Hubbry Logo
VolunteeringVolunteeringMain
Open search
Volunteering
Community hub
Volunteering
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Volunteering
Volunteering
Volunteering
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Volunteers at the Vilnius Marathon
Volunteers sweep the boardwalk in Brooklyn after the 2012 Hurricane Sandy
Semi-professional volunteering: Trained lifeguards of the German DLRG, the largest voluntary water rescue organization in the world, patrolling a public bathing area of a lake in Munich

Volunteering is an optional and freely chosen act of an individual or group giving their time and labor, often for community service.[1][2] Many volunteers have specialized training in the fields that they work in, such as medicine, education, or emergency rescue. Others provide their services as needed, such as in response to a natural disaster.

Etymology and history

[edit]

The verb was first recorded in 1755. It was derived from the noun volunteer, in c. 1600, "one who offers himself for military service," from the Middle French voluntaire.[3] In the non-military sense, the word was first recorded during the 1630s. The word volunteering has more recent usage—still predominantly military—coinciding with the phrase community service.[3][4] In a military context, a volunteer army is a military body whose soldiers have chosen to enlist, as opposed to having been conscripted. Such volunteers do not work "for free" and are given regular pay.

19th century

[edit]

During this time, America experienced the Great Awakening. People became aware of the disadvantaged and realized the cause for movement against slavery.[5] In 1851, the first YMCA in the United States was started, followed seven years later by the first YWCA. During the American Civil War, women volunteered their time to sew supplies for the soldiers, and the "Angel of the Battlefield" Clara Barton and a team of volunteers began providing aid to servicemen. Barton founded the American Red Cross in 1881 and began mobilizing volunteers for disaster relief operations, including relief for victims of the Johnstown Flood in 1889.

20th and 21st centuries

[edit]
Volunteers from around the world came to Ithaca, Queensland to address an influenza epidemic through the Women's Emergency Corps (later the Women's Volunteer Reserve) in July 1919.

The Salvation Army is one of the oldest and largest organizations working for disadvantaged people. Though it is a charity organization, it has organized a number of volunteering programs since its inception.[6] Prior to the 19th century, few formal charitable organizations existed to assist people in need.

In the first few decades of the 20th century, several volunteer organizations were founded, including the Rotary International, Kiwanis International, Association of Junior Leagues International, and Lions Clubs International.

The Great Depression saw one of the first large-scale efforts to coordinate volunteering for a specific need in the US. During World War II, thousands of volunteer offices supervised the volunteers who helped with the many needs of the military and the home front, including collecting supplies, entertaining soldiers on leave, and caring for the injured.[6]

After World War II, people shifted the focus of their altruistic passions to other areas, including helping the poor and volunteering overseas. A major development was the Peace Corps in the United States in 1960. When President Lyndon B. Johnson declared a War on Poverty in 1964, volunteer opportunities started to expand and continued into the next few decades. The process for finding volunteer work became more formalized, with more volunteer centers forming and new ways to find work appearing on the World Wide Web through organizations like JustServe and AmeriCorps.[6][7]

John F. Kennedy greets volunteers on 28 August 1961

According to the Corporation for National and Community Service (in 2012), about 64.5 million Americans, or 26.5 percent of the adult population, gave 7.9 billion hours of volunteer service worth $175 billion. This calculates at about 125–150 hours per year or 3 hours per week at a rate of $22 per hour. Volunteer hours in the UK are similar; the data for other countries is unavailable.

Types

[edit]

Volunteering as utilized by service learning programs

[edit]

Many schools on all education levels offer service-learning programs, which allow students to serve the community through volunteering while earning educational credit.[8] According to Alexander Astin in the foreword to Where's the Learning in Service-Learning? by Janet Eyler and Dwight E. Giles, Jr., "...we promote more wide-spread adoption of service-learning in higher education because we see it as a powerful means of preparing students to become more caring and responsible parents and citizens and of helping colleges and universities to make good on their pledge to 'serve society.'"[9] When describing service learning, the Medical Education at Harvard says, "Service learning unites academic study and volunteer community service in mutually reinforcing ways. ...service learning is characterized by a relationship of partnership: the student learns from the service agency and from the community and, in return, gives energy, intelligence, commitment, time and skills to address human and community needs."[8] Volunteering in service learning seems to have the result of engaging both mind and heart, thus providing a more powerful learning experience; according to Janet Eyler and Dwight E. Giles, it succeeds by the fact that it "...fosters student development by capturing student interest..."[9]: 1–2, 8  More recent scholarship has found shortcomings in the early assumptions of mutual benefit, since early studies were interested in educational benefits rather than community outcomes. An Indiana study found that the nonprofit agencies hosting student service-learners do not report a positive impact on service capacity, although service-learners do help to increase agency visibility.[10] In the end, service-learning must follow other principles of effective volunteer management such as screening, training, and supervising.[editorializing]

Skills-based volunteering

[edit]

Skills-based volunteering is leveraging the specialized skills and the talents of individuals to strengthen the infrastructure of nonprofits, helping them build and sustain their capacity to successfully achieve their missions.[11] This is in contrast to traditional volunteering, where volunteers do something other than their professional work.[12] The average hour of traditional volunteering is valued by the Independent Sector at between $18–20 an hour.[13] Skills-based volunteering is, on average, valued at $220 an hour.[14]

Virtual volunteering

[edit]
Further information: Virtual volunteering

Also called e-volunteering or online volunteering, virtual volunteering is a volunteer who completes tasks, in whole or in part, offsite from the organization being assisted. They use the Internet and a home, school, telecenter or work computer, or other Internet-connected device, such as a PDA or smartphone. Virtual volunteering is also known as cyber service, telementoring, and teletutoring, as well as various other names. Virtual volunteering is similar to remote work, except that instead of online employees who are paid, these are online volunteers who are not paid.[15][16] Contributing to free and open source software projects or editing Wikipedia are examples of virtual volunteering.[17]

Micro-volunteering

[edit]
Further information: Micro-volunteering

Micro-volunteering is a task performed via an internet-connected device. An individual typically does this task in small, un-paid increments of time. Micro-volunteering is distinct from "virtual volunteering" in that it typically does not require the individual volunteer to go through an application process, screening process, or training period.[18][19]

Environmental volunteering

[edit]
Further information: Environmental volunteering

Environmental volunteering refers to the volunteers who contribute towards environmental management or conservation. Volunteers conduct a range of activities including environmental monitoring, ecological restoration such as re-vegetation and weed removal, protecting endangered animals, and educating others about the natural environment.[20]

Volunteering in an emergency

[edit]
Volunteers assist survivors at the Houston Astrodome following Hurricane Katrina in September 2005.

Volunteering often plays a pivotal role in the recovery effort following natural disasters, such as tsunamis, floods, droughts, hurricanes, and earthquakes. For example, the 1995 Great Hanshin-Awaji earthquake in Japan was a watershed moment, bringing in many first-time volunteers for earthquake response. The 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake and tsunami attracted a large number of volunteers worldwide, deployed by non-governmental organizations, government agencies, and the United Nations.[21][22]

During the 2012 hurricane Sandy emergency, Occupy Sandy volunteers formed a laterally organized rapid-response team that provided much needed help during and after the storm, from food to shelter to reconstruction. It is an example of mutualism at work, pooling resources and assistance and leveraging social media.

Volunteering is particularly consequential in the context of Disasters, which are those emergency situations associated with destruction and/or functional disruptions that may test or exceed the capacity of a community or society to respond.[23]

In a time when disasters are increasing in frequency and intensity faster than the capacity of the community/society to respond can be developed, the relative importance of volunteer response will tend to grow. [24] [25] [26]

Volunteering in schools

[edit]

Resource poor schools around the world rely on government support or on efforts from volunteers and private donations, in order to run effectively. In some countries, whenever the economy is down, the need for volunteers and resources increases greatly.[27] School systems offer many volunteer opportunities with minimal requirements. Whether one is a high school or TEFL (Teaching English as a Foreign Language) graduate or college student, most schools require just voluntary and selfless effort.[28]

Much like the benefits of any type of volunteering there are great rewards for the volunteer, student, and school. In addition to intangible rewards, volunteers can add relevant experience to their resumes. Volunteers who travel to assist may learn foreign culture and language. "Volunteering can give the students the sufficient experience in order to support and strengthen their CVs and resumes."[29]

Volunteering in schools can be an additional teaching guide for the students and help to fill the gap of local teachers. Cultural and language exchange during teaching and other school activities can be the most essential learning experience for both students and volunteers.[28]

Corporate volunteering

[edit]
Further information: Volunteer grant

Benefacto, a volunteering brokerage, describe corporate volunteering as "Companies giving their employees an allowance of paid time off annually, which they use to volunteer at a charity of their choice."[30]

A majority of the companies at the Fortune 500 allow their employees to volunteer during work hours. These formalized Employee Volunteering Programs (EVPs), also called Employer Supported Volunteering (ESV), are regarded as a part of the companies' sustainability efforts and their social responsibility activities.[31] About 40% of Fortune 500 companies provide monetary donations, also known as volunteer grants, to nonprofits as a way to recognize employees who dedicate significant amounts of time to volunteering in the community.[32]

According to the information from VolunteerMatch, a service that provides Employee Volunteering Program solutions, the key drivers for companies that produce and manage EVPs are building brand awareness and affinity, strengthening trust and loyalty among consumers, enhancing corporate image and reputation, improving employee retention, increasing employee productivity and loyalty, and providing an effective vehicle to reach strategic goals.[33]

In April 2015, David Cameron pledged to give all UK workers employed by companies with more 250 staff mandatory three days' paid volunteering leave, which if implemented will generate an extra 360 million volunteering hours a year.[34]

Community volunteer work

[edit]
Volunteers fit new windows at the Sumac Centre in Nottingham, England, UK.

