimorphism is minimal across tarsier species, with males slightly larger than females in body size but otherwise similar in appearance. The tail is long and slender, exceeding the head-body length and covered in short fur except for a tuft at the tip, aiding in balance during locomotion.

Sensory physiology

Tarsiers exhibit remarkable adaptations in their visual physiology, optimized for nocturnal environments through structural and cellular specializations in the retina. The retina features an exceptionally high density of rod photoreceptors, surpassing 300,000 per square millimeter across much of its extent, which facilitates superior sensitivity to dim light and supports visual acuity in low-illumination conditions. Unlike many other nocturnal mammals, tarsiers lack a tapetum lucidum—a reflective layer that amplifies light—but compensate with extraordinarily large eyes, each having a volume equivalent to that of the brain and reportedly weighing more than the brain itself, thereby maximizing photon capture without the need for such a reflector. Complementing this scotopic dominance, tarsiers retain color vision capabilities via a mix of cone types: medium- and long-wavelength-sensitive (M/L) cones reach densities of up to 14,200 per square millimeter near the fovea for high-acuity tasks, while short-wavelength-sensitive (S) cones, potentially UV-sensitive, are sparse centrally (under 300 per square millimeter) but increase peripherally to around 1,600 per square millimeter, enabling dichromatic discrimination in brighter moments. Their is equally specialized for detecting subtle nocturnal cues, with an upper limit of approximately 91 kHz—among the highest recorded for any terrestrial —enabling perception of ultrasonic vibrations that may aid in prey detection akin to echolocation, though primarily utilized in communication. Oversized, membranous pinnae that are highly mobile enhance sound collection and directionality, while the cervical permits rapid head rotations of up to 180 degrees in either direction, allowing precise localization of sound sources through binaural cues without . Olfaction in tarsiers is notably reduced compared to other , reflected in the small size of the olfactory bulbs, which constitute only 0.82–0.92% of total volume—a significant decrease from the ancestral condition and indicative of diminished reliance on chemical sensing in favor of visual and auditory modalities. Tactile sensitivity, meanwhile, is mediated by specialized digital pads on the hands and feet, featuring disc-like structures that provide enhanced grip and sensory feedback during arboreal navigation, supplemented by facial vibrissae (whiskers) that serve as near-range detectors for environmental textures and obstacles. Supporting these sensory demands, tarsiers maintain a low , approximately 65% of that predicted for their body size, which conserves energy during prolonged inactivity and allows for intense bursts of and locomotion without excessive caloric expenditure.

Habitat and distribution

Geographic range

Tarsiers are endemic to , with all extant species restricted to the island nations and regions of the , , , and . Their distribution is highly fragmented, confined to numerous islands across these archipelagos, reflecting the influence of island biogeography that has isolated populations on separate landmasses. No modern tarsier populations occur in continental or . As of 2023, 14 species of tarsiers are recognized, divided into three genera: Carlito, Cephalopachus, and Tarsius, each adapted to specific island habitats within this region. For example, the Philippine tarsier (Carlito syrichta) inhabits four main islands in the southeastern Philippines: Bohol, Samar, Leyte, and Mindanao. In contrast, the Siau Island tarsier (Tarsius tumpara) is limited to a single small volcanic island in the Sangihe chain off northern Sulawesi, Indonesia, highlighting the extreme endemism typical of many species. Other notable distributions include the western tarsier (Cephalopachus bancanus) on Borneo and nearby islands in Indonesia and Malaysia, and various Tarsius species on Sulawesi and its satellite islands, such as T. pelengensis on Peleng Island. Fossil records indicate that tarsiers once had a much broader historical range, with remains dating back to the Eocene epoch (approximately 50 million years ago) discovered in , , , and . This suggests an ancestral distribution across continents, but subsequent evolutionary and environmental changes have contracted their range to the current insular confines of .