Community volunteering, in the US called "community service", refers globally to those who work to improve their local community. This activity commonly occurs through not for profit organizations, local governments and churches; but also encompasses ad-hoc or informal groups such as recreational sports teams.[35]

Social volunteering or welfare volunteering

[edit]

In some European countries government organisations and non-government organisations provide auxiliary positions for a certain period in institutions like hospitals, schools, memorial sites and welfare institutions. The difference to other types of volunteering is that there are strict legal regulations, what organisation is allowed to engage volunteers and about the period a volunteer is allowed to work in a voluntary position. Due to that fact, the volunteer is getting a limited amount as a pocket money from the government. Organizations having the biggest manpower in Europe are the Voluntary social year (German: Freiwilliges Soziales Jahr), with more than 50.000 volunteers per year, and the Federal volunteers service (German: Bundesfreiwilligendienst), with about 30.000 to 40.000 volunteers per year.[36][37][38]

Volunteering at major sporting events

[edit]

25,000 volunteers worked at the 2014 Sochi Winter Olympics. They supported the organisers in more than 20 functional areas: meeting guests, assisting navigation, organising the opening and closing ceremonies, organising food outlets, etc. Volunteer applications were open to any nationals of Russia and other countries. The Sochi 2014 Organising Committee received about 200,000 applications, 8 applicants per place. Volunteers received training over the course of more than a year at 26 volunteer centres in 17 cities across Russia. The majority of participants were between 17 and 22 years old. At the same time, 3000 applications were submitted from people over 55 years old. Some of them worked as volunteers during the 1980 Olympics in Moscow. It was the first experience with such a large-scale volunteer program in the contemporary Russia.

The FIFA World Cup in 2018 was supported by 17,040 volunteers of the Russia 2018 Local Organising Committee.[39]

Medical Volunteering

[edit]

Volunteering in the context of delivering medical care is referred to as medical volunteering. In general, medical volunteering has been lauded as a "ethical responsibility to aid the needy". The activities are often offered by both for profit and not for profit associations. Medical volunteers typically participate in unpaid medical volunteer programs in hospitals, clinics, and underserved areas. Typically, these regions are in underdeveloped nations or nations battling natural disasters, sickness, or violence. These activities typically involves volunteer physicians and nurses. Dental volunteering is a part of medical volunteering which predominantly focused on dental care.[40]

Seva

[edit]

In Hinduism, seva means selfless service and is often associated with karma yoga, disciplined action, and bhakti yoga, disciplined devotion. Seva is also connected to other Sanskrit concepts such as dāna (gift giving), karunā (compassion), and preman (kindness). Seva is also performed as a form of ego-transcending spiritual practise known as Sadhana, and plays a large role in modern Hinduism. This is because a key concept in Hinduism is liberation (Moksha) from the cycle of births and deaths (Saṃsāra), and sadhana is the effort one makes to strive for liberation, highlighting the importance of service to others.[41]

In Sikhism, the word seva also means "to worship, to adore, to pay homage through the act of love." In the writings of Sikh gurus, these two meanings of seva (service and worship) have been merged. Seva is expected to be a labour of love performed without desire and intention, and with humility.[41]

Volunteer days, weeks and years

[edit]

Designated days, weeks and years observed by a country or as designated by the United Nations to encourage volunteering / community service

Political view

[edit]
Further information: Gift economy

Modern societies share a common value of people helping each other; not only do volunteer acts assist others, but they also benefit the volunteering individual on a personal level.[42] Despite having similar objectives, tension can arise between volunteers and state-provided services. In order to curtail this tension, most countries develop policies and enact legislation to clarify the roles and relationships among governmental stakeholders and their voluntary counterparts; this regulation identifies and allocates the necessary legal, social, administrative, and financial support of each party. This is particularly necessary when some voluntary activities are seen as a challenge to the authority of the state (e.g., on 29 January 2001, President Bush cautioned that volunteer groups should supplement—not replace—government agencies' work).[43]

Volunteering that benefits the state but challenges paid counterparts angers labor unions that represent those who are paid for their volunteer work; this is particularly seen in combination departments, such as volunteer fire departments.

Difficulties in cross-national aid

[edit]
See also: International volunteering

Difficulties in the cross-national aid model of volunteering can arise when it is applied across national borders. The presence of volunteers who are sent from one state to another can be viewed as a breach of sovereignty and showing a lack of respect towards the national government of the proposed recipients. Thus, motivations are important when states negotiate offers to send aid and when these proposals are accepted, particularly if donors may postpone assistance or stop it altogether. Three types of conditionality have evolved:

  1. Financial accountability: Transparency in funding management to ensure that what is done by the volunteers is properly targeted
  2. Policy reform: Governmental request that developing countries adopt certain social, economic, or environmental policies; often, the most controversial relate to the privatization of services traditionally offered by the state
  3. Development objectives: Asking developing countries to adjust specific time-bound economic objectives

Some international volunteer organizations define their primary mission as being altruistic: to fight poverty and improve the living standards of people in the developing world, (e.g. Voluntary Services Overseas has almost 2,000 skilled professionals working as volunteers to pass on their expertise to local people so that the volunteers' skills remain long after they return home). When these organizations work in partnership with governments, the results can be impressive. However, when other organizations or individual First World governments support the work of volunteer groups, there can be questions as to whether the organizations' or governments' real motives are poverty alleviation. Instead, a focus on creating wealth for some of the poor or developing policies intended to benefit the donor states is sometimes reported.[44] Many low-income countries' economies suffer from industrialization without prosperity and investment without growth. One reason for this is that development assistance guides many Third World governments to pursue development policies that have been wasteful, ill-conceived, or unproductive; some of these policies have been so destructive that the economies could not have been sustained without outside support.[45]

Indeed, some offers of aid have distorted the general spirit of volunteering, treating local voluntary action as contributions in kind, i.e., existing conditions requiring the modification of local people's behavior in order for them to earn the right to donors' charity. This can be seen as patronizing and offensive to the recipients because the aid expressly serves the policy aims of the donors rather than the needs of the recipients.

Moral resources, political capital and civil society

[edit]
Some files for helping people in a volunteers station in Shenzhen, People's Republic of China

Based on a case study in China, Xu and Ngai (2011) revealed that the developing grassroots volunteerism can be an enclave among various organizations and may be able to work toward the development of civil society in the developing countries. The researchers developed a "Moral Resources and Political Capital" approach to examine the contributions of volunteerism in promoting the civil society. Moral resource means the available morals could be chosen by NGOs. Political capital means the capital that will improve or enhance the NGOs' status, possession or access in the existing political system.[46]

Moreover, Xu and Ngai (2011) distinguished two types of Moral Resources: Moral Resource-I and Moral Resource-II (ibid).

  1. Moral Resource I: Inspired by Immanuel Kant's (1998 [1787]) argument of "What ought I to do," Moral Resource-I will encourage the NGOs' confidence and then have the courage to act and conquer difficulties by way of answering and confirming the question of "What ought I to do."[47]
  2. Moral Resource II: given that Adorno (2000) recognizes that moral or immoral tropes are socially determined, Moral Resource-II refers to the morals that are well accepted by the given society.[48]

Thanks to the intellectual heritage of Blau and Duncan (1967), two types of political capital were identified:

  1. Political Capital-I refers to the political capital mainly ascribed to the status that the NGO inherited throughout history (e.g., the CYL).
  2. Political Capital-II refers to the Political Capital that the NGOs earned through their hard efforts.[49]

Obviously, "Moral resource-I itself contains the self-determination that gives participants confidence in the ethical beliefs they have chosen",[50] almost any organizations may have Moral Resource-I, while not all of them have the societal recognized Moral Resource-II. However, the voluntary service organizations predominantly occupy Moral Resource-II because a sense of moral superiority makes it possible that for parties with different values, goals and cultures to work together in promoting the promotion of volunteering. Thus the voluntary service organizations are likely to win the trust and support of the masses as well as the government more easily than will the organizations whose morals are not accepted by mainstream society. In other words, Moral Resource II helps the grassroots organizations with little Political Capital I to win Political Capital-II, which is a crucial factor for their survival and growth in developing countries such as China. Therefore, the voluntary service realm could be an enclave of the development of civil society in the developing nations.[46]

Potential benefits of volunteering

[edit]

Academic

[edit]
Further information: Service-learning § Effects

Volunteering for community service as part of a college curriculum (service-learning) provides opportunities for students to surround themselves with new people which helps them learn how to work together as a group, improve teamwork and relational skills, reduce stereotypes, and increases appreciation of other cultures.[9] Students participating in service-learning programs are shown to have more positive attitudes toward self, attitudes toward school and learning, civic engagement, social skills, and academic performance.[51][52] They are also more likely to complete their degree.[53][54]

Longevity

[edit]

Volunteers are observed to have a reduced mortality risk compared to non-volunteers.[55] Therefore, the various types of work as a volunteer and psychological effects of such altruistic work may produce enough side-effects to contribute to a longer and more fulfilling life. A systematic review shows that adults over age of 65 years who volunteer may experience improved physical and mental health and potentially reduced mortality.[56]

Mental health

[edit]

A worldwide survey was conducted in a study, suggesting that people who experience the highest levels of happiness are the most successful in terms of close relationships and volunteer work.[57] In comparison, charity in the form of monetary donations, which is another form of altruism (volunteering being one of them) is also known to have a similar effect.[58][59] Another study finds that helping others is associated with higher levels of mental health, above and beyond the benefits of receiving help.[60] This is true across age groups. Observational evidence indicates that volunteering helps improve the mental health of adolescents.[61] Moreover, on the subject of service-learning, undergraduate students who volunteered 1 to 9 hours per week were less likely to feel depressed than students who did not volunteer.[62] Among people aged 65 years old or above, volunteering may reduce the risk of depression.[56]

Volunteering in the aftermath of the 2011 Christchurch Earthquake was found to build social capital, increasing the social connectedness of individuals as well as community wellbeing. The researchers suggested healthcare professionals could prescribe volunteering to improve the health of individuals.[63]

Statistics

[edit]

In the United States, statistics on volunteering have historically been limited, according to volunteerism expert Susan J. Ellis.[64] In 2013, the U.S. Current Population Survey included a volunteering supplement which produced statistics on volunteering.[65]

Barriers to volunteering

[edit]

The UK's National Council for Voluntary Organisations (NCVO) has identified reluctance to enter into an ongoing commitment and work, study and other competing personal activities as barriers affecting willingness to volunteer.[66] The Scout Association in the UK also recognises that finance and accessibility can also act as barriers.[67]

Criticisms

[edit]

In the 1960s, Ivan Illich offered an analysis of the role of American volunteers in Mexico in his speech entitled "To Hell With Good Intentions". His concerns, along with those of critics such as Paulo Freire and Edward Said, revolve around the notion of altruism as an extension of Christian missionary ideology. In addition, he mentions the sense of responsibility/obligation as a factor, which drives the concept of noblesse oblige—first developed by the French aristocracy as a moral duty derived from their wealth. Simply stated, these apprehensions propose the extension of power and authority over indigenous cultures around the world. Recent critiques of volunteering come from Westmier and Kahn (1996) and bell hooks (née Gloria Watkins) (2004). Also, Georgeou (2012) has critiqued the impact of neoliberalism on international aid volunteering.

The field of the medical tourism (referring to volunteers who travel overseas to deliver medical care) has recently attracted negative criticism when compared to the alternative notion of sustainable capacities, i.e., work done in the context of long-term, locally-run, and foreign-supported infrastructures. A preponderance of this criticism appears largely in scientific and peer-reviewed literature.[68][69][70] Recently, media outlets with more general readerships have published such criticisms as well.[71] This type of volunteering is pejoratively referred to as "medical voluntourism".[72]

Another problem noted with volunteering is that it can be used to replace low paid entry positions. This can act to decrease social mobility, with only those capable of affording to work without payment able to gain the experience.[73] Trade unions in the United Kingdom (UK) have warned that long term volunteering is a form of exploitation, used by charities to avoid minimum wage legislation.[74] Some sectors now expect candidates for paid roles to have undergone significant periods of volunteer experience whether relevant to the role or not, setting up 'Volunteer Credentialism'.[75]

Volunteers can be exposed to stressful situations and attitudes, which can cause them to suffer from burnout which in turn reduces their activism and overall well-being.[76] There is also a clear evidence that volunteering can become a moral obligation that prompts feelings of guilt when not performed.[77]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Volunteering

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Volunteering entails the unpaid contribution of time, skills, or resources by individuals to assist persons, groups, or organizations outside their immediate familial or obligatory ties, typically motivated by , civic responsibility, or personal fulfillment rather than financial gain. Globally, an estimated 860 million people aged 15 and older volunteer at least monthly, comprising roughly 15% of the adult population, with participation rates varying widely by country—highest in places like (51%) and (46%)—and encompassing both formal roles through structured organizations and informal direct aid to neighbors or communities. Empirical research consistently links volunteering to tangible outcomes, including reduced mortality risk, enhanced physical functioning, and improved mental , with meta-analyses of longitudinal studies attributing these effects to mechanisms like increased and purpose-derived stress reduction, though benefits accrue most reliably from sustained, voluntary engagement rather than coerced or sporadic efforts. , formal volunteering supported an economic value of over $122 billion in services as of recent estimates, underscoring its role in supplementing public goods like and community infrastructure, yet participation rates have declined from 30% in the early to around 23% by 2021, a trend correlated more strongly with economic downturns and inequality than with diminishing cultural norms. Historically rooted in mutual aid practices traceable to medieval religious charities in and formalized in the through early initiatives like Benjamin Franklin's 1736 volunteer fire brigade, volunteering has evolved into a cornerstone of , enabling scalable responses to crises such as epidemics and while fostering individual resilience; however, data reveal potential drawbacks, including opportunity costs where excessive time commitments hinder employment prospects for some demographics, prompting scrutiny of its net societal efficiency absent rigorous impact measurement.

Definition and Etymology

Core Definition and Conceptual Boundaries

Volunteering refers to any activity in which time is contributed freely to benefit another , group, or , without expectation of financial . This definition emphasizes the voluntary nature of the act, distinguishing it from coerced or obligatory labor, and positions it as a form of aimed at external welfare rather than personal or familial gain. Core conceptual elements include the absence of compulsion, where participation stems from individual agency rather than external mandates, and the lack of or material compensation, though incidental non-monetary benefits such as skill acquisition or social connections may occur without undermining the volunteer status. Scholars delineate volunteering along dimensions of free choice, (or lack thereof), relation to advancement, and the locus of benefit—prioritizing agency or over the volunteer's immediate circle. Not all unpaid efforts qualify; for instance, routine household assistance to members typically falls outside this boundary due to implicit obligations tied to rather than detached . Boundaries are further marked by distinctions from mandatory service, such as court-ordered community work, which lacks genuine voluntarism despite unpaid status, as participation is enforced rather than self-initiated. Similarly, unpaid labor resembling employment—such as internships displacing paid roles or fulfilling professional requirements—crosses into exploitative territory under labor laws, as determined by criteria like control over work conditions and expectation of future compensation. Formal volunteering occurs through structured organizations, enabling accountability and scale, whereas informal variants involve direct, unmediated aid to individuals or communities, though the latter risks definitional ambiguity if benefits to the volunteer (e.g., reciprocity) outweigh costs. These delineations prevent conflation with other unpaid activities, ensuring the term retains focus on uncoerced contributions to broader societal ends.

Linguistic Origins and Evolution

The term "volunteer" derives from the Latin voluntarius, meaning "willing" or "of one's ," rooted in voluntas ("will" or ""). This Latin adjective emphasized without compulsion, initially applied to personal inclinations or decisions. The word entered as volontaire or voluntaire by the late , retaining the sense of willful participation, particularly in contexts where individuals offered service without draft. It was borrowed into English around 1600 as a noun denoting "one who offers himself for service," as evidenced in writings like those of before 1618. Early English usage, such as in a 1330 poem Of Arthour & of , may reflect proto-forms, but standardized adoption aligns with French influence during the . The verb form "to volunteer" emerged in 1755, initially tied to enlisting for armed service, as in Samuel Johnson's Dictionary of the English Language. Over the 18th and 19th centuries, the term evolved semantically to encompass non-military, unpaid civic contributions, reflecting societal shifts toward organized philanthropy and community aid, such as in British and American charitable societies. By the late 19th century, "volunteering" denoted broader altruistic labor, detached from remuneration or obligation, as seen in contexts like relief efforts and welfare organizations. This expansion paralleled the institutionalization of voluntary associations, broadening volunteer from martial self-offering to modern unpaid service for public good.

Historical Development

Pre-Modern Practices

In ancient civilizations, practices resembling volunteering were typically intertwined with religious duties, kinship obligations, or corvée systems rather than independent, unpaid choices. In Egypt during the New Kingdom (c. 1550–1070 BCE), some individuals voluntarily entered temple service as a means to avoid mandatory state labor, paying fees or surrendering personal autonomy for lifelong roles in maintaining cultic activities and supporting priesthoods. This form of self-imposed servitude provided economic security amid periodic famines or floods but differed from modern volunteering by involving permanent status changes. In contrast, monumental projects like pyramid construction relied on conscripted seasonal farmers rather than slaves, with labor framed as communal duty to pharaohs, though strikes by workers in 1157 BCE highlight underlying coercion over voluntarism. Classical Greece and Rome exhibited limited purely voluntary labor, as economies depended heavily on slavery and dependent workers for agriculture, mining, and construction. Athenian citizens (adult males) engaged in voluntary civic participation, such as serving in assemblies or juries, often without direct compensation beyond civic prestige, but this was restricted to a small elite and blended with compulsory elements like military levies. Roman collegia—voluntary associations of artisans or firefighters—offered mutual aid and public service, with members contributing time and resources unpaid, yet these were self-interested guilds rather than altruism toward strangers. Broader societal labor, including urban infrastructure, drew from slaves comprising up to 30-40% of Italy's population by the late Republic, underscoring that discretionary helping was marginal compared to institutionalized bondage. The advent of introduced more explicit voluntary service rooted in scriptural imperatives like the Good Samaritan parable. Early Christians (1st–4th centuries CE) volunteered to nurse plague victims, distribute aid to , and bury unclaimed dead—acts that contrasted with pagan avoidance of the contagious and helped convert populations through demonstrated compassion. By the medieval period in (c. 500–1500 CE), the Church centralized such efforts, with monastic orders like the (founded 529 CE) requiring vows of poverty, chastity, and obedience that included manual labor, hospitality for travelers, and almsgiving from tithes. Religious institutions operated most welfare, providing food, , and care for the indigent without state involvement, though feudal vassals owed mandatory labor to lords, distinguishing obligatory from pious, self-chosen charity. In 12th-century England, over 500 hospitals emerged under voluntary religious management, staffed by lay brothers and sisters who tended the sick and poor as acts of imitatio Christi, funded by donations rather than fees. This era's charity emphasized personal salvation through giving, with lay donors and volunteers supporting leper houses and almshouses, yet systemic feudal hierarchies limited participation to those unbound by serfdom, where peasants fulfilled fixed labor dues rather than discretionary service. Overall, pre-modern practices prioritized religious motivation over secular organization, with voluntarism often serving spiritual ends amid prevalent coerced labor structures.

19th-Century Institutionalization

The marked a pivotal era in the institutionalization of volunteering, as rapid industrialization, , and social upheaval in and spurred the creation of formal organizations to coordinate volunteer efforts systematically, shifting from sporadic, informal to structured, sustained initiatives for poverty relief, moral , and humanitarian response. These entities emerged to address gaps in state provision, leveraging volunteer labor to deliver services like , healthcare, and , often rooted in religious or philanthropic impulses amid growing populations in cities. By the latter half of the century, voluntary associations proliferated, with bursts of formation in the United States before the Civil War and accelerated growth in post-political crises, enabling coordinated responses to issues such as and war casualties. In Europe, key institutions exemplified this trend. The Young Men's Christian Association (YMCA) was founded in on June 6, 1844, by draper George Williams, aiming to counter urban moral decay by offering young working men Bible study, physical activities, and social support through volunteer-led programs; it expanded rapidly across Britain and continental , establishing over 30 branches by 1851. The International Committee of the Red Cross formed in in 1863, initiated by following his observations of untreated wounded at the in 1859, to mobilize neutral volunteers for battlefield medical aid, resulting in the in 1864 that codified protections for such efforts. The Salvation Army originated in London's East End in 1865 under Methodist preacher , deploying uniformed volunteers for soup kitchens, shelters, and targeted at the destitute, growing to encompass thousands of participants by the through militaristic . In Britain, the (COS) was established in 1869 to rationalize fragmented charitable giving, employing volunteer "friendly visitors" for case-by-case assessments to curb mendicancy and dependency, influencing similar bodies across and influencing early practices. Across the Atlantic, Alexis de Tocqueville's (1835–1840) highlighted the ubiquity of U.S. voluntary associations, which he credited with fostering by addressing local needs without heavy state intervention; this reflected the Second Great Awakening's revivalist fervor from the early 1800s, which galvanized Protestant groups to form temperance societies, tracts distributors, and orphanages, with Methodist and Baptist denominations alone expanding circuits through volunteer preachers. By the –, created an unprecedented volume of such groups in cities like Peoria and , covering fraternal orders, ethnic aid societies, and reform movements, often incorporating legal charters for permanence and filling welfare voids before federal expansions. These transatlantic developments institutionalized volunteering by emphasizing , specialization, and , laying groundwork for 20th-century mass participation while relying on empirical assessments of need over indiscriminate .