Habitat preferences

Tarsiers primarily inhabit tropical rainforests characterized by dense vegetation and abundant lianas, which provide essential vertical support for climbing and leaping. These favor environments with thick foliage for concealment and foraging, typically occurring from to elevations of up to 2,200 meters, varying by species—such as the in montane mossy forests—where cooler conditions support diverse vegetation layers. Such habitats allow tarsiers to exploit insect-rich layers while minimizing exposure to predators. While preferring primary forests, tarsiers show a notable tolerance for secondary forests, particularly those near edges where regrowth offers suitable cover, and they actively avoid open areas lacking dense vegetation. Their dependence on structural elements like thickets and vines is evident, as these features serve as perches and pathways in disturbed landscapes, enabling persistence in moderately altered settings. This adaptability underscores their reliance on vertical and vegetation for mobility and safety. Within these habitats, tarsiers occupy microhabitats in the low to mid-canopy, generally 2 to 10 meters above the ground, where they during activity and amid foliage. For daytime shelter, they utilize tree holes or cavities, which offer protection from diurnal threats and weather, though some also retreat to tangles or clusters. In fragmented forests, tarsiers demonstrate resilience through small home ranges, as observed in a 2024 study in Mindanao's Initao-Libertad Protected Landscape, where adult females maintained ranges of 0.7 to 2.5 hectares and males up to 4.9 hectares, facilitating efficient resource use in isolated patches.

Behavior and ecology

Activity patterns

Tarsiers exhibit strictly nocturnal activity patterns, emerging from sleeping sites around 18:00 and remaining active until approximately 06:00 the following morning, with notable peaks in movement and vocalization during crepuscular periods at dawn and dusk. This temporal niche aligns with their sensory adaptations, such as oversized eyes and acute hearing, which facilitate and prey detection in low-light conditions. During daylight hours, tarsiers retreat to sleep in clusters with conspecifics, typically clinging vertically to trunks, vines, or foliage at heights of 3–6 meters, a that provides protection from diurnal predators. Locomotion during their active phase involves vertical clinging and leaping, with individuals capable of jumps up to 5 meters between supports, enabling efficient traversal of their arboreal environment. Territorial maintenance occurs primarily at night through vocalizations, including coordinated duets between mated pairs that serve to defend ranges and coordinate reunions after . These calls, often emitted sporadically throughout the night but intensifying near dawn, underscore the species' reliance on acoustic signaling in dense, dark habitats. Activity rhythms show minimal seasonal variation across most populations, though reproductive efforts peak during the rainy season, correlating with increased resource availability from to in many regions. Tarsiers are highly sensitive to stress, particularly in , where disrupted conditions lead to elevated physiological responses and self-destructive behaviors such as head-banging.

Foraging and diet

Tarsiers are entirely carnivorous primates, with diets consisting exclusively of animal matter and no plant material. Their primary prey includes insects such as beetles (Coleoptera), cockroaches, grasshoppers (Orthoptera), moths (Lepidoptera), ants (Hymenoptera), termites, and spiders, supplemented by small vertebrates like lizards, frogs, snakes, birds, bats, and crabs. Tarsiers employ a sit-and-wait strategy, perching motionless on vertical supports at heights of 1.2–2.1 meters to scan for prey, which they capture by leaping or reaching with their hands from distances under 0.6 meters. This energetically efficient tactic yields high success rates, with approximately 88% of capture attempts resulting in prey seizure, primarily targeting arboreal on leaves and branches. Individuals can consume up to 10% of their body weight in prey each night, equivalent to about 10–15 grams for an average adult weighing 100–150 grams. Their is specialized for processing tough prey, featuring high-cusped molars that concentrate stress to crack and crush exoskeletons, as well as handle softer tissues like and . Finite element analysis demonstrates that these cusps enable efficient fracture propagation in chitinous structures, distinguishing tarsier molars as versatile for both hard and elastic foods. Tarsiers derive most of their hydration from the moisture in their prey, engaging in minimal direct drinking in the wild. Foraging and dietary preferences exhibit seasonal variation, particularly in response to resource availability. During the , tarsiers prioritize larger like orthopterans and lepidopterans when prey abundance is high, allowing reduced time. In the , they shift toward smaller, more accessible such as coleopterans and hymenopterans, increasing overall and travel efforts to compensate for .

Social structure

Tarsiers exhibit varied social structures across species, often characterized as solitary or forming monogamous pairs with minimal overlap in home ranges of approximately 1 to 2 hectares. In many populations, individuals maintain largely independent territories during nocturnal activity, though brief territorial interactions may occur at night. Communication plays a central role in tarsier social interactions, primarily through species-specific vocalizations and scent marking. Tarsiers produce high-pitched calls, including trills, twitters, and ultrasonic squeaks exceeding 70 kHz, which serve functions such as alarms, duets, and family choruses, often inaudible to humans. Additionally, they employ scent marking with and glandular secretions from epigastric and facial glands to delineate ranges and signal presence, a behavior observed in both wild and captive settings. Recent research has challenged the traditional view of tarsiers as predominantly solitary, revealing more complex in certain populations. A 2025 study by biologists in the Initao-Libertad Protected Landscape and Seascape, a fragmented in , documented family groups of up to four individuals, including an adult male, adult female, and subadults, with overlapping home ranges (6.45 ha for males and 2.25 ha for females). Notably, adult males engaged in behaviors, such as and huddling with young, indicating cooperative care within these units. A separate 2025 study analyzing posts from 2006 to 2024 found sightings in 29 provinces, many in human-altered environments outside protected areas, suggesting greater ecological flexibility and adaptability to habitat disturbance as of August 2025. Social organization varies notably by species and habitat; for instance, tarsiers, such as the (Tarsius spectrum), typically form small family groups of 2 to 6 individuals, consisting of one adult male, one or more females, and offspring, which remain cohesive during both daytime roosting and nocturnal foraging. These groups engage in affiliative behaviors like allogrooming and synchronized vocalizations, fostering social bonds while navigating dense forest environments.