20th-Century Mass Mobilization

The marked a period of large-scale organized volunteering, driven primarily by world wars, economic crises, and geopolitical initiatives that required rapid mobilization of civilian labor for humanitarian, relief, and development efforts. Unlike earlier participation, these mobilizations involved structured through national organizations, leveraging , civic duty, and institutional networks to engage millions in unpaid service. During , American volunteers responded en masse to Allied needs even before U.S. entry in 1917, forming relief organizations and providing medical, logistical, and fundraising support. The exemplified this surge, expanding from 107 local chapters in 1914 to 3,864 by 1918, with over 8 million adult volunteers contributing to wartime aid, including canteen services, driving, and nursing. Membership reached 20 million adults and 11 million youth, facilitating the delivery of supplies and medical care to troops and civilians across . Post-armistice, volunteers extended efforts to the 1918-1919 , with workers in places like , aiding quarantine and care operations in July 1919. World War II further amplified mass volunteering on the , where civilians filled gaps in production, defense, and welfare amid labor shortages. Organizations like the innovated with mobile blood collection units, preserving and transporting donations that saved thousands of lives, supported by unprecedented volunteer influxes for training and operations. The United Services Organization (USO) and American Women's Voluntary Services mobilized performers, drivers, and aides to boost troop morale and , while volunteers—numbering in the millions—conducted air raid drills, instruction, and resource conservation drives. In alone, efforts integrated diverse groups into coordinated volunteer networks for salvage, victory gardens, and bond sales. In the postwar era, volunteering shifted toward and ideological competition during the . The , established on March 1, 1961, by President , epitomized this transition by deploying American civilians—primarily young adults—for grassroots projects in , , and abroad. By 1966, it peaked at 15,556 volunteers serving in 52 countries, promoting U.S. while fostering skills exchange, though participation waned in the 1970s amid disillusionment. These efforts highlighted volunteering's evolution into a tool for national projection, distinct from wartime urgency but reliant on similar mass recruitment appeals.

21st-Century Shifts and Digital Integration

The early witnessed a sustained decline in formal volunteering rates in the United States, falling from a peak of 28.8% of adults in 2005 to 23.2% by 2021, attributed to economic pressures such as recessions and shifts in work patterns that reduced available time, alongside regional variations where urban areas saw steeper drops than rural ones. This trend reflected broader changes toward episodic and skill-based participation over sustained commitments, driven by demands from younger cohorts prioritizing flexibility amid gig economies and dual-income households. The COVID-19 pandemic intensified these shifts, causing an initial plunge in traditional volunteering due to lockdowns and health risks, yet it catalyzed a rebound to 28.3% formal participation from September 2022 to September 2023 as restrictions eased. Post-pandemic adaptations emphasized hybrid models, with organizations creating remote opportunities to sustain engagement, particularly among those valuing work-life balance and diverse demographics including remote workers. Digital technologies have profoundly integrated into volunteering, enabling virtual formats that allow remote skill contributions via platforms matching professionals with nonprofits for tasks like or . In 2023, 18.1% of U.S. formal volunteers participated partially or fully online, contributing an estimated 1.2 billion service hours, which expanded access for geographically isolated or mobility-limited individuals while reducing organizational costs by up to 35% through virtual operations. and apps further facilitate rapid mobilization for crises, as seen in digital for , where volunteers provide real-time mapping or support without physical presence. Emerging tools like AI-driven matching algorithms and are enhancing efficiency, though they raise concerns over data privacy and equitable access, with adoption varying by nonprofit resources. Globally, initiatives such as UN Volunteers' online programs exemplify this integration, promoting micro-volunteering—short, tech-enabled tasks—that aligns with modern attention spans and boosts participation among tech-savvy youth. These developments underscore a causal pivot from location-bound service to scalable, data-informed models, though sustained growth depends on addressing digital divides and verifying impact metrics beyond self-reported hours.

Motivations Driving Participation

Altruistic and Ethical Impulses

Altruistic motivations for volunteering stem from an intrinsic desire to promote others' welfare without expectation of personal gain, often rooted in and . Empirical studies consistently identify as a core driver, with volunteers frequently reporting a sense of fulfillment from aiding those in need, such as in clinical trials where participants cite helping advance medical knowledge for society. Research on college students, for instance, reveals that altruistic impulses, including the urge to address social inequalities, significantly predict participation rates, independent of external rewards. These tendencies are linked to personality traits like , which foster an altruistic that mediates decisions to volunteer. Ethical impulses further propel volunteering through a perceived obligation to contribute to communal good, drawing from deontological principles of and reciprocity. Volunteers often view their actions as aligning with personal norms, enhancing persistence in activities like , where altruistic orientations predict sustained engagement among youth. Studies highlight that higher levels correlate with volunteering frequency, as empathic individuals experience moral compulsion to act on observed , distinguishing volunteers from non-volunteers in prosocial value orientation. identity—internalization of ethical standards—reinforces this, with research showing it boosts via empathetic helping behaviors. Cross-cultural and longitudinal data underscore these impulses' robustness, though they coexist with self-interested factors; pure remains empirically verifiable through self-reports and behavioral persistence in low-reward contexts. For example, in environmental and welfare volunteering, ethical commitments to motivate ongoing involvement, reflecting causal links from to action. Such motivations yield societal benefits, as altruistically driven volunteers report enhanced from perceived impact.

Self-Interested Incentives and Signaling Value

Volunteers often pursue participation for self-interested reasons, including skill acquisition, professional networking, and enhanced . Empirical research indicates that volunteering facilitates the development of transferable skills such as , communication, and problem-solving, which directly contribute to progression. For instance, a study of student volunteers found that engagement in voluntary activities improved by providing practical experience and demonstrating initiative to potential employers. Similarly, analysis links volunteering to higher earnings and , attributing these outcomes to real-world application of abilities gained through unpaid service. Beyond tangible skills, volunteering serves as a mechanism for building through networking with professionals and community leaders, often leading to job referrals or opportunities. Surveys of employers reveal that volunteer experience is valued comparably to paid work, with 41% of respondents equating the two in assessing candidate qualifications. This instrumental motivation is evident in qualitative accounts where individuals strategically select volunteer roles aligned with career goals to fill resume gaps or explore industry transitions. From an economic and evolutionary perspective, volunteering functions as a costly signal of desirable personal traits, such as reliability, , and prosocial orientation, which are difficult to feign due to the of unpaid time and effort. Costly signaling posits that such behaviors honestly convey to observers, including employers who interpret volunteer commitments as indicators of long-term commitment and interpersonal competence. In labor markets, this signaling enhances hiring prospects; one analysis notes that volunteers signal positive attributes to recruiters, potentially shortening durations compared to non-volunteers, though excessive volunteering without paid experience can sometimes delay re-entry if perceived as a substitute rather than complement. Analogous applications in contexts like further support that unpaid, effortful acts credibly advertise and dependability, yielding reputational returns. These self-interested drivers coexist with altruistic ones, but evidence suggests they independently predict sustained participation, particularly among younger demographics seeking competitive edges in saturated job markets. While some studies correlate self-oriented motives with lower satisfaction, the causal pathway from volunteering to personal gains remains robust, underscoring its role in rational, utility-maximizing behavior.

Forms and Categories

Community and Welfare-Based Volunteering

Community and welfare-based volunteering refers to unpaid contributions supporting local and neighborly aid, targeting vulnerable groups through activities like , elderly companionship, and relief programs. These efforts prioritize intervention over professionalized or remote forms, often filling gaps in public welfare provision by delivering immediate, tangible assistance. In the United States, informal community helping—encompassing tasks such as running errands, providing caregiving, or lending tools—reached 54.2% of adults aged 16 and older in surveys from 2023, up from 51.7% previously, reflecting heightened local mutual aid post-pandemic. Formal volunteering through organizations dedicated to community welfare, including social service agencies, accounted for a substantial share of the 4.99 billion hours contributed by 75.7 million participants between September 2022 and 2023, with 66% citing community improvement as a primary motivation. Such volunteering enhances welfare outcomes by bridging service deficiencies in under-resourced areas, fostering social cohesion, and reducing isolation among recipients. Empirical analyses indicate it correlates with lower mortality rates and better physical functioning for volunteers, while community-level participation strengthens informal support networks that alleviate pressure on state-funded systems. For instance, programs linking volunteers to deprived locales have demonstrated sustained economic value, equivalent to formal labor at rates around $28.54 per hour. Participation patterns show higher engagement among women (5.1% daily rate versus 3.2% for men in data) and younger demographics drawn to welfare-oriented causes like and animal support.

Skills-Based and Corporate Initiatives

Skills-based volunteering involves individuals applying their professional expertise, such as in , , , or legal services, to support nonprofit organizations on a pro bono basis, distinct from traditional hands-on tasks like event staffing. This form addresses nonprofits' capacity gaps in strategic areas, with examples including software engineers developing databases for groups or accountants auditing finances for small charities. Empirical assessments indicate that one hour of such volunteering equates to approximately $220 in , far exceeding the $31.80 average for general volunteer hours, due to the specialized nature of the contributions. Corporate initiatives integrate skills-based volunteering into strategies, often through dedicated programs offering paid time off, matching grants, or structured partnerships with nonprofits. By 2023, 73% of surveyed companies provided some form of skills-based employee volunteering opportunities, reflecting a strategic shift toward leveraging talents for societal impact alongside goals like talent retention. Global corporate volunteer participation rose 58% in recent years, with skills-based efforts contributing to a 44% increase in total volunteer hours, though median employee involvement remains at 20.1%. Companies such as have scaled these programs to connect thousands of employees with nonprofits, focusing on initiatives through consulting. Studies confirm tangible benefits for nonprofits, including enhanced and long-term , with 92% of recipient organizations reporting sustained improvements post-engagement. A systematic highlights mutual gains: nonprofits gain high-value expertise without costs, volunteers accrue professional fulfillment and networking, and corporations observe boosts in employee and , though outcomes depend on structured matching to avoid mismatched efforts. Skills-based volunteering constitutes only about 15.7% of total volunteer activities but delivers three times the economic value per hour compared to unskilled labor, underscoring its efficiency in resource-scarce nonprofit sectors.

Virtual, Micro, and Environmental Efforts

Virtual volunteering involves remote contributions to organizations using digital tools, such as providing professional skills like , graphic design, or research assistance without physical presence. Platforms like the (UNV) Online Volunteering service facilitate tasks including content development and for global NGOs, with over 17,000 online volunteers supporting UN agencies in 2023 alone through activities like support and management post-disasters. By 2025, 18% of formal volunteers in the U.S. participated partially or fully online, up from pre-pandemic levels, driven by flexibility that accommodates remote workers and global connectivity. This modality reduces organizational costs by up to 35% through minimized logistics, while enabling broader geographic reach, though it demands reliable and self-motivation. Micro-volunteering consists of short-duration, low-commitment tasks—typically under 30 minutes—that individuals complete via apps or online portals, such as verifying data entries, writing brief posts, or conducting quick surveys for nonprofits. Examples include platforms enabling users to describe images for the visually impaired via or tagging photos for conservation databases, which aggregate small efforts into substantial impacts like improved tools or datasets. This approach expands volunteer pools by 20-30% for participating organizations, as it suits fragmented schedules and lowers entry barriers compared to sustained commitments, fostering initial engagement that can lead to deeper involvement. However, its fragmented nature may limit depth in skill-building or long-term project continuity, with nonprofits reporting challenges in measuring cumulative outcomes beyond task volume. Environmental volunteering entails direct actions to preserve ecosystems, such as restoration, pollution cleanup, and monitoring, often organized by groups like local conservation trusts or international bodies. Participants engage in activities including trail maintenance, removal, or testing, with global trends showing increased focus amid concerns; for instance, corporate programs emphasized initiatives in 2025, integrating employee time into and waste reduction efforts. Data from 2023-2025 indicates rising participation in eco-focused volunteering, particularly in volunteer tourism segments valued at €725 million annually and projected to grow, though links these efforts to tangible outcomes like restored acreage—e.g., millions of trees planted via organized drives—while causal impacts on require site-specific verification beyond self-reported metrics. and virtual elements enhance here, with apps allowing remote reporting of environmental data or quick online , bridging gaps for those unable to but amplifying collective efficacy through crowdsourced intelligence.

Emergency, Medical, and International Aid

Volunteering in emergency response encompasses activities such as disaster relief, , and immediate crisis intervention, often coordinated through organizations like the , where 95% of disaster relief workers are volunteers responding primarily to home fires and larger-scale events. Groups like deploy trained veterans for debris removal and recovery in events like typhoons and floods, leveraging military discipline for efficient operations. Empirical studies highlight challenges in integrating spontaneous volunteers, emphasizing the need for trust-building and structured management to avoid inefficiencies during responses. In the U.S., FEMA collaborates with voluntary organizations active in disasters (VOADs) for response and recovery, underscoring volunteers' role in supplementing professional efforts amid resource constraints. Medical volunteering involves support in hospitals, clinics, and scenarios, including care assistance, administrative , and surge capacity during outbreaks. A pooled analysis of studies found 66.13% willingness among medical and health professionals to volunteer, with rates exceeding 50% across most individual investigations, indicating substantial potential mobilization. Hospital volunteer programs yield cost savings and may enhance profit margins by handling non-clinical tasks, allowing professionals to focus on core duties. During the , volunteer health technicians contributed to response efforts, with documented recoveries among participants and in managing caseloads. Preparation is critical, as unprepared volunteers risk inefficacy or harm; training in protocols improves deployment outcomes. International aid volunteering deploys personnel for humanitarian relief in conflicts, famines, and health crises, often via NGOs like Doctors Without Borders (MSF), which operates in over 70 countries providing medical assistance. The U.S. , in fiscal year 2024, engaged volunteers supporting programs that reached over 24,000 individuals in initiatives and trained nearly 18,000 smallholder farmers in improved practices across 54 posts worldwide. A 2024 survey of 2,435 volunteers revealed insights into service experiences, informing program adjustments for sustained impact. Studies on international medical volunteering report gains in volunteers' clinical skills and , though benefits vary by origin country, with local participants in low- and middle-income countries showing higher satisfaction than those from high-income nations. Effectiveness evaluations stress evaluating risks and local system integration to maximize causal contributions over dependency creation.

Empirical Benefits to Individuals and Society

Health, Longevity, and Psychological Gains

Volunteering has been linked to improved psychological in multiple observational studies, including reduced symptoms of depression and anxiety, alongside increased and . A of 23 studies identified psychological effects as the most frequently reported outcome, with volunteers exhibiting lower rates of issues compared to non-volunteers. Daily volunteering activities demonstrate a stress-buffering effect, enhancing emotional by mitigating the negative impacts of stressors on mood. These benefits appear particularly pronounced among older adults, where long-term volunteering correlates with higher overall psychological functioning, though effects may vary by intensity and individual baseline . Empirical evidence also associates volunteering with physical improvements, such as better self-reported status and enhanced functional abilities in daily living. A cumulative of cohort studies found that general adult volunteers experience superior mental and physical outcomes, potentially due to increased and purposeful activity. For instance, regular volunteering predicts reduced risk of chronic conditions and functional decline in older populations. Regarding , meta-analyses of cohort data indicate that organizational volunteering among adults aged 55 and older is tied to a 22% lower mortality ( ratio: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.66–0.90), based on five studies tracking over 70,000 participants. This survival advantage holds in able-bodied older adults but diminishes among those with disabilities, suggesting selection effects where healthier individuals self-select into volunteering. Recent biological markers further support these findings, with volunteering (1–49 hours or 200+ hours annually) correlating to slower epigenetic age acceleration, implying potential deceleration of cellular aging processes. However, these associations are primarily observational, and remains uncertain, as reverse causation—wherein healthier individuals are more likely to volunteer—cannot be fully ruled out without randomized trials.

Career, Economic, and Social Capital Returns

Volunteering can enhance career prospects through skill development and networking, though is mixed and context-dependent. A of studies indicates that volunteering is associated with improved and work-related outcomes, such as experience and interpersonal skills acquisition. For instance, skills-based volunteering has been shown to yield gains in interpersonal competencies for 79% of participants, potentially transferable to roles. However, longitudinal analyses reveal potential drawbacks; among young unemployed individuals, volunteering may prolong job search duration by signaling lower to recruiters or diverting time from active job-seeking. Selection effects likely influence these outcomes, as higher-skilled individuals self-select into volunteering, causal attribution. Economic returns from volunteering often manifest indirectly via career trajectories rather than immediate compensation. Empirical investigations using estimate that voluntary work during prime working ages correlates with lifetime earnings increases, such as a 16.7% premium for according to fixed-effects models controlling for unobserved heterogeneity. Similar positive associations appear in Canadian and European datasets, where volunteering predicts higher wages through accumulation. These benefits accrue unevenly, favoring those already in stable , while opportunity costs—forgone wages during volunteer time—may offset gains for low-income or unemployed participants. Causal identification remains challenging due to endogeneity, with instrumental variable approaches suggesting modest net positives after accounting for self-selection. Volunteering fosters by expanding networks of trust and reciprocity, empirically linked to greater access to resources and . Participation in voluntary associations increases individuals' social resources, including connections that facilitate cooperation and , as corroborated by cross-national surveys aligning with theoretical frameworks like Putnam's. Low-status volunteers derive disproportionate benefits, gaining upward mobility through diverse ties, while high-status participants reinforce existing networks. Quantitative analyses of volunteer hours demonstrate causal boosts to social connectedness and civic capacity, though effects diminish in highly diverse or low-trust communities where bonding over bridging capital predominates. These dynamics underscore volunteering's role in building durable social leverage, independent of economic incentives.

Economic Dimensions

Valuation of Volunteer Contributions

Valuation of volunteer contributions typically employs economic methods to estimate the monetary equivalent of unpaid labor, primarily through replacement cost approaches, which calculate the expense of hiring paid workers for equivalent tasks, or input-based valuations multiplying volunteer hours by rates for similar roles. Alternative methods include , reflecting volunteers' foregone earnings, though these can vary widely due to differences in volunteer demographics and task complexity. Such valuations exclude non-monetary benefits like or innovation spillovers, potentially understating total impact, while over-reliance on proxies risks inflating figures if volunteers perform tasks inefficiently compared to professionals. In the United States, the Independent Sector estimates the value of a volunteer hour at $34.79 for 2024, reflecting a 3.9% increase from $33.49 in 2023, derived from average national wage data adjusted for nonprofit sector equivalents. With approximately 75.7 million adults engaging in formal volunteering between September 2022 and 2023, contributing billions of hours annually, this translates to substantial economic substitution; for instance, total volunteer value exceeded $167 billion in recent assessments using similar metrics. State-level variations exist, with higher values in ($38.61 per hour) versus ($27.74), tied to regional labor costs. Globally, estimates from the Center for Studies and suggest volunteer work contributes around 2.4% of world GDP, valued at approximately $1.348 trillion as of 2017 data, though conservative methodologies across 37 countries indicate even higher potential when including informal contributions. In OECD countries, volunteering accounts for about 1.9% of GDP, embedded within broader nonprofit sector outputs nearing 5% when including paid activities. These figures, while useful for , face methodological critiques for incomplete coverage of episodic or and sensitivity to wage assumptions, underscoring the need for standardized international guidelines like the UN's Manual on the Measurement of Volunteer Work.