Reproduction and development

Mating system

Tarsiers exhibit primarily monogamous mating systems, though facultative polygyny occurs in certain species and populations, where a single male's territory overlaps with multiple females. In species such as the spectral tarsier (Tarsius spectrum), approximately 85% of groups are monogamous, with the remaining showing polygynous arrangements influenced by resource availability and population density. Males actively defend territories that encompass the home ranges of their paired female(s), using vocalizations and scent marking to deter rivals and maintain pair bonds. Courtship behaviors in tarsiers involve singing between paired individuals, which reinforces territorial boundaries and pair cohesion, often performed at dawn or . Allogrooming and mutual scent marking also play key roles in mate attraction and , with females signaling estrus through increased scent production from specialized glands. Copulation is brief, typically lasting 3-5 minutes per event, characterized by rapid thrusting (up to 236 times) following male mounting, and occurs multiple times during the 1-3 day estrus period, usually shortly after waking. Breeding in tarsiers varies by species; most reproduce seasonally with births concentrated in specific periods, while some breed year-round. For example, spectral tarsiers have peaks during April-June and October-December coinciding with higher insect availability. lasts 157-193 days (approximately 6 months), resulting in the birth of a single offspring weighing 25-30% of the mother's body mass, which clings to her immediately after birth. is rare but documented, primarily perpetrated by intruding males during territorial takeovers in the pre-mating season, potentially to accelerate female re-entry into estrus.

Parental care

Tarsier infants are born in a relatively precocial state, fully furred and with eyes open, enabling them to cling to branches shortly after birth. Mothers employ a "parking" strategy, leaving the concealed in foliage at an average height of 162 cm while they forage nocturnally, typically for durations of 4 to 235 minutes (mean 112 minutes). This solitary parking occurs 66% of the time during the infant's first two months, with mothers transporting offspring orally over longer distances until approximately 50 days of age. Infants begin at one week and jumping short distances by two weeks, gradually following the by 18–23 days. Lactation lasts approximately 80 days, during which mothers provide as the primary , with occurring around this time as infants achieve nutritional independence and begin small prey. Full locomotor independence develops by about four weeks, though complete behavioral independence, including dispersal from the unit, is reached around of age. Individuals reach at about of age. In , tarsiers have a lifespan of up to approximately 11 years on average around 10 years, reflecting their slow life-history strategy. Parental care is primarily maternal, but recent studies indicate paternal involvement in some species, such as male Philippine tarsiers (Tarsius syrichta) babysitting and huddling with infants in family groups. by subadults has been observed in spectral tarsiers (Tarsius spectrum), where young females provide more care, including sharing sleeping sites and guarding infants, than males. Juvenile mortality is high, often exceeding 50% in the early months, primarily due to predation by , snakes, and monitor , as well as accidental falls from branches.

Predators and defense

Natural predators

Tarsiers are vulnerable to predation by a range of avian, reptilian, and mammalian due to their small size, nocturnal habits, and arboreal lifestyle in Southeast Asian forests. Avian predators primarily include and other raptors, which exploit the tarsiers' activity patterns to capture them during foraging or resting periods. For example, spectral tarsiers (Tarsius tarsier) have been observed responding to threats from these birds through vocalizations and evasion tactics. Reptilian predators such as arboreal snakes, pythons, and also target tarsiers, with documented cases highlighting their impact. A water (Varanus salvator) was recorded preying on an adult female (Tarsius syrichta), demonstrating the vulnerability of these to ground- and tree-dwelling reptiles. Similarly, a (Python reticulatus) successfully predated a , underscoring the role of in tarsier mortality. Mammalian predators encompass , which hunt in the where tarsiers often perch, as well as like cats in certain regions. These predators contribute to elevated mortality risks, particularly in areas with that limits escape options. For the critically endangered Siau Island tarsier (Tarsius tumpara), cats and dogs represent key predators, with observations indicating they actively hunt these on the island. Juveniles of various tarsier species are especially susceptible to such threats, alongside general ectoparasites that may weaken them but do not constitute predation. Overall, these natural enemies exert pressure on tarsier populations, influencing their distribution and density in fragmented habitats.