Opportunity Costs and Resource Allocation Trade-offs

Volunteering entails significant opportunity costs for individuals, primarily measured as the forgone value of alternative uses of time, such as paid , production, or activities. Empirical analyses indicate that these costs are not uniformly tied to rates; a 2022 study using German found that opportunity costs more strongly correlate with reduced family time than with lost earnings, influencing both the decision to volunteer and the hours committed. Higher-wage individuals, who face elevated monetary opportunity costs, often volunteer at comparable or greater rates than lower-wage peers, suggesting that non-pecuniary benefits—like social signaling or intrinsic satisfaction—can offset these trade-offs. This pattern challenges strict economic models predicting inverse wage-volunteering relationships, as volunteers disproportionately possess high skills and thus high shadow wages. At the organizational level, nonprofits must weigh the allocation of scarce resources between volunteer , , and versus hiring paid staff, potentially leading to inefficiencies if volunteers substitute for professionals in roles requiring specialized expertise. For instance, reliance on unskilled or intermittently available volunteers can increase coordination overhead, diverting managerial time from core mission activities and raising overall operational costs. Such trade-offs manifest in reduced program quality or scalability; a review of volunteer highlights that while volunteer labor lowers direct labor expenses, it may crowd out investments in capital or technology that could yield higher long-term productivity. In resource-constrained settings, this can distort incentives, as organizations prioritize volunteer-dependent models to appeal to donors focused on low overhead ratios, even when paid expertise would optimize outcomes. Societally, volunteering's resource allocation implications include potential displacement of market labor, where unpaid contributions in sectors like education or health care suppress wages or employment for marginal workers. Evidence from labor supply models shows that high-opportunity-cost volunteering by skilled individuals may exacerbate shortages in paid roles, as these volunteers forgo taxable income that could fund public alternatives. Conversely, in under-resourced areas, volunteers enable services unattainable via markets alone, but this hinges on accurate valuation: imputing volunteer time at market wages overstates net benefits if alternative allocations (e.g., to entrepreneurship) generate greater economic multipliers. Policymakers thus face trade-offs in promoting volunteering through tax incentives, which amplify individual costs without fully internalizing systemic reallocations from productive sectors.

Participation Patterns and Data

Global and Demographic Statistics

Globally, an estimated 862 million individuals aged 15 and older volunteer at least once per month, comprising approximately 15% of the working-age population. This figure encompasses both formal volunteering, which involves structured engagement through organizations, and informal volunteering, such as direct aid to family, neighbors, or community members without organizational affiliation. Data from the ' State of the World's Volunteerism Report indicate that 14.3% of the global population participates in informal volunteering, while 6.5% of working-age adults engage in formal volunteering. Demographic patterns reveal distinct variations in participation. Formal volunteering skews toward men, who comprise the majority of structured organizational roles, whereas informal volunteering is predominantly undertaken by women. Higher education levels consistently correlate with increased volunteering rates worldwide, as individuals with tertiary education volunteer at rates exceeding those with lower , based on analyses of data from 37 waves across 31 countries between 2000 and 2018. Age distributions show volunteering peaking in mid-adulthood in many contexts, though global meta-analyses report an overall pooled prevalence of 39.93% among adults aged 15 and older, with heterogeneity by country. Regional disparities are pronounced, with volunteering rates exceeding 50% in high-participation nations like , , and , compared to under 10% in lower-engagement countries such as , , and . These differences persist after controlling for demographics like , status, and religious , underscoring cultural and institutional influences on engagement.
Demographic FactorKey Global Patterns
GenderFormal: Majority male; Informal: Majority female
EducationPositive association; higher rates among those with post-secondary education
AgePeaks in middle adulthood; overall prevalence 39.93% for ages 15+
RegionHigh in / (e.g., >50% in ); low in / (e.g., <10% in )

Recent Trends Post-2020

The caused a sharp decline in formal volunteering participation worldwide, with restrictions on gatherings and heightened health risks leading to historic lows. , the national volunteering rate dropped to 23.2% from September 2020 to September 2021, compared to pre-pandemic levels around 30%. Globally, similar patterns emerged, though data varied by region; for instance, many countries in the Global South reported reduced organized activities, with informal volunteering comprising about 70% of total efforts even as formal rates fell. This downturn was exacerbated by economic disruptions and shifts in priorities, though some pandemic-related aid efforts, such as distribution, temporarily boosted informal helping in select areas. Post-2021, volunteering rebounded significantly, particularly in high-income countries, driven by easing restrictions and renewed . In the , the formal volunteering rate rose to 28.3% between 2022 and 2023, marking a 5.1 increase from 2022 and representing over 22% growth, though still 1.7 points below pre-2020 norms; this equated to over 75.7 million participants. Globally, informal volunteering remained robust at around 14.3% of the in 2022, with formal rates at 6.5%, showing uneven recovery across demographics and regions like higher proportions in (51%) and (46%). Corporate volunteering also surged, with median volunteer hours per employee increasing 75% from 2021 to 2023. Emerging trends include a pivot toward flexible, virtual, and skills-based formats, accelerating post-pandemic. opportunities expanded from 32% to 51% of total offerings in , with sustained growth into 2023-2024 emphasizing short-term, episodic commitments over traditional long-haul roles. Demographically, (ages 43-58) led formal volunteering at 27.2% in 2023, while dominated informal helping at 58.7%; youth (18-34) showed lower baseline rates but 17% of non-volunteers in this group planned to start in 2023, signaling potential future gains amid broader shifts to micro-volunteering. Average volunteer hours per capita declined to 70 in 2023 from 96.5 pre-pandemic, reflecting these bite-sized engagements.

Barriers to Engagement

Individual-Level Obstacles

Time scarcity, driven by , responsibilities, and competing leisure activities, represents the predominant individual-level obstacle to volunteering participation. Surveys consistently identify lack of time as the top barrier, with 49% of respondents citing work commitments as their primary impediment, compared to only 30% among active volunteers who report similar constraints. In the , 43% of non-volunteers attribute non-participation to insufficient time, often exacerbated by inflexible schedules or unwillingness to commit ongoing hours. Empirical studies corroborate this, noting that time barriers arise when volunteering ranks below personal priorities like career advancement or household duties, reducing perceived availability for unpaid labor. Financial considerations at the personal level further deter engagement, including out-of-pocket expenses for transportation, meals, or not reimbursed by organizations. highlights these costs as interconnected with time constraints, particularly for lower-income individuals who face opportunity costs in forgone wages or added budgetary strain. A 2019 review of barriers among groups identified and personal expenses as recurrent issues, limiting access even when motivation exists. Health limitations and physical constraints pose significant hurdles, especially for older adults, where poor functioning or chronic conditions reduce capacity for demanding volunteer roles. Studies report that self-perceived inadequacy in skills or fitness contributes to hesitation, with individuals fearing inability to meet expectations or sustain involvement. Lack of awareness about suitable opportunities compounds this, as potential volunteers often lack information on flexible or low-commitment roles that align with their circumstances. Motivational deficits, including low intrinsic or about personal impact, also inhibit participation, distinct from logistical barriers. Non-volunteers frequently perceive volunteering as unappealing or misaligned with self-, with distinguishing this from time excuses by showing interest gaps predict sustained disengagement. Among younger demographics, such as students, academic demands and competing social pursuits amplify these factors, leading to lower uptake despite potential . Overall, these obstacles reflect rational individual trade-offs, where perceived costs in time, resources, and effort outweigh anticipated non-monetary returns.

Institutional and Structural Hurdles

Regulatory and compliance requirements imposed on nonprofit organizations create significant administrative burdens that indirectly hinder volunteer recruitment and retention. Nonprofits must adhere to federal and state laws governing tax-exempt status, reporting, and operations, which divert staff time from volunteer management to paperwork and audits; for example, in New York, nonprofits approaching revenue thresholds for mandatory audits often restructure to avoid heightened scrutiny, reducing operational flexibility for volunteer programs. funding, while enabling some activities, amplifies these demands through grant-specific reporting and restrictions, leading to an estimated 10-20% increase in administrative costs that crowd out volunteer coordination efforts. Liability concerns further constrain volunteer engagement, as organizations fear lawsuits from injuries or misconduct, prompting overly restrictive policies despite legal safeguards. The federal Volunteer Protection Act of 1997 offers to volunteers acting within scope and in , yet many nonprofits impose waivers, mandates, or limit roles to mitigate residual risks under varying state laws, resulting in fewer opportunities for casual or high-risk volunteering. This caution is evidenced by surveys where liability fears correlate with reduced volunteer utilization in community events and services. Mandatory background screenings for roles involving children, the elderly, or vulnerable groups add procedural delays and costs, deterring potential participants. In the U.S., 41% of volunteers expect national checks, but implementation gaps—such as worries and processing times averaging 2-4 weeks—lead to drop-offs, with one analysis identifying screening concerns as a key submission barrier. Nonprofits often bear or pass on fees of $20-50 per check, exacerbating exclusion for low-income prospects and straining small organizations without dedicated resources. Bureaucratic in and fosters frustration and disengagement. Volunteers report irritation with excessive paperwork, unclear hierarchies, and rigid protocols that prioritize compliance over action, as documented in qualitative studies where such hurdles impede proactive involvement and contribute to turnover rates exceeding 50% in under-resourced groups. Structural mismatches, such as insufficient institutional infrastructure for matching skills to needs or integrating volunteers into hybrid post-2020 workflows, compound these issues, with empirical reviews linking them to sustained declines in participation amid rising formalization of services.