Anti-predator behaviors

Tarsiers employ a range of anti-predator strategies, including both active and passive defenses, to mitigate threats from predators such as snakes, , and mammals. One prominent active behavior is , where groups of spectral tarsiers (Tarsius spectrum) gather to harass intruders, particularly snakes, through intense vocalizations and leaps toward the predator. These mobbing events typically involve an average of 5.1 individuals and last about 33 minutes, with adults and males participating more frequently than juveniles or females. In contrast, individual tarsiers may respond to immediate threats by freezing motionless to avoid detection or executing rapid flights into cover, depending on the predator's proximity and type. Passive defenses rely heavily on camouflage and habitat utilization. The cryptic coloration of tarsiers' fur, which blends with the grayish-brown tones of their forested surroundings, helps them remain inconspicuous during rest or foraging. They further exploit dense vegetation, such as bamboo thickets, pandanus stands, and epiphytic ferns, for escape routes and sleeping sites, selecting locations with multiple exits like tree crevices or complex root systems to evade pursuit. Over 90% of observed sleeping trees in Sulawesi's Tangkoko Nature Reserve are large Ficus species providing such thick cover. Alarm calls play a crucial role in early warning systems, with tarsier species producing distinct, species-specific vocalizations that alert conspecifics to dangers. These calls, often high-pitched trills or whistles, trigger coordinated responses like . Enhanced hearing capabilities, extending to ultrasonic frequencies up to 91 kHz, allow tarsiers to detect subtle predator movements or rustles from afar, facilitating proactive evasion before threats close in. This acute auditory sensitivity, among the highest in terrestrial mammals, complements their nocturnal lifestyle by enabling on potential dangers without visual reliance. Human-related disturbances exacerbate predation risks, as documented in local knowledge studies from Bilar, Bohol, . In tourist-heavy areas, tarsiers exhibit to human presence, leading them to venture into more exposed habitats and increasing vulnerability to predators like domestic cats. Tourism-driven capture for display or sale further disrupts natural behaviors, heightening overall endangerment in these zones.

Conservation

Status and threats

Tarsiers face varying levels of conservation concern across species, with the (Carlito syrichta) classified as Near Threatened by the IUCN due to ongoing habitat loss and fragmentation, though its population has experienced a decline of less than 30% over the past three generations (approximately 20 years). The Siau Island tarsier (Tarsius tumpara) is assessed as Critically Endangered, with an estimated population of 1,358 to 12,470 individuals confined to a small area of remaining habitat on Siau Island, . The Sangihe Island tarsier (Tarsius sangirensis) is featured on the IUCN Species Survival Commission Primate Specialist Group's list of the World's 25 Most Endangered for 2023–2025, highlighting its vulnerability to . The primary threats to tarsiers include driven by and agricultural expansion; in the , tree cover loss totaled 1.5 million hectares from 2001 to 2024, representing about 8% of the 2000 baseline and severely impacting habitats preferred by many tarsier species. A 2022 assessment in Hindang, , identified small-holder farming and firewood collection as moderate local threats to the population, exacerbating habitat degradation in this region. Additionally, illegal capture for the pet trade and has emerged as a significant ; a 2021 study based on community interviews in revealed widespread reports of tarsiers being trapped from the wild for sale to tourists or as exotic pets, often leading to high mortality rates in . further compounds these risks by altering forest microclimates and increasing the frequency of events, such as typhoons, which disrupt tarsier habitats and foraging patterns. Population trends for tarsiers are generally downward, with the showing continued decline due to cumulative habitat pressures, while more restricted species like the Siau Island tarsier face even steeper reductions estimated at over 80% in recent decades. A analysis of social media posts on platforms like documented numerous sightings outside protected areas between 2006 and 2024, indicating heightened human-tarsier interactions that could facilitate illegal trade and further population stress. These trends underscore the urgent need to address anthropogenic threats to prevent broader risks across the .

Conservation measures

Conservation efforts for tarsiers emphasize the establishment of protected areas to safeguard their habitats from and human encroachment. The Sanctuary in Corella, , established in 1996 by the Philippine Tarsier Foundation, functions as a 9-hectare reserve dedicated to the and research of the Philippine tarsier (Carlito syrichta), where over 200 individuals reside in a semi-natural environment free from predators. In , community-based conservation initiatives, such as those recommended for the Sangihe tarsier (Tarsius sangirensis), involve local participation in habitat monitoring and to enhance awareness and sustainable management practices around endemic populations. Breeding tarsiers in captivity presents significant challenges, primarily due to their extreme sensitivity to stress, which often results in , high , and low reproductive success rates. Recent radio-tracking studies, including those on Dian's tarsier (Tarsius dianae), have provided critical data on ranging patterns and use to develop reintroduction protocols, enabling better post-release monitoring and adaptation strategies for rescued individuals. Ongoing initiatives include the promotion of ethical ecotourism guidelines at sanctuaries, which prohibit flash photography and loud noises to reduce stress on tarsiers while supporting local economies through controlled visitation. A 2025 study from the University of the Philippines Diliman demonstrated the value of social media platforms like Facebook for citizen science, analyzing public posts to map tarsier sightings across 29 provinces and fill knowledge gaps in distribution beyond protected areas. Enforcement against illegal pet trade has intensified, with Philippine laws since 1997 prohibiting the capture and possession of tarsiers, leading to rescues and prosecutions that curb black market activities. Future strategies focus on genetic management to address isolation in fragmented populations, as revealed by mitochondrial and nuclear DNA analyses identifying distinct evolutionary lineages that prioritize targeted interventions for connectivity. Habitat restoration efforts, aligned with broader goals, aim to rehabilitate degraded forests, with initiatives like Project Tarsier working toward large-scale to support tarsier recovery by 2030.