Criticisms and Unintended Consequences

Exploitation of Volunteer Labor

In nonprofit organizations, empirical studies have identified a partial whereby volunteers displace paid staff, allowing entities to minimize labor costs by relying on unpaid contributions for roles that would otherwise command wages. A 2014 analysis of German nonprofit data found that an increase in volunteer hours correlates with reduced hiring of paid workers, supporting the existence of substitution rather than pure complementarity. Similarly, a 2007 U.S. study observed instances where volunteers directly replaced paid personnel, and vice versa, within the same organizations, indicating interchangeability that undermines paid opportunities. This dynamic raises concerns of exploitation, as organizations capture economic value from volunteer inputs—estimated globally at over $400 billion annually in equivalent paid labor—without incurring full market costs or providing benefits like pensions or protections. In settings, such practices are particularly scrutinized under U.S. labor laws, where the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) prohibits volunteers from performing services for for-profit employers that would otherwise be compensated, to prevent displacement of wage-earning jobs. For-profit hospitals have faced allegations of exploiting volunteer programs post-COVID-19, assigning unpaid workers to operational tasks amid staffing shortages, potentially violating FLSA by benefiting bottom lines through free labor equivalent to minimum-wage roles. initiatives, often reliant on volunteers for core services, have similarly been critiqued for overburdening unpaid participants without fair contracts, exacerbating vulnerabilities in under-resourced areas. Internationally, aid programs illustrate how funding constraints can foster exploitation by framing as moral duty amid material hardship. In urban Ethiopia's AIDS treatment initiatives around 2010–2012, NGOs recruited impoverished volunteers (median daily income $0.29, 80% food insecure) for 15-hour weekly commitments serving 13 patients each, offering stipends as low as $5–$10 monthly before cuts, while rituals emphasized sacrifice over remuneration. Participants reported inequities and unsustainability, with some questioning the feasibility of labor without sustenance, echoing critiques of unpaid task-shifting as ethically dubious and prone to burnout. Such mechanisms sustain operations but risk eroding volunteer motivation when expectations of reciprocity go unmet, highlighting causal links between global fiscal policies and localized labor extraction.

Inefficiencies and Failures in Aid Delivery

Volunteer-led efforts often suffer from mismatches, where participants lack the specialized expertise required for effective , resulting in suboptimal or counterproductive outcomes. For instance, in humanitarian projects involving water infrastructure, numerous initiatives have failed to reduce disease transmission despite investments, as volunteers and local teams overlooked post-distribution behaviors like improper storage that perpetuate contamination. Similarly, spontaneous volunteers frequently arrive without in , , or , exacerbating chaos rather than alleviating it; studies identify liability risks, mismatched expectations, and inadequate preparation as primary barriers to integration into response systems. In disaster relief, coordination failures amplify inefficiencies, with uncoordinated volunteer influxes straining supply chains and diverting professional responders. During in 2012, the American Red Cross's volunteer-heavy operations faced internal disarray, including delayed resource distribution and unfulfilled shelter promises, despite claims of near-flawless execution; investigations revealed that volunteer enthusiasm clashed with bureaucratic controls, leading to duplicated efforts and unmet needs for thousands of evacuees. Post-2010 earthquake volunteerism similarly produced unintended harms, such as unqualified medical interventions spreading infections or constructing unsafe shelters that required demolition, highlighting how rapid, unskilled mobilization undermines long-term recovery. Long-term volunteer programs exhibit high failure rates in , often due to short-term engagements ignoring local economic realities. evaluations from the through document numerous agricultural projects where volunteers promoted inputs like fertilizers that increased costs without yield gains, eroding trust and ; in one Malawian case, volunteer-driven initiatives mirrored broader pitfalls, such as the PlayPump , which broke down mechanically and economically burdened communities with maintenance fees exceeding benefits. These patterns reflect causal disconnects: volunteer optimism prioritizes visible actions over evidence-based planning, fostering dependency or resource misallocation, as seen in volunteer-managed nonprofits struggling with losses and mismatched recruitments that dilute impact.

Voluntourism and Cultural Disruptions

Voluntourism, combining short-term volunteering with leisure , often targets developing and has been criticized for generating cultural disruptions in host communities by prioritizing visitor experiences over local needs. Participants, typically from wealthier nations, engage in activities like building projects or , but their brief, unskilled involvement can undermine local expertise and traditions, fostering perceptions of Western superiority. A stark illustration occurs in voluntourism, where foreigners volunteer in residential facilities, inadvertently sustaining harmful institutions. In , nearly 80% of children in such orphanages have living parents, yet voluntourist demand has fueled a 60% rise in facilities since the early 2000s, with over half located in tourist areas like and to capitalize on visitors. This commodifies children, who perform for donations, eroding family-based caregiving norms and promoting institutional dependency that severs cultural ties to extended kin networks. The practice disrupts child socialization; frequent turnover of volunteers—often staying weeks—induces attachment issues, as children repeatedly bond and lose caregivers, akin to chronic neglect documented in institutional settings. reports that such volunteering perpetuates risks of trafficking and substandard care, trapping children in environments that prioritize tourist interactions over developmental stability. Broader cultural harms include reinforcement of paternalistic stereotypes, where hosts are viewed as helpless beneficiaries, echoing imperial dynamics that diminish indigenous . Untrained volunteers supplant locals in roles like or , creating job displacement and dependency that erodes and traditional skills. In conservation or programs, imposition of external methods—such as standardized Western curricula—can marginalize local knowledge systems, leading to and failed long-term outcomes due to lack of sustained engagement.