References

  1. https://animaldiversity.org/accounts/Tarsiidae/
  2. https://primate.wisc.edu/primate-info-net/pin-factsheets/pin-factsheet-tarsier/
  3. https://www.britannica.com/animal/tarsier
  4. https://animaldiversity.org/accounts/Tarsius/
  5. https://neprimateconservancy.org/tarsiers/
  6. https://www.iucnredlist.org/search?query=tarsier&searchType=species
  7. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/226054137_The_Genera_and_Species_of_Tarsiidae
  8. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230014
  9. https://anatomypubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ar.21367
  10. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.0509424103
  11. https://www.nature.com/articles/349064a0
  12. https://www.sci.news/paleontology/eocene-omomyids-12297.html
  13. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1214&context=usgsstaffpub
  14. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3107645/
  15. https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms12997
  16. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsbl.2021.0642
  17. https://www.nature.com/articles/srep01756
  18. https://animaldiversity.org/accounts/Tarsius_syrichta/
  19. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/pharmacology-toxicology-and-pharmaceutical-science/tarsier
  20. https://anatomypubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ar.a.20263
  21. https://animaldiversity.org/accounts/Tarsius_tarsier/
  22. https://neprimateconservancy.org/philippine-tarsier/
  23. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/zoology/western-tarsier
  24. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsbl.2011.1149
  25. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/pharmacology-toxicology-and-pharmaceutical-science/large-ear
  26. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4110675/
  27. https://anatomypubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ar.25651
  28. https://the.oandplibrary.org/items/show/179638
  29. https://neprimateconservancy.org/gurskys-spectral-tarsier/
  30. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/physzool.60.5.30156133
  31. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-30049-5
  32. https://bioone.org/journals/primate-conservation/volume-23/issue-1/052.023.0106/Tarsius-tumpara--A-New-Tarsier-Species-from-Siau-Island/10.1896/052.023.0106.full
  33. https://primate.wisc.edu/primate-info-net/pin-factsheet-tarsier/
  34. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362422544_Habitat_preferences_and_site_fidelity_of_Tarsius_supriatnai_in_agricultural_area_and_secondary_forest_of_Popayato-Paguat_Landscape_Gorontalo_Indonesia
  35. https://neprimateconservancy.org/makassar-tarsier/
  36. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385711063_Ranging_Behavior_of_Philippine_Tarsiers_Carlito_syrichta_Inhabiting_a_Protected_Forest_Fragment_in_Misamis_Oriental_Mindanao_Implications_for_Monitoring_Nocturnal_Primates
  37. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7233616/
  38. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/zoo.1430120207
  39. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Myron-Shekelle/publication/267156236_EASTERN_TARSIERS_IN_CAPTIVITY_PART_II_A_PRELIMINARY_ASSESSMENT_OF_DIET/links/5447001a0cf2f14fb811cfed/EASTERN-TARSIERS-IN-CAPTIVITY-PART-II-A-PRELIMINARY-ASSESSMENT-OF-DIET.pdf
  40. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/290906379_The_Mechanics_of_Food_Reduction_in_Tarsius_bancanus
  41. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1005444020059
  42. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/12507284_Sociality_in_the_spectral_tarsier_Tarsius_spectrum
  43. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/275667372_Ultrasonic_Vocalizations_by_the_Spectral_Tarsier_Tarsius_spectrum
  44. https://www.endangeredspeciesinternational.org/tarsiersection4.html
  45. https://karger.com/fpr/article/89/2/157/144059/Sexual-Behaviour-of-the-Spectral-Tarsier-Tarsius
  46. https://up.edu.ph/deep-in-a-southern-forest-philippine-tarsiers-are-no-longer-solitary/
  47. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10764-024-00465-z
  48. https://science.upd.edu.ph/recent-up-study-finds-social-media-a-valuable-tool-for-understanding-philippine-tarsiers/
  49. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/226950335_Intraspecific_Variation_in_the_Mating_System_of_Spectral_Tarsiers
  50. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227133104_Dispersal_Patterns_in_Tarsius_spectrum
  51. https://www.academia.edu/13972055/The_behavior_of_wild_spectral_tarsiers
  52. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/immunology-and-microbiology/haplorhini
  53. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343878043_Sexual_Behaviour_of_the_Spectral_Tarsier_Tarsius_spectrum_in_Captivity
  54. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337497793_Social_Behavior_of_a_Reproducing_Pair_of_the_Philippine_Tarsier_Tarsius_syrichta_in_Captivity
  55. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/immunology-and-microbiology/tarsiiform
  56. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/226904528_Effect_of_Seasonality_on_the_Behavior_of_an_Insectivorous_Primate_Tarsius_spectrum
  57. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/51582384_Infanticide_by_a_male_spectral_tarsier_Tarsius_spectrum
  58. https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/57203
  59. https://animaldiversity.org/accounts/Tarsius_bancanus/
  60. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267156377_TARSIER_LONGEVITY_DATA_FROM_A_RECAPTURE_IN_THE_WILD_AND_FROM_CAPTIVE_ANIMALS
  61. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10686486/
  62. https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/pdf/17978520
  63. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257488099_Predation_on_a_wild_Philippine_tarsier_Tarsius_syrichta
  64. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/11308521_Predation_on_a_Wild_Spectral_Tarsier_Tarsius_spectrum_by_a_Snake
  65. https://neprimateconservancy.org/siau-island-tarsier/
  66. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/oryx/article/an-acute-conservation-threat-to-two-tarsier-species-in-the-sangihe-island-chain-north-sulawesi-indonesia/14B594D43AA08FE54C29269324A283E2
  67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-005-0731-0
  68. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227580878_The_Behavioral_Ecology_of_the_Spectral_Tarsier_Tarsius_spectrum
  69. https://neprimateconservancy.org/peleng-tarsier/
  70. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2011.1149
  71. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351816602_Utilizing_local_community_knowledge_of_the_Philippine_tarsier_in_assessing_the_Bilar_population_endangerment_risk_and_implications_for_conservation
  72. https://static1.1.sqspcdn.com/static/f/1200343/28689322/1746295616970/Top_25_Primates_2023-2025.pdf
  73. https://www.globalforestwatch.org/dashboards/country/PHL/
  74. https://www.wildlife-biodiversity.com/index.php/jwb/article/view/252
  75. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1617138121000753
  76. https://theconversation.com/monkeys-lemurs-and-apes-at-risk-climate-change-threatens-a-quarter-of-worlds-primate-habitat-161955
  77. https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/2090739/researchers-see-alarming-fb-trend-on-tarsier-sightings
  78. https://www.escape.com.au/destinations/asia/yoda-in-real-life-a-tour-of-the-philippine-tarsier-sanctuary-in-bohol/news-story/4fb1052331eb7e6f9bf40221e66ea545
  79. https://neprimateconservancy.org/sangihe-tarsier/
  80. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12184444/
  81. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16429421/
  82. https://bohol-philippines.com/tarsier-sanctuary-guide-in-corella/
  83. https://www.vice.com/en/article/the-man-trying-to-save-the-filipino-tarsier-from-the-black-market/
  84. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0104340
  85. https://www.usc.edu.au/research/forest-research-institute/project-tarsier
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.