References

  1. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4358158/
  2. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-92817-9_1
  3. https://www.oecd.org/en/events/2024/12/valorising-volunteering-for-people-and-places-international-trends-and-experiences.html
  4. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-05459-2
  5. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10159229/
  6. https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-017-4561-8
  7. https://activategood.org/volunteering-statistics-2025/
  8. https://phys.org/news/2024-09-links-decline-volunteering-economic-conditions.html
  9. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/08997640241264264
  10. https://www.rosterfy.com/blog/volunteerism-in-america-history-and-trends
  11. https://www.ucl.ac.uk/ioe/news/2020/aug/volunteering-can-have-negative-impact-employment-study-finds
  12. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5612372/
  13. https://sites.charlotte.edu/vpa/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2013/08/Wilson-2000.pdf
  14. https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.215
  15. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0899764096253006
  16. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249676933_Defining_Who_Is_a_Volunteer_Conceptual_and_Empirical_Considerations
  17. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Defining-Who-is-a-Volunteer%253A-Conceptual-and-Cnaan-Handy/4053dc5ae7830b5ffcd4e75b9d44e767c91300bf
  18. https://www.cleanupusa.org/whats-the-difference-between-volunteer-and-community-service
  19. https://isso.charlotte.edu/current-students/employment/volunteering-vs-unpaid-employment/
  20. https://www.open.edu/openlearncreate/mod/oucontent/view.php?id=81610&section=1.2.1
  21. http://ellisarchive.org/sites/default/files/2019-09/Document_20190918_0006_1.pdf
  22. https://www.etymonline.com/word/volunteer
  23. https://patimes.org/the-origins-of-the-word-volunteer/
  24. https://www.oed.com/dictionary/volunteer_n
  25. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/volunteer
  26. https://youthareawesome.com/from-soldiers-to-service-the-history-of-the-word-volunteer/
  27. https://www.etymonline.com/word/volunteerism
  28. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/in-ancient-egypt-people-paid-to-become-temple-servants-674595/
  29. https://rethinkq.adp.com/history-strikes-ancient-world/
  30. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4434609
  31. https://www.nacsw.org/Convention/PlacidoNAHistoryFINAL.pdf
  32. https://www.tutorchase.com/answers/ib/history/what-role-did-religious-institutions-play-in-medieval-charity
  33. https://vcla.net/a-short-history-of-volunteering/
  34. https://qcurtius.com/2018/01/11/what-were-a-medieval-serfs-feudal-obligations/
  35. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/building-community-top-down-or-bottom-up-americas-voluntary-groups-thrive-in-a-national-network/
  36. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdfplus/10.1086/380141
  37. https://mfldymca.org/about_us/history_national.php
  38. https://www.icrc.org/en/our-history
  39. https://www.salvationarmyusa.org/about-us/our-history/
  40. https://socialwelfare.library.vcu.edu/eras/civil-war-reconstruction/charity-organization-societies-1877-1893/
  41. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/patterns-of-social-capital/growth-of-voluntary-associations-in-america-18401940/283CA95F4DB01BFCB2A22201484F086F
  42. https://www.jstor.org/stable/206973
  43. https://bibliothek.wzb.eu/pdf/2005/iv05-405.pdf
  44. https://www.theworldwar.org/exhibitions/volunteers-americans-join-world-war-i-1914-1919
  45. https://www.redcross.org/content/dam/redcross/National/history-wwi.pdf
  46. https://libapps.salisbury.edu/nabb-online/exhibits/show/redcross/the-american-red-cross
  47. https://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/theses/62/
  48. https://www.womenshistory.org/resources/general/home-front
  49. https://www.nationalww2museum.org/war/articles/uniting-communities-war
  50. https://www.peacecorps.gov/about-the-agency/history/
  51. https://www.jfklibrary.org/learn/about-jfk/jfk-in-history/peace-corps
  52. https://www.archives.gov/legislative/features/peace-corps
  53. https://cppp.usc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Grimm-Robert-Dietz-and-Grimm_A-Less-Charitable-Nation_March-2019-USC-Conference-Paper.pdf
  54. https://www.scientia.global/the-decline-of-volunteering-in-america-economic-factors-and-rural-urban-differences/
  55. https://www.evidencebasedmentoring.org/what-is-your-evidence-based-mentoring-iq-2/
  56. https://johnsoncenter.org/blog/what-does-the-future-of-volunteering-look-like/
  57. https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2024/11/civic-engagement-and-volunteerism.html
  58. https://www.ajpmonline.org/article/S0749-3797%2823%2900472-5/fulltext
  59. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/volunteerism-rebounded-after-covid-19-pandemic-americorps-lp6oe
  60. https://lodestar.asu.edu/blog/2024/12/volunteering-digital-age
  61. https://candid.org/blogs/one-off-virtual-volunteering-experiences-boost-nonprofit-volunteerism/
  62. https://www.goodera.com/blog/benefits-of-virtual-volunteering
  63. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666764924000389
  64. https://blogs.ed.ac.uk/chussell/2025/03/03/ai-automation-and-the-future-of-digital-volunteering/
  65. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/digital-tools-that-support-volunteering/digital-tools-that-support-volunteering
  66. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32363984/
  67. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/225440575_Motivations_to_volunteer_The_role_of_altruism
  68. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2214804321000379
  69. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1553888/full
  70. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10653356/
  71. https://iaap-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/aphw.70026
  72. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/016748709190044T
  73. https://theoryandpractice.citizenscienceassociation.org/articles/506/files/64df4f5e81938.pdf
  74. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3910233/
  75. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7956941/
  76. https://oecdedutoday.com/volunteering-the-pathway-to-personal-growth-and-career-success/
  77. https://www.doccafe.com/blog/399/the-unspoken-value-of-volunteer-experience
  78. https://online.maryville.edu/blog/benefits-of-volunteering/
  79. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328430819_Costly_Signaling_Theory
  80. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12163562/
  81. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269403292_Motivations_to_Volunteer_and_Their_Associations_With_Volunteers%27_Well-Being
  82. https://bloomerang.com/blog/what-is-volunteerism-a-guide-to-the-history-benefits/
  83. https://360matchpro.com/volunteering-statistics/
  84. https://www.inclind.com/news/volunteering-statistics-trends-nonprofits
  85. https://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2024/more-than-11-million-people-volunteered-on-an-average-day-in-2022.htm
  86. https://www.rosterfy.com/blog/2024-volunteering-statistics-and-key-trends
  87. https://taprootfoundation.org/blog/what-is-skills-based-volunteering/
  88. https://www.goodera.com/blog/skill-based-volunteering-benefits-examples-best-practices
  89. https://www.shrm.org/topics-tools/news/organizational-employee-development/skills-based-volunteering-uses-employee-talents-to-benefit-nonpr
  90. https://doublethedonation.com/skills-based-volunteering/
  91. https://wearematchable.com/blog/corporate-volunteering-statistics-2023-what-they-mean-for-the-future-of-volunteering
  92. https://www.givingforce.com/blog/enhancing-employee-engagement-and-recruitment-through-corporate-volunteering-programs
  93. https://www.goodera.com/ebook/global-corporate-volunteering-quotient
  94. https://commonimpact.org/success-stories/how-skills-based-volunteering-helps-create-economic-mobility/
  95. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105348222100053X
  96. https://www.trueimpact.com/social-impact-resources/bid/83815/measuring-the-social-value-of-volunteers-economic-value-to-society
  97. https://www.unv.org/
  98. https://docs.un.org/en/DP/2024/23
  99. https://donorbox.org/nonprofit-blog/volunteer-statistics
  100. https://www.goodera.com/blog/micro-volunteering
  101. https://benevity.com/blog/micro-volunteering-nonprofits
  102. https://www.chezuba.com/blog/corporate-volunteering-and-giving-in-2025-5-key-trends-to-watch
  103. https://www.euronews.com/travel/2025/10/04/a-lifeline-for-conservation-and-community-projects-why-voluntourism-is-growing-again
  104. https://www.good-deeds-day.org/volunteer-trends-for-2025-whats-next-for-good-deeds-day/
  105. https://www.redcross.org/about-us/our-work/disaster-relief.html
  106. https://teamrubiconusa.org/
  107. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2212420923004909
  108. https://www.fema.gov/emergency-managers/individuals-communities/faith-volunteer/voluntary-organizations
  109. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11019965/
  110. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280218105_The_Role_Measurement_and_Impact_of_Volunteerism_in_Hospitals
  111. https://www.hophonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/HOPH-2022_931203-1206.pdf
  112. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp1001737
  113. https://www.doctorswithoutborders.org/what-we-do/where-we-work
  114. https://www.peacecorps.gov/what-we-do/our-mission/facts-and-figures/
  115. https://files.peacecorps.gov/documents/open-government/2024_AVS_Global_Tabular_Report.pdf
  116. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7993159/
  117. https://ccforum.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13054-022-03984-4
  118. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7489103/
  119. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13607863.2020.1711862
  120. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7375895/
  121. https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2458-13-773
  122. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5971845/
  123. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0277953624009559
  124. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44202-025-00403-x
  125. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1468-4446.13182
  126. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0165176521001312
  127. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/4915216_Volunteering_and_Income_-_The_Fallacy_of_the_Good_Samaritan
  128. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/142668/1/EERI_RP_2014_05.pdf
  129. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w5435/w5435.pdf
  130. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0899764002311002
  131. https://direct.mit.edu/euso/article/16/4/570/126910/Social-Capital-in-Voluntary-AssociationsLocalizing
  132. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378873323000503
  133. https://sandcat.middlebury.edu/econ/repec/mdl/ancoec/0305r.pdf
  134. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258311461_Volunteerism_and_the_creation_of_social_capital_A_functional_approach
  135. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227701837_Measuring_the_Economic_Value_of_Volunteer_Work_Globally_Concepts_Estimates_and_a_Roadmap_to_the_Future
  136. https://www.ilo.org/sites/default/files/wcmsp5/groups/public/%40dgreports/%40stat/documents/publication/wcms_162119.pdf
  137. https://tobijohnson.com/value-of-volunteerism/
  138. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK216829/
  139. https://independentsector.org/research/value-of-volunteer-time/
  140. https://thenonprofittimes.com/npt_articles/value-of-volunteers-jumped-3-9-for-2024/
  141. https://www.groundswell.io/blog/volunteering-statistics
  142. https://independentsector.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/is-vovt-report-2024_v2.pdf
  143. https://www.unv.org/swvr/volunteers-count-their-work-deserves-be-counted
  144. https://pure.johnshopkins.edu/en/publications/measuring-the-economic-value-of-volunteer-work-globally-concepts--3
  145. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/volunteering-and-social-support_5kskn7qshzlw.pdf
  146. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/08997640221129579
  147. https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4923
  148. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016726812400372X
  149. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/209859
  150. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/84747/1/zef_dp31.pdf
  151. https://swvr2022.unv.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Chapter-2_web.pdf
  152. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/sociology/articles/10.3389/fsoc.2025.1584761/full
  153. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40692828/
  154. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12256606/
  155. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2024/12/unleashing-the-potential-of-volunteering-for-local-development_719f94b6/deab71bd-en.pdf
  156. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9483687/
  157. https://www.nonprofitpro.com/article/more-than-75-7m-people-volunteered-in-america-americorps-reports/
  158. https://teamstage.io/volunteering-statistics/
  159. https://doublethedonation.com/volunteer-time-off-statistics/
  160. https://www.ncvo.org.uk/news-and-insights/news-index/time-well-spent-2023/volunteering-barriers-enablers/
  161. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9638260/
  162. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/74208298.pdf
  163. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11266-019-00119-2
  164. https://longevity.stanford.edu/three-reasons-why-people-dont-volunteer-and-what-can-be-done-about-it/
  165. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229482460_Differences_in_Perceived_Barriers_to_Volunteering_to_Formal_Organizations_Lack_of_Time_Versus_Lack_of_Interest
  166. https://knowledge.e.southern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1315&context=crd
  167. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10911359.2024.2396032
  168. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304374850_How_Do_Nonprofits_Respond_to_Regulatory_Thresholds_Evidence_From_New_York%27s_Audit_Requirements_How_Do_Nonprofits_Respond_to_Regulatory_Thresholds
  169. https://www.philanthropyroundtable.org/resource/how-government-funding-compromises-nonprofit-independence/
  170. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/nml.21592
  171. https://millercares.com/blogs/understanding-the-volunteer-protection-act-and-liability/
  172. https://www.volgistics.com/blog/how-to-avoid-legal-problems-with-volunteers/
  173. https://www.beckymccray.com/breaking-through-liability-fears-that-hold-volunteers-back-idea-friendly-answers/
  174. https://gp1.com/study-finds-volunteers-expect-background-checks/
  175. https://aact.org/sites/default/files/resource_library/VolunteerBackgroundChecks.pdf
  176. https://volunteerhub.com/blog/what-are-the-biggest-barriers-to-volunteer-engagement-how-do-we-overcome-them
  177. https://www.unitedwayjwc.org/sites/unitedwayjwc/files/What%2520Frustrates%2520Volunteers.pdf
  178. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9280637/
  179. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261330717_Paid_and_Unpaid_Labour_in_Non-Profit_Organizations_Does_the_Substitution_Effect_Exist
  180. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0899764007303528
  181. https://webapps.dol.gov/elaws/whd/flsa/docs/volunteers.asp
  182. https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/fact-sheets/14a-flsa-non-profits
  183. https://truthout.org/articles/us-hospitals-rely-on-exploited-volunteer-staff-potentially-violating-labor-laws/
  184. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3783341/
  185. https://www.who.int/hrh/documents/task_shifting/en/
  186. https://www.givewell.org/international/technical/criteria/impact/failure-stories
  187. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2212420921005070
  188. https://www.propublica.org/article/disturbing-things-about-the-red-crosss-sandy-relief-efforts
  189. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5531079/
  190. https://peacecorpsworldwide.org/the-forgotten-failures-of-the-peace-corps/
  191. https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1205&context=etd
  192. https://volunteerhub.com/blog/what-common-problems-does-volunteer-management-software-solve
  193. https://www.humanrightsresearch.org/post/doing-good-or-doing-harm-a-critical-examination-of-voluntourism-in-a-globalized-world
  194. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227907035_The_Possible_Negative_Impacts_of_Volunteer_Tourism
  195. https://onetrackinternational.org/?p=825
  196. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/aug/19/the-race-to-rescue-cambodian-children-from-orphanages-exploiting-them-for-profit
  197. https://ballardbrief.byu.edu/issue-briefs/inadequate-residential-care-for-children-in-cambodia
  198. https://www.unicef.org/rosa/what-we-do/child-protection/volunteering-orphanages
  199. https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2020/01/13/779528039/why-theres-a-global-campaign-to-stop-volunteers-from-visiting-orphanages
  200. https://glocality.eu/en/articles/10.5334/glo.50
  201. https://sites.lsa.umich.edu/mje/2022/01/22/the-paradox-of-voluntourism-how-international-volunteering-impacts-host-communities/
  202. https://volunteeralive.org/docs/OMalley_IJOVA_Final.pdf
  203. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09669582.2022.2039678
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